<p>Picture this: 2019, Martin Scorsese drops a bombshell by saying that Marvel movies aren't cinema. The godfather of filmmaking dissing superhero flicks was not taken kindly by the Marvel fandom and even filmmakers and actors involved in MCU jumped in the fray. Little did we know that Scorsese's words might have cast a subtle curse on the MCU, leading to some stinkers since then.</p>

<p>Now, let's talk about <em>The Marvels,</em> the new kid on the MCU block. It's been more than four years since the original Captain Marvel, and it's like they're trying to decide if it's a gourmet meal or a fast-food combo. At 105 minutes, it's one of Marvel's shortest films, but don't let that fool you. Short doesn't always mean sweet.</p>

<p>The story revolves around three superheroines: Captain Marvel (Brie Larson), Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris), and Ms. Marvel (Iman Vellani). You might remember the latter two from WandaVision and Ms. Marvel. With all that buildup, you would expect some fireworks. But here's the catch: Dar-Benn (Zawe Ashton), the central antagonist seems to epitomise the recurring archetype of lacklustre villains that has plagued numerous MCU films and shows.&nbsp;</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/uwmDH12MAA4?si=o8s1PNAkNXcimxeA" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>With motivations shrouded in ambiguity and a character profile that fails to leave a lasting impression, or any impression at all, she falls into the category of adversaries we have encountered far too many times before. Too by-the-numbers. And I am saying that as a huge fan of Ashton since Fresh Meat's times (seriously, watch it).</p>

<p><em>The Marvels</em> throws us a curveball by playing with time. The heroes swap places in a kind of chaotic way. It's like playing musical chairs, but with superpowers. There's this scene where Captain Marvel is in the middle of a battle, and suddenly, she's Ms. Marvel. It's like a superhero version of Freaky Friday.</p>

<p>Director Nia DaCosta, known for Candyman, adds some fun through Kamala Khan (Iman Vellani), a fangirl who meets her idols, particularly Carol. Kamala's enthusiasm is infectious, and her interactions with the seasoned heroes bring a sense of charm to the movie. But the rest of the film feels like it's stuck in second gear.</p>

<p>It's glaringly evident that the MCU has been navigating a treacherous path since the culmination of Avengers: Endgame. Scorsese's 2019 critique still lingers, casting a discernible shadow over the franchise. The bygone days of monumental battles against formidable adversaries like Thanos appear as distant echoes.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>The Marvels </em>aims for the funny bone with Goose, the Flerkin cat. Lovers of the small felines might like a scene&nbsp;that involves several cute kittens. But it's like they are trying too hard to make you laugh and not hard enough to make you care.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-is-the-marvels-all-set-to-be-a-box-office-bomb-mcu-film-tracking-for-disappointing-opening-656497">Is The Marvels set to be a box office bomb? MCU film tracking for disappointing opening</a></strong></p>

<p>The best part is actually at the very end, in the credits. And isn't that the perfect indication that a movie sucks? It gives us a teaser for what's coming next, and it is indeed intriguing. Nevertheless, this flicker of hope remains eclipsed by the overarching veil of mediocrity that envelops the majority of the film. The MCU needs a shake-up and a return to the cinematic grandeur that made it famous.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scorsese's comment might still be lurking in the background (and in the head of Kevin Feige), but it's time to break free and bring back the superhero movie magic. Time for a fresh start.</p>


Picture this: 2019, Martin Scorsese drops a bombshell by saying that Marvel movies aren't cinema. The godfather of filmmaking dissing superhero flicks was not taken kindly by the Marvel fandom and even filmmakers and actors involved in MCU jumped in the fray.

Picture this: 2019, Martin Scorsese drops a bombshell by saying that Marvel movies aren't cinema. The godfather of filmmaking dissing superhero flicks was not taken kindly by the Marvel fandom and even filmmakers and actors involved in MCU jumped in the fray. Little did we know that Scorsese's words might have cast a subtle curse on the MCU, leading to some stinkers since then. Now, let's talk about The Marvels, the new kid on the MCU block. It's been more than four years since the original Captain Marvel, and it's like they're trying to decide if it's a gourmet meal or a fast-food combo. At 105 minutes, it's one of Marvel's shortest films, but don't let that fool you. Short doesn't always mean sweet. The story revolves around three superheroines: Captain Marvel (Brie Larson), Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris), and Ms. Marvel (Iman Vellani). You might remember the latter two from WandaVision and Ms. Marvel. With all that buildup, you would expect some fireworks. But here's the catch: Dar-Benn (Zawe Ashton), the central antagonist seems to epitomise the recurring archetype of lacklustre villains that has plagued numerous MCU films and shows. With motivations shrouded in ambiguity and a character profile that fails to leave a lasting impression, or any impression at all, she falls into the category of adversaries we have encountered far too many times before. Too by-the-numbers. And I am saying that as a huge fan of Ashton since Fresh Meat's times (seriously, watch it). The Marvels throws us a curveball by playing with time. The heroes swap places in a kind of chaotic way. It's like playing musical chairs, but with superpowers. There's this scene where Captain Marvel is in the middle of a battle, and suddenly, she's Ms. Marvel. It's like a superhero version of Freaky Friday. Director Nia DaCosta, known for Candyman, adds some fun through Kamala Khan (Iman Vellani), a fangirl who meets her idols, particularly Carol. Kamala's enthusiasm is infectious, and her interactions with the seasoned heroes bring a sense of charm to the movie. But the rest of the film feels like it's stuck in second gear. It's glaringly evident that the MCU has been navigating a treacherous path since the culmination of Avengers: Endgame. Scorsese's 2019 critique still lingers, casting a discernible shadow over the franchise. The bygone days of monumental battles against formidable adversaries like Thanos appear as distant echoes. The Marvels aims for the funny bone with Goose, the Flerkin cat. Lovers of the small felines might like a scene that involves several cute kittens. But it's like they are trying too hard to make you laugh and not hard enough to make you care. Also Read | Is The Marvels set to be a box office bomb? MCU film tracking for disappointing opening The best part is actually at the very end, in the credits. And isn't that the perfect indication that a movie sucks? It gives us a teaser for what's coming next, and it is indeed intriguing. Nevertheless, this flicker of hope remains eclipsed by the overarching veil of mediocrity that envelops the majority of the film. The MCU needs a shake-up and a return to the cinematic grandeur that made it famous. Scorsese's comment might still be lurking in the background (and in the head of Kevin Feige), but it's time to break free and bring back the superhero movie magic. Time for a fresh start.

The Marvels review: A middling superhero movie with a glimmer of hope

<p>As <em>Thor: The Dark World</em> turns 10, it's time to address the elephant in the room — was it really that bad? Well, brace yourself for a resounding "yes." While some may try to repackage this film as a misunderstood masterpiece, let's be honest, it's nothing like that. And for those who think otherwise, I'm here to remind you of why <em>The Dark World</em> deserves its place in the Marvel Cinematic Universe's hall of infamy.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-thanos-idiotic-plan-and-other-things-that-make-absolutely-no-sense-in-marvel-movies-498039">Six things that make absolutely NO sense in Marvel movies</a></strong></p>

<p>Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of the film's shortcomings, let's briefly recap the plot for those who may have tried to suppress their memories of this movie. In <em>Thor: The Dark World</em>, we revisit the Nine Worlds, each ruled by Asgardians, who are essentially pseudo-Viking proto-fascist hereditary-monarchical beings. The plot revolves around the Dark Elves, led by a barely recognisable Christopher Eccleston, sporting inch-thick death-pale facial prosthetics and a mane of long, braided blond hair that's more reminiscent of a budget Julian Assange impersonation than a formidable antagonist. Their quest for a mysterious energy source called the Aether becomes the catalyst for all the cosmic chaos.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/10-marvel-dc-characters-who-need-their-own-movies-511168/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>Now, let's dissect some of the glaring issues that make this film truly cringe-worthy.</p>

<p><em>The Dark World</em> boasts of a story that's more tangled than a ball of Christmas lights forgotten in the attic. The Aether's nature and purpose remain as clear as cranberry juice poured into water. It is, at best bewildering and frustrating. At worst, it's a baffling concoction that even the great minds of Asgard would struggle to decipher. Throughout the film, we are bombarded with inexplicable plot devices that feel more like lazy writing than clever twists.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--marvel-overhauls-strategy-amid-superhero-slump-will-it-work-654282">Explained | Marvel overhauls strategy amid superhero slump. Will it work?</a></strong></p>

<p>Whenever things start to get tough for our heroes, the movie pulls a metaphorical get-out-of-jail-free card. You think Loki's dead? Nope, he's not. You believe there's no way out of Asgard? Well, there's this secret exit that we forgot to tell you earlier. The film's attempts at plot twists fall flat, leaving you with a sinking feeling of plot leakage and a franchise more interested in protecting its marketable characters.</p>

<p>The romantic subplot between Chris Hemsworth's Thor and Natalie Portman's Jane Foster is about as electric as a wet fuse. Their chemistry is so lacklustre that it borders on the embarrassing, making it extra-hard to invest in their relationship. That shouldn't have been the case.</p>

<p>Apart from everything else, at over two hours long, <em>The Dark World</em> also overstays its welcome. The film's pacing feels sluggish at times, making it an absolute chore to sit through. The comedic moments aimed at lightening the mood often fall flat, leaving the audience with a sense of cringe rather than laughter.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/why-quentin-tarantino-martin-scorsese-et-al-are-right-about-marvel-movies-537156">Why Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, et al. are right about Marvel movies</a></strong></p>

<p>While we love a good superhero movie, we also appreciate a little emotional investment. However, in this film, it seems that only the non-marketable characters like Rene Russo's Frigga are expendable, which drains the stakes from the story.</p>

<p>In all fairness, <em>Thor: The Dark World</em> does have some redeeming qualities, such as the nifty special effects and the quirky design of Asgard, which exudes kitsch Heavy Metal Album Cover faux-grandeur. However, these attributes hardly make up for the film's glaring shortcomings.</p>


As Thor: The Dark World turns 10, it's time to address the elephant in the room — was it really that bad? Well, brace yourself for a resounding "yes." While some may try to repackage this film as a misunderstood masterpiece, let's be honest, it's nothing like that.

As Thor: The Dark World turns 10, it's time to address the elephant in the room — was it really that bad? Well, brace yourself for a resounding "yes." While some may try to repackage this film as a misunderstood masterpiece, let's be honest, it's nothing like that. And for those who think otherwise, I'm here to remind you of why The Dark World deserves its place in the Marvel Cinematic Universe's hall of infamy. Also Read | Six things that make absolutely NO sense in Marvel movies Before we delve into the nitty-gritty of the film's shortcomings, let's briefly recap the plot for those who may have tried to suppress their memories of this movie. In Thor: The Dark World, we revisit the Nine Worlds, each ruled by Asgardians, who are essentially pseudo-Viking proto-fascist hereditary-monarchical beings. The plot revolves around the Dark Elves, led by a barely recognisable Christopher Eccleston, sporting inch-thick death-pale facial prosthetics and a mane of long, braided blond hair that's more reminiscent of a budget Julian Assange impersonation than a formidable antagonist. Their quest for a mysterious energy source called the Aether becomes the catalyst for all the cosmic chaos. Now, let's dissect some of the glaring issues that make this film truly cringe-worthy. The Dark World boasts of a story that's more tangled than a ball of Christmas lights forgotten in the attic. The Aether's nature and purpose remain as clear as cranberry juice poured into water. It is, at best bewildering and frustrating. At worst, it's a baffling concoction that even the great minds of Asgard would struggle to decipher. Throughout the film, we are bombarded with inexplicable plot devices that feel more like lazy writing than clever twists. Also Read | Explained | Marvel overhauls strategy amid superhero slump. Will it work? Whenever things start to get tough for our heroes, the movie pulls a metaphorical get-out-of-jail-free card. You think Loki's dead? Nope, he's not. You believe there's no way out of Asgard? Well, there's this secret exit that we forgot to tell you earlier. The film's attempts at plot twists fall flat, leaving you with a sinking feeling of plot leakage and a franchise more interested in protecting its marketable characters. The romantic subplot between Chris Hemsworth's Thor and Natalie Portman's Jane Foster is about as electric as a wet fuse. Their chemistry is so lacklustre that it borders on the embarrassing, making it extra-hard to invest in their relationship. That shouldn't have been the case. Apart from everything else, at over two hours long, The Dark World also overstays its welcome. The film's pacing feels sluggish at times, making it an absolute chore to sit through. The comedic moments aimed at lightening the mood often fall flat, leaving the audience with a sense of cringe rather than laughter. Also Read | Why Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, et al. are right about Marvel movies While we love a good superhero movie, we also appreciate a little emotional investment. However, in this film, it seems that only the non-marketable characters like Rene Russo's Frigga are expendable, which drains the stakes from the story. In all fairness, Thor: The Dark World does have some redeeming qualities, such as the nifty special effects and the quirky design of Asgard, which exudes kitsch Heavy Metal Album Cover faux-grandeur. However, these attributes hardly make up for the film's glaring shortcomings.

