China is reportedly helping Russia build nuclear-capable hypersonic missiles. These weapons so fast they could breach modern Western air defences. As Beijing and Moscow surge ahead, the US and its allies are scrambling to respond. Is the balance of power already shifting, and can the West catch up before it's too late?


China Helping Russia Build Nuclear Missiles, Oreshniks, Which No Western Missile Defence Can Stop

A new report claims China is secretly supplying technology and equipment to Russia, boosting Moscow’s hypersonic missile production. The development is seen as accelerating the hypersonic arms race, raising concerns in the West over NATO’s defensive capabilities.


Russia-China Ties: Report Suggests Beijing Secretly Supplying Tech & Equipments to Moscow 

NATO Chief warns that Europe cannot defend itself without the support of the United States. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte emphasizes that Europe must stop relying solely on itself for defense. This comes amid ongoing discussions about European security, NATO’s transatlantic alliances, and the US role in global defense.

NATO Chief Warns: Europe’s Defense Impossible Without American Backing

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has warned that Europe cannot defend itself without the United States, amid growing transatlantic unease over President Donald Trump’s ambitions regarding Greenland. Speaking to members of the European Parliament in Brussels, Rutte said any belief that Europe could ensure its own security without US support was unrealistic, stressing that NATO allies “need each other” as concerns grow over the future of US–Europe relations.


Europe: NATO Chief Warns Europe ‘Can’t Defend Itself’ Without US Amid Greenland Tensions

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday (Jan 27) claimed that Europe cannot defend itself with the US. His remarks come amid tensions over Greenland as US President Donald Trump escalates his push to acquire the Arctic territory. Days earlier, Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also engaged in a row over the contribution of NATO troops in Afghanistan following the September 9 attacks.&nbsp;“If anyone thinks here again that the European Union, or Europe as a whole, can defend itself without the US, keep on dreaming. You can’t. We can’t. We need each other,” Rutte told lawmakers at the European Parliament.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-financing-war-against-itself-us-slams-europe-over-russian-oil-as-india-eu-trade-deal-nears-1769488585079">‘Financing war against itself’: US slams Europe over Russian oil as India-EU trade deal nears</a> Speaking about the framework agreed between Rutte and Trump, the NATO chief said, “Second workstream is between Denmark, Greenland and the US, which is up to them to continue discussions.”Rutte warned that European nations would need to expand their defence spending to 10 per cent if they “really want to do it alone.” He added that they would also need to build their own nuclear capability that would cost billions of Euros.Also read | &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/live-blog-eu-india-fta-summit-2026-live-updates-free-trade-agreement-pm-narendra-modi-ursula-von-der-leyen-1769493974586">‘We have concluded mother of all deals’: India-EU sign historic deal</a>“In that scenario, you will lose the ultimate guarantor of our freedom, which is the US nuclear umbrella. So hey, good luck,” he said.The NATO chief also praised Trump for raising the issue of Arctic security.&nbsp;“I think he’s right. There is an issue with the Arctic region. There is an issue of collective security, because these sea lanes are opening up, and because the Chinese and the Russians are more and more active,” he said.Watch | US Greenland: NATO Chief Warns Europe ‘Can’t Defend Itself’ Without US Amid Greenland Tensions<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-greenland-nato-chief-warns-europe-can-t-defend-itself-without-us-amid-greenland-tensions-1769492164579/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-greenland-nato-chief-warns-europe-can-t-defend-itself-without-us-amid-greenland-tensions-1769492164579/embed</a>

His remarks come amid tensions over Greenland as US President Donald Trump escalates his push to acquire the Arctic territory.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday (Jan 27) claimed that Europe cannot defend itself with the US. His remarks come amid tensions over Greenland as US President Donald Trump escalates his push to acquire the Arctic territory. Days earlier, Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also engaged in a row over the contribution of NATO troops in Afghanistan following the September 9 attacks. “If anyone thinks here again that the European Union, or Europe as a whole, can defend itself without the US, keep on dreaming. You can’t. We can’t. We need each other,” Rutte told lawmakers at the European Parliament. Also read | ‘Financing war against itself’: US slams Europe over Russian oil as India-EU trade deal nears Speaking about the framework agreed between Rutte and Trump, the NATO chief said, “Second workstream is between Denmark, Greenland and the US, which is up to them to continue discussions.” Rutte warned that European nations would need to expand their defence spending to 10 per cent if they “really want to do it alone.” He added that they would also need to build their own nuclear capability that would cost billions of Euros. Also read | ‘We have concluded mother of all deals’: India-EU sign historic deal “In that scenario, you will lose the ultimate guarantor of our freedom, which is the US nuclear umbrella. So hey, good luck,” he said. The NATO chief also praised Trump for raising the issue of Arctic security. “I think he’s right. There is an issue with the Arctic region. There is an issue of collective security, because these sea lanes are opening up, and because the Chinese and the Russians are more and more active,” he said. Watch | US Greenland: NATO Chief Warns Europe ‘Can’t Defend Itself’ Without US Amid Greenland Tensions https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-greenland-nato-chief-warns-europe-can-t-defend-itself-without-us-amid-greenland-tensions-1769492164579/embed

His remarks come amid tensions over Greenland as US President Donald Trump escalates his push to acquire the Arctic territory.

