The wheel of time turns and age is just a number that changes every year. But what lies permanently is his experience, wisdom and good memories that become legends going across geographical boundaries. When passion drives someone to achieve something for human values and common respect globally, a person becomes a global leader whose vision and statesmanship become the need of the hour to steer the world towards peace and prosperity. This unmistakably carves the indelible imprints of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has turned 75 today and is stepping into another year to serve humanity across the world with sustainable growth. From the by-lanes of Vadnagar in Gujarat to becoming chief minister of the state, then Prime Minister of India, and now a dynamic, decisive and development-oriented reputed global leader, PM Modi's inspiring journey is not only vital for India but for the world as he has emerged as a ray of hope for humans across the borders of the continents.&nbsp;Global Icon, Unmatched PopularityPrime Minister Narendra Modi stands out as one of the world's most popular democratic leaders, with a recent global survey by US-based data analytics firm Morning Consult showing his approval rating at 71 per cent in early September 2025. This high level of support manifests his strong foreign policy, economic reforms and firm governance, which&nbsp;have earned him praise beyond India's shores. Leaders from countries like the United States, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Israel, Russia and those in the Gulf have often highlighted his vision for global peace, prosperity and sustainability. On the eve of his birthday, US President Donald Trump called PM Modi to extend greetings and express thanks for his support in peace efforts related to the Russia-Ukraine war, signalling the close ties between the two nations. Over the past 11 years, PM Modi has guided India with confidence on both national and international platforms, building bridges that were once strained.&nbsp;Russian President Vladimir Putin, during the 15th VTB Russia Calling Investment Forum, commended PM Modi's "India-first" policy and the "Make in India" initiative, noting how the Indian government under his leadership has created stable conditions for growth. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese once referred to him as the 'boss' while addressing the Indian community in Sydney, underlining the warmth in bilateral relations. At the sidelines of a G7 Summit, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told PM Modi, "You are the best. I am trying to be as you," leading to the trending hashtag "Melodi" that captured public imagination and pointed to his rising global stature. World Bank President Ajay Banga last year praised PM Modi for focusing on a solid relationship with the United States, both directly and through the Quad grouping. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has time and again spoken of Modi's "visionary leadership" and its role in boosting cooperation in defence and technology. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva acknowledged his work in counter-terrorism, while French President Emmanuel Macron highlighted his diplomatic moves for peace, particularly in resolving the Ukraine conflict. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer shared cordial exchanges during PM Modi's visit to the UK, adding to the list of positive interactions.&nbsp;Championing Peace, Global CooperationFor the first time in India's history, the world sees the country as one that extends an olive branch to nations that once viewed it with suspicion, proving that India seeks no harm to others and aims to make the world a better place for all to live and prosper. This shift owes much to PM Modi's approach, which places India as a partner in progress rather than a rival. His global popularity stems from championing ideas like "One Earth, One Family, One Future," a slogan he promoted at international forums. He has pushed for peace and faster UN reforms amid ongoing crises and conflicts, calling for joint efforts to update global governance. PM Modi stresses a human-centric path to sustainable development and technological advancement, often pointing out India's readiness to share its experiences with poorer nations. Under his rule, India has lifted 250 million people out of poverty, and he offers these methods as models for others. He also advocates using technology for the greater good, stating that India is prepared to share its digital public infrastructure worldwide to aid development and cooperation. Moreover, he has called for worldwide steps to handle emerging conflicts in cyber, maritime and space areas, showing foresight in new security challenges.&nbsp;Balancing Global Power DynamicsPM Modi's foreign policy has played a key role in maintaining world order at a time when geopolitical tensions raise fears of another major war. His recent participation in the SCO Summit in Tianjin, China, where he outlined priorities around security, connectivity and opportunity, helped balance regional dynamics. His strategic stance in forums like the Russia-India-China (RIC) troika, along with BRICS and SCO, has enabled dialogue amid power imbalances. By advocating an early end to the Ukraine conflict during talks with Putin and stressing&nbsp;neutrality to maximise India's interests, he has kept channels open without taking sides. The improvement in India-US relations, from past tensions to a thaw marked by stronger partnerships, highlights India's steady position on the global stage. Even his visit to Ukraine in 2024 opened new avenues, showing India's balanced diplomacy. PM Modi's foreign trips draw huge crowds from the Indian diaspora, revealing a strong personal appeal that goes beyond policy to a kind of personality cult built on his direct connect with people.&nbsp;All things considered, PM Modi is the need of the moment for global power balance and peace. As conflicts simmer and economic uncertainties grow, his leadership offers a steady hand, promoting cooperation over confrontation. With India under him reaching out to all corners, the world finds in him a figure who can guide towards shared prosperity, making his role indispensable in these testing times.

When passion drives someone to achieve something for human values and common respect globally, a person becomes a global leader. This unmistakably carves the indelible imprints of  Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has turned 75 today 

The wheel of time turns and age is just a number that changes every year. But what lies permanently is his experience, wisdom and good memories that become legends going across geographical boundaries. When passion drives someone to achieve something for human values and common respect globally, a person becomes a global leader whose vision and statesmanship become the need of the hour to steer the world towards peace and prosperity. This unmistakably carves the indelible imprints of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has turned 75 today and is stepping into another year to serve humanity across the world with sustainable growth. From the by-lanes of Vadnagar in Gujarat to becoming chief minister of the state, then Prime Minister of India, and now a dynamic, decisive and development-oriented reputed global leader, PM Modi's inspiring journey is not only vital for India but for the world as he has emerged as a ray of hope for humans across the borders of the continents. Global Icon, Unmatched Popularity Prime Minister Narendra Modi stands out as one of the world's most popular democratic leaders, with a recent global survey by US-based data analytics firm Morning Consult showing his approval rating at 71 per cent in early September 2025. This high level of support manifests his strong foreign policy, economic reforms and firm governance, which have earned him praise beyond India's shores. Leaders from countries like the United States, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Israel, Russia and those in the Gulf have often highlighted his vision for global peace, prosperity and sustainability. On the eve of his birthday, US President Donald Trump called PM Modi to extend greetings and express thanks for his support in peace efforts related to the Russia-Ukraine war, signalling the close ties between the two nations. Over the past 11 years, PM Modi has guided India with confidence on both national and international platforms, building bridges that were once strained. Russian President Vladimir Putin, during the 15th VTB Russia Calling Investment Forum, commended PM Modi's "India-first" policy and the "Make in India" initiative, noting how the Indian government under his leadership has created stable conditions for growth. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese once referred to him as the 'boss' while addressing the Indian community in Sydney, underlining the warmth in bilateral relations. At the sidelines of a G7 Summit, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told PM Modi, "You are the best. I am trying to be as you," leading to the trending hashtag "Melodi" that captured public imagination and pointed to his rising global stature. World Bank President Ajay Banga last year praised PM Modi for focusing on a solid relationship with the United States, both directly and through the Quad grouping. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has time and again spoken of Modi's "visionary leadership" and its role in boosting cooperation in defence and technology. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva acknowledged his work in counter-terrorism, while French President Emmanuel Macron highlighted his diplomatic moves for peace, particularly in resolving the Ukraine conflict. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer shared cordial exchanges during PM Modi's visit to the UK, adding to the list of positive interactions. Championing Peace, Global Cooperation For the first time in India's history, the world sees the country as one that extends an olive branch to nations that once viewed it with suspicion, proving that India seeks no harm to others and aims to make the world a better place for all to live and prosper. This shift owes much to PM Modi's approach, which places India as a partner in progress rather than a rival. His global popularity stems from championing ideas like "One Earth, One Family, One Future," a slogan he promoted at international forums. He has pushed for peace and faster UN reforms amid ongoing crises and conflicts, calling for joint efforts to update global governance. PM Modi stresses a human-centric path to sustainable development and technological advancement, often pointing out India's readiness to share its experiences with poorer nations. Under his rule, India has lifted 250 million people out of poverty, and he offers these methods as models for others. He also advocates using technology for the greater good, stating that India is prepared to share its digital public infrastructure worldwide to aid development and cooperation. Moreover, he has called for worldwide steps to handle emerging conflicts in cyber, maritime and space areas, showing foresight in new security challenges. Balancing Global Power Dynamics PM Modi's foreign policy has played a key role in maintaining world order at a time when geopolitical tensions raise fears of another major war. His recent participation in the SCO Summit in Tianjin, China, where he outlined priorities around security, connectivity and opportunity, helped balance regional dynamics. His strategic stance in forums like the Russia-India-China (RIC) troika, along with BRICS and SCO, has enabled dialogue amid power imbalances. By advocating an early end to the Ukraine conflict during talks with Putin and stressing neutrality to maximise India's interests, he has kept channels open without taking sides. The improvement in India-US relations, from past tensions to a thaw marked by stronger partnerships, highlights India's steady position on the global stage. Even his visit to Ukraine in 2024 opened new avenues, showing India's balanced diplomacy. PM Modi's foreign trips draw huge crowds from the Indian diaspora, revealing a strong personal appeal that goes beyond policy to a kind of personality cult built on his direct connect with people. All things considered, PM Modi is the need of the moment for global power balance and peace. As conflicts simmer and economic uncertainties grow, his leadership offers a steady hand, promoting cooperation over confrontation. With India under him reaching out to all corners, the world finds in him a figure who can guide towards shared prosperity, making his role indispensable in these testing times.

When passion drives someone to achieve something for human values and common respect globally, a person becomes a global leader. This unmistakably carves the indelible imprints of &nbsp;Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has turned 75 today&nbsp;

Balancing power, building peace—why PM Modi@75 is indispensable for global prosperity | Explained

In an era where the power of governments fundamentally derives from the consent of the people they govern, Gen Z's protests worldwide serve as a stark reminder that authority unchecked by public will can lead to upheaval. These young demonstrators, prioritising their holistic well-being—encompassing economic opportunities, social justice, and personal freedoms—are quick to mobilize and demand change. Accounting for roughly 26 percent of the global population, Gen Z has emerged as a driving force challenging established conventions in politics and personal life. Their aspirations must be integrated into governance, or risk backlash from unilateral decisions, suppression, and leaders' personal aggrandizement, as seen in the eye-opening crises in France and Nepal. Democratic dissent, when handled with decency and sensitivity, can pave the way for progress; however, heavy-handed tactics only fuel resentment. Ultimately, change to the establishment comes via the ballot or, regrettably, the bullet—but in the fast-paced world of social media reels, real-life results unfold at unprecedented speeds.&nbsp;From France's "Block Everything" movement to Nepal's outcry against "Nepo Kids," Gen Z is wielding the cudgels against systems that stray from the democratic ideal of government "of the people, by the people, and for the people." These protests underscore that Gen Z and authoritarian politics are incompatible; governments must prioritize inclusive development, listening to voices rather than silencing them through bans or force. The scenes of ember-red flames, billowing smoke, stick-wielding youths, and mobile selfies from Western Europe to South Asia highlight a global attention-grabber: Nepal's streets turning into battlegrounds against corruption and suppression, mirroring broader youth-led unrest.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/people-shouldn-t-be-afraid-of-their-government-governments-should-be-afraid-of-their-people-lessons-from-south-asia-1757514125479">People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people: Lessons from South Asia</a>&nbsp;Gen Z Wants Progress, Not Power Plays&nbsp;What began in Nepal as outrage over a September 4, 2025, ban on 26 social media platforms—citing regulatory issues but perceived as a bid to stifle dissent—escalated into demands for accountability, jobs, and political overhaul. Protesters, predominantly aged 13-28, clashed with police, torched parliament buildings like Singh Durbar, and vandalized politicians' homes, leading to Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's resignation amid the chaos. This marks Nepal's worst unrest in years, with at least 19-30 deaths and over 300 injuries reported, prompting army patrols, curfews in Kathmandu, and international calls for restraint from groups like Human Rights Watch. The ban backfired, as youths used VPNs and offline networks to amplify videos of police brutality, drawing global solidarity inspired by movements like Hong Kong's or Thailand's. Underlying issues include 19 percent youth unemployment, wealth gaps, and cronyism benefiting elites, despite 5.8 percent economic growth in 2024. The government labeled the protests "hijacked" by political elements, but critics see it as a failure to address core grievances. Social media was restored post-unrest, but no consensus has emerged on an interim leader, with fears of further escalation as prisons saw escapes and borders felt economic ripples. After two days of violent unrest (Sept 8–9), calm is returning to Kathmandu as the army enforces order and detains rioters. Gen Z leaders, however, demand an interim government under ex–Supreme Court Chief Justice Sushila Karki, citing the need for transparency.&nbsp;Echoing this, Nepal's crisis reflects global patterns where Gen Z reshapes discourse, as seen in Bangladesh's 2024 youth-led toppling of Sheikh Hasina or US Black Lives Matter waves. Social media accelerates local grievances into international narratives, sensitizing populations to democratic rights. Yet, protests alone aren't sufficient—governments must respond with vision for inclusive policies like education, skills training, and anti-corruption measures. Ignoring Gen Z's calls for progress over power plays invites flare-ups anywhere.&nbsp;‘Block Everything’ Echoes French Revolution&nbsp;In France, the "Block Everything" (Bloquons Tout) movement erupted on September 10, 2025, coinciding with new Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu's first day in office after François Bayrou's resignation. Nationwide protests saw 200,000-250,000 demonstrators—many young and Gen Z—blocking highways, roundabouts, gas stations, and tram lines, setting barricades ablaze, and clashing with 80,000 deployed police, resulting in 295-473 arrests by late afternoon. Originating online in May among right-wing groups but co-opted by the left, it targets President Emmanuel Macron's elite, austerity measures, and proposed €44 billion spending cuts amid 114 percent GDP public debt. Scenes in Paris, Lille, Marseille, and Rennes included tear gas, water cannons, and fires at restaurants and vehicles, drawing comparisons to the 2018-2019 Yellow Vests and the French Revolution of 1789, when citizens rose against economic hardship and elitism, toppling entrenched power structures. Today’s more educated, anticapitalist youth seek social justice and reduced inequality, echoing the revolutionary cries for liberty and equality. Endorsed by figures like Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the movement uses TikTok, Telegram, and Instagram for coordination, employing "Black Bloc" tactics. Authorities warn of no tolerance for violence, but the movement's viral, leaderless nature—reminiscent of the decentralized uprisings during the French Revolution—signals ongoing challenges for governance in addressing Gen Z’s demands for systemic change.&nbsp;Both cases reveal unilateral decisions—like Nepal's ban or France's budget cuts—backfiring, with suppression breeding resentment. Nepal's history of movements (e.g., 2006 monarchy end) shows Gen Z's digital edge in mobilization, while France's echoes fears of prolonged unrest. Governments must adapt through dialogue and inclusive development to represent Gen Z's aspirations.&nbsp;However, Gen Z's violent protests, which have led to loss of life and widespread destruction, are widely criticized. While Gen Z and the educated global population have every right to voice their opposition to injustices, this must not come at the expense of decency. Escalating to lethal clashes or property destruction undermines their cause and invites harsher crackdowns. Peaceful methods, amplified through social media, can drive change without bloodshed. As Mahatma Gandhi profoundly stated, “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.”&nbsp;

