Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian claimed that America demanded all of the enriched nuclear material of the Islamic Republic, and in return, Donald Trump would exempt Tehran for three months from the sanctions. Rejecting the offer, Pezeshkian called it "unacceptable". "This is by no means acceptable," the Iranian president told reporters in New York, AFP reported.&nbsp;This came after the UN nuclear watchdog reported that Tehran's stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent had increased, and it was around 440.9 kilogrammes as of June 13. Since May 17, there has been an increase of 32.3 kilograms. Iran stated that it was ready for the inspection of its sites, but Western powers claimed they had seen insufficient progress to justify delaying sanctions.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestinians-to-stay-in-gaza-israel-will-coexist-peacefully-trump-s-21-point-plan-revealed-note-it-might-shock-netanyahu-1758985106410">Palestinians to stay in Gaza, Israel will coexist ‘peacefully’: Trump’s 21-point plan REVEALED. Note: It might shock Netanyahu</a>&nbsp;The Iranian president previously said France had made a similar proposal, but offered a one-month delay. "Why would we put ourselves in such a trap and have a noose around our neck each month?" Pezeshkian asked.&nbsp;Pezeshkian repeated what he has been claiming since the beginning of the nuke talks that Iran had no intention of developing nuclear weapons. He accused Washington and Israel of using pressure to try to topple the Islamic Republic.&nbsp;We must not allow Iran to rebuild their nuclear ability&nbsp;Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his UNGA address on Friday (September 26), showed a "curse map" and said, "Iran threaten the stability of the region and existence of my country. Iran is massively developing nuclear programme and ballistic missiles - not only Israel but also blackmail everywhere." The Israeli PM said that his army has "hammered" the Iran-backed Houthis, crushed the bulk of the Palestinian militant group Hamas, and cripples Hezbollah. “During the last decade, We devastated the atomic weapons and ballistic missile programme of Iran,” Netanyahu said. He said that Iran “must” be stopped from rebuilding their nuclear ability.

This came after the UN nuclear watchdog reported that Tehran stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent had increased, and it was around 440.9 kilogrammes as of June 13. Since May 17, there has been an increase of 32.3 kilograms.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian claimed that America demanded all of the enriched nuclear material of the Islamic Republic, and in return, Donald Trump would exempt Tehran for three months from the sanctions. Rejecting the offer, Pezeshkian called it "unacceptable". "This is by no means acceptable," the Iranian president told reporters in New York, AFP reported. This came after the UN nuclear watchdog reported that Tehran's stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent had increased, and it was around 440.9 kilogrammes as of June 13. Since May 17, there has been an increase of 32.3 kilograms. Iran stated that it was ready for the inspection of its sites, but Western powers claimed they had seen insufficient progress to justify delaying sanctions. Also read: Palestinians to stay in Gaza, Israel will coexist ‘peacefully’: Trump’s 21-point plan REVEALED. Note: It might shock Netanyahu The Iranian president previously said France had made a similar proposal, but offered a one-month delay. "Why would we put ourselves in such a trap and have a noose around our neck each month?" Pezeshkian asked. Pezeshkian repeated what he has been claiming since the beginning of the nuke talks that Iran had no intention of developing nuclear weapons. He accused Washington and Israel of using pressure to try to topple the Islamic Republic. We must not allow Iran to rebuild their nuclear ability Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in his UNGA address on Friday (September 26), showed a "curse map" and said, "Iran threaten the stability of the region and existence of my country. Iran is massively developing nuclear programme and ballistic missiles - not only Israel but also blackmail everywhere." The Israeli PM said that his army has "hammered" the Iran-backed Houthis, crushed the bulk of the Palestinian militant group Hamas, and cripples Hezbollah. “During the last decade, We devastated the atomic weapons and ballistic missile programme of Iran,” Netanyahu said. He said that Iran “must” be stopped from rebuilding their nuclear ability.

This came after the UN nuclear watchdog reported that Tehran's stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent had increased, and it was around 440.9 kilogrammes as of June 13. Since May 17, there has been an increase of 32.3 kilograms.

Pezeshkian says Trump asked for Iran's entire enriched nuke material; In return US will give...

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday (September 24), said that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb.&nbsp;"I hereby declare once more before this assembly that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb," Pezeshkian said. The Iranian president started his speech saying, "Is this the state of our world? The world in these two years was witness to genocide in Gaza, was witness to the destruction of homes and repeated violation, was witness to sovereignty and territorial integrity in Lebanon, was witness to the devastation of Syria's infrastructure, was witness to assault against the people of Yemen, was witness to the force starvation of emaciated children in the arms their mothers, was witness to the assassination of Iran's scientists, was witness to the surreptitious raids infringing upon the sovereignty of nations, violating the territorial integrity of states and openly targeting leaders of people."&nbsp;"And all of this under the full support of the most heavily armed regime in the face of the earth and under the pretext of self defence. Would you countenance such things for yourself?" he asked. Read more: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-india-begged-pakistan-won-islamabad-is-living-in-delusion-its-textbook-featuring-operation-sindoor-proves-it-1758712916257">‘India begged, Pakistan won’: Islamabad is living in delusion, its textbook featuring Operation Sindoor proves it</a>&nbsp;Pezeshkian also said, "Excellence ladies and gentlemen, you all were witness that this past June, my country was subjected to a savage aggression in flagrant contravention of the most elementary principles of the international law."&nbsp;&nbsp;“Since records began, there’s only been a period where more Americans have come to London. There must be a reason for that. You look at a number of different criteria; we’re often the No 1 city in the globe when it comes to culture, when it comes to foreign investment, when it comes to sports, when it comes to the ability of people to fulfil their potential. I’m really proud we are the greatest city in the world," he added.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Pezeshkian said that he declares once more before this assembly that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb. 


Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday (September 24), said that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb. "I hereby declare once more before this assembly that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb," Pezeshkian said. The Iranian president started his speech saying, "Is this the state of our world? The world in these two years was witness to genocide in Gaza, was witness to the destruction of homes and repeated violation, was witness to sovereignty and territorial integrity in Lebanon, was witness to the devastation of Syria's infrastructure, was witness to assault against the people of Yemen, was witness to the force starvation of emaciated children in the arms their mothers, was witness to the assassination of Iran's scientists, was witness to the surreptitious raids infringing upon the sovereignty of nations, violating the territorial integrity of states and openly targeting leaders of people." "And all of this under the full support of the most heavily armed regime in the face of the earth and under the pretext of self defence. Would you countenance such things for yourself?" he asked. Read more: ‘India begged, Pakistan won’: Islamabad is living in delusion, its textbook featuring Operation Sindoor proves it Pezeshkian also said, "Excellence ladies and gentlemen, you all were witness that this past June, my country was subjected to a savage aggression in flagrant contravention of the most elementary principles of the international law." “Since records began, there’s only been a period where more Americans have come to London. There must be a reason for that. You look at a number of different criteria; we’re often the No 1 city in the globe when it comes to culture, when it comes to foreign investment, when it comes to sports, when it comes to the ability of people to fulfil their potential. I’m really proud we are the greatest city in the world," he added.

"I hereby declare once more before this assembly that Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb," Pezeshkian said.

‘Iran has never sought and will never seek to build a nuclear bomb’: Pezeshkian

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council on Saturday warned that the return of UN sanctions will halt Tehran’s cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. In a meeting chaired by President Pezeshkian, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, concluded that the Europeans’ push to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran “will in practice lead to a suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog,” the state TV said. Iran’s top security body said that the action by Britain, France, and Germany to reimpose UN sanctions will ‘effectively suspend’ its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog.&nbsp;The move has reignited fears that the Middle Eastern nation could begin enriching Uranium again. Iranian hardliners are pushing for Tehran’s withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and even development of a nuclear bomb in response to the snapback of sanctions.&nbsp;“Despite the foreign ministry’s cooperation with the (International Atomic Energy) Agency and the presentation of plans to resolve the issue, the actions of European countries will effectively suspend the path of cooperation with the agency,” the Supreme National Security Council said in a televised statement.&nbsp;The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution which would have stopped the sanctions coming back into force on Friday. The sanctions will return unless the nine members of the security council agree to prolong the sanctions relief.The resolution was supported by China, Russia, Pakistan and Algeria.&nbsp;WATCH: Israel alarmed by Egypt's military build-up<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-alarmed-by-egypt-s-military-build-up-1758390624475/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-alarmed-by-egypt-s-military-build-up-1758390624475/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi said US air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities had caused severe but ‘not total’ damage, casting doubt on Donald Trump’s claim that the sites were totally obliterated by the bunker-busting bomb and missile strikes.&nbsp;Asked if Iran could still make a bomb if it wanted to, Grossi said, “Iran had a very vast ambitious programme, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology.”&nbsp;US envoy to the United Nations Dorothea Shea said, in the absence of any further UN Security Council action, the vote means international sanctions will be re-imposed on Iran next month.

Iran’s top security body said that the action by Britain, France, and Germany to reimpose UN sanctions will ‘effectively suspend’ its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. The move has reignited fears that the Middle Eastern nation could begin enriching Uranium again.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council on Saturday warned that the return of UN sanctions will halt Tehran’s cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. In a meeting chaired by President Pezeshkian, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, concluded that the Europeans’ push to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran “will in practice lead to a suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog,” the state TV said. Iran’s top security body said that the action by Britain, France, and Germany to reimpose UN sanctions will ‘effectively suspend’ its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. The move has reignited fears that the Middle Eastern nation could begin enriching Uranium again. Iranian hardliners are pushing for Tehran’s withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and even development of a nuclear bomb in response to the snapback of sanctions. “Despite the foreign ministry’s cooperation with the (International Atomic Energy) Agency and the presentation of plans to resolve the issue, the actions of European countries will effectively suspend the path of cooperation with the agency,” the Supreme National Security Council said in a televised statement. The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution which would have stopped the sanctions coming back into force on Friday. The sanctions will return unless the nine members of the security council agree to prolong the sanctions relief. The resolution was supported by China, Russia, Pakistan and Algeria. WATCH: Israel alarmed by Egypt's military build-up https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-alarmed-by-egypt-s-military-build-up-1758390624475/embed International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi said US air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities had caused severe but ‘not total’ damage, casting doubt on Donald Trump’s claim that the sites were totally obliterated by the bunker-busting bomb and missile strikes. Asked if Iran could still make a bomb if it wanted to, Grossi said, “Iran had a very vast ambitious programme, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology.” US envoy to the United Nations Dorothea Shea said, in the absence of any further UN Security Council action, the vote means international sanctions will be re-imposed on Iran next month.

Iran’s top security body said that the action by Britain, France, and Germany to reimpose UN sanctions will ‘effectively suspend’ its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. The move has reignited fears that the Middle Eastern nation could begin enriching uranium again.

Iran threatens to axe cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog if sanctions are reimposed

Following talks with the European powers over its nuclear program, Iran on Wednesday (Sep 17) said that it was ready to reach a “fair and balanced” solution. This comes after officials from Britain, France and Germany held discussions over a call with the Islamic Republic official.“Iran is prepared to achieve a fair and balanced solution that ensures mutual interests. Attaining such a goal requires a responsible and independent approach by the three European countries, and refraining from being influenced by actors,” Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said after the call with his E3 counterparts and EU foreign policy chief.Germany said that the ‘ball is still in Iran’s court’ after the discussions, adding that sanctions would be reimposed unless there were “concrete actions in the coming days”. The phone talks come after the European powers triggered a 30-day deadline for “snapback” sanctions to come back into effect if there is no negotiated deal on the nuclear programme of Iran.Speaking of the talks, the German foreign ministry spokesman said that the offer from the E3 powers “to discuss a temporary extension of the snapback if Iran fulfils certain conditions remains on the table,” adding that “at this point the steps taken by Iran have not been sufficient.”The recent talks come after an agreement between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency last week to resume cooperation, including inspection of nuclear sites.However, many Western diplomats have raised concerns that the accord is not detailed enough, with no timeframe, and leaves an opportunity open for Iran to continue obstruction.“The Islamic Republic of Iran has entered into dialogue with the International Atomic Energy Agency with a responsible approach... on how Iran will fulfil its safeguards obligations in the new situation... It is now the turn of the opposing parties to use this opportunity to continue the diplomatic path and prevent an avoidable crisis,” Araghchi said.

