Happy 43rd birthday to Jake Gyllenhaal! On the occasion, let's take a moment to appreciate his outstanding performance in Nightcrawler.

Released in 2014 and directed by Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler follows the story of Lou Bloom, played by Gyllenhaal, a driven and morally ambiguous man who stumbles into the world of crime journalism in Los Angeles. Lou is a character like no other, and Gyllenhaal's portrayal is nothing short of mesmerising.

From the very outset, Gyllenhaal's commitment to the role is palpable. The physical metamorphosis he undergoes is striking—shedding weight to embody the gaunt and wiry Lou Bloom. His appearance, coupled with the piercing intensity of his wide, unblinking eyes and the unsettling stillness that pervades his demeanor, creates an on-screen presence that is both eerie and undeniably captivating.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X8kYDQan8bw?si=gMZw_2jEpwqpqe-f" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

What for me truly elevates Gyllenhaal's performance is his adept handling of the intricate layers that define Lou Bloom's character. Lou isn't a conventional protagonist; he exists in the morally ambiguous realm of an antihero, a charismatic and intelligent individual whose compass is solely calibrated by ambition and an unrelenting desire for success. Gyllenhaal deftly navigates these complexities, skillfully portraying Lou as a character who is simultaneously repulsive and magnetic, blurring the lines between right and wrong.

Gyllenhaal's meticulous attention to detail becomes the cornerstone of his portrayal. Every nuance, from Lou's idiosyncratic mannerisms to his distinct speech patterns and expressions, is carefully crafted. This attention to authenticity contributes to the creation of a character that is not only fascinating but also deeply disturbing. It is through Gyllenhaal's performance that Bloom transcends the screen, becoming an uncomfortably real presence that lingers in the minds of the audience long after the credits roll.

Happy 43rd birthday to Jake Gyllenhaal! On the occasion, let's take a moment to appreciate his outstanding performance in Nightcrawler. Released in 2014 and directed by Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler follows the story of Lou Bloom, played by Gyllenhaal, a driven and morally ambiguous man who stumbles into the world of crime journalism in Los Angeles.

Happy 43rd birthday to Jake Gyllenhaal! On the occasion, let's take a moment to appreciate his outstanding performance in Nightcrawler. Released in 2014 and directed by Dan Gilroy, Nightcrawler follows the story of Lou Bloom, played by Gyllenhaal, a driven and morally ambiguous man who stumbles into the world of crime journalism in Los Angeles. Lou is a character like no other, and Gyllenhaal's portrayal is nothing short of mesmerising. From the very outset, Gyllenhaal's commitment to the role is palpable. The physical metamorphosis he undergoes is striking—shedding weight to embody the gaunt and wiry Lou Bloom. His appearance, coupled with the piercing intensity of his wide, unblinking eyes and the unsettling stillness that pervades his demeanor, creates an on-screen presence that is both eerie and undeniably captivating. What for me truly elevates Gyllenhaal's performance is his adept handling of the intricate layers that define Lou Bloom's character. Lou isn't a conventional protagonist; he exists in the morally ambiguous realm of an antihero, a charismatic and intelligent individual whose compass is solely calibrated by ambition and an unrelenting desire for success. Gyllenhaal deftly navigates these complexities, skillfully portraying Lou as a character who is simultaneously repulsive and magnetic, blurring the lines between right and wrong. Gyllenhaal's meticulous attention to detail becomes the cornerstone of his portrayal. Every nuance, from Lou's idiosyncratic mannerisms to his distinct speech patterns and expressions, is carefully crafted. This attention to authenticity contributes to the creation of a character that is not only fascinating but also deeply disturbing. It is through Gyllenhaal's performance that Bloom transcends the screen, becoming an uncomfortably real presence that lingers in the minds of the audience long after the credits roll.

Jake Gyllenhaal at 43: A spotlight on his mesmerising performance in Nightcrawler

Well, well, well, what have we here? We have Priscilla — Sofia Coppola's latest concoction of seduction, celebrity, and a dash of teenage naivety. As I sat through this cinematic journey into the golden age of Elvis and Priscilla, I couldn't help but feel like I was flipping through the pages of a vintage romance novel with a slightly worn cover. Sure, there's a certain allure to the tale of a young girl swept off her feet by the King of Rock and Roll, but Priscilla somehow manages to make it feel like a rose-tinted nightmare.

From the get-go, we're served a dose of nostalgia, complete with milkshakes in a West German diner and a young Priscilla, played quite convincingly by Cailee Spaeny, navigating the pitfalls of falling for a man who's not only twice her age but happens to be the undisputed musical sensation of the time — enter Jacob Elordi as the hip-shaking heartthrob himself.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DBWk6BohVXk?si=DwbspekyE8irsnef" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Coppola's touch is unmistakable in crafting visually appealing worlds that are, more often than not, gilded cages for her female protagonists. Priscilla, too, finds herself trapped in the lavish yet isolating confines of Graceland, where the line between adoration and derision becomes as blurry as an old black-and-white photograph.

Yet, for all its visual splendour and a commendable performance by Spaeny, Priscilla feels like it dances around the edges of its own potential. It's a film that knows it's hollow, a confection of slipper-pink nail polish and cutesy knick-knacks, but somehow, that acknowledgment doesn't elevate it beyond the realm of mere aesthetics. It's as if the film is aware of its own shortcomings but chooses not to dig deeper.

And speaking of digging deeper, Coppola, with her own lineage entwined with the cinematic world, could have provided a more nuanced exploration of the Presley marriage dynamics. Instead, Priscilla often feels like a faithful adaptation of Presley's memoir, lacking the grit and psychological dimensions that could have given it a more profound impact.

Sure, we get glimpses into Priscilla's struggles — the isolation, the compromises, the alleged infidelities of Elvis — but they feel like sketches rather than fully realised strokes on the canvas of a woman's life. It's a bit like looking at a masterpiece from afar and realising that, upon closer inspection, there are more shadows than substance.

As Priscilla navigates the glittering yet tumultuous world of fame and love, we are left wondering if there was a missed opportunity to explore the complexities of a woman finding her identity amidst the glitz and glamour. Coppola, much like Priscilla herself, chose the safety of the familiar over the risk of delving into the uncomfortable truths that could have made this biopic truly resonate.

In the end, Priscilla is a delicate masterwork that tiptoes around its subject matter, celebrating female self-ownership while remaining sympathetic and cautionary about the perils of losing oneself in the arms of a man. It's a film that knows its own artificiality, but whether it embraces it knowingly or succumbs to it inadvertently is a question left lingering. 
&nbsp;

Well, well, well, what have we here? We have Priscilla — Sofia Coppola's latest concoction of seduction, celebrity, and a dash of teenage naivety. As I sat through this cinematic journey into the golden age of Elvis and Priscilla, I couldn't help but feel like I was flipping through the pages of a vintage romance novel with a slightly worn cover.

Well, well, well, what have we here? We have Priscilla — Sofia Coppola's latest concoction of seduction, celebrity, and a dash of teenage naivety. As I sat through this cinematic journey into the golden age of Elvis and Priscilla, I couldn't help but feel like I was flipping through the pages of a vintage romance novel with a slightly worn cover. Sure, there's a certain allure to the tale of a young girl swept off her feet by the King of Rock and Roll, but Priscilla somehow manages to make it feel like a rose-tinted nightmare. From the get-go, we're served a dose of nostalgia, complete with milkshakes in a West German diner and a young Priscilla, played quite convincingly by Cailee Spaeny, navigating the pitfalls of falling for a man who's not only twice her age but happens to be the undisputed musical sensation of the time — enter Jacob Elordi as the hip-shaking heartthrob himself. Coppola's touch is unmistakable in crafting visually appealing worlds that are, more often than not, gilded cages for her female protagonists. Priscilla, too, finds herself trapped in the lavish yet isolating confines of Graceland, where the line between adoration and derision becomes as blurry as an old black-and-white photograph. Yet, for all its visual splendour and a commendable performance by Spaeny, Priscilla feels like it dances around the edges of its own potential. It's a film that knows it's hollow, a confection of slipper-pink nail polish and cutesy knick-knacks, but somehow, that acknowledgment doesn't elevate it beyond the realm of mere aesthetics. It's as if the film is aware of its own shortcomings but chooses not to dig deeper. And speaking of digging deeper, Coppola, with her own lineage entwined with the cinematic world, could have provided a more nuanced exploration of the Presley marriage dynamics. Instead, Priscilla often feels like a faithful adaptation of Presley's memoir, lacking the grit and psychological dimensions that could have given it a more profound impact. Sure, we get glimpses into Priscilla's struggles — the isolation, the compromises, the alleged infidelities of Elvis — but they feel like sketches rather than fully realised strokes on the canvas of a woman's life. It's a bit like looking at a masterpiece from afar and realising that, upon closer inspection, there are more shadows than substance. As Priscilla navigates the glittering yet tumultuous world of fame and love, we are left wondering if there was a missed opportunity to explore the complexities of a woman finding her identity amidst the glitz and glamour. Coppola, much like Priscilla herself, chose the safety of the familiar over the risk of delving into the uncomfortable truths that could have made this biopic truly resonate. In the end, Priscilla is a delicate masterwork that tiptoes around its subject matter, celebrating female self-ownership while remaining sympathetic and cautionary about the perils of losing oneself in the arms of a man. It's a film that knows its own artificiality, but whether it embraces it knowingly or succumbs to it inadvertently is a question left lingering.

