The Pentagon has cleared US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin of wrongdoing over his failure to disclose hospital stays related to his cancer diagnosis. The Pentagon chief has apologised for not notifying government leaders about hospital stays in December and January.

US: Pentagon says Lloyd Austin showed 'no ill intent' in secret hospital stay

According to the inspector general of the Pentagon, their criminal investigators have initiated over 50 probes concerning help sent to Ukraine, some of which involve contractors, but they have not yet confirmed any of the accusations.

Pentagon in US has opened over 50 criminal probes on US aid to Ukraine

Meet the other Taylor Swift – not the global music superstar but the combatant in a psychological warfare operation to keep former US president Donald Trump from winning the 2024 elections.

Meet the other Taylor Swift – not the global music superstar but the combatant in a psychological warfare operation to keep former US president Donald Trump from winning the 2024 elections. For those unfamiliar with the increasingly bizarre alternative universe inhabited by millions of Americans whose views are shaped by the former president, social media tweets and influencers, here is a brief guide to the role supposedly played by psy-op Taylor Swift in an operation designed to culminate at next Sunday’s (Feb 11) Super Bowl in Las Vegas. The biggest event in US sports, last year’s Super Bowl had a television audience of just over 115 million. This year it may well be more because Taylor Swift is scheduled to attend to watch her boyfriend Travis Kelce play for the Kansas City Chiefs against the San Francisco 49ers. According to tweets and a video seen by hundreds of thousands, psy-ops warriors have planned to rig the game so that the Chiefs will win after a dramatic finish. To celebrate, Swift and Kelce will announce their engagement, soon followed by the celebrity couple’s endorsement of Joe Biden for another four years in the White House. Inhabitants of what has become known as Trumpworld have pointed to a variety of participants in the scheme, including the CIA and the Pentagon. Speculation on the latter was so persistent that the Pentagon felt it necessary to issue a denial through its deputy press secretary, Sabrina Singh. “To set the record straight,” she told the newspaper Politico, “Taylor Swift is not part of a DOD (Department of Defense) psychological operation. Period.” Also read | Grammy Awards 2024: Taylor Swift, Miley Cyrus win Best Album & Best Record; check full list of winners Conspiracy theorists distrust government and tend to interpret official government denials as a form of confirmation, so the exasperated “period” exclamation is unlikely to kill speculation of a well-planned plot. Not long after TIME magazine made Taylor Swift 2023 Person of The Year, prominent FOX News host Jesse Walters told his viewers that “it’s real. The Pentagon psy-op unit pitched NATO on turning Taylor Swift into an asset.” Also on record to fuel speculation was Vivek Ramaswamy, a presidential candidate until he dropped out of the race for the Republican party’s primary elections in mid-January. “I wonder whether there’s a major presidential endorsement coming from an artificially culturally propped up couple this fall,” he said, alluding to an endorsement for Biden. Ramaswamy did not explain what he meant by “artificially propped”. Record-breaking tours, music royalties and a movie on her concerts turned Swift into a billionaire last year, Bloomberg reported. On Sunday’s Grammy Awards, she was awarded for Album of the Year, becoming the only artist to ever win that category four times. Her successes and devoted fans – she has 300 million followers on social media -- reminiscent of the Beatlemania of the late 1960 and 1970s, has done little to impress those on the far right who have pegged her as a supporter of Joe Biden and thus an enemy of Trump. The paranoia in Trumpland about a romance between a superstar singer and a football player makes some wonder about the sanity of Republicans who, as the Wall Street Journal put it in an editorial “demonise two of America’s healthier entertainments". It had a question for those fanning the conspiracy: “If they believe defeating Mr Trump is so easy that Mr Biden can do it merely by getting an endorsement from a singer who backed him in 2020, doesn’t that suggest the GOP might be making a mistake by nominating such a weak candidate?” The National Football League (NFL) has been quiet about the affair which is keeping trolls busy. But it is a reasonable bet that the NFL would not be unhappy if the number of Super Bowl viewers would be boosted by thousands of “swifties,” as the singer’s fans are called. Why the United States is such fertile ground for conspiracy theories has puzzled historians, social scientists and pundits for decades – more so since the Internet allowed for weird ideas to spread worldwide and instantly. Watch | Gravitas | Super bowl: What makes it an advertiser's dream platform? × In 1964, a ground-breaking essay, later turned into a book, by the late Columbia University historian Richard Hofstadter provided an explanation that still stands. “It is the use of paranoid modes of expression by more or less normal people that makes the phenomenon significant," he wrote in The Paranoid Style in American Politics. The “more or less normal people” he cited in a tour of conspiracy theories going back to the 18th century included Samuel Morse, the celebrated inventor of the telegraph. Morse wrote that the government of Austria had sent Jesuit missionaries to America and supplied them with ample funds with the aim of installing a scion of the House of Hapsburg as emperor of the United States. Among the most durable conspiracy tales alive in the alternative universe: The landing of American astronauts on the moon. The theory claimed it was filmed in California studios to convince the world of the USA's superiority in space. No American set foot on the moon. More recently: The January 6, 2020 assault on the Capitol in Washington to prevent the peaceful transfer of power from the loser, Donald Trump, to the winner, Joe Biden, was fostered by the FBI. According to a Washington Post/University of Maryland poll, a quarter of Americans think the FBI instigated the attack. That belief has been repeatedly denied – but in America’s alternative universe that just amounts to confirmation. Just like Taylor Swift’s secret role in undermining Trump. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

Taylor Swift and the Super Bowl – a tale of America’s alternative universe

The Pentagon has vowed to take "all necessary actions" to defend the US troops after Iran-backed terrorists killed US soldiers and wounded several others in a drone strike on Al-Tanf, a US military site&nbsp;in Jordan on Sunday (Jan 28).

Recently discharged Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin made the statement and asserted that Pentagon was chalking up a plan to avenge the drone attack.&nbsp;

“The president and I will not tolerate attacks on US forces and we will take all necessary actions to defend the US and our troops,” Austin said at the Pentagon on Monday (Jan 29).

Pentagon's statement comes a day after&nbsp;US President Joe Biden also blamed Iran&nbsp;for the strike and vowed that Washington would respond.

"While we are still gathering the facts of this attack, we know it was carried out by radical Iran-backed militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq," Biden said in a statement on the attack.

"We will carry on their commitment to fight terrorism. And have no doubt -- we will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing," he added.

The three US soldiers killed in the attack were also named by the Pentagon on Monday. They have been identified as&nbsp;army reservists Sgt William Jerome Rivers, Spc Breonna Alexsondria Moffett and Spc Kennedy Sanders.

Sunday's strike was the first deadly attack&nbsp;against US forces since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted on Oct 7 last year.&nbsp;

<h2>Iran denies involvement</h2>

Meanwhile, Iran has denied any involvement in the terror attack.&nbsp;Nasser Kanaani, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson said it was a "repetition of baseless accusations" from the US side.&nbsp;

"The groups in the region do not take orders from Iran," Kanaani said. "War is not a solution. An immediate cease-fire in Gaza can lead to the return of peace."

Also watch |&nbsp;West Asia crisis: Three US soldiers killed, at least 34 injured in Jordan drone attack

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-20="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/west-asia-crisis-three-us-soldiers-killed-at-least-34-injured-in-jordan-drone-attack-684706/embed" width="560"></iframe>

<h2>Where is Al-Tanf based?</h2>

According to reports, Al-Tanf is located in Syria on the Iraqi border and within miles of the Jordanian border.

Since 2016, the US garrison at Tanf has served as a launching point for operations against Islamic State and a training area for Syrian opposition factions fighting the terrorist group.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/three-us-troops-killed-in-drone-attack-on-base-in-jordan-military-684606">Also read | Biden vows to strike back after drone strike on Jordan base kills 3 US troops</a>

The drone strike took place&nbsp;at the military outpost Tower 22, which is near Al-Tanf. It is not yet known how many US troops are actually stationed on Tower 22, and it is also unclear what type of weapons are kept at the base, and what air defences are used.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The Pentagon has vowed to take "all necessary actions" to defend the US troops after Iran-backed terrorists killed US soldiers and wounded several others in a drone strike on Al-Tanf, a US military site in Jordan on Sunday (Jan 28).

The Pentagon has vowed to take "all necessary actions" to defend the US troops after Iran-backed terrorists killed US soldiers and wounded several others in a drone strike on Al-Tanf, a US military site in Jordan on Sunday (Jan 28). Recently discharged Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin made the statement and asserted that Pentagon was chalking up a plan to avenge the drone attack. “The president and I will not tolerate attacks on US forces and we will take all necessary actions to defend the US and our troops,” Austin said at the Pentagon on Monday (Jan 29). Pentagon's statement comes a day after US President Joe Biden also blamed Iran for the strike and vowed that Washington would respond. "While we are still gathering the facts of this attack, we know it was carried out by radical Iran-backed militant groups operating in Syria and Iraq," Biden said in a statement on the attack. "We will carry on their commitment to fight terrorism. And have no doubt -- we will hold all those responsible to account at a time and in a manner of our choosing," he added. The three US soldiers killed in the attack were also named by the Pentagon on Monday. They have been identified as army reservists Sgt William Jerome Rivers, Spc Breonna Alexsondria Moffett and Spc Kennedy Sanders. Sunday's strike was the first deadly attack against US forces since the war between Israel and Hamas erupted on Oct 7 last year. Iran denies involvement Meanwhile, Iran has denied any involvement in the terror attack. Nasser Kanaani, an Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson said it was a "repetition of baseless accusations" from the US side. "The groups in the region do not take orders from Iran," Kanaani said. "War is not a solution. An immediate cease-fire in Gaza can lead to the return of peace." Also watch | West Asia crisis: Three US soldiers killed, at least 34 injured in Jordan drone attack Where is Al-Tanf based? According to reports, Al-Tanf is located in Syria on the Iraqi border and within miles of the Jordanian border. Since 2016, the US garrison at Tanf has served as a launching point for operations against Islamic State and a training area for Syrian opposition factions fighting the terrorist group. Also read | Biden vows to strike back after drone strike on Jordan base kills 3 US troops The drone strike took place at the military outpost Tower 22, which is near Al-Tanf. It is not yet known how many US troops are actually stationed on Tower 22, and it is also unclear what type of weapons are kept at the base, and what air defences are used. (With inputs from agencies)

Pentagon vows action after Jordan attack, releases names of 3 soldiers killed as Iran denies involvement

Pentagon’s former chief investigator of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) Sean Kirkpatrick claimed that the conspiracy theorists who have been working for and within the US government have been perpetuating myths regarding UFOs that millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent into studying a “self-licking ice cream cone”. 
 
The claims were made by Kirkpatrick in a podcast after he stepped down from the position of the first director of the defence department’s all-domain anomaly resolution office (Aaro) last month. 
 
The department was established in 2022 to collect military reports of UAP sightings and to provide more transparency regarding what information the government has. 
 
