The United States and Russia are set to face off over nuclear weapons in space at the United Nations Security Council. The council is due to vote on a US-drafted resolution calling on countries to prevent an arms race in outer space.

US-Russia face off at UNSC over nukes in space, vote on US draft resolution at UNSC

Russian President Vladimir Putin declared Tuesday that Moscow has no intention of deploying nuclear weapons in space, claiming that the country has only developed space capabilities similar to those of the US.

Russian President Putin denies plans to deploy nuclear weapons in space

<p>Iran on Monday (Feb 5) confirmed it had&nbsp;commenced the construction of a new nuclear research reactor in the central city of Isfahan. The new 10-megawatt facility is being built to create a powerful neutron source, according to&nbsp;state media outlet IRNA.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“Today, the process of pouring concrete for the foundation of the reactor started at the Isfahan site,” Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran, was quoted as saying by the agency.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Amid biting US sanctions, the new facility is expected to help in conducting&nbsp;fuel and nuclear material tests as well as the production of industrial radioisotopes and radiopharmaceuticals.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The announcement comes days after Tehran announced it was constructing a nuclear power plant complex in the south.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Eslami said last week the construction of the nuclear power plant complex would comprise four individual plants with a combined production capacity of 5,000 megawatts.</p>

<p>"We must reach the production capacity of 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power in the country by the year 2041," said Eslami.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Notably, only the US, France, China, Russia and South Korea have&nbsp;more than 20,000 megawatts of nuclear capacity installed.</p>

<p>The rapid construction of nuclear facilities suggests that Iran was looking to enhance its nuclear weapons programme - a proposition that may not go down well with the Western bloc.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaea-cannot-guarantee-irans-nuclear-programme-is-peaceful-514209"><strong>WATCH |&nbsp;IAEA: Cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear programme is peaceful</strong></a></p>

<p><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-20="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iaea-cannot-guarantee-irans-nuclear-programme-is-peaceful-514209/embed" width="560"></iframe></p>

<h2><strong>Iran's nuclear ambitions</strong></h2>

<p>Western countries for long have accused Tehran of developing nuclear weapons - a claim repeatedly denied by Tehran.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Iran is of the view that&nbsp;nuclear watchdog IAEA's&nbsp;probe into the matter needs to be closed before any agreement can be reached on restoring the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, also called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).</p>

<p>Notably, in 2018, former US president Donald Trump reneged on the deal and restored harsh sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to gradually violate the agreement's nuclear limits.&nbsp;</p>

<p>It was one of the reasons why&nbsp;Germany, France and Britain last year refused to&nbsp;remove ballistic missile and nuclear proliferation-related sanctions on Iran.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/germany-france-and-uk-refuse-to-lift-sanctions-on-iran-under-jcpoa-636069"><strong>Also read |&nbsp;Germany, France and UK refuse to lift sanctions on Iran under JCPOA</strong></a></p>

<p>The original deal stated that some UN sanctions were supposed to be lifted on October 18, 2023, as part of the sunset clause which would have allowed Iran to import and export ballistic missiles and drones.&nbsp;</p>

<p>However, the three European nations, known as E3, wrote a letter to&nbsp;European Union External Affairs Chief&nbsp;Josep Borell and said Tehran was in serious breach of the deal - meaning the sanctions could not be lifted.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>


Iran on Monday (Feb 5) confirmed it had commenced the construction of a new nuclear research reactor in the central city of Isfahan. The new 10-megawatt facility is being built to create a powerful neutron source, according to state media outlet IRNA.

Iran on Monday (Feb 5) confirmed it had commenced the construction of a new nuclear research reactor in the central city of Isfahan. The new 10-megawatt facility is being built to create a powerful neutron source, according to state media outlet IRNA. “Today, the process of pouring concrete for the foundation of the reactor started at the Isfahan site,” Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran, was quoted as saying by the agency. Amid biting US sanctions, the new facility is expected to help in conducting fuel and nuclear material tests as well as the production of industrial radioisotopes and radiopharmaceuticals. The announcement comes days after Tehran announced it was constructing a nuclear power plant complex in the south. Eslami said last week the construction of the nuclear power plant complex would comprise four individual plants with a combined production capacity of 5,000 megawatts. "We must reach the production capacity of 20,000 megawatts of nuclear power in the country by the year 2041," said Eslami. Notably, only the US, France, China, Russia and South Korea have more than 20,000 megawatts of nuclear capacity installed. The rapid construction of nuclear facilities suggests that Iran was looking to enhance its nuclear weapons programme - a proposition that may not go down well with the Western bloc. WATCH | IAEA: Cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear programme is peaceful Iran's nuclear ambitions Western countries for long have accused Tehran of developing nuclear weapons - a claim repeatedly denied by Tehran. Iran is of the view that nuclear watchdog IAEA's probe into the matter needs to be closed before any agreement can be reached on restoring the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, also called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Notably, in 2018, former US president Donald Trump reneged on the deal and restored harsh sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to gradually violate the agreement's nuclear limits. It was one of the reasons why Germany, France and Britain last year refused to remove ballistic missile and nuclear proliferation-related sanctions on Iran. Also read | Germany, France and UK refuse to lift sanctions on Iran under JCPOA The original deal stated that some UN sanctions were supposed to be lifted on October 18, 2023, as part of the sunset clause which would have allowed Iran to import and export ballistic missiles and drones. However, the three European nations, known as E3, wrote a letter to European Union External Affairs Chief Josep Borell and said Tehran was in serious breach of the deal - meaning the sanctions could not be lifted. (With inputs from agencies)

Iran starts construction of new nuclear reactor, further antagonising the West

Tensions in the Korean peninsula are flaring up. Kim calls the South "primary foe and invariable principal enemy". He is also seeking a change in the constitution. Is North Korea-South Korea unification even possible? Watch this video for all details.

Is North Korea-South Korea unification possible? Here's what Kim Jong Un says

North Korea has conducted a test of its underwater nuclear weapons system in a protest against this week's joint military drills by South Korea, the United States and Japan, state media KCNA said on Friday.

North Korea says tests underwater nuclear drone, criticises US-led joint drills

Tensions continue to spiral on the Korean peninsula. North Korea claims that it conducted a test of its underwater nuclear weapons system. Test of the Haeil-5-23 system was carried out in the waters off North Korea's eastern coast.

Pyongyang's nuclear-capable underwater drone

North Korea lauds Pyongyang's ‘underwater nuclear weapon system’

Belarus is working on a new nuclear doctrine which will be used for the nuclear weapons. The Defence Minister of Belarus said that Russian aly will put forth a new doctrine soon.

Russia stations nuclear weapons in Belarusian territory

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is believed to have turned 40 on Monday. But state media continued its decades of silence on his birthday. Watch this video to find out why.

Why did North Korea's Kim Jong Un not celebrate his 40th birthday?

Iran has increased the rate at which it is producing near weapons-grade uranium in recent weeks, reversing a previous slowdown that started in the middle of this year, the International Atomic Energy Agency said in a report to member states.

Iran increases Uranium production, enriched at 60% purity currently | World DNA | WION

<p>Asteroid strikes can spell an end for thriving life on a planet. Just ask dinosaurs. Oh yeah, they are not here anymore. But based on what we've learnt from their broken, mangled sometimes charred remains obtained from their deep geologic graveyards, we know for sure that a space rock travelling at a speed of thousands of kilometres per second cannot exactly bring good tidings when it is resolved to hit Earth head on. Scientists and governments have been expending considerable energy to create a fool-proof solution to guard humanity in case another asteroid poses an existential threat to us.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Nuking the asteroid to pieces is an option. But it may make things worse as smaller pieces of the asteroid may still hit Earth. So the problem does require more looking into.</p>

<p><strong>Watch | NASA streams an ultra-high-definition video of a cat back to Earth from deep space</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-streams-an-ultra-high-definition-video-of-a-cat-back-to-earth-from-deep-space-671832/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>Experts at Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) now have made a simuation that tells us what may happen if an asteroid is nuked. Is it really a bad idea?</p>

<h2><strong>The 'nuclear ablation'</strong></h2>

<p>The explosive technique these scientists have considered is called nuclear ablation. This technique involves vaporisation of some of asteroid's surface using radiation from the nuclear blast. This would in turn create an explosive thrust and change the velocity of the asteroid.</p>

<p>The model is called X-ray energy deposition model.</p>

<p>The researchers have written a paper on this which has been published in The Planetary Science Journal.</p>