‘Keep dreaming’: NATO chief claims Europe can’t defend itself without US

US President Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy among NATO allies, claiming that alliance troops stayed back from frontline duties. His remarks come amid ongoing discussions about burden-sharing, global security commitments, and NATO’s role in managing international conflicts. Explore the implications for US-European relations and alliance unity.

Trump Angers NATO Allies, Criticizes Troops for Staying Back From Frontlines

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has strongly criticised US President Donald Trump for his remarks on the role of NATO troops in Afghanistan, calling them “insulting and frankly appalling”, and suggested that he should apologise for his comment. Speaking to reporters on Trump’s remark that NATO troops stayed off the front line during the conflict in Afghanistan, Starmer said on Friday that the comment had caused deep pain to the families of those who served. “I consider President Trump’s remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling, and I’m not surprised they’ve caused such hurt for the loved ones of those who were killed or injured,” Starmer said.&nbsp;In October 2001, nearly a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, a US-led coalition launched an invasion of Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaida, which had used the country as its base, and the group’s Taliban hosts. Alongside the US were troops from dozens of countries, including from NATO, whose mutual-defence mandate had been triggered for the first time after the attacks on New York and Washington.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ai-tsunami-will-hit-job-market-young-and-middle-class-will-suffer-most-imf-chief-1769181642148">AI ‘tsunami’ will hit job market, young and middle class will suffer most: IMF chief</a>&nbsp;<h2>UK PM pays tribute to 457 British personnel who died in Afghanistan</h2>&nbsp;Starmer paid tribute to the 457 British personnel who died in Afghanistan and said the US president should apologise. “I will never forget their courage, their bravery and the sacrifice they made for their country,” he said. “I consider President Trump’s remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling, and I am not surprised they have caused such hurt to the loved ones of those who were killed or injured and, in fact, across the country.”&nbsp;After 9/11, then British Prime Minister Tony Blair pledged that the United Kingdom would “stand shoulder to shoulder” with the United States. British forces played a major role in operations in Afghanistan until their withdrawal in 2014, particularly in Helmand Province. American troops remained until 2021, following which the Taliban recaptured power.More than 150,000 British troops served in Afghanistan after the 2001 invasion, making it the largest contingent after the United States.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/death-toll-in-karachi-shopping-mall-blaze-rises-to-71-may-go-up-further-as-search-operation-still-on-1769170605758">Death toll in Karachi shopping mall blaze rises to 71, may go up further as search operation still on</a><h2>‘Contribution of Polish troops in Afghanistan must not be diminished’</h2>&nbsp;Polish defence minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said the contribution of Polish troops in Afghanistan “must not be diminished”. More than 33,000 Polish troops and military personnel served in Afghanistan, and 43 Polish soldiers and one civilian employee were killed there.&nbsp;The minister said in a post on X, “Poland has always been, is, and will be a responsible and reliable ally that, at the moment when security is threatened, stands in its defence.”“The Polish Army, arm in arm with its allies, took part, among others, in missions in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is present today in missions and operations conducted by Nato,” he adds.“Tragic moments, when our soldiers died, showed that in defence of international security, of Poland’s security, we are ready to pay the highest price. This sacrifice will never be forgotten and must not be diminished. Poland is a reliable and proven ally, and nothing will change that,” he says.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/davos-2026-zelensky-says-europe-needs-to-protect-itself-take-action-to-become-global-force-1769091116500">‘Europe needs to protect itself, take action to become global force,’ says Zelensky at Davos</a><h2>What did Trump say that riled US allies?&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Trump had said in an interview with Fox News in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, “We’ve never needed them, we have never really asked anything of them.”“You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-claims-total-access-greenland-deal-pm-says-unaware-as-europe-unites-1769111824495">Trump claims ‘total access’ Greenland deal, PM Nielsen says unaware of details</a>&nbsp;Criticism of Trump intensified because the remarks came from someone who did not serve in the Vietnam War despite being eligible. Trump received a deferment due to bone spurs, though he has been unable to recall which foot was affected, leading to accusations of draft dodging.

