Navratri 2026: 9 days, 9 forms of Goddess Durga and 9 colours- Check the complete list

Russian woman and Bihar boy's love story goes viral after she reaches India to marry him

Arijit Singh 9-city India stadium tour to start from January: Check venue and ticket prices

F1 set to return to Africa for first time since 1993 

'Don't ever mess with nature!': Trump’s tiger attack post triggers social media backlash as victim's family issues heartbreaking tribute

US judge blocks Trump administration sanctions on human rights groups supporting Gaza war crimes investigation

Washington calls for 'de-escalation' as Ethiopia-Eritrea tensions fuel war fears

Trump's $100,000 H-1B fee: Why neither Republicans nor Democrats want to make it a 2026 US Midterm issue

Which jobs are safest from humanoid robots?

US midterms: Trump rallies behind Husted as Brown mounts challenge in crucial Ohio race

US police foil alleged mass shooting plot targeting Illinois Hindu temple; 19-year-old’s manifesto called Indians ‘subhumans’

‘Rise up, young patriots!’: American singer Mary Millben says US donors funding CJP, backs Modi govt

Nobel Peace Prize winner Navi Pillay calls on US to 'get back to' being defender of human rights

Iran war: Will Trump, Netanyahu escalate conflict ahead of crucial elections? | Race to Power

Iranian woman, 23, handed death sentence for ‘blasphemy’ in social media post; appeals for help

'Turn approver, resign, we'll forgive you': Rahul Gandhi claims receiving messages from CEC Gyanesh Kumar

'Leakers should be shot': Trump rages over leak of US military plans to attack Iran, slams media

Somaliland celebrates after Trump calls it 'a totally different country', raise hopes of US recognition

‘My president, I mean my husband’: Trump's new press secretary Katie Zacharia's first briefing goes off the rails in 14 minutes

Mars is not for man: Human heart is too weak to survive the trip, study shows

Sheikh Hasina warns of 'deep sense of insecurity' among Bangladesh's minorities in Durga Puja message

FBI refutes media report claiming Kash Patel is in Russia for talks, says he is in Virginia

'Ouch!!! That must hurt': Kangana Ranaut hails Kamal Haasan's sharp reply to Elon Musk over Starlink row

Girl 'dead' for 8 hours wakes up at her own funeral, dad insists she wasn't breathing

Durga Puja 2026: Kolkata roads get a splash of colours

New OTT releases this week (October 12-18, 2026): Sacrifice, Koffee with Karan S9, Roadies Rebirth- 6 titles coming on Netflix, JioHotstar and more

Did the US withhold missile warnings? Ukraine questions Washington's 'bad weather' explanation after Russian strikes kill six, cut power to 600,000

US Singer Mary Millben alleges foreign funding for CJP, warns against anti-Modi forces: All you need to know

Global energy crisis hits Indian economy 

Durga Puja 2026: Power banks, water bottles and more, a foolproof guide to pandal hopping

Netflix layoffs: Streaming giant to cut 1,000 jobs globally amid slow growth and declining user engagement

Hidden video recording device found on Australian Navy ship amid claims of secret filming

Zelensky feels betrayed by Trump, urges Musk to restore Starlink in Ukraine; Musk responds

'Girls are uncomfortable': Salman Khan calls out paparazzi for bad angles, speaks on PR on Koffee With Karan

After flydubai co-pilot attack, Air France bans Pakistani, Muslim-majority crew on Israel flights

US midterms 2026: Trump under election watch? Democrats deploy 100 observers across nine states

In a landmark shift for India’s clean energy transition, solar-plus-storage (S+S) projects are now capable of delivering 24/7 electricity at record-low costs—posing a formidable economic challenge to new coal-fired power.&nbsp;According to a new report from the India Energy and Climate Center (IECC) at UC Berkeley, recent auction results show that the ‘flat block’ power problem—power availability continuously through the day and night—can now be supplied for less than ₹6 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).&nbsp;Over the past few years, the cost of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules and lithium-ion batteries has plummeted. Solar module prices have dropped below ₹9/W ($0.10/W), while battery pack costs are now as low as $60/kWh for Indian developers—levels comparable to those in China. Coupled with improved performance, including battery life cycles exceeding 10,000 uses, these reductions have sharply lowered the Levelised Cost of Storage (LCOS).&nbsp;Recent auctions reflect this trend vividly. In April 2025, a standalone battery energy storage system (BESS) was awarded at ₹2.8 lakh/MW/month (about $3,256) without subsidies.&nbsp;Meanwhile, solar-plus-storage bids with 2–4 hours of storage duration fetched between ₹3.1 and ₹3.5/kWh (about $0.03). These figures represent a 50–60 per cent drop from just 18 months ago.&nbsp;When reverse-engineered, the winning bids imply a flat block S+S power cost of ₹4.0–₹4.3/kWh (nearly $0.04) (assuming 60 per cent of daily solar energy is stored), with some configurations reaching up to ₹4.6/kWh ($0.05).&nbsp;These prices are well below industrial electricity tariffs in most Indian states, which average around ₹7.9/kWh ($0.09) and are projected to rise with inflation.&nbsp;Implications for industry and coal&nbsp;IECC’s modelling suggests that solar-plus-storage can deliver reliable, 95 per cent availability clean electricity at ₹4.5/kWh ($0.052). Even with 100 per cent uptime through grid or diesel backup, prices remain under ₹6.2/kWh ($0.072)—undercutting coal-based power, which typically sees higher variability and costs.&nbsp;Notably, unlike coal or grid tariffs, solar-plus-storage prices are fixed for 25 years and unaffected by inflation. Even after accounting for transmission tariffs, the total cost of solar-plus-storage remains well below prevailing industrial rates in many states.This makes S+S particularly attractive for commercial and industrial consumers such as data centres and manufacturing facilities that demand round-the-clock power.&nbsp;The IECC report, however, cautioned that region-specific planning will be needed to deal with transmission constraints and solar variability. But the economics are already compelling.&nbsp;The findings also raise serious questions about the viability of investing in new thermal power plants. With S+S systems offering scalable, modular solutions and backed by falling capital costs, India’s clean power trajectory appears not only environmentally urgent but also economically inevitable.&nbsp;IECC’s report concludes that India is replicating its global leadership in low-cost solar in the battery storage space as well, paving the way for a sustainable and resilient power future.

Unlike coal or grid tariffs, solar-plus-storage prices are fixed for 25 years and unaffected by inflation. Even after accounting for transmission tariffs, the total cost of solar-plus-storage remains well below prevailing industrial rates in many states.

In a landmark shift for India’s clean energy transition, solar-plus-storage (S+S) projects are now capable of delivering 24/7 electricity at record-low costs—posing a formidable economic challenge to new coal-fired power. According to a new report from the India Energy and Climate Center (IECC) at UC Berkeley, recent auction results show that the ‘flat block’ power problem—power availability continuously through the day and night—can now be supplied for less than ₹6 per kilowatt-hour (kWh). Over the past few years, the cost of solar photovoltaic (PV) modules and lithium-ion batteries has plummeted. Solar module prices have dropped below ₹9/W ($0.10/W), while battery pack costs are now as low as $60/kWh for Indian developers—levels comparable to those in China. Coupled with improved performance, including battery life cycles exceeding 10,000 uses, these reductions have sharply lowered the Levelised Cost of Storage (LCOS). Recent auctions reflect this trend vividly. In April 2025, a standalone battery energy storage system (BESS) was awarded at ₹2.8 lakh/MW/month (about $3,256) without subsidies. Meanwhile, solar-plus-storage bids with 2–4 hours of storage duration fetched between ₹3.1 and ₹3.5/kWh (about $0.03). These figures represent a 50–60 per cent drop from just 18 months ago. When reverse-engineered, the winning bids imply a flat block S+S power cost of ₹4.0–₹4.3/kWh (nearly $0.04) (assuming 60 per cent of daily solar energy is stored), with some configurations reaching up to ₹4.6/kWh ($0.05). These prices are well below industrial electricity tariffs in most Indian states, which average around ₹7.9/kWh ($0.09) and are projected to rise with inflation. Implications for industry and coal IECC’s modelling suggests that solar-plus-storage can deliver reliable, 95 per cent availability clean electricity at ₹4.5/kWh ($0.052). Even with 100 per cent uptime through grid or diesel backup, prices remain under ₹6.2/kWh ($0.072)—undercutting coal-based power, which typically sees higher variability and costs. Notably, unlike coal or grid tariffs, solar-plus-storage prices are fixed for 25 years and unaffected by inflation. Even after accounting for transmission tariffs, the total cost of solar-plus-storage remains well below prevailing industrial rates in many states. This makes S+S particularly attractive for commercial and industrial consumers such as data centres and manufacturing facilities that demand round-the-clock power. The IECC report, however, cautioned that region-specific planning will be needed to deal with transmission constraints and solar variability. But the economics are already compelling. The findings also raise serious questions about the viability of investing in new thermal power plants. With S+S systems offering scalable, modular solutions and backed by falling capital costs, India’s clean power trajectory appears not only environmentally urgent but also economically inevitable. IECC’s report concludes that India is replicating its global leadership in low-cost solar in the battery storage space as well, paving the way for a sustainable and resilient power future.

Unlike coal or grid tariffs, solar-plus-storage prices are fixed for 25 years and unaffected by inflation. Even after accounting for transmission tariffs, the total cost of solar-plus-storage remains well below prevailing industrial rates in many states.

Is India set for a clean power revolution amid a sharp drop in solar-plus-storage prices?

The US labour market showed a mixed picture in April, with job openings increasing slightly while layoffs ticked higher, signalling a potential shift towards a slower economy.According to the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), available positions rose by 191,000 to 7.39 million by the end of April, up from 7.20 million in the previous month, surpassing analysts’ expectations.Economists had forecast 7.10 million openings, but the increase in vacancies was largely driven by sectors such as health care and social assistance.However, not all industries experienced growth in job openings. Manufacturing, accommodation, and food services saw a decline in available positions, and state and local government education also showed a noticeable drop. The overall picture was one of stability, with job openings fluctuating within a narrow range of 7 million to 8 million for the past year.Hiring increased slightly in April, rising by 169,000 to a total of 5.57 million, but the pace of new jobs was still far below the pace set earlier in 2022. While the rise in hiring may seem encouraging, the number of layoffs surged to 1.78 million, a worrying sign that companies could be trimming their workforces in response to mounting economic pressures.<h2>Tariff uncertainty and its impact on the job market</h2>One major factor affecting the labour market is the ongoing trade war and the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The uncertainty surrounding these import duties has left businesses struggling to plan for the future.Last week, a US trade court blocked most of Trump’s tariffs, only for them to be reinstated by a federal appeals court. Economists say that businesses remain in limbo, unsure of whether the tariffs will be sustained or further escalated, which could affect their hiring and investment plans.The tariffs have already had a dampening effect on business sentiment, contributing to the slower pace of hiring and increasing layoffs. Consumers are also feeling the effects, with growing concern over the labour market’s future.The Conference Board’s labour market differential, a measure of the difference between jobs available and the number of unemployed workers, has narrowed considerably in recent months. The increasing uncertainty, combined with fears of rising prices due to tariffs, has weighed on consumer confidence and expectations for future job growth.<h2>Stagflation fears push Fed’s “wait and see” stance</h2>The Federal Reserve has taken a cautious approach to the current economic climate, particularly in light of the growing risks of stagflation—a combination of high inflation, slow economic growth and rising unemployment.Although the labour market remains relatively strong, inflationary pressures and higher tariffs have created a complicated economic backdrop. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently acknowledged that while the economy is still in a “strong position”, there is a looming risk of stagflation if the tariff-driven uncertainty continues to rise.At its most recent meeting in May 2025, the Fed opted to keep its benchmark interest rate steady, citing the need for more time to assess the impact of tariffs and a slowing economy. While the job market is still adding positions, the rise in layoffs and decline in voluntary quits suggest that employees are becoming more cautious about leaving their current roles.The Federal Reserve, under Powell’s leadership, has long been focused on supporting maximum employment while keeping inflation under control. However, if stagflation takes hold, the Fed may face a difficult dilemma, as rising unemployment could be met with an increase in inflation.The uncertainty surrounding tariffs is complicating the Fed’s decision-making process. Powell has emphasised the Fed’s “wait and see” approach, stating that it is too early to determine the full economic impact of the ongoing trade war.If tariffs remain high and inflation continues to rise, the economy could slow down further, leading to job losses that could offset the gains made in the labour market.While the Federal Reserve has been able to maintain a delicate balance so far, economists are closely watching for any signs of a sustained weakening in job growth or rising inflation.Powell made it clear that, at this point, the central bank is in a good position to observe and adjust as the situation evolves. However, if stagflation becomes a persistent issue, the Fed may be forced to take more aggressive action, something that could bring even greater economic uncertainty in the months ahead.While the JOLTS report brings a glimmer of hope for the US economy as job openings rose, but layoffs also remain high. The upcoming May jobs report will be a key indicator of how the labour market is reacting to these shifting dynamics.If hiring continues to slow and layoffs increase, it could signal that the US economy is entering a period of stagnation, potentially leading to more cautious policies from the Federal Reserve.

While the rise in hiring may seem encouraging, the number of layoffs surged to 1.78 million, a worrying sign that companies could be trimming their workforces in response to mounting economic pressures.

The US labour market showed a mixed picture in April, with job openings increasing slightly while layoffs ticked higher, signalling a potential shift towards a slower economy. According to the latest Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), available positions rose by 191,000 to 7.39 million by the end of April, up from 7.20 million in the previous month, surpassing analysts’ expectations. Economists had forecast 7.10 million openings, but the increase in vacancies was largely driven by sectors such as health care and social assistance. However, not all industries experienced growth in job openings. Manufacturing, accommodation, and food services saw a decline in available positions, and state and local government education also showed a noticeable drop. The overall picture was one of stability, with job openings fluctuating within a narrow range of 7 million to 8 million for the past year. Hiring increased slightly in April, rising by 169,000 to a total of 5.57 million, but the pace of new jobs was still far below the pace set earlier in 2022. While the rise in hiring may seem encouraging, the number of layoffs surged to 1.78 million, a worrying sign that companies could be trimming their workforces in response to mounting economic pressures. Tariff uncertainty and its impact on the job market One major factor affecting the labour market is the ongoing trade war and the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The uncertainty surrounding these import duties has left businesses struggling to plan for the future. Last week, a US trade court blocked most of Trump’s tariffs, only for them to be reinstated by a federal appeals court. Economists say that businesses remain in limbo, unsure of whether the tariffs will be sustained or further escalated, which could affect their hiring and investment plans. The tariffs have already had a dampening effect on business sentiment, contributing to the slower pace of hiring and increasing layoffs. Consumers are also feeling the effects, with growing concern over the labour market’s future. The Conference Board’s labour market differential, a measure of the difference between jobs available and the number of unemployed workers, has narrowed considerably in recent months. The increasing uncertainty, combined with fears of rising prices due to tariffs, has weighed on consumer confidence and expectations for future job growth. Stagflation fears push Fed’s “wait and see” stance The Federal Reserve has taken a cautious approach to the current economic climate, particularly in light of the growing risks of stagflation—a combination of high inflation, slow economic growth and rising unemployment. Although the labour market remains relatively strong, inflationary pressures and higher tariffs have created a complicated economic backdrop. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recently acknowledged that while the economy is still in a “strong position”, there is a looming risk of stagflation if the tariff-driven uncertainty continues to rise. At its most recent meeting in May 2025, the Fed opted to keep its benchmark interest rate steady, citing the need for more time to assess the impact of tariffs and a slowing economy. While the job market is still adding positions, the rise in layoffs and decline in voluntary quits suggest that employees are becoming more cautious about leaving their current roles. The Federal Reserve, under Powell’s leadership, has long been focused on supporting maximum employment while keeping inflation under control. However, if stagflation takes hold, the Fed may face a difficult dilemma, as rising unemployment could be met with an increase in inflation. The uncertainty surrounding tariffs is complicating the Fed’s decision-making process. Powell has emphasised the Fed’s “wait and see” approach, stating that it is too early to determine the full economic impact of the ongoing trade war. If tariffs remain high and inflation continues to rise, the economy could slow down further, leading to job losses that could offset the gains made in the labour market. While the Federal Reserve has been able to maintain a delicate balance so far, economists are closely watching for any signs of a sustained weakening in job growth or rising inflation. Powell made it clear that, at this point, the central bank is in a good position to observe and adjust as the situation evolves. However, if stagflation becomes a persistent issue, the Fed may be forced to take more aggressive action, something that could bring even greater economic uncertainty in the months ahead. While the JOLTS report brings a glimmer of hope for the US economy as job openings rose, but layoffs also remain high. The upcoming May jobs report will be a key indicator of how the labour market is reacting to these shifting dynamics. If hiring continues to slow and layoffs increase, it could signal that the US economy is entering a period of stagnation, potentially leading to more cautious policies from the Federal Reserve.

While the rise in hiring may seem encouraging, the number of layoffs surged to 1.78 million, a worrying sign that companies could be trimming their workforces in response to mounting economic pressures.

US labour market shows signs of cooling amid growing stagflation fears

US President Donald Trump has once again reignited tensions with Beijing, calling Chinese President Xi Jinping “very tough” and “extremely hard to make a deal with”.&nbsp;The remark was posted in the early hours of Tuesday on his social media platform, Truth Social.&nbsp;The US president's remark comes amid fresh trade and geopolitical flashpoints that threaten to undo the fragile truce achieved just weeks ago.

“I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!” Trump wrote on the Truth Social website.<h2>US-China tariff tension continues</h2>The US-China trade relationship has remained turbulent in recent years. In early 2025, President Trump imposed a sweeping 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, citing trade imbalances and national security concerns.&nbsp;China responded with retaliatory tariffs of up to 125 per cent on US goods.&nbsp;A temporary easing of tensions came in May, when both countries agreed to scale back certain tariffs during talks in Geneva.However, Washington’s latest actions, including export bans, software curbs, and visa restrictions, have sparked renewed conflict.&nbsp;Last week, the Trump administration said it planned to start revoking visas for Chinese students, while moving to restrict sales of chip design software to China.&nbsp;According to the New York Times, the US has also barred exports of critical jet engine parts and aviation technology to China.&nbsp;Although Trump did not provide specifics when accusing Beijing of violating the trade truce on Friday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said China had failed to accelerate exports of critical minerals used in advanced electronics, as per Bloomberg.&nbsp;According to a report by Bloomberg, China has accused the United States of “seriously violating” the trade truce established in Geneva in May 2025.&nbsp;The Chinese Ministry of Commerce criticised the US for introducing new trade and technology restrictions, including export controls on artificial intelligence (AI) chips, curbs on chip design software sales to China, and the revocation of Chinese student visas.&nbsp;Beijing said these actions undermined the consensus reached between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping during their last conversation in January.&nbsp;“If the US insists on its way and continues to damage China’s interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” the ministry stated, as quoted by Bloomberg.&nbsp;The ministry further stated it “resolutely rejects these unjustified accusations” and insisted that China has strictly implemented the Geneva consensus.&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, last week, the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that trade talks had stalled and hinted that a direct call between Trump and Xi might be necessary to break the deadlock.&nbsp;The two leaders of the world’s largest economy have spoken in January, shortly before Trump returned to the Oval Office.&nbsp;Despite growing tension, the US reportedly said that Trump and Xi are likely to speak on a call.&nbsp; US President's adviser Kevin Hassett suggested a call could happen this week, according to Bloomberg.&nbsp;Whether Xi will entertain the outreach remains uncertain.&nbsp;&nbsp;Beijing has repeatedly stated that any high-level engagement must be based on mutual respect and the withdrawal of what it calls “unilateral and coercive measures”.&nbsp;For now, with tariffs rising, visas tightening, and rhetoric intensifying, the road to détente appears steeper than ever. &nbsp;

The US president remark comes amid fresh trade and geopolitical flashpoints that threaten to undo the fragile truce achieved just weeks ago.

US President Donald Trump has once again reignited tensions with Beijing, calling Chinese President Xi Jinping “very tough” and “extremely hard to make a deal with”. The remark was posted in the early hours of Tuesday on his social media platform, Truth Social. The US president's remark comes amid fresh trade and geopolitical flashpoints that threaten to undo the fragile truce achieved just weeks ago.

Amid US-China trade deal growing tension, US President Donald Trump has called negotiations with Chinese President Xi Jinping ‘very tough’.&nbsp;

Trump calls Xi ‘extremely hard to make a deal with’ as US-China trade war flares up again

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order doubling import tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent, a move that has sparked fresh concerns of a global trade flare-up.&nbsp;&nbsp;The decision, effective from June 5, has exempted the United Kingdom for now, thanks to an ongoing bilateral agreement, but other trading partners, including Canada, Mexico and the European Union, are preparing countermeasures.<h2>US metals tariffs hiked to 50 per cent</h2>Trump’s new order raises the stakes in an already tense global trade environment. In a proclamation signed late Tuesday, he authorised a 50 per cent duty on most imported steel and aluminium, citing the need to bolster domestic industry. “Nobody’s going to be able to steal your industry… at 50 per cent, they can no longer get over the fence,” Trump said during a rally at a US Steel plant, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;The hike marks the second major tariff escalation since March, when Trump first reimposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and 10 per cent on aluminium, using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a clause that allows tariffs in the name of national security. “We started at 25 and then, after studying the data more, realised more help is needed,” said White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett at a steel conference in Washington, according to Reuters.<h2>UK temporarily escapes the tariff blow for now&nbsp;</h2>The United Kingdom has been spared, for now. Under a preliminary trade understanding known as the Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD), signed on May 8, UK metal exports will continue to face the original 25 per cent tariff, not the new 50 per cent rate. The deal is yet to be fully ratified in Parliament, and the exemption remains conditional.&nbsp;In the order, Trump said the UK deserved “different treatment” due to the EPD but warned that the 50 per cent tariff could still be applied on or after July 9 if the agreement does not fully materialise. Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, who met US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris, welcomed the temporary relief and reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to implementing the agreement.&nbsp;Gareth Stace, Director General of UK Steel, said the exemption was “a welcome pause,” but warned of uncertainty. “The introduction of 50 per cent tariffs immediately puts the shutters up… most of our orders, if not all of them, will now be cancelled,” he told Reuters.<h2>Tariffs take effect as deadline for new trade offers looms</h2>The tariff spike also coincides with a broader Trump deadline; June 5 marks the date by which trading partners were expected to submit their “best offers” to avoid additional tariffs, part of Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” duties set to kick in from July 8.&nbsp;As reported by Reuters, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) recently sent letters to multiple governments asking for detailed proposals, including commitments on reducing tariffs, addressing non-tariff barriers, and purchasing more US goods. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the letters were intended as a “friendly reminder.”&nbsp;So far, only the UK has struck a deal in principle. Other major trading partners, including Canada and Mexico, have warned of retaliation. “It makes no sense for the United States to levy a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,” Mexico’s Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard told Reuters, noting that Mexico imports more steel from the US than it exports there.<h2>Global steel and aluminium trade reels under pressure</h2>The global steel and aluminium sectors are already seeing ripple effects. US steel imports fell 17 per cent in April compared to March, according to data from the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). Census Bureau data cited by Bloomberg shows that Canada and Mexico,&nbsp;the first and third largest exporters of steel to the US, will be hit hardest.&nbsp;Canada also faces steep exposure on the aluminium front, as it supplies nearly half of US aluminium imports, more than twice that of the next ten countries combined, according to official US trade data reviewed by Reuters.&nbsp;Domestic price shocks have followed. Aluminium premiums in the US have more than doubled since the start of the year, with Bloomberg reporting a surge in market volatility due to the abrupt policy shift.&nbsp;Business leaders have raised alarms. Chad Bartusek, Director of Supply Chain at Illinois-based Drill Rod &amp; Tool Steels, told Reuters that he woke up to a 50 per cent tariff bill of $145,000, double what he expected. “It’s one punch after another,” he said, adding that his firm has had to raise prices by up to 14 per cent and reduce workers’ hours.&nbsp;Economists, too, remain sceptical. Erica York, Vice President of Federal Tax Policy at the Tax Foundation, warned of broader fallout. “It’s just very foolish to double down on this type of tariff,” she told Reuters. York pointed to a 2020 analysis showing that Trump’s earlier tariffs created about 1,000 steel jobs but cost the economy 75,000 jobs in downstream industries.<h2>What lies ahead?</h2>As Trump’s trade deadline looms, the global metals market waits in limbo. While the UK has secured a temporary reprieve, much of the world, including close allies, continues to face stiff levies. Whether these measures ultimately protect American industry or deepen global economic fragmentation remains to be seen.&nbsp;For now, businesses, trade diplomats and economists alike are bracing for the next round of negotiations or the next wave of tariffs.