Priscilla movie review: A love story that's more smothering than sweet

The members of BTS, the globally acclaimed K-pop sensation, find themselves at a crossroads as all members of the band have now embarked on their mandatory military service in South Korea. This decision, confirmed by their agency, BigHit Music, owned by HYBE, last October, has significant implications for the future trajectory of the boy band and its individual members.

<h2>Mandatory military service</h2>

The initiation of this mandatory military service became apparent when Jin, the eldest member of BTS, enlisted in December 2022. Now, the remaining members, including lead vocalist Jung Kook, are following suit, adhering to the legal requirement for all able-bodied South Korean men aged 18-28 to serve in the military. The obligation, ranging between 18 and 21 months, is deeply ingrained in South Korean society, and is viewed as a rite of passage for young men.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/explained-why-is-military-service-mandatory-in-south-korea-a-look-at-history-scandals-and-controversies-584360">Explained: Why's military service mandatory in S Korea, not sparing even BTS? Know history, controversies</a>

<h2>ARMY's emotional response</h2>

This hiatus has sparked conversations about the impact on BTS's colossal fanbase, affectionately known as the ARMY. With their engagement on social media being unprecedented, the departure of the members has left a void that many fans are finding hard to fill. The emotional responses were evident as the four remaining members—RM, V, Jimin, and Jungkook—departed for their military service, with fans expressing their heartfelt sentiments on various platforms.

The commitment of the ARMY to BTS has been a driving force in the group's unparalleled success. The fanbase's dedication extends beyond streaming music and attending concerts.

It manifests in diverse forms, from trending hashtags to charting BTS songs on platforms like iTunes, showcasing a level of loyalty that is rare in the music industry.

The surge of BTS's 2017 single, "Spring Day," to the top of the US iTunes charts during their absence exemplifies the ARMY's unwavering support.

K-pop academic Jimmyn Parc notes while speaking to the BBC that there is a potential for short depression among fans during this hiatus. The sense of loss is palpable, akin to a wartime separation of loved ones.

The fandom's actions mirror historical gestures of devotion, such as WW2 wives sending off their sweethearts to war. The ARMY's emotional tributes, expressed in various languages, highlight the global reach and impact of BTS.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bts-boys-join-military-service-fans-vow-to-wait-4-more-bts-boys-begin-their-military-services-668807/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>What the future holds</h2>

As BTS takes a collective break, questions loom about their future dynamics. Will they return to BigHit Music, their current agency, or explore new avenues? The uncertainty extends to individual pursuits, with speculation about solo careers gaining traction.

The hiatus also prompts contemplation about the nature of BTS's future activities—will they solely engage in reunions, or will members pursue independent projects?

The global success of BTS, often compared to the Beatles, has led to widespread anticipation about their next moves.

The hiatus, though challenging for fans, presents an opportunity for other K-pop groups to step into the limelight. The void left by BTS's absence opens doors for emerging bands like New Jeans and Le Sserafim, offering them a chance to receive more attention on Western mainstream charts.

The longevity and sustained popularity of a musical group during a hiatus are often uncertain. However, industry observers believe that BTS's dedicated fanbase and their management's strategic approach will play crucial roles in maintaining their status.

Jeff Benjamin, a K-pop columnist and writer at Billboard Magazine, emphasises the importance of consistently providing content during the hiatus. BTS's meticulous preparation, including songs, videos, and fan messages, showcases their commitment to keeping the connection alive with the ARMY.

<h2>Historical roots of mandatory military service</h2>

The mandatory military service, deeply rooted in South Korea's history, traces back to the post-World War II division of Korea into Soviet-aligned North Korea and America-aligned South Korea.

Article 39 of the South Korean constitution established the duty of national defence, and conscription became mandatory in 1957. The duration of service, initially set at 30 months, has been reduced to the current range.

The necessity of military service is closely tied to the conflict with North Korea, as the two nations technically remain at war. Exemptions or deferments, whether based on being the sole breadwinner or possessing exceptional talents, reflect the complexities of the system. Notably, there have been exemptions for artists and athletes, including footballer Son Heung-min, who was exempted after the national team won gold at the 2018 Asian Games.

<h2>Controversies and exemptions</h2>

Controversies surrounding conscription include societal expectations and the potential stigma faced by those perceived as evading service. The exemption system, installed in 1973, aimed at recognising achievements in various fields. Evading conscription, as demonstrated by pop singer Yoo Seung-jun, has had consequences, including deportation.

<h2>Conscientious objection and legal changes</h2>

The practice of conscientious objection has been a point of contention, with individuals facing a choice between military service against their beliefs or punishment. Human rights groups and international organisations, including the United Nations, criticised South Korea for violating the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. In response, the South Korean Constitutional Court ruled in 2018 that alternative civilian service must be introduced for conscientious objectors, leading to a change in the law in 2019.

<h2>BTS' future remains uncertain</h2>

As BTS members fulfil their mandatory military service, the impact on the broader K-pop industry, the future of the group, and the global music scene are shrouded in uncertainty.

While the hiatus prompts reflection for BTS, their fans, and the industry, the ARMY's steadfast support, combined with the strategic planning by BTS's management, is poised to play a decisive role in shaping the group's trajectory upon their reunion in 2025.

The world anticipates and closely observes the unfolding of the next chapter in BTS's extraordinary journey.

 
&nbsp;

The members of BTS, the globally acclaimed K-pop sensation, find themselves at a crossroads as all members of the band have now embarked on their mandatory military service in South Korea.

The members of BTS, the globally acclaimed K-pop sensation, find themselves at a crossroads as all members of the band have now embarked on their mandatory military service in South Korea. This decision, confirmed by their agency, BigHit Music, owned by HYBE, last October, has significant implications for the future trajectory of the boy band and its individual members. Mandatory military service The initiation of this mandatory military service became apparent when Jin, the eldest member of BTS, enlisted in December 2022. Now, the remaining members, including lead vocalist Jung Kook, are following suit, adhering to the legal requirement for all able-bodied South Korean men aged 18-28 to serve in the military. The obligation, ranging between 18 and 21 months, is deeply ingrained in South Korean society, and is viewed as a rite of passage for young men. Also Read | Explained: Why's military service mandatory in S Korea, not sparing even BTS? Know history, controversies ARMY's emotional response This hiatus has sparked conversations about the impact on BTS's colossal fanbase, affectionately known as the ARMY. With their engagement on social media being unprecedented, the departure of the members has left a void that many fans are finding hard to fill. The emotional responses were evident as the four remaining members—RM, V, Jimin, and Jungkook—departed for their military service, with fans expressing their heartfelt sentiments on various platforms. The commitment of the ARMY to BTS has been a driving force in the group's unparalleled success. The fanbase's dedication extends beyond streaming music and attending concerts. It manifests in diverse forms, from trending hashtags to charting BTS songs on platforms like iTunes, showcasing a level of loyalty that is rare in the music industry. The surge of BTS's 2017 single, "Spring Day," to the top of the US iTunes charts during their absence exemplifies the ARMY's unwavering support. K-pop academic Jimmyn Parc notes while speaking to the BBC that there is a potential for short depression among fans during this hiatus. The sense of loss is palpable, akin to a wartime separation of loved ones. The fandom's actions mirror historical gestures of devotion, such as WW2 wives sending off their sweethearts to war. The ARMY's emotional tributes, expressed in various languages, highlight the global reach and impact of BTS. What the future holds As BTS takes a collective break, questions loom about their future dynamics. Will they return to BigHit Music, their current agency, or explore new avenues? The uncertainty extends to individual pursuits, with speculation about solo careers gaining traction. The hiatus also prompts contemplation about the nature of BTS's future activities—will they solely engage in reunions, or will members pursue independent projects? The global success of BTS, often compared to the Beatles, has led to widespread anticipation about their next moves. The hiatus, though challenging for fans, presents an opportunity for other K-pop groups to step into the limelight. The void left by BTS's absence opens doors for emerging bands like New Jeans and Le Sserafim, offering them a chance to receive more attention on Western mainstream charts. The longevity and sustained popularity of a musical group during a hiatus are often uncertain. However, industry observers believe that BTS's dedicated fanbase and their management's strategic approach will play crucial roles in maintaining their status. Jeff Benjamin, a K-pop columnist and writer at Billboard Magazine, emphasises the importance of consistently providing content during the hiatus. BTS's meticulous preparation, including songs, videos, and fan messages, showcases their commitment to keeping the connection alive with the ARMY. Historical roots of mandatory military service The mandatory military service, deeply rooted in South Korea's history, traces back to the post-World War II division of Korea into Soviet-aligned North Korea and America-aligned South Korea. Article 39 of the South Korean constitution established the duty of national defence, and conscription became mandatory in 1957. The duration of service, initially set at 30 months, has been reduced to the current range. The necessity of military service is closely tied to the conflict with North Korea, as the two nations technically remain at war. Exemptions or deferments, whether based on being the sole breadwinner or possessing exceptional talents, reflect the complexities of the system. Notably, there have been exemptions for artists and athletes, including footballer Son Heung-min, who was exempted after the national team won gold at the 2018 Asian Games. Controversies and exemptions Controversies surrounding conscription include societal expectations and the potential stigma faced by those perceived as evading service. The exemption system, installed in 1973, aimed at recognising achievements in various fields. Evading conscription, as demonstrated by pop singer Yoo Seung-jun, has had consequences, including deportation. Conscientious objection and legal changes The practice of conscientious objection has been a point of contention, with individuals facing a choice between military service against their beliefs or punishment. Human rights groups and international organisations, including the United Nations, criticised South Korea for violating the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. In response, the South Korean Constitutional Court ruled in 2018 that alternative civilian service must be introduced for conscientious objectors, leading to a change in the law in 2019. BTS' future remains uncertain As BTS members fulfil their mandatory military service, the impact on the broader K-pop industry, the future of the group, and the global music scene are shrouded in uncertainty. While the hiatus prompts reflection for BTS, their fans, and the industry, the ARMY's steadfast support, combined with the strategic planning by BTS's management, is poised to play a decisive role in shaping the group's trajectory upon their reunion in 2025. The world anticipates and closely observes the unfolding of the next chapter in BTS's extraordinary journey.

