Snap has become the latest major social media platform to settle a high-profile child safety lawsuit, joining TikTok and YouTube. The settlement leaves Meta as the only remaining defendant in a growing legal battle over the alleged impact of addictive platform features on children and teenagers. The lawsuit claims social media companies knowingly designed products that harmed young users' mental health. Legal experts believe these cases could force major tech companies to strengthen child safety protections, improve parental controls, and redesign key platform features.

Snap settles Child Safety Lawsuit | Meta left alone as legal pressure mounts

YouTube, the world's biggest video-sharing platform, is cracking down on AI-generated slop, a monster of its own creation, at least in part. The irony is that Google and Alphabet, YouTube's parent companies, are creating and promoting AI tools for content generation, with products and models including Gemini AI, Veo, Nano Banana, and Dream Screen. Now, millions of videos and thousands of YT channels face the risk of demonetisation or even removal. The guidance from YouTube is confusing at best, making it difficult for creators to navigate AI-assisted content. If you are a creator hoping to monetise your YouTube channel using AI, here's what you should know.<h2>YouTube AI crackdown: What's likely to be demonetised and what's fine with AI use?</h2>The updated monetisation policies appear to target ‘AI slop’, although YouTube has not used that specific term, which refers to low-quality, mass-produced, repetitive, generic, template-based, or inauthentic AI-generated content. YouTube says it will continue to allow responsible, original, and value-adding content that uses AI.The main update came on 14 July, when YouTube clarified and renamed its existing "repetitious content" policy as the "inauthentic content" policy. This marks another step in the platform's long-running effort to tackle low-effort, spammy, and reused content rather than AI itself.YouTube's Channel Monetisation Policies and its Generative AI disclosure guidelines provide details on what qualifies for monetisation and when creators must disclose realistic AI-generated or altered content. In a recent video, YouTube's Vice President of Trust and Safety, Matt Halprin, described inauthentic content as generic, repetitive, "off-putting", and emotionally manipulative. He also highlighted AI personas - virtual avatars offering advice on subjects ranging from health to finance. Such content could be demonetised under the YouTube Partner Programme (YPP) guidelines if it lacks originality or meaningful human contribution.&nbsp;However,&nbsp;Content that may not be monetised includes mass-produced slideshows with similar AI narration, near-identical videos, or formulaic repetitive uploads. Unsatisfying or off-putting content could also be penalised, particularly emotionally manipulative, shock-oriented, or interchangeable videos designed purely to generate views and engagement.AI-generated "expert" personas dispensing advice on health, finance, legal matters, or politics could also face demonetisation if they are mass-produced, low-value, or created with minimal human oversight or creative input.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/-200-billion-views-a-day-on-shorts-youtube-bets-big-on-ai-creators-may-soon-get-to-use-ai-likenesses-1769080738659">'200 billion views a day on Shorts': YouTube bets big on AI, creators may soon get to use AI likenesses</a><h2>What's fine on YouTube with AI use?</h2>YouTube insists AI is not banned. The focus remains on originality, creativity, and viewer value. The crackdown is aimed at low-effort spam farms, not creators using AI as a production tool.Original, creative, or educational content with substantial human input, unique value, or a clear creative vision remains eligible for monetisation, even if AI tools are used for editing, scripting, visuals, or other production tasks.Properly disclosed realistic AI-generated or AI-altered content, using YouTube Studio's disclosure tools, should be fine, mostly. Although an "AI" label may appear on such videos, it does not automatically affect monetisation eligibility or recommendations. Non-realistic AI content used for animation, visual effects, or production assistance may not require disclosure. High-quality AI-assisted videos that viewers find satisfying and non-repetitive are also expected to remain monetisable.YouTube continues to promote its own AI tools, including Dream Screen and Creator AI features, provided the final content adds genuine value.&nbsp;Disclosure requirements have existed for more than a year, particularly to combat deepfakes involving real people, fabricated events, and photorealistic AI-generated scenes. Failure to disclose such content could lead to penalties.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/google-settles-android-tv-antitrust-case-in-india-pays-2-3-million-8990436/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/google-settles-android-tv-antitrust-case-in-india-pays-2-3-million-8990436/embed</a><h2>AI slop: The growth of mass-produced content on YouTube</h2>An analysis by video-editing platform Kapwing found that channels producing only AI slop amassed tens of billions of views and hundreds of millions of subscribers, generating an estimated US$117 million a year in revenue. It estimated that more than 20 per cent of content recommended by YouTube's algorithm to new users consisted of AI slop or low-quality "brainrot". Several AI-only channels grew from zero to tens of millions of subscribers within months through such mass production.&nbsp;Meanwhile, demand for AI video-generation tools continues to surge, with platforms reporting hundreds of millions of AI-generated videos.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/viral-sensation-to-timeless-hit-psy-s-gangnam-style-hits-6-billion-youtube-views-after-14-years-1784570378800">Viral sensation to timeless hit! PSY's 'Gangnam Style' hits 6 billion YouTube views after 14 years</a><h2>The irony of AI slop: YouTube is dealing with a monster that Google and Alphabet helped create</h2>Google and YouTube heavily promoted their own generative AI tools, including Gemini, Veo, Nano Banana, and Dream Screen. Now they are attempting to curb a flood of low-quality AI content, much of it showcased through YouTube videos, Shorts, and creator promotions. In recent months, YouTube Chief Executive Officer Neal Mohan has described AI as a "new creative frontier" in interviews, keynote speeches, company announcements and blog posts, even as the platform simultaneously builds systems to limit the AI slop it helped accelerate.YouTube is now grappling with the scalable downsides of the technology it developed and promoted. Labelling requirements, AI detection systems, and likeness protection tools are all attempts to address the problem. But the floodgates are already open, and pushing the water back will not be easy. At worst, the changing policies could confuse creators and discourage some from treating YouTube as a viable source of full-time or supplementary income.