<p>To make the simulation model, the researchers considered a wide range of conditions that took into account different types of asteroids humanity has been able to study closely. Some of the asteroids considered for the simulation were solid rocks to rubble piles. The wide range of data considered to make the simulation expansive.</p>

<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/arctic-skies-lit-up-by-extremely-rare-rainbow-clouds-whats-the-phenomenon-672505">Arctic skies lit up by extremely rare rainbow clouds. What's the phenomenon?</a></strong></p>

<p>"If we have enough warning time, we could potentially launch a nuclear device, sending it millions of miles away to an asteroid that is headed toward Earth," said researcher Mary Burkey as quoted in a press release from LLNL.</p>

<p>"We would then detonate the device and either deflect the asteroid, keeping it intact but providing a controlled push away from Earth, or we could disrupt the asteroid, breaking it up into small, fast-moving fragments that would also miss the planet."</p>

<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/its-holiday-season-in-space-too-eso-captured-a-running-chicken-like-nebula-in-a-15-billion-pixel-image-672397">It's holiday season in space too! See the beautiful running-chicken-like nebula</a></strong></p>

<p>NASA has already carried out the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission in which a kinetic impacter was crashed on an asteroid to study how such an approach would alter the trajectory.</p>

<p>The new model created by LLNL's scientists is likely to give other scientists from around the world to better understand and build upon the knowledge already gathered about deflecting or destroying a dangerous asteroid.</p>

<p>"While the probability of a large asteroid impact during our lifetime is low, the potential consequences could be devastating," said Megan Bruck Syal, LLNL's planetary defense project lead.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>


Asteroid strikes can spell an end for thriving life on a planet. Just ask dinosaurs. Oh yeah, they are not here anymore. But based on what we've learnt from their broken, mangled sometimes charred remains obtained from their deep geologic graveyards, we know for sure that a space rock travelling at a speed of thousands of kilometres per second cannot exactly bring good tidings when it is resolved to hit Earth head on.

Asteroid strikes can spell an end for thriving life on a planet. Just ask dinosaurs. Oh yeah, they are not here anymore. But based on what we've learnt from their broken, mangled sometimes charred remains obtained from their deep geologic graveyards, we know for sure that a space rock travelling at a speed of thousands of kilometres per second cannot exactly bring good tidings when it is resolved to hit Earth head on. Scientists and governments have been expending considerable energy to create a fool-proof solution to guard humanity in case another asteroid poses an existential threat to us. Nuking the asteroid to pieces is an option. But it may make things worse as smaller pieces of the asteroid may still hit Earth. So the problem does require more looking into. Watch | NASA streams an ultra-high-definition video of a cat back to Earth from deep space × Experts at Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) now have made a simuation that tells us what may happen if an asteroid is nuked. Is it really a bad idea? The 'nuclear ablation' The explosive technique these scientists have considered is called nuclear ablation. This technique involves vaporisation of some of asteroid's surface using radiation from the nuclear blast. This would in turn create an explosive thrust and change the velocity of the asteroid. The model is called X-ray energy deposition model. The researchers have written a paper on this which has been published in The Planetary Science Journal. To make the simulation model, the researchers considered a wide range of conditions that took into account different types of asteroids humanity has been able to study closely. Some of the asteroids considered for the simulation were solid rocks to rubble piles. The wide range of data considered to make the simulation expansive. Also Read | Arctic skies lit up by extremely rare rainbow clouds. What's the phenomenon? "If we have enough warning time, we could potentially launch a nuclear device, sending it millions of miles away to an asteroid that is headed toward Earth," said researcher Mary Burkey as quoted in a press release from LLNL. "We would then detonate the device and either deflect the asteroid, keeping it intact but providing a controlled push away from Earth, or we could disrupt the asteroid, breaking it up into small, fast-moving fragments that would also miss the planet." Also Read | It's holiday season in space too! See the beautiful running-chicken-like nebula NASA has already carried out the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission in which a kinetic impacter was crashed on an asteroid to study how such an approach would alter the trajectory. The new model created by LLNL's scientists is likely to give other scientists from around the world to better understand and build upon the knowledge already gathered about deflecting or destroying a dangerous asteroid. "While the probability of a large asteroid impact during our lifetime is low, the potential consequences could be devastating," said Megan Bruck Syal, LLNL's planetary defense project lead. (With inputs from agencies)

How safe is nuking earth-bound asteroid? Scientists create simulation to answer

North Korea has adopted a constitutional amendment to enshrine its policy on nuclear force. This development comes in the backdrop of North Korea accelerating its advancement of nuclear and missile arsenal.

North Korea adopts constitutional amendment, Kim Jong-Un calls for modernising nukes | World DNA

- Ukraine claims to have captured the 'Boiko towers' along the Crimean peninsula - Timbuktu under a blockade after militants launch series of attacks in Mali - Narco gangs use increasingly sophisticated drones & submarines to peddle drugs across the Atlantic

Pakistan is increasing its nuclear arsenal to 200 warheads | World At War

<p>Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida hit out at Russian threats to use nuclear weapons as the nation marked 78th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on Sunday (August 6).</p>

<p>Japan was at the receiving end of only two instances of military use of atomic bomb during Second World War. About 140,000 people died in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and 74,000 died in Nagasaki just three days later. The United States had dropped the bomb on the Japanese cities.</p>

<p>"Japan, as the only nation to have suffered atomic bombings in war, will continue efforts towards a nuclear-free world," Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said at a ceremony in Hiroshima.</p>

<p>"The path towards it is becoming increasingly difficult because of deepening divisions in the international community over nuclear disarmament and Russia's nuclear threat," he said.</p>

<p>"Given this situation, it is all the more important to bring back international momentum towards realisation of a nuclear-free world," he said.</p>

<p>"Devastation brought to Hiroshima and Nagasaki by nuclear weapons can never be repeated," said Kishida, whose family comes from Hiroshima.</p>

<p>Kishida's latest comments have resembled those of United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres. The UN chief issued a statement on the Hiroshima anniversary saying "some countries are recklessly rattling the nuclear sabre once again, threatening to use these tools of annihilation."</p>

<p>"In the face of these threats, the global community must speak as one. Any use of nuclear weapons is unacceptable," Guterres said.</p>

<p>At a ceremony, thousands of people that included survivors, relatives and foreign dignitaries from a record 111 countries offered prayers for those who were killed or wounded in the bombing. They called for world peace.</p>

<p>Russia and Belarus were not invited to the ceremony for the second straight year because of the Ukraine crisis.</p>

<p>Participants, many dressed in black, offered a silent prayer at 8:15 am (2315 GMT Saturday) when the first nuclear weapon used in wartime was dropped.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Earlier this year, Prime Minister Kishida hosted the G7 summit in the city.</p>

<p>Kishida has tried to move nuclear disarmament up the global agenda, taking leaders of wealthy democracies to Hiroshima's peace park memorials and museum.</p>

<p>However, there is little appetite in political arenas to reduce stockpiles and Russia has been repeatedly issuing thinly veiled warnings that it could use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Reported North Korean missile tests and stalling efforts towards non-proliferation have made the progress towards a nuclear weapons-free world difficult.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><em>You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form"><strong>here</strong></a>.</em></p>

<p><strong><em>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</em></strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida hit out at Russian threats to use nuclear weapons as the nation marked 78th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on Sunday (August 6).

