<p>China has officially commissioned its most advanced aircraft carrier, the CNS Fujian, marking a decisive leap in the Asian nation’s race with the United States for blue-water supremacy. President Xi Jinping attended the commissioning ceremony held earlier this week in Hainan Province, according to state media reports on Friday (Nov 7). The Fujian heralds a new “three-carrier era” for the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), and is being seen as a new chapter in the US–China naval rivalry.</p><h2>Why the Fujian aircraft carrier is significant</h2><p>The Fujian, under construction for several years, is the largest warship ever built in Asia and the world’s biggest conventionally powered carrier. Its CATOBAR (Catapult-Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) system is a first for China, replacing the ski-jump ramps used on its earlier carriers.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/top-7-nations-operating-the-most-aircraft-carriers-in-2025-where-does-india-stand-1762001245386">Top 7 nations operating the most aircraft carriers in 2025: Where does India stand?</a></p><h2>Fujian aircraft carrier has fully indigenous design</h2><p>The Fujian is the PLAN’s third and largest aircraft carrier, and its first to be fully indigenously designed and built. It surpasses both the Liaoning and Shandong carriers in size, sophistication and operational potential, displacing roughly 80,000 to 85,000 tonnes and measuring about 316 metres in length.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/china-new-warfare-mindset-fujian-drone-carriers-492946">China's new warfare mindset: Fujian &amp; drone carriers</a></p><h2>Fujian aircraft carrier can launch heavier aircraft</h2><p>The ship has three electromagnetic catapults, similar in concept to the US Navy’s EMALS system on the Gerald R &nbsp;Ford-class carriers. These catapults allow the Fujian to launch heavier and fully fuelled aircraft, dramatically improving sortie rates and mission flexibility. In September this year, Chinese state television broadcast footage showing successful catapult launches of the J-15T multirole fighter, the stealth J-35, and the KJ-600 airborne early-warning aircraft, demonstrating the carrier’s combat readiness.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-fujian-aircraft-carrier-to-be-commissioned-on-war-anniversary-next-month-1756009763279/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-fujian-aircraft-carrier-to-be-commissioned-on-war-anniversary-next-month-1756009763279/embed</a></p><h2>Fujian aircraft carrier of China can support 50 aircraft</h2><p>The Fujian’s flat-deck design and expanded hangar bays allow it to operate more than 50 aircraft, including fighters, early-warning planes, helicopters and drones. For the first time, China can field a true carrier air wing capable of sustained power projection far from its shores.</p><h2>A major technological step for the Chinese Navy</h2><p>The Fujian also carries advanced active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars, electronic warfare systems, and HQ-10 short-range surface-to-air missiles for close-in defence, supported by 30 mm close-in weapon system (CIWS) guns. It uses a conventional propulsion system—steam turbines with diesel-electric generators—which limits its endurance compared with America’s nuclear-powered supercarriers. The next Chinese carrier, reportedly the Type 004, is expected to be nuclear-powered, bridging that gap.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-now-has-the-technology-that-only-us-had-till-now-is-beijing-closing-the-gap-with-the-us-military-1758624349204">China now has the technology that only US had till now - Is Beijing closing the gap with the US military?</a></p><h2>Strategic implications of Fujian for South China Sea and West Pacific</h2><p>The Fujian strengthens China’s ability to project power across the Western Pacific and the South China Sea—waters long dominated by the naval forces of the United States and its allies. It also fits within Beijing’s long-term anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) strategy, designed to deter or delay American intervention in a Taiwan or South China Sea conflict.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/big-boost-china-launches-most-advanced-aircraft-carrier-called-fujian-find-out-why-it-is-special-489015">Big boost: China launches 'most advanced' aircraft carrier called Fujian. Find out why it is special</a></p><h2>The US is closely watching Chinese naval modernisation and expansion</h2><p>For Washington and its allies, the Fujian’s entry into service is the clearest signal yet that China’s naval modernisation is accelerating at a pace unmatched since the Cold War. The US Navy still maintains overwhelming superiority, with 11 nuclear-powered supercarriers and decades of operational experience. Yet, the Fujian’s commissioning shows that China is rapidly closing the technological and capability gaps.</p><p>As one defence analyst put it, the Fujian is not merely another bigger carrier, it is a blueprint for China’s global naval ambitions.</p>

China’s new aircraft carrier, the CNS Fujian, has entered into service, making a major leap in its naval power and race with US. Fujian has electromagnetic catapults, boosting its blue-water reach and can challenge US dominance in the Indo-Pacific


China has officially commissioned its most advanced aircraft carrier, the CNS Fujian, marking a decisive leap in the Asian nation’s race with the United States for blue-water supremacy. President Xi Jinping attended the commissioning ceremony held earlier this week in Hainan Province, according to state media reports on Friday (Nov 7). The Fujian heralds a new “three-carrier era” for the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), and is being seen as a new chapter in the US–China naval rivalry. Why the Fujian aircraft carrier is significant The Fujian, under construction for several years, is the largest warship ever built in Asia and the world’s biggest conventionally powered carrier. Its CATOBAR (Catapult-Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) system is a first for China, replacing the ski-jump ramps used on its earlier carriers. Also read: Top 7 nations operating the most aircraft carriers in 2025: Where does India stand? Fujian aircraft carrier has fully indigenous design The Fujian is the PLAN’s third and largest aircraft carrier, and its first to be fully indigenously designed and built. It surpasses both the Liaoning and Shandong carriers in size, sophistication and operational potential, displacing roughly 80,000 to 85,000 tonnes and measuring about 316 metres in length. Also read: China's new warfare mindset: Fujian & drone carriers Fujian aircraft carrier can launch heavier aircraft The ship has three electromagnetic catapults, similar in concept to the US Navy’s EMALS system on the Gerald R Ford-class carriers. These catapults allow the Fujian to launch heavier and fully fuelled aircraft, dramatically improving sortie rates and mission flexibility. In September this year, Chinese state television broadcast footage showing successful catapult launches of the J-15T multirole fighter, the stealth J-35, and the KJ-600 airborne early-warning aircraft, demonstrating the carrier’s combat readiness. https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-fujian-aircraft-carrier-to-be-commissioned-on-war-anniversary-next-month-1756009763279/embed Fujian aircraft carrier of China can support 50 aircraft The Fujian’s flat-deck design and expanded hangar bays allow it to operate more than 50 aircraft, including fighters, early-warning planes, helicopters and drones. For the first time, China can field a true carrier air wing capable of sustained power projection far from its shores. A major technological step for the Chinese Navy The Fujian also carries advanced active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars, electronic warfare systems, and HQ-10 short-range surface-to-air missiles for close-in defence, supported by 30 mm close-in weapon system (CIWS) guns. It uses a conventional propulsion system—steam turbines with diesel-electric generators—which limits its endurance compared with America’s nuclear-powered supercarriers. The next Chinese carrier, reportedly the Type 004, is expected to be nuclear-powered, bridging that gap. Also read: China now has the technology that only US had till now - Is Beijing closing the gap with the US military? Strategic implications of Fujian for South China Sea and West Pacific The Fujian strengthens China’s ability to project power across the Western Pacific and the South China Sea—waters long dominated by the naval forces of the United States and its allies. It also fits within Beijing’s long-term anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) strategy, designed to deter or delay American intervention in a Taiwan or South China Sea conflict. Also read: Big boost: China launches 'most advanced' aircraft carrier called Fujian. Find out why it is special The US is closely watching Chinese naval modernisation and expansion For Washington and its allies, the Fujian’s entry into service is the clearest signal yet that China’s naval modernisation is accelerating at a pace unmatched since the Cold War. The US Navy still maintains overwhelming superiority, with 11 nuclear-powered supercarriers and decades of operational experience. Yet, the Fujian’s commissioning shows that China is rapidly closing the technological and capability gaps. As one defence analyst put it, the Fujian is not merely another bigger carrier, it is a blueprint for China’s global naval ambitions.

<p>China’s new aircraft carrier, the CNS Fujian, has entered into service, making a major leap in its naval power and race with US. Fujian has electromagnetic catapults, boosting its blue-water reach and can challenge US dominance in the Indo-Pacific<br>&nbsp;</p>

Fujian: China's most advanced aircraft carrier enters service amid naval race with US. Know its capabilities, features

<p>It has emerged that China-made vehicles exported to foreign countries can, in theory, be stopped or switched off via remote access from China. This raises the question: Can Chinese defence exports also be controlled remotely? The issue of remote control came to light in Norway, where public transport authorities discovered their buses could be accessed from abroad.</p><h2>Norway electric buses can be stopped remotely</h2><p>Ruter, Oslo’s public transport operator, found during a security audit of Chinese-made Yutong electric buses that the vehicles had embedded mobile network connections and remote software access. This allowed the manufacturer to perform diagnostics and updates, which means the buses could potentially be disabled remotely. In response, Ruter removed SIM cards from the buses’ modems to mitigate the risk.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-check-for-any-backdoor-xi-s-light-hearted-warning-on-phones-he-gifted-to-s-korea-president-yes-someone-can-crack-your-phone-for-spying-1762156032147">'Check for any backdoor', Xi's light-hearted warning on phones he gifted to S Korea president. Yes, someone can crack your phone for spying</a></p><h2>Denmark reviews Chinese-made buses over remote access fears</h2><p>Denmark’s Movia launched a review of its Chinese-made bus fleet.&nbsp;</p><p>No actual remote disabling incidents have been reported, but the situation highlights that exported vehicles can have embedded remote access, ostensibly for maintenance or diagnostic purposes.</p><p>Also read: <a href="OpenAI bans suspected China-linked accounts for seeking surveillance proposals">OpenAI bans suspected China-linked accounts for seeking surveillance proposals</a></p><h2>Remote access in military equipment: A potential worry for future</h2><p>Chinese export drones, such as the Wing Loong series, include ‘geofencing technology’ that prevents their use in Chinese airspace. If a drone crosses a restricted boundary, it can automatically stop or return to its launch point. These features are intended to prevent misuse against China, but demonstrate that exported military equipment can incorporate mechanisms for limiting or controlling their operation.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-surveillance-built-on-u-s-tech-report-1757766906160/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-surveillance-built-on-u-s-tech-report-1757766906160/embed</a></p><h2>Fighter jets, frigates can have remote software update features</h2><p>Chinese-made fighter jets, such as the JF-17 jointly produced with Pakistan, include advanced avionics and data links that support over-the-air software updates and diagnostics. Analysts have warned that chips and systems from China could theoretically include backdoors. However, there is no verified evidence of China remotely controlling or disabling exported jets.</p><p>Chinese-built frigates, such as the Type 054A/P class sold to Pakistan, integrate networked systems for software updates and diagnostics, which could theoretically allow remote access, though no incidents have been reported.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/5-countries-with-the-most-powerful-internet-surveillance-capabilities-1759435437882">5 countries with the most powerful internet surveillance capabilities</a></p><h2>Why China embeds remote access</h2><p>In civilian products like buses, remote access is generally intended for maintenance and fleet management. For military exports, buyers often require co-production, local maintenance, and restrictions on supplier access to reduce the possibility of remote control. Nonetheless, the presence of remote-access capabilities and geofencing demonstrates that China has the technical ability to embed controls into equipment it exports.</p><p>The cases involving China-made vehicles provide examples of built-in remote access that could potentially allow the manufacturers to disable them. They highlight supply-chain and software vulnerabilities. Buyers of both civilian and military equipment are now paying closer attention to digital and software security as part of overall procurement risk assessments</p>

China-made vehicles and export drones can be remotely accessed or disabled. Remote control of Chinese equipment, both civilian and defence, could be a security threat of the future.
 

It has emerged that China-made vehicles exported to foreign countries can, in theory, be stopped or switched off via remote access from China. This raises the question: Can Chinese defence exports also be controlled remotely? The issue of remote control came to light in Norway, where public transport authorities discovered their buses could be accessed from abroad. Norway electric buses can be stopped remotely Ruter, Oslo’s public transport operator, found during a security audit of Chinese-made Yutong electric buses that the vehicles had embedded mobile network connections and remote software access. This allowed the manufacturer to perform diagnostics and updates, which means the buses could potentially be disabled remotely. In response, Ruter removed SIM cards from the buses’ modems to mitigate the risk. Also read: 'Check for any backdoor', Xi's light-hearted warning on phones he gifted to S Korea president. Yes, someone can crack your phone for spying Denmark reviews Chinese-made buses over remote access fears Denmark’s Movia launched a review of its Chinese-made bus fleet. No actual remote disabling incidents have been reported, but the situation highlights that exported vehicles can have embedded remote access, ostensibly for maintenance or diagnostic purposes. Also read: OpenAI bans suspected China-linked accounts for seeking surveillance proposals Remote access in military equipment: A potential worry for future Chinese export drones, such as the Wing Loong series, include ‘geofencing technology’ that prevents their use in Chinese airspace. If a drone crosses a restricted boundary, it can automatically stop or return to its launch point. These features are intended to prevent misuse against China, but demonstrate that exported military equipment can incorporate mechanisms for limiting or controlling their operation. https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-s-surveillance-built-on-u-s-tech-report-1757766906160/embed Fighter jets, frigates can have remote software update features Chinese-made fighter jets, such as the JF-17 jointly produced with Pakistan, include advanced avionics and data links that support over-the-air software updates and diagnostics. Analysts have warned that chips and systems from China could theoretically include backdoors. However, there is no verified evidence of China remotely controlling or disabling exported jets. Chinese-built frigates, such as the Type 054A/P class sold to Pakistan, integrate networked systems for software updates and diagnostics, which could theoretically allow remote access, though no incidents have been reported. Also read: 5 countries with the most powerful internet surveillance capabilities Why China embeds remote access In civilian products like buses, remote access is generally intended for maintenance and fleet management. For military exports, buyers often require co-production, local maintenance, and restrictions on supplier access to reduce the possibility of remote control. Nonetheless, the presence of remote-access capabilities and geofencing demonstrates that China has the technical ability to embed controls into equipment it exports. The cases involving China-made vehicles provide examples of built-in remote access that could potentially allow the manufacturers to disable them. They highlight supply-chain and software vulnerabilities. Buyers of both civilian and military equipment are now paying closer attention to digital and software security as part of overall procurement risk assessments

<p>China-made vehicles and export drones can be remotely accessed or disabled. Remote control of Chinese equipment, both civilian and defence, could be a security threat of the future.<br>&nbsp;</p>

Chinese exported buses can be stopped via remote control from China. Can its defence equipment be controlled from afar too?

