A US federal appeals court has just made it significantly harder for women to access the most common method of abortion in the United States: Mifepristone. Here's all you need to know.

US bans abortion pill by mail: Federal court's Mifepristone ruling turns back the clock on life-saving healthcare | In pics

Puerto Rico on Friday (Feb 13) cleared the way for a law that puts the rights of a foetus over those of a pregnant woman. The Caribbean nation's governor has signed into law a contentious bill that recognises a foetus as a 'human being,' a move which legal experts warn could have devastating consequences for the US territory. The amendment was approved without any public hearings, which has sparked significant opposition from critics who warn it could impact how pregnant women and doctors are treated in the country.<h2>An unborn child is a human being</h2>The amendment modifies the section of Puerto Rico's penal code that defines murder. According to Governor Jenniffer González, who approved the measure known as Senate Bill 923, it aims to "maintain consistency between civil and criminal provisions by recognising the unborn child as a human being."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jamaat-chief-shafiqur-rahman-who-compared-working-women-to-prostitutes-wins-dhaka-15-seat-1770954274658">Jamaat chief who compared working women to prostitutes, wins Dhaka-15 seat</a><h2>Inspired by a double murder</h2>The law, as per reports, builds on earlier legislation passed after the 2021 killing of Keishla Rodríguez, who was pregnant when she was murdered. Her partner, former boxer Félix Verdejo, was later convicted and sentenced to two life terms. Officials say the new amendment complements existing provisions that classify the killing of a pregnant woman resulting in the death of a fetus as first-degree murder.<h2>Critics sound an alarm</h2>However, critics warn the change could have far wider consequences for healthcare and reproductive rights across the island.Dr Carlos Díaz Vélez, president of Puerto Rico’s College of Medical Surgeons, said the law could push doctors toward "defensive health care," where medical decisions are influenced by fear of legal consequences rather than patient needs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-admin-tracking-lawmakers-epstein-files-research-bondi-seen-with-jayapal-search-history-document-is-the-doj-protecting-someone-1770947317976">Trump tracking lawmakers’ Epstein files review: Is the DoJ protecting someone?</a>"This will bring complex clinical decisions into the realm of criminal law," he said, warning that physicians could face suspicion or legal risk when treating complicated pregnancies.Díaz added that Puerto Rico’s healthcare system, already strained by staff shortages and limited resources, is not prepared for the legal and procedural changes the law may require. He also raised concerns that third-party intervention in doctor-patient decisions could undermine medical privacy. "This will bring disastrous consequences," he said.Rosa Seguí Cordero, a lawyer and abortion rights advocate, argued the measure could eventually open the door to criminalising abortion, which remains legal in Puerto Rico. Slamming the law, she noted, “A zygote was given legal personality.”"We women were stripped of our rights," she claimed, adding that potentially dangerous scenarios could include women who lose a zygote or a fertilised egg being treated as a criminal.

Puerto Rico has passed a controversial law recognising a foetus as a “human being,” raising fears about abortion rights and medical decisions. Supporters call it justice for unborn lives, critics warn it could criminalise pregnancy complications. What exactly changes now? Scroll down.