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida hit out at Russian threats to use nuclear weapons as the nation marked 78th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on Sunday (August 6). Japan was at the receiving end of only two instances of military use of atomic bomb during Second World War. About 140,000 people died in Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and 74,000 died in Nagasaki just three days later. The United States had dropped the bomb on the Japanese cities. "Japan, as the only nation to have suffered atomic bombings in war, will continue efforts towards a nuclear-free world," Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said at a ceremony in Hiroshima. "The path towards it is becoming increasingly difficult because of deepening divisions in the international community over nuclear disarmament and Russia's nuclear threat," he said. "Given this situation, it is all the more important to bring back international momentum towards realisation of a nuclear-free world," he said. "Devastation brought to Hiroshima and Nagasaki by nuclear weapons can never be repeated," said Kishida, whose family comes from Hiroshima. Kishida's latest comments have resembled those of United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres. The UN chief issued a statement on the Hiroshima anniversary saying "some countries are recklessly rattling the nuclear sabre once again, threatening to use these tools of annihilation." "In the face of these threats, the global community must speak as one. Any use of nuclear weapons is unacceptable," Guterres said. At a ceremony, thousands of people that included survivors, relatives and foreign dignitaries from a record 111 countries offered prayers for those who were killed or wounded in the bombing. They called for world peace. Russia and Belarus were not invited to the ceremony for the second straight year because of the Ukraine crisis. Participants, many dressed in black, offered a silent prayer at 8:15 am (2315 GMT Saturday) when the first nuclear weapon used in wartime was dropped. Earlier this year, Prime Minister Kishida hosted the G7 summit in the city. Kishida has tried to move nuclear disarmament up the global agenda, taking leaders of wealthy democracies to Hiroshima's peace park memorials and museum. However, there is little appetite in political arenas to reduce stockpiles and Russia has been repeatedly issuing thinly veiled warnings that it could use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Reported North Korean missile tests and stalling efforts towards non-proliferation have made the progress towards a nuclear weapons-free world difficult. (With inputs from agencies) You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

On Hiroshima bombing anniversary, Japan decries Russian nuclear threat

<p>The Permanent Mission of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) to the United Nations criticised the US for having nuclear weapons and defended its own nuclear weapons. North Korea urged the US to stop "sharing nuclear" or "beefing up extended deterrence," state media KCNA reported on Saturday (August 5).&nbsp;</p>

<p>North Korea defended its own nuclear weapons as an "exercise of sovereignty". It criticesd the US over the AUKUS alliance and Nuclear Consultative Group with South Korea.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"Signatories to the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) should not take issue with the DPRK over its legitimate exercise of sovereignty, as it had legally withdrawn from the NPT 20 years ago," the DPRK permanent mission to the UN Office and international organizations in Vienna was quoted as saying.</p>

<p>"Its nuclear force will never be a threat to those countries respecting its sovereignty and security interests," the permanent mission said.</p>

<p>North Korea has found itself at odds with the West for decades and recently for flurry of missile tests that included Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM). It recently tried to launch a satellite as well. But the launch was a failure and the satellite fell into the sea shortly after lifting-off.</p>

<p>However, North Korea has continued issuing threats to the United States as well as South Korea. It has openly hinted that it plans to have a sizeable arsenal of nuclear weapons, something the US is absolutely against.</p>

<h2><strong>The fresh tussle</strong></h2>

<p>North Korea and the US have been sparring over a fresh issue lately. Travis King, an American soldier, ran across the border separating North and South Korea last month. North Korea has detained King.</p>

<p>Earlier this week, the US-led multinational force overseeing the Korean war truce said that North Korean military &nbsp;"has responded to the United Nations Command with regards to Private King".</p>

<p>"In order not to interfere with our efforts to get him home, we will not go into details at this time," it added.</p>

<p>The latest announcement comes more than a week after the UN Command said it had started a conversation with the North over the soldier.</p>

<p>US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has already conformed that contact had been made with the North Koreans. He said he had no idea about location or condition of King.</p>

<p>"We're actually trying to learn more about his whereabouts and his well-being, and we simply don't have that information," Blinken told US television channel ABC.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"Yesterday, finally, the North Koreans acknowledged that they understand we're asking these questions. They haven't given us responses," he added.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><em>You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form"><strong>here</strong></a>.</em></p>

<p><strong><em>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</em></strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


The Permanent Mission of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) to the United Nations criticised the US for having nuclear weapons and defended its own nuclear weapons.

The Permanent Mission of Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) to the United Nations criticised the US for having nuclear weapons and defended its own nuclear weapons. North Korea urged the US to stop "sharing nuclear" or "beefing up extended deterrence," state media KCNA reported on Saturday (August 5). North Korea defended its own nuclear weapons as an "exercise of sovereignty". It criticesd the US over the AUKUS alliance and Nuclear Consultative Group with South Korea. "Signatories to the NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) should not take issue with the DPRK over its legitimate exercise of sovereignty, as it had legally withdrawn from the NPT 20 years ago," the DPRK permanent mission to the UN Office and international organizations in Vienna was quoted as saying. "Its nuclear force will never be a threat to those countries respecting its sovereignty and security interests," the permanent mission said. North Korea has found itself at odds with the West for decades and recently for flurry of missile tests that included Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM). It recently tried to launch a satellite as well. But the launch was a failure and the satellite fell into the sea shortly after lifting-off. However, North Korea has continued issuing threats to the United States as well as South Korea. It has openly hinted that it plans to have a sizeable arsenal of nuclear weapons, something the US is absolutely against. The fresh tussle North Korea and the US have been sparring over a fresh issue lately. Travis King, an American soldier, ran across the border separating North and South Korea last month. North Korea has detained King. Earlier this week, the US-led multinational force overseeing the Korean war truce said that North Korean military "has responded to the United Nations Command with regards to Private King". "In order not to interfere with our efforts to get him home, we will not go into details at this time," it added. The latest announcement comes more than a week after the UN Command said it had started a conversation with the North over the soldier. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has already conformed that contact had been made with the North Koreans. He said he had no idea about location or condition of King. "We're actually trying to learn more about his whereabouts and his well-being, and we simply don't have that information," Blinken told US television channel ABC. "Yesterday, finally, the North Koreans acknowledged that they understand we're asking these questions. They haven't given us responses," he added. (With inputs from agencies) You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

North Korea defends its nuclear weapons, slams US

<p>United States Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) has “no reason to doubt” the claim of Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding moving the tactical nuclear weapons' first batch to Belarus, stated senior DIA officials on Friday (July 21).<br />
<br />
Last month, Putin had stated that St Petersburg International Economic Forum said that “the first [Russian] nuclear warheads were delivered to the territory of Belarus,” further adding that they have been moved for “deterrence.”<br />
<br />
According to the Federation of American Scientists, Moscow has around 4,477 deployed and reserved nuclear warheads, which include 1,900 tactical nuclear weapons. It remains unclear how much nuclear arsenal Putin intends to move, reported CNN.</p>

<p><strong>ALSO READ |</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-president-vladimir-putin-warns-poland-will-act-to-agression-against-belarus-618183">Russian President Vladimir Putin warns Poland: ‘Will act to aggression against Belarus’</a></p>

<p>According to the report, a few DIA officials told some media persons that analysts have “no reason to doubt” the claims of Putin, and no reason to doubt “that they have had some success” in moving the weapons.</p>

<h2><strong>US to face challenges in tracking weapons</strong></h2>

<p>The officials accepted that the US intelligence community is likely to face difficulty in tracking the weapons, even through satellite imagery.<br />
<br />
Speaking to CNN earlier this month, US and Western officials said that it looks like Belarus has not yet completed the upgradation of necessary storage facilities for housing tactical nuclear weapons. They added that the recent satellite imagery shows no signs of the kind of preparations and security which would be required at a Russian nuclear facility.<br />
<br />
British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, on being asked if he had seen signs of weapons being moved by Russia, told CNN that the UK had “seen signs of this progressing” and noted that Putin “doesn’t always lie”.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH |&nbsp;Gravitas Global Headlines: Russia vows to protect Belarus | South Africa: Will arrest Putin</strong></p>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-global-headlines-russia-vows-to-protect-belarus-south-africa-will-arrest-putin-618323/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<p>In a briefing on July 11, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said, “I will say that we continue to actively monitor reports of the Russia-Belarus arrangement to ensure that Russia maintains control of its weapons in the event of any deployment to Belarus and upholds its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. We will be paying close attention to any deviation by Russia.”<br />
<br />
Last month, Belarusian President Aleksander Lukashenko said in the face of aggression, “no hesitation” will be shown by him in using the Russian tactical nuclear weapons which have been stationed on Belarusian soil.<br />
<br />
However, senior DIA officials stated that they don't think Lukashenko will have any control over the arsenal. The officials added that the entire control of the arsenal would most likely be with Russia.&nbsp;</p>

<p>You can&nbsp;<strong>now write for wionews.com</strong>&nbsp;and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us&nbsp;<strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>

<main>
<section>
<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>
</section>
</main>


United States Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) has “no reason to doubt” the claim of Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding moving the tactical nuclear weapons' first batch to Belarus, stated senior DIA officials on Friday (July 21).