The first comprehensive historical record report of Aaro was submitted to Congress and will be published later this year, said Kirkpatrick, adding that it contains no evidence of the existence of alien life and not only any government cover-up.&nbsp;

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/its-official-us-is-not-able-to-defend-itself-against-an-alien-invasion-684284">It’s official, US is not able to defend itself against an alien invasion: Report</a>

He added that various lawmakers happily embrace unsubstantiated stories which are circulated by “a core group of people” regarding the secret government UFO research programmes. 
 
“They’re some of the same people that have been working behind the scenes with Congress to write legislation,” said Kirkpatrick, in the podcast. 
 
“They’re the same people that worked with a US company and the US army to explore a piece of material that they claim was a UAP and really is a piece of missile casing from the 1950s. They’re the same people that have been influencing some of these whistleblowers who have come forward to say: ‘Hey, I don’t have any first-hand evidence, but all these people are telling me this',” he added. 
 
Kirkpatrick did not identify the people by name, but agreed with the observation of Bergen that “the actual conspiracy is being carried out by a group of true believers themselves to get the government involved in the business of investigating aliens”. 
 
“That is a self-licking ice cream cone, exactly. The best thing that could have happened in this job is I found the aliens, and I could have rolled them out, but there’s none. There is no evidence of extraterrestrials. There is no evidence of aliens, and there’s no evidence of the government conspiracy,” said Kirkpatrick.

<h2 lang="en-US">Lawmakers succumbed to “conspiracy-driven decision-making”: Kirkpatrick</h2>

In his resignation essay, which was published last week by Scientific American, Kirkpatrick said that the lawmakers have succumbed to “conspiracy-driven decision-making” and sensationalism in their efforts to “uncover the cover-up”.

Watch:&nbsp;NASA Chief says Aliens exist | This World

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-chief-says-aliens-exist-this-world-636678/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

“Worrisome is the willingness of some to make judgments and take actions on these stories without having seen or even requested supporting evidence, an omission that is all the more problematic when the claims are so extraordinary,” Kirkpatrick wrote. 
 
“Some members of Congress prefer to opine about aliens to the press rather than get an evidence-based briefing on the matter. Members have a responsibility to exhibit critical-thinking skills instead of seeking the spotlight,” he wrote.

(With inputs from agencies)

Pentagon’s former chief investigator of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) Sean Kirkpatrick claimed that the conspiracy theorists who have been working for and within the US government have been perpetuating myths regarding UFOs that millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent into studying a “self-licking ice cream cone”.

Pentagon’s former chief investigator of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) Sean Kirkpatrick claimed that the conspiracy theorists who have been working for and within the US government have been perpetuating myths regarding UFOs that millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent into studying a “self-licking ice cream cone”. The claims were made by Kirkpatrick in a podcast after he stepped down from the position of the first director of the defence department’s all-domain anomaly resolution office (Aaro) last month. The department was established in 2022 to collect military reports of UAP sightings and to provide more transparency regarding what information the government has. The first comprehensive historical record report of Aaro was submitted to Congress and will be published later this year, said Kirkpatrick, adding that it contains no evidence of the existence of alien life and not only any government cover-up. Also read: It’s official, US is not able to defend itself against an alien invasion: Report He added that various lawmakers happily embrace unsubstantiated stories which are circulated by “a core group of people” regarding the secret government UFO research programmes. “They’re some of the same people that have been working behind the scenes with Congress to write legislation,” said Kirkpatrick, in the podcast. “They’re the same people that worked with a US company and the US army to explore a piece of material that they claim was a UAP and really is a piece of missile casing from the 1950s. They’re the same people that have been influencing some of these whistleblowers who have come forward to say: ‘Hey, I don’t have any first-hand evidence, but all these people are telling me this',” he added. Kirkpatrick did not identify the people by name, but agreed with the observation of Bergen that “the actual conspiracy is being carried out by a group of true believers themselves to get the government involved in the business of investigating aliens”. “That is a self-licking ice cream cone, exactly. The best thing that could have happened in this job is I found the aliens, and I could have rolled them out, but there’s none. There is no evidence of extraterrestrials. There is no evidence of aliens, and there’s no evidence of the government conspiracy,” said Kirkpatrick. Lawmakers succumbed to “conspiracy-driven decision-making”: Kirkpatrick In his resignation essay, which was published last week by Scientific American, Kirkpatrick said that the lawmakers have succumbed to “conspiracy-driven decision-making” and sensationalism in their efforts to “uncover the cover-up”. Watch: NASA Chief says Aliens exist | This World “Worrisome is the willingness of some to make judgments and take actions on these stories without having seen or even requested supporting evidence, an omission that is all the more problematic when the claims are so extraordinary,” Kirkpatrick wrote. “Some members of Congress prefer to opine about aliens to the press rather than get an evidence-based briefing on the matter. Members have a responsibility to exhibit critical-thinking skills instead of seeking the spotlight,” he wrote. (With inputs from agencies)

No aliens, US govt's money spent over 'self-licking ice cream cone': Pentagon ex-UFO chief

Forget Hollywood movies, the US as of today is not able to defend itself should an alien invasion take place, according to a recent statement by the US Department of Defense (DoD). The statement was based on an analysis of the nation’s ability to respond to a threat posed by unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), formerly UFOs.

It must be noted that the Pentagon had formed the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) back in July 2022 to handle all UAP affairs. Now, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has expressed its doubts over the USA’s ability to fend off the threat of an alien invasion.

Watch:&nbsp;Bird flu detected in Antarctica | Scientists create 'identical twin' universe

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bird-flu-detected-in-antarctica-scientists-create-identical-twin-universe-trending-on-wion-651203/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The recent observation comes in a summary of the classified report, ‘Evaluation of the DoD’s Actions Regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena’, first issued in August.

According to the statement by OIG, “DoD’s lack of a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP may pose a threat to military forces and national security.” 
 
“The DoD OIG found that the DoD does not have a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP,” it added.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-jsarwt="1" data-usg="AOvVaw1VXFKuClqG7hxyw9UczlUX" data-ved="2ahUKEwjGluvGwP2DAxWqb2wGHR1_Dt8QxfQBKAB6BAgPEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/aliens-kidnapped-my-mom-woman-leaves-reddit-stunned-with-otherworldly-claim-682051" jsname="YKoRaf">'Aliens kidnapped my mom,' woman leaves Reddit stunned with otherworldly claim</a>

Inspector General Robert P Storch said he was making this summary public in order to bring some transparency to the subject, otherwise shrouded in mystery.

“We are releasing this unclassified summary to be as transparent as possible with the American people about our oversight work on this important issue,” he added.

The OIG further also makes 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security for issuing a policy to “integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.”

The policy is required to be formed in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

(With inputs from agencies)

Forget Hollywood movies, the US as of today is not able to defend itself should an alien invasion take place, according to a recent statement by the US Department of Defense (DoD).

Forget Hollywood movies, the US as of today is not able to defend itself should an alien invasion take place, according to a recent statement by the US Department of Defense (DoD). The statement was based on an analysis of the nation’s ability to respond to a threat posed by unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), formerly UFOs. It must be noted that the Pentagon had formed the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) back in July 2022 to handle all UAP affairs. Now, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) has expressed its doubts over the USA’s ability to fend off the threat of an alien invasion. Watch: Bird flu detected in Antarctica | Scientists create 'identical twin' universe × The recent observation comes in a summary of the classified report, ‘Evaluation of the DoD’s Actions Regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena’, first issued in August. According to the statement by OIG, “DoD’s lack of a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP may pose a threat to military forces and national security.” “The DoD OIG found that the DoD does not have a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP,” it added. Also read: 'Aliens kidnapped my mom,' woman leaves Reddit stunned with otherworldly claim Inspector General Robert P Storch said he was making this summary public in order to bring some transparency to the subject, otherwise shrouded in mystery. “We are releasing this unclassified summary to be as transparent as possible with the American people about our oversight work on this important issue,” he added. The OIG further also makes 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security for issuing a policy to “integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.” The policy is required to be formed in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (With inputs from agencies)

It’s official, US is not able to defend itself against an alien invasion: Report

The United States targeted sites used by Iran-backed militants in Iraq on Tuesday (Jan 23), said the Pentagon. Two people were killed and two wounded in the bombardments, said Iraqi officials.&nbsp;

The US strikes come days after a number of American military personnel were injured after a ballistic missile attack by Iran-backed militants hit Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq.

<h2>US strikes in Iraq&nbsp;</h2>

The latest strikes targeted three facilities used by Iranian-backed Kataib Hezbollah and other Tehran-affiliated groups in Iraq, said the US officials.&nbsp;

WATCH |&nbsp;US strikes three facilities in Iraq linked to Iran-backed militia for attacks on US forces

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-three-facilities-in-iraq-linked-to-iran-backed-militia-for-attacks-on-us-forces-683011/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

The strikes “are in direct response to a series of escalatory attacks against US and coalition personnel in Iraq and Syria” by Iranian-backed militia groups, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said in a statement.&nbsp;

The US Central Command (CENTCOM) also released a statement saying that their forces “conducted unilateral airstrikes” targeting “KH headquarters, storage, and training locations for rocket, missile, and one-way attack UAV capabilities.”

The strikes, according to US defence officials, were carried out at two sites in western Iraq, Al-Qa’im near the Syrian border and Jurf al-Sakhar south of Baghdad.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-and-uk-conduct-fresh-series-of-air-strikes-against-houthi-targets-in-yemen-682642">US and UK conduct fresh series of air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen</a>

<h2>Iraqi official criticises US strikes</h2>

AFP report citing Iraqi sources said that the US strikes targeted Ketaib Hezbollah, a militant faction affiliated with the former Hashed al-Shaabi paramilitaries.&nbsp;

Two people were killed and two wounded in the bombardments in the al-Qaim sector, said the Iraqi interior ministry and former member of the Hashed al-Shaabi, whose fighters have been integrated into the regular army.

However, a Reuters report citing a medical source and a militant source said four people were wounded.

A senior&nbsp;Iraqi official later took to X and criticised Washington's move saying that these strikes "do not help bring calm" and called them a "flagrant violation of Iraq's sovereignty".&nbsp;

<h2>Biden under pressure</h2>

According to the Pentagon, US and allied forces in Iraq and Syria have been targeted in more than 150 attacks since mid-October.&nbsp;

The spike in attacks against American forces in the region and Washington’s response to them also comes amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza.&nbsp;

Therefore, US President Joe Biden has reportedly come under pressure to militarily respond to attacks on US forces despite political sensitivities in Baghdad. In his criticism of US' strikes in Iraq, the senior official also asked Washington to pressure Israel to stop its offensive in Gaza.&nbsp;

"The US side should pile on pressure for a halt to the (Israeli) offensive in Gaza rather than targeting and bombing the bases of an Iraqi national body," National Security Adviser Qassem al-Aaraji said in a post on X.