10 years of Thor The Dark World: Was it really that bad?

<p>'Tis the season to be jolly — well, almost — and what better way to usher in the holiday cheer than by celebrating the 20th anniversary of a film that has become a timeless classic: <em>Elf</em>. Starring the lovably zany Will Ferrell as Buddy the Elf, this modern holiday masterpiece has earned its spot as one of the best Christmas movies of all time. Let's explore the North Pole-sized reasons why <em>Elf </em>is a hilarious, heartwarming, and outright elf-tastic Christmas film.</p>

<h2><strong>Will Ferrell's unforgettable performance</strong></h2>

<p>To say that Will Ferrell was born to play Buddy the <em>Elf </em>might just be an understatement. His boundless enthusiasm and childlike wonderment perfectly capture the spirit of the holiday season. Ferrell's comedic genius is on full display, and his performance remains one of the most iconic in Christmas movie history. Elf's opening scene, with Buddy's "I passed through the seven levels of the Candy Cane forest" tirade, sets the tone for the entire film, and it's a ride full of laughter and merriment.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-kill-bill-volume-1-%E2%80%94-20-years-of-sword-swinging-sass-644959">Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>A joyful exploration of innocence</strong></h2>

<p><em>Elf </em>goes beyond slapstick humour and delivers a deeper message about the innocence of childhood and the importance of keeping that childlike wonder alive, even as we grow older. In a world often tarnished by cynicism, Elf reminds us to embrace the joy of the holiday season with the same purity of heart as Buddy the Elf. It's an uplifting reminder to find the magic in the everyday.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/xjxieexfDyU?si=SvrL2jjhNUQNn4CT" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Iconic quotes that keep on giving</strong></h2>

<p><em>Elf </em>is a treasure trove of unforgettable quotes and one-liners. From "The best way to spread Christmas cheer is singing loud for all to hear" to "I'm a cotton-headed ninny muggins," the film is a veritable goldmine for quotable moments that have become ingrained in our collective holiday consciousness. These lines are like the gift that keeps on giving, bringing smiles and chuckles year after year.</p>

<h2><strong>Zooey Deschanel's enchanting melodies</strong></h2>

<p>Not only does <em>Elf </em>give us humour and heart, but it also treats our ears to Zooey Deschanel's enchanting rendition of "Baby, It's Cold Outside." Her singing voice, combined with the overall musical score, contributes to the film's magical ambience and adds another layer of joy to the viewing experience.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-the-truman-shows-25-year-reign-lights-cameras-reality-600821">The Truman Show's 25-year reign: Lights, cameras, reality</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Outrageously heartwarming moments</strong></h2>

<p>Beneath the humour and candy-coated chaos lies a heartwarming story about Buddy's quest to find his true family and the love he discovers along the way. Whether it's the emotional reunion with his father, the snowball fight in Central Park, or the heart-melting singing in the finale, <em>Elf </em>strikes all the right chords when it comes to tugging at our heartstrings.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H9auMPx1WVE?si=mZhOMeeVhxXbjfsP" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>A timeless tale for all ages</strong></h2>

<p><em>Elf </em>is the type of Christmas movie that appeals to kids and adults alike. It offers a charming and straightforward narrative for the little ones, but it also sneaks in clever humour and pop culture references that grown-ups can appreciate. Few films manage to strike this perfect balance, making <em>Elf </em>a true family favourite.</p>

<h2><strong>Candy, candy canes, candy corns, and syrup</strong></h2>

<p>Buddy the Elf's diet may be questionable, but his unwavering commitment to his sugary treats is nothing short of hilarious. His fervour for all things sweet is a running gag throughout the film and adds an extra layer of absurdity that will have you rolling with laughter.</p>


'Tis the season to be jolly — well, almost — and what better way to usher in the holiday cheer than by celebrating the 20th anniversary of a film that has become a timeless classic: Elf.

'Tis the season to be jolly — well, almost — and what better way to usher in the holiday cheer than by celebrating the 20th anniversary of a film that has become a timeless classic: Elf. Starring the lovably zany Will Ferrell as Buddy the Elf, this modern holiday masterpiece has earned its spot as one of the best Christmas movies of all time. Let's explore the North Pole-sized reasons why Elf is a hilarious, heartwarming, and outright elf-tastic Christmas film. Will Ferrell's unforgettable performance To say that Will Ferrell was born to play Buddy the Elf might just be an understatement. His boundless enthusiasm and childlike wonderment perfectly capture the spirit of the holiday season. Ferrell's comedic genius is on full display, and his performance remains one of the most iconic in Christmas movie history. Elf's opening scene, with Buddy's "I passed through the seven levels of the Candy Cane forest" tirade, sets the tone for the entire film, and it's a ride full of laughter and merriment. Also Read | Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass A joyful exploration of innocence Elf goes beyond slapstick humour and delivers a deeper message about the innocence of childhood and the importance of keeping that childlike wonder alive, even as we grow older. In a world often tarnished by cynicism, Elf reminds us to embrace the joy of the holiday season with the same purity of heart as Buddy the Elf. It's an uplifting reminder to find the magic in the everyday. Iconic quotes that keep on giving Elf is a treasure trove of unforgettable quotes and one-liners. From "The best way to spread Christmas cheer is singing loud for all to hear" to "I'm a cotton-headed ninny muggins," the film is a veritable goldmine for quotable moments that have become ingrained in our collective holiday consciousness. These lines are like the gift that keeps on giving, bringing smiles and chuckles year after year. Zooey Deschanel's enchanting melodies Not only does Elf give us humour and heart, but it also treats our ears to Zooey Deschanel's enchanting rendition of "Baby, It's Cold Outside." Her singing voice, combined with the overall musical score, contributes to the film's magical ambience and adds another layer of joy to the viewing experience. Also Read | The Truman Show's 25-year reign: Lights, cameras, reality Outrageously heartwarming moments Beneath the humour and candy-coated chaos lies a heartwarming story about Buddy's quest to find his true family and the love he discovers along the way. Whether it's the emotional reunion with his father, the snowball fight in Central Park, or the heart-melting singing in the finale, Elf strikes all the right chords when it comes to tugging at our heartstrings. A timeless tale for all ages Elf is the type of Christmas movie that appeals to kids and adults alike. It offers a charming and straightforward narrative for the little ones, but it also sneaks in clever humour and pop culture references that grown-ups can appreciate. Few films manage to strike this perfect balance, making Elf a true family favourite. Candy, candy canes, candy corns, and syrup Buddy the Elf's diet may be questionable, but his unwavering commitment to his sugary treats is nothing short of hilarious. His fervour for all things sweet is a running gag throughout the film and adds an extra layer of absurdity that will have you rolling with laughter.

20 years of Elf: A hilarious holiday classic that sleighs the competition

<p><strong>Aankh Micholi movie review:</strong> <em>Aankh Micholi </em>is a 2023 Indian comedy film that attempts to tickle your funny bone but, unfortunately, ends up tickling the wrong places. The film introduces us to the Singh family from Hoshiarpur, Punjab, a quirky bunch with a penchant for peculiar medical conditions. We've got the forgetful homoeopathic.... er, Ayurvedic, doctor, Navjot Singh (Paresh Rawal), his deaf elder son, Yuvraj Singh (Sharman Joshi), the stammering second son, Harbhajan Singh (Abhishek Banerjee), and the daughter, Paro (Mrunal Thakur), who is suffering from night blindness. It's a family that could easily give the Addams Family a run for their money.</p>

<p>The film takes off when Navjot, with the desperation of a parent trying to offload his troublesome stock, dives into the world of online matchmaking. His attempts to find a suitable match for Paro lead to the introduction of Rohit Patel (Abhimanyu Dasani), a potential groom with his own secret: he's got day blindness (don't worry, this is not really a spoiler). The ensuing comedy of errors is the heart of the film, where secrets continue to pile up.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KBuUqcJ5rco?si=uzeaBUPlfh11mJHa" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>What <em>Aankh Micholi </em>gets right is its cast. Paresh Rawal, as always, is a standout. Sharman Joshi, Abhishek Banerjee, and Divya Dutta give their best to make us chuckle. However, the film's Achilles' heel is its script. It leans heavily on slapstick humour, but not the kind that sticks, more like a slapstick that slaps you across the face but leaves no lasting impression. The jokes often feel forced, and some of the dialogues might make you cringe, It is like watching a teenager's awkward attempts at flirting (I was that teenager).</p>

<p>The chemistry between the lead pair, Mrunal Thakur and Abhimanyu Dasani, is also nonexistent. Their on-screen connection lacks the spark that's crucial here, even it is only a romantic subplot.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The film's attempt to rekindle the charm of classic comedies falls short of its lofty goal. It does pay homage to the golden era of Bollywood comedies, but doesn't quite capture the magic that made those classics timeless.</p>

<p>So. <em>Aankh Micholi</em> is a mixed bag. While the performances manage to elicit a chuckle or two, the film's flawed script and execution leave much to be desired. If you're a fan of slapstick comedies and are willing to overlook its shortcomings, you might find some sort of entertainment in the Singh family's zany escapades. Just don't expect it to be anything particularly special.</p>


Aankh Micholi movie review: Aankh Micholi is a 2023 Indian comedy film that attempts to tickle your funny bone but, unfortunately, ends up tickling the wrong places.

Aankh Micholi movie review: Aankh Micholi is a 2023 Indian comedy film that attempts to tickle your funny bone but, unfortunately, ends up tickling the wrong places. The film introduces us to the Singh family from Hoshiarpur, Punjab, a quirky bunch with a penchant for peculiar medical conditions. We've got the forgetful homoeopathic.... er, Ayurvedic, doctor, Navjot Singh (Paresh Rawal), his deaf elder son, Yuvraj Singh (Sharman Joshi), the stammering second son, Harbhajan Singh (Abhishek Banerjee), and the daughter, Paro (Mrunal Thakur), who is suffering from night blindness. It's a family that could easily give the Addams Family a run for their money. The film takes off when Navjot, with the desperation of a parent trying to offload his troublesome stock, dives into the world of online matchmaking. His attempts to find a suitable match for Paro lead to the introduction of Rohit Patel (Abhimanyu Dasani), a potential groom with his own secret: he's got day blindness (don't worry, this is not really a spoiler). The ensuing comedy of errors is the heart of the film, where secrets continue to pile up. What Aankh Micholi gets right is its cast. Paresh Rawal, as always, is a standout. Sharman Joshi, Abhishek Banerjee, and Divya Dutta give their best to make us chuckle. However, the film's Achilles' heel is its script. It leans heavily on slapstick humour, but not the kind that sticks, more like a slapstick that slaps you across the face but leaves no lasting impression. The jokes often feel forced, and some of the dialogues might make you cringe, It is like watching a teenager's awkward attempts at flirting (I was that teenager). The chemistry between the lead pair, Mrunal Thakur and Abhimanyu Dasani, is also nonexistent. Their on-screen connection lacks the spark that's crucial here, even it is only a romantic subplot. The film's attempt to rekindle the charm of classic comedies falls short of its lofty goal. It does pay homage to the golden era of Bollywood comedies, but doesn't quite capture the magic that made those classics timeless. So. Aankh Micholi is a mixed bag. While the performances manage to elicit a chuckle or two, the film's flawed script and execution leave much to be desired. If you're a fan of slapstick comedies and are willing to overlook its shortcomings, you might find some sort of entertainment in the Singh family's zany escapades. Just don't expect it to be anything particularly special.