<p>An eagerly watched legal battle between Amazon and Perplexity AI could redefine how we shop online. Amazon is challenging Perplexity AI’s Comet browser, which includes an AI assistant that can log into users’ shopping accounts and make purchases on their behalf. The court case is expected to shape the future of “agentic commerce”, where AI acts autonomously for users.&nbsp;</p><h2>Status of the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case on agentic shopping</h2><p>Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity on October 31, and then filed a lawsuit four days later in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Perplexity, in a blog post, aptly titled “Bullying is Not Innovation”, accused Amazon of trying to stifle progress and restrict user choices. No hearings have been scheduled yet, but the outcome could have ripple effects far beyond these two companies.</p><h2>Automated shopping: How the shopping bot on Comet browser of Perplexity AI works</h2><p>Comet’s users can tell the AI assistant what they want to buy, and it handles the rest — searching for products, comparing prices, adding items to the basket, and even checking out. Perplexity describes it as a personal assistant that knows exactly what you want and takes care of all the clicks for you.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed</a></p><h2>Why is Amazon suing Perplexity over its shopping bot?</h2><p>Amazon is accusing the startup of violating its terms of service. According to Amazon, Comet’s AI performs automated actions that are disguised as human browsing activity, effectively turning Comet into a “stealth browser”. Amazon argues that this poses potential security and privacy risks, including exposure of personal data and disruption of returns or refunds. The company also claims this could be computer fraud under the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/amazon-microsoft-accenture-and-more-here-s-a-list-of-companies-cutting-jobs-to-focus-on-ai-1761829243515">Amazon, Microsoft, Accenture and more: Here’s a list of companies cutting jobs to focus on AI</a></p><h2>What’s Perplexity saying about its shopping bot in Comet browser?</h2><p>Perplexity argues that Comet does not scrape data or store user information on its own servers. The company says the AI acts only under direct user instruction, while login credentials are kept locally on the user’s device. In its view, the AI assistant is not an unauthorised bot but an extension of the user — a digital stand-in acting with full consent.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/lack-of-market-research-or-tone-deaf-chinese-shopping-site-aliexpress-sells-lord-jagannath-doormat-online-devotees-outraged-1753788995615">Lack of market research or tone-deaf? Chinese shopping site AliExpress sells 'Lord Jagannath doormat’ online, devotees outraged</a></p><h2>At stake is a $50 billion advertising business of Amazon</h2><p>Perplexity accuses Amazon of trying to crush competition to protect its $50 billion advertising business, which depends heavily on data from human browsing and impulse purchases. If users delegate shopping to an AI that optimises for the best deal, rather than ‘sponsored results’, Amazon could lose control over which products people see, and which ads they click on.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/amazon-planning-to-replace-600-000-employees-with-robots-report-makes-massive-claim-1761116762286">Amazon&nbsp;planning to replace 600,000 employees with robots? Report makes massive claim</a></p><h2>How the Amazon vs Perplexity case could change online shopping</h2><p>The case is shaping up as a David vs Goliath battle. If the court sides with Amazon, it could lead to tighter restrictions on any AI that tries to browse websites or make purchases on behalf of users. Such a ruling might shut out smaller AI companies from building their own shopping assistants and further strengthen large tech platforms like Amazon.</p><p>It’s worth noting that Amazon already has its own AI shopping tools, such as Rufus and “Buy for Me”, which operate within its website and mobile app.</p><h2>Agentic commerce is the future? If Perplexity wins, a new kind of online shopping could emerge</h2><p>Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds the AI compares dozens of stores, applies coupons, checks return policies, and completes the purchase — all without you clicking once.</p><p>But convenience comes with challenges around security, trust and accountability. What happens if the AI buys the wrong items? Who is responsible if there’s a return dispute or a data breach caused by automated access? These legal and ethical questions are exactly what this lawsuit could begin to define.</p><p>The core issue is whether Comet broke Amazon’s rules — and, more broadly, whether users have the right to let an AI act fully on their behalf online. Can a bot legally and safely shop for you? Or will platforms draw a harder line against any automation that bypasses their systems?</p><p>The answer to these questions would shape the next decade of e-commerce, and decide who really controls the future of online shopping: the user or the platform.<br>&nbsp;</p>

Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds, the AI compares dozens of stores and completes the purchase. Is that the future?

An eagerly watched legal battle between Amazon and Perplexity AI could redefine how we shop online. Amazon is challenging Perplexity AI’s Comet browser, which includes an AI assistant that can log into users’ shopping accounts and make purchases on their behalf. The court case is expected to shape the future of “agentic commerce”, where AI acts autonomously for users. Status of the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case on agentic shopping Amazon sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity on October 31, and then filed a lawsuit four days later in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Perplexity, in a blog post, aptly titled “Bullying is Not Innovation”, accused Amazon of trying to stifle progress and restrict user choices. No hearings have been scheduled yet, but the outcome could have ripple effects far beyond these two companies. Automated shopping: How the shopping bot on Comet browser of Perplexity AI works Comet’s users can tell the AI assistant what they want to buy, and it handles the rest — searching for products, comparing prices, adding items to the basket, and even checking out. Perplexity describes it as a personal assistant that knows exactly what you want and takes care of all the clicks for you. https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-aws-openai-strikes-mega-38b-cloud-deal-with-amazon-web-services-1762255380066/embed Why is Amazon suing Perplexity over its shopping bot? Amazon is accusing the startup of violating its terms of service. According to Amazon, Comet’s AI performs automated actions that are disguised as human browsing activity, effectively turning Comet into a “stealth browser”. Amazon argues that this poses potential security and privacy risks, including exposure of personal data and disruption of returns or refunds. The company also claims this could be computer fraud under the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. Also read: Amazon, Microsoft, Accenture and more: Here’s a list of companies cutting jobs to focus on AI What’s Perplexity saying about its shopping bot in Comet browser? Perplexity argues that Comet does not scrape data or store user information on its own servers. The company says the AI acts only under direct user instruction, while login credentials are kept locally on the user’s device. In its view, the AI assistant is not an unauthorised bot but an extension of the user — a digital stand-in acting with full consent. Also read: Lack of market research or tone-deaf? Chinese shopping site AliExpress sells 'Lord Jagannath doormat’ online, devotees outraged At stake is a $50 billion advertising business of Amazon Perplexity accuses Amazon of trying to crush competition to protect its $50 billion advertising business, which depends heavily on data from human browsing and impulse purchases. If users delegate shopping to an AI that optimises for the best deal, rather than ‘sponsored results’, Amazon could lose control over which products people see, and which ads they click on. Also read: Amazon planning to replace 600,000 employees with robots? Report makes massive claim How the Amazon vs Perplexity case could change online shopping The case is shaping up as a David vs Goliath battle. If the court sides with Amazon, it could lead to tighter restrictions on any AI that tries to browse websites or make purchases on behalf of users. Such a ruling might shut out smaller AI companies from building their own shopping assistants and further strengthen large tech platforms like Amazon. It’s worth noting that Amazon already has its own AI shopping tools, such as Rufus and “Buy for Me”, which operate within its website and mobile app. Agentic commerce is the future? If Perplexity wins, a new kind of online shopping could emerge Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds the AI compares dozens of stores, applies coupons, checks return policies, and completes the purchase — all without you clicking once. But convenience comes with challenges around security, trust and accountability. What happens if the AI buys the wrong items? Who is responsible if there’s a return dispute or a data breach caused by automated access? These legal and ethical questions are exactly what this lawsuit could begin to define. The core issue is whether Comet broke Amazon’s rules — and, more broadly, whether users have the right to let an AI act fully on their behalf online. Can a bot legally and safely shop for you? Or will platforms draw a harder line against any automation that bypasses their systems? The answer to these questions would shape the next decade of e-commerce, and decide who really controls the future of online shopping: the user or the platform.

<p>Shopping online is hard work. It would be wonderful if a trustworthy AI could handle the task for you. Imagine a world where you simply say, “Find me the best deal on jeans,” and within seconds, the AI compares dozens of stores and completes the purchase. Is that the future?</p>

Can a bot really go ahead and shop for you? Why the Amazon vs Perplexity AI case could change the future of online shopping

<p>Donald Trump is feeling consternation as the US Supreme Court seems sceptical about the global tariffs he imposed unilaterally on several countries, including India. In all likelihood, the SCOTUS will end, or significantly restrict, the US president's marauding that led to economic pain and diplomatic tussles. If indeed that happens, one country will stand vindicated: India. Prime Minister Modi's government has taken a wait-and-watch approach while not compromising on the interests of Indian stakeholders - from farmers to local businesses. India's trade talks with US have dragged on, possibly intentionally. Now, the biggest resistance to tariffs came from within the US, and Trump might be forced to withdraw at least parts of this punitive regime. Here is what you should know:</p><h2>What the SCOTUS hearing on Trump tariffs is about&nbsp;</h2><p>At the heart of the hearings is Trump's use of emergency powers to impose the sweeping tariffs. The question is mainly about how such moves affect or alter US trade law. &nbsp;Specifically, it is about whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) allowed the president to unilaterally impose tariffs.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/days-after-donald-trump-s-tariff-warning-china-vows-to-fight-till-end-1760428641268">Days after Donald Trump's tariff warning, China vows to 'fight till end'</a></p><h2>What happened at the Trump tariffs hearing?&nbsp;</h2><p><br>Both conservative and liberal justices found the administration’s reading of the US trade law to be too broad. The court appeared more concerned about the “major questions” doctrine, which requires clear congressional authorisation for significant economic or political actions, such as the tariffs.</p><p>The Supreme Court Justices , some of them appointed by Trump himself, did not appreciate his administration’s argument that the IEEPA allows the president to announce tariffs. At the hearing on Wednesday (Nov 5), Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether tariffs (which essentially are taxes on Americans) could really be seen as mere “regulation” under the law.</p><p>Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed the government attorney to explain why regulating 'importation' should include tariffs when no president in the US trade law’s 50-year history had done so.</p><p>Justice Neil Gorsuch warned that giving the president such sweeping authority would turn the US Congress’s power to tax and regulate trade into a ‘presidential prerogative.’<br>Even Brett Kavanaugh, who is generally cautious, questioned whether Congress ever meant IEEPA to authorise such a vast power.</p><p>The Solicitor General D John Sauer, defended the tariffs as 'legitimate responses to national emergencies', ranging from trade deficits to the fentanyl drug abuse crisis.</p><p>But the justices expressed unease with that reasoning.&nbsp;</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-he-was-offended-canada-s-carney-desperate-to-resume-trade-talks-apologises-to-trump-over-anti-tariff-reagan-ad-1762131032752">'He was offended': Canada's Carney desperate to resume trade talks, apologises to Trump over anti-tariff Reagan ad</a></p><h2>Prediction markets think Trump could lose tariff case</h2><p>Prediction markets and speculative traders are taking positions with the assumption that Trump's wings could be clipped by the court. Traders have quickly reduced their bets on the tariffs surviving the legal test at the SCOTUS. Platforms tracking the case showed steep drops in the odds of a Trump victory, which indicated that Wall Street now expect the court to invalidate or limit Trump's use of IEEPA. &nbsp;In fact, it's the outcome that the market wants: Trump tariffs have brought in inflationary pressures and hit global trade, and the court ruling could ease these, they hope.</p><h2>Trump is watching the SCOTUS ruling</h2><p>Trump is feeling a lot of tension on the case, and he has not been silent about it. He called the litigation 'a politically motivated attack'. He insisted that the tariffs were essential to protect American jobs and punish countries like China, Mexico and India for what he calls unfair trade practices. His line on tariffs has been to link them to national security, and even to the geopolitical balance around Russia and Ukraine. He has portrayed tariffs as crucial for maintaining US leverage, while accusing opponents of undermining his authority to act swiftly in emergencies.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-court-hears-final-arguments-in-trump-s-tariff-authority-battle-1762409271893/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-court-hears-final-arguments-in-trump-s-tariff-authority-battle-1762409271893/embed</a></p><h2>Why the Trump tariff legal showdown is important for India</h2><p>Since 2018, India has faced a number of US tariffs: on steel, aluminium, pharmaceuticals, and textiles, often over ‘national security’ grounds. India has refrained from tit-for-tat retaliation. It has filed challenges at the World Trade Organization, while maintaining dialogue with American trade officials.&nbsp;</p><p>India has extended US trade talks to buy time, even as global institutions and courts tested the legality of Trump’s moves. Indian negotiators have long stressed that trade rules must not be rewritten by unilateral presidential action.</p><p>That restraint now appears to have been correct in hindsight.&nbsp;</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-justices-appear-sceptical-of-trump-s-tariffs-argument-1762369739218">US Supreme Court justices appear sceptical of Trump’s tariffs argument</a></p><h2>If the justices do indeed bulldoze Trump’s tariff machine, India will have reason to smile</h2><p>The Supreme Court’s decision, which might take weeks or even months, &nbsp;will determine whether presidents can continue to wield emergency powers to reshape global trade on their own.&nbsp;</p><p>If it limits or strikes down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, it will affirm the principle that only legislatures can authorise taxes and trade barriers, not the president. It will echo India’s argument that international commerce must rest on clear, rules-based frameworks rather than impulsive executive orders.&nbsp;</p><p>On the ground, it could ease pressure on Indian exporters who have faced tariff surcharges of up to 50 per cent in some sectors. Politically, it would strengthen India’s image as a defender of multilateralism.</p>

India has long opposed Trump’s unilateral tariffs- including the '50 per cent punishment' for buying Russian oil. India termed them as arbitrary and contrary to global trade rules, while many other countries bent their knee and entered into deals with Trump. 

