A former London police officer, who was jailed for life last year for a rape and murder that horrified the nation, was charged on Friday with four new counts of indecent assault which took place just weeks earlier.

Wayne Couzens, 49, whose job was to guard diplomatic premises, abducted marketing executive&nbsp;Sarah&nbsp;Everard&nbsp;on a London street as she walked home from visiting a friend in March last year, using his police credentials to force her into his car.

Her body was later found in woodland about 50 miles (80 km) away in southeast England.

His actions provoked anger at the failure of police and wider society to tackle violence against women, and he was told he would go to prison for life with no chance of parole.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/men-do-better-londoners-hold-vigil-for-sarah-everard-police-revolts-370400#sarah-everard-370062">Also see |&nbsp;'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts</a>

The Crown Prosecution Service said it had now authorised Couzens to be charged with four more suspected offences of exposing himself which had taken place less than a month before he attacked&nbsp;Everard.

"Following a referral of evidence by the Metropolitan Police, the CPS has authorised four charges of indecent exposure against Wayne Couzens," said Rosemary Ainslie, Head of the CPS Special Crime Division. "The four alleged offences took place between January and February 2021."

He is due to appear at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 13.

In January, the government announced there would be a public inquiry into whether Couzens could have been stopped before he murdered&nbsp;Everard.

Her death led to public rallies and outpourings of anger from women who recounted their own experiences and fears of being out alone at night.

Last week the High Court in London ruled that police had acted unlawfully when they used COVID-19 rules to force campaigners to cancel an outdoor vigil for&nbsp;Everard, which ended with officers using heavy-handed tactics to arrest several women and provoked widespread condemnation.

A former London police officer, who was jailed for life last year for a rape and murder that horrified the nation, was charged on Friday with four new counts of indecent assault which took place just weeks earlier.

A former London police officer, who was jailed for life last year for a rape and murder that horrified the nation, was charged on Friday with four new counts of indecent assault which took place just weeks earlier. Wayne Couzens, 49, whose job was to guard diplomatic premises, abducted marketing executive Sarah Everard on a London street as she walked home from visiting a friend in March last year, using his police credentials to force her into his car. Her body was later found in woodland about 50 miles (80 km) away in southeast England. His actions provoked anger at the failure of police and wider society to tackle violence against women, and he was told he would go to prison for life with no chance of parole. Also see | 'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts The Crown Prosecution Service said it had now authorised Couzens to be charged with four more suspected offences of exposing himself which had taken place less than a month before he attacked Everard. "Following a referral of evidence by the Metropolitan Police, the CPS has authorised four charges of indecent exposure against Wayne Couzens," said Rosemary Ainslie, Head of the CPS Special Crime Division. "The four alleged offences took place between January and February 2021." He is due to appear at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court on April 13. In January, the government announced there would be a public inquiry into whether Couzens could have been stopped before he murdered Everard. Her death led to public rallies and outpourings of anger from women who recounted their own experiences and fears of being out alone at night. Last week the High Court in London ruled that police had acted unlawfully when they used COVID-19 rules to force campaigners to cancel an outdoor vigil for Everard, which ended with officers using heavy-handed tactics to arrest several women and provoked widespread condemnation.

UK police officer, jailed for murder, charged with more sex crimes

The London police violated the human rights of the organizers behind a March 2021 vigil for a woman who was killed by a serving police officer as she walked home, the British High Court ruled Friday, a decision that comes as the government seeks greater authority for the police to block protests.

The judgment comes at a particularly fraught time for London’s Metropolitan Police Service, which is dealing with the resignation of its chief, Cressida Dick, and a broader crisis of trust after allegations of misogyny, racism and bullying within the force.

Four leaders of Reclaim These Streets, the group that had organized the protest after the killing of the woman, Sarah Everard, took the police force to court after it canceled the vigil, saying their rights had been violated. The group celebrated the decision as “a victory for women.”

“Last March, women’s voices were silenced. Today’s judgment conclusively shows that the police were wrong to silence us,” the organization said in a statement. “The decisions and actions by the Met Police in the run-up to the planned vigil for Sarah Everard last year were unlawful and the judgment sets a powerful precedent for protest rights.”

The decision was announced as Parliament is considering a controversial bill that would make it easier for the police to set limits on demonstrations and punish protesters who refuse to comply.

“The Government should take heed and drop its Policing Bill, which would give the police new powers that undermine our right to protest,” Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a lawmaker whose constituency includes the area where Everard was abducted, wrote on Twitter.

The court’s ruling came almost a year to the day after London police cracked down on a group of people who had gathered at a park in South London to remember Everard, just days after the discovery of her body.

Everard, 33, was kidnapped, raped and murdered by a Metropolitan Police Service officer, and her case came to encapsulate broader concerns about misogyny in the police force and violence against women and girls.

In response, Reclaim These Streets planned a vigil at Clapham Common. The police banned the event, citing coronavirus restrictions on gatherings that were in place at the time and threatening the organizers with fines of 10,000 pounds, about $13,000.

A spontaneous group gathered in the park anyway, quickly growing into the thousands as the day progressed. Although the event was largely peaceful and the crowd was allowed to remain for hours, the police began to disperse people, sometimes violently, as dusk fell.

When several women were arrested and handcuffed by the police, images of their arrest drew outrage and calls for an investigation into the police handling of the situation.

The High Court decision on Friday stands in stark contrast to an earlier investigation by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire &amp;amp; Rescue Services, an independent watchdog group, which found that the police acted appropriately at the informal protest.

The ruling announced Friday focused instead on the cancellation of the planned vigil, after four organizers — Jessica Leigh, Anna Birley, Henna Shah and Jamie Klingler — challenged the police in court.

The judgment found that the London Police had violated the organizers’ right to freedom of speech and assembly by preventing them from carrying out the vigil.

Judge Mark Warby, in a summary of the ruling, said that the Metropolitan Police Service “failed to perform its legal duty to consider whether the claimants might have a reasonable excuse for holding the gathering.”

He added that the police overstepped by making “statements at meetings, in letters, and in a press statement” that coronavirus regulations in force at the time “meant that holding the vigil would be unlawful.”