This decision, effective June 5, exempts the UK temporarily under a bilateral agreement. 

US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order doubling import tariffs on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent, a move that has sparked fresh concerns of a global trade flare-up. The decision, effective from June 5, has exempted the United Kingdom for now, thanks to an ongoing bilateral agreement, but other trading partners, including Canada, Mexico and the European Union, are preparing countermeasures. US metals tariffs hiked to 50 per cent Trump’s new order raises the stakes in an already tense global trade environment. In a proclamation signed late Tuesday, he authorised a 50 per cent duty on most imported steel and aluminium, citing the need to bolster domestic industry. “Nobody’s going to be able to steal your industry… at 50 per cent, they can no longer get over the fence,” Trump said during a rally at a US Steel plant, as quoted by Reuters. The hike marks the second major tariff escalation since March, when Trump first reimposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and 10 per cent on aluminium, using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a clause that allows tariffs in the name of national security. “We started at 25 and then, after studying the data more, realised more help is needed,” said White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett at a steel conference in Washington, according to Reuters. UK temporarily escapes the tariff blow for now The United Kingdom has been spared, for now. Under a preliminary trade understanding known as the Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD), signed on May 8, UK metal exports will continue to face the original 25 per cent tariff, not the new 50 per cent rate. The deal is yet to be fully ratified in Parliament, and the exemption remains conditional. In the order, Trump said the UK deserved “different treatment” due to the EPD but warned that the 50 per cent tariff could still be applied on or after July 9 if the agreement does not fully materialise. Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, who met US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris, welcomed the temporary relief and reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to implementing the agreement. Gareth Stace, Director General of UK Steel, said the exemption was “a welcome pause,” but warned of uncertainty. “The introduction of 50 per cent tariffs immediately puts the shutters up… most of our orders, if not all of them, will now be cancelled,” he told Reuters. Tariffs take effect as deadline for new trade offers looms The tariff spike also coincides with a broader Trump deadline; June 5 marks the date by which trading partners were expected to submit their “best offers” to avoid additional tariffs, part of Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” duties set to kick in from July 8. As reported by Reuters, the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) recently sent letters to multiple governments asking for detailed proposals, including commitments on reducing tariffs, addressing non-tariff barriers, and purchasing more US goods. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the letters were intended as a “friendly reminder.” So far, only the UK has struck a deal in principle. Other major trading partners, including Canada and Mexico, have warned of retaliation. “It makes no sense for the United States to levy a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus,” Mexico’s Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard told Reuters, noting that Mexico imports more steel from the US than it exports there. Global steel and aluminium trade reels under pressure The global steel and aluminium sectors are already seeing ripple effects. US steel imports fell 17 per cent in April compared to March, according to data from the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI). Census Bureau data cited by Bloomberg shows that Canada and Mexico, the first and third largest exporters of steel to the US, will be hit hardest. Canada also faces steep exposure on the aluminium front, as it supplies nearly half of US aluminium imports, more than twice that of the next ten countries combined, according to official US trade data reviewed by Reuters. Domestic price shocks have followed. Aluminium premiums in the US have more than doubled since the start of the year, with Bloomberg reporting a surge in market volatility due to the abrupt policy shift. Business leaders have raised alarms. Chad Bartusek, Director of Supply Chain at Illinois-based Drill Rod & Tool Steels, told Reuters that he woke up to a 50 per cent tariff bill of $145,000, double what he expected. “It’s one punch after another,” he said, adding that his firm has had to raise prices by up to 14 per cent and reduce workers’ hours. Economists, too, remain sceptical. Erica York, Vice President of Federal Tax Policy at the Tax Foundation, warned of broader fallout. “It’s just very foolish to double down on this type of tariff,” she told Reuters. York pointed to a 2020 analysis showing that Trump’s earlier tariffs created about 1,000 steel jobs but cost the economy 75,000 jobs in downstream industries. What lies ahead? As Trump’s trade deadline looms, the global metals market waits in limbo. While the UK has secured a temporary reprieve, much of the world, including close allies, continues to face stiff levies. Whether these measures ultimately protect American industry or deepen global economic fragmentation remains to be seen. For now, businesses, trade diplomats and economists alike are bracing for the next round of negotiations or the next wave of tariffs.

Amid global trade tension, US President Trump has signed an executive order raising import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent.&nbsp;

Trump doubles US steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%; UK temporarily spared amid wider trade war

In a dramatic escalation of tensions between two high-profile allies, Elon Musk has publicly denounced US President Donald Trump’s flagship tax and spending bill, calling it a “disgusting abomination”.&nbsp;&nbsp;The tech mogul’s blunt criticism comes just days after his abrupt departure from the Trump administration, ending his short-lived role as head of a federal cost-cutting task force.&nbsp;Musk’s comments mark the clearest break yet between the Tesla CEO and the Republican president he once endorsed and worked alongside.&nbsp;&nbsp;The billionaire, who donated over $250 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and was handpicked to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), now finds himself among the bill’s most vocal critics.<h2>What did Musk say?</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1929954109689606359?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Taking to X on Tuesday, Musk lashed out at the legislation, saying: “This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it”, as quoted by Reuters on 3 June.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt <a href="https://t.co/dHCj3pprJO">https://t.co/dHCj3pprJO</a>&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1929955052527202503?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He further claimed that the legislation “will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt”, Musk wrote on X.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people <a href="https://t.co/GTRc9Rjled">https://t.co/GTRc9Rjled</a>&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1929984535456035202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In another pointed remark on X, Musk warned: “In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people."

Musk’s frustrations reportedly extended beyond the broader economic implications. According to reports, one of the specific sticking points was the denial of a proposal to have air traffic control run via his Starlink satellite system, &nbsp;rejected over conflict of interest and technology concerns.<h2>What is Trump’s tax-cut and spending bill?</h2>Passed by the House of Representatives last month by a single vote, Trump’s controversial bill is a centerpiece of his second-term agenda.&nbsp;It seeks to extend the 2017 tax cuts introduced during his first term, increase defence spending, and allocate billions towards mass deportation of undocumented immigrants.The legislation also raises the US debt ceiling to $4 trillion, a move that has drawn sharp rebukes from fiscal conservatives.&nbsp;&nbsp;The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill will add $3.8 trillion to the US federal debt, which currently stands at more than $36.2 trillion, according to Reuters.&nbsp;While Trump has defended the proposal as “one big, beautiful bill”, according to Reuters, critics within and outside his party are growing louder. Republican Senator Rand Paul told CBS News that the GOP “will own the debt once they vote for this” and reaffirmed his opposition to any increase in the debt ceiling.&nbsp;Despite the backlash, Senate Republicans are pressing ahead. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said: “We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president,” as reported by the BBC. He also told reporters, as quoted by Reuters: “My hope is that as [Musk] has an opportunity to further assess what this bill actually does, that he comes to a different conclusion.”<h2>Musk’s journey: From Trump supporter to critic</h2>Musk’s fiery condemnation is particularly striking given his recent proximity to Trump’s political and administrative machinery. A vocal supporter of Trump during the 2024 campaign, Musk contributed over $250 million to the re-election effort.&nbsp;He was later appointed to lead DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency where he oversaw attempts to reform federal spending. His tenure lasted 129 days and formally ended on 31 May. Upon his departure, Trump said, “He will, always, be with us, helping all the way,” according to Reuters.&nbsp;Signs of strain had already begun to emerge before Musk’s exit. In an interview a week prior, he called the bill “disappointing”, according to Bloomberg, and warned that it would undermine DOGE’s objectives. He amplified that criticism after leaving the administration, with the latest comments representing his most severe rebuke yet.&nbsp;Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, a key architect of the bill, claimed he had a 20-minute call with Musk on Monday. Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, Johnson said: “My friend Elon is terribly wrong… it’s a very important first start. Elon is missing it,” as quoted by the BBC. Johnson also expressed surprise at Musk’s public opposition, saying: “I just deeply regret he’s made this mistake,” according to BBC.<h2>Republican backlash and bipartisan ripples</h2>Other Republican lawmakers also pushed back. Thune and Johnson reiterated their commitment to the bill’s passage despite Musk’s criticism. Johnson acknowledged that the removal of electric vehicle tax credits could “have an effect” on Tesla, but insisted the bill remains “very important”, according to BBC.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Democrats seized on Musk’s remarks to reinforce their own objections. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said: “Even Elon Musk, who’s been part of the whole process and is one of Trump’s buddies, said the bill is bad. We can imagine how bad this bill is,” as reported by the BBC.&nbsp;White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Musk’s attack, stating: “The President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn’t change the President’s opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he’s sticking to it,” Reuters reported.<h2>A widening rift with November stakes</h2>The fracture between Trump and Musk highlights deeper ideological divides within the Republican party, particularly around fiscal conservatism, government debt, and economic priorities.&nbsp;&nbsp;With Trump aiming for Senate passage by 4 July, the next few weeks will determine whether his legislative ambitions survive intra-party rebellion.&nbsp;Though Musk’s time in the Trump administration is over, his scathing assessment of the bill and his call to oust those who supported it, signal a new phase in his political engagement.&nbsp;&nbsp;For a figure once central to Trump’s cost-cutting crusade, Musk now appears to be positioning himself as its loudest dissenting voice.&nbsp;

Musk further claimed it would worsen the budget deficit and burden citizens with debt, urging accountability for politicians.

In a dramatic escalation of tensions between two high-profile allies, Elon Musk has publicly denounced US President Donald Trump’s flagship tax and spending bill, calling it a “disgusting abomination”. The tech mogul’s blunt criticism comes just days after his abrupt departure from the Trump administration, ending his short-lived role as head of a federal cost-cutting task force. Musk’s comments mark the clearest break yet between the Tesla CEO and the Republican president he once endorsed and worked alongside. The billionaire, who donated over $250 million to Trump’s 2024 campaign and was handpicked to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), now finds himself among the bill’s most vocal critics. What did Musk say?

Elon Musk criticized President Trump's tax and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination," marking a stark break from his previous support.

Elon Musk slams Trump’s tax bill as ‘a disgusting abomination’, warns of political fallout

Alarm over China’s increasing control over critical minerals intensified on June 3 as both global automakers and US defence officials raised the stakes in the ongoing trade dispute with Beijing.The latest concerns were sparked by China’s sweeping restrictions on exports of rare earth alloys, mixtures, and magnets, which have triggered warnings of serious production delays and even shutdowns in key industries worldwide.German car manufacturers have now joined their US counterparts in sounding the alarm, noting that the curbs could cripple vehicle production, disrupt supply chains, and potentially rattle local economies.China’s decision in April to suspend exports of a broad range of critical minerals—including magnets, essential for building everything from electric vehicles to missiles—has upended the global supply chains that automakers, aerospace companies, and military contractors depend on. These export controls underscore China’s overwhelming dominance in the critical minerals market and are widely perceived as part of its strategy to leverage its position in the ongoing trade war with the United States.Warning about the bleak situation, Germany's automotive lobby head, Hildegard Mueller, told Reuters, “If the situation is not changed quickly, production delays and even production outages can no longer be ruled out.”The worries over these mineral export restrictions are not limited to the automotive sector. Semiconductor companies, defence contractors, and other industries reliant on rare earth magnets for their products have also voiced concern.With the export ban still in place, officials from various countries, including Japan, India, and the European Union (EU), have been urgently pushing for Beijing to lift the export restrictions.A business delegation from Japan will visit Beijing in early June to meet with the Ministry of Commerce over the curbs, and European diplomats from countries with big auto industries have also sought "emergency" meetings with Chinese officials in recent weeks, Reuters reported.<h2>Strategic leverage in trade war with the US</h2>China's rare earth dominance is a key bargaining chip in its ongoing trade standoff with the US, particularly under President Donald Trump’s administration. Trump’s aggressive tariffs and trade measures against China, including tariffs as high as 145 per cent placed earlier, have created an environment where Beijing can flex its muscle in ways that have reverberated across global supply chains.Reuters reported that according to Frank Fannon, a former US Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources,&nbsp;the disruptions should not come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to the shifting global dynamics in mineral supply chains.“We have a production challenge (in the US), and we need to leverage our whole government approach to secure resources and ramp up domestic capability as soon as possible. The time horizon to do this was yesterday,” Fannon said.In response to China’s move, US diplomats, automakers, and military executives have escalated their discussions with Beijing, scrambling to identify alternate sources for these critical materials. The most immediate concern revolves around rare earth magnets. The export controls have created a shortage of key materials, risking disruption to production as early as the end of this summer.China’s export halt has also raised the stakes for US defence contractors. The Pentagon's advanced weapon systems—such as F-35 fighter jets, naval ships, and missiles—are heavily dependent on rare earths and other critical minerals.<h2>US strategic vulnerability and the race for alternatives</h2>China mines 70 per cent of the world’s rare earth materials. Myanmar, Australia and the United States mine most of the rest. But China does the chemical processing for 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths because it refines all of its own ore and also practically all of Myanmar’s and nearly half of US production, and the Pentagon is particularly vulnerable to any disruptions in this supply chain.The Pentagon has long relied on China for its supply of critical minerals used in advanced weaponry, but the recent restrictions on exports of seven medium and heavy rare earth elements have exposed the vulnerabilities in US military readiness.China’s recent export controls on gallium, germanium, and other materials have also had a significant impact. These minerals are indispensable in manufacturing technologies used by the military, and their scarcity could hinder America’s ability to maintain its technological edge.Despite this, the US military is beginning to act to mitigate its dependence on China. The Pentagon has been investing heavily in building domestic supply chains for critical minerals. Since 2020, the US government has allocated more than $400 million to develop alternative sources, and the US company MP Materials has been awarded significant funding to help increase production at the Mountain Pass mine in California.However, experts caution that this is a slow process. The US still relies heavily on China for its refined critical minerals, with only one mine in the US producing rare earth elements, and even then, it only accounts for about 11 per cent of global production, according to Statista.As geopolitical tensions rise between the US and China, the rare earth mineral issue is poised to become an even more significant flashpoint. China has a long history of using rare earth exports as leverage in diplomatic disputes, including a brief but intense embargo on shipments to Japan in 2010 during a territorial disagreement.While US efforts to develop alternative sources of critical minerals continue, the global automotive and defence sectors remain on edge, fearing that Beijing’s strategic control over these materials will continue to disrupt industries vital to both economic growth and national security. The ongoing situation underscores the urgent need for the US to diversify its mineral supply chains and reduce reliance on China in the years ahead.&nbsp;(With inputs from agencies)

China’s decision in April to suspend exports of a broad range of critical minerals has upended the global supply chains that automakers, aerospace companies, and military contractors depend on.

Alarm over China’s increasing control over critical minerals intensified on June 3 as both global automakers and US defence officials raised the stakes in the ongoing trade dispute with Beijing. The latest concerns were sparked by China’s sweeping restrictions on exports of rare earth alloys, mixtures, and magnets, which have triggered warnings of serious production delays and even shutdowns in key industries worldwide. German car manufacturers have now joined their US counterparts in sounding the alarm, noting that the curbs could cripple vehicle production, disrupt supply chains, and potentially rattle local economies. China’s decision in April to suspend exports of a broad range of critical minerals—including magnets, essential for building everything from electric vehicles to missiles—has upended the global supply chains that automakers, aerospace companies, and military contractors depend on. These export controls underscore China’s overwhelming dominance in the critical minerals market and are widely perceived as part of its strategy to leverage its position in the ongoing trade war with the United States. Warning about the bleak situation, Germany's automotive lobby head, Hildegard Mueller, told Reuters, “If the situation is not changed quickly, production delays and even production outages can no longer be ruled out.” The worries over these mineral export restrictions are not limited to the automotive sector. Semiconductor companies, defence contractors, and other industries reliant on rare earth magnets for their products have also voiced concern. With the export ban still in place, officials from various countries, including Japan, India, and the European Union (EU), have been urgently pushing for Beijing to lift the export restrictions. A business delegation from Japan will visit Beijing in early June to meet with the Ministry of Commerce over the curbs, and European diplomats from countries with big auto industries have also sought "emergency" meetings with Chinese officials in recent weeks, Reuters reported. Strategic leverage in trade war with the US China's rare earth dominance is a key bargaining chip in its ongoing trade standoff with the US, particularly under President Donald Trump’s administration. Trump’s aggressive tariffs and trade measures against China, including tariffs as high as 145 per cent placed earlier, have created an environment where Beijing can flex its muscle in ways that have reverberated across global supply chains. Reuters reported that according to Frank Fannon, a former US Assistant Secretary of State for Energy Resources, the disruptions should not come as a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to the shifting global dynamics in mineral supply chains. “We have a production challenge (in the US), and we need to leverage our whole government approach to secure resources and ramp up domestic capability as soon as possible. The time horizon to do this was yesterday,” Fannon said. In response to China’s move, US diplomats, automakers, and military executives have escalated their discussions with Beijing, scrambling to identify alternate sources for these critical materials. The most immediate concern revolves around rare earth magnets. The export controls have created a shortage of key materials, risking disruption to production as early as the end of this summer. China’s export halt has also raised the stakes for US defence contractors. The Pentagon's advanced weapon systems—such as F-35 fighter jets, naval ships, and missiles—are heavily dependent on rare earths and other critical minerals. US strategic vulnerability and the race for alternatives China mines 70 per cent of the world’s rare earth materials. Myanmar, Australia and the United States mine most of the rest. But China does the chemical processing for 90 per cent of the world’s rare earths because it refines all of its own ore and also practically all of Myanmar’s and nearly half of US production, and the Pentagon is particularly vulnerable to any disruptions in this supply chain. The Pentagon has long relied on China for its supply of critical minerals used in advanced weaponry, but the recent restrictions on exports of seven medium and heavy rare earth elements have exposed the vulnerabilities in US military readiness. China’s recent export controls on gallium, germanium, and other materials have also had a significant impact. These minerals are indispensable in manufacturing technologies used by the military, and their scarcity could hinder America’s ability to maintain its technological edge. Despite this, the US military is beginning to act to mitigate its dependence on China. The Pentagon has been investing heavily in building domestic supply chains for critical minerals. Since 2020, the US government has allocated more than $400 million to develop alternative sources, and the US company MP Materials has been awarded significant funding to help increase production at the Mountain Pass mine in California. However, experts caution that this is a slow process. The US still relies heavily on China for its refined critical minerals, with only one mine in the US producing rare earth elements, and even then, it only accounts for about 11 per cent of global production, according to Statista. As geopolitical tensions rise between the US and China, the rare earth mineral issue is poised to become an even more significant flashpoint. China has a long history of using rare earth exports as leverage in diplomatic disputes, including a brief but intense embargo on shipments to Japan in 2010 during a territorial disagreement. While US efforts to develop alternative sources of critical minerals continue, the global automotive and defence sectors remain on edge, fearing that Beijing’s strategic control over these materials will continue to disrupt industries vital to both economic growth and national security. The ongoing situation underscores the urgent need for the US to diversify its mineral supply chains and reduce reliance on China in the years ahead. (With inputs from agencies)

China’s decision in April to suspend exports of a broad range of critical minerals has upended the global supply chains that automakers, aerospace companies, and military contractors depend on.

