Pentagon announced on Monday that it had awarded Raytheon, an RTX business, a $22.9 billion US Navy contract aimed at rapidly expanding production of Tomahawk cruise missiles. This comes amid concerns about inventories of air defence and precision-guided ​weapons amid the war in Iran."The Department called upon industry to expand munitions production, and RTX has answered that call,” said Michael P Duffey, the under secretary of defence for acquisition and sustainment. “This Tomahawk award increases our ability to equip the Joint Force, ensuring our Warfighters never face a fair fight.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/andy-burnham-susie-wiles-impersonator-security-breach-1786974370048">UK PM Andy Burnham duped by Trump's aide Susie Wiles impersonator in security breach</a>Think-tank analyses, including reports from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), noted that active conflicts have heavily drained US stockpiles of long-range precision weapons and air-defence interceptors. The deal is meant to accelerate manufacturing capacity to build more than 1,000 Tomahawk missiles per year. It is a seven-year, multi-year procurement contract for &nbsp;RTX Corporation, which currently makes just 60 a year. Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile used by the US Navy for its precision strike ​capability.“Guaranteeing our naval and joint forces have the lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount,” said Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao. “This landmark $22.9 billion investment will accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed.”&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Pentagon has awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion US Navy contract to rapidly expand Tomahawk missile production amid concerns over depleted US weapons stockpiles.

Pentagon announced on Monday that it had awarded Raytheon, an RTX business, a $22.9 billion US Navy contract aimed at rapidly expanding production of Tomahawk cruise missiles. This comes amid concerns about inventories of air defence and precision-guided weapons amid the war in Iran. "The Department called upon industry to expand munitions production, and RTX has answered that call,” said Michael P Duffey, the under secretary of defence for acquisition and sustainment. “This Tomahawk award increases our ability to equip the Joint Force, ensuring our Warfighters never face a fair fight.” Also Read: UK PM Andy Burnham duped by Trump's aide Susie Wiles impersonator in security breach Think-tank analyses, including reports from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), noted that active conflicts have heavily drained US stockpiles of long-range precision weapons and air-defence interceptors. The deal is meant to accelerate manufacturing capacity to build more than 1,000 Tomahawk missiles per year. It is a seven-year, multi-year procurement contract for RTX Corporation, which currently makes just 60 a year. Tomahawk is a long-range cruise missile used by the US Navy for its precision strike capability. “Guaranteeing our naval and joint forces have the lethal firepower they need to deter aggression and protect the homeland is paramount,” said Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao. “This landmark $22.9 billion investment will accelerate Tomahawk missile delivery to our warfighters at unprecedented speed.”

The Pentagon has awarded Raytheon a $22.9 billion US Navy contract to rapidly expand Tomahawk missile production amid concerns over depleted US weapons stockpiles.

Pentagon awards Raytheon $22.9 billion contract to ramp up Tomahawk missile production

Japan marked the 81st anniversary of the Hiroshima atomic bombing with a solemn peace ceremony, reaffirming its commitment to its long-standing non-nuclear principles. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba emphasized that the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki must never be repeated. The commemoration comes as Japan simultaneously undertakes its largest defense buildup since World War II in response to growing security concerns posed by China and North Korea, highlighting the country's delicate balance between peace and national security.

August 6, 1945: Around 140,000 People Perished in Hiroshima Bombing

Japan has marked the 81st anniversary of the Hiroshima atomic bombing, with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba reaffirming the country's commitment to its long-standing non-nuclear principles.

Thousands gathered at Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park to honor the victims of the world's first atomic bombing on August 6, 1945. During the ceremony, Japan pledged to continue supporting global nuclear disarmament while maintaining its commitment to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The commemoration comes as Japan undertakes its largest military buildup since World War II, citing growing regional security challenges from China, North Korea, and closer Russia-China-North Korea cooperation. The country recently conducted its first live-fire test of a U.S.-made Tomahawk cruise missile, highlighting its expanding conventional defense capabilities.