Accounting for roughly 26 percent of the global population, Gen Z has emerged as a driving force challenging established conventions in politics and personal life.

In an era where the power of governments fundamentally derives from the consent of the people they govern, Gen Z's protests worldwide serve as a stark reminder that authority unchecked by public will can lead to upheaval. These young demonstrators, prioritising their holistic well-being—encompassing economic opportunities, social justice, and personal freedoms—are quick to mobilize and demand change. Accounting for roughly 26 percent of the global population, Gen Z has emerged as a driving force challenging established conventions in politics and personal life. Their aspirations must be integrated into governance, or risk backlash from unilateral decisions, suppression, and leaders' personal aggrandizement, as seen in the eye-opening crises in France and Nepal. Democratic dissent, when handled with decency and sensitivity, can pave the way for progress; however, heavy-handed tactics only fuel resentment. Ultimately, change to the establishment comes via the ballot or, regrettably, the bullet—but in the fast-paced world of social media reels, real-life results unfold at unprecedented speeds. From France's "Block Everything" movement to Nepal's outcry against "Nepo Kids," Gen Z is wielding the cudgels against systems that stray from the democratic ideal of government "of the people, by the people, and for the people." These protests underscore that Gen Z and authoritarian politics are incompatible; governments must prioritize inclusive development, listening to voices rather than silencing them through bans or force. The scenes of ember-red flames, billowing smoke, stick-wielding youths, and mobile selfies from Western Europe to South Asia highlight a global attention-grabber: Nepal's streets turning into battlegrounds against corruption and suppression, mirroring broader youth-led unrest. Also Read: People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people: Lessons from South Asia Gen Z Wants Progress, Not Power Plays What began in Nepal as outrage over a September 4, 2025, ban on 26 social media platforms—citing regulatory issues but perceived as a bid to stifle dissent—escalated into demands for accountability, jobs, and political overhaul. Protesters, predominantly aged 13-28, clashed with police, torched parliament buildings like Singh Durbar, and vandalized politicians' homes, leading to Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's resignation amid the chaos. This marks Nepal's worst unrest in years, with at least 19-30 deaths and over 300 injuries reported, prompting army patrols, curfews in Kathmandu, and international calls for restraint from groups like Human Rights Watch. The ban backfired, as youths used VPNs and offline networks to amplify videos of police brutality, drawing global solidarity inspired by movements like Hong Kong's or Thailand's. Underlying issues include 19 percent youth unemployment, wealth gaps, and cronyism benefiting elites, despite 5.8 percent economic growth in 2024. The government labeled the protests "hijacked" by political elements, but critics see it as a failure to address core grievances. Social media was restored post-unrest, but no consensus has emerged on an interim leader, with fears of further escalation as prisons saw escapes and borders felt economic ripples. After two days of violent unrest (Sept 8–9), calm is returning to Kathmandu as the army enforces order and detains rioters. Gen Z leaders, however, demand an interim government under ex–Supreme Court Chief Justice Sushila Karki, citing the need for transparency. Echoing this, Nepal's crisis reflects global patterns where Gen Z reshapes discourse, as seen in Bangladesh's 2024 youth-led toppling of Sheikh Hasina or US Black Lives Matter waves. Social media accelerates local grievances into international narratives, sensitizing populations to democratic rights. Yet, protests alone aren't sufficient—governments must respond with vision for inclusive policies like education, skills training, and anti-corruption measures. Ignoring Gen Z's calls for progress over power plays invites flare-ups anywhere. ‘Block Everything’ Echoes French Revolution In France, the "Block Everything" (Bloquons Tout) movement erupted on September 10, 2025, coinciding with new Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu's first day in office after François Bayrou's resignation. Nationwide protests saw 200,000-250,000 demonstrators—many young and Gen Z—blocking highways, roundabouts, gas stations, and tram lines, setting barricades ablaze, and clashing with 80,000 deployed police, resulting in 295-473 arrests by late afternoon. Originating online in May among right-wing groups but co-opted by the left, it targets President Emmanuel Macron's elite, austerity measures, and proposed €44 billion spending cuts amid 114 percent GDP public debt. Scenes in Paris, Lille, Marseille, and Rennes included tear gas, water cannons, and fires at restaurants and vehicles, drawing comparisons to the 2018-2019 Yellow Vests and the French Revolution of 1789, when citizens rose against economic hardship and elitism, toppling entrenched power structures. Today’s more educated, anticapitalist youth seek social justice and reduced inequality, echoing the revolutionary cries for liberty and equality. Endorsed by figures like Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the movement uses TikTok, Telegram, and Instagram for coordination, employing "Black Bloc" tactics. Authorities warn of no tolerance for violence, but the movement's viral, leaderless nature—reminiscent of the decentralized uprisings during the French Revolution—signals ongoing challenges for governance in addressing Gen Z’s demands for systemic change. Both cases reveal unilateral decisions—like Nepal's ban or France's budget cuts—backfiring, with suppression breeding resentment. Nepal's history of movements (e.g., 2006 monarchy end) shows Gen Z's digital edge in mobilization, while France's echoes fears of prolonged unrest. Governments must adapt through dialogue and inclusive development to represent Gen Z's aspirations. However, Gen Z's violent protests, which have led to loss of life and widespread destruction, are widely criticized. While Gen Z and the educated global population have every right to voice their opposition to injustices, this must not come at the expense of decency. Escalating to lethal clashes or property destruction undermines their cause and invites harsher crackdowns. Peaceful methods, amplified through social media, can drive change without bloodshed. As Mahatma Gandhi profoundly stated, “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.”

Accounting for roughly 26 percent of the global population, Gen Z has emerged as a driving force challenging established conventions in politics and personal life.

Nepal’s ‘nepo kids’ to France’s ‘block everything’, how Gen Z’s reels-to-revolution shakes the world

US President Donald Trump’s sudden reversal on India has become the talking point in global diplomacy. After weeks of tough talk, high tariffs, and social media criticism, Trump unexpectedly shifted his tone. He praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “great Prime Minister” and called India-US ties “very special.” PM Modi, in a measured and statesmanlike response, reciprocated warmly and underlined the strength of the partnership.&nbsp;This change is not just a passing remark. It carries deeper meaning. The US and India need each other for peace, prosperity, and balance in an uncertain world. The U-turn signals that even in times of strain, both democracies recognize the value of staying aligned. Why Trump Changed His Tone&nbsp;Trump’s hard line on India, marked by tariffs as high as 50 percent on Indian imports, was seen as punishment for New Delhi’s independent energy and trade policies. His criticism even extended to suggesting that India was drifting closer to Russia and China. But soon after, he walked back and stressed friendship.&nbsp;Why this shift? The answer lies in strategic reality. Over the decades, successive governments on both sides of the Pacific have built a robust India-US partnership. India’s geographic position, economic strength, and democratic credentials make it indispensable for America’s long-term interests in Asia. India is part of the Indo-Pacific balance and a counterweight in an era of shifting alliances.&nbsp;Economically too, India matters. It is the fastest-growing major economy and a huge consumer market. American companies such as Apple and Tesla see India as a vital investment hub. Equally, India’s pool of skilled professionals continues to strengthen US industries, from Silicon Valley to healthcare.&nbsp;In this context, Trump’s U-turn was less about personal sentiment and more about recognizing ground realities. Alienating India could not only hurt US companies but also weaken America’s strategic influence in Asia. India’s Mature Diplomacy&nbsp;India, on its part, responded to the situation with balance and dignity. Throughout the tariff episode, New Delhi avoided sharp words or retaliation. Instead, it stuck to a calm, strategic communication style. PM Modi’s eventual response to Trump’s praise was measured: he highlighted mutual respect and reaffirmed the partnership.&nbsp;This reflects India’s long-standing approach to foreign policy. Guided by the principle of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam—the world is one family—India seeks global peace and cooperation, not confrontation. At the same time, it protects its sovereignty and makes independent choices, whether on energy, trade, or defense.&nbsp;India’s focus on “Make in India” and “Make for World” highlights its dual ambition: self-reliance at home and contribution to global prosperity abroad. By avoiding any warlike rhetoric, India showed the world that it stands for constructive engagement, even under pressure.&nbsp;Another dimension is the strength of the Indian diaspora in the US Millions of Indian-origin Americans contribute significantly to the US economy and society. They form a natural bridge between the two democracies and are an important factor in shaping US policies toward India. Shared Need for Peace and Prosperity&nbsp;The India-US relationship is not just transactional. It is strategic, people-driven, and rooted in shared democratic values. Both countries want an open, stable global order. They have cooperated on defense, technology, clean energy, and regional stability. Both stand against terrorism and support freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific.&nbsp;Even when disagreements emerge—whether on trade or foreign policy—these are bumps on a larger road. The big picture remains the same: the US needs India as a trusted partner in Asia, and India needs the US as a reliable economic and technological ally. Together, they act as stabilizers in a world facing conflicts, recession risks, and geopolitical rivalries. What Could Be Next&nbsp;Trump’s U-turn is more than an adjustment of words. It is a recognition that India cannot be sidelined in any global strategy. The US may impose tariffs or raise concerns, but ultimately, cooperation with India is unavoidable. For India, the episode reaffirms the wisdom of patience and diplomatic maturity.&nbsp;What could be next? The coming months may see new negotiations on trade, technology, and defense. US companies are expected to expand their presence in India, while strategic cooperation in the Indo-Pacific could deepen further. On the global stage, India is likely to leverage this renewed warmth to strengthen its voice at the United Nations, the G20, and other multilateral platforms.&nbsp;Trump’s softer stand may also have a domestic angle. With elections approaching in the US, outreach to the influential Indian diaspora and projecting strong India ties could become part of his campaign narrative. On the other hand, India will continue to walk its independent path, balancing relations with multiple powers while safeguarding its sovereignty.&nbsp;The reset shows that even in moments of friction, India and the US remain bound by shared interests and larger responsibilities. If both nations now build on this opening with vision and consistency, their partnership can not only secure prosperity for their people but also shape the future of global peace, stability, and economic growth. In an era of shifting powers, this may well be one of the defining alliances of the 21st century.

India’s geographic position, economic strength, and democratic credentials make it indispensable for America’s long-term interests in Asia.