“Those statements interfered with the claimants’ rights because each had a ‘chilling effect’ and made at least some causal contribution to the decision to cancel the vigil,” he wrote.

The police have the right to appeal the decision. Louisa Rolfe, an assistant commissioner for the Metropolitan Police Service, said in a statement issued after the ruling that the force was still deciding whether to pursue the case further.

The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said he welcomed the decision. The murder of Everard had damaged public trust in London’s police force, he said, and the way the police handled the vigil eroded that trust further.

“A series of events in the past year have damaged confidence in the police, and urgent and wide-reaching action is needed to restore it,” he said. “I remain committed to doing everything in my power to hold the police to account and working with the Met to deliver on the changes needed.”

The London police violated the human rights of the organizers behind a March 2021 vigil for a woman who was killed by a serving police officer as she walked home, the British High Court ruled Friday, a decision that comes as the government seeks greater authority for the police to block protests.

The London police violated the human rights of the organizers behind a March 2021 vigil for a woman who was killed by a serving police officer as she walked home, the British High Court ruled Friday, a decision that comes as the government seeks greater authority for the police to block protests. The judgment comes at a particularly fraught time for London’s Metropolitan Police Service, which is dealing with the resignation of its chief, Cressida Dick, and a broader crisis of trust after allegations of misogyny, racism and bullying within the force. Four leaders of Reclaim These Streets, the group that had organized the protest after the killing of the woman, Sarah Everard, took the police force to court after it canceled the vigil, saying their rights had been violated. The group celebrated the decision as “a victory for women.” “Last March, women’s voices were silenced. Today’s judgment conclusively shows that the police were wrong to silence us,” the organization said in a statement. “The decisions and actions by the Met Police in the run-up to the planned vigil for Sarah Everard last year were unlawful and the judgment sets a powerful precedent for protest rights.” The decision was announced as Parliament is considering a controversial bill that would make it easier for the police to set limits on demonstrations and punish protesters who refuse to comply. “The Government should take heed and drop its Policing Bill, which would give the police new powers that undermine our right to protest,” Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a lawmaker whose constituency includes the area where Everard was abducted, wrote on Twitter. The court’s ruling came almost a year to the day after London police cracked down on a group of people who had gathered at a park in South London to remember Everard, just days after the discovery of her body. Everard, 33, was kidnapped, raped and murdered by a Metropolitan Police Service officer, and her case came to encapsulate broader concerns about misogyny in the police force and violence against women and girls. In response, Reclaim These Streets planned a vigil at Clapham Common. The police banned the event, citing coronavirus restrictions on gatherings that were in place at the time and threatening the organizers with fines of 10,000 pounds, about $13,000. A spontaneous group gathered in the park anyway, quickly growing into the thousands as the day progressed. Although the event was largely peaceful and the crowd was allowed to remain for hours, the police began to disperse people, sometimes violently, as dusk fell. When several women were arrested and handcuffed by the police, images of their arrest drew outrage and calls for an investigation into the police handling of the situation. The High Court decision on Friday stands in stark contrast to an earlier investigation by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire &amp; Rescue Services, an independent watchdog group, which found that the police acted appropriately at the informal protest. The ruling announced Friday focused instead on the cancellation of the planned vigil, after four organizers — Jessica Leigh, Anna Birley, Henna Shah and Jamie Klingler — challenged the police in court. The judgment found that the London Police had violated the organizers’ right to freedom of speech and assembly by preventing them from carrying out the vigil. Judge Mark Warby, in a summary of the ruling, said that the Metropolitan Police Service “failed to perform its legal duty to consider whether the claimants might have a reasonable excuse for holding the gathering.” He added that the police overstepped by making “statements at meetings, in letters, and in a press statement” that coronavirus regulations in force at the time “meant that holding the vigil would be unlawful.” “Those statements interfered with the claimants’ rights because each had a ‘chilling effect’ and made at least some causal contribution to the decision to cancel the vigil,” he wrote. The police have the right to appeal the decision. Louisa Rolfe, an assistant commissioner for the Metropolitan Police Service, said in a statement issued after the ruling that the force was still deciding whether to pursue the case further. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said he welcomed the decision. The murder of Everard had damaged public trust in London’s police force, he said, and the way the police handled the vigil eroded that trust further. “A series of events in the past year have damaged confidence in the police, and urgent and wide-reaching action is needed to restore it,” he said. “I remain committed to doing everything in my power to hold the police to account and working with the Met to deliver on the changes needed.”

Leaders of Sarah Everard vigil had rights violated by police, court rules

The policeman who killed Sarah Everard was deployed to the Parliamentary Estate five times in the past year, even after incidents of criminal nature.<o:p></o:p>

Wayne Couzens has been jailed for lifetime last week after he abducted, raped and murdered a London woman, Sarah Everard.<o:p></o:p>

The 33-year-old woman was heading back home from her friend’s house in Clapham in South London on March 03 when she went missing.<o:p></o:p>

It was later revealed that she was abducted, raped and murdered by Couzens, who had served as a policeman.<o:p></o:p>

Now, local reports have stated that Couzens was deployed for the&nbsp;Parliamentary and Diplomatic Protection Command in February 2020 to guard diplomatic premises, embassies and such.<o:p></o:p>

However, this has come as a shock as the convict had history of flashing. He had been linked to a flashing incident in 2015 and another similar one a few days before he killed Sarah Everard.

<o:p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/united-kingdom-sarah-everard-rape-and-murder-case-verdict-is-out-417265">WATCH |</a></o:p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/united-kingdom-sarah-everard-rape-and-murder-case-verdict-is-out-417265/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

A spokesperson for the Met Police confirmed that he was deployed to armed static protection duties on the Parliamentary Estate five times between February and July 2020. His guarding duties covered estates such as the House of Lords and House of Commons.<o:p></o:p>

The fact that he was deployed in the Parliamentary duty even with a criminal record has shocked and worried the authorities.<o:p></o:p>

"Like everyone, I have been sickened by the depravity of Wayne Couzens - and heartbroken for the family of Sarah Everard, " Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle told local media, house, The Sunday Times. "I have asked the Met to meet me urgently to discuss how this person could have been deemed suitable for deployment here."<o:p></o:p>

He also questioned the police department that how was Couzens allowed to cross the parliamentary threshold with his background. "Further, I will be seeking reassurance that at no time was anyone on the parliamentary estate put at risk, " he said.<o:p></o:p>

It has also been reported that the criminal had used his position to make the victim believe that she was breaching Covid regulations set up by the UK government.<o:p></o:p>

The policeman who killed Sarah Everard was deployed to the Parliamentary Estate five times in the past year, even after incidents of criminal nature. Wayne Couzens has been jailed for lifetime last week after he abducted, raped and murdered a London woman, Sarah Everard.