Japan Honors Hiroshima Victims While Expanding Military Capabilities | Hiroshima Anniversary

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.&nbsp;<h2>&nbsp;A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered.&nbsp;Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/f-35-b-21-advanced-drones-trump-s-1-5-trillion-defence-budget-prioritises-750-billion-for-ships-jets-golden-dome-1776786954360">F-35, B-21 &amp; advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome</a>&nbsp;<h2>High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire.&nbsp;Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM)Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments.&nbsp;Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM)More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-too-old-too-slow-too-expensive-us-air-force-is-keeping-a-10-warthog-until-2030-despite-retirement-calls-why-1776768344552">‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why?</a>&nbsp;Precision Strike Missile (PrSM)The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems.&nbsp;Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system.&nbsp;Patriot (PAC-3 MSE)Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-golden-grip-on-hormuz-why-gulf-fears-us-iran-talks-in-pakistan-risk-handing-tehran-control-of-middle-east-energy-lifeline-1776760786907">‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline</a>&nbsp;<h2>The scale of usage</h2>&nbsp;The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.&nbsp;

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

Concern over US munitions stockpiles has intensified after heavy use of Tomahawk, Patriot and other missiles in the Iran war. With a fragile ceasefire in place, a clearer picture has emerged: the United States has not run out of missiles, but has come close to testing the limits of its arsenal. Analysis of seven key munitions, conducted by the Centre of Strategic and International Studies, shows sufficient capacity to sustain this war under any plausible scenario. The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness. A War Fought at Unsustainable Intensity In just 39 days of air and missile operations over Iran, the United States expended enormous volumes of high-end munitions. For four of the seven critical munitions analysed, the US may have used more than 50 per cent of its pre-war inventory. This is not marginal depletion, but it is a structural drawdown of core capabilities that underpin modern warfare. CSIS notes: Rebuilding to prewar levels for the seven munitions will take from one to four years as missiles in the pipeline are delivered. Reduced inventories are also likely to constrain US supplies of Patriot, THAAD, and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) to Ukraine and other allies that depend on them. As stockpiles tighten, Washington will increasingly compete with partner nations seeking to rebuild their own arsenals, adding pressure to already stretched production lines. The challenge is further compounded by shifting dynamics among allies, with Japan recently opening the door to expanded arms exports, signalling a more active role in the global defence supply chain and probably intensifying competition for critical munitions and systems. ALSO READ: F-35, B-21 & advanced drones: Trump’s $1.5 trillion defence budget prioritises $750 billion for ships, jets and Golden Dome High-Tempo Strikes Strain High-End Munitions During the conflict, US forces struck over 13,000 targets in just 39 days, reflecting an exceptionally high operational tempo. As Iranian air defences were degraded, operations gradually shifted towards shorter-range, more readily available munitions. However, this transition was only partial. The United States continued to rely on long-range precision missiles for targets beyond reach or heavily defended, sustaining pressure on high-end inventories right up to the ceasefire. Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM) Tomahawk missiles, in service since the 1980s, have seen sustained operational use, but the Iran conflict marked an intense surge. CSIS says, US naval forces fired over 850 TLAMs in the first month, with totals likely exceeding 950 before the ceasefire. The strain is already visible: Japan’s planned delivery of 400 Tomahawks may be delayed, signalling pressure on both US inventories and allied commitments. Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) More than 1,000 JASSMs were expended in the first month of operations, with an additional ~180 likely used before the ceasefire. Sustained sorties by B-52 bombers from UK bases kept demand high until the end. The scale of use highlights the missile’s central role in long-range strike operations—and the growing stress on high-end precision strike inventories. ALSO READ: ‘Too old, too slow, too expensive’: US Air Force is keeping A-10 Warthog until 2030 despite retirement calls. Why? Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) The PrSM, still in early deployment, was used extensively against diverse targets, including reportedly maritime assets. One US Army official suggested the “entire inventory” may have been expended, though this remains contested. Even so, the scale of use has sharply reduced availability, likely halting near-term deliveries and exposing the vulnerability of low-volume, next-generation systems. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) THAAD interceptors, already limited in number, faced intense demand, with over 150 fired during the conflict. The US operates just eight batteries, several redeployed to the Middle East, stretching global coverage. According to the analysis, the production gaps are acute, no new interceptors delivered since August 2023, with supply only expected to resume by April 2027. THAAD relies on scarce AN/TPY-2 radars, with only 13 delivered to date. Their potential loss or damage creates a critical capability gap, making THAAD the most constrained and strategically sensitive system. Patriot (PAC-3 MSE) Patriot systems remain in high global demand, with 18 countries operating them and Ukraine a major user. Around half of annual production is allocated to allies, tightening availability for US needs. While Lockheed Martin plans to raise PAC-3 MSE output to 2,000 annually by 2030 (from 600), near-term supply constraints will force difficult decisions over allocation and prioritisation. ALSO READ: ‘Golden grip on Hormuz?’ Why gulf fears US–Iran talks in Pakistan risk handing Tehran control of Middle East energy lifeline The scale of usage The scale of US munitions use in the Iran conflict is stark against pre-war inventories. According to CSIS analysis, of roughly 3,100 Tomahawks, over 850 were used, while more than 1,000 JASSMs were expended from a stock of 4,400. Limited systems saw sharper strain: 40–70 PrSMs were used from just 90 available. Air defence was heavily taxed, with SM-3 usage (130–250) exceeding its 90-unit inventory, and SM-6 seeing 190–370 used from 410. Defensive systems bore the brunt, with THAAD (190–290 of 360) and Patriot (1,060–1,430 of 2,330) significantly depleted, highlighting the intensity and scale of consumption.