Puerto Rico on Friday (Feb 13) cleared the way for a law that puts the rights of a foetus over those of a pregnant woman. The Caribbean nation's governor has signed into law a contentious bill that recognises a foetus as a 'human being,' a move which legal experts warn could have devastating consequences for the US territory. The amendment was approved without any public hearings, which has sparked significant opposition from critics who warn it could impact how pregnant women and doctors are treated in the country. An unborn child is a human being The amendment modifies the section of Puerto Rico's penal code that defines murder. According to Governor Jenniffer González, who approved the measure known as Senate Bill 923, it aims to "maintain consistency between civil and criminal provisions by recognising the unborn child as a human being." Also read | Jamaat chief who compared working women to prostitutes, wins Dhaka-15 seat Inspired by a double murder The law, as per reports, builds on earlier legislation passed after the 2021 killing of Keishla Rodríguez, who was pregnant when she was murdered. Her partner, former boxer Félix Verdejo, was later convicted and sentenced to two life terms. Officials say the new amendment complements existing provisions that classify the killing of a pregnant woman resulting in the death of a fetus as first-degree murder. Critics sound an alarm However, critics warn the change could have far wider consequences for healthcare and reproductive rights across the island. Dr Carlos Díaz Vélez, president of Puerto Rico’s College of Medical Surgeons, said the law could push doctors toward "defensive health care," where medical decisions are influenced by fear of legal consequences rather than patient needs. Also read | Trump tracking lawmakers’ Epstein files review: Is the DoJ protecting someone? "This will bring complex clinical decisions into the realm of criminal law," he said, warning that physicians could face suspicion or legal risk when treating complicated pregnancies. Díaz added that Puerto Rico’s healthcare system, already strained by staff shortages and limited resources, is not prepared for the legal and procedural changes the law may require. He also raised concerns that third-party intervention in doctor-patient decisions could undermine medical privacy. "This will bring disastrous consequences," he said. Rosa Seguí Cordero, a lawyer and abortion rights advocate, argued the measure could eventually open the door to criminalising abortion, which remains legal in Puerto Rico. Slamming the law, she noted, “A zygote was given legal personality.” "We women were stripped of our rights," she claimed, adding that potentially dangerous scenarios could include women who lose a zygote or a fertilised egg being treated as a criminal.

Puerto Rico has passed a controversial law recognising a foetus as a “human being,” raising fears about abortion rights and medical decisions. Supporters call it justice for unborn lives, critics warn it could criminalise pregnancy complications. What exactly changes now? Scroll down.

Puerto Rico passes law recognising foetus as 'human being,' critics warn women's rights are in danger

Former United States president Donald Trump, on Monday (Apr 8) said that he believes that the decision regarding abortion rights should be left up to the US states, but did not mention his position on a national abortion ban.

<h2>What did Trump say?&nbsp;</h2>

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee weighed in on one of the most contentious issues in American politics months ahead of the upcoming elections in November, in a video post on his social media platform, Truth Social.&nbsp;

Trump has previously indicated support for a 15-week federal ban with exceptions for rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother. He also reiterated his support for the availability of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fake-news-donald-trump-dismisses-report-about-him-pressuring-ukraine-to-give-russia-some-territory-708846">Will Trump ask Ukraine to give up some land to end war? His campaign denies any such plans</a>

“My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both. And whatever they decide must be the law of the land. In this case, the law of the state,” said the former president.&nbsp;

He also said that many states will be “different” and have “different number of weeks, or some will have more conservative than others, and that’s what they will be. At the end of the day, this is all about the will of the people,” Trump added.&nbsp;

However, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee did not mention anything about a national ban to prohibit abortions beyond a certain number of weeks into a pregnancy.&nbsp;

In his video, on Monday, the former president also took credit for overturning the 1973 landmark Supreme Court decision on Roe v Wade which effectively ended the&nbsp;constitutional right to an abortion.&nbsp;

The reversal of the five-decade-old decision has led more than a dozen states to ban or severely restrict women’s ability to access safe and legal abortion.&nbsp;

“This 50-year battle over Roe v. Wade took it out of the federal hands and brought it into the hearts, minds and vote of the people in each state. It was really something. Now it’s up to the states to do the right thing,” said Trump.&nbsp;

Notably, the court’s decision to overturn the landmark decision triggered a backlash among voters and <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/wasnt-my-fault-donald-trump-on-the-midterm-loss-blames-abortion-548875https://www.wionews.com/world/wasnt-my-fault-donald-trump-on-the-midterm-loss-blames-abortion-548875">reportedly affected</a> Republican gains in several states during the 2022 midterm elections.&nbsp;

<h2>About Biden’s stance</h2>

Meanwhile, incumbent President and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden has made his predecessor and Republicans’ opposition to abortion rights a key tenet of his re-election campaign.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-wants-immigrants-from-nice-countries-like-denmark-switzerland-to-come-to-america-708877">Trump wants immigrants only from 'nice' countries like 'Denmark, Switzerland'</a>