The policeman who killed Sarah Everard was deployed to the Parliamentary Estate five times in the past year, even after incidents of criminal nature. Wayne Couzens has been jailed for lifetime last week after he abducted, raped and murdered a London woman, Sarah Everard. The 33-year-old woman was heading back home from her friend’s house in Clapham in South London on March 03 when she went missing. It was later revealed that she was abducted, raped and murdered by Couzens, who had served as a policeman. Now, local reports have stated that Couzens was deployed for the Parliamentary and Diplomatic Protection Command in February 2020 to guard diplomatic premises, embassies and such. However, this has come as a shock as the convict had history of flashing. He had been linked to a flashing incident in 2015 and another similar one a few days before he killed Sarah Everard. WATCH | A spokesperson for the Met Police confirmed that he was deployed to armed static protection duties on the Parliamentary Estate five times between February and July 2020. His guarding duties covered estates such as the House of Lords and House of Commons. The fact that he was deployed in the Parliamentary duty even with a criminal record has shocked and worried the authorities. "Like everyone, I have been sickened by the depravity of Wayne Couzens - and heartbroken for the family of Sarah Everard, " Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle told local media, house, The Sunday Times. "I have asked the Met to meet me urgently to discuss how this person could have been deemed suitable for deployment here." He also questioned the police department that how was Couzens allowed to cross the parliamentary threshold with his background. "Further, I will be seeking reassurance that at no time was anyone on the parliamentary estate put at risk, " he said. It has also been reported that the criminal had used his position to make the victim believe that she was breaching Covid regulations set up by the UK government.

Sarah Everard's killer was put on Parliamentary duty 5 times despite criminal background: Reports

The police officer who abducted, raped and murdered Sarah Everard — a case that prompted a wave of criticism of the police and calls to reform the way officers handle violence against women — was sentenced on Thursday to life in prison by Britain's top criminal court.

The sentence was announced a day after prosecutors detailed how the officer, Wayne Couzens, abused his authority and, under the guise of the coronavirus restrictions imposed during a national lockdown in March, deceived Everard into thinking that she was under arrest.

Judge Adrian Bruce Fulford, in explaining why Couzens would not be eligible for parole, said that he had "irretrievably damaged the lives of Sarah Everard's family and friends"&nbsp;and “eroded the confidence that the public are entitled to have to the police force in England and Wales."

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/democrats-move-to-avert-shutdown-but-divisions-imperil-bidens-agenda-417166">Democrats move to avert shutdown, but divisions imperil Biden's agenda</a>

The judge said that the "misuse of a police officer's role"&nbsp;— he used his official police credentials, equipment and training to carry out the crime, according to prosecutors — justified the steepest possible sentence.

Judges in Britain are usually obligated to give life sentences to people convicted of murder, but those sentenced to life in prison rarely serve out the entire term behind bars.

There is, however, an exception for the most serious murder cases, when a judge passes a "whole life order,"&nbsp;as was the case for Couzens. In this situation, the offender must remain in prison for life without any possibility of early release.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/venezuela-economic-crisis-over-three-quarters-live-in-extreme-poverty-417155">Venezuela economic crisis: Over three-quarters live in extreme poverty</a>

Tom Little, a prosecutor, detailed the case against Couzens in London's central criminal court this week, revealing new and harrowing details about the March killing of Everard, a 33-year-old whose death inspired national calls for better protections for women. Those present, including Everard’s family, heard how Couzens went "hunting for a lone young female to kidnap and rape."

Couzens then confronted Everard as she walked home from a friend’s house and conducted "a false arrest"&nbsp;to get her into his car, the prosecutor said.

Couzens, who was a diplomatic protection officer with London's Metropolitan Police, presented a police identity card to Everard and handcuffed her before driving her out of the city, raping her and eventually killing her and setting her body on fire, Little said.

Her remains were discovered seven days later in a wooded area in Kent, nearly 80 miles from London.

The police officer who abducted, raped and murdered Sarah Everard — a case that prompted a wave of criticism of the police and calls to reform the way officers handle violence against women — was sentenced on Thursday to life in prison by Britain's top criminal court.

The police officer who abducted, raped and murdered Sarah Everard — a case that prompted a wave of criticism of the police and calls to reform the way officers handle violence against women — was sentenced on Thursday to life in prison by Britain's top criminal court. The sentence was announced a day after prosecutors detailed how the officer, Wayne Couzens, abused his authority and, under the guise of the coronavirus restrictions imposed during a national lockdown in March, deceived Everard into thinking that she was under arrest. Judge Adrian Bruce Fulford, in explaining why Couzens would not be eligible for parole, said that he had "irretrievably damaged the lives of Sarah Everard's family and friends" and “eroded the confidence that the public are entitled to have to the police force in England and Wales." ALSO READ | Democrats move to avert shutdown, but divisions imperil Biden's agenda The judge said that the "misuse of a police officer's role" — he used his official police credentials, equipment and training to carry out the crime, according to prosecutors — justified the steepest possible sentence. Judges in Britain are usually obligated to give life sentences to people convicted of murder, but those sentenced to life in prison rarely serve out the entire term behind bars. There is, however, an exception for the most serious murder cases, when a judge passes a "whole life order," as was the case for Couzens. In this situation, the offender must remain in prison for life without any possibility of early release. ALSO READ | Venezuela economic crisis: Over three-quarters live in extreme poverty Tom Little, a prosecutor, detailed the case against Couzens in London's central criminal court this week, revealing new and harrowing details about the March killing of Everard, a 33-year-old whose death inspired national calls for better protections for women. Those present, including Everard’s family, heard how Couzens went "hunting for a lone young female to kidnap and rape." Couzens then confronted Everard as she walked home from a friend’s house and conducted "a false arrest" to get her into his car, the prosecutor said. Couzens, who was a diplomatic protection officer with London's Metropolitan Police, presented a police identity card to Everard and handcuffed her before driving her out of the city, raping her and eventually killing her and setting her body on fire, Little said. Her remains were discovered seven days later in a wooded area in Kent, nearly 80 miles from London.