YouTube is tightening monetisation rules for AI-generated slop. This will target repetitive and inauthentic content while allowing original, value-adding AI-assisted videos that meet disclosure requirements. Here is what you should know if you are a creator



YouTube, the world's biggest video-sharing platform, is cracking down on AI-generated slop, a monster of its own creation, at least in part. The irony is that Google and Alphabet, YouTube's parent companies, are creating and promoting AI tools for content generation, with products and models including Gemini AI, Veo, Nano Banana, and Dream Screen. Now, millions of videos and thousands of YT channels face the risk of demonetisation or even removal. The guidance from YouTube is confusing at best, making it difficult for creators to navigate AI-assisted content. If you are a creator hoping to monetise your YouTube channel using AI, here's what you should know. YouTube AI crackdown: What's likely to be demonetised and what's fine with AI use? The updated monetisation policies appear to target ‘AI slop’, although YouTube has not used that specific term, which refers to low-quality, mass-produced, repetitive, generic, template-based, or inauthentic AI-generated content. YouTube says it will continue to allow responsible, original, and value-adding content that uses AI. The main update came on 14 July, when YouTube clarified and renamed its existing "repetitious content" policy as the "inauthentic content" policy. This marks another step in the platform's long-running effort to tackle low-effort, spammy, and reused content rather than AI itself. YouTube's Channel Monetisation Policies and its Generative AI disclosure guidelines provide details on what qualifies for monetisation and when creators must disclose realistic AI-generated or altered content. In a recent video, YouTube's Vice President of Trust and Safety, Matt Halprin, described inauthentic content as generic, repetitive, "off-putting", and emotionally manipulative. He also highlighted AI personas - virtual avatars offering advice on subjects ranging from health to finance. Such content could be demonetised under the YouTube Partner Programme (YPP) guidelines if it lacks originality or meaningful human contribution. However, Content that may not be monetised includes mass-produced slideshows with similar AI narration, near-identical videos, or formulaic repetitive uploads. Unsatisfying or off-putting content could also be penalised, particularly emotionally manipulative, shock-oriented, or interchangeable videos designed purely to generate views and engagement. AI-generated "expert" personas dispensing advice on health, finance, legal matters, or politics could also face demonetisation if they are mass-produced, low-value, or created with minimal human oversight or creative input. Also read: '200 billion views a day on Shorts': YouTube bets big on AI, creators may soon get to use AI likenesses What's fine on YouTube with AI use? YouTube insists AI is not banned. The focus remains on originality, creativity, and viewer value. The crackdown is aimed at low-effort spam farms, not creators using AI as a production tool. Original, creative, or educational content with substantial human input, unique value, or a clear creative vision remains eligible for monetisation, even if AI tools are used for editing, scripting, visuals, or other production tasks. Properly disclosed realistic AI-generated or AI-altered content, using YouTube Studio's disclosure tools, should be fine, mostly. Although an "AI" label may appear on such videos, it does not automatically affect monetisation eligibility or recommendations. Non-realistic AI content used for animation, visual effects, or production assistance may not require disclosure. High-quality AI-assisted videos that viewers find satisfying and non-repetitive are also expected to remain monetisable. YouTube continues to promote its own AI tools, including Dream Screen and Creator AI features, provided the final content adds genuine value. Disclosure requirements have existed for more than a year, particularly to combat deepfakes involving real people, fabricated events, and photorealistic AI-generated scenes. Failure to disclose such content could lead to penalties. https://www.wionews.com/videos/google-settles-android-tv-antitrust-case-in-india-pays-2-3-million-8990436/embed AI slop: The growth of mass-produced content on YouTube An analysis by video-editing platform Kapwing found that channels producing only AI slop amassed tens of billions of views and hundreds of millions of subscribers, generating an estimated US$117 million a year in revenue. It estimated that more than 20 per cent of content recommended by YouTube's algorithm to new users consisted of AI slop or low-quality "brainrot". Several AI-only channels grew from zero to tens of millions of subscribers within months through such mass production. Meanwhile, demand for AI video-generation tools continues to surge, with platforms reporting hundreds of millions of AI-generated videos. Also read: Viral sensation to timeless hit! PSY's 'Gangnam Style' hits 6 billion YouTube views after 14 years The irony of AI slop: YouTube is dealing with a monster that Google and Alphabet helped create Google and YouTube heavily promoted their own generative AI tools, including Gemini, Veo, Nano Banana, and Dream Screen. Now they are attempting to curb a flood of low-quality AI content, much of it showcased through YouTube videos, Shorts, and creator promotions. In recent months, YouTube Chief Executive Officer Neal Mohan has described AI as a "new creative frontier" in interviews, keynote speeches, company announcements and blog posts, even as the platform simultaneously builds systems to limit the AI slop it helped accelerate. YouTube is now grappling with the scalable downsides of the technology it developed and promoted. Labelling requirements, AI detection systems, and likeness protection tools are all attempts to address the problem. But the floodgates are already open, and pushing the water back will not be easy. At worst, the changing policies could confuse creators and discourage some from treating YouTube as a viable source of full-time or supplementary income.