US military and automakers raise alarms as China leverages rare earth trump card

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has sharply downgraded its global economic growth outlook, warning that a combination of rising trade barriers, policy uncertainty, and persistent inflation could slow growth more than anticipated.According to the OECD's latest Economic Outlook, global GDP growth is projected to decelerate to just 2.9 per cent in 2025 and 2026 from 3.3 per cent in 2024—substantially below previous projections.The report attributed the slowdown to escalating trade tensions, particularly the fallout from the Trump administration's tariff policies, which have had a ripple effect on global supply chains and business investment.&nbsp;What is dragging global growth?&nbsp;The OECD's report highlights that the global economic outlook has grown more challenging as trade barriers have risen sharply. New tariffs, particularly between the US and several major trading partners, have pushed global trade to a standstill.The OECD warns that further protectionist measures could exacerbate inflationary pressures, disrupt global supply chains, and increase economic policy uncertainty, all of which are likely to dampen growth prospects for many countries.“Substantial increases in trade barriers and tighter financial conditions will have marked adverse effects on global growth if they persist,” the OECD report states.Rising trade costs, especially tariffs, are pushing up inflation, although this may be partially offset by falling commodity prices in some regions. Despite the anticipated slowdown, the OECD also notes that a reversal of recent tariff hikes could provide a much-needed boost to global economic activity and ease some inflationary pressures.In the United States, the forecast for economic growth has been cut significantly. The US economy is now expected to expand at only 1.6 per cent in 2025, a sharp decline from earlier forecasts. The main reasons for the downgrade are the increase in tariff rates, retaliatory measures from trading partners, and policy uncertainty surrounding the trade war.This slowdown is exacerbated by rising inflation, which the OECD expects will remain above target, staying near 4 per cent by the end of 2025. Higher import prices, resulting from tariffs, are eroding consumer purchasing power, while economic policy uncertainty has also caused businesses to hold back on investment.While the Eurozone is seeing more moderate growth expectations, China’s growth has also been impacted. The OECD revised its forecast for China down to 4.7 per cent for 2025, slightly lower than earlier predictions. Despite this, China’s government is trying to offset the economic damage through fiscal stimulus and welfare transfers aimed at boosting domestic demand.On the other hand, India’s real GDP is projected to grow by 6.3 per cent in fiscal year 2025-26 and 6.4 per cent in 2026-27. The report predicts that private consumption will gradually strengthen, driven by rising real incomes that are helped by moderate inflation, recent tax cuts and a strengthening of the labour market.Investment in India will be supported by declining interest rates and substantial public capital spending, but higher US tariffs will weigh on exports. Inflation will remain contained at around 4 per cent as economic activity grows around the trend. A less benign monsoon season or higher global commodity prices could drive up food prices and inflation.&nbsp;Inflation and investment woes&nbsp;Globally, inflation is expected to remain elevated for longer than anticipated. The OECD’s inflation forecast for 2025 has been revised upward to 4.2 per cent from 3.7 per cent in earlier projections, with inflation expected to remain above 3 per cent in 2026 as well. This persistent inflation is largely attributed to ongoing trade disruptions and the inflationary effects of tariffs, which are also expected to stifle investment.Investment has been sluggish in many advanced economies since the global financial crisis, with weak business confidence further exacerbating the problem. The OECD emphasises that without a significant increase in investment, especially in public infrastructure and housing, many economies will face longer-term stagnation, weakening their potential growth.The OECD report also stressed that a major driver of the slowdown is the weakening of business investment due to heightened uncertainty and inflationary pressures. This situation, combined with a lack of capital accumulation, threatens the ability of advanced economies to regain a strong growth trajectory.&nbsp;Policy solutions: A path to resilient growth&nbsp;To mitigate these challenges, the OECD suggests several key policy interventions. First, reducing international trade barriers and addressing policy uncertainty could stimulate growth and reduce inflationary pressures. Governments are encouraged to diversify supply chains, encourage competition, and support entrepreneurship to reinvigorate investment.Monetary policy must also remain vigilant to keep inflation in check while fostering an environment conducive to investment. Central banks, according to the OECD, should maintain low interest rates where inflation expectations are under control and adjust rates as necessary to support demand.Finally, the OECD advises governments to focus on reducing public debt ratios and rebuilding fiscal space to respond to future economic shocks, particularly those related to climate change and population ageing.With the global outlook facing significant headwinds, the OECD stresses that coordinated international action to lower trade barriers and reduce policy uncertainty is essential to ensure a more robust and resilient global economy in the years ahead.

According to the OECD's latest Economic Outlook, global GDP growth is projected to decelerate to just 2.9 per cent in 2025 and 2026 from 3.3 per cent in 2024—substantially below previous projections.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has sharply downgraded its global economic growth outlook, warning that a combination of rising trade barriers, policy uncertainty, and persistent inflation could slow growth more than anticipated. According to the OECD's latest Economic Outlook, global GDP growth is projected to decelerate to just 2.9 per cent in 2025 and 2026 from 3.3 per cent in 2024—substantially below previous projections. The report attributed the slowdown to escalating trade tensions, particularly the fallout from the Trump administration's tariff policies, which have had a ripple effect on global supply chains and business investment. What is dragging global growth? The OECD's report highlights that the global economic outlook has grown more challenging as trade barriers have risen sharply. New tariffs, particularly between the US and several major trading partners, have pushed global trade to a standstill. The OECD warns that further protectionist measures could exacerbate inflationary pressures, disrupt global supply chains, and increase economic policy uncertainty, all of which are likely to dampen growth prospects for many countries. “Substantial increases in trade barriers and tighter financial conditions will have marked adverse effects on global growth if they persist,” the OECD report states. Rising trade costs, especially tariffs, are pushing up inflation, although this may be partially offset by falling commodity prices in some regions. Despite the anticipated slowdown, the OECD also notes that a reversal of recent tariff hikes could provide a much-needed boost to global economic activity and ease some inflationary pressures. In the United States, the forecast for economic growth has been cut significantly. The US economy is now expected to expand at only 1.6 per cent in 2025, a sharp decline from earlier forecasts. The main reasons for the downgrade are the increase in tariff rates, retaliatory measures from trading partners, and policy uncertainty surrounding the trade war. This slowdown is exacerbated by rising inflation, which the OECD expects will remain above target, staying near 4 per cent by the end of 2025. Higher import prices, resulting from tariffs, are eroding consumer purchasing power, while economic policy uncertainty has also caused businesses to hold back on investment. While the Eurozone is seeing more moderate growth expectations, China’s growth has also been impacted. The OECD revised its forecast for China down to 4.7 per cent for 2025, slightly lower than earlier predictions. Despite this, China’s government is trying to offset the economic damage through fiscal stimulus and welfare transfers aimed at boosting domestic demand. On the other hand, India’s real GDP is projected to grow by 6.3 per cent in fiscal year 2025-26 and 6.4 per cent in 2026-27. The report predicts that private consumption will gradually strengthen, driven by rising real incomes that are helped by moderate inflation, recent tax cuts and a strengthening of the labour market. Investment in India will be supported by declining interest rates and substantial public capital spending, but higher US tariffs will weigh on exports. Inflation will remain contained at around 4 per cent as economic activity grows around the trend. A less benign monsoon season or higher global commodity prices could drive up food prices and inflation. Inflation and investment woes Globally, inflation is expected to remain elevated for longer than anticipated. The OECD’s inflation forecast for 2025 has been revised upward to 4.2 per cent from 3.7 per cent in earlier projections, with inflation expected to remain above 3 per cent in 2026 as well. This persistent inflation is largely attributed to ongoing trade disruptions and the inflationary effects of tariffs, which are also expected to stifle investment. Investment has been sluggish in many advanced economies since the global financial crisis, with weak business confidence further exacerbating the problem. The OECD emphasises that without a significant increase in investment, especially in public infrastructure and housing, many economies will face longer-term stagnation, weakening their potential growth. The OECD report also stressed that a major driver of the slowdown is the weakening of business investment due to heightened uncertainty and inflationary pressures. This situation, combined with a lack of capital accumulation, threatens the ability of advanced economies to regain a strong growth trajectory. Policy solutions: A path to resilient growth To mitigate these challenges, the OECD suggests several key policy interventions. First, reducing international trade barriers and addressing policy uncertainty could stimulate growth and reduce inflationary pressures. Governments are encouraged to diversify supply chains, encourage competition, and support entrepreneurship to reinvigorate investment. Monetary policy must also remain vigilant to keep inflation in check while fostering an environment conducive to investment. Central banks, according to the OECD, should maintain low interest rates where inflation expectations are under control and adjust rates as necessary to support demand. Finally, the OECD advises governments to focus on reducing public debt ratios and rebuilding fiscal space to respond to future economic shocks, particularly those related to climate change and population ageing. With the global outlook facing significant headwinds, the OECD stresses that coordinated international action to lower trade barriers and reduce policy uncertainty is essential to ensure a more robust and resilient global economy in the years ahead.

According to the OECD's latest Economic Outlook, global GDP growth is projected to decelerate to just 2.9 per cent in 2025 and 2026 from 3.3 per cent in 2024—substantially below previous projections.

OECD slashes global growth forecast amid rising trade barriers and inflation

China’s manufacturing sector experienced its most significant downturn since September 2022, as a private-sector survey revealed a steep drop in activity, driven by the impact of the ongoing US tariff tension.&nbsp;The Caixin/S&amp;P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) declined to 48.3 in May from 50.4 in April, dipping below the critical 50-mark which signals contraction in the economy. This marked the first contraction since last September and the weakest performance in over two years.&nbsp;The data came in significantly below analysts' expectations and underscored the growing impact of trade tensions on the world’s second-largest economy.&nbsp;The decline in the Caixin PMI, which primarily surveys small to medium-sized firms, pointed to a marked reduction in foreign demand, with new export orders falling at their fastest rate since July 2023. This steep drop in orders follows a pattern of worsening global trade conditions, exacerbated by US tariffs imposed during the trade war.&nbsp;<h2>Smaller exporters hit hard</h2>&nbsp;While the official PMI, released earlier this month, showed a less severe contraction, the divergence between the two surveys reflects the disproportionate impact on smaller Chinese firms. These businesses, which often have fewer resources and less diversification, have struggled to cope with the tariff hikes.&nbsp;“The downward pressure on the economy has significantly intensified,” said Wang Zhe, senior economist at Caixin Insight Group, as reported by Bloomberg. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are reporting higher costs and a slowdown in production, leading to job cuts.&nbsp;The latest figures also reveal that factory employment shrank for the second consecutive month, further illustrating the ongoing economic strain. With a large segment of the economy tied to export demand, the manufacturing sector is grappling with both external uncertainties and persistent domestic issues, including weak consumer demand and a struggling property market.&nbsp;Although there was some optimism about the recent trade truce between China and the US, the survey suggests the short-term effects are limited. The US had agreed to lower some of its tariff rates as part of a temporary 90-day trade ceasefire, but these adjustments have not yet translated into a significant rebound in the Chinese manufacturing sector.&nbsp;<h2>More stimulus needed?</h2>&nbsp;In response to the worsening economic outlook, Chinese authorities have already implemented a range of measures aimed at boosting domestic demand. These include interest rate cuts and changes to the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) to enhance liquidity.&nbsp;However, economists warn that these measures may not be enough to offset the trade war's long-term effects. As the global economy faces increasing pressures, especially from rising trade protectionism, China’s manufacturing sector is likely to continue its struggle in the months ahead.&nbsp;Analysts expect China to intensify efforts to support the economy, particularly by stimulating domestic consumption and addressing the persistent slump in the housing market. Without significant recovery in both external and internal demand, China’s path to economic stabilisation remains uncertain.

The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) declined to 48.3 in May from 50.4 in April, dipping below the critical 50-mark which signals contraction in the economy.

China’s manufacturing sector experienced its most significant downturn since September 2022, as a private-sector survey revealed a steep drop in activity, driven by the impact of the ongoing US tariff tension. The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) declined to 48.3 in May from 50.4 in April, dipping below the critical 50-mark which signals contraction in the economy. This marked the first contraction since last September and the weakest performance in over two years. The data came in significantly below analysts' expectations and underscored the growing impact of trade tensions on the world’s second-largest economy. The decline in the Caixin PMI, which primarily surveys small to medium-sized firms, pointed to a marked reduction in foreign demand, with new export orders falling at their fastest rate since July 2023. This steep drop in orders follows a pattern of worsening global trade conditions, exacerbated by US tariffs imposed during the trade war. Smaller exporters hit hard While the official PMI, released earlier this month, showed a less severe contraction, the divergence between the two surveys reflects the disproportionate impact on smaller Chinese firms. These businesses, which often have fewer resources and less diversification, have struggled to cope with the tariff hikes. “The downward pressure on the economy has significantly intensified,” said Wang Zhe, senior economist at Caixin Insight Group, as reported by Bloomberg. Many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are reporting higher costs and a slowdown in production, leading to job cuts. The latest figures also reveal that factory employment shrank for the second consecutive month, further illustrating the ongoing economic strain. With a large segment of the economy tied to export demand, the manufacturing sector is grappling with both external uncertainties and persistent domestic issues, including weak consumer demand and a struggling property market. Although there was some optimism about the recent trade truce between China and the US, the survey suggests the short-term effects are limited. The US had agreed to lower some of its tariff rates as part of a temporary 90-day trade ceasefire, but these adjustments have not yet translated into a significant rebound in the Chinese manufacturing sector. More stimulus needed? In response to the worsening economic outlook, Chinese authorities have already implemented a range of measures aimed at boosting domestic demand. These include interest rate cuts and changes to the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) to enhance liquidity. However, economists warn that these measures may not be enough to offset the trade war's long-term effects. As the global economy faces increasing pressures, especially from rising trade protectionism, China’s manufacturing sector is likely to continue its struggle in the months ahead. Analysts expect China to intensify efforts to support the economy, particularly by stimulating domestic consumption and addressing the persistent slump in the housing market. Without significant recovery in both external and internal demand, China’s path to economic stabilisation remains uncertain.

The Caixin/S&amp;P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) declined to 48.3 in May from 50.4 in April, dipping below the critical 50-mark which signals contraction in the economy.

China's manufacturing activity shrinks amid trade tensions and US tariffs

Elon Musk’s neurotechnology startup Neuralink has successfully raised $650 million in a Series E funding round, advancing its mission to merge the human brain with cutting-edge digital systems.&nbsp;This latest capital infusion comes just as Musk is refocusing on his core business ventures—Tesla, Neuralink, xAI and SpaceX—following his decision to step away from his role with the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).&nbsp;With support from high-profile investors like ARK Invest, Sequoia Capital, Founders Fund, and Thrive Capital, Neuralink is poised to accelerate its clinical trials and bring its life-changing technology to a broader group of patients.Neuralink is pushing the envelope on brain-computer interface (BCI) technology, aiming to restore critical abilities such as speech, mobility, and vision for people with severe neurological impairments. The funds raised will enable the company to expand clinical trial access and further develop advanced devices that aim to seamlessly integrate biological brains with artificial intelligence (AI).In a statement, Neuralink emphasised that the funding will help “restore independence for those with unmet medical needs” while pushing the boundaries of what's possible in neurotechnology. The company’s experimental devices, which decode neural signals to control computers and robotic systems, are already being used by five patients with severe paralysis. These patients are able to control both digital and physical devices using only their thoughts.The FDA recently granted Neuralink a ‘breakthrough’ designation for its speech restoration system, which could provide a much-needed alternative for those unable to communicate due to paralysis.&nbsp;This follows an earlier designation for its vision-restoring device, underscoring the potential of the technology to dramatically improve patients’ quality of life. Neuralink’s trials are underway in three countries—the US, China, and the UAE—with plans to expand as the technology evolves.&nbsp;<h2>Elon Musk's expanding empire</h2>&nbsp;This recent funding milestone comes as Musk shifts focus back to his business empire after stepping down from his advisory role in DOGE, the cost-cutting initiative he led within the Trump administration.&nbsp;With the new developments at xAI, Musk's AI company, and Neuralink advancing rapidly, Musk’s strategic pivot suggests an even stronger commitment to his tech ventures.In a related move, xAI has also raised significant funds, with a $5 billion debt package and a $300 million stock sale, valuing the company at $113 billion. Musk’s focus on xAI and Neuralink signals his intention to lead multiple frontier technologies, from AI to neurotechnology, and drive these industries toward new heights of innovation.Musk has emphasised the critical importance of AI, neurotechnology, and space exploration in shaping the future. “Back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms,” Musk wrote in a post on X.&nbsp;Neuralink’s progress in clinical trials represents a crucial milestone in the development of brain-computer interfaces. The company is now looking to broaden its impact, expanding beyond a select group of patients to a wider demographic, while continuing to refine and perfect its devices.While the technology remains experimental, the potential for transformative change is clear. By helping people with disabilities regain lost functions, Neuralink could change the landscape of healthcare. The integration of AI with human cognition is still in its infancy, but with continued investment, the company could open the door to a future where cognitive and physical limitations are significantly reduced.Musk’s Neuralink and xAI have a shared vision of leveraging the power of artificial intelligence to enhance human capabilities, whether that’s by improving how we communicate, interact with the world, or even think.&nbsp;As more companies enter the brain-computer interface space, Neuralink’s leadership in the field could have a profound impact on both healthcare and the AI industry, making it a critical player in shaping how we interact with emerging technologies in the coming decades.With this new funding, Neuralink is set to deepen its commitment to innovation and continue its groundbreaking work, opening up new possibilities for a future where the lines between human cognition and artificial intelligence are increasingly blurred.

Neuralink is pushing the envelope on brain-computer interface (BCI) technology, aiming to restore critical abilities such as speech, mobility, and vision for people with severe neurological impairments.

Elon Musk’s neurotechnology startup Neuralink has successfully raised $650 million in a Series E funding round, advancing its mission to merge the human brain with cutting-edge digital systems. This latest capital infusion comes just as Musk is refocusing on his core business ventures—Tesla, Neuralink, xAI and SpaceX—following his decision to step away from his role with the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). With support from high-profile investors like ARK Invest, Sequoia Capital, Founders Fund, and Thrive Capital, Neuralink is poised to accelerate its clinical trials and bring its life-changing technology to a broader group of patients. Neuralink is pushing the envelope on brain-computer interface (BCI) technology, aiming to restore critical abilities such as speech, mobility, and vision for people with severe neurological impairments. The funds raised will enable the company to expand clinical trial access and further develop advanced devices that aim to seamlessly integrate biological brains with artificial intelligence (AI). In a statement, Neuralink emphasised that the funding will help “restore independence for those with unmet medical needs” while pushing the boundaries of what's possible in neurotechnology. The company’s experimental devices, which decode neural signals to control computers and robotic systems, are already being used by five patients with severe paralysis. These patients are able to control both digital and physical devices using only their thoughts. The FDA recently granted Neuralink a ‘breakthrough’ designation for its speech restoration system, which could provide a much-needed alternative for those unable to communicate due to paralysis. This follows an earlier designation for its vision-restoring device, underscoring the potential of the technology to dramatically improve patients’ quality of life. Neuralink’s trials are underway in three countries—the US, China, and the UAE—with plans to expand as the technology evolves. Elon Musk's expanding empire This recent funding milestone comes as Musk shifts focus back to his business empire after stepping down from his advisory role in DOGE, the cost-cutting initiative he led within the Trump administration. With the new developments at xAI, Musk's AI company, and Neuralink advancing rapidly, Musk’s strategic pivot suggests an even stronger commitment to his tech ventures. In a related move, xAI has also raised significant funds, with a $5 billion debt package and a $300 million stock sale, valuing the company at $113 billion. Musk’s focus on xAI and Neuralink signals his intention to lead multiple frontier technologies, from AI to neurotechnology, and drive these industries toward new heights of innovation. Musk has emphasised the critical importance of AI, neurotechnology, and space exploration in shaping the future. “Back to spending 24/7 at work and sleeping in conference/server/factory rooms,” Musk wrote in a post on X. Neuralink’s progress in clinical trials represents a crucial milestone in the development of brain-computer interfaces. The company is now looking to broaden its impact, expanding beyond a select group of patients to a wider demographic, while continuing to refine and perfect its devices. While the technology remains experimental, the potential for transformative change is clear. By helping people with disabilities regain lost functions, Neuralink could change the landscape of healthcare. The integration of AI with human cognition is still in its infancy, but with continued investment, the company could open the door to a future where cognitive and physical limitations are significantly reduced. Musk’s Neuralink and xAI have a shared vision of leveraging the power of artificial intelligence to enhance human capabilities, whether that’s by improving how we communicate, interact with the world, or even think. As more companies enter the brain-computer interface space, Neuralink’s leadership in the field could have a profound impact on both healthcare and the AI industry, making it a critical player in shaping how we interact with emerging technologies in the coming decades. With this new funding, Neuralink is set to deepen its commitment to innovation and continue its groundbreaking work, opening up new possibilities for a future where the lines between human cognition and artificial intelligence are increasingly blurred.

Neuralink is pushing the envelope on brain-computer interface (BCI) technology, aiming to restore critical abilities such as speech, mobility, and vision for people with severe neurological impairments.

Elon Musk’s Neuralink raises $650 million to expand brain-computer interface technology

Tesla, the electric vehicle (EV) giant led by Elon Musk, has confirmed that it is not interested in manufacturing cars in India but plans to open showrooms in the country, Union Heavy Industries Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy said on June 2.The announcement came as the Indian government unveiled detailed guidelines for its new initiative aimed at promoting the manufacturing of electric passenger vehicles in India.Under the scheme, global automakers are encouraged to set up manufacturing facilities in India, with significant investments and commitments to local manufacturing. However, Tesla, which had previously shown interest in the Indian market, is not expected to participate in manufacturing under the scheme.“Tesla is more focused on starting showrooms in India, but they are not interested in setting up manufacturing units here,” Minister Kumaraswamy told reporters during a media briefing. While the EV maker has participated in early discussions regarding the scheme, it has not shown interest in moving forward with production plans in India.&nbsp;Other global EV makers show interest in India&nbsp;In stark contrast, other global automakers such as Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen-Skoda, Hyundai, and Kia have expressed strong interest in the central government’s scheme and are keen to establish manufacturing units in India, according to Kumaraswamy. These companies have already indicated their intent to apply for the scheme once the official application process opens.Tesla’s reluctance to establish a production base in India is not entirely surprising. The company has previously voiced concerns over the country's high import duties, which can reach up to 110 per cent on foreign-made vehicles.However, the Indian government has announced a reduction in customs duties on electric vehicles (EVs) under its new policy, which allows a maximum of 8,000 imported EVs every year to be brought in at a reduced duty of 15 per cent for five years, provided the companies commit to local manufacturing.The scheme is expected to boost the country’s EV industry, generate employment, and align with India’s long-term goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070. To qualify for the reduced import duties, foreign companies must invest at least ₹4,150 crore (approximately $500 million) and meet certain local value addition targets.The window for applying under the scheme will open in the coming weeks, with the government looking to attract global players to set up a manufacturing base in India.While Tesla has opted to focus on imports and showrooms in India, the potential investment by Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, and others signals a growing interest in India’s EV sector. The government's push to turn India into a global hub for EV manufacturing is poised to transform the country’s automotive landscape.With the global EV market becoming increasingly competitive, especially with the rise of Chinese EV manufacturers like BYD, the success of India’s new policy could have long-term implications for both the domestic and international automotive industries.

The announcement came as the Indian government unveiled detailed guidelines for its new initiative aimed at promoting the manufacturing of electric passenger vehicles in India.

