Singapore policies have ordered Meta to implement anti-scam measures against advertisements, accounts, profiles and business pages impersonating key government office holders on its social media network Facebook to combat scams, a government minister said.



Meta Under Fire: Singapore Cracks Down on Facebook as Impersonation Scams Triple in Singapore | WION

Facebook parent company Meta is hosting ads on its platforms, including Instagram and Threads, to fund Israeli military gear, which in many cases, was responsible for the killings of unarmed civilians in Gaza, according to new research. The ads, critics say, also seem to directly violate the platform's own rules on political and weapons-related content. These paid ads, first flagged to Meta by global consumer watchdog Ekō, have reportedly raised millions of dollars to arm the Israeli military.<h2>What do the ads say?</h2>One such ad, which as per The Guardian, remained live as of July 17, read: "We are the sniper team of Unit Shaked, stationed in Gaza, and we urgently need shooting tripods to complete our mission in Jabalia". It was first posted on June 11.Ekō has identified at least 117 such ads since March of this year, all seeking donations for gear for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The IDF itself is not running these campaigns, but according to Ekō, the military has received equipment through donations raised online. What's more, this isn't the first time the group flagged these campaigns. In December 2024, Ekō alerted Meta to 98 similar ads—prompting the tech giant to remove many. But the same publishers, it says, returned soon after with nearly identical fundraising appeals."This shows that Meta will literally take money from anybody," said Maen Hammad, a campaigner with Ekō. "So little of the checks and balances the platform ought to be doing actually takes place and if it does, they’ll do it after the fact".<h2>Ads removed, but for the wrong reasons</h2>Meta confirmed that it had removed the ads for violating its policies—but only after Ekō and The Guardian reached out for comment, and that too not for raising money for weapons but something else. A Meta spokesperson said all political or social issue-based ads must include disclaimers that identify who paid for them. None of these ads did.Ekō estimates that the ads, most of which were shown in the UK and EU, racked up at least 76,000 impressions. It was unable to determine the reach of the ads in the United States.<h2>What was the raised money used for?</h2>A deeper investigation by Israeli publication +972 Magazine revealed that many of the drones being crowdfunded—commercial quadcopters sold on Amazon—are being retrofitted by Israeli soldiers to drop grenades in combat. Several soldiers told the outlet that such drones were delivered via online donation drives and private Facebook groups."Most of our drones are broken and falling apart—and we don’t have any replacements," read one ad. "Donate now — every second counts, every drone saves lives."One publisher flagged by Ekō, Vaad Hatzedaka, a non profit, has even linked its ads to a donation page listing the exact models of drones and tactical gear it was fundraising for, including two drones made by Chinese firm Autel. According to the group's donation tracker, it has raised over $250,000 of its $300,000 goal.Another campaigner, Israeli musician Mayer Malik, has used Meta ads to promote a donation page that offers sponsorships for tactical items like thermal drones. He has reportedly raised over $2.2 million for Israeli units through these efforts.<h2>Are such ads allowed? What do Meta rules say?</h2>Meta's policies broadly prohibit the buying, selling, gifting, or fundraising for "firearms, firearm parts, ammunition, explosives, or lethal enhancements," though they allow some exceptions. But the company said the recent ads were removed primarily for lacking political disclaimers—not for fundraising for military gear.According to Ekō, these campaigns may also violate the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), which obligates platforms to remove any content that violates national or EU law. In both France and the UK, strict regulations limit how charities can fundraise for foreign militaries. In January 2025, the UK’s Charity Commission issued a formal warning to a London-based charity after it raised funds for an Israeli soldier, saying the effort was "not lawful or acceptable."

"This shows that Meta will literally take money from anybody," said Maen Hammad, a campaigner with Ekō. "So little of the checks and balances the platform ought to be doing actually takes place and if it does, they’ll do it after the fact".

Facebook parent company Meta is hosting ads on its platforms, including Instagram and Threads, to fund Israeli military gear, which in many cases, was responsible for the killings of unarmed civilians in Gaza, according to new research. The ads, critics say, also seem to directly violate the platform's own rules on political and weapons-related content. These paid ads, first flagged to Meta by global consumer watchdog Ekō, have reportedly raised millions of dollars to arm the Israeli military. What do the ads say? One such ad, which as per The Guardian, remained live as of July 17, read: "We are the sniper team of Unit Shaked, stationed in Gaza, and we urgently need shooting tripods to complete our mission in Jabalia". It was first posted on June 11. Ekō has identified at least 117 such ads since March of this year, all seeking donations for gear for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The IDF itself is not running these campaigns, but according to Ekō, the military has received equipment through donations raised online. What's more, this isn't the first time the group flagged these campaigns. In December 2024, Ekō alerted Meta to 98 similar ads—prompting the tech giant to remove many. But the same publishers, it says, returned soon after with nearly identical fundraising appeals. "This shows that Meta will literally take money from anybody," said Maen Hammad, a campaigner with Ekō. "So little of the checks and balances the platform ought to be doing actually takes place and if it does, they’ll do it after the fact". Ads removed, but for the wrong reasons Meta confirmed that it had removed the ads for violating its policies—but only after Ekō and The Guardian reached out for comment, and that too not for raising money for weapons but something else. A Meta spokesperson said all political or social issue-based ads must include disclaimers that identify who paid for them. None of these ads did. Ekō estimates that the ads, most of which were shown in the UK and EU, racked up at least 76,000 impressions. It was unable to determine the reach of the ads in the United States. What was the raised money used for? A deeper investigation by Israeli publication +972 Magazine revealed that many of the drones being crowdfunded—commercial quadcopters sold on Amazon—are being retrofitted by Israeli soldiers to drop grenades in combat. Several soldiers told the outlet that such drones were delivered via online donation drives and private Facebook groups. "Most of our drones are broken and falling apart—and we don’t have any replacements," read one ad. "Donate now — every second counts, every drone saves lives." One publisher flagged by Ekō, Vaad Hatzedaka, a non profit, has even linked its ads to a donation page listing the exact models of drones and tactical gear it was fundraising for, including two drones made by Chinese firm Autel. According to the group's donation tracker, it has raised over $250,000 of its $300,000 goal. Another campaigner, Israeli musician Mayer Malik, has used Meta ads to promote a donation page that offers sponsorships for tactical items like thermal drones. He has reportedly raised over $2.2 million for Israeli units through these efforts. Are such ads allowed? What do Meta rules say? Meta's policies broadly prohibit the buying, selling, gifting, or fundraising for "firearms, firearm parts, ammunition, explosives, or lethal enhancements," though they allow some exceptions. But the company said the recent ads were removed primarily for lacking political disclaimers—not for fundraising for military gear. According to Ekō, these campaigns may also violate the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), which obligates platforms to remove any content that violates national or EU law. In both France and the UK, strict regulations limit how charities can fundraise for foreign militaries. In January 2025, the UK’s Charity Commission issued a formal warning to a London-based charity after it raised funds for an Israeli soldier, saying the effort was "not lawful or acceptable."

"This shows that Meta will literally take money from anybody," said Maen Hammad, a campaigner with Ekō. "So little of the checks and balances the platform ought to be doing actually takes place and if it does, they’ll do it after the fact".

'Meta will literally take money from anybody': Facebook, Instagram ran ads funding Israeli military strikes in Gaza, watchdog finds

Facebook is under scrutiny once again for a significant drop in reporting incidents of child sexual abuse on its platform. Official figures reveal a staggering decline of nearly 7 million reports in just one year. What's stopping them from detecting and reporting these abuses? Watch this video for full story.