US President Donald Trump’s sudden reversal on India has become the talking point in global diplomacy. After weeks of tough talk, high tariffs, and social media criticism, Trump unexpectedly shifted his tone. He praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “great Prime Minister” and called India-US ties “very special.” PM Modi, in a measured and statesmanlike response, reciprocated warmly and underlined the strength of the partnership. This change is not just a passing remark. It carries deeper meaning. The US and India need each other for peace, prosperity, and balance in an uncertain world. The U-turn signals that even in times of strain, both democracies recognize the value of staying aligned. Why Trump Changed His Tone Trump’s hard line on India, marked by tariffs as high as 50 percent on Indian imports, was seen as punishment for New Delhi’s independent energy and trade policies. His criticism even extended to suggesting that India was drifting closer to Russia and China. But soon after, he walked back and stressed friendship. Why this shift? The answer lies in strategic reality. Over the decades, successive governments on both sides of the Pacific have built a robust India-US partnership. India’s geographic position, economic strength, and democratic credentials make it indispensable for America’s long-term interests in Asia. India is part of the Indo-Pacific balance and a counterweight in an era of shifting alliances. Economically too, India matters. It is the fastest-growing major economy and a huge consumer market. American companies such as Apple and Tesla see India as a vital investment hub. Equally, India’s pool of skilled professionals continues to strengthen US industries, from Silicon Valley to healthcare. In this context, Trump’s U-turn was less about personal sentiment and more about recognizing ground realities. Alienating India could not only hurt US companies but also weaken America’s strategic influence in Asia. India’s Mature Diplomacy India, on its part, responded to the situation with balance and dignity. Throughout the tariff episode, New Delhi avoided sharp words or retaliation. Instead, it stuck to a calm, strategic communication style. PM Modi’s eventual response to Trump’s praise was measured: he highlighted mutual respect and reaffirmed the partnership. This reflects India’s long-standing approach to foreign policy. Guided by the principle of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam—the world is one family—India seeks global peace and cooperation, not confrontation. At the same time, it protects its sovereignty and makes independent choices, whether on energy, trade, or defense. India’s focus on “Make in India” and “Make for World” highlights its dual ambition: self-reliance at home and contribution to global prosperity abroad. By avoiding any warlike rhetoric, India showed the world that it stands for constructive engagement, even under pressure. Another dimension is the strength of the Indian diaspora in the US Millions of Indian-origin Americans contribute significantly to the US economy and society. They form a natural bridge between the two democracies and are an important factor in shaping US policies toward India. Shared Need for Peace and Prosperity The India-US relationship is not just transactional. It is strategic, people-driven, and rooted in shared democratic values. Both countries want an open, stable global order. They have cooperated on defense, technology, clean energy, and regional stability. Both stand against terrorism and support freedom of navigation in the Indo-Pacific. Even when disagreements emerge—whether on trade or foreign policy—these are bumps on a larger road. The big picture remains the same: the US needs India as a trusted partner in Asia, and India needs the US as a reliable economic and technological ally. Together, they act as stabilizers in a world facing conflicts, recession risks, and geopolitical rivalries. What Could Be Next Trump’s U-turn is more than an adjustment of words. It is a recognition that India cannot be sidelined in any global strategy. The US may impose tariffs or raise concerns, but ultimately, cooperation with India is unavoidable. For India, the episode reaffirms the wisdom of patience and diplomatic maturity. What could be next? The coming months may see new negotiations on trade, technology, and defense. US companies are expected to expand their presence in India, while strategic cooperation in the Indo-Pacific could deepen further. On the global stage, India is likely to leverage this renewed warmth to strengthen its voice at the United Nations, the G20, and other multilateral platforms. Trump’s softer stand may also have a domestic angle. With elections approaching in the US, outreach to the influential Indian diaspora and projecting strong India ties could become part of his campaign narrative. On the other hand, India will continue to walk its independent path, balancing relations with multiple powers while safeguarding its sovereignty. The reset shows that even in moments of friction, India and the US remain bound by shared interests and larger responsibilities. If both nations now build on this opening with vision and consistency, their partnership can not only secure prosperity for their people but also shape the future of global peace, stability, and economic growth. In an era of shifting powers, this may well be one of the defining alliances of the 21st century.

India’s geographic position, economic strength, and democratic credentials make it indispensable for America’s long-term interests in Asia.

Trade Tariffs, Tough Talk, & U-Turn! Trump Calls Modi ‘Great’ — Why It Matters and What’s Next”

India's GST 2.0 rationalization under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi marks a bold step in tax reforms, sending a clear message to the world that the country is serious about spurring growth and attracting investments. With simplified slabs and rate cuts on everyday items, this overhaul goes beyond mere tweaks—it aims to put more money in consumers' pockets, rev up manufacturing, and lift overall economic sentiment. Coming on the heels of income tax relief in the 2025 Union Budget and RBI's repo rate cuts, GST 2.0 forms part of an economic hat-trick designed to counter global headwinds like trade tariffs and sluggish demand. As Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced, the new structure, effective from September 22, collapses multiple brackets into four: 0 per cent for essentials, 5 per cent for basic goods, 18 per cent for most items, and 40 per cent for luxury and sin products like high-end cars and aerated drinks.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/putin-s-hug-xi-s-smile-modi-s-message-to-trump-s-america-1756964858692">Putin's Hug, Xi's Smile: Modi's message to Trump's America</a>This move scraps the confusing 12 per cent and 28 per cent slabs, ending classification disputes that have long plagued businesses.The timing could not be better. India's economy grew at 7.4 per cent in the last quarter of fiscal 2024-25, but global uncertainties demand fresh momentum. GST 2.0 is expected to add 20-30 basis points to GDP growth, pushing projections towards 6.5-7 per cent over the next two years, according to estimates from HSBC and the IMF. By lowering taxes on items like paneer, packaged snacks, and even luxury SUVs—now under 40 per cent but without the old cess—the reform eases burdens on households and firms alike. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has urged industry to pass on these benefits, ensuring cheaper goods reach consumers and spark a spending spree.This is no standalone change. It syncs with the 2025 Union Budget's income tax overhaul, where slabs were streamlined under the new regime: nil up to Rs 4 lakh, 5 per cent between Rs 4-8 lakh, and so on, with no tax payable on incomes up to Rs 12 lakh after rebates and deductions. The exemption threshold for middle-class earners jumped, leaving more disposable income for spending. Add to this the Reserve Bank of India's recent moves: a repo rate cut to 5.5 per cent and a reduced cash reserve ratio, injecting liquidity and making loans cheaper. Borrowers now face lower EMIs on home and vehicle loans, while businesses get easier credit for expansion. Together, these steps create a virtuous cycle: cheaper goods, affordable credit, and higher take-home pay, all set to drive consumption.The ripple effects are already visible in market euphoria. Sectors like automobiles, cement, real estate, and consumer goods are buzzing, with stock indices climbing on reform hopes. For instance, big cars and SUVs might see effective price drops despite the 40 per cent slab, thanks to cess withdrawal. The banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI) space stands to gain from rising loans and investments. Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), often hit by complex taxes, now face simpler compliance, freeing up resources for growth. Manufacturing gets a leg up, with rate cuts in textiles, renewable energy, and auto parts fixing inverted duty structures that once led to refund delays. This could ramp up production and exports, making India more competitive globally.For rural households and the middle class, GST 2.0 means real relief. Essentials stay at 0 or 5 per cent, while processed foods and hygiene items see cuts, easing inflation pressures. With more cash in hand, spending on durables and services could rise, creating a multiplier effect that lifts jobs and incomes across the board. Experts like those from the Indian Chamber of Commerce note this could offset high US tariffs' impact, adding up to 1 per cent to GDP. The reform also boosts ease of doing business, with fewer slabs cutting litigation and improving India's global rankings. Foreign investors, eyeing stable policies, may pour in more, drawn by a market where consumption drives two-thirds of growth.Yet, success hinges on execution. Businesses must pass on savings, as urged by the government, to avoid profiteering. States, worried about revenue dips, get compensation assurances, but long-term fiscal health needs monitoring. If done right, GST 2.0 could rekindle "animal spirits" in the economy, offsetting drags from global slowdowns.In the end, GST 2.0 is more than a tax cut—it's a growth engine. By simplifying rules and fueling demand, it signals to global players that India is open for business. With GDP forecasts at 6.4-6.5 per cent for 2025-26 from the IMF and RBI, this reform could push the needle higher. From small households saving on snacks to big firms expanding output, the benefits touch all. As India eyes Viksit Bharat by 2047, such moves show policy is immediate, tangible, and geared for sustained prosperity.&nbsp;

The timing could not be better. Indias economy grew at 7.4 per cent in the last quarter of fiscal 2024-25, but global uncertainties demand fresh momentum. 

India's GST 2.0 rationalization under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi marks a bold step in tax reforms, sending a clear message to the world that the country is serious about spurring growth and attracting investments. With simplified slabs and rate cuts on everyday items, this overhaul goes beyond mere tweaks—it aims to put more money in consumers' pockets, rev up manufacturing, and lift overall economic sentiment. Coming on the heels of income tax relief in the 2025 Union Budget and RBI's repo rate cuts, GST 2.0 forms part of an economic hat-trick designed to counter global headwinds like trade tariffs and sluggish demand. As Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced, the new structure, effective from September 22, collapses multiple brackets into four: 0 per cent for essentials, 5 per cent for basic goods, 18 per cent for most items, and 40 per cent for luxury and sin products like high-end cars and aerated drinks. Also Read: Putin's Hug, Xi's Smile: Modi's message to Trump's America This move scraps the confusing 12 per cent and 28 per cent slabs, ending classification disputes that have long plagued businesses. The timing could not be better. India's economy grew at 7.4 per cent in the last quarter of fiscal 2024-25, but global uncertainties demand fresh momentum. GST 2.0 is expected to add 20-30 basis points to GDP growth, pushing projections towards 6.5-7 per cent over the next two years, according to estimates from HSBC and the IMF. By lowering taxes on items like paneer, packaged snacks, and even luxury SUVs—now under 40 per cent but without the old cess—the reform eases burdens on households and firms alike. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has urged industry to pass on these benefits, ensuring cheaper goods reach consumers and spark a spending spree. This is no standalone change. It syncs with the 2025 Union Budget's income tax overhaul, where slabs were streamlined under the new regime: nil up to Rs 4 lakh, 5 per cent between Rs 4-8 lakh, and so on, with no tax payable on incomes up to Rs 12 lakh after rebates and deductions. The exemption threshold for middle-class earners jumped, leaving more disposable income for spending. Add to this the Reserve Bank of India's recent moves: a repo rate cut to 5.5 per cent and a reduced cash reserve ratio, injecting liquidity and making loans cheaper. Borrowers now face lower EMIs on home and vehicle loans, while businesses get easier credit for expansion. Together, these steps create a virtuous cycle: cheaper goods, affordable credit, and higher take-home pay, all set to drive consumption. The ripple effects are already visible in market euphoria. Sectors like automobiles, cement, real estate, and consumer goods are buzzing, with stock indices climbing on reform hopes. For instance, big cars and SUVs might see effective price drops despite the 40 per cent slab, thanks to cess withdrawal. The banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI) space stands to gain from rising loans and investments. Micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), often hit by complex taxes, now face simpler compliance, freeing up resources for growth. Manufacturing gets a leg up, with rate cuts in textiles, renewable energy, and auto parts fixing inverted duty structures that once led to refund delays. This could ramp up production and exports, making India more competitive globally. For rural households and the middle class, GST 2.0 means real relief. Essentials stay at 0 or 5 per cent, while processed foods and hygiene items see cuts, easing inflation pressures. With more cash in hand, spending on durables and services could rise, creating a multiplier effect that lifts jobs and incomes across the board. Experts like those from the Indian Chamber of Commerce note this could offset high US tariffs' impact, adding up to 1 per cent to GDP. The reform also boosts ease of doing business, with fewer slabs cutting litigation and improving India's global rankings. Foreign investors, eyeing stable policies, may pour in more, drawn by a market where consumption drives two-thirds of growth. Yet, success hinges on execution. Businesses must pass on savings, as urged by the government, to avoid profiteering. States, worried about revenue dips, get compensation assurances, but long-term fiscal health needs monitoring. If done right, GST 2.0 could rekindle "animal spirits" in the economy, offsetting drags from global slowdowns. In the end, GST 2.0 is more than a tax cut—it's a growth engine. By simplifying rules and fueling demand, it signals to global players that India is open for business. With GDP forecasts at 6.4-6.5 per cent for 2025-26 from the IMF and RBI, this reform could push the needle higher. From small households saving on snacks to big firms expanding output, the benefits touch all. As India eyes Viksit Bharat by 2047, such moves show policy is immediate, tangible, and geared for sustained prosperity.