The CENTCOM said the Al Asad airbase which also hosts American troops came under attack by Iran-backed militia with ballistic missiles and rockets on Saturday (Jan 20) evening.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-military-personnel-injured-after-ballistic-missile-attack-by-iran-backed-militants-on-airbase-in-iraq-681950">US military personnel injured after ballistic missile attack by Iran-backed militants on airbase in Iraq</a> 
 
The attack resulted in minor injuries, but it was not immediately clear how many military personnel were wounded. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an Iran-backed militia group, claimed responsibility for Saturday’s attack on the base.&nbsp;

“The President and I will not hesitate to take necessary action to defend them and our interests. We do not seek to escalate conflict in the region,” said Austin.&nbsp;

He added, “We are fully prepared to take further measures to protect our people and our facilities. We call on these groups and their Iranian sponsors to immediately cease these attacks.”

The US has 900 troops in Syria and 2,500 in Iraq, advising and assisting local forces to prevent a resurgence of Islamic State.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

The United States targeted sites used by Iran-backed militants in Iraq on Tuesday (Jan 23), said the Pentagon. Two people were killed and two wounded in the bombardments, said Iraqi officials.

The United States targeted sites used by Iran-backed militants in Iraq on Tuesday (Jan 23), said the Pentagon. Two people were killed and two wounded in the bombardments, said Iraqi officials. The US strikes come days after a number of American military personnel were injured after a ballistic missile attack by Iran-backed militants hit Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq. US strikes in Iraq The latest strikes targeted three facilities used by Iranian-backed Kataib Hezbollah and other Tehran-affiliated groups in Iraq, said the US officials. WATCH | US strikes three facilities in Iraq linked to Iran-backed militia for attacks on US forces The strikes “are in direct response to a series of escalatory attacks against US and coalition personnel in Iraq and Syria” by Iranian-backed militia groups, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said in a statement. The US Central Command (CENTCOM) also released a statement saying that their forces “conducted unilateral airstrikes” targeting “KH headquarters, storage, and training locations for rocket, missile, and one-way attack UAV capabilities.” The strikes, according to US defence officials, were carried out at two sites in western Iraq, Al-Qa’im near the Syrian border and Jurf al-Sakhar south of Baghdad. ALSO READ | US and UK conduct fresh series of air strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen Iraqi official criticises US strikes AFP report citing Iraqi sources said that the US strikes targeted Ketaib Hezbollah, a militant faction affiliated with the former Hashed al-Shaabi paramilitaries. Two people were killed and two wounded in the bombardments in the al-Qaim sector, said the Iraqi interior ministry and former member of the Hashed al-Shaabi, whose fighters have been integrated into the regular army. However, a Reuters report citing a medical source and a militant source said four people were wounded. A senior Iraqi official later took to X and criticised Washington's move saying that these strikes "do not help bring calm" and called them a "flagrant violation of Iraq's sovereignty". Biden under pressure According to the Pentagon, US and allied forces in Iraq and Syria have been targeted in more than 150 attacks since mid-October. The spike in attacks against American forces in the region and Washington’s response to them also comes amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza. Therefore, US President Joe Biden has reportedly come under pressure to militarily respond to attacks on US forces despite political sensitivities in Baghdad. In his criticism of US' strikes in Iraq, the senior official also asked Washington to pressure Israel to stop its offensive in Gaza. "The US side should pile on pressure for a halt to the (Israeli) offensive in Gaza rather than targeting and bombing the bases of an Iraqi national body," National Security Adviser Qassem al-Aaraji said in a post on X. The CENTCOM said the Al Asad airbase which also hosts American troops came under attack by Iran-backed militia with ballistic missiles and rockets on Saturday (Jan 20) evening. ALSO READ | US military personnel injured after ballistic missile attack by Iran-backed militants on airbase in Iraq The attack resulted in minor injuries, but it was not immediately clear how many military personnel were wounded. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an Iran-backed militia group, claimed responsibility for Saturday’s attack on the base. “The President and I will not hesitate to take necessary action to defend them and our interests. We do not seek to escalate conflict in the region,” said Austin. He added, “We are fully prepared to take further measures to protect our people and our facilities. We call on these groups and their Iranian sponsors to immediately cease these attacks.” The US has 900 troops in Syria and 2,500 in Iraq, advising and assisting local forces to prevent a resurgence of Islamic State. (With inputs from agencies)

US carries out strikes on Iranian-backed militants in Iraq; two dead

More than $1 billion in military weapons and equipment that the United States has provided Ukraine to fight invading Russian forces cannot be accounted for and is not being fully tracked, according to a Pentagon audit released Thursday.

US failed to track more than $1 billion military aid given to Ukraine, watchdog says

The Pentagon's independent inspector general will investigate US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's recent medical treatment and failure to report his hospitalization to the rest of the government.

US: Pentagon to probe Defence Chief Lloyd Austin's hospitalisation

The Defense Department inspector general on Thursday (Jan 11) said that it will probe the mishandling of US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin’s secretive hospitalisation.

The inspector general, in a <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2024/Jan/11/2003374367/-1/-1/1/REVIEW%20OF%20SECDEF%20HOSPITALIZATION%20NOTIFICATION%20PROCEDURES%2020240110.PDF">memo</a>, said that it would examine "the roles, processes, procedures, responsibilities, and actions related to the Secretary of Defense's hospitalisation."

It further said that it will "assess whether the DoD's policies and procedures are sufficient to ensure timely and appropriate notifications and the effective transition of authorities as may be warranted due to health-based or other unavailability of senior leadership."

Austin came under fire for hiding his medical condition from the White House amid the delicate geopolitical landscape involving the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war.&nbsp;

There have been calls for his resignation from critics who say the senior government official violated the law by failing to report his hospitalisation to his bosses.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-why-iowa-caucuses-2024-are-important-for-us-presidential-elections-679088">Explained | Why Iowa Caucuses 2024 are important for US Presidential Elections?</a>

<h2>Austin's medical condition</h2>

The Pentagon chief was hospitalised on New Year's Day (Jan 1) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre due to complications from an elective medical procedure.

Surprisingly, the Pentagon did not make any official announcement until four days later while waiting to notify other top government officers about Austin's absence.&nbsp;

During the period, Austin was away from action, and some of his powers were transferred to Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks.&nbsp;

However, even she was not informed that his boss had been hospitalised until two days later.&nbsp;

WATCH |&nbsp;Donald Trump calls for Lloyd Austin's removal

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-calls-for-lloyd-austins-removal-678365/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

<h2>The protocol</h2>

His mishandling of the situation was a violation of the protocol for top-ranking cabinet officials, who reportedly have to inform well in advance of planned medical absences and identify the one who would be filling in for them.

Austin on Saturday said that he "could have done a better job" and took "full responsibility" for the secrecy over his hospitalisation.

White House officials released a statement saying that Biden still has "complete confidence" in Austin and that he would be continuing his job.

Addressing a press conference on Air Force One, National Security Council (NSC) spokesperson John Kirby said, "There is no plan for anything other than for Secretary Austin to stay in the job."&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The Defense Department inspector general on Thursday (Jan 11) said that it will probe the mishandling of US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin’s secretive hospitalisation.

The Defense Department inspector general on Thursday (Jan 11) said that it will probe the mishandling of US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin’s secretive hospitalisation. The inspector general, in a memo, said that it would examine "the roles, processes, procedures, responsibilities, and actions related to the Secretary of Defense's hospitalisation." It further said that it will "assess whether the DoD's policies and procedures are sufficient to ensure timely and appropriate notifications and the effective transition of authorities as may be warranted due to health-based or other unavailability of senior leadership." Austin came under fire for hiding his medical condition from the White House amid the delicate geopolitical landscape involving the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Hamas war. There have been calls for his resignation from critics who say the senior government official violated the law by failing to report his hospitalisation to his bosses. Also read: Explained | Why Iowa Caucuses 2024 are important for US Presidential Elections? Austin's medical condition The Pentagon chief was hospitalised on New Year's Day (Jan 1) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre due to complications from an elective medical procedure. Surprisingly, the Pentagon did not make any official announcement until four days later while waiting to notify other top government officers about Austin's absence. During the period, Austin was away from action, and some of his powers were transferred to Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks. However, even she was not informed that his boss had been hospitalised until two days later. WATCH | Donald Trump calls for Lloyd Austin's removal × The protocol His mishandling of the situation was a violation of the protocol for top-ranking cabinet officials, who reportedly have to inform well in advance of planned medical absences and identify the one who would be filling in for them. Austin on Saturday said that he "could have done a better job" and took "full responsibility" for the secrecy over his hospitalisation. White House officials released a statement saying that Biden still has "complete confidence" in Austin and that he would be continuing his job. Addressing a press conference on Air Force One, National Security Council (NSC) spokesperson John Kirby said, "There is no plan for anything other than for Secretary Austin to stay in the job." (With inputs from agencies)

Pentagon to probe Lloyd Austin's secretive hospitalisation

The Pentagon inspector general's office said Thursday it will investigate Lloyd Austin's failure to report his hospitalization to the rest of the government, as the defense secretary faces mounting criticism over his silence on his health.

Pentagon inspector to probe US defense chief's hospitalisation

US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin has courted controversy for hiding his medical condition from the White House amid the delicate geopolitical landscape involving the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel-Hamas war. There have been calls for his resignation from critics who say the senior government official violated the law by failing to report his hospitalisation to his bosses. The incident soon snowballed into a so-called transparency scandal.

<h2>What did Austin do?</h2>

Austin, 70, was hospitalised on New Year's Day (Jan 1) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre&nbsp;due to complications from an elective medical procedure.

Surprisingly, the Pentagon did not make any official announcement until four days later while waiting to notify other top government officers about Austin's absence.&nbsp;

During the period, Austin was away from action, and some of his powers were transferred&nbsp;to Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks.

However, even she was not informed that his boss had been hospitalised until two days later.&nbsp;

<h2>What did the doctors say?</h2>

Austin was attended to by a team of doctors who later released a medical bulletin informing about his medical history for the last month.

The doctors clarified that prior to the New Year's Day admission to ICU, Austin had undergone minor surgery on December 22 after early detection of prostate cancer in routine screening.&nbsp;

"As part of Secretary Austin's routinely recommended health screening, he has undergone regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) surveillance. Changes in his laboratory evaluation in early December 2023 identified prostate cancer which required treatment," read the statement issued by&nbsp;Dr John Maddox, Trauma Medical Director, and Dr Gregory Chesnut, Center for Prostate Disease Research of the Murtha Cancer Center Director, at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.&nbsp;

"On December 22, 2023, after consultation with his medical team, he was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and underwent a minimally invasive surgical procedure called a prostatectomy to treat and cure prostate cancer," it added.&nbsp;

After the procedure, Austin recovered without event and returned home the next morning. However, complications soon emerged and evaluation revealed that abdominal fluid collection was impairing the function of his small intestines.&nbsp;

"This resulted in the back up of his intestinal contents which was treated by placing a tube through his nose to drain his stomach. The abdominal fluid collections were drained by non-surgical drain placement."