“Donald Trump is endorsing every single abortion ban in the states, including abortion bans with no exceptions. And he’s bragging about his role in creating this hellscape,” said Ammar Moussa, director of rapid response for the Biden campaign, on X, on Monday.&nbsp;

Earlier this month, Biden denounced a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court which allows a six-week ban on abortion to take effect. On April 1, the state’s top court upheld a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.&nbsp;

The incumbent president slammed Republicans for limiting reproductive rights in Florida and other US states saying that it is “putting the health and lives of millions of women at risk.”&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

Former United States president Donald Trump, on Monday (Apr 8) said that he believes that the decision regarding abortion rights should be left up to the US states, but did not mention his position on a national abortion ban.

Former United States president Donald Trump, on Monday (Apr 8) said that he believes that the decision regarding abortion rights should be left up to the US states, but did not mention his position on a national abortion ban. What did Trump say? The presumptive Republican presidential nominee weighed in on one of the most contentious issues in American politics months ahead of the upcoming elections in November, in a video post on his social media platform, Truth Social. Trump has previously indicated support for a 15-week federal ban with exceptions for rape, incest and to protect the life of the mother. He also reiterated his support for the availability of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). Also Read | Will Trump ask Ukraine to give up some land to end war? His campaign denies any such plans “My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both. And whatever they decide must be the law of the land. In this case, the law of the state,” said the former president. He also said that many states will be “different” and have “different number of weeks, or some will have more conservative than others, and that’s what they will be. At the end of the day, this is all about the will of the people,” Trump added. However, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee did not mention anything about a national ban to prohibit abortions beyond a certain number of weeks into a pregnancy. In his video, on Monday, the former president also took credit for overturning the 1973 landmark Supreme Court decision on Roe v Wade which effectively ended the constitutional right to an abortion. The reversal of the five-decade-old decision has led more than a dozen states to ban or severely restrict women’s ability to access safe and legal abortion. “This 50-year battle over Roe v. Wade took it out of the federal hands and brought it into the hearts, minds and vote of the people in each state. It was really something. Now it’s up to the states to do the right thing,” said Trump. Notably, the court’s decision to overturn the landmark decision triggered a backlash among voters and reportedly affected Republican gains in several states during the 2022 midterm elections. About Biden’s stance Meanwhile, incumbent President and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden has made his predecessor and Republicans’ opposition to abortion rights a key tenet of his re-election campaign. Also Read | Trump wants immigrants only from 'nice' countries like 'Denmark, Switzerland' “Donald Trump is endorsing every single abortion ban in the states, including abortion bans with no exceptions. And he’s bragging about his role in creating this hellscape,” said Ammar Moussa, director of rapid response for the Biden campaign, on X, on Monday. Earlier this month, Biden denounced a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court which allows a six-week ban on abortion to take effect. On April 1, the state’s top court upheld a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The incumbent president slammed Republicans for limiting reproductive rights in Florida and other US states saying that it is “putting the health and lives of millions of women at risk.” (With inputs from agencies)

Donald Trump says US states should decide abortion law, dodges stand on national ban

The Texas Supreme Court, on Monday (Dec 11) reversed a lower court’s ruling that allowed Kate Cox, a 31-year-old&nbsp;woman,&nbsp;to have&nbsp;an abortion under the state's "medical emergency". The recent ruling came hours after she was forced to leave the state for an emergency abortion.&nbsp;&nbsp;

A court filing by her lawyers said&nbsp;that Cox was prevented from terminating her potentially life-threatening pregnancy.&nbsp;

Last week, a Texas judge allowed her to have an abortion, a decision that challenged the US state's strict laws prohibiting the procedure. But the Texas Supreme Court had temporarily halted the decision&nbsp;late Friday.