Explained | All BTS members are in South Korean military now. Will K-pop stars return as a band?

The world mourns the loss of a true icon as we bid a heartfelt farewell to the esteemed actor, Andre Keith Braugher. Born on July 1, 1962, Braugher's departure at the age of 61 leaves a profound void in the hearts of fans and colleagues alike.

Braugher's celebrated career spanned decades, marked by a repertoire of powerful performances that showcased his unparalleled talent. However, he will forever be etched in our memories for his portrayal of the indomitable Captain Raymond Holt on the hit television series, Brooklyn Nine-Nine.

Braugher's portrayal of Captain Holt introduced a new dimension to stoicism, redefining the archetype of the stern police captain. Holt's stoicism was not just a facade of seriousness; it was a carefully nuanced portrayal that revealed layers of emotion beneath the surface. Braugher's ability to convey Holt's inner struggles and triumphs with a subtle shift in expression or a measured delivery of a line showcased his mastery of the craft.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/kZ_cyQg0QDA?si=Z3qEpJ9rv0hzlKg5" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

At the heart of Captain Holt's character was an unflinching resolve that set the tone for the precinct. Braugher's delivery of Holt's unwavering commitment to professionalism, discipline, and duty was nothing short of masterful. The captain's stern gaze and composed demeanour spoke volumes, creating a character whose authority and integrity were unquestionable. Braugher's ability to embody these qualities without sacrificing the humanity of the character made Holt a figure to be both respected and loved.

While Holt may be known for his deadpan humour, Braugher elevated this comedic style to an art form. The subtlety of his delivery, coupled with impeccable timing, turned even the most straightforward lines into moments of comedic brilliance. Whether it was a dry remark, a perfectly executed deadpan stare, or a well-timed punchline, Braugher's comedic precision added a layer of humour that resonated with fans and became a defining feature of the character.

The chemistry between characters is a crucial element in any ensemble cast, and Braugher's interactions with his co-stars, particularly Andy Samberg's Jake Peralta, were nothing short of magical. The dynamic between the stoic captain and the playful detective provided a rich source of humour as well as heart. The actor's ability to navigate the complexities of these relationships, seamlessly transitioning between mentorship and camaraderie, added depth to the character dynamics, making every single interaction a delight to watch.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Braugher's performance was his ability to humanise Captain Holt. Behind the facade of the stern leader was a character with hopes, dreams, and vulnerabilities. Braugher delicately peeled back the layers of Holt's stoicism, allowing the audience to witness the captain's personal and emotional journey. This humanising touch transformed Holt from a caricature into a relatable and three-dimensional character, earning the empathy of viewers.

Beyond the screen, Braugher's impact was not limited to his acting prowess. Colleagues and crew members speak of his professionalism, mentorship, and dedication to his craft. His presence was not just a contribution to a television show; it was an embodiment of excellence and a beacon for aspiring actors.

As we say goodbye to Andre Braugher, we remember not only the actor but the legacy he leaves behind—of laughter and inspiration.&nbsp;

The world mourns the loss of a true icon as we bid a heartfelt farewell to the esteemed actor, Andre Keith Braugher. Born on July 1, 1962, Braugher's departure at the age of 61 leaves a profound void in the hearts of fans and colleagues alike.

The world mourns the loss of a true icon as we bid a heartfelt farewell to the esteemed actor, Andre Keith Braugher. Born on July 1, 1962, Braugher's departure at the age of 61 leaves a profound void in the hearts of fans and colleagues alike. Braugher's celebrated career spanned decades, marked by a repertoire of powerful performances that showcased his unparalleled talent. However, he will forever be etched in our memories for his portrayal of the indomitable Captain Raymond Holt on the hit television series, Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Braugher's portrayal of Captain Holt introduced a new dimension to stoicism, redefining the archetype of the stern police captain. Holt's stoicism was not just a facade of seriousness; it was a carefully nuanced portrayal that revealed layers of emotion beneath the surface. Braugher's ability to convey Holt's inner struggles and triumphs with a subtle shift in expression or a measured delivery of a line showcased his mastery of the craft. At the heart of Captain Holt's character was an unflinching resolve that set the tone for the precinct. Braugher's delivery of Holt's unwavering commitment to professionalism, discipline, and duty was nothing short of masterful. The captain's stern gaze and composed demeanour spoke volumes, creating a character whose authority and integrity were unquestionable. Braugher's ability to embody these qualities without sacrificing the humanity of the character made Holt a figure to be both respected and loved. While Holt may be known for his deadpan humour, Braugher elevated this comedic style to an art form. The subtlety of his delivery, coupled with impeccable timing, turned even the most straightforward lines into moments of comedic brilliance. Whether it was a dry remark, a perfectly executed deadpan stare, or a well-timed punchline, Braugher's comedic precision added a layer of humour that resonated with fans and became a defining feature of the character. The chemistry between characters is a crucial element in any ensemble cast, and Braugher's interactions with his co-stars, particularly Andy Samberg's Jake Peralta, were nothing short of magical. The dynamic between the stoic captain and the playful detective provided a rich source of humour as well as heart. The actor's ability to navigate the complexities of these relationships, seamlessly transitioning between mentorship and camaraderie, added depth to the character dynamics, making every single interaction a delight to watch. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of Braugher's performance was his ability to humanise Captain Holt. Behind the facade of the stern leader was a character with hopes, dreams, and vulnerabilities. Braugher delicately peeled back the layers of Holt's stoicism, allowing the audience to witness the captain's personal and emotional journey. This humanising touch transformed Holt from a caricature into a relatable and three-dimensional character, earning the empathy of viewers. Beyond the screen, Braugher's impact was not limited to his acting prowess. Colleagues and crew members speak of his professionalism, mentorship, and dedication to his craft. His presence was not just a contribution to a television show; it was an embodiment of excellence and a beacon for aspiring actors. As we say goodbye to Andre Braugher, we remember not only the actor but the legacy he leaves behind—of laughter and inspiration.

Farewell to the deadpan king: Remembering Andre Braugher, the inimitable Captain Holt

John Malkovich, one of Hollywood's most underrated actors, turns 70. While Malkovich has graced the silver screen with numerous memorable performances throughout his illustrious career, one film stands out as a true masterpiece that encapsulates his brilliance as an actor — Being John Malkovich.

Released in 1999 and directed by Spike Jonze, Being John Malkovich is a surreal and inventive comedy that not only showcases Malkovich's acting prowess but also delves into the whimsical and bizarre. The film's premise is as unique as they come — a puppeteer named Craig Schwartz, played by John Cusack, discovers a mysterious portal that leads directly into the mind of John Malkovich for 15 minutes.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/LEtlqumjXLw?si=Cdp0gvABSFPw0J6X" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Malkovich takes on the audacious challenge of playing a fictionalised version of himself in the film, adding layers of complexity to the narrative. His portrayal of the quirky, self-absorbed, and somewhat absurd version of himself is a testament to his versatility as an actor. Malkovich effortlessly navigates between the real and surreal, injecting the character with a blend of charm and eccentricity that captivates the audience from start to finish.

What makes Malkovich's performance truly exceptional in Being John Malkovich is his ability to embrace the absurdity of the concept and turn it into a vehicle for comedic and introspective moments. He navigates the blurred lines between reality and fiction with a sense of self-awareness that adds a meta layer to the film. The audience is invited not only to witness Malkovich's acting skills but also to ponder questions about identity, celebrity, and the nature of consciousness.

The film's success lies not only in Malkovich's stellar performance but also in the collaboration with director Spike Jonze and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman. Jonze's distinct visual style and Kaufman's penchant for unconventional storytelling create a cinematic experience that is both thought-provoking and entertaining. The film received critical acclaim for its originality, wit, and the boldness of its premise.

Being John Malkovich garnered three Academy Award nominations, including Best Director for Spike Jonze and Best Original Screenplay for Charlie Kaufman. While Malkovich himself was not nominated, his contribution to the film played a pivotal role in its success. The film's impact has endured over the years, solidifying its place as a cult classic that continues to captivate audiences and critics alike.

John Malkovich, one of Hollywood's most underrated actors, turns 70. While Malkovich has graced the silver screen with numerous memorable performances throughout his illustrious career, one film stands out as a true masterpiece that encapsulates his brilliance as an actor — Being John Malkovich.