Aankh Micholi movie review: Paresh Rawal's new comedy tries too hard

<p>Tupac Shakur, a prominent American rapper and actor known for his profound impact on the hip-hop genre, was tragically shot dead in 1996 in Las Vegas, Nevada. This event sent shockwaves throughout the music industry and the world, marking the untimely end of a young artist whose life was marked by both artistic brilliance and personal turmoil.</p>

<p>Born on June 16, 1971, Shakur emerged as a defining figure in the world of rap music, with his powerful lyrics addressing social issues, inequality, and urban life. His glittering career, however, was intertwined with controversy and legal entanglements, often overshadowing his musical contributions.</p>

<p>In the lead-up to the fatal shooting, Shakur had been in Las Vegas to attend the highly anticipated boxing match between Bruce Seldon and Mike Tyson at the MGM Grand. Accompanied by Marion "Suge" Knight, the head of Death Row Records, Shakur's evening took an ominous turn when a confrontation erupted between his entourage and members of a rival gang. This altercation would set the stage for the tragic events that followed.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/tupac-shakur-murder-mystery-nevada-grand-jury-indicts-former-gang-leader-davis-for-murder-641123/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>The altercation had its roots in a prior incident in July 1996 when Orlando "Baby Lane" Anderson, a member of the South Side Compton Crips, and a group of associates attempted to rob one of Suge Knight's associates, Trevon "Tre" Lane, at a Foot Locker store in Lakewood, California. Shakur, informed of this encounter, confronted Anderson in the MGM Grand lobby, igniting a brawl in which both Shakur and Knight's entourage participated.</p>

<p>The following timeline delves into the circumstances leading up to the shooting, the shocking events of that evening, and the subsequent investigation. It also touches on the complex web of allegations, speculation, and rivalries that have shrouded the case over the years:</p>

<p>On September 7, 1996, Shakur attended the Bruce Seldon vs. Mike Tyson boxing match at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada. He was accompanied by Marion "Suge" Knight.</p>

<p>A confrontation emerged when Trevon "Tre" Lane, an associate of Knight and a member of the M.O.B. Pirus gang, spotted Orlando "Baby Lane" Anderson, a member of the South Side Compton Crips, in the MGM Grand lobby. This was the result of an earlier incident in which Anderson and his associates had attempted to rob Lane in a Foot Locker store.</p>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained-from-the-matrix-to-the-terminator-how-artificial-intelligence-in-cinema-reflects-our-hopes-fears-577331">&nbsp;Explained: From The Matrix to The Terminator, how artificial intelligence in cinema reflects our hopes, fears</a></strong></p>

<p>Shakur intervened and initiated an attack on Anderson in the lobby, leading to a physical altercation in which Shakur and Knight's entourage participated. The brawl was captured on the MGM Grand's video surveillance.</p>

<p>After the fight, Shakur returned to his hotel, the Luxor Las Vegas, and disclosed his involvement in the altercation to his girlfriend, Kidada Jones.</p>

<p>Between 11:00 and 11:05 pm, Shakur and Knight were briefly detained by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police for playing loud music and lacking license plates. They were released without charges.</p>

<p>At around 11:10 pm, while stopped at a red light at the intersection of East Flamingo Road and Koval Lane, a vehicle with two women pulled up on the left side of Shakur's brand new 1996 BMW 750iL. Shakur exchanged words with the women and invited them to Club 662.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained-how-digital-doubles-ai-generated-trailers-put-hollywood-in-quandary-599643">Explained: How digital doubles, AI-generated trailers put Hollywood in a quandary</a></strong></p>

<p>At 11:15 pm, a white, four-door Cadillac pulled up to Knight's right side at the same intersection. The shooter, seated at the back of the Cadillac, rolled down the window and rapidly fired gunshots from a .40 S&amp;W Glock 22 at Shakur's BMW. Shakur was struck four times: twice in the chest, once in the arm, and once in the thigh. Knight was also injured.</p>

<p>Despite Knight's injuries and a flat tire, he managed to drive Shakur and himself about a mile from the scene to Las Vegas Boulevard and Harmon Avenue. They were pulled over by the Bike Patrol, who alerted paramedics through the radio.</p>

<p>Shakur was heavily sedated and placed on life support machines at the hospital. He was ultimately put under a medically-induced coma. Shakur passed away on September 13, 1996, due to respiratory failure after the removal of his right lung.</p>

<p>In the year following the shooting, Sgt. Kevin Manning, who led the investigation, expressed doubts about solving Shakur's murder, citing a lack of new leads and limited cooperation from witnesses.</p>

<p>A 2002 Los Angeles Times investigative report pointed to the South Side Crips' involvement in the shooting.</p>

<p>Allegations involving Sean "Puffy" Combs and the South Side Compton Crips also surfaced.</p>

<p>Witnesses have provided conflicting statements to the police, complicating the investigation.</p>

<p>July 18, 2023: The Las Vegas Police Department executed a search warrant in connection with Shakur's murder at a home in Henderson, Nevada, owned by Duane "Keefe D" Davis's wife.</p>

<p>September 29, 2023: Duane "Keefe D" Davis was arrested in connection with Shakur's murder following a grand jury hearing. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charges. He's the sole surviving occupant of the vehicle involved in the deadly drive-by shooting, and the only one charged in connection with the case.</p>

<p>November 2, 2023: Davis pleaded not guilty to murder. In court, Davis, standing in shackles, acknowledged his family in the packed spectator gallery as he awaited proceedings.</p>

<p><br />
&nbsp;</p>


Tupac Shakur, a prominent American rapper and actor known for his profound impact on the hip-hop genre, was tragically shot dead in 1996 in Las Vegas, Nevada. This event sent shockwaves throughout the music industry and the world, marking the untimely end of a young artist whose life was marked by both artistic brilliance and personal turmoil.

Tupac Shakur, a prominent American rapper and actor known for his profound impact on the hip-hop genre, was tragically shot dead in 1996 in Las Vegas, Nevada. This event sent shockwaves throughout the music industry and the world, marking the untimely end of a young artist whose life was marked by both artistic brilliance and personal turmoil. Born on June 16, 1971, Shakur emerged as a defining figure in the world of rap music, with his powerful lyrics addressing social issues, inequality, and urban life. His glittering career, however, was intertwined with controversy and legal entanglements, often overshadowing his musical contributions. In the lead-up to the fatal shooting, Shakur had been in Las Vegas to attend the highly anticipated boxing match between Bruce Seldon and Mike Tyson at the MGM Grand. Accompanied by Marion "Suge" Knight, the head of Death Row Records, Shakur's evening took an ominous turn when a confrontation erupted between his entourage and members of a rival gang. This altercation would set the stage for the tragic events that followed. The altercation had its roots in a prior incident in July 1996 when Orlando "Baby Lane" Anderson, a member of the South Side Compton Crips, and a group of associates attempted to rob one of Suge Knight's associates, Trevon "Tre" Lane, at a Foot Locker store in Lakewood, California. Shakur, informed of this encounter, confronted Anderson in the MGM Grand lobby, igniting a brawl in which both Shakur and Knight's entourage participated. The following timeline delves into the circumstances leading up to the shooting, the shocking events of that evening, and the subsequent investigation. It also touches on the complex web of allegations, speculation, and rivalries that have shrouded the case over the years: On September 7, 1996, Shakur attended the Bruce Seldon vs. Mike Tyson boxing match at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada. He was accompanied by Marion "Suge" Knight. A confrontation emerged when Trevon "Tre" Lane, an associate of Knight and a member of the M.O.B. Pirus gang, spotted Orlando "Baby Lane" Anderson, a member of the South Side Compton Crips, in the MGM Grand lobby. This was the result of an earlier incident in which Anderson and his associates had attempted to rob Lane in a Foot Locker store. Also Read | Explained: From The Matrix to The Terminator, how artificial intelligence in cinema reflects our hopes, fears Shakur intervened and initiated an attack on Anderson in the lobby, leading to a physical altercation in which Shakur and Knight's entourage participated. The brawl was captured on the MGM Grand's video surveillance. After the fight, Shakur returned to his hotel, the Luxor Las Vegas, and disclosed his involvement in the altercation to his girlfriend, Kidada Jones. Between 11:00 and 11:05 pm, Shakur and Knight were briefly detained by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police for playing loud music and lacking license plates. They were released without charges. At around 11:10 pm, while stopped at a red light at the intersection of East Flamingo Road and Koval Lane, a vehicle with two women pulled up on the left side of Shakur's brand new 1996 BMW 750iL. Shakur exchanged words with the women and invited them to Club 662. Also Read | Explained: How digital doubles, AI-generated trailers put Hollywood in a quandary At 11:15 pm, a white, four-door Cadillac pulled up to Knight's right side at the same intersection. The shooter, seated at the back of the Cadillac, rolled down the window and rapidly fired gunshots from a .40 S&W Glock 22 at Shakur's BMW. Shakur was struck four times: twice in the chest, once in the arm, and once in the thigh. Knight was also injured. Despite Knight's injuries and a flat tire, he managed to drive Shakur and himself about a mile from the scene to Las Vegas Boulevard and Harmon Avenue. They were pulled over by the Bike Patrol, who alerted paramedics through the radio. Shakur was heavily sedated and placed on life support machines at the hospital. He was ultimately put under a medically-induced coma. Shakur passed away on September 13, 1996, due to respiratory failure after the removal of his right lung. In the year following the shooting, Sgt. Kevin Manning, who led the investigation, expressed doubts about solving Shakur's murder, citing a lack of new leads and limited cooperation from witnesses. A 2002 Los Angeles Times investigative report pointed to the South Side Crips' involvement in the shooting. Allegations involving Sean "Puffy" Combs and the South Side Compton Crips also surfaced. Witnesses have provided conflicting statements to the police, complicating the investigation. July 18, 2023: The Las Vegas Police Department executed a search warrant in connection with Shakur's murder at a home in Henderson, Nevada, owned by Duane "Keefe D" Davis's wife. September 29, 2023: Duane "Keefe D" Davis was arrested in connection with Shakur's murder following a grand jury hearing. He entered a plea of not guilty to the charges. He's the sole surviving occupant of the vehicle involved in the deadly drive-by shooting, and the only one charged in connection with the case. November 2, 2023: Davis pleaded not guilty to murder. In court, Davis, standing in shackles, acknowledged his family in the packed spectator gallery as he awaited proceedings.

Explained | All that's happened in Tupac Shakur murder case: Complete timeline

<p>Marvel, the juggernaut of superhero cinema, is in a bit of a pickle lately, as reported in a comprehensive Variety feature. They have gone from being the cocky cool kid on the block to wrestling with some serious issues. It's like watching Tony Stark fumble with his Iron Man suit — not something we're used to seeing in the superhero universe. So, what exactly is going on with Marvel's strategy for their movies? Let's break it all down.</p>

<h2><strong>The Kang conundrum</strong></h2>

<p>It all started with Jonathan Majors, the promising actor poised to take the MCU by storm as Kang the Conqueror. However, fate had other plans. Majors found himself entangled in a messy legal scandal involving domestic violence charges, and Marvel was left in a dilemma. Do they stick with Kang, or do they pivot to another villain like Dr&nbsp;Doom? It's a classic "choose your path" scenario, but one with significant implications for the future of the MCU.</p>

<p>Majors had already made a mark in the MCU as a scene-stealing antagonist in <em>Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania.</em> He was set to become the franchise's next big thing in Loki, with the finale setting up Kang as the titular star of a fifth <em>Avengers </em>film in 2026. Now, all of this hangs in the balance, thanks to his legal woes.</p>

<p>The Marvel decision-makers gathered at their annual retreat in Palm Springs with a collective sense of anxiety. The high-flying confidence that once defined these gatherings had given way to a cloud of uncertainty. They were forced to discuss backup plans, such as pivoting to a different comic book adversary like Dr&nbsp;Doom. Yet, this decision carries its own set of complications, as Majors had already left his mark on the MCU, for better or worse.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/10-marvel-dc-characters-who-need-their-own-movies-511168/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Overdose of superheroes</strong></h2>

<p>The MCU has been on a relentless mission to provide a never-ending stream of interconnected content for both theatres and Disney+. The goal was to never have a lapse in superhero storytelling, but this strategy appears to have backfired. The sheer volume of content produced taxed the Marvel apparatus to its limits, leading to viewer confusion and dissatisfaction.</p>