Tesla, the electric vehicle (EV) giant led by Elon Musk, has confirmed that it is not interested in manufacturing cars in India but plans to open showrooms in the country, Union Heavy Industries Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy said on June 2. The announcement came as the Indian government unveiled detailed guidelines for its new initiative aimed at promoting the manufacturing of electric passenger vehicles in India. Under the scheme, global automakers are encouraged to set up manufacturing facilities in India, with significant investments and commitments to local manufacturing. However, Tesla, which had previously shown interest in the Indian market, is not expected to participate in manufacturing under the scheme. “Tesla is more focused on starting showrooms in India, but they are not interested in setting up manufacturing units here,” Minister Kumaraswamy told reporters during a media briefing. While the EV maker has participated in early discussions regarding the scheme, it has not shown interest in moving forward with production plans in India. Other global EV makers show interest in India In stark contrast, other global automakers such as Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen-Skoda, Hyundai, and Kia have expressed strong interest in the central government’s scheme and are keen to establish manufacturing units in India, according to Kumaraswamy. These companies have already indicated their intent to apply for the scheme once the official application process opens. Tesla’s reluctance to establish a production base in India is not entirely surprising. The company has previously voiced concerns over the country's high import duties, which can reach up to 110 per cent on foreign-made vehicles. However, the Indian government has announced a reduction in customs duties on electric vehicles (EVs) under its new policy, which allows a maximum of 8,000 imported EVs every year to be brought in at a reduced duty of 15 per cent for five years, provided the companies commit to local manufacturing. The scheme is expected to boost the country’s EV industry, generate employment, and align with India’s long-term goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2070. To qualify for the reduced import duties, foreign companies must invest at least ₹4,150 crore (approximately $500 million) and meet certain local value addition targets. The window for applying under the scheme will open in the coming weeks, with the government looking to attract global players to set up a manufacturing base in India. While Tesla has opted to focus on imports and showrooms in India, the potential investment by Mercedes-Benz, Hyundai, and others signals a growing interest in India’s EV sector. The government's push to turn India into a global hub for EV manufacturing is poised to transform the country’s automotive landscape. With the global EV market becoming increasingly competitive, especially with the rise of Chinese EV manufacturers like BYD, the success of India’s new policy could have long-term implications for both the domestic and international automotive industries.

The announcement came as the Indian government unveiled detailed guidelines for its new initiative aimed at promoting the manufacturing of electric passenger vehicles in India.

Tesla ditches India production plans, focuses on showroom expansion

US manufacturing contracted for the third consecutive month in May, signalling continued uncertainty in the sector as tariffs and trade tensions weighed heavily on businesses.The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported on June 2 that the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell to a six-month low of 48.5 in May, slightly down from 48.7 in April. A PMI reading below 50 indicates contraction, which represents about 10.2 per cent of the economy.Despite the drop, the PMI remained above the threshold of 42.3, a level that indicates expansion of the broader economy according to ISM. However, economists were expecting a higher reading, with many forecasting a rise to 49.3. Instead, the survey’s findings underscored a manufacturing sector still navigating a volatile trade environment, compounded by rising input costs, supply chain disruptions, and shifting tariff policies.The New Orders Index, a key measure of future demand, showed continued contraction for the fourth month in a row. It rose marginally to 47.6 in May, from 47.2 in April, but remained in negative territory.Similarly, the Backlog of Orders Index improved slightly, registering 47.1—up 3.4 percentage points from April, signalling a slower pace of decline in order backlogs. However, both of these indices suggest a muted demand outlook, as businesses continue to struggle with supply chain delays and rising costs.&nbsp;Tariff uncertainty exacerbates supply chain bottlenecks&nbsp;One of the most notable aspects of the ISM report was the sharp decline in the Imports Index, which plummeted to 39.9, a 7.2 percentage point drop from April. This marked the lowest reading for imports in 16 years and highlighted the growing strain on the supply chain as businesses hesitate to commit to new international orders due to unpredictable tariffs and trade policies.The uneven rollout and frequent changes to tariffs, particularly in the US-China trade relationship, have led to significant uncertainty. As a result, many manufacturers are pulling back from imports, and the forecast for future shipments remains bleak.The New Export Orders Index also contracted sharply to 40.1, reflecting retaliatory tariffs from other countries on US goods and a slowing global demand for US goods.Further complicating matters, the Supplier Deliveries Index rose to 56.1 in May, indicating that suppliers are taking longer to deliver goods. This is typically a sign of an economy in growth, but in this context, it suggests bottlenecks and delays caused by supply chain inefficiencies exacerbated by the tariff war.US port operators have reported declines in cargo volumes, further indicating disruptions in the movement of goods.Employment in manufacturing also remained sluggish, with the Employment Index inching up slightly to 46.8 in May from 46.5 in April. While the index indicates a slight improvement, it remains firmly in contraction territory, reflecting ongoing layoffs in the sector.Manufacturers are increasingly turning to layoffs rather than natural attrition to reduce labour costs, with headcount reductions continuing across several industries.&nbsp;Factories face rising costs, but hope for resolution lingers&nbsp;The ISM’s Price Index, which measures the cost of materials and inputs for manufacturers, remained elevated at 69.4, down slightly from 69.8 in April. Though prices have slightly moderated, they continue to reflect the strain on businesses as tariffs and supply chain issues push up costs.Despite the ongoing contraction in the sector, there is cautious optimism among some industry leaders. Susan Spence, Chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, emphasised that the overall economy remains in expansion, and she expressed hope that tariff uncertainties would soon be resolved.“We are really hopeful that the tariff uncertainties can come to a conclusion nd that purchasing managers can focus on the normality of what their job should be,” Spence said.

US manufacturing PMI dips to six-month low of 48.5 amid ongoing supply chain challenges and unpredictable tariff policies.

US manufacturing contracted for the third consecutive month in May, signalling continued uncertainty in the sector as tariffs and trade tensions weighed heavily on businesses. The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported on June 2 that the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell to a six-month low of 48.5 in May, slightly down from 48.7 in April. A PMI reading below 50 indicates contraction, which represents about 10.2 per cent of the economy. Despite the drop, the PMI remained above the threshold of 42.3, a level that indicates expansion of the broader economy according to ISM. However, economists were expecting a higher reading, with many forecasting a rise to 49.3. Instead, the survey’s findings underscored a manufacturing sector still navigating a volatile trade environment, compounded by rising input costs, supply chain disruptions, and shifting tariff policies. The New Orders Index, a key measure of future demand, showed continued contraction for the fourth month in a row. It rose marginally to 47.6 in May, from 47.2 in April, but remained in negative territory. Similarly, the Backlog of Orders Index improved slightly, registering 47.1—up 3.4 percentage points from April, signalling a slower pace of decline in order backlogs. However, both of these indices suggest a muted demand outlook, as businesses continue to struggle with supply chain delays and rising costs. Tariff uncertainty exacerbates supply chain bottlenecks One of the most notable aspects of the ISM report was the sharp decline in the Imports Index, which plummeted to 39.9, a 7.2 percentage point drop from April. This marked the lowest reading for imports in 16 years and highlighted the growing strain on the supply chain as businesses hesitate to commit to new international orders due to unpredictable tariffs and trade policies. The uneven rollout and frequent changes to tariffs, particularly in the US-China trade relationship, have led to significant uncertainty. As a result, many manufacturers are pulling back from imports, and the forecast for future shipments remains bleak. The New Export Orders Index also contracted sharply to 40.1, reflecting retaliatory tariffs from other countries on US goods and a slowing global demand for US goods. Further complicating matters, the Supplier Deliveries Index rose to 56.1 in May, indicating that suppliers are taking longer to deliver goods. This is typically a sign of an economy in growth, but in this context, it suggests bottlenecks and delays caused by supply chain inefficiencies exacerbated by the tariff war. US port operators have reported declines in cargo volumes, further indicating disruptions in the movement of goods. Employment in manufacturing also remained sluggish, with the Employment Index inching up slightly to 46.8 in May from 46.5 in April. While the index indicates a slight improvement, it remains firmly in contraction territory, reflecting ongoing layoffs in the sector. Manufacturers are increasingly turning to layoffs rather than natural attrition to reduce labour costs, with headcount reductions continuing across several industries. Factories face rising costs, but hope for resolution lingers The ISM’s Price Index, which measures the cost of materials and inputs for manufacturers, remained elevated at 69.4, down slightly from 69.8 in April. Though prices have slightly moderated, they continue to reflect the strain on businesses as tariffs and supply chain issues push up costs. Despite the ongoing contraction in the sector, there is cautious optimism among some industry leaders. Susan Spence, Chair of the ISM Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, emphasised that the overall economy remains in expansion, and she expressed hope that tariff uncertainties would soon be resolved. “We are really hopeful that the tariff uncertainties can come to a conclusion nd that purchasing managers can focus on the normality of what their job should be,” Spence said.

US manufacturing PMI dips to six-month low of 48.5 amid ongoing supply chain challenges and unpredictable tariff policies.

US manufacturing slows as tariff uncertainty drives contraction in May

In a move reflecting urgency within the Trump administration, the United States is asking trade partners to submit their best offers by Wednesday (June 4) in an effort to expedite negotiations before a self-imposed deadline in early July.The White House, which has yet to finalise major agreements since President Donald Trump paused tariffs for 90 days on April 9, is aiming to complete as many deals as possible by the expiration of this pause on July 8.According to Reuters, the US Trade Representative has directed countries involved in active negotiations to submit proposals in a variety of key areas, including tariffs and quotas on US industrial and agricultural products.Additionally, Washington is pushing for trade partners to outline plans for addressing non-tariff barriers, committing to digital trade rules, and ensuring economic security. The administration plans to evaluate the responses quickly and offer a “possible landing zone” that could involve reciprocal tariff rates, Reuters&nbsp;reported.The draft letter that the news report referred to did not specify which countries would receive the request, though it is expected that negotiations with the European Union (EU), Japan, Vietnam, India, South Korea and other nations currently engaged in trade talks will be among the recipients.&nbsp;Racing against time&nbsp;As the clock ticks toward the July 8 deadline, the Trump administration has ramped up efforts to wrap up multiple trade deals. While officials have expressed optimism, only one deal has been announced since the pause on tariffs—a limited framework with Britain.Negotiations with other countries, including major US trading partners, remain ongoing, raising concerns about whether the ambitious target of “90 deals in 90 days” will be met.Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender acknowledged on June 2 that while significant progress has been made, only a few deals are close to completion.“As long as we continue to make progress, I think you’re going to see a lot more deals that are announced prior to that July 9 time frame,” Faulkender told CNBC.Despite the apparent lack of finalised agreements, Reuters reported that White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett remains optimistic. He emphasised that the Trump administration aims to “reach at least terms of an agreement prior to the expiration of that pause”, stressing the importance of goodwill from trade partners to continue making progress toward closing deals.However, the White House faces the challenge of navigating complex negotiations. With little time remaining, Faulkender admitted that the process can be slow and complicated. Still, he expressed confidence that substantial progress could be achieved in the coming weeks. “We are looking to conclude as many discussions as possible before the pause ends,” he said.&nbsp;Legal challenges loom&nbsp;The legal basis for Trump’s tariff policies remains in question. Last week, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the Trump administration had overstepped its authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, including the controversial “Liberation Day” levies. These tariffs targeted countries such as Canada, Mexico, and China, accusing them of facilitating the flow of fentanyl into the US.However, the ruling was quickly stayed by an appeals court, allowing the tariffs to remain in effect while the legal battle continues.Reuters&nbsp;reported that the draft letter sent to trading partners warns that, regardless of the ongoing litigation, Trump intends to continue his tariff programme through other legal channels, if necessary. “It is important that we continue our discussions on these matters," the letter states.The White House has also faced increasing tension with China, as the two nations continue to clash over trade and economic issues. The Trump administration accused China of violating a preliminary trade agreement by delaying the renewal of critical mineral exports to the US.Meanwhile, China has pushed back, accusing the US of undermining the deal with new restrictions on Chinese student visas and other measures.Despite these tensions, Kevin Hassett hinted on June 1 that a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping could take place as soon as this week. The outcome of these discussions may have significant implications for the future of US-China trade relations.As the deadline draws nearer, the Trump administration remains determined to finalise as many trade agreements as possible, but whether it can achieve its ambitious goals remains uncertain.

the Trump administration has ramped up efforts to wrap up multiple trade deals. While officials have expressed optimism, only one deal has been announced since the pause on tariffs—a limited framework with Britain.

In a move reflecting urgency within the Trump administration, the United States is asking trade partners to submit their best offers by Wednesday (June 4) in an effort to expedite negotiations before a self-imposed deadline in early July. The White House, which has yet to finalise major agreements since President Donald Trump paused tariffs for 90 days on April 9, is aiming to complete as many deals as possible by the expiration of this pause on July 8. According to Reuters, the US Trade Representative has directed countries involved in active negotiations to submit proposals in a variety of key areas, including tariffs and quotas on US industrial and agricultural products. Additionally, Washington is pushing for trade partners to outline plans for addressing non-tariff barriers, committing to digital trade rules, and ensuring economic security. The administration plans to evaluate the responses quickly and offer a “possible landing zone” that could involve reciprocal tariff rates, Reuters reported. The draft letter that the news report referred to did not specify which countries would receive the request, though it is expected that negotiations with the European Union (EU), Japan, Vietnam, India, South Korea and other nations currently engaged in trade talks will be among the recipients. Racing against time As the clock ticks toward the July 8 deadline, the Trump administration has ramped up efforts to wrap up multiple trade deals. While officials have expressed optimism, only one deal has been announced since the pause on tariffs—a limited framework with Britain. Negotiations with other countries, including major US trading partners, remain ongoing, raising concerns about whether the ambitious target of “90 deals in 90 days” will be met. Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender acknowledged on June 2 that while significant progress has been made, only a few deals are close to completion. “As long as we continue to make progress, I think you’re going to see a lot more deals that are announced prior to that July 9 time frame,” Faulkender told CNBC. Despite the apparent lack of finalised agreements, Reuters reported that White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett remains optimistic. He emphasised that the Trump administration aims to “reach at least terms of an agreement prior to the expiration of that pause”, stressing the importance of goodwill from trade partners to continue making progress toward closing deals. However, the White House faces the challenge of navigating complex negotiations. With little time remaining, Faulkender admitted that the process can be slow and complicated. Still, he expressed confidence that substantial progress could be achieved in the coming weeks. “We are looking to conclude as many discussions as possible before the pause ends,” he said. Legal challenges loom The legal basis for Trump’s tariff policies remains in question. Last week, the US Court of International Trade ruled that the Trump administration had overstepped its authority in using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, including the controversial “Liberation Day” levies. These tariffs targeted countries such as Canada, Mexico, and China, accusing them of facilitating the flow of fentanyl into the US. However, the ruling was quickly stayed by an appeals court, allowing the tariffs to remain in effect while the legal battle continues. Reuters reported that the draft letter sent to trading partners warns that, regardless of the ongoing litigation, Trump intends to continue his tariff programme through other legal channels, if necessary. “It is important that we continue our discussions on these matters," the letter states. The White House has also faced increasing tension with China, as the two nations continue to clash over trade and economic issues. The Trump administration accused China of violating a preliminary trade agreement by delaying the renewal of critical mineral exports to the US. Meanwhile, China has pushed back, accusing the US of undermining the deal with new restrictions on Chinese student visas and other measures. Despite these tensions, Kevin Hassett hinted on June 1 that a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping could take place as soon as this week. The outcome of these discussions may have significant implications for the future of US-China trade relations. As the deadline draws nearer, the Trump administration remains determined to finalise as many trade agreements as possible, but whether it can achieve its ambitious goals remains uncertain.

The Trump administration has ramped up efforts to wrap up multiple trade deals. While officials have expressed optimism, only one deal has been announced since the pause on tariffs—a limited framework with Britain.

US asks trade partners to submit best offers by June 4 as deadline looms

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections remained above the ₹2 lakh crore mark (approx. $24.1 billion) for the second consecutive month in May 2025, registering a robust 16.4 per cent year-on-year growth.&nbsp;&nbsp;The latest data, released by the Ministry of Finance, comes just days before the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) convenes for its bi-monthly Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting on 4 June.&nbsp;The total GST revenue stood at ₹2.01 lakh crore ($24.1 billion) in May, compared to ₹1.72 lakh crore ($20.6 billion) in May 2024.&nbsp; &nbsp;This follows a record ₹2.37 lakh crore ($28.4 billion) collection in April 2025. Net revenue after refunds amounted to ₹1.74 lakh crore ($20.8 billion), a sharp 20.4 per cent rise from the ₹1.44 lakh crore ($17.2 billion) collected in May last year.<h2>Import-led growth raises questions on consumption patterns</h2>The growth was driven largely by import-related taxes. GST revenue from imports rose 25.2 per cent to ₹51,266 crore ($6.2 billion), while domestic transactions contributed ₹1.50 lakh crore ($18 billion)—up 13.7 per cent from the previous year.&nbsp;&nbsp;Total refunds issued declined 4 per cent to ₹27,210 crore ($3.26 billion).&nbsp;“The 16 per cent growth in GST collections in the month shows a renewed upward momentum after a few months of growth in the range of 11–12 per cent,” Pratik Jain, Partner at Price Waterhouse &amp; Co LLP, told PTI. “If this growth sustains over the next few months, it might provide a cushion for the government to consider rate rationalisation, on which significant groundwork has already been done,” he added.&nbsp;However, experts warn that the growth pattern is not uniform across India. States like Maharashtra, West Bengal, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu posted strong collection growth of 17–25 per cent, while states such as Gujarat and Telangana lagged with growth below 6 per cent, according to M S Mani, Partner at Deloitte India, quoted by PTI.&nbsp;“The average growth across the country does not appear to be uniformly reflected across states, possibly due to sectoral or seasonal factors which require deeper, data-based analysis,” Mani said.<h2>Domestic demand lags, import surge continues</h2>Several tax analysts believe the growth is being powered by imports rather than domestic consumption. Vivek Jalan, Partner at Tax Connect Advisory Services LLP, told PTI&nbsp;that while import-related GST rose nearly 73 per cent, domestic revenue growth was modest in comparison. “This, coupled with the fact that export refunds are not growing correspondingly, reflects the fact that import growth far exceeds export growth,” Jalan explained.&nbsp;EY India’s Saurabh Agarwal also told PTI&nbsp;that similar numbers could be seen in June owing to ongoing geopolitical developments impacting global trade flows.<h2>RBI to weigh strong GST data and soft inflation in June MPC meeting</h2>The strong GST collections—an indicator of sustained economic activity—arrive just as the Reserve Bank of India prepares for its rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, scheduled from 4–6 June.&nbsp; Economists widely expect the six-member panel to deliver a 25-basis point rate cut, reducing the repo rate from 6 per cent to 5.75 per cent, in what could be the third consecutive rate cut in 2025. The move is backed by a steep fall in inflation. India’s consumer price index (CPI) dropped to 3.2 per cent in April, the lowest in nearly five years. This aligns well within the RBI’s flexible inflation targeting framework of 4 per cent ± 2 per cent.&nbsp; According to the RBI’s annual report, “The benign inflation outlook and moderate growth warrant monetary policy to be growth supportive, while remaining watchful about rapidly evolving global macroeconomic conditions.” Market participants and lenders are also anticipating a total of 50 basis points in rate cuts for FY26, which would help lower external benchmark lending rates (EBLR) and reduce borrowing costs for home, auto and personal loans.&nbsp; As GST revenues remain strong and inflation eases, the central bank may find ample headroom to support India’s growth trajectory through accommodative monetary policy.&nbsp;

The most recent GST figures, published by the Ministry of Finance, arrive only days ahead of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) gathering for its bi-monthly Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) session on 4 June.

India’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections remained above the ₹2 lakh crore mark (approx. $24.1 billion) for the second consecutive month in May 2025, registering a robust 16.4 per cent year-on-year growth. The latest data, released by the Ministry of Finance, comes just days before the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) convenes for its bi-monthly Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting on 4 June. The total GST revenue stood at ₹2.01 lakh crore ($24.1 billion) in May, compared to ₹1.72 lakh crore ($20.6 billion) in May 2024. This follows a record ₹2.37 lakh crore ($28.4 billion) collection in April 2025. Net revenue after refunds amounted to ₹1.74 lakh crore ($20.8 billion), a sharp 20.4 per cent rise from the ₹1.44 lakh crore ($17.2 billion) collected in May last year. Import-led growth raises questions on consumption patterns The growth was driven largely by import-related taxes. GST revenue from imports rose 25.2 per cent to ₹51,266 crore ($6.2 billion), while domestic transactions contributed ₹1.50 lakh crore ($18 billion)—up 13.7 per cent from the previous year. Total refunds issued declined 4 per cent to ₹27,210 crore ($3.26 billion). “The 16 per cent growth in GST collections in the month shows a renewed upward momentum after a few months of growth in the range of 11–12 per cent,” Pratik Jain, Partner at Price Waterhouse & Co LLP, told PTI. “If this growth sustains over the next few months, it might provide a cushion for the government to consider rate rationalisation, on which significant groundwork has already been done,” he added. However, experts warn that the growth pattern is not uniform across India. States like Maharashtra, West Bengal, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu posted strong collection growth of 17–25 per cent, while states such as Gujarat and Telangana lagged with growth below 6 per cent, according to M S Mani, Partner at Deloitte India, quoted by PTI. “The average growth across the country does not appear to be uniformly reflected across states, possibly due to sectoral or seasonal factors which require deeper, data-based analysis,” Mani said. Domestic demand lags, import surge continues Several tax analysts believe the growth is being powered by imports rather than domestic consumption. Vivek Jalan, Partner at Tax Connect Advisory Services LLP, told PTI that while import-related GST rose nearly 73 per cent, domestic revenue growth was modest in comparison. “This, coupled with the fact that export refunds are not growing correspondingly, reflects the fact that import growth far exceeds export growth,” Jalan explained. EY India’s Saurabh Agarwal also told PTI that similar numbers could be seen in June owing to ongoing geopolitical developments impacting global trade flows. RBI to weigh strong GST data and soft inflation in June MPC meeting The strong GST collections—an indicator of sustained economic activity—arrive just as the Reserve Bank of India prepares for its rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, scheduled from 4–6 June. Economists widely expect the six-member panel to deliver a 25-basis point rate cut, reducing the repo rate from 6 per cent to 5.75 per cent, in what could be the third consecutive rate cut in 2025. The move is backed by a steep fall in inflation. India’s consumer price index (CPI) dropped to 3.2 per cent in April, the lowest in nearly five years. This aligns well within the RBI’s flexible inflation targeting framework of 4 per cent ± 2 per cent. According to the RBI’s annual report, “The benign inflation outlook and moderate growth warrant monetary policy to be growth supportive, while remaining watchful about rapidly evolving global macroeconomic conditions.” Market participants and lenders are also anticipating a total of 50 basis points in rate cuts for FY26, which would help lower external benchmark lending rates (EBLR) and reduce borrowing costs for home, auto and personal loans. As GST revenues remain strong and inflation eases, the central bank may find ample headroom to support India’s growth trajectory through accommodative monetary policy.