Police officer sentenced to life in prison for murder of Sarah Everard

A British police officer on Friday pleaded guilty to the murder of a woman whose disappearance as she walked to her London home sparked outrage and a national debate about women's safety.

Wayne Couzens, 48, who served in the Metropolitan Police's elite diplomatic protection unit, had already admitted to the charges of rape and kidnapping of Sarah Everard.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/united-kingdom-london-police-officer-charged-with-the-murder-of-sarah-everard-370536/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

What happened to&nbsp;Everard?

Everard, 33, was abducted as she walked home from a friend's house in south London on March 3. Her body was later found in woodland around 50 miles away in southeast England.

A post-mortem conducted by the Metropolitan Police last month concluded she had died as a result of compression of the neck".

The next hearing is due to take place on July 9. A provisional trial date has been set for October.

Also see|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/men-do-better-londoners-hold-vigil-for-sarah-everard-police-revolts-370400">'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts</a>

London police criticised for clashes at vigil

Her disappearance led to vigils and protests and prompted the government to promise enhanced police patrols at night, as well as funding to make the streets safer for women.

London police faced criticism&nbsp;and calls for investigations after clashing with crowds at a memorial for the murder victim.

Misogyny a 'hate crime'

British lawmakers are considering whether to make misogyny a hate crime amid calls for tougher action on violence against women following national outrage over the murder of Everard.

An amendment to the Domestic Abuse Bill, which was debated on Wednesday in Britain's upper parliamentary chamber, the House of Lords, would require police in England and Wales to record crimes motivated by hatred of someone's sex or gender.

Home Office Minister Susan Williams told parliament that she opposed the amendment as the necessary powers were already in place to require the police to provide such data but said she would ask the police to collect it "on an experimental basis".

"We will ask police forces to identify and record any crimes of violence ... including stalking and harassment, as well as sexual offences where the victim perceives it to have been motivated by a hostility based on their sex," she said.

About a quarter of 43 police constabularies in England and Wales have already made misogyny a hate crime, trialled the policy or are considering implementing it.

Similar protections already exist for race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and gender identity and can lead to harsher penalties for those convicted.

Women suffer 80% of sexual assaults and rarely report it

Women's rights campaigners want misogyny to be made a hate crime to help detect and prevent violence against women, and end a culture in which abuse is tolerated, excused and repeated.

According to official data in the UK, women make up 80 per cent of sexual assault victims over the age of 16.&nbsp;

The latest statistics showed little progress in tackling sexual assault, with 773,000 people, 1.8 per cent of adults in England and Wales, experiencing rape, assault by penetration, indecent exposure or unwanted sexual touching in the year to March 2020.

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

A British police officer on Friday pleaded guilty to the murder of a woman whose disappearance as she walked to her London home sparked outrage and a national debate about women's safety.

A British police officer on Friday pleaded guilty to the murder of a woman whose disappearance as she walked to her London home sparked outrage and a national debate about women's safety. Wayne Couzens, 48, who served in the Metropolitan Police's elite diplomatic protection unit, had already admitted to the charges of rape and kidnapping of Sarah Everard. What happened to Everard? Everard, 33, was abducted as she walked home from a friend's house in south London on March 3. Her body was later found in woodland around 50 miles away in southeast England. A post-mortem conducted by the Metropolitan Police last month concluded she had died as a result of compression of the neck". The next hearing is due to take place on July 9. A provisional trial date has been set for October. Also see| 'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts London police criticised for clashes at vigil Her disappearance led to vigils and protests and prompted the government to promise enhanced police patrols at night, as well as funding to make the streets safer for women. London police faced criticism and calls for investigations after clashing with crowds at a memorial for the murder victim. Misogyny a 'hate crime' British lawmakers are considering whether to make misogyny a hate crime amid calls for tougher action on violence against women following national outrage over the murder of Everard. An amendment to the Domestic Abuse Bill, which was debated on Wednesday in Britain's upper parliamentary chamber, the House of Lords, would require police in England and Wales to record crimes motivated by hatred of someone's sex or gender. Home Office Minister Susan Williams told parliament that she opposed the amendment as the necessary powers were already in place to require the police to provide such data but said she would ask the police to collect it "on an experimental basis". "We will ask police forces to identify and record any crimes of violence ... including stalking and harassment, as well as sexual offences where the victim perceives it to have been motivated by a hostility based on their sex," she said. About a quarter of 43 police constabularies in England and Wales have already made misogyny a hate crime, trialled the policy or are considering implementing it. Similar protections already exist for race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and gender identity and can lead to harsher penalties for those convicted. Women suffer 80% of sexual assaults and rarely report it Women's rights campaigners want misogyny to be made a hate crime to help detect and prevent violence against women, and end a culture in which abuse is tolerated, excused and repeated. According to official data in the UK, women make up 80 per cent of sexual assault victims over the age of 16. The latest statistics showed little progress in tackling sexual assault, with 773,000 people, 1.8 per cent of adults in England and Wales, experiencing rape, assault by penetration, indecent exposure or unwanted sexual touching in the year to March 2020. (With inputs from agencies)

Monster in uniform: UK cop admits to killing Sarah Everard who was just walking home in the night

A few months after a London woman, Sarah Everard, was murdered, a police officer has confessed to kidnapping and raping the 33-year-old.

Wayne Couzens, a 48-year-old officer with the Met police, pleaded guilty to abducting Everard while she was walking home from her friend’s house in the South of London on March 03.