YouTube is tightening monetisation rules for AI-generated slop. This will target repetitive and inauthentic content while allowing original, value-adding AI-assisted videos that meet disclosure requirements. Here is what you should know if you are a creator&nbsp;

YouTube cracks down on AI slop, but didn't it help create the monster? Your channel will be demonetised if...

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, along with Google-owned YouTube, on Monday (Feb 9) were accused of "engineering addiction" in children. The accusation against the tech giants was levelled as a closely watched trial against major social media companies began in California. The trial would see Meta and YouTube facing accusations that their platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive for children. It marks one of the first times a jury will directly consider whether social media companies can be held legally responsible for the mental health impact of their platforms on children.<h2>"Engineered addiction"</h2>The case, unfolding before a Los Angeles jury, could set an important legal precedent for hundreds of similar lawsuits across the United States. At the centre of the trial is a 20-year-old woman identified in court documents as Kaley G.M., who claims she suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jimmy-lai-s-son-sebastien-lai-asks-trump-to-tell-xi-the-prison-sentence-is-a-mistake-warns-if-he-dies-1770685339030">Jimmy Lai’s son asks Trump to tell Xi the prison sentence is a ‘mistake’</a>In opening arguments, plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Lanier accused tech companies of intentionally engineering their platforms to hook young users. "This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier told the jury. Stacking children's toy bricks, he described the case "as easy as A-B-C," A for addicting, B for brains, and C for children.Lanier argued that companies built systems designed to maximise engagement, comparing social media features to gambling mechanisms. "They don't only build apps; they build traps," he said, adding that Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design".He told jurors that Kaley began using YouTube at the age of six, and her family was never warned that "the goal was viewer addiction," or about the risks of algorithm-driven addiction among children.The case is being treated as a “bellwether” trial, meaning its outcome could influence how future lawsuits against social media companies are handled, including potential compensation for plaintiffs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/trump-health-secretary-robert-f-kennedy-jr-s-bizarre-link-with-paedophile-revealed-in-latest-epstein-file-dump-dinosaur-hunt-emails-1770444507541">Trump health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s bizarre link with paedophile revealed in latest Epstein file dump</a><h2>Companies reject responsibility</h2>Lawyers for Meta strongly pushed back against the claims, arguing that social media was not the primary cause of the young woman’s struggles. "If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Defense attorney Paul Schmidt asked jurors. He said that personal challenges, including bullying and family issues, played a larger role in her mental health difficulties.YouTube also denied the allegations. A company spokesperson said the claims were "simply not true,” pointing to ongoing efforts to introduce safety tools for younger users.