Iran held talks with the European powers to negotiate a deal on its nuclear programme on Wednesday (Sep 17).

Following talks with the European powers over its nuclear program, Iran on Wednesday (Sep 17) said that it was ready to reach a “fair and balanced” solution. This comes after officials from Britain, France and Germany held discussions over a call with the Islamic Republic official. “Iran is prepared to achieve a fair and balanced solution that ensures mutual interests. Attaining such a goal requires a responsible and independent approach by the three European countries, and refraining from being influenced by actors,” Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said after the call with his E3 counterparts and EU foreign policy chief. Germany said that the ‘ball is still in Iran’s court’ after the discussions, adding that sanctions would be reimposed unless there were “concrete actions in the coming days”. The phone talks come after the European powers triggered a 30-day deadline for “snapback” sanctions to come back into effect if there is no negotiated deal on the nuclear programme of Iran. Speaking of the talks, the German foreign ministry spokesman said that the offer from the E3 powers “to discuss a temporary extension of the snapback if Iran fulfils certain conditions remains on the table,” adding that “at this point the steps taken by Iran have not been sufficient.” The recent talks come after an agreement between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency last week to resume cooperation, including inspection of nuclear sites. However, many Western diplomats have raised concerns that the accord is not detailed enough, with no timeframe, and leaves an opportunity open for Iran to continue obstruction. “The Islamic Republic of Iran has entered into dialogue with the International Atomic Energy Agency with a responsible approach... on how Iran will fulfil its safeguards obligations in the new situation... It is now the turn of the opposing parties to use this opportunity to continue the diplomatic path and prevent an avoidable crisis,” Araghchi said.

Iran held talks with the European powers to negotiate a deal on its nuclear programme on Wednesday (Sep 17).

‘Prepared to achieve fair, balanced solution’: Iran expresses hope after nuclear talks with European powers

Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi has said that Tehran is ready for a real and lasting agreement that includes strict monitoring and limits on its domestic uranium enrichment in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. In an opinion piece Aragchi wrote for the Guardian on Sunday, Iran’s foreign minister urged the European nations to change course and abandon their plan to snapback a wide array of UN sanctions at the end of the month and warned of “unprecedentedly destructive” consequences otherwise. “If this short opportunity to change course is missed, it will have consequences that could be unprecedentedly destructive for the region and beyond,” Aragchi warned in his piece titled, “A message from Tehran to Britain, France and Germany: in your own interests, you should change course.”&nbsp;Tehran is still hoping that Europeans can be persuaded to defer snapping back sanctions at the UN Security Council while arguing that Europe will not benefit from such a move since it will only put the US in the driving seat on negotiating any new nuclear deal and leave Europe isolated. However, conflicting signals are emerging from within Iran.&nbsp;The minister said that he had made progress in recent talks with the UN weapons inspectors on their terms for their return to Iran’s bombed nuclear sites, one of the preconditions set by Europe for deferring the snapback.&nbsp;However, the Iranian parliament is still discussing a bill that would require Iran to leave the nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions were restored, which would shut off all independent access to its nuclear sites.&nbsp;<h2>‘European leaders making a huge mistake if they think…’</h2>&nbsp;Araghchi, who met with the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, in Doha last Thursday, claims European leaders are making a huge mistake if they think that by being tough with Iran, the US President Donald Trump will stop viewing them as secondary actors and give them a place on the world stage.The return of UN sanctions “will only exclude the three countries from future diplomatic processes, with widespread negative consequences for the whole of Europe in terms of its credibility and global standing,” he wrote.&nbsp;<h2>‘Trump views European countries as secondary players’</h2>&nbsp;“President Trump has made it clear that he views the three European countries as secondary players, and this is evident in the exclusion of Europe from issues that are vital to its future, including the Russia-Ukraine crisis. Washington’s message is clear: to gain a foothold, the three countries must demonstrate unwavering loyalty.”“Israel may present itself as capable of fighting on behalf of the west, but as we saw in June, the truth is that Iran’s powerful armed forces are once again ready and capable of defeating Israel to the point where it will be forced to turn to ‘Grandpa’ for salvation,” Aragchi wrote, referring to Israel’s dependence on the US for military hardware.&nbsp;WATCH: Undersea cables cut in the Red Sea, disrupting internet access in Asia and the Middle East<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/undersea-cables-cut-in-the-red-sea-disrupting-internet-access-in-asia-and-the-middle-east-1757269237544/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/undersea-cables-cut-in-the-red-sea-disrupting-internet-access-in-asia-and-the-middle-east-1757269237544/embed</a>&nbsp;

Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi said European nations should engage constructively and not facilitate ‘America’s excesses’ and claimed European leaders are making a mistake if they think Trump will stop viewing them as secondary actors and give them a place on the world stage.

Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi has said that Tehran is ready for a real and lasting agreement that includes strict monitoring and limits on its domestic uranium enrichment in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. In an opinion piece Aragchi wrote for the Guardian on Sunday, Iran’s foreign minister urged the European nations to change course and abandon their plan to snapback a wide array of UN sanctions at the end of the month and warned of “unprecedentedly destructive” consequences otherwise. “If this short opportunity to change course is missed, it will have consequences that could be unprecedentedly destructive for the region and beyond,” Aragchi warned in his piece titled, “A message from Tehran to Britain, France and Germany: in your own interests, you should change course.” Tehran is still hoping that Europeans can be persuaded to defer snapping back sanctions at the UN Security Council while arguing that Europe will not benefit from such a move since it will only put the US in the driving seat on negotiating any new nuclear deal and leave Europe isolated. However, conflicting signals are emerging from within Iran. The minister said that he had made progress in recent talks with the UN weapons inspectors on their terms for their return to Iran’s bombed nuclear sites, one of the preconditions set by Europe for deferring the snapback. However, the Iranian parliament is still discussing a bill that would require Iran to leave the nuclear non-proliferation treaty if UN sanctions were restored, which would shut off all independent access to its nuclear sites. ‘European leaders making a huge mistake if they think…’ Araghchi, who met with the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, in Doha last Thursday, claims European leaders are making a huge mistake if they think that by being tough with Iran, the US President Donald Trump will stop viewing them as secondary actors and give them a place on the world stage. The return of UN sanctions “will only exclude the three countries from future diplomatic processes, with widespread negative consequences for the whole of Europe in terms of its credibility and global standing,” he wrote. ‘Trump views European countries as secondary players’ “President Trump has made it clear that he views the three European countries as secondary players, and this is evident in the exclusion of Europe from issues that are vital to its future, including the Russia-Ukraine crisis. Washington’s message is clear: to gain a foothold, the three countries must demonstrate unwavering loyalty.” “Israel may present itself as capable of fighting on behalf of the west, but as we saw in June, the truth is that Iran’s powerful armed forces are once again ready and capable of defeating Israel to the point where it will be forced to turn to ‘Grandpa’ for salvation,” Aragchi wrote, referring to Israel’s dependence on the US for military hardware. WATCH: Undersea cables cut in the Red Sea, disrupting internet access in Asia and the Middle East https://www.wionews.com/videos/undersea-cables-cut-in-the-red-sea-disrupting-internet-access-in-asia-and-the-middle-east-1757269237544/embed

Iran’s Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi said European nations should engage constructively and not facilitate ‘America’s excesses’ and claimed European leaders are making a mistake if they think Trump will stop viewing them as secondary actors and give them a place on the world stage.

Iran to allow nuclear monitoring if sanctions are lifted, says foreign minister Araghchi

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday (Aug 28) welcomed the decision by E3 nations to initiate “snapback” of sanctions on Iran. He further added that Washington is open to direct talks with Iran on ending its nuclear program. This comes after France, Germany, and the United Kingdom initiated a process to reimpose the United Nations sanctions on Tehran.In a statement, Rubio said, “The United States remains available for direct engagement with Iran – in furtherance of a peaceful, enduring resolution to the Iran nuclear issue.” He added that the “snapback does not contradict our earnest readiness for diplomacy, it only enhances it.”Rubio further urged Iranian leaders to take necessary measures to ensure their nation never obtains a nuclear weapon for the peace and prosperity of the Iranian people.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The E3 – France, Germany, and the United Kingdom – initiated a process to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran. Snapback sanctions are a direct response to Iran’s continuing defiance of its nuclear commitments. The United States supports the E3’s decision and urges Iran to engage in…&mdash; Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) <a href="https://twitter.com/SecRubio/status/1961081155605697008?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

“I urge Iranian leaders to take the immediate steps necessary to ensure that their nation will never obtain a nuclear weapon; to walk the path of peace; and to, by extension, advance prosperity for the Iranian people,” he said.In a post on X, Rubio said, “The E3 – France, Germany, and the United Kingdom – initiated a process to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran. Snapback sanctions are a direct response to Iran’s continuing defiance of its nuclear commitments. The United States supports the E3’s decision and urges Iran to engage in serious diplomatic negotiations to resolve the nuclear issue.”Earlier on Thursday, France, Britain, and Germany started the process to reimpose the UN sanctions on Iran. The move was taken after Tehran failed to comply with commitments over its nuclear program.US President Donald Trump has pushed for stopping Iran’s nuclear program. In the first term of Trump, this has resulted in major tensions between the United States and Europe. In his second term, Trump first insisted that he sought a nuclear deal with Iran but then joined Israel in its military campaign, targetting Tehran’s nuclear sites in air strikes.

Rubio further urged Iranian leaders to take necessary measures to ensure their nation never obtains a nuclear weapon for the peace and prosperity of the Iranian people.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday (Aug 28) welcomed the decision by E3 nations to initiate “snapback” of sanctions on Iran. He further added that Washington is open to direct talks with Iran on ending its nuclear program. This comes after France, Germany, and the United Kingdom initiated a process to reimpose the United Nations sanctions on Tehran. In a statement, Rubio said, “The United States remains available for direct engagement with Iran – in furtherance of a peaceful, enduring resolution to the Iran nuclear issue.” He added that the “snapback does not contradict our earnest readiness for diplomacy, it only enhances it.” Rubio further urged Iranian leaders to take necessary measures to ensure their nation never obtains a nuclear weapon for the peace and prosperity of the Iranian people.

Rubio further urged Iranian leaders to take necessary measures to ensure their nation never obtains a nuclear weapon for the peace and prosperity of the Iranian people.

‘Direct response to Iran’s defiance’: Rubio backs Europeans to restore UN sanctions on Tehran, says US open for talks

After Israel killed multiple Iranian nuclear scientists during the 12-day war against the Islamic Republic's nuke programme, it has been reported that some of them are alive and have been sent into hiding. The British newspaper, The Telegraph, reported that over 15 of the surviving researchers, among 100 on an Israeli list, are no longer living in their main homes or lecturing at universities amid fear of renewed Israeli strikes, citing a senior Iranian official.&nbsp;The scientists have been moved into safe villas in Tehran and along the country’s northern coast with their families. The report claimed that among those who were teaching in the universities of Tehran were “replaced with people who have no connection with the nuclear program." The report cited some of the Israeli officials who called these scientists “dead men walking” despite the increased security.<h2>Iran has started nuclear programme at a different location?</h2>US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location.&nbsp;"I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem."<h2>How much damage has Iran faced</h2>As per the American news agency CBS News, US defence officials said that three American B-2 bombers were used to strike the Fordow nuclear site of Iran. Each of the B-2s was armed by 2 US-made "bunker-buster" bombs - also known as GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, or MOPs bombs. These bombs are extremely heavy in weight and can only be dropped using a B-2.&nbsp;Iran's key nuke facility, Fordow, was attacked by the US. It is Iran's high-grade uranium enrichment facility and is buried around 300 feet under a mountain. Apart from this, Natanz and Isfahan, two other nuclear sites, were also targeted by the US via Tomahawk missiles launched by submarines.&nbsp;The United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a social media post that there was "no increase in off-site radiation levels" after the US strike. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation also confirmed the US attacks on its three nuclear facilities but said the strikes will not stop it from progressing in its nuclear program.<h2>The condition of Iran's nuke sites</h2>The US strike came after nine days of continuous bombing by Israel on Iran's top nuclear facilities. The Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed Iran’s nuclear programme had been set back by two years - a claim thatTehran continues to deny. Moreover, the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Mahdi Mohammadi, said that nothing "exceptional" had happened after the US struck Iran.&nbsp;"From Iran's perspective, nothing exceptional had happened. Iran had been anticipating an attack on the Fordow site for several nights, and the site had been evacuated some time ago. Even if an attack had occurred, no irreparable damage had been recorded," he said.&nbsp;