In May 2025, India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) collections exceeded ₹2 lakh crore (around $24.1 billion) for the second month in a row, showing a strong year-on-year growth of 16.4 percent.

India’s GST collections cross $24 billion in May: What it signals before RBI policy review

Russia’s central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina is reportedly facing growing pressure from the Kremlin to cut interest rates from their record-high level, as recession fears mount and war-time spending begins to strain the economy. &nbsp;The benchmark interest rate stands at 21 percent—it's highest since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022—following a series of aggressive hikes aimed at defending the ruble and containing inflation.&nbsp; &nbsp;However, top Kremlin officials are now urging a shift in policy.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, discussions are underway to slash rates as early as the upcoming central bank meeting this Friday, with officials eyeing a 200 to 300 basis-point cut to ease borrowing costs.&nbsp;Nabiullina, once praised for stabilising Russia’s financial system through capital controls and emergency tightening, is now being blamed for stalling investment and pushing non-military sectors into stagnation.&nbsp; &nbsp;Bloomberg Economics reports that while inflation has cooled to 6.2 percent in April, down from 10.7 percent in January 2025—this drop is largely due to temporary ruble strength, which may not be sustainable.&nbsp;Russia’s industrial giants are already feeling the pinch. Severstal PJSC, one of the country’s largest steelmakers, posted a negative cash flow of 33 billion rubles ($421 million) in Q1 2025, compared to a positive 33 billion rubles in the same period last year—citing weak domestic demand and delayed projects due to high borrowing costs. &nbsp;Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov, and First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov have all reportedly hinted at the need for a policy pivot to rescue struggling civilian industries and avoid a deeper economic slowdown.<h2>War and sanctions continue to squeeze the Russian economy</h2>More than three years into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia’s economy remains under severe pressure from Western sanctions, war-related destruction, and the soaring cost of maintaining an extended military campaign.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to Reuters&nbsp;and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), sanctions imposed by the US, EU, UK, and their allies have triggered some of the harshest restrictions on any major economy in recent history.&nbsp;&nbsp;These include asset freezes and SWIFT bans on major Russian banks, export controls on semiconductors, aviation parts, and industrial machinery, as well as oil price caps, shipping restrictions, and bans on Western investment and technology transfers. &nbsp;These measures have left deep scars on Russia’s economic structure. Russia’s GDP, after a brief rebound in 2023, is expected to grow only 0.8 to 1.2 percent in 2025, according to IMF projections, far below pre-war levels. Inflation, which peaked above 12 percent in 2023, forced the central bank to raise interest rates to a record 21 percent, where they remain.&nbsp;&nbsp;These high borrowing costs have throttled credit availability, dampened investment, and hit civilian industries particularly hard. Energy revenues, the backbone of Russia’s economy, have collapsed.&nbsp; &nbsp;As per Bloomberg&nbsp;and the International Energy Agency (IEA), oil and gas export revenues fell by over 40 percent between 2022 and 2024 due to sanctions and discounted sales to non-Western buyers like China and India.<h2>Ruble volatility, industrial strain, and brain drain deepen the crisis</h2>The Russian ruble has undergone repeated devaluations since the war began. Despite tight capital controls, the currency remains fragile, creating import bottlenecks and adding to inflationary pressure.&nbsp;Industrial disruptions are also mounting. With restricted access to Western technology and components, Russia’s aviation sector is now cannibalising grounded aircraft for spare parts.&nbsp;&nbsp;Automakers and electronics manufacturers are reportedly struggling to localise production without imported machinery.&nbsp;Beyond economics, the war has triggered an exodus of human capital.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to the Carnegie Endowment, more than 1 million Russians, including IT professionals, scientists, and business leaders have left the country since 2022. Coupled with tightened visa regimes and travel bans, this brain drain has accelerated Russia’s international isolation.<h2>A pivot to China and India — but with limits</h2>To cushion the impact, Moscow has pivoted eastward, strengthening trade with China, India, Iran, and the Gulf.&nbsp; According to Bloomberg, trade with China hit a record $240 billion in 2024, while Indian imports of Russian oil have surged by over 50 percent since 2022. However, this realignment has limits. Chinese and Indian capital cannot fully replace Western investment and technology.&nbsp; Most Russian firms now operate in a two-speed economy, where defence-linked sectors thrive while consumer and tech industries languish. Although trade with Asia is helping Moscow stay afloat, it is not enough to reignite broad-based growth.&nbsp; As inflation, fiscal strain, and industrial stagnation persist, the Kremlin sees monetary easing as a political and economic necessity. The central bank’s next move could prove pivotal, not just for Russia’s economy, but for its ability to sustain the cost of a prolonged war in an increasingly isolated global position.&nbsp;

The benchmark interest rate is at 21 percent—its peak since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine—after a number of aggressive increases intended to protect the ruble and control inflation.

Russia’s central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina is reportedly facing growing pressure from the Kremlin to cut interest rates from their record-high level, as recession fears mount and war-time spending begins to strain the economy. The benchmark interest rate stands at 21 percent—it's highest since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022—following a series of aggressive hikes aimed at defending the ruble and containing inflation. However, top Kremlin officials are now urging a shift in policy. According to Bloomberg, discussions are underway to slash rates as early as the upcoming central bank meeting this Friday, with officials eyeing a 200 to 300 basis-point cut to ease borrowing costs. Nabiullina, once praised for stabilising Russia’s financial system through capital controls and emergency tightening, is now being blamed for stalling investment and pushing non-military sectors into stagnation. Bloomberg Economics reports that while inflation has cooled to 6.2 percent in April, down from 10.7 percent in January 2025—this drop is largely due to temporary ruble strength, which may not be sustainable. Russia’s industrial giants are already feeling the pinch. Severstal PJSC, one of the country’s largest steelmakers, posted a negative cash flow of 33 billion rubles ($421 million) in Q1 2025, compared to a positive 33 billion rubles in the same period last year—citing weak domestic demand and delayed projects due to high borrowing costs. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, Economy Minister Maxim Reshetnikov, and First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov have all reportedly hinted at the need for a policy pivot to rescue struggling civilian industries and avoid a deeper economic slowdown. War and sanctions continue to squeeze the Russian economy More than three years into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia’s economy remains under severe pressure from Western sanctions, war-related destruction, and the soaring cost of maintaining an extended military campaign. According to Reuters and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), sanctions imposed by the US, EU, UK, and their allies have triggered some of the harshest restrictions on any major economy in recent history. These include asset freezes and SWIFT bans on major Russian banks, export controls on semiconductors, aviation parts, and industrial machinery, as well as oil price caps, shipping restrictions, and bans on Western investment and technology transfers. These measures have left deep scars on Russia’s economic structure. Russia’s GDP, after a brief rebound in 2023, is expected to grow only 0.8 to 1.2 percent in 2025, according to IMF projections, far below pre-war levels. Inflation, which peaked above 12 percent in 2023, forced the central bank to raise interest rates to a record 21 percent, where they remain. These high borrowing costs have throttled credit availability, dampened investment, and hit civilian industries particularly hard. Energy revenues, the backbone of Russia’s economy, have collapsed. As per Bloomberg and the International Energy Agency (IEA), oil and gas export revenues fell by over 40 percent between 2022 and 2024 due to sanctions and discounted sales to non-Western buyers like China and India. Ruble volatility, industrial strain, and brain drain deepen the crisis The Russian ruble has undergone repeated devaluations since the war began. Despite tight capital controls, the currency remains fragile, creating import bottlenecks and adding to inflationary pressure. Industrial disruptions are also mounting. With restricted access to Western technology and components, Russia’s aviation sector is now cannibalising grounded aircraft for spare parts. Automakers and electronics manufacturers are reportedly struggling to localise production without imported machinery. Beyond economics, the war has triggered an exodus of human capital. According to the Carnegie Endowment, more than 1 million Russians, including IT professionals, scientists, and business leaders have left the country since 2022. Coupled with tightened visa regimes and travel bans, this brain drain has accelerated Russia’s international isolation. A pivot to China and India — but with limits To cushion the impact, Moscow has pivoted eastward, strengthening trade with China, India, Iran, and the Gulf. According to Bloomberg, trade with China hit a record $240 billion in 2024, while Indian imports of Russian oil have surged by over 50 percent since 2022. However, this realignment has limits. Chinese and Indian capital cannot fully replace Western investment and technology. Most Russian firms now operate in a two-speed economy, where defence-linked sectors thrive while consumer and tech industries languish. Although trade with Asia is helping Moscow stay afloat, it is not enough to reignite broad-based growth. As inflation, fiscal strain, and industrial stagnation persist, the Kremlin sees monetary easing as a political and economic necessity. The central bank’s next move could prove pivotal, not just for Russia’s economy, but for its ability to sustain the cost of a prolonged war in an increasingly isolated global position.

Elvira Nabiullina, the governor of Russia's central bank, is experiencing increasing pressure from the Kremlin to lower interest rates from their unprecedented high.&nbsp;

Kremlin pressures Russia’s top banker to slash rates as sanctions hit economy

Asia’s manufacturing sector is under pressure as US President Donald Trump’s renewed tariff offensive sends shockwaves through global trade.&nbsp;From Vietnam to South Korea, Taiwan to Japan, factory activity contracted sharply in May 2025, with Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) readings slipping below the 50-mark that separates growth from contraction, according to S&amp;P Global data cited by Reuters.&nbsp;The downturn highlights growing uncertainty as Trump’s protectionist policies, aimed at rebalancing American trade—begin to disrupt supply chains and dent export-driven economies across the region.<h2>Vietnam’s exports slump amid tariff shock</h2>Vietnam’s manufacturing sector is bearing the brunt of Washington’s aggressive stance. New export orders declined for the seventh straight month in May, pushing factory activity deeper into contraction.&nbsp;Input costs fell for the first time in nearly two years, signalling weak demand and easing global commodity prices, according to S&amp;P Global, cited by Bloomberg.&nbsp;The pain stems largely from a 46 per cent reciprocal tariff the US imposed on Vietnamese goods in April. The US is a key destination for Vietnamese exports, and the tariff shock has shaken business confidence.&nbsp;Still, there is some optimism. A few firms cited “tariff stability” and improved production outlooks amid early-stage trade deals with the US and UK, S&amp;P Global noted.<h2>South Korea’s output plunges, steel sector under pressure</h2>South Korea’s PMI fell to 47.7 in May, the fourth straight month of contraction. New orders dropped at the sharpest rate in five years, and factory output posted its worst performance in nearly three years, Reuters reported.&nbsp;The most severe blow is being felt in the steel and aluminium sectors. Trump has doubled tariffs to 50 per cent on Korean metals, triggering alarm among exporters. South Korea’s Trade Ministry said it is working to “minimise the damage,” while urging calm, according to Reuters.&nbsp;Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned of a domino effect, noting that South Korea’s deep supply chain ties with China could amplify the tariff impact. South Korea’s exports to the US fell 8.1 per cent in May, a sharp reversal after a brief spike during Trump’s 90-day tariff pause, Bloomberg reported.<h2>Taiwan and Indonesia's demand weakens</h2>Taiwan’s manufacturing sector contracted for the second straight month. Export sales fell, and companies cited client hesitation and uncertain demand conditions driven by US tariff uncertainty.Businesses have begun cutting back on purchases and hiring, according to S&amp;P Global, reported by Bloomberg.&nbsp;In Indonesia, the picture is similarly bleak. New orders fell at their steepest pace since August 2021, indicating broader weakness in consumer demand across the ASEAN region, according to Reuters.<h2>Japan's prolonged contraction continues</h2>Japan’s PMI came in at 49.4 in May, marking the 11th consecutive month of contraction, according to Reuters.&nbsp;Though the downturn is less severe than in neighbouring economies, it points to long-term structural weakness in Japanese manufacturing, driven by sluggish exports and high input costs.<h2>Philippines' growth momentum slows</h2>The Philippines once a regional outlier is now also showing signs of slowing. Factory activity continued to expand in May, but at a much slower pace, as regional headwinds spread, Bloomberg reported.&nbsp;Businesses are reportedly becoming more cautious as demand from major export markets softens.<h2>US-China's fresh trade flare-up threatens fragile truce</h2>In early 2025, President Trump imposed a sweeping 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, citing trade imbalances and national security concerns. Beijing hit back with retaliatory duties of up to 125 per cent.&nbsp;While both sides briefly agreed to scale back some tariffs during talks in Geneva last month, relations have soured again.&nbsp;The US recently imposed new export restrictions on chip design software and AI technologies and revoked visas for Chinese students. It also banned exports of jet engine parts to China.&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, the US Trade Representative accused China of failing to uphold the Geneva agreement by not accelerating exports of critical minerals.&nbsp;Beijing, in turn, called the moves a “serious violation” of the truce. China’s Ministry of Commerce said it would take “resolute and forceful measures” if Washington continued to escalate, rejecting the US claims as “unjustified.”

Factory activity in May 2025 contracted sharply across Vietnam, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan, with Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) readings slipping below the 50-mark. 

Asia’s manufacturing sector is under pressure as US President Donald Trump’s renewed tariff offensive sends shockwaves through global trade. From Vietnam to South Korea, Taiwan to Japan, factory activity contracted sharply in May 2025, with Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) readings slipping below the 50-mark that separates growth from contraction, according to S&P Global data cited by Reuters. The downturn highlights growing uncertainty as Trump’s protectionist policies, aimed at rebalancing American trade—begin to disrupt supply chains and dent export-driven economies across the region. Vietnam’s exports slump amid tariff shock Vietnam’s manufacturing sector is bearing the brunt of Washington’s aggressive stance. New export orders declined for the seventh straight month in May, pushing factory activity deeper into contraction. Input costs fell for the first time in nearly two years, signalling weak demand and easing global commodity prices, according to S&P Global, cited by Bloomberg. The pain stems largely from a 46 per cent reciprocal tariff the US imposed on Vietnamese goods in April. The US is a key destination for Vietnamese exports, and the tariff shock has shaken business confidence. Still, there is some optimism. A few firms cited “tariff stability” and improved production outlooks amid early-stage trade deals with the US and UK, S&P Global noted. South Korea’s output plunges, steel sector under pressure South Korea’s PMI fell to 47.7 in May, the fourth straight month of contraction. New orders dropped at the sharpest rate in five years, and factory output posted its worst performance in nearly three years, Reuters reported. The most severe blow is being felt in the steel and aluminium sectors. Trump has doubled tariffs to 50 per cent on Korean metals, triggering alarm among exporters. South Korea’s Trade Ministry said it is working to “minimise the damage,” while urging calm, according to Reuters. Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned of a domino effect, noting that South Korea’s deep supply chain ties with China could amplify the tariff impact. South Korea’s exports to the US fell 8.1 per cent in May, a sharp reversal after a brief spike during Trump’s 90-day tariff pause, Bloomberg reported. Taiwan and Indonesia's demand weakens Taiwan’s manufacturing sector contracted for the second straight month. Export sales fell, and companies cited client hesitation and uncertain demand conditions driven by US tariff uncertainty. Businesses have begun cutting back on purchases and hiring, according to S&P Global, reported by Bloomberg. In Indonesia, the picture is similarly bleak. New orders fell at their steepest pace since August 2021, indicating broader weakness in consumer demand across the ASEAN region, according to Reuters. Japan's prolonged contraction continues Japan’s PMI came in at 49.4 in May, marking the 11th consecutive month of contraction, according to Reuters. Though the downturn is less severe than in neighbouring economies, it points to long-term structural weakness in Japanese manufacturing, driven by sluggish exports and high input costs. Philippines' growth momentum slows The Philippines once a regional outlier is now also showing signs of slowing. Factory activity continued to expand in May, but at a much slower pace, as regional headwinds spread, Bloomberg reported. Businesses are reportedly becoming more cautious as demand from major export markets softens. US-China's fresh trade flare-up threatens fragile truce In early 2025, President Trump imposed a sweeping 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, citing trade imbalances and national security concerns. Beijing hit back with retaliatory duties of up to 125 per cent. While both sides briefly agreed to scale back some tariffs during talks in Geneva last month, relations have soured again. The US recently imposed new export restrictions on chip design software and AI technologies and revoked visas for Chinese students. It also banned exports of jet engine parts to China. According to Bloomberg, the US Trade Representative accused China of failing to uphold the Geneva agreement by not accelerating exports of critical minerals. Beijing, in turn, called the moves a “serious violation” of the truce. China’s Ministry of Commerce said it would take “resolute and forceful measures” if Washington continued to escalate, rejecting the US claims as “unjustified.”

US President Donald Trump's tariff tension has disrupted global trade and put pressure on Asia's manufacturing sector.&nbsp;

Trump’s tariffs hit Asia’s factories, trigger region-wide slowdown: Details here

Tensions between the United States and China have escalated once again as Beijing accuses Washington of breaching a recent trade agreement.&nbsp;The Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a statement condemning the US’s actions, signalling a potential setback in ongoing efforts to stabilise bilateral trade relations.<h2>China’s accusation</h2>According to a report by Bloomberg, China has accused the United States of “seriously violating” the trade truce established in Geneva in May 2025.&nbsp;The Chinese Ministry of Commerce criticised the US for introducing new trade and technology restrictions, including export controls on artificial intelligence (AI) chips, curbs on chip design software sales to China, and the revocation of Chinese student visas. &nbsp;Beijing said these actions undermined the consensus reached between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping during their last conversation in January. &nbsp;“If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China’s interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” the ministry stated, as quoted by Bloomberg.&nbsp;The ministry further stated it “resolutely rejects these unjustified accusations” and insisted that China has strictly implemented the Geneva consensus.<h2>China-US trade truce under pressure</h2>The US-China trade relationship has remained turbulent in recent years. In early 2025, President Trump imposed a sweeping 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, citing trade imbalances and national security concerns. &nbsp;China responded with retaliatory tariffs of up to 125 per cent on US goods. &nbsp;A temporary easing of tensions came in May, when both countries agreed to scale back certain tariffs during talks in Geneva.&nbsp;However, Washington’s latest actions—including export bans, software curbs, and visa restrictions—have sparked renewed conflict.&nbsp;Last week, the Trump administration said it planned to start revoking visas for Chinese students, while moving to restrict sales of chip design software to China.&nbsp;According to the New York Times, the US has also barred exports of critical jet engine parts and aviation technology to China.&nbsp;Although Trump did not provide specifics when accusing Beijing of violating the trade truce on Friday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said China had failed to accelerate exports of critical minerals used in advanced electronics, as per Bloomberg . &nbsp;According to Bloomberg, the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that trade talks had stalled and hinted that a direct call between Trump and Xi might be necessary to break the deadlock.&nbsp;Trump has recently reportedly voiced dissatisfaction with Beijing’s pace in fulfilling agreed commitments, particularly in boosting exports of critical minerals essential to the US tech and defence sectors.<h2>Impact on the Chinese Economy</h2>The ongoing trade tensions have had a tangible impact on China’s economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Despite setting an ambitious GDP growth target of around 5% for 2025, analysts reportedly remain skeptical about China’s ability to achieve this goal amid external pressures.&nbsp; &nbsp;The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects China’s economy will grow by 4.6% in 2025, down from 5% in 2024.&nbsp;Furthermore, China’s fiscal deficit target for 2025 has been set at approximately 4% of GDP, the highest level in over three decades, indicating increased public spending to support growth, according to Reuters.&nbsp;The Economist Intelligence Unit anticipates a 20% reduction in China’s exports to the U.S. over 2025-27, with the majority of the impact being felt in 2026.&nbsp;&nbsp;This contraction is expected to reduce GDP growth by 0.6 percentage points over the same period.<h2>What lies ahead?</h2>As both countries harden their trade stances, the path forward remains uncertain.&nbsp;The risk of further escalation is real, but diplomatic backchannels could still pave the way for renewed dialogue between Trump and Xi.&nbsp;With global markets, supply chains, and developing economies exposed to fallout from any US-China fallout, the world is closely watching how the next chapter of this economic standoff unfolds.&nbsp;

Citing a possible setback in the stabilization of bilateral economic relations, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce denounced the US actions. 

Tensions between the United States and China have escalated once again as Beijing accuses Washington of breaching a recent trade agreement. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued a statement condemning the US’s actions, signalling a potential setback in ongoing efforts to stabilise bilateral trade relations. China’s accusation According to a report by Bloomberg, China has accused the United States of “seriously violating” the trade truce established in Geneva in May 2025. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce criticised the US for introducing new trade and technology restrictions, including export controls on artificial intelligence (AI) chips, curbs on chip design software sales to China, and the revocation of Chinese student visas. Beijing said these actions undermined the consensus reached between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping during their last conversation in January. “If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China’s interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests,” the ministry stated, as quoted by Bloomberg. The ministry further stated it “resolutely rejects these unjustified accusations” and insisted that China has strictly implemented the Geneva consensus. China-US trade truce under pressure The US-China trade relationship has remained turbulent in recent years. In early 2025, President Trump imposed a sweeping 145 per cent tariff on Chinese imports, citing trade imbalances and national security concerns. China responded with retaliatory tariffs of up to 125 per cent on US goods. A temporary easing of tensions came in May, when both countries agreed to scale back certain tariffs during talks in Geneva. However, Washington’s latest actions—including export bans, software curbs, and visa restrictions—have sparked renewed conflict. Last week, the Trump administration said it planned to start revoking visas for Chinese students, while moving to restrict sales of chip design software to China. According to the New York Times, the US has also barred exports of critical jet engine parts and aviation technology to China. Although Trump did not provide specifics when accusing Beijing of violating the trade truce on Friday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said China had failed to accelerate exports of critical minerals used in advanced electronics, as per Bloomberg . According to Bloomberg, the US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed that trade talks had stalled and hinted that a direct call between Trump and Xi might be necessary to break the deadlock. Trump has recently reportedly voiced dissatisfaction with Beijing’s pace in fulfilling agreed commitments, particularly in boosting exports of critical minerals essential to the US tech and defence sectors. Impact on the Chinese Economy The ongoing trade tensions have had a tangible impact on China’s economy. Despite setting an ambitious GDP growth target of around 5% for 2025, analysts reportedly remain skeptical about China’s ability to achieve this goal amid external pressures. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects China’s economy will grow by 4.6% in 2025, down from 5% in 2024. Furthermore, China’s fiscal deficit target for 2025 has been set at approximately 4% of GDP, the highest level in over three decades, indicating increased public spending to support growth, according to Reuters. The Economist Intelligence Unit anticipates a 20% reduction in China’s exports to the U.S. over 2025-27, with the majority of the impact being felt in 2026. This contraction is expected to reduce GDP growth by 0.6 percentage points over the same period. What lies ahead? As both countries harden their trade stances, the path forward remains uncertain. The risk of further escalation is real, but diplomatic backchannels could still pave the way for renewed dialogue between Trump and Xi. With global markets, supply chains, and developing economies exposed to fallout from any US-China fallout, the world is closely watching how the next chapter of this economic standoff unfolds.