Facebook Accused of Endangering Children's Lives

Meta is stepping up its efforts to make its platforms safer for teenagers. The company is now expanding its teen safety features beyond Instagram, bringing new restrictions to Facebook and Messenger as well.
<h2>No more live streaming for under-16s</h2>
One of the main changes is a new restriction on Instagram&rsquo;s Live feature. Teenagers under the age of 16 will no longer be able to use Instagram Live unless they have permission from a parent. Meta is also tightening how teens interact with images in direct messages. A feature that blurs images suspected of containing nudity will now require parental approval to be switched off.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/meta-may-launch-standalone-instagram-reels-app-to-challenge-tiktok-8763257">Meta may launch standalone Instagram Reels app to challenge TikTok</a>
<h2>What are other new features?</h2>
The company is rolling out the same system of teen accounts that was introduced on Instagram last year to Facebook and Messenger. These teen accounts automatically apply stricter safety settings for under-18 users. Parents can set daily time limits, restrict usage at certain hours, and view who their child is messaging.
In the new update, users under 16 will need parental consent to make any changes to these default settings. Those aged 16 and 17 will also have the features turned on by default but will be allowed to adjust them on their own.
The updated features will first be introduced in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia.
Meta said that more than 90% of 13- to 15-year-olds using Instagram have kept the restrictions on, and around 54 million teens worldwide are currently using the teen account system.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-to-toss-out-factcheckers-reduce-censorship-and-restore-free-expression-8599677">Meta to toss out factcheckers to reduce censorship, restore 'free expression'</a>
The changes come at a time when governments are putting pressure on tech companies to protect young users. In the UK, the Online Safety Act came into effect in March.
This law forces online platforms to take action against illegal content like child abuse, terrorism, and online fraud. It also requires extra protections for under-18s to keep them safe from harmful material such as suicide or self-harm-related content.
<h2>&ldquo;Shift the balance in favour of parents&rdquo;</h2>
When the Instagram teen features were first introduced, Meta&rsquo;s then president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, said the goal was to give parents more control.
He explained that the new rules would &ldquo;shift the balance in favour of parents&rdquo; when it comes to keeping their children safe online. Clegg also pointed out that many parents still don&rsquo;t make use of available safety tools.
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Teenagers under the age of 16 will no longer be able to use Instagram Live unless they have permission from a parent.   Trending

Meta is stepping up its efforts to make its platforms safer for teenagers. The company is now expanding its teen safety features beyond Instagram, bringing new restrictions to Facebook and Messenger as well. No more live streaming for under-16s One of the main changes is a new restriction on Instagram’s Live feature. Teenagers under the age of 16 will no longer be able to use Instagram Live unless they have permission from a parent. Meta is also tightening how teens interact with images in direct messages. A feature that blurs images suspected of containing nudity will now require parental approval to be switched off. Also read: Meta may launch standalone Instagram Reels app to challenge TikTok What are other new features? The company is rolling out the same system of teen accounts that was introduced on Instagram last year to Facebook and Messenger. These teen accounts automatically apply stricter safety settings for under-18 users. Parents can set daily time limits, restrict usage at certain hours, and view who their child is messaging. In the new update, users under 16 will need parental consent to make any changes to these default settings. Those aged 16 and 17 will also have the features turned on by default but will be allowed to adjust them on their own. The updated features will first be introduced in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Meta said that more than 90% of 13- to 15-year-olds using Instagram have kept the restrictions on, and around 54 million teens worldwide are currently using the teen account system. Also read: Meta to toss out factcheckers to reduce censorship, restore 'free expression' The changes come at a time when governments are putting pressure on tech companies to protect young users. In the UK, the Online Safety Act came into effect in March. This law forces online platforms to take action against illegal content like child abuse, terrorism, and online fraud. It also requires extra protections for under-18s to keep them safe from harmful material such as suicide or self-harm-related content. “Shift the balance in favour of parents” When the Instagram teen features were first introduced, Meta’s then president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, said the goal was to give parents more control. He explained that the new rules would “shift the balance in favour of parents” when it comes to keeping their children safe online. Clegg also pointed out that many parents still don’t make use of available safety tools. (With inputs from agencies)

Meta bans under-16s from going live on Instagram: Here's what new safety rules mean for parents

Meta has agreed to pay former President Donald Trump $25 million to settle a lawsuit regarding his claims about the company's handling of his accounts on Facebook and Instagram.

Meta to pay Trump $25 Million to settle lawsuit over Facebook and Instagram

Many Instagram and Facebook users discovered they were unexpectedly following accounts for President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and First Lady Melania Trump. Meta clarified that this transition occurs with new administrations. Users can unfollow these accounts, though some may face delays. Watch this report for more details!

Meta denies claims of pushing users to follow Trump team accounts

Meta will allow WhatsApp users to share status updates across Instagram and Facebook, as well as enable single sign-in, according to tech media reports late Tuesday (January 21).&nbsp;
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/can-cia-read-your-whatapp-messages-this-is-what-mark-zuckerberg-has-to-say-8612166" rel="dofollow">Can CIA read your WhatsApp messages? This is what Mark Zuckerberg has to say...</a>
This update is part of Meta integrating WhatsApp into its Accounts Center, as WABetaINfo spotted. According to Meta, the feature link won't be turned on automatically and hence it is up to users to decide if linking WhatsApp to Accounts Center is something they want.
<h2>How will the WhatsApp info be used?</h2>
If users agree to use the feature, Meta will start using their WhatsApp information to do things such as provide, personalise, and improve its products and services, including showing advertisements, a report by The Verge said.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-supporters-press-zuckerberg-to-release-facebook-files-as-meta-steers-to-right-8623982" rel="dofollow">Trump supporters press Zuckerberg to release Facebook Files as Meta steers to right</a>
The company also said that Meta's other apps would not use WhatsApp personal data &ldquo;unless it&rsquo;s to determine how many people we serve, keep people safe, or to provide optional features that work across Meta products.&rdquo;&nbsp;
Meta also said that linking users' accounts would not change the fact that messages are end-to-end encrypted in WhatsApp.
<h2>Who can see my status?</h2>
Meta has shared a photograph of how this feature would allow WhatsApp users to share status updates across Instagram and Facebook.&nbsp;
Also watch | Meta and Apple pouring their money into making smart glasses
<iframe width="600" height="auto" style="width: 100%; aspect-ratio: 4/3;" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" class="external-video publive-iframes-block" src="https://cdn.thepublive.com/wion/static/kaltura_player/wion_video_player_iframe.html?thumbnail=wion/media/post_attachments/screenshot/1601_glasses_9am_pkwo/00000002.jpg&amp;videourl=https://vodakm.zeenews.com/vod/WION/1601_glasses_9am_pkwo.mp4/index.m3u8&amp;duration=138&amp;tags=Technology, World News, WION" title="Meta and Apple pouring their money into making smart glasses" id="PL_iframe_block-m67lwm8p-t9ou4zt4-3xdtln7h"></iframe>
The photograph shows the "Who can see my status?" tab on WhatsApp. Apart from the usual options of sharing status with, "My contacts," "My contacts except...," and "Only share with...," the feature gives two more options- upload status on Facebook and upload status on Instagram.
(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;
&nbsp;

Meta has shared a photograph of how this feature would allow WhatsApp users to share status updates as stories across Instagram and Facebook. 