<p>"The Marvel machine was pumping out a lot of content. Did it get to the point where there was just too much, and they were burning people out on superheroes? It's possible," noted Wall Street analyst Eric Handler. This oversaturation risked compromising the quality that fans had come to expect from Marvel.</p>

<h2><strong>The Marvels misfire?</strong></h2>

<p><em>The Marvels</em> was supposed to be a triumphant sequel to <em>Captain Marvel</em>, but it turned into a story of delays and reshoots. The film, with a budget of $250 million, was intended to be a box office behemoth. Instead, it's tracking for an opening well below the $185 million Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness achieved in its debut weekend.</p>

<p>Directed by Nia DaCosta, the film reunites Brie Larson's Captain Marvel with two superpowered allies. However, instead of building on the success of the original film, it stumbled into four weeks of reshoots to bring coherence to a tangled storyline. The director's departure for another project during post-production added further fuel to the fire.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/guardians-of-the-galaxy-3-review-hilarious-and-heart-wrenching-best-mcu-film-in-years-589362/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>VFX fiasco</strong></h2>

<p>Marvel's visual effects team, once renowned for its excellence, is now struggling to keep pace with the endless stream of productions. The situation reached a tipping point when the world premiere of <em>Quantumania </em>featured shoddy CGI that left attendees baffled.</p>

<p>In February, when the film was shown, there were at least 10 scenes with last-minute, out-of-focus visual effects, according to a veteran power broker who witnessed the disaster. The rushed post-production schedule left little room for the VFX team to deliver their best work.</p>

<p>The situation led to a unanimous vote among Marvel VFX workers to unionise in September, sparking an industrywide trend. Their concerns included long hours and inadequate pay. Anna George, a former Marvel Studios VFX assistant coordinator, testified before the Congressional Labor Caucus about the studio's untenable deadlines and working conditions.</p>

<p>The difficulties extended to the very top of the VFX hierarchy, leading to the firing of Victoria Alonso, who oversaw the studio's physical production, post-production, VFX, and animation. Disney's top brass was reportedly infuriated by the declining quality control on Marvel productions, particularly on the expanding TV front.</p>

<h2><strong>Quality vs Quantity</strong></h2>

<p>Marvel's strategy of pushing out an abundance of content may have been its undoing. Fans, who once associated the Marvel brand with quality, are now questioning this association. As Joanna Robinson, a writer and podcaster, noted, "The quality is suffering," and many projects have felt "half-baked and undercooked." This deviation from their traditional model has raised concerns about the studio's ability to maintain the same level of excellence.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iuk77TjvfmE?si=QXokYIAchswox0wQ" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Blade's bumpy ride</strong></h2>

<p>Marvel's planned reboot of <em>Blade </em>with Mahershala Ali took an unexpected turn. Multiple script changes, director swaps, and a shutdown six weeks before production left the project in disarray. At one point, the story morphed into a narrative led by women, sidelining Blade as a supporting character in his own movie. Such a deviation from the established formula was perplexing, especially considering that Mahershala Ali, a two-time Oscar winner, was cast in the titular role.</p>

<p>The script for Blade underwent so many transformations that the studio was forced to bring in Michael Green, the Oscar-nominated writer of Logan, to start from scratch. The project's release date was pushed back to 2025, with speculation that the film's budget would be significantly reduced, marking a departure from Marvel's traditionally high-spending approach.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-thanos-idiotic-plan-and-other-things-that-make-absolutely-no-sense-in-marvel-movies-498039">Six things that make absolutely NO sense in Marvel movies</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>The Old Guard returns</strong></h2>

<p>In a move born out of desperation, Marvel is exploring the possibility of resurrecting beloved characters like Iron Man and Black Widow, who were seemingly killed off in Avengers: Endgame. While this could be an exciting prospect for fans, it comes with a hefty price tag, as Robert Downey Jr's upfront salary for Iron Man 3 was approximately $25 million. Reviving these iconic characters could be a costly gamble, even for Marvel.</p>

<h2><strong>The Fox factor</strong></h2>

<p>One potential lifeline for Marvel lies in the treasure trove of superhero properties acquired through Disney's purchase of 21st Century Fox in 2019. The deal brought characters like the X-Men and the Fantastic Four back into Marvel's fold, generating considerable excitement among fans. <em>Deadpool 3 </em>and a <em>Fantastic Four</em> reboot are on the horizon, offering fresh opportunities for storytelling and character crossovers.</p>

<p>Additionally, the acquisition of the X-Men franchise provides Marvel with a chance to reimagine these beloved characters within the MCU. The recent resolution of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike has allowed Marvel to initiate discussions with writers about integrating the X-Men into their cinematic universe.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/why-quentin-tarantino-martin-scorsese-et-al-are-right-about-marvel-movies-537156">Why Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, et al. are right about Marvel movies</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Kevin Feige's reckoning</strong></h2>

<p>Amid these challenges, Kevin Feige, the mastermind behind the Marvel Cinematic Universe, is taking a step back to reassess their strategy. Recognising that some scripts and projects have veered off course, he's making difficult decisions to realign the studio's creative direction.&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>What the future holds</strong></h2>

<p>Marvel's recent setbacks might feel like a stark departure from their prior track record of success, but they are far from down for the count. As long as they can strike a balance between quantity and quality, harness the potential of their newly acquired Fox assets, and make strategic choices, there's hope yet for the Marvel Cinematic Universe.</p>


Marvel, the juggernaut of superhero cinema, is in a bit of a pickle lately, as reported in a comprehensive Variety feature. They have gone from being the cocky cool kid on the block to wrestling with some serious issues.

Marvel, the juggernaut of superhero cinema, is in a bit of a pickle lately, as reported in a comprehensive Variety feature. They have gone from being the cocky cool kid on the block to wrestling with some serious issues. It's like watching Tony Stark fumble with his Iron Man suit — not something we're used to seeing in the superhero universe. So, what exactly is going on with Marvel's strategy for their movies? Let's break it all down. The Kang conundrum It all started with Jonathan Majors, the promising actor poised to take the MCU by storm as Kang the Conqueror. However, fate had other plans. Majors found himself entangled in a messy legal scandal involving domestic violence charges, and Marvel was left in a dilemma. Do they stick with Kang, or do they pivot to another villain like Dr Doom? It's a classic "choose your path" scenario, but one with significant implications for the future of the MCU. Majors had already made a mark in the MCU as a scene-stealing antagonist in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania. He was set to become the franchise's next big thing in Loki, with the finale setting up Kang as the titular star of a fifth Avengers film in 2026. Now, all of this hangs in the balance, thanks to his legal woes. The Marvel decision-makers gathered at their annual retreat in Palm Springs with a collective sense of anxiety. The high-flying confidence that once defined these gatherings had given way to a cloud of uncertainty. They were forced to discuss backup plans, such as pivoting to a different comic book adversary like Dr Doom. Yet, this decision carries its own set of complications, as Majors had already left his mark on the MCU, for better or worse. Overdose of superheroes The MCU has been on a relentless mission to provide a never-ending stream of interconnected content for both theatres and Disney+. The goal was to never have a lapse in superhero storytelling, but this strategy appears to have backfired. The sheer volume of content produced taxed the Marvel apparatus to its limits, leading to viewer confusion and dissatisfaction. "The Marvel machine was pumping out a lot of content. Did it get to the point where there was just too much, and they were burning people out on superheroes? It's possible," noted Wall Street analyst Eric Handler. This oversaturation risked compromising the quality that fans had come to expect from Marvel. The Marvels misfire? The Marvels was supposed to be a triumphant sequel to Captain Marvel, but it turned into a story of delays and reshoots. The film, with a budget of $250 million, was intended to be a box office behemoth. Instead, it's tracking for an opening well below the $185 million Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness achieved in its debut weekend. Directed by Nia DaCosta, the film reunites Brie Larson's Captain Marvel with two superpowered allies. However, instead of building on the success of the original film, it stumbled into four weeks of reshoots to bring coherence to a tangled storyline. The director's departure for another project during post-production added further fuel to the fire. VFX fiasco Marvel's visual effects team, once renowned for its excellence, is now struggling to keep pace with the endless stream of productions. The situation reached a tipping point when the world premiere of Quantumania featured shoddy CGI that left attendees baffled. In February, when the film was shown, there were at least 10 scenes with last-minute, out-of-focus visual effects, according to a veteran power broker who witnessed the disaster. The rushed post-production schedule left little room for the VFX team to deliver their best work. The situation led to a unanimous vote among Marvel VFX workers to unionise in September, sparking an industrywide trend. Their concerns included long hours and inadequate pay. Anna George, a former Marvel Studios VFX assistant coordinator, testified before the Congressional Labor Caucus about the studio's untenable deadlines and working conditions. The difficulties extended to the very top of the VFX hierarchy, leading to the firing of Victoria Alonso, who oversaw the studio's physical production, post-production, VFX, and animation. Disney's top brass was reportedly infuriated by the declining quality control on Marvel productions, particularly on the expanding TV front. Quality vs Quantity Marvel's strategy of pushing out an abundance of content may have been its undoing. Fans, who once associated the Marvel brand with quality, are now questioning this association. As Joanna Robinson, a writer and podcaster, noted, "The quality is suffering," and many projects have felt "half-baked and undercooked." This deviation from their traditional model has raised concerns about the studio's ability to maintain the same level of excellence. Blade's bumpy ride Marvel's planned reboot of Blade with Mahershala Ali took an unexpected turn. Multiple script changes, director swaps, and a shutdown six weeks before production left the project in disarray. At one point, the story morphed into a narrative led by women, sidelining Blade as a supporting character in his own movie. Such a deviation from the established formula was perplexing, especially considering that Mahershala Ali, a two-time Oscar winner, was cast in the titular role. The script for Blade underwent so many transformations that the studio was forced to bring in Michael Green, the Oscar-nominated writer of Logan, to start from scratch. The project's release date was pushed back to 2025, with speculation that the film's budget would be significantly reduced, marking a departure from Marvel's traditionally high-spending approach. Also Read | Six things that make absolutely NO sense in Marvel movies The Old Guard returns In a move born out of desperation, Marvel is exploring the possibility of resurrecting beloved characters like Iron Man and Black Widow, who were seemingly killed off in Avengers: Endgame. While this could be an exciting prospect for fans, it comes with a hefty price tag, as Robert Downey Jr's upfront salary for Iron Man 3 was approximately $25 million. Reviving these iconic characters could be a costly gamble, even for Marvel. The Fox factor One potential lifeline for Marvel lies in the treasure trove of superhero properties acquired through Disney's purchase of 21st Century Fox in 2019. The deal brought characters like the X-Men and the Fantastic Four back into Marvel's fold, generating considerable excitement among fans. Deadpool 3 and a Fantastic Four reboot are on the horizon, offering fresh opportunities for storytelling and character crossovers. Additionally, the acquisition of the X-Men franchise provides Marvel with a chance to reimagine these beloved characters within the MCU. The recent resolution of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike has allowed Marvel to initiate discussions with writers about integrating the X-Men into their cinematic universe. Also Read | Why Quentin Tarantino, Martin Scorsese, et al. are right about Marvel movies Kevin Feige's reckoning Amid these challenges, Kevin Feige, the mastermind behind the Marvel Cinematic Universe, is taking a step back to reassess their strategy. Recognising that some scripts and projects have veered off course, he's making difficult decisions to realign the studio's creative direction. What the future holds Marvel's recent setbacks might feel like a stark departure from their prior track record of success, but they are far from down for the count. As long as they can strike a balance between quantity and quality, harness the potential of their newly acquired Fox assets, and make strategic choices, there's hope yet for the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Explained | Marvel overhauls strategy amid superhero slump. Will it work?