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-defence-secretary-lloyd-austin-admitted-to-intensive-care-for-complications-from-prostate-cancer-surgery-678419">Also read |&nbsp;US Defence Secy Lloyd Austin was admitted to ICU for complications from prostate cancer surgery</a>

<h2 data-testid="paragraph-20">Was Austin ever unconscious?</h2>

According to the Pentagon, Austin arrived at the hospital after booking an ambulance in a conscious state. He was later admitted to ICU where he underwent the aforementioned procedures.

The Pentagon clarified that Austin was in a significant amount of pain but did not say if the painkiller medicines he had taken altered his judgment.&nbsp;

<h2>What should have Austin done?</h2>

Whatever medical condition a senior government official of the stature of Austin goes through, the protocol mandates that they inform the public of planned medical absences ahead of time.

Additionally, they should identify the associates who would be filling in for them.&nbsp;

Legally speaking, Austin may have violated internal&nbsp;US Department of Defense protocols.

According to legal experts, the law is largely procedural and does not spell out any penalties for lapses.&nbsp;

Being the secretary of defence, Austin is required to be available at a moment's notice to answer any national security crisis.

However, his absence put the country in danger - a mistake that could have been easily avoided.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-defense-secretary-lloyd-austins-secret-hospitalization-all-you-need-to-know-677912">Watch |&nbsp;US defense secretary Lloyd Austin's secret hospitalization: All you need to know</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-defense-secretary-lloyd-austins-secret-hospitalization-all-you-need-to-know-677912/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>What did the White House say?</h2>

The White House on Monday (Jan 8) said that Austin would be continuing in his job, adding there was no plan for anything else.

Addressing a press conference on Air Force One, National Security Council (NSC) spokesperson John Kirby said,&nbsp;"There is no plan for anything other than for Secretary Austin to stay in the job."&nbsp;

However, the DoD was conducting a full review of the incident to determine how future lapses could be prevented.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-defense-secretary-lloyd-austin-will-stay-in-job-says-white-house-678203">Also read |&nbsp;US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will stay in job, says White House</a>

<h2>Will&nbsp;Pentagon intervene?</h2>

"We are considering the impact of any statutory reporting requirements and will provide updates as appropriate,"&nbsp;Chief Pentagon spokesperson Air Force Major General Patrick Ryder told reporters.

Ryder further said the reporting requirements being examined would not just involve Congress. "It's to Congress, the White House or anyone else," he said.

<h2>What is prostate cancer?</h2>

Prostate cancer is the most common cause of cancer among American men, and impacts 1 in every 8 men - and 1 in every 6 African-American men - during their lifetime.

Despite the frequency of prostate cancer, discussions about screening, treatment, and support are often deeply personal and private ones. Early screening is important for detection and treatment of prostate cancer and people should talk to their doctors to see what screening is appropriate for them.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin has courted controversy for hiding his medical condition from the White House amid the delicate geopolitical landscape involving the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel-Hamas war.

US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin has courted controversy for hiding his medical condition from the White House amid the delicate geopolitical landscape involving the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel-Hamas war. There have been calls for his resignation from critics who say the senior government official violated the law by failing to report his hospitalisation to his bosses. The incident soon snowballed into a so-called transparency scandal. What did Austin do? Austin, 70, was hospitalised on New Year's Day (Jan 1) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre due to complications from an elective medical procedure. Surprisingly, the Pentagon did not make any official announcement until four days later while waiting to notify other top government officers about Austin's absence. During the period, Austin was away from action, and some of his powers were transferred to Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks. However, even she was not informed that his boss had been hospitalised until two days later. What did the doctors say? Austin was attended to by a team of doctors who later released a medical bulletin informing about his medical history for the last month. The doctors clarified that prior to the New Year's Day admission to ICU, Austin had undergone minor surgery on December 22 after early detection of prostate cancer in routine screening. "As part of Secretary Austin's routinely recommended health screening, he has undergone regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) surveillance. Changes in his laboratory evaluation in early December 2023 identified prostate cancer which required treatment," read the statement issued by Dr John Maddox, Trauma Medical Director, and Dr Gregory Chesnut, Center for Prostate Disease Research of the Murtha Cancer Center Director, at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. "On December 22, 2023, after consultation with his medical team, he was admitted to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and underwent a minimally invasive surgical procedure called a prostatectomy to treat and cure prostate cancer," it added. After the procedure, Austin recovered without event and returned home the next morning. However, complications soon emerged and evaluation revealed that abdominal fluid collection was impairing the function of his small intestines. "This resulted in the back up of his intestinal contents which was treated by placing a tube through his nose to drain his stomach. The abdominal fluid collections were drained by non-surgical drain placement." Also read | US Defence Secy Lloyd Austin was admitted to ICU for complications from prostate cancer surgery Was Austin ever unconscious? According to the Pentagon, Austin arrived at the hospital after booking an ambulance in a conscious state. He was later admitted to ICU where he underwent the aforementioned procedures. The Pentagon clarified that Austin was in a significant amount of pain but did not say if the painkiller medicines he had taken altered his judgment. What should have Austin done? Whatever medical condition a senior government official of the stature of Austin goes through, the protocol mandates that they inform the public of planned medical absences ahead of time. Additionally, they should identify the associates who would be filling in for them. Legally speaking, Austin may have violated internal US Department of Defense protocols. According to legal experts, the law is largely procedural and does not spell out any penalties for lapses. Being the secretary of defence, Austin is required to be available at a moment's notice to answer any national security crisis. However, his absence put the country in danger - a mistake that could have been easily avoided. Watch | US defense secretary Lloyd Austin's secret hospitalization: All you need to know × What did the White House say? The White House on Monday (Jan 8) said that Austin would be continuing in his job, adding there was no plan for anything else. Addressing a press conference on Air Force One, National Security Council (NSC) spokesperson John Kirby said, "There is no plan for anything other than for Secretary Austin to stay in the job." However, the DoD was conducting a full review of the incident to determine how future lapses could be prevented. Also read | US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will stay in job, says White House Will Pentagon intervene? "We are considering the impact of any statutory reporting requirements and will provide updates as appropriate," Chief Pentagon spokesperson Air Force Major General Patrick Ryder told reporters. Ryder further said the reporting requirements being examined would not just involve Congress. "It's to Congress, the White House or anyone else," he said. What is prostate cancer? Prostate cancer is the most common cause of cancer among American men, and impacts 1 in every 8 men - and 1 in every 6 African-American men - during their lifetime. Despite the frequency of prostate cancer, discussions about screening, treatment, and support are often deeply personal and private ones. Early screening is important for detection and treatment of prostate cancer and people should talk to their doctors to see what screening is appropriate for them. (With inputs from agencies)

Explained | The secret hospitalisation of US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin

Controversy erupted over U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin's delayed disclosure of his hospitalisation last week. Both Democrat and Republican lawmakers questioned the communication breakdown and asked why key figures like president Joe Biden as well as Deputy Defence Secretary Kathleen Hicks were not immediately informed about Austin's hospitalisation. Watch this video for more.

Gravitas: Biden kept in the dark about US Defence Secretary's hospitalisation | Scandal erupts

According to two defence officials, the deputy secretary of defence did not even realize that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin had been hospitalized when she started taking on some of his duties on January 2. Until Thursday, three days after the secretary checked into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center due to complications from an elective surgery, senior leaders, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, the Pentagon's second-in-command, were kept in the dark about Austin's actual location. As previously reported in news, Austin was hospitalised for three days before even the president learned of it.

Lloyd Austin Secret Hospitalisation: White House to review Austin's lack of disclosure

According to two defence officials, the deputy secretary of defence did not even realize that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin had been hospitalized when she started taking on some of his duties on January 2. Until Thursday, three days after the secretary checked into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center due to complications from an elective surgery, senior leaders, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, the Pentagon's second-in-command, were kept in the dark about Austin's actual location. As previously reported in news, Austin was hospitalized for three days before even the president learned of it.

Donald Trump calls for Lloyd Austin's removal over his secret hospitalisation

US's Lloyd Austin in hospital: Pentagon delays key communication to White House by 3 days

According to two defense officials, the deputy secretary of defense did not even realize that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin had been hospitalized when she started taking on some of his duties on January 2. Until Thursday, three days after the secretary checked into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center due to complications from an elective surgery, senior leaders, including Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, the Pentagon's second-in-command, were kept in the dark about Austin's actual location. As previously reported by CNN, Austin was hospitalized for three days before even the president learned of it.

US defense secretary Lloyd Austin's secret hospitalization: All you need to know

White House not told for days defence secretary Lloyd Austin in hospital

U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has been hospitalized since Monday for an unspecified medical matter, the Pentagon said late on Friday, without detailing why he was being treated or why it kept his hospital stay secret all week. Austin, who is 70, sits just below President Joe Biden at the top of the chain of command of the U.S. military and his duties require him being available at a moment's notice to respond to any manner of national security crisis.

US: Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin takes responsibility of not disclosing hospitalisation

United States Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, on Saturday (Jan 7) released a statement taking “full responsibility” for failing to disclose a recent and ongoing week-long hospitalisation following reports that&nbsp;the White House was not informed about it&nbsp;until at least Thursday morning.

At least one official has told US media that the Biden administration was not informed for days that US Defence Secretary had been hospitalised.&nbsp;Austin, 70, was admitted to the Walter Reed Medical Center on Monday due to complications following surgery, the reason for which remains shrouded in secrecy. 
 
The statement comes amid reports that President Joe Biden&nbsp;was in the dark that Austin was ill and unable to carry out his duties during this time.&nbsp;

<h2>Week-long hospitalisation hidden</h2>

The 70-year-old was admitted on Monday (Jan 1) to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for what the Pentagon has said were “complications following a recent elective medical procedure.”&nbsp;

The Department of Defense waited until Friday (Dec 5) evening to make the announcement, a breach of standard protocol at a time when Washington is embroiled in two wars – the Israel-Hamas war and the Russia-Ukraine war.&nbsp;

Pentagon spokesperson said that its chief resumed “full duties” Friday evening, but remained in the hospital.

Several American media reports citing sources have also claimed that not only was the hospitalisation hidden from the public but also the US president for days.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-says-it-dismantled-hamas-command-structure-in-northern-gaza-fighting-to-continue-677326">Israel says it ‘dismantled’ Hamas command structure in north Gaza; at least 6 killed in West Bank raid</a>

Speaking on condition of anonymity, an American official told Reuters that Biden was only informed on Thursday evening, a day before the Pentagon released the statement.&nbsp;

However, according to a second US official as per Reuters, Biden maintained confidence in Austin and the two spoke on Saturday evening.&nbsp;

“I recognize I could have done a better job ensuring the public was appropriately informed. I commit to doing better,” said Austin, in a statement.&nbsp;

He added, “But this is important to say: this was my medical procedure, and I take full responsibility for my decisions about disclosure.” Austin said he will be “returning to the Pentagon soon.”

Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks was prepared to step in during Austin’s illness, and made some routine decisions on his behalf during the time, a Defense Department spokesperson told AFP.

Notably, Austin sits below Biden at the top of the chain of command of the US military and his duties often require him to be available at a moment’s notice to respond to any national security-related crisis.&nbsp;

<h2>Secrecy garners backlash</h2>

Politico was among the first of many media outlets to report that Austin had been in the hospital for three days before Pentagon officials told National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and other top White House officials.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pentagon-chief-lloyd-austin-was-hospitalised-defence-department-gives-update-677030">Pentagon Chief Lloyd Austin hospitalised, defence department gives update&nbsp;</a>

According to Politico, Sullivan then informed Biden. It also said that Congress found out about Austin’s hospitalisation 15 minutes before Friday evening’s public statement.

The apparent cover-up of Austin’s hospitalisation has led Republican lawmakers to criticise Democrat Biden’s administration and have since demanded an explanation.

Top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, accused the Pentagon of failing to inform Congress immediately about such matters and said that the incident further eroded the public’s trust in the Biden administration.&nbsp;

He also cited past failures of the current administration to quickly disclose information about national security incidents, including the appearance of a Chinese spy balloon over the US last year.&nbsp;

“When one of the country's two National Command Authorities is unable to perform their duties, military families, Members of Congress, and the American public deserve to know the full extent of the circumstances,” said Wicker in a statement.&nbsp;

The Pentagon Press Association which comprises of journalists who cover the Defense Department, in a statement expressed “significant concerns” over the apparent cover-up, saying that Austin was a public figure who had no claim to medical privacy in such a situation.

It added, “At a time when there are growing threats to U.S. military service members in the Middle East and the U.S. is playing key national security roles in the wars in Israel and Ukraine, it is particularly critical for the American public to be informed about the health status and decision-making ability of its top defense leader.”&nbsp; 
 
(With inputs from agencies)

United States Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, on Saturday (Jan 7) released a statement taking “full responsibility” for failing to disclose a recent and ongoing week-long hospitalisation following reports that the White House was not informed about it until at least Thursday morning.

United States Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, on Saturday (Jan 7) released a statement taking “full responsibility” for failing to disclose a recent and ongoing week-long hospitalisation following reports that the White House was not informed about it until at least Thursday morning. At least one official has told US media that the Biden administration was not informed for days that US Defence Secretary had been hospitalised. Austin, 70, was admitted to the Walter Reed Medical Center on Monday due to complications following surgery, the reason for which remains shrouded in secrecy. The statement comes amid reports that President Joe Biden was in the dark that Austin was ill and unable to carry out his duties during this time. Week-long hospitalisation hidden The 70-year-old was admitted on Monday (Jan 1) to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for what the Pentagon has said were “complications following a recent elective medical procedure.” The Department of Defense waited until Friday (Dec 5) evening to make the announcement, a breach of standard protocol at a time when Washington is embroiled in two wars – the Israel-Hamas war and the Russia-Ukraine war. Pentagon spokesperson said that its chief resumed “full duties” Friday evening, but remained in the hospital. Several American media reports citing sources have also claimed that not only was the hospitalisation hidden from the public but also the US president for days. ALSO READ | Israel says it ‘dismantled’ Hamas command structure in north Gaza; at least 6 killed in West Bank raid Speaking on condition of anonymity, an American official told Reuters that Biden was only informed on Thursday evening, a day before the Pentagon released the statement. However, according to a second US official as per Reuters, Biden maintained confidence in Austin and the two spoke on Saturday evening. “I recognize I could have done a better job ensuring the public was appropriately informed. I commit to doing better,” said Austin, in a statement. He added, “But this is important to say: this was my medical procedure, and I take full responsibility for my decisions about disclosure.” Austin said he will be “returning to the Pentagon soon.” Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks was prepared to step in during Austin’s illness, and made some routine decisions on his behalf during the time, a Defense Department spokesperson told AFP. Notably, Austin sits below Biden at the top of the chain of command of the US military and his duties often require him to be available at a moment’s notice to respond to any national security-related crisis. Secrecy garners backlash Politico was among the first of many media outlets to report that Austin had been in the hospital for three days before Pentagon officials told National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and other top White House officials. ALSO READ | Pentagon Chief Lloyd Austin hospitalised, defence department gives update According to Politico, Sullivan then informed Biden. It also said that Congress found out about Austin’s hospitalisation 15 minutes before Friday evening’s public statement. The apparent cover-up of Austin’s hospitalisation has led Republican lawmakers to criticise Democrat Biden’s administration and have since demanded an explanation. Top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Roger Wicker, accused the Pentagon of failing to inform Congress immediately about such matters and said that the incident further eroded the public’s trust in the Biden administration. He also cited past failures of the current administration to quickly disclose information about national security incidents, including the appearance of a Chinese spy balloon over the US last year. “When one of the country's two National Command Authorities is unable to perform their duties, military families, Members of Congress, and the American public deserve to know the full extent of the circumstances,” said Wicker in a statement. The Pentagon Press Association which comprises of journalists who cover the Defense Department, in a statement expressed “significant concerns” over the apparent cover-up, saying that Austin was a public figure who had no claim to medical privacy in such a situation. It added, “At a time when there are growing threats to U.S. military service members in the Middle East and the U.S. is playing key national security roles in the wars in Israel and Ukraine, it is particularly critical for the American public to be informed about the health status and decision-making ability of its top defense leader.” (With inputs from agencies)

Prez Biden kept in dark about Austin’s hospitalisation, US defence secretary pledges transparency

Iran blamed Israel and the United States on Wednesday for twin bomb blasts that killed at least 95 people in the country's south, ripping through a crowd commemorating Revolutionary Guards general Qasem Soleimani four years after his death in a US strike.

Iraq labels US strikes as blatant aggression, Pentagon calls it a 'self defence measure' | World DNA

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, on Monday (Dec 25) rejected the Pentagon’s claim of Iran attacking&nbsp;a chemical ship off India coast&nbsp;as “baseless”. This comes after the&nbsp; United States military reportedly accused Iran of&nbsp;drone attack on the Japanese-owned “Israel-affiliated” chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India.&nbsp;

<h2>‘Baseless’</h2>

“These repetitive accusations are rejected as baseless,” Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said at a briefing, adding that Washington should instead face accusations for its role in Israel’s war on Gaza.

He added, “Such claims are aimed at projecting, distracting public attention, and covering up for the full support of the American government for the crimes of the Zionist regime (Israel) in Gaza.”&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-pentagon-accuses-iran-for-drone-attack-on-israel-affiliated-chemical-tanker-off-indian-coast-672986">Pentagon accuses Iran of drone attack on 'Israel-affiliated' chemical tanker off Indian Coast</a>

Tehran’s foreign ministry spokesperson also slammed British Foreign Secretary David Cameron’s “repetitive” and “threadbare” remarks for branding&nbsp;Iran a “malign influence in the region and the world” and urged a “set of deterrent measures against” it.&nbsp;

<h2>US military's accusations against Iran</h2>

Pentagon, speaking on the incident told WION that the drone was “fired from Iran.” Notably, it is the first time that Washington&nbsp;directly accused Tehran of targeting ships.&nbsp;

The attack, as per US officials, occurred at approximately 10:00 am &nbsp;(local time) in the Indian Ocean, 200 nautical miles off India's Gujarat coast.

It said that the “motor vessel CHEM PLUTO, a Liberia-flagged, Japanese-owned, and Netherlands-operated chemical tanker” was hit by “a one-way attack drone fired from Iran.”

In a statement to WION, the Pentagon said “No U.S. Navy vessels were in the vicinity. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command remains in communication with the vessel as it continues toward a destination in India.”&nbsp;

It added, “This is the seventh Iranian attack on commercial shipping since 2021.”&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tanker-in-bab-al-mandab-strait-attacked-by-missiles-from-houthi-controlled-yemen-gunmen-on-speedboats-669295">Tanker carrying jet fuel from India hit by missiles from Houthi-controlled Yemen, gunmen on speedboats</a>

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom-based maritime security firm, Ambrey said that the ship was “Israel-affiliated” and was en route from Saudi Arabia to India.&nbsp;

The Wall Street Journal citing the Dutch company operating the vessel said that it had connections to Israeli shipping tycoon Idan Ofer.&nbsp;

The recent attack off the Indian coast came amid a flurry of attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea by the Yemen-based Iran-backed Houthi rebels amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza.&nbsp;

The militant group had warned that they would target all ships heading to Israel, regardless of their nationality, and warned international shipping companies against dealing in Israeli ports.&nbsp;

<h2>Indian Navy&nbsp;to investigate incident</h2>

The Indian Navy said that it responded to a request for assistance by dispatching an aircraft and a warship to ensure the safety of the involved ship and its crew. Indian Defence officials reportedly said, “As per inputs received, the fire has been extinguished but it has affected its functioning.”&nbsp;

ALSO WATCH |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/mv-chem-pluto-attacked-in-arabian-sea-was-enroute-mangalore-from-jubail-saudi-arabia-wion-673293">MV Chem Pluto attacked in Arabian Sea, was enroute Mangalore from Jubail, Saudi Arabia</a>

They added, “The ICGS Vikram was deployed on the patrol of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone when it was directed towards the merchant ship in distress. All crew are safe which includes around 20 Indians.”&nbsp;

The Indian Navy is “now investigating whether the drone used to attack the vessel was launched from long range or from a nearby vessel. The vessels operating in the area where the attack took place are being checked.”

The latest incident follows a similar suspected drone attack on an Israeli-owned cargo ship in the Indian Ocean last month.

(With inputs from agencies)

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, on Monday (Dec 25) rejected the Pentagon’s claim of Iran attacking a chemical ship off India coast as “baseless”. This comes after the United States military reportedly accused Iran of drone attack on the Japanese-owned “Israel-affiliated” chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India.