Meta will allow WhatsApp users to share status updates across Instagram and Facebook, as well as enable single sign-in, according to tech media reports late Tuesday (January 21). Also read | Can CIA read your WhatsApp messages? This is what Mark Zuckerberg has to say... This update is part of Meta integrating WhatsApp into its Accounts Center, as WABetaINfo spotted. According to Meta, the feature link won't be turned on automatically and hence it is up to users to decide if linking WhatsApp to Accounts Center is something they want. How will the WhatsApp info be used? If users agree to use the feature, Meta will start using their WhatsApp information to do things such as provide, personalise, and improve its products and services, including showing advertisements, a report by The Verge said. Also read | Trump supporters press Zuckerberg to release Facebook Files as Meta steers to right The company also said that Meta's other apps would not use WhatsApp personal data “unless it’s to determine how many people we serve, keep people safe, or to provide optional features that work across Meta products.” Meta also said that linking users' accounts would not change the fact that messages are end-to-end encrypted in WhatsApp. Who can see my status? Meta has shared a photograph of how this feature would allow WhatsApp users to share status updates across Instagram and Facebook. Also watch | Meta and Apple pouring their money into making smart glasses The photograph shows the "Who can see my status?" tab on WhatsApp. Apart from the usual options of sharing status with, "My contacts," "My contacts except...," and "Only share with...," the feature gives two more options- upload status on Facebook and upload status on Instagram. (With inputs from agencies)

Meta to allow WhatsApp users to share status updates on Instagram, Facebook

US right-wing is pressing Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to release what they are calling &ldquo;Facebook Files&rdquo;, referring to internal documents and conversations at the company regarding content moderation. The US techie has drastically steered Meta to the right ahead of the inauguration ceremony of US President-elect Donald Trump.
Zuckerberg earlier shut down Meta&rsquo;s fact-checking and moderation systems, arguing they promoted censorship and curtailed freedom of speech. Meta has also made some changes to its policy on political content, saying it will again start recommending posts on politics.
Meta is also ending its programmes aimed at hiring diverse candidates, including disbanding its diversity, equity and inclusion team and getting rid of its &ldquo;Diverse Slate Approach&rdquo; in its hiring process.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mozambiques-daniel-chapo-swears-in-as-new-president-post-election-unrest-8623859">Mozambique's Daniel Chapo swears in as new president post-election unrest</a>
But US right-wing and Trump supporters are looking askance upon Zuckerberg&rsquo;s drastic shift. Trump and his loyalists spent years accusing Zuckerberg of sucking up to the administration of Joe Biden and suppressing conservative narratives and accounts across Meta platforms.
&ldquo;If Zuckeberg is serious about transparency, then it&rsquo;s time for the Facebook Files,&rdquo; wrote one user Mario Nawfal.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m5xsv4pq-t20zf2yd-2q7ih4fr">
🚨 WAIT, COULD WE BE SEEING FACEBOOK FILES? If Zuckeberg is serious about transparency, then it&rsquo;s time for the Facebook Files. Let&rsquo;s see all the back-and-forth between the government and Facebook on COVID/vaccine censorship &mdash; not just carefully selected emails. We&rsquo;ve seen the&hellip; <a href="https://t.co/eadLrm16JO">https://t.co/eadLrm16JO</a>
&mdash; Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1879408958642811241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2025</a></blockquote>
&ldquo;Let&rsquo;s see all the back-and-forth between the government and Facebook on COVID/vaccine censorship &mdash; not just carefully selected emails.&rdquo;
People are asking Zuckerberg to release Facebook Files on the lines of Twitter Files released by Elon Musk when he bought the platform.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-ceo-mark-zuckerberg-to-co-host-reception-for-trumps-inauguration-8623368">Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to co-host reception for Trump&rsquo;s inauguration</a>
Musk showed "what really happened" behind the scenes regarding content moderation decisions at the social media company. Twitter Files consisted of thousands of documents, including many Slack discussions, between Twitter employees about their content moderation practices.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet publive-iframes-block publive-Twitter-block" contenteditable="false" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m5xsve8y-6i2tlsb7-4dhl1qvu">
That would be great <a href="https://t.co/4EMb1zuw4P">https://t.co/4EMb1zuw4P</a>
&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1879415680396931367?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2025</a></blockquote>
Musk has also agreed to the idea of Zuckerberg releasing Facebook Files. Reacting to Mario Nawfal&rsquo;s post on X, Musk wrote, &ldquo;"That would be great".

World | Trump and his loyalists spent years accusing Zuckerberg of sucking up to Joe Biden's administration and suppressing conservative narratives across Meta platforms. 

US right-wing is pressing Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to release what they are calling “Facebook Files”, referring to internal documents and conversations at the company regarding content moderation. The US techie has drastically steered Meta to the right ahead of the inauguration ceremony of US President-elect Donald Trump. Zuckerberg earlier shut down Meta’s fact-checking and moderation systems, arguing they promoted censorship and curtailed freedom of speech. Meta has also made some changes to its policy on political content, saying it will again start recommending posts on politics. Meta is also ending its programmes aimed at hiring diverse candidates, including disbanding its diversity, equity and inclusion team and getting rid of its “Diverse Slate Approach” in its hiring process. Also read: Mozambique's Daniel Chapo swears in as new president post-election unrest But US right-wing and Trump supporters are looking askance upon Zuckerberg’s drastic shift. Trump and his loyalists spent years accusing Zuckerberg of sucking up to the administration of Joe Biden and suppressing conservative narratives and accounts across Meta platforms. “If Zuckeberg is serious about transparency, then it’s time for the Facebook Files,” wrote one user Mario Nawfal. 🚨 WAIT, COULD WE BE SEEING FACEBOOK FILES? If Zuckeberg is serious about transparency, then it’s time for the Facebook Files. Let’s see all the back-and-forth between the government and Facebook on COVID/vaccine censorship — not just carefully selected emails. We’ve seen the… https://t.co/eadLrm16JO — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 15, 2025 “Let’s see all the back-and-forth between the government and Facebook on COVID/vaccine censorship — not just carefully selected emails.” People are asking Zuckerberg to release Facebook Files on the lines of Twitter Files released by Elon Musk when he bought the platform. Also read: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to co-host reception for Trump’s inauguration Musk showed "what really happened" behind the scenes regarding content moderation decisions at the social media company. Twitter Files consisted of thousands of documents, including many Slack discussions, between Twitter employees about their content moderation practices. That would be great https://t.co/4EMb1zuw4P — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 15, 2025 Musk has also agreed to the idea of Zuckerberg releasing Facebook Files. Reacting to Mario Nawfal’s post on X, Musk wrote, “"That would be great".

Trump supporters press Zuckerberg to release Facebook Files as Meta steers to right

META CEO Mark Zuckerberg's announcement to toss out fact-checkers and prioritise 'free speech' sparked condemnation from critics, who called it a "major step back" for public discourse.&nbsp;
Zuckerberg announced on Tuesday (Jan 7) that the company will be making some changes to its moderation policies and practices, citing its aim to embrace free speech.&nbsp;
The company will be altering the way posts, videos, and other content are moderated online. It will be getting rid of fact-checkers and will replace them with user-generated "community notes", which is similar to Elon Musk's X.&nbsp;
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-to-toss-out-factcheckers-reduce-censorship-and-restore-free-expression-8599677" rel="dofollow">Also read: Meta to toss out factcheckers to reduce censorship, restore 'free expression'</a>
Moreover, content moderation teams would also be moved from California to Texas &ldquo;where there is less concern about the bias of our teams&rdquo;, said Zuckerberg in a five-minute video statement.&nbsp;
<h2>'Bending of knee to Trump'</h2>
Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described Zuckerberg's move as a "full bending of the knee to Trump."
"Facebook has already contributed to the demise of journalism and this will be the final nail in the coffin," she added.
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science-technology/meta-denies-taking-down-its-ai-powered-chatbots-on-instagram-and-facebook-heres-why-8591383" rel="dofollow">Also read: Meta denies taking down its AI-powered chatbots from Instagram and Facebook</a>
Zuckerberg cited that the fact-checkers were "too politically biased".&nbsp;
Later in the day, Trump said the changes were "probably" in response to his warnings and added, "think they&rsquo;ve come a long way, Meta, Facebook.&rdquo;
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/meta-donates-1-million-to-trumps-inaugural-fund-783514" rel="dofollow">Also read: Meta donates $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund</a>
<h2>'Blatant attempt'</h2>
Global Witness, a human rights group, said, &ldquo;Zuckerberg&rsquo;s announcement is a blatant attempt to cosy up to the incoming Trump administration, with harmful implications."&nbsp;
"These changes will make it more dangerous for women, LGBT+ people, people of colour, scientists, and activists to speak out online, where they already face disproportionate harassment and attacks," it added.
The Centre for Information Resilience warned it was a "major step back for content moderation at a time when disinformation and harmful content are evolving faster than ever."&nbsp;
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amazon-to-donate-1-million-to-trumps-inaugural-fund-after-meta-783729" rel="dofollow">Also read: After Meta, Amazon to donate $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund</a>
<h2>'Disappointing'</h2>
Chris Morris, chief executive of Full Fact, said Meta's decision to end its partnership with fact-checkers in the US is "disappointing" and a backward step that risks a chilling effect around the world.&nbsp;
&ldquo;From safeguarding elections to protecting public health to dissipating potential unrest on the streets, fact-checkers are first responders in the information environment," Morris said.&nbsp;
(With inputs from agencies)

World: Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described Zuckerberg's move as a "full blending of the knee to Trump."