The immediate risk is not depletion. However, rapid consumption has thinned reserves, eroding strategic depth. The deeper concern is long-term strain, as rebuilding stockpiles will take years, exposing structural gaps in industrial capacity and readiness.

US Stockpiles running dry? Heavy use in Iran war pushes THAAD, Patriot and Tomahawk reserves to the brink

Breaking: The United States and Israel have launched coordinated military strikes against targets inside 

US-Iran War: US Released Video of Tomahawk Missiles Being Launched on Feb 28

A video circulating online appears to show a U.S. Tomahawk missile strike near an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) facility in the Iranian town of Minab. The strike reportedly occurred close to the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school, where Iranian officials say around 170–175 people, most of them children, were killed.


US-Iran War: Video Shows US Hit IRGC Facility Near School; 175 Mostly Children Killed

With many nations investing heavily in stand-off strike capabilities, a small group of cruise missiles stands out for their range, accuracy and destructive payload.

Tomahawk, Kalibr, BrahMos and more: Top 7 most powerful cruise missiles ranked by range, speed and payload

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Nov 2) once again voiced his reluctance against giving Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine. He told reporters that he was not considering a deal to sell the long-range missiles to Kyiv for use against Russia, signalling continued caution about deepening American involvement in the conflict.<h2>What did Trump say?</h2>Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while returning to Washington from Palm Beach, Florida, Trump was asked if he was open to selling Tomahawk missiles to NATO allies who could then transfer them to Kyiv. "No, not really," he replied, though he added that he could change his mind in the future.Last month, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, after meeting with Trump at the White House, revealed that the POTUS said that the missile delivery would not align with "America’s interests," though he did not elaborate on what that meant.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-not-yes-not-no-zelensky-reveals-trump-said-ukrainian-request-for-tomahawk-missiles-doesn-t-aling-with-america-s-interests-1760840151534">‘Not yes, not no’: Zelensky reveals Trump said Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles doesn't align with 'America’s interests'</a>The Tomahawk proposal has been under discussion since Trump met NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House on October 22. Rutte later said the idea was being reviewed, but emphasised that the final decision rested with Washington.<h2>Tomahawk missiles</h2>The missiles in question are capable of striking targets up to 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles) away — a range that would allow Ukraine to hit deep inside Russian territory, including Moscow. Kyiv has long sought such weapons, with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy arguing they are vital to counter Russia's continued missile barrages and to push back against entrenched positions.Moscow, however, has warned the US that supplying Tomahawks to Ukraine would mark a major escalation and provoke "serious consequences." Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council, has previously warned, "The delivery of these missiles could end badly for everyone. And most of all, for Trump himself."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-test-underground-where-no-one-knows-trump-accuses-russia-china-of-secret-nuclear-testing-1762141529429">‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing</a>The Kremlin has repeatedly accused the West of crossing red lines with arms transfers. The United States has already provided Ukraine with advanced air defence systems, precision artillery, and long-range ATACMS missiles under earlier aid packages.&nbsp;

Trump has ruled out selling Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, saying he’s “not really” considering it for now. The missiles can strike 2,500 km, reaching deep into Russia. 