United States Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) has “no reason to doubt” the claim of Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding moving the tactical nuclear weapons' first batch to Belarus, stated senior DIA officials on Friday (July 21). Last month, Putin had stated that St Petersburg International Economic Forum said that “the first [Russian] nuclear warheads were delivered to the territory of Belarus,” further adding that they have been moved for “deterrence.” According to the Federation of American Scientists, Moscow has around 4,477 deployed and reserved nuclear warheads, which include 1,900 tactical nuclear weapons. It remains unclear how much nuclear arsenal Putin intends to move, reported CNN. ALSO READ | Russian President Vladimir Putin warns Poland: ‘Will act to aggression against Belarus’ According to the report, a few DIA officials told some media persons that analysts have “no reason to doubt” the claims of Putin, and no reason to doubt “that they have had some success” in moving the weapons. US to face challenges in tracking weapons The officials accepted that the US intelligence community is likely to face difficulty in tracking the weapons, even through satellite imagery. Speaking to CNN earlier this month, US and Western officials said that it looks like Belarus has not yet completed the upgradation of necessary storage facilities for housing tactical nuclear weapons. They added that the recent satellite imagery shows no signs of the kind of preparations and security which would be required at a Russian nuclear facility. British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, on being asked if he had seen signs of weapons being moved by Russia, told CNN that the UK had “seen signs of this progressing” and noted that Putin “doesn’t always lie”. WATCH | Gravitas Global Headlines: Russia vows to protect Belarus | South Africa: Will arrest Putin In a briefing on July 11, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said, “I will say that we continue to actively monitor reports of the Russia-Belarus arrangement to ensure that Russia maintains control of its weapons in the event of any deployment to Belarus and upholds its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. We will be paying close attention to any deviation by Russia.” Last month, Belarusian President Aleksander Lukashenko said in the face of aggression, “no hesitation” will be shown by him in using the Russian tactical nuclear weapons which have been stationed on Belarusian soil. However, senior DIA officials stated that they don't think Lukashenko will have any control over the arsenal. The officials added that the entire control of the arsenal would most likely be with Russia. You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

US says it has 'no reason to doubt' Putin's claims over nuclear belligerence

<p>Wagner fighters had successfully reached a Russian nuclear base, Voronezh-45, with the intention of seizing small Soviet-era nukes to "raise the stakes" in their recent failed mutiny, reported Reuters quoting Ukraine's head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov. "The doors of the storage were closed and they didn't get into the technical section," he told the news agency.&nbsp;</p>

<p>However, it cannot be fully ascertained whether the Wagner fighters actually reached the Russian nuclear base and there is no independent verification of these claims.&nbsp;</p>

<p>A source close to the Kremlin confirmed to Reuters the presence of Wagner fighters near the base and said that the developments&nbsp;caused concern for Americans. However, US officials expressed doubt that the Russian nukes were in any sort of danger.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>According to Reuters, videos posted online and interviews with local residents indicated that while rebellious Wagner forces were heading north towards Moscow on June 24, a separate group of military vehicles diverted eastward on a highway towards a heavily fortified Russian army base known to house nuclear weapons.</p>

<p>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/investigation-into-greek-shipwreck-suggests-coastguard-responsible-for-sinking-report-613990">Investigation into Greek shipwreck suggests coastguard responsible for sinking: Report</a></p>

<p>The contingent "managed to get into a zone of special interest, as a result of which the Americans got agitated because nuclear munitions are stored there," the Kremlin source told Reuters.&nbsp;</p>

<p>According to a source quoted by Reuters in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine, the incident raised concerns within the Kremlin and played a significant role in hastening the negotiated resolution to the rebellion on the evening of June 24, which was brokered by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko.</p>

<h2><strong>Security of Russia's nuclear arsenal</strong></h2>

<p>Despite this appearing as a significant development in mutiny, experts quoted by Reuters contend that the Wagner fighters would have faced considerable difficulties in detonating the bombs, even if they had managed to acquire these nuclear weapons.</p>

<p>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/turkey-will-back-swedens-nato-bid-if-eu-embraces-ankara-says-erdogan-613983">'Turkey will back Sweden's NATO bid if EU embraces Ankara', says Erdogan</a></p>

<p>Matt Korda, a Senior Research Associate and Project Manager for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists argued that it would be "virtually impossible for a non-state actor" like Wagner fighters to breach Russian nuclear security.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"If you had a malicious actor who was able to get their hands on a nuclear weapon, they would find the weapons stored in a state of incomplete assembly," he said adding, "They would need to be completed by installing specialised equipment and then unlocking permissive action links, and in order to do that they would need the cooperation of someone from the 12th Directorate".&nbsp;</p>

<p>The 12th Directorate, also known as the 12th Main Directorate, is a division within the Russian Ministry of Defense that is responsible for the security, storage, and maintenance of nuclear weapons. It specifically focuses on the management and protection of Russia's nuclear arsenal.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Budanov said that the nuclear storage facility at Voronezh-45, operated by military unit no. 14254, which is shrouded in secrecy, holds small nuclear devices that can be carried in a backpack.</p>

<p>"This was one of the key storage facilities for these backpacks," he told Reuters.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong>Watch | 'Safeguarding reefs': Theme of Florida Music Festival</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/safeguarding-reefs-theme-of-florida-music-festival-613859/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>On the evening of June 24, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko announced a negotiated halt to the rebellion brokered by him.&nbsp;Under the agreement, Wagner fighters would either withdraw to Belarus or join Russia's regular army, and no prosecutions would be pursued.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The current whereabouts and future plans of Prigozhin remain uncertain, although his private jet has made multiple trips between Belarus and Russia since the rebellion, Reuters said citing flight tracking data.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p><br />
&nbsp;</p>


Wagner fighters had successfully reached a Russian nuclear base, Voronezh-45, with the intention of seizing small Soviet-era nukes to "raise the stakes" in their recent failed mutiny, reported Reuters quoting Ukraine's head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov.

Wagner fighters had successfully reached a Russian nuclear base, Voronezh-45, with the intention of seizing small Soviet-era nukes to "raise the stakes" in their recent failed mutiny, reported Reuters quoting Ukraine's head of military intelligence Kyrylo Budanov. "The doors of the storage were closed and they didn't get into the technical section," he told the news agency. However, it cannot be fully ascertained whether the Wagner fighters actually reached the Russian nuclear base and there is no independent verification of these claims. A source close to the Kremlin confirmed to Reuters the presence of Wagner fighters near the base and said that the developments caused concern for Americans. However, US officials expressed doubt that the Russian nukes were in any sort of danger. According to Reuters, videos posted online and interviews with local residents indicated that while rebellious Wagner forces were heading north towards Moscow on June 24, a separate group of military vehicles diverted eastward on a highway towards a heavily fortified Russian army base known to house nuclear weapons. Also Read | Investigation into Greek shipwreck suggests coastguard responsible for sinking: Report The contingent "managed to get into a zone of special interest, as a result of which the Americans got agitated because nuclear munitions are stored there," the Kremlin source told Reuters. According to a source quoted by Reuters in Russian-occupied eastern Ukraine, the incident raised concerns within the Kremlin and played a significant role in hastening the negotiated resolution to the rebellion on the evening of June 24, which was brokered by Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. Security of Russia's nuclear arsenal Despite this appearing as a significant development in mutiny, experts quoted by Reuters contend that the Wagner fighters would have faced considerable difficulties in detonating the bombs, even if they had managed to acquire these nuclear weapons. Also Read | 'Turkey will back Sweden's NATO bid if EU embraces Ankara', says Erdogan Matt Korda, a Senior Research Associate and Project Manager for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists argued that it would be "virtually impossible for a non-state actor" like Wagner fighters to breach Russian nuclear security. "If you had a malicious actor who was able to get their hands on a nuclear weapon, they would find the weapons stored in a state of incomplete assembly," he said adding, "They would need to be completed by installing specialised equipment and then unlocking permissive action links, and in order to do that they would need the cooperation of someone from the 12th Directorate". The 12th Directorate, also known as the 12th Main Directorate, is a division within the Russian Ministry of Defense that is responsible for the security, storage, and maintenance of nuclear weapons. It specifically focuses on the management and protection of Russia's nuclear arsenal. Budanov said that the nuclear storage facility at Voronezh-45, operated by military unit no. 14254, which is shrouded in secrecy, holds small nuclear devices that can be carried in a backpack. "This was one of the key storage facilities for these backpacks," he told Reuters. Watch | 'Safeguarding reefs': Theme of Florida Music Festival × On the evening of June 24, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko announced a negotiated halt to the rebellion brokered by him. Under the agreement, Wagner fighters would either withdraw to Belarus or join Russia's regular army, and no prosecutions would be pursued. The current whereabouts and future plans of Prigozhin remain uncertain, although his private jet has made multiple trips between Belarus and Russia since the rebellion, Reuters said citing flight tracking data. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. ×

Wagner fighters tried to seize Soviet-era nukes to 'raise stakes' in mutiny: Report

North Korea has blown the whistle against the US. The nation accused the US of violating its airspace by conducting surveillance flights. Pyongyang said it was exercising restraint but warned that it would shoot down such flights.