META CEO Mark Zuckerberg's announcement to toss out fact-checkers and prioritise 'free speech' sparked condemnation from critics, who called it a "major step back" for public discourse. Zuckerberg announced on Tuesday (Jan 7) that the company will be making some changes to its moderation policies and practices, citing its aim to embrace free speech. The company will be altering the way posts, videos, and other content are moderated online. It will be getting rid of fact-checkers and will replace them with user-generated "community notes", which is similar to Elon Musk's X. Also read: Meta to toss out factcheckers to reduce censorship, restore 'free expression' Moreover, content moderation teams would also be moved from California to Texas “where there is less concern about the bias of our teams”, said Zuckerberg in a five-minute video statement. 'Bending of knee to Trump' Nina Jankowicz, a former US government official tasked with fighting disinformation, described Zuckerberg's move as a "full bending of the knee to Trump." "Facebook has already contributed to the demise of journalism and this will be the final nail in the coffin," she added. Also read: Meta denies taking down its AI-powered chatbots from Instagram and Facebook Zuckerberg cited that the fact-checkers were "too politically biased". Later in the day, Trump said the changes were "probably" in response to his warnings and added, "think they’ve come a long way, Meta, Facebook.” Also read: Meta donates $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund 'Blatant attempt' Global Witness, a human rights group, said, “Zuckerberg’s announcement is a blatant attempt to cosy up to the incoming Trump administration, with harmful implications." "These changes will make it more dangerous for women, LGBT+ people, people of colour, scientists, and activists to speak out online, where they already face disproportionate harassment and attacks," it added. The Centre for Information Resilience warned it was a "major step back for content moderation at a time when disinformation and harmful content are evolving faster than ever." Also read: After Meta, Amazon to donate $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund 'Disappointing' Chris Morris, chief executive of Full Fact, said Meta's decision to end its partnership with fact-checkers in the US is "disappointing" and a backward step that risks a chilling effect around the world. “From safeguarding elections to protecting public health to dissipating potential unrest on the streets, fact-checkers are first responders in the information environment," Morris said. (With inputs from agencies)

'Bending of knee to Trump', say critics as Meta CEO ditches fact-checking

Meta announces the termination of its fact-checking program, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg committing to re-establishing free expression on Facebook and Instagram, signaling a shift in the platform’s approach to content moderation.

Mark Zuckerberg Announces Meta Will End Fact-Checking Program in the U.S

Social media giant <a href="https://www.wionews.com/search?title=+Meta+" rel="dofollow">Meta</a> denies taking down profiles of AI characters from Facebook and Instagram, which it created over a year ago after users rediscovered some of the profiles led to a viral controversy, the Guardian reported on Saturday (Jan 4).&nbsp;
Meta introduced these AI-powered profiles in September last year, but most of them were pulled dwon last year itself.&nbsp;
However, a few of those characters remained and showed new interest.&nbsp;
Meta created 28 chatbot profiles on its platforms with disclaimers saying &ldquo;messages are generated by Meta AI". The company further claims its AI chatbot feature "helps people solve complex problems, be more imaginative, and create something never seen before&rdquo;.
&ldquo;From bringing real-time answers to chat to helping people organise and plan for their next vacation to giving them more ways to express themselves, Al at Meta helps people enhance their everyday activities, experiences, and moments,&rdquo; the disclaimer read.
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amazon-to-donate-1-million-to-trumps-inaugural-fund-after-meta-783729" rel="dofollow">Also read: After Meta, Amazon to donate $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund</a>
Meta executive Connor Hayes told the Financial Times late last week that the company had plans to bring out more AI character profiles.&nbsp;
&ldquo;We expect these AIs to actually, over time, exist on our platforms, kind of in the same way that accounts do,&rdquo; Hayes told the Financial Times.&nbsp;
Later, Meta spokesperson Liz Sweeney told the Guardian that&nbsp;these profiles were part of an "early experiment with AI" and "were managed by humans".
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/australia-social-media-ban-for-under-16s-meta-slams-law-minister-says-play-ball-or-will-get-after-them-780131" rel="dofollow">Also read: Australia social media ban for under-16s: Meta slams law, minister says 'play ball' or will 'get after them'</a>
This comes after users asked questions on the origins and development of the AI characters.&nbsp;
One of the AI profiles, named "Liv", described itself as a "proud Black queer momma of two and truth-teller", and replied that its creator team had "Zero black people and was predominantly white and male".&nbsp;
The bot replied to a Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah, saying that it was a "pretty glaring omission given my identity".&nbsp;
Later, after the screenshots of these conversations were circulating on social media, users said that these profiles began to disappear. Further, it was noted that these controversial profiles could not be blocked.&nbsp;
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/meta-reduces-eu-facebook-and-instagram-subscription-fees-by-40-775814" rel="dofollow">Also read: Meta reduces EU Facebook and Instagram subscription fees by 40% STORY HIGHLIGHTS</a>
Liz also said that the inability to block these accounts was a "bug", adding that Meta is removing these accounts to fix the issue.&nbsp;
She further explained that the Meta executive's statement was about the company's vision for its existing AI characters and not about introducing new AI products.&nbsp;
Meta's disclaimer stressed that its &ldquo;generative Al is not a database or static collection of information, but a type of computer model&rdquo;.
&ldquo;There are different models depending on what they're used for. These models are trained on different types of data like text and images. By studying this information, they learn things like the association and patterns between different types of content. That way the models are able to generate new content when a person gives it instructions or a question,&rdquo; it added.&nbsp;
(With inputs from agencies)

Science & technology, trending: This comes after the Meta executive Connor Hayes told the Financial Times that the company had plans to bring out more AI character profiles. 

Social media giant Meta denies taking down profiles of AI characters from Facebook and Instagram, which it created over a year ago after users rediscovered some of the profiles led to a viral controversy, the Guardian reported on Saturday (Jan 4). Meta introduced these AI-powered profiles in September last year, but most of them were pulled dwon last year itself. However, a few of those characters remained and showed new interest. Meta created 28 chatbot profiles on its platforms with disclaimers saying “messages are generated by Meta AI". The company further claims its AI chatbot feature "helps people solve complex problems, be more imaginative, and create something never seen before”. “From bringing real-time answers to chat to helping people organise and plan for their next vacation to giving them more ways to express themselves, Al at Meta helps people enhance their everyday activities, experiences, and moments,” the disclaimer read. Also read: After Meta, Amazon to donate $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund Meta executive Connor Hayes told the Financial Times late last week that the company had plans to bring out more AI character profiles. “We expect these AIs to actually, over time, exist on our platforms, kind of in the same way that accounts do,” Hayes told the Financial Times. Later, Meta spokesperson Liz Sweeney told the Guardian that these profiles were part of an "early experiment with AI" and "were managed by humans". Also read: Australia social media ban for under-16s: Meta slams law, minister says 'play ball' or will 'get after them' This comes after users asked questions on the origins and development of the AI characters. One of the AI profiles, named "Liv", described itself as a "proud Black queer momma of two and truth-teller", and replied that its creator team had "Zero black people and was predominantly white and male". The bot replied to a Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah, saying that it was a "pretty glaring omission given my identity". Later, after the screenshots of these conversations were circulating on social media, users said that these profiles began to disappear. Further, it was noted that these controversial profiles could not be blocked. Also read: Meta reduces EU Facebook and Instagram subscription fees by 40% STORY HIGHLIGHTS Liz also said that the inability to block these accounts was a "bug", adding that Meta is removing these accounts to fix the issue. She further explained that the Meta executive's statement was about the company's vision for its existing AI characters and not about introducing new AI products. Meta's disclaimer stressed that its “generative Al is not a database or static collection of information, but a type of computer model”. “There are different models depending on what they're used for. These models are trained on different types of data like text and images. By studying this information, they learn things like the association and patterns between different types of content. That way the models are able to generate new content when a person gives it instructions or a question,” it added. (With inputs from agencies)

Meta denies taking down its AI-powered chatbots from Instagram and Facebook

Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, reacted with fury after Australia passed a law banning children under 16 from social media, while a minister warned tech firms the government will 'get after them' if they don't 'play ball'.