John Malkovich, one of Hollywood's most underrated actors, turns 70. While Malkovich has graced the silver screen with numerous memorable performances throughout his illustrious career, one film stands out as a true masterpiece that encapsulates his brilliance as an actor — Being John Malkovich. Released in 1999 and directed by Spike Jonze, Being John Malkovich is a surreal and inventive comedy that not only showcases Malkovich's acting prowess but also delves into the whimsical and bizarre. The film's premise is as unique as they come — a puppeteer named Craig Schwartz, played by John Cusack, discovers a mysterious portal that leads directly into the mind of John Malkovich for 15 minutes. Malkovich takes on the audacious challenge of playing a fictionalised version of himself in the film, adding layers of complexity to the narrative. His portrayal of the quirky, self-absorbed, and somewhat absurd version of himself is a testament to his versatility as an actor. Malkovich effortlessly navigates between the real and surreal, injecting the character with a blend of charm and eccentricity that captivates the audience from start to finish. What makes Malkovich's performance truly exceptional in Being John Malkovich is his ability to embrace the absurdity of the concept and turn it into a vehicle for comedic and introspective moments. He navigates the blurred lines between reality and fiction with a sense of self-awareness that adds a meta layer to the film. The audience is invited not only to witness Malkovich's acting skills but also to ponder questions about identity, celebrity, and the nature of consciousness. The film's success lies not only in Malkovich's stellar performance but also in the collaboration with director Spike Jonze and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman. Jonze's distinct visual style and Kaufman's penchant for unconventional storytelling create a cinematic experience that is both thought-provoking and entertaining. The film received critical acclaim for its originality, wit, and the boldness of its premise. Being John Malkovich garnered three Academy Award nominations, including Best Director for Spike Jonze and Best Original Screenplay for Charlie Kaufman. While Malkovich himself was not nominated, his contribution to the film played a pivotal role in its success. The film's impact has endured over the years, solidifying its place as a cult classic that continues to captivate audiences and critics alike.

On John Malkovich's 70th birthday, revisiting Being John Malkovich

American actor Wendell Pierce celebrates his 60th birthday today. Today, it is fitting to delve into one of the highlights of his illustrious journey — the unforgettable portrayal of Detective William "Bunk" Moreland in the greatest TV&nbsp;series of all time, The Wire. In the gritty urban landscape of Baltimore, Pierce's performance not only stood out amidst a cast of compelling characters but also left an enduring imprint on the very fabric of television history.

In the gritty streets of Baltimore, where the line between good and bad blurred and justice teetered on the edge, Pierce's performance as Bunk was a masterclass in authenticity. The character, a seasoned detective with a penchant for colourful language and an unwavering commitment to his job, became a linchpin in the complex narrative tapestry of The Wire. Pierce's portrayal exuded a raw, unfiltered realness that elevated the character beyond mere fiction, breathing life into the very soul of Bunk Moreland.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hsjKbAHYM2Y?si=L8KOPbOIjlMW_ulo" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

What set Pierce apart in a series brimming with compelling characters was his ability to carve a niche for himself, leaving an indomitable impression amidst a sea of memorable personalities. In a landscape where moral ambiguity was the norm, Bunk stood as a beacon of unwavering morality, a principled investigator navigating the tumultuous waters of crime and corruption. Pierce brought nuance to Bunk, infusing him with a charisma that made audiences both respect and empathise with the character's struggles and triumphs.

Pierce's performance was marked by a quiet intensity, a simmering force that bubbled beneath the surface of every scene. Whether he was dissecting a crime scene with meticulous precision or engaging in banter with his partner, Jimmy McNulty, played by Dominic West, there was an authenticity to his portrayal that resonated with viewers. It was a portrayal grounded in the reality of police work, devoid of sensationalism but rich in the complexities that make characters truly memorable.

Witness Bunk and McNulty's linguistic acrobatics in a particular scene&nbsp;as they communicate for a quarter of an hour using nothing but variations of the f-word. Viewer discretion is, of course, advised. You can watch that scene on YouTube.

Happy birthday, Wendell!

American actor Wendell Pierce celebrates his 60th birthday today. Today, it is fitting to delve into one of the highlights of his illustrious journey — the unforgettable portrayal of Detective William "Bunk" Moreland in the greatest TV series of all time, The Wire.

American actor Wendell Pierce celebrates his 60th birthday today. Today, it is fitting to delve into one of the highlights of his illustrious journey — the unforgettable portrayal of Detective William "Bunk" Moreland in the greatest TV series of all time, The Wire. In the gritty urban landscape of Baltimore, Pierce's performance not only stood out amidst a cast of compelling characters but also left an enduring imprint on the very fabric of television history. In the gritty streets of Baltimore, where the line between good and bad blurred and justice teetered on the edge, Pierce's performance as Bunk was a masterclass in authenticity. The character, a seasoned detective with a penchant for colourful language and an unwavering commitment to his job, became a linchpin in the complex narrative tapestry of The Wire. Pierce's portrayal exuded a raw, unfiltered realness that elevated the character beyond mere fiction, breathing life into the very soul of Bunk Moreland. What set Pierce apart in a series brimming with compelling characters was his ability to carve a niche for himself, leaving an indomitable impression amidst a sea of memorable personalities. In a landscape where moral ambiguity was the norm, Bunk stood as a beacon of unwavering morality, a principled investigator navigating the tumultuous waters of crime and corruption. Pierce brought nuance to Bunk, infusing him with a charisma that made audiences both respect and empathise with the character's struggles and triumphs. Pierce's performance was marked by a quiet intensity, a simmering force that bubbled beneath the surface of every scene. Whether he was dissecting a crime scene with meticulous precision or engaging in banter with his partner, Jimmy McNulty, played by Dominic West, there was an authenticity to his portrayal that resonated with viewers. It was a portrayal grounded in the reality of police work, devoid of sensationalism but rich in the complexities that make characters truly memorable. Witness Bunk and McNulty's linguistic acrobatics in a particular scene as they communicate for a quarter of an hour using nothing but variations of the f-word. Viewer discretion is, of course, advised. You can watch that scene on YouTube. Happy birthday, Wendell!

Wendell Pierce @ 60: Celebrating the legacy of Detective Bunk in The Wire

In Paul King's new musical fantasy film, Wonka, audiences are treated to a sugar-coated journey through the early days of the iconic chocolatier Willy Wonka. Timothée Chalamet steps into the top hat of the whimsical character, bringing to life a vibrant and charming version that captivates its innocence and eccentricity.

Set against the backdrop of a vague, whimsical European city, the film introduces us to a young and wide-eyed Willy Wonka, played with genuine appeal by Chalamet. His dream of opening a chocolate and candy shop in the swanky Galeries Gourmet sets the stage for a delightful adventure filled with quirky characters and catchy tunes.

Chalamet's Wonka is not the assured candymaker we remember from Gene Wilder's portrayal, but a lovably odd dreamer with a top hat that hides both mysteries and daily necessities. His inability to read, a quirky detail, sets off a chain of events that lands him in the clutches of the sneaky Mrs. Scrubit, played in a cartoonish fashion by Olivia Colman. The ensuing escapades, complete with catchy musical numbers, take Willy and his resourceful assistant Noodle (Calah Lane) on a journey to evade the corrupt Chocolate Cartel and their police chief (Keegan-Michael Key).

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/otNh9bTjXWg?si=0IEQ0Z639fenrxf2" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The film's ensemble cast, including standout performances by Hugh Grant as a cheeky orange Oompa-Loompa, adds to the charm. Grant's scene-stealing antics, reminiscent of his role in King's Paddington 2, inject humour and energy into the narrative. The musical numbers, with original songs by Neil Hannon, contribute to the film's lively atmosphere, making it feel more like a whimsical theater production than a traditional film.

King's signature style, previously showcased in the Paddington films, is evident in the colourful and fun sets that embrace a range of European influences. The film's visual rules often defy physics, creating a theatrical and enchanting experience. The decision to keep the tone light-hearted and charming, in contrast to Stuart's darker 1971 adaptation, pays off, offering a movie that is more about dreams and collaboration than peril and trauma.

While Wonka may not delve into the psychological depths of Roald Dahl's character, it does succeed in creating a feel-good origin story that encourages dreaming and teamwork. The absence of malice and the low stakes contribute to a film that is infectious in its delight, reminiscent of King's previous successes. In a cinematic landscape often filled with high stakes and intense drama, Wonka stands out as a sweet escape—a confectionary delight that embraces whimsy and levity. King has once again worked his magic, turning a beloved childhood character into a charming and heartwarming tale for all ages. 
&nbsp;

In Paul King's new musical fantasy film, Wonka, audiences are treated to a sugar-coated journey through the early days of the iconic chocolatier Willy Wonka. Timothée Chalamet steps into the top hat of the whimsical character, bringing to life a vibrant and charming version that captivates its innocence and eccentricity.

In Paul King's new musical fantasy film, Wonka, audiences are treated to a sugar-coated journey through the early days of the iconic chocolatier Willy Wonka. Timothée Chalamet steps into the top hat of the whimsical character, bringing to life a vibrant and charming version that captivates its innocence and eccentricity. Set against the backdrop of a vague, whimsical European city, the film introduces us to a young and wide-eyed Willy Wonka, played with genuine appeal by Chalamet. His dream of opening a chocolate and candy shop in the swanky Galeries Gourmet sets the stage for a delightful adventure filled with quirky characters and catchy tunes. Chalamet's Wonka is not the assured candymaker we remember from Gene Wilder's portrayal, but a lovably odd dreamer with a top hat that hides both mysteries and daily necessities. His inability to read, a quirky detail, sets off a chain of events that lands him in the clutches of the sneaky Mrs. Scrubit, played in a cartoonish fashion by Olivia Colman. The ensuing escapades, complete with catchy musical numbers, take Willy and his resourceful assistant Noodle (Calah Lane) on a journey to evade the corrupt Chocolate Cartel and their police chief (Keegan-Michael Key). The film's ensemble cast, including standout performances by Hugh Grant as a cheeky orange Oompa-Loompa, adds to the charm. Grant's scene-stealing antics, reminiscent of his role in King's Paddington 2, inject humour and energy into the narrative. The musical numbers, with original songs by Neil Hannon, contribute to the film's lively atmosphere, making it feel more like a whimsical theater production than a traditional film. King's signature style, previously showcased in the Paddington films, is evident in the colourful and fun sets that embrace a range of European influences. The film's visual rules often defy physics, creating a theatrical and enchanting experience. The decision to keep the tone light-hearted and charming, in contrast to Stuart's darker 1971 adaptation, pays off, offering a movie that is more about dreams and collaboration than peril and trauma. While Wonka may not delve into the psychological depths of Roald Dahl's character, it does succeed in creating a feel-good origin story that encourages dreaming and teamwork. The absence of malice and the low stakes contribute to a film that is infectious in its delight, reminiscent of King's previous successes. In a cinematic landscape often filled with high stakes and intense drama, Wonka stands out as a sweet escape—a confectionary delight that embraces whimsy and levity. King has once again worked his magic, turning a beloved childhood character into a charming and heartwarming tale for all ages.