An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, on Monday (Dec 25) rejected the Pentagon’s claim of Iran attacking a chemical ship off India coast as “baseless”. This comes after the United States military reportedly accused Iran of drone attack on the Japanese-owned “Israel-affiliated” chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India. ‘Baseless’ “These repetitive accusations are rejected as baseless,” Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said at a briefing, adding that Washington should instead face accusations for its role in Israel’s war on Gaza. He added, “Such claims are aimed at projecting, distracting public attention, and covering up for the full support of the American government for the crimes of the Zionist regime (Israel) in Gaza.” ALSO READ | Pentagon accuses Iran of drone attack on 'Israel-affiliated' chemical tanker off Indian Coast Tehran’s foreign ministry spokesperson also slammed British Foreign Secretary David Cameron’s “repetitive” and “threadbare” remarks for branding Iran a “malign influence in the region and the world” and urged a “set of deterrent measures against” it. US military's accusations against Iran Pentagon, speaking on the incident told WION that the drone was “fired from Iran.” Notably, it is the first time that Washington directly accused Tehran of targeting ships. The attack, as per US officials, occurred at approximately 10:00 am (local time) in the Indian Ocean, 200 nautical miles off India's Gujarat coast. It said that the “motor vessel CHEM PLUTO, a Liberia-flagged, Japanese-owned, and Netherlands-operated chemical tanker” was hit by “a one-way attack drone fired from Iran.” In a statement to WION, the Pentagon said “No U.S. Navy vessels were in the vicinity. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command remains in communication with the vessel as it continues toward a destination in India.” It added, “This is the seventh Iranian attack on commercial shipping since 2021.” ALSO READ | Tanker carrying jet fuel from India hit by missiles from Houthi-controlled Yemen, gunmen on speedboats Meanwhile, the United Kingdom-based maritime security firm, Ambrey said that the ship was “Israel-affiliated” and was en route from Saudi Arabia to India. The Wall Street Journal citing the Dutch company operating the vessel said that it had connections to Israeli shipping tycoon Idan Ofer. The recent attack off the Indian coast came amid a flurry of attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea by the Yemen-based Iran-backed Houthi rebels amid the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza. The militant group had warned that they would target all ships heading to Israel, regardless of their nationality, and warned international shipping companies against dealing in Israeli ports. Indian Navy to investigate incident The Indian Navy said that it responded to a request for assistance by dispatching an aircraft and a warship to ensure the safety of the involved ship and its crew. Indian Defence officials reportedly said, “As per inputs received, the fire has been extinguished but it has affected its functioning.” ALSO WATCH | MV Chem Pluto attacked in Arabian Sea, was enroute Mangalore from Jubail, Saudi Arabia They added, “The ICGS Vikram was deployed on the patrol of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone when it was directed towards the merchant ship in distress. All crew are safe which includes around 20 Indians.” The Indian Navy is “now investigating whether the drone used to attack the vessel was launched from long range or from a nearby vessel. The vessels operating in the area where the attack took place are being checked.” The latest incident follows a similar suspected drone attack on an Israeli-owned cargo ship in the Indian Ocean last month. (With inputs from agencies)

Tehran rejects ‘baseless’ US claim about Iran targeting chemical tanker off Indian coast

Pentagon, speaking on the incident of reported drone attack on Japanese-owned "Israel-affiliated" chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India on Saturday (Dec 23) told WION that it was "fired from Iran."

In a statement to WION, Pentagon said that the attack occurred at approximately 10 am local time in the Indian Ocean, 200 nautical miles from the coast of India. It said that the "motor vessel CHEM PLUTO, a Liberia-flagged, Japanese-owned, and Netherlands-operated chemical tanker" was hit by "a one-way attack drone fired from Iran."

"No U.S. Navy vessels were in the vicinity. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command remains in communication with the vessel as it continues toward a destination in India," the statement said adding, "This is the seventh Iranian attack on commercial shipping&nbsp;since&nbsp;2021.”&nbsp;

A maritime security firm, Ambrey, reportedly said that the ship was "Israel-affiliated" and was en route from Saudi Arabia to India. The Dutch company operating the vessel reportedly has connections to Israeli shipping tycoon Idan Ofer, The Wall Street Journal reported.

<h2>Tensions escalating beyond Red Sea?&nbsp;</h2>

This development comes amidst heightened tensions in the Red Sea, particularly with ongoing drone and missile strikes by Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels on a crucial shipping lane.

In the incident which transpired on Saturday (Dec 23), there were no casualties reported. However, there was a brief fire onboard the tanker which was successfully extinguished.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-strikes-on-gaza-killed-200-in-24-hours-says-hamas-672981">Israeli strikes on Gaza killed 200 in 24 hours, says Hamas</a>

The incident involving the MV Chem Pluto is crucial as it saw the Pentagon openly accusing Tehran of its misdoings, by directly targeting ships, for the first time.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/united-states-condemns-vandalism-swaminarayan-temple-in-california-672952">United States condemns vandalism of Swaminarayan Temple in California</a>

<h2>Indian Navy responds</h2>

The Indian navy responded to a request for assistance, dispatching an aircraft and a warship to ensure the safety of the involved ship and its crew.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Indian Defence officials reportedly said, “As per inputs received, the fire has been extinguished but it has affected its functioning. The ICGS Vikram was deployed on the patrol of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone when it was directed towards the merchant ship in distress. All crew are safe which includes around 20 Indians. The ICGS Vikram has alerted all ships in the area to provide assistance to it."

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-eam-s-jaishankar-says-we-must-respond-to-cross-border-terrorism-672971">India: EAM S Jaishankar says we must respond to cross-border terrorism</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-eam-s-jaishankar-says-we-must-respond-to-cross-border-terrorism-672971/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Later, in an update, Indian Navy officials&nbsp;said that the Indian Navy warship INS Mormugao had reached the MV Chem Pluto and ascertained details of the attack on it.

The officials added that the Indian Navy is "now investigating whether the drone used to attack the vessel was launched from long range or from a nearby vessel. The vessels operating in the area where the attack took place are being checked."&nbsp;

Notably, this incident follows a similar suspected drone attack on an Israeli-owned cargo ship in the Indian Ocean last month. The Red Sea attacks during the Israel-Hamas war have led major shipping firms to reroute vessels around the southern tip of Africa due to heightened security concerns.

Amid the evolving situation, an official from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard warned of the potential forced "closure of other waterways" as well in case Israel fails to stop the ongoing war with the Hamas militant group.

(With inputs from agencies)

Pentagon, speaking on the incident of reported drone attack on Japanese-owned "Israel-affiliated" chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India on Saturday (Dec 23) told WION that it was "fired from Iran.

Pentagon, speaking on the incident of reported drone attack on Japanese-owned "Israel-affiliated" chemical tanker MV Chem Pluto, off the coast of India on Saturday (Dec 23) told WION that it was "fired from Iran." In a statement to WION, Pentagon said that the attack occurred at approximately 10 am local time in the Indian Ocean, 200 nautical miles from the coast of India. It said that the "motor vessel CHEM PLUTO, a Liberia-flagged, Japanese-owned, and Netherlands-operated chemical tanker" was hit by "a one-way attack drone fired from Iran." "No U.S. Navy vessels were in the vicinity. U.S. Naval Forces Central Command remains in communication with the vessel as it continues toward a destination in India," the statement said adding, "This is the seventh Iranian attack on commercial shipping since 2021.” A maritime security firm, Ambrey, reportedly said that the ship was "Israel-affiliated" and was en route from Saudi Arabia to India. The Dutch company operating the vessel reportedly has connections to Israeli shipping tycoon Idan Ofer, The Wall Street Journal reported. Tensions escalating beyond Red Sea? This development comes amidst heightened tensions in the Red Sea, particularly with ongoing drone and missile strikes by Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels on a crucial shipping lane. In the incident which transpired on Saturday (Dec 23), there were no casualties reported. However, there was a brief fire onboard the tanker which was successfully extinguished. Also Read | Israeli strikes on Gaza killed 200 in 24 hours, says Hamas The incident involving the MV Chem Pluto is crucial as it saw the Pentagon openly accusing Tehran of its misdoings, by directly targeting ships, for the first time. Also Read | United States condemns vandalism of Swaminarayan Temple in California Indian Navy responds The Indian navy responded to a request for assistance, dispatching an aircraft and a warship to ensure the safety of the involved ship and its crew. Indian Defence officials reportedly said, “As per inputs received, the fire has been extinguished but it has affected its functioning. The ICGS Vikram was deployed on the patrol of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone when it was directed towards the merchant ship in distress. All crew are safe which includes around 20 Indians. The ICGS Vikram has alerted all ships in the area to provide assistance to it." Watch | India: EAM S Jaishankar says we must respond to cross-border terrorism × Later, in an update, Indian Navy officials said that the Indian Navy warship INS Mormugao had reached the MV Chem Pluto and ascertained details of the attack on it. The officials added that the Indian Navy is "now investigating whether the drone used to attack the vessel was launched from long range or from a nearby vessel. The vessels operating in the area where the attack took place are being checked." Notably, this incident follows a similar suspected drone attack on an Israeli-owned cargo ship in the Indian Ocean last month. The Red Sea attacks during the Israel-Hamas war have led major shipping firms to reroute vessels around the southern tip of Africa due to heightened security concerns. Amid the evolving situation, an official from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard warned of the potential forced "closure of other waterways" as well in case Israel fails to stop the ongoing war with the Hamas militant group. (With inputs from agencies)

Pentagon accuses Iran of drone attack on 'Israel-affiliated' chemical tanker off Indian Coast

According to the Pentagon, the senior U.S. military officer and his Chinese counterpart had their first virtual meeting in over a year.

US and China military leaders speak for the first time in over a year

Top US and Chinese military officers resume communication; Pentagon credits Biden-Xi meeting. An official called it an "important step," but not the last. Xi told President Biden this at a recent summit.

US-China military talks: Biden and Xi agreed to resume talks last month

With the United States presidential elections less than a year away, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is once again making headlines as he plans to fundamentally alter America’s relationship with the rest of the world, including&nbsp;sending armed forces into Mexico and imposing tariffs on allies and foes alike.&nbsp;

Trump, who earlier this month said that he won’t be a dictator <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-trump-says-he-wont-be-a-dictator-if-he-becomes-president-american-media-lawmakers-say-otherwise-666905">“except on day one,”</a> might install loyalists, whose primary allegiance would be to him, in key positions in the Pentagon, State Department and CIA, that is if he wins a second term, reported Reuters citing nearly 20 current and former aides and diplomats.&nbsp;

If realised, the Republican frontrunner would reportedly have much more freedom than his first presidency to enact isolationist policies and whims. Not to mention, the sweeping changes in the US’ stance on a number of issues, including the Russia-Ukraine war, and trade with China.&nbsp;

<h2>What does Trump plan on doing?</h2>

Amid his ongoing campaign trail for the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-four-reasons-why-donald-trump-might-win-2024-presidential-elections-669267">upcoming elections</a>, Trump has proposed a series of changes to America’s foreign policies, including rethinking the US-led military alliance NATO’s “purpose” and “mission”. He had also cut funding to NATO during his presidency,&nbsp;saying that America was paying more than its fair share.&nbsp;

The Republican frontrunner said that under his presidency he would ask Europe to reimburse the US for “almost $200 billion” worth of munitions sent to Ukraine. So far, the US Congress has approved $113 billion in aid to Ukraine since the beginning of Russia’s invasion.&nbsp;

He has also repeatedly claimed that if he were the president he would have the conflict resolved in 24 hours, without proposing any tangible solutions.&nbsp;

Trump recently also renewed his frequent threats to implement major new tariffs or trade restrictions on China and some European allies. He recently proposed the imposition of the trade act which would ramp up retaliatory tariffs on countries.&nbsp;

During an interview, in August, he suggested a 10 per cent universal tariff which would effectively disrupt international markets. Trump has also called for an end to China’s inclusion in America’s most favoured nation list which typically lowers trade barriers between nations.&nbsp;

If he returns to power, he will waste little time cutting defence aid to Europe and further shrinking economic ties with China, his aides told Reuters.&nbsp;

<h2>Trump’s personal vs presidential policies</h2>

During his presidency between 2017 and 2021, Trump <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trumps-anti-immigrant-remarks-praise-of-dictators-garners-criticism-670788">often complained</a> about his struggle to impose his impulsive and erratic vision on the US national security establishment and repeatedly voiced his frustration against top officials who would delay or talk him out of some of his schemes.&nbsp;

In his memoir, Former Defence Secretary Mark Esper said that he had to twice raise objections to the former president’s suggestion of missile strikes on drug cartels in Mexico.&nbsp;

Recently, the Republican frontrunner has also said that he would designate drug cartels operating in Mexico as foreign terrorist organisations and ask the Pentagon to “make appropriate use of special forces” to attack cartel leadership and infrastructure, a plan which is unlikely to be approved by the Mexican government.&nbsp;

“President Trump came to realize that personnel is policy,” said Robert O’Brien, Trump’s fourth and final national security adviser, adding that towards the end of his presidency, “there were a lot of people that were interested in implementing their own policies, not the president’s policies.”