In the first such move in the world, Australia passed a law on Thursday (Nov 28) to ban under-16s from social media, citing mental health issues among other things.

The law stipulates that failure to comply would incur penalties worth up to $50 million on social media companies.

Watch: UNESCO: Influencers Don't Verify Information | 62% Digital Content Creators Don't Check Facts: Study

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/unesco-influencers-dont-verify-information-62-digital-content-creators-dont-check-facts-study-779674/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Despite their initial resistance, most major tech companies with social media platforms have grudgingly agreed to comply with the ban.

But after the law was passed, a Meta spokesperson accused the government of failing to consider young people’s voices and rushing the legislation.

“We are concerned about the process which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people,” a Meta spokesperson said as quoted by The Guardian newspaper. 
 
<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/australia-passes-social-media-ban-on-children-under-16-becomes-first-country-to-take-such-measure-779993">Australia passes social media ban on children under 16, becomes first country to take such measure</a>

The spokesperson of the Mark Zuckerberg-owned tech giant urged 'productive consultation on all rules' of the bill 'to ensure a technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens'.

Meta also sought a commitment that the rules will apply to all social media apps used by teens.

X owner Elon Musk had opposed the law as a 'backdoor way to control access to the Internet' for all Australians.

But the government is digging its heels on the matter.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/australia-pushes-ahead-bill-banning-children-from-social-media-linkedin-says-its-too-dull-for-kids-779519">Australia clears bill banning children from social media, LinkedIn says its platform is 'too dull for kids'</a> 
 
Cabinet minister Murray Watt warned that social media firms "should take the ban seriously."

“Between those fines and social pressure, we will see social media companies play ball – and if they don’t, then we have the ability to go after them,” Watt said.

While the opposition supported the ban saying the benefits outweigh the risks, one independent MP criticised it.&nbsp;

Opposition's shadow communications minister David Coleman speaking to Sky News, asked: "What other generation in history has grown up being exposed to as much damaging content as this generation?”

Independent MP Kylea Tink called the bill a ‘1970 solution for a 2024 problem’, adding the ban was 'headline-grabbing', without saying what it would do.

It's a "piece of legislation that’s grabbing headlines, not only here but right around the world," she said, while speaking to ABC RN channel.

"But will it make any child under 16 safer on social media today? No. And in fact, it will create a high degree of anxiety amongst young Australians who are using their social media platforms to feel like they’re part of a community that may not be in their immediate circle," she added.

(With inputs from agencies)

Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, reacted with fury after Australia passed a law banning children under 16 from social media, while a minister warned tech firms the government will 'get after them' if they don't 'play ball'.

Meta, the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, reacted with fury after Australia passed a law banning children under 16 from social media, while a minister warned tech firms the government will 'get after them' if they don't 'play ball'. In the first such move in the world, Australia passed a law on Thursday (Nov 28) to ban under-16s from social media, citing mental health issues among other things. The law stipulates that failure to comply would incur penalties worth up to $50 million on social media companies. Watch: UNESCO: Influencers Don't Verify Information | 62% Digital Content Creators Don't Check Facts: Study × Despite their initial resistance, most major tech companies with social media platforms have grudgingly agreed to comply with the ban. But after the law was passed, a Meta spokesperson accused the government of failing to consider young people’s voices and rushing the legislation. “We are concerned about the process which rushed the legislation through while failing to properly consider the evidence, what industry already does to ensure age-appropriate experiences, and the voices of young people,” a Meta spokesperson said as quoted by The Guardian newspaper. Australia passes social media ban on children under 16, becomes first country to take such measure The spokesperson of the Mark Zuckerberg-owned tech giant urged 'productive consultation on all rules' of the bill 'to ensure a technically feasible outcome that does not place an onerous burden on parents and teens'. Meta also sought a commitment that the rules will apply to all social media apps used by teens. X owner Elon Musk had opposed the law as a 'backdoor way to control access to the Internet' for all Australians. But the government is digging its heels on the matter. Australia clears bill banning children from social media, LinkedIn says its platform is 'too dull for kids' Cabinet minister Murray Watt warned that social media firms "should take the ban seriously." “Between those fines and social pressure, we will see social media companies play ball – and if they don’t, then we have the ability to go after them,” Watt said. While the opposition supported the ban saying the benefits outweigh the risks, one independent MP criticised it. Opposition's shadow communications minister David Coleman speaking to Sky News, asked: "What other generation in history has grown up being exposed to as much damaging content as this generation?” Independent MP Kylea Tink called the bill a ‘1970 solution for a 2024 problem’, adding the ban was 'headline-grabbing', without saying what it would do. It's a "piece of legislation that’s grabbing headlines, not only here but right around the world," she said, while speaking to ABC RN channel. "But will it make any child under 16 safer on social media today? No. And in fact, it will create a high degree of anxiety amongst young Australians who are using their social media platforms to feel like they’re part of a community that may not be in their immediate circle," she added. (With inputs from agencies)

Australia social media ban for under-16s: Meta slams law, minister says 'play ball' or will 'get after them'

The European Commission has fined Meta Platforms over $840 million for antitrust violations linked to its Facebook Marketplace. The Commission has accused Meta of breaching EU competition laws by unfairly linking its classified ad service, Facebook Marketplace, with its social network. Watch in for more details!

Meta Fined $840 Million For Tying Facebook Marketplace To Platform

Meta has reduced the price of its ad-free subscription versions of Facebook and Instagram by 40 per cent for European Union (EU) users. This has been done to comply with regulatory demands in the region, according to a detailed report by CNBC.<o:p></o:p>

The leading social media company will also offer EU users access to Facebook and Instagram for free if they agree to be shown advertisements based on a limited set of user data, the company stated in a blog on November 12, the CNBC report detailed further.<o:p></o:p>

Meta originally debuted an ad-free subscription service for the European Union in October 2023 due to an EU regulation intended to clamp down on anti-competitive practices by tech companies. The subscription service also came into effect after regional regulators fined the company over $400 million for violating EU data privacy laws.<o:p></o:p>

“The changes we’re announcing today meet EU regulator demands and go beyond what’s required by EU law,” Meta President Nick Clegg said Tuesday on Threads, explained the CNBC report further.

Price drop for its EU subscriptions<o:p></o:p>

The company said it will drop the price of its EU monthly subscription service from 9.99 euros to 5.99 euros for desktop users and from 12.99 euros to 7.99 euros for iOS and Android users. <o:p></o:p>

If EU users choose the “less personalized option” to access Facebook and Instagram for free, they will see ads that “may be less relevant to a person’s interests,” the company said. For this version, Meta said it will show ads based on “a minimal set of data points,” including users’ age, gender, location and how they engage with ads.<o:p></o:p>

Additionally, EU users who choose the free option will also see unavoidable advertisements that are intended to “provide value to advertisers,” Meta stated.

The EU’s tough regulations have impacted Meta’s ability to quickly debut new services in the region compared to less-regulated areas like the US In 2023, for instance, it took nearly half a year before Meta was able to offer its Twitter-like threads service to European users after it launched in the US that summer.<o:p></o:p>

Pedro Pavón, a Meta global policy director, stated that while European Union regulators make it difficult for online-advertising based companies to operate in the region, he believes that the business practice of offering personalized ads represents “the foundation of a modern, free internet” and lets people “connect with the brands and products most relevant to them in seamless and non-disruptive ways.”