Donald Trump is feeling consternation as the US Supreme Court seems sceptical about the global tariffs he imposed unilaterally on several countries, including India. In all likelihood, the SCOTUS will end, or significantly restrict, the US president's marauding that led to economic pain and diplomatic tussles. If indeed that happens, one country will stand vindicated: India. Prime Minister Modi's government has taken a wait-and-watch approach while not compromising on the interests of Indian stakeholders - from farmers to local businesses. India's trade talks with US have dragged on, possibly intentionally. Now, the biggest resistance to tariffs came from within the US, and Trump might be forced to withdraw at least parts of this punitive regime. Here is what you should know: What the SCOTUS hearing on Trump tariffs is about At the heart of the hearings is Trump's use of emergency powers to impose the sweeping tariffs. The question is mainly about how such moves affect or alter US trade law. Specifically, it is about whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) allowed the president to unilaterally impose tariffs. Also read: Days after Donald Trump's tariff warning, China vows to 'fight till end' What happened at the Trump tariffs hearing? Both conservative and liberal justices found the administration’s reading of the US trade law to be too broad. The court appeared more concerned about the “major questions” doctrine, which requires clear congressional authorisation for significant economic or political actions, such as the tariffs. The Supreme Court Justices , some of them appointed by Trump himself, did not appreciate his administration’s argument that the IEEPA allows the president to announce tariffs. At the hearing on Wednesday (Nov 5), Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether tariffs (which essentially are taxes on Americans) could really be seen as mere “regulation” under the law. Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed the government attorney to explain why regulating 'importation' should include tariffs when no president in the US trade law’s 50-year history had done so. Justice Neil Gorsuch warned that giving the president such sweeping authority would turn the US Congress’s power to tax and regulate trade into a ‘presidential prerogative.’ Even Brett Kavanaugh, who is generally cautious, questioned whether Congress ever meant IEEPA to authorise such a vast power. The Solicitor General D John Sauer, defended the tariffs as 'legitimate responses to national emergencies', ranging from trade deficits to the fentanyl drug abuse crisis. But the justices expressed unease with that reasoning. Also read: 'He was offended': Canada's Carney desperate to resume trade talks, apologises to Trump over anti-tariff Reagan ad Prediction markets think Trump could lose tariff case Prediction markets and speculative traders are taking positions with the assumption that Trump's wings could be clipped by the court. Traders have quickly reduced their bets on the tariffs surviving the legal test at the SCOTUS. Platforms tracking the case showed steep drops in the odds of a Trump victory, which indicated that Wall Street now expect the court to invalidate or limit Trump's use of IEEPA. In fact, it's the outcome that the market wants: Trump tariffs have brought in inflationary pressures and hit global trade, and the court ruling could ease these, they hope. Trump is watching the SCOTUS ruling Trump is feeling a lot of tension on the case, and he has not been silent about it. He called the litigation 'a politically motivated attack'. He insisted that the tariffs were essential to protect American jobs and punish countries like China, Mexico and India for what he calls unfair trade practices. His line on tariffs has been to link them to national security, and even to the geopolitical balance around Russia and Ukraine. He has portrayed tariffs as crucial for maintaining US leverage, while accusing opponents of undermining his authority to act swiftly in emergencies. https://www.wionews.com/videos/high-court-hears-final-arguments-in-trump-s-tariff-authority-battle-1762409271893/embed Why the Trump tariff legal showdown is important for India Since 2018, India has faced a number of US tariffs: on steel, aluminium, pharmaceuticals, and textiles, often over ‘national security’ grounds. India has refrained from tit-for-tat retaliation. It has filed challenges at the World Trade Organization, while maintaining dialogue with American trade officials. India has extended US trade talks to buy time, even as global institutions and courts tested the legality of Trump’s moves. Indian negotiators have long stressed that trade rules must not be rewritten by unilateral presidential action. That restraint now appears to have been correct in hindsight. Also read: US Supreme Court justices appear sceptical of Trump’s tariffs argument If the justices do indeed bulldoze Trump’s tariff machine, India will have reason to smile The Supreme Court’s decision, which might take weeks or even months, will determine whether presidents can continue to wield emergency powers to reshape global trade on their own. If it limits or strikes down Trump’s IEEPA tariffs, it will affirm the principle that only legislatures can authorise taxes and trade barriers, not the president. It will echo India’s argument that international commerce must rest on clear, rules-based frameworks rather than impulsive executive orders. On the ground, it could ease pressure on Indian exporters who have faced tariff surcharges of up to 50 per cent in some sectors. Politically, it would strengthen India’s image as a defender of multilateralism.

<p>India has long opposed Trump’s unilateral tariffs- including the '50 per cent punishment' for buying Russian oil. India termed them as arbitrary and contrary to global trade rules, while many other countries bent their knee and entered into deals with Trump.&nbsp;</p>

US Supreme Court might end or limit Trump tariffs, and India will smile

<p>Zohran Mamdani has become the New York City mayor. But the enthusiasm for the 34-year-old Democrat becoming a national-level politician akin to Barack Obama might be misplaced. The direct endorsement of Mamdani by the former president gave the NYC mayoral race, essentially a local election in the US, renewed global attention. This is partly due to Mamdani’s origin—Indian and Muslim roots—and his political stance on controversial issues like the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Mamdani is New York City’s first Muslim and South Asian mayor. In case you have not noticed him yet, it is high time.</p><h2>Who is Zohran Mamdani?</h2><p>Zohran Kwame Mamdani was born on 18 October 1991 in Kampala, Uganda, to Ugandan scholar Mahmood Mamdani and Indian-origin filmmaker Mira Nair. He moved to New York City at the age of seven and later studied at Bowdoin College. He co-founded the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter during college, and was active in community organising and hip-hop. Before entering politics, Mamdani worked as a foreclosure-prevention housing counsellor in Queens.</p><p>Mamdani joined the Democratic Socialists of America and challenged the Democratic establishment.</p><h2>Mamdani’s political career</h2><p>In 2020, Mamdani defeated five-term incumbent Aravella Simotas to win a seat in the New York State Assembly. Representing Astoria, Queens, he worked on tenant rights, public transit funding, and taxi driver debt relief, including a hunger strike that secured $450 million in aid.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-much-better-looking-person-is-zohran-mamdani-left-wing-version-of-trump-here-s-what-us-president-said-1762132235241">'Much better looking person...': Is Zohran Mamdani 'left-wing version' of Trump? Here's what US president said</a></p><h2>Mamdani’s mayoral race is focused on local issues</h2><p>Mamdani’s mayoral campaign focused on affordability and social equity. He advocated freezing rents, fare-free buses, universal childcare, city-owned grocery stores, and a 30-dollar minimum wage by 2030. He also wants to tax corporations and millionaires with the aim of raising nine billion dollars.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/live-blog-new-york-mayor-election-2025-updates-obama-offers-support-to-zohran-mamdani-donald-trump-us-elections-nyc-mayor-1762254876191">New York Mayor Election 2025 updates: Obama offers support to Zohran Mamdani</a></p><h2>Is Mamdani the next Obama?</h2><p>Some media outlets and observers compared Mamdani to a “young Obama.” The comparisons are based on similar life stories: fathers who were East African scholars, backgrounds in community organising, and the ability to appeal to younger voters through personal charisma and authenticity.</p><p>While the comparison is appealing, it is possibly overstated. Obama’s message was broadly unifying and centrist, whereas Mamdani’s is more radical and divisive. Obama aimed to appeal across the political spectrum, while Mamdani’s rhetoric and policies are tailored to the Democratic Socialist left.</p><h2>Mamdani cannot become US president because…</h2><p>Mamdani cannot legally become President of the United States because he is not a natural-born citizen. He was naturalised in 2018, and regardless of his popularity, Mamdani will never be able to run for president under the current law.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-best-mayor-potus-endorses-cuomo-for-nyc-mayor-says-will-stop-federal-funding-if-communist-candidate-zohran-mamdani-wins-1762229434725">Trump’s 'best NYC mayor'? POTUS endorses Cuomo, says will stop federal funding if 'Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani' wins</a></p><h2>How high can Mamdani go?</h2><p>Mamdani can run for the US Senate, the House of Representatives, or even Governor of New York. He could become a figurehead for a new generation of left-leaning politicians. With support from the Democratic Socialists of America, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Bernie Sanders, he could emerge as a national progressive voice.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nyc-mayoral-election-zohran-mamdani-a-threat-to-nyc-1762185180063/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/nyc-mayoral-election-zohran-mamdani-a-threat-to-nyc-1762185180063/embed</a></p><h2>Mamdani is a polarising figure</h2><p>Mamdani’s stances on foreign affairs, particularly on Israel and Palestine, have made him a deeply polarising figure. During the Gaza war, he called Israel’s actions genocide while refusing to condemn the slogan “globalise the intifada.” He has both fervent supporters and harsh opponents. Republicans, including President Donald Trump, label him a communist or terrorist sympathiser. Even some Democrats, such as Hakeem Jeffries and John Fetterman, have publicly distanced themselves from him.</p><p>Yet, in a city as politically diverse as New York, his outspokenness may strengthen his local base even as it limits his national appeal.</p><h2>A significant rise for an unlikely politician</h2><p>Nevertheless, Zohran Mamdani’s rise from a Queens housing counsellor to likely New York City mayor is one of the most remarkable political stories of the decade, a trajectory possible only in America, or more specifically, New York.</p><p>Even though his charisma and commitment to social justice echo aspects of Obama’s early career, their paths diverge sharply: Obama became president by appealing to the centre, while Mamdani inspires the left by challenging it. Mamdani may never sit in the Oval Office, but he could still reshape New York City politics and emerge as one of the most influential progressive politicians in the United States.</p>

Zohran Mamdani may become NYC’s first Muslim and Indian-origin mayor. The progressive figure is being compared to Obama, but legal and political limits would limit his political career. Here is what you should know about him

