<p>Moonbin, a member of the K-pop group ASTRO, was found dead at his home on Wednesday. The police suspect the 25-year-old took his own life. The truth will come out later, but the tragedy has sparked a broader conversation about mental health and the intense demands placed on those in the entertainment industry in South Korea. Moonbin is only the latest among recent deaths of young celebrities in the country, which is an East Asian entertainment giant. Actress Jung Chae-yull was found dead at her home right this very month. K-pop singers Sulli and Goo Hara both died by suicide in 2019. There are several other cases. What's sad is that most of them died very young, in their 20s or 30s.</p>

<p>The rise in popularity of the South Korean entertainment industry, a significant component of the so-called 'Korean Wave', has faced criticism globally due to its rigorous training and work regimens, exacting beauty standards, and invasive scrutiny of celebrities' personal lives.</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/k-pop-star-moonbin-from-astro-dies-at-25-police-suspect-suicide-584231">K-Pop star Moonbin from Astro dies at 25. Police suspect suicide</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>What is the Korean Wave?</strong></h2>

<p>The Korean Wave, also known as Hallyu, refers to the rapid global growth of Korean popular culture, including music, television dramas (that gave birth to a whole new genre K-drama), movies, and more. The term was first coined in the late 1990s but gained widespread recognition in the early 2000s as Korean entertainment and culture steadily gained popularity in other Asian countries. The Korean Wave has since engulfed other parts of the world, most notably the United States, Europe, and Latin America.</p>

<p>It has helped promote the country's image and enhance its soft power in the world. The country's government has actively supported it, recognising its economic potential and ability to promote Korean culture and identity globally.<br />
<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zVnlAOCRonU" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>The human cost of the Korean Wave: Is it killing the youth?</strong></h2>

<p>It is certainly true that South Korea has emerged as a global powerhouse in the entertainment industry in recent years thanks to the Korean Wave. But this rise also has a dark side. Behind all the glitz and glamour lies a human cost of the Korean wave, particularly on the country's youth.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Korean Wave has brought about a cultural shift in South Korea, with young people expected to conform to the global image of Korean pop culture. This has reportedly led to a rise in plastic surgery among young people, with many feeling pressured to undergo cosmetic procedures to conform to the idealised beauty standards perpetuated by Korean entertainment media. According to a report by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, South Korea has the highest rate of cosmetic surgery per capita in the world, with 1 in 77 South Koreans having had some form of cosmetic procedure.</p>

<p>Also Read:<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/explained-why-is-military-service-mandatory-in-south-korea-a-look-at-history-scandals-and-controversies-584360">&nbsp;Explained: Why's military service mandatory in S Korea, not sparing even BTS? Know history, controversies</a></strong></p>

<p>In addition to the pressure to look a certain way, the Korean Wave has also created a new set of social norms and expectations for young people to adhere to. South Korean youth are expected to be constantly connected and engaged with social media, as this is where the Korean Wave is most visible and influential. This constant need to be online and engaged with social media can lead to increased stress and anxiety, as young people feel pressure to maintain a certain image and reputation online.</p>

<p>The pressure to succeed constantly and be their perfect selves all the time has taken a toll on South Korean youth. The suicide rate among young people in South Korea is among the highest in the world, with suicide being the leading cause of death among young people aged 10 to 24. A 2014 poll said just over half of country's teenagers had suicidal thoughts that year. South Korea has simply the highest suicide rate among developed countries.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-decoding-the-korean-wave-553966/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Exploitative practices in entertainment industry</strong></h2>

<p>Being a celebrity in India or a western country like US and the UK is very different from being one in South Korea. The entertainment industry in the country is notoriously harsh, and all artists but those at the very top are often overworked and underpaid. Even big stars are bound into highly exploitative contracts from which it is hard to wriggle out. The pressure to maintain the image and reputation of the country means artists are subjected to profound media scrutiny and criticism, and any minor misstep or mistake can lead to severe consequences.</p>

<p>The Korean Wave has undoubtedly brought in untold economic and cultural benefits for the country, but it has also taken a heavy toll on the youth and young celebrities. The already-present pressures in Korean society have intensified, with young stars expected to look a certain way and maintain a certain image both online and offline. This leads to all sorts of adverse effects on the body and mind, and there are also issues in the entertainment industry like overwork and exploitation.</p>

<p>It's important to acknowledge the human cost of the Korean Wave. It's a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach, but it's essential to prioritise the health and well-being of young South Koreans.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Moonbin, a member of the K-pop group ASTRO, was found dead at his home on Wednesday. The police suspect the 25-year-old took his own life. The truth will come out later, but the tragedy has sparked a broader conversation about mental health and the intense demands placed on those in the entertainment industry in South Korea.

Moonbin, a member of the K-pop group ASTRO, was found dead at his home on Wednesday. The police suspect the 25-year-old took his own life. The truth will come out later, but the tragedy has sparked a broader conversation about mental health and the intense demands placed on those in the entertainment industry in South Korea. Moonbin is only the latest among recent deaths of young celebrities in the country, which is an East Asian entertainment giant. Actress Jung Chae-yull was found dead at her home right this very month. K-pop singers Sulli and Goo Hara both died by suicide in 2019. There are several other cases. What's sad is that most of them died very young, in their 20s or 30s. The rise in popularity of the South Korean entertainment industry, a significant component of the so-called 'Korean Wave', has faced criticism globally due to its rigorous training and work regimens, exacting beauty standards, and invasive scrutiny of celebrities' personal lives. Also Read: K-Pop star Moonbin from Astro dies at 25. Police suspect suicide What is the Korean Wave? The Korean Wave, also known as Hallyu, refers to the rapid global growth of Korean popular culture, including music, television dramas (that gave birth to a whole new genre K-drama), movies, and more. The term was first coined in the late 1990s but gained widespread recognition in the early 2000s as Korean entertainment and culture steadily gained popularity in other Asian countries. The Korean Wave has since engulfed other parts of the world, most notably the United States, Europe, and Latin America. It has helped promote the country's image and enhance its soft power in the world. The country's government has actively supported it, recognising its economic potential and ability to promote Korean culture and identity globally. The human cost of the Korean Wave: Is it killing the youth? It is certainly true that South Korea has emerged as a global powerhouse in the entertainment industry in recent years thanks to the Korean Wave. But this rise also has a dark side. Behind all the glitz and glamour lies a human cost of the Korean wave, particularly on the country's youth. The Korean Wave has brought about a cultural shift in South Korea, with young people expected to conform to the global image of Korean pop culture. This has reportedly led to a rise in plastic surgery among young people, with many feeling pressured to undergo cosmetic procedures to conform to the idealised beauty standards perpetuated by Korean entertainment media. According to a report by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, South Korea has the highest rate of cosmetic surgery per capita in the world, with 1 in 77 South Koreans having had some form of cosmetic procedure. Also Read: Explained: Why's military service mandatory in S Korea, not sparing even BTS? Know history, controversies In addition to the pressure to look a certain way, the Korean Wave has also created a new set of social norms and expectations for young people to adhere to. South Korean youth are expected to be constantly connected and engaged with social media, as this is where the Korean Wave is most visible and influential. This constant need to be online and engaged with social media can lead to increased stress and anxiety, as young people feel pressure to maintain a certain image and reputation online. The pressure to succeed constantly and be their perfect selves all the time has taken a toll on South Korean youth. The suicide rate among young people in South Korea is among the highest in the world, with suicide being the leading cause of death among young people aged 10 to 24. A 2014 poll said just over half of country's teenagers had suicidal thoughts that year. South Korea has simply the highest suicide rate among developed countries. Exploitative practices in entertainment industry Being a celebrity in India or a western country like US and the UK is very different from being one in South Korea. The entertainment industry in the country is notoriously harsh, and all artists but those at the very top are often overworked and underpaid. Even big stars are bound into highly exploitative contracts from which it is hard to wriggle out. The pressure to maintain the image and reputation of the country means artists are subjected to profound media scrutiny and criticism, and any minor misstep or mistake can lead to severe consequences. The Korean Wave has undoubtedly brought in untold economic and cultural benefits for the country, but it has also taken a heavy toll on the youth and young celebrities. The already-present pressures in Korean society have intensified, with young stars expected to look a certain way and maintain a certain image both online and offline. This leads to all sorts of adverse effects on the body and mind, and there are also issues in the entertainment industry like overwork and exploitation. It's important to acknowledge the human cost of the Korean Wave. It's a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach, but it's essential to prioritise the health and well-being of young South Koreans. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Explained | How Moonbin's death sheds light on K-pop's dark side and human cost of 'Korean Wave'

<p>Sam Raimi's&nbsp;<em>Evil Dead </em>franchise is an outlier, particularly when it comes to time-honoured horror franchises. It's hard to believe that the first installment was released over four decades ago, and since then, every single entry has hit the mark. Even Starz's television continuation of Ash Williams' story, Ash vs Evil Dead, captured the same deliciously gory and darkly funny spirit that made the movies so unique in the genre. With the release of Evil Dead Rise, the latest addition to the franchise, fans have been eagerly anticipating whether it will live up to the same high standards set by its predecessors. And I'm happy to report that it not only meets those expectations, but exceeds them in every way imaginable.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/top-10-greatest-horror-movies-of-all-time-529631">Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time</a></strong></p>

