The Supreme Court in Pakistan has accepted an appeal by the family of slain American journalist Daniel Pearl seeking to keep the accused on death row over the beheading of the reporter.

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British-born Pakistani man, has been accused of killing the Wall Street Journal reporter. He has&nbsp;been on death row since his conviction in 2002.

The court delayed until next week hearing the appeal over the lower-court acquittal of Sheikh.

Sheikh had reportedly helped lure Pearl to a meeting in the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi in which he was kidnapped.&nbsp;

When he was killed, Pearl had been investigating the link between Pakistani militants and Richard C Reid, also known as the “Shoe Bomber”.

The lower court’s April ruling acquitted Sheikh and three other accomplices, who had been sentenced to life in jail for their role in the plot.&nbsp;

This despite the fact that a letter written by Sheikh on July 19, 2019 had acknowledged his involvement in Pearl’s killing.

Pearl was abducted January 23, 2002. Pakistani police sought to locate Pearl for weeks until a video received by US diplomats showed his beheading.

The Supreme Court in Pakistan has accepted an appeal by the family of slain American journalist Daniel Pearl seeking to keep the accused on death row over the beheading of the reporter.

The Supreme Court in Pakistan has accepted an appeal by the family of slain American journalist Daniel Pearl seeking to keep the accused on death row over the beheading of the reporter. Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British-born Pakistani man, has been accused of killing the Wall Street Journal reporter. He has been on death row since his conviction in 2002. The court delayed until next week hearing the appeal over the lower-court acquittal of Sheikh. Sheikh had reportedly helped lure Pearl to a meeting in the southern Pakistani port city of Karachi in which he was kidnapped. When he was killed, Pearl had been investigating the link between Pakistani militants and Richard C Reid, also known as the “Shoe Bomber”. The lower court’s April ruling acquitted Sheikh and three other accomplices, who had been sentenced to life in jail for their role in the plot. This despite the fact that a letter written by Sheikh on July 19, 2019 had acknowledged his involvement in Pearl’s killing. Pearl was abducted January 23, 2002. Pakistani police sought to locate Pearl for weeks until a video received by US diplomats showed his beheading.

Pakistan's top court accepts appeal by Daniel Pearl’s family

Supreme Court of Pakistan has allowed Daniel Pearl's parents to become party to case. Supreme Court suspended Sindh High Court's verdict. Watch this video to know more.

Pakistan SC allows Daniel Pearl's parents to become party to case

The Supreme Court of Pakistan has called out the Pakistan govt for its negligence. The top court has demanded the ouster of the Health Advisor to Pak PM Dr. Zafar Mirza. But Imran Khan is still seeking loan waivers and additional funds. Where is the Pakistan govt spending its relief money? WION's Palki Sharma gets you a report.

Gravitas: Top Court in Pakistan wants health adviser removed | Wuhan Coronavirus

Pakistan's top court has asked the government to remove Health Minister Zafar Mirza over his incapability of handling the coronavirus cases in the country. Watch report:

Pakistan SC seeks Health Minister's removal: Mirza unable to handle COVID-19 crisis

The Pakistan government on Saturday said that by April 25, 2020, the country&nbsp;may have 50,000 COVID-19 positive cases.

In its report on National Action Plan against Corona to the Supreme Court, the government said&nbsp;41,000 to be normal cases, 7,000 to be critical and 2,500 to be extremely critical.

This is an assessment and not the final word, the government told the SC.

Until April 25th, Pakistan will have lesser cases than Europe, the report said and added that the government would increase the testing capability daily at the cost of $366 million.

The government has also come up with an emergency health action plan and coronavirus prevention guidelines with the help of provinces and other organisations, the government told the apex court.

A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been formulated for the screening of passengers arriving from abroad and to bury those who succumbed to the deadly virus.

A campaign for prevention from the virus was already underway.

From airports and other entry points, 222 suspected cases of coronavirus have been identified, the report said.

Pakistan also has set up screening counters at all airport entry points and imposed an emergency along its borders of with &nbsp;Iran.&nbsp;

A 300-bed quarantine centre has been built in the capital along with four hospitals with 154 isolation wards.

154 districts in the country have the isolation wards to keep suspected patients, the report added.

The Pakistan government on Saturday said that by April 25, 2020, the country may have 50,000 COVID-19 positive cases. In its report on National Action Plan against Corona to the Supreme Court, the government said 41,000 to be normal cases, 7,000 to be critical and 2,500 to be extremely critical.

The Pakistan government on Saturday said that by April 25, 2020, the country may have 50,000 COVID-19 positive cases. In its report on National Action Plan against Corona to the Supreme Court, the government said 41,000 to be normal cases, 7,000 to be critical and 2,500 to be extremely critical. This is an assessment and not the final word, the government told the SC. Until April 25th, Pakistan will have lesser cases than Europe, the report said and added that the government would increase the testing capability daily at the cost of $366 million. The government has also come up with an emergency health action plan and coronavirus prevention guidelines with the help of provinces and other organisations, the government told the apex court. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been formulated for the screening of passengers arriving from abroad and to bury those who succumbed to the deadly virus. A campaign for prevention from the virus was already underway. From airports and other entry points, 222 suspected cases of coronavirus have been identified, the report said. Pakistan also has set up screening counters at all airport entry points and imposed an emergency along its borders of with Iran. A 300-bed quarantine centre has been built in the capital along with four hospitals with 154 isolation wards. 154 districts in the country have the isolation wards to keep suspected patients, the report added.

Pakistan may have 50,000 COVID-19 cases by April 25: Govt tells Supreme Court

In order to give a three-year extension to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-government-to-present-amendment-bill-for-bajwas-extension-as-army-chief-271607">General Qamar Javed Bajwa</a>, Prime Minister Imran Khan hurriedly called an urgent meeting of his Cabinet for&nbsp;approval of proposed amendments to the Constitution and the Army Act.

If the Parliament passes the proposed amendments, PM Imran Khan&nbsp;would have power to extend the tenure of all three defence chiefs for up to three years and at his advice, the president will issue a formal notification.

The cabinet meeting approved the proposed three-year extension in the tenure of the army chief, indicating that General Bajwa would continue to serve as the COAS till 2023.

The apex court last month in a detailed verdict had issued direction to the government to remove all ambiguities and frame a law to the pave the way for giving extension to the Army chief. The Cabinet also decided to introduce an amendment bill in the Parliament on Friday after building a consensus with the opposition on the matter.

According to an amendment, the maximum age limit for an army chief will be 64 years and this will be applied in case of <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-imran-khan-led-government-challenges-supreme-courts-decision-on-bajwas-tenure-270355">extension in his term</a>, but the regular age limit of COAS will be 60 years.

Now it would be the prime minister's prerogative whether to give an extension to the army chief in the future. The Army Act's amendments will also be applicable to the chairman of joint chiefs and the other two services chiefs.

A government committee comprising Defence Minister Pervez Khattak, Amir Dogar, Ali Muhammad Khan and Azam Swati has also been formed to hold talks with the opposition parties regarding the amendment bill.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-governments-u-turn-on-army-chief-general-bajwas-extension-270363/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The court, after grilling the attorney general for three days over the matter, had decided that General Bajwa would remain COAS during the six-month period in which the parliament would draft laws regarding the extension and appointment of an army chief.

"We would like to emphasise that this crucial matter of the tenure of COAS and its extension, which has a somewhat chequered history, is before the Parliament, to fix for all times to come," wrote Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, a member of the three-judge bench which heard the case, in the court's 43-page judgment.

"It is now for the people of Pakistan and their chosen representatives in the parliament to come up with a law that will provide certainty and predictability to the post of COAS, remembering that in strengthening institutions, nations prosper," the court had noted.

In order to give a three-year extension to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa, Prime Minister Imran Khan hurriedly called an urgent meeting of his Cabinet for approval of proposed amendments to the Constitution and the Army Act.

In order to give a three-year extension to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa, Prime Minister Imran Khan hurriedly called an urgent meeting of his Cabinet for approval of proposed amendments to the Constitution and the Army Act. If the Parliament passes the proposed amendments, PM Imran Khan would have power to extend the tenure of all three defence chiefs for up to three years and at his advice, the president will issue a formal notification. The cabinet meeting approved the proposed three-year extension in the tenure of the army chief, indicating that General Bajwa would continue to serve as the COAS till 2023. The apex court last month in a detailed verdict had issued direction to the government to remove all ambiguities and frame a law to the pave the way for giving extension to the Army chief. The Cabinet also decided to introduce an amendment bill in the Parliament on Friday after building a consensus with the opposition on the matter. According to an amendment, the maximum age limit for an army chief will be 64 years and this will be applied in case of extension in his term, but the regular age limit of COAS will be 60 years. Now it would be the prime minister's prerogative whether to give an extension to the army chief in the future. The Army Act's amendments will also be applicable to the chairman of joint chiefs and the other two services chiefs. A government committee comprising Defence Minister Pervez Khattak, Amir Dogar, Ali Muhammad Khan and Azam Swati has also been formed to hold talks with the opposition parties regarding the amendment bill. × The court, after grilling the attorney general for three days over the matter, had decided that General Bajwa would remain COAS during the six-month period in which the parliament would draft laws regarding the extension and appointment of an army chief. "We would like to emphasise that this crucial matter of the tenure of COAS and its extension, which has a somewhat chequered history, is before the Parliament, to fix for all times to come," wrote Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, a member of the three-judge bench which heard the case, in the court's 43-page judgment. "It is now for the people of Pakistan and their chosen representatives in the parliament to come up with a law that will provide certainty and predictability to the post of COAS, remembering that in strengthening institutions, nations prosper," the court had noted.

Pak PM Imran Khan seeks powers to extend General Bajwa's tenure

Pakistan government on Thursday filed a civil miscellaneous petition with the Supreme Court seeking a stay order on the apex court's verdict regarding the extension of Army Chief Javed Qamar Bajwa's extension.

The petition asked that a stay order should remain in effect until a decision on the government's review petition on the verdict has been made, Dawn reported.

On November 28, 2019, the Supreme Court had asserted that the country's Army Act lacks clauses to justify Bajwa's extension and ordered the government to legislate on the Pakistan Army chief's extension/reappointment.

In response, the Pakistan government submitted a review petition against the top court's verdict, seeking it to be set aside asserting that the verdict has "glaring omissions and mistakes".

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Imran Khan on Wednesday headed a cabinet meeting to approve proposed amendments to the Constitution and the Army Act, Dawn reported.

The government will also introduce the amendment bill in Parliament on Friday after building a consensus with the opposition on the matter.

Bajwa is turning 60 this year.

Prime Minister Khan had extended Bajwa's tenure for another three years on August 19, 2019.

The extension was then challenged on the grounds that it is offensive to Article 243(4)(b) of the Constitution.

The case was initially filed by the Jurists'&nbsp;Foundation but after it asked to withdraw the case, the court decided to take it up against itself.

During the hearing, the court explored the scope of Article 243 of the Constitution, and the Pakistan Army Act, 1952.

On November 28, the court extended Bajwa's tenure by six months and ordered the government to make a law regulating such appointments.

The detailed 43-page written verdict in the case was released on December 16.

The judgement stated that the matter is being handed over to parliament in order to avoid such mistakes in the future. It also urged parliament to assign a tenure for the post of the army chief.

It added that the federal government had included the word, extension, during the hearing held on November 26, however, the legislation was incorrect as it did not mention the details of the army chief`s period of services and retirement age.&nbsp;

Pakistan government on Thursday filed a civil miscellaneous petition with the Supreme Court seeking a stay order on the apex court's verdict regarding the extension of Army Chief Javed Qamar Bajwa's extension.