A recent report has revealed that during Israel 12-day war with Iran, several Iranian nuclear scientists are alive and have been sent into hiding in Tehran. They were replaced in universities with people who have no connection with Iranian nuke programme.

After Israel killed multiple Iranian nuclear scientists during the 12-day war against the Islamic Republic's nuke programme, it has been reported that some of them are alive and have been sent into hiding. The British newspaper, The Telegraph, reported that over 15 of the surviving researchers, among 100 on an Israeli list, are no longer living in their main homes or lecturing at universities amid fear of renewed Israeli strikes, citing a senior Iranian official. The scientists have been moved into safe villas in Tehran and along the country’s northern coast with their families. The report claimed that among those who were teaching in the universities of Tehran were “replaced with people who have no connection with the nuclear program." The report cited some of the Israeli officials who called these scientists “dead men walking” despite the increased security. Iran has started nuclear programme at a different location? US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location. "I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem." How much damage has Iran faced As per the American news agency CBS News, US defence officials said that three American B-2 bombers were used to strike the Fordow nuclear site of Iran. Each of the B-2s was armed by 2 US-made "bunker-buster" bombs - also known as GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, or MOPs bombs. These bombs are extremely heavy in weight and can only be dropped using a B-2. Iran's key nuke facility, Fordow, was attacked by the US. It is Iran's high-grade uranium enrichment facility and is buried around 300 feet under a mountain. Apart from this, Natanz and Isfahan, two other nuclear sites, were also targeted by the US via Tomahawk missiles launched by submarines. The United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a social media post that there was "no increase in off-site radiation levels" after the US strike. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation also confirmed the US attacks on its three nuclear facilities but said the strikes will not stop it from progressing in its nuclear program. The condition of Iran's nuke sites The US strike came after nine days of continuous bombing by Israel on Iran's top nuclear facilities. The Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed Iran’s nuclear programme had been set back by two years - a claim that Tehran continues to deny. Moreover, the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Mahdi Mohammadi, said that nothing "exceptional" had happened after the US struck Iran. "From Iran's perspective, nothing exceptional had happened. Iran had been anticipating an attack on the Fordow site for several nights, and the site had been evacuated some time ago. Even if an attack had occurred, no irreparable damage had been recorded," he said.

A recent report has revealed that during Israel's 12-day war with Iran, several Iranian nuclear scientists are alive and have been sent into hiding in Tehran. They were replaced in universities with people who have no connection with Iran's nuke programme.

‘Dead men walking’: Several Iranian nuclear scientists survived Israel's attack, are hiding in Tehran

US strikes on Iran nuclear sites new assessment: Out of the three Iranian nuclear sites hit by the US B2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles in June, only one - Fordow- was ‘mostly destroyed’ while the other two - Natanz and Isfahan - were less damaged. The latter two might still have the capability to resume nuclear enrichment within months if Iran chooses to do so. This is as per a new US assessment, as reported by NBC News on Thursday (July 17).<h2>How much were the Iranian nuclear sites damaged in US strikes?</h2>As per the US assessment, the Fordow uranium enrichment site was set back by as much as two years in the air strikes. The site, deeply buried in mountainous terrain, was hit with 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs or GBU-57s.But both Natanz and Isfahan have tunnels and facilities likely beyond the reach of GBU-57s, NBC report noted citing US officials.While surface targets at Isfahan were hit with Tomahawk missiles, GBU-57s were used at Natanz.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/fordow-was-just-the-beginning-new-iranian-site-twice-as-deep-as-fordow-1751042742463/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/fordow-was-just-the-beginning-new-iranian-site-twice-as-deep-as-fordow-1751042742463/embed</a>&nbsp;In the June strike that ended the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, Fordow site's work was significantly set back, said the assessment which was given to US lawmakers, defence department officials, and allied countries, reported NBC.The US strikes reportedly 'buried most enriched uranium' at Isfahan and Fordow, making extraction and enrichment difficult, as per the NBC report.&nbsp; Israel, which believes that some highly enriched uranium remains buried but is effectively unreachable, has threatened new strikes if Iran tries to recover it.Iran’s air defences were largely destroyed, making future strikes easier, as per the assessment.&nbsp;“It was made clear that Iran no longer has any more [air defences], so the idea that they can easily rebuild anything is ludicrous,” the NBC report quoted one official as saying.<h2>The plan was to strike six sites</h2>According to the report, the US Central Command had a plan as early as 2023 to strike Iranian nuclear sites. That plan was more extensive than what finally came about this June. It was to strike six sites over several weeks, deploying air defences and missile capabilities. But President Donald Trump rejected the plan. “We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,” the NBC report quoted an official as saying, as Trump preferred to avoid prolonged conflicts and high casualties on both sides.<h2>Iran nuclear site attacks: Official messaging and reality continue to differ</h2>The extent of damage to Iranian sites following the US strikes has been a major issue of debate inside and outside the US.&nbsp;Soon after the strikes, Trump called the operation 'a spectacular military success' and claimed that Iran’s key enrichment facilities were "completely and totally obliterated.”&nbsp; CIA Director John Ratcliffe claimed that the metal conversion facility at Natanz was “destroyed to the point that it would take years to rebuild.”&nbsp; But soon, various intelligence assessments gave more qualified descriptions, with the latest pointing towards significant damage to Fordow but less to Natanz and Isfahan.<h2>More strikes on Iran nuclear sites can't be ruled out</h2>The report said that the US and Israeli governments are still discussing more strikes in future on the less-damaged sites if Iran rebuilds them. If Iran rebuilds its nuclear programme or refuses to restart negotiations on it, the US could again enter the conflict.