Why is North Korea accusing the US of 'NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL'?

<p>Humanity is drifting into one of the most dangerous periods in history. The nuclear weapons stockpile across the globe is at an all-time high as&nbsp;deteriorating international relations give rise to increased nuclear sabre-rattling, a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) has revealed.&nbsp;</p>

<p>There are an&nbsp;estimated&nbsp;12,512 nuclear warheads globally, up 86 from a year ago,&nbsp;of which 9,756 are military stockpiles, ready for potential use at any moment, at the press of a button.&nbsp;The number of deployed warheads, 3,844, was also up from the 3,732 warheads, a year ago.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Russia and US make up almost 90 per cent of the nuclear warhead arsenal.&nbsp;Moscow currently leads the chart with 4,489&nbsp; warheads while Washington&nbsp;comes behind in second with 3,708&nbsp;warheads. Additionally, the both have more than 1,000 warheads, previously retired from military service.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“We are approaching, or maybe have already reached, the end of a long period of the number of nuclear weapons worldwide declining,” said Sipri Director Dan Smith.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-vs-the-west-what-are-tactical-nuclear-weapons-russia-ukraine-war-596707"><strong>Watch |&nbsp;Russia vs The West: What are tactical nuclear weapons? | Russia-Ukraine war</strong></a></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-vs-the-west-what-are-tactical-nuclear-weapons-russia-ukraine-war-596707/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>The numbers, however, may still paint an opaque picture. Nearly every country has reduced their level of transparency, ever since Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The rise in nuclear warheads comes despite the UN's five permanent security council members releasing a joint statement in 2021 saying, "nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought".&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>China increased numbers exponentially&nbsp;</strong></h2>

<p>60 of the new warheads were being held by China. It increased its stockpile from 350 to 410 warheads within a year. In the backdrop of Taiwan tension, Beijing is preparing to triple its&nbsp;nuclear warheads arsenal to 900 by 2035, according to multiple reports.&nbsp;</p>

<p><strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-what-are-tactical-nuclear-weapons-and-how-russia-can-use-it-575924">Also read |&nbsp;Explained: What are tactical nuclear weapons, and how Russia may use them?</a></strong></p>

<p>The current plan is to raise the number of nuclear warheads to 550 by 2027, the centenary of the foundation of the armed forces, and later take it to 900 by 2035.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“China has started a significant expansion of its nuclear arsenal. It is increasingly difficult to square this trend with China’s declared aim of having only the minimum nuclear forces needed to maintain its national security,"&nbsp;Hans M Kristensen,&nbsp;an associate senior fellow with Sipri’s weapons of mass destruction programme was quoted as saying by The Guardian.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-to-triple-its-nuclear-warheads-by-2025-report-561307"><strong>Also&nbsp;read |&nbsp;China to triple its nuclear warheads by 2035: Report</strong></a></p>

<p>The think tank added that after 30 years of the number of nuclear warheads coming down, the process has come to an end now and the trend reversed.</p>

<p>Since the Russia-Ukraine war broke out, numerous threats of a nuclear winter have been espoused. Experts believe that humankind sits at a very delicate juncture where one wrong move of starting a nuclear war could wipe out the entire race from the face of the planet.&nbsp;Thus it is necessary that the global nuclear stockpile&nbsp;be&nbsp;regulated.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>


Humanity is drifting into one of the most dangerous periods in history. The nuclear weapons stockpile across the globe is at an all-time high as deteriorating international relations give rise to increased nuclear sabre-rattling, a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) has revealed.

Humanity is drifting into one of the most dangerous periods in history. The nuclear weapons stockpile across the globe is at an all-time high as deteriorating international relations give rise to increased nuclear sabre-rattling, a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) has revealed. There are an estimated 12,512 nuclear warheads globally, up 86 from a year ago, of which 9,756 are military stockpiles, ready for potential use at any moment, at the press of a button. The number of deployed warheads, 3,844, was also up from the 3,732 warheads, a year ago. Russia and US make up almost 90 per cent of the nuclear warhead arsenal. Moscow currently leads the chart with 4,489 warheads while Washington comes behind in second with 3,708 warheads. Additionally, the both have more than 1,000 warheads, previously retired from military service. “We are approaching, or maybe have already reached, the end of a long period of the number of nuclear weapons worldwide declining,” said Sipri Director Dan Smith. Watch | Russia vs The West: What are tactical nuclear weapons? | Russia-Ukraine war × The numbers, however, may still paint an opaque picture. Nearly every country has reduced their level of transparency, ever since Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The rise in nuclear warheads comes despite the UN's five permanent security council members releasing a joint statement in 2021 saying, "nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought". China increased numbers exponentially 60 of the new warheads were being held by China. It increased its stockpile from 350 to 410 warheads within a year. In the backdrop of Taiwan tension, Beijing is preparing to triple its nuclear warheads arsenal to 900 by 2035, according to multiple reports. Also read | Explained: What are tactical nuclear weapons, and how Russia may use them? The current plan is to raise the number of nuclear warheads to 550 by 2027, the centenary of the foundation of the armed forces, and later take it to 900 by 2035. “China has started a significant expansion of its nuclear arsenal. It is increasingly difficult to square this trend with China’s declared aim of having only the minimum nuclear forces needed to maintain its national security," Hans M Kristensen, an associate senior fellow with Sipri’s weapons of mass destruction programme was quoted as saying by The Guardian. Also read | China to triple its nuclear warheads by 2035: Report The think tank added that after 30 years of the number of nuclear warheads coming down, the process has come to an end now and the trend reversed. Since the Russia-Ukraine war broke out, numerous threats of a nuclear winter have been espoused. Experts believe that humankind sits at a very delicate juncture where one wrong move of starting a nuclear war could wipe out the entire race from the face of the planet. Thus it is necessary that the global nuclear stockpile be regulated. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

Peace in our time? Nuclear weapons stockpile rising, says thinktank

<p>US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Monday (June 5) that America won't let Iran get nuclear weapons, reiterating the Biden administration's firm stance against Tehran.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Blinken showed commitment to Israel's security in a speech to the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC, where he said that there was no danger that Israel faces "that is graver than the one posed by the Iranian regime".&nbsp;</p>

<p>In a speech to the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, Blinken said that the US continues to believe that diplomacy is the best way to "verifiably, effectively and sustainably" prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. But he added that economic pressure and deterrence reinforce the diplomacy in parallel.&nbsp;</p>

<p>He added, "If Iran rejects the path of diplomacy, then, as President Biden has repeatedly made clear, all options are on the table to ensure that Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons."&nbsp;</p>

<p>Blinken also pledged continued US commitment to both Israel's security and a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. He, however, warned the expansion of Jewish settlements would be an obstacle to peace.&nbsp;</p>

<p>He said that the administration of President Joe Biden was committed to the Abraham Accords, which is an initiative launched under former president Donald Trump to persuade Arab countries to establish formal relations with the Jewish state.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Without specifying the holy sites in his reference, he said in his speech that moves toward annexation of the Israeli-occupied West Bank or that disrupting the status quo at holy sites would hurt the prospects for a two-state solution.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Blinken said, "Settlement expansion clearly presents an obstacle to the horizon of hope that we seek. Likewise, any move toward annexation of the West Bank, de facto or de jure, disruption of the historic status quo at holy sites, the continuing demolitions of homes and the evictions of families that have lived in those homes for generations damage prospects for two states. They also undermine the basic daily dignity to which all people are entitled."&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Blinken urges for normalisation between Israel and Saudi Arabia&nbsp;</strong></h2>

<p>News agency Reuters reported that there was a muted response from the audience when he spoke about the settlement expansion, but he received widespread applause when he outlined the longstanding American commitment to Israel and said all options were on the table when it came to preventing Israel's No. 1 enemy, Iran, from acquiring a nuclear weapon.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Blinken said that Washington would continue to work toward helping Israel integrate into the region as a means of enhancing security, stability and prosperity in the Middle East. He also stressed the importance of normalisation of relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel.&nbsp;</p>

<p>He said, "The United States has a real national security interest in promoting normalisation between Israel and Saudi Arabia."&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;</em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>

<p>You can <strong>now write for wionews.com</strong> and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.</strong></p>