The timing could not be better. India's economy grew at 7.4 per cent in the last quarter of fiscal 2024-25, but global uncertainties demand fresh momentum.&nbsp;

Why GST 2.0 is a global signal that India means business, EXPLAINED

As global trade faces fresh headwinds from unilateral US tariffs, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with his Japanese counterpart, Shigeru Ishiba, in Tokyo has drawn sharp attention. The two-day visit marks the 15th India-Japan Annual Summit and comes at a time when both nations seek to build more robust economic buffers. With the US imposing duties on key imports, India and Japan are stepping up their partnership to secure supply chains and drive mutual growth, a move that could steady Asia’s economic landscape.&nbsp;The summit builds on a long-standing special strategic and global partnership between the two countries. During the talks, PM Modi and Ishiba agreed to expand cooperation across eight key fields: economy, economic security, mobility, environment, technology and innovation, health, people-to-people links, and ties between local governments. This broad framework aims to address shared challenges like climate change and digital divides while capitalising on each other’s strengths. Japan, with its advanced tech base, and India, with its vast market and young workforce, see this as a way to create jobs and spur innovation on both sides.&nbsp;At the heart of the discussions lies PM Modi’s flagship ‘Make in India’ programme, now evolving into ‘Make for the World’. The prime minister urged Japanese industry leaders at the India-Japan Economic Forum to invest more deeply in five priority areas: manufacturing, technology and innovation, green energy, next-generation infrastructure, and skills development. He highlighted the success of India-Japan collaboration in the automobile sector, where Japanese firms like Suzuki and Honda helped build India’s auto industry from scratch in the 1980s. Today, India ranks among the world’s top vehicle producers, thanks in part to that early support. PM Modi suggested replicating this model in emerging fields such as batteries, robotics, semiconductors, shipbuilding, and nuclear energy.&nbsp;Japan’s response has been enthusiastic. Tokyo plans to double its private-sector investment in India to 10 trillion yen, or about USD 68 billion, over the next decade. This builds on the previous target of 5 trillion yen set in 2022, which saw annual inflows of around 1 trillion yen. Japanese companies have already poured over USD 40 billion into India, including USD 13 billion in the last two years alone. The new goal, outlined in a joint statement, will focus on high-tech sectors to help India become a global manufacturing hub. For instance, an agreement on joint credit mechanisms will support clean energy projects, aligning with India’s push for sustainable development.&nbsp;Beyond investments, the leaders emphasised human connections. Japan aims to increase exchanges with India to 500,000 people over the next five years, including 50,000 skilled workers and talents from India. This could ease Japan’s labour shortages in ageing industries while providing Indian youth with global opportunities. PM Modi also visited a semiconductor facility in Sendai, underscoring the partnership’s forward-looking nature. With India investing heavily in chip-making—over Rs 65,000 crore recently—Japanese expertise could accelerate this effort, reducing reliance on vulnerable global supplies.&nbsp;Several bilateral pacts were inked during the visit, including memorandums on digital partnerships, clean energy, and economic security. A notable deal involves the space agencies of both countries—the Indian Space Research Organisation and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency—for a joint Lunar Polar Exploration Mission. This scientific collaboration could yield breakthroughs in resource mapping on the moon, benefiting future space endeavours. In defence, the talks touched on transferring Japanese E-10 coaches for India’s high-speed rail projects, like the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, which is already a symbol of the partnership.&nbsp;Experts view this summit as a strategic pivot amid rising US protectionism. With tariffs disrupting trade flows, India and Japan are working to diversify their economies. Bilateral trade stood at USD 22.85 billion in 2023-24, with Japan enjoying a surplus due to exports of machinery and electronics. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, in place since 2011, has cut tariffs, but trade remains below potential. By ramping up investments, both nations aim to balance this and create resilient value chains. For India, Japanese funds could boost its export-oriented manufacturing under ‘Make for the World’, targeting global markets in green tech and digital services.&nbsp;On a wider canvas, the India-Japan bond contributes to Asia’s stability. As members of the Quad grouping with the US and Australia, they share concerns over assertive actions in the Indo-Pacific, including maritime disputes. Their partnership promotes a rules-based order, countering any single power’s dominance. Economically, it could inspire similar ties across the region, from Southeast Asia to Africa, cultivating shared prosperity. PM Modi echoed this in his remarks, noting that India and Japan hold a common vision for peace and progress, not just for their people but for the world.&nbsp;Yet, challenges persist. India’s trade deficit with Japan, at around USD 5 billion last year, needs addressing through more balanced exchanges. Regulatory hurdles in India, such as land acquisition delays, have slowed some projects. Japan, facing domestic economic pressures, must ensure its firms see India as a safe bet. If navigated well, this alliance could set an example for Asia, where growth often hinges on cross-border cooperation.&nbsp;As PM Modi wraps up his Japan leg before heading to China for the SCO summit, the message is clear: In an uncertain world, old friends like India and Japan are paving a path to enduring stability and wealth. From the nostalgic charm of ‘Mera Joota Hai Japani’ to the ambitious vision of ‘Make in India, Make for the World’, this visit may well mark a turning point, where ‘Make in India’ becomes a bridge for Asian unity.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

With US tariffs disrupting trade flows, India and Japan are working to diversify their economies. Bilateral trade between Tokyo and Delhi stood at USD 22.85 billion in 2023-24, with Japan enjoying a surplus due to exports of machinery and electronics.

As global trade faces fresh headwinds from unilateral US tariffs, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with his Japanese counterpart, Shigeru Ishiba, in Tokyo has drawn sharp attention. The two-day visit marks the 15th India-Japan Annual Summit and comes at a time when both nations seek to build more robust economic buffers. With the US imposing duties on key imports, India and Japan are stepping up their partnership to secure supply chains and drive mutual growth, a move that could steady Asia’s economic landscape. The summit builds on a long-standing special strategic and global partnership between the two countries. During the talks, PM Modi and Ishiba agreed to expand cooperation across eight key fields: economy, economic security, mobility, environment, technology and innovation, health, people-to-people links, and ties between local governments. This broad framework aims to address shared challenges like climate change and digital divides while capitalising on each other’s strengths. Japan, with its advanced tech base, and India, with its vast market and young workforce, see this as a way to create jobs and spur innovation on both sides. At the heart of the discussions lies PM Modi’s flagship ‘Make in India’ programme, now evolving into ‘Make for the World’. The prime minister urged Japanese industry leaders at the India-Japan Economic Forum to invest more deeply in five priority areas: manufacturing, technology and innovation, green energy, next-generation infrastructure, and skills development. He highlighted the success of India-Japan collaboration in the automobile sector, where Japanese firms like Suzuki and Honda helped build India’s auto industry from scratch in the 1980s. Today, India ranks among the world’s top vehicle producers, thanks in part to that early support. PM Modi suggested replicating this model in emerging fields such as batteries, robotics, semiconductors, shipbuilding, and nuclear energy. Japan’s response has been enthusiastic. Tokyo plans to double its private-sector investment in India to 10 trillion yen, or about USD 68 billion, over the next decade. This builds on the previous target of 5 trillion yen set in 2022, which saw annual inflows of around 1 trillion yen. Japanese companies have already poured over USD 40 billion into India, including USD 13 billion in the last two years alone. The new goal, outlined in a joint statement, will focus on high-tech sectors to help India become a global manufacturing hub. For instance, an agreement on joint credit mechanisms will support clean energy projects, aligning with India’s push for sustainable development. Beyond investments, the leaders emphasised human connections. Japan aims to increase exchanges with India to 500,000 people over the next five years, including 50,000 skilled workers and talents from India. This could ease Japan’s labour shortages in ageing industries while providing Indian youth with global opportunities. PM Modi also visited a semiconductor facility in Sendai, underscoring the partnership’s forward-looking nature. With India investing heavily in chip-making—over Rs 65,000 crore recently—Japanese expertise could accelerate this effort, reducing reliance on vulnerable global supplies. Several bilateral pacts were inked during the visit, including memorandums on digital partnerships, clean energy, and economic security. A notable deal involves the space agencies of both countries—the Indian Space Research Organisation and Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency—for a joint Lunar Polar Exploration Mission. This scientific collaboration could yield breakthroughs in resource mapping on the moon, benefiting future space endeavours. In defence, the talks touched on transferring Japanese E-10 coaches for India’s high-speed rail projects, like the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, which is already a symbol of the partnership. Experts view this summit as a strategic pivot amid rising US protectionism. With tariffs disrupting trade flows, India and Japan are working to diversify their economies. Bilateral trade stood at USD 22.85 billion in 2023-24, with Japan enjoying a surplus due to exports of machinery and electronics. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, in place since 2011, has cut tariffs, but trade remains below potential. By ramping up investments, both nations aim to balance this and create resilient value chains. For India, Japanese funds could boost its export-oriented manufacturing under ‘Make for the World’, targeting global markets in green tech and digital services. On a wider canvas, the India-Japan bond contributes to Asia’s stability. As members of the Quad grouping with the US and Australia, they share concerns over assertive actions in the Indo-Pacific, including maritime disputes. Their partnership promotes a rules-based order, countering any single power’s dominance. Economically, it could inspire similar ties across the region, from Southeast Asia to Africa, cultivating shared prosperity. PM Modi echoed this in his remarks, noting that India and Japan hold a common vision for peace and progress, not just for their people but for the world. Yet, challenges persist. India’s trade deficit with Japan, at around USD 5 billion last year, needs addressing through more balanced exchanges. Regulatory hurdles in India, such as land acquisition delays, have slowed some projects. Japan, facing domestic economic pressures, must ensure its firms see India as a safe bet. If navigated well, this alliance could set an example for Asia, where growth often hinges on cross-border cooperation. As PM Modi wraps up his Japan leg before heading to China for the SCO summit, the message is clear: In an uncertain world, old friends like India and Japan are paving a path to enduring stability and wealth. From the nostalgic charm of ‘Mera Joota Hai Japani’ to the ambitious vision of ‘Make in India, Make for the World’, this visit may well mark a turning point, where ‘Make in India’ becomes a bridge for Asian unity. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

With US tariffs disrupting trade flows, India and Japan are working to diversify their economies. Bilateral trade between Tokyo and Delhi stood at USD 22.85 billion in 2023-24, with Japan enjoying a surplus due to exports of machinery and electronics.

From ‘Mera Joota Hai Japani’ to ‘Make in India, Make for the World’, PM Modi’s India-Japan alliance boosts Asian stability

The Parliament of India’s decision to pass the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, banning real-money online games, marks a turning point for the country’s digital landscape. The move, driven by concerns over gambling addiction, money laundering, and financial frauds, targets a USD 3.8 billion industry that has attracted global investors and powered platforms like Dream11, Games24x7, Mobile Premier League, 99Games, KheloFantasy, and My11Circle. Official data paints a grim picture: Indians lose nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually to such games, impacting around 45 crore people. The human toll is stark—families pushed into debt, young lives disrupted, and mental health strained by addictive platforms. This ban, while disruptive, reflects the PM Modi-led Central Government’s duty to shield citizens from exploitative systems that drain household savings and channel profits to foreign firms. Yet, it also raises a critical question: what lies ahead for India’s gaming future?&nbsp;For years, real-money gaming (RMG) platforms have lured players with the promise of quick riches. Games like rummy, poker, and fantasy sports blurred the lines between skill and gambling, trapping users in cycles of deposits and losses. Industry advocates highlight the sector’s economic contributions—Rs 31,000 crore in annual revenue, over 2 lakh jobs, and Rs 25,000 crore in foreign investment. However, these gains pale against the social costs. Media reports note that lawmakers see an outright ban as more effective than regulation, given the financial ruin caused by “manipulative design features and addictive algorithms” in these games. The state’s stance is clear: if physical gambling faces strict controls, its digital version cannot escape scrutiny. The flow of billions overseas further underlines the unsustainability of this model, where India’s tax revenue is dwarfed by citizen losses.&nbsp;Ban, an opportunity&nbsp;The ban, however, is not just a crackdown—it’s an opportunity to reshape India’s gaming ecosystem. The Online Gaming Bill explicitly promotes e-sports, educational, and social gaming platforms, signaling a shift toward ethical entertainment. The Union Ministry of Sports will frame guidelines for e-sports events, establish training academies, research centres, and technology platforms, recognizing competitive gaming as a legitimate sport. This aligns with global trends, where e-sports is a USD 180 billion industry, surpassing films and music in revenue. By nurturing skill-based gaming, India can tap into professional tournaments, streaming economies, and creative studios, building a sector that inspires talent and careers without exploiting users.&nbsp;Gaming, the Aatmanirbhar way&nbsp;A Make-in-India gaming vision could anchor this new direction. For too long, Indian gamers have consumed foreign content—Chinese battle royales, American sports titles, or European fantasy games—while local talent served global studios. A domestic ecosystem can change this. It would keep capital within India, curbing the outflow of billions to overseas firms. Game development, animation, coding, and event management could create lakhs of jobs, boosting employment in high-skill sectors. Games rooted in Indian culture—think a strategy title based on the Mahabharata or a city-builder inspired by the Indus Valley Civilization—could resonate globally, showcasing India’s heritage. Most crucially, homegrown platforms can embed ethical safeguards like spending caps, time alerts, and age verification, ensuring safe and responsible entertainment. So, if Aatmanirbhar Bharat is more than a slogan, online gaming is one of the sectors where it must be tested.&nbsp;Eyeing for ethical gaming&nbsp;The bill’s emphasis on cultural and educational games matching with Indian values adds another layer. These platforms, free from monetary stakes, can engage users through storytelling and skill-building. Imagine games that teach history or promote digital literacy, appealing to both young players and families. Such initiatives can position India as a hub for meaningful gaming, distinct from the profit-driven RMG model. The government’s push to regulate content under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ensures these games remain age-appropriate and culturally relevant, creating a balanced digital ecosystem.&nbsp;Critics warn that a blanket ban might drive users to illegal offshore apps, which lack oversight and consumer protections. This concern is valid—unregulated platforms pose risks of fraud and exploitation. However, the solution lies in swiftly building ethical alternatives. When offered engaging, safe, and culturally resonant games, users are likely to shift away from shady operators. European markets offer a blueprint: strict KYC norms, spending limits, self-exclusion options, and independent grievance mechanisms ensure responsible gaming. India, with its success in digital payments, can adopt similar standards, leapfrogging into a model for ethical gaming globally.&nbsp;The road ahead demands a straegic coordination. Policymakers must work with developers to create a supportive environment, offering incentives for local studios and clear compliance rules. Entrepreneurs should seize the chance to build platforms that prioritize user welfare over profit. Gamers, too, have a role—choosing ethical games can drive demand for quality content. If real-money gaming is revisited, it must operate under tight rules: robust KYC, spending caps, and transparent fund management to prevent misuse.&nbsp;Ultimately, gaming is more than entertainment—it ventilates how India balances innovation with responsibility. The ban is not the end but a chance to clear a flawed path and build a better one. A healthy, ethical gaming industry can become a pillar of India’s digital economy, creating jobs, retaining wealth, and projecting cultural pride. Under PM Modi’s vision, India is not just banning harmful games—it is laying the foundation for a gaming future that is innovative, inclusive, and proudly Indian.