A landmark trial in California has begun against Meta and YouTube, with plaintiffs accusing the companies of deliberately designing their platforms to ‘addict’ children and harm their mental health. All you need to know.

Meta, the company behind Facebook and Instagram, along with Google-owned YouTube, on Monday (Feb 9) were accused of "engineering addiction" in children. The accusation against the tech giants was levelled as a closely watched trial against major social media companies began in California. The trial would see Meta and YouTube facing accusations that their platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive for children. It marks one of the first times a jury will directly consider whether social media companies can be held legally responsible for the mental health impact of their platforms on children. "Engineered addiction" The case, unfolding before a Los Angeles jury, could set an important legal precedent for hundreds of similar lawsuits across the United States. At the centre of the trial is a 20-year-old woman identified in court documents as Kaley G.M., who claims she suffered severe mental harm after becoming addicted to social media as a child. Also read | Jimmy Lai’s son asks Trump to tell Xi the prison sentence is a ‘mistake’ In opening arguments, plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Lanier accused tech companies of intentionally engineering their platforms to hook young users. "This case is about two of the richest corporations in history who have engineered addiction in children's brains," Lanier told the jury. Stacking children's toy bricks, he described the case "as easy as A-B-C," A for addicting, B for brains, and C for children. Lanier argued that companies built systems designed to maximise engagement, comparing social media features to gambling mechanisms. "They don't only build apps; they build traps," he said, adding that Meta and YouTube pursued "addiction by design". He told jurors that Kaley began using YouTube at the age of six, and her family was never warned that "the goal was viewer addiction," or about the risks of algorithm-driven addiction among children. The case is being treated as a “bellwether” trial, meaning its outcome could influence how future lawsuits against social media companies are handled, including potential compensation for plaintiffs. Also read | Trump health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s bizarre link with paedophile revealed in latest Epstein file dump Companies reject responsibility Lawyers for Meta strongly pushed back against the claims, arguing that social media was not the primary cause of the young woman’s struggles. "If you took Instagram away and everything else was the same in Kaley's life, would her life be completely different, or would she still be struggling with the same things she is today?" Defense attorney Paul Schmidt asked jurors. He said that personal challenges, including bullying and family issues, played a larger role in her mental health difficulties. YouTube also denied the allegations. A company spokesperson said the claims were "simply not true,” pointing to ongoing efforts to introduce safety tools for younger users.

A landmark trial in California has begun against Meta and YouTube, with plaintiffs accusing the companies of deliberately designing their platforms to ‘addict’ children and harm their mental health. All you need to know.

‘Addiction by design’? Meta, YouTube accused of 'engineering addiction' in children during US trial

You may soon start seeing AI-generated versions of your favourite creators while scrolling through Shorts. YouTube CEO Neal Mohan announced that creators will be able to make Shorts using their own likeness, including their face and voice, using artificial intelligence tools.The announcement was made in Mohan’s annual letter, where he outlined YouTube’s plans for AI-powered creation in 2026. According to him, AI on YouTube will focus on helping creators express themselves, not replace them.<h2>What the new AI likeness feature means</h2>According to him, creators will soon be able to use their own likeness to create Shorts, generate games using simple text prompts, and experiment with music. While YouTube has not yet shared detailed technical information, the feature will be added to the platform’s growing list of AI tools for Shorts.These already include AI-generated video clips, AI stickers, automatic dubbing into other languages, and editing tools designed to save time for creators. The new likeness feature will allow creators to appear in content even when they are not directly recording videos.<h2>Massive reach and YouTube’s AI push</h2>Shorts is one of the platform’s fastest-growing formats. Mohan said Shorts now receives an average of&nbsp;200 billion views every day, making it a key focus area for YouTube’s future growth.To keep creators engaged and maintain viewer interest, YouTube is investing heavily in AI-powered features. The company believes these tools can help creators produce content faster.Control and protection of creator identityHe said creators will be given new tools to manage how their likeness is used in AI-generated content. This comes as concerns grow around misuse of AI, including deepfakes and unauthorised impersonation.&nbsp;Last October, YouTube introduced likeness-detection technology for eligible creators. The system helps identify AI-generated videos that use a creator’s face or voice without permission. Creators can then request removal of such content.According to Mohan, YouTube will continue improving these systems to protect creators while allowing responsible use of AI tools.<h2>YouTube’s effort to curb low-quality AI content</h2>Like other social media platforms, YouTube has faced criticism over the spread of low-quality and repetitive AI-generated videos. Mohan said the company is actively working to reduce such content.He noted that YouTube is building on its existing systems that already fight spam and clickbait. The goal, he said, is to protect the quality of content while still allowing creative freedom.YouTube believes that while trends change over time, maintaining trust and viewing quality remains essential as AI becomes a bigger part of online video creation.&nbsp;&nbsp;