The&nbsp;Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Cox said that she has&nbsp;left the state to get health care elsewhere, but hours later the state's apex court ruled against her.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fbi-director-meets-cbi-chief-amid-us-allegations-against-india-over-alleged-pannun-murder-plot-668688">FBI director meets CBI chief amid US allegations against India over alleged Pannun 'murder plot'</a>&nbsp;

Cox hails from Dallas-Fort Worth and&nbsp;is a mother of two. She is more than 20 weeks pregnant with a fetus that has a rare genetic defect, which means it will likely die before birth or at most live a few days.&nbsp;

Ultrasounds revealed many serious conditions, including a twisted spine and irregular skull and heart development. Doctors have said that unless the pregnancy is terminated, it could cause a uterine rupture that threatens Cox's life and future fertility.&nbsp;

She sued the state to have an abortion for a pregnancy that she and her physicians claim endangers not only her life but also her future fertility. As mentioned, she initially won a right to an abortion but the state's Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/senior-imf-official-warns-fragmentation-in-global-economy-could-trigger-new-cold-war-668686">Senior IMF official warns fragmentation in global economy could trigger 'new Cold War'</a>&nbsp;

The appeal has blocked the lower court's order, with Paxton threatening to prosecute any doctor carrying out the abortion.&nbsp;

The new filing stated: "Due to the ongoing deterioration of Ms. Cox's health condition, and in light of the administrative stay entered by the Court on December 8 and the Attorney General's ongoing threats to enforce Texas's abortion bans against the Plaintiffs in this case, Ms. Cox is now forced to seek medical care outside of Texas."&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;Trump forgoes testification at trial as his poll ratings rise&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-forgoes-testification-at-trial-as-his-poll-ratings-rise-668658/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Abortion laws in Texas</h2>

Texas has some of the strictest abortion laws in the nation, prohibiting it even in cases of rape or incest. While the state's law does allow abortions in cases where the mother's life is in danger, physicians have said that in practice the wording is vague and unclear, leaving them open to legal consequences for exercising their medical judgment.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

The Texas Supreme Court, on Monday (Dec 11) reversed a lower court’s ruling that allowed Kate Cox, a 31-year-old woman, to have an abortion under the state's "medical emergency".

The Texas Supreme Court, on Monday (Dec 11) reversed a lower court’s ruling that allowed Kate Cox, a 31-year-old woman, to have an abortion under the state's "medical emergency". The recent ruling came hours after she was forced to leave the state for an emergency abortion. A court filing by her lawyers said that Cox was prevented from terminating her potentially life-threatening pregnancy. Last week, a Texas judge allowed her to have an abortion, a decision that challenged the US state's strict laws prohibiting the procedure. But the Texas Supreme Court had temporarily halted the decision late Friday. The Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Cox said that she has left the state to get health care elsewhere, but hours later the state's apex court ruled against her. Also read: FBI director meets CBI chief amid US allegations against India over alleged Pannun 'murder plot' Cox hails from Dallas-Fort Worth and is a mother of two. She is more than 20 weeks pregnant with a fetus that has a rare genetic defect, which means it will likely die before birth or at most live a few days. Ultrasounds revealed many serious conditions, including a twisted spine and irregular skull and heart development. Doctors have said that unless the pregnancy is terminated, it could cause a uterine rupture that threatens Cox's life and future fertility. She sued the state to have an abortion for a pregnancy that she and her physicians claim endangers not only her life but also her future fertility. As mentioned, she initially won a right to an abortion but the state's Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed to the Texas Supreme Court. Also read: Senior IMF official warns fragmentation in global economy could trigger 'new Cold War' The appeal has blocked the lower court's order, with Paxton threatening to prosecute any doctor carrying out the abortion. The new filing stated: "Due to the ongoing deterioration of Ms. Cox's health condition, and in light of the administrative stay entered by the Court on December 8 and the Attorney General's ongoing threats to enforce Texas's abortion bans against the Plaintiffs in this case, Ms. Cox is now forced to seek medical care outside of Texas." Watch: Trump forgoes testification at trial as his poll ratings rise × Abortion laws in Texas Texas has some of the strictest abortion laws in the nation, prohibiting it even in cases of rape or incest. While the state's law does allow abortions in cases where the mother's life is in danger, physicians have said that in practice the wording is vague and unclear, leaving them open to legal consequences for exercising their medical judgment. (With inputs from agencies)

Texas supreme court overturns ruling on pregnant woman seeking abortion after she leaves state

The Texas Supreme Court on Monday overturned a lower court's ruling that would have allowed a pregnant woman to get an emergency abortion under the medical exception for the state's near-total abortion ban, granting a petition by Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Texas top court rules against woman who sought abortion for medical emergency

North Carolina's Republican-led General Assembly moved Tuesday to ban most abortions after 12 weeks, voting to override a veto from Democratic Governor Roy Cooper. The bill now becomes law and takes effect July 1.