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Nov 2) once again voiced his reluctance against giving Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine. He told reporters that he was not considering a deal to sell the long-range missiles to Kyiv for use against Russia, signalling continued caution about deepening American involvement in the conflict. What did Trump say? Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while returning to Washington from Palm Beach, Florida, Trump was asked if he was open to selling Tomahawk missiles to NATO allies who could then transfer them to Kyiv. "No, not really," he replied, though he added that he could change his mind in the future. Last month, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, after meeting with Trump at the White House, revealed that the POTUS said that the missile delivery would not align with "America’s interests," though he did not elaborate on what that meant. Also read | ‘Not yes, not no’: Zelensky reveals Trump said Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles doesn't align with 'America’s interests' The Tomahawk proposal has been under discussion since Trump met NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House on October 22. Rutte later said the idea was being reviewed, but emphasised that the final decision rested with Washington. Tomahawk missiles The missiles in question are capable of striking targets up to 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles) away — a range that would allow Ukraine to hit deep inside Russian territory, including Moscow. Kyiv has long sought such weapons, with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy arguing they are vital to counter Russia's continued missile barrages and to push back against entrenched positions. Moscow, however, has warned the US that supplying Tomahawks to Ukraine would mark a major escalation and provoke "serious consequences." Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council, has previously warned, "The delivery of these missiles could end badly for everyone. And most of all, for Trump himself." Also read | ‘They test underground where no one knows’: Trump accuses Russia, China of secret nuclear testing The Kremlin has repeatedly accused the West of crossing red lines with arms transfers. The United States has already provided Ukraine with advanced air defence systems, precision artillery, and long-range ATACMS missiles under earlier aid packages.

Trump has ruled out selling Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, saying he’s “not really” considering it for now. The missiles can strike 2,500 km, reaching deep into Russia.&nbsp;

Is US considering selling Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine via NATO? 'No, not really,' says Trump

Another meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has reportedly ended in chaos, with both leaders shouting at each other during a heated exchange at the White House on Friday (Oct 17). The meeting, which Zelensky hoped would secure long-range Tomahawk missiles, instead turned into what one report described as "a shouting match," with "cursing all the time." According to the Financial Times, Trump was pressuring his Ukrainian counterpart to accept Russia’s terms for a ceasefire, allegedly warning that President Vladimir Putin would “destroy” Ukraine if he refused.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-insists-gaza-ceasefire-still-in-place-despite-fresh-israeli-strikes-blames-rebels-within-for-violations-1760923155703">Trump insists Gaza ceasefire still in place despite fresh Israeli strikes, blames 'rebels within' for violations</a><h2>History repeats itself</h2>As per reports, the latest Trump-Zelensky confrontation mirrored the Ukrainian President's earlier Oval Office visit in February, when Vice President JD Vance scolded him for not expressing enough gratitude for US support in the war. At that meeting, Zelensky was also accused of being "disrespectful" for not wearing a suit, and was reportedly rushed out of the building after the exchange.This time, Trump went further, demanding that Ukraine surrender the entire Donbas region to Russia, sources said. European officials told FT that Trump appeared to echo Putin’s rhetoric almost "verbatim," repeatedly insisting that "If [Putin] wants it, he will destroy you."According to one European official, "Zelensky was very negative" after the meeting, and EU diplomats were left "not optimistic but pragmatic" about what to do next.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-not-yes-not-no-zelensky-reveals-trump-said-ukrainian-request-for-tomahawk-missiles-doesn-t-aling-with-america-s-interests-1760840151534">‘Not yes, not no’: Zelensky reveals Trump said Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles doesn't align with 'America’s interests'</a><h2>What caused Trump to blow up at Zelensky?</h2>The blowup reportedly came shortly after Trump spoke by phone with Putin. On his Truth Social account, Trump wrote that Putin had congratulated him on his "Great Accomplishment of Peace in the Middle East," and suggested that "Success in the Middle East will help in our negotiation in attaining an end to the War with Russia/Ukraine".Trump also announced that “high-level advisors” from the US and Russia will meet next week at an undisclosed location, followed by his own meeting with Putin in Budapest, Hungary, to "see if we can bring this 'inglorious' War, between Russia and Ukraine, to an end." The irony was not lost on observers: Budapest is where Russia once signed a pledge promising never to invade Ukraine.&nbsp;

A White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky on Oct 17 reportedly erupted into a shouting match, with Trump pressuring Zelensky to accept Russia’s terms, warning Putin would “destroy” Ukraine. Here's what we know. 