Wonka movie review: Timothée Chalamet sweetens the screen in this delightful film

Once upon an ink-stained era in the Roaring Twenties, in a small and cramped office, the air tinged with the scent of pencil shavings and artistic fervour, a creative tempest was brewing. Walt Disney, a man with dreams as big as his imagination, found himself at a crossroads, the fate of his fledgling studio hanging in the balance.

It was the aftermath of a bitter business fallout. Disney had just lost the rights to his beloved creation, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, leaving him disheartened and contemplative. Yet, in the face of adversity, creativity flickered like a stubborn flame within him. It was during an arduous train ride back to Los Angeles that the spark of an idea danced in the synapses of Disney's mind—a character that would redefine animation and become an international icon.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/wion-fineprint-disney-set-to-lose-iconic-mickey-mouse-character-in-2024-494511/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

The genesis of Mickey Mouse wasn't a meticulously planned affair; it was a burst of inspiration, a whimsical concoction. The idea began to take shape in the form of a mischievous, big-eared, and cheerful rodent, a character Disney initially named Mortimer. But it wasn't long before his wife, Lillian, intervened with a suggestion that would echo through the annals of animation history. Mortimer sounded a tad too solemn for a character meant to bring joy, she thought. And thus, the alliterative name Mickey Mouse was born that would resonate across the decades.

With the name settled, Disney set his animators on the task of bringing this newfound rodent to life. On November 18, 1928, at the Colony Theatre in New York, Mickey Mouse made his official debut in the short film Steamboat Willie. It seems primitive now but it is hard to overstate how groundbreaking a moment it was back then, a black-and-white spectacle that introduced synchronised sound to animation and left audiences in awe.

Mickey, with his infectious optimism and spirited antics, quickly became a cultural phenomenon. His success not only saved Disney's studio from the brink of collapse but also catapulted animation into a new era of storytelling.

In the end, Mickey Mouse wasn't just a character; he was Walt Disney's response to adversity, a testament to the power of creativity in the face of setbacks. As we celebrate the birthday of the man who dared to dream beyond the confines of convention, let's raise a toast to the little mouse that could, a character conceived in the crucible of challenge and destined to eternally enchant audiences around the globe.

Happy 122nd birthday, Walt Disney! May your dreams continue to inspire and your creations continue to enchant the young and the young at heart across the realms of imagination.

Once upon an ink-stained era in the Roaring Twenties, in a small and cramped office, the air tinged with the scent of pencil shavings and artistic fervour, a creative tempest was brewing.

Once upon an ink-stained era in the Roaring Twenties, in a small and cramped office, the air tinged with the scent of pencil shavings and artistic fervour, a creative tempest was brewing. Walt Disney, a man with dreams as big as his imagination, found himself at a crossroads, the fate of his fledgling studio hanging in the balance. It was the aftermath of a bitter business fallout. Disney had just lost the rights to his beloved creation, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit, leaving him disheartened and contemplative. Yet, in the face of adversity, creativity flickered like a stubborn flame within him. It was during an arduous train ride back to Los Angeles that the spark of an idea danced in the synapses of Disney's mind—a character that would redefine animation and become an international icon. The genesis of Mickey Mouse wasn't a meticulously planned affair; it was a burst of inspiration, a whimsical concoction. The idea began to take shape in the form of a mischievous, big-eared, and cheerful rodent, a character Disney initially named Mortimer. But it wasn't long before his wife, Lillian, intervened with a suggestion that would echo through the annals of animation history. Mortimer sounded a tad too solemn for a character meant to bring joy, she thought. And thus, the alliterative name Mickey Mouse was born that would resonate across the decades. With the name settled, Disney set his animators on the task of bringing this newfound rodent to life. On November 18, 1928, at the Colony Theatre in New York, Mickey Mouse made his official debut in the short film Steamboat Willie. It seems primitive now but it is hard to overstate how groundbreaking a moment it was back then, a black-and-white spectacle that introduced synchronised sound to animation and left audiences in awe. Mickey, with his infectious optimism and spirited antics, quickly became a cultural phenomenon. His success not only saved Disney's studio from the brink of collapse but also catapulted animation into a new era of storytelling. In the end, Mickey Mouse wasn't just a character; he was Walt Disney's response to adversity, a testament to the power of creativity in the face of setbacks. As we celebrate the birthday of the man who dared to dream beyond the confines of convention, let's raise a toast to the little mouse that could, a character conceived in the crucible of challenge and destined to eternally enchant audiences around the globe. Happy 122nd birthday, Walt Disney! May your dreams continue to inspire and your creations continue to enchant the young and the young at heart across the realms of imagination.

A mouse named Mickey: How Walt Disney turned adversity into triumph

The gaming world is once again set ablaze with the trailer release of GTA game. The Grand Theft Auto franchise, as we have learned over the last two decades, is an unparalleled cultural phenomenon, a juggernaut that consistently dwarfs its peers, and almost everything else. To give you an idea, GTA V remains the highest-grossing entertainment product of all time, with $8 billion in earnings. Avatar, the highest-grossing movie of all time, has grossed $2.92 billion. This isn't even a competition.

Anyhoo, the trailer for the next entry Grand Theft Auto VI has graced our screens, leaving a trail of shockwaves through the gaming community. But before we dive into the future, let's take a nostalgic pit stop and revisit the phenomenon that was GTA V.

Apart from its head-spinning financial success and cultural footprint, Grand Theft Auto V was a beast of a game. One of the standout features was the sheer expansiveness of the game world. Los Santos, its setting, wasn't just a city; it was a living, breathing entity. The attention to detail (pretty much a Rockstar trademark) was, and remains, staggering, from the gritty urban sprawl to the vast, sun-soaked deserts and the depths of the ocean.&nbsp;

As the sun set over the Los Santos skyline, casting long shadows on the urban sprawl, or as the waves of the Pacific Ocean gently caressed the shore, one couldn't help but marvel at the meticulous craftsmanship. Each frame was a tableau vivant, a cinematic snapshot that transcended gaming conventions. It was a meticulously crafted universe that players could get lost in.&nbsp;

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QdBZY2fkU-0?si=yWhd_9EGx56RUn5y" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

The craftsmanship displayed in Grand Theft Auto V remains a benchmark, even after a decade. Rockstar's dedication and passion are evident in a world so intricately detailed that it not only stood the test of time but also continues to influence the standards for immersive and captivating virtual environments.

The narrative brilliance of GTA V also played a pivotal role in its success. The game introduced us to a trio of protagonists – Michael, the retired bank robber living a seemingly idyllic life; Franklin, the ambitious hustler looking for a way out of the hood; and Trevor, the unhinged, wild card character. This narrative approach was a masterstroke, adding layers of complexity to the storyline and allowing players to experience the narrative from different perspectives.&nbsp;

The characters were flawed, relatable, and, in the case of Trevor, utterly unpredictable, making the journey through Los Santos an emotionally charged rollercoaster.

The satirical take on American culture was another highlight. Rockstar Games didn't shy away from lampooning contemporary society, from the media and celebrity culture to political commentary. The result was a game world that felt not only immersive but also eerily reflective of the real world, albeit in a vastly exaggerated and humorous way.

<img alt="gta v" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d0f729b-2f44-4a2f-99ae-89b103aca8b0" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/c1964d6dfe37619793cf9eb073deff3d0719fe00%20%281%29.jpg" />

The heists, a central element of the game, were a stroke of genius. They added a strategic and planning layer to the gameplay, elevating the stakes and making every mission feel like a blockbuster movie sequence. The ability to switch between characters on the fly during heists added a dynamic element to the gameplay, keeping players on the edge of their seats.

Then there was the multiplayer component — GTA Online. What started as a multiplayer extension soon became a phenomenon in its own right. While nowhere near as good as its story mode, the expansive multiplayer world allowed players to create their own criminal enterprises, engage in races, heists, and all sorts of chaotic activities with friends or strangers.&nbsp;

Now, and this for me is the most impressive part, a decade later, GTA V still manages to hold its own against modern AAA titles. The graphics, while not cutting-edge by today's standards, have aged gracefully. The game's mechanics, from the driving physics to the combat system, remain solid. The fact that players continue to discover new details and easter eggs in the game is a testament to its dizzying depth.

As the gaming world eagerly awaits Grand Theft Auto VI, the legacy of GTA V looms large. It's not just a game that captured a moment in time; it's a timeless masterpiece that set a standard for open-world gaming, a standard that many still strive to achieve. The question now is whether GTA VI can surpass its predecessor and create a new era-defining experience. Only time will tell, but for now, the streets of Los Santos still echo with the memories of a game that changed the industry. 
&nbsp;

The gaming world is once again set ablaze with the trailer release of GTA game. The Grand Theft Auto franchise, as we have learned over the last two decades, is an unparalleled cultural phenomenon, a juggernaut that consistently dwarfs its peers, and almost everything else.