In October 2001, nearly a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, a US-led coalition launched an invasion of Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaida, which had used the country as its base, and the group’s Taliban hosts. Alongside the US were troops from dozens of countries, including from NATO.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has strongly criticised US President Donald Trump for his remarks on the role of NATO troops in Afghanistan, calling them “insulting and frankly appalling”, and suggested that he should apologise for his comment. Speaking to reporters on Trump’s remark that NATO troops stayed off the front line during the conflict in Afghanistan, Starmer said on Friday that the comment had caused deep pain to the families of those who served. “I consider President Trump’s remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling, and I’m not surprised they’ve caused such hurt for the loved ones of those who were killed or injured,” Starmer said. In October 2001, nearly a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, a US-led coalition launched an invasion of Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaida, which had used the country as its base, and the group’s Taliban hosts. Alongside the US were troops from dozens of countries, including from NATO, whose mutual-defence mandate had been triggered for the first time after the attacks on New York and Washington. Also Read: AI ‘tsunami’ will hit job market, young and middle class will suffer most: IMF chief UK PM pays tribute to 457 British personnel who died in Afghanistan Starmer paid tribute to the 457 British personnel who died in Afghanistan and said the US president should apologise. “I will never forget their courage, their bravery and the sacrifice they made for their country,” he said. “I consider President Trump’s remarks to be insulting and frankly appalling, and I am not surprised they have caused such hurt to the loved ones of those who were killed or injured and, in fact, across the country.” After 9/11, then British Prime Minister Tony Blair pledged that the United Kingdom would “stand shoulder to shoulder” with the United States. British forces played a major role in operations in Afghanistan until their withdrawal in 2014, particularly in Helmand Province. American troops remained until 2021, following which the Taliban recaptured power. More than 150,000 British troops served in Afghanistan after the 2001 invasion, making it the largest contingent after the United States. Also Read: Death toll in Karachi shopping mall blaze rises to 71, may go up further as search operation still on ‘Contribution of Polish troops in Afghanistan must not be diminished’ Polish defence minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said the contribution of Polish troops in Afghanistan “must not be diminished”. More than 33,000 Polish troops and military personnel served in Afghanistan, and 43 Polish soldiers and one civilian employee were killed there. The minister said in a post on X, “Poland has always been, is, and will be a responsible and reliable ally that, at the moment when security is threatened, stands in its defence.” “The Polish Army, arm in arm with its allies, took part, among others, in missions in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is present today in missions and operations conducted by Nato,” he adds. “Tragic moments, when our soldiers died, showed that in defence of international security, of Poland’s security, we are ready to pay the highest price. This sacrifice will never be forgotten and must not be diminished. Poland is a reliable and proven ally, and nothing will change that,” he says. Also Read: ‘Europe needs to protect itself, take action to become global force,’ says Zelensky at Davos What did Trump say that riled US allies? Trump had said in an interview with Fox News in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, “We’ve never needed them, we have never really asked anything of them.” “You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines.” Also Read: Trump claims ‘total access’ Greenland deal, PM Nielsen says unaware of details Criticism of Trump intensified because the remarks came from someone who did not serve in the Vietnam War despite being eligible. Trump received a deferment due to bone spurs, though he has been unable to recall which foot was affected, leading to accusations of draft dodging.

In October 2001, nearly a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, a US-led coalition launched an invasion of Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaida, which had used the country as its base, and the group’s Taliban hosts. Alongside the US were troops from dozens of countries, including from NATO.

‘Trump’s remarks about Nato troops in Afghanistan insulting and appalling,’ says Starmer, seeks apology

Donald Trump announces a sweeping new framework on Greenland after high-level talks with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, securing long-term U.S. control over key military bases and strategic territories in the Arctic. The deal halts threatened trade tariffs and reshapes regional security as Washington moves to counter growing Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic. While stopping short of annexation, the agreement gives the United States sovereign rights over major military zones, raising concerns in Denmark and across Europe.

Greenland Partitioned: Trump Takes Control of Arctic Bases in Major NATO Deal

The United States may be given land in Greenland under a newly announced framework, according to reports. US President Donald Trump has called off tariffs and hailed the move as a deal benefiting all NATO nations, while stressing that Washington will not use force to pursue its interests in Greenland.


Trump announces Greenland framework: 'I want Greenland, but won’t use force'

After weeks of threats and tariff talk, Donald Trump has flipped the script on Greenland. Instead of force or trade punishment, the US president is now pushing a negotiated deal with NATO that could reshape control of the Arctic. All you need to know.

After weeks of threats and tariff talk, Donald Trump has flipped the script on Greenland. Instead of force or trade punishment, the US president is now pushing a negotiated deal with NATO that could reshape control of the Arctic. All you need to know.

Trump's Greenland U-turn explained: NATO, 'forever' framework, minerals, Golden Dome and more | In Pics

President Donald Trump met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and announced that the U.S. and NATO have reached a “framework of a future deal” on Greenland and the wider Arctic region following their talks. 

NATO Chief Meets US President in Davos | Trump: I Want Greenland But Won't Use Force 

Questions are mounting over America’s commitment to NATO after reports suggest the Pentagon may not replace U.S. troops once their current terms end. While officials have not confirmed a withdrawal, the move could signal a strategic shift in U.S. military posture in Europe amid rising global tensions. This report examines what’s being considered, why it matters, and how allies are reacting.

Is the U.S. Retreating From NATO? Pentagon Weighs Troop Pullback 

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (January 21) revisited remarks made last year by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who had jokingly referred to him as “daddy,” while also confusing Greenland with Iceland as he renewed his call to acquire the Danish autonomous territory. Trump said he had been helping Europe and NATO for decades and claimed that allies were highly supportive of him until recently. Referring to past praise, he recalled being called “daddy” by a “very smart man” who, he said, believed Trump was running things. Trump then complained that he had gone from being praised to being portrayed as a terrible person.&nbsp;He argued that his current request, seeking control of what he described as a cold, remote “piece of ice”—was modest compared to what the US had given NATO over many years, insisting the territory was strategically important for global security and peace. Trump also questioned NATO’s commitment, saying the US would defend its allies completely but he was unsure they would do the same in return.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-nation-in-position-to-secure-greenland-apart-from-us-trump-claims-in-davos-1769004458019">Davos 2026 | ‘No nation in position to secure Greenland apart from US’: Trump claims in Davos</a>&nbsp;During his speech and subsequent fireside chat at the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, President Donald Trump took aim at Switzerland, the host nation of the annual gathering. Trump recalled imposing a 39% tariff on Swiss imports last year—one of the steepest rates applied at the time—saying the decision triggered intense backlash from Swiss officials. “All hell broke loose. They were calling nonstop,” he remarked, adding that the reaction led him to conclude that Switzerland’s economic strength depends heavily on the United States.&nbsp;He suggested the tariffs could have been even more severe, claiming that higher rates would have caused serious financial damage to the country. After months of negotiations, however, the tariff was reduced to 15%, matching the rate applied to goods from the European Union. The remarks drew a mix of uncomfortable laughter and quiet disapproval from audience members, though most attendees remained silent as Trump aired his complaints.&nbsp;Later in the day, Trump struck a markedly different tone during a bilateral meeting with the president of the Swiss Confederation, praising Switzerland and describing it as a great country.