Another meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has reportedly ended in chaos, with both leaders shouting at each other during a heated exchange at the White House on Friday (Oct 17). The meeting, which Zelensky hoped would secure long-range Tomahawk missiles, instead turned into what one report described as "a shouting match," with "cursing all the time." According to the Financial Times, Trump was pressuring his Ukrainian counterpart to accept Russia’s terms for a ceasefire, allegedly warning that President Vladimir Putin would “destroy” Ukraine if he refused. Also read | Trump insists Gaza ceasefire still in place despite fresh Israeli strikes, blames 'rebels within' for violations History repeats itself As per reports, the latest Trump-Zelensky confrontation mirrored the Ukrainian President's earlier Oval Office visit in February, when Vice President JD Vance scolded him for not expressing enough gratitude for US support in the war. At that meeting, Zelensky was also accused of being "disrespectful" for not wearing a suit, and was reportedly rushed out of the building after the exchange. This time, Trump went further, demanding that Ukraine surrender the entire Donbas region to Russia, sources said. European officials told FT that Trump appeared to echo Putin’s rhetoric almost "verbatim," repeatedly insisting that "If [Putin] wants it, he will destroy you." According to one European official, "Zelensky was very negative" after the meeting, and EU diplomats were left "not optimistic but pragmatic" about what to do next. Also read | ‘Not yes, not no’: Zelensky reveals Trump said Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles doesn't align with 'America’s interests' What caused Trump to blow up at Zelensky? The blowup reportedly came shortly after Trump spoke by phone with Putin. On his Truth Social account, Trump wrote that Putin had congratulated him on his "Great Accomplishment of Peace in the Middle East," and suggested that "Success in the Middle East will help in our negotiation in attaining an end to the War with Russia/Ukraine". Trump also announced that “high-level advisors” from the US and Russia will meet next week at an undisclosed location, followed by his own meeting with Putin in Budapest, Hungary, to "see if we can bring this 'inglorious' War, between Russia and Ukraine, to an end." The irony was not lost on observers: Budapest is where Russia once signed a pledge promising never to invade Ukraine.

A White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky on Oct 17 reportedly erupted into a shouting match, with Trump pressuring Zelensky to accept Russia’s terms, warning Putin would “destroy” Ukraine. Here's what we know.&nbsp;

Trump-Zelensky meeting reportedly erupts into 'shouting match' as POTUS reconnects with Putin

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during an interview on Friday (Oct 17) said that US President Donald Trump refused to approve Kyiv’s request for long-range Tomahawk missiles, dealing a setback to Ukraine’s push for stronger Western firepower in its war against Russia. Speaking on NBC’s "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker," Zelensky said Trump "didn't say 'no,' but for today, didn't say 'yes'," &nbsp;when asked about providing Tomahawks — US-made cruise missiles capable of striking targets more than 1,500 miles away.<h2>Difficult with only Ukrainian power</h2>Zelensky, who met with Trump earlier in the day on Friday, said, "It's very difficult just to operate only with Ukrainian drones. We need long-range Tomahawks, and United States has similar things".He noted that Ukraine needs Tomahawks for "mixed" uses. "We need it for mixed — using like Russia uses it, it’s understandable how it works, so our teams work on it, I said, and I’m honest, it’s good that President Trump didn't say 'no,' but for today, didn't say 'yes'."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-warns-hamas-planning-imminent-attack-on-gaza-civilians-calls-it-grave-ceasefire-violation-1760832556840">US warns Hamas planning ‘imminent attack’ on Gaza civilians, calls it grave ceasefire violation</a><h2>Why isn't Trump giving Ukraine Tomahawks?</h2>Zelensky met with Trump at the White House earlier Friday. He told NBC that Trump argued the missile delivery would not align with “America’s interests,” though he did not elaborate on what that meant.Trump later told reporters that sending Tomahawks is "not easy" and suggested that the US should instead focus on ending the war. “Hopefully, we’ll be able to get the war over with without thinking about Tomahawks,” he said, adding that he had urged both Russia and Ukraine to “stop where they are.”The remarks came a day after Trump spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The two leaders, according to both sides, agreed to hold another meeting in Budapest, following their August summit in Alaska.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-i-don-t-want-to-destroy-his-political-career-trump-makes-bizarre-remark-about-pm-modi-1760580304027">‘I don’t want to destroy his political career’: Trump makes bizarre remark about PM Modi</a><h2>Russian warning to the US</h2>Russia has warned Washington against arming Ukraine with Tomahawks, which have a range of more than 1,500 miles (2,414.02 kilometres). Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council, wrote on Telegram that "Trump said that if the Russian President doesn’t resolve the Ukrainian conflict, ‘it will end badly for him.’ He’s making this threat for the hundredth time, in short."Labelling Trump "business peacemaker," he added that if the US President "is referring to Tomahawk missiles, then the phrase is incorrect. The delivery of these missiles could end badly for everyone. And most of all, for Trump himself."Zelensky, however, suggested Putin fears what U.S. long-range weapons in Ukrainian hands could mean for Moscow. “I think Putin is afraid that the United States will deliver us Tomahawks,” he said. “And I think he’s really afraid we will use them.” &nbsp;