<p>For years, Hollywood has been a stronghold of progressive values, where the left-leaning Democratic Party finds resounding support. It's a place where liberal ideologies are championed, and where celebrities have used their platform to endorse causes like Black Lives Matter. This ideological alignment appeared almost unshakeable until the events of October 7, when an armed conflict erupted between Hamas-led Palestinian militant groups and the Israeli military.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The attack began with a coordinated surprise offensive by Hamas, codenamed "Al-Aqsa Flood." It involved a massive rocket barrage launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel and the breach of the Gaza-Israel barrier by Palestinian militants who attacked civilian communities and Israeli military bases. Israel formally declared war on Hamas after the offensive.&nbsp;</p>

<p>It launched airstrikes in the Gaza Strip, resulting in thousands of deaths. Concerns about a humanitarian crisis have escalated after Israel discontinued the provision of food, water, electricity, and fuel to Gaza.</p>

<p>The war has divided global public opinion, with several pro-Palestine rallies, anti-Semitic attacks and terrorist killings reported from different parts of the world. Hollywood has also not been left untouched. But in order to understand the Hollywood reaction, we need to dig into its past a bit.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-palestine-war-celebrities-speak-out-two-groups-of-a-listers-pen-open-letters-653410/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>Exploring Hollywood's deep Jewish roots</strong></h2>

<p>From the very inception of Hollywood, Jews have played a key role in shaping the entertainment industry. Seeking refuge from anti-Semitism and discrimination in other industries, Jewish immigrants in the early 20th century became pioneers in the burgeoning film business. Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros, Universal Pictures – these major studios, founded by Jewish entrepreneurs, would go on to become the cornerstones of the industry.</p>

<p>Over the decades, Jews have ascended to prominence in various roles within the entertainment and media businesses. Figures like Barbra Streisand, Kirk Douglas, and Natalie Portman have achieved international acclaim as actors, while directors like Steven Spielberg and Mel Brooks have left indelible marks on cinema. Producers, including Carl Laemmle and Lew Wasserman, have played pivotal roles in shaping the industry's business landscape. The Jewish influence extends beyond the names and faces on the screen, touching upon the stories told, the themes explored, and the values championed.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-how-netanyahu-helped-grow-hamas-which-became-the-frankensteins-monster-for-him-651336">Explained | How Netanyahu helped turn Hamas into his Frankenstein's monster</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>The resounding silence</strong></h2>

<p>What's remarkable about the recent Hollywood divide is the notable silence that followed the Israel-Hamas conflict. Prominent celebrities, often vocal about global events on social media, remained surprisingly quiet. Major studios, typically quick to comment on socio-political issues worldwide, initially chose silence over action. This stands in stark contrast to the industry's unified opposition to Russia's Ukraine invasion in February 2022.</p>

<h2><strong>The Writers' Guild divide</strong></h2>

<p>The most evident division emerged within the Writers Guild of America (WGA), representing a significant portion of Hollywood's screenwriters. The WGA's decision not to condemn the attacks on Israel left many Jewish writers disenchanted. Some even contemplated severing ties with the union, while others, like Marc Guggenheim, a notable writer and producer, decided to withhold their dues. In contrast, an anonymous pro-Palestinian group known as WGA for Peace supported the union's stance, arguing that its members were apprehensive about being labelled as anti-Semitic.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-palestine-war-how-is-hamas-funded-how-does-hamas-govern-gaza-653273/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2><strong>A broader ideological chasm</strong></h2>

<p>This divide isn't confined to Hollywood; it extends to the broader liberal landscape. The Israel-Palestine conflict has ignited passionate debates within political circles, among students on college campuses in prestigious universities like Harvard and Stanford, and within progressive activist groups and philanthropic organisations. On one side, there's fervent support for Israel, while on the other, an energised faction perceives the Palestinian cause as an extension of the broader social justice movements that gained momentum in the United States in 2020. Simultaneously, there are voices, including Jewish individuals, advocating for a ceasefire.</p>

<h2><strong>Letters to President Biden</strong></h2>

<p>Prominent figures, including well-known actors like Paul Rudd and Ben Stiller, expressed their gratitude to President Joe Biden for his diplomatic efforts in one letter. In contrast, another group, featuring notables like Ben Affleck and Tony Kushner, penned a separate letter, urging President Biden to call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and Israel.</p>

<h2><strong>Social media controversy</strong></h2>

<p>Differences in opinion also spilled over onto social media platforms. Notable agent Maha Dakhil at the Creative Artists Agency faced a backlash after characterising Israel's airstrikes in Gaza as "genocide" in an Instagram post. Dakhil, who represents high-profile stars like Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon, later issued an apology and stepped down from an internal leadership position at the agency. This incident led to the loss of a significant client, screenwriter and playwright Aaron Sorkin, who<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-aaron-sorkin-leaves-talent-agency-caa-over-maha-dakhils-controversial-israel-hamas-post-651200"> opted to switch</a></strong> to a rival agency.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained-how-martin-scorsese-makes-movies-651192">Explained: How Martin Scorsese makes movies</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Resurgence of anti-Semitism</strong></h2>

<p>While the division within the entertainment industry hasn't led to violence, there's growing concern among Jewish individuals as anti-Semitic incidents and hate crimes have surged in the United States since the start of the conflict. The Anti-Defamation League reported a 388 per cent increase in harassment, vandalism, and assault in the past three weeks compared to the same period the previous year.</p>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--osage-indian-murders-that-inspired-martin-scorseses-killers-of-the-flower-moon-592892">&nbsp;Explained | Osage Indian Murders that inspired Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Is the complexity of the conflict to blame?</strong></h2>

<p>The divide that has emerged within Hollywood may, in large part, be attributed to the inherent complexity of the Israel-Palestine conflict. This multifaceted and deeply entrenched conflict defies simplistic solutions and has fueled a wide spectrum of opinions, even within the liberal bastion of Hollywood.</p>

<p>The conflict's long and turbulent history, marked by territorial disputes, historical grievances, and competing narratives, has generated passionate advocacy on both sides. Within the entertainment industry, where social and political issues are often under the spotlight, navigating this intricate landscape becomes challenging.</p>

<p>The conflict's nuances make it difficult for a one-size-fits-all approach to be embraced in a place like Hollywood, where diversity of thought and perspective is generally celebrated. This complexity has contributed to the divide within the industry, with individuals and organisations grappling with how to align their values and beliefs in a landscape marked by conflicting loyalties and deeply held convictions.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


For years, Hollywood has been a stronghold of progressive values, where the left-leaning Democratic Party finds resounding support. It's a place where liberal ideologies are championed, and where celebrities have used their platform to endorse causes like Black Lives Matter.

For years, Hollywood has been a stronghold of progressive values, where the left-leaning Democratic Party finds resounding support. It's a place where liberal ideologies are championed, and where celebrities have used their platform to endorse causes like Black Lives Matter. This ideological alignment appeared almost unshakeable until the events of October 7, when an armed conflict erupted between Hamas-led Palestinian militant groups and the Israeli military. The attack began with a coordinated surprise offensive by Hamas, codenamed "Al-Aqsa Flood." It involved a massive rocket barrage launched from the Gaza Strip into Israel and the breach of the Gaza-Israel barrier by Palestinian militants who attacked civilian communities and Israeli military bases. Israel formally declared war on Hamas after the offensive. It launched airstrikes in the Gaza Strip, resulting in thousands of deaths. Concerns about a humanitarian crisis have escalated after Israel discontinued the provision of food, water, electricity, and fuel to Gaza. The war has divided global public opinion, with several pro-Palestine rallies, anti-Semitic attacks and terrorist killings reported from different parts of the world. Hollywood has also not been left untouched. But in order to understand the Hollywood reaction, we need to dig into its past a bit. Exploring Hollywood's deep Jewish roots From the very inception of Hollywood, Jews have played a key role in shaping the entertainment industry. Seeking refuge from anti-Semitism and discrimination in other industries, Jewish immigrants in the early 20th century became pioneers in the burgeoning film business. Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros, Universal Pictures – these major studios, founded by Jewish entrepreneurs, would go on to become the cornerstones of the industry. Over the decades, Jews have ascended to prominence in various roles within the entertainment and media businesses. Figures like Barbra Streisand, Kirk Douglas, and Natalie Portman have achieved international acclaim as actors, while directors like Steven Spielberg and Mel Brooks have left indelible marks on cinema. Producers, including Carl Laemmle and Lew Wasserman, have played pivotal roles in shaping the industry's business landscape. The Jewish influence extends beyond the names and faces on the screen, touching upon the stories told, the themes explored, and the values championed. Also Read | Explained | How Netanyahu helped turn Hamas into his Frankenstein's monster The resounding silence What's remarkable about the recent Hollywood divide is the notable silence that followed the Israel-Hamas conflict. Prominent celebrities, often vocal about global events on social media, remained surprisingly quiet. Major studios, typically quick to comment on socio-political issues worldwide, initially chose silence over action. This stands in stark contrast to the industry's unified opposition to Russia's Ukraine invasion in February 2022. The Writers' Guild divide The most evident division emerged within the Writers Guild of America (WGA), representing a significant portion of Hollywood's screenwriters. The WGA's decision not to condemn the attacks on Israel left many Jewish writers disenchanted. Some even contemplated severing ties with the union, while others, like Marc Guggenheim, a notable writer and producer, decided to withhold their dues. In contrast, an anonymous pro-Palestinian group known as WGA for Peace supported the union's stance, arguing that its members were apprehensive about being labelled as anti-Semitic. A broader ideological chasm This divide isn't confined to Hollywood; it extends to the broader liberal landscape. The Israel-Palestine conflict has ignited passionate debates within political circles, among students on college campuses in prestigious universities like Harvard and Stanford, and within progressive activist groups and philanthropic organisations. On one side, there's fervent support for Israel, while on the other, an energised faction perceives the Palestinian cause as an extension of the broader social justice movements that gained momentum in the United States in 2020. Simultaneously, there are voices, including Jewish individuals, advocating for a ceasefire. Letters to President Biden Prominent figures, including well-known actors like Paul Rudd and Ben Stiller, expressed their gratitude to President Joe Biden for his diplomatic efforts in one letter. In contrast, another group, featuring notables like Ben Affleck and Tony Kushner, penned a separate letter, urging President Biden to call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and Israel. Social media controversy Differences in opinion also spilled over onto social media platforms. Notable agent Maha Dakhil at the Creative Artists Agency faced a backlash after characterising Israel's airstrikes in Gaza as "genocide" in an Instagram post. Dakhil, who represents high-profile stars like Natalie Portman and Reese Witherspoon, later issued an apology and stepped down from an internal leadership position at the agency. This incident led to the loss of a significant client, screenwriter and playwright Aaron Sorkin, who opted to switch to a rival agency. Also Read | Explained: How Martin Scorsese makes movies Resurgence of anti-Semitism While the division within the entertainment industry hasn't led to violence, there's growing concern among Jewish individuals as anti-Semitic incidents and hate crimes have surged in the United States since the start of the conflict. The Anti-Defamation League reported a 388 per cent increase in harassment, vandalism, and assault in the past three weeks compared to the same period the previous year. Also Read | Explained | Osage Indian Murders that inspired Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon Is the complexity of the conflict to blame? The divide that has emerged within Hollywood may, in large part, be attributed to the inherent complexity of the Israel-Palestine conflict. This multifaceted and deeply entrenched conflict defies simplistic solutions and has fueled a wide spectrum of opinions, even within the liberal bastion of Hollywood. The conflict's long and turbulent history, marked by territorial disputes, historical grievances, and competing narratives, has generated passionate advocacy on both sides. Within the entertainment industry, where social and political issues are often under the spotlight, navigating this intricate landscape becomes challenging. The conflict's nuances make it difficult for a one-size-fits-all approach to be embraced in a place like Hollywood, where diversity of thought and perspective is generally celebrated. This complexity has contributed to the divide within the industry, with individuals and organisations grappling with how to align their values and beliefs in a landscape marked by conflicting loyalties and deeply held convictions. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Explained | How Israel-Hamas war is dividing Hollywood and celeb world

Killers of the Flower Moon, directed by Martin Scorsese and based on David Grann's 2017 book, explores a dark chapter in American history involving the gruesome murders of wealthy Native Americans in early 20th-century Oklahoma. The film stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Lily Gladstone, and Robert De Niro. Does it deliver?

Was Killers of the Flower Moon worth waiting?