<p><em>Evil Dead Rise</em>&nbsp;is a movie that demands to be seen with a group of friends, preferably in a cabin deep in the woods, far away from civilisation. Though, the movie itself takes place at an apartment building. But the exigencies of the story ensure that the said apartment building be somehow stranded right between the city. So there's an earthquake that cuts power and mobile connections, and also unearths the dreaded Necronomicon Ex-Mortis. It all feels extremely contrived, but once the evil tome wreaks Deadite havoc and gore and scares pile up, one hardly cares.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/john-wick-4-movie-review-keanu-reeves-baba-yaga-wreaks-mayhem-critically-speaking-575558/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>A young female roadie called Beth (Lily Sullivan) finds herself pregnant so visits her sister Ellie (Alyssa Sutherland), a single mother, and her children — Danny (Morgan Davies), Bridget (Gabrielle Echols), and the youngest Kassie (Nell Fisher). The aforementioned earthquake causes a hole to open in the parking lot, revealing religious artifacts, including the Book of the Dead. Danny reads the book's incantations, and a demonic entity possesses Ellie. It is up to Beth to try and keep her sister's kids safe from the person she has become.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The best part about <em>Evil Dead Rise</em> is that it is a very typical <em>Evil Dead</em> movie. Minus Bruce Campbell's middle-aged, witty presence as Ash, the film does feel like it has been directed by Raimi. Director Lee Cronin does a truly swell job of capturing the frenzied, over-the-top, humour-tinged brand of horror that is unique to the franchise. The pacing, with a steady buildup of tension that explodes into a frenzied climax, is just right for an<em> Evil Dead</em> movie.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/BqQNO7BzN08" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>The 97-odd minutes pass in a jiffy, with each scene building upon the last to create a terrifying and pulse-pounding experience. Cronin also injects the movie with a healthy dose of dark humour and wit. In the spirit of the franchise, the film also manages to deliver some truly impressive practical effects, with a greater reliance on old-school techniques rather than CGI.</p>

<p>Sutherland, who I remember as Aslaug from the TV series Vikings, makes for a quite terrifying Deadite. It is understandable that her image is used liberally in the film's marketing. She fully embraces the role, bringing a sense of menace and otherworldly possession that is both frightening and captivating. Sullivan and the kids are all great too. &nbsp;</p>

<p>I believe <em>Evil Dead Rise</em> is a worthy addition to the franchise. It delivers pretty much everything fans of the series have come to expect – gore, scares, and dark humour. You just have to get past a couple of plot contrivances.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Sam Raimi's Evil Dead franchise is an outlier, particularly when it comes to time-honoured horror franchises. It's hard to believe that the first installment was released over four decades ago, and since then, every single entry has hit the mark.

Sam Raimi's Evil Dead franchise is an outlier, particularly when it comes to time-honoured horror franchises. It's hard to believe that the first installment was released over four decades ago, and since then, every single entry has hit the mark. Even Starz's television continuation of Ash Williams' story, Ash vs Evil Dead, captured the same deliciously gory and darkly funny spirit that made the movies so unique in the genre. With the release of Evil Dead Rise, the latest addition to the franchise, fans have been eagerly anticipating whether it will live up to the same high standards set by its predecessors. And I'm happy to report that it not only meets those expectations, but exceeds them in every way imaginable. Also Read: Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time Evil Dead Rise is a movie that demands to be seen with a group of friends, preferably in a cabin deep in the woods, far away from civilisation. Though, the movie itself takes place at an apartment building. But the exigencies of the story ensure that the said apartment building be somehow stranded right between the city. So there's an earthquake that cuts power and mobile connections, and also unearths the dreaded Necronomicon Ex-Mortis. It all feels extremely contrived, but once the evil tome wreaks Deadite havoc and gore and scares pile up, one hardly cares. A young female roadie called Beth (Lily Sullivan) finds herself pregnant so visits her sister Ellie (Alyssa Sutherland), a single mother, and her children — Danny (Morgan Davies), Bridget (Gabrielle Echols), and the youngest Kassie (Nell Fisher). The aforementioned earthquake causes a hole to open in the parking lot, revealing religious artifacts, including the Book of the Dead. Danny reads the book's incantations, and a demonic entity possesses Ellie. It is up to Beth to try and keep her sister's kids safe from the person she has become. The best part about Evil Dead Rise is that it is a very typical Evil Dead movie. Minus Bruce Campbell's middle-aged, witty presence as Ash, the film does feel like it has been directed by Raimi. Director Lee Cronin does a truly swell job of capturing the frenzied, over-the-top, humour-tinged brand of horror that is unique to the franchise. The pacing, with a steady buildup of tension that explodes into a frenzied climax, is just right for an Evil Dead movie. The 97-odd minutes pass in a jiffy, with each scene building upon the last to create a terrifying and pulse-pounding experience. Cronin also injects the movie with a healthy dose of dark humour and wit. In the spirit of the franchise, the film also manages to deliver some truly impressive practical effects, with a greater reliance on old-school techniques rather than CGI. Sutherland, who I remember as Aslaug from the TV series Vikings, makes for a quite terrifying Deadite. It is understandable that her image is used liberally in the film's marketing. She fully embraces the role, bringing a sense of menace and otherworldly possession that is both frightening and captivating. Sullivan and the kids are all great too. I believe Evil Dead Rise is a worthy addition to the franchise. It delivers pretty much everything fans of the series have come to expect – gore, scares, and dark humour. You just have to get past a couple of plot contrivances. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Evil Dead Rise movie review: A demonic delight that'll haunt your dreams

<p>The mandatory military service in South Korea has suddenly become one of the hot topics of conversation as K-pop singer and BTS member Jung Ho-seok, more popular by his stage-name J-Hope, became the second member of the boy band to enter the mandatory military service on Tuesday (April 18). In December last year, Kim Seok-jin or Jin, the eldest of the group at 30, had become the first BTS member to enlist as an active duty soldier. Earlier in June 2022, BTS had announced that owing to upcoming conscriptions of band members, the group will go on a hiatus. The members will eventually reunite in 2025. Jin and J-Hope are only two of the personalities in the East Asian country who have had to put their successful professions on hold to fulfill their mandatory military service.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In South Korea, military service of 18 to 21 months is compulsory for physically fit men aged between 18 and 35, though there have been rare exemptions. So how did military service come to be mandatory in South Korea? When did it come into existence? We answer your every question.</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/i-will-be-back-bts-j-hope-pens-goodbye-note-before-military-enlistment-debuts-his-buzz-cut-look-583410">I will be back! BTS' J-Hope pens goodbye note before military enlistment, debuts his buzz cut look</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>History of conscription in South Korea</strong></h2>

<p>After Japanese surrendered at the end of World War II, Korea was divided into two occupation zones, with the northern part occupied by Soviet Union and the southern part occupied by the United States. The two world powers were unable to come to agreement on a joint trusteeship, and the two Koreas as they currently stand came into being: the Soviet-aligned Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the America-aligned FNirst Republic of Korea, with both claiming the full control of the peninsula. These are what we know today as North Korea and South Korea, respectively.</p>

<p>Conscription was enshrined in the South Korean constitution right from the beginning. Article 39 reads, "All citizens shall have the duty of national defence under the conditions as prescribed by Act." But it was only in 1957 that it became mandatory.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bts-star-j-hope-begins-south-korean-military-enlistment-566387/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>The duration of the service was initially set at 30 months but has since been reduced to between 18 and 21 months. Since its establishment, mandatory military service has been a constant and integral aspect of Korean society. It was partly borne out of the need to defend against North Korean aggression as the war between the two countries is technically still going on.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There have been several changes to the criteria for exemption or deferment from military service over the years. Sole breadwinners of their family or those with exceptional talents in certain areas, such as sports or music, may be exempted or have their service period shortened.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Mandatory military service is popularly considered a rite of passage for young men in South Korea and has played a crucial role in maintaining the country's national defence.</p>

<h2><strong>How does conscription work?</strong></h2>

<p>After turning 19 years old according to the Korean age system (read it up, it's rather interesting), all South Korean men are required to undergo a thorough medical examination to determine their eligibility for military service. The results of the exam can lead to three possible outcomes. If the individual is deemed healthy, they are required to serve in the armed forces. Those who are found not to be in good physical condition are considered unsuitable for military service and may instead perform civil service in public institutions. Finally, individuals who have physical or psychological conditions that prevent them from serving in any capacity may be exempted from service altogether.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/south-korea-bts-member-jins-first-military-picture-goes-viral-546525/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Controversies and scandals</strong></h2>

<p>There are opponents of South Korean conscription. There have been exemptions, and not all of them have had to do with the person not being fit to serve. The exemption system was installed in 1973 by then-president Park Chung-hee, aimed at artists and athletes with considerable achievements. Son Heung-min, a South Korean footballer playing with Tottenham Hotspur, was exempted from the full service after the national team won the gold medal at the 2018's Asian Games, but still had to serve a shorter service.</p>

<p>It is also something of a taboo not to serve. If somebody is found to have evaded conscription, they are sometimes looked at with scorn and suspicion. Many companies require military service in the candidates' CVs when hiring.</p>

<p>Many also successfully end up evading conscription. Pop singer Yoo Seung-jun became a naturalised US citizen in 2002 just before his military service draft. South Korean government deemed this an act of desertion and subsequently deported him, banning him from returning to the country permanently. The ban was lifted later.</p>

<p>There was talk of BTS members being exempted too, with their fans saying that the group had made significant contributions to the promotion of the Korean culture. But the stars themselves expressed willingness to enlist, something that is expected in the country from upstanding citizens.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/exclusive-k-pop-band-blackswan-on-wion-553850/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Conscientious objections and impact</strong></h2>

<p>Apart from the wider controversies in the practice of conscription, there are also many conscientious objectors to conscription, as they believe it has caused militarism to seep into the daily life of the country's people. And they have been successful in bringing the government down on its knees on the issue. Until recently, all able-bodied men were required to serve about two years in the military or face criminal penalties, including imprisonment. However, for those who objected to serving on ethical or religious grounds, there was no legal alternative. This meant that conscientious objectors had to either serve in the military against their beliefs or face punishment.</p>

<p>This practice came under scrutiny by human rights groups and international organisations, including the United Nations, which criticised the country for violating the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. In 2018, the South Korean Constitutional Court ruled that the government must introduce alternative civilian service for conscientious objectors by the end of 2019. The court stated that punishing conscientious objectors with imprisonment was unconstitutional and a violation of individual rights.</p>

<p>In response, the South Korean government passed a bill in 2019 allowing conscientious objectors to perform alternative service in non-military roles for 36 months. The government also began to review cases of conscientious objectors who had been imprisoned before the law was enacted, with many being released early.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


The mandatory military service in South Korea has suddenly become one of the hot topics of conversation as K-pop singer and BTS member Jung Ho-seok, more popular by his stage-name J-Hope, became the second member of the boy band to enter the mandatory military service on Tuesday (April 18).