Ukrainian President Zelensky said Trump refused, for now, to approve long-range Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine, citing US interests. Zelensky called it a setback, noting Kyiv relies mostly on drones. Russia, meanwhile, has warned the US that such deliveries could backfire.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during an interview on Friday (Oct 17) said that US President Donald Trump refused to approve Kyiv’s request for long-range Tomahawk missiles, dealing a setback to Ukraine’s push for stronger Western firepower in its war against Russia. Speaking on NBC’s "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker," Zelensky said Trump "didn't say 'no,' but for today, didn't say 'yes'," when asked about providing Tomahawks — US-made cruise missiles capable of striking targets more than 1,500 miles away. Difficult with only Ukrainian power Zelensky, who met with Trump earlier in the day on Friday, said, "It's very difficult just to operate only with Ukrainian drones. We need long-range Tomahawks, and United States has similar things". He noted that Ukraine needs Tomahawks for "mixed" uses. "We need it for mixed — using like Russia uses it, it’s understandable how it works, so our teams work on it, I said, and I’m honest, it’s good that President Trump didn't say 'no,' but for today, didn't say 'yes'." Also read | US warns Hamas planning ‘imminent attack’ on Gaza civilians, calls it grave ceasefire violation Why isn't Trump giving Ukraine Tomahawks? Zelensky met with Trump at the White House earlier Friday. He told NBC that Trump argued the missile delivery would not align with “America’s interests,” though he did not elaborate on what that meant. Trump later told reporters that sending Tomahawks is "not easy" and suggested that the US should instead focus on ending the war. “Hopefully, we’ll be able to get the war over with without thinking about Tomahawks,” he said, adding that he had urged both Russia and Ukraine to “stop where they are.” The remarks came a day after Trump spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The two leaders, according to both sides, agreed to hold another meeting in Budapest, following their August summit in Alaska. Also read | ‘I don’t want to destroy his political career’: Trump makes bizarre remark about PM Modi Russian warning to the US Russia has warned Washington against arming Ukraine with Tomahawks, which have a range of more than 1,500 miles (2,414.02 kilometres). Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chair of Russia’s Security Council, wrote on Telegram that "Trump said that if the Russian President doesn’t resolve the Ukrainian conflict, ‘it will end badly for him.’ He’s making this threat for the hundredth time, in short." Labelling Trump "business peacemaker," he added that if the US President "is referring to Tomahawk missiles, then the phrase is incorrect. The delivery of these missiles could end badly for everyone. And most of all, for Trump himself." Zelensky, however, suggested Putin fears what U.S. long-range weapons in Ukrainian hands could mean for Moscow. “I think Putin is afraid that the United States will deliver us Tomahawks,” he said. “And I think he’s really afraid we will use them.”

Ukrainian President Zelensky said Trump refused, for now, to approve long-range Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine, citing US interests. Zelensky called it a setback, noting Kyiv relies mostly on drones. Russia, meanwhile, has warned the US that such deliveries could backfire.