Pakistan government on Thursday filed a civil miscellaneous petition with the Supreme Court seeking a stay order on the apex court's verdict regarding the extension of Army Chief Javed Qamar Bajwa's extension. The petition asked that a stay order should remain in effect until a decision on the government's review petition on the verdict has been made, Dawn reported. On November 28, 2019, the Supreme Court had asserted that the country's Army Act lacks clauses to justify Bajwa's extension and ordered the government to legislate on the Pakistan Army chief's extension/reappointment. In response, the Pakistan government submitted a review petition against the top court's verdict, seeking it to be set aside asserting that the verdict has "glaring omissions and mistakes". Meanwhile, Prime Minister Imran Khan on Wednesday headed a cabinet meeting to approve proposed amendments to the Constitution and the Army Act, Dawn reported. The government will also introduce the amendment bill in Parliament on Friday after building a consensus with the opposition on the matter. Bajwa is turning 60 this year. Prime Minister Khan had extended Bajwa's tenure for another three years on August 19, 2019. The extension was then challenged on the grounds that it is offensive to Article 243(4)(b) of the Constitution. The case was initially filed by the Jurists' Foundation but after it asked to withdraw the case, the court decided to take it up against itself. During the hearing, the court explored the scope of Article 243 of the Constitution, and the Pakistan Army Act, 1952. On November 28, the court extended Bajwa's tenure by six months and ordered the government to make a law regulating such appointments. The detailed 43-page written verdict in the case was released on December 16. The judgement stated that the matter is being handed over to parliament in order to avoid such mistakes in the future. It also urged parliament to assign a tenure for the post of the army chief. It added that the federal government had included the word, extension, during the hearing held on November 26, however, the legislation was incorrect as it did not mention the details of the army chief`s period of services and retirement age.

Pakistan government files petition seeking stay on Supreme Court verdict on Bajwa's extension

Prime Minister Imran Khan-led Pakistan government has filed a review petition on Chief of Army Staff (COAS) <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-supreme-court-gives-6-month-extension-to-army-chief-qamar-bajwa-265076">General Qamar Javed Bajwa's tenure extension</a> and seeks a larger bench to hear the matter.&nbsp;

Pakistan Supreme Court, last month, granted a conditional extension to incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa stating that he will continue serving as Chief of Army Staff for six months. The Parliament was to decide on his further tenure.

The PTI government's move follows the retirement of Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa who had delivered the Bajwa's extension last month.&nbsp;

"The extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) is for 6 months, subject to relative legislation through parliament which will decide his further tenure," Pak Chief Justice then ruled.

Pakistan's apex court, in its ruling last month, suspended the decision to extend Bajwa's tenure which was approved by the government for three years in August.

The top court cited a series of irregularities and ordered the government and the army to produce legal provisions and detailed arguments on the extending Bajwa's tenure for three years.

 
&nbsp;

Prime Minister Imran Khan-led Pakistan government has filed a review petition on Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa's tenure extension and seeks a larger bench to hear the matter.

Prime Minister Imran Khan-led Pakistan government has filed a review petition on Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa's tenure extension and seeks a larger bench to hear the matter. Pakistan Supreme Court, last month, granted a conditional extension to incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa stating that he will continue serving as Chief of Army Staff for six months. The Parliament was to decide on his further tenure. The PTI government's move follows the retirement of Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa who had delivered the Bajwa's extension last month. "The extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) is for 6 months, subject to relative legislation through parliament which will decide his further tenure," Pak Chief Justice then ruled. Pakistan's apex court, in its ruling last month, suspended the decision to extend Bajwa's tenure which was approved by the government for three years in August. The top court cited a series of irregularities and ordered the government and the army to produce legal provisions and detailed arguments on the extending Bajwa's tenure for three years.

Pakistan: Imran Khan-led government challenges Supreme Court's decision on Bajwa's tenure

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Wednesday summoned an emergency meeting of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) core committee to discuss the conviction of former military <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pervez-musharraf-an-army-general-dictator-and-convict-268670">dictator Pervez Musharraf</a> in a high treason case.

The Prime Minister was in Geneva on Tuesday to attend the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-pm-imran-khan-once-again-issues-nuclear-threat-to-india-this-time-over-citizenship-amendment-act-268834">"Global Refugee Forum"</a> when the special court formed to try the ex-president announced its verdict awarding him the death penalty for imposing a state of emergency in 2007 and suspending the Constitution.

Khan had to cut short his visit to the European country in the wake of the verdict, according to The News International.

The verdict, announced by a three-member bench of the special tribunal, was received with a 'lot of pain and anguish' by the Pakistan Army.

The government, too, expressed its reservations to the verdict, saying that the requirements for a fair trial under Article 10-A were not fulfilled in the case.

Also Watch:&nbsp;Musharraf has right to appeal within 30 days, currently in a Dubai hospital

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-musharraf-has-right-to-appeal-within-30-days-currently-in-a-dubai-hospital-268672/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

Attorney General Anwar Mansoor Khan has already made it clear that the government will not oppose an appeal against the special court's verdict.

In the meeting today, the ruling party is further expected to discuss matters related to legislation regarding the extension of services of the army chief and the appointment of a chief election commissioner and other members of the electoral body.

The PTI's legal team will brief the members about the extension issue after the detailed <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/musharrafs-sentence-received-with-pain-anguish-he-can-never-be-a-traitor-pak-army-268772">verdict of the Supreme Court</a> in this regard.

Meanwhile, UK-based Barrister Toby Cadman, a former representative of Musharraf at the United Nations, on Tuesday pointed out what he deemed 'flaws' in the capital punishment handed to the former president in a high treason case and called for a full review of the case.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Wednesday summoned an emergency meeting of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) core committee to discuss the conviction of former military dictator Pervez Musharraf in a high treason case.

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan on Wednesday summoned an emergency meeting of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's (PTI) core committee to discuss the conviction of former military dictator Pervez Musharraf in a high treason case. The Prime Minister was in Geneva on Tuesday to attend the "Global Refugee Forum" when the special court formed to try the ex-president announced its verdict awarding him the death penalty for imposing a state of emergency in 2007 and suspending the Constitution. Khan had to cut short his visit to the European country in the wake of the verdict, according to The News International. The verdict, announced by a three-member bench of the special tribunal, was received with a 'lot of pain and anguish' by the Pakistan Army. The government, too, expressed its reservations to the verdict, saying that the requirements for a fair trial under Article 10-A were not fulfilled in the case. Also Watch: Musharraf has right to appeal within 30 days, currently in a Dubai hospital × Attorney General Anwar Mansoor Khan has already made it clear that the government will not oppose an appeal against the special court's verdict. In the meeting today, the ruling party is further expected to discuss matters related to legislation regarding the extension of services of the army chief and the appointment of a chief election commissioner and other members of the electoral body. The PTI's legal team will brief the members about the extension issue after the detailed verdict of the Supreme Court in this regard. Meanwhile, UK-based Barrister Toby Cadman, a former representative of Musharraf at the United Nations, on Tuesday pointed out what he deemed 'flaws' in the capital punishment handed to the former president in a high treason case and called for a full review of the case.

Imran Khan cuts short Geneva visit, calls emergency meeting to discuss Musharraf verdict

The Supreme Court of Pakistan late on Monday issued a 43-page written verdict in a case related to the extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa.

The written judgment by the court's Justice Mansoor Ali Shah has been issued in connection with its previous short written order in the plea announced on November 28 that had ordered granting six months to the government for the legislation on the matter from the parliament, ARY News reported.

WATCH:&nbsp;Pak PM Imran Khan gave 3-year extension to Army chief Bajwa

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pak-pm-imran-khan-gave-3-year-extension-to-army-chief-bajwa-263820/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

An additional note of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, was also given in the detailed verdict in the case.

The judgment stated that the matter is being handed over to the parliament in order to avoid such mistakes in the future. It also urged the parliament to assign a tenure for the post of the army chief.

It added that the federal government had included the word, extension, during the hearing held on November 26, however, the legislation was incorrect as it did not mention the details of the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-government-amends-army-regulations-for-bajwas-tenure-extension-264807">army</a> chief's period of services and retirement age.

The government had <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-supreme-court-puts-army-chief-bajwas-tenure-extension-on-hold-264579">restricted</a> the tenure of Bajwa for three years under <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-supreme-court-gives-6-month-extension-to-army-chief-qamar-bajwa-265076">regulation 255</a> but it was not eligible to be implemented as it did not define the retirement age of the general in the legislation, the verdict said.

On November 28, the top court had granted a six-month extension to Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa in his service tenure.

The court while announcing its short written order had given six months to the government for the legislation on the matter from the parliament.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan late on Monday issued a 43-page written verdict in a case related to the extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan late on Monday issued a 43-page written verdict in a case related to the extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa. The written judgment by the court's Justice Mansoor Ali Shah has been issued in connection with its previous short written order in the plea announced on November 28 that had ordered granting six months to the government for the legislation on the matter from the parliament, ARY News reported. WATCH: Pak PM Imran Khan gave 3-year extension to Army chief Bajwa × An additional note of the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, was also given in the detailed verdict in the case. The judgment stated that the matter is being handed over to the parliament in order to avoid such mistakes in the future. It also urged the parliament to assign a tenure for the post of the army chief. It added that the federal government had included the word, extension, during the hearing held on November 26, however, the legislation was incorrect as it did not mention the details of the army chief's period of services and retirement age. The government had restricted the tenure of Bajwa for three years under regulation 255 but it was not eligible to be implemented as it did not define the retirement age of the general in the legislation, the verdict said. On November 28, the top court had granted a six-month extension to Chief of Army Staff General Qamar Javed Bajwa in his service tenure. The court while announcing its short written order had given six months to the government for the legislation on the matter from the parliament.

Pakistan Supreme Court issues detailed verdict on army chief's extension

The Supreme Court of Pakistan granted a conditional extension to incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa on Thursday.

Bajwa will continue serving as&nbsp;Chief of Army Staff for six months, the court ruled. The Parliament will decide on his further tenure.

"The extension of the Army Chief was challenged. The government moved from one position to another. This was done through Article 342 of the Constitution and Section 255 of the army rules and regulations," Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said while delivering the verdict.

Pakistan Chief Justice also said that&nbsp;"In spite of the assistance from the Attorney General,"&nbsp;the court "could not find any provision in the law."&nbsp;

"Attorney General explained under practice but it was not in law."

"The extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS)&nbsp;is for 6 months, subject to relative legislation through parliament which will decide his further tenure," Pak Chief Justice then ruled.

"President on the advice of the Prime Minister subject to law can appoint an Army Chief, but the law does not specify the tenure. Attorney General has assured that the practice will be codified under the law. Considering Chief of the Army Staff is responsible for the command, administration and is the head of General Headquarter, while exercising judicial restraint say that the matter shall be taken through an act of parliament,"&nbsp;Khosa said while dismissing the petition.

In a surprise ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court suspended the decision to extend his tenure, approved by the government in August, citing a series of irregularities and ordering the government and the army to produce legal provisions and detailed arguments on the reasoning behind the move.

On August 19, Prime Minister Khan had approved an extension in the tenure of Gen Bajwa for another three years.

"General Qamar Javed Bajwa is appointed Chief of Army Staff for another term of three years from the date of completion of current tenure," the brief notification issued by the prime minister`s office had said.

Khan extended his tenure citing "regional security environment", according to a local media report.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's government on Tuesday amended its Army Regulations (Rules) to include a provision for an "extension in tenure" of Bajwa.&nbsp;

It is to be noted that over the past two decades, Gen Raheel Sharif is the only army chief to have retired on time.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court of Pakistan granted a conditional extension to incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa on Thursday. Bajwa will continue serving as Chief of Army Staff for six months, the court ruled.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan granted a conditional extension to incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa on Thursday. Bajwa will continue serving as Chief of Army Staff for six months, the court ruled. The Parliament will decide on his further tenure. "The extension of the Army Chief was challenged. The government moved from one position to another. This was done through Article 342 of the Constitution and Section 255 of the army rules and regulations," Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said while delivering the verdict. Pakistan Chief Justice also said that "In spite of the assistance from the Attorney General," the court "could not find any provision in the law." "Attorney General explained under practice but it was not in law." "The extension of Chief of Army Staff (COAS) is for 6 months, subject to relative legislation through parliament which will decide his further tenure," Pak Chief Justice then ruled. "President on the advice of the Prime Minister subject to law can appoint an Army Chief, but the law does not specify the tenure. Attorney General has assured that the practice will be codified under the law. Considering Chief of the Army Staff is responsible for the command, administration and is the head of General Headquarter, while exercising judicial restraint say that the matter shall be taken through an act of parliament," Khosa said while dismissing the petition. In a surprise ruling on Tuesday, the Supreme Court suspended the decision to extend his tenure, approved by the government in August, citing a series of irregularities and ordering the government and the army to produce legal provisions and detailed arguments on the reasoning behind the move. On August 19, Prime Minister Khan had approved an extension in the tenure of Gen Bajwa for another three years. "General Qamar Javed Bajwa is appointed Chief of Army Staff for another term of three years from the date of completion of current tenure," the brief notification issued by the prime minister`s office had said. Khan extended his tenure citing "regional security environment", according to a local media report. Meanwhile, Pakistan's government on Tuesday amended its Army Regulations (Rules) to include a provision for an "extension in tenure" of Bajwa. It is to be noted that over the past two decades, Gen Raheel Sharif is the only army chief to have retired on time. (With inputs from agencies)

Pakistan: Supreme Court gives 6-month extension to Army Chief Qamar Bajwa

Pak SC hearing Bajwa extension case: Watch live updates here

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Thursday resumed the hearing in a case pertaining to the extension of incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa.