Israel, which believes that some highly enriched uranium remains buried but is effectively unreachable, has threatened new strikes if Iran tries to recover it.

US strikes on Iran nuclear sites new assessment: Out of the three Iranian nuclear sites hit by the US B2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles in June, only one - Fordow- was ‘mostly destroyed’ while the other two - Natanz and Isfahan - were less damaged. The latter two might still have the capability to resume nuclear enrichment within months if Iran chooses to do so. This is as per a new US assessment, as reported by NBC News on Thursday (July 17). How much were the Iranian nuclear sites damaged in US strikes? As per the US assessment, the Fordow uranium enrichment site was set back by as much as two years in the air strikes. The site, deeply buried in mountainous terrain, was hit with 30,000-pound bunker buster bombs or GBU-57s. But both Natanz and Isfahan have tunnels and facilities likely beyond the reach of GBU-57s, NBC report noted citing US officials. While surface targets at Isfahan were hit with Tomahawk missiles, GBU-57s were used at Natanz. https://www.wionews.com/videos/fordow-was-just-the-beginning-new-iranian-site-twice-as-deep-as-fordow-1751042742463/embed In the June strike that ended the 12-day war between Israel and Iran, Fordow site's work was significantly set back, said the assessment which was given to US lawmakers, defence department officials, and allied countries, reported NBC. The US strikes reportedly 'buried most enriched uranium' at Isfahan and Fordow, making extraction and enrichment difficult, as per the NBC report. Israel, which believes that some highly enriched uranium remains buried but is effectively unreachable, has threatened new strikes if Iran tries to recover it. Iran’s air defences were largely destroyed, making future strikes easier, as per the assessment. “It was made clear that Iran no longer has any more [air defences], so the idea that they can easily rebuild anything is ludicrous,” the NBC report quoted one official as saying. The plan was to strike six sites According to the report, the US Central Command had a plan as early as 2023 to strike Iranian nuclear sites. That plan was more extensive than what finally came about this June. It was to strike six sites over several weeks, deploying air defences and missile capabilities. But President Donald Trump rejected the plan. “We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,” the NBC report quoted an official as saying, as Trump preferred to avoid prolonged conflicts and high casualties on both sides. Iran nuclear site attacks: Official messaging and reality continue to differ The extent of damage to Iranian sites following the US strikes has been a major issue of debate inside and outside the US. Soon after the strikes, Trump called the operation 'a spectacular military success' and claimed that Iran’s key enrichment facilities were "completely and totally obliterated.” CIA Director John Ratcliffe claimed that the metal conversion facility at Natanz was “destroyed to the point that it would take years to rebuild.” But soon, various intelligence assessments gave more qualified descriptions, with the latest pointing towards significant damage to Fordow but less to Natanz and Isfahan. More strikes on Iran nuclear sites can't be ruled out The report said that the US and Israeli governments are still discussing more strikes in future on the less-damaged sites if Iran rebuilds them. If Iran rebuilds its nuclear programme or refuses to restart negotiations on it, the US could again enter the conflict.

Israel, which believes that some highly enriched uranium remains buried but is effectively unreachable, has threatened new strikes if Iran tries to recover it.

B2 bombers failed? Only 1 out of 3 Iranian nuclear sites hit by US suffered. Fordow ‘mostly destroyed,’ Natanz and Isfahan were…

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday called Israel a United States’ “dog on a leash” and a “cancerous tumour” and added that the US is an accomplice to all Israeli crimes. Khamenei further said that Iran is ready to respond to any renewed military attack and that it could deliver even ‘bigger blows’ to its adversaries than it did during the 12-day war with Israel. “The fact that our nation is ready to face the power of the United States and its dog on a leash, the Zionist regime (Israel), is very praiseworthy,” Khamenei said.“The base attacked by Iran was an extremely sensitive American regional base, and an even bigger blow could be inflicted on the US and others,” Khamenei said.&nbsp;Last month, the United States had launched strikes on Iran’s nuclear and military facilities, and in response, Iran had struck a US base in Qatar.&nbsp;&nbsp;Iran is under pressure to agree to a nuclear deal with the US, as Washington and three European powers have set an August-end deadline for the deal. France’s foreign minister said that if there is no progress, then a “snapback” mechanism will automatically impose all international sanctions that were lifted under the 2015 Iran deal—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.&nbsp;<h2>‘Tehran will not resume nuclear talks with the US unless…’&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;However, Iran’s parliament shared a statement on Wednesday saying that Tehran will not resume nuclear talks with the US unless its preconditions are met.“In both the diplomatic and military fields, whenever we enter the stage, we do so with our hands full and not from a position of weakness,” Khamenei said in the statement, adding that diplomats should heed “guidelines” and continue their work.&nbsp;In a statement published on his website, Khamenei said Israel’s attacks during the 12-day war were intended to weaken the Islamic Republic’s system and spark unrest to topple it.“The calculation and plan of the aggressors was to weaken the system by targeting certain figures and sensitive centres in Iran,” said Khamenei. He also slammed the US for aiding Israel in its attacks on Iranian soil and said America is “an accomplice to Israel’s crimes”.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Iran and Israel conflict started with an Israeli attack on June 13 to stop the Iranian nuclear programme from progressing.The Israeli strikes killed senior military commanders, nuclear scientists, and hundreds of civilians in Iran, with the total death toll at 1,060, according to Iranian officials.Retaliatory Iranian drone and missile barrages killed around 28 people in Israel, according to official figures.The US launched strikes against Iran’s nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz.President Donald Trump said the US strikes carried out by the B2 Bomber planes that dropped bunker-buster bombs, “totally obliterated” the targeted nuclear facilities.