Couzens was earlier accused of raping and murdering the 33-year-old and was scheduled to enter a plea next month.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/i-am-not-an-object-women-in-london-march-for-safety-375245">WATCH |</a>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/i-am-not-an-object-women-in-london-march-for-safety-375245/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

However, the police officer pleaded guilty to kidnapping and raping the London woman, the local media reported on Tuesday.

Everard’s case has highlighted the poor status of security of women in the country, especially London, where several women claim to feel unsafe while walking alone on the streets.

Her death led to several women recounting their own experiences of unsafe travel in the city and thousands of people took to the streets to demand justice for Everard’s murder.

However, the London police were criticised for the way the unit mishandled a vigil that was organised for Everard.

A few months after a London woman, Sarah Everard, was murdered, a police officer has confessed to kidnapping and raping the 33-year-old. Wayne Couzens, a 48-year-old officer with the Met police, pleaded guilty to abducting Everard while she was walking home from her friend’s house in the South of London on March 03.

A few months after a London woman, Sarah Everard, was murdered, a police officer has confessed to kidnapping and raping the 33-year-old. Wayne Couzens, a 48-year-old officer with the Met police, pleaded guilty to abducting Everard while she was walking home from her friend’s house in the South of London on March 03. Couzens was earlier accused of raping and murdering the 33-year-old and was scheduled to enter a plea next month. WATCH | However, the police officer pleaded guilty to kidnapping and raping the London woman, the local media reported on Tuesday. Everard’s case has highlighted the poor status of security of women in the country, especially London, where several women claim to feel unsafe while walking alone on the streets. Her death led to several women recounting their own experiences of unsafe travel in the city and thousands of people took to the streets to demand justice for Everard’s murder. However, the London police were criticised for the way the unit mishandled a vigil that was organised for Everard.

Sarah Everard disappearance case: UK police officer confesses to kidnap and rape

''Kill the bill!''

That has been the refrain echoing in streets across Britain in recent weeks as protesters demand a rethinking of a sweeping crime bill that would give the police more power to deal with nonviolent demonstrations.

In recent months, a series of issues have galvanized mass protests across Europe: Black Lives Matter demonstrations in cities last summer, protests against security laws across France last fall, and anti-lockdown rallies seemingly everywhere.

How the police should handle these mass demonstrations has become a topic of heated debate, especially as officers have been accused in some cases of over-aggressive responses. Coronavirus restrictions have added another layer to questions about the right balance between the rule of law and protecting civil liberties.

In Britain, that discussion has zeroed in on the new police bill.

The proposed legislation has come under intense criticism in recent weeks in the wake of the killing of Sarah Everard, a young woman who was murdered in London after walking home from a friend’s house in the evening, and a subsequent vigil to honor her that was broken up by the police.

Here is what you need to know about the proposed policing bill that would affect England and Wales, and the protests demanding that it be shelved.

What would the policing bill do?

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Court Bill is an immense piece of proposed legislation that makes provisions for a broad range of issues in its nearly 300 pages. The bill — which covers England and Wales — introduces harsher penalties for serious crimes, end a policy of early prison release for some offenders and prevent unauthorized encampments, among other sweeping measures.

It also gives broad authority to police forces when it comes to handling protests — and that has proved to be a lightning rod.

Under current law, the police must first determine that a demonstration could result in serious public disorder, property damage or serious disruption to the life of the community before it can impose restrictions.

But the new bill would offer much broader powers for the police. It will leave much to their own discretion, and potentially allow them to criminalize protests they deem a “public nuisance.”

The police would be allowed to set time and noise limits on rallies, and protesters who do not follow restrictions they “ought” to know about, even if they have not received a direct order from an officer, would be vulnerable to prosecution.

The bill also makes it possible for those who damage memorials to be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. That provision comes months after a statue commemorating a slave trader, Edward Colston, was toppled in Bristol last year during a Black Lives Matter demonstration.

There had already been pushback.

The government maintains that the bill provides for better policing and community protection. Priti Patel, the home secretary, said last week that there was “a balance to be struck between the rights of the protester and the rights of individuals to go about their daily lives.”

“In recent years, we have seen a significant change of protest tactics, with protesters exploiting gaps in the law which have led to disproportionate amounts of disruption,” Patel said, speaking in front of Parliament last week. She pointed specifically to tactics used by Extinction Rebellion climate change protesters to block trains and shut down cities.

Opposition lawmakers and rights groups have denounced what they see as a move to give police overly broad, and potentially problematic, powers. Many say they need more time to work through the potential implications.

The Local Government Association, a cross-party organization, said that certain aspects of the bill, particularly those focused on public protests, “warrant further formal consultation.” The group expressed concerns that a rushed timetable to vote on the bill “left little time to scrutinize the bill in sufficient detail.”

The Good Law Project, a British governance watchdog, said in a briefing that the bill “represents a serious threat to the right to protest,” and called for the portions of the legislation that deal with protests to be dropped.

Why have people taken to the streets now?

While rights groups have long had concerns about the policing bill and its potential impact on what they say is the essential democratic tool of protest, the legislation was suddenly thrust into the national spotlight after the murder of Everard.

The 33-year-old vanished off a London street on March 3, and her body was later found in a wooded area. A police officer was charged in her death.

The killing set off a national outcry over violence against women. Then came the day of the vigil.

Officers were widely criticized for breaking up the March 12 event, deemed illegal because of coronavirus restrictions. Images spread quickly showing the police moving in to halt speeches and arrest a group of women denouncing violence.

An independent investigation has been launched into conduct of the police, and the controversy raised questions about the ban on protests during the pandemic.

More broadly, the police's heavy-handed response to the vigil catalyzed the movement against the policing bill, shifting the debate to one about police overreach. The vigil took place just days before the crime bill was set to be debated in Parliament.

The problem with the bill, critics say, is not just that it gives officers more power to tamp down demonstrations. The bill makes no specific mention of violence against women — indeed, it includes more language about how to criminalize the defacing a statute than it does about crimes against human being motivated by misogyny.

A number of protests against the bill have been held nationally since the vigil for Everard in London. Last week, hundreds gathered outside government buildings, with crowds parading from Parliament Square to police headquarters in largely peaceful demonstrations. Other protests were held nationally last weekend.