If he wins a second term, having more loyalists in top offices would allow Trump to advance his foreign policy priorities faster and more efficiently, reported Reuters citing the current and former aides.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

With the United States presidential elections less than a year away, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is once again making headlines as he plans to fundamentally alter America’s relationship with the rest of the world, including sending armed forces into Mexico and imposing tariffs on allies and foes alike.

With the United States presidential elections less than a year away, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is once again making headlines as he plans to fundamentally alter America’s relationship with the rest of the world, including sending armed forces into Mexico and imposing tariffs on allies and foes alike. Trump, who earlier this month said that he won’t be a dictator “except on day one,” might install loyalists, whose primary allegiance would be to him, in key positions in the Pentagon, State Department and CIA, that is if he wins a second term, reported Reuters citing nearly 20 current and former aides and diplomats. If realised, the Republican frontrunner would reportedly have much more freedom than his first presidency to enact isolationist policies and whims. Not to mention, the sweeping changes in the US’ stance on a number of issues, including the Russia-Ukraine war, and trade with China. What does Trump plan on doing? Amid his ongoing campaign trail for the upcoming elections, Trump has proposed a series of changes to America’s foreign policies, including rethinking the US-led military alliance NATO’s “purpose” and “mission”. He had also cut funding to NATO during his presidency, saying that America was paying more than its fair share. The Republican frontrunner said that under his presidency he would ask Europe to reimburse the US for “almost $200 billion” worth of munitions sent to Ukraine. So far, the US Congress has approved $113 billion in aid to Ukraine since the beginning of Russia’s invasion. He has also repeatedly claimed that if he were the president he would have the conflict resolved in 24 hours, without proposing any tangible solutions. Trump recently also renewed his frequent threats to implement major new tariffs or trade restrictions on China and some European allies. He recently proposed the imposition of the trade act which would ramp up retaliatory tariffs on countries. During an interview, in August, he suggested a 10 per cent universal tariff which would effectively disrupt international markets. Trump has also called for an end to China’s inclusion in America’s most favoured nation list which typically lowers trade barriers between nations. If he returns to power, he will waste little time cutting defence aid to Europe and further shrinking economic ties with China, his aides told Reuters. Trump’s personal vs presidential policies During his presidency between 2017 and 2021, Trump often complained about his struggle to impose his impulsive and erratic vision on the US national security establishment and repeatedly voiced his frustration against top officials who would delay or talk him out of some of his schemes. In his memoir, Former Defence Secretary Mark Esper said that he had to twice raise objections to the former president’s suggestion of missile strikes on drug cartels in Mexico. Recently, the Republican frontrunner has also said that he would designate drug cartels operating in Mexico as foreign terrorist organisations and ask the Pentagon to “make appropriate use of special forces” to attack cartel leadership and infrastructure, a plan which is unlikely to be approved by the Mexican government. “President Trump came to realize that personnel is policy,” said Robert O’Brien, Trump’s fourth and final national security adviser, adding that towards the end of his presidency, “there were a lot of people that were interested in implementing their own policies, not the president’s policies.” If he wins a second term, having more loyalists in top offices would allow Trump to advance his foreign policy priorities faster and more efficiently, reported Reuters citing the current and former aides. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump would place loyalists in Pentagon, State Department to reshape US foreign policy: Report

In the intricate realm of financial audits, the Department of Defence (DoD) for Fiscal Year 2023 faced a complex landscape. The audit of the Department's consolidated financial statements resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, reflecting a mixed bag of outcomes for its various components. Despite challenges, notable progress has been made in key areas, reshaping the financial narrative of one of the world's largest defence entities.

Audit outcomes &amp; component highlights

Seven of the 29 components undergoing standalone financial statement audits secured unmodified opinions, and one garnered a qualified opinion. Pending results for the U.S. Marine Corps, Defence Information Systems Agency Working Capital Fund, and DoD Office of Inspector General added an air of anticipation. However, the majority of DoD components faced disclaimers of opinion. Notably, a restructuring of two DoD-wide material weaknesses occurred, with no addition to the count.

Focus on fund balance with treasury material weakness

A significant stride forward unfolded as the DoD addressed its Fund Balance with Treasury material weakness – a high-priority area. The Air Force General Fund led the charge by closing this gap, marking a historic achievement as the first Service to rectify this foundational issue. Parallel progress was seen with the Army Working Capital Fund and Navy General Fund, both downgrading their Fund Balance with Treasury material weakness. This shift underscored substantive advancements in aligning financial discrepancies.

Metrics &amp; progress monitoring

Michael McCord, the DoD Under Secretary of Defence and Chief Financial Officer, emphasised the widespread positive impact of ongoing audits on military personnel and civilians alike. The DoD measured audit progress across critical areas such as Workforce Modernisation, Business Operations, Quality Decision-Making, Reliable Networks, and Enhanced Public Confidence. Success narratives unfolded, including the deployment of 65 bots by the Department of the Air Force, resulting in significant labour hour savings and the Army's effective monitoring of construction-in-progress.

Improper payment programmes &amp; ongoing efforts

DoD's financial landscape successfully addressed improper payment programmes, resolving three high-priority cases in FY 2023. The preventive measures implemented forestalled other programs from reaching high-priority status in FY 2024. Rigorous efforts focused on identifying root causes, enhancing controls, and staff training on travel policy guidance.

Call to action &amp; collaboration

Despite visible progress, McCord underscored the imperative for further action. A memorandum issued to the Secretaries of the Military Departments and Principal Staff Assistants emphasised expectations for supporting DoD financial statement audits. McCord called on Congress and defence industry partners to play pivotal roles. Congressional actions were highlighted, including stabilising the budget process and advocating for financial statement audits. Simultaneously, defence industry partners were urged to introduce innovative solutions and comply with audit requirements.

Bottomline

In a dynamic narrative of fiscal intricacies, the DoD's audit journey unfolded with a tapestry of challenges and triumphs. The commitment to address material weaknesses and enhance financial transparency echoed loudly in the corridors of one of the world's largest defence entities. As the DoD charts its course through financial waters, collaboration with Congress and industry partners emerges as the linchpin in ensuring a resilient and accountable financial future.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

In the intricate realm of financial audits, the Department of Defence (DoD) for Fiscal Year 2023 faced a complex landscape. The audit of the Department's consolidated financial statements resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, reflecting a mixed bag of outcomes for its various components.

In the intricate realm of financial audits, the Department of Defence (DoD) for Fiscal Year 2023 faced a complex landscape. The audit of the Department's consolidated financial statements resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, reflecting a mixed bag of outcomes for its various components. Despite challenges, notable progress has been made in key areas, reshaping the financial narrative of one of the world's largest defence entities. Audit outcomes & component highlights Seven of the 29 components undergoing standalone financial statement audits secured unmodified opinions, and one garnered a qualified opinion. Pending results for the U.S. Marine Corps, Defence Information Systems Agency Working Capital Fund, and DoD Office of Inspector General added an air of anticipation. However, the majority of DoD components faced disclaimers of opinion. Notably, a restructuring of two DoD-wide material weaknesses occurred, with no addition to the count. Focus on fund balance with treasury material weakness A significant stride forward unfolded as the DoD addressed its Fund Balance with Treasury material weakness – a high-priority area. The Air Force General Fund led the charge by closing this gap, marking a historic achievement as the first Service to rectify this foundational issue. Parallel progress was seen with the Army Working Capital Fund and Navy General Fund, both downgrading their Fund Balance with Treasury material weakness. This shift underscored substantive advancements in aligning financial discrepancies. Metrics & progress monitoring Michael McCord, the DoD Under Secretary of Defence and Chief Financial Officer, emphasised the widespread positive impact of ongoing audits on military personnel and civilians alike. The DoD measured audit progress across critical areas such as Workforce Modernisation, Business Operations, Quality Decision-Making, Reliable Networks, and Enhanced Public Confidence. Success narratives unfolded, including the deployment of 65 bots by the Department of the Air Force, resulting in significant labour hour savings and the Army's effective monitoring of construction-in-progress. Improper payment programmes & ongoing efforts DoD's financial landscape successfully addressed improper payment programmes, resolving three high-priority cases in FY 2023. The preventive measures implemented forestalled other programs from reaching high-priority status in FY 2024. Rigorous efforts focused on identifying root causes, enhancing controls, and staff training on travel policy guidance. Call to action & collaboration Despite visible progress, McCord underscored the imperative for further action. A memorandum issued to the Secretaries of the Military Departments and Principal Staff Assistants emphasised expectations for supporting DoD financial statement audits. McCord called on Congress and defence industry partners to play pivotal roles. Congressional actions were highlighted, including stabilising the budget process and advocating for financial statement audits. Simultaneously, defence industry partners were urged to introduce innovative solutions and comply with audit requirements. Bottomline In a dynamic narrative of fiscal intricacies, the DoD's audit journey unfolded with a tapestry of challenges and triumphs. The commitment to address material weaknesses and enhance financial transparency echoed loudly in the corridors of one of the world's largest defence entities. As the DoD charts its course through financial waters, collaboration with Congress and industry partners emerges as the linchpin in ensuring a resilient and accountable financial future. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Navigating Complexity: Pentagon's Fiscal Audit reveals varied outcomes amid strategic advances

Pentagon UFO office launches digital form to collect info on government UAP programs. The all-domain anomaly resolution office says it will use the information submitted through its website in a report on UAPS.