Indians lose nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually to such games, impacting around 45 crore people. The human toll is stark—families pushed into debt, young lives disrupted, and mental health strained by addictive platforms. 

The Parliament of India’s decision to pass the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, banning real-money online games, marks a turning point for the country’s digital landscape. The move, driven by concerns over gambling addiction, money laundering, and financial frauds, targets a USD 3.8 billion industry that has attracted global investors and powered platforms like Dream11, Games24x7, Mobile Premier League, 99Games, KheloFantasy, and My11Circle. Official data paints a grim picture: Indians lose nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually to such games, impacting around 45 crore people. The human toll is stark—families pushed into debt, young lives disrupted, and mental health strained by addictive platforms. This ban, while disruptive, reflects the PM Modi-led Central Government’s duty to shield citizens from exploitative systems that drain household savings and channel profits to foreign firms. Yet, it also raises a critical question: what lies ahead for India’s gaming future? For years, real-money gaming (RMG) platforms have lured players with the promise of quick riches. Games like rummy, poker, and fantasy sports blurred the lines between skill and gambling, trapping users in cycles of deposits and losses. Industry advocates highlight the sector’s economic contributions—Rs 31,000 crore in annual revenue, over 2 lakh jobs, and Rs 25,000 crore in foreign investment. However, these gains pale against the social costs. Media reports note that lawmakers see an outright ban as more effective than regulation, given the financial ruin caused by “manipulative design features and addictive algorithms” in these games. The state’s stance is clear: if physical gambling faces strict controls, its digital version cannot escape scrutiny. The flow of billions overseas further underlines the unsustainability of this model, where India’s tax revenue is dwarfed by citizen losses. Ban, an opportunity The ban, however, is not just a crackdown—it’s an opportunity to reshape India’s gaming ecosystem. The Online Gaming Bill explicitly promotes e-sports, educational, and social gaming platforms, signaling a shift toward ethical entertainment. The Union Ministry of Sports will frame guidelines for e-sports events, establish training academies, research centres, and technology platforms, recognizing competitive gaming as a legitimate sport. This aligns with global trends, where e-sports is a USD 180 billion industry, surpassing films and music in revenue. By nurturing skill-based gaming, India can tap into professional tournaments, streaming economies, and creative studios, building a sector that inspires talent and careers without exploiting users. Gaming, the Aatmanirbhar way A Make-in-India gaming vision could anchor this new direction. For too long, Indian gamers have consumed foreign content—Chinese battle royales, American sports titles, or European fantasy games—while local talent served global studios. A domestic ecosystem can change this. It would keep capital within India, curbing the outflow of billions to overseas firms. Game development, animation, coding, and event management could create lakhs of jobs, boosting employment in high-skill sectors. Games rooted in Indian culture—think a strategy title based on the Mahabharata or a city-builder inspired by the Indus Valley Civilization—could resonate globally, showcasing India’s heritage. Most crucially, homegrown platforms can embed ethical safeguards like spending caps, time alerts, and age verification, ensuring safe and responsible entertainment. So, if Aatmanirbhar Bharat is more than a slogan, online gaming is one of the sectors where it must be tested. Eyeing for ethical gaming The bill’s emphasis on cultural and educational games matching with Indian values adds another layer. These platforms, free from monetary stakes, can engage users through storytelling and skill-building. Imagine games that teach history or promote digital literacy, appealing to both young players and families. Such initiatives can position India as a hub for meaningful gaming, distinct from the profit-driven RMG model. The government’s push to regulate content under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology ensures these games remain age-appropriate and culturally relevant, creating a balanced digital ecosystem. Critics warn that a blanket ban might drive users to illegal offshore apps, which lack oversight and consumer protections. This concern is valid—unregulated platforms pose risks of fraud and exploitation. However, the solution lies in swiftly building ethical alternatives. When offered engaging, safe, and culturally resonant games, users are likely to shift away from shady operators. European markets offer a blueprint: strict KYC norms, spending limits, self-exclusion options, and independent grievance mechanisms ensure responsible gaming. India, with its success in digital payments, can adopt similar standards, leapfrogging into a model for ethical gaming globally. The road ahead demands a straegic coordination. Policymakers must work with developers to create a supportive environment, offering incentives for local studios and clear compliance rules. Entrepreneurs should seize the chance to build platforms that prioritize user welfare over profit. Gamers, too, have a role—choosing ethical games can drive demand for quality content. If real-money gaming is revisited, it must operate under tight rules: robust KYC, spending caps, and transparent fund management to prevent misuse. Ultimately, gaming is more than entertainment—it ventilates how India balances innovation with responsibility. The ban is not the end but a chance to clear a flawed path and build a better one. A healthy, ethical gaming industry can become a pillar of India’s digital economy, creating jobs, retaining wealth, and projecting cultural pride. Under PM Modi’s vision, India is not just banning harmful games—it is laying the foundation for a gaming future that is innovative, inclusive, and proudly Indian.

Indians lose nearly Rs 20,000 crore annually to such games, impacting around 45 crore people. The human toll is stark—families pushed into debt, young lives disrupted, and mental health strained by addictive platforms.&nbsp;

Online Gaming Going Aatmanirbhar Way! PM Modi’s Push for Esports Rooted in Ethical Entertainment

Violence in politics, marked by slaps, shoe-throwing, and other assaults, has long cast a shadow over democratic societies. From the assault on Mahatma Gandhi in South Africa nearly five decades before India's independence in 1947 to the recent attack on Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, such acts of violence and animosityhave reverberated globally, targeting prominent leaders. In a democracy built on the principle of being of the people, by the people, and for the people, these incidents are wholly unacceptable. While the right to disagree or dissent is a cornerstone of democracy, physical violence has no place in a civilised setup and it could be largely seen as slapping on democracy in public discourse.&nbsp;The latest case involving Rekha Gupta unfolded during a public hearing, or "Jan Sunwai", at her official residence. A young man approached her, handed over some papers, and then allegedly attacked her like a bolt from the blue. The attacker was swiftly detained, and the Chief Minister was reportedly taken to hospital for medical checks. Leaders across political spectrum condemned the act, with the BJP voicing strong outrage over the incident. The Rekha Gupta government, in its first 100 days, has been steering Delhi towards inclusive and sustainable development under the "Viksit Delhi" vision matching the pace of PM Modi’s Viksit Bharat mission.&nbsp;Such safety-valve-eruption ofoutbursts do more than harm individuals; they shake the foundations of democratic systems and liberal ideals. They expose deep social fissuresas well as reflect frustration and intolerance among people as if they are sitting on a short fuse. Attacks on leaders erode public safety and order, pushing nations towards unrest. Research from the London School of Economics points to the "Black Sheep Effect", where individuals lash out at politicians seen as betraying group norms or threatening shared identities. These knee-jerk reactions often stem from perceived failures in policy or leadership that strike at personal or community concerns.&nbsp;The rise of artificial intelligence-driven deepfakes and unregulated social media content has, as experts opine, worsened the climate of political hostility. AI tools can flood platforms with misleading material that incites anger and pushes individuals towards extreme views, especially during high-stakes periods like elections. Reports warn that synthetic media, including deepfakes, could be weaponised to undermine trust in polls and fuel violence. With limited oversight, this trend heightens the risk of radicalisation, turning online grievances into real-world actions.&nbsp;High-profile attacks across globe In recent years, several high-profile cases of violence against politicians have grabbed global attention. On July 13, 2024, former US President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for the presidential race, narrowly escaped an assassination attempt at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. A 20-year-old gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, fired shots from a nearby rooftop, grazing Trump’s ear. The incident sparked intense debates on security and polarisation in American politics.&nbsp;Indian leaders under fire Closer home, Indian leaders have faced similar shocks. In May 2019, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was slapped during a roadshow in Moti Nagar while campaigning for his party’s candidate. The attacker cited local grievances, showing how public discontent can spill into violence. In 2011, Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar was slapped by a 27-year-old auto driver, Harvinder Singh, who blamed the minister for rising prices. More recently, on June 6, 2024, BJP MP Kangana Ranaut alleged she was slapped by a CISF constable at Chandigarh airport amid tensions over farmer protests, leading to the officer’s suspension. In 2009, former Home Minister P Chidambaram faced a shoe-throwing incident at a press meet, with the journalist protesting his stance on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.&nbsp;Global episodes of political violence Beyond India, global leaders have not been spared. In 2021, French President Emmanuel Macron was slapped during a public walkabout, an act that stunned viewers worldwide. In 2008, Iraqi journalist Muntazer al-Zaidi hurled his shoes at then-US President George W. Bush during a Baghdad press conference, protesting the Iraq war. Italy’s former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi suffered serious injuries in 2009 when struck with a metal statue in Milan, losing significant blood. Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro was stabbed during his 2018 campaign, an attack that boosted his popularity and aided his victory. In 1991, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl clashed with protesters in eastern Germany after being pelted with eggs and paint, requiring security intervention.&nbsp;Lighter but disruptive attacks Some incidents, while less severe, remain disruptive. Britain’s former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott punched a protester in 2001 after an egg was thrown at him during an election event. Canada’s ex-Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustaf were hit with pies around 2000-2001, often by activists making a statement. UK politician Nigel Farage, known for his Brexit campaign, had a milkshake thrown at him in 2019, part of a wave of such protests against right-wing figures.&nbsp;Broader pattern, its impact These events, spanning continents, reveal a pattern where frustration meets opportunity, often amplified by media coverage. Data from tracking groups show over 300 cases of political violence in the US since 2021, with a rise in 2024 amid election fever. In Europe, threats to elected officials are climbing, linked to economic woes and ideological rifts. Such assaults breed fear among public figures, potentially discouraging capable individuals from entering politics. They also deepen societal divides, with sympathisers rallying around victims while critics downplay the acts. In India, where elections draw massive crowds, ensuring leader safety is a logistical challenge, as past lapses show.&nbsp;Strong legal action against perpetrators is crucial, but addressing root causes like inequality and misinformation is equally vital. Governments, educators, media, and civil society must collaborate to instil civic values and promote dialogue over discord. Youth, often at the forefront of such incidents, need guidance to channel dissent through peaceful means like voting or protests.&nbsp;&nbsp;Vibrant democracies thrive on debate, not violence. As the attack on Rekha Guptadeeply underlines the downfall of civility in society and political circle, ignoring this menace risks pushing nations towards instability. A collective commitment to non-violence is essential to preserve the essence of people-driven governance across the world.

AI tools can flood platforms with misleading material that incites anger and pushes individuals towards extreme views, especially during high-stakes periods like elections.