US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Monday (June 5) that America won't let Iran get nuclear weapons, reiterating the Biden administration's firm stance against Tehran.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Monday (June 5) that America won't let Iran get nuclear weapons, reiterating the Biden administration's firm stance against Tehran. Blinken showed commitment to Israel's security in a speech to the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC, where he said that there was no danger that Israel faces "that is graver than the one posed by the Iranian regime". In a speech to the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC, Blinken said that the US continues to believe that diplomacy is the best way to "verifiably, effectively and sustainably" prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. But he added that economic pressure and deterrence reinforce the diplomacy in parallel. He added, "If Iran rejects the path of diplomacy, then, as President Biden has repeatedly made clear, all options are on the table to ensure that Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons." Blinken also pledged continued US commitment to both Israel's security and a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict. He, however, warned the expansion of Jewish settlements would be an obstacle to peace. He said that the administration of President Joe Biden was committed to the Abraham Accords, which is an initiative launched under former president Donald Trump to persuade Arab countries to establish formal relations with the Jewish state. Without specifying the holy sites in his reference, he said in his speech that moves toward annexation of the Israeli-occupied West Bank or that disrupting the status quo at holy sites would hurt the prospects for a two-state solution. Blinken said, "Settlement expansion clearly presents an obstacle to the horizon of hope that we seek. Likewise, any move toward annexation of the West Bank, de facto or de jure, disruption of the historic status quo at holy sites, the continuing demolitions of homes and the evictions of families that have lived in those homes for generations damage prospects for two states. They also undermine the basic daily dignity to which all people are entitled." Blinken urges for normalisation between Israel and Saudi Arabia News agency Reuters reported that there was a muted response from the audience when he spoke about the settlement expansion, but he received widespread applause when he outlined the longstanding American commitment to Israel and said all options were on the table when it came to preventing Israel's No. 1 enemy, Iran, from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Blinken said that Washington would continue to work toward helping Israel integrate into the region as a means of enhancing security, stability and prosperity in the Middle East. He also stressed the importance of normalisation of relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel. He said, "The United States has a real national security interest in promoting normalisation between Israel and Saudi Arabia." (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

US won't allow Iran get nuclear weapons, says Secretary of State Antony Blinken

<p>A day after US President Joe Biden criticised Russia for deploying tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus,&nbsp;Moscow has responded.&nbsp;Russia's embassy in the United States released a statement dismissing the criticism, adding that Moscow was moving ahead with the deployment.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"It is the sovereign right of Russia and Belarus to ensure their security by means we deem necessary amidst of a large-scale hybrid war unleashed by Washington against us," read the statement.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"The measures we undertake are fully consistent with our international legal obligations."</p>

<p>The consulate called out the USA for its hypocrisy as Washington had deployed hoards of nuclear weapons in Europe&nbsp;to keep enemies in check.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>"The United States has been for decades maintaining a large arsenal of its nuclear weapons in Europe. Together with its NATO allies, it participates in nuclear sharing arrangements and trains for scenarios of nuclear weapons use against our country," the embassy added.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Tactical nuclear arms are battlefield weapons that, while devastating, have a smaller yield compared to long-range strategic weapons.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-why-is-russia-sending-nuclear-arms-to-belarus-596926"><strong>WATCH |&nbsp;Russia-Ukraine war: Why is Russia sending nuclear arms to Belarus?</strong></a></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-why-is-russia-sending-nuclear-arms-to-belarus-596926/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Biden not enthused by the deployment</strong></h2>

<p>Notably, on Friday, Biden said he felt&nbsp;"extremely negative" about the prospect of Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus.&nbsp;</p>

<p>''Extremely negative is my reaction," Biden told reporters before he left Washington for Camp David.&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Lukashenko announces the deployment</strong></h2>

<p>On Thursday,&nbsp;Belarus President&nbsp;Alexander Lukashenko announced Russia has started moving tactical nuclear weapons to his country.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"The transfer of nuclear munitions has begun," Lukashenko told reporters during a visit to Moscow.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“We had to prepare storage areas and stuff. We have done this, so the movement of nuclear weapons has already begun," he added.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-has-begun-moving-nuclear-weapons-to-belarus-says-lukashenko-596528"><strong>ALSO READ |&nbsp;Russia has started moving nuclear weapons to Belarus, says Lukashenko</strong></a></p>

<p>It was in March earlier this year that&nbsp;Russian President Vladimir Putin first announced plans to move Russia's tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus.&nbsp;Putin's announcement had spurred fears of nuclear conflict, but experts and governments said it was unlikely that the move would change the course of the conflict.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Notably, this is the first time since 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed that Russia is deploying such bombs outside Russia. Interestingly, after the balkanisation of the Soviet Union,&nbsp;Ukraine briefly held the title of the third-largest nuclear power in the world. Still reeling from the effects of disintegration, Moscow had left thousands of nuclear arms on Ukrainian soil.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Ukraine could have easily dominated the world order with the stockpile of nuclear arsenal it had. However,&nbsp;the USA, UK and other Western powers persuaded it to give up on nuclear ambitions.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>


A day after US President Joe Biden criticised Russia for deploying tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, Moscow has responded. Russia's embassy in the United States released a statement dismissing the criticism, adding that Moscow was moving ahead with the deployment.

A day after US President Joe Biden criticised Russia for deploying tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, Moscow has responded. Russia's embassy in the United States released a statement dismissing the criticism, adding that Moscow was moving ahead with the deployment. "It is the sovereign right of Russia and Belarus to ensure their security by means we deem necessary amidst of a large-scale hybrid war unleashed by Washington against us," read the statement. "The measures we undertake are fully consistent with our international legal obligations." The consulate called out the USA for its hypocrisy as Washington had deployed hoards of nuclear weapons in Europe to keep enemies in check. "The United States has been for decades maintaining a large arsenal of its nuclear weapons in Europe. Together with its NATO allies, it participates in nuclear sharing arrangements and trains for scenarios of nuclear weapons use against our country," the embassy added. Tactical nuclear arms are battlefield weapons that, while devastating, have a smaller yield compared to long-range strategic weapons. WATCH | Russia-Ukraine war: Why is Russia sending nuclear arms to Belarus? × Biden not enthused by the deployment Notably, on Friday, Biden said he felt "extremely negative" about the prospect of Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus. ''Extremely negative is my reaction," Biden told reporters before he left Washington for Camp David. Lukashenko announces the deployment On Thursday, Belarus President Alexander Lukashenko announced Russia has started moving tactical nuclear weapons to his country. "The transfer of nuclear munitions has begun," Lukashenko told reporters during a visit to Moscow. “We had to prepare storage areas and stuff. We have done this, so the movement of nuclear weapons has already begun," he added. ALSO READ | Russia has started moving nuclear weapons to Belarus, says Lukashenko It was in March earlier this year that Russian President Vladimir Putin first announced plans to move Russia's tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus. Putin's announcement had spurred fears of nuclear conflict, but experts and governments said it was unlikely that the move would change the course of the conflict. Notably, this is the first time since 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed that Russia is deploying such bombs outside Russia. Interestingly, after the balkanisation of the Soviet Union, Ukraine briefly held the title of the third-largest nuclear power in the world. Still reeling from the effects of disintegration, Moscow had left thousands of nuclear arms on Ukrainian soil. Ukraine could have easily dominated the world order with the stockpile of nuclear arsenal it had. However, the USA, UK and other Western powers persuaded it to give up on nuclear ambitions. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

Moscow schools US for criticising deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus

Tactical Nuclear Weapons typically refer to short-range weapons. The categorisation includes land-based missiles with a range of less than 500 kilometres & air and sea-launched weapons with a range of less than 600 kilometres. Tactical nukes are the least-regulated category of nuclear weapons covered in arms control agreements. They are only subject to an informal regime created by unilateral, parallel declarations, made by George Bush & Mikhail Gorbachev in the fall of 1991.