Zohran Mamdani has become the New York City mayor. But the enthusiasm for the 34-year-old Democrat becoming a national-level politician akin to Barack Obama might be misplaced. The direct endorsement of Mamdani by the former president gave the NYC mayoral race, essentially a local election in the US, renewed global attention. This is partly due to Mamdani’s origin—Indian and Muslim roots—and his political stance on controversial issues like the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Mamdani is New York City’s first Muslim and South Asian mayor. In case you have not noticed him yet, it is high time. Who is Zohran Mamdani? Zohran Kwame Mamdani was born on 18 October 1991 in Kampala, Uganda, to Ugandan scholar Mahmood Mamdani and Indian-origin filmmaker Mira Nair. He moved to New York City at the age of seven and later studied at Bowdoin College. He co-founded the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter during college, and was active in community organising and hip-hop. Before entering politics, Mamdani worked as a foreclosure-prevention housing counsellor in Queens. Mamdani joined the Democratic Socialists of America and challenged the Democratic establishment. Mamdani’s political career In 2020, Mamdani defeated five-term incumbent Aravella Simotas to win a seat in the New York State Assembly. Representing Astoria, Queens, he worked on tenant rights, public transit funding, and taxi driver debt relief, including a hunger strike that secured $450 million in aid. Also read: 'Much better looking person...': Is Zohran Mamdani 'left-wing version' of Trump? Here's what US president said Mamdani’s mayoral race is focused on local issues Mamdani’s mayoral campaign focused on affordability and social equity. He advocated freezing rents, fare-free buses, universal childcare, city-owned grocery stores, and a 30-dollar minimum wage by 2030. He also wants to tax corporations and millionaires with the aim of raising nine billion dollars. Also read: New York Mayor Election 2025 updates: Obama offers support to Zohran Mamdani Is Mamdani the next Obama? Some media outlets and observers compared Mamdani to a “young Obama.” The comparisons are based on similar life stories: fathers who were East African scholars, backgrounds in community organising, and the ability to appeal to younger voters through personal charisma and authenticity. While the comparison is appealing, it is possibly overstated. Obama’s message was broadly unifying and centrist, whereas Mamdani’s is more radical and divisive. Obama aimed to appeal across the political spectrum, while Mamdani’s rhetoric and policies are tailored to the Democratic Socialist left. Mamdani cannot become US president because… Mamdani cannot legally become President of the United States because he is not a natural-born citizen. He was naturalised in 2018, and regardless of his popularity, Mamdani will never be able to run for president under the current law. Also read: Trump’s 'best NYC mayor'? POTUS endorses Cuomo, says will stop federal funding if 'Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani' wins How high can Mamdani go? Mamdani can run for the US Senate, the House of Representatives, or even Governor of New York. He could become a figurehead for a new generation of left-leaning politicians. With support from the Democratic Socialists of America, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Bernie Sanders, he could emerge as a national progressive voice. https://www.wionews.com/videos/nyc-mayoral-election-zohran-mamdani-a-threat-to-nyc-1762185180063/embed Mamdani is a polarising figure Mamdani’s stances on foreign affairs, particularly on Israel and Palestine, have made him a deeply polarising figure. During the Gaza war, he called Israel’s actions genocide while refusing to condemn the slogan “globalise the intifada.” He has both fervent supporters and harsh opponents. Republicans, including President Donald Trump, label him a communist or terrorist sympathiser. Even some Democrats, such as Hakeem Jeffries and John Fetterman, have publicly distanced themselves from him. Yet, in a city as politically diverse as New York, his outspokenness may strengthen his local base even as it limits his national appeal. A significant rise for an unlikely politician Nevertheless, Zohran Mamdani’s rise from a Queens housing counsellor to likely New York City mayor is one of the most remarkable political stories of the decade, a trajectory possible only in America, or more specifically, New York. Even though his charisma and commitment to social justice echo aspects of Obama’s early career, their paths diverge sharply: Obama became president by appealing to the centre, while Mamdani inspires the left by challenging it. Mamdani may never sit in the Oval Office, but he could still reshape New York City politics and emerge as one of the most influential progressive politicians in the United States.

<p>Zohran Mamdani has become NYC’s first Muslim and Indian-origin mayor. The progressive figure is being compared to Obama, but legal and political limits would curb his political career. Here is what you should know about him</p>

Zohran Mamdani is New York City mayor, but is he the next Obama? Hold your horses and read this

<p>Zohran Mamdani's election as the Mayor of New York City was watched globally. The rise of a Muslim to the key post in the city that witnessed the 9/11 attacks, the worst act of Islamist terror on US soil, is seen as problematic by many: from Trump-supporting MAGA Republicans to pro-Israel groups and even some New Yorkers and Democrats. Here is what they think.</p><h2>New York City, forever scarred by 9/11 terrorist attack&nbsp;</h2><p>Almost a quarter of a century ago, the 11 September 2001 terror attacks claimed 2,977 lives in the US. For many, it would have been inconceivable that a Muslim could be leading City Hall in 2025. But the 34‑year-old democratic socialist has overcome the barriers. The practising Muslim is now the 111th mayor of New York City, whether his detractors like it or hate it.</p><p>It has been a meteoric rise for Mamdani, from a little‑known Queens assemblyman to the city’s first Muslim, Indian, South Asian, and Millennial mayor. While it is historic, his rise is problematic for many Republicans, New Yorkers, and even some moderate Democrats.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/indian-american-zohran-mamdani-wins-new-york-mayor-elections-but-he-opposes-pm-modi-here-s-why-1762317715428">Indian-American Zohran Mamdani wins New York mayor elections but he opposes PM Modi - Here's why</a></p><h2>Why Mamdani’s rise evokes unease in a nation known for Islamophobia</h2><p>Beyond the Islamophobia, xenophobia, and racism at the core of some views against him, Mamdani’s own statements, writings, and associations have contributed to public concern. In these, he appeared to downplay the horror of 9/11, while foregrounding Islamphpobia in post-9/11 America. For his critics, he seemed to align with anti‑American and anti‑Israel rhetoric. Hed has been accused of prioritising narratives of Muslim victimhood over the city’s collective trauma.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/controversial-remarks-of-zohran-mamdani-new-york-city-mayor-find-out-what-he-said-about-india-narendra-modi-bjp-rss-1762322572388">Controversial remarks of Zohran Mamdani, New York City mayor: Find out what he said about India, Narendra Modi, BJP, RSS</a></p><h2>Mamdani’s rise stirs an unusual convergence of concern across the political spectrum</h2><p>Led by President Donald Trump and his MAGA Republicans, Mamdani’s identity as a Muslim and a democratic socialist is being seen as a symbolic rupture in the US political narrative, which has often depicted Muslims as the enemy. Trump launched a scathing attack following Mamdani’s primary win, calling him a “100 per cent Communist Lunatic.” He went further, criticising Mamdani’s “grating voice” and “terrible looks” as emblematic of what he described as a “radical left‑wing takeover.”</p><p>Trump’s rhetoric taps directly into lingering fears among Republicans, far-right groups, and conservatives about Islamist terrorism. For them, Mamdani is not just a political rival but a cultural and security threat to the city’s identity, scarred by 9/11.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zohran-mamdani-reveals-real-reason-why-he-is-critical-of-indian-pm-modi-bjp-1761118768748">Zohran Mamdani on temple run in Diwali, reveals REAL reason why he is critical of Indian PM Modi</a></p><h2>For many New Yorkers, 9/11 is a wound yet to heal</h2><p>For a generation of New Yorkers, particularly survivors of 9/11 who walked through ash-choked streets on that fateful day, Mamdani’s rise brings both symbolic and real unease. His public remarks about being Muslim and facing suspicion after 9/11 are well-known. One widely cited anecdote involves his aunt, who reportedly stopped taking the subway because she did not feel safe in her hijab. Critics have interpreted such remarks as foregrounding his family’s social discomfort over the deaths of thousands.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/-indian-origin-zohran-mamdani-clinches-historic-victory-in-mayoral-prelims-1750870374642/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/-indian-origin-zohran-mamdani-clinches-historic-victory-in-mayoral-prelims-1750870374642/embed</a></p><h2>Mamdani's radical reform agenda is likely to face opposition</h2><p>Mamdani is a populist in his own way, with a policy platform that includes radical reform of the New York Police Department and the redirection of resources from traditional security priorities.</p><p>For all its glamour, New York remains a heavily policed, high-security city since 9/11. Mamdani's security reform plans have fuelled concerns among residents who feel that ideological goals might override pragmatic public safety issues in a city ever-vigilant against terrorism.</p><h2>Mamdani is not universally liked within his own Democratic Party</h2><p>Although he ran as a Democratic candidate, Mamdani has roots in the democratic socialist wing and belongs to the more vocal, left-leaning sections of the party. His candidacy and victory prompted hesitation among moderate Democrats. They view his ideological commitments and relative lack of executive experience as potential liabilities.</p><p>Business leaders and centrist voices have expressed alarm too, with Wall Street strategists reportedly mobilising hedge fund and real estate donors to oppose his general election bid, fearing a radical shift—or a socialist takeover—of the city’s governance and economy. His vocal criticism of US policy toward Israel and support for Palestinian rights have also raised concerns that Democrats are providing conservatives with potent attack lines for the 2026 midterm elections.</p><h2>Will Mamdani bring a fresh way of looking at politics in New York and America?</h2><p>While supporters celebrate the diversity and fresh perspective Mamdani brings, critics argue that these virtues should not erase the need for clear commitment to New York’s resilience against terror.</p><p>In the metropolis where the Freedom Tower stands as a defiant memorial opposing jihadist ideology, electing a leader who has appeared, to some, to be an apologist for 9/11 while focusing on Islamophobia feels like a betrayal of hard-won ground for many New Yorkers.</p>

Zohran Mamdani's election as NYC's first Muslim mayor is sparking concern among Republicans, some Democrats, and 9/11 survivors. At issue are security, ideology, and sensitivity to the city’s history of terror attacks. 

Zohran Mamdani's election as the Mayor of New York City was watched globally. The rise of a Muslim to the key post in the city that witnessed the 9/11 attacks, the worst act of Islamist terror on US soil, is seen as problematic by many: from Trump-supporting MAGA Republicans to pro-Israel groups and even some New Yorkers and Democrats. Here is what they think. New York City, forever scarred by 9/11 terrorist attack Almost a quarter of a century ago, the 11 September 2001 terror attacks claimed 2,977 lives in the US. For many, it would have been inconceivable that a Muslim could be leading City Hall in 2025. But the 34‑year-old democratic socialist has overcome the barriers. The practising Muslim is now the 111th mayor of New York City, whether his detractors like it or hate it. It has been a meteoric rise for Mamdani, from a little‑known Queens assemblyman to the city’s first Muslim, Indian, South Asian, and Millennial mayor. While it is historic, his rise is problematic for many Republicans, New Yorkers, and even some moderate Democrats. Also read: Indian-American Zohran Mamdani wins New York mayor elections but he opposes PM Modi - Here's why Why Mamdani’s rise evokes unease in a nation known for Islamophobia Beyond the Islamophobia, xenophobia, and racism at the core of some views against him, Mamdani’s own statements, writings, and associations have contributed to public concern. In these, he appeared to downplay the horror of 9/11, while foregrounding Islamphpobia in post-9/11 America. For his critics, he seemed to align with anti‑American and anti‑Israel rhetoric. Hed has been accused of prioritising narratives of Muslim victimhood over the city’s collective trauma. Also read: Controversial remarks of Zohran Mamdani, New York City mayor: Find out what he said about India, Narendra Modi, BJP, RSS Mamdani’s rise stirs an unusual convergence of concern across the political spectrum Led by President Donald Trump and his MAGA Republicans, Mamdani’s identity as a Muslim and a democratic socialist is being seen as a symbolic rupture in the US political narrative, which has often depicted Muslims as the enemy. Trump launched a scathing attack following Mamdani’s primary win, calling him a “100 per cent Communist Lunatic.” He went further, criticising Mamdani’s “grating voice” and “terrible looks” as emblematic of what he described as a “radical left‑wing takeover.” Trump’s rhetoric taps directly into lingering fears among Republicans, far-right groups, and conservatives about Islamist terrorism. For them, Mamdani is not just a political rival but a cultural and security threat to the city’s identity, scarred by 9/11. Also read: Zohran Mamdani on temple run in Diwali, reveals REAL reason why he is critical of Indian PM Modi For many New Yorkers, 9/11 is a wound yet to heal For a generation of New Yorkers, particularly survivors of 9/11 who walked through ash-choked streets on that fateful day, Mamdani’s rise brings both symbolic and real unease. His public remarks about being Muslim and facing suspicion after 9/11 are well-known. One widely cited anecdote involves his aunt, who reportedly stopped taking the subway because she did not feel safe in her hijab. Critics have interpreted such remarks as foregrounding his family’s social discomfort over the deaths of thousands. https://www.wionews.com/videos/-indian-origin-zohran-mamdani-clinches-historic-victory-in-mayoral-prelims-1750870374642/embed Mamdani's radical reform agenda is likely to face opposition Mamdani is a populist in his own way, with a policy platform that includes radical reform of the New York Police Department and the redirection of resources from traditional security priorities. For all its glamour, New York remains a heavily policed, high-security city since 9/11. Mamdani's security reform plans have fuelled concerns among residents who feel that ideological goals might override pragmatic public safety issues in a city ever-vigilant against terrorism. Mamdani is not universally liked within his own Democratic Party Although he ran as a Democratic candidate, Mamdani has roots in the democratic socialist wing and belongs to the more vocal, left-leaning sections of the party. His candidacy and victory prompted hesitation among moderate Democrats. They view his ideological commitments and relative lack of executive experience as potential liabilities. Business leaders and centrist voices have expressed alarm too, with Wall Street strategists reportedly mobilising hedge fund and real estate donors to oppose his general election bid, fearing a radical shift—or a socialist takeover—of the city’s governance and economy. His vocal criticism of US policy toward Israel and support for Palestinian rights have also raised concerns that Democrats are providing conservatives with potent attack lines for the 2026 midterm elections. Will Mamdani bring a fresh way of looking at politics in New York and America? While supporters celebrate the diversity and fresh perspective Mamdani brings, critics argue that these virtues should not erase the need for clear commitment to New York’s resilience against terror. In the metropolis where the Freedom Tower stands as a defiant memorial opposing jihadist ideology, electing a leader who has appeared, to some, to be an apologist for 9/11 while focusing on Islamophobia feels like a betrayal of hard-won ground for many New Yorkers.