Trump revisited a NATO leader’s “daddy” remark, mixed up Greenland and Iceland, and argued the territory is vital to US and global security

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (January 21) revisited remarks made last year by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who had jokingly referred to him as “daddy,” while also confusing Greenland with Iceland as he renewed his call to acquire the Danish autonomous territory. Trump said he had been helping Europe and NATO for decades and claimed that allies were highly supportive of him until recently. Referring to past praise, he recalled being called “daddy” by a “very smart man” who, he said, believed Trump was running things. Trump then complained that he had gone from being praised to being portrayed as a terrible person. He argued that his current request, seeking control of what he described as a cold, remote “piece of ice”—was modest compared to what the US had given NATO over many years, insisting the territory was strategically important for global security and peace. Trump also questioned NATO’s commitment, saying the US would defend its allies completely but he was unsure they would do the same in return. Also Read: Davos 2026 | ‘No nation in position to secure Greenland apart from US’: Trump claims in Davos During his speech and subsequent fireside chat at the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, President Donald Trump took aim at Switzerland, the host nation of the annual gathering. Trump recalled imposing a 39% tariff on Swiss imports last year—one of the steepest rates applied at the time—saying the decision triggered intense backlash from Swiss officials. “All hell broke loose. They were calling nonstop,” he remarked, adding that the reaction led him to conclude that Switzerland’s economic strength depends heavily on the United States. He suggested the tariffs could have been even more severe, claiming that higher rates would have caused serious financial damage to the country. After months of negotiations, however, the tariff was reduced to 15%, matching the rate applied to goods from the European Union. The remarks drew a mix of uncomfortable laughter and quiet disapproval from audience members, though most attendees remained silent as Trump aired his complaints. Later in the day, Trump struck a markedly different tone during a bilateral meeting with the president of the Swiss Confederation, praising Switzerland and describing it as a great country.

Trump revisited a NATO leader’s “daddy” remark, mixed up Greenland and Iceland, and argued the territory is vital to US and global security

'They called me daddy': Trump mixes Greenland with Iceland in NATO remarks

For decades, Moscow has sought to exploit and deepen rifts between the United States and Europe, believing that a divided West would be less capable of resisting Russian ambitions. Undermining transatlantic unity has been a cornerstone of Kremlin strategy, pursued through disinformation campaigns, covert sabotage, and sustained political pressure on Western institutions.&nbsp;At the center of these efforts sits NATO, the military alliance that for 80 years has constrained Russia’s ability to project power across Europe. The Kremlin has long portrayed NATO expansion as a threat, a narrative used to rationalize its full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago. Against that backdrop, the recent turmoil triggered by US President Donald Trump’s overtures toward Greenland has drawn intense interest in Moscow. The idea that NATO could fracture, not over war or defense spending, but over the status of a Danish territory, has been met with visible fascination, and even delight, among Russian commentators.&nbsp;European officials have openly acknowledged the geopolitical implications. “China and Russia must be enjoying this,” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas remarked after Trump warned European allies with sweeping tariffs if they opposed US control of Greenland. Publicly, both Russia and China deny harboring ambitions toward Greenland, and Denmark’s military has dismissed any immediate threat from the east. Yet Russian state television has been less restrained, with pro-Kremlin analysts hailing Trump’s actions as a severe blow to NATO cohesion and a strategic gift to Moscow.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/davos-2026-us-president-donald-trump-lands-in-switzerland-amid-diplomatic-tensions-with-european-allies-1768996228796">Davos 2026: US President Donald Trump lands in Switzerland amid diplomatic tensions with European allies</a>&nbsp;From a Western perspective, the fear is straightforward: if transatlantic unity erodes, military and financial backing for Ukraine could weaken, handing Russia a decisive advantage on the battlefield. That concern may well be justified.Still, Moscow’s celebrations remain muted. Official Kremlin reactions have been cautious, even critical. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov accused Trump of acting outside international law, an ironic rebuke from a government frequently accused of violating those same norms.&nbsp;Beyond public rhetoric, Russian strategists may see risks as well as opportunities. Expanded US influence in Greenland would strengthen Washington’s position in the Arctic, a region where Moscow has invested heavily and seeks dominance. More broadly, the Kremlin appears unsettled by what it perceives as an erratic and unconstrained American foreign policy. In a recent address, President Vladimir Putin criticized what he described as a global trend toward unilateral action, warning that force was increasingly replacing diplomacy, comments widely interpreted as a veiled critique of Washington, despite Russia’s own record.&nbsp;Compounding Moscow’s unease is the steady erosion of its global partnerships. The fall of Syria’s Russian-backed leader Bashar al-Assad dealt a major blow. Iran, another key ally, has endured US and Israeli strikes and faces renewed instability. Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro, long supported by Moscow, was dramatically detained by US forces earlier this month, further highlighting Russia’s diminishing influence.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/davos-2026-kerala-participates-for-the-second-time-1768998033739/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/davos-2026-kerala-participates-for-the-second-time-1768998033739/embed</a>&nbsp;Speculation that Cuba could be next on Washington’s list of pressure targets only deepens the sense of vulnerability in Moscow. For years, the Kremlin has dismissed the post–World War II international order as a Western construct designed to preserve American dominance. Russia has openly challenged the principle that borders cannot be changed by force and argued instead for a world governed by great-power spheres of influence.&nbsp;Ironically, Washington’s recent rhetoric appears to echo parts of that worldview, a theoretical win for Moscow. Yet any satisfaction is tempered by anxiety over the unpredictability of US power. Dealing with a volatile Trump administration may prove more difficult for the Kremlin than confronting a consistent, rules-based adversary. As one Russian tabloid bluntly put it, likening global politics to an asylum: the real fear is not just chaos—but who is now in charge of it.