North Carolina GOP overrides veto of 12-week abortion limit

Idaho has become the first state to pass a law restricting travel for abortions. On Wednesday (April 5), Governor Brad Little signed a bill that makes it illegal for an adult to help a minor get an abortion without parental consent, the news agency Associated Press reported on Thursday.

Idaho has become the first state to pass a law restricting travel for abortions. On Wednesday (April 5), Governor Brad Little signed a bill that makes it illegal for an adult to help a minor get an abortion without parental consent, the news agency Associated Press reported on Thursday. The abortion trafficking law is the first of its kind in the United States. The law makes it illegal to either obtain abortion pills for a minor or to help them leave the state for an abortion without their parents' knowledge and consent. Anyone convicted will face two to five years in prison and could also be sued by the minor’s parent or guardian. The law states that parents who raped their child will not be able to sue, though the criminal penalties for anyone who helped the minor obtain an abortion will remain in effect. ALSO READ | Wyoming district court judge halts abortion ban days after it came into effect The law also gives the attorney general the ability to prosecute someone for alleged violations of the law, even if the county prosecutor — who would normally be responsible for filing a criminal case — declines to prosecute. In a statement, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America said that the law raises pressing concerns about the state’s legal ability to restrict residents from travelling to neighbouring states to access abortion care. "Banning abortion wasn’t enough for these anti-abortion zealots. They will stop at nothing to control what we do and where we go — even if it means holding people, hostage, when trying to access essential health services. Young people seeking abortion deserve our compassion and support, not the extreme government overreach this law sanctions," Alexis McGill Johnson, the federation's president, said in the statement. Idaho, like many other American states, has multiple abortion laws on the books. Two Idaho doctors and a regional Planned Parenthood affiliate sued Wednesday over the state’s interpretation of another strict abortion ban, contending it unconstitutionally limits interstate travel for abortions, the Associated Press reported. The ban makes it illegal for physicians to use “any means to intentionally terminate the clinically diagnosable pregnancy of a woman,” if they know the termination will reasonably cause the death of the unborn child. It went into effect shortly after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year. Idaho has already effectively banned abortion in all stages of pregnancy and is one of a handful of states that already have laws penalising those who help people of any age obtain abortions. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

US: Idaho becomes first state to pass law restricting travel for abortions

Hungary has tightened its abortion rules, now, women seeking abortions will be forced to listen to foetal heartbeats, this is before doctors can go ahead with the procedure of an abortion.

Women rights activists to stage protests against abortion rules in Hungary

Hungary has tightened its abortion laws. Women seeking to terminate pregnancies will now be made to listen to their fetus's heartbeat before going through the procedure.

Hungary enshrines 'foetal heartbeat' law

In the United States, a man in Ohio was arrested on Tuesday (July 12) and has been charged with raping a 10-year-old girl, who became pregnant but was denied an abortion under state law. The local media reported Wednesday that the victim crossed state lines to terminate her pregnancy.&nbsp;

The shocking case has received massive media attention from all parts of the country, and even the world as it comes in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.&nbsp;

Media outlet Indianapolis Star first reported the story and drew international scrutiny.

The Dispatch reports that Fuentes confessed to raping the young girl "on at least two occasions".&nbsp;

The case was so appalling that some people even raised questions. It was even questioned by conservative-leaning media outlets.&nbsp;

But in the latest development, the Ohio police detective Jeffrey Huhn testified in court early Wednesday, confirming that the unidentified girl underwent an abortion in Indianapolis on June 30.&nbsp;

According to the paper, Huhn was testifying at the arraignment of a man arrested Tuesday by police who say he confessed to raping the child.&nbsp;

The Dispatch reported that the DNA samples obtained from the Indiana clinic were being tested against the 27-year-old suspect.&nbsp;

(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

In the United States, a man in Ohio was arrested on Tuesday (July 12) and has been charged with raping a 10-year-old girl, who became pregnant but was denied an abortion under state law.