Today is the last opportunity for the government to satisfy the court on the legal grounds of the said move as the Army chief is set to retire from his post at midnight, Dawn reported.

The three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa, Justice Mian Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, is hearing the case.

It is to be noted that over the past two decades, Gen Raheel Sharif is the only army chief to have retired on time.

During yesterday`s hearing, the bench was irked by the fact that after Tuesday`s cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Imran Khan submitted a summary to President Arif Alvi for approval to "reappoint" the army chief on his retirement and the new appointment was made under Article 243(4) of the Constitution, but the notification later issued pertains to the "grant of extension" to the COAS for another term of three years.

The army chief was represented by Farogh Naseem, who resigned from his post as law minister yesterday to pursue the case, while Attorney General (AG) Anwar Mansoor Khan presented arguments on behalf of the government.

Tuesday`s hearing was adjourned twice. The second time the court resumed proceedings, the attorney general informed the court that the summary which notifies Gen Bajwa`s extension had referred to Article 243 and Article 245 of the Constitution.

On August 19, Prime Minister Khan had approved an extension in the tenure of Gen Bajwa for another three years.

"General Qamar Javed Bajwa is appointed Chief of Army Staff for another term of three years from the date of completion of current tenure," the brief notification issued by the prime minister`s office had said.

Khan extended his tenure citing "regional security environment", according to The Express Tribune.

Meanwhile, Pakistan`s government on Tuesday amended its Army Regulations (Rules) to include a provision for an "extension in tenure" of Bajwa.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Thursday resumed the hearing in a case pertaining to the extension of incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa.

The Supreme Court of Pakistan on Thursday resumed the hearing in a case pertaining to the extension of incumbent Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa. Today is the last opportunity for the government to satisfy the court on the legal grounds of the said move as the Army chief is set to retire from his post at midnight, Dawn reported. The three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan Asif Saeed Khosa, Justice Mian Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, is hearing the case. It is to be noted that over the past two decades, Gen Raheel Sharif is the only army chief to have retired on time. During yesterday`s hearing, the bench was irked by the fact that after Tuesday`s cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Imran Khan submitted a summary to President Arif Alvi for approval to "reappoint" the army chief on his retirement and the new appointment was made under Article 243(4) of the Constitution, but the notification later issued pertains to the "grant of extension" to the COAS for another term of three years. The army chief was represented by Farogh Naseem, who resigned from his post as law minister yesterday to pursue the case, while Attorney General (AG) Anwar Mansoor Khan presented arguments on behalf of the government. Tuesday`s hearing was adjourned twice. The second time the court resumed proceedings, the attorney general informed the court that the summary which notifies Gen Bajwa`s extension had referred to Article 243 and Article 245 of the Constitution. On August 19, Prime Minister Khan had approved an extension in the tenure of Gen Bajwa for another three years. "General Qamar Javed Bajwa is appointed Chief of Army Staff for another term of three years from the date of completion of current tenure," the brief notification issued by the prime minister`s office had said. Khan extended his tenure citing "regional security environment", according to The Express Tribune. Meanwhile, Pakistan`s government on Tuesday amended its Army Regulations (Rules) to include a provision for an "extension in tenure" of Bajwa.

Pakistan Supreme Court resumes hearing on Bajwa's extension case

Pakistan Supreme Court issues notice to the defence ministry.

SC puts a hold on Bajwa tenure extension

Pakistani Supreme Court has suspended the notification giving an extension to Army chief <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/soft-coup-in-pakistan-general-bajwa-to-be-part-of-xi-imran-meet-254385">General Qamar Javed Bajwa</a>.

The court issued a notice to all parties including the Pakistan defence ministry and General Bajwa.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-qamar-javed-bajwas-term-as-army-chief-extended-for-another-3-years-244163">General Bajwa </a>was&nbsp;due to retire on November 29, however, he&nbsp;was given an extension for a period of three year by Pakistan PM Imran Khan on August 19.

Pakistan's Supreme Court said that the cabinet has 25 members but only 11 members voted in favour of the resolution, therefore the extension was given without the consent of the majority of the cabinet.

The court further said that only the president of Pakistan can approve the&nbsp;extension of tenure for the Army chief.

The hearing in the case has been adjourned till Wednesday.

Bajwa has held the post since November 29, 2016, and was appointed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.

Prior to his appointment, Pakistan's Army chief had served as the Inspector General of the Training and Evaluation at the Army General headquarter. He had also served as field commander of X Corps from August 2013 to September 2015.

In 2007, General Bajwa had served as a Brigadier in the United Nations mission in Congo and as a brigade commander.

Pakistani Supreme Court has suspended the notification giving an extension to Army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa. The court issued a notice to all parties including the Pakistan defence ministry and General Bajwa.

Pakistani Supreme Court has suspended the notification giving an extension to Army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa. The court issued a notice to all parties including the Pakistan defence ministry and General Bajwa. General Bajwa was due to retire on November 29, however, he was given an extension for a period of three year by Pakistan PM Imran Khan on August 19. Pakistan's Supreme Court said that the cabinet has 25 members but only 11 members voted in favour of the resolution, therefore the extension was given without the consent of the majority of the cabinet. The court further said that only the president of Pakistan can approve the extension of tenure for the Army chief. The hearing in the case has been adjourned till Wednesday. Bajwa has held the post since November 29, 2016, and was appointed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. Prior to his appointment, Pakistan's Army chief had served as the Inspector General of the Training and Evaluation at the Army General headquarter. He had also served as field commander of X Corps from August 2013 to September 2015. In 2007, General Bajwa had served as a Brigadier in the United Nations mission in Congo and as a brigade commander.

Pakistan Supreme Court puts Army chief Bajwa's tenure extension on hold

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Friday ordered disciplinary action against a judge who convicted former premier Nawaz Sharif, effectively giving a boost to Sharif's appeal against a seven-year jail term for corruption.

Sharif was convicted and jailed last year after failing to prove the source of income that had led to his ownership of a steel mill in Saudi Arabia. Under Pakistani law, that is taken as proof of corruption.

Sharif denied the charges that he said were politically motivated.

His party in July presented a video at a news conference apparently showing the judge who presided over Sharif's conviction, Arshad Malik, as saying he had been pressured into handing down a guilty verdict by individuals he did not identify who had compromising footage of him.

Malik later issued a statement denying he had been blackmailed to convict Sharif and saying the video had been manipulated.

Malik had already been removed from his position in an anti-corruption court and the Supreme Court on Friday ordered him to report back to the High Court in the city of Lahore.

"We expect that after his repatriation appropriate departmental disciplinary proceedings shall be initiated against him," the Supreme Court said in an order.

The Lahore High Court, shortly after receiving the ruling, issued an order suspending Malik from service until he faces an inquiry into his conduct, according to a copy of the order, seen by Reuters.

A seven-member committee would hold the inquiry from Monday, it said.

Malik could not be reached for comment.

The Supreme Court said Malik's "stinking conduct" in connection with the video scandal was abhorrent, and an appeals court should decide whether to consider it as evidence for any relief for Sharif.

An appeal against Sharif's conviction is pending before the Islamabad High Court. The Supreme Court said that was the proper forum to evaluate the video scandal.

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Friday ordered disciplinary action against a judge who convicted former premier Nawaz Sharif, effectively giving a boost to Sharif's appeal against a seven-year jail term for corruption.

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Friday ordered disciplinary action against a judge who convicted former premier Nawaz Sharif, effectively giving a boost to Sharif's appeal against a seven-year jail term for corruption. Sharif was convicted and jailed last year after failing to prove the source of income that had led to his ownership of a steel mill in Saudi Arabia. Under Pakistani law, that is taken as proof of corruption. Sharif denied the charges that he said were politically motivated. His party in July presented a video at a news conference apparently showing the judge who presided over Sharif's conviction, Arshad Malik, as saying he had been pressured into handing down a guilty verdict by individuals he did not identify who had compromising footage of him. Malik later issued a statement denying he had been blackmailed to convict Sharif and saying the video had been manipulated. Malik had already been removed from his position in an anti-corruption court and the Supreme Court on Friday ordered him to report back to the High Court in the city of Lahore. "We expect that after his repatriation appropriate departmental disciplinary proceedings shall be initiated against him," the Supreme Court said in an order. The Lahore High Court, shortly after receiving the ruling, issued an order suspending Malik from service until he faces an inquiry into his conduct, according to a copy of the order, seen by Reuters. A seven-member committee would hold the inquiry from Monday, it said. Malik could not be reached for comment. The Supreme Court said Malik's "stinking conduct" in connection with the video scandal was abhorrent, and an appeals court should decide whether to consider it as evidence for any relief for Sharif. An appeal against Sharif's conviction is pending before the Islamabad High Court. The Supreme Court said that was the proper forum to evaluate the video scandal.

Pakistan Supreme Court orders action against judge in Nawaz Sharif's case

Pakistan on Thursday provided its first official confirmation that Asia Bibi, a <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/asia-bibi-arrives-in-canada-after-leaving-pakistan-report-217001">Christian woman </a>who spent eight years on death row falsely charged with blasphemy, had left the country more than six months after being acquitted by the Supreme Court.

The case created an international furore in October after her release prompted days of rioting and demands for her death from hardline Islamists who rejected the outcome and warned Prime Minister Imran Khan's government not to let her leave.

"Asia Bibi has left Pakistan of her free will," foreign office spokesman Mohammad Faisal told reporters in Islamabad, the capital. "She is a free person and left of her own free will."

Faisal did not confirm media reports that she had joined f<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/asia-bibi-has-left-for-canada-confirms-her-lawyer-216969">amily members in Canada</a>, however.

On Wednesday, Bibi's lawyer Saif-ul-Malook said she had left for Canada to unite with her daughters, who were believed to have already taken asylum there but Canadian authorities have not confirmed this.

In November, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi. This week, Canada said it had no comment on the matter, however.

Pakistan's Supreme Court in January upheld an earlier verdict to free Bibi, but officials have worried that her sudden departure could trigger further riots.

Islamists have been criticising the government and the military for caving into what they call pressure from the West.

Bibi's departure is a Western conspiracy against Islam, a hardline extremist party, Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan, which has made blasphemy a rallying cry, said in a statement on Wednesday.

The farm worker and mother of five was convicted in 2010 of making derogatory remarks about Islam after neighbours working in the fields with her objected to Bibi's drinking water from their glass because she was not Muslim.

Two Pakistani politicians who sought to help her were assassinated, including Punjab province governor Salman Taseer, who was shot by his own bodyguard.

Any insult to Islam or the Prophet Muhammad carries a death sentence in Pakistan, although no one has been executed in decades.

Blasphemy is such a sensitive issue that a mere accusation can result in mob lynching. At least 67 people have been killed over unproven blasphemy accusations since 1990, human rights groups say.

The blasphemy laws are often invoked to settle personal scores and to intimidate liberal journalists, lawyers and politicians.

Pakistan on Thursday provided its first official confirmation that Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who spent eight years on death row falsely charged with blasphemy, had left the country more than six months after being acquitted by the Supreme Court.