YouTube will soon let creators use AI to generate Shorts using their own face and voice, YouTube CEO Neal Mohan said. The move is to boost creativity while adding safeguards to prevent misuse, deepfakes and low-quality AI content.

You may soon start seeing AI-generated versions of your favourite creators while scrolling through Shorts. YouTube CEO Neal Mohan announced that creators will be able to make Shorts using their own likeness, including their face and voice, using artificial intelligence tools. The announcement was made in Mohan’s annual letter, where he outlined YouTube’s plans for AI-powered creation in 2026. According to him, AI on YouTube will focus on helping creators express themselves, not replace them. What the new AI likeness feature means According to him, creators will soon be able to use their own likeness to create Shorts, generate games using simple text prompts, and experiment with music. While YouTube has not yet shared detailed technical information, the feature will be added to the platform’s growing list of AI tools for Shorts. These already include AI-generated video clips, AI stickers, automatic dubbing into other languages, and editing tools designed to save time for creators. The new likeness feature will allow creators to appear in content even when they are not directly recording videos. Massive reach and YouTube’s AI push Shorts is one of the platform’s fastest-growing formats. Mohan said Shorts now receives an average of 200 billion views every day, making it a key focus area for YouTube’s future growth. To keep creators engaged and maintain viewer interest, YouTube is investing heavily in AI-powered features. The company believes these tools can help creators produce content faster. Control and protection of creator identity He said creators will be given new tools to manage how their likeness is used in AI-generated content. This comes as concerns grow around misuse of AI, including deepfakes and unauthorised impersonation. Last October, YouTube introduced likeness-detection technology for eligible creators. The system helps identify AI-generated videos that use a creator’s face or voice without permission. Creators can then request removal of such content. According to Mohan, YouTube will continue improving these systems to protect creators while allowing responsible use of AI tools. YouTube’s effort to curb low-quality AI content Like other social media platforms, YouTube has faced criticism over the spread of low-quality and repetitive AI-generated videos. Mohan said the company is actively working to reduce such content. He noted that YouTube is building on its existing systems that already fight spam and clickbait. The goal, he said, is to protect the quality of content while still allowing creative freedom. YouTube believes that while trends change over time, maintaining trust and viewing quality remains essential as AI becomes a bigger part of online video creation.

YouTube will soon let creators use AI to generate Shorts using their own face and voice, YouTube CEO Neal Mohan said. The move is to boost creativity while adding safeguards to prevent misuse, deepfakes and low-quality AI content.

'200 billion views a day on Shorts': YouTube bets big on AI, creators may soon get to use AI likenesses

YouTube is testing AI-generated video overviews to help users quickly gauge content before watching. These brief text summaries, created by analysing audio and visuals, appear on search and watch pages. It aims to save time and reduce clickbait.

YouTube is testing AI-generated video overviews: Here’s how it works

A YouTuber couple died Saturday (Apr 13) in Bahadurgarh district of India’s Haryana state by suicide following an argument over an undisclosed matter. The couple, identified as 25-year-old Garvit and 22-year-old Nandini, jumped off the seventh floor of a high-rise building in the city located just 20km away from the national capital Delhi.

Both content creators used to make reels, and videos for social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook. The couple had moved to Bahadurgarh just days ago from Dehradun along with their team. They had rented a flat on the seventh floor of Ruheela Residency.