The mandatory military service in South Korea has suddenly become one of the hot topics of conversation as K-pop singer and BTS member Jung Ho-seok, more popular by his stage-name J-Hope, became the second member of the boy band to enter the mandatory military service on Tuesday (April 18). In December last year, Kim Seok-jin or Jin, the eldest of the group at 30, had become the first BTS member to enlist as an active duty soldier. Earlier in June 2022, BTS had announced that owing to upcoming conscriptions of band members, the group will go on a hiatus. The members will eventually reunite in 2025. Jin and J-Hope are only two of the personalities in the East Asian country who have had to put their successful professions on hold to fulfill their mandatory military service. In South Korea, military service of 18 to 21 months is compulsory for physically fit men aged between 18 and 35, though there have been rare exemptions. So how did military service come to be mandatory in South Korea? When did it come into existence? We answer your every question. Also Read: I will be back! BTS' J-Hope pens goodbye note before military enlistment, debuts his buzz cut look History of conscription in South Korea After Japanese surrendered at the end of World War II, Korea was divided into two occupation zones, with the northern part occupied by Soviet Union and the southern part occupied by the United States. The two world powers were unable to come to agreement on a joint trusteeship, and the two Koreas as they currently stand came into being: the Soviet-aligned Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the America-aligned FNirst Republic of Korea, with both claiming the full control of the peninsula. These are what we know today as North Korea and South Korea, respectively. Conscription was enshrined in the South Korean constitution right from the beginning. Article 39 reads, "All citizens shall have the duty of national defence under the conditions as prescribed by Act." But it was only in 1957 that it became mandatory. The duration of the service was initially set at 30 months but has since been reduced to between 18 and 21 months. Since its establishment, mandatory military service has been a constant and integral aspect of Korean society. It was partly borne out of the need to defend against North Korean aggression as the war between the two countries is technically still going on. There have been several changes to the criteria for exemption or deferment from military service over the years. Sole breadwinners of their family or those with exceptional talents in certain areas, such as sports or music, may be exempted or have their service period shortened. Mandatory military service is popularly considered a rite of passage for young men in South Korea and has played a crucial role in maintaining the country's national defence. How does conscription work? After turning 19 years old according to the Korean age system (read it up, it's rather interesting), all South Korean men are required to undergo a thorough medical examination to determine their eligibility for military service. The results of the exam can lead to three possible outcomes. If the individual is deemed healthy, they are required to serve in the armed forces. Those who are found not to be in good physical condition are considered unsuitable for military service and may instead perform civil service in public institutions. Finally, individuals who have physical or psychological conditions that prevent them from serving in any capacity may be exempted from service altogether. Controversies and scandals There are opponents of South Korean conscription. There have been exemptions, and not all of them have had to do with the person not being fit to serve. The exemption system was installed in 1973 by then-president Park Chung-hee, aimed at artists and athletes with considerable achievements. Son Heung-min, a South Korean footballer playing with Tottenham Hotspur, was exempted from the full service after the national team won the gold medal at the 2018's Asian Games, but still had to serve a shorter service. It is also something of a taboo not to serve. If somebody is found to have evaded conscription, they are sometimes looked at with scorn and suspicion. Many companies require military service in the candidates' CVs when hiring. Many also successfully end up evading conscription. Pop singer Yoo Seung-jun became a naturalised US citizen in 2002 just before his military service draft. South Korean government deemed this an act of desertion and subsequently deported him, banning him from returning to the country permanently. The ban was lifted later. There was talk of BTS members being exempted too, with their fans saying that the group had made significant contributions to the promotion of the Korean culture. But the stars themselves expressed willingness to enlist, something that is expected in the country from upstanding citizens. Conscientious objections and impact Apart from the wider controversies in the practice of conscription, there are also many conscientious objectors to conscription, as they believe it has caused militarism to seep into the daily life of the country's people. And they have been successful in bringing the government down on its knees on the issue. Until recently, all able-bodied men were required to serve about two years in the military or face criminal penalties, including imprisonment. However, for those who objected to serving on ethical or religious grounds, there was no legal alternative. This meant that conscientious objectors had to either serve in the military against their beliefs or face punishment. This practice came under scrutiny by human rights groups and international organisations, including the United Nations, which criticised the country for violating the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. In 2018, the South Korean Constitutional Court ruled that the government must introduce alternative civilian service for conscientious objectors by the end of 2019. The court stated that punishing conscientious objectors with imprisonment was unconstitutional and a violation of individual rights. In response, the South Korean government passed a bill in 2019 allowing conscientious objectors to perform alternative service in non-military roles for 36 months. The government also began to review cases of conscientious objectors who had been imprisoned before the law was enacted, with many being released early. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Explained: Why's military service mandatory in S Korea, not sparing even BTS? Know history, controversies

<p>The announcement regarding the new<em> Harry Potter </em>TV series in development has nonplussed many, this scribe included. For one, a franchise barely 10 year older does not need a reboot. But the execs at Warner Bros Discovery would not be denied. They shall indeed have their reboot. But there is something to be said about the poverty of imagination if we are going to follow the same old story involving Harry Potter and the overarching conflict against Dark Wizard Lord Voldemort. Considering how rich and detailed the <em>Harry Potter</em> universe (also called <em>Wizarding World</em>) is, it is a shame.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Instead of again telling the story we already know intimately, the series should instead take a new direction and explore different stories and time periods in the Wizarding World.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Also Read: <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/offical-harry-potter-tv-series-is-coming-to-ott-platform-max-581941">Official! Harry Potter TV series is coming to OTT platform Max</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>The founding of Hogwarts</strong></h2>

<p>The Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry was founded around the 9th century and 10th century by four powerful wizards: Godric Gryffindor, Rowena Ravenclaw, Helga Hufflepuff and Salazar Slytherin. They sound like fascinating characters and also their presence still looms large in the present time. A standalone TV show could get deep into their characters and their motivations for creating the school.</p>

<h2><strong>The Marauders</strong></h2>

<p>And then there are the Marauders. A mischievous and yet brilliant group of young Gryffindors wizards (Remus Lupin, Peter Pettigrew, Sirius Black, and James Potter) they were not only pranksters during their time at Hogwarts, but they also left Marauder's Map, an object that helped future generations of troublemakers — including Harry, Hermione, and Ron. The series could delve into the friendships and rivalries between the four boys, as well as their interactions with other characters like Lily Evans and Severus Snape.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Also Read: <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-why-rebooting-harry-potter-franchise-as-a-tv-series-makes-no-sense-579752">Why rebooting Harry Potter franchise as a TV series makes NO sense</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>The rise of Voldemort</strong></h2>

<p>While we don't need to see another retelling of Voldemort's showdown with Harry Potter, we could explore his rise to power in more detail. The TV series could delve into his early years at Hogwarts and his gradual descent into darkness. We could see how he became interested in the dark arts and how he began recruiting followers. How his charisma and ability to attract people to this undoubtedly evil cause, and not just his unparalleled skills, played a part in him becoming the most powerful Dark Wizard the world had ever seen. The series could also explore the rise of the Death Eaters.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/harry-potter-making-a-comeback-with-tv-series-announcement-582127/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>The Ministry of Magic</strong></h2>

<p>The <em>Harry Potter </em>movies did show us the inner workings of the Ministry of Magic, but a TV series could delve into how it operates and how Aurors, for instance, confront threats to the Wizarding World. We could see the political manoeuvring and power struggles that go on behind the scenes</p>

<h2><strong>Fresh characters and stories</strong></h2>

<p>There are many different corners of the Wizarding World that we have yet to explore, and the TV series could take us there. We could see how other wizarding schools operate, or how magical creatures interact with each other. Perhaps introduced a hitherto-new or little know character and tell their story.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


The announcement regarding the new Harry Potter TV series in development has nonplussed many, this scribe included. For one, a franchise barely 10 year older does not need a reboot.