Russia Ukraine War | US: No signs of Russia prepping to use nukes | World News | WION

Russia-Belarus nuclear agreement; former to send Nuclear Weapons to Belarus

Putin's nuclear doom for Ukraine? First deployment outside Russia since fall of the USSR | Details

<p><meta name="uuid" content="uuid35QwE3deA3s6" /><meta charset="utf-8" /></p>

<p>South Korea will not develop its own nuclear weapons while the US will aid in the use of them in any potential conflict with North Korea, according to a new agreement, known as the Washington Declaration,&nbsp;signed on Wednesday by President Joe Biden and his South Korean counterpart Yoon Suk Yeol in the White House.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>The declaration will help in 'deterring and defending' by engaging in joint training, information training and military exercises. A US-South Korean consultative group will also be created under the declaration. It will provide Seoul with more information and input on nuclear policy but with the caveat that Washington will have the sole command of its weapons.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As part of the agreement, the US will also deploy nuclear-armed submarines to South Korea. Additionally, there will be a routine visit of aircraft carriers and bombers to the region to send a message to the enemy, informed officials.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Notably, this is the first time since the US withdrew all of its nuclear weapons from South Korea in 1991 that talks about such an agreement have reached any fruition. However, there is no immediate plan to station nuclear weapons in South Korea - a marked difference from the Cold War strategy when US nuclear weapons were deployed to protect its allies in Europe.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"The United States has not taken these steps, really, since the height of the Cold War with our very closest handful of allies in Europe. And we are seeking to ensure that by undertaking these new procedures, these new steps, that our commitment to extended deterrence is unquestionable," a senior official was quoted as saying by AFP.&nbsp;</p>

<p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/leaked-pentagon-documents-reveal-south-koreas-turmoil-over-sending-arms-to-ukraine-581283"><strong>ALSO READ |&nbsp;Leaked Pentagon documents reveal South Korea's turmoil over sending arms to Ukraine</strong></a></p>

<h2><strong>S Koreans want the development of nuclear weapons</strong></h2>

<p>The signing of the accord comes against the backdrop of the majority of South Koreans showing support to build an independent nuclear force. A recent survey showed that 71 per cent of Koreans believed that the time was right for the country to develop its own arsenal.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In the last year and a half, North Korea has ramped up its military programmes involving nuclear weapons. It has been firing missiles indiscriminately, including several ICBMs and has openly stated that it will not concede its nuclear capabilities.&nbsp;</p>

<h2><strong>Seoul for San Francisco?</strong></h2>

<p>South Koreans are wary of trusting the US. The idea has gained prominence, especially after N Korea developed missiles that are capable of reaching major US cities. Many fear that Washington may sacrifice Seoul for San Francisco, if push comes to shove.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Earlier this year, even President Yoon himself discussed the possibility of such a situation.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“It’s possible that the problem gets worse and our country will introduce tactical nuclear weapons or build them on our own. If that’s the case, we can have our own nuclear weapons pretty quickly, given our scientific and technological capabilities.”</p>

<p><strong>ALSO WATCH |&nbsp;North Korean missile could hit US&nbsp;in 33 mins, says study; find gaps in US&nbsp;missile defence</strong></p>

<p><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/north-korean-missile-could-hit-us-in-33-mins-says-study-find-gaps-in-us-missile-defence-573192/embed" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>However, Yoon did not pursue the line of thought for long and took a quiet reversal on it.&nbsp;South Korea is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty - meaning it cannot obtain nuclear weapons. Hence, signing the agreement with the US appears to be the safer bet, experts suggest.&nbsp;</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;</strong></p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></p>


South Korea will not develop its own nuclear weapons while the US will aid in the use of them in any potential conflict with North Korea, according to a new agreement, known as the Washington Declaration, signed on Wednesday by President Joe Biden and his South Korean counterpart Yoon Suk Yeol in the White House.

South Korea will not develop its own nuclear weapons while the US will aid in the use of them in any potential conflict with North Korea, according to a new agreement, known as the Washington Declaration, signed on Wednesday by President Joe Biden and his South Korean counterpart Yoon Suk Yeol in the White House. The declaration will help in 'deterring and defending' by engaging in joint training, information training and military exercises. A US-South Korean consultative group will also be created under the declaration. It will provide Seoul with more information and input on nuclear policy but with the caveat that Washington will have the sole command of its weapons. As part of the agreement, the US will also deploy nuclear-armed submarines to South Korea. Additionally, there will be a routine visit of aircraft carriers and bombers to the region to send a message to the enemy, informed officials. Notably, this is the first time since the US withdrew all of its nuclear weapons from South Korea in 1991 that talks about such an agreement have reached any fruition. However, there is no immediate plan to station nuclear weapons in South Korea - a marked difference from the Cold War strategy when US nuclear weapons were deployed to protect its allies in Europe. "The United States has not taken these steps, really, since the height of the Cold War with our very closest handful of allies in Europe. And we are seeking to ensure that by undertaking these new procedures, these new steps, that our commitment to extended deterrence is unquestionable," a senior official was quoted as saying by AFP. ALSO READ | Leaked Pentagon documents reveal South Korea's turmoil over sending arms to Ukraine S Koreans want the development of nuclear weapons The signing of the accord comes against the backdrop of the majority of South Koreans showing support to build an independent nuclear force. A recent survey showed that 71 per cent of Koreans believed that the time was right for the country to develop its own arsenal. In the last year and a half, North Korea has ramped up its military programmes involving nuclear weapons. It has been firing missiles indiscriminately, including several ICBMs and has openly stated that it will not concede its nuclear capabilities. Seoul for San Francisco? South Koreans are wary of trusting the US. The idea has gained prominence, especially after N Korea developed missiles that are capable of reaching major US cities. Many fear that Washington may sacrifice Seoul for San Francisco, if push comes to shove. Earlier this year, even President Yoon himself discussed the possibility of such a situation. “It’s possible that the problem gets worse and our country will introduce tactical nuclear weapons or build them on our own. If that’s the case, we can have our own nuclear weapons pretty quickly, given our scientific and technological capabilities.” ALSO WATCH | North Korean missile could hit US in 33 mins, says study; find gaps in US missile defence However, Yoon did not pursue the line of thought for long and took a quiet reversal on it. South Korea is a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty - meaning it cannot obtain nuclear weapons. Hence, signing the agreement with the US appears to be the safer bet, experts suggest. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

US nuclear weapons for S Korea? Yoon, Biden ink landmark agreement

All power plants, coal, gas & nuclear, have a finite life. Beyond a certain period, it is not economically feasible to operate them. Generally, early nuclear plants were designed for a life of about 30 years. While newer plants are designed for 40 to 60 years of operating life. At the end of the life of any power plant, it needs to be decommissioned, cleaned up & demolished. The work of dismantling a nuclear power plant is painstaking. Germany's last three nuclear reactors will go fully offline by mid-April. They will enter the slow process of decommissioning.

Germany reckons with lengthy nuclear demolition job

North Korea has claimed that it has successfully tested a second underwater nuclear-capable drone. This is the third test of underwater drone that Pyongyang has claimed to have conducted in less than three weeks.

North Korea: Pyongyang claims another successful underwater drone test

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un's powerful sister accused Ukraine of calling for nuclear weapons. Kim Yo Jong backed her assertion on the basis of an online petition in Ukraine which was signed by almost 1,000 signatures so far.

North Korea accuses Kyiv of having nuclear ambitions

<p>Whenever we hear the word 'Uranium' in the context of a war, our antennas go up. The nuclear connotations immediately take us back to Second World War during which the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were flattened within seconds due to American nuclear bombs. Though (till now) there hasn't been another outright use of a nuclear bomb in a conflict, 'depleted uranium' has become something of a buzz in connection with ongoing conflict in Ukraine.&nbsp;</p>

<h2>What is depleted uranium?</h2>

<p>Depleted uranium is naturally occurring uranaium, except it has been stripped of most, but not all, of its radioactivity. In nerdspeak, depleted uranium is a waste material formed during the process of enrichment of uranium for its use in nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants.</p>

<h2>What is the use of depleted uranium?</h2>

<p>Depleted uranium can be used in weapons to make them more devastating. It can be put on the tips of tank shells, mortar rounds and even bullets. Such a treatment enhances ability of the weapons to penetrate enemy armour, something that can be of decisive advantage in a battlefield. Projectiles with depleted uranium tips can ignite on impact. This adds another element to their destructive capability.</p>

<h2>Have weapons with depleted uranium been used before?</h2>

<p>Yes, they were used in Iraq war in 2003. Before that, they were used in Kosovo (1999) and in Gulf War (1991).</p>

<h2>The biological aspect: Does depleted uranium cause cancer?</h2>

<p>World Health Organization's (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) lists depleted uranium as group 1 carcinogen.</p>

<p>Though depleted uranium is stripped of most of its radioactivity, it still has low levels of it. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) thus advises caution while handling depleted uranium.</p>

<p>A study carried out by team of researchers from American University of Beirut and Rutgers University has found "positive associations between uranium exposure and adverse health outcomes" among Iraqi population. The study has been featured by National Library of Medicine (NLM).</p>

<p>The study says that opponents of depleted uranium assert that its use resulted in increased rate of birth defects and cancers in Iraq after use of such weaponry.</p>