<h2>What happened between the couple?</h2>

As per the police, the couple died by suicide at 6 am in the morning. They had returned home late at night after a shoot and had some argument over an undisclosed matter.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwig14q3sL-FAxXO-zgGHTbdCKcQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/youtube-removes-9mn-videos-worldwide-22mn-alone-in-india-for-policy-violations-704527" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/world/youtube-removes-9mn-videos-worldwide-22mn-alone-in-india-for-policy-violations-704527&amp;ved=2ahUKEwig14q3sL-FAxXO-zgGHTbdCKcQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE">YouTube removes 9 million videos worldwide, 2.2mn in India alone, for policy violations</a>

Then in the morning, both of them committed suicide. Police are investigating the matter and retrieving CCTV footage to know what happened between the two that led them to take the extreme step.

Watch:&nbsp;Youtube climate change denial problem is growing and evolving, says Report

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/youtube-climate-change-denial-problem-is-growing-and-evolving-says-report-680722/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The police sent the bodies for post-mortem. A forensics team was also present at the scene later in the day to gather evidence. Jagbir, the investigating officer of the case, was quoted by NDTV as saying, "We are looking into the incident, and further action will be taken accordingly."

(With inputs from agencies)

A YouTuber couple died Saturday (Apr 13) in Bahadurgarh district of India’s Haryana state by suicide following an argument over an undisclosed matter. The couple, identified as 25-year-old Garvit and 22-year-old Nandini, jumped off the seventh floor of a high-rise building in the city located just 20km away from the national capital Delhi.

A YouTuber couple died Saturday (Apr 13) in Bahadurgarh district of India’s Haryana state by suicide following an argument over an undisclosed matter. The couple, identified as 25-year-old Garvit and 22-year-old Nandini, jumped off the seventh floor of a high-rise building in the city located just 20km away from the national capital Delhi. Both content creators used to make reels, and videos for social media platforms like YouTube and Facebook. The couple had moved to Bahadurgarh just days ago from Dehradun along with their team. They had rented a flat on the seventh floor of Ruheela Residency. What happened between the couple? As per the police, the couple died by suicide at 6 am in the morning. They had returned home late at night after a shoot and had some argument over an undisclosed matter. Also read: YouTube removes 9 million videos worldwide, 2.2mn in India alone, for policy violations Then in the morning, both of them committed suicide. Police are investigating the matter and retrieving CCTV footage to know what happened between the two that led them to take the extreme step. Watch: Youtube climate change denial problem is growing and evolving, says Report × The police sent the bodies for post-mortem. A forensics team was also present at the scene later in the day to gather evidence. Jagbir, the investigating officer of the case, was quoted by NDTV as saying, "We are looking into the incident, and further action will be taken accordingly." (With inputs from agencies)

India’s YouTuber couple dies by suicide after argument following late-night shoot

YouTube on Monday&nbsp;introduced a new feature that will warn users when they post offensive comments&nbsp;to prevent bullying and hate on its platform

As per the latest feature, YouTube will prompt them before posting a comment to be more respectful.&nbsp;

According to Mashable, Johanna Wright, Vice President of Product Management at YouTube said in a blog, "We know that comments play a key role in helping creators connect with their community, but issues with the quality of comments are also one of the most consistent pieces of feedback we receive from creators."

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/new-smartphone-based-covid-19-test-gives-results-in-less-than-30-minutes-348091">New smartphone-based COVID-19 test gives results in less than 30 minutes</a>

Google employee Sarah posted on Google support, "Today we`re introducing a new reminder in comments to help encourage respectful interactions. Now on Android, the reminder may pop up before posting a comment that may be offensive to others, giving the commenter the option to reflect before posting".

However, users can continue to comment if they want to. Apart from the new reminder feature, YouTube has also made a few more updates to make YouTube a more inclusive platform.

As per Mashable, the blog stated that YouTube will be testing a new filter in YouTube Studio for inappropriate and hurtful comments. These comments will be automatically held for review so that content creators on the platform won`t ever have to read these comments if they are not interested.

YouTube said it will also be streamlining the comment moderation tools to make the overall process easy for creators.

YouTube will also invest&nbsp;in technology that can help enhance the system to detect and remove hateful comments. It will consider factors such as the topic of the video and the context of the comment that`s being made.

YouTube on Monday introduced a new feature that will warn users when they post offensive comments to prevent bullying and hate on its platform As per the latest feature, YouTube will prompt them before posting a comment to be more respectful.