<p>On this special day, as we celebrate Joaquin Phoenix's 49th birthday, it's an opportunity to delve deeper into the multifaceted career of this extraordinary actor. While his portrayal of the <em>Joker </em>has received global recognition (and an Oscar), there exists a tour de force performance that is often overshadowed in comparison, which, in this scribe's humble opinion, is his very best. It is Phoenix's work as Freddie Quell in<em> The Master</em>. While it did not receive an Oscar, perhaps it should have (not to undermine the actor's clearly superb performance in <em>Joker</em>).</p>

<h2><strong>What is <em>The Master</em> all about?</strong></h2>

<p>A 2012 film written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, the film is a drama set in the 1950s that revolves around the intricate relationship between two central characters: Freddie Quell, played by Joaquin Phoenix, a deeply troubled World War II veteran grappling with alcoholism and post-traumatic stress, and Lancaster Dodd, portrayed by Philip Seymour Hoffman, a charismatic leader known as The Master of a spiritual movement called The Cause. The film delves into their complex bond as Freddie becomes part of Dodd's inner circle, with Dodd attempting to help Freddie confront his demons and integrate him into the movement. The film explores themes of power, control, belief, manipulation, and the quest for meaning, while shedding light on the dynamics of a cult-like organisation and the vulnerabilities of individuals seeking belonging and purpose.&nbsp;</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/a6Zw0p9qOkg?si=530jrn0mbHpLz36z" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Joaquin Phoenix is excellent in<em> The Master</em></strong></h2>

<p>Phoenix's transformation into Quell is nothing short of a masterclass in method acting. Quell attempts to reintegrate into society but remains a tormented soul. Phoenix's dedication to this character is always awe-inspiring and we saw the extent to which he was able to alter his physical appearance to become Arthur Fleck. In<em> The Master,</em> he sheds weight, adopts an erratic, unpredictable demeanour, and wears the character's inner turmoil on his sleeves. Every movement and expression exudes raw emotion, creating a portrayal that is not just engrossing but breathtaking in its authenticity.</p>

<p>What sets this performance apart is its complexity. Phoenix dives headfirst into the psyche of Quell, a character teetering on the edge of sanity. His unpredictable outbursts, inner demons, and the emotional maelstrom that Quell navigates are portrayed with a skill by Phoenix that is astounding.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>The Master</em> isn't merely a showcase of Phoenix's brilliance; it's a film that, as a whole, is a cinematic tour de force. Phoenix's on-screen chemistry with Hoffman is electrifying, and their interactions are a mesmerising dance of control and submission.</p>

<p>Despite the undeniable brilliance of Phoenix's performance, he faced stiff competition during the awards season when <em>The Master</em> was released. The Academy recognised his talent, but the Best Actor Oscar sadly went to another actor that year (Daniel Day-Lewis for Lincoln, so maybe not that sad).&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


On this special day, as we celebrate Joaquin Phoenix's 49th birthday, it's an opportunity to delve deeper into the multifaceted career of this extraordinary actor.

On this special day, as we celebrate Joaquin Phoenix's 49th birthday, it's an opportunity to delve deeper into the multifaceted career of this extraordinary actor. While his portrayal of the Joker has received global recognition (and an Oscar), there exists a tour de force performance that is often overshadowed in comparison, which, in this scribe's humble opinion, is his very best. It is Phoenix's work as Freddie Quell in The Master. While it did not receive an Oscar, perhaps it should have (not to undermine the actor's clearly superb performance in Joker). What is The Master all about? A 2012 film written and directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, the film is a drama set in the 1950s that revolves around the intricate relationship between two central characters: Freddie Quell, played by Joaquin Phoenix, a deeply troubled World War II veteran grappling with alcoholism and post-traumatic stress, and Lancaster Dodd, portrayed by Philip Seymour Hoffman, a charismatic leader known as The Master of a spiritual movement called The Cause. The film delves into their complex bond as Freddie becomes part of Dodd's inner circle, with Dodd attempting to help Freddie confront his demons and integrate him into the movement. The film explores themes of power, control, belief, manipulation, and the quest for meaning, while shedding light on the dynamics of a cult-like organisation and the vulnerabilities of individuals seeking belonging and purpose. Joaquin Phoenix is excellent in The Master Phoenix's transformation into Quell is nothing short of a masterclass in method acting. Quell attempts to reintegrate into society but remains a tormented soul. Phoenix's dedication to this character is always awe-inspiring and we saw the extent to which he was able to alter his physical appearance to become Arthur Fleck. In The Master, he sheds weight, adopts an erratic, unpredictable demeanour, and wears the character's inner turmoil on his sleeves. Every movement and expression exudes raw emotion, creating a portrayal that is not just engrossing but breathtaking in its authenticity. What sets this performance apart is its complexity. Phoenix dives headfirst into the psyche of Quell, a character teetering on the edge of sanity. His unpredictable outbursts, inner demons, and the emotional maelstrom that Quell navigates are portrayed with a skill by Phoenix that is astounding. The Master isn't merely a showcase of Phoenix's brilliance; it's a film that, as a whole, is a cinematic tour de force. Phoenix's on-screen chemistry with Hoffman is electrifying, and their interactions are a mesmerising dance of control and submission. Despite the undeniable brilliance of Phoenix's performance, he faced stiff competition during the awards season when The Master was released. The Academy recognised his talent, but the Best Actor Oscar sadly went to another actor that year (Daniel Day-Lewis for Lincoln, so maybe not that sad). WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Joaquin Phoenix at 49: Revisiting his overlooked tour de force in The Master

<p>In <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, the legendary director Martin Scorsese undertakes a monumental task: bringing to life the dark and complex history of the Osage Nation and the gruesome murders that marred their newfound wealth following the discovery of oil on their land in early 20th century Oklahoma.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Based on David Grann's 2017 book, the film is a disturbing and often haunting chronicle of a deeply unsettling chapter in American history. It is a masterful work by any definition of the word and depicts the murders and the ensuing atmosphere of fear in harrowing detail. And with Scorsese's natural directorial flair, it also raises significant questions about whose perspective the story truly serves and whether it is able to navigate the tricky terrain of telling a story of the oppressed without falling prey to oppressor's perspective.</p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/was-killers-of-the-flower-moon-worth-waiting-652355/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>It was a tasty idea: An eye-opening non-fiction book about an overlooked and horrifying events in the American history being adapted to a 3.5 hours film by one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. Does it deliver? Well, yes and no.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The Osage Reign of Terror was a two-decade-long string of brutal murders that targeted the Osage community after their land, hitherto considered too rocky and without much value and "gifted" to them by white settlers, yielded immense wealth from oil reserves. The Osage, like many other Native American tribes, had a history of loss, displacement, and struggle, and the sudden influx of wealth turned them into the richest people per capita in the United States.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But their newfound riches attracted the envy of white outsiders who saw them as undeserving of their money and sought to exploit and dispossess them. The film attempts to depict the kind of thinking that led to one of the most inhumane and heinous murder campaigns in American history.</p>

<p>To this day, the exact number of Osage people murdered during this reign of terror remains unknown.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EP34Yoxs3FQ?si=KB_ZAgGF2eNcNZLy" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Does<em> Killers of the Flower Moon </em>tell the story from the wrong perspective?</strong></h2>

<p>The film tells the story by focusing on Mollie Kyle, portrayed by Lily Gladstone, one of the Osage individuals who initially saw white rancher and the ringleader of the conspiracy William King Hale, portrayed by Robert De Niro, as a local hero and referred to him with respect by using his middle name, King. Mollie's perspective serves as a pivotal lens through which the audience experiences the harrowing events.&nbsp;</p>

<p>I had not seen anything of Gladstone before this movie and thus was dumbfounded by the ease with which she held her own before the actors of Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro's calibre. I cannot overstate this, but she was simply outstanding in the movie, though I do believe she was not awarded the 'main character' treatment that she deserved.&nbsp;</p>

<p>She is depicted as a determined and strong woman, but her character's passivity and lack of overt anger or retaliation in the face of the crimes committed against her, her family, and her community, even at the end, was less than satisfying. I expected a catharsis after witnessing unrelenting violence against her community for three hours.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The film presents a stark dichotomy: it does successfully highlight the pain the Osage suffered. However, the movie's choice to centralise the character of Ernest Burkhart, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, admittedly alongside Mollie, is a strange creative choice that rankled with me. I get Leo is a phenomenal actor (and he is certainly amazing in this movie) but perhaps it would have been better for him to take a backseat this time?</p>

<p>While Ernest and Mollie's stories are undoubtedly interconnected, the narrative approach makes <em>Killers of the Flower Moon </em>feel like a film primarily tailored, however unintentionally, for a white audience.</p>

<p>The Osage perspective is at times relegated to the background. It is a valid criticism, even if I am talking about a maestro like Scorsese (and his co-screenwriter Eric Roth), to wonder if the film should have provided a more robust platform for their voices and experiences.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The choice to focus on Ernest and his transformation from a seemingly innocuous character into an accomplice in heinous crimes would have been an interesting and compelling to witness in any other movie. But here, in a film about a series of tragedies taking place in a Native American community at the hands of white settlers, it inevitably steers the narrative towards an oppressor's perspective.</p>

<p>In all fairness, though, Osage's language and culture do play an important role in the film and are celebrated, with several scenes where characters speak in Osage and rituals being performed. The movie directly confronts the racism, violence, and maliciousness prevalent among white settlers, particularly those who consider themselves friends of the "Indians", and paints a vivid and painful picture of the harsh reality that many Indigenous communities around the world have had to endure.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Scorsese, after all, made this film in conjunction with members of the community, and it is clear while watching the film that he has deep respect for the people and this story.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7cx9nCHsemc?si=QZbqKdVZE1mFjnkP" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2>Performances</h2>

<p>The performances are universally excellent and one of the reasons the film, despite its hefty runtime, never felt dull. Gladstone and DiCaprio are excellent individually as mentioned above but as a team, they get even better. De Niro, a Scorsese old hand, is brilliant in his role as the cunning and enigmatic Hale, I do wish De Niro would play more outright villains. He is crazy good at it. He exudes an outward charm that does not quite mask his underlying malevolence. His ability to transition seamlessly between charismatic and sinister is something to behold.</p>

<h2><strong>Technical aspects are flawless</strong></h2>

<p>Cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto crafts breathtaking visuals. There are striking angles, composition, and sparing, artful use of light. The interior and exterior shots are composed with precision, creating a truly vivid and immersive cinematic experience. I recommend an IMAX screen if your city has one. Prieto's use of saturated colours enhances the visual richness of already gorgeous vistas of the Osage Nation and interiors. The visuals also go a long way in capturing the essence of the time and place.</p>

<p>Thelma Schoonmaker's editing is one other reason why the pacing of the film is just perfect. There are quick, daring cuts that may be jarring at times, but they contribute to the film's overall rhythm and impact. She is able to maintain a sense of urgency in certain scenes while allowing for moments of reflection in others. It is a delicate balance to maintain but she nails it. Her editing choices, coupled with Scorsese's directon, serves to keep the audience on the edge of their seats, enhancing the storytelling and maintaining a sense of momentum throughout the nearly three-and-a-half-hour runtime.</p>

<p>The late Robbie Robertson's score create a rich atmosphere, alternating between a rhythmic, drum-heavy Native American beat, chants, and evocative soundscapes. His connection to indigenous themes, rooted in his Mohawk heritage, was evident in the music's resonance and cultural relevance.</p>

<h2><strong><em>Killers of the Flower Moon,</em> despite flaws, is a tremendous piece of filmmaking</strong></h2>

<p>In the end,<em> Killers of the Flower Moon</em>, for all its flaws, is a moving, devastating, and utterly tremendous piece of cinema that demands attention and reflection. The film is a stark reminder of the importance of historical awareness and the need to confront uncomfortable truths. It is a work of great artistry and emotional depth, yet it raises important questions about the portrayal of historical atrocities and whose perspective should take precedence in telling these stories.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


In Killers of the Flower Moon, the legendary director Martin Scorsese undertakes a monumental task: bringing to life the dark and complex history of the Osage Nation and the gruesome murders that marred their newfound wealth following the discovery of oil on their land in early 20th century Oklahoma.