<p>The researchers also say that their findings imply that US sanctions on Iraq 'may have played a role in limiting research and publication on the health impacts of weaponised uranium on the Iraqi population.'</p>

<p>A United Nations study carried out over situation in Kosovo right after the conflict noted that if projectiles like bullets, tipped with depleted uranium are lying on ground and picked up by someone from the local population, it may result in 'local radiation doses above safety standards.' This can happen if the bullet is kept in pocket or worn in a chain around the neck.</p>

<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-retaliation-to-russia-pulling-back-from-new-start-treaty-us-decides-to-withhold-nuclear-data-576798">In retaliation to Russia pulling back from New START treaty, US decides to withhold nuclear data</a></strong><br />
&nbsp;</p>

<p>The study also noted that bullets embedded in the ground, several metres from the surface, pose 'risk of future DU contamination of groundwater and drinking water'.</p>

<h2>Depleted uranium, the political aspect</h2>

<p>Russia attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022. After sustained gains in first few months of the conflict, Russian forces had to retreat from several areas in the face of Ukrainian counterattack. Conquering Ukraine has not been a walk in the park for Russia as it was initially feared.</p>

<p>The Russian camp has been issuing nuclear threats for many months now, something that the West is worried about. Former Russian president and a staunch Putin-ally, Dmitry Medvedev, has been regular in hinting that Russia was very open to consider the nuclear option.</p>

<p><strong>Watch | Joe Biden expresses concern over Vladimir Putin's move to station nukes, calls it dangerous</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/joe-biden-expresses-concern-over-vladimir-putins-move-to-station-nukes-calls-it-dangerous-576896/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>Expressing his dismay over West's supply of weapons to Ukraine, Medvedev said last month that this could lead to a nuclear war.</p>

<p>"Our enemies are doing just that, not wanting to understand that their goals will certainly lead to a total fiasco. Loss for everyone. A collapse. Apocalypse. Where you forget for centuries about your former life, until the rubble ceases to emit radiation," he said, as quoted by the daily Izvestia.</p>

<p>In short, anything 'nuclear' represents a clear and devastating escalation of the current conflict in Ukraine.</p>

<p>Uranium, even if depleted, thus, may have become an uncomfortable 'U-word' especially when both camps are high on war-speak.</p>

<p>The West has so far been generous in helping Ukraine with weapons and other aid but provision of depleted uranium weapons might just open a new chapter.</p>

<p>Russia knows this and has chosen to warn the UK to not provide depleted uranium shells to Ukraine, saying that they contain a 'nuclear component'.</p>

<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-successfully-tests-supersonic-missiles-at-target-in-sea-of-japan-576736">Russian Navy successfully tests supersonic missiles at mock target in Sea of Japan: Russian defence ministry</a></strong></p>

<p>It's not that Russia is helping to prevent nuclear turn of the Ukraine war. Russian President Vladimir Putin recently announced himself that Russia would station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, a country, the ruling regime of which is strongly pro-Russia even if people aren't.</p>

<p>The world has seen horrific devastation nuclear weapons can cause. It is therefore eager to avoid nuclear confrontation. The efforts have been successful till now at least, but everyone is looking warily at the Ukraine conflict for sure. A lot remains to be seen.</p>

<p>You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form"><strong>here</strong></a>.</p>

<p><strong>WATCH WION LIVE HERE</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false"><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


Whenever we hear the word 'Uranium' in the context of a war, our antennas go up. The nuclear connotations immediately take us back to Second World War during which the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were flattened within seconds due to American nuclear bombs.

Whenever we hear the word 'Uranium' in the context of a war, our antennas go up. The nuclear connotations immediately take us back to Second World War during which the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were flattened within seconds due to American nuclear bombs. Though (till now) there hasn't been another outright use of a nuclear bomb in a conflict, 'depleted uranium' has become something of a buzz in connection with ongoing conflict in Ukraine. What is depleted uranium? Depleted uranium is naturally occurring uranaium, except it has been stripped of most, but not all, of its radioactivity. In nerdspeak, depleted uranium is a waste material formed during the process of enrichment of uranium for its use in nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants. What is the use of depleted uranium? Depleted uranium can be used in weapons to make them more devastating. It can be put on the tips of tank shells, mortar rounds and even bullets. Such a treatment enhances ability of the weapons to penetrate enemy armour, something that can be of decisive advantage in a battlefield. Projectiles with depleted uranium tips can ignite on impact. This adds another element to their destructive capability. Have weapons with depleted uranium been used before? Yes, they were used in Iraq war in 2003. Before that, they were used in Kosovo (1999) and in Gulf War (1991). The biological aspect: Does depleted uranium cause cancer? World Health Organization's (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) lists depleted uranium as group 1 carcinogen. Though depleted uranium is stripped of most of its radioactivity, it still has low levels of it. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) thus advises caution while handling depleted uranium. A study carried out by team of researchers from American University of Beirut and Rutgers University has found "positive associations between uranium exposure and adverse health outcomes" among Iraqi population. The study has been featured by National Library of Medicine (NLM). The study says that opponents of depleted uranium assert that its use resulted in increased rate of birth defects and cancers in Iraq after use of such weaponry. The researchers also say that their findings imply that US sanctions on Iraq 'may have played a role in limiting research and publication on the health impacts of weaponised uranium on the Iraqi population.' A United Nations study carried out over situation in Kosovo right after the conflict noted that if projectiles like bullets, tipped with depleted uranium are lying on ground and picked up by someone from the local population, it may result in 'local radiation doses above safety standards.' This can happen if the bullet is kept in pocket or worn in a chain around the neck. Also Read | In retaliation to Russia pulling back from New START treaty, US decides to withhold nuclear data The study also noted that bullets embedded in the ground, several metres from the surface, pose 'risk of future DU contamination of groundwater and drinking water'. Depleted uranium, the political aspect Russia attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022. After sustained gains in first few months of the conflict, Russian forces had to retreat from several areas in the face of Ukrainian counterattack. Conquering Ukraine has not been a walk in the park for Russia as it was initially feared. The Russian camp has been issuing nuclear threats for many months now, something that the West is worried about. Former Russian president and a staunch Putin-ally, Dmitry Medvedev, has been regular in hinting that Russia was very open to consider the nuclear option. Watch | Joe Biden expresses concern over Vladimir Putin's move to station nukes, calls it dangerous × Expressing his dismay over West's supply of weapons to Ukraine, Medvedev said last month that this could lead to a nuclear war. "Our enemies are doing just that, not wanting to understand that their goals will certainly lead to a total fiasco. Loss for everyone. A collapse. Apocalypse. Where you forget for centuries about your former life, until the rubble ceases to emit radiation," he said, as quoted by the daily Izvestia. In short, anything 'nuclear' represents a clear and devastating escalation of the current conflict in Ukraine. Uranium, even if depleted, thus, may have become an uncomfortable 'U-word' especially when both camps are high on war-speak. The West has so far been generous in helping Ukraine with weapons and other aid but provision of depleted uranium weapons might just open a new chapter. Russia knows this and has chosen to warn the UK to not provide depleted uranium shells to Ukraine, saying that they contain a 'nuclear component'. Also Read | Russian Navy successfully tests supersonic missiles at mock target in Sea of Japan: Russian defence ministry It's not that Russia is helping to prevent nuclear turn of the Ukraine war. Russian President Vladimir Putin recently announced himself that Russia would station tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus, a country, the ruling regime of which is strongly pro-Russia even if people aren't. The world has seen horrific devastation nuclear weapons can cause. It is therefore eager to avoid nuclear confrontation. The efforts have been successful till now at least, but everyone is looking warily at the Ukraine conflict for sure. A lot remains to be seen. You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

Explained | What the fuss over depleted uranium in Ukraine war is about

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un has ordered more production of weapons-grade nuclear material to grow the country's Arsenal asserting on how Pyongyang should be ready to use the weapons at any time. As he inspected the country's nuclear weapons program including the new tactical nuclear weapons in technology for mounting Warheads on ballistic missiles, according to the state news media.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un orders scaling up of weapons-grade nuclear materials

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un orders to ramp up production of weapons-grade nuclear material to exponentially expand the countries arsenal. With this latest move, how real is the threat of a nuclear crisis? East Asian geopolitics and security analyst professor Benoit Hardy-Chartrand joins us to discuss the implications.

North Korea to ramp up production of weapons grade nuclear materials

nuclear-weapons

Nuclear Weapons, News on Nuclear Weapons, stories on Nuclear Weapons, articles on Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear Weapons stories at Wion, Nuclear Weapons news, Nuclear Weapons latest news