YouTube on Monday introduced a new feature that will warn users when they post offensive comments to prevent bullying and hate on its platform As per the latest feature, YouTube will prompt them before posting a comment to be more respectful. According to Mashable, Johanna Wright, Vice President of Product Management at YouTube said in a blog, "We know that comments play a key role in helping creators connect with their community, but issues with the quality of comments are also one of the most consistent pieces of feedback we receive from creators." Also read: New smartphone-based COVID-19 test gives results in less than 30 minutes Google employee Sarah posted on Google support, "Today we`re introducing a new reminder in comments to help encourage respectful interactions. Now on Android, the reminder may pop up before posting a comment that may be offensive to others, giving the commenter the option to reflect before posting". However, users can continue to comment if they want to. Apart from the new reminder feature, YouTube has also made a few more updates to make YouTube a more inclusive platform. As per Mashable, the blog stated that YouTube will be testing a new filter in YouTube Studio for inappropriate and hurtful comments. These comments will be automatically held for review so that content creators on the platform won`t ever have to read these comments if they are not interested. YouTube said it will also be streamlining the comment moderation tools to make the overall process easy for creators. YouTube will also invest in technology that can help enhance the system to detect and remove hateful comments. It will consider factors such as the topic of the video and the context of the comment that`s being made.

YouTube introduces new feature to warn users before they post toxic comments

If you are a big fan of singer Billie Eilish, this will interest you!

YouTube and Google Creative Labs have just come together for an experiment, calling it the world’s first “infinite” video which has different versions of Billie Eilish’s popular song ‘Bad Guy’ playing on loop.&nbsp;

With ‘Bad Guy’ becoming a sensation after it premiered, many people around the world have performed/sang their own versions of the popular song. This video literally puts them all together for an infinite loop.&nbsp;

On occasion of the music video passing 1 billion views, YouTube and Google Creative Lab have turned all of those covers into an interactive AI experiment, called “Infinite Bad Guy,” which YouTube described as “the world’s first infinite music video.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/news-grammys-2021-check-out-the-complete-list-of-nominees-here-345161" hreflang="en">Grammys 2021: Check out the complete list of nominees here</a>

The loop has every single cover from ballet, jazz, saxophone, sitar, choir and everything else you can imagine. Even TikTok videos which are made to recreate the song using ordinary household sounds have been used.&nbsp;

Watch it here:

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="514" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OqY_IV3gj7E" width="914"></iframe>

If you are a big fan of singer Billie Eilish, this will interest you! YouTube and Google Creative Labs have just come together for an experiment, calling it the world’s first “infinite” video which has different versions of Billie Eilish’s popular song ‘Bad Guy’ playing on loop.

If you are a big fan of singer Billie Eilish, this will interest you! YouTube and Google Creative Labs have just come together for an experiment, calling it the world’s first “infinite” video which has different versions of Billie Eilish’s popular song ‘Bad Guy’ playing on loop. With ‘Bad Guy’ becoming a sensation after it premiered, many people around the world have performed/sang their own versions of the popular song. This video literally puts them all together for an infinite loop. On occasion of the music video passing 1 billion views, YouTube and Google Creative Lab have turned all of those covers into an interactive AI experiment, called “Infinite Bad Guy,” which YouTube described as “the world’s first infinite music video.” Grammys 2021: Check out the complete list of nominees here The loop has every single cover from ballet, jazz, saxophone, sitar, choir and everything else you can imagine. Even TikTok videos which are made to recreate the song using ordinary household sounds have been used. Watch it here:

YouTube creates world's first 'infinite' video with Billie Eilish' 'Bad Guy' covers

youtube-news

Youtube News, News on Youtube News, stories on Youtube News, articles on Youtube News, Youtube News stories at Wion, Youtube News news, Youtube News latest news

youtube news

Snap settles Child Safety Lawsuit | Meta left alone as legal pressure mounts

YouTube cracks down on AI slop, but didn't it help create the monster?

Meta, YouTube accused of 'engineering addiction' in children during US trial

YouTube to allow creators to use AI versions of themselves in Shorts

YouTube is testing AI-generated video overviews: Here’s how it works

India’s YouTuber couple dies by suicide after argument following late-night shoot

YouTube introduces new feature to warn users before they post toxic comments

YouTube creates world's first 'infinite' video with Billie Eilish' 'Bad Guy' covers