Pakistan on Thursday provided its first official confirmation that Asia Bibi, a Christian woman who spent eight years on death row falsely charged with blasphemy, had left the country more than six months after being acquitted by the Supreme Court. The case created an international furore in October after her release prompted days of rioting and demands for her death from hardline Islamists who rejected the outcome and warned Prime Minister Imran Khan's government not to let her leave. "Asia Bibi has left Pakistan of her free will," foreign office spokesman Mohammad Faisal told reporters in Islamabad, the capital. "She is a free person and left of her own free will." Faisal did not confirm media reports that she had joined family members in Canada, however. On Wednesday, Bibi's lawyer Saif-ul-Malook said she had left for Canada to unite with her daughters, who were believed to have already taken asylum there but Canadian authorities have not confirmed this. In November, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi. This week, Canada said it had no comment on the matter, however. Pakistan's Supreme Court in January upheld an earlier verdict to free Bibi, but officials have worried that her sudden departure could trigger further riots. Islamists have been criticising the government and the military for caving into what they call pressure from the West. Bibi's departure is a Western conspiracy against Islam, a hardline extremist party, Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan, which has made blasphemy a rallying cry, said in a statement on Wednesday. The farm worker and mother of five was convicted in 2010 of making derogatory remarks about Islam after neighbours working in the fields with her objected to Bibi's drinking water from their glass because she was not Muslim. Two Pakistani politicians who sought to help her were assassinated, including Punjab province governor Salman Taseer, who was shot by his own bodyguard. Any insult to Islam or the Prophet Muhammad carries a death sentence in Pakistan, although no one has been executed in decades. Blasphemy is such a sensitive issue that a mere accusation can result in mob lynching. At least 67 people have been killed over unproven blasphemy accusations since 1990, human rights groups say. The blasphemy laws are often invoked to settle personal scores and to intimidate liberal journalists, lawyers and politicians.

Christian woman who was on death row has left country, Pakistan says

A Pakistani Christian woman, Asia Bibi, who had spent eight years on death row in a Pakistan prison over blasphemy charges has left the country, her lawyer, Saif Ul Malook 
confirmed to Reuters on Wednesday.

"I have inquired within available channels, and according to them she has left for Canada," Bibi's lawyer, Saif Ul Malook told Reuters.

Asia Bibi was in protective custody in Pakistan after her acquittal last October by the country's Supreme Court. She was on death row since 2010. Bibi was charged for Blasphemy over the incident that took place in 2009. Her daughters are believed to have already fled to Canada, reports said.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/asia-bibi-leaves-pakistan-sources-say-she-is-headed-to-canada-216904/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Asia's acquittal in January had sparked protests&nbsp;across the country by hardline group Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP) who threatened to kill her, ultimately, the government stepped in to contain the agitation.

The Pakistan foreign ministry hasn't reacted to Bibi's departure, neither has the Pakistan government issued any statement so far. Pakistan's local media has widely reported Asia's flight from the country.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had said earlier that his country was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi.

A Pakistani Christian woman, Asia Bibi, who had spent eight years on death row in a Pakistan prison over blasphemy charges has left the country, her lawyer, Saif Ul Malook confirmed to Reuters on Wednesday.

A Pakistani Christian woman, Asia Bibi, who had spent eight years on death row in a Pakistan prison over blasphemy charges has left the country, her lawyer, Saif Ul Malook confirmed to Reuters on Wednesday. "I have inquired within available channels, and according to them she has left for Canada," Bibi's lawyer, Saif Ul Malook told Reuters. Asia Bibi was in protective custody in Pakistan after her acquittal last October by the country's Supreme Court. She was on death row since 2010. Bibi was charged for Blasphemy over the incident that took place in 2009. Her daughters are believed to have already fled to Canada, reports said. Asia's acquittal in January had sparked protests across the country by hardline group Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP) who threatened to kill her, ultimately, the government stepped in to contain the agitation. The Pakistan foreign ministry hasn't reacted to Bibi's departure, neither has the Pakistan government issued any statement so far. Pakistan's local media has widely reported Asia's flight from the country. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had said earlier that his country was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi.

Asia Bibi has left for Canada, confirms her lawyer

Pakistan's former military dictator Pervez Musharraf, who is facing high treason case, is likely to return to the country on May 1, his lawyer said on Saturday.

A special court indicted General (retd) Musharraf, 75, for high treason in March 2014. He left for Dubai in 2016 to "seek medical treatment" and has not returned since.

Last month, he was admitted to a hospital in Dubai after suffering a reaction from a rare disease for which he is already under treatment.

"Despite his deteriorating medical condition, the former military ruler is determined to appear before the court that had summoned him for the hearing scheduled for May 2," Musharraf's lawyer Salman Safdar told reporters.

"The approval of former president's personal physician had become of utmost importance in the current circumstances, considering his fragile medical condition," Safdar was quoted as saying by the Express-News.

However, family sources have confirmed his arrival date, he added.

Pakistan's Supreme Court, while hearing a plea filed by a lawyer who pointed out that proceedings of the treason case had come to a halt as former president Musharraf had not returned since 2016, on April 1 directed the former military ruler to appear before the special court on May 2.

The three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa also warned him that if he fails to turn up then he will lose his right to record a statement under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedures.

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had filed the treason case against Musharraf over the president's imposition of extra-constitutional emergency in November 2007.

The special court declared Musharraf a proclaimed offender and ordered the confiscation of his property owing to his no-show.

Later, on orders of the Supreme Court, Musharraf's passport and national identity card were also cancelled.

Musharraf ruled Pakistan from 1999 to 2008. A conviction for high treason carries the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Pakistan's former military dictator Pervez Musharraf, who is facing high treason case, is likely to return to the country on May 1, his lawyer said on Saturday. A special court indicted General (retd) Musharraf, 75, for high treason in March 2014.

Pakistan's former military dictator Pervez Musharraf, who is facing high treason case, is likely to return to the country on May 1, his lawyer said on Saturday. A special court indicted General (retd) Musharraf, 75, for high treason in March 2014. He left for Dubai in 2016 to "seek medical treatment" and has not returned since. Last month, he was admitted to a hospital in Dubai after suffering a reaction from a rare disease for which he is already under treatment. "Despite his deteriorating medical condition, the former military ruler is determined to appear before the court that had summoned him for the hearing scheduled for May 2," Musharraf's lawyer Salman Safdar told reporters. "The approval of former president's personal physician had become of utmost importance in the current circumstances, considering his fragile medical condition," Safdar was quoted as saying by the Express-News. However, family sources have confirmed his arrival date, he added. Pakistan's Supreme Court, while hearing a plea filed by a lawyer who pointed out that proceedings of the treason case had come to a halt as former president Musharraf had not returned since 2016, on April 1 directed the former military ruler to appear before the special court on May 2. The three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa also warned him that if he fails to turn up then he will lose his right to record a statement under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedures. The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had filed the treason case against Musharraf over the president's imposition of extra-constitutional emergency in November 2007. The special court declared Musharraf a proclaimed offender and ordered the confiscation of his property owing to his no-show. Later, on orders of the Supreme Court, Musharraf's passport and national identity card were also cancelled. Musharraf ruled Pakistan from 1999 to 2008. A conviction for high treason carries the death penalty or life imprisonment.

Pervez Musharraf to return to Pakistan on May 1: Lawyer

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Thursday expressed its displeasure over the delay in the trial of <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/pakistan-intel-used-jaish-e-mohammed-for-carrying-out-attacks-in-india-during-my-tenure-paks-former-president-pervez-musharraf-201691">former military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf</a> in the treason case and sought an explanation from the government, according to a media report.&nbsp;

General Musharraf, 75, who lives in Dubai, is facing several cases including a treason case for suspending the Constitution in 2007, a punishable offence.

The treason case was started by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government in 2013 and he was indicted in 2014.

The former military ruler left for the UAE in 2016 for medical treatment and has not returned since, citing security and health reasons.

Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa summoned the attorney general of Pakistan to appear before it in person and appraise the apex court as to what steps have been taken by the government to bring Musharraf back, the Express Tribune reported.

He was hearing a plea filed by the ex-president of Lahore High Court's Rawalpindi bench's bar association, which said that the proceedings of the treason case - being heard by a special court - had come to a halt since Musharraf had not returned to the country since 2016.

"The former president was not sent abroad by the court but by the government. Court decisions did not say that Musharraf should be sent abroad. If he is not coming back, his testimony should be recorded via Skype," he said.

"It was the government's job to put Musharraf's name on the Exit Control List (ECL), and bringing him back was also their job," the CJP said, adding that should the court be held hostage by the accused.

Chief Justice Khosa also sought a report within 15 days from the court's registrar over the reasons of delay and issued notices to the federal government and other respondents, before adjourning the case till March 25, the report said.&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Thursday expressed its displeasure over the delay in the trial of former military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf in the treason case and sought an explanation from the government, according to a media report.

Pakistan's Supreme Court on Thursday expressed its displeasure over the delay in the trial of former military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf in the treason case and sought an explanation from the government, according to a media report. General Musharraf, 75, who lives in Dubai, is facing several cases including a treason case for suspending the Constitution in 2007, a punishable offence. The treason case was started by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government in 2013 and he was indicted in 2014. The former military ruler left for the UAE in 2016 for medical treatment and has not returned since, citing security and health reasons. Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa summoned the attorney general of Pakistan to appear before it in person and appraise the apex court as to what steps have been taken by the government to bring Musharraf back, the Express Tribune reported. He was hearing a plea filed by the ex-president of Lahore High Court's Rawalpindi bench's bar association, which said that the proceedings of the treason case - being heard by a special court - had come to a halt since Musharraf had not returned to the country since 2016. "The former president was not sent abroad by the court but by the government. Court decisions did not say that Musharraf should be sent abroad. If he is not coming back, his testimony should be recorded via Skype," he said. "It was the government's job to put Musharraf's name on the Exit Control List (ECL), and bringing him back was also their job," the CJP said, adding that should the court be held hostage by the accused. Chief Justice Khosa also sought a report within 15 days from the court's registrar over the reasons of delay and issued notices to the federal government and other respondents, before adjourning the case till March 25, the report said.

Pakistan Supreme Court expresses displeasure over delay in Musharraf's treason case

Pakistan's top court on Monday set a one-month deadline for the completion of any inquiry against Pakistan Army officers who allegedly distributed millions of rupees among politicians and public figures to manipulate the 1990 elections.

A three-member bench headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed heard the implementation of court's decision given in 2012 in the Asghar Khan Case, which was initially launched in mid-1990s.

During the hearing, Justice Ahmed asked why court-martial proceedings were not initiated against the army officers.

Attorney General Mansoor Ali Khan responded that no actionable evidence was found against anyone.

The judge reprimanded the defence ministry for its failure to take action and ordered it to investigate the army officers in four weeks and file a reply.

The order by the court came after the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) submitted its report in the court on February 9 and also sought its help to further probe the matter.

In its report, the FIA highlighted several reasons due to which the investigation could not reach a logical conclusion.

It said that "no army officer gave any statement of handing over money to any private person directly."

The court in its 2012 judgment said that former army chief Gen Aslam Baig and former ISI chief Lt-Gen Asad Durrani were also involved in the case. 
Earlier, Durrani in one of his affidavits submitted in the apex court accepted that money was given to a group of politician to influence elections in 1990.

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader Nawaz Sharif was also allegedly among the recipients. As a result, Pakistan Peoples Party lost and an alliance led by Sharif won. Sharif became prime minister for the first time.

Pakistan's powerful military has ruled the country through various coups for nearly half of the country's history since independence in 1947. The military plays an important role in the country's decision making.

Pakistan's top court on Monday set a one-month deadline for the completion of any inquiry against Pakistan Army officers who allegedly distributed millions of rupees among politicians and public figures to manipulate the 1990 elections.