The gaming world is once again set ablaze with the trailer release of GTA game. The Grand Theft Auto franchise, as we have learned over the last two decades, is an unparalleled cultural phenomenon, a juggernaut that consistently dwarfs its peers, and almost everything else. To give you an idea, GTA V remains the highest-grossing entertainment product of all time, with $8 billion in earnings. Avatar, the highest-grossing movie of all time, has grossed $2.92 billion. This isn't even a competition. Anyhoo, the trailer for the next entry Grand Theft Auto VI has graced our screens, leaving a trail of shockwaves through the gaming community. But before we dive into the future, let's take a nostalgic pit stop and revisit the phenomenon that was GTA V. Apart from its head-spinning financial success and cultural footprint, Grand Theft Auto V was a beast of a game. One of the standout features was the sheer expansiveness of the game world. Los Santos, its setting, wasn't just a city; it was a living, breathing entity. The attention to detail (pretty much a Rockstar trademark) was, and remains, staggering, from the gritty urban sprawl to the vast, sun-soaked deserts and the depths of the ocean. As the sun set over the Los Santos skyline, casting long shadows on the urban sprawl, or as the waves of the Pacific Ocean gently caressed the shore, one couldn't help but marvel at the meticulous craftsmanship. Each frame was a tableau vivant, a cinematic snapshot that transcended gaming conventions. It was a meticulously crafted universe that players could get lost in. The craftsmanship displayed in Grand Theft Auto V remains a benchmark, even after a decade. Rockstar's dedication and passion are evident in a world so intricately detailed that it not only stood the test of time but also continues to influence the standards for immersive and captivating virtual environments. The narrative brilliance of GTA V also played a pivotal role in its success. The game introduced us to a trio of protagonists – Michael, the retired bank robber living a seemingly idyllic life; Franklin, the ambitious hustler looking for a way out of the hood; and Trevor, the unhinged, wild card character. This narrative approach was a masterstroke, adding layers of complexity to the storyline and allowing players to experience the narrative from different perspectives. The characters were flawed, relatable, and, in the case of Trevor, utterly unpredictable, making the journey through Los Santos an emotionally charged rollercoaster. The satirical take on American culture was another highlight. Rockstar Games didn't shy away from lampooning contemporary society, from the media and celebrity culture to political commentary. The result was a game world that felt not only immersive but also eerily reflective of the real world, albeit in a vastly exaggerated and humorous way. The heists, a central element of the game, were a stroke of genius. They added a strategic and planning layer to the gameplay, elevating the stakes and making every mission feel like a blockbuster movie sequence. The ability to switch between characters on the fly during heists added a dynamic element to the gameplay, keeping players on the edge of their seats. Then there was the multiplayer component — GTA Online. What started as a multiplayer extension soon became a phenomenon in its own right. While nowhere near as good as its story mode, the expansive multiplayer world allowed players to create their own criminal enterprises, engage in races, heists, and all sorts of chaotic activities with friends or strangers. Now, and this for me is the most impressive part, a decade later, GTA V still manages to hold its own against modern AAA titles. The graphics, while not cutting-edge by today's standards, have aged gracefully. The game's mechanics, from the driving physics to the combat system, remain solid. The fact that players continue to discover new details and easter eggs in the game is a testament to its dizzying depth. As the gaming world eagerly awaits Grand Theft Auto VI, the legacy of GTA V looms large. It's not just a game that captured a moment in time; it's a timeless masterpiece that set a standard for open-world gaming, a standard that many still strive to achieve. The question now is whether GTA VI can surpass its predecessor and create a new era-defining experience. Only time will tell, but for now, the streets of Los Santos still echo with the memories of a game that changed the industry.

GTA 6 looks impressive but can it surpass its predecessor's unmatched legacy?

Fifteen years have passed since director Ron Howard unleashed a cinematic tour de force that charmed audiences and critics alike. Frost/Nixon, based on the acclaimed play by Peter Morgan (who would go on to create The Crown, about to culminate later this month), brought to life the electrifying clash of intellects and egos between David Frost and Richard Nixon. As we celebrate its 15th anniversary, let's revisit the film that not only showcased the prowess of its lead actors but also offered a brilliant exploration of power, accountability, and the timeless art of political manoeuvring

<h3>Setting the stage</h3>

The film, set in the post-Watergate era, thrusts us into the heart of one of the most remarkable interviews in television history. Michael Sheen's portrayal of the charismatic British TV host David Frost is nothing short of mesmerising. He navigates the high-stakes world of American politics with a blend of charm, determination, and an ever-present twinkle in his eye.

Frank Langella, on the other hand, steps into the shoes of the disgraced former President Richard Nixon. Langella's Nixon is a masterclass in controlled vulnerability. The actor not only captures Nixon's cunning intelligence but also exposes the human frailty that lies beneath the political facade.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/O9S1RKNgdLw?si=6ZhDbwtuTIMersX7" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

<h3>The chess game of words</h3>

Frost/Nixon is at its core a verbal joust between two formidable opponents. The screenplay, adapted by Peter Morgan from his own stage play, is a symphony of wit and tension. The back-and-forth exchanges between Frost and Nixon are a verbal ballet, a dance of words that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.

The film's brilliance lies in its ability to humanise Nixon without absolving him of his wrongdoings. We witness his struggles, regrets, and the weight of his legacy. Frost, on the other hand, emerges as a cunning underdog, determined to extract the truth from a man adept at dancing around it.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-kill-bill-volume-1-%E2%80%94-20-years-of-sword-swinging-sass-644959">Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass</a>

<h3>The power of silence</h3>

One of the film's most powerful tools is its use of silence. In the pauses between questions and answers, we feel the unspoken weight of Nixon's sins. The silence speaks volumes, forcing both the characters and the audience to confront the uncomfortable truths lingering in the room.

Howard's direction, coupled with the stellar performances, turns what could have been a straightforward historical drama into a gripping psychological thriller. The camera lingers on the characters' faces, capturing every nuance and unspoken emotion.

Also Read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-joaquin-phoenix-at-49-revisiting-his-overlooked-tour-de-force-in-the-master-652330">&nbsp;Joaquin Phoenix at 49: Revisiting his overlooked tour de force in The Master</a>

<h3>The supporting cast</h3>

While Sheen and Langella rightfully steal the spotlight, the supporting cast adds depth and nuance to the narrative. Oliver Platt as Bob Zelnick and Sam Rockwell as James Reston Jr. provide the perfect foil to Frost's relentless pursuit of journalistic glory. Their interactions inject humour and camaraderie into the film, balancing the weighty themes with moments of levity.

<h3>Legacy and impact</h3>

Frost/Nixon rightfully received critical acclaim upon its release and went on to earn five Academy Award nominations. Frank Langella's portrayal of Nixon garnered widespread praise, earning him an Oscar nomination for Best Actor. The film's success also reignited interest in the original interviews, reminding a new generation of the importance of holding leaders accountable.

Fifteen years have passed since director Ron Howard unleashed a cinematic tour de force that charmed audiences and critics alike. Frost/Nixon, based on the acclaimed play by Peter Morgan (who would go on to create The Crown, about to culminate later this month), brought to life the electrifying clash of intellects and egos between David Frost and Richard Nixon.

Fifteen years have passed since director Ron Howard unleashed a cinematic tour de force that charmed audiences and critics alike. Frost/Nixon, based on the acclaimed play by Peter Morgan (who would go on to create The Crown, about to culminate later this month), brought to life the electrifying clash of intellects and egos between David Frost and Richard Nixon. As we celebrate its 15th anniversary, let's revisit the film that not only showcased the prowess of its lead actors but also offered a brilliant exploration of power, accountability, and the timeless art of political manoeuvring Setting the stage The film, set in the post-Watergate era, thrusts us into the heart of one of the most remarkable interviews in television history. Michael Sheen's portrayal of the charismatic British TV host David Frost is nothing short of mesmerising. He navigates the high-stakes world of American politics with a blend of charm, determination, and an ever-present twinkle in his eye. Frank Langella, on the other hand, steps into the shoes of the disgraced former President Richard Nixon. Langella's Nixon is a masterclass in controlled vulnerability. The actor not only captures Nixon's cunning intelligence but also exposes the human frailty that lies beneath the political facade. The chess game of words Frost/Nixon is at its core a verbal joust between two formidable opponents. The screenplay, adapted by Peter Morgan from his own stage play, is a symphony of wit and tension. The back-and-forth exchanges between Frost and Nixon are a verbal ballet, a dance of words that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats. The film's brilliance lies in its ability to humanise Nixon without absolving him of his wrongdoings. We witness his struggles, regrets, and the weight of his legacy. Frost, on the other hand, emerges as a cunning underdog, determined to extract the truth from a man adept at dancing around it. Also Read | Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass The power of silence One of the film's most powerful tools is its use of silence. In the pauses between questions and answers, we feel the unspoken weight of Nixon's sins. The silence speaks volumes, forcing both the characters and the audience to confront the uncomfortable truths lingering in the room. Howard's direction, coupled with the stellar performances, turns what could have been a straightforward historical drama into a gripping psychological thriller. The camera lingers on the characters' faces, capturing every nuance and unspoken emotion. Also Read | Joaquin Phoenix at 49: Revisiting his overlooked tour de force in The Master The supporting cast While Sheen and Langella rightfully steal the spotlight, the supporting cast adds depth and nuance to the narrative. Oliver Platt as Bob Zelnick and Sam Rockwell as James Reston Jr. provide the perfect foil to Frost's relentless pursuit of journalistic glory. Their interactions inject humour and camaraderie into the film, balancing the weighty themes with moments of levity. Legacy and impact Frost/Nixon rightfully received critical acclaim upon its release and went on to earn five Academy Award nominations. Frank Langella's portrayal of Nixon garnered widespread praise, earning him an Oscar nomination for Best Actor. The film's success also reignited interest in the original interviews, reminding a new generation of the importance of holding leaders accountable.