Why Trump’s Greenland ploy is both a gift and a headache for the Kremlin

For decades, Moscow has sought to exploit and deepen rifts between the United States and Europe, believing that a divided West would be less capable of resisting Russian ambitions. Undermining transatlantic unity has been a cornerstone of Kremlin strategy, pursued through disinformation campaigns, covert sabotage, and sustained political pressure on Western institutions. At the center of these efforts sits NATO, the military alliance that for 80 years has constrained Russia’s ability to project power across Europe. The Kremlin has long portrayed NATO expansion as a threat, a narrative used to rationalize its full-scale invasion of Ukraine nearly four years ago. Against that backdrop, the recent turmoil triggered by US President Donald Trump’s overtures toward Greenland has drawn intense interest in Moscow. The idea that NATO could fracture, not over war or defense spending, but over the status of a Danish territory, has been met with visible fascination, and even delight, among Russian commentators. European officials have openly acknowledged the geopolitical implications. “China and Russia must be enjoying this,” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas remarked after Trump warned European allies with sweeping tariffs if they opposed US control of Greenland. Publicly, both Russia and China deny harboring ambitions toward Greenland, and Denmark’s military has dismissed any immediate threat from the east. Yet Russian state television has been less restrained, with pro-Kremlin analysts hailing Trump’s actions as a severe blow to NATO cohesion and a strategic gift to Moscow. Also Read: Davos 2026: US President Donald Trump lands in Switzerland amid diplomatic tensions with European allies From a Western perspective, the fear is straightforward: if transatlantic unity erodes, military and financial backing for Ukraine could weaken, handing Russia a decisive advantage on the battlefield. That concern may well be justified. Still, Moscow’s celebrations remain muted. Official Kremlin reactions have been cautious, even critical. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov accused Trump of acting outside international law, an ironic rebuke from a government frequently accused of violating those same norms. Beyond public rhetoric, Russian strategists may see risks as well as opportunities. Expanded US influence in Greenland would strengthen Washington’s position in the Arctic, a region where Moscow has invested heavily and seeks dominance. More broadly, the Kremlin appears unsettled by what it perceives as an erratic and unconstrained American foreign policy. In a recent address, President Vladimir Putin criticized what he described as a global trend toward unilateral action, warning that force was increasingly replacing diplomacy, comments widely interpreted as a veiled critique of Washington, despite Russia’s own record. Compounding Moscow’s unease is the steady erosion of its global partnerships. The fall of Syria’s Russian-backed leader Bashar al-Assad dealt a major blow. Iran, another key ally, has endured US and Israeli strikes and faces renewed instability. Venezuela’s president Nicolás Maduro, long supported by Moscow, was dramatically detained by US forces earlier this month, further highlighting Russia’s diminishing influence. https://www.wionews.com/videos/davos-2026-kerala-participates-for-the-second-time-1768998033739/embed Speculation that Cuba could be next on Washington’s list of pressure targets only deepens the sense of vulnerability in Moscow. For years, the Kremlin has dismissed the post–World War II international order as a Western construct designed to preserve American dominance. Russia has openly challenged the principle that borders cannot be changed by force and argued instead for a world governed by great-power spheres of influence. Ironically, Washington’s recent rhetoric appears to echo parts of that worldview, a theoretical win for Moscow. Yet any satisfaction is tempered by anxiety over the unpredictability of US power. Dealing with a volatile Trump administration may prove more difficult for the Kremlin than confronting a consistent, rules-based adversary. As one Russian tabloid bluntly put it, likening global politics to an asylum: the real fear is not just chaos—but who is now in charge of it.

Russia welcomes signs of NATO division, but Trump’s Greenland push and erratic US power are creating as much anxiety in Moscow as opportunity

Donald Trump said the US and NATO would reach an agreement on Greenland that satisfies both sides, arguing the territory is vital for security as European allies push back against his tariffs and rhetoric.

How Far Will Trump Go On Greenland? EU Vows Unflinching Response To Trump's Greenland Threats

US-Greenland Tensions: Trump Says He is Confident of a Deal with NATO Allies

Donald Trump ratcheted up the uncertainty over how far he would be willing to go to acquire Greenland as he warned the NATO alliance on Tuesday that it was only as strong as the United States allowed it to be.


Greenland Showdown: EU Vows Unflinching Response To Trump's Greenland Threats

Donald Trump ratcheted up the uncertainty over how far he would be willing to go to acquire Greenland as he warned the NATO alliance on Tuesday that it was only as strong as the United States allowed it to be.