Pakistan's top court on Monday set a one-month deadline for the completion of any inquiry against Pakistan Army officers who allegedly distributed millions of rupees among politicians and public figures to manipulate the 1990 elections. A three-member bench headed by Justice Gulzar Ahmed heard the implementation of court's decision given in 2012 in the Asghar Khan Case, which was initially launched in mid-1990s. During the hearing, Justice Ahmed asked why court-martial proceedings were not initiated against the army officers. Attorney General Mansoor Ali Khan responded that no actionable evidence was found against anyone. The judge reprimanded the defence ministry for its failure to take action and ordered it to investigate the army officers in four weeks and file a reply. The order by the court came after the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) submitted its report in the court on February 9 and also sought its help to further probe the matter. In its report, the FIA highlighted several reasons due to which the investigation could not reach a logical conclusion. It said that "no army officer gave any statement of handing over money to any private person directly." The court in its 2012 judgment said that former army chief Gen Aslam Baig and former ISI chief Lt-Gen Asad Durrani were also involved in the case. Earlier, Durrani in one of his affidavits submitted in the apex court accepted that money was given to a group of politician to influence elections in 1990. Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader Nawaz Sharif was also allegedly among the recipients. As a result, Pakistan Peoples Party lost and an alliance led by Sharif won. Sharif became prime minister for the first time. Pakistan's powerful military has ruled the country through various coups for nearly half of the country's history since independence in 1947. The military plays an important role in the country's decision making.

Pak Supreme Court sets one-month deadline to complete inquiry against army officers in Asghar Khan case

Expressing concern over education becoming a business in Pakistan, the Supreme Court on Monday said that private schools are not a money-making industry and hinted at directing the government to take control of such educational institutes.

A three-member bench comprising Justices Gulzar Ahmed, Faisal Arbab and Ijazul Ahsan made the remarks during the hearing of a case regarding the use of contemptuous language in a letter addressed to the top judge by the administrations of two private schools in Islamabad, the Geo TV reported.

"How did you have the audacity to term the court's decision regarding hike in school fee 'a draconian judgment'. Your letters to parents are in contempt of court," Justice Ahsan told the private school authorities.

Justice Gulzar added, "What kind of things do you write? We should close your schools and can even nationalise them. We can ask the government to handle the administrative affairs of your schools."

The letter pertained to the apex court's decision ordering a 20 per cent decrease in the fee charged by the private schools, Express News reported.

The December 13, 2018 order was applicable to private schools charging over Rs 5,000 per month. It also restricted them to a maximum 8 per cent increase per year with the permission of a regulator. The apex court also directed administrations to return half the fee charged for summer vacations or adjust the amount, it added.

The private school's counsel clarified that the administration did not intent to disrespect the court.&nbsp;

"We apologise to the court. No such thing will happen again."

Justice Gulzar responded, "You can submit a written apology and we will take a look. We will get an audit done to check whether you have black or white money."

"Education has been made into a business," he said and added, "Schools are not a money-making industry."&nbsp;

"There's not a drop of shame in the eyes of private school owners," he added.

The counsel of the private schools then told the court, "We did not intend to insult the court and have implemented court orders and reduced fee."

However, Justice Gulzar said, "We are aware of the kind of comments that were passed after the court order. Why don't we deal with private schools and order the government to take charge of them? Schools are neither an industry nor a money-making sector."

The court then adjourned the hearing of the case for two weeks.

Expressing concern over education becoming a business in Pakistan, the Supreme Court on Monday said that private schools are not a money-making industry and hinted at directing the government to take control of such educational institutes.

Expressing concern over education becoming a business in Pakistan, the Supreme Court on Monday said that private schools are not a money-making industry and hinted at directing the government to take control of such educational institutes. A three-member bench comprising Justices Gulzar Ahmed, Faisal Arbab and Ijazul Ahsan made the remarks during the hearing of a case regarding the use of contemptuous language in a letter addressed to the top judge by the administrations of two private schools in Islamabad, the Geo TV reported. "How did you have the audacity to term the court's decision regarding hike in school fee 'a draconian judgment'. Your letters to parents are in contempt of court," Justice Ahsan told the private school authorities. Justice Gulzar added, "What kind of things do you write? We should close your schools and can even nationalise them. We can ask the government to handle the administrative affairs of your schools." The letter pertained to the apex court's decision ordering a 20 per cent decrease in the fee charged by the private schools, Express News reported. The December 13, 2018 order was applicable to private schools charging over Rs 5,000 per month. It also restricted them to a maximum 8 per cent increase per year with the permission of a regulator. The apex court also directed administrations to return half the fee charged for summer vacations or adjust the amount, it added. The private school's counsel clarified that the administration did not intent to disrespect the court. "We apologise to the court. No such thing will happen again." Justice Gulzar responded, "You can submit a written apology and we will take a look. We will get an audit done to check whether you have black or white money." "Education has been made into a business," he said and added, "Schools are not a money-making industry." "There's not a drop of shame in the eyes of private school owners," he added. The counsel of the private schools then told the court, "We did not intend to insult the court and have implemented court orders and reduced fee." However, Justice Gulzar said, "We are aware of the kind of comments that were passed after the court order. Why don't we deal with private schools and order the government to take charge of them? Schools are neither an industry nor a money-making sector." The court then adjourned the hearing of the case for two weeks.

Pakistan's top court hints at nationalising private schools

The Pakistani Supreme Court cited, among other texts, the Indian constitution and Indian cases in its judgement Wednesday that <a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistans-top-court-tells-army-to-stay-out-of-politics-media-195566">slammed the Pakistani Army and the notorious spy agency the Inter-Services Intelligence</a> (ISI) for the Islamabad-Rawalpindi protests of 2017.

The 2017 sit-in had seen anti-blasphemy protests by the little-known group Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan which were later resolved by the powerful Pakistani Army but led to the resignation of the country's law minister.

The court, in its judgement, while elaborating on the "right to assemble peacefully", stated that "the rights to free movement, peaceful assembly and freedom of speech and expression (respectively Articles 15, 16 and 19 of the Constitution) are provided in Article 19 of the Indian Constitution" but in "India too such rights are not absolute".&nbsp;

It also cited two Indian cases in its judgement.

It used the Indian Supreme Court's judgement in "Bimal Gurung v Union of India" which said, "Demonstrations whether political, religious or social or other demonstrations which create public disturbances or operate as nuisances, or create or manifestly threaten some tangible public or private mischief, are not covered by protection under Article 19(1)."

The other case Pakistan's Supreme Court cited was "Re Ramlila Maidan Incident" in which the Indian Supreme Court observed, "To maintain and preserve public peace, and public order is unequivocal duty of the State and its organs… There can be no social order or proper State governance without the State performing this function and duty in all its spheres."

The Pakistani SC also used history to elaborate on "the right to protest", saying the Muslim League and the Congress protested peacefully and "as a consequence of which two independent countries, Pakistan and India, emerged".

The Pakistani Supreme Court in its judgement Wednesday asked intelligence agencies not to exceed their mandate and told the Pakistani Army not to engage in political activity since the Pakistani "Constitution emphatically prohibits" that.

The Pakistani Supreme Court cited, among other texts, the Indian constitution and Indian cases in its judgement Wednesday that slammed the Pakistani Army and the notorious spy agency the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for the Islamabad-Rawalpindi protests of 2017.

The Pakistani Supreme Court cited, among other texts, the Indian constitution and Indian cases in its judgement Wednesday that slammed the Pakistani Army and the notorious spy agency the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for the Islamabad-Rawalpindi protests of 2017. The 2017 sit-in had seen anti-blasphemy protests by the little-known group Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan which were later resolved by the powerful Pakistani Army but led to the resignation of the country's law minister. The court, in its judgement, while elaborating on the "right to assemble peacefully", stated that "the rights to free movement, peaceful assembly and freedom of speech and expression (respectively Articles 15, 16 and 19 of the Constitution) are provided in Article 19 of the Indian Constitution" but in "India too such rights are not absolute". It also cited two Indian cases in its judgement. It used the Indian Supreme Court's judgement in "Bimal Gurung v Union of India" which said, "Demonstrations whether political, religious or social or other demonstrations which create public disturbances or operate as nuisances, or create or manifestly threaten some tangible public or private mischief, are not covered by protection under Article 19(1)." The other case Pakistan's Supreme Court cited was "Re Ramlila Maidan Incident" in which the Indian Supreme Court observed, "To maintain and preserve public peace, and public order is unequivocal duty of the State and its organs… There can be no social order or proper State governance without the State performing this function and duty in all its spheres." The Pakistani SC also used history to elaborate on "the right to protest", saying the Muslim League and the Congress protested peacefully and "as a consequence of which two independent countries, Pakistan and India, emerged". The Pakistani Supreme Court in its judgement Wednesday asked intelligence agencies not to exceed their mandate and told the Pakistani Army not to engage in political activity since the Pakistani "Constitution emphatically prohibits" that.

Pakistan Supreme Court cites Indian cases, constitution in judgement that slams Pak Army, ISI

Pakistan's Supreme Court <a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/will-help-asia-bibi-in-blasphemy-case-leave-her-country-italy-176228">rejected a review petition challenging</a> the acquittal of Asia Bibi in the blasphemy case.

"Based on merit, this review petition is dismissed," Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said while presiding over the three-judge panel.

<a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/how-asia-bibi-was-convicted-in-blasphemey-case-a-timeline-174662">Asia Bibi who is a Christian</a> had spent eight years&nbsp;on death row after being convicted in 2010&nbsp;on blasphemy charges but she got a reprieve last year as Pakistan's top court overturned the verdict.

Bibi's lawyer, Saif-ul-Malook, who fled to Europe due to fears for his safety last year had said earlier that he expected the case to be dismissed.&nbsp;&nbsp;Saif-ul-Mulook had called the petition "frivolous"&nbsp;

Bibi is widely expected to seek asylum abroad due to safety concerns, with reports claiming that Canada and Italy being the favourites to accept her.

"She should now be free to reunite with her family and seek safety in a country of her choice," Amnesty International said in a statement.

The Pakistani national was alleged to have made derogatory remarks against Islam. Her neighbours working in the fields objected to her drinking water from their glass because she was not a Muslim. Asia denied ever committing blasphemy.

After she was acquitted last month, Leaders of the ultra-Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik (TLP) and other parties had protested across the country calling for her death and pressured the government not to allow her to leave.

The TLP ultimately called off the protests after striking a deal with the government to put Bibi on an "exit control list" barring her from leaving the country.

Pakistan's Supreme Court rejected a review petition challenging the acquittal of Asia Bibi in the blasphemy case. "Based on merit, this review petition is dismissed," Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said while presiding over the three-judge panel.

Pakistan's Supreme Court rejected a review petition challenging the acquittal of Asia Bibi in the blasphemy case. "Based on merit, this review petition is dismissed," Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said while presiding over the three-judge panel. Asia Bibi who is a Christian had spent eight years on death row after being convicted in 2010 on blasphemy charges but she got a reprieve last year as Pakistan's top court overturned the verdict. Bibi's lawyer, Saif-ul-Malook, who fled to Europe due to fears for his safety last year had said earlier that he expected the case to be dismissed. Saif-ul-Mulook had called the petition "frivolous" Bibi is widely expected to seek asylum abroad due to safety concerns, with reports claiming that Canada and Italy being the favourites to accept her. "She should now be free to reunite with her family and seek safety in a country of her choice," Amnesty International said in a statement. The Pakistani national was alleged to have made derogatory remarks against Islam. Her neighbours working in the fields objected to her drinking water from their glass because she was not a Muslim. Asia denied ever committing blasphemy. After she was acquitted last month, Leaders of the ultra-Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik (TLP) and other parties had protested across the country calling for her death and pressured the government not to allow her to leave. The TLP ultimately called off the protests after striking a deal with the government to put Bibi on an "exit control list" barring her from leaving the country.

Pakistan Supreme Court rejects petition against Asia Bibi's acquittal

Pakistan's Supreme Court will on Tuesday begin a review of its own acquittal of a Christian woman charged with blasphemy, a verdict that sparked days of Islamist protests and threats and chaos across the country.

<a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/pakistan-asia-bibis-lawyer-returns-to-pakistan-to-aid-in-appeal-193043">Asia Bibi</a>, who spent eight years on death row, has been in hiding since the Supreme Court freed her in October, with religious hardliners calling for her death and putting pressure on the government to prevent her from leaving the country.