Violence in politics, marked by slaps, shoe-throwing, and other assaults, has long cast a shadow over democratic societies. From the assault on Mahatma Gandhi in South Africa nearly five decades before India's independence in 1947 to the recent attack on Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, such acts of violence and animosityhave reverberated globally, targeting prominent leaders. In a democracy built on the principle of being of the people, by the people, and for the people, these incidents are wholly unacceptable. While the right to disagree or dissent is a cornerstone of democracy, physical violence has no place in a civilised setup and it could be largely seen as slapping on democracy in public discourse. The latest case involving Rekha Gupta unfolded during a public hearing, or "Jan Sunwai", at her official residence. A young man approached her, handed over some papers, and then allegedly attacked her like a bolt from the blue. The attacker was swiftly detained, and the Chief Minister was reportedly taken to hospital for medical checks. Leaders across political spectrum condemned the act, with the BJP voicing strong outrage over the incident. The Rekha Gupta government, in its first 100 days, has been steering Delhi towards inclusive and sustainable development under the "Viksit Delhi" vision matching the pace of PM Modi’s Viksit Bharat mission. Such safety-valve-eruption ofoutbursts do more than harm individuals; they shake the foundations of democratic systems and liberal ideals. They expose deep social fissuresas well as reflect frustration and intolerance among people as if they are sitting on a short fuse. Attacks on leaders erode public safety and order, pushing nations towards unrest. Research from the London School of Economics points to the "Black Sheep Effect", where individuals lash out at politicians seen as betraying group norms or threatening shared identities. These knee-jerk reactions often stem from perceived failures in policy or leadership that strike at personal or community concerns. The rise of artificial intelligence-driven deepfakes and unregulated social media content has, as experts opine, worsened the climate of political hostility. AI tools can flood platforms with misleading material that incites anger and pushes individuals towards extreme views, especially during high-stakes periods like elections. Reports warn that synthetic media, including deepfakes, could be weaponised to undermine trust in polls and fuel violence. With limited oversight, this trend heightens the risk of radicalisation, turning online grievances into real-world actions. High-profile attacks across globe In recent years, several high-profile cases of violence against politicians have grabbed global attention. On July 13, 2024, former US President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for the presidential race, narrowly escaped an assassination attempt at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. A 20-year-old gunman, Thomas Matthew Crooks, fired shots from a nearby rooftop, grazing Trump’s ear. The incident sparked intense debates on security and polarisation in American politics. Indian leaders under fire Closer home, Indian leaders have faced similar shocks. In May 2019, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was slapped during a roadshow in Moti Nagar while campaigning for his party’s candidate. The attacker cited local grievances, showing how public discontent can spill into violence. In 2011, Union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar was slapped by a 27-year-old auto driver, Harvinder Singh, who blamed the minister for rising prices. More recently, on June 6, 2024, BJP MP Kangana Ranaut alleged she was slapped by a CISF constable at Chandigarh airport amid tensions over farmer protests, leading to the officer’s suspension. In 2009, former Home Minister P Chidambaram faced a shoe-throwing incident at a press meet, with the journalist protesting his stance on the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. Global episodes of political violence Beyond India, global leaders have not been spared. In 2021, French President Emmanuel Macron was slapped during a public walkabout, an act that stunned viewers worldwide. In 2008, Iraqi journalist Muntazer al-Zaidi hurled his shoes at then-US President George W. Bush during a Baghdad press conference, protesting the Iraq war. Italy’s former Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi suffered serious injuries in 2009 when struck with a metal statue in Milan, losing significant blood. Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro was stabbed during his 2018 campaign, an attack that boosted his popularity and aided his victory. In 1991, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl clashed with protesters in eastern Germany after being pelted with eggs and paint, requiring security intervention. Lighter but disruptive attacks Some incidents, while less severe, remain disruptive. Britain’s former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott punched a protester in 2001 after an egg was thrown at him during an election event. Canada’s ex-Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustaf were hit with pies around 2000-2001, often by activists making a statement. UK politician Nigel Farage, known for his Brexit campaign, had a milkshake thrown at him in 2019, part of a wave of such protests against right-wing figures. Broader pattern, its impact These events, spanning continents, reveal a pattern where frustration meets opportunity, often amplified by media coverage. Data from tracking groups show over 300 cases of political violence in the US since 2021, with a rise in 2024 amid election fever. In Europe, threats to elected officials are climbing, linked to economic woes and ideological rifts. Such assaults breed fear among public figures, potentially discouraging capable individuals from entering politics. They also deepen societal divides, with sympathisers rallying around victims while critics downplay the acts. In India, where elections draw massive crowds, ensuring leader safety is a logistical challenge, as past lapses show. Strong legal action against perpetrators is crucial, but addressing root causes like inequality and misinformation is equally vital. Governments, educators, media, and civil society must collaborate to instil civic values and promote dialogue over discord. Youth, often at the forefront of such incidents, need guidance to channel dissent through peaceful means like voting or protests. Vibrant democracies thrive on debate, not violence. As the attack on Rekha Guptadeeply underlines the downfall of civility in society and political circle, ignoring this menace risks pushing nations towards instability. A collective commitment to non-violence is essential to preserve the essence of people-driven governance across the world.

AI tools can flood platforms with misleading material that incites anger and pushes individuals towards extreme views, especially during high-stakes periods like elections.

‘Slapping Democracy’? Mahatma Gandhi, Rekha Gupta, Donald Trump & global politics of ATTACKS that deface humane civility

The chequered history of antagonistic stances during the decades-long USA-Soviet Union Cold War and subsequent détente, which brought Capitol Hill and Raisina Hill closer, shaped by geopolitical power balances between the world’s oldest and youngest democratic countries, is a tell-tale sign of the complexity and dynamics of their relationship. A high-voltage trade war between the United States and India could have far-reaching consequences—not just economically, but also diplomatically and strategically. At a time when the US is already deeply entrenched in a tech and trade cold war with China, the feasibility of sustaining another trade conflict, particularly with a strategic partner like India, appears both impractical and unwise. Such a conflict could overshadow the efforts of former US presidents like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, who extended an olive branch to Delhi to work together on common concerns regarding growing Islamic extremism, energy security, and climate change.&nbsp;The trade war between the United States and China, initiated under the Trump administration and continued with nuanced strategies by President Joe Biden, has disrupted global supply chains, increased tariffs, and led to decoupling in key sectors like semiconductors, AI, 5G, and pharmaceuticals. This rivalry is not just about economics but also technology supremacy, national security, and ideological competition between democratic and authoritarian models of governance.&nbsp;The US is now actively working to "de-risk" from China, which includes encouraging Chian Plus One strategy, manufacturing relocations, forming trade partnerships with democratic nations, and controlling Chinese access to cutting-edge technologies. In this strategic calculus, India has emerged as a natural partner—not only because of its shared democratic values, but also due to its economic potential, strategic location, and growing technological prowess.&nbsp;India, with a population of over 1.4 billion and a GDP nearing USD 4 trillion, is the world's fastest-growing major economy, placing it behind the United States with a GDP of USD 30.51 trillion, China at USD19.23 trillion, and Germany at USD 4.74 trillion. It is projected to become the third-largest economy by 2030. More importantly, it is a robust democracy, unlike China, and has a young, digitally enabled consumer base.&nbsp;Over the years, successive Indian governments—whether led by the Congress or the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—have nurtured deeper ties with the United States. From the civil nuclear deal during the Manmohan Singh-Bush era to the strengthening of QUAD and signing of key defense agreements under Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Biden, bilateral ties have touched new heights. "Howdy Modi" and "Abki Baar, Trump Sarkar," the reverberations of which are still echoing around the world, have cemented India-US relations with an emotional bond between PM Modi and Trump.&nbsp;The US now sees India as a central pillar of its Indo-Pacific strategy, aimed at counterbalancing Chinese influence in the region. From military cooperation and joint exercises like Malabar to investments in critical technologies and semiconductors, India’s positioning with the US has become more strategic than transactional.<h2>Can the US Sustain Strained Ties with India?</h2>&nbsp;Engaging in a trade war with India, especially in the current geopolitical climate, could be counterproductive for the United States. Here are five compelling reasons WHY:&nbsp;1. India as a Consumer Powerhouse&nbsp;India is one of the largest markets for American companies in sectors like technology, defense, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and energy. US giants such as Apple, Amazon, Boeing, and Tesla see India as a critical growth destination. Restricting trade or imposing tariffs would directly impact US corporate interests.&nbsp;Moreover, India’s increasing emphasis on local manufacturing (Make in India, PLI schemes) is creating opportunities for American investments in electronics, green energy, and EVs. Disrupting this potential through a trade war could push India toward alternative partners such as Russia or the EU.&nbsp;2. A Reliable Democratic Ally in Asia&nbsp;As the US seeks to strengthen global democracies and build resilient supply chains, India remains the only large, stable, and democratic counterweight to China in Asia. Its neutral stance in conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war has also demonstrated India's commitment to strategic autonomy, a quality the US respects.&nbsp;India’s G20 presidency and leadership role in the Global South further enhance its diplomatic influence. Isolating or antagonizing such a partner could weaken the US's broader goals of forming a rules-based global order.&nbsp;3. Economic Interdependence&nbsp;In the fiscal year 2024–25, India–US trade reached USD 131.8 billion, comprising USD 86.5 billion in exports from India and USD 45.3 billion in imports, making the US India’s largest trading partner. This shows a strong and robust strategic economic relationship between the two countries. Nearly 2,000 American companies operate in India, while Indian firms have invested over USD 40 billion in the US, creating around 425,000 jobs that is documented in a report titled "Indian Roots, American Soil”. This economic interdependence serves as a buffer against abrupt policy shifts or trade hostilities.&nbsp;4. Geopolitical Timing Matters&nbsp;With tensions in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and Ukraine-Russia conflict still unresolved, the US cannot afford to lose India as a regional ally. Unlike Cold War times, today’s conflicts are multipolar and multidimensional—ranging from cyberspace to climate diplomacy. India’s cooperation is crucial in areas like AI regulation, global data flows, cybersecurity, and space exploration.&nbsp;5. India-US for Global PeaceIndia and the US, united, can ensure global peace, prosperity, and stability. India, once counted among the 'Fragile Five' nations, as coined by investment firm Morgan Stanley, today finds itself among the 'Fabulous Five' economies of the world. The strong base of the Indian diaspora in the US works with honesty and dedication, in line with the spirit of 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam' (The World is One Family). The India-America partnership operates on the principle of promoting global peace.<h3>Pragmatism Over Provocation</h3>&nbsp;Of course, India and the US have their share of trade disputes—ranging from tariffs on agricultural products and medical devices to data localization policies and digital taxation. But these should be addressed through dialogue and negotiation mechanisms such as the US-India Trade Policy Forum, rather than retaliatory measures. Both nations are members of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and have begun collaborating on semiconductor supply chains, critical minerals, and AI governance. These positive developments must be leveraged to create a roadmap for sustainable, balanced trade rather than indulging in protectionist impulses.&nbsp;In an era where alliances are being redrawn and global order is in flux, the US must tread carefully. Engaging in a trade war with India would not only harm American business interests but also erode the foundation of a strategic partnership that is essential to its Indo-Pacific vision. India, with its demographic dividend, economic momentum, and democratic stability, is not just another trade partner—it is a strategic necessity for the United States. It worth mentioned the famous quote of former US president Barack Obama, “India is not simply an emerging power; it is already a world power, and a natural partner of the United States.” So, instead of trade conflict, collaboration should guide the next phase of India-US relations, Donald Trump must rethink.

 A high-voltage trade war between the United States and India could have far-reaching consequences—not just economically, but also diplomatically and strategically.