As Beijing accuses Washington of breaking a trade agreement, tensions between the US and China have increased.&nbsp;

US-China trade tensions flare as Beijing accuses Washington of breaching deal

Stanley Fischer, the quietly powerful figure who influenced modern macroeconomics across academia, global financial institutions, and central banks, passed away on Saturday at the age of 81.&nbsp;&nbsp;His death was confirmed by the Bank of Israel, according to Bloomberg, marking the end of an era in economic thought and crisis management.&nbsp;Fischer’s life was one of service to stability, whether as an academic at MIT, a crisis manager at the International Monetary Fund, or a central banker guiding Israel and the US through turbulent financial waters. The Financial Times&nbsp;once called him “the pocket-sized colossus of modern central banking.”<h2>From Africa to the world stage</h2>Born on 15 October 1943 in Mazabuka, Northern Rhodesia now Zambia, Fischer was raised in a Jewish family within southern Africa’s immigrant communities. As a teenager, he moved to Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), where he joined the Habonim Zionist youth movement and met his future wife, Rhoda Keet, as reported by The Times of Israel.&nbsp;He pursued economics at the London School of Economics, completing both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees by 1966.&nbsp; &nbsp;Fischer later moved to the United States to earn a PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), graduating in 1969 under the supervision of Nobel laureates Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow, according to Bloomberg.<h2>The teacher of titans</h2>Fischer began teaching at MIT in the 1970s and went on to shape a generation of economic policymakers who would lead the world’s most powerful institutions.&nbsp; &nbsp;Among his students were Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the US Federal Reserve; Mario Draghi, former President of the European Central Bank and later Prime Minister of Italy; Lawrence Summers, former US Treasury Secretary; Kazuo Ueda, the current Governor of the Bank of Japan; Greg Mankiw, who advised US President George W. Bush; and IMF chief economists Olivier Blanchard and Maurice Obstfeld, according to Bloomberg.&nbsp;Blanchard later remarked, “It is hard to think of any other macroeconomist alive who has had as much direct and indirect influence… on macroeconomic policy around the world,” Bloomberg reported.&nbsp;In 1978, Fischer co-authored the foundational textbook Macroeconomics&nbsp;with Rudi Dornbusch. The book educated generations of students and was still being updated decades later its 13th edition was released in 2018, according to Bloomberg.<h2>The global crisis whisperer</h2>Fischer was not just a teacher; he was a crisis whisperer for nations on the brink. From 1994 to 2001, he served as First Deputy Managing Director at the International Monetary Fund. During that period, he led responses to some of the most severe financial meltdowns in modern history, including the crises in Mexico, South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, Russia, and Brazil.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to Bloomberg, he oversaw nearly 250 billion US dollars in emergency lending and became the face of the IMF’s crisis management during those turbulent years. &nbsp;Long before that, in 1985, Fischer helped design an economic stabilisation programme for Israel at a time when the country was struggling with hyperinflation. The plan, backed by 1.5 billion US dollars in American aid, helped pull the economy back from the brink.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to The Times of Israel, that experience solidified Fischer’s reputation as someone who could bridge theory and real-world application.&nbsp;Later, he moved to the private sector, serving as vice chairman at Citigroup. There, he chaired the bank’s country risk committee and advised its global strategy, as reported by Bloomberg.<h2>Israel’s central banker in crisis</h2>In 2005, Fischer accepted the role of Governor of the Bank of Israel and became an Israeli citizen. According to Bloomberg, he conducted meetings in fluent Hebrew and helped modernise the central bank’s structure and policy approach.&nbsp;His leadership during the 2008 global financial crisis drew global praise. The Bank of Israel was among the first central banks to cut interest rates at the onset of the crisis and among the first to raise them during the recovery.&nbsp; &nbsp;Fischer established a new Monetary Policy Committee, shifting authority from a single governor to a more collaborative six-member board that included external academic voices. Under his leadership, Israel’s economy grew every year during the global crisis, defying recessionary trends.<h2>From Jerusalem to Washington</h2>In 2014, Fischer was nominated by US President Barack Obama to serve as Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve under Janet Yellen.&nbsp;&nbsp;Although frequently mentioned as a possible candidate to head the Fed or the IMF, Fischer never reached those top roles, largely due to timing and age-related factors, according to Bloomberg.&nbsp;He retired from the Fed in 2017 and later became a senior adviser at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager.&nbsp;Reflecting on Fischer’s legacy, Lawrence Summers told Bloomberg, “In a just world, Stan would have served as Fed chairman or IMF managing director. But fate is fickle. And yet, his influence through teaching, writing, advising and leading touched hundreds of millions of lives.”&nbsp;Fischer’s wife, Rhoda, his partner since their teenage days in a Zionist youth group, passed away in 2020. He is survived by three children, and by a global network of students, colleagues, and admirers who carry forward his intellectual legacy.&nbsp;He once said that macroeconomics attracted him because it dealt with “big questions.” Through every classroom, crisis, and central bank, Stanley Fischer spent a lifetime answering those big questions with clarity, humility, and an unwavering sense of purpose.

Fischer was a crisis whisperer for nations on the brink, serving as First Deputy Managing Director at the International Monetary Fund from 1994 to 2001. 

Stanley Fischer, the quietly powerful figure who influenced modern macroeconomics across academia, global financial institutions, and central banks, passed away on Saturday at the age of 81. His death was confirmed by the Bank of Israel, according to Bloomberg, marking the end of an era in economic thought and crisis management. Fischer’s life was one of service to stability, whether as an academic at MIT, a crisis manager at the International Monetary Fund, or a central banker guiding Israel and the US through turbulent financial waters. The Financial Times once called him “the pocket-sized colossus of modern central banking.” From Africa to the world stage Born on 15 October 1943 in Mazabuka, Northern Rhodesia now Zambia, Fischer was raised in a Jewish family within southern Africa’s immigrant communities. As a teenager, he moved to Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), where he joined the Habonim Zionist youth movement and met his future wife, Rhoda Keet, as reported by The Times of Israel. He pursued economics at the London School of Economics, completing both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees by 1966. Fischer later moved to the United States to earn a PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), graduating in 1969 under the supervision of Nobel laureates Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow, according to Bloomberg. The teacher of titans Fischer began teaching at MIT in the 1970s and went on to shape a generation of economic policymakers who would lead the world’s most powerful institutions. Among his students were Ben Bernanke, former Chair of the US Federal Reserve; Mario Draghi, former President of the European Central Bank and later Prime Minister of Italy; Lawrence Summers, former US Treasury Secretary; Kazuo Ueda, the current Governor of the Bank of Japan; Greg Mankiw, who advised US President George W. Bush; and IMF chief economists Olivier Blanchard and Maurice Obstfeld, according to Bloomberg. Blanchard later remarked, “It is hard to think of any other macroeconomist alive who has had as much direct and indirect influence… on macroeconomic policy around the world,” Bloomberg reported. In 1978, Fischer co-authored the foundational textbook Macroeconomics with Rudi Dornbusch. The book educated generations of students and was still being updated decades later its 13th edition was released in 2018, according to Bloomberg. The global crisis whisperer Fischer was not just a teacher; he was a crisis whisperer for nations on the brink. From 1994 to 2001, he served as First Deputy Managing Director at the International Monetary Fund. During that period, he led responses to some of the most severe financial meltdowns in modern history, including the crises in Mexico, South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, Russia, and Brazil. According to Bloomberg, he oversaw nearly 250 billion US dollars in emergency lending and became the face of the IMF’s crisis management during those turbulent years. Long before that, in 1985, Fischer helped design an economic stabilisation programme for Israel at a time when the country was struggling with hyperinflation. The plan, backed by 1.5 billion US dollars in American aid, helped pull the economy back from the brink. According to The Times of Israel, that experience solidified Fischer’s reputation as someone who could bridge theory and real-world application. Later, he moved to the private sector, serving as vice chairman at Citigroup. There, he chaired the bank’s country risk committee and advised its global strategy, as reported by Bloomberg. Israel’s central banker in crisis In 2005, Fischer accepted the role of Governor of the Bank of Israel and became an Israeli citizen. According to Bloomberg, he conducted meetings in fluent Hebrew and helped modernise the central bank’s structure and policy approach. His leadership during the 2008 global financial crisis drew global praise. The Bank of Israel was among the first central banks to cut interest rates at the onset of the crisis and among the first to raise them during the recovery. Fischer established a new Monetary Policy Committee, shifting authority from a single governor to a more collaborative six-member board that included external academic voices. Under his leadership, Israel’s economy grew every year during the global crisis, defying recessionary trends. From Jerusalem to Washington In 2014, Fischer was nominated by US President Barack Obama to serve as Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve under Janet Yellen. Although frequently mentioned as a possible candidate to head the Fed or the IMF, Fischer never reached those top roles, largely due to timing and age-related factors, according to Bloomberg. He retired from the Fed in 2017 and later became a senior adviser at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager. Reflecting on Fischer’s legacy, Lawrence Summers told Bloomberg, “In a just world, Stan would have served as Fed chairman or IMF managing director. But fate is fickle. And yet, his influence through teaching, writing, advising and leading touched hundreds of millions of lives.” Fischer’s wife, Rhoda, his partner since their teenage days in a Zionist youth group, passed away in 2020. He is survived by three children, and by a global network of students, colleagues, and admirers who carry forward his intellectual legacy. He once said that macroeconomics attracted him because it dealt with “big questions.” Through every classroom, crisis, and central bank, Stanley Fischer spent a lifetime answering those big questions with clarity, humility, and an unwavering sense of purpose.

Stanley Fischer, a prominent figure in modern macroeconomics, passed away at the age of 81.&nbsp;

Stanley Fischer: Architect of modern macroeconomics dies at 81

Consumers in India’s aviation and hospitality sectors received much-needed relief on Sunday as jet fuel and commercial LPG prices were cut for the third consecutive month.&nbsp;&nbsp;The revision reportedly comes amid a persistent decline in global crude benchmarks, signalling broader shifts in the international oil economy and easing cost pressures for fuel-reliant industries. &nbsp;According to a PTI-cited report, aviation turbine fuel (ATF) prices in India were slashed by 2.82 per cent, or ₹2,414.25 per kilolitre (~$28.90), bringing the price in Delhi down to ₹83,072.55 per kl (~$995).&nbsp;&nbsp;Similarly, the price of commercial LPG, used extensively in hotels and restaurants, was reduced by ₹24 per 19-kg cylinder (~$0.29), with revised prices now at ₹1,723.50 in Delhi (~$20.63) and ₹1,647.50 in Mumbai (~$19.72).<h2>What it means for flyers, food businesses, and fuel consumers in India</h2>This downward revision is expected to reduce operational costs for Indian airlines, where fuel makes up nearly 40 per cent of total expenditure.&nbsp; &nbsp;With travel peaking during the summer holiday season, this move could improve margins for airlines or potentially lead to lower fares, though no official comment has been issued by carriers so far. &nbsp;In the hospitality and food services sector, the cut in commercial LPG prices will bring some cost relief to restaurants, cafés, and catering units across India that continue to battle inflationary pressures and volatile demand cycles.&nbsp;According to PTI, the ATF price cuts in April (6.15 per cent), May (4.4 per cent) and now June (2.82 per cent) have collectively rolled back most of the fuel price hikes from early 2024, marking a welcome breather for the aviation sector.<h2>Global Trade tension weighs on oil demand outlook</h2>While Indian consumers are seeing local benefits, the root of these price cuts lies in a softening of global crude oil benchmarks, which have dipped due to a dampened demand outlook.&nbsp;&nbsp;As PTI notes, “international oil prices have softened in the last couple of months as the global trade war eroded the outlook for fuel demand.”&nbsp;Escalating trade tensions between major economies, especially China and the US along with ongoing geopolitical uncertainties have pushed down global oil prices, allowing oil-importing countries like India to pass on the benefits.<h2>Retail fuel prices remain unchanged for Indian households</h2>Despite these cuts, domestic LPG prices in India remain unchanged, holding at ₹853 per 14.2-kg cylinder (~$10.21). In fact, April saw a ₹50 hike (~$0.60) in household LPG rates, a cost still being borne by Indian households.&nbsp;Meanwhile, petrol and diesel prices have been frozen since a ₹2 per litre cut (~$0.024) in March 2024, ahead of the general elections.&nbsp; &nbsp;Petrol continues to retail at ₹94.72 per litre (~$1.13) in Delhi, while diesel is priced at ₹87.62 (~$1.05). &nbsp;State-run fuel retailers, Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL), adjust prices of ATF and LPG on the first of every month, based on global fuel averages and currency exchange rate, as per PTI.&nbsp; &nbsp;Prices still vary from state to state depending on local VAT and taxes. &nbsp;The three consecutive cuts in jet fuel and LPG prices signal temporary relief, but analysts warn of continued volatility in the global oil markets.&nbsp; &nbsp;With Trump’s aggressive tariff policies, demand stagnation in China, and geopolitical tensions in West Asia, the outlook for stable oil prices remains uncertain. &nbsp;Nonetheless, Indian businesses, especially those in aviation, logistics, and hospitality are seeing tangible gains from the ongoing softness in global energy markets.&nbsp;&nbsp;Whether this turns into sustained consumer relief or merely a temporary dip before another rally will depend on global policy moves and geopolitical shifts in the months ahead.&nbsp;

The cut coincides with lessening cost constraints on industries that depend on gasoline and more significant changes in the global oil industry.

Consumers in India’s aviation and hospitality sectors received much-needed relief on Sunday as jet fuel and commercial LPG prices were cut for the third consecutive month. The revision reportedly comes amid a persistent decline in global crude benchmarks, signalling broader shifts in the international oil economy and easing cost pressures for fuel-reliant industries. According to a PTI-cited report, aviation turbine fuel (ATF) prices in India were slashed by 2.82 per cent, or ₹2,414.25 per kilolitre (~$28.90), bringing the price in Delhi down to ₹83,072.55 per kl (~$995). Similarly, the price of commercial LPG, used extensively in hotels and restaurants, was reduced by ₹24 per 19-kg cylinder (~$0.29), with revised prices now at ₹1,723.50 in Delhi (~$20.63) and ₹1,647.50 in Mumbai (~$19.72). What it means for flyers, food businesses, and fuel consumers in India This downward revision is expected to reduce operational costs for Indian airlines, where fuel makes up nearly 40 per cent of total expenditure. With travel peaking during the summer holiday season, this move could improve margins for airlines or potentially lead to lower fares, though no official comment has been issued by carriers so far. In the hospitality and food services sector, the cut in commercial LPG prices will bring some cost relief to restaurants, cafés, and catering units across India that continue to battle inflationary pressures and volatile demand cycles. According to PTI, the ATF price cuts in April (6.15 per cent), May (4.4 per cent) and now June (2.82 per cent) have collectively rolled back most of the fuel price hikes from early 2024, marking a welcome breather for the aviation sector. Global Trade tension weighs on oil demand outlook While Indian consumers are seeing local benefits, the root of these price cuts lies in a softening of global crude oil benchmarks, which have dipped due to a dampened demand outlook. As PTI notes, “international oil prices have softened in the last couple of months as the global trade war eroded the outlook for fuel demand.” Escalating trade tensions between major economies, especially China and the US along with ongoing geopolitical uncertainties have pushed down global oil prices, allowing oil-importing countries like India to pass on the benefits. Retail fuel prices remain unchanged for Indian households Despite these cuts, domestic LPG prices in India remain unchanged, holding at ₹853 per 14.2-kg cylinder (~$10.21). In fact, April saw a ₹50 hike (~$0.60) in household LPG rates, a cost still being borne by Indian households. Meanwhile, petrol and diesel prices have been frozen since a ₹2 per litre cut (~$0.024) in March 2024, ahead of the general elections. Petrol continues to retail at ₹94.72 per litre (~$1.13) in Delhi, while diesel is priced at ₹87.62 (~$1.05). State-run fuel retailers, Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL), adjust prices of ATF and LPG on the first of every month, based on global fuel averages and currency exchange rate, as per PTI. Prices still vary from state to state depending on local VAT and taxes. The three consecutive cuts in jet fuel and LPG prices signal temporary relief, but analysts warn of continued volatility in the global oil markets. With Trump’s aggressive tariff policies, demand stagnation in China, and geopolitical tensions in West Asia, the outlook for stable oil prices remains uncertain. Nonetheless, Indian businesses, especially those in aviation, logistics, and hospitality are seeing tangible gains from the ongoing softness in global energy markets. Whether this turns into sustained consumer relief or merely a temporary dip before another rally will depend on global policy moves and geopolitical shifts in the months ahead.

Following a drop in global crude benchmarks, jet fuel and commercial LPG costs in India's aviation and hospitality industries fell 3.2% for the third consecutive month.&nbsp;

Jet fuel and LPG prices in India slashed as global oil tension continues to rise

South Korea’s exports declined in May for the first time in four months, signalling early damage from escalating trade tensions driven by US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda.&nbsp;&nbsp;The slowdown in shipments to both the United States and China, South Korea’s two largest trading partners reflects the widening ripple effects of the ongoing global trade conflict. &nbsp;According to Reuters, exports from Asia’s fourth-largest economy fell 1.3 per cent year-on-year in May to $57.27 billion, with trade officials warning that ongoing tariff disputes are disrupting demand for key South Korean goods.&nbsp;&nbsp;The latest decline, though smaller than the 2.7 per cent drop forecast in a Reuters poll, marks the first contraction since January.<h2>What does the data say&nbsp;</h2>According to data released by South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on Sunday showed that exports to the United States dropped 8.1 per cent, while shipments to China fell 8.4 per cent.&nbsp;&nbsp;These two nations collectively account for more than 35 per cent of South Korea’s total exports, underscoring the deep exposure of its economy to external demand from both Washington and Beijing, as per Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Reuters, despite the broader decline, semiconductor exports reportedly surged 21.2 per cent, buoyed by resilient demand for advanced memory chips.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, car exports fell 4.4 per cent, partly due to tariffs imposed by the US and transitional delays at Hyundai Motor’s new factory in Georgia, according to the trade ministry, reported by Reuters.&nbsp; On the other hand, exports to the European Union rose 4 per cent, and shipments to Taiwan soared 49.6 per cent, offsetting some of the drag from the US and China. Meanwhile, imports dropped 5.3 per cent to $50.33 billion, resulting in a trade surplus of $6.94 billion, the largest since June 2024.&nbsp;“Declines in exports to both the United States and China, the two biggest markets, suggest US tariff measures are having an impact on the global economy as well as our exports,” said South Korean Industry and Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun, as quoted by Reuters.<h2>US-South Korea trade ties hit turbulence</h2>South Korea’s reliance on US trade has become more vulnerable under Trump’s “America First” trade doctrine. Since early 2025, the US administration has imposed reciprocal tariffs, including 25 per cent duties on South Korean steel and aluminium, though they are currently under a 90-day negotiation pause.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump recently threatened to double global tariffs on these metals to 50 per cent, sparking renewed concerns in Seoul.&nbsp;According to Reuters, the recent US-China trade truce in mid-May had offered some hope of easing pressure. But President Trump’s accusation that China had violated the agreement has thrown the ceasefire into question.&nbsp;&nbsp;The re-escalation threatens to deepen export volatility for South Korea, whose tech-driven economy depends heavily on trade flows across the Pacific.&nbsp;South Korea is often viewed as a bellwether for global trade, given its strong manufacturing and export-oriented base.&nbsp;&nbsp;With US tariffs biting into car and industrial shipments, South Korea faces a dual challenge balancing geopolitical ties with Washington while defending its economic interests.

South Korea two biggest trading partners, the US and China, saw a 1.3% YoY decline in exports to $57.27 billion.

South Korea’s exports declined in May for the first time in four months, signalling early damage from escalating trade tensions driven by US President Donald Trump’s aggressive tariff agenda. The slowdown in shipments to both the United States and China, South Korea’s two largest trading partners reflects the widening ripple effects of the ongoing global trade conflict. According to Reuters, exports from Asia’s fourth-largest economy fell 1.3 per cent year-on-year in May to $57.27 billion, with trade officials warning that ongoing tariff disputes are disrupting demand for key South Korean goods. The latest decline, though smaller than the 2.7 per cent drop forecast in a Reuters poll, marks the first contraction since January. What does the data say According to data released by South Korea’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on Sunday showed that exports to the United States dropped 8.1 per cent, while shipments to China fell 8.4 per cent. These two nations collectively account for more than 35 per cent of South Korea’s total exports, underscoring the deep exposure of its economy to external demand from both Washington and Beijing, as per Reuters. According to Reuters, despite the broader decline, semiconductor exports reportedly surged 21.2 per cent, buoyed by resilient demand for advanced memory chips. However, car exports fell 4.4 per cent, partly due to tariffs imposed by the US and transitional delays at Hyundai Motor’s new factory in Georgia, according to the trade ministry, reported by Reuters. On the other hand, exports to the European Union rose 4 per cent, and shipments to Taiwan soared 49.6 per cent, offsetting some of the drag from the US and China. Meanwhile, imports dropped 5.3 per cent to $50.33 billion, resulting in a trade surplus of $6.94 billion, the largest since June 2024. “Declines in exports to both the United States and China, the two biggest markets, suggest US tariff measures are having an impact on the global economy as well as our exports,” said South Korean Industry and Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun, as quoted by Reuters. US-South Korea trade ties hit turbulence South Korea’s reliance on US trade has become more vulnerable under Trump’s “America First” trade doctrine. Since early 2025, the US administration has imposed reciprocal tariffs, including 25 per cent duties on South Korean steel and aluminium, though they are currently under a 90-day negotiation pause. Trump recently threatened to double global tariffs on these metals to 50 per cent, sparking renewed concerns in Seoul. According to Reuters, the recent US-China trade truce in mid-May had offered some hope of easing pressure. But President Trump’s accusation that China had violated the agreement has thrown the ceasefire into question. The re-escalation threatens to deepen export volatility for South Korea, whose tech-driven economy depends heavily on trade flows across the Pacific. South Korea is often viewed as a bellwether for global trade, given its strong manufacturing and export-oriented base. With US tariffs biting into car and industrial shipments, South Korea faces a dual challenge balancing geopolitical ties with Washington while defending its economic interests.