<p>Zohran Mamdani's election as NYC's first Muslim mayor is sparking concern among Republicans, some Democrats, and 9/11 survivors. At issue are security, ideology, and sensitivity to the city’s history of terror attacks.&nbsp;</p>

Why many love to hate Zohran Mamdani: First Muslim mayor at Ground Zero of 9/11 Islamist terror attack is problematic for them

<p>When Donald Trump began his second term as US president in January 2025, his reported net worth stood at approximately US$6.7 billion according to Forbes and US$7.16 bn as per the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, as of January 21. Less than a year into that term, his personal wealth has already climbed further through a combination of crypto ventures, real estate licensing deals and brand monetisation.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-social-post-drives-crypto-flash-crash-1760421021220/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-social-post-drives-crypto-flash-crash-1760421021220/embed</a></p><h2>Crypto: Trumps' cash engine for future</h2><p>One of the fastest-growing channels for his personal wealth is the crypto platform World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a decentralised finance or DeFi venture backed by the Trump family. Public filings show WLFI raised about US$550 million in token sales across two rounds launched in October 2024 and January 2025. WLFI’s documentation stated that the Trump family entity is entitled to 75 per cent of net revenue after expenses. This means a substantial portion of that US$550 million could flow into the family ecosystem. According to crypto-industry trackers, the Trump family controls roughly 22.5 billion WLFI tokens, which some reports value at more than US$6 billion to US$7 billion, albeit on paper.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-s-granddaughter-kai-earns-more-than-us-president-know-her-net-worth-1752857889466">Trump’s granddaughter Kai earns more than US president? Know her net worth</a></p><h2>Real estate deals remain core business of Trump</h2><p>Beyond crypto, the core real-estate and licensing business of the Trump Organization remains a driver of his wealth. Much of Trump’s fortune still stems from his global real-estate empire: office towers, leaseholds, golf resorts and branded licensing. In India alone, the Trump brand reportedly earned about US$12 million in 2024 from licensing deals tied to seven real-estate projects across Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata and Gurugram. These fees, and the expanded global brand reach, help boost his valuations even if the revenue streams are less visible.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/laura-loomer-net-worth-donald-trump-1755790798711">How much does Trump’s far-right supporter Laura Loomer earn? Check her net worth inside</a></p><h2>Social media venture helping Trump amass more wealth</h2><p>While many of the gains are on paper rather than fully realised cash, the valuations show a clear uptick. A Forbes summary noted that Trump’s stake in social media via the Trump Media &amp; Technology Group (TMTG) - which owns Truth Social - and crypto helped him double his net worth in a year to around US$5.1 billion.</p><p>The inclusion of crypto token holdings, governance tokens, and brand stakes would take the totals up significantly.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-family-made-6-billion-from-crypto-coin-launch-thanks-to-a-company-run-by-steve-witkoff-s-son-here-s-how-1756790078013">Trump family made $6 BILLION from crypto-coin launch thanks to a company run by Steve Witkoff's son - Here's how</a></p><h2>Brand Trump is growing</h2><p>The Trump Organization benefited from the post-election enthusiasm for the president. Golf club memberships reportedly rose. Valuations of several Trump-branded developments are growing too. His personal brand directly fuels premium pricing in real estate and licensing markets.</p><p>The accumulation of wealth even before one full year in office shows how Trump is leveraging new-age assets such as cryptocurrency and social media, alongside traditional real-estate and branding businesses, to expand his personal fortune.<br>Surely, he will leave office a much richer man.</p>

Donald Trump’s net worth has surged past US$7 billion less than a year into his second term. The growth is fuelled by crypto ventures, real-estate licensing, and booming brand valuations. Here is a breakdown


When Donald Trump began his second term as US president in January 2025, his reported net worth stood at approximately US$6.7 billion according to Forbes and US$7.16 bn as per the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, as of January 21. Less than a year into that term, his personal wealth has already climbed further through a combination of crypto ventures, real estate licensing deals and brand monetisation. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-social-post-drives-crypto-flash-crash-1760421021220/embed Crypto: Trumps' cash engine for future One of the fastest-growing channels for his personal wealth is the crypto platform World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a decentralised finance or DeFi venture backed by the Trump family. Public filings show WLFI raised about US$550 million in token sales across two rounds launched in October 2024 and January 2025. WLFI’s documentation stated that the Trump family entity is entitled to 75 per cent of net revenue after expenses. This means a substantial portion of that US$550 million could flow into the family ecosystem. According to crypto-industry trackers, the Trump family controls roughly 22.5 billion WLFI tokens, which some reports value at more than US$6 billion to US$7 billion, albeit on paper. Also read: Trump’s granddaughter Kai earns more than US president? Know her net worth Real estate deals remain core business of Trump Beyond crypto, the core real-estate and licensing business of the Trump Organization remains a driver of his wealth. Much of Trump’s fortune still stems from his global real-estate empire: office towers, leaseholds, golf resorts and branded licensing. In India alone, the Trump brand reportedly earned about US$12 million in 2024 from licensing deals tied to seven real-estate projects across Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata and Gurugram. These fees, and the expanded global brand reach, help boost his valuations even if the revenue streams are less visible. Also read: How much does Trump’s far-right supporter Laura Loomer earn? Check her net worth inside Social media venture helping Trump amass more wealth While many of the gains are on paper rather than fully realised cash, the valuations show a clear uptick. A Forbes summary noted that Trump’s stake in social media via the Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) - which owns Truth Social - and crypto helped him double his net worth in a year to around US$5.1 billion. The inclusion of crypto token holdings, governance tokens, and brand stakes would take the totals up significantly. Also read: Trump family made $6 BILLION from crypto-coin launch thanks to a company run by Steve Witkoff's son - Here's how Brand Trump is growing The Trump Organization benefited from the post-election enthusiasm for the president. Golf club memberships reportedly rose. Valuations of several Trump-branded developments are growing too. His personal brand directly fuels premium pricing in real estate and licensing markets. The accumulation of wealth even before one full year in office shows how Trump is leveraging new-age assets such as cryptocurrency and social media, alongside traditional real-estate and branding businesses, to expand his personal fortune. Surely, he will leave office a much richer man.

<p>Donald Trump’s net worth has surged past US$7 billion less than a year into his second term. The growth is fuelled by crypto ventures, real-estate licensing, and booming brand valuations. Here is a breakdown<br>&nbsp;</p>

Trump is already billions richer even before one year into second term. Here is how he is filling his pockets

<p>US President Donald Trump has claimed that China might be secretly conducting underground nuclear tests ‘without telling the world.’ His comments can be dismissed as political rhetoric. Or not. Recent research and satellite imagery have shown signs of activity at China’s long-dormant nuclear test facility at the Lop Nur site in Xinjiang. Does it mean Beijing has resumed full-scale nuclear explosions? &nbsp;No, there is no verifiable evidence for this. But reports and studies have suggested that China may be preparing, or already conducting so-called 'subcritical' nuclear tests. Here is what you should know:</p><h2>What are subcritical nuclear tests?</h2><p>Subcritical tests, as opposed to supercritical tests, are 'experiments' that fall outside the scope of international bans and treaties on nuclear testing. These experiments could potentially allow China and other countries to modernise its nuclear arsenal without formally violating non-proliferation treaties. Subcritical tests are designed to study how plutonium and other nuclear materials behave under extreme pressure, without causing an actual chain reaction, and thereby an explosion.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fact-check-trump-made-explosive-claim-on-pakistan-conducting-nuclear-tests-what-are-treaties-accountability-and-monioring-systems-1762162784350">FACT CHECK: Trump made EXPLOSIVE CLAIM on Pakistan conducting nuclear tests. What are treaties, accountability and monitoring systems?</a></p><h2>The treaty loophole allowing subcritical tests</h2><p>Subcritical tests are not prohibited by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) since they do not produce an explosive yield. Still, these tests can help refine nuclear weapon designs. This treaty loophole is a grey zone in global arms control, enabling major nuclear powers to conduct such experiments 'legally'.<br>And it's not only China. Reportedly, the US and Russia have also conducted such experiments. The US is thought to have conducted more than 30 subcritical tests since 1997 at sites like the Nevada National Security Site. Russia has conducted at least 25 at Novaya Zemlya, according to statements by US Department of Energy and Russian authorities.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-claims-russia-china-conducting-nuclear-tests-check-how-many-nations-lead-in-explosions-1762174788014">Trump claims Russia, China conducting nuclear tests; check how many nations lead in explosions</a></p><h2>Significant construction at Chinese nuclear facility in Xinjiang</h2><p>Citing satellite images and analysis by think tanks like the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, several media reports said between 2023 and 2024 that there is significant new construction at Lop Nur. &nbsp;Commercial satellite imagery of the area in Xinjiang from Planet Labs, analysed by Deciphering Mycroft and others in 2023–2025 confirmed horizontal tunneling and infrastructure.&nbsp;</p><p>The work there includes excavation for what could be a sixth underground tunnel, ventilation shafts, new roads, spoil piles, and expanded support buildings. Experts like Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies said the construction is consistent with preparations for subcritical testing. &nbsp;Ventilation stacks and sealed tunnel entrances are generally used for containing radiation, leading to this assessment. But the opposing view is that this could be for 'peaceful purposes like hydrodynamic experiments or storage.</p><h2>China's growing capabilities for controlled nuclear experiments</h2><p>As per a 2025 paper published by the China Institute of Atomic Energy, China has made advances in accelerator-driven subcritical systems or ADS. Officially, the research focused on energy applications. But the underlying technology is similar to the one used in subcritical nuclear weapons tests. This includes use of accelerators or high-powered lasers to simulate explosions without creating them. This has made experts conclude that China has the technical means and infrastructure to conduct subcritical experiments. The paper specifically refers to civilian thorium reactor research, like the TMSR programme of China, but dual-use concerns persist.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-test-underground-where-no-one-knows-trump-accuses-russia-china-of-secret-nuclear-testing-1762141529429">‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing</a></p><h2>Pentagon’s repeated warnings about China’s expanding nuclear arsenal</h2><p>In its annual reports to Congress from 2020 to 2024, the US Department of Defense said that China’s nuclear warheads, estimated at low-200s in 2020, are on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030 and potentially reach 1,500 by 2035.&nbsp;<br>The projections are based on satellite data showing the construction of new nuclear fuel reprocessing plants and fast breeder reactors that can produce weapons-grade plutonium.</p><p>The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (NPEC) estimated that, by the late 2020s to early 2030s, China could possess enough weapons-grade plutonium - up to three tonnes - for hundreds of additional warheads beyond its current stockpiles.&nbsp;</p><p>The FAS or Federation of American Scientists assessed that as of 2024, China has around 3–5 kg per new silo-based warheads. NPEC's three tonnes assessement is from potential production at new facilities at Jiuquan and Guangyuan, according to SIPRI and US intelligence inputs.<br>&nbsp;</p><h2>China may be quietly exploiting the loopholes of CTBT and NPT to advance its nuclear weapons programme</h2><p>Through subcritical tests- &nbsp;instead of explosive supercritical ones - China can improve warhead reliability, develop smaller and more efficient designs, maintain its deterrent credibility, even as it avoids international scrutiny and appears to comply.</p><p>As mentioned, China is in fact following the method of the US and Russia, who already use such testing to modernise their arsenals.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-pakistan-china-russia-conducting-secret-nuke-tests-1762232883235/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-pakistan-china-russia-conducting-secret-nuke-tests-1762232883235/embed</a></p><h3>How China will benefit from subcritical tests</h3><p>Subcritical tests could help China grow its nuclear weapons capabilities, and thus reshape the global balance of power. If China achieves nuclear parity with the US, it may feel more confident in deterring American intervention in regional issues such as Taiwan.&nbsp;</p><p>But do note that there has been no confirmed Chinese subcritical tests announced or detected. The speculations are based mainly on infrastructure parallels to American and Russian facilities.</p><p>No seismic or radionuclide evidence of Chinese subcritical tests has been publicly detected by international watchdogs, like the CTBTO's International Monitoring System.</p><h2>Revival of a nuclear arms race&nbsp;</h2><p>China's nuclear arsenal growth could prompt an arms race by other nuclear states. India, for one, which last tested in 1998 with the explicit mention of China as the main threat, could go back to the drawing board on nuclear testing, as per some expert analysis.</p><p>Chinese advances might further embolden North Korea to conduct nuclear detonations. As a result, its key adversaries like South Korea and Japan could either deploy American nuclear weapons in the region or locally develop indigenous nuclear programmes and capabilities.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-fires-back-after-trump-accuses-it-of-secret-nuclear-testing-says-always-adhered-to-the-path-of-peaceful-development-1762155328582">China fires back after Trump accuses it of secret nuclear testing, says 'always adhered to the path of peaceful development'</a></p><h2>Treaties could become irrelevant</h2><p>Article 6 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) commits nuclear powers to pursue disarmament in good faith, but slowly, nations are straying away from it.&nbsp;</p><p>Note that China has not ratified the CTBT, though it signed in 1996 and maintains a testing moratorium since 1996. The US signed CTBT but did not ratify, while Russia ratified but withdrew in 2023. None of these countries are legally bound to zero-yield, but all observe moratoriums on supercritical tests, as of now.<br>If China, the US and Russia all expand their arsenals through subcritical tests or other means, the credibility of the NPT and CTBT could erode. More nations could question its value, or withdraw entirely, leading to a further arms race.</p><p>It is not possible to say with available evidence that China has resumed underground nuclear testing in violation of international law, as indicated by Trump.&nbsp;</p><p>But subcritical tests may be the path used by Beijing to modernise its nuclear forces while staying 'clean' with regards to international treaties. Such actions, whether done by China, Russia or the US, challenge the spirit of the CTBT and could ignite a new era of nuclear arms race.</p><p>Trump’s warning is not just speculation or rhetoric, in spite of China's sharp rejection of his claims. It is essential now to look at plugging the loophole on subcritical testing, or the global non-proliferation regime could unravel.</p>

China could be conducting subcritical nuclear tests at Lop Nur to modernise its arsenal without violating treaties, if the recent assessments are true. This could raise global arms race concerns and challenging nuclear non-proliferation regimes.
 