Khamenei said in a statement that Israel’s attacks during the 12-day war were intended to weaken the Islamic Republic’s system and spark unrest to topple it. He also slammed the US for aiding Israel in its attacks on Iranian soil and said America is “an accomplice to Israel’s crimes”.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Wednesday called Israel a United States’ “dog on a leash” and a “cancerous tumour” and added that the US is an accomplice to all Israeli crimes. Khamenei further said that Iran is ready to respond to any renewed military attack and that it could deliver even ‘bigger blows’ to its adversaries than it did during the 12-day war with Israel. “The fact that our nation is ready to face the power of the United States and its dog on a leash, the Zionist regime (Israel), is very praiseworthy,” Khamenei said. “The base attacked by Iran was an extremely sensitive American regional base, and an even bigger blow could be inflicted on the US and others,” Khamenei said. Last month, the United States had launched strikes on Iran’s nuclear and military facilities, and in response, Iran had struck a US base in Qatar. Iran is under pressure to agree to a nuclear deal with the US, as Washington and three European powers have set an August-end deadline for the deal. France’s foreign minister said that if there is no progress, then a “snapback” mechanism will automatically impose all international sanctions that were lifted under the 2015 Iran deal—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. ‘Tehran will not resume nuclear talks with the US unless…’ However, Iran’s parliament shared a statement on Wednesday saying that Tehran will not resume nuclear talks with the US unless its preconditions are met. “In both the diplomatic and military fields, whenever we enter the stage, we do so with our hands full and not from a position of weakness,” Khamenei said in the statement, adding that diplomats should heed “guidelines” and continue their work. In a statement published on his website, Khamenei said Israel’s attacks during the 12-day war were intended to weaken the Islamic Republic’s system and spark unrest to topple it. “The calculation and plan of the aggressors was to weaken the system by targeting certain figures and sensitive centres in Iran,” said Khamenei. He also slammed the US for aiding Israel in its attacks on Iranian soil and said America is “an accomplice to Israel’s crimes”. The Iran and Israel conflict started with an Israeli attack on June 13 to stop the Iranian nuclear programme from progressing. The Israeli strikes killed senior military commanders, nuclear scientists, and hundreds of civilians in Iran, with the total death toll at 1,060, according to Iranian officials. Retaliatory Iranian drone and missile barrages killed around 28 people in Israel, according to official figures. The US launched strikes against Iran’s nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz. President Donald Trump said the US strikes carried out by the B2 Bomber planes that dropped bunker-buster bombs, “totally obliterated” the targeted nuclear facilities.

Khamenei said in a statement that Israel’s attacks during the 12-day war were intended to weaken the Islamic Republic’s system and spark unrest to topple it. He also slammed the US for aiding Israel in its attacks on Iranian soil and said America is “an accomplice to Israel’s crimes”.

Israel ‘dog on a leash’ of US, says Khamenei, warns of ‘bigger blows’ next time

Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday that the country will ‘respond’ if the United Nations sanctions on it over its nuclear programme are reinstated but did not disclose what measures Tehran is contemplating to take. Last week, a French diplomatic source said that European nations would be compelled to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran using the “snapback mechanism” if no nuclear agreement is reached that addresses the security concerns of European nations. The “snapback mechanism” is a provision in the 2015 nuclear agreement that allows for the reinstatement of UN sanctions on Iran previously lifted in exchange for limits on its nuclear activities. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said at a press conference that the threat to activate the ‘snapback mechanism’ has no legal or political validity and warned that Iran would respond appropriately and proportionately, though he did not provide specific details.&nbsp;“The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Baghaei said.&nbsp;<h2>UNSC can trigger ‘snapback mechanism’ under 2015 deal</h2>&nbsp;The 2015 deal with Britain, Germany, France, the US, Russia, and China—known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—specifies that if the parties cannot resolve accusations of “significant non-performance” by Iran, the “snapback mechanism” process can be triggered by the 15-member UN Security Council.“The European parties, who are constantly trying to use this possibility as a tool, have themselves committed gross and fundamental violations of their obligations under the JCPOA,” Baghaei said.“They have failed to fulfill the duties they had undertaken under the JCPOA, so they have no legal or moral standing to resort to this mechanism.”&nbsp;Western countries accuse Iran of plotting to build a nuclear weapon, which Tehran denies.The United States pulled out of the deal in 2018 under the first administration of President Donald Trump, who called the agreement “weak”.Trump is urging Tehran to restart nuclear negotiations for a new deal after a ceasefire reached last month ended a 12-day air war between Iran and Israel that destabilised the Middle East.Baghaei did not respond in the affirmative when asked if Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi would meet Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff,&nbsp;and&nbsp;said no date or location had been set for resuming the US-Iran nuclear talks.

Western countries accuse Iran of plotting to build a nuclear weapon, which Tehran denies. Trump is urging Tehran to restart nuclear negotiations for a new deal after a ceasefire reached last month ended a 12-day air war between Iran and Israel that destabilised the Middle East.