US-Greenland Tensions: US President Donald Trump Refuses to Step Back on Greenland

European leaders are debating a future security framework beyond NATO, with talk of a “coalition of the willing” gaining traction. French President Emmanuel Macron has warned of a world without rules, as Friedrich Merz, Macron, and Keir Starmer reportedly coordinate closely amid shifting global power dynamics.


Coalition Of The Willing: Europe's Alternative Security Alliance? 

U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington and NATO would eventually reach an agreement on Greenland that keeps both sides “very happy,” calling the territory critical for security even as European allies push back amid rising tensions over tariffs and rhetoric.


US vs Europe: Greenland In Focus As Trump Heads For Davos

U.S. President Donald Trump said Washington and NATO would eventually reach an agreement on Greenland that keeps both sides “very happy,” calling the territory critical for security even as European allies push back amid rising tensions over tariffs and rhetoric.

Greenland Showdown: Trump Says NATO Will Be Happy With Deal On Greenland

Norway government has alerted its citizens about wartime acquisition of private properties such as houses, vehicles, boats and machinery. The government sent around 13,500 preparatory requisition letters to citizens, as Arctic has emerged as the flashpoint for the domination of the global superpowers like the US, Russia and China. The notices were sent out on January 19 and will be valid for a year. One third of the letters sent were new requests, while two-thirds were from the last year."The requisitions are intended to ensure that, in a wartime situation, the armed forces have access to the resources necessary for the defence of the country," the military said in a statement.Norway shares a vital 123-mile-long border with Russia and a maritime border. It plays an important role in NATO's surveillance operations. Global warming and the resulting shrinking of ice caps have opened up new shipping lanes and natural resources, possibilities that are strategic to all the global powers.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-greenland-standoff-american-empire-decline-1768890078760">Why US Greenland standoff signals US imperial overreach?</a>Russia, by virtue of its geography, is the largest country in the Arctic and has 2 million people living in it. It already has a massive military presence in the Arctic. Around 53 per cent of the coast in Arctic belongs to Russia. Moreover, China claims to be a “near-Arctic state”. Russia has invited investment through its "Ice Silk Road,” or Polar Silk Road, which is another part of its mega development project. Four NATO defence experts, including the former Chief of US Southern Command, Glen VanHerck, stated that the NATO states would require another decade to catch up with Russia. The Kola facility, which is near the Norwegian border, is home to the world's largest concentration of nuclear warheads.&nbsp;"They [the nuclear weapons] are not only pointed towards Norway, but towards the UK and over the pole towards Canada and the US," said Norway's Ministry of Defence Tore Sandvik. But Trump has been consistent with his rhetoric and has threatened to acquire Greenland. He wrote in a letter to Norway's Prime Minister that he is not thinking about “peace” since he was snubbed for the Nobel Peace Prize.&nbsp;“The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland,” claimed Trump.On Saturday, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store wrote in a post, “Norway's position is firm: Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Norway fully supports the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark.”&nbsp;

Norway has alerted citizens about wartime acquisition of private property as Arctic tensions escalate involving NATO, Russia, China and US interests.

Norway government has alerted its citizens about wartime acquisition of private properties such as houses, vehicles, boats and machinery. The government sent around 13,500 preparatory requisition letters to citizens, as Arctic has emerged as the flashpoint for the domination of the global superpowers like the US, Russia and China. The notices were sent out on January 19 and will be valid for a year. One third of the letters sent were new requests, while two-thirds were from the last year. "The requisitions are intended to ensure that, in a wartime situation, the armed forces have access to the resources necessary for the defence of the country," the military said in a statement. Norway shares a vital 123-mile-long border with Russia and a maritime border. It plays an important role in NATO's surveillance operations. Global warming and the resulting shrinking of ice caps have opened up new shipping lanes and natural resources, possibilities that are strategic to all the global powers. Also Read: Why US Greenland standoff signals US imperial overreach? Russia, by virtue of its geography, is the largest country in the Arctic and has 2 million people living in it. It already has a massive military presence in the Arctic. Around 53 per cent of the coast in Arctic belongs to Russia. Moreover, China claims to be a “near-Arctic state”. Russia has invited investment through its "Ice Silk Road,” or Polar Silk Road, which is another part of its mega development project. Four NATO defence experts, including the former Chief of US Southern Command, Glen VanHerck, stated that the NATO states would require another decade to catch up with Russia. The Kola facility, which is near the Norwegian border, is home to the world's largest concentration of nuclear warheads. "They [the nuclear weapons] are not only pointed towards Norway, but towards the UK and over the pole towards Canada and the US," said Norway's Ministry of Defence Tore Sandvik. But Trump has been consistent with his rhetoric and has threatened to acquire Greenland. He wrote in a letter to Norway's Prime Minister that he is not thinking about “peace” since he was snubbed for the Nobel Peace Prize. “The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland,” claimed Trump. On Saturday, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store wrote in a post, “Norway's position is firm: Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. Norway fully supports the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark.”

Norway has alerted citizens about wartime acquisition of private property as Arctic tensions escalate involving NATO, Russia, China and US interests.

Norway warns citizens of wartime property seizures as Arctic tensions rise among global powers

 U.S. President Donald Trump has turned Greenland into a pressure point, and Europe appears to be scrambling to contain the fallout. Trump has threatened tariffs on European allies over Greenland, tying trade penalties to his demand to take over the island.   
 


NATO Hit by Mortal Wound, United Nations in Coma 

A transatlantic trade dispute is escalating after US President Donald Trump warned of new import tariffs on European countries opposing Washington’s push to gain control of Greenland.