US President Donald Trump has claimed that China might be secretly conducting underground nuclear tests ‘without telling the world.’ His comments can be dismissed as political rhetoric. Or not. Recent research and satellite imagery have shown signs of activity at China’s long-dormant nuclear test facility at the Lop Nur site in Xinjiang. Does it mean Beijing has resumed full-scale nuclear explosions? No, there is no verifiable evidence for this. But reports and studies have suggested that China may be preparing, or already conducting so-called 'subcritical' nuclear tests. Here is what you should know: What are subcritical nuclear tests? Subcritical tests, as opposed to supercritical tests, are 'experiments' that fall outside the scope of international bans and treaties on nuclear testing. These experiments could potentially allow China and other countries to modernise its nuclear arsenal without formally violating non-proliferation treaties. Subcritical tests are designed to study how plutonium and other nuclear materials behave under extreme pressure, without causing an actual chain reaction, and thereby an explosion. Also read: FACT CHECK: Trump made EXPLOSIVE CLAIM on Pakistan conducting nuclear tests. What are treaties, accountability and monitoring systems? The treaty loophole allowing subcritical tests Subcritical tests are not prohibited by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) since they do not produce an explosive yield. Still, these tests can help refine nuclear weapon designs. This treaty loophole is a grey zone in global arms control, enabling major nuclear powers to conduct such experiments 'legally'. And it's not only China. Reportedly, the US and Russia have also conducted such experiments. The US is thought to have conducted more than 30 subcritical tests since 1997 at sites like the Nevada National Security Site. Russia has conducted at least 25 at Novaya Zemlya, according to statements by US Department of Energy and Russian authorities. Also read: Trump claims Russia, China conducting nuclear tests; check how many nations lead in explosions Significant construction at Chinese nuclear facility in Xinjiang Citing satellite images and analysis by think tanks like the Sasakawa Peace Foundation, several media reports said between 2023 and 2024 that there is significant new construction at Lop Nur. Commercial satellite imagery of the area in Xinjiang from Planet Labs, analysed by Deciphering Mycroft and others in 2023–2025 confirmed horizontal tunneling and infrastructure. The work there includes excavation for what could be a sixth underground tunnel, ventilation shafts, new roads, spoil piles, and expanded support buildings. Experts like Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies said the construction is consistent with preparations for subcritical testing. Ventilation stacks and sealed tunnel entrances are generally used for containing radiation, leading to this assessment. But the opposing view is that this could be for 'peaceful purposes like hydrodynamic experiments or storage. China's growing capabilities for controlled nuclear experiments As per a 2025 paper published by the China Institute of Atomic Energy, China has made advances in accelerator-driven subcritical systems or ADS. Officially, the research focused on energy applications. But the underlying technology is similar to the one used in subcritical nuclear weapons tests. This includes use of accelerators or high-powered lasers to simulate explosions without creating them. This has made experts conclude that China has the technical means and infrastructure to conduct subcritical experiments. The paper specifically refers to civilian thorium reactor research, like the TMSR programme of China, but dual-use concerns persist. Also read: ‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing Pentagon’s repeated warnings about China’s expanding nuclear arsenal In its annual reports to Congress from 2020 to 2024, the US Department of Defense said that China’s nuclear warheads, estimated at low-200s in 2020, are on track to exceed 1,000 by 2030 and potentially reach 1,500 by 2035. The projections are based on satellite data showing the construction of new nuclear fuel reprocessing plants and fast breeder reactors that can produce weapons-grade plutonium. The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (NPEC) estimated that, by the late 2020s to early 2030s, China could possess enough weapons-grade plutonium - up to three tonnes - for hundreds of additional warheads beyond its current stockpiles. The FAS or Federation of American Scientists assessed that as of 2024, China has around 3–5 kg per new silo-based warheads. NPEC's three tonnes assessement is from potential production at new facilities at Jiuquan and Guangyuan, according to SIPRI and US intelligence inputs. China may be quietly exploiting the loopholes of CTBT and NPT to advance its nuclear weapons programme Through subcritical tests- instead of explosive supercritical ones - China can improve warhead reliability, develop smaller and more efficient designs, maintain its deterrent credibility, even as it avoids international scrutiny and appears to comply. As mentioned, China is in fact following the method of the US and Russia, who already use such testing to modernise their arsenals. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-pakistan-china-russia-conducting-secret-nuke-tests-1762232883235/embed How China will benefit from subcritical tests Subcritical tests could help China grow its nuclear weapons capabilities, and thus reshape the global balance of power. If China achieves nuclear parity with the US, it may feel more confident in deterring American intervention in regional issues such as Taiwan. But do note that there has been no confirmed Chinese subcritical tests announced or detected. The speculations are based mainly on infrastructure parallels to American and Russian facilities. No seismic or radionuclide evidence of Chinese subcritical tests has been publicly detected by international watchdogs, like the CTBTO's International Monitoring System. Revival of a nuclear arms race China's nuclear arsenal growth could prompt an arms race by other nuclear states. India, for one, which last tested in 1998 with the explicit mention of China as the main threat, could go back to the drawing board on nuclear testing, as per some expert analysis. Chinese advances might further embolden North Korea to conduct nuclear detonations. As a result, its key adversaries like South Korea and Japan could either deploy American nuclear weapons in the region or locally develop indigenous nuclear programmes and capabilities. Also read: China fires back after Trump accuses it of secret nuclear testing, says 'always adhered to the path of peaceful development' Treaties could become irrelevant Article 6 of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) commits nuclear powers to pursue disarmament in good faith, but slowly, nations are straying away from it. Note that China has not ratified the CTBT, though it signed in 1996 and maintains a testing moratorium since 1996. The US signed CTBT but did not ratify, while Russia ratified but withdrew in 2023. None of these countries are legally bound to zero-yield, but all observe moratoriums on supercritical tests, as of now. If China, the US and Russia all expand their arsenals through subcritical tests or other means, the credibility of the NPT and CTBT could erode. More nations could question its value, or withdraw entirely, leading to a further arms race. It is not possible to say with available evidence that China has resumed underground nuclear testing in violation of international law, as indicated by Trump. But subcritical tests may be the path used by Beijing to modernise its nuclear forces while staying 'clean' with regards to international treaties. Such actions, whether done by China, Russia or the US, challenge the spirit of the CTBT and could ignite a new era of nuclear arms race. Trump’s warning is not just speculation or rhetoric, in spite of China's sharp rejection of his claims. It is essential now to look at plugging the loophole on subcritical testing, or the global non-proliferation regime could unravel.

<p>China could be conducting subcritical nuclear tests at Lop Nur to modernise its arsenal without violating treaties, if the recent assessments are true. This could raise global arms race concerns and challenging nuclear non-proliferation regimes.<br>&nbsp;</p>

Subcritical tests: Is China exploiting this loophole in non-proliferation treaties to expand its nuclear arsenal? A reality check

<p>US President Donald Trump has claimed that Pakistan has been conducting nuclear tests, besides Russia, China and North Korea. Speaking in a CBS interview, Trump suggested that these nations are expanding their nuclear capabilities through testing. His remarks implied a potential escalation in global nuclear tensions, sparking questions about their accuracy, and making many wonder what mechanisms are in place to monitor nuclear activities.</p><h2>Is Pakistan actually conducting nuclear tests?</h2><p>As per historical records, Pakistan conducted two nuclear tests in May 1998, following India’s three nuclear tests earlier in the same month. Since then, there has been no verified proof of Pakistan conducting nuclear explosions. But speculation has arisen over the years based on seismic events and unusual lenticular clouds.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-fires-back-after-trump-accuses-it-of-secret-nuclear-testing-says-always-adhered-to-the-path-of-peaceful-development-1762155328582">China fires back after Trump accuses it of secret nuclear testing, says 'always adhered to the path of peaceful development'</a></p><h2>Accountability and verification of nuclear tests</h2><p>The United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) oversees nuclear material safeguards but does not directly regulate nuclear tests. Neither Pakistan nor India is a signatory to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which prohibits all nuclear explosions and establishes international monitoring systems. This means Pakistan is not formally constrained by CTBT's provisions. Potential nuclear tests are verified through seismic, satellite, and radionuclide monitoring. This is coordinated by agencies such as the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO).</p><h2>Distinction between test types</h2><p>It is important to distinguish between actual nuclear explosive tests and tests of delivery systems like missiles, submarines and aircraft capable of carrying nukes. Russia has focused on testing deliverable systems, without conducting full nuclear detonations.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-planning-nuclear-explosions-under-new-plan-energy-secretary-reveal-details-1762149202719/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-planning-nuclear-explosions-under-new-plan-energy-secretary-reveal-details-1762149202719/embed</a></p><h2>Historical nuclear tests by country</h2><p>The US remains the country with largest number of tests, totalling 1,030. The former Soviet Union carried out 715 tests, while China has conducted 45. Britain conducted 45, France 210, and North Korea six. The combined total of nuclear tests worldwide stands at 2,056.</p><p>Out of these, 528 were conducted in the atmosphere, mostly before the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty. There have been 1,528 underground tests.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-pakistan-s-been-testing-trump-makes-big-nuclear-weapons-test-revelation-repeats-india-pak-nuke-war-claims-1762141536694">'Pakistan's been testing...': Trump makes BIG nuclear weapons test revelation, repeats 'India-Pak nuke war' claims</a></p><h2>Can Pakistan conduct tests secretly?</h2><p>Conducting a nuclear test is hard work, not to mention the secrecy. Extensive preparation, instrumentation and strict safety protocols are required. IAEA and CTBT have guidelines on such nuclear activities. This involves selecting a geologically stable and isolated test site, environmental monitoring and prevention of radioactive contamination. CTBT signatories are also required to report the test for international verification. Being a non-signatory of the CTBT, Pakistan is not legally bound to report nuclear tests, but a real test could be identified using the technologies mentioned above.</p><p>Also read: <a href="">‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing</a></p><h2>How are nuclear tests monitored and reported?</h2><p>The 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty banned atmospheric nuclear tests, while the CTBT of 1996 bans all nuclear explosions and established a global monitoring network. Note that the CTBT has not yet entered into force due to pending ratifications. Meanwhile, the IAEA, which monitors nuclear material, can detect potential nuclear explosions.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

Trump claims Pakistan is conducting nuclear tests.  IAEA is the key agency monitoring nuclear proliferation.  Pakistan is not a signatory to test ban treaties. How are nuclear tests monitored?



US President Donald Trump has claimed that Pakistan has been conducting nuclear tests, besides Russia, China and North Korea. Speaking in a CBS interview, Trump suggested that these nations are expanding their nuclear capabilities through testing. His remarks implied a potential escalation in global nuclear tensions, sparking questions about their accuracy, and making many wonder what mechanisms are in place to monitor nuclear activities. Is Pakistan actually conducting nuclear tests? As per historical records, Pakistan conducted two nuclear tests in May 1998, following India’s three nuclear tests earlier in the same month. Since then, there has been no verified proof of Pakistan conducting nuclear explosions. But speculation has arisen over the years based on seismic events and unusual lenticular clouds. Also read: China fires back after Trump accuses it of secret nuclear testing, says 'always adhered to the path of peaceful development' Accountability and verification of nuclear tests The United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) oversees nuclear material safeguards but does not directly regulate nuclear tests. Neither Pakistan nor India is a signatory to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which prohibits all nuclear explosions and establishes international monitoring systems. This means Pakistan is not formally constrained by CTBT's provisions. Potential nuclear tests are verified through seismic, satellite, and radionuclide monitoring. This is coordinated by agencies such as the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO). Distinction between test types It is important to distinguish between actual nuclear explosive tests and tests of delivery systems like missiles, submarines and aircraft capable of carrying nukes. Russia has focused on testing deliverable systems, without conducting full nuclear detonations. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-planning-nuclear-explosions-under-new-plan-energy-secretary-reveal-details-1762149202719/embed Historical nuclear tests by country The US remains the country with largest number of tests, totalling 1,030. The former Soviet Union carried out 715 tests, while China has conducted 45. Britain conducted 45, France 210, and North Korea six. The combined total of nuclear tests worldwide stands at 2,056. Out of these, 528 were conducted in the atmosphere, mostly before the 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty. There have been 1,528 underground tests. Also read: 'Pakistan's been testing...': Trump makes BIG nuclear weapons test revelation, repeats 'India-Pak nuke war' claims Can Pakistan conduct tests secretly? Conducting a nuclear test is hard work, not to mention the secrecy. Extensive preparation, instrumentation and strict safety protocols are required. IAEA and CTBT have guidelines on such nuclear activities. This involves selecting a geologically stable and isolated test site, environmental monitoring and prevention of radioactive contamination. CTBT signatories are also required to report the test for international verification. Being a non-signatory of the CTBT, Pakistan is not legally bound to report nuclear tests, but a real test could be identified using the technologies mentioned above. Also read: ‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing How are nuclear tests monitored and reported? The 1963 Limited Test Ban Treaty banned atmospheric nuclear tests, while the CTBT of 1996 bans all nuclear explosions and established a global monitoring network. Note that the CTBT has not yet entered into force due to pending ratifications. Meanwhile, the IAEA, which monitors nuclear material, can detect potential nuclear explosions.