The announcement regarding the new Harry Potter TV series in development has nonplussed many, this scribe included. For one, a franchise barely 10 year older does not need a reboot. But the execs at Warner Bros Discovery would not be denied. They shall indeed have their reboot. But there is something to be said about the poverty of imagination if we are going to follow the same old story involving Harry Potter and the overarching conflict against Dark Wizard Lord Voldemort. Considering how rich and detailed the Harry Potter universe (also called Wizarding World) is, it is a shame. Instead of again telling the story we already know intimately, the series should instead take a new direction and explore different stories and time periods in the Wizarding World. Also Read: Official! Harry Potter TV series is coming to OTT platform Max The founding of Hogwarts The Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry was founded around the 9th century and 10th century by four powerful wizards: Godric Gryffindor, Rowena Ravenclaw, Helga Hufflepuff and Salazar Slytherin. They sound like fascinating characters and also their presence still looms large in the present time. A standalone TV show could get deep into their characters and their motivations for creating the school. The Marauders And then there are the Marauders. A mischievous and yet brilliant group of young Gryffindors wizards (Remus Lupin, Peter Pettigrew, Sirius Black, and James Potter) they were not only pranksters during their time at Hogwarts, but they also left Marauder's Map, an object that helped future generations of troublemakers — including Harry, Hermione, and Ron. The series could delve into the friendships and rivalries between the four boys, as well as their interactions with other characters like Lily Evans and Severus Snape. Also Read: Why rebooting Harry Potter franchise as a TV series makes NO sense The rise of Voldemort While we don't need to see another retelling of Voldemort's showdown with Harry Potter, we could explore his rise to power in more detail. The TV series could delve into his early years at Hogwarts and his gradual descent into darkness. We could see how he became interested in the dark arts and how he began recruiting followers. How his charisma and ability to attract people to this undoubtedly evil cause, and not just his unparalleled skills, played a part in him becoming the most powerful Dark Wizard the world had ever seen. The series could also explore the rise of the Death Eaters. The Ministry of Magic The Harry Potter movies did show us the inner workings of the Ministry of Magic, but a TV series could delve into how it operates and how Aurors, for instance, confront threats to the Wizarding World. We could see the political manoeuvring and power struggles that go on behind the scenes Fresh characters and stories There are many different corners of the Wizarding World that we have yet to explore, and the TV series could take us there. We could see how other wizarding schools operate, or how magical creatures interact with each other. Perhaps introduced a hitherto-new or little know character and tell their story. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Instead of rebooting Harry Potter, the TV series can explore these Wizarding World stories

<p>“They said the age of heroes would never come again," says Gal Gadot's <em>Wonder Woman</em> wonderingly in 2017's <em>Justice League</em>, referring to the rise of metahumans (DC's in-universe term for superheroes) like herself, Superman, the Flash, and so on. It has indeed come in our world, and I cannot wait for it to be over. No, we are&nbsp;not beset by (that we know of) by intergalactic warlords like Steppenwolf or Darkseid and there aren't any&nbsp;spandex-clad creatures flying or swinging through our cities, shooting laser beams from their eyes or web from gadgets and whatnot. What I do see is, as a movie buff, a cinematic landscape overrun by superhero movies, movies based on established IPs, sequels, prequels, and remakes.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There is some indication that your typical moviegoer may be worn out by the inundation of cinema halls by these kinds of movies over the last decade and a half. There is a new hunger for original content in the air. But movie studios may be slow to catch up, which would surprise absolutely no one.</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained-how-disney-is-trying-hard-not-to-fail-as-marvel-magic-wanes-563335">Explained: How Disney is trying hard not to fail as Marvel magic wanes</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Why studios are retreating to time-hallowed franchises</strong></h2>

<p>From Disney to Warner Bros Discovery, movie studios are falling back to old, tried-and-tested intellectual properties (IPs). After removing Bob Chapek as CEO, Disney announced "restructuring" which inevitably meant layoffs. 7,000 employees (3 per cent of its workforce) lost their jobs. Bob Iger, who had also led the company through its most profitable tenure from 2005 to 2020, was brought in from retirement and he quickly made it clear that his priority is profit. Earlier, in his original tenure he had expanded aggressively by acquiring valuable (in terms of popular appeal and expected returns) IPs like Pixar, <em>Star Wars, Indiana Jones,</em> and Marvel Entertainment. Now, he means to cash in on all that IP goodness to earn moolah and bring the company back on track.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/five-great-superhero-movies-that-are-not-dc-or-marvel-510918/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>The company recently announced <em>Toy Story 5, Frozen 3</em>, and <em>Zootopia 2</em>. The MCU juggernaut will not stop until remains profitable for the company. And judging purely by the box office numbers, the movies in the cinematic universe remain moneymaking and this may be just a brief lull after the mega extravaganzas that were the last two Avengers movies.&nbsp;</p>

<p>At Warner Bros, or more accurately Warner Bros Discovery, the new CEO of the entity David Zaslav was also handed the reins of a beleaguered, loss-making company. And his response, too, was predictably dismal. Under his watch, the $90 million <em>Batgirl </em>movie, which was already relegated to an HBO Max (RIP!) streaming release, was cancelled altogether for presumably tax write-off purposes. He cancelled or put on sale a lot of other stuff, and at the same time announced an ambitious 10-year plan for the floundering DC property.&nbsp;</p>

<p>He instated James Gunn and his producing partner Peter Safran as co-heads of DC Studios, a successor to DC Films. This approach might actually do some good to DC movies, but it might be too little, too late.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-marvels-loss-is-dcs-gain-how-james-gunn-can-cash-in-on-mcus-struggles-to-outdo-competition-540504">Marvel's loss is DC's gain: How DC Studios can cash in on MCU's struggles to outdo competition</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Is a focus on big-budget blockbusters new?</strong></h2>

<p>To be fair, all that isn't new. Ever since Steven Spielberg invented the modern blockbuster with 1975's <em>Jaws</em>, crowd-pleasers have dominated the box office charts. But things have never been so heavily skewed towards franchises and sequels as they are now. In the past, successful movies would often inspire sequels or spin-offs, but they were not the only game in town. There was still room for original stories to be told, and they could often find success on their own merits.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/10-marvel-dc-characters-who-need-their-own-movies-511168/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>With each new instalment of a successful franchise, the stakes are higher, and the budgets become larger. This creates a cycle of dependence, where studios feel the need to keep churning out sequels and prequels to meet the demand for more content from fans. There are people I know who get nonplussed while watching Marvel movies unless they come across a mention or connection or reference or Easter egg to another character or movie within the MCU every fifteen minutes or so. It is all unchallenging fluff that is not suited for the discerning movie buff.</p>

<p>Also, the COVID-19 pandemic may have hit a mortal blow to the theatrical experience as we know it. Now, a lot of people prefer staying at home unless the film provides spectacle and boasts of lots of visual effects.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In a nutshell, things have never been so dire.</p>

<p>Also Read: <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained-from-the-matrix-to-the-terminator-how-artificial-intelligence-in-cinema-reflects-our-hopes-fears-577331">Explained: From The Matrix to The Terminator, how artificial intelligence in cinema reflects our hopes, fears</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Why big studios are usually loath&nbsp;to finance original films&nbsp;</strong></h2>

<p>The trend may be seeing an encouraging reversal, but for the most part, movies based on original ideas are becoming rare, and it is now unheard&nbsp;of&nbsp;an original movie not backed by a major director or star&nbsp;being financed by any of the big studios. A24 is one exception as it is one indie studio that has done a unique thing of turning itself into a brand, a place, where you can watch weird, exciting, and auteur-driven movies.</p>

<p>But as I said, A24 is an exception to the rule. So why do big studios rarely put their weight behind original stuff? One major factor is the current business model of the film industry, which seriously needs an overhaul. It places a premium on big-budget blockbusters and franchises that have a proven track record of success. As a result, studios are more likely to invest in sequels, remakes, and adaptations of popular books, comics, or video games rather than taking risks on untested ideas.</p>

<p>Also Read:<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--controversy-around-friends-a-classic-sitcom-or-a-relic-of-a-less-diverse-era-577770">&nbsp;Explained | Controversy around Friends: A classic sitcom or a relic of a less diverse era?</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Financing original content will actually benefit studios</strong></h2>

<p>And we know from recent developments, the execs making those stupid decisions are misguided. A24's <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-%E2%80%98everything-everywhere-all-at-once%E2%80%99-movie-review-this-michelle-yeoh-starrer-is-a-cinematic-miracle-516701"><em>Everything Everywhere All At Once</em> </a></strong>became a worldwide phenomenon on a budget of $14.3–25 million, grossing more than $139 million. And of course, it took pretty much every major award at the Oscars. Even Rian Johnson's <em>Knives Out</em> was made on only (in blockbuster terms) $40 million and went on to gross $311.9 million. These movies are proof that clever, creative marketing can propel compelling stories to success even if a Tom Cruise or a Dwayne Johnson is not involved in the project.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


“They said the age of heroes would never come again," says Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman wonderingly in 2017's Justice League, referring to the rise of metahumans (DC's in-universe term for superheroes) like herself, Superman, the Flash, and so on.