In the United States, a man in Ohio was arrested on Tuesday (July 12) and has been charged with raping a 10-year-old girl, who became pregnant but was denied an abortion under state law. The local media reported Wednesday that the victim crossed state lines to terminate her pregnancy. The shocking case has received massive media attention from all parts of the country, and even the world as it comes in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade. Media outlet Indianapolis Star first reported the story and drew international scrutiny. The Dispatch reports that Fuentes confessed to raping the young girl "on at least two occasions". The case was so appalling that some people even raised questions. It was even questioned by conservative-leaning media outlets. But in the latest development, the Ohio police detective Jeffrey Huhn testified in court early Wednesday, confirming that the unidentified girl underwent an abortion in Indianapolis on June 30. According to the paper, Huhn was testifying at the arraignment of a man arrested Tuesday by police who say he confessed to raping the child. The Dispatch reported that the DNA samples obtained from the Indiana clinic were being tested against the 27-year-old suspect. (With inputs from the agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

United States: Man charged with raping a 10-year-old girl, who was denied abortion

The state of Florida in the United States restored the ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy after a judge temporarily stopped the state law. The “trigger law” was passed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade but Judge John C Cooper of an appellate court in Florida’s capital of Tallahassee called the law “unconstitutional”. However, the state won an appeal on Tuesday and that meant that the measures are once again valid in Florida with immediate effect.

While Florida and Kentucky had similar judgements, it seems that the appeals will allow the fast application of the trigger laws. Earlier, the judgement by Judge Cooper faced a lot of criticism as the Republican lawmakers of the state were not happy in the delay when it comes to their application.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/highland-park-parade-shooting-suspect-charged-with-seven-counts-of-murder-494833" hreflang="en">Highland Park parade shooting suspect charged with seven counts of murder</a>

“The Florida constitution does not include – and has never included – a right to kill an innocent unborn child,” said a spokesperson for Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, last week.

Republican representative Anthony Sabatini had also said that the party would be looking at even tougher abortion laws in the absence of Roe v Wade. “We must pass the heartbeat bill &amp; other strong … measures to protect Florida’s unborn children,” he wrote on Twitter.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nadhim-zahawi-appointed-uk-finance-minister-after-rishi-sunak-resignation-494829">Nadhim Zahawi appointed UK Finance Minister after Rishi Sunak resignation</a>

The pro-abortion groups did not take the development well as they criticised the stance taken by the Republican politicians.

“Florida politicians have turned their backs on women and people who can become pregnant, forcing us into a second-class status by denying us the right to make decisions about our bodies, our healthcare, and our futures,” the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a tweet on Tuesday.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

The state of Florida in the United States restored the ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy after a judge temporarily stopped the state law. The “trigger law” was passed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade but Judge John C Cooper of an appellate court in Florida’s capital of Tallahassee called the law “unconstitutional”.

The state of Florida in the United States restored the ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy after a judge temporarily stopped the state law. The “trigger law” was passed in the aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v Wade but Judge John C Cooper of an appellate court in Florida’s capital of Tallahassee called the law “unconstitutional”. However, the state won an appeal on Tuesday and that meant that the measures are once again valid in Florida with immediate effect. While Florida and Kentucky had similar judgements, it seems that the appeals will allow the fast application of the trigger laws. Earlier, the judgement by Judge Cooper faced a lot of criticism as the Republican lawmakers of the state were not happy in the delay when it comes to their application. Also read | Highland Park parade shooting suspect charged with seven counts of murder “The Florida constitution does not include – and has never included – a right to kill an innocent unborn child,” said a spokesperson for Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, last week. Republican representative Anthony Sabatini had also said that the party would be looking at even tougher abortion laws in the absence of Roe v Wade. “We must pass the heartbeat bill & other strong … measures to protect Florida’s unborn children,” he wrote on Twitter. Also read | Nadhim Zahawi appointed UK Finance Minister after Rishi Sunak resignation The pro-abortion groups did not take the development well as they criticised the stance taken by the Republican politicians. “Florida politicians have turned their backs on women and people who can become pregnant, forcing us into a second-class status by denying us the right to make decisions about our bodies, our healthcare, and our futures,” the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a tweet on Tuesday. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Florida's 15-week abortion 'trigger law' restored after temporary halt