Gravitas: Pentagon announces long-awaited UFO reporting form

Were you visited by the little green men? Was someone you know at the receiving end of an extraterrestrial probe? If yes, you may soon be able to report such a (mis)&nbsp;happening online to the US Pentagon.

This could be done via an online reporting tool that went live on Tuesday (Oct 31). However, there's a catch.

<h2>Report aliens: Terms and conditions applied&nbsp;</h2>

For now, this secure form is available only to current or former federal employees or those "with direct knowledge of US government programs or activities related to UAP dating back to 1945", The Guardian said in a report.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/where-exactly-on-mars-should-humans-go-nasa-scientists-release-a-map-653058">Where exactly on Mars should humans go? NASA scientists release a map</a>

The form is called All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (Aaro) and it is available to people with the above-mentioned access on the US Defence Department website.&nbsp;

However, officials have reportedly said that the public will also be able to report such anomalies soon.

On the website, it says that Aaro "is intended as an initial point of contact … it is not intended for conveying potentially sensitive or classified information".

Watch |&nbsp;Are governments using aliens to distract the public?

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/are-governments-using-aliens-to-distract-the-public-638583/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Talking to reporters, Sean Kirkpatrick, the director of Aaro, said that first-hand knowledge of sensitive topics like the government's involvement in UAP programmes is welcome.

On the other hand, second-hand information about UAP, alien encounters etc is not welcome.

"This reporting mechanism that is on the website is for people who think they have first-hand knowledge of clandestine programs that the government has been hiding," said Kirkpatrick.

<h2>US government finally 'opening up'</h2>

The move is an expansion of the US government's efforts to be more transparent about its exploration of the unknown, reports The Guardian.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/the-truth-about-ufos-nasas-to-unveil-important-report-on-uaps-heres-how-you-can-watch-it-live-635757">The truth about UFOs: NASA to unveil important report on UAPs. Here's how you can watch it live</a>

It signifies that the government is slowly inching towards living up to its promises of complete openness about what it does or doesn't know, about peculiar things like strange flashes in the sky, the possibility of alien life and sightings of UFOs or UAPs as they are now called.

For decades now, conspiracy theories about clandestine government programmes involving reports of alien vehicles and remains at Area 51 in the Mojave Desert have been a source of intrigue. 
 
However, as per the Aaro chief, people might be disappointed as they currently have "no evidence of any programme having ever existed to do any sort of reverse engineering, of any sort of extraterrestrial UAP programme."

(With inputs from agencies)

Were you visited by the little green men? Was someone you know at the receiving end of an extraterrestrial probe? If yes, you may soon be able to report such a (mis) happening online to the US Pentagon.

Were you visited by the little green men? Was someone you know at the receiving end of an extraterrestrial probe? If yes, you may soon be able to report such a (mis) happening online to the US Pentagon. This could be done via an online reporting tool that went live on Tuesday (Oct 31). However, there's a catch. Report aliens: Terms and conditions applied For now, this secure form is available only to current or former federal employees or those "with direct knowledge of US government programs or activities related to UAP dating back to 1945", The Guardian said in a report. Also read | Where exactly on Mars should humans go? NASA scientists release a map The form is called All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (Aaro) and it is available to people with the above-mentioned access on the US Defence Department website. However, officials have reportedly said that the public will also be able to report such anomalies soon. On the website, it says that Aaro "is intended as an initial point of contact … it is not intended for conveying potentially sensitive or classified information". Watch | Are governments using aliens to distract the public? Talking to reporters, Sean Kirkpatrick, the director of Aaro, said that first-hand knowledge of sensitive topics like the government's involvement in UAP programmes is welcome. On the other hand, second-hand information about UAP, alien encounters etc is not welcome. "This reporting mechanism that is on the website is for people who think they have first-hand knowledge of clandestine programs that the government has been hiding," said Kirkpatrick. US government finally 'opening up' The move is an expansion of the US government's efforts to be more transparent about its exploration of the unknown, reports The Guardian. Also read | The truth about UFOs: NASA to unveil important report on UAPs. Here's how you can watch it live It signifies that the government is slowly inching towards living up to its promises of complete openness about what it does or doesn't know, about peculiar things like strange flashes in the sky, the possibility of alien life and sightings of UFOs or UAPs as they are now called. For decades now, conspiracy theories about clandestine government programmes involving reports of alien vehicles and remains at Area 51 in the Mojave Desert have been a source of intrigue. However, as per the Aaro chief, people might be disappointed as they currently have "no evidence of any programme having ever existed to do any sort of reverse engineering, of any sort of extraterrestrial UAP programme." (With inputs from agencies)

Know something about aliens or UFOs? You can tell Pentagon all about it at...

Around 900 more troops from the United States have arrived in the Middle East or are heading there to bolster air defences for the American military personnel amid a surge in attacks by Iran-affiliated groups, said the Pentagon on Thursday (Oct 26).&nbsp;

American and allied forces in Iraq and Syria have been attacked at least 16 times this month, said US officials. The update also comes a day after the Pentagon confirmed that a total of 21 US service members reported “minor injuries” following drone and rocket attacks on military bases in Iraq and Syria.

<h2>Rise in attacks</h2>

The latest attack, Pentagon spokesman Brigadier General Patrick Ryder told journalists, took place in the autonomous Kurdistan region in northern Iraq on Thursday. However, “no casualties” were reported and “some minor damage to infrastructure.”&nbsp;

Since October 17, “US and coalition forces have been attacked at least 12 separate times in Iraq (and) four separate times in Syria,” said Ryder, referring to the international coalition against the Islamic State.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/advancing-india-middle-east-europe-economic-corridor-potential-reason-behind-hamas-attack-biden-651583">&nbsp;Advancing India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor potential reason behind Hamas attack: Biden</a>

When asked who is behind the attacks, he said, “We know that these are Iranian-backed militia groups that are supported by Iran and of course, we hold Iran responsible for these groups.”&nbsp;

This comes as tensions soar over the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in the region. The attacks have led US troops to be constantly on alert. During a false alarm at Al-Asad air base in Iraq on Thursday, a civilian contractor died after a cardiac arrest.

“Between Oct. 17-18, 21 US personnel received minor injuries due to drone attacks at Al Assad Airbase, Iraq, and Al-Tanf Garrison, Syria,” Ryder said on Wednesday (Oct 25). He added, “All members returned to duty.”

<h2>US to send troops, warships and fighter aircraft</h2>

Following the recent attacks, the US, in addition to sending troops – whose number is now in thousands – also deployed warships and fighter aircraft to the region since the conflict erupted on October 7 which includes two aircraft carriers in a bid to deter Iran and Iran-backed groups.&nbsp;

Since the beginning of the war, Washington has been one of the biggest supporters of Israel with multiple high-ranking US officials, including President Joe Biden visiting the country in a show of support.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/white-house-says-iran-actively-facilitating-attacks-on-us-military-bases-confirms-advisors-in-israel-650494">White House says Iran ‘actively facilitating’ attacks on US military bases</a>

Earlier this week, the US media also reported how the US military was taking new measures to protect its Middle East forces during this rise in attacks, the responsibility for a few of which has been claimed by Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iranian-backed militias.&nbsp;

A report by Reuters citing officials also said that the US is ramping up monitoring from guard towers on its military facilities; increasing security at base access points and increasing operations to counter potential incoming drones, rockets and missiles.&nbsp;

The US also plans to deploy a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system and Patriot missile batteries, said the news agency. There are around 2,500 American troops in Iraq and some 900 in Syria as part of efforts to prevent a resurgence of IS.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Around 900 more troops from the United States have arrived in the Middle East or are heading there to bolster air defences for the American military personnel amid a surge in attacks by Iran-affiliated groups, said the Pentagon on Thursday (Oct 26).

Around 900 more troops from the United States have arrived in the Middle East or are heading there to bolster air defences for the American military personnel amid a surge in attacks by Iran-affiliated groups, said the Pentagon on Thursday (Oct 26). American and allied forces in Iraq and Syria have been attacked at least 16 times this month, said US officials. The update also comes a day after the Pentagon confirmed that a total of 21 US service members reported “minor injuries” following drone and rocket attacks on military bases in Iraq and Syria. Rise in attacks The latest attack, Pentagon spokesman Brigadier General Patrick Ryder told journalists, took place in the autonomous Kurdistan region in northern Iraq on Thursday. However, “no casualties” were reported and “some minor damage to infrastructure.” Since October 17, “US and coalition forces have been attacked at least 12 separate times in Iraq (and) four separate times in Syria,” said Ryder, referring to the international coalition against the Islamic State. ALSO READ | Advancing India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor potential reason behind Hamas attack: Biden When asked who is behind the attacks, he said, “We know that these are Iranian-backed militia groups that are supported by Iran and of course, we hold Iran responsible for these groups.” This comes as tensions soar over the ongoing Israel-Hamas war in the region. The attacks have led US troops to be constantly on alert. During a false alarm at Al-Asad air base in Iraq on Thursday, a civilian contractor died after a cardiac arrest. “Between Oct. 17-18, 21 US personnel received minor injuries due to drone attacks at Al Assad Airbase, Iraq, and Al-Tanf Garrison, Syria,” Ryder said on Wednesday (Oct 25). He added, “All members returned to duty.” US to send troops, warships and fighter aircraft Following the recent attacks, the US, in addition to sending troops – whose number is now in thousands – also deployed warships and fighter aircraft to the region since the conflict erupted on October 7 which includes two aircraft carriers in a bid to deter Iran and Iran-backed groups. Since the beginning of the war, Washington has been one of the biggest supporters of Israel with multiple high-ranking US officials, including President Joe Biden visiting the country in a show of support. ALSO READ | White House says Iran ‘actively facilitating’ attacks on US military bases Earlier this week, the US media also reported how the US military was taking new measures to protect its Middle East forces during this rise in attacks, the responsibility for a few of which has been claimed by Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iranian-backed militias. A report by Reuters citing officials also said that the US is ramping up monitoring from guard towers on its military facilities; increasing security at base access points and increasing operations to counter potential incoming drones, rockets and missiles. The US also plans to deploy a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system and Patriot missile batteries, said the news agency. There are around 2,500 American troops in Iraq and some 900 in Syria as part of efforts to prevent a resurgence of IS. (With inputs from agencies)

US to send 900 troops to Middle East amid rise in attacks on its forces in Iraq and Syria

US President Joe Biden ordered strikes on two facilities in Syria following attacks on US troops in the past week, the Pentagon said, warning the US will take additional measures if attacks by Iran's proxies continue.

US strikes two Syrian facilities, takes place near Abu Kamal; follow direct warning by Biden | WION

pentagon

Pentagon, News on Pentagon, stories on Pentagon, articles on Pentagon, Pentagon stories at Wion, Pentagon news, Pentagon latest news