“They said the age of heroes would never come again," says Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman wonderingly in 2017's Justice League, referring to the rise of metahumans (DC's in-universe term for superheroes) like herself, Superman, the Flash, and so on. It has indeed come in our world, and I cannot wait for it to be over. No, we are not beset by (that we know of) by intergalactic warlords like Steppenwolf or Darkseid and there aren't any spandex-clad creatures flying or swinging through our cities, shooting laser beams from their eyes or web from gadgets and whatnot. What I do see is, as a movie buff, a cinematic landscape overrun by superhero movies, movies based on established IPs, sequels, prequels, and remakes. There is some indication that your typical moviegoer may be worn out by the inundation of cinema halls by these kinds of movies over the last decade and a half. There is a new hunger for original content in the air. But movie studios may be slow to catch up, which would surprise absolutely no one. Also Read: Explained: How Disney is trying hard not to fail as Marvel magic wanes Why studios are retreating to time-hallowed franchises From Disney to Warner Bros Discovery, movie studios are falling back to old, tried-and-tested intellectual properties (IPs). After removing Bob Chapek as CEO, Disney announced "restructuring" which inevitably meant layoffs. 7,000 employees (3 per cent of its workforce) lost their jobs. Bob Iger, who had also led the company through its most profitable tenure from 2005 to 2020, was brought in from retirement and he quickly made it clear that his priority is profit. Earlier, in his original tenure he had expanded aggressively by acquiring valuable (in terms of popular appeal and expected returns) IPs like Pixar, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and Marvel Entertainment. Now, he means to cash in on all that IP goodness to earn moolah and bring the company back on track. The company recently announced Toy Story 5, Frozen 3, and Zootopia 2. The MCU juggernaut will not stop until remains profitable for the company. And judging purely by the box office numbers, the movies in the cinematic universe remain moneymaking and this may be just a brief lull after the mega extravaganzas that were the last two Avengers movies. At Warner Bros, or more accurately Warner Bros Discovery, the new CEO of the entity David Zaslav was also handed the reins of a beleaguered, loss-making company. And his response, too, was predictably dismal. Under his watch, the $90 million Batgirl movie, which was already relegated to an HBO Max (RIP!) streaming release, was cancelled altogether for presumably tax write-off purposes. He cancelled or put on sale a lot of other stuff, and at the same time announced an ambitious 10-year plan for the floundering DC property. He instated James Gunn and his producing partner Peter Safran as co-heads of DC Studios, a successor to DC Films. This approach might actually do some good to DC movies, but it might be too little, too late. Also Read: Marvel's loss is DC's gain: How DC Studios can cash in on MCU's struggles to outdo competition Is a focus on big-budget blockbusters new? To be fair, all that isn't new. Ever since Steven Spielberg invented the modern blockbuster with 1975's Jaws, crowd-pleasers have dominated the box office charts. But things have never been so heavily skewed towards franchises and sequels as they are now. In the past, successful movies would often inspire sequels or spin-offs, but they were not the only game in town. There was still room for original stories to be told, and they could often find success on their own merits. With each new instalment of a successful franchise, the stakes are higher, and the budgets become larger. This creates a cycle of dependence, where studios feel the need to keep churning out sequels and prequels to meet the demand for more content from fans. There are people I know who get nonplussed while watching Marvel movies unless they come across a mention or connection or reference or Easter egg to another character or movie within the MCU every fifteen minutes or so. It is all unchallenging fluff that is not suited for the discerning movie buff. Also, the COVID-19 pandemic may have hit a mortal blow to the theatrical experience as we know it. Now, a lot of people prefer staying at home unless the film provides spectacle and boasts of lots of visual effects. In a nutshell, things have never been so dire. Also Read: Explained: From The Matrix to The Terminator, how artificial intelligence in cinema reflects our hopes, fears Why big studios are usually loath to finance original films The trend may be seeing an encouraging reversal, but for the most part, movies based on original ideas are becoming rare, and it is now unheard of an original movie not backed by a major director or star being financed by any of the big studios. A24 is one exception as it is one indie studio that has done a unique thing of turning itself into a brand, a place, where you can watch weird, exciting, and auteur-driven movies. But as I said, A24 is an exception to the rule. So why do big studios rarely put their weight behind original stuff? One major factor is the current business model of the film industry, which seriously needs an overhaul. It places a premium on big-budget blockbusters and franchises that have a proven track record of success. As a result, studios are more likely to invest in sequels, remakes, and adaptations of popular books, comics, or video games rather than taking risks on untested ideas. Also Read: Explained | Controversy around Friends: A classic sitcom or a relic of a less diverse era? Financing original content will actually benefit studios And we know from recent developments, the execs making those stupid decisions are misguided. A24's Everything Everywhere All At Once became a worldwide phenomenon on a budget of $14.3–25 million, grossing more than $139 million. And of course, it took pretty much every major award at the Oscars. Even Rian Johnson's Knives Out was made on only (in blockbuster terms) $40 million and went on to gross $311.9 million. These movies are proof that clever, creative marketing can propel compelling stories to success even if a Tom Cruise or a Dwayne Johnson is not involved in the project. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Is originality dead in Hollywood? Why studios are ditching original movies for reboots and sequels

RDR 2, BioShock, Dragon Age & other video games that need movies or TV adaptation

<p>"It's not TV. It's HBO" is more than just a marketing catchphrase. It now defines HBO. The premium cable network has brought us some of the finest TV over several decades. Unlike the approach of throwing money blindly at anything that might sell that is popular these days, HBO has stuck with a curated outlook. It's the same old quality over quantity style. And, what do you know, it works. Practically every other HBO show becomes a phenomenon. From the gritty streets of Baltimore to the epic battlefields of Westeros, the network has consistently delivered some of the best television out there. The HBO brand, however, may be in peril right now. And not because of any competition.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Warner Bros Discovery, the new entity that emerged after the merger between two entertainment giants, has changed the name of HBO Max to just Max. Since then, many have been stupefied over the decision to remove the HBO tag, which has signified quality for such a long time, and not Max, which is painfully generic.&nbsp;</p>

<p>HBO, as we know it, is alive at the moment. But who knows what the corporate overlords of the company will decide next, considering 'HBO' is no longer a profitable brand name in their books. Before the beloved network dies, though, let's celebrate it by listing the top 10 HBO shows. So, without further ado, let's dive into the top 10 HBO shows of all time (according to me, of course).</p>

<h2><strong>1.<em> The Wire</em></strong></h2>

<p>Widely considered one of the greatest TV dramas of all time, <em>The Wire </em>depicts the interconnecting lives of various characters in Baltimore, from drug dealers and police officers to politicians and journalists. The show's creators, led by David Simon, meticulously researched and crafted each season to provide a nuanced and realistic portrayal of life in the city. The writing is exceptional, the acting superb, and the social commentary insightful.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/w7gGsZNQRyQ" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>2. <em>The Sopranos</em></strong></h2>

<p>A close second, <em>The Sopranos</em> centres around New Jersey mob boss Tony Soprano and his struggles to balance his family life with his criminal activities. The show features complex characters, sharp writing, and a pitch-dark sense of humour that sets it apart from other crime dramas. James Gandolfini's performance as Tony Soprano is for me the best screen performance ever.</p>

<h2><strong>3. <em>Rome</em></strong></h2>

<p>This historical drama takes viewers back to ancient Rome during the rise of Julius Caesar and then Augustus. The show's attention to detail, from the costumes to the sets, is mind-boggling, and the writing deftly weaves together historical events with fictional storylines. The ensemble cast, including Kevin McKidd, Ray Stevenson, Polly Walker, and Ciarán Hinds, delivers strong performances throughout the show's two seasons.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/PbMKc17EtGI" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>4. <em>Game of Thrones</em></strong></h2>

<p>Based on George R.R. Martin's fantasy book series, <em>Game of Thrones</em> became a cultural phenomenon during its eight-season run. The show's complex plot, shocking twists, and large ensemble cast kept viewers on the edge of their seats. While the final season received mixed reviews, there's no denying the impact the show had on popular culture and the TV industry as a whole.</p>

<h2><strong>5. <em>Succession</em></strong></h2>

<p>This dark comedy-drama follows the wealthy and dysfunctional Roy family, who own a global media conglomerate. The show features a stellar cast, including Brian Cox, Jeremy Strong, and Sarah Snook, and the writing is sharp and biting. Succession's examination of wealth, power, and family dynamics makes for a compelling (and often uncomfortable) watch.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1UdLrRbHmr8" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>6. <em>Curb Your Enthusiasm</em></strong></h2>

<p>Larry David's semi-autobiographical show follows his misadventures and social faux pas in Los Angeles. The show's unique blend of cringe humour and improvisation sets it apart from other comedies, and David's character is both relatable and frustrating. The show has been praised for its ability to capture the absurdities of everyday life.</p>

<h2><strong>7. <em>Deadwood</em></strong></h2>

<p>Set in the lawless town of Deadwood, South Dakota during the late 1800s, this Western drama features a rich cast of characters and explores themes of power, corruption, and morality. The writing, led by David Milch, is lyrical and vivid, and the performances from the likes of Ian McShane and Timothy Olyphant are superb. While the show was cancelled after three seasons, it remains a cult favorite among fans. There is a movie too that ties up loose threads.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Eq8JXKJA1GY" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>8. <em>Veep</em></strong></h2>

<p>This political satire stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Selina Meyer, a former vice president who becomes president after her predecessor resigns. The show skewers the inner workings of Washington D.C., with biting wit and sharp writing. The ensemble cast, including Tony Hale and Anna Chlumsky, delivers top-notch performances, and Louis-Dreyfus' portrayal of Meyer is both hilarious and cringe-inducing.</p>

<h2><strong>9. <em>Six Feet Under</em></strong></h2>

<p>This drama explores the lives of the Fisher family, who run a funeral home in Los Angeles. The show's exploration of death, grief, and family dynamics is poignant and thought-provoking, and the writing is top-notch. The ensemble cast, including Peter Krause and Michael C. Hall, delivers outstanding performances, and the show's finale is widely regarded as one of the best in TV history. The show's creator, Alan Ball, was also responsible for the critically acclaimed American Beauty and True Blood.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/MagdQwVaOtM" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>10. <em>Boardwalk Empire</em></strong></h2>

<p>Set in Atlantic City during the Prohibition era, <em>Boardwalk Empire</em> stars Steve Buscemi as a corrupt politician and bootlegger Enoch "Nucky" Thompson. The show features a strong ensemble cast and impressive period detail, with each episode feeling like a mini-movie. The writing, led by Terence Winter, is nuanced and complex, with themes of power, greed, and morality explored throughout the series.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


"It's not TV. It's HBO" is more than just a marketing catchphrase. It now defines HBO. The premium cable network has brought us some of the finest TV over several decades.