<o:p>Market participants and investors will carefully follow these developments. These developments will help them in making informed investment choices.&nbsp;</o:p>

&nbsp;

Meta has reduced the price of its ad-free subscription versions of Facebook and Instagram by 40 per cent for European Union (EU) users. This has been done to comply with regulatory demands in the region, according to a detailed report by CNBC.

Meta has reduced the price of its ad-free subscription versions of Facebook and Instagram by 40 per cent for European Union (EU) users. This has been done to comply with regulatory demands in the region, according to a detailed report by CNBC. The leading social media company will also offer EU users access to Facebook and Instagram for free if they agree to be shown advertisements based on a limited set of user data, the company stated in a blog on November 12, the CNBC report detailed further. Meta originally debuted an ad-free subscription service for the European Union in October 2023 due to an EU regulation intended to clamp down on anti-competitive practices by tech companies. The subscription service also came into effect after regional regulators fined the company over $400 million for violating EU data privacy laws. “The changes we’re announcing today meet EU regulator demands and go beyond what’s required by EU law,” Meta President Nick Clegg said Tuesday on Threads, explained the CNBC report further. Price drop for its EU subscriptions The company said it will drop the price of its EU monthly subscription service from 9.99 euros to 5.99 euros for desktop users and from 12.99 euros to 7.99 euros for iOS and Android users. If EU users choose the “less personalized option” to access Facebook and Instagram for free, they will see ads that “may be less relevant to a person’s interests,” the company said. For this version, Meta said it will show ads based on “a minimal set of data points,” including users’ age, gender, location and how they engage with ads. Additionally, EU users who choose the free option will also see unavoidable advertisements that are intended to “provide value to advertisers,” Meta stated. The EU’s tough regulations have impacted Meta’s ability to quickly debut new services in the region compared to less-regulated areas like the US In 2023, for instance, it took nearly half a year before Meta was able to offer its Twitter-like threads service to European users after it launched in the US that summer. Pedro Pavón, a Meta global policy director, stated that while European Union regulators make it difficult for online-advertising based companies to operate in the region, he believes that the business practice of offering personalized ads represents “the foundation of a modern, free internet” and lets people “connect with the brands and products most relevant to them in seamless and non-disruptive ways.” Market participants and investors will carefully follow these developments. These developments will help them in making informed investment choices.

Meta reduces EU Facebook and Instagram subscription fees by 40%

Several schools in the Canadian province of Ontario are suing social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat for more than $8 billion, according to local media reports on Thursday (Nov 7).

Several schools in the Canadian province of Ontario are suing social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat for more than $8 billion, according to local media reports on Thursday (Nov 7). A dozen Ontario boards and two private schools are suing these social media platforms, alleging they have harmed the mental health and well-being of children. Initially, four school boards- Toronto public, Toronto Catholic, Peel public, and Ottawa-Carleton public- filed their cases in March 2023 and sought $4.5 billion. However, the list of schools has now gone up to 14, a report by the Toronto Star on Thursday said. The updated list includes Dufferin-Peel Catholic, York Catholic, Trillium Lakelands, Ottawa Catholic, District School Board of Niagara, Simcoe County, Kawartha Pine Ridge and Rainy River boards, and private religious schools Holy Name of Mary College School, and Eitz Chaim day school. The cases filed against social media platforms As per the Toronto Star report, the 14 schools filed separate but similar cases in Ontario's Superior Court of Justice, alleging Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat rewired the way children "rewired the way children think, behave, and learn," that has cost them (schools) billions in staff supports and resources. Also read | US court okays lawsuits accusing Meta, Google of deploying addiction tactics on teens The schools also called the social media giants to make improvements to their platforms. The report added that the allegations of the schools had not been tested in school, and the social media companies said they would defend the claims. Speaking to the newspaper, a spokesperson from Snapchat said that the app was intentionally designed to be different from traditional social media. "Snapchat opens directly to a camera — rather than a feed of content — and has no traditional public likes or comments," the spokesperson said. Meanwhile, a spokesperson from Meta (representing Facebook and Instagram), told the Toronto Star said that the company wanted to reassure every parent that "we have their interests at heart in the work we’re doing to provide teens with safe, supportive experiences.” Canada orders shutdown of TikTok's business in country The above developments came as Canada ordered TikTok's business in the country to be dissolved, citing national security risks, but added the government was not blocking Canadians' access to the short-video app or their ability to create content. Also read | Canadian government bans TikTok’s business in country, app access continues "The government is taking action to address the specific national security risks related to ByteDance Ltd's operations in Canada through the establishment of TikTok Technology Canada Inc," Innovation Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said in a statement. (With inputs from agencies)

Schools in Canada's Ontario suing social media platforms for over $8 billion. Here's why

A woman was arrested by the Texas police after she was accused of trying to sell her newborn baby on social media platform Facebook for only $150. The 21-year-old Juniper Bryson allegedly posted about the baby in September in an online group entitled 'Birth Mothers Looking for Adoptive Parent(s)'.

A woman was arrested by the Texas police after she was accused of trying to sell her newborn baby on social media platform Facebook for only $150. The 21-year-old Juniper Bryson allegedly posted about the baby in September in an online group entitled 'Birth Mothers Looking for Adoptive Parent(s)'. Bryson, who has been living in Houston, said that she was willing to travel to adopt the baby. The woman allegedly reached out to a family member to ensure that the child was taken by them and not placed into foster care and further noted that the baby was drug-positive. "She needs someone there during labour and to take the baby boy home. She doesn't want him going into foster care," read the charging documents. Also Read: Texas abortion ban kills teenager as she experienced pregnancy complications: Reports However, Bryson allegedly asked for payment while writing, "It's not even like that, just enough to move into an apartment so I can work a job and get (my daughter) back, or a cheap down payment, or any car to get to different places to DoorDash. Nothing crazy at all." Woman reaches out to families to sell her newborn Bryson wrote to at least seven people and appealed to them to adopt her newborn. Many of the responses came from those who were either struggling to get pregnant or were same-sex couples. Some of these couples were willing to drive through the night to pick up the infant. However, when they were on their way, Bryson asked for money. "Juniper sent him a picture of the food she was trying to order, and he sent her money, a total of $25 via Apple Pay to complete the food delivery. (The prospective parent) stated that 3.5 hours into their trip to Houston, she asked them to send her $150," stated charging documents. Also Read: China is now monitoring couples' 'right time' to conceive a baby and pregnancy. But why? Bryson then blocked the cellphone number of the prospective parents but later unblocked them to state, "If the baby wasn't worth $200 to them, then screw all." Who adopted the baby? Local woman Wendy Williams, who was living in Houston, decided to adopt the baby and even sent Bryson an Uber when she was in labour for her to reach the hospital. The baby was born on September 24, and Williams remained with Bryson during her eight hours. She also chose the name of the baby and later adopted her. "I felt a real bond between a mom and a baby. I felt a connection as if he were biologically mine," said Williams, while speaking to KTRK. (With inputs from agencies)

US police arrest woman for selling newborn baby on Facebook for just $150

Stolen vehicles sold online are an increasingly growing problem, and authorities are warning people about it — particularly on Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in New York says this year they’ve recovered 228 stolen cars and half (149) are sold in the advertisements. Quite a few victims thought they bought these vehicles and then tried to register them, only to discover they are stolen.

DMV Commissioner Mark J.F. Schroeder warned: 'Scammers are ready to take advantage of those who would need an affordable vehicle.' State officials are offering up needed guidance to help potential buyers avoid becoming victims.

Each year, most stolen cars are sold on popular online marketplaces, and State Police Superintendent Steven G. James has urged consumers to do their research before buying anything. He warned that car buyers must be on the lookout for dishonest sellers who might rip them off thousands of dollars.