Most reviews of Supreme Court verdicts are dismissed immediately, but the politically sensitive nature of the case has added an extra layer of uncertainty.

A three-judge panel, including the new Supreme Court Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, is due to hear the case.

Bibi's lawyer, Saif-ul-Malook, who fled to Europe due to fears for his safety last year, told Reuters he expected the case to be dismissed.

"They have filed the petition on flimsy grounds. They haven't attempted to counter her release on constitutional grounds," said Malook, who returned to Pakistan this week and will represent Bibi in court.

"God willing, she will have the decision in her favour tomorrow. She will be a free person to go anywhere she wants to."

Bibi is widely expected to seek asylum abroad due to safety concerns, with Canada among the favourites to accept her. In November, Canadian Premier Justin Trudeau said his country was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi.

Bibi, a farm worker, was condemned in 2010 over allegations that she made derogatory remarks about Islam after neighbours working in the fields with her objected to her drinking water from their glass because she was not Muslim. She has always denied committing blasphemy.

Leaders of the ultra-Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik (TLP) group blocked main roads in Pakistan's biggest cities for three days after Bibi's acquittal, calling for the murder of the Supreme Court judges who freed her and urging their cooks and servants to kill them.

The TLP called off the protests after striking a deal with the government that would see authorities seek to put Bibi on an "exit control list" barring her from leaving the country. The government later cracked down on TLP members, detaining more than 3,000 activists and pressing terrorism charges against the group's leaders.

Bibi's case has outraged Christians worldwide and reignited a debate about Pakistan's draconian blasphemy law, which critics say is often abused and unfairly targets ethnic minorities.

"No one should be able to intimidate the Supreme Court into reversing a long-overdue ruling. Asia Bibi has been found to be innocent," said Omar Waraich, deputy South Asia director for Amnesty International.

"She should now finally be free to be reunited with her family and leave the country if she chooses."

Pakistan's Supreme Court will on Tuesday begin a review of its own acquittal of a Christian woman charged with blasphemy, a verdict that sparked days of Islamist protests and threats and chaos across the country.

Pakistan's Supreme Court will on Tuesday begin a review of its own acquittal of a Christian woman charged with blasphemy, a verdict that sparked days of Islamist protests and threats and chaos across the country. Asia Bibi, who spent eight years on death row, has been in hiding since the Supreme Court freed her in October, with religious hardliners calling for her death and putting pressure on the government to prevent her from leaving the country. Most reviews of Supreme Court verdicts are dismissed immediately, but the politically sensitive nature of the case has added an extra layer of uncertainty. A three-judge panel, including the new Supreme Court Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, is due to hear the case. Bibi's lawyer, Saif-ul-Malook, who fled to Europe due to fears for his safety last year, told Reuters he expected the case to be dismissed. "They have filed the petition on flimsy grounds. They haven't attempted to counter her release on constitutional grounds," said Malook, who returned to Pakistan this week and will represent Bibi in court. "God willing, she will have the decision in her favour tomorrow. She will be a free person to go anywhere she wants to." Bibi is widely expected to seek asylum abroad due to safety concerns, with Canada among the favourites to accept her. In November, Canadian Premier Justin Trudeau said his country was in talks with Pakistan about helping Bibi. Bibi, a farm worker, was condemned in 2010 over allegations that she made derogatory remarks about Islam after neighbours working in the fields with her objected to her drinking water from their glass because she was not Muslim. She has always denied committing blasphemy. Leaders of the ultra-Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik (TLP) group blocked main roads in Pakistan's biggest cities for three days after Bibi's acquittal, calling for the murder of the Supreme Court judges who freed her and urging their cooks and servants to kill them. The TLP called off the protests after striking a deal with the government that would see authorities seek to put Bibi on an "exit control list" barring her from leaving the country. The government later cracked down on TLP members, detaining more than 3,000 activists and pressing terrorism charges against the group's leaders. Bibi's case has outraged Christians worldwide and reignited a debate about Pakistan's draconian blasphemy law, which critics say is often abused and unfairly targets ethnic minorities. "No one should be able to intimidate the Supreme Court into reversing a long-overdue ruling. Asia Bibi has been found to be innocent," said Omar Waraich, deputy South Asia director for Amnesty International. "She should now finally be free to be reunited with her family and leave the country if she chooses."

Pakistan Supreme Court to review Asia Bibi's blasphemy acquittal

The Pakistani lawyer of a <a href="http://www.wionews.com/south-asia/asia-bibis-daughters-get-refuge-in-canada-ahead-of-blasphemy-case-hearing-193000">Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy</a>&nbsp;jetted out of the Netherlands Saturday to "hopefully assist his client for the last time" in a Pakistani court hearing, a Dutch MP said.&nbsp;

Saif-ul-Malook fled to the Netherlands from Pakistan in November last year after violent protests erupted over the Pakistani Supreme Court's decision to overturn the conviction of Asia Bibi, who was on death row.

Pakistan's Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether to allow an appeal against Bibi's acquittal, lawyers in the case have said.

Christian Union party parliamentarian Joel Voordewind tweeted a picture of himself and Malook saying "this afternoon (Saturday) I escorted Asia Bibi's lawyer, Mr Malook to Schiphol airport."

"He's going back to Pakistan to hopefully represent Asia for the last time in her case," Voordewind said.

The Netherlands last year granted Malook a temporary stay, but Voordewind said Malook will "unfortunately lose his asylum status in the Netherlands."

The allegations against Bibi date back to 2009, when Muslim women accused her of blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed, a charge punishable by death under the colonial-era legislation.

Her case drew the attention of international rights groups and swiftly became the most high-profile in the country.

If the court refuses to allow the appeal, it will remove the last legal hurdle facing Bibi, who is a prime target in conservative Muslim-majority Pakistan and remains in protective custody.

Bibi was on death row for eight years for blasphemy, a hugely sensitive charge.

Ambassador threatened

Meanwhile, the Dutch ambassador to Pakistan is to return to Islamabad next month after receiving a death threat last year, reportedly from Islamists angry over anti-Islam tweets by far-right politician Geert Wilders, Dutch media reported earlier Saturday.

Ardi Stoios-Braken "will fly back to Islamabad in early February," the daily tabloid Algemeen Dagblad said.

She was on leave in the Netherlands in late October last year when she received word "that a letter arrived at the embassy from Pakistani authorities."

"The letter spoke of a 'specific threat' and was related to the Mohammed cartoon contest which had already been cancelled months before," the paper said.

Dutch Foreign Minister Stef Blok said in November that Stoios-Braken, a veteran diplomat, faced "threats" in Pakistan, apparently over "blasphemous depictions" by Wilders on Twitter.

Wilders in August called off a planned Prophet Mohammed cartoon competition that stirred anger in Pakistan.

Pakistan's interior ministry in October wrote a secret memo on plans to "target" the Dutch ambassador by the hardline Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan party (TLP), media from both countries reported at the time.

The TLP, founded in 2015, led protests in August calling for Pakistan to sever diplomatic relations with the Netherlands over the Wilders cartoon contest.

The TLP has denied making any threats.

The Pakistani government, however, has since launched a crackdown on the TLP, charging its leaders with sedition and terrorism.

But authorities also struck a deal with the protesters to end the violence, forming an agreement which included allowing a final review of the Supreme Court's judgement.

The Pakistani lawyer of a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy jetted out of the Netherlands Saturday to "hopefully assist his client for the last time" in a Pakistani court hearing, a Dutch MP said.

The Pakistani lawyer of a Christian woman acquitted of blasphemy jetted out of the Netherlands Saturday to "hopefully assist his client for the last time" in a Pakistani court hearing, a Dutch MP said. Saif-ul-Malook fled to the Netherlands from Pakistan in November last year after violent protests erupted over the Pakistani Supreme Court's decision to overturn the conviction of Asia Bibi, who was on death row. Pakistan's Supreme Court will decide on Tuesday whether to allow an appeal against Bibi's acquittal, lawyers in the case have said. Christian Union party parliamentarian Joel Voordewind tweeted a picture of himself and Malook saying "this afternoon (Saturday) I escorted Asia Bibi's lawyer, Mr Malook to Schiphol airport." "He's going back to Pakistan to hopefully represent Asia for the last time in her case," Voordewind said. The Netherlands last year granted Malook a temporary stay, but Voordewind said Malook will "unfortunately lose his asylum status in the Netherlands." The allegations against Bibi date back to 2009, when Muslim women accused her of blasphemy against the Prophet Mohammed, a charge punishable by death under the colonial-era legislation. Her case drew the attention of international rights groups and swiftly became the most high-profile in the country. If the court refuses to allow the appeal, it will remove the last legal hurdle facing Bibi, who is a prime target in conservative Muslim-majority Pakistan and remains in protective custody. Bibi was on death row for eight years for blasphemy, a hugely sensitive charge. Ambassador threatened Meanwhile, the Dutch ambassador to Pakistan is to return to Islamabad next month after receiving a death threat last year, reportedly from Islamists angry over anti-Islam tweets by far-right politician Geert Wilders, Dutch media reported earlier Saturday. Ardi Stoios-Braken "will fly back to Islamabad in early February," the daily tabloid Algemeen Dagblad said. She was on leave in the Netherlands in late October last year when she received word "that a letter arrived at the embassy from Pakistani authorities." "The letter spoke of a 'specific threat' and was related to the Mohammed cartoon contest which had already been cancelled months before," the paper said. Dutch Foreign Minister Stef Blok said in November that Stoios-Braken, a veteran diplomat, faced "threats" in Pakistan, apparently over "blasphemous depictions" by Wilders on Twitter. Wilders in August called off a planned Prophet Mohammed cartoon competition that stirred anger in Pakistan. Pakistan's interior ministry in October wrote a secret memo on plans to "target" the Dutch ambassador by the hardline Islamist Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan party (TLP), media from both countries reported at the time. The TLP, founded in 2015, led protests in August calling for Pakistan to sever diplomatic relations with the Netherlands over the Wilders cartoon contest. The TLP has denied making any threats. The Pakistani government, however, has since launched a crackdown on the TLP, charging its leaders with sedition and terrorism. But authorities also struck a deal with the protesters to end the violence, forming an agreement which included allowing a final review of the Supreme Court's judgement.

Asia Bibi's lawyer returns to Pakistan to 'hopefully assist client for last time'

This is a story of Pakistan's Khadija Siddiqui, a 24-year-old law student who was brutally stabbed 23 times in Lahore on May 3, 2016, by Shah Hussain, a fellow student from the university.

Khadija's battle for justice was finally honoured by the Pakistan Supreme Court on Wednesday, January 23. The Court sentenced the guilty to prison.

Back in 2016, Khadija was just 21, waiting to take on the world. Little did she know on that fateful summer afternoon, three days before her law exam, that she would suffer an attack that would scar her face and life forever.&nbsp;

Siddiqui shared her story with WION, stating that her determination and will to fight brought her justice and the confidence with which she faces the world fearlessly. &nbsp;

"It was around 2 pm. I, along with my driver had gone to pick my sister from school in our car. Everything was pre-meditated. He had parked his bike and was waiting for me to appear," she said.

Hussain attacked her as she was about to get into the backseat of her car.&nbsp;

"He kept stabbing me like a mad man and no one came forward to help," she explained adding that it was her driver who managed to fight Hussain and save the sisters.

"I had refused to continue being friends with him in the university when I sensed there was something that was not right about him," Siddiqui told WION.&nbsp;

Khadija believes Hussain's male ego was wounded and drove him to commit the heinous crime. For four months she fought death.

"I had 200 stitches. 50 in the neck alone. I could barely open my mouth to eat", she told as he fought back tears.

Her body was scarred but her soul was not willing to give up just yet. Khadija wanted to live to fight for justice.

"It was a tough decision we had to make, the decision to pursue justice", she said.&nbsp;

Her family was aware they were up against the son of a famous lawyer but they never gave up hope, their decision to fight the battle for justice never faltered.

"He is the son of a lawyer and the legal fraternity was out there to protect him with all their might and that was the biggest hurdle," she noted.

"They thought they could use their power and authority to suppress my cause. Being a law student myself I just could not let that happen".