"It's not TV. It's HBO" is more than just a marketing catchphrase. It now defines HBO. The premium cable network has brought us some of the finest TV over several decades. Unlike the approach of throwing money blindly at anything that might sell that is popular these days, HBO has stuck with a curated outlook. It's the same old quality over quantity style. And, what do you know, it works. Practically every other HBO show becomes a phenomenon. From the gritty streets of Baltimore to the epic battlefields of Westeros, the network has consistently delivered some of the best television out there. The HBO brand, however, may be in peril right now. And not because of any competition. Warner Bros Discovery, the new entity that emerged after the merger between two entertainment giants, has changed the name of HBO Max to just Max. Since then, many have been stupefied over the decision to remove the HBO tag, which has signified quality for such a long time, and not Max, which is painfully generic. HBO, as we know it, is alive at the moment. But who knows what the corporate overlords of the company will decide next, considering 'HBO' is no longer a profitable brand name in their books. Before the beloved network dies, though, let's celebrate it by listing the top 10 HBO shows. So, without further ado, let's dive into the top 10 HBO shows of all time (according to me, of course). 1. The Wire Widely considered one of the greatest TV dramas of all time, The Wire depicts the interconnecting lives of various characters in Baltimore, from drug dealers and police officers to politicians and journalists. The show's creators, led by David Simon, meticulously researched and crafted each season to provide a nuanced and realistic portrayal of life in the city. The writing is exceptional, the acting superb, and the social commentary insightful. 2. The Sopranos A close second, The Sopranos centres around New Jersey mob boss Tony Soprano and his struggles to balance his family life with his criminal activities. The show features complex characters, sharp writing, and a pitch-dark sense of humour that sets it apart from other crime dramas. James Gandolfini's performance as Tony Soprano is for me the best screen performance ever. 3. Rome This historical drama takes viewers back to ancient Rome during the rise of Julius Caesar and then Augustus. The show's attention to detail, from the costumes to the sets, is mind-boggling, and the writing deftly weaves together historical events with fictional storylines. The ensemble cast, including Kevin McKidd, Ray Stevenson, Polly Walker, and Ciarán Hinds, delivers strong performances throughout the show's two seasons. 4. Game of Thrones Based on George R.R. Martin's fantasy book series, Game of Thrones became a cultural phenomenon during its eight-season run. The show's complex plot, shocking twists, and large ensemble cast kept viewers on the edge of their seats. While the final season received mixed reviews, there's no denying the impact the show had on popular culture and the TV industry as a whole. 5. Succession This dark comedy-drama follows the wealthy and dysfunctional Roy family, who own a global media conglomerate. The show features a stellar cast, including Brian Cox, Jeremy Strong, and Sarah Snook, and the writing is sharp and biting. Succession's examination of wealth, power, and family dynamics makes for a compelling (and often uncomfortable) watch. 6. Curb Your Enthusiasm Larry David's semi-autobiographical show follows his misadventures and social faux pas in Los Angeles. The show's unique blend of cringe humour and improvisation sets it apart from other comedies, and David's character is both relatable and frustrating. The show has been praised for its ability to capture the absurdities of everyday life. 7. Deadwood Set in the lawless town of Deadwood, South Dakota during the late 1800s, this Western drama features a rich cast of characters and explores themes of power, corruption, and morality. The writing, led by David Milch, is lyrical and vivid, and the performances from the likes of Ian McShane and Timothy Olyphant are superb. While the show was cancelled after three seasons, it remains a cult favorite among fans. There is a movie too that ties up loose threads. 8. Veep This political satire stars Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Selina Meyer, a former vice president who becomes president after her predecessor resigns. The show skewers the inner workings of Washington D.C., with biting wit and sharp writing. The ensemble cast, including Tony Hale and Anna Chlumsky, delivers top-notch performances, and Louis-Dreyfus' portrayal of Meyer is both hilarious and cringe-inducing. 9. Six Feet Under This drama explores the lives of the Fisher family, who run a funeral home in Los Angeles. The show's exploration of death, grief, and family dynamics is poignant and thought-provoking, and the writing is top-notch. The ensemble cast, including Peter Krause and Michael C. Hall, delivers outstanding performances, and the show's finale is widely regarded as one of the best in TV history. The show's creator, Alan Ball, was also responsible for the critically acclaimed American Beauty and True Blood. 10. Boardwalk Empire Set in Atlantic City during the Prohibition era, Boardwalk Empire stars Steve Buscemi as a corrupt politician and bootlegger Enoch "Nucky" Thompson. The show features a strong ensemble cast and impressive period detail, with each episode feeling like a mini-movie. The writing, led by Terence Winter, is nuanced and complex, with themes of power, greed, and morality explored throughout the series. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

From The Wire to The Sopranos, top 10 HBO shows of all time

<p>It's a bird, it's a plane, it's...Mario? I must admit, I was sceptical going into <em>The Super Mario Bros. Movie</em>. Video game adaptations have a&nbsp;reputation for being terrible, but this one wasn't half bad. It's colourful, fast-paced, and delivers some satisfying fan service for longtime fans of the Mario franchise. But this is also clear that this movie was made more for the fans than for the general movie-going audience. With a plot so thin you could roll it up and stick it in your pocket, it relies heavily on nostalgia and Easter eggs to carry it along.</p>

<p><em>The Super Mario Bros. Movie</em> follows the story of Mario (Chris Pratt) and Luigi (Charlie Day), two plumbers from Brooklyn who get sucked into a Warp Pipe and end up in different kingdoms. Mario ends up in the Mushroom Kingdom ruled by Princess Peach (Anya Taylor Joy), while Luigi lands in the Dark Lands ruled by the Koopa king Bowser (Jack Black). Bowser plans to marry Peach and destroy the Mushroom Kingdom if that fails. He imprisons Luigi to blackmail Mario, who he sees as competition for Peach's favour. It is the classic Mario story.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TnGl01FkMMo" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>Let's start with the good. The animation is pretty nice, bursting with vibrant colours and fluid movements that make it feel like you are watching the characters from some of the newer versions of the video game come to life on the big screen. The Mushroom Kingdom and the Dark Lands are brought to life in truly stunning detail. The action is also mostly exciting, with plenty of jumping, running, chasing, getting power-ups, and dodging fireballs and rivers of lava involved. There are nods to the original games scattered throughout the movie, from the recognisable sound effects and musical cues to the power-ups like the Super Star and the Cat Suit.&nbsp;</p>

<p>However, the movie's overreliance on nostalgia and fan service also proves to be its downfall. The plot feels like an afterthought, a mere vehicle to showcase the various locations and characters from the games. It is barely more than a flimsy excuse to string together a series of set pieces. Voice actors do their best with what they are given, but there's only so much one can do with such thinly written roles. The dialogue in the movie is a lacklustre affair, punctuated by trite quips that seem to be directly lifted from a low-budget animated series.</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-super-mario-bros-movie-from-a-plumber-to-a-global-sensation-the-fascinating-origin-story-of-mario-579630"><em>Super Mario Bros Movie: </em>From a plumber to a global sensation, the fascinating origin story of Mario</a></strong></p>

<p>In the grand scheme of things, <em>The Super Mario Bros. Movie</em> is a small blip on the radar of video game adaptations. It's not the worst one out there, but it's certainly not the best. However, it's a testament to the enduring popularity of the Mario franchise that people are still interested in seeing these characters on the big screen, even after all these years. One of the strengths of these games has always been their ability to appeal to a wide range of audiences. Kids and adults alike can enjoy the colourful worlds and zany characters that populate the games. The movie is able to capture that same sense of joy and wonder, bringing to life its world in a way that feels true to the source material.</p>

<p><em>The Super Mario Bros. Movie </em>is not exactly very 'super', but it is&nbsp;still a fun, nostalgic trip down memory lane that's worth checking out for fans of the franchise. Just remember to check your expectations at the Warp Pipe.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


It's a bird, it's a plane, it's...Mario? I must admit, I was sceptical going into The Super Mario Bros. Movie. Video game adaptations have a reputation for being terrible, but this one wasn't half bad.