New York Police Department (NYPD) Interim Commissioner Thomas Donion repeated the concern, however, saying the vehicle should be verified and the seller proved to be legit. To help prevent bumping, he recommended avoiding cash transactions, as well as meeting in public, safe and well lit places like the NYPD's precincts, they have cameras with 24 hour video surveillance.

The DMV has shared some key tips about buying a car nationwide and to help buyers even more, they've outlined some of their thoughts on what to do. Prospective car buyers should:

1. Verify that the vehicle isn’t reported stolen with the use of a third party VIN history checker. 
2. CAUTIO: Make sure the seller’s name matches the data on the vehicle title. 
3. The VIN on the car should match the title.

Buyers are also encouraged to write a cashier’s check made out to the seller, instead of cash, in order to reduce the risk of being scammed by having the money returned if the purchase goes awry.

The NY DMV has also launched a dedicated website to educate consumers on what to look for in legitimate sales and how to choose a vehicle wisely. As online car sales continue to grow, these precautions are essential for protecting against fraud and theft.

Stolen vehicles sold online are an increasingly growing problem, and authorities are warning people about it — particularly on Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist.

Stolen vehicles sold online are an increasingly growing problem, and authorities are warning people about it — particularly on Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in New York says this year they’ve recovered 228 stolen cars and half (149) are sold in the advertisements. Quite a few victims thought they bought these vehicles and then tried to register them, only to discover they are stolen. DMV Commissioner Mark J.F. Schroeder warned: 'Scammers are ready to take advantage of those who would need an affordable vehicle.' State officials are offering up needed guidance to help potential buyers avoid becoming victims. Each year, most stolen cars are sold on popular online marketplaces, and State Police Superintendent Steven G. James has urged consumers to do their research before buying anything. He warned that car buyers must be on the lookout for dishonest sellers who might rip them off thousands of dollars. New York Police Department (NYPD) Interim Commissioner Thomas Donion repeated the concern, however, saying the vehicle should be verified and the seller proved to be legit. To help prevent bumping, he recommended avoiding cash transactions, as well as meeting in public, safe and well lit places like the NYPD's precincts, they have cameras with 24 hour video surveillance. The DMV has shared some key tips about buying a car nationwide and to help buyers even more, they've outlined some of their thoughts on what to do. Prospective car buyers should: 1. Verify that the vehicle isn’t reported stolen with the use of a third party VIN history checker. 2. CAUTIO: Make sure the seller’s name matches the data on the vehicle title. 3. The VIN on the car should match the title. Buyers are also encouraged to write a cashier’s check made out to the seller, instead of cash, in order to reduce the risk of being scammed by having the money returned if the purchase goes awry. The NY DMV has also launched a dedicated website to educate consumers on what to look for in legitimate sales and how to choose a vehicle wisely. As online car sales continue to grow, these precautions are essential for protecting against fraud and theft.

Authorities warn of stolen cars sold on Facebook and Craigslist

Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, will use the voices of celebrities like legendary British actress Dame Judi Dench and American wrestler-actor John Cena for its artificial intelligence chatbot.

Other AI voice options for users include American actress Kristen Bell as well as actor-comedians Awkwafina and Keegan-Michael Key.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/openai-cto-mira-murati-2-research-executives-announce-exit-joining-wave-of-high-profile-departures-762067">Also read: OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, 2 research executives announce exit, joining wave of high-profile departures</a> 
 
CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the celebrity chatbots at Meta's annual Connect conference on Wednesday (Sep 25).

Users can opt for one of these five celebrities for the digital assistant of Meta, which is similar to OpenAI's ChatGPT.

Earlier reports had said that Meta offered millions of dollars to several celebrities to be the voice of its AI chatbot.&nbsp;

Last week, Zuckerberg shared a video of Cena in the run-up to the chatbot announcement.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DAEQq8lvpvD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);">
<div style="padding:16px;">
<div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>

<div style="padding: 19% 0;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DAEQq8lvpvD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"><svg height="50px" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 60 60" width="50px" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd" stroke="none" stroke-width="1"><g fill="#000000" transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></a></div>

<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DAEQq8lvpvD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank">View this post on Instagram</a></div>
</div>

<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DAEQq8lvpvD/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A post shared by Mark Zuckerberg (@zuck)</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Meta debuted its AI chatbots in September 2023. They had the personalities of model Kendall Jenner and rapper Snoop Dogg, but did not seem to work. Those bots were yanked by the social media giant.

Watch: Meta rolls out verified plans in India 
&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/meta-rolls-out-verified-plans-in-india-741932/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The new voiced chatbots will be launched first in the US and other English-speaking regions.

The celebrity-voiced chatbots will be featured across the Meta apps: WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/you-phone-is-listening-to-your-conversations-firm-working-for-fb-google-confirms-755911">Also read:&nbsp;Your phone is listening to your conversations, firm working for FB, Google confirms</a>

Meta's move into the chatbots comes as compensation is intensifying with Microsoft-backed OpenAI and Google parent Alphabet in the field of generative AI.

OpenAI had introduced a similar voiced chatbot this May, but it became controversial after actress Scarlett Johansson complained about it being too similar to her voice, in spite of her having declined to take part in the project. 
 
(With inputs from agencies)

Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, will use the voices of celebrities like legendary British actress Dame Judi Dench and American wrestler-actor John Cena for its artificial intelligence chatbot.

Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, will use the voices of celebrities like legendary British actress Dame Judi Dench and American wrestler-actor John Cena for its artificial intelligence chatbot. Other AI voice options for users include American actress Kristen Bell as well as actor-comedians Awkwafina and Keegan-Michael Key. Also read: OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, 2 research executives announce exit, joining wave of high-profile departures CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced the celebrity chatbots at Meta's annual Connect conference on Wednesday (Sep 25). Users can opt for one of these five celebrities for the digital assistant of Meta, which is similar to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Earlier reports had said that Meta offered millions of dollars to several celebrities to be the voice of its AI chatbot. Last week, Zuckerberg shared a video of Cena in the run-up to the chatbot announcement. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Mark Zuckerberg (@zuck) × Meta debuted its AI chatbots in September 2023. They had the personalities of model Kendall Jenner and rapper Snoop Dogg, but did not seem to work. Those bots were yanked by the social media giant. Watch: Meta rolls out verified plans in India × The new voiced chatbots will be launched first in the US and other English-speaking regions. The celebrity-voiced chatbots will be featured across the Meta apps: WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram. Also read: Your phone is listening to your conversations, firm working for FB, Google confirms Meta's move into the chatbots comes as compensation is intensifying with Microsoft-backed OpenAI and Google parent Alphabet in the field of generative AI. OpenAI had introduced a similar voiced chatbot this May, but it became controversial after actress Scarlett Johansson complained about it being too similar to her voice, in spite of her having declined to take part in the project. (With inputs from agencies)

Meta launches AI chatbot in voices of Judi Dench, John Cena, other celebrities

A major marketing company whose clients include Facebook, Amazon and Google has admitted that it listens to users' smartphone conversations and uses artificial intelligence (AI) to articulate data and later place advertisements.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Cox Media Group (CMG) privately admitted to the long-held suspicions of smartphone users during a pitch deck to investors. The&nbsp;firm stated that its&nbsp;“Active Listening” software uses AI to&nbsp;“capture real-time intent data by listening to our conversations", according to a report in 404 Media.

"Advertisers can pair this voice data with behavioural data to target in-market consumers," CMG said in the pitch deck.&nbsp;

"Consumers leave a data trail based on their conversations and online behaviour and the AI-powered software collects and analyses behavioural and voice data from 470+ sources,"&nbsp;it added.&nbsp;

Watch | Facebook pressured by US govt to censor Covid content: Mark Zuckerberg

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/facebook-pressured-by-us-govt-to-censor-covid-content-mark-zuckerberg-753794/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Companies issue statement&nbsp;</h2>

After the outlet's report, Google removed CMG from its "Partners Program" website.