On Sunday, one of them turned riotous in Bristol, where a small group set fire to police vehicles, smashed shop windows and clashed with officers. At least 20 police officers were injured, two seriously, and seven were arrests made, according to the police.

What happens next?

The bill has already passed one hurdle in Parliament, despite the concerns over civil liberties, when it was voted through during its second reading last week amid heated debate.

Now it goes to committee, when it will be assessed in detail, and experts and interest groups can weigh in. When that is over, the committee will report its findings — and perhaps suggest amendments — to the House of Commons, where it will be debated again.

But that process has been put off until later this year.

The government has tried to use the passions set off by Everard’s death to secure passage of the policing bill. The sweeping new police powers it contains, officials argue, would make women safer.

But many others have argued that the bill misses the point. The measure, they argue, fails to address the pervasive misogyny at the heart of crimes committed against women, as well as undermining the right to protest.

As the dispute has heated up, some lawmakers are taking a new look the bill.

The Labour party had originally planned to abstain from voting on the bill, but shifted its position last week to instead vote against it. David Lammy, a Labour lawmaker who is the opposition party’s justice spokesman, called the legislation “a mess.”

“The tragic death of Sarah Everard has instigated a national demand for action to tackle violence against women,” Lammy said. “This is no time to be rushing through poorly thought-out measures to impose disproportionate controls on free expression and the right to protest.”

&nbsp;

''Kill the bill!'' That has been the refrain echoing in streets across Britain in recent weeks as protesters demand a rethinking of a sweeping crime bill that would give the police more power to deal with nonviolent demonstrations.

''Kill the bill!'' That has been the refrain echoing in streets across Britain in recent weeks as protesters demand a rethinking of a sweeping crime bill that would give the police more power to deal with nonviolent demonstrations. In recent months, a series of issues have galvanized mass protests across Europe: Black Lives Matter demonstrations in cities last summer, protests against security laws across France last fall, and anti-lockdown rallies seemingly everywhere. How the police should handle these mass demonstrations has become a topic of heated debate, especially as officers have been accused in some cases of over-aggressive responses. Coronavirus restrictions have added another layer to questions about the right balance between the rule of law and protecting civil liberties. In Britain, that discussion has zeroed in on the new police bill. The proposed legislation has come under intense criticism in recent weeks in the wake of the killing of Sarah Everard, a young woman who was murdered in London after walking home from a friend’s house in the evening, and a subsequent vigil to honor her that was broken up by the police. Here is what you need to know about the proposed policing bill that would affect England and Wales, and the protests demanding that it be shelved. What would the policing bill do? The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Court Bill is an immense piece of proposed legislation that makes provisions for a broad range of issues in its nearly 300 pages. The bill — which covers England and Wales — introduces harsher penalties for serious crimes, end a policy of early prison release for some offenders and prevent unauthorized encampments, among other sweeping measures. It also gives broad authority to police forces when it comes to handling protests — and that has proved to be a lightning rod. Under current law, the police must first determine that a demonstration could result in serious public disorder, property damage or serious disruption to the life of the community before it can impose restrictions. But the new bill would offer much broader powers for the police. It will leave much to their own discretion, and potentially allow them to criminalize protests they deem a “public nuisance.” The police would be allowed to set time and noise limits on rallies, and protesters who do not follow restrictions they “ought” to know about, even if they have not received a direct order from an officer, would be vulnerable to prosecution. The bill also makes it possible for those who damage memorials to be sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. That provision comes months after a statue commemorating a slave trader, Edward Colston, was toppled in Bristol last year during a Black Lives Matter demonstration. There had already been pushback. The government maintains that the bill provides for better policing and community protection. Priti Patel, the home secretary, said last week that there was “a balance to be struck between the rights of the protester and the rights of individuals to go about their daily lives.” “In recent years, we have seen a significant change of protest tactics, with protesters exploiting gaps in the law which have led to disproportionate amounts of disruption,” Patel said, speaking in front of Parliament last week. She pointed specifically to tactics used by Extinction Rebellion climate change protesters to block trains and shut down cities. Opposition lawmakers and rights groups have denounced what they see as a move to give police overly broad, and potentially problematic, powers. Many say they need more time to work through the potential implications. The Local Government Association, a cross-party organization, said that certain aspects of the bill, particularly those focused on public protests, “warrant further formal consultation.” The group expressed concerns that a rushed timetable to vote on the bill “left little time to scrutinize the bill in sufficient detail.” The Good Law Project, a British governance watchdog, said in a briefing that the bill “represents a serious threat to the right to protest,” and called for the portions of the legislation that deal with protests to be dropped. Why have people taken to the streets now? While rights groups have long had concerns about the policing bill and its potential impact on what they say is the essential democratic tool of protest, the legislation was suddenly thrust into the national spotlight after the murder of Everard. The 33-year-old vanished off a London street on March 3, and her body was later found in a wooded area. A police officer was charged in her death. The killing set off a national outcry over violence against women. Then came the day of the vigil. Officers were widely criticized for breaking up the March 12 event, deemed illegal because of coronavirus restrictions. Images spread quickly showing the police moving in to halt speeches and arrest a group of women denouncing violence. An independent investigation has been launched into conduct of the police, and the controversy raised questions about the ban on protests during the pandemic. More broadly, the police's heavy-handed response to the vigil catalyzed the movement against the policing bill, shifting the debate to one about police overreach. The vigil took place just days before the crime bill was set to be debated in Parliament. The problem with the bill, critics say, is not just that it gives officers more power to tamp down demonstrations. The bill makes no specific mention of violence against women — indeed, it includes more language about how to criminalize the defacing a statute than it does about crimes against human being motivated by misogyny. A number of protests against the bill have been held nationally since the vigil for Everard in London. Last week, hundreds gathered outside government buildings, with crowds parading from Parliament Square to police headquarters in largely peaceful demonstrations. Other protests were held nationally last weekend. On Sunday, one of them turned riotous in Bristol, where a small group set fire to police vehicles, smashed shop windows and clashed with officers. At least 20 police officers were injured, two seriously, and seven were arrests made, according to the police. What happens next? The bill has already passed one hurdle in Parliament, despite the concerns over civil liberties, when it was voted through during its second reading last week amid heated debate. Now it goes to committee, when it will be assessed in detail, and experts and interest groups can weigh in. When that is over, the committee will report its findings — and perhaps suggest amendments — to the House of Commons, where it will be debated again. But that process has been put off until later this year. The government has tried to use the passions set off by Everard’s death to secure passage of the policing bill. The sweeping new police powers it contains, officials argue, would make women safer. But many others have argued that the bill misses the point. The measure, they argue, fails to address the pervasive misogyny at the heart of crimes committed against women, as well as undermining the right to protest. As the dispute has heated up, some lawmakers are taking a new look the bill. The Labour party had originally planned to abstain from voting on the bill, but shifted its position last week to instead vote against it. David Lammy, a Labour lawmaker who is the opposition party’s justice spokesman, called the legislation “a mess.” “The tragic death of Sarah Everard has instigated a national demand for action to tackle violence against women,” Lammy said. “This is no time to be rushing through poorly thought-out measures to impose disproportionate controls on free expression and the right to protest.”