In Killers of the Flower Moon, the legendary director Martin Scorsese undertakes a monumental task: bringing to life the dark and complex history of the Osage Nation and the gruesome murders that marred their newfound wealth following the discovery of oil on their land in early 20th century Oklahoma. Based on David Grann's 2017 book, the film is a disturbing and often haunting chronicle of a deeply unsettling chapter in American history. It is a masterful work by any definition of the word and depicts the murders and the ensuing atmosphere of fear in harrowing detail. And with Scorsese's natural directorial flair, it also raises significant questions about whose perspective the story truly serves and whether it is able to navigate the tricky terrain of telling a story of the oppressed without falling prey to oppressor's perspective. It was a tasty idea: An eye-opening non-fiction book about an overlooked and horrifying events in the American history being adapted to a 3.5 hours film by one of the greatest filmmakers of all time. Does it deliver? Well, yes and no. The Osage Reign of Terror was a two-decade-long string of brutal murders that targeted the Osage community after their land, hitherto considered too rocky and without much value and "gifted" to them by white settlers, yielded immense wealth from oil reserves. The Osage, like many other Native American tribes, had a history of loss, displacement, and struggle, and the sudden influx of wealth turned them into the richest people per capita in the United States. But their newfound riches attracted the envy of white outsiders who saw them as undeserving of their money and sought to exploit and dispossess them. The film attempts to depict the kind of thinking that led to one of the most inhumane and heinous murder campaigns in American history. To this day, the exact number of Osage people murdered during this reign of terror remains unknown. Does Killers of the Flower Moon tell the story from the wrong perspective? The film tells the story by focusing on Mollie Kyle, portrayed by Lily Gladstone, one of the Osage individuals who initially saw white rancher and the ringleader of the conspiracy William King Hale, portrayed by Robert De Niro, as a local hero and referred to him with respect by using his middle name, King. Mollie's perspective serves as a pivotal lens through which the audience experiences the harrowing events. I had not seen anything of Gladstone before this movie and thus was dumbfounded by the ease with which she held her own before the actors of Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro's calibre. I cannot overstate this, but she was simply outstanding in the movie, though I do believe she was not awarded the 'main character' treatment that she deserved. She is depicted as a determined and strong woman, but her character's passivity and lack of overt anger or retaliation in the face of the crimes committed against her, her family, and her community, even at the end, was less than satisfying. I expected a catharsis after witnessing unrelenting violence against her community for three hours. The film presents a stark dichotomy: it does successfully highlight the pain the Osage suffered. However, the movie's choice to centralise the character of Ernest Burkhart, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, admittedly alongside Mollie, is a strange creative choice that rankled with me. I get Leo is a phenomenal actor (and he is certainly amazing in this movie) but perhaps it would have been better for him to take a backseat this time? While Ernest and Mollie's stories are undoubtedly interconnected, the narrative approach makes Killers of the Flower Moon feel like a film primarily tailored, however unintentionally, for a white audience. The Osage perspective is at times relegated to the background. It is a valid criticism, even if I am talking about a maestro like Scorsese (and his co-screenwriter Eric Roth), to wonder if the film should have provided a more robust platform for their voices and experiences. The choice to focus on Ernest and his transformation from a seemingly innocuous character into an accomplice in heinous crimes would have been an interesting and compelling to witness in any other movie. But here, in a film about a series of tragedies taking place in a Native American community at the hands of white settlers, it inevitably steers the narrative towards an oppressor's perspective. In all fairness, though, Osage's language and culture do play an important role in the film and are celebrated, with several scenes where characters speak in Osage and rituals being performed. The movie directly confronts the racism, violence, and maliciousness prevalent among white settlers, particularly those who consider themselves friends of the "Indians", and paints a vivid and painful picture of the harsh reality that many Indigenous communities around the world have had to endure. Scorsese, after all, made this film in conjunction with members of the community, and it is clear while watching the film that he has deep respect for the people and this story. Performances The performances are universally excellent and one of the reasons the film, despite its hefty runtime, never felt dull. Gladstone and DiCaprio are excellent individually as mentioned above but as a team, they get even better. De Niro, a Scorsese old hand, is brilliant in his role as the cunning and enigmatic Hale, I do wish De Niro would play more outright villains. He is crazy good at it. He exudes an outward charm that does not quite mask his underlying malevolence. His ability to transition seamlessly between charismatic and sinister is something to behold. Technical aspects are flawless Cinematographer Rodrigo Prieto crafts breathtaking visuals. There are striking angles, composition, and sparing, artful use of light. The interior and exterior shots are composed with precision, creating a truly vivid and immersive cinematic experience. I recommend an IMAX screen if your city has one. Prieto's use of saturated colours enhances the visual richness of already gorgeous vistas of the Osage Nation and interiors. The visuals also go a long way in capturing the essence of the time and place. Thelma Schoonmaker's editing is one other reason why the pacing of the film is just perfect. There are quick, daring cuts that may be jarring at times, but they contribute to the film's overall rhythm and impact. She is able to maintain a sense of urgency in certain scenes while allowing for moments of reflection in others. It is a delicate balance to maintain but she nails it. Her editing choices, coupled with Scorsese's directon, serves to keep the audience on the edge of their seats, enhancing the storytelling and maintaining a sense of momentum throughout the nearly three-and-a-half-hour runtime. The late Robbie Robertson's score create a rich atmosphere, alternating between a rhythmic, drum-heavy Native American beat, chants, and evocative soundscapes. His connection to indigenous themes, rooted in his Mohawk heritage, was evident in the music's resonance and cultural relevance. Killers of the Flower Moon, despite flaws, is a tremendous piece of filmmaking In the end, Killers of the Flower Moon, for all its flaws, is a moving, devastating, and utterly tremendous piece of cinema that demands attention and reflection. The film is a stark reminder of the importance of historical awareness and the need to confront uncomfortable truths. It is a work of great artistry and emotional depth, yet it raises important questions about the portrayal of historical atrocities and whose perspective should take precedence in telling these stories. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Killers of the Flower Moon review: A devastating, utterly tremendous piece of cinema

<p><em>Cult Corner is a new weekly column that will serve as your gateway to the uncharted territories of entertainment. Discover hidden treasures, forgotten classics, and offbeat wonders that deserve your attention. Join us in this realm of pop culture that often escapes mainstream recognition.</em></p>

<p>Welcome back to Cult Corner, where we, you and I, traverse the uncharted territories of the entertainment world to uncover the hidden treasures that may have slipped past the otherwise watchful eyes of mainstream audiences. In this, our second edition, we invite you to lose yourself in the labyrinthine streets of Victorian London, a place where the supernatural and the literary merge seamlessly, in the Showtime horror series <em>Penny Dreadful.</em></p>

<h2><strong>A dark, gothic rhapsody</strong></h2>

<p><em>Penny Dreadful</em> isn't just a TV series; it's a dark, intoxicating sonnet that tantalises the senses. Created by John Logan, it beckons viewers into a world where the line between reality and nightmare is as thin as the pages of a vintage horror novel. In a television landscape dominated by predictability, <em>Penny Dreadful </em>emerges as a beacon of unpredictability and eloquent darkness.</p>

<h2><strong>The unforgettable ensemble</strong></h2>

<p>Eva Green as Vanessa Ives is the MVP of this show, even if the rest of the cast is uncommonly strong as well. She is nothing short of bewitching. Her portrayal of the tortured, possessed heroine is a masterclass in acting. Josh Hartnett's Ethan Chandler adds a dash of Wild West enigma to the Victorian backdrop, while Timothy Dalton's Sir Malcolm Murray brings gravitas and complexity to the ensemble. The entire cast is a dark dream brought to life.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/YFXHfEqMcis?si=MEWl6G3zQeXnw1A2" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>A literary feast</strong></h2>

<p><em>Penny Dreadful </em>will please those who love the literary works set in London and written during the Victorian era. The show serves up a feast for literary aficionados. It's as if the classics of the 19th century have come to life, only to reveal their darkest and most intimate secrets. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and more are reimagined with a twist of supernatural allure. Each episode is almost like a literary treasure hunt for those who are well-versed in the literature of that era.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-cult-corner-charming-british-comedy-series-detectorists-unearths-the-extraordinary-in-the-ordinary-649522">Cult Corner: Charming British comedy series Detectorists unearths the extraordinary in the ordinary</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Dark and delicious atmosphere</strong></h2>

<p>The show's creators didn't just construct a backdrop; they summoned a realm. The streets of Victorian London, perpetually shrouded in fog, and candlelit chambers evoke a world that's both hauntingly authentic and intoxicatingly atmospheric. Every cobblestone, and every flickering shadow adds to the overall aura of mystery and dread. It is one of the most beautifully shot TV shows around, though I may be a little biased in its favour without intending to, as I’ve always loved novels, movies, and TV shows set in the Victorian England. But no matter what your opinion is on the setting, you are going to love the show's visual style.</p>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/top-10-greatest-horror-movies-of-all-time-529631">&nbsp;Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Spellbinding musical score</strong></h2>

<p>The musical score in <em>Penny Dreadful,</em> composed by Polish composer Abel Korzeniowski, is very good. It might be the shared historical backdrop, but I couldn't help but draw comparisons between the background score of <em>Penny Dreadful</em> and Hans Zimmer's haunting melodies in Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes films. The dark and atmospheric tunes play a pivotal role in recreating the mesmerising Gothic ambiance, and what's particularly remarkable is the way character-specific pieces capture the essence, or perhaps the absence of it in the case of Caliban, of each character with remarkable effectiveness.</p>

<h2><strong>Mystery, morality, and monstrous themes</strong></h2>

<p>Beyond the supernatural, <em>Penny Dreadful </em>delves deep into the human psyche. It's a show that asks profound questions about morality, redemption, and what truly makes a monster. The characters grapple with their inner demons (sometimes a little too literal), and sometimes, it's the darkness within that's more terrifying than any external threat.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


Cult Corner is a new weekly column that will serve as your gateway to the uncharted territories of entertainment. Discover hidden treasures, forgotten classics, and offbeat wonders that deserve your attention.

Cult Corner is a new weekly column that will serve as your gateway to the uncharted territories of entertainment. Discover hidden treasures, forgotten classics, and offbeat wonders that deserve your attention. Join us in this realm of pop culture that often escapes mainstream recognition. Welcome back to Cult Corner, where we, you and I, traverse the uncharted territories of the entertainment world to uncover the hidden treasures that may have slipped past the otherwise watchful eyes of mainstream audiences. In this, our second edition, we invite you to lose yourself in the labyrinthine streets of Victorian London, a place where the supernatural and the literary merge seamlessly, in the Showtime horror series Penny Dreadful. A dark, gothic rhapsody Penny Dreadful isn't just a TV series; it's a dark, intoxicating sonnet that tantalises the senses. Created by John Logan, it beckons viewers into a world where the line between reality and nightmare is as thin as the pages of a vintage horror novel. In a television landscape dominated by predictability, Penny Dreadful emerges as a beacon of unpredictability and eloquent darkness. The unforgettable ensemble Eva Green as Vanessa Ives is the MVP of this show, even if the rest of the cast is uncommonly strong as well. She is nothing short of bewitching. Her portrayal of the tortured, possessed heroine is a masterclass in acting. Josh Hartnett's Ethan Chandler adds a dash of Wild West enigma to the Victorian backdrop, while Timothy Dalton's Sir Malcolm Murray brings gravitas and complexity to the ensemble. The entire cast is a dark dream brought to life. A literary feast Penny Dreadful will please those who love the literary works set in London and written during the Victorian era. The show serves up a feast for literary aficionados. It's as if the classics of the 19th century have come to life, only to reveal their darkest and most intimate secrets. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray, Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and more are reimagined with a twist of supernatural allure. Each episode is almost like a literary treasure hunt for those who are well-versed in the literature of that era. Also Read | Cult Corner: Charming British comedy series Detectorists unearths the extraordinary in the ordinary Dark and delicious atmosphere The show's creators didn't just construct a backdrop; they summoned a realm. The streets of Victorian London, perpetually shrouded in fog, and candlelit chambers evoke a world that's both hauntingly authentic and intoxicatingly atmospheric. Every cobblestone, and every flickering shadow adds to the overall aura of mystery and dread. It is one of the most beautifully shot TV shows around, though I may be a little biased in its favour without intending to, as I’ve always loved novels, movies, and TV shows set in the Victorian England. But no matter what your opinion is on the setting, you are going to love the show's visual style. Also Read | Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time Spellbinding musical score The musical score in Penny Dreadful, composed by Polish composer Abel Korzeniowski, is very good. It might be the shared historical backdrop, but I couldn't help but draw comparisons between the background score of Penny Dreadful and Hans Zimmer's haunting melodies in Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes films. The dark and atmospheric tunes play a pivotal role in recreating the mesmerising Gothic ambiance, and what's particularly remarkable is the way character-specific pieces capture the essence, or perhaps the absence of it in the case of Caliban, of each character with remarkable effectiveness. Mystery, morality, and monstrous themes Beyond the supernatural, Penny Dreadful delves deep into the human psyche. It's a show that asks profound questions about morality, redemption, and what truly makes a monster. The characters grapple with their inner demons (sometimes a little too literal), and sometimes, it's the darkness within that's more terrifying than any external threat. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Cult Corner: The dark, eerie elegance of Penny Dreadful