Trump vs EU: Trade Clash Brews As Trump Pressures Europe Over Greenland Standoff

US President Donald Trump has said he will impose new tariffs on Denmark and seven other European countries unless they agree to a deal allowing the United States to buy Greenland.

Trump said 10 percent tariffs would come into force immediately and rise to 25 percent on June 1 if negotiations fail. The move has triggered sharp backlash from European allies, raising concerns of a fresh transatlantic trade conflict over sovereignty and security in the Arctic.

US-Greenland Standoff: Trump Threatens Tariffs On Europe To Force Dea

Tensions between NATO allies, the US and the EU, escalated after President Trump announced 10 per cent tariffs on eight European countries over their opposition to his plan to acquire Greenland from Denmark.

Tensions between United States and the European Union sharply escalated after President Trump announced 10 per cent tariffs on eight European countries over their opposition to his plan to acquire Greenland from Denmark.

US vs EU: Where does European bloc stands in comparison to America | See in pics

France has issued a sharp warning to the United States, cautioning the Donald Trump administration against any military move involving Greenland. In an interview with the Financial Times, French Finance Minister Roland Lescure said such an action would cross a red line, threaten EU–US relations, and create a “totally new world.” The warning comes as NATO allies including Denmark, Germany, and Norway bolster defenses in Greenland amid rising tensions. This video explains why Greenland matters strategically, how Europe is responding, and what this means for transatlantic relations.

France's Future In NATO Under Scanner As Greenland Crisis Fuels Divisions Within

NATO countries have deployed a small multinational military force of 37 military personnel to Greenland in a symbolic deployment. It was intended to send a political signal to assert Danish Sovereignity in the territory through the so-called “reconnaissance mission”. The Danish-led initiative is called Arctic Endurance. It already has 200 personnel stationed there. Denmark has promised that it was pressing on with plans for a "larger and more permanent" NATO presence to secure the island coveted by US President Donald Trump.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/elon-musk-sues-openai-microsoft-134-billion-fraud-1768650251288">Elon Musk sues OpenAI and Microsoft, alleges fraud and seeks upto $134 bn</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">The &quot;clown show&quot; is getting started🤣🤣 German Troops Reportedly Arrive in Greenland for Danish-Led Arctic Exercise 🇩🇪 Thirteen WHOLE German soldiers have arrived in Greenland to participate in “Operation Arctic Endurance,” a military exercise organized by Denmark on the Arctic… <a href="https://t.co/6p5zE1LqTm">pic.twitter.com/6p5zE1LqTm</a>&mdash; Alma Gentil (@Chinoy200096633) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chinoy200096633/status/2012512237190005047?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 17, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

France has sent 15 soldiers of the 27th Mountain Infantry Brigade, Germany has added 13 more personnel, Sweden has sent 3 officers participating, Norway has 2 officers deployed, the United Kingdom has 1 military officer added to the group, Netherlands has 1 navy officer who has also joined the mission. People online trolled the scale of deployment, one user commented, may be the one officer from the UK is “James Bond”. Others called it a “clown show”. Another called it "THE BOYS WEEKEND AWAY FROM THE WIVES"&nbsp;The US military already has a presence of 140–150 personnel at Pituffik Space Base. “I don’t think troops in Europe impact the president’s decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. Soren Enderson, Head of Denmark's Joint Arctic Force, said that the military exercises in Greenland are linked to Russia. Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that Russia will bolster its defence and infrastructure in the Northern Sea route, calling NATO activities near Greenland a provocation and Western 'hysteria' over nonexistent threats.&nbsp;

NATO deploys just 37 troops to Greenland under Operation Arctic Endurance, sparking online trolling as Denmark asserts sovereignty amid US interest.

NATO countries have deployed a small multinational military force of 37 military personnel to Greenland in a symbolic deployment. It was intended to send a political signal to assert Danish Sovereignity in the territory through the so-called “reconnaissance mission”. The Danish-led initiative is called Arctic Endurance. It already has 200 personnel stationed there. Denmark has promised that it was pressing on with plans for a "larger and more permanent" NATO presence to secure the island coveted by US President Donald Trump. Also Read: Elon Musk sues OpenAI and Microsoft, alleges fraud and seeks upto $134 bn

NATO deploys just 37 troops to Greenland under Operation Arctic Endurance, sparking online trolling as Denmark asserts sovereignty amid US interest.

NATO's Greenland defence sees symbolic troop deployment, not a fighting force

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 16) warned that the United States may pull out of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if America’s allies do not agree to its bid to acquire Greenland. This comes after Trump threatened to impose tariffs on nation that don’t back his plan of acquiring the Arctic territory.When asked by a reporter whether he would “pull out of NATO if it doesn't help you acquire Greenland,” Trump responded by saying, “We’re going to see.”“NATO has been dealing with us on Greenland, we need Greenland for national security very badly. If we don’t have it we have a very big hole in terms of national security, especially in terms of the Golden Dome,” Trump added. He was referring to the multi-layer missile defence system that he believes is reliant on seizing control of Denmark’s Arctic territory.Trump earlier threatened to impose tariffs on countries that don’t support his plan to take over Greenland. Speaking at an event in the White House, Trump referred to the tariffs he slapped on pharmaceutical imports from the EU as part of his efforts to lower drug prices in the US, and said, “I may do that for Greenland too. I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security.”On Wednesday (Jan 14), the US president said that the United States need Greenland for its national security interests, warning that Russia or China could otherwise attempt to gain control of the strategically located Arctic territory.Meanwhile, NATO allies including Britain, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden have deployed some troops to Greenland against Trump’s repeated threats. In response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a briefing that the employment of European troops in Greenland has no impact on Trump’s plans to take over Greenland.“I don’t think troops in Europe impact the president’s decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all,” she said.Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt and Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen also held talks with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House on Wednesday (Jan 14) that ended in “fundamental disagreement”.