What are the ‘kill the bill’ protests in Britain all about?

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Wednesday that there needed to be a cultural change in attitudes in Britain towards women after the murder of Londoner Sarah Everard prompted a debate over how the country deals with male violence against women.

During the weekly Prime Minister's Questions session, opposition Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the murder a "watershed moment" that demanded cross-party support to achieve cultural change.

Also see|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/men-do-better-londoners-hold-vigil-for-sarah-everard-police-revolts-370400">'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts</a>

Putting aside party differences temporarily, Johnson said he fully agreed with Starmer and said that the issue of women's safety would not be resolved without widespread cultural and social change.

A serving police officer is set to go on trial in October accused of the kidnap and murder of Everard, whose killing sparked anger and soul-searching about what police, government and society can do to stop male violence against women.

The 33-year-old was abducted as she walked home from a friend's house in south London on March 3, with her body later found in woodland around 50 miles away in southeast England.

'Unwavering'

An official cause of death has not yet been given, but a coroner's inquest is due to open on Thursday.

At a cabinet meeting Tuesday chaired by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the government pledged to be "unwavering" in its commitment to tackle violence against women.

Johnson on Monday headed a meeting of his criminal justice taskforce to make new recommendations to improve safety.

But critics have objected that the taskforce does not include any ministers with responsibility for gender equality, and that criminal justice legislation currently making its way through parliament does not go far enough on the issue.&nbsp;

More socially distanced solidarity vigils have been staged in British cities in recent days, as well as in Irish cities including the capital Dublin, where up to 200 people gathered Tuesday.&nbsp;

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Wednesday that there needed to be a cultural change in attitudes in Britain towards women after the murder of Londoner Sarah Everard prompted a debate over how the country deals with male violence against women.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Wednesday that there needed to be a cultural change in attitudes in Britain towards women after the murder of Londoner Sarah Everard prompted a debate over how the country deals with male violence against women. During the weekly Prime Minister's Questions session, opposition Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the murder a "watershed moment" that demanded cross-party support to achieve cultural change. Also see| 'Men, do better': Londoners hold vigil for Sarah Everard; Police revolts Putting aside party differences temporarily, Johnson said he fully agreed with Starmer and said that the issue of women's safety would not be resolved without widespread cultural and social change. A serving police officer is set to go on trial in October accused of the kidnap and murder of Everard, whose killing sparked anger and soul-searching about what police, government and society can do to stop male violence against women. The 33-year-old was abducted as she walked home from a friend's house in south London on March 3, with her body later found in woodland around 50 miles away in southeast England. 'Unwavering' An official cause of death has not yet been given, but a coroner's inquest is due to open on Thursday. At a cabinet meeting Tuesday chaired by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the government pledged to be "unwavering" in its commitment to tackle violence against women. Johnson on Monday headed a meeting of his criminal justice taskforce to make new recommendations to improve safety. But critics have objected that the taskforce does not include any ministers with responsibility for gender equality, and that criminal justice legislation currently making its way through parliament does not go far enough on the issue. More socially distanced solidarity vigils have been staged in British cities in recent days, as well as in Irish cities including the capital Dublin, where up to 200 people gathered Tuesday.

Sarah Everard case: Britain needs cultural change says Prime Minister Boris Johnson

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday backed London's police chief following outrage over her officers' handling of a vigil for a woman who was allegedly kidnapped and murdered by a member of the same force.

Johnson said he still had full confidence in Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick but supported the internal and independent reviews launched into how officers handled the gathering on Saturday.

Dick has faced calls to resign after police scuffled with the predominantly female crowd and physically restrained demonstrators, arresting four people.

Hundreds including Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, had assembled throughout Saturday to pay tribute to 33-year-old Sarah Everard, who disappeared on March 3 and whose body was found in woodland last week.&nbsp;

A Met police officer serving in the elite diplomatic protection unit has been charged with her kidnap and murder.

The force has agreed to launch an internal probe into its handling of the event, while interior minister Priti Patel has also asked a policing watchdog to "conduct a lessons learned review".

Johnson said officers had "a very, very difficult job" during the pandemic, but added that "there's no question that the scenes that we saw were very distressing".

"The reality is that, the country is united still in shock and grief about what happened to Sarah Everard, and we must do everything we can to find the answers," he said.

Dick was set later on Monday to join Johnson and several senior ministers at a meeting of a government taskforce examining crime and justice.&nbsp;

She has defended the vigil's "fiendishly difficult policing", saying on Sunday she was "more determined, not less" to remain in her post.

Everard's disappearance and death reignited a conversation about women's safety in public spaces in Britain.

Saturday's event had been banned on coronavirus safety grounds, and police said they moved in because of public health fears.

Patel told lawmakers the chaotic scenes were "upsetting" and said she had ordered the independent review "in the interest of providing greater assurance, and ensuring public confidence".

"I also think no one should prejudge anything in terms of conduct until we absolutely see what has happened in terms of that report," she added, noting it would be concluded in the next two weeks.