Iran’s foreign ministry said on Monday that the country will ‘respond’ if the United Nations sanctions on it over its nuclear programme are reinstated but did not disclose what measures Tehran is contemplating to take. Last week, a French diplomatic source said that European nations would be compelled to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran using the “snapback mechanism” if no nuclear agreement is reached that addresses the security concerns of European nations. The “snapback mechanism” is a provision in the 2015 nuclear agreement that allows for the reinstatement of UN sanctions on Iran previously lifted in exchange for limits on its nuclear activities. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said at a press conference that the threat to activate the ‘snapback mechanism’ has no legal or political validity and warned that Iran would respond appropriately and proportionately, though he did not provide specific details. “The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Baghaei said. UNSC can trigger ‘snapback mechanism’ under 2015 deal The 2015 deal with Britain, Germany, France, the US, Russia, and China—known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—specifies that if the parties cannot resolve accusations of “significant non-performance” by Iran, the “snapback mechanism” process can be triggered by the 15-member UN Security Council. “The European parties, who are constantly trying to use this possibility as a tool, have themselves committed gross and fundamental violations of their obligations under the JCPOA,” Baghaei said. “They have failed to fulfill the duties they had undertaken under the JCPOA, so they have no legal or moral standing to resort to this mechanism.” Western countries accuse Iran of plotting to build a nuclear weapon, which Tehran denies. The United States pulled out of the deal in 2018 under the first administration of President Donald Trump, who called the agreement “weak”. Trump is urging Tehran to restart nuclear negotiations for a new deal after a ceasefire reached last month ended a 12-day air war between Iran and Israel that destabilised the Middle East. Baghaei did not respond in the affirmative when asked if Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi would meet Trump’s Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, and said no date or location had been set for resuming the US-Iran nuclear talks.

Western countries accuse Iran of plotting to build a nuclear weapon, which Tehran denies. Trump is urging Tehran to restart nuclear negotiations for a new deal after a ceasefire reached last month ended a 12-day air war between Iran and Israel that destabilised the Middle East.

Iran warns of ‘appropriate response’ if UN sanctions are reimposed under ‘snapback mechanism’

Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly told both US and Iranian officials that he supports a nuclear deal that would stop Iran from enriching uranium altogether, according to sources familiar with recent discussions. This marks a major change in Russia’s long-held public position, which has backed Iran’s right to enrich uranium under international law. The shift is said to have come after the recent 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-imagine-if-it-was-biden-trump-ridiculed-for-imagining-he-saw-hegseth-live-on-tv-1752332200465">'Imagine. If. It. Was. Biden': Trump ridiculed for 'imagining' he saw Hegseth live on TV</a><h2>What is Russia telling the US and Iran?</h2>Sources told Axios that Putin shared his view directly with US President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron during recent phone calls. Russia has also delivered the same message to Iranian leaders on several occasions over the past few weeks.“Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favourable. The Iranians said they won’t consider it,” a European official said.Two sources also claimed that the Kremlin briefed the Israeli government on Putin’s stance. A senior Israeli official confirmed, “We know that this is what Putin told the Iranians.”<h2>Trump eyes nuclear talks, but Iran still says no</h2>The US is reportedly preparing to push for a “zero enrichment” demand if formal nuclear talks resume soon. President Trump has said publicly that he wants a new deal with Tehran, but Iran has always insisted on keeping its right to enrich uranium, even under international supervision. Despite the opposition, Russian officials have continued encouraging Iran to give ground on this issue to make talks with the US easier.<h2>Tensions between Iran and Russia rise quietly</h2>Putin’s position is seen as especially surprising given how closely Iran has worked with Russia during the Ukraine war. Tehran has supplied Moscow with drones and missiles, but Iranian officials were said to be frustrated by Russia’s limited support during the recent Israel conflict.Even so, Russia is believed to have offered to help if a deal is reached. Moscow is willing to remove Iran’s stock of highly enriched uranium and instead supply Iran with lower-grade fuel, 3.67% enriched uranium for power plants, and small amounts of 20% enriched uranium for research purposes.<h2>US and Iran look for new venue to restart talks</h2>Meanwhile, US envoy Steve Witkoff has been speaking with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about restarting nuclear negotiations. A possible meeting in Oslo had been under consideration, but both sides now seem hesitant and are looking for a different location to resume talks.

The US is reportedly preparing to push for a “zero enrichment” demand if formal nuclear talks resume soon. President Trump has said publicly that he wants a new deal with Tehran, but Iran has always insisted on keeping its right to enrich uranium.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly told both US and Iranian officials that he supports a nuclear deal that would stop Iran from enriching uranium altogether, according to sources familiar with recent discussions. This marks a major change in Russia’s long-held public position, which has backed Iran’s right to enrich uranium under international law. The shift is said to have come after the recent 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel. Also read: 'Imagine. If. It. Was. Biden': Trump ridiculed for 'imagining' he saw Hegseth live on TV What is Russia telling the US and Iran? Sources told Axios that Putin shared his view directly with US President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron during recent phone calls. Russia has also delivered the same message to Iranian leaders on several occasions over the past few weeks. “Putin would support zero enrichment. He encouraged the Iranians to work towards that in order to make negotiations with the Americans more favourable. The Iranians said they won’t consider it,” a European official said. Two sources also claimed that the Kremlin briefed the Israeli government on Putin’s stance. A senior Israeli official confirmed, “We know that this is what Putin told the Iranians.” Trump eyes nuclear talks, but Iran still says no The US is reportedly preparing to push for a “zero enrichment” demand if formal nuclear talks resume soon. President Trump has said publicly that he wants a new deal with Tehran, but Iran has always insisted on keeping its right to enrich uranium, even under international supervision. Despite the opposition, Russian officials have continued encouraging Iran to give ground on this issue to make talks with the US easier. Tensions between Iran and Russia rise quietly Putin’s position is seen as especially surprising given how closely Iran has worked with Russia during the Ukraine war. Tehran has supplied Moscow with drones and missiles, but Iranian officials were said to be frustrated by Russia’s limited support during the recent Israel conflict. Even so, Russia is believed to have offered to help if a deal is reached. Moscow is willing to remove Iran’s stock of highly enriched uranium and instead supply Iran with lower-grade fuel, 3.67% enriched uranium for power plants, and small amounts of 20% enriched uranium for research purposes. US and Iran look for new venue to restart talks Meanwhile, US envoy Steve Witkoff has been speaking with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi about restarting nuclear negotiations. A possible meeting in Oslo had been under consideration, but both sides now seem hesitant and are looking for a different location to resume talks.

The US is reportedly preparing to push for a “zero enrichment” demand if formal nuclear talks resume soon. President Trump has said publicly that he wants a new deal with Tehran, but Iran has always insisted on keeping its right to enrich uranium.

Is Russia turning on Iran? Putin secretly backs ‘zero enrichment’ nuclear deal