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's...Mario? I must admit, I was sceptical going into The Super Mario Bros. Movie. Video game adaptations have a reputation for being terrible, but this one wasn't half bad. It's colourful, fast-paced, and delivers some satisfying fan service for longtime fans of the Mario franchise. But this is also clear that this movie was made more for the fans than for the general movie-going audience. With a plot so thin you could roll it up and stick it in your pocket, it relies heavily on nostalgia and Easter eggs to carry it along. The Super Mario Bros. Movie follows the story of Mario (Chris Pratt) and Luigi (Charlie Day), two plumbers from Brooklyn who get sucked into a Warp Pipe and end up in different kingdoms. Mario ends up in the Mushroom Kingdom ruled by Princess Peach (Anya Taylor Joy), while Luigi lands in the Dark Lands ruled by the Koopa king Bowser (Jack Black). Bowser plans to marry Peach and destroy the Mushroom Kingdom if that fails. He imprisons Luigi to blackmail Mario, who he sees as competition for Peach's favour. It is the classic Mario story. Let's start with the good. The animation is pretty nice, bursting with vibrant colours and fluid movements that make it feel like you are watching the characters from some of the newer versions of the video game come to life on the big screen. The Mushroom Kingdom and the Dark Lands are brought to life in truly stunning detail. The action is also mostly exciting, with plenty of jumping, running, chasing, getting power-ups, and dodging fireballs and rivers of lava involved. There are nods to the original games scattered throughout the movie, from the recognisable sound effects and musical cues to the power-ups like the Super Star and the Cat Suit. However, the movie's overreliance on nostalgia and fan service also proves to be its downfall. The plot feels like an afterthought, a mere vehicle to showcase the various locations and characters from the games. It is barely more than a flimsy excuse to string together a series of set pieces. Voice actors do their best with what they are given, but there's only so much one can do with such thinly written roles. The dialogue in the movie is a lacklustre affair, punctuated by trite quips that seem to be directly lifted from a low-budget animated series. Also Read: Super Mario Bros Movie: From a plumber to a global sensation, the fascinating origin story of Mario In the grand scheme of things, The Super Mario Bros. Movie is a small blip on the radar of video game adaptations. It's not the worst one out there, but it's certainly not the best. However, it's a testament to the enduring popularity of the Mario franchise that people are still interested in seeing these characters on the big screen, even after all these years. One of the strengths of these games has always been their ability to appeal to a wide range of audiences. Kids and adults alike can enjoy the colourful worlds and zany characters that populate the games. The movie is able to capture that same sense of joy and wonder, bringing to life its world in a way that feels true to the source material. The Super Mario Bros. Movie is not exactly very 'super', but it is still a fun, nostalgic trip down memory lane that's worth checking out for fans of the franchise. Just remember to check your expectations at the Warp Pipe. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

The Super Mario Bros Movie review: A sojourn to Nostalgia Land

<p><em>Renfield </em>is almost here. Directed by Chris McKay, the film has Nicolas Cage portraying Count Dracula, a fictional vampire from Bram Stoker's landmark 1897 epistolary novel <em>Dracula</em>. Nicholas Hoult essays the titular R. M. Renfield, the Count's assistant who is desperate to get out of the powerful vampire's grasp. For centuries now, he has had the unsavoury task of bringing his boss innocent victims like nuns and cheerleaders so he could feast on them. There have been countless adaptations of&nbsp;<em>Dracula </em>over the years, spanning from films and television shows to stage productions and even video games. However, some adaptations stand out as particularly exceptional, either for their faithfulness to the source material, their creativity, or their impact on the popular imagination. Here are 10 of the best <em>Dracula </em>adaptations, listed in no particular order:</p>

<p>Also Read:&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/top-10-greatest-horror-movies-of-all-time-529631">Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time</a></strong></p>

<p><em><strong>Nosferatu (1922)</strong></em></p>

<p>This silent German Expressionist film was an unofficial adaptation of Stoker's novel, as the filmmakers were unable to secure the rights to the story. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most iconic portrayals of the vampire, with Max Schreck's haunting performance as Count Orlok inspiring countless imitations in the years since its release.</p>

<p><strong><em>Dracula (1931)</em></strong></p>

<p>This classic Universal horror film starring Bela Lugosi is perhaps the most famous adaptation of the novel, and helped establish many of the tropes that have since become associated with the vampire genre. Lugosi's suave and menacing portrayal of the Count set the standard for future adaptations, and the film's influence can still be felt today.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Q6QlpJWNTvw" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p><em><strong>Dracula (1979)</strong></em></p>

<p>This lavish adaptation starring Frank Langella as Dracula and Laurence Olivier as Van Helsing is notable for its romantic approach to the story, which emphasises the tragic love story between the Count and Mina Harker. While it takes some liberties with the source material, the film's lush production design and strong performances make it a standout adaptation.</p>

<p><em><strong>Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)</strong></em></p>

<p>Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, this film is perhaps the most visually stunning adaptation of the novel, with its lush Gothic sets and elaborate costumes. The film also features a strong cast, with Gary Oldman's transformative performance as Dracula and Anthony Hopkins' scene-stealing turn as Van Helsing.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CjgwUB1CXek" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p><em><strong>Dracula (2020)</strong></em></p>

<p>This recent Netflix series takes a fresh approach to the story, updating it for a modern audience and incorporating new elements that set it apart from previous adaptations. The show's diverse cast and emphasis on female characters, including a new protagonist in the form of Agatha Van Helsing, make it a timely and engaging take on the classic tale.</p>

<p><em><strong>Dracula (BBC, 2019)</strong></em></p>

<p>This three-part miniseries from the BBC and Netflix takes a similarly modern approach to the story, but with a darker and more sinister tone. Claes Bang's portrayal of the Count is both charismatic and chilling, and the series includes some surprising twists and turns that keep viewers on the edge of their seats.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7a6YFwC2zKA" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p><em><strong>The Hunger (1983)</strong></em></p>

<p>While not a direct adaptation of Dracula, this stylish and sensual horror film has many of the same themes and motifs, including the allure of eternal youth and the dangers of succumbing to one's own desires. David Bowie's haunting performance as a vampire musician is a standout, and the film's moody atmosphere and striking visuals make it a cult classic.</p>

<p><em><strong>Shadow of the Vampire (2000)</strong></em></p>

<p>This meta-fictional film imagines that Max Schreck, the actor who played Count Orlok in Nosferatu, was actually a real vampire who was hired to star in the film. Willem Dafoe's performance as Schreck/Orlok is both hilarious and terrifying, and the film offers a unique perspective on the making of one of the most iconic vampire movies of all time.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3fdRKme00uI" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p><em><strong>Van Helsing (2004)</strong></em></p>

<p>While not the most critically acclaimed film on this list, Van Helsing is a fun and action-packed romp that brings together many of the most iconic characters from the Dracula mythos, including Dracula himself, Van Helsing, and the Wolf Man. The film's over-the-top action sequences and CGI-heavy visuals may not be to everyone's taste, but it's hard to deny the sheer entertainment value of this monster mash-up.</p>

<p><em><strong>Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's Diary (2002)</strong></em></p>

<p>This unique adaptation is actually a ballet film, directed by Guy Maddin and choreographed by Mark Godden. The film uses elements of silent cinema and avant-garde art to create a surreal and dreamlike interpretation of the story, with inventive dance sequences and striking black-and-white cinematography. While it may not be the most traditional adaptation, it's certainly one of the most beautiful.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Renfield is almost here. Directed by Chris McKay, the film has Nicolas Cage portraying Count Dracula, a fictional vampire from Bram Stoker's landmark 1897 epistolary novel Dracula.

Renfield is almost here. Directed by Chris McKay, the film has Nicolas Cage portraying Count Dracula, a fictional vampire from Bram Stoker's landmark 1897 epistolary novel Dracula. Nicholas Hoult essays the titular R. M. Renfield, the Count's assistant who is desperate to get out of the powerful vampire's grasp. For centuries now, he has had the unsavoury task of bringing his boss innocent victims like nuns and cheerleaders so he could feast on them. There have been countless adaptations of Dracula over the years, spanning from films and television shows to stage productions and even video games. However, some adaptations stand out as particularly exceptional, either for their faithfulness to the source material, their creativity, or their impact on the popular imagination. Here are 10 of the best Dracula adaptations, listed in no particular order: Also Read: Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time Nosferatu (1922) This silent German Expressionist film was an unofficial adaptation of Stoker's novel, as the filmmakers were unable to secure the rights to the story. Nevertheless, it remains one of the most iconic portrayals of the vampire, with Max Schreck's haunting performance as Count Orlok inspiring countless imitations in the years since its release. Dracula (1931) This classic Universal horror film starring Bela Lugosi is perhaps the most famous adaptation of the novel, and helped establish many of the tropes that have since become associated with the vampire genre. Lugosi's suave and menacing portrayal of the Count set the standard for future adaptations, and the film's influence can still be felt today. Dracula (1979) This lavish adaptation starring Frank Langella as Dracula and Laurence Olivier as Van Helsing is notable for its romantic approach to the story, which emphasises the tragic love story between the Count and Mina Harker. While it takes some liberties with the source material, the film's lush production design and strong performances make it a standout adaptation. Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, this film is perhaps the most visually stunning adaptation of the novel, with its lush Gothic sets and elaborate costumes. The film also features a strong cast, with Gary Oldman's transformative performance as Dracula and Anthony Hopkins' scene-stealing turn as Van Helsing. Dracula (2020) This recent Netflix series takes a fresh approach to the story, updating it for a modern audience and incorporating new elements that set it apart from previous adaptations. The show's diverse cast and emphasis on female characters, including a new protagonist in the form of Agatha Van Helsing, make it a timely and engaging take on the classic tale. Dracula (BBC, 2019) This three-part miniseries from the BBC and Netflix takes a similarly modern approach to the story, but with a darker and more sinister tone. Claes Bang's portrayal of the Count is both charismatic and chilling, and the series includes some surprising twists and turns that keep viewers on the edge of their seats. The Hunger (1983) While not a direct adaptation of Dracula, this stylish and sensual horror film has many of the same themes and motifs, including the allure of eternal youth and the dangers of succumbing to one's own desires. David Bowie's haunting performance as a vampire musician is a standout, and the film's moody atmosphere and striking visuals make it a cult classic. Shadow of the Vampire (2000) This meta-fictional film imagines that Max Schreck, the actor who played Count Orlok in Nosferatu, was actually a real vampire who was hired to star in the film. Willem Dafoe's performance as Schreck/Orlok is both hilarious and terrifying, and the film offers a unique perspective on the making of one of the most iconic vampire movies of all time. Van Helsing (2004) While not the most critically acclaimed film on this list, Van Helsing is a fun and action-packed romp that brings together many of the most iconic characters from the Dracula mythos, including Dracula himself, Van Helsing, and the Wolf Man. The film's over-the-top action sequences and CGI-heavy visuals may not be to everyone's taste, but it's hard to deny the sheer entertainment value of this monster mash-up. Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's Diary (2002) This unique adaptation is actually a ballet film, directed by Guy Maddin and choreographed by Mark Godden. The film uses elements of silent cinema and avant-garde art to create a surreal and dreamlike interpretation of the story, with inventive dance sequences and striking black-and-white cinematography. While it may not be the most traditional adaptation, it's certainly one of the most beautiful. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Before Renfield, 10 top Dracula adaptations from Nosferatu to Van Helsing