‘Not yes, not no’: Zelensky reveals Trump said Ukrainian request for Tomahawk missiles doesn't align with 'America’s interests'

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that if the United States supplied Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, it would lead to the destruction of Moscow’s relationship with Washington. The US weapons would allow Kyiv to launch long-range strikes deep into Russia. Putin made the remarks in a video statement released on Sunday (Oct 5) by Russian state television. Meanwhile, Russian drone sightings in NATO airspace have fueled tensions between the West and Russia.US President Donald Trump, who held talks with Putin in Alaska less than two months ago, has expressed disappointment with the Russian president for failing to make peace and end the war. Last month, US Vice President JD Vance said that Washington was considering Ukraine’s request for long-range Tomahawks that could strike deep into Russia, including Moscow. However, it is not clear whether a final decision has been made for the same.“This will lead to the destruction of our relations, or at least the positive trends that have emerged in these relations,” Putin said in the video clip released by Russian state television reporter Pavel Zarubin.The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the US will provide Ukraine with intelligence on long-range energy infrastructure targets in Russia, while considering whether to send missiles to Kyiv that could be used in such strikes.However, Reuters reported, citing a US official and three other sources, that the Trump administration’s desire to supply missiles to Ukraine may not be viable as Tomahawk’s current inventory is being used by the US Navy and others.Earlier on Thursday (Oct 2), Putin said that it was impossible to use Tomahawks without direct involvement of US troops and supply of any such missiles to Ukraine would lead to a “qualitatively new stage of escalation.”“This will mean a completely new, qualitatively new stage of escalation, including in relations between Russia and the United States,” Putin said. He added that Tomahawks could harm Russia, but it would simply shoot them down and improve its air defence.With a range of 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles), Tomahawk cruise missiles would enable Ukraine to strike the Kremlin and all of European Russia.

With a range of 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles), Tomahawk cruise missiles would enable Ukraine to strike the Kremlin and all of European Russia.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that if the United States supplied Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, it would lead to the destruction of Moscow’s relationship with Washington. The US weapons would allow Kyiv to launch long-range strikes deep into Russia. Putin made the remarks in a video statement released on Sunday (Oct 5) by Russian state television. Meanwhile, Russian drone sightings in NATO airspace have fueled tensions between the West and Russia. US President Donald Trump, who held talks with Putin in Alaska less than two months ago, has expressed disappointment with the Russian president for failing to make peace and end the war. Last month, US Vice President JD Vance said that Washington was considering Ukraine’s request for long-range Tomahawks that could strike deep into Russia, including Moscow. However, it is not clear whether a final decision has been made for the same. “This will lead to the destruction of our relations, or at least the positive trends that have emerged in these relations,” Putin said in the video clip released by Russian state television reporter Pavel Zarubin. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the US will provide Ukraine with intelligence on long-range energy infrastructure targets in Russia, while considering whether to send missiles to Kyiv that could be used in such strikes. However, Reuters reported, citing a US official and three other sources, that the Trump administration’s desire to supply missiles to Ukraine may not be viable as Tomahawk’s current inventory is being used by the US Navy and others. Earlier on Thursday (Oct 2), Putin said that it was impossible to use Tomahawks without direct involvement of US troops and supply of any such missiles to Ukraine would lead to a “qualitatively new stage of escalation.” “This will mean a completely new, qualitatively new stage of escalation, including in relations between Russia and the United States,” Putin said. He added that Tomahawks could harm Russia, but it would simply shoot them down and improve its air defence. With a range of 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles), Tomahawk cruise missiles would enable Ukraine to strike the Kremlin and all of European Russia.

With a range of 2,500 kilometres (1,550 miles), Tomahawk cruise missiles would enable Ukraine to strike the Kremlin and all of European Russia.

‘Will lead to destruction of relations’: Putin warns US against sending Tomahawk to Ukraine

The U.S. is considering Ukraine's request for long-range Tomahawk missiles, with Vice President JD Vance stating President Trump will make the final determination. These 2,500 km range missiles would be a powerful asset for Ukraine but would likely be seen by Russia as an escalation. Trump, frustrated by Putin's refusal for peace, is reviewing the deal as Russia's invasion stalls.


Breaking: US is considering Ukraine's request to obtain long-range Tomahawk missiles

The Royal Australian Navy has achieved a major milestone by successfully test-firing the Tomahawk land-attack cruise missile for the first time during a deployment to the United States. Australia is now the third country to accomplish this feat, following the US and the UK, its AUKUS allies. Watch in for more details!

Australia Becomes 3rd Country To Fire Tomahawk Cruise Missile

Japan has signed a deal with the United States to purchase up to 400 Tomahawk cruise missiles as part of its ongoing military buildup in response to increased regional threats.

Japan signs deal with US to buy 400 Tomahawk missiles

The US has approved a major long-range missile deal for Japan worth $2.35 billion. The deal includes two types of Tomahawk missiles, which have a range of 1,600 kilometres.

US backs Japan's bid to bolster defences