US President Donald Trump warned the US could leave NATO if allies do not back his bid to acquire Greenland, calling it vital for national security. He also threatened tariffs on countries opposing the plan, despite European allies deploying troops and voicing opposition.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jan 16) warned that the United States may pull out of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) if America’s allies do not agree to its bid to acquire Greenland. This comes after Trump threatened to impose tariffs on nation that don’t back his plan of acquiring the Arctic territory. When asked by a reporter whether he would “pull out of NATO if it doesn't help you acquire Greenland,” Trump responded by saying, “We’re going to see.” “NATO has been dealing with us on Greenland, we need Greenland for national security very badly. If we don’t have it we have a very big hole in terms of national security, especially in terms of the Golden Dome,” Trump added. He was referring to the multi-layer missile defence system that he believes is reliant on seizing control of Denmark’s Arctic territory. Trump earlier threatened to impose tariffs on countries that don’t support his plan to take over Greenland. Speaking at an event in the White House, Trump referred to the tariffs he slapped on pharmaceutical imports from the EU as part of his efforts to lower drug prices in the US, and said, “I may do that for Greenland too. I may put a tariff on countries if they don’t go along with Greenland, because we need Greenland for national security.” On Wednesday (Jan 14), the US president said that the United States need Greenland for its national security interests, warning that Russia or China could otherwise attempt to gain control of the strategically located Arctic territory. Meanwhile, NATO allies including Britain, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden have deployed some troops to Greenland against Trump’s repeated threats. In response, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told a briefing that the employment of European troops in Greenland has no impact on Trump’s plans to take over Greenland. “I don’t think troops in Europe impact the president’s decision-making process, nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all,” she said. Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt and Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen also held talks with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the White House on Wednesday (Jan 14) that ended in “fundamental disagreement”.

US President Donald Trump warned the US could leave NATO if allies do not back his bid to acquire Greenland, calling it vital for national security. He also threatened tariffs on countries opposing the plan, despite European allies deploying troops and voicing opposition.

Trump to pull out of NATO over Greenland? Here’s what US president said

NATO allies are moving troops and military assets to Greenland as tensions rise in the Arctic. Denmark announced it is boosting its military presence on the island with aircraft, naval vessels, and soldiers, while Sweden confirmed it is sending officers at Copenhagen’s request. France, Norway, and Netherlands have also stepped in. 

Trump's Warning Shakes NATO's Collective Defence | EU Allies Begin Greenland Military Mission 

Denmark ramps up military deployments in Greenland following stalled Washington talks on U.S. acquisition ambitions. France, Germany, Norway, and Sweden contribute troops-Germany's 13-person recon team already landed in Nuuk-for joint patrols, fighter ops, and naval maneuvers through 2026.


Greenland Showdown: Denmark Boosts Military Presence in Greenland

nato

Nato, News on Nato, stories on Nato, articles on Nato, Nato stories at Wion, Nato news, Nato latest news

nato

China Helping Russia Build Nuclear Missiles, Oreshniks, Which No Western Missile Defence Can Stop

Russia-China Ties: Report Suggests Beijing Secretly Supplying Tech & Equipments to Moscow

NATO Chief Warns: Europe’s Defense Impossible Without American Backing

Europe: NATO Chief Warns Europe ‘Can’t Defend Itself’ Without US Amid Greenland Tensions

‘Keep dreaming’: NATO chief claims Europe can’t defend itself without US

Trump Angers NATO Allies, Criticizes Troops for Staying Back From Frontlines

‘Trump’s remarks on Nato troops in Afghanistan insulting and appalling’: Starmer

Greenland Partitioned: Trump Takes Control of Arctic Bases in Major NATO Deal

Trump announces Greenland framework: 'I want Greenland, but won’t use force'

Trump's Greenland U-turn explained: NATO, 'forever' framework, minerals and more

NATO Chief Meets US President in Davos | Trump: I Want Greenland But Won't Use Force

Is the U.S. Retreating From NATO? Pentagon Weighs Troop Pullback

'They called me daddy': Trump mixes Greenland with Iceland in NATO remarks

'They called me daddy': Trump mixes Greenland with Iceland in NATO remarks

Why Trump’s Greenland ploy is both a gift and a headache for the Kremlin

How Far Will Trump Go On Greenland? EU Vows Unflinching Response To Trump's Greenland Threats

US-Greenland Tensions: Trump Says He is Confident of a Deal with NATO Allies

Greenland Showdown: EU Vows Unflinching Response To Trump's Greenland Threats

US-Greenland Tensions: US President Donald Trump Refuses to Step Back on Greenland

Coalition Of The Willing: Europe's Alternative Security Alliance?

US vs Europe: Greenland In Focus As Trump Heads For Davos

Greenland Showdown: Trump Says NATO Will Be Happy With Deal On Greenland

Norway warns citizens of wartime property seizures as Arctic tensions rise

NATO Hit by Mortal Wound, United Nations in Coma