<p>Martin Scorsese, one of the most influential and prolific directors in the history of cinema and easily the greatest living filmmaker, has a distinctive approach to making movies that sets him apart from many of his contemporaries. His films are known for their storytelling prowess, meticulous attention to detail, and unique visual style. As his latest <em>Killers of the Flower Moon</em> hits theatres, let's explore the key elements of his filmmaking process, which has made him an iconic figure in the world of cinema.</p>

<h2><strong>Vision and passion</strong></h2>

<p>Every Scorsese film begins with a strong and personal vision. He is known for his passion for storytelling and cinema, and this enthusiasm is the driving force behind each of his projects. Scorsese often selects projects that resonate with him on a deep, emotional level. Whether it's exploring the complexities of crime, religion, or personal struggles, his films are often a reflection of his own interests and experiences.</p>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-martin-scorsese-cinemas-guiding-light-in-the-age-of-blockbusters-650753">&nbsp;Martin Scorsese, cinema's guiding light in the age of blockbusters</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Extensive research</strong></h2>

<p>Before shooting begins, Scorsese and his team engage in extensive research. This research phase is particularly important for his more historically grounded films. He immerses himself in the subject matter, gathering information on everything from the historical context to the characters and events he intends to depict. This thorough understanding allows him to make his films feel authentic and grounded in reality.</p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tp-xlcdWLok?si=BZ3SIVWnub-u4xlp" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Collaborative approach</strong></h2>

<p>One of the cornerstones of Scorsese's filmmaking process is his collaborative approach. He works closely with a dedicated team that shares his passion and vision. Thelma Schoonmaker, his long-time editor, plays a pivotal role in shaping the structure and pacing of his films. Their partnership is a testament to the power of collaboration in filmmaking. Schoonmaker's expertise in editing complements Scorsese's directorial style, ensuring that the final cut is finely tuned and seamlessly conveys the story's emotional nuances. Then there is Robert De Niro, who has worked with him since 1973's <em>Mean Streets</em>.<em> Killers of the Flower Moon</em> will be their 10th project together.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-martin-scorseses-goodfellas-the-king-of-mob-movies-that-still-packs-a-punch-645541">Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas: The king of mob movies that still packs a punch</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Screenplay development</strong></h2>

<p>The script is the foundation of any Scorsese film. He works closely with screenwriters to develop a strong, character-driven narrative. His films often focus on complex characters dealing with moral dilemmas and personal conflicts. He values sharp and authentic dialogue, which is crucial in bringing out the depth of the characters and advancing the story. Scorsese's dedication to a well-crafted screenplay is evident in the powerful dialogue exchanges that his films are known for.</p>

<h2><strong>Visual style</strong></h2>

<p>Scorsese has a distinctive visual style that has evolved over the years. He frequently employs techniques such as long tracking shots, freeze frames, and slow motion to add a unique and dynamic visual flair to his films. His use of color and lighting is meticulous, and he often works with skilled cinematographers to achieve the desired mood and atmosphere in each scene.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-martin-scorseses-taxi-driver-a-haunting-journey-into-the-dark-side-of-the-human-psyche-643568">Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver: A haunting journey into the dark side of the human psyche</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Music and sound</strong></h2>

<p>Music plays a crucial role in Scorsese's films. He has an exceptional knack for selecting music that complements the narrative and enhances the emotional impact of a scene. From rock 'n' roll in Goodfellas to classical pieces in The Age of Innocence, his film soundtracks are carefully curated to provide an emotional depth that resonates with the audience.</p>

<h2><strong>Editing and pacing</strong></h2>

<p>Scorsese is a master of editing and pacing. He often collaborates with long-time editor Thelma Schoonmaker to shape the structure of his films. Their partnership is renowned for creating a rhythm and momentum that keeps the audience engaged. The use of jump cuts, quick edits, and montage sequences is a signature element of Scorsese's storytelling style.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-martin-scorseses-mean-streets-where-mobsters-meet-mayhem-642823">Martin Scorsese's Mean Streets: Where mobsters meet mayhem</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>Themes and motifs</strong></h2>

<p>Certain themes and motifs are recurrent in Scorsese's work. For instance, the exploration of guilt, redemption, and the blurred lines between good and evil is a central theme in many of his films. He often delves into the darker aspects of human nature and society, creating a complex and morally ambiguous atmosphere.</p>

<h2><strong>Attention to detail</strong></h2>

<p>Scorsese's films are known for their attention to detail. Whether it's the historical accuracy of a period piece or the precise portrayal of a specific subculture, he goes to great lengths to ensure authenticity. This meticulous approach extends to set design, costume, and the portrayal of real locations. It's this dedication to detail that brings his worlds to life.</p>

<h2><strong>Directing actors</strong></h2>

<p>Scorsese is known for getting the best performances out of his actors. His collaborative approach allows for open communication and trust between him and his cast. He encourages improvisation and experimentation, which can lead to authentic and emotionally charged performances. This emphasis on character development and actor direction is a cornerstone of his filmmaking.</p>

<h2><strong>Post-production and final touches</strong></h2>

<p>Scorsese is closely involved in the post-production process of his films. He works alongside his editor and sound designer to fine-tune the movie, ensuring that every scene and every piece of dialogue contributes to the overall impact. His commitment to perfection often results in films that are exceptionally polished and compelling.</p>

<h2><strong>Film preservation and advocacy</strong></h2>

<p>In addition to his role as a filmmaker, Martin Scorsese is a prominent advocate for film preservation. He's passionate about preserving classic films and has been instrumental in restoring and preserving a wide range of cinema classics. This commitment to the art of film is evident in his own work, as he often pays homage to cinema history through references and visual cues in his films.</p>

<p>Also Read |&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-martin-scorseses-the-age-of-innocence-a-departure-from-the-gritty-to-the-genteel-645908">Martin Scorsese's The Age of Innocence: A departure from the gritty to the genteel</a></strong></p>

<h2><strong>What is <em>Killer of the Flower Moon</em> all about?</strong></h2>

<p>Also Read |<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-explained--osage-indian-murders-that-inspired-martin-scorseses-killers-of-the-flower-moon-592892">&nbsp;Explained | Osage Indian Murders that inspired Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon</a></strong></p>

<p>During the early 20th century, the Osage Nation, a Native American tribe living on an Oklahoma reservation, experienced a harrowing period filled with fear and violence. This turbulent era, known as the Osage Indian murders, serves as the backdrop for <em>Killers of the Flower Moon.</em></p>

<p>With a budget of $200 million, the film boasts of an impressive cast, including frequent collaborators of Scorsese such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro. Joining them are Jesse Plemons, Lily Gladstone, Brendan Fraser, and John Lithgow, among other notable actors.&nbsp;</p>




Martin Scorsese, one of the most influential and prolific directors in the history of cinema and easily the greatest living filmmaker, has a distinctive approach to making movies that sets him apart from many of his contemporaries.

Martin Scorsese, one of the most influential and prolific directors in the history of cinema and easily the greatest living filmmaker, has a distinctive approach to making movies that sets him apart from many of his contemporaries. His films are known for their storytelling prowess, meticulous attention to detail, and unique visual style. As his latest Killers of the Flower Moon hits theatres, let's explore the key elements of his filmmaking process, which has made him an iconic figure in the world of cinema. Vision and passion Every Scorsese film begins with a strong and personal vision. He is known for his passion for storytelling and cinema, and this enthusiasm is the driving force behind each of his projects. Scorsese often selects projects that resonate with him on a deep, emotional level. Whether it's exploring the complexities of crime, religion, or personal struggles, his films are often a reflection of his own interests and experiences. Also Read | Martin Scorsese, cinema's guiding light in the age of blockbusters Extensive research Before shooting begins, Scorsese and his team engage in extensive research. This research phase is particularly important for his more historically grounded films. He immerses himself in the subject matter, gathering information on everything from the historical context to the characters and events he intends to depict. This thorough understanding allows him to make his films feel authentic and grounded in reality. Collaborative approach One of the cornerstones of Scorsese's filmmaking process is his collaborative approach. He works closely with a dedicated team that shares his passion and vision. Thelma Schoonmaker, his long-time editor, plays a pivotal role in shaping the structure and pacing of his films. Their partnership is a testament to the power of collaboration in filmmaking. Schoonmaker's expertise in editing complements Scorsese's directorial style, ensuring that the final cut is finely tuned and seamlessly conveys the story's emotional nuances. Then there is Robert De Niro, who has worked with him since 1973's Mean Streets. Killers of the Flower Moon will be their 10th project together. Also Read | Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas: The king of mob movies that still packs a punch Screenplay development The script is the foundation of any Scorsese film. He works closely with screenwriters to develop a strong, character-driven narrative. His films often focus on complex characters dealing with moral dilemmas and personal conflicts. He values sharp and authentic dialogue, which is crucial in bringing out the depth of the characters and advancing the story. Scorsese's dedication to a well-crafted screenplay is evident in the powerful dialogue exchanges that his films are known for. Visual style Scorsese has a distinctive visual style that has evolved over the years. He frequently employs techniques such as long tracking shots, freeze frames, and slow motion to add a unique and dynamic visual flair to his films. His use of color and lighting is meticulous, and he often works with skilled cinematographers to achieve the desired mood and atmosphere in each scene. Also Read | Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver: A haunting journey into the dark side of the human psyche Music and sound Music plays a crucial role in Scorsese's films. He has an exceptional knack for selecting music that complements the narrative and enhances the emotional impact of a scene. From rock 'n' roll in Goodfellas to classical pieces in The Age of Innocence, his film soundtracks are carefully curated to provide an emotional depth that resonates with the audience. Editing and pacing Scorsese is a master of editing and pacing. He often collaborates with long-time editor Thelma Schoonmaker to shape the structure of his films. Their partnership is renowned for creating a rhythm and momentum that keeps the audience engaged. The use of jump cuts, quick edits, and montage sequences is a signature element of Scorsese's storytelling style. Also Read | Martin Scorsese's Mean Streets: Where mobsters meet mayhem Themes and motifs Certain themes and motifs are recurrent in Scorsese's work. For instance, the exploration of guilt, redemption, and the blurred lines between good and evil is a central theme in many of his films. He often delves into the darker aspects of human nature and society, creating a complex and morally ambiguous atmosphere. Attention to detail Scorsese's films are known for their attention to detail. Whether it's the historical accuracy of a period piece or the precise portrayal of a specific subculture, he goes to great lengths to ensure authenticity. This meticulous approach extends to set design, costume, and the portrayal of real locations. It's this dedication to detail that brings his worlds to life. Directing actors Scorsese is known for getting the best performances out of his actors. His collaborative approach allows for open communication and trust between him and his cast. He encourages improvisation and experimentation, which can lead to authentic and emotionally charged performances. This emphasis on character development and actor direction is a cornerstone of his filmmaking. Post-production and final touches Scorsese is closely involved in the post-production process of his films. He works alongside his editor and sound designer to fine-tune the movie, ensuring that every scene and every piece of dialogue contributes to the overall impact. His commitment to perfection often results in films that are exceptionally polished and compelling. Film preservation and advocacy In addition to his role as a filmmaker, Martin Scorsese is a prominent advocate for film preservation. He's passionate about preserving classic films and has been instrumental in restoring and preserving a wide range of cinema classics. This commitment to the art of film is evident in his own work, as he often pays homage to cinema history through references and visual cues in his films. Also Read | Martin Scorsese's The Age of Innocence: A departure from the gritty to the genteel What is Killer of the Flower Moon all about? Also Read | Explained | Osage Indian Murders that inspired Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon During the early 20th century, the Osage Nation, a Native American tribe living on an Oklahoma reservation, experienced a harrowing period filled with fear and violence. This turbulent era, known as the Osage Indian murders, serves as the backdrop for Killers of the Flower Moon. With a budget of $200 million, the film boasts of an impressive cast, including frequent collaborators of Scorsese such as Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro. Joining them are Jesse Plemons, Lily Gladstone, Brendan Fraser, and John Lithgow, among other notable actors.

Explained: How Martin Scorsese makes movies

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Kshitij Mohan Rawat

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.