For the first time in four months, South Korea's exports declined in May, a sign of the harm caused by rising trade tensions brought on by US President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policy.&nbsp;

South Korea’s exports dip as Trump tariffs squeeze trade with US and China

The pace of job creation in the US is cooling, as shifting trade policies, rising business costs and a sharp drop in corporate profits weigh on labour market momentum, according to Bloomberg reports.&nbsp;Employers added an estimated 125,000 jobs in May, a decline from the average 162,000 payroll additions over the past three months, as per a Bloomberg median forecast. The unemployment rate is expected to hold at 4.2 per cent, reflecting a stable but softening labour environment.&nbsp;“Our preliminary forecast range for May nonfarm payrolls is 60,000–130,000, with the central tendency clustering around 90,000 – lower than the consensus of 130,000,” Bloomberg economists Anna Wong, Stuart Paul, Eliza Winger, Estelle Ou and Chris G. Collins wrote in a note.&nbsp;They added that the weakness is likely concentrated in the leisure and hospitality sector, due to reduced international tourism and government travel.<h2>Corporate profits slump as businesses face tariff squeeze</h2>According to the US Commerce Department, corporate profits fell by 118.1 billion dollars in the first quarter of 2025 – the steepest decline since the onset of the pandemic in 2020. As per Reuters, this profit contraction is being largely blamed on higher input costs, driven by President Donald Trump’s escalating trade tariffs.&nbsp;On 30 May, Trump announced plans to double steel and aluminium tariffs to 50 per cent from the existing 25 per cent, in a bid to pressure global producers and reduce the trade deficit. The move has sparked backlash from the European Commission, which called it a violation of fair trade and warned of countermeasures.&nbsp;“Employers seeking clarity around the White House’s trade policy have instead been greeted with frequent adjustments to timelines and import duty schedules,” Bloomberg noted, adding that this has left businesses hesitant to commit to fresh investments.<h2>Labour data reveals rising unemployment claims</h2>As businesses tighten costs amid profit pressures, signs of softening labour demand are becoming more visible. Initial jobless claims rose by 14,000 to 240,000 for the week ending 24 May, higher than expected, while continuing claims climbed to 1.92 million, the highest since November 2021, according to Reuters.<h2>Fed likely to hold policy amid mixed signals</h2>The Federal Reserve has kept rates steady at 4.25–4.50 per cent since December 2024, as officials await more consistent economic signals. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has emphasised that the central bank will take a “data-dependent approach,” noting risks on both inflation and employment fronts.&nbsp;“Federal Reserve officials are likely to take the labour market reports in stride as they too await clarity on how trade and tax policy will impact the economy and inflation,” Bloomberg reported.&nbsp;Investors will watch closely for comments this week from Fed Governors Lisa Cook, Adriana Kugler, and Christopher Waller, as well as the release of the Fed’s Beige Book on anecdotal economic conditions across districts.<h2>Trade-driven GDP drag</h2>The economic slowdown is further evidenced by revised GDP figures. As per the Commerce Department, US GDP contracted by 0.2 per cent in the first quarter, slightly better than the earlier -0.3 per cent estimate.&nbsp;&nbsp;The contraction reflects a 42.6 per cent spike in imports, as companies rushed purchases ahead of expected tariffs. However, inventories and consumer spending failed to keep pace, leading to a net drag on growth.&nbsp;“Concerned that revenue will suffer, companies are growing more conscious about cost-saving efforts that risk culminating in slower labour demand,” Bloomberg observed.

Compared to the average of 162,000 jobs created over the previous three months, employers added an estimated 125,000 jobs in May. 

The pace of job creation in the US is cooling, as shifting trade policies, rising business costs and a sharp drop in corporate profits weigh on labour market momentum, according to Bloomberg reports. Employers added an estimated 125,000 jobs in May, a decline from the average 162,000 payroll additions over the past three months, as per a Bloomberg median forecast. The unemployment rate is expected to hold at 4.2 per cent, reflecting a stable but softening labour environment. “Our preliminary forecast range for May nonfarm payrolls is 60,000–130,000, with the central tendency clustering around 90,000 – lower than the consensus of 130,000,” Bloomberg economists Anna Wong, Stuart Paul, Eliza Winger, Estelle Ou and Chris G. Collins wrote in a note. They added that the weakness is likely concentrated in the leisure and hospitality sector, due to reduced international tourism and government travel. Corporate profits slump as businesses face tariff squeeze According to the US Commerce Department, corporate profits fell by 118.1 billion dollars in the first quarter of 2025 – the steepest decline since the onset of the pandemic in 2020. As per Reuters, this profit contraction is being largely blamed on higher input costs, driven by President Donald Trump’s escalating trade tariffs. On 30 May, Trump announced plans to double steel and aluminium tariffs to 50 per cent from the existing 25 per cent, in a bid to pressure global producers and reduce the trade deficit. The move has sparked backlash from the European Commission, which called it a violation of fair trade and warned of countermeasures. “Employers seeking clarity around the White House’s trade policy have instead been greeted with frequent adjustments to timelines and import duty schedules,” Bloomberg noted, adding that this has left businesses hesitant to commit to fresh investments. Labour data reveals rising unemployment claims As businesses tighten costs amid profit pressures, signs of softening labour demand are becoming more visible. Initial jobless claims rose by 14,000 to 240,000 for the week ending 24 May, higher than expected, while continuing claims climbed to 1.92 million, the highest since November 2021, according to Reuters. Fed likely to hold policy amid mixed signals The Federal Reserve has kept rates steady at 4.25–4.50 per cent since December 2024, as officials await more consistent economic signals. Fed Chair Jerome Powell has emphasised that the central bank will take a “data-dependent approach,” noting risks on both inflation and employment fronts. “Federal Reserve officials are likely to take the labour market reports in stride as they too await clarity on how trade and tax policy will impact the economy and inflation,” Bloomberg reported. Investors will watch closely for comments this week from Fed Governors Lisa Cook, Adriana Kugler, and Christopher Waller, as well as the release of the Fed’s Beige Book on anecdotal economic conditions across districts. Trade-driven GDP drag The economic slowdown is further evidenced by revised GDP figures. As per the Commerce Department, US GDP contracted by 0.2 per cent in the first quarter, slightly better than the earlier -0.3 per cent estimate. The contraction reflects a 42.6 per cent spike in imports, as companies rushed purchases ahead of expected tariffs. However, inventories and consumer spending failed to keep pace, leading to a net drag on growth. “Concerned that revenue will suffer, companies are growing more conscious about cost-saving efforts that risk culminating in slower labour demand,” Bloomberg observed.

A decline in corporate profits, increased business expenses, and changing trade policy are all contributing to the cooling of the US labor market.&nbsp;

US job growth slows amid profit slump and Trump tariff uncertainty

The European Union has sharply criticised US President Donald Trump’s decision to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium, calling the move a blow to global trade stability. The European Commission reportedly warned that it is prepared to activate countermeasures if a negotiated solution is not reached soon.&nbsp;According to Reuters, Trump on Friday announced that the US would raise tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, citing national security and the need to protect American industries.&nbsp;&nbsp;The tariff hike is seen as a major escalation in the ongoing trade conflict between Washington and its allies.&nbsp;“We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent,” a European Commission spokesperson said in an emailed statement, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;The Commission noted that the decision “adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.” It further added that the tariff hike undermines efforts currently underway to reach a negotiated resolution between the EU and US.<h2>EU prepares retaliatory measures</h2>The EU had earlier paused its own counter-tariff actions in order to allow room for diplomatic talks. However, following Trump’s latest announcement, the Commission said it was finalising internal consultations on expanding its trade defence measures.&nbsp;“The EU is prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to the latest US tariff increase,” the spokesperson said, according to Reuters.&nbsp;If talks fail, both existing and newly drafted EU tariffs will take effect on 14 July—or earlier if required. These retaliatory measures are expected to target key American exports, similar to past EU responses during previous tariff disputes.<h2>Impact on transatlantic trade ties</h2>Trump’s decision comes amid growing friction with both China and the EU on multiple trade fronts. The doubling of tariffs is not only expected to raise input costs for US manufacturers but also risks damaging already fragile EU-US trade relations.&nbsp;European officials view the move as part of a broader trend in Trump’s protectionist trade policies, which have also included hefty tariffs on Chinese goods and threats against auto imports from Germany and Japan.&nbsp;The European Commission reiterated that it remains open to discussions but stressed the importance of a fair and rules-based global trading system.&nbsp;“The tariff increase also undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution,” the Commission said, per Reuters. &nbsp;

The European Commission has warned that it is prepared to activate countermeasures if a negotiated solution is not reached soon. 


The European Union has sharply criticised US President Donald Trump’s decision to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium, calling the move a blow to global trade stability. The European Commission reportedly warned that it is prepared to activate countermeasures if a negotiated solution is not reached soon. According to Reuters, Trump on Friday announced that the US would raise tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, citing national security and the need to protect American industries. The tariff hike is seen as a major escalation in the ongoing trade conflict between Washington and its allies. “We strongly regret the announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent,” a European Commission spokesperson said in an emailed statement, as quoted by Reuters. The Commission noted that the decision “adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.” It further added that the tariff hike undermines efforts currently underway to reach a negotiated resolution between the EU and US. EU prepares retaliatory measures The EU had earlier paused its own counter-tariff actions in order to allow room for diplomatic talks. However, following Trump’s latest announcement, the Commission said it was finalising internal consultations on expanding its trade defence measures. “The EU is prepared to impose countermeasures, including in response to the latest US tariff increase,” the spokesperson said, according to Reuters. If talks fail, both existing and newly drafted EU tariffs will take effect on 14 July—or earlier if required. These retaliatory measures are expected to target key American exports, similar to past EU responses during previous tariff disputes. Impact on transatlantic trade ties Trump’s decision comes amid growing friction with both China and the EU on multiple trade fronts. The doubling of tariffs is not only expected to raise input costs for US manufacturers but also risks damaging already fragile EU-US trade relations. European officials view the move as part of a broader trend in Trump’s protectionist trade policies, which have also included hefty tariffs on Chinese goods and threats against auto imports from Germany and Japan. The European Commission reiterated that it remains open to discussions but stressed the importance of a fair and rules-based global trading system. “The tariff increase also undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution,” the Commission said, per Reuters.

The European Union has strongly criticized US President Donald Trump's decision to double tariffs on imported steel and aluminium, arguing it is a blow to global trade stability.

EU warns of countermeasures as Trump doubles US steel tariffs

In a move that could reshape the global oil landscape yet again, OPEC+ is considering increasing its crude output by over 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July, as per sources cited by Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;This comes amid rising internal tensions within the group and growing geopolitical pressures, particularly from overproducing members such as Kazakhstan.&nbsp;The alliance, which includes members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and key non-OPEC allies like Russia, has already hiked output by 411,000 bpd for both May and June 2025.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, the July increase could be larger, according to four sources familiar with ongoing talks, as reported by Reuters on 31 May.<h2>Discontent within OPEC+&nbsp;stirs push for more output</h2>Eight major producers within OPEC+, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Kazakhstan have been ramping up production more quickly than initially agreed, even as oil prices face downward pressure.&nbsp;According to Reuters, this strategy is partly designed to discipline non-compliant members and recapture lost market share in a volatile energy environment.&nbsp;Kazakhstan, in particular, has stirred unease. On Thursday, it publicly announced that it would not cut output—a move seen as open defiance of OPEC+ norms. “Kazakhstan’s repeated public displays of production defiance do raise the risk of an even bigger output increase,” Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, she added that she still sees a 411,000-bpd hike in July as the most likely scenario.The group’s internal rifts are expected to dominate the upcoming virtual meeting scheduled for 0900 GMT on Saturday, with output policy for July being the central point of debate.<h2>Oil prices under pressure</h2>OPEC+’s supply dynamics are unfolding in the backdrop of falling oil prices. In April 2025, global oil prices slumped to a four-year low, dipping below $60 per barrel, largely due to the group’s earlier announcement of tripling output and growing concerns about a global economic slowdown.&nbsp;&nbsp;The price of Brent crude closed just below $63 per barrel on Friday, Reuters reported.&nbsp;Adding to market jitters are renewed fears over US-led trade tensions. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on key exports from China, India, and Pakistan have reignited concerns about a wider slowdown in demand, especially in emerging markets.<h2>Russia and Saudi Arabia: Pulling the levers</h2>According to Reuters, Saudi Arabia, and Russia, the two largest producers in the group are leading the push to increase output and pressure non-compliant allies.&nbsp;&nbsp;Sources reported by Reuters suggest this is a deliberate strategy to bring rogue producers like Kazakhstan in line by essentially flooding the market and reducing their price advantage.&nbsp;Meanwhile, some overproducing members are being asked to offset their extra output in upcoming months, but Kazakhstan’s stance suggests it may not comply.&nbsp;&nbsp;The implications could be far-reaching, as persistent overproduction may reportedly force Saudi Arabia and Russia to leverage larger group-wide hikes to rebalance the equation.&nbsp;In an earlier statement on Tuesday, UAE’s Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei said OPEC+ was doing its best to “balance the oil market”, but did not reveal specific plans for July output, as reported by Reuters.&nbsp;<h2>Industry outlook</h2>The global oil industry is at a critical juncture. The transition to green energy, increasing electric vehicle penetration, and policy headwinds in the West have already dampened long-term demand projections.&nbsp;Now, with reportedly&nbsp;internal fractures within OPEC+ and rising geopolitical uncertainty, the near-term future remains equally murky.&nbsp;For now, the world waits to see whether OPEC+ will proceed with a moderate hike of 411,000 bpd or a larger-than-expected increase, which could test the group’s unity and influence in global markets. &nbsp; &nbsp;

The alliance, which includes OPEC members and non-OPEC allies like Russia, has already hiked output by 411,000 bpd for both May and June 2025. 

In a move that could reshape the global oil landscape yet again, OPEC+ is considering increasing its crude output by over 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July, as per sources cited by Reuters. This comes amid rising internal tensions within the group and growing geopolitical pressures, particularly from overproducing members such as Kazakhstan. The alliance, which includes members of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and key non-OPEC allies like Russia, has already hiked output by 411,000 bpd for both May and June 2025. However, the July increase could be larger, according to four sources familiar with ongoing talks, as reported by Reuters on 31 May. Discontent within OPEC+ stirs push for more output Eight major producers within OPEC+, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Kazakhstan have been ramping up production more quickly than initially agreed, even as oil prices face downward pressure. According to Reuters, this strategy is partly designed to discipline non-compliant members and recapture lost market share in a volatile energy environment. Kazakhstan, in particular, has stirred unease. On Thursday, it publicly announced that it would not cut output—a move seen as open defiance of OPEC+ norms. “Kazakhstan’s repeated public displays of production defiance do raise the risk of an even bigger output increase,” Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, told Reuters. However, she added that she still sees a 411,000-bpd hike in July as the most likely scenario. The group’s internal rifts are expected to dominate the upcoming virtual meeting scheduled for 0900 GMT on Saturday, with output policy for July being the central point of debate. Oil prices under pressure OPEC+’s supply dynamics are unfolding in the backdrop of falling oil prices. In April 2025, global oil prices slumped to a four-year low, dipping below $60 per barrel, largely due to the group’s earlier announcement of tripling output and growing concerns about a global economic slowdown. The price of Brent crude closed just below $63 per barrel on Friday, Reuters reported. Adding to market jitters are renewed fears over US-led trade tensions. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on key exports from China, India, and Pakistan have reignited concerns about a wider slowdown in demand, especially in emerging markets. Russia and Saudi Arabia: Pulling the levers According to Reuters, Saudi Arabia, and Russia, the two largest producers in the group are leading the push to increase output and pressure non-compliant allies. Sources reported by Reuters suggest this is a deliberate strategy to bring rogue producers like Kazakhstan in line by essentially flooding the market and reducing their price advantage. Meanwhile, some overproducing members are being asked to offset their extra output in upcoming months, but Kazakhstan’s stance suggests it may not comply. The implications could be far-reaching, as persistent overproduction may reportedly force Saudi Arabia and Russia to leverage larger group-wide hikes to rebalance the equation. In an earlier statement on Tuesday, UAE’s Energy Minister Suhail Mohamed Al Mazrouei said OPEC+ was doing its best to “balance the oil market”, but did not reveal specific plans for July output, as reported by Reuters. Industry outlook The global oil industry is at a critical juncture. The transition to green energy, increasing electric vehicle penetration, and policy headwinds in the West have already dampened long-term demand projections. Now, with reportedly internal fractures within OPEC+ and rising geopolitical uncertainty, the near-term future remains equally murky. For now, the world waits to see whether OPEC+ will proceed with a moderate hike of 411,000 bpd or a larger-than-expected increase, which could test the group’s unity and influence in global markets.

OPEC+ is reportedly considering increasing its crude output by over 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July, amid rising internal tensions and geopolitical pressures, particularly from overproducing members like Kazakhstan.&nbsp;

OPEC+ eyes fresh oil output hike: What it means for global energy markets

The United States saw a record-breaking decline in goods imports in April, as President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs began to reshape the country’s trade landscape. Imports plummeted by 19.8 per cent from March to $276.1 billion, the largest monthly drop since the Census Bureau began tracking the data in 1992, according to figures released on May 30.The collapse in imports followed a frenzied import rush in March, when businesses scrambled to stockpile foreign goods ahead of Trump’s so-called “liberation day” tariff hike announced for April 2. That front-loading sent the March trade deficit soaring to $162.3 billion, but the tide turned sharply in April as US companies slammed the brakes on new shipments.As a result, the goods trade deficit narrowed by 46 per cent to $87.6 billion, the smallest gap in 18 months. Exports, meanwhile, edged up 3.4 per cent to $188.5 billion, adding to the positive swing in trade data.&nbsp;Tariff turmoil and economic whiplash&nbsp;The abrupt reversal in trade volumes has distorted US economic readings. The import surge in March contributed to a 0.2 per cent annualised decline in first-quarter GDP, marking the country’s first contraction since 2022. However, economists now expect a rebound in the second quarter (Q2).The Atlanta Federal Reserve on May 30 revised its GDP forecast for the second quarter sharply upward, from 2.2 per cent to 3.8 per cent, citing the improvement in net trade.JPMorgan echoed the trend, upgrading its Q2 growth outlook to 4 per cent, though it cautioned that “swings in trade volumes may be making it difficult to measure underlying growth.” Over the first half of the year, the bank sees average growth at around 2 per cent.Consumer goods imports were hit hardest in April, falling 32 per cent to $69.6 billion. Industrial supply shipments dropped 31 per cent, and automotive imports slid 19 per cent, the Census Bureau said. Analysts believe declines in high-value categories such as pharmaceuticals, computer equipment, and precious metals drove much of the drop.Despite a recent US-China deal to temporarily reduce tariffs, the situation remains fluid. Trump accused Beijing on May 30 of “totally violating” the agreement via a Truth Social post, stoking fears of renewed friction.A US trade court briefly ruled the tariffs illegal earlier this week, but they were reinstated by a federal appeals court the following day, pending further review.Economists warn that volatility could persist in the coming months, suggesting that inventory drawdowns may dampen GDP growth before summer’s end.&nbsp;

Imports plummeted by 19.8 per cent from March to $276.1 billion, the largest monthly drop since the Census Bureau began tracking the data in 1992, according to figures released on May 30.

The United States saw a record-breaking decline in goods imports in April, as President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs began to reshape the country’s trade landscape. Imports plummeted by 19.8 per cent from March to $276.1 billion, the largest monthly drop since the Census Bureau began tracking the data in 1992, according to figures released on May 30. The collapse in imports followed a frenzied import rush in March, when businesses scrambled to stockpile foreign goods ahead of Trump’s so-called “liberation day” tariff hike announced for April 2. That front-loading sent the March trade deficit soaring to $162.3 billion, but the tide turned sharply in April as US companies slammed the brakes on new shipments. As a result, the goods trade deficit narrowed by 46 per cent to $87.6 billion, the smallest gap in 18 months. Exports, meanwhile, edged up 3.4 per cent to $188.5 billion, adding to the positive swing in trade data. Tariff turmoil and economic whiplash The abrupt reversal in trade volumes has distorted US economic readings. The import surge in March contributed to a 0.2 per cent annualised decline in first-quarter GDP, marking the country’s first contraction since 2022. However, economists now expect a rebound in the second quarter (Q2). The Atlanta Federal Reserve on May 30 revised its GDP forecast for the second quarter sharply upward, from 2.2 per cent to 3.8 per cent, citing the improvement in net trade. JPMorgan echoed the trend, upgrading its Q2 growth outlook to 4 per cent, though it cautioned that “swings in trade volumes may be making it difficult to measure underlying growth.” Over the first half of the year, the bank sees average growth at around 2 per cent. Consumer goods imports were hit hardest in April, falling 32 per cent to $69.6 billion. Industrial supply shipments dropped 31 per cent, and automotive imports slid 19 per cent, the Census Bureau said. Analysts believe declines in high-value categories such as pharmaceuticals, computer equipment, and precious metals drove much of the drop. Despite a recent US-China deal to temporarily reduce tariffs, the situation remains fluid. Trump accused Beijing on May 30 of “totally violating” the agreement via a Truth Social post, stoking fears of renewed friction. A US trade court briefly ruled the tariffs illegal earlier this week, but they were reinstated by a federal appeals court the following day, pending further review. Economists warn that volatility could persist in the coming months, suggesting that inventory drawdowns may dampen GDP growth before summer’s end.

Imports plummeted by 19.8 per cent from March to $276.1 billion, the largest monthly drop since the Census Bureau began tracking the data in 1992, according to figures released on May 30.