<p>Trump claims Pakistan is conducting nuclear tests. &nbsp;IAEA is the key agency monitoring nuclear proliferation. &nbsp;Pakistan is not a signatory to test ban treaties. So can it test? Here is what you should know</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

FACT CHECK: Trump made EXPLOSIVE CLAIM on Pakistan conducting nuclear tests. What are treaties, accountability and monitoring systems?

<p>Chinese President Xi Jinping jocularly told Lee Jae-myung to "check if there’s any backdoor" on the smartphones he gifted to his South Korean counterpart. The unusual exchange was seen in some circles as a sarcastic remark on longstanding suspicions that mobile phones are used as tools of surveillance by China. But what exactly is a "backdoor"? Is it even possible to spy on cell phone users via such a method? The answers might surprise you — and no, it’s not only China that’s been accused of turning devices into digital spies. Read on to find more about the world of digital device surveillance.</p><h2>What Xi told Lee when gifting Xiaomi smartphones</h2><p>During a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the APEC Summit in Gyeongju on November 1, Xi gifted Lee Jae-myung a pair of Xiaomi smartphones. When Lee asked if the devices were secure, Xi smiled and said through an interpreter, "You should check if there’s a backdoor," drawing laughter from the leaders and delegations on both sides. The moment, light-hearted as it was, carried a subtle undertone: A wry acknowledgement of global fears that modern smartphones — mainly Chinese-made but others too— could be turned into listening posts in a new era of digital geopolitics.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/what-s-behind-the-us-move-to-limit-huawei-s-ai-chip-production-in-2025-1749807803990">What’s behind the US move to limit Huawei’s AI chip production in 2025?</a></p><h2>Digital surveillance: What's the hidden ‘backdoor’ inside your phone?</h2><p>In cybersecurity, a ‘backdoor’ refers to a secret method of bypassing normal authentication or encryption controls on digital devices. This would potentally allow hackers, the manufacturers or even governments, to sneak inside the system without users' permission. Once accessed, &nbsp;calls can be quietly intercepted. Messages and photos can be accessed. Even the camera and microphone of these devices can be turned on remotely.<br>Unlike a typical software bug, a backdoor is put there deliberatedly. Some of these could be for maintenance (remote-access of phones and computers) or law-enforcement access. It is nearly impossible to be sure who all can access a single phone using such backdoors. The backdoors, even when created for "good" intentions, could be used for exploitation.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-china-honeytrap-west-with-beautiful-spies-1761331069743/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-china-honeytrap-west-with-beautiful-spies-1761331069743/embed</a></p><h2>China’s tech industry has long faced accusations of covert data collection</h2><p>In 2016, researchers found pre-installed software in some budget Android phones made in China. They were allegedly transmitting user data secretly to servers in China. Huawei and Xiaomi have often faced such allegations, but both have repeatedly denied building surveillance features into their devices. In their defence, these Chinese companies had pointed the fingers at rogue app developers or firmware vendors.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/us-china-chip-tensions-rise-as-taiwan-blacklists-huawei-details-here-1750237097649">US–China chip tensions rise as Taiwan blacklists Huawei: Details here</a></p><h2>Digital device snooping: No country is innocent</h2><p>China, however, is not the only country alleged to have used backdoors on digital devices. In the US, the "Clipper chip" sought to give the government a built-in key to encrypted phones. This was cancelled due to public backlash. The Edward Snowden leaks revealed that the US intelligence agencies like NSA, could infiltrate smartphones by intercepting them in transit and implanting spy firmware.<br>The Israeli firm NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware created invisible backdoors on iPhones and Android devices. This controversial product, sold commercially, could allow governments worldwide to monitor journalists and activists. Russia reportedly deployed malware that could hijack soldiers’ smartphones in conflict zones.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-spying-on-its-own-citizens-using-chinese-technology-claims-amnesty-international-investigation-report-1757409778161">PAKISTAN SPYING on its own citizens using Chinese technology, claims Amnesty International investigation report</a></p><h2>Every phone and digital device is a potential spy</h2><p>While no nation publicly admits to planting consumer backdoors, nearly every major power has used digital tools to watch, listen, and gather intelligence. As cellular networks grow smarter and more connected, the line between convenience and surveillance is thinning out .<br>Xi’s quip to Lee may have been a joke, but it echoed a deeper truth that trust in technology is as fragile as the code it runs on. Checking if your device has a backdoor is not always possible. &nbsp;But it's not just a matter of paranoia anymore: it’s an aspect of digital self-defence.<br>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Checking for a backdoor isn’t paranoia anymore; it’s digital self-defense.<br> </p>

During a recent summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping jokingly told South Korean President Lee Jae-myung to "check for any backdoor" on Xiaomi phones he gifted. Smartphone surveillance through such backdoors is not a joke, but a reality.

Chinese President Xi Jinping jocularly told Lee Jae-myung to "check if there’s any backdoor" on the smartphones he gifted to his South Korean counterpart. The unusual exchange was seen in some circles as a sarcastic remark on longstanding suspicions that mobile phones are used as tools of surveillance by China. But what exactly is a "backdoor"? Is it even possible to spy on cell phone users via such a method? The answers might surprise you — and no, it’s not only China that’s been accused of turning devices into digital spies. Read on to find more about the world of digital device surveillance. What Xi told Lee when gifting Xiaomi smartphones During a bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the APEC Summit in Gyeongju on November 1, Xi gifted Lee Jae-myung a pair of Xiaomi smartphones. When Lee asked if the devices were secure, Xi smiled and said through an interpreter, "You should check if there’s a backdoor," drawing laughter from the leaders and delegations on both sides. The moment, light-hearted as it was, carried a subtle undertone: A wry acknowledgement of global fears that modern smartphones — mainly Chinese-made but others too— could be turned into listening posts in a new era of digital geopolitics. Also read: What’s behind the US move to limit Huawei’s AI chip production in 2025? Digital surveillance: What's the hidden ‘backdoor’ inside your phone? In cybersecurity, a ‘backdoor’ refers to a secret method of bypassing normal authentication or encryption controls on digital devices. This would potentally allow hackers, the manufacturers or even governments, to sneak inside the system without users' permission. Once accessed, calls can be quietly intercepted. Messages and photos can be accessed. Even the camera and microphone of these devices can be turned on remotely. Unlike a typical software bug, a backdoor is put there deliberatedly. Some of these could be for maintenance (remote-access of phones and computers) or law-enforcement access. It is nearly impossible to be sure who all can access a single phone using such backdoors. The backdoors, even when created for "good" intentions, could be used for exploitation. https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-china-honeytrap-west-with-beautiful-spies-1761331069743/embed China’s tech industry has long faced accusations of covert data collection In 2016, researchers found pre-installed software in some budget Android phones made in China. They were allegedly transmitting user data secretly to servers in China. Huawei and Xiaomi have often faced such allegations, but both have repeatedly denied building surveillance features into their devices. In their defence, these Chinese companies had pointed the fingers at rogue app developers or firmware vendors. Also read: US–China chip tensions rise as Taiwan blacklists Huawei: Details here Digital device snooping: No country is innocent China, however, is not the only country alleged to have used backdoors on digital devices. In the US, the "Clipper chip" sought to give the government a built-in key to encrypted phones. This was cancelled due to public backlash. The Edward Snowden leaks revealed that the US intelligence agencies like NSA, could infiltrate smartphones by intercepting them in transit and implanting spy firmware. The Israeli firm NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware created invisible backdoors on iPhones and Android devices. This controversial product, sold commercially, could allow governments worldwide to monitor journalists and activists. Russia reportedly deployed malware that could hijack soldiers’ smartphones in conflict zones. Also read: PAKISTAN SPYING on its own citizens using Chinese technology, claims Amnesty International investigation report Every phone and digital device is a potential spy While no nation publicly admits to planting consumer backdoors, nearly every major power has used digital tools to watch, listen, and gather intelligence. As cellular networks grow smarter and more connected, the line between convenience and surveillance is thinning out . Xi’s quip to Lee may have been a joke, but it echoed a deeper truth that trust in technology is as fragile as the code it runs on. Checking if your device has a backdoor is not always possible. But it's not just a matter of paranoia anymore: it’s an aspect of digital self-defence.

<p>During a recent summit, Chinese President Xi Jinping jokingly told South Korean President Lee Jae-myung to "check for any backdoor" on Xiaomi phones he gifted. Smartphone surveillance through such backdoors is not a joke, but a reality.</p>

'Check for any backdoor', Xi's light-hearted warning on phones he gifted to S Korea president. Yes, someone can crack your phone for spying

<p>There is widespread fear and speculation that the United States could launch a military operation against Venezuela, while President Donald Trump has been ambiguous about his plans for President Nicolás Maduro. Reports suggest that the US is currently undertaking the biggest military build-up in the Caribbean since 1994, when its forces intervened in Haiti. The operation is officially described as an anti-drug campaign, but it appears to go far beyond such missions.</p><h2>US Navy warships, nuclear-powered submarines near Venezuelan waters</h2><p>At least eight US Navy warships and a nuclear-powered attack submarine are operating in waters near Venezuela, according to Reuters, the Financial Times and other outlets. The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group is in the region, along with F-35 stealth fighters. Several thousand US Marines from the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group are also deployed on duty.</p><h2>Pentagon insists the mission targets “narco-terrorist networks”</h2><p>The official position of the US Department of Defense is that the deployment is aimed at targeting drug cartels such as Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua and the Cartel of the Suns. However, the scale and composition of the force suggest a broader strategic goal, according to analysts and observers. Amphibious assault ships, stealth jets, and a carrier strike group are capable of launching precision strikes and conducting limited land operations — capabilities far beyond typical anti-drug patrols. Al Jazeera reports that these forces are positioned within striking distance of Venezuela’s northern coast.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-plotting-a-regime-change-in-venezuela-why-is-he-interfering-in-other-nations-internal-politics-1761756418422">Trump plotting a regime change in Venezuela? Why is he interfering in other nations’ internal politics?</a></p><h2>Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands are activated</h2><p>Military activity has increased in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. At defence installations in these American territories, reports have emerged of aircraft refuelling, radar systems being activated, and Marine logistics units operating at a higher tempo. Social media posts have claimed that the former Roosevelt Roads Naval Station has been reopened and expanded, but this has not been verified or confirmed officially.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-dispute-hegseth-announces-new-strike-on-drug-boats-15-boats-destroyed-65-killed-1762086186407/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-dispute-hegseth-announces-new-strike-on-drug-boats-15-boats-destroyed-65-killed-1762086186407/embed</a></p><h2>US adds teeth to anti-drug operations, with deadly results</h2><p>American naval and air assets have, since early September, intercepted and destroyed multiple suspected drug-carrying vessels in Caribbean waters. At least 10 of these incidents are publicly known, resulting in more than 40 deaths at sea. There has been speculation that the CIA or US special forces have conducted lethal operations inside Venezuelan territory, but nothing has been confirmed.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-not-considering-strikes-within-venezuela-as-maduro-accuses-us-of-pushing-slanderous-narrative-to-justify-attack-1761970255648">Trump says not considering strikes within Venezuela as Maduro accuses US of pushing ‘slanderous narrative’ to justify attack</a></p><h2>Pressure mounts on Venezuelan president Maduro</h2><p>Calling the Nicolás Maduro government a criminal regime, President Trump has doubled the US reward for the Venezuelan president’s capture to 50 million dollars. Caracas has reportedly offered oil trade or mineral concessions, which the US has refused.</p><h2>Maduro digs in as Russia and China oppose unilateral US moves</h2><p>Asserting that his forces are ready to repel an invasion, Maduro has reportedly deployed troops and drones along Venezuela’s coastal states. He accused the US of preparing to seize Venezuelan oilfields under the guise of anti-drug patrols.&nbsp;</p><p>Russia and China have publicly condemned the US build-up as “excessive and destabilising.” Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has proposed regional mediation to de-escalate the situation.</p><h2>No shots fired, but tensions remain high in the region</h2><p>Although no American military action has occurred inside Venezuelan territory, there was a “near incident”, reported by The Washington Post, involving Venezuelan fighter jets buzzing a US warship. The rhetoric has escalated, matched by the scale of military deployments. The question now is whether this is a calculated pressure campaign by Trump against Maduro’s government or the prelude to a real plan for occupation.</p>

The biggest US military buildup in the Caribbean since 1994 near Venezuela is raising fears of an invasion to oust its president  Maduro. Tensions escalate despite claims that it's an anti-drug mission. What's brewing?