Frost/Nixon at 15: A gripping clash of wits, power, and accountability

Veteran American actress Lucy Liu turns 55 today. On the occasion, let us embark on a cinematic journey to revisit one of her most riveting and iconic performances — her portrayal of O-Ren Ishii in Quentin Tarantino's magnum opus, Kill Bill: Volume 1. Without further ado, let's look back at the masterpiece performance that allowed the talented birthday girl to wield both a katana and her acting prowess with equal finesse.

Kill Bill: Volume 1 introduces us to The Bride (Uma Thurman), a former assassin left for dead on her wedding day by her former comrades in the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad. Tarantino's narrative, as is his wont, unfolds nonlinearly, revealing The Bride's quest for retribution against those who wronged her.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-kill-bill-volume-1-%E2%80%94-20-years-of-sword-swinging-sass-644959">Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass</a>

Enter Liu as O-Ren Ishii, the enigmatic and cunning leader of the Tokyo Yakuza. Kill Bill: Volume 1 weaves a tale of betrayal, blood-soaked vendettas, and razor-sharp katana duels. The film is a beautiful, deadly symphony of violence and visual splendour, with each frame meticulously crafted to pay homage to various genres, from martial arts epics to spaghetti westerns.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DjUi-P4gm6k?si=wqmUYcq5PQAe28HZ" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

From the moment Liu graces the screen as O-Ren, it's evident that we are in for a performance that transcends the boundaries of conventional villainy. O-Ren embodies strength, vulnerability, and a touch of deadly elegance. As the story unfolds, we witness The Bride's journey, encountering formidable adversaries, each with their own unique flair. Yet, it is Liu's portrayal of O-Ren that stands out.

The character demanded both physical prowess and emotional depth, and it was fortunate that it was played by a performer of Liu's calibre. She delivered on all fronts with an apparent ease that elevated the role to an instant iconic status.

The film's action sequences, choreographed with the precision of a ballet and the brutality of a street fight, showcase Liu's dedication to her craft. The duel between O-Ren and The Bride is a cinematic ballet, a dance of death where every move is a brushstroke on the canvas of vengeance. Liu's performance elevates the confrontation beyond mere choreography; it becomes a clash of titans, each moment etching itself into the memory of the audience.

Yet, Kill Bill: Volume 1 is not just about blood-soaked katana battles. It's about the characters that inhabit this hyper-stylised world, and Liu's performance as O-Ren adds a layer of emotional depth to the story. We catch glimpses of O-Ren's traumatic past, and Liu navigates these moments with a delicate touch, revealing the vulnerability that lurks beneath the steely exterior.

Liu is also able to infuse the character with an irresistible charisma. O-Ren Ishii commands the screen with a magnetic presence, whether she's engaged in a fierce battle or delivering a poignant monologue. Liu's delivery of the memorable "silly Caucasian girl likes to play with samurai swords" line is both chilling and exudes a sense of authority that lingers long after the scene concludes.

Veteran American actress Lucy Liu turns 55 today. On the occasion, let us embark on a cinematic journey to revisit one of her most riveting and iconic performances — her portrayal of O-Ren Ishii in Quentin Tarantino's magnum opus, Kill Bill: Volume 1.

Veteran American actress Lucy Liu turns 55 today. On the occasion, let us embark on a cinematic journey to revisit one of her most riveting and iconic performances — her portrayal of O-Ren Ishii in Quentin Tarantino's magnum opus, Kill Bill: Volume 1. Without further ado, let's look back at the masterpiece performance that allowed the talented birthday girl to wield both a katana and her acting prowess with equal finesse. Kill Bill: Volume 1 introduces us to The Bride (Uma Thurman), a former assassin left for dead on her wedding day by her former comrades in the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad. Tarantino's narrative, as is his wont, unfolds nonlinearly, revealing The Bride's quest for retribution against those who wronged her. Also Read | Kill Bill: Volume 1 — 20 years of sword-swinging sass Enter Liu as O-Ren Ishii, the enigmatic and cunning leader of the Tokyo Yakuza. Kill Bill: Volume 1 weaves a tale of betrayal, blood-soaked vendettas, and razor-sharp katana duels. The film is a beautiful, deadly symphony of violence and visual splendour, with each frame meticulously crafted to pay homage to various genres, from martial arts epics to spaghetti westerns. From the moment Liu graces the screen as O-Ren, it's evident that we are in for a performance that transcends the boundaries of conventional villainy. O-Ren embodies strength, vulnerability, and a touch of deadly elegance. As the story unfolds, we witness The Bride's journey, encountering formidable adversaries, each with their own unique flair. Yet, it is Liu's portrayal of O-Ren that stands out. The character demanded both physical prowess and emotional depth, and it was fortunate that it was played by a performer of Liu's calibre. She delivered on all fronts with an apparent ease that elevated the role to an instant iconic status. The film's action sequences, choreographed with the precision of a ballet and the brutality of a street fight, showcase Liu's dedication to her craft. The duel between O-Ren and The Bride is a cinematic ballet, a dance of death where every move is a brushstroke on the canvas of vengeance. Liu's performance elevates the confrontation beyond mere choreography; it becomes a clash of titans, each moment etching itself into the memory of the audience. Yet, Kill Bill: Volume 1 is not just about blood-soaked katana battles. It's about the characters that inhabit this hyper-stylised world, and Liu's performance as O-Ren adds a layer of emotional depth to the story. We catch glimpses of O-Ren's traumatic past, and Liu navigates these moments with a delicate touch, revealing the vulnerability that lurks beneath the steely exterior. Liu is also able to infuse the character with an irresistible charisma. O-Ren Ishii commands the screen with a magnetic presence, whether she's engaged in a fierce battle or delivering a poignant monologue. Liu's delivery of the memorable "silly Caucasian girl likes to play with samurai swords" line is both chilling and exudes a sense of authority that lingers long after the scene concludes.

Lucy Liu turns 55: Revisiting her iconic performance in Kill Bill: Volume 1

Actor-director Vinod Rawat takes a look back at his remarkable film, Pushtaini. From familial escapades in Uttarakhand's hills to unexpected deer cameos, Rawat delves into the intricacies of his feature debut, which in this scribe's opinion is quite brilliant. With Rajkummar Rao joining the cast for the sheer joy of it and a commitment to keeping it real (but positive), Rawat spills the beans on the secret of his storytelling.

<h3>Q. Can you share a particular moment or incident that inspired the creation of the movie "Pushtaini"?</h3>

A. Life unfolds in various moments, and such an inspiration gradually took root within me. Whenever I visited my village, I observed the way people adorned their houses. In Uttarakhand, a fruit known as Dadim which resembles pomegranate, is available in abundance and is used for decorating courtyards, creating a picturesque greenery. However, over two decades, I witnessed the gradual decay of scenic beauty in the state. The thought of how migration to the mountains has caused the deterioration of homes lingered in my mind. My father&nbsp;himself moved from Uttarakhand to Delhi, where I was born. Our ancestral home fell into disrepair, but I have since rebuilt it and cherish visiting the house. Similarly, I moved from Delhi to Mumbai with the aspiration of earning recognition and prosperity. During workshops, I noticed people leaving their homes, prompting me to contemplate organising sessions with new participants.&nbsp;

These reflections converged, and helped me explore the theme of how houses crumble due to migration from hills. Simultaneously, I delved into the evolving understanding between fathers and sons. I believe that between the ages of nineteen to twenty-four, every young man perceives his father as a formidable adversary. I too experienced this, and many others have shared similar sentiments with me. These diverse thoughts intertwined to shape the narrative of Pushtaini.

<img alt="pushtaini" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="099d3761-bf64-4aed-83bd-4c30b0a4cb52" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/vinod-rawat-pushtaini.png" />

<h3>Q. There are non-professional actors in this film. Your family members are there too. So there must have been both challenges and benefits of making films with them. Tell us about it.</h3>

A. I have been training actors and doing acting workshops in the industry since 2009-10. So handling actors is my strength. I have handled many non-actors as well. I know what needs to be extracted from whom at which level. Not much was needed to work on the characterisation in the film as the actors were my relatives who have been a witness to the situation themselves.

It was my aunt who used to say 'I cannot act right now', and was more concerned about feeding her cattles like goats and cows. She had to make sure that her cattles were not in the sun when it was harsh and that they were fed timely. My aunt was also of the opinion that she did not know Hindi well due to which acting for her in the film would be difficult. However, I organised workshops and finally convinced her to shoot for the film. On occasions, I also played the emotional card and said "Aunty, I have invested a lot of money in this, I will be ruined", after which they used to agree to work.

<h3>Q. In your film, you have not demonised the father. You have shown that he remains silent only for the welfare of his son. What was the thought process behind that?</h3>

A. Let's consider the second option. Suppose he would have killed the person who raped his son. What would have happened then? What would all the people of his family done after this? They would have had to beg or would have&nbsp;been subjected to rape. Their helplessness will be taken advantage of. In my opinion, fathers of middle -class families are the biggest heroes of the society. There is no greater hero in the world than them.