A court in Louisiana has blocked the enforcement of efforts to ban abortion at any stages of a pregnancy in the state. The so-called trigger law snapped into place right after last Friday's Supreme Court ruling striking down Roe v. Wade, the landmark opinion that had kept abortion legal in the United States.

United States: Louisiana blocks abortion trigger law

After a leaked draft showed that the US Supreme Court could overturns Roe v. Wade, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed a legislation that protects patients getting abortions and medical professionals.

The measures in the legislation, which take effect immediately, will provide protection from legal retaliation by other states that restrict the procedure.

With the final ruling by Supreme Court regarding an abortion ban expected shortly, the New York legislation allows providers and patients to file claims against anyone who tries to bring charges against them.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/most-restrictive-abortion-ban-in-us-oklahoma-approves-anti-abortion-bill-480794/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

This is contrary to the new anti-abortion laws in some conservative states that allow private citizens to sue anyone who aids or abets an abortion.

Prohibiting law enforcement from cooperating with anti-abortion states' investigations into New York abortions, the new legislation does not allow state courts to cooperate in civil or criminal lawsuits stemming from abortions that take place legally in New York,

After signing the legislation, Hochul said in a news conference "This legislation is just one more way we say that New York is leading and will always stand up against attacks on our bodily autonomy."

"I refuse to go backwards. Make no mistake, this is not just an attack on reproductive health and freedom. It's an attack on the very values that make New York what it is. And that's why, with the stroke of a pen, I will say, 'Not here, not in New York, not ever.'"

New York, which is one of several liberal states expected to become a more frequent destination for out-of-state abortion patients, has long been a haven for abortion access.

(With inputs from agencies)

Watch WION's live TV here:

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1&lt;/div">&amp;times;</iframe></div>

&nbsp;
</div>

After a leaked draft showed that the US Supreme Court could overturns Roe v. Wade, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed a legislation that protects patients getting abortions and medical professionals.

After a leaked draft showed that the US Supreme Court could overturns Roe v. Wade, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has signed a legislation that protects patients getting abortions and medical professionals. The measures in the legislation, which take effect immediately, will provide protection from legal retaliation by other states that restrict the procedure. With the final ruling by Supreme Court regarding an abortion ban expected shortly, the New York legislation allows providers and patients to file claims against anyone who tries to bring charges against them. This is contrary to the new anti-abortion laws in some conservative states that allow private citizens to sue anyone who aids or abets an abortion. Prohibiting law enforcement from cooperating with anti-abortion states' investigations into New York abortions, the new legislation does not allow state courts to cooperate in civil or criminal lawsuits stemming from abortions that take place legally in New York, After signing the legislation, Hochul said in a news conference "This legislation is just one more way we say that New York is leading and will always stand up against attacks on our bodily autonomy." "I refuse to go backwards. Make no mistake, this is not just an attack on reproductive health and freedom. It's an attack on the very values that make New York what it is. And that's why, with the stroke of a pen, I will say, 'Not here, not in New York, not ever.'" New York, which is one of several liberal states expected to become a more frequent destination for out-of-state abortion patients, has long been a haven for abortion access. (With inputs from agencies) Watch WION's live TV here:

Leading by example: New York Governor signs legal protections for abortion providers and patients

This week, the Afghan government ordered women to wear a burqa in public places and the United States was one of the first to issue a statement of condemnation on this issue. It says that Washington is extremely concerned for the women in Afghanistan.

Abortion & Burqa Debate: Is US really a champion of Women rights?