US goods imports plunge in April as tariffs bite, narrowing trade deficit sharply

As US President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on Chinese imports with plans to double tariffs on steel and aluminium, fresh turbulence is erupting in China’s auto industry.&nbsp;&nbsp;The world’s largest car market is facing intense price wars, a situation that Beijing reportedly now calls “unsustainable” and dangerous for long-term industrial health.&nbsp;According to Reuters, on Saturday, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) issued a rare public warning, urging domestic automakers to stop “brutal price wars” that it says are damaging profitability and destabilising the sector, according to state news agency Xinhua.&nbsp;&nbsp;This comes at a critical moment. The global auto supply chain is already bracing for impact as the US under Trump signals a hard line on trade.&nbsp;&nbsp;Washington is preparing to double tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminium exports and talks between Beijing and Washington over broader trade concerns remain deadlocked.<h2>An industry under-price siege</h2>Since early 2023, China’s carmakers have been reportedly locked in an escalating cycle of discount wars.&nbsp;&nbsp;Leading the latest round is BYD, China’s biggest electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, which introduced fresh subsidies on over 20 models last week, including government-backed trade-in offers.&nbsp;According to Reuters, the cost of BYD’s Seagull electric hatchback has been slashed to as low as 55,800 yuan (around $7,750), triggering a domino effect.&nbsp;&nbsp;Rivals like Geely and Chery have since followed suit with their own price cuts. &nbsp;The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) also issued a parallel appeal on Saturday, calling the discounting spiral a “panic-triggered” trend that hurts operational efficiency and long-term viability.&nbsp; &nbsp;“Apart from reducing the price of goods according to law, enterprises shall not dump goods at prices below cost,” CAAM, in a statement released via state media as reported by Reuters.&nbsp; &nbsp;The organisation advised automakers to uphold fair competition and avoid monopolistic pricing practices.<h2>Internal friction: BYD vs Great Wall</h2>The government’s plea reportedly follows a public spat between industry heavyweights. On Friday, a BYD executive reportedly dismissed concerns about industry instability as “alarmist”, in response to Great Wall Motor Chairman Wei Jianjun, who reportedly warned that cutthroat pricing was hitting not just carmakers, but also their suppliers.&nbsp;According to Reuters, Wei said the industry was becoming “unhealthy” under the pressure of constant undercutting, a rare admission from a top Chinese automotive executive.<h2>Tariff tensions in the backdrop</h2>This domestic unrest is unfolding just as the external environment becomes more hostile.&nbsp; &nbsp;Last month, the US slapped fresh tariffs on several Chinese goods, including a proposal to double duties on Chinese steel and aluminium.&nbsp;&nbsp;This could reportedly disrupt raw material flows crucial to EV manufacturing.&nbsp;US officials have also raised concerns over the global dominance of Chinese EVs and components, with President Trump promising to “defend American manufacturing”.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, China is reportedly preparing retaliatory measures, although no formal announcements have been made. &nbsp;According to Bloomberg, US-China trade talks remain gridlocked, with officials struggling to find common ground on tariffs, technology transfer, and market access.&nbsp; &nbsp;The auto sector, which sits at the intersection of all three, is particularly exposed.<h2>What lies ahead?</h2>As both domestic and international pressure mounts, Beijing appears to be recalibrating its strategy. The MIIT’s intervention reportedly signals that authorities may soon push for industry-wide pricing norms, or even regulatory scrutiny of aggressive discounting practices.&nbsp;For automakers like BYD, Geely, Chery, and Great Wall, the challenge now is two-fold: navigating rising input costs amid tariff uncertainty, while avoiding a profit squeeze from endless price battles.

Business & Economy: With President Trump increasing pressure on Chinese imports through plans to double tariffs on steel and aluminium, China automotive sector is experiencing substantial upheaval characterized by intense price competition. 

As US President Donald Trump ramps up pressure on Chinese imports with plans to double tariffs on steel and aluminium, fresh turbulence is erupting in China’s auto industry. The world’s largest car market is facing intense price wars, a situation that Beijing reportedly now calls “unsustainable” and dangerous for long-term industrial health. According to Reuters, on Saturday, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) issued a rare public warning, urging domestic automakers to stop “brutal price wars” that it says are damaging profitability and destabilising the sector, according to state news agency Xinhua. This comes at a critical moment. The global auto supply chain is already bracing for impact as the US under Trump signals a hard line on trade. Washington is preparing to double tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminium exports and talks between Beijing and Washington over broader trade concerns remain deadlocked. An industry under-price siege Since early 2023, China’s carmakers have been reportedly locked in an escalating cycle of discount wars. Leading the latest round is BYD, China’s biggest electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, which introduced fresh subsidies on over 20 models last week, including government-backed trade-in offers. According to Reuters, the cost of BYD’s Seagull electric hatchback has been slashed to as low as 55,800 yuan (around $7,750), triggering a domino effect. Rivals like Geely and Chery have since followed suit with their own price cuts. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) also issued a parallel appeal on Saturday, calling the discounting spiral a “panic-triggered” trend that hurts operational efficiency and long-term viability. “Apart from reducing the price of goods according to law, enterprises shall not dump goods at prices below cost,” CAAM, in a statement released via state media as reported by Reuters. The organisation advised automakers to uphold fair competition and avoid monopolistic pricing practices. Internal friction: BYD vs Great Wall The government’s plea reportedly follows a public spat between industry heavyweights. On Friday, a BYD executive reportedly dismissed concerns about industry instability as “alarmist”, in response to Great Wall Motor Chairman Wei Jianjun, who reportedly warned that cutthroat pricing was hitting not just carmakers, but also their suppliers. According to Reuters, Wei said the industry was becoming “unhealthy” under the pressure of constant undercutting, a rare admission from a top Chinese automotive executive. Tariff tensions in the backdrop This domestic unrest is unfolding just as the external environment becomes more hostile. Last month, the US slapped fresh tariffs on several Chinese goods, including a proposal to double duties on Chinese steel and aluminium. This could reportedly disrupt raw material flows crucial to EV manufacturing. US officials have also raised concerns over the global dominance of Chinese EVs and components, with President Trump promising to “defend American manufacturing”. Meanwhile, China is reportedly preparing retaliatory measures, although no formal announcements have been made. According to Bloomberg, US-China trade talks remain gridlocked, with officials struggling to find common ground on tariffs, technology transfer, and market access. The auto sector, which sits at the intersection of all three, is particularly exposed. What lies ahead? As both domestic and international pressure mounts, Beijing appears to be recalibrating its strategy. The MIIT’s intervention reportedly signals that authorities may soon push for industry-wide pricing norms, or even regulatory scrutiny of aggressive discounting practices. For automakers like BYD, Geely, Chery, and Great Wall, the challenge now is two-fold: navigating rising input costs amid tariff uncertainty, while avoiding a profit squeeze from endless price battles.

With President Trump increasing pressure on Chinese imports through plans to double tariffs on steel and aluminium, China's automotive sector is experiencing substantial upheaval characterized by intense price competition.

China warns auto giants to halt price wars as US tariff tension escalates: Details here

Pakistan is sending a delegation to the United States next week for high-stakes trade talks, President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday, as the South Asian nation tries to avert a looming tariff crisis that could jeopardise billions in export earnings, according to Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The development comes amid Washington’s broader tariff campaign against countries running significant trade surpluses with the US and follows a sharp warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbour India.<h2>Why Pakistan is under pressure</h2>As per Reuters, the US government last month announced sweeping tariff hikes on multiple trading partners. Among them, Pakistan now faces potential tariffs of up to 29 per cent on its exports to the US, owing to a trade surplus of approximately $3 billion.&nbsp;This makes the upcoming trade negotiations critical for Islamabad, which heavily relies on US market access to sustain key sectors such as textiles and surgical instruments.&nbsp;Trump, speaking at Joint Base Andrews, said that “Representatives from Pakistan are coming to the United States next week as they seek to make a deal on tariffs,” as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;While he did not elaborate on the scope of discussions, his remarks signal that the talks will centre on tariff exemptions and possibly a broader bilateral trade reset.<h2>A fragile moment for regional diplomacy</h2>The talks also come against the backdrop of heightened military tensions in South Asia.&nbsp;Earlier in May, Pakistan and India engaged in four days of intense cross-border conflict involving missiles, drones, artillery, and fighter jets, worst confrontation in decades.&nbsp;Referring to this, Trump added, “I would have no interest in making a deal with Pakistan or India if they were to engage in war with each other,” as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;The White House is closely monitoring the situation, given the nuclear capabilities of both nations and their strategic importance in regional stability.<h2>US-Pakistan trade dependency</h2>According to 2024 trade data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), total two-way goods trade between the US and Pakistan stood at $12.2 billion, with Pakistan exporting $7.6 billion worth of goods to the US and importing $4.6 billion in return.&nbsp;Pakistan’s largest exports to the US include:<ul><li>Textiles and apparel: over $4.4 billion</li><li>Surgical and medical instruments: around $500 million</li><li>Leather goods and footwear</li><li>Sporting equipment</li></ul>The US is Pakistan’s single largest export destination, accounting for over 21 per cent of its total exports, according to data from Pakistan’s Ministry of Commerce.&nbsp;By contrast, US exports to Pakistan remain limited, concentrated mainly in machinery, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and agricultural products.&nbsp;This asymmetry gives the US considerable leverage in trade negotiations but also highlights Pakistan’s economic vulnerability if tariff hikes are implemented.<h2>Will Pakistan offer concessions?</h2>As per Bloomberg, Pakistan may offer market access guarantees and investment incentives to US firms as part of the deal, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, green energy, and e-commerce.&nbsp;Pakistan’s Board of Investment is reportedly finalising a list of federal infrastructure contracts and public-private partnerships worth over $25 billion, which could be opened up to US bidders in exchange for tariff relief.&nbsp;The talks are expected to include Pakistan’s caretaker Commerce Minister and key officials from its Finance and Foreign Affairs Ministries, according to government sources quoted by The Express Tribune.<h2>US Parallel talks with India complicate the picture</h2>While Pakistan prepares for negotiations, India is also deepening trade engagement with Washington. Trump confirmed on Friday that the US is “very close [to] making a deal with India,” as quoted by Reuters.India’s Trade Minister Piyush Goyal was in Washington earlier this month to advance discussions, with an interim trade agreement expected by early July, as per Reuters.&nbsp;India currently faces 26 per cent tariffs on US-bound goods under the April tariff hike and is reportedly offering $50 billion in procurement opportunities to American firms in return for relief and improved access to the US tech and defence markets.&nbsp;This parallel track may influence how Washington negotiates with Islamabad, potentially demanding more structural reforms or commercial openness.<h2>What happens next?</h2>For Pakistan, the stakes are high. Without a deal, its key exports could become uncompetitive overnight, triggering factory closures and job losses in industries that employ millions of workers, particularly in cities like Karachi, Sialkot, and Faisalabad.&nbsp;The US also risks weakening a strategically important partner in South Asia, one it often relies on for counterterrorism, Afghan stability, and regional intelligence cooperation.&nbsp;Trade officials from both countries are expected to meet in Washington next week, with preparatory talks already underway, according to sources quoted by Dawn&nbsp; &nbsp;

Business & Economy: This comes amid Washington broader tariff campaign against countries with significant trade surpluses with the US and a warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbor India. 

Pakistan is sending a delegation to the United States next week for high-stakes trade talks, President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday, as the South Asian nation tries to avert a looming tariff crisis that could jeopardise billions in export earnings, according to Reuters. The development comes amid Washington’s broader tariff campaign against countries running significant trade surpluses with the US and follows a sharp warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbour India. Why Pakistan is under pressure As per Reuters, the US government last month announced sweeping tariff hikes on multiple trading partners. Among them, Pakistan now faces potential tariffs of up to 29 per cent on its exports to the US, owing to a trade surplus of approximately $3 billion. This makes the upcoming trade negotiations critical for Islamabad, which heavily relies on US market access to sustain key sectors such as textiles and surgical instruments. Trump, speaking at Joint Base Andrews, said that “Representatives from Pakistan are coming to the United States next week as they seek to make a deal on tariffs,” as quoted by Reuters. While he did not elaborate on the scope of discussions, his remarks signal that the talks will centre on tariff exemptions and possibly a broader bilateral trade reset. A fragile moment for regional diplomacy The talks also come against the backdrop of heightened military tensions in South Asia. Earlier in May, Pakistan and India engaged in four days of intense cross-border conflict involving missiles, drones, artillery, and fighter jets, worst confrontation in decades. Referring to this, Trump added, “I would have no interest in making a deal with Pakistan or India if they were to engage in war with each other,” as quoted by Reuters. The White House is closely monitoring the situation, given the nuclear capabilities of both nations and their strategic importance in regional stability. US-Pakistan trade dependency According to 2024 trade data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), total two-way goods trade between the US and Pakistan stood at $12.2 billion, with Pakistan exporting $7.6 billion worth of goods to the US and importing $4.6 billion in return. Pakistan’s largest exports to the US include: Textiles and apparel: over $4.4 billion Surgical and medical instruments: around $500 million Leather goods and footwear Sporting equipment The US is Pakistan’s single largest export destination, accounting for over 21 per cent of its total exports, according to data from Pakistan’s Ministry of Commerce. By contrast, US exports to Pakistan remain limited, concentrated mainly in machinery, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and agricultural products. This asymmetry gives the US considerable leverage in trade negotiations but also highlights Pakistan’s economic vulnerability if tariff hikes are implemented. Will Pakistan offer concessions? As per Bloomberg, Pakistan may offer market access guarantees and investment incentives to US firms as part of the deal, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, green energy, and e-commerce. Pakistan’s Board of Investment is reportedly finalising a list of federal infrastructure contracts and public-private partnerships worth over $25 billion, which could be opened up to US bidders in exchange for tariff relief. The talks are expected to include Pakistan’s caretaker Commerce Minister and key officials from its Finance and Foreign Affairs Ministries, according to government sources quoted by The Express Tribune. US Parallel talks with India complicate the picture While Pakistan prepares for negotiations, India is also deepening trade engagement with Washington. Trump confirmed on Friday that the US is “very close [to] making a deal with India,” as quoted by Reuters. India’s Trade Minister Piyush Goyal was in Washington earlier this month to advance discussions, with an interim trade agreement expected by early July, as per Reuters. India currently faces 26 per cent tariffs on US-bound goods under the April tariff hike and is reportedly offering $50 billion in procurement opportunities to American firms in return for relief and improved access to the US tech and defence markets. This parallel track may influence how Washington negotiates with Islamabad, potentially demanding more structural reforms or commercial openness. What happens next? For Pakistan, the stakes are high. Without a deal, its key exports could become uncompetitive overnight, triggering factory closures and job losses in industries that employ millions of workers, particularly in cities like Karachi, Sialkot, and Faisalabad. The US also risks weakening a strategically important partner in South Asia, one it often relies on for counterterrorism, Afghan stability, and regional intelligence cooperation. Trade officials from both countries are expected to meet in Washington next week, with preparatory talks already underway, according to sources quoted by Dawn

Pakistan is reportedly set to send a delegation to the US next week for high-stakes trade talks to avoid a potential tariff crisis that could threaten billions in export earnings.&nbsp;

Pakistan heads to Washington for trade talks: What’s at stake as US tariff threat looms?

For decades, Indian tech professionals have been the backbone of America’s digital revolution, filling critical roles in software development, data analysis, and IT services. But in 2025, the landscape is shifting dramatically.&nbsp;&nbsp;A wave of AI-powered automation and the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) politics are threatening to unravel the American Dream for thousands of Indian techies.&nbsp;Across major tech firms including Google, Meta and Amazon, thousands of layoffs have rippled through the workforce, with H-1B visa holders disproportionately impacted. As AI tools like ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google's Gemini take over coding, debugging, and testing tasks, entry- and mid-level roles are rapidly disappearing.&nbsp;According to a report by Axios, white-collar workers, particularly in tech, marketing, and administration, are bearing the brunt of automation. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently warned that AI could wipe out up to 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years.&nbsp;This technological disruption has collided with an increasingly hostile political narrative. Several conservative factions aligned with the MAGA movement have begun targeting foreign workers, especially Indian nationals on H-1B visas, as scapegoats for job losses. A Financial Express report highlights a growing sentiment among some Americans urging Indian tech workers to “leave the US” as layoffs increase.&nbsp;Caught in a perfect storm&nbsp;For many Indian professionals, the dual forces of automation and nationalism have created a precarious situation. Job security has evaporated almost overnight, while immigration status hangs by a thread. The US H-1B system ties a worker’s legal status to employment. If someone is laid off, they typically have just 60 days to secure another job or leave the United States.&nbsp;Social media platforms like LinkedIn and TeamBlind are flooded with posts from Indian tech workers seeking leads, legal advice, or emotional support. A viral LinkedIn post by Indian professional Movin Jain about why Indians in the US are being replaced by Indians in India sparked debate, reflecting a growing sense of displacement and frustration among highly skilled immigrants.&nbsp;The post mentions that the cost of tech talent in India is much lower; the salary for software engineers in India is around 20 per cent of what the company has to pay an employee in the US. India's strong pool of tech talent definitely makes it an attractive option for companies looking to cut expenses while maintaining output.&nbsp;On the other side, many American citizens, particularly in swing states like Pennsylvania and Ohio, view foreign workers as competitors in an increasingly tight job market. Trump-era policies and the MAGA movement have tapped into this resentment, pushing for stricter immigration controls and the elimination of perceived “job theft” by visa holders.&nbsp;AI raises the stakes&nbsp;While MAGA rhetoric is loud, AI is quietly reshaping the fundamental structure of white-collar employment. A recent news report from the Economic Times noted that managers and mid-tier engineers are now being replaced by AI systems that not only code but also manage workflows, analyse large datasets, and even conduct performance reviews.&nbsp;DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, speaking to students earlier this month, warned, “The world you’re entering will look nothing like the one you were trained for.” Former President Barack Obama also sounded the alarm, stating in an interview that AI could erase “millions of white-collar jobs within years”.&nbsp;Analysts predict that the first to go will be those in support and entry-level roles, the very positions Indian H-1B professionals often occupy early in their careers in the US. Although many of these workers are highly educated, their vulnerability lies in their visa dependence and the speed at which automation is rendering certain roles obsolete.&nbsp;What lies ahead&nbsp;Some Indian workers are considering returning home or looking to Canada, Germany, or Australia, where immigration policies may offer greater flexibility. Others are doubling down on upskilling, pivoting toward AI, cybersecurity, or product leadership roles that are harder to automate.&nbsp;However, the path ahead remains uncertain. Many are caught in legal limbo, struggling to find new jobs within a shrinking market while navigating complex visa rules. The US tech industry, once a beacon of opportunity for international talent, now appears less welcoming.&nbsp;Despite the bleak outlook, some industry voices are calling for reform. Tech CEOs and immigrant advocacy groups are urging lawmakers to decouple visas from employers, offer grace periods, and invest in re-skilling displaced workers. But with MAGA populism surging, meaningful change may be hard to come by.&nbsp;The convergence of AI disruption and MAGA-fuelled anti-immigration sentiment has put Indian tech professionals in the US at a unique disadvantage. As companies streamline their operations and politics grow more polarised, the very workers who helped build America’s digital future now find themselves questioning whether they have a future in the country at all.

As AI-driven automation reshapes the tech industry, Indian professionals on H-1B visas are increasingly caught in the crossfire—facing mass layoffs, uncertain immigration futures, and rising political hostility.

For decades, Indian tech professionals have been the backbone of America’s digital revolution, filling critical roles in software development, data analysis, and IT services. But in 2025, the landscape is shifting dramatically. A wave of AI-powered automation and the “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) politics are threatening to unravel the American Dream for thousands of Indian techies. Across major tech firms including Google, Meta and Amazon, thousands of layoffs have rippled through the workforce, with H-1B visa holders disproportionately impacted. As AI tools like ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google's Gemini take over coding, debugging, and testing tasks, entry- and mid-level roles are rapidly disappearing. According to a report by Axios, white-collar workers, particularly in tech, marketing, and administration, are bearing the brunt of automation. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently warned that AI could wipe out up to 50 per cent of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. This technological disruption has collided with an increasingly hostile political narrative. Several conservative factions aligned with the MAGA movement have begun targeting foreign workers, especially Indian nationals on H-1B visas, as scapegoats for job losses. A Financial Express report highlights a growing sentiment among some Americans urging Indian tech workers to “leave the US” as layoffs increase. Caught in a perfect storm For many Indian professionals, the dual forces of automation and nationalism have created a precarious situation. Job security has evaporated almost overnight, while immigration status hangs by a thread. The US H-1B system ties a worker’s legal status to employment. If someone is laid off, they typically have just 60 days to secure another job or leave the United States. Social media platforms like LinkedIn and TeamBlind are flooded with posts from Indian tech workers seeking leads, legal advice, or emotional support. A viral LinkedIn post by Indian professional Movin Jain about why Indians in the US are being replaced by Indians in India sparked debate, reflecting a growing sense of displacement and frustration among highly skilled immigrants. The post mentions that the cost of tech talent in India is much lower; the salary for software engineers in India is around 20 per cent of what the company has to pay an employee in the US. India's strong pool of tech talent definitely makes it an attractive option for companies looking to cut expenses while maintaining output. On the other side, many American citizens, particularly in swing states like Pennsylvania and Ohio, view foreign workers as competitors in an increasingly tight job market. Trump-era policies and the MAGA movement have tapped into this resentment, pushing for stricter immigration controls and the elimination of perceived “job theft” by visa holders. AI raises the stakes While MAGA rhetoric is loud, AI is quietly reshaping the fundamental structure of white-collar employment. A recent news report from the Economic Times noted that managers and mid-tier engineers are now being replaced by AI systems that not only code but also manage workflows, analyse large datasets, and even conduct performance reviews. DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, speaking to students earlier this month, warned, “The world you’re entering will look nothing like the one you were trained for.” Former President Barack Obama also sounded the alarm, stating in an interview that AI could erase “millions of white-collar jobs within years”. Analysts predict that the first to go will be those in support and entry-level roles, the very positions Indian H-1B professionals often occupy early in their careers in the US. Although many of these workers are highly educated, their vulnerability lies in their visa dependence and the speed at which automation is rendering certain roles obsolete. What lies ahead Some Indian workers are considering returning home or looking to Canada, Germany, or Australia, where immigration policies may offer greater flexibility. Others are doubling down on upskilling, pivoting toward AI, cybersecurity, or product leadership roles that are harder to automate. However, the path ahead remains uncertain. Many are caught in legal limbo, struggling to find new jobs within a shrinking market while navigating complex visa rules. The US tech industry, once a beacon of opportunity for international talent, now appears less welcoming. Despite the bleak outlook, some industry voices are calling for reform. Tech CEOs and immigrant advocacy groups are urging lawmakers to decouple visas from employers, offer grace periods, and invest in re-skilling displaced workers. But with MAGA populism surging, meaningful change may be hard to come by. The convergence of AI disruption and MAGA-fuelled anti-immigration sentiment has put Indian tech professionals in the US at a unique disadvantage. As companies streamline their operations and politics grow more polarised, the very workers who helped build America’s digital future now find themselves questioning whether they have a future in the country at all.

As AI-driven automation reshapes the tech industry, Indian professionals on H-1B visas are increasingly caught in the crossfire—facing mass layoffs, uncertain immigration futures, and rising political hostility.

Indian techies coding the American dream: Until AI and MAGA hit delete