Every upcoming Marvel movie! The Marvels, Avengers 5, Guardians of the Galaxy 3, & more

From Ned Stark to Logan Roy: Most shocking TV deaths that left fans reeling

<p><strong>Succession season 4 episode 3:&nbsp;</strong>The death of Logan Roy in the HBO series <em>Succession </em>has left audiences, including this scribe, reeling. Who knew an episode titled Connor's Wedding' will take the wind out of so many collective sails? The episode itself was a tour-de-force in television writing and acting, and might just be the best episode of the show. It made me (and, I expect, most of you) grieve for somebody who was basically a monster. He was known for his ruthless business tactics, uncompromising demeanour, and almost eerie ability to manipulate those around him to maintain his power and control. He also thrived on his bullying, overcoming ill health by the sheer force of his will.</p>

<p>With Logan gone, there is a power vacuum at the top of Waystar Royco, a media conglomerate that he built from the ground up and controlled with an iron fist.&nbsp;</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HSm-4kCs3I4" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>The consequences of Logan's death</strong></h2>

<p>There are going to have far-reaching consequences for the Roys and the media industry as a whole. Logan had a complex relationship with his children. His four offspring — Kendall, Roman, Shiv, and Connor — have all been affected in different ways by his passing. Kendall, who had been vying for control of the company and battling his father for years, was forced to confront the reality of his loss and his own shortcomings as a son.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As he sees it, he had been so consumed by his desire to take over Waystar Royco that he had lost sight of the emotional cost of his actions. The weight of his father's death will weigh heavily on him. He realises that his relationship with Logan had been defined by power struggles rather than love and affection. That is mostly Logan's fault, of course, but Kendall is not going to see it that way. Because, and this is important, he is not his father.</p>

<p>Roman, on the other hand, had always been the most subservient of the children. He had long struggled with his father's expectations and often found himself playing second fiddle to his siblings. His guilt over the last words he ever spoke to his father (where he called him c*nt for forcing him to apprise Gerri about her dismissal from the company) on voicemail that Logan may or may not have checked will endure. The suddenness of his father's demise only makes his feelings of remorse more acute. He even might feel that those last words may have played a role in the death of Logan.</p>

<p>Shiv, the only daughter in the family, had earlier been trying to forge her own path away from the Roy family. She had moved to New York and taken a job in politics, distancing herself from the family's media empire. However, Logan's illness and the ensuing power struggle pulled her back into the fold, forcing her to confront the legacy and future of Waystar Royco. She was torn between her loyalty to her family and her desire to chart her own course. Now that Logan is dead, she lost the father who, in his own twisted way, loved her the most among his kids.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/1UdLrRbHmr8" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>And then there was Connor, the black sheep of the family. He had always been something of an outsider, estranged from his siblings and often mocked by his father. His relationship with Logan was strained at best, and he struggled to come to terms with the fact that his father had never truly loved him. Logan's sudden passing has left Connor with a mix of emotions, from grief to bitterness, and he found keeping busy and going on with the marriage was one way of dealing with his grief.&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Succession season 4 episode 3:&nbsp;The impact of Logan's death goes beyond the Roys</strong></h2>

<p>But the impact of Logan's death will not be limited to his children. The entire media industry was thrown into chaos as the news of his passing spread. Waystar Royco, the company that Logan had built, was now without a clear leader. Shareholders, employees, and competitors were left wondering what would happen next. The power struggles that had defined the Roy family were now playing out on a much larger stage.</p>

<p>In the wake of Logan's death, the Roys are forced to come together to mourn their loss and figure out what to do next. The question of who would take over Waystar Royco looms large, with each of the children jockeying for position. Kendall is the obvious choice, but his past mistakes made him a risky pick. Roman had been loyal to his father but lacks the experience to lead. Shiv is a wildcard, with her loyalty to the family in question. And Connor was a long shot, with little experience in the media industry.</p>

<p>The power struggles that had been simmering beneath the surface of the family dynamic will now play out in full view. Each of the children will have to confront their own motivations and desires, as well as their relationships with each other. The legacy of Logan Roy hangs over them like a cloud, and the question of whether they could preserve it or tear it apart will be a constant source of tension for the rest of the episodes.</p>

<p>The road ahead is filled with twists, turns, and heartbreak. Logan Roy's death, after all, shook the foundation of the Roy family and the media industry as a whole, leaving behind a legacy that will be felt for years to come.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Succession season 4 episode 3: The death of Logan Roy in the HBO series Succession has left audiences, including this scribe, reeling. Who knew an episode titled Connor's Wedding' will take the wind out of so many collective sails?

Succession season 4 episode 3: The death of Logan Roy in the HBO series Succession has left audiences, including this scribe, reeling. Who knew an episode titled Connor's Wedding' will take the wind out of so many collective sails? The episode itself was a tour-de-force in television writing and acting, and might just be the best episode of the show. It made me (and, I expect, most of you) grieve for somebody who was basically a monster. He was known for his ruthless business tactics, uncompromising demeanour, and almost eerie ability to manipulate those around him to maintain his power and control. He also thrived on his bullying, overcoming ill health by the sheer force of his will. With Logan gone, there is a power vacuum at the top of Waystar Royco, a media conglomerate that he built from the ground up and controlled with an iron fist. The consequences of Logan's death There are going to have far-reaching consequences for the Roys and the media industry as a whole. Logan had a complex relationship with his children. His four offspring — Kendall, Roman, Shiv, and Connor — have all been affected in different ways by his passing. Kendall, who had been vying for control of the company and battling his father for years, was forced to confront the reality of his loss and his own shortcomings as a son. As he sees it, he had been so consumed by his desire to take over Waystar Royco that he had lost sight of the emotional cost of his actions. The weight of his father's death will weigh heavily on him. He realises that his relationship with Logan had been defined by power struggles rather than love and affection. That is mostly Logan's fault, of course, but Kendall is not going to see it that way. Because, and this is important, he is not his father. Roman, on the other hand, had always been the most subservient of the children. He had long struggled with his father's expectations and often found himself playing second fiddle to his siblings. His guilt over the last words he ever spoke to his father (where he called him c*nt for forcing him to apprise Gerri about her dismissal from the company) on voicemail that Logan may or may not have checked will endure. The suddenness of his father's demise only makes his feelings of remorse more acute. He even might feel that those last words may have played a role in the death of Logan. Shiv, the only daughter in the family, had earlier been trying to forge her own path away from the Roy family. She had moved to New York and taken a job in politics, distancing herself from the family's media empire. However, Logan's illness and the ensuing power struggle pulled her back into the fold, forcing her to confront the legacy and future of Waystar Royco. She was torn between her loyalty to her family and her desire to chart her own course. Now that Logan is dead, she lost the father who, in his own twisted way, loved her the most among his kids. And then there was Connor, the black sheep of the family. He had always been something of an outsider, estranged from his siblings and often mocked by his father. His relationship with Logan was strained at best, and he struggled to come to terms with the fact that his father had never truly loved him. Logan's sudden passing has left Connor with a mix of emotions, from grief to bitterness, and he found keeping busy and going on with the marriage was one way of dealing with his grief. Succession season 4 episode 3: The impact of Logan's death goes beyond the Roys But the impact of Logan's death will not be limited to his children. The entire media industry was thrown into chaos as the news of his passing spread. Waystar Royco, the company that Logan had built, was now without a clear leader. Shareholders, employees, and competitors were left wondering what would happen next. The power struggles that had defined the Roy family were now playing out on a much larger stage. In the wake of Logan's death, the Roys are forced to come together to mourn their loss and figure out what to do next. The question of who would take over Waystar Royco looms large, with each of the children jockeying for position. Kendall is the obvious choice, but his past mistakes made him a risky pick. Roman had been loyal to his father but lacks the experience to lead. Shiv is a wildcard, with her loyalty to the family in question. And Connor was a long shot, with little experience in the media industry. The power struggles that had been simmering beneath the surface of the family dynamic will now play out in full view. Each of the children will have to confront their own motivations and desires, as well as their relationships with each other. The legacy of Logan Roy hangs over them like a cloud, and the question of whether they could preserve it or tear it apart will be a constant source of tension for the rest of the episodes. The road ahead is filled with twists, turns, and heartbreak. Logan Roy's death, after all, shook the foundation of the Roy family and the media industry as a whole, leaving behind a legacy that will be felt for years to come. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Succession season 4 episode 3: After Logan's death, what's next for the Roys?

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Kshitij Mohan Rawat

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.