The course of judgement was a long and an extremely difficult one. Hussain's father had vowed to use everything in his power to stop his son from being jailed. Though the judicial magistrate had sentenced Hussain to seven-year imprisonment in July 2017, he was later acquitted by the Lahore High Court.

There were numerous threats. Khadija had to suffer sexual harassment and face many hurdles during the legal process.

The guilty had left no stone unturned to scare the family into submission. However, instead of feeling threatened, the family became more determined to shatter the arrogance of those guilty and ensure justice prevailed.

"Women who have suffered similar fate have come up to me and thanked me for not giving up. They said unlike them, I should not give up, that I should be an example they failed to be due to lack of support," she shared.&nbsp;

"Women are not weak. Just that we have been conditioned to believe otherwise. I was fighting to help Pakistani women get rid of this psyche," Khadija noted.

The Pakistan Supreme Court finally ruled in her favour. The Court accepted Khadija's appeal to overturn the acquittal and declared the Lahore High Court's verdict null and void. Hussain was taken into custody from outside Pakistan Supreme Court.

Khadija clearly remembers the moment the judgement was pronounced and describes it as 'overwhelming'. She was aware of the significance of the case, how the ruling would go down in history and how she had to win the case for the sake of all the women who looked up to her.

"I could not jeopardise the future of justice for women in the country. I felt it was my responsibility to keep fighting till I won."

"This victory is not mine alone. It is a victory for every woman out there," she emphasised.

With the nightmare behind her now, Khadija wishes to continue studying law so that she can be well equipped to take up cases of human rights violation in future. She wishes to practice criminal law and fight cases of violence committed against women.

"Do not suffer in silence" is Khadija's parting message to all women. She called out women to raise their voice against the injustices they suffer. "Stop victim shaming," she pleaded.

"The truth you will emerge as victorious. It took me three years but I did win finally," she concluded.

This is a story of Pakistan's Khadija Siddiqui, a 24-year-old law student who was brutally stabbed 23 times in Lahore on May 3, 2016, by Shah Hussain, a fellow student from the university.

This is a story of Pakistan's Khadija Siddiqui, a 24-year-old law student who was brutally stabbed 23 times in Lahore on May 3, 2016, by Shah Hussain, a fellow student from the university. Khadija's battle for justice was finally honoured by the Pakistan Supreme Court on Wednesday, January 23. The Court sentenced the guilty to prison. Back in 2016, Khadija was just 21, waiting to take on the world. Little did she know on that fateful summer afternoon, three days before her law exam, that she would suffer an attack that would scar her face and life forever. Siddiqui shared her story with WION, stating that her determination and will to fight brought her justice and the confidence with which she faces the world fearlessly. "It was around 2 pm. I, along with my driver had gone to pick my sister from school in our car. Everything was pre-meditated. He had parked his bike and was waiting for me to appear," she said. Hussain attacked her as she was about to get into the backseat of her car. "He kept stabbing me like a mad man and no one came forward to help," she explained adding that it was her driver who managed to fight Hussain and save the sisters. "I had refused to continue being friends with him in the university when I sensed there was something that was not right about him," Siddiqui told WION. Khadija believes Hussain's male ego was wounded and drove him to commit the heinous crime. For four months she fought death. "I had 200 stitches. 50 in the neck alone. I could barely open my mouth to eat", she told as he fought back tears. Her body was scarred but her soul was not willing to give up just yet. Khadija wanted to live to fight for justice. "It was a tough decision we had to make, the decision to pursue justice", she said. Her family was aware they were up against the son of a famous lawyer but they never gave up hope, their decision to fight the battle for justice never faltered. "He is the son of a lawyer and the legal fraternity was out there to protect him with all their might and that was the biggest hurdle," she noted. "They thought they could use their power and authority to suppress my cause. Being a law student myself I just could not let that happen". The course of judgement was a long and an extremely difficult one. Hussain's father had vowed to use everything in his power to stop his son from being jailed. Though the judicial magistrate had sentenced Hussain to seven-year imprisonment in July 2017, he was later acquitted by the Lahore High Court. There were numerous threats. Khadija had to suffer sexual harassment and face many hurdles during the legal process. The guilty had left no stone unturned to scare the family into submission. However, instead of feeling threatened, the family became more determined to shatter the arrogance of those guilty and ensure justice prevailed. "Women who have suffered similar fate have come up to me and thanked me for not giving up. They said unlike them, I should not give up, that I should be an example they failed to be due to lack of support," she shared. "Women are not weak. Just that we have been conditioned to believe otherwise. I was fighting to help Pakistani women get rid of this psyche," Khadija noted. The Pakistan Supreme Court finally ruled in her favour. The Court accepted Khadija's appeal to overturn the acquittal and declared the Lahore High Court's verdict null and void. Hussain was taken into custody from outside Pakistan Supreme Court. Khadija clearly remembers the moment the judgement was pronounced and describes it as 'overwhelming'. She was aware of the significance of the case, how the ruling would go down in history and how she had to win the case for the sake of all the women who looked up to her. "I could not jeopardise the future of justice for women in the country. I felt it was my responsibility to keep fighting till I won." "This victory is not mine alone. It is a victory for every woman out there," she emphasised. With the nightmare behind her now, Khadija wishes to continue studying law so that she can be well equipped to take up cases of human rights violation in future. She wishes to practice criminal law and fight cases of violence committed against women. "Do not suffer in silence" is Khadija's parting message to all women. She called out women to raise their voice against the injustices they suffer. "Stop victim shaming," she pleaded. "The truth you will emerge as victorious. It took me three years but I did win finally," she concluded.

I fought for women of Pakistan: Knife-attack victim Khadija Siddiqui to WION

Pakistan's Supreme Court Thursday ordered the government led by Prime Minister Imran Khan to lift the travel ban imposed on opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and the Sindh Chief Minister, and asked the country's anti-corruption body to probe their involvement in Rs 35 billion 'fake accounts case'.

As many as 172 suspects were placed on the Exit Control List (ECL) on the recommendations of a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) formed by the apex court.

A person cannot fly abroad if his name is placed on the ECL.

The Supreme Court, in a detailed judgement, ordered the government to remove the names of opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal and Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah from the ECL.

It, however, referred the report and material collected by the JIT in the Rs 35 billion 'fake accounts case' to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Dawn news reported.

The JIT probe focused on "32 fake accounts" which were allegedly used to give massive financial benefits to former president Asif Ali Zardari, his sister Faryal Talpur and several others.

"Removing of the names will not prevent (the) NAB to probe and in case sufficient material is found connecting these individuals with cognisable offences, it will not be precluded from making an appropriate request to the federal government to place their names on (the) ECL again or take any appropriate action provided by law," according to the judgement authored by Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan.

The apex court in its earlier instructions asked the government to delete names of Bilawal and Shah from the ECL but the Cabinet waited for the detailed judgment.

After the judgement, Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry said the government will decide whether it should implement the court orders or file a review petition.

Justice Ahsan was part of the three-judge bench that last year took a suo-motu cognisance after it emerged that several big names were involved in money laundering through fake accounts.

Currently, a Karachi court is hearing the case against Zardari and Talpur for alleged money laundering.

Pakistan's Supreme Court Thursday ordered the government led by Prime Minister Imran Khan to lift the travel ban imposed on opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and the Sindh Chief Minister, and asked the country's anti-corruption body to probe their involvement in Rs 35 billion 'fake accounts case'.

Pakistan's Supreme Court Thursday ordered the government led by Prime Minister Imran Khan to lift the travel ban imposed on opposition leader Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari and the Sindh Chief Minister, and asked the country's anti-corruption body to probe their involvement in Rs 35 billion 'fake accounts case'. As many as 172 suspects were placed on the Exit Control List (ECL) on the recommendations of a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) formed by the apex court. A person cannot fly abroad if his name is placed on the ECL. The Supreme Court, in a detailed judgement, ordered the government to remove the names of opposition Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) chairman Bilawal and Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah from the ECL. It, however, referred the report and material collected by the JIT in the Rs 35 billion 'fake accounts case' to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Dawn news reported. The JIT probe focused on "32 fake accounts" which were allegedly used to give massive financial benefits to former president Asif Ali Zardari, his sister Faryal Talpur and several others. "Removing of the names will not prevent (the) NAB to probe and in case sufficient material is found connecting these individuals with cognisable offences, it will not be precluded from making an appropriate request to the federal government to place their names on (the) ECL again or take any appropriate action provided by law," according to the judgement authored by Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan. The apex court in its earlier instructions asked the government to delete names of Bilawal and Shah from the ECL but the Cabinet waited for the detailed judgment. After the judgement, Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry said the government will decide whether it should implement the court orders or file a review petition. Justice Ahsan was part of the three-judge bench that last year took a suo-motu cognisance after it emerged that several big names were involved in money laundering through fake accounts. Currently, a Karachi court is hearing the case against Zardari and Talpur for alleged money laundering.

Pakistan SC asks Imran Khan government to lift travel ban on opposition leaders

Describing Pakistan's rapidly growing population as a "ticking timebomb", the Supreme Court Tuesday urged religious scholars, the civil society and the government to back population control measures, including a two children per family norm, in the Muslim-majority country.

A three-member bench led by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar made the observations during a hearing in a case related to population control in Pakistan, now the world's fifth most populous.

In its order, the Supreme Court urged religious scholars, the civil society and the government to take steps to promote population control in the country.

The bench referred to the increasing population as a "ticking timebomb", the Express Tribune reported.

"The increasing population is a burden on the country's resources. It is about the future of the next generation. It would be unfortunate if the population is not controlled. Two children per home will help to control the population. There is a need for a campaign on the matter," the apex court was quoted as saying by the report.

"The entire nation needs to stand together to control the population," the chief justice said.

According to the 2017 census, Pakistan's population was approximately 207,774,520, making it the world's fifth most populous nation only behind China, India, the United States and Indonesia.

In July, the Supreme Court took suo motu action on increase in population. The chief justice, on the occasion, remarked that there is dire need to formulate a uniform and effective policy to curb Pakistan's population growth.

On Monday, the apex court came down hard on Health Secretary Captain (Rtd) Zahid Saeed after he admitted that the department could not devise and implement effective measures to control population growth, Duniya News reported.

An angry Chief Justice Nisar remarked, "how could surveys be done while sitting in offices?"

Subsequently, the court ordered him to submit a progress report to the court every three months.

The secretary informed the court that a plan has been devised to control the population growth rate which has to be brought down to 1.5 per cent by 2025.&nbsp;

The Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) has also voiced its concern at the rapid increase of population in the country, calling it a looming disaster.

In a recent press statement, the PMA said the birth of 15,000 babies in Pakistan on the 1st day of 2019 was alarming.

The PMA thinks that it is a distressing situation as at the moment as 60 per cent of the national population stands below the age of 25 years; 25 million children are not going to school and 90 per cent the population is not being provided with clean drinking water. Malnutrition is another big issue and food scarcity is a big problem, the association said.

The PMA said it believes that the unchecked rise in the population is a looming disaster, and concrete steps should be taken to implement family planning and make people-friendly economic policies to overcome these difficulties and save the coming generations.

Pakistan's population was one of the fastest growing in the world and in years to come, the country will be the fourth most populous in the world, the PMA said.&nbsp;

Describing Pakistan's rapidly growing population as a "ticking timebomb", the Supreme Court Tuesday urged religious scholars, the civil society and the government to back population control measures, including a two children per family norm, in the Muslim-majority country.