Over the last 40 years, abortion has frequently taken center stage in American politics for voters and politicians. In 1982, Joe Biden voted to overturn Roe v Wade ruling and in 1983, he flipped, and voted against overturning bill.

Abortion Debate: What made US President Joe Biden support abortion rights?

US repeatedly lectures the world and India on human rights, minority rights. This 'champion' of rights is all set to overturn the right to abortion at home. America will deny basic reproductive rights to women. Palki Sharma tells you more.

Gravitas: US top court is set to overturn abortion rights, reveals leaked document

The Roe vs Wade judgment in 1973 was a watershed moment in abortion rights in US. It declared that state laws banning abortion were unconstitutional. Jane Roe was the plaintiff in the case. But that was a pseudonym. Who was the real Jane Roe? Watch this report.

Who was the real Jane Roe in Roe vs Wade case, which changed US abortion law?

According to a leaked initial draft majority opinion published by Politico, the US Supreme Court is on the verge of overturning Roe v. Wade decision that legalised abortion in the country.

US: Draft leak suggests court to overturn abortion rights

According to a leaked initial draft majority opinion published by Politico, the US Supreme Court looks set to vote to overturn the Roe vs Wade decision that legalised abortion nationwide.

US Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v Wade abortion rights decision, says report

The Supreme Court of the United States is likely to strike down the right to abortion in the country, citing a leaked draft of a majority opinion that would represent a staggering blow to women’s rights.

US top court set to overturn law legalizing abortion, leaked draft opinion shows

Idaho has passed a draconian abortion ban modeled on controversial Texas law that prohibits abortions after 6 weeks.

Bounty Hunter law: Idaho bans abortion after six weeks

US Supreme Court in a landmark judgement upheld Texas six-week abortion law but provides relief to clinics by allowing them to sue Texas over the ban.

US Supreme Court upheld Texas six-week abortion law but allows clinics to sue Texas over ban

The United States Supreme Court on Friday (December 10) has ruled on the Texas abortion law, now allowing the abortion providers to challenge the ban in federal court.

The United States Supreme Court on Friday (December 10) has ruled on the Texas abortion law, now allowing the abortion providers to challenge the ban in federal court. However, it let the controversial law remain in effect for now. The controversial law, known as SB8, prohibits the procedure after around six weeks of pregnancy - a phase before most women even know they are pregnant. An exception can be made if there is any medical emergency, however, not in the case of rape or incest. ALSO READ | US blacklists Chinese firm, sanctions political leaders over human rights violations in Uyghur The controversial law remained one of the highly-debated topics in US politics this year as this emerged as a restrictive law in the country, passed since abortion was made a constitutional right five decades ago. Today's ruling gives a window that the law might get suspended as the case will return to a district court for further proceedings, CNN reported. The law came into effect on September 1 and was heavily criticised by women's rights groups, especially by the Biden administration. Eight out of nine justices agreed that lawsuits filed by abortion providers against the Texas law may proceed, but they divided 5-4 on whether other officials could be sued. ALSO READ | United States wins appeal over extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange Here's what the court said: Chief Justice John Roberts, in his opinion, said that "given the ongoing chilling effect of the state law, the District Court should resolve this litigation and enter appropriate relief without delay." "The Court concludes that the petitioners may pursue a pre-enforcement challenge against certain of the named defendants but not others," the court, led by Justice Neil Gorsuch, said as quoted by FOX News. "The petitioners then filed a request for injunctive relief with the Court, seeking emergency resolution of their application ahead of [the law's] approaching effective date," the court said. "In the abbreviated time available for review, the Court concluded that the petitioners’ filings failed to identify a basis in existing law that could justify disturbing the Fifth Circuit’s decision to deny injunctive relief," it added. ×

US Supreme Court allows abortion providers to challenge Texas law in federal court

Pro-Choice protests in Poland : Woman’s death sparks new abortion rights protests.

Poland : Protests erupt over abortion law

abortion-law

Abortion Law, News on Abortion Law, stories on Abortion Law, articles on Abortion Law, Abortion Law stories at Wion, Abortion Law news, Abortion Law latest news

abortion law