Patel also defended the government's record on female safety, noting that a domestic abuse bill set to be passed by parliament would "transform our collective response".

She added that a reopened government survey gathering views on the issue had gathered 78,000 responses since Friday.

As MPs debated the issue, hundreds gathered again Monday, this time in Parliament Square, to pay tribute to Everard. The crowd held banners and chanted as dozens of police officers looked on.

Meanwhile, the controversy over the vigil's policing came as the government tried to enact draft legislation granting officers greater powers to crack down on disruptive protests.

The opposition Labour Party, which has condemned Saturday's scenes, has indicated it will now vote against the bill on the grounds that it places "disproportionate controls on free expression". 
&nbsp;

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday backed London's police chief following outrage over her officers' handling of a vigil for a woman who was allegedly kidnapped and murdered by a member of the same force.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday backed London's police chief following outrage over her officers' handling of a vigil for a woman who was allegedly kidnapped and murdered by a member of the same force. Johnson said he still had full confidence in Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick but supported the internal and independent reviews launched into how officers handled the gathering on Saturday. Dick has faced calls to resign after police scuffled with the predominantly female crowd and physically restrained demonstrators, arresting four people. Hundreds including Kate Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, had assembled throughout Saturday to pay tribute to 33-year-old Sarah Everard, who disappeared on March 3 and whose body was found in woodland last week. A Met police officer serving in the elite diplomatic protection unit has been charged with her kidnap and murder. The force has agreed to launch an internal probe into its handling of the event, while interior minister Priti Patel has also asked a policing watchdog to "conduct a lessons learned review". Johnson said officers had "a very, very difficult job" during the pandemic, but added that "there's no question that the scenes that we saw were very distressing". "The reality is that, the country is united still in shock and grief about what happened to Sarah Everard, and we must do everything we can to find the answers," he said. Dick was set later on Monday to join Johnson and several senior ministers at a meeting of a government taskforce examining crime and justice. She has defended the vigil's "fiendishly difficult policing", saying on Sunday she was "more determined, not less" to remain in her post. Everard's disappearance and death reignited a conversation about women's safety in public spaces in Britain. Saturday's event had been banned on coronavirus safety grounds, and police said they moved in because of public health fears. Patel told lawmakers the chaotic scenes were "upsetting" and said she had ordered the independent review "in the interest of providing greater assurance, and ensuring public confidence". "I also think no one should prejudge anything in terms of conduct until we absolutely see what has happened in terms of that report," she added, noting it would be concluded in the next two weeks. Patel also defended the government's record on female safety, noting that a domestic abuse bill set to be passed by parliament would "transform our collective response". She added that a reopened government survey gathering views on the issue had gathered 78,000 responses since Friday. As MPs debated the issue, hundreds gathered again Monday, this time in Parliament Square, to pay tribute to Everard. The crowd held banners and chanted as dozens of police officers looked on. Meanwhile, the controversy over the vigil's policing came as the government tried to enact draft legislation granting officers greater powers to crack down on disruptive protests. The opposition Labour Party, which has condemned Saturday's scenes, has indicated it will now vote against the bill on the grounds that it places "disproportionate controls on free expression".

Sarah Everard murder: London police chief faces heat over protest crackdown

London police chief Cressida Dick on Sunday said she was not considering resigning and backed her officers after criticism of how they dispersed mourners at a vigil for a murdered woman on Saturday evening.

She dismissed “armchair” critics amid widespread outrage over officers manhandling women who were mourning the killing of Sarah Everard, The Guardian reported.

Cressida has faced calls to quit after a storm of criticism over the force’s handling of a vigil held in memory of Sarah Everard on Saturday.&nbsp;

The policing minister also gave his public backing to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick.

“We’re still in a pandemic, unlawful gatherings are unlawful gatherings, officers have to take action if people are putting themselves massively at risk,” Dick told reporters.

Asked if she was considering resigning, she said: “No, I’m not.”

The disappearance of Sarah Everard, 33, as she walked home on the evening of March 3, has provoked a huge outpouring of grief and dismay in Britain at the failure of police and wider society to tackle violence against women.

Police had denied permission for a vigil on Saturday evening at London’s Clapham Common, near where Everard was last seen alive, citing regulations aimed at preventing the spread of the coronavirus.

But hundreds of people, mostly women, gathered peacefully at the park in defiance of the ban to pay their respects to Everard throughout Saturday, including Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge.

(With inputs from agencies)

London police chief Cressida Dick on Sunday said she was not considering resigning and backed her officers after criticism of how they dispersed mourners at a vigil for a murdered woman on Saturday evening.

London police chief Cressida Dick on Sunday said she was not considering resigning and backed her officers after criticism of how they dispersed mourners at a vigil for a murdered woman on Saturday evening. She dismissed “armchair” critics amid widespread outrage over officers manhandling women who were mourning the killing of Sarah Everard, The Guardian reported. Cressida has faced calls to quit after a storm of criticism over the force’s handling of a vigil held in memory of Sarah Everard on Saturday. The policing minister also gave his public backing to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick. “We’re still in a pandemic, unlawful gatherings are unlawful gatherings, officers have to take action if people are putting themselves massively at risk,” Dick told reporters. Asked if she was considering resigning, she said: “No, I’m not.” The disappearance of Sarah Everard, 33, as she walked home on the evening of March 3, has provoked a huge outpouring of grief and dismay in Britain at the failure of police and wider society to tackle violence against women. Police had denied permission for a vigil on Saturday evening at London’s Clapham Common, near where Everard was last seen alive, citing regulations aimed at preventing the spread of the coronavirus. But hundreds of people, mostly women, gathered peacefully at the park in defiance of the ban to pay their respects to Everard throughout Saturday, including Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge. (With inputs from agencies)

Sarah Everard case: London police chief backs her officers as cops face backlash after dragging mourners

sarah-everard-case

Sarah Everard Case, News on Sarah Everard Case, stories on Sarah Everard Case, articles on Sarah Everard Case, Sarah Everard Case stories at Wion, Sarah Everard Case news, Sarah Everard Case latest news

sarah everard-case