There is widespread fear and speculation that the United States could launch a military operation against Venezuela, while President Donald Trump has been ambiguous about his plans for President Nicolás Maduro. Reports suggest that the US is currently undertaking the biggest military build-up in the Caribbean since 1994, when its forces intervened in Haiti. The operation is officially described as an anti-drug campaign, but it appears to go far beyond such missions. US Navy warships, nuclear-powered submarines near Venezuelan waters At least eight US Navy warships and a nuclear-powered attack submarine are operating in waters near Venezuela, according to Reuters, the Financial Times and other outlets. The USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group is in the region, along with F-35 stealth fighters. Several thousand US Marines from the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group are also deployed on duty. Pentagon insists the mission targets “narco-terrorist networks” The official position of the US Department of Defense is that the deployment is aimed at targeting drug cartels such as Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua and the Cartel of the Suns. However, the scale and composition of the force suggest a broader strategic goal, according to analysts and observers. Amphibious assault ships, stealth jets, and a carrier strike group are capable of launching precision strikes and conducting limited land operations — capabilities far beyond typical anti-drug patrols. Al Jazeera reports that these forces are positioned within striking distance of Venezuela’s northern coast. Also read: Trump plotting a regime change in Venezuela? Why is he interfering in other nations’ internal politics? Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands are activated Military activity has increased in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. At defence installations in these American territories, reports have emerged of aircraft refuelling, radar systems being activated, and Marine logistics units operating at a higher tempo. Social media posts have claimed that the former Roosevelt Roads Naval Station has been reopened and expanded, but this has not been verified or confirmed officially. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-venezuela-dispute-hegseth-announces-new-strike-on-drug-boats-15-boats-destroyed-65-killed-1762086186407/embed US adds teeth to anti-drug operations, with deadly results American naval and air assets have, since early September, intercepted and destroyed multiple suspected drug-carrying vessels in Caribbean waters. At least 10 of these incidents are publicly known, resulting in more than 40 deaths at sea. There has been speculation that the CIA or US special forces have conducted lethal operations inside Venezuelan territory, but nothing has been confirmed. Also read: Trump says not considering strikes within Venezuela as Maduro accuses US of pushing ‘slanderous narrative’ to justify attack Pressure mounts on Venezuelan president Maduro Calling the Nicolás Maduro government a criminal regime, President Trump has doubled the US reward for the Venezuelan president’s capture to 50 million dollars. Caracas has reportedly offered oil trade or mineral concessions, which the US has refused. Maduro digs in as Russia and China oppose unilateral US moves Asserting that his forces are ready to repel an invasion, Maduro has reportedly deployed troops and drones along Venezuela’s coastal states. He accused the US of preparing to seize Venezuelan oilfields under the guise of anti-drug patrols. Russia and China have publicly condemned the US build-up as “excessive and destabilising.” Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has proposed regional mediation to de-escalate the situation. No shots fired, but tensions remain high in the region Although no American military action has occurred inside Venezuelan territory, there was a “near incident”, reported by The Washington Post, involving Venezuelan fighter jets buzzing a US warship. The rhetoric has escalated, matched by the scale of military deployments. The question now is whether this is a calculated pressure campaign by Trump against Maduro’s government or the prelude to a real plan for occupation.

<p>The biggest US military buildup in the Caribbean since 1994 near Venezuela is raising fears of an invasion to oust its president &nbsp;Maduro. Tensions escalate despite claims that it's an anti-drug mission. What's brewing?</p>

Biggest military build-up since 1994: Is the US planning to invade Venezuela with warships roaming seas, Puerto Rico activated?

<p>Prince Andrew is no longer a prince. The erstwhile Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, as his alleged scandalous past has caught up with him—particularly due to a voice from the grave: Virginia Giuffre, who claimed during her life, and again in her posthumous book, that she was a victim of sex trafficking involving the now-former British royal. The favourite child of the late Queen Elizabeth II, the 65-year-old former fighter pilot went from playboy to the poster boy of disgrace. At the height of his fame, Andrew was seen as a modern royal—glamorous, global, and entrepreneurial. But today, his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, stand embarrassed by the actions of their father. This is his story:</p><h2>The life of Prince Andrew: Privilege and pomp</h2><p>Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward was born on 19 February 1960 at Buckingham Palace. The third child—and second son—of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, he was known for his charm and energy.</p><p>He joined the Royal Navy in 1979 and served as a helicopter pilot during the 1982 Falklands War, flying dangerous missions that earned him recognition as a war hero. Andrew rose to the rank of lieutenant commander by 1992 and retired from active duty in 2001, later receiving honorary promotions up to vice admiral. That same year, Andrew was appointed the UK’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, promoting British business abroad, particularly in Asia and the Middle East.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/major-royal-move-king-charles-strips-andrew-of-titles-1761893567672/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/major-royal-move-king-charles-strips-andrew-of-titles-1761893567672/embed</a></p><p>His 1986 marriage to Sarah Ferguson at Westminster Abbey was a global spectacle, but the relationship was rocked by scandals and infidelity. The couple divorced in 1996 but remained close, continuing to share the Royal Lodge in Windsor.&nbsp;</p><h2>A Royal Scandal: How Epstein friendship ruined Andrew</h2><p>Andrew’s associations were controversial even in the early 2000s, particularly his dealings with authoritarian regimes such as Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. But his friendship with the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein became his ultimate undoing.</p><p>The two met around 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, a London socialite and Epstein’s then-girlfriend. According to public records, Andrew visited Epstein’s properties in New York, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean. The association continued even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex offences. Andrew hosted Epstein and Maxwell at Windsor Castle in 2006 and stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2010, supposedly to “end” their friendship. Later emails, however, revealed continued contact. Epstein also paid £15,000 towards Sarah Ferguson’s debts.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/king-charles-strips-prince-andrew-of-all-royal-titles-orders-him-out-of-windsor-home-1761872104652">King Charles strips Prince Andrew of all royal titles, orders him to vacate Windsor castle</a></p><h2>Virginia Giuffre: The woman who brought down Prince Andrew, in life and after death</h2><p>In 2014, Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s sex trafficking victims, publicly accused Andrew of sexually abusing her. The abuse, she claimed, took place after she was a trafficked as a 17-year-old in London, New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the Virgin Islands. A now-infamous photo showed Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell smiling beside them.</p><p>In public remarks, including a disastrous 2019 BBC interview, Andrew claimed to have “no recollection” of Giuffre and denied all allegations. His bizarre justifications—including a medical condition preventing him from sweating and an alibi involving a visit to Pizza Express—only made matters worse. Sponsors withdrew support, and within days, he stepped down from public duties.</p><p>Giuffre’s pursuit of justice continued. She sued Andrew in 2021 for sexual assault, and after failing to have the case dismissed, he settled out of court in February 2022 for a reported £12 million without admitting guilt. The late Queen stripped him of military roles, royal patronages, and the use of “His Royal Highness.”</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/where-will-be-prince-andrew-s-next-residence-after-royal-lodge-exit-1761898950853">Where will be Prince Andrew's next residence after Royal lodge exit?</a></p><h2>Epstein file disclosures: The brother king takes action</h2><p>In early 2025, new Epstein files released by US authorities, followed by leaked emails in which Andrew urged Epstein to stay in touch and promised to “play again,” reignited public outrage. Fresh misconduct claims emerged, and the final blow came from Giuffre’s posthumous memoir, <i>Nobody’s Girl</i>, which described Andrew as having treated her “like property.”</p><p>On October 17, Andrew relinquished his ducal titles. &nbsp;Facing mounting political and public pressure, King Charles III acted to protect the monarchy’s integrity. On Friday (Oct 31), the king formally removed his brother's “Prince” title and HRH style by royal warrant, ordering him to vacate his royal residence.</p><p>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/princess-beatrice-and-princess-eugenie-are-reportedly-not-in-the-uk-amid-prince-andrew-s-royal-title-drama-1761883624744">Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are reportedly not in the UK amid Prince Andrew’s royal title drama</a></p><p>Once a decorated naval officer and royal hero, Andrew’s swift decline into a disgraced commoner marks one of the most dramatic royal downfalls in modern British history. His legacy will now be that of an enduring cautionary tale of power, misused privilege and accountability.&nbsp;</p>

Prince Andrew, new name Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, now holds no official role or privileges. The former Duke of York has been evicted from Royal Lodge. Two dead people - sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his victim Virginia Gueffre- caused the downfall of the former British royal. But how?

Prince Andrew is no longer a prince. The erstwhile Duke of York will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, as his alleged scandalous past has caught up with him—particularly due to a voice from the grave: Virginia Giuffre, who claimed during her life, and again in her posthumous book, that she was a victim of sex trafficking involving the now-former British royal. The favourite child of the late Queen Elizabeth II, the 65-year-old former fighter pilot went from playboy to the poster boy of disgrace. At the height of his fame, Andrew was seen as a modern royal—glamorous, global, and entrepreneurial. But today, his daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, stand embarrassed by the actions of their father. This is his story: The life of Prince Andrew: Privilege and pomp Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward was born on 19 February 1960 at Buckingham Palace. The third child—and second son—of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, he was known for his charm and energy. He joined the Royal Navy in 1979 and served as a helicopter pilot during the 1982 Falklands War, flying dangerous missions that earned him recognition as a war hero. Andrew rose to the rank of lieutenant commander by 1992 and retired from active duty in 2001, later receiving honorary promotions up to vice admiral. That same year, Andrew was appointed the UK’s Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, promoting British business abroad, particularly in Asia and the Middle East. https://www.wionews.com/videos/major-royal-move-king-charles-strips-andrew-of-titles-1761893567672/embed His 1986 marriage to Sarah Ferguson at Westminster Abbey was a global spectacle, but the relationship was rocked by scandals and infidelity. The couple divorced in 1996 but remained close, continuing to share the Royal Lodge in Windsor. A Royal Scandal: How Epstein friendship ruined Andrew Andrew’s associations were controversial even in the early 2000s, particularly his dealings with authoritarian regimes such as Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya. But his friendship with the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein became his ultimate undoing. The two met around 1999 through Ghislaine Maxwell, a London socialite and Epstein’s then-girlfriend. According to public records, Andrew visited Epstein’s properties in New York, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean. The association continued even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for sex offences. Andrew hosted Epstein and Maxwell at Windsor Castle in 2006 and stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2010, supposedly to “end” their friendship. Later emails, however, revealed continued contact. Epstein also paid £15,000 towards Sarah Ferguson’s debts. Also read: King Charles strips Prince Andrew of all royal titles, orders him to vacate Windsor castle Virginia Giuffre: The woman who brought down Prince Andrew, in life and after death In 2014, Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s sex trafficking victims, publicly accused Andrew of sexually abusing her. The abuse, she claimed, took place after she was a trafficked as a 17-year-old in London, New York, and on Epstein’s private island in the Virgin Islands. A now-infamous photo showed Andrew with his arm around Giuffre’s waist, with Maxwell smiling beside them. In public remarks, including a disastrous 2019 BBC interview, Andrew claimed to have “no recollection” of Giuffre and denied all allegations. His bizarre justifications—including a medical condition preventing him from sweating and an alibi involving a visit to Pizza Express—only made matters worse. Sponsors withdrew support, and within days, he stepped down from public duties. Giuffre’s pursuit of justice continued. She sued Andrew in 2021 for sexual assault, and after failing to have the case dismissed, he settled out of court in February 2022 for a reported £12 million without admitting guilt. The late Queen stripped him of military roles, royal patronages, and the use of “His Royal Highness.” Also read: Where will be Prince Andrew's next residence after Royal lodge exit? Epstein file disclosures: The brother king takes action In early 2025, new Epstein files released by US authorities, followed by leaked emails in which Andrew urged Epstein to stay in touch and promised to “play again,” reignited public outrage. Fresh misconduct claims emerged, and the final blow came from Giuffre’s posthumous memoir, Nobody’s Girl, which described Andrew as having treated her “like property.” On October 17, Andrew relinquished his ducal titles. Facing mounting political and public pressure, King Charles III acted to protect the monarchy’s integrity. On Friday (Oct 31), the king formally removed his brother's “Prince” title and HRH style by royal warrant, ordering him to vacate his royal residence. Also read: Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are reportedly not in the UK amid Prince Andrew’s royal title drama Once a decorated naval officer and royal hero, Andrew’s swift decline into a disgraced commoner marks one of the most dramatic royal downfalls in modern British history. His legacy will now be that of an enduring cautionary tale of power, misused privilege and accountability.

<p>Prince Andrew, new name Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, now holds no official role or privileges. The former Duke of York has been evicted from Royal Lodge. Two dead people - sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his victim Virginia Giuffre- caused the downfall of the former British royal. But how?</p>

Downfall of Prince Andrew: End of Duke of York and the making of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Vinod Janardhanan

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.