<h3>Q. You have shown a happy ending for Bhupi and Dimple [protagonists] in your film. Was your initial thought also that you had to keep the ending of the film promising?</h3>

A. Leave aside films, I only want positivity in life too. Even if I get to make a hundred films, each of my films will have a hopeful ending. I think we live in a beautiful world. We should make it even more beautiful.

Every coin has two sides. Nothing is achieved by negativity, I believe. Even if I have to make a biopic, I will end it happily. If someone forces me to make a biopic with a depressing, sad ending, I will not make it. Through films, I would not like to give the message that life is full of disappointments. I had made a film called MAD. You will find the same in that also. I feel that mother-son, father-son, brother-sister, husband-wife, all these relationships are beautiful and I want to be hopeful in all these. This is my belief system.

<h3>Q. Can you tell us about any incident in which you faced a big challenge while making Pushtaini and how did you handle that challenge?</h3>

A.Let me tell you an interesting incident that was quite magical. You must have seen that deer scene. We have not used any VFX in it as we did not have money. When we went for recce, we were told that sometimes deers come to the place. So we were thinking that Bhupi will look this way and there will be a deer there. But we also felt that no deer was going to come as per our wish. So we were shooting one day when suddenly one of my assistants said in a low voice, "Deer…deer has come." And indeed the deer had come. We started panicking that we should shoot quickly. But it did not run away and kept standing as we changed the lenses of the camera. As if he is saying that you can shoot comfortably, I am here only for you. Our scene was shot. Many such incidents have happened to me in the mountains. I feel that I have not made this film. There is some spiritual influence. We came from Mumbai during Covid. If anything had happened to even one person, my film would have stopped. The energies of the mountain itself accomplished this. Such miraculous incidents kept happening every second day.

<img alt="pushtaini" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="f9741da9-477e-49ea-98bc-0fc4390a97aa" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/vinod-rawat-pushtaini%20%282%29.png" />

<h3>Q. Rajkummar Rao has also worked in your film without taking any money. So how did that happen?</h3>

A. I must have earned some good karma. Rajkumar Rao and I both used to do theatre together in Delhi. I also came to Mumbai because of him. He also supported me a lot here. Even today we both are very close friends. When I gave him the narration, he said "I will do this one". This is only a blessing from God. Rajkummar has an aura of his own. It is a very beautiful thing for him to be a part of my film.

<h3>Q. Sexual abuse, especially child sexual abuse, is a very sensitive topic. You have handled this very well. What was your approach regarding this?</h3>

A. I lived in a lower middle-class colony of Kidwai Nagar in Delhi. There were many such cases. Which we did not even understand at that time. We used to hear things. When we grew up we thought, "Oh! This used to happen?" At that time, we used to see how the family suppressed the matter. Those with whom it happened did not want to speak. They felt that their son or daughter's life will be ruined. So all these incidents were in my mind. Now when it comes to approach, I don't want to make a 'guilty film'. I take these topics and talk about them. But in today's time, if you keep harping on this all the time then nothing good will happen. I also show the life around it. I want to make it simple but effective.&nbsp;

Suppose you finish the entire box of rasgullas or eat just one, the effect of both will be different. This is my approach regarding these subjects. And in future too, I will present these topics in a simple manner so that its core message can be understood. I think this approach works.

Actor-director Vinod Rawat takes a look back at his remarkable film, Pushtaini. From familial escapades in Uttarakhand's hills to unexpected deer cameos, Rawat delves into the intricacies of his feature debut, which in this scribe's opinion is quite brilliant.

Actor-director Vinod Rawat takes a look back at his remarkable film, Pushtaini. From familial escapades in Uttarakhand's hills to unexpected deer cameos, Rawat delves into the intricacies of his feature debut, which in this scribe's opinion is quite brilliant. With Rajkummar Rao joining the cast for the sheer joy of it and a commitment to keeping it real (but positive), Rawat spills the beans on the secret of his storytelling. Q. Can you share a particular moment or incident that inspired the creation of the movie "Pushtaini"? A. Life unfolds in various moments, and such an inspiration gradually took root within me. Whenever I visited my village, I observed the way people adorned their houses. In Uttarakhand, a fruit known as Dadim which resembles pomegranate, is available in abundance and is used for decorating courtyards, creating a picturesque greenery. However, over two decades, I witnessed the gradual decay of scenic beauty in the state. The thought of how migration to the mountains has caused the deterioration of homes lingered in my mind. My father himself moved from Uttarakhand to Delhi, where I was born. Our ancestral home fell into disrepair, but I have since rebuilt it and cherish visiting the house. Similarly, I moved from Delhi to Mumbai with the aspiration of earning recognition and prosperity. During workshops, I noticed people leaving their homes, prompting me to contemplate organising sessions with new participants. These reflections converged, and helped me explore the theme of how houses crumble due to migration from hills. Simultaneously, I delved into the evolving understanding between fathers and sons. I believe that between the ages of nineteen to twenty-four, every young man perceives his father as a formidable adversary. I too experienced this, and many others have shared similar sentiments with me. These diverse thoughts intertwined to shape the narrative of Pushtaini. Q. There are non-professional actors in this film. Your family members are there too. So there must have been both challenges and benefits of making films with them. Tell us about it. A. I have been training actors and doing acting workshops in the industry since 2009-10. So handling actors is my strength. I have handled many non-actors as well. I know what needs to be extracted from whom at which level. Not much was needed to work on the characterisation in the film as the actors were my relatives who have been a witness to the situation themselves. It was my aunt who used to say 'I cannot act right now', and was more concerned about feeding her cattles like goats and cows. She had to make sure that her cattles were not in the sun when it was harsh and that they were fed timely. My aunt was also of the opinion that she did not know Hindi well due to which acting for her in the film would be difficult. However, I organised workshops and finally convinced her to shoot for the film. On occasions, I also played the emotional card and said "Aunty, I have invested a lot of money in this, I will be ruined", after which they used to agree to work. Q. In your film, you have not demonised the father. You have shown that he remains silent only for the welfare of his son. What was the thought process behind that? A. Let's consider the second option. Suppose he would have killed the person who raped his son. What would have happened then? What would all the people of his family done after this? They would have had to beg or would have been subjected to rape. Their helplessness will be taken advantage of. In my opinion, fathers of middle -class families are the biggest heroes of the society. There is no greater hero in the world than them. Q. You have shown a happy ending for Bhupi and Dimple [protagonists] in your film. Was your initial thought also that you had to keep the ending of the film promising? A. Leave aside films, I only want positivity in life too. Even if I get to make a hundred films, each of my films will have a hopeful ending. I think we live in a beautiful world. We should make it even more beautiful. Every coin has two sides. Nothing is achieved by negativity, I believe. Even if I have to make a biopic, I will end it happily. If someone forces me to make a biopic with a depressing, sad ending, I will not make it. Through films, I would not like to give the message that life is full of disappointments. I had made a film called MAD. You will find the same in that also. I feel that mother-son, father-son, brother-sister, husband-wife, all these relationships are beautiful and I want to be hopeful in all these. This is my belief system. Q. Can you tell us about any incident in which you faced a big challenge while making Pushtaini and how did you handle that challenge? A.Let me tell you an interesting incident that was quite magical. You must have seen that deer scene. We have not used any VFX in it as we did not have money. When we went for recce, we were told that sometimes deers come to the place. So we were thinking that Bhupi will look this way and there will be a deer there. But we also felt that no deer was going to come as per our wish. So we were shooting one day when suddenly one of my assistants said in a low voice, "Deer…deer has come." And indeed the deer had come. We started panicking that we should shoot quickly. But it did not run away and kept standing as we changed the lenses of the camera. As if he is saying that you can shoot comfortably, I am here only for you. Our scene was shot. Many such incidents have happened to me in the mountains. I feel that I have not made this film. There is some spiritual influence. We came from Mumbai during Covid. If anything had happened to even one person, my film would have stopped. The energies of the mountain itself accomplished this. Such miraculous incidents kept happening every second day. Q. Rajkummar Rao has also worked in your film without taking any money. So how did that happen? A. I must have earned some good karma. Rajkumar Rao and I both used to do theatre together in Delhi. I also came to Mumbai because of him. He also supported me a lot here. Even today we both are very close friends. When I gave him the narration, he said "I will do this one". This is only a blessing from God. Rajkummar has an aura of his own. It is a very beautiful thing for him to be a part of my film. Q. Sexual abuse, especially child sexual abuse, is a very sensitive topic. You have handled this very well. What was your approach regarding this? A. I lived in a lower middle-class colony of Kidwai Nagar in Delhi. There were many such cases. Which we did not even understand at that time. We used to hear things. When we grew up we thought, "Oh! This used to happen?" At that time, we used to see how the family suppressed the matter. Those with whom it happened did not want to speak. They felt that their son or daughter's life will be ruined. So all these incidents were in my mind. Now when it comes to approach, I don't want to make a 'guilty film'. I take these topics and talk about them. But in today's time, if you keep harping on this all the time then nothing good will happen. I also show the life around it. I want to make it simple but effective. Suppose you finish the entire box of rasgullas or eat just one, the effect of both will be different. This is my approach regarding these subjects. And in future too, I will present these topics in a simple manner so that its core message can be understood. I think this approach works.

Vinod Rawat talks Pushtaini: Inspiration, Rajkummar Rao cameo and crafting hopeful endings

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Kshitij Mohan Rawat

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.