Describing Pakistan's rapidly growing population as a "ticking timebomb", the Supreme Court Tuesday urged religious scholars, the civil society and the government to back population control measures, including a two children per family norm, in the Muslim-majority country. A three-member bench led by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar made the observations during a hearing in a case related to population control in Pakistan, now the world's fifth most populous. In its order, the Supreme Court urged religious scholars, the civil society and the government to take steps to promote population control in the country. The bench referred to the increasing population as a "ticking timebomb", the Express Tribune reported. "The increasing population is a burden on the country's resources. It is about the future of the next generation. It would be unfortunate if the population is not controlled. Two children per home will help to control the population. There is a need for a campaign on the matter," the apex court was quoted as saying by the report. "The entire nation needs to stand together to control the population," the chief justice said. According to the 2017 census, Pakistan's population was approximately 207,774,520, making it the world's fifth most populous nation only behind China, India, the United States and Indonesia. In July, the Supreme Court took suo motu action on increase in population. The chief justice, on the occasion, remarked that there is dire need to formulate a uniform and effective policy to curb Pakistan's population growth. On Monday, the apex court came down hard on Health Secretary Captain (Rtd) Zahid Saeed after he admitted that the department could not devise and implement effective measures to control population growth, Duniya News reported. An angry Chief Justice Nisar remarked, "how could surveys be done while sitting in offices?" Subsequently, the court ordered him to submit a progress report to the court every three months. The secretary informed the court that a plan has been devised to control the population growth rate which has to be brought down to 1.5 per cent by 2025. The Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) has also voiced its concern at the rapid increase of population in the country, calling it a looming disaster. In a recent press statement, the PMA said the birth of 15,000 babies in Pakistan on the 1st day of 2019 was alarming. The PMA thinks that it is a distressing situation as at the moment as 60 per cent of the national population stands below the age of 25 years; 25 million children are not going to school and 90 per cent the population is not being provided with clean drinking water. Malnutrition is another big issue and food scarcity is a big problem, the association said. The PMA said it believes that the unchecked rise in the population is a looming disaster, and concrete steps should be taken to implement family planning and make people-friendly economic policies to overcome these difficulties and save the coming generations. Pakistan's population was one of the fastest growing in the world and in years to come, the country will be the fourth most populous in the world, the PMA said.

Pakistan should strive for two child per family norm to control population growth: Pak Supreme Court

In a relief to jailed former Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the anti-graft body's appeal against the suspension of his jail sentence and that of his family in one of three corruption cases faced by the embattled leader.

In July 2018, an accountability court here handed Sharif 10 years as jail time for owning assets beyond known income and 1 year for not cooperating with the National Accountability Bureau (NAB).

A five-member bench led by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar upheld the Islamabad High Court's verdict that ordered suspension of prison sentences awarded to Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Captain (retd) Mohammad Safdar in the Avenfield corruption case related to their purchase of four luxury flats in London through corrupt practices.

The apex court, in its ruling, said that the NAB has failed to provide the "ground for cancellation of bail" and that the IHC had not exceeded its authority in granting bail to the convicts of the Avenfield case.

The 69-year-old three-time former prime minister and his family have denied any wrongdoing.&nbsp;

Sharif is currently in jail after an anti-corruption court sentenced him on December 24 to seven years in jail in the Al-Azizia Steel Mills graft case while acquitting him in the Flagship Investments corruption case in the Panama Papers scandal.

The Supreme Court's decision brings a rare relief for the Sharif family, both of whose leaders&nbsp;Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif&nbsp;are currently incarcerated, Dawn newspaper commented.

The NAB, Pakistan's anti-corruption body, approached the apex court after the Islamabad High Court, on September 19, suspended prison sentences of the Sharifs awarded by an accountability court.&nbsp;

The accountability court convicted Maryam and Safdar in the Avenfield properties case and sentenced them to eight years and one year, respectively, in prison.

Upholding the lower court's decision, the Supreme Court bench threw out the NAB's request to revoke the Sharifs' bails, observing that the anti-corruption watchdog had failed to provide the "grounds for cancellation of bail".&nbsp;

The IHC did not exceed its authority in granting bail to the convicts of the Avenfield case, Geo TV quoted the bench as observing.&nbsp;

Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, who will be sworn in as the country's next chief justice later this month, stated that the IHC decision was temporary and the apex court would not interfere with the decision.&nbsp;

"The person [Nawaz Sharif] is in prison and there is no allegation about the misuse of bail. We have a Constitution to follow and we will make sure justice prevails. There will be a fair trial in every case," Justice Khosa remarked.

Responding to the apex court verdict, Maryam Nawaz, daughter of Sharif, said she was thankful to Allah Almighty.&nbsp;

She, however, said that true relief and happiness would be when her father came back home from jail.

The former premier has been a serving seven-year imprisonment at Kot Lakhpat prison after being declared guilty of corruption in Al-Azizia case.

Sharif has already filed an appeal in the Islamabad High Court against the sentence.

"I am thankful to Allah Almighty for today's decision. The fact is that not for a moment was I concerned about myself. Insha'Allah true relief &amp; happiness would be when my father comes back home. I have faith in Allah and His infinite Mercy. Thank you all for your prayers &amp; support," Maryam tweeted.

Reacting to the top court's decision, Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry took to Twitter and hailed the decision saying Sharif is still is in prison and hence the decision will not have any effect on the present state of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader.

Three cases of corruption&nbsp;the Avenfield properties case, Flagship Investment case and Al-Azizia steel mills case - were launched by the NAB on September 8, 2017, following a judgment by the apex court that disqualified Sharif.

The apex court initially set a six-month deadline to conclude the cases but it subsequently increased around eight times on the request of the accountability court.

Sharif was disqualified by the Supreme Court in the Panama Papers case in July, 2017.

In a relief to jailed former Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the anti-graft body's appeal against the suspension of his jail sentence and that of his family in one of three corruption cases faced by the embattled leader.

In a relief to jailed former Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed the anti-graft body's appeal against the suspension of his jail sentence and that of his family in one of three corruption cases faced by the embattled leader. In July 2018, an accountability court here handed Sharif 10 years as jail time for owning assets beyond known income and 1 year for not cooperating with the National Accountability Bureau (NAB). A five-member bench led by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar upheld the Islamabad High Court's verdict that ordered suspension of prison sentences awarded to Sharif, his daughter Maryam Nawaz and son-in-law Captain (retd) Mohammad Safdar in the Avenfield corruption case related to their purchase of four luxury flats in London through corrupt practices. The apex court, in its ruling, said that the NAB has failed to provide the "ground for cancellation of bail" and that the IHC had not exceeded its authority in granting bail to the convicts of the Avenfield case. The 69-year-old three-time former prime minister and his family have denied any wrongdoing. Sharif is currently in jail after an anti-corruption court sentenced him on December 24 to seven years in jail in the Al-Azizia Steel Mills graft case while acquitting him in the Flagship Investments corruption case in the Panama Papers scandal. The Supreme Court's decision brings a rare relief for the Sharif family, both of whose leaders Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif are currently incarcerated, Dawn newspaper commented. The NAB, Pakistan's anti-corruption body, approached the apex court after the Islamabad High Court, on September 19, suspended prison sentences of the Sharifs awarded by an accountability court. The accountability court convicted Maryam and Safdar in the Avenfield properties case and sentenced them to eight years and one year, respectively, in prison. Upholding the lower court's decision, the Supreme Court bench threw out the NAB's request to revoke the Sharifs' bails, observing that the anti-corruption watchdog had failed to provide the "grounds for cancellation of bail". The IHC did not exceed its authority in granting bail to the convicts of the Avenfield case, Geo TV quoted the bench as observing. Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, who will be sworn in as the country's next chief justice later this month, stated that the IHC decision was temporary and the apex court would not interfere with the decision. "The person [Nawaz Sharif] is in prison and there is no allegation about the misuse of bail. We have a Constitution to follow and we will make sure justice prevails. There will be a fair trial in every case," Justice Khosa remarked. Responding to the apex court verdict, Maryam Nawaz, daughter of Sharif, said she was thankful to Allah Almighty. She, however, said that true relief and happiness would be when her father came back home from jail. The former premier has been a serving seven-year imprisonment at Kot Lakhpat prison after being declared guilty of corruption in Al-Azizia case. Sharif has already filed an appeal in the Islamabad High Court against the sentence. "I am thankful to Allah Almighty for today's decision. The fact is that not for a moment was I concerned about myself. Insha'Allah true relief & happiness would be when my father comes back home. I have faith in Allah and His infinite Mercy. Thank you all for your prayers & support," Maryam tweeted. Reacting to the top court's decision, Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry took to Twitter and hailed the decision saying Sharif is still is in prison and hence the decision will not have any effect on the present state of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader. Three cases of corruption the Avenfield properties case, Flagship Investment case and Al-Azizia steel mills case - were launched by the NAB on September 8, 2017, following a judgment by the apex court that disqualified Sharif. The apex court initially set a six-month deadline to conclude the cases but it subsequently increased around eight times on the request of the accountability court. Sharif was disqualified by the Supreme Court in the Panama Papers case in July, 2017.

Pakistan SC dismisses appeal against suspension of Sharifs' sentences in graft case

The Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar has said that the country's Supreme Court will not allow Indian shows to be aired on Pakistani TV channels. The court has stated that the shows damage the country's culture.&nbsp;

Nisar's remarks came after a three-member apex court bench heard an appeal filed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) against the High Court's decision to ban the broadcast of Indian content on TV channels in the country, reported Dawn.&nbsp;

The Pemra had imposed a blanket ban on all Indian content in October 2016 after relations between the two countries soured following a terrorist attack on Indian military base camp in Uri, Jammu, and Kashmir. &nbsp;Around the same time, India too put a ban on Pakistani shows that were aired on Zee's Zindagi channel and MNS put a ban on Pakistani actors working in Bollywood.&nbsp;

However, in July 2017, the Lahore high court had lifted the ban, terming it null and void. In October 2018, the Supreme Court of Pakistan restored the ban setting aside the Lahore HC order.&nbsp;

Pemra counselor Zafar Iqbal Kalanauri told the Supreme Court that foreign content was banned on court orders before a High Court issued a stay. 
However the chairman of Pemra, Saleem Baig said that 65 percent of the content shown on a channel called Filmazia was foreign and that the number at times goes up to 80 percent. At this, the Chief Justice remarked: "We will not allow Indian content to be aired on (Pakistani) channels."

When he was told 'Filmazia was not a news channel but was an entertainment channel and that it did not do any propaganda", the Chief Justice countered the Pemra counsel and said, "It is, however, damaging our culture."

The court, however, is yet to announce its judgment as the counsel of Pakistan Broadcast Association was not present at the court on Wednesday. The hearing will now take place in February first week.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar has said that the country's Supreme Court will not allow Indian shows to be aired on Pakistani TV channels. The court has stated that the shows damage the country's culture.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan Saqib Nisar has said that the country's Supreme Court will not allow Indian shows to be aired on Pakistani TV channels. The court has stated that the shows damage the country's culture. Nisar's remarks came after a three-member apex court bench heard an appeal filed by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) against the High Court's decision to ban the broadcast of Indian content on TV channels in the country, reported Dawn. The Pemra had imposed a blanket ban on all Indian content in October 2016 after relations between the two countries soured following a terrorist attack on Indian military base camp in Uri, Jammu, and Kashmir. Around the same time, India too put a ban on Pakistani shows that were aired on Zee's Zindagi channel and MNS put a ban on Pakistani actors working in Bollywood. However, in July 2017, the Lahore high court had lifted the ban, terming it null and void. In October 2018, the Supreme Court of Pakistan restored the ban setting aside the Lahore HC order. Pemra counselor Zafar Iqbal Kalanauri told the Supreme Court that foreign content was banned on court orders before a High Court issued a stay. However the chairman of Pemra, Saleem Baig said that 65 percent of the content shown on a channel called Filmazia was foreign and that the number at times goes up to 80 percent. At this, the Chief Justice remarked: "We will not allow Indian content to be aired on (Pakistani) channels." When he was told 'Filmazia was not a news channel but was an entertainment channel and that it did not do any propaganda", the Chief Justice countered the Pemra counsel and said, "It is, however, damaging our culture." The court, however, is yet to announce its judgment as the counsel of Pakistan Broadcast Association was not present at the court on Wednesday. The hearing will now take place in February first week.

No Indian content to be aired in the country as it 'damages our culture', says Pak Chief Justice

pakistan-supreme-court

Pakistan Supreme Court, News on Pakistan Supreme Court, stories on Pakistan Supreme Court, articles on Pakistan Supreme Court, Pakistan Supreme Court stories at Wion, Pakistan Supreme Court news, Pakistan Supreme Court latest news

pakistan supreme-court