The chequered history of antagonistic stances during the decades-long USA-Soviet Union Cold War and subsequent détente, which brought Capitol Hill and Raisina Hill closer, shaped by geopolitical power balances between the world’s oldest and youngest democratic countries, is a tell-tale sign of the complexity and dynamics of their relationship. A high-voltage trade war between the United States and India could have far-reaching consequences—not just economically, but also diplomatically and strategically. At a time when the US is already deeply entrenched in a tech and trade cold war with China, the feasibility of sustaining another trade conflict, particularly with a strategic partner like India, appears both impractical and unwise. Such a conflict could overshadow the efforts of former US presidents like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden, who extended an olive branch to Delhi to work together on common concerns regarding growing Islamic extremism, energy security, and climate change. The trade war between the United States and China, initiated under the Trump administration and continued with nuanced strategies by President Joe Biden, has disrupted global supply chains, increased tariffs, and led to decoupling in key sectors like semiconductors, AI, 5G, and pharmaceuticals. This rivalry is not just about economics but also technology supremacy, national security, and ideological competition between democratic and authoritarian models of governance. The US is now actively working to "de-risk" from China, which includes encouraging Chian Plus One strategy, manufacturing relocations, forming trade partnerships with democratic nations, and controlling Chinese access to cutting-edge technologies. In this strategic calculus, India has emerged as a natural partner—not only because of its shared democratic values, but also due to its economic potential, strategic location, and growing technological prowess. India, with a population of over 1.4 billion and a GDP nearing USD 4 trillion, is the world's fastest-growing major economy, placing it behind the United States with a GDP of USD 30.51 trillion, China at USD19.23 trillion, and Germany at USD 4.74 trillion. It is projected to become the third-largest economy by 2030. More importantly, it is a robust democracy, unlike China, and has a young, digitally enabled consumer base. Over the years, successive Indian governments—whether led by the Congress or the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—have nurtured deeper ties with the United States. From the civil nuclear deal during the Manmohan Singh-Bush era to the strengthening of QUAD and signing of key defense agreements under Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Biden, bilateral ties have touched new heights. "Howdy Modi" and "Abki Baar, Trump Sarkar," the reverberations of which are still echoing around the world, have cemented India-US relations with an emotional bond between PM Modi and Trump. The US now sees India as a central pillar of its Indo-Pacific strategy, aimed at counterbalancing Chinese influence in the region. From military cooperation and joint exercises like Malabar to investments in critical technologies and semiconductors, India’s positioning with the US has become more strategic than transactional. Can the US Sustain Strained Ties with India? Engaging in a trade war with India, especially in the current geopolitical climate, could be counterproductive for the United States. Here are five compelling reasons WHY: 1. India as a Consumer Powerhouse India is one of the largest markets for American companies in sectors like technology, defense, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, and energy. US giants such as Apple, Amazon, Boeing, and Tesla see India as a critical growth destination. Restricting trade or imposing tariffs would directly impact US corporate interests. Moreover, India’s increasing emphasis on local manufacturing (Make in India, PLI schemes) is creating opportunities for American investments in electronics, green energy, and EVs. Disrupting this potential through a trade war could push India toward alternative partners such as Russia or the EU. 2. A Reliable Democratic Ally in Asia As the US seeks to strengthen global democracies and build resilient supply chains, India remains the only large, stable, and democratic counterweight to China in Asia. Its neutral stance in conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war has also demonstrated India's commitment to strategic autonomy, a quality the US respects. India’s G20 presidency and leadership role in the Global South further enhance its diplomatic influence. Isolating or antagonizing such a partner could weaken the US's broader goals of forming a rules-based global order. 3. Economic Interdependence In the fiscal year 2024–25, India–US trade reached USD 131.8 billion, comprising USD 86.5 billion in exports from India and USD 45.3 billion in imports, making the US India’s largest trading partner. This shows a strong and robust strategic economic relationship between the two countries. Nearly 2,000 American companies operate in India, while Indian firms have invested over USD 40 billion in the US, creating around 425,000 jobs that is documented in a report titled "Indian Roots, American Soil”. This economic interdependence serves as a buffer against abrupt policy shifts or trade hostilities. 4. Geopolitical Timing Matters With tensions in the South China Sea, the Taiwan Strait, and Ukraine-Russia conflict still unresolved, the US cannot afford to lose India as a regional ally. Unlike Cold War times, today’s conflicts are multipolar and multidimensional—ranging from cyberspace to climate diplomacy. India’s cooperation is crucial in areas like AI regulation, global data flows, cybersecurity, and space exploration. 5. India-US for Global Peace India and the US, united, can ensure global peace, prosperity, and stability. India, once counted among the 'Fragile Five' nations, as coined by investment firm Morgan Stanley, today finds itself among the 'Fabulous Five' economies of the world. The strong base of the Indian diaspora in the US works with honesty and dedication, in line with the spirit of 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam' (The World is One Family). The India-America partnership operates on the principle of promoting global peace. Pragmatism Over Provocation Of course, India and the US have their share of trade disputes—ranging from tariffs on agricultural products and medical devices to data localization policies and digital taxation. But these should be addressed through dialogue and negotiation mechanisms such as the US-India Trade Policy Forum, rather than retaliatory measures. Both nations are members of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) and have begun collaborating on semiconductor supply chains, critical minerals, and AI governance. These positive developments must be leveraged to create a roadmap for sustainable, balanced trade rather than indulging in protectionist impulses. In an era where alliances are being redrawn and global order is in flux, the US must tread carefully. Engaging in a trade war with India would not only harm American business interests but also erode the foundation of a strategic partnership that is essential to its Indo-Pacific vision. India, with its demographic dividend, economic momentum, and democratic stability, is not just another trade partner—it is a strategic necessity for the United States. It worth mentioned the famous quote of former US president Barack Obama, “India is not simply an emerging power; it is already a world power, and a natural partner of the United States.” So, instead of trade conflict, collaboration should guide the next phase of India-US relations, Donald Trump must rethink.

&nbsp;A high-voltage trade war between the United States and India could have far-reaching consequences—not just economically, but also diplomatically and strategically.

Can US afford trade war with India amid evolving geopolitics? 5 must-know geopolitical realities

The world, on Wednesday, July 30, awoke to chaos as a massive 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula, the strongest in the region since 1952. Hours later, tsunami waves up to 4 metres high crashed into the coasts of Russia and Japan, triggering evacuations and causing structural damage. The tremors’ ripple effects were felt as far away as the U.S. West Coast, where rising water levels and strong currents sparked alarm. This natural disaster, reminiscent of the catastrophic 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that killed over 230,000 people across 14 countries, underscores the indiscriminate fury of nature. As geopolitical tensions, from the Ukraine war to U.S.-Russia rivalries, dominate global discourse, the earthquake and tsunami serve as a grim reminder that climate change and natural calamities are humanity’s true common enemies, demanding urgent, united action.&nbsp;The Kamchatka earthquake, centered off Russia’s eastern coast, unleashed waves that battered coastal towns, uprooting infrastructure and forcing thousands to flee to higher ground. Japan, no stranger to seismic activity, activated its early warning systems, evacuating coastal areas in Hokkaido and Tohoku. The Japan Meteorological Agency reported minor injuries but no fatalities, though damaged buildings and disrupted power lines painted a picture of disarray. Across the Pacific, the U.S. National Tsunami Warning Center issued alerts for California, Oregon, and Washington, as tidal surges caused flooding in low-lying areas. The U.S. Geological Survey noted that the quake’s transcontinental impact highlights the interconnectedness of global geophysical systems, a reality often overshadowed by political rivalries.&nbsp;The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, triggered by a 9.1–9.3-magnitude quake near Sumatra, remains a haunting benchmark. It devastated coastal communities in Thailand, Sri Lanka, India, and beyond, displacing millions and exposing the vulnerability of densely populated coastlines. India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Tamil Nadu bore heavy losses, with over 12,000 deaths. The 2025 Kamchatka event, while less deadly, reignites fears of such catastrophes, particularly as climate change amplifies their severity. Rising sea levels, melting glaciers, and destabilized coastal sediments—driven by human-induced greenhouse gas emissions—make tsunamis more destructive. In countries like Japan, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and coastal India, even a modest 0.5-meter sea-level rise can double the impact of tsunami surges, according to a 2023 UN Climate Report.&nbsp;Climate change is no longer a distant threat but a present crisis, disrupting economies and lives across every continent. The Paris Agreement, effective since November 4, 2016, urges nations to limit global temperature rise to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, to mitigate climate impacts. Yet, global emissions continue to climb, with 2024 recording a 1.3 percent increase in CO2 levels, per the International Energy Agency. Changing weather patterns, rising sea levels, and extreme events like heatwaves and floods are now commonplace. In India, erratic monsoons and coastal erosion threaten livelihoods, with 40 percent of the population living in vulnerable coastal areas, as per the Ministry of Environment. The Kamchatka tsunami underscores how climate factors, such as warming oceans, intensify natural disasters, making them more frequent and far-reaching.&nbsp;The irony is stark: while nations like the US and Russia remain locked in geopolitical tussles—evident in the ongoing Ukraine conflict and Cold War-era rivalries—they face a shared adversary in climate-induced disasters. The US, despite its economic might, saw its Pacific coast rattled by the Kamchatka quake’s aftershocks. Russia, grappling with its own economic sanctions, now faces reconstruction costs in Kamchatka. “Nature spares no one, not even superpowers,” noted environmentalist Sunita Narain, emphasizing the need for global cooperation. The UN has repeatedly called for collective action to curb emissions, yet major powers remain distracted by arms races and trade wars, diverting resources from climate resilience.&nbsp;India, too, is at a crossroads. Its 7,500-km coastline, home to bustling ports and tourist hubs, is increasingly at risk. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has invested in early warning systems since 2004, saving lives in events like Cyclone Amphan in 2020. However, rising sea levels threaten cities like Mumbai and Chennai, with a 2024 World Bank study estimating USD 1.2 trillion in potential losses by 2050 if climate measures falter. India’s push for renewable energy, targeting 500 GW by 2030, is commendable, but it must accelerate adaptation strategies like mangrove restoration and coastal defenses to mitigate tsunami risks.&nbsp;Notably, the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, signed on July 24, 2025, offers a silver lining. By promoting sustainable trade practices and green technology exchanges, the FTA can bolster India’s climate resilience. UK expertise in offshore wind and India’s solar advancements could drive joint projects, reducing emissions and strengthening coastal infrastructure. “Global challenges like climate change demand partnerships beyond borders,” said Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, highlighting the FTA’s role in supporting India’s green goals. Collaborative efforts could fund early warning systems and disaster-preparedness programs, critical for vulnerable regions.&nbsp;The Kamchatka disaster is a wake-up call. While nations bicker over boundaries, climate change unites them in vulnerability. The Paris Agreement’s goals remain elusive without concerted action. India, with its Viksit Bharat vision, must lead by example, investing its Rs. 2,541.06 crore tourism budget to build climate-resilient hospitality infrastructure. Globally, redirecting defence budgets—estimated at USD 2.24 trillion in 2024 by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute(SIPRI)—towards climate mitigation could save millions from disasters like tsunamis. As the world grapples with nature’s fury, it’s time to set aside geopolitical rivalries and fight the real enemy: climate change.

As geopolitical tensions, from the Ukraine war to U.S.-Russia rivalries, dominate global discourse, the earthquake and tsunami serve as a grim reminder that climate change and natural calamities are humanity’s true common enemies, demanding urgent, united action.

The world, on Wednesday, July 30, awoke to chaos as a massive 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula, the strongest in the region since 1952. Hours later, tsunami waves up to 4 metres high crashed into the coasts of Russia and Japan, triggering evacuations and causing structural damage. The tremors’ ripple effects were felt as far away as the U.S. West Coast, where rising water levels and strong currents sparked alarm. This natural disaster, reminiscent of the catastrophic 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami that killed over 230,000 people across 14 countries, underscores the indiscriminate fury of nature. As geopolitical tensions, from the Ukraine war to U.S.-Russia rivalries, dominate global discourse, the earthquake and tsunami serve as a grim reminder that climate change and natural calamities are humanity’s true common enemies, demanding urgent, united action. The Kamchatka earthquake, centered off Russia’s eastern coast, unleashed waves that battered coastal towns, uprooting infrastructure and forcing thousands to flee to higher ground. Japan, no stranger to seismic activity, activated its early warning systems, evacuating coastal areas in Hokkaido and Tohoku. The Japan Meteorological Agency reported minor injuries but no fatalities, though damaged buildings and disrupted power lines painted a picture of disarray. Across the Pacific, the U.S. National Tsunami Warning Center issued alerts for California, Oregon, and Washington, as tidal surges caused flooding in low-lying areas. The U.S. Geological Survey noted that the quake’s transcontinental impact highlights the interconnectedness of global geophysical systems, a reality often overshadowed by political rivalries. The 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, triggered by a 9.1–9.3-magnitude quake near Sumatra, remains a haunting benchmark. It devastated coastal communities in Thailand, Sri Lanka, India, and beyond, displacing millions and exposing the vulnerability of densely populated coastlines. India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Tamil Nadu bore heavy losses, with over 12,000 deaths. The 2025 Kamchatka event, while less deadly, reignites fears of such catastrophes, particularly as climate change amplifies their severity. Rising sea levels, melting glaciers, and destabilized coastal sediments—driven by human-induced greenhouse gas emissions—make tsunamis more destructive. In countries like Japan, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and coastal India, even a modest 0.5-meter sea-level rise can double the impact of tsunami surges, according to a 2023 UN Climate Report. Climate change is no longer a distant threat but a present crisis, disrupting economies and lives across every continent. The Paris Agreement, effective since November 4, 2016, urges nations to limit global temperature rise to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, to mitigate climate impacts. Yet, global emissions continue to climb, with 2024 recording a 1.3 percent increase in CO2 levels, per the International Energy Agency. Changing weather patterns, rising sea levels, and extreme events like heatwaves and floods are now commonplace. In India, erratic monsoons and coastal erosion threaten livelihoods, with 40 percent of the population living in vulnerable coastal areas, as per the Ministry of Environment. The Kamchatka tsunami underscores how climate factors, such as warming oceans, intensify natural disasters, making them more frequent and far-reaching. The irony is stark: while nations like the US and Russia remain locked in geopolitical tussles—evident in the ongoing Ukraine conflict and Cold War-era rivalries—they face a shared adversary in climate-induced disasters. The US, despite its economic might, saw its Pacific coast rattled by the Kamchatka quake’s aftershocks. Russia, grappling with its own economic sanctions, now faces reconstruction costs in Kamchatka. “Nature spares no one, not even superpowers,” noted environmentalist Sunita Narain, emphasizing the need for global cooperation. The UN has repeatedly called for collective action to curb emissions, yet major powers remain distracted by arms races and trade wars, diverting resources from climate resilience. India, too, is at a crossroads. Its 7,500-km coastline, home to bustling ports and tourist hubs, is increasingly at risk. The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has invested in early warning systems since 2004, saving lives in events like Cyclone Amphan in 2020. However, rising sea levels threaten cities like Mumbai and Chennai, with a 2024 World Bank study estimating USD 1.2 trillion in potential losses by 2050 if climate measures falter. India’s push for renewable energy, targeting 500 GW by 2030, is commendable, but it must accelerate adaptation strategies like mangrove restoration and coastal defenses to mitigate tsunami risks. Notably, the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, signed on July 24, 2025, offers a silver lining. By promoting sustainable trade practices and green technology exchanges, the FTA can bolster India’s climate resilience. UK expertise in offshore wind and India’s solar advancements could drive joint projects, reducing emissions and strengthening coastal infrastructure. “Global challenges like climate change demand partnerships beyond borders,” said Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, highlighting the FTA’s role in supporting India’s green goals. Collaborative efforts could fund early warning systems and disaster-preparedness programs, critical for vulnerable regions. The Kamchatka disaster is a wake-up call. While nations bicker over boundaries, climate change unites them in vulnerability. The Paris Agreement’s goals remain elusive without concerted action. India, with its Viksit Bharat vision, must lead by example, investing its Rs. 2,541.06 crore tourism budget to build climate-resilient hospitality infrastructure. Globally, redirecting defence budgets—estimated at USD 2.24 trillion in 2024 by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute(SIPRI)—towards climate mitigation could save millions from disasters like tsunamis. As the world grapples with nature’s fury, it’s time to set aside geopolitical rivalries and fight the real enemy: climate change.

As geopolitical tensions, from the Ukraine war to U.S.-Russia rivalries, dominate global discourse, the earthquake and tsunami serve as a grim reminder that climate change and natural calamities are humanity’s true common enemies, demanding urgent, united action.

Earthquake rocks Russia, ripples reach US; will climate change end geopolitical wars?

The Monsoon Session of Parliament turned fiery as the Opposition rolled up its sleeves to corner the government over the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent military response. On July 28, 2025, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh called a spade a spade in the Lok Sabha, declaring Operation Sindoor a “historic, decisive, and effective” display of India’s firm stand against terrorism and India halted the operation only after achieving its military objectives. Addressing the House, the Defense Minister underlined the successful military campaign against perpetrators who killed 26 civilians, mostly tourists, in a brutal attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025. The attack, driven by religious motives, shook the conscience of the nation. “The Indian Army achieved a stupendous feat, meeting its military goals without any external or internal pressure,” Singh firmly stated, emphasizing the operation’s precision and independence.The nub of Singh’s statements was to refute US President Donald Trump’s claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Operation Sindoor, launched on May 6-7, 2025, targeted nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), destroying them with surgical precision while minimizing civilian casualties. He clarified that the operation was paused at Pakistan’s request through direct military channels on May 10, not due to any diplomatic pressure or external intervention. This directly countered Trump’s repeated assertions—26 times since May 10, as claimed by the Congress—that he brokered the truce, even suggesting he prevented a nuclear war. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a June 18 phone call with Trump, had already clarified that the ceasefire was a bilateral decision, a stance echoed by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri at the G7 summit.The Opposition, led by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, seized the moment to question the Modi-led government’s handling of the Pahalgam attack and Trump’s claims. Labeling the US President’s assertions “humiliating,” they demanded a 16-hour debate on Operation Sindoor, set for July 29, to probe alleged intelligence failures. Kharge cited Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha’s admission of lapses, noting that the terrorists responsible remain at large. The Congress argued that the government’s silence on Trump’s narrative risked undermining India’s global credibility. In response, Singh mounted a robust defense, stating, “Results always matter in any examination, not if the pencil broke or the pen was lost.” He emphasized that Pakistan failed to inflict any damage on India’s military assets, while the Indian Army achieved its objective of dismantling terror infrastructure.Operation Sindoor targeted Pakistan-based terror outfits, eliminating over 100 terrorists, including members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, and destroying key infrastructure like China-supplied HQ-9 missile systems. Indian warplanes and strategic planning ensured maximum damage to terror camps without harming innocent civilians, earning global acknowledgment for India’s military prowess. The Defense Minister’s address highlighted the operation’s success in sending a clear message: India will not tolerate cross-border terrorism. The Defense Minister’s visit to Srinagar’s 15 Corps Headquarters on May 15, where he praised the armed forces’ valour, further reinforced this stance. He also called for the International Atomic Energy Agency to oversee Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, signaling India’s concerns over “nuclear blackmail.”India has consistently extended an olive branch to Pakistan, from the 1999 Lahore Bus Yatra to Modi’s attendance at Nawaz Sharif’s granddaughter’s wedding in 2015 as a gesture of goodwill. However, Singh noted in the Lok Sabha, “India has always emphasized peaceful relations with Pakistan, but our neighbour has failed to understand its merit.” Despite these efforts, Pakistan’s persistent support for terrorism has forced India to adopt a zero-tolerance policy. Modi has driven home the message that “terror and talks cannot go together,” a principle reflected in the 2016 Surgical Strike, the 2019 Balakot Air Strike, and now Operation Sindoor. These operations underscore India’s resolve to safeguard its sovereignty while advocating for global peace under the vision of “One Nation, One Earth, One Future.”The Pahalgam attack, executed by Pakistan-backed terrorists, targeted civilians in a popular tourist destination, prompting nationwide outrage. The Indian Army’s response, authorized by PM Modi, utilized indigenous platforms, showcasing India’s growing self-reliance in defense manufacturing. According to a Ministry of Defense report, the operation involved advanced drones and precision-guided munitions, with no Indian casualties reported. This success has bolstered India’s image as a decisive power, capable of countering terrorism without external reliance. The operation’s global impact was evident when the UN Security Council, in a May 12 statement, condemned the Pahalgam attack and supported India’s right to self-defense, a rare endorsement for New Delhi.However, challenges remain. The Opposition’s push for accountability on intelligence failures and Trump’s narrative risks domestic political friction. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor’s international outreach, while clarifying India’s stance, faced criticism within the party for diluting its aggressive posture. The government must also navigate Pakistan’s propaganda, which falsely claimed civilian casualties in PoK, debunked by India’s satellite imagery evidence.Operation Sindoor highlights India’s sole focus on security and sovereignty. As it marches towards Viksit Bharat by 2047, India’s zero-tolerance policy on terrorism and strategic partnerships signal its emergence as a global leader. Singh’s firm rebuttal of Trump’s claims and the success of Operation Sindoor underscore a clear message: India will protect its sovereignty and peace, no matter the cost.&nbsp;&nbsp;

 On July 28, 2025, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh called a spade a spade in the Lok Sabha, declaring Operation Sindoor a “historic, decisive, and effective” display of India’s firm stand against terrorism and India halted the operation only after achieving its military objectives. 

The Monsoon Session of Parliament turned fiery as the Opposition rolled up its sleeves to corner the government over the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent military response. On July 28, 2025, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh called a spade a spade in the Lok Sabha, declaring Operation Sindoor a “historic, decisive, and effective” display of India’s firm stand against terrorism and India halted the operation only after achieving its military objectives. Addressing the House, the Defense Minister underlined the successful military campaign against perpetrators who killed 26 civilians, mostly tourists, in a brutal attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025. The attack, driven by religious motives, shook the conscience of the nation. “The Indian Army achieved a stupendous feat, meeting its military goals without any external or internal pressure,” Singh firmly stated, emphasizing the operation’s precision and independence. The nub of Singh’s statements was to refute US President Donald Trump’s claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Operation Sindoor, launched on May 6-7, 2025, targeted nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), destroying them with surgical precision while minimizing civilian casualties. He clarified that the operation was paused at Pakistan’s request through direct military channels on May 10, not due to any diplomatic pressure or external intervention. This directly countered Trump’s repeated assertions—26 times since May 10, as claimed by the Congress—that he brokered the truce, even suggesting he prevented a nuclear war. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in a June 18 phone call with Trump, had already clarified that the ceasefire was a bilateral decision, a stance echoed by Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri at the G7 summit. The Opposition, led by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, seized the moment to question the Modi-led government’s handling of the Pahalgam attack and Trump’s claims. Labeling the US President’s assertions “humiliating,” they demanded a 16-hour debate on Operation Sindoor, set for July 29, to probe alleged intelligence failures. Kharge cited Jammu and Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha’s admission of lapses, noting that the terrorists responsible remain at large. The Congress argued that the government’s silence on Trump’s narrative risked undermining India’s global credibility. In response, Singh mounted a robust defense, stating, “Results always matter in any examination, not if the pencil broke or the pen was lost.” He emphasized that Pakistan failed to inflict any damage on India’s military assets, while the Indian Army achieved its objective of dismantling terror infrastructure. Operation Sindoor targeted Pakistan-based terror outfits, eliminating over 100 terrorists, including members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, and destroying key infrastructure like China-supplied HQ-9 missile systems. Indian warplanes and strategic planning ensured maximum damage to terror camps without harming innocent civilians, earning global acknowledgment for India’s military prowess. The Defense Minister’s address highlighted the operation’s success in sending a clear message: India will not tolerate cross-border terrorism. The Defense Minister’s visit to Srinagar’s 15 Corps Headquarters on May 15, where he praised the armed forces’ valour, further reinforced this stance. He also called for the International Atomic Energy Agency to oversee Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, signaling India’s concerns over “nuclear blackmail.” India has consistently extended an olive branch to Pakistan, from the 1999 Lahore Bus Yatra to Modi’s attendance at Nawaz Sharif’s granddaughter’s wedding in 2015 as a gesture of goodwill. However, Singh noted in the Lok Sabha, “India has always emphasized peaceful relations with Pakistan, but our neighbour has failed to understand its merit.” Despite these efforts, Pakistan’s persistent support for terrorism has forced India to adopt a zero-tolerance policy. Modi has driven home the message that “terror and talks cannot go together,” a principle reflected in the 2016 Surgical Strike, the 2019 Balakot Air Strike, and now Operation Sindoor. These operations underscore India’s resolve to safeguard its sovereignty while advocating for global peace under the vision of “One Nation, One Earth, One Future.” The Pahalgam attack, executed by Pakistan-backed terrorists, targeted civilians in a popular tourist destination, prompting nationwide outrage. The Indian Army’s response, authorized by PM Modi, utilized indigenous platforms, showcasing India’s growing self-reliance in defense manufacturing. According to a Ministry of Defense report, the operation involved advanced drones and precision-guided munitions, with no Indian casualties reported. This success has bolstered India’s image as a decisive power, capable of countering terrorism without external reliance. The operation’s global impact was evident when the UN Security Council, in a May 12 statement, condemned the Pahalgam attack and supported India’s right to self-defense, a rare endorsement for New Delhi. However, challenges remain. The Opposition’s push for accountability on intelligence failures and Trump’s narrative risks domestic political friction. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor’s international outreach, while clarifying India’s stance, faced criticism within the party for diluting its aggressive posture. The government must also navigate Pakistan’s propaganda, which falsely claimed civilian casualties in PoK, debunked by India’s satellite imagery evidence. Operation Sindoor highlights India’s sole focus on security and sovereignty. As it marches towards Viksit Bharat by 2047, India’s zero-tolerance policy on terrorism and strategic partnerships signal its emergence as a global leader. Singh’s firm rebuttal of Trump’s claims and the success of Operation Sindoor underscore a clear message: India will protect its sovereignty and peace, no matter the cost.

&nbsp;On July 28, 2025, Defense Minister Rajnath Singh called a spade a spade in the Lok Sabha, declaring Operation Sindoor a “historic, decisive, and effective” display of India’s firm stand against terrorism and India halted the operation only after achieving its military objectives.&nbsp;

Operation Sindoor: Donald Trump’s ceasefire boast falls flat as Defense Minister Rajnath Singh sets record straight in Lok Sabha

Author

Zee News Rajasthan

Editor

Ramakant Chaudhary

Home

Live Tv

Latest

World

India

Business

Entertainment

Sports

Opinions

Videos

Photos

Gravitas

Lifestyle

Science

Tech

Rajasthan News in Hindi: In-depth coverage of Rajasthan Crime, Political News, Education, Rajasthan Weather Update and Latest Rajasthan News on Zee News Rajasthan.