“All advertisers must comply with all applicable laws and regulations as well as our Google Ads policies, and when we identify ads or advertisers that violate these policies, we will take appropriate action,” a Google spokesperson was quoted as saying by NY Post.&nbsp;

Meanwhile, Meta, the parent company of Facebook said it was reviewing CMG to assess whether it violated any of its terms of service.

“Meta does not use your phone’s microphone for ads and we’ve been public about this for years,” Meta spokesperson said.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mark-zuckerberg-reveals-biden-administration-pressured-meta-to-censor-covid-19-related-posts-753534">Also read |&nbsp;Mark Zuckerberg reveals Biden administration 'pressured' Meta to censor Covid-related posts</a>

This is not the first time when a company has claimed to be hearing real-life conversations through a smartphone. Last year, MindSift, a&nbsp;New Hampshire-based company similarly claimed that it used voice data to place targeted ads.&nbsp;

“We know what you’re thinking. Is this even legal?” the company wrote in a since-deleted Cox blog post from November 2023.

“It is legal for phones and devices to listen to you. When a new app download or update prompts consumers with a multi-page term of use agreement somewhere in the fine print, Active Listening is often included.”

(With inputs from agencies)

A major marketing company whose clients include Facebook, Amazon and Google has admitted that it listens to users' smartphone conversations and uses artificial intelligence (AI) to articulate data and later place advertisements.

A major marketing company whose clients include Facebook, Amazon and Google has admitted that it listens to users' smartphone conversations and uses artificial intelligence (AI) to articulate data and later place advertisements. Cox Media Group (CMG) privately admitted to the long-held suspicions of smartphone users during a pitch deck to investors. The firm stated that its “Active Listening” software uses AI to “capture real-time intent data by listening to our conversations", according to a report in 404 Media. "Advertisers can pair this voice data with behavioural data to target in-market consumers," CMG said in the pitch deck. "Consumers leave a data trail based on their conversations and online behaviour and the AI-powered software collects and analyses behavioural and voice data from 470+ sources," it added. Watch | Facebook pressured by US govt to censor Covid content: Mark Zuckerberg × Companies issue statement After the outlet's report, Google removed CMG from its "Partners Program" website. “All advertisers must comply with all applicable laws and regulations as well as our Google Ads policies, and when we identify ads or advertisers that violate these policies, we will take appropriate action,” a Google spokesperson was quoted as saying by NY Post. Meanwhile, Meta, the parent company of Facebook said it was reviewing CMG to assess whether it violated any of its terms of service. “Meta does not use your phone’s microphone for ads and we’ve been public about this for years,” Meta spokesperson said. Also read | Mark Zuckerberg reveals Biden administration 'pressured' Meta to censor Covid-related posts This is not the first time when a company has claimed to be hearing real-life conversations through a smartphone. Last year, MindSift, a New Hampshire-based company similarly claimed that it used voice data to place targeted ads. “We know what you’re thinking. Is this even legal?” the company wrote in a since-deleted Cox blog post from November 2023. “It is legal for phones and devices to listen to you. When a new app download or update prompts consumers with a multi-page term of use agreement somewhere in the fine print, Active Listening is often included.” (With inputs from agencies)

Your phone is listening to your conversations, firm working for FB, Google confirms

Watching YouTube shorts, Instagram reels and TikTok videos on endless scroll is a way to kill boredom for millions of mostly young people. However, a new study has found that moving from one video to the next actually causes more boredom.

Digital switching is the practice of people switching between videos or fast-forward through them on platforms like YouTube, TikTok and Netflix. The study done in University of Toronto showed that this switching behaviour "makes people feel more bored, less satisfied, less engaged, and less meaningful in some instances."&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp; <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-court-blocks-key-part-of-california-law-on-childrens-online-safety-750870">US court blocks key part of California law on children's online safety</a>

The&nbsp;assessment was made based on the idea that switching from one content to other is actually a tedious process, which tires one's attention span. Boredom is directly linked to attention: it's the disparity between what one wants to do or where one wants to be versus the reality.&nbsp;

“When people keep switching through videos, they become less engaged with the videos and they are looking for something more interesting. This can lead to increased feelings of boredom,” the Guardian newspaper quoted Dr Katy Tam at the University of Toronto Scarborough, the lead author of the research, as saying.

<h2>How 'boredom on social media' study was done</h2>

The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, reached the conclusion after experiments on 1,200 participants who were shown videos and made to answer questions about boredom.

One experiment with 140 respondents revealed that people tended to switch between videos more when they rated the content more boring.&nbsp;

WATCH:&nbsp;Social media platform X makes likes private to enhance user privacy

&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/social-media-platform-x-makes-likes-private-to-enhance-user-privacy-731597/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

"We found a bidirectional, causal relationship between boredom and digital switching.&nbsp;When participants were bored, they switched and they believed that switching would help them avoid boredom," said the study.

It was found that switching between videos - or within a video - not only led to more boredom, but also reduced satisfaction, reduced attention, and lowered meaning.&nbsp;

Even when participants had the freedom to watch videos of personal choice and interest on YouTube, digital switching still intensified boredom, it found.&nbsp;

"Our findings suggest that attempts to avoid boredom through digital switching may sometimes inadvertently exacerbate it," said the authors.

<h2>Age may be a factor in how easily bored you get with online videos</h2>

People of different ages, said the study,&nbsp;may have different habits when it comes to watching videos and switching. “How people consume videos and how this affects boredom may vary based on age and digital media habits," it said, adding further research is needed to explore this aspect.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/google-meta-bend-their-own-rules-to-target-teenagers-with-ad-campaigns-report-748487">Google, Meta bend their own rules to target teenagers with ad campaigns: Report</a>

So what's the best way to enjoy videos while avoiding boredom?

“Just as we pay for an immersive experience in a movie theatre, enjoyment often comes from immersing ourselves in videos rather than swiping through them,” Tan said. 
 
(With inputs from agencies)

Watching YouTube shorts, Instagram reels and TikTok videos on endless scroll is a way to kill boredom for millions of mostly young people. However, a new study has found that moving from one video to the next actually causes more boredom.

Watching YouTube shorts, Instagram reels and TikTok videos on endless scroll is a way to kill boredom for millions of mostly young people. However, a new study has found that moving from one video to the next actually causes more boredom. Digital switching is the practice of people switching between videos or fast-forward through them on platforms like YouTube, TikTok and Netflix. The study done in University of Toronto showed that this switching behaviour "makes people feel more bored, less satisfied, less engaged, and less meaningful in some instances." Also read: US court blocks key part of California law on children's online safety The assessment was made based on the idea that switching from one content to other is actually a tedious process, which tires one's attention span. Boredom is directly linked to attention: it's the disparity between what one wants to do or where one wants to be versus the reality. “When people keep switching through videos, they become less engaged with the videos and they are looking for something more interesting. This can lead to increased feelings of boredom,” the Guardian newspaper quoted Dr Katy Tam at the University of Toronto Scarborough, the lead author of the research, as saying. How 'boredom on social media' study was done The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, reached the conclusion after experiments on 1,200 participants who were shown videos and made to answer questions about boredom. One experiment with 140 respondents revealed that people tended to switch between videos more when they rated the content more boring. WATCH: Social media platform X makes likes private to enhance user privacy × "We found a bidirectional, causal relationship between boredom and digital switching. When participants were bored, they switched and they believed that switching would help them avoid boredom," said the study. It was found that switching between videos - or within a video - not only led to more boredom, but also reduced satisfaction, reduced attention, and lowered meaning. Even when participants had the freedom to watch videos of personal choice and interest on YouTube, digital switching still intensified boredom, it found. "Our findings suggest that attempts to avoid boredom through digital switching may sometimes inadvertently exacerbate it," said the authors. Age may be a factor in how easily bored you get with online videos People of different ages, said the study, may have different habits when it comes to watching videos and switching. “How people consume videos and how this affects boredom may vary based on age and digital media habits," it said, adding further research is needed to explore this aspect. Also read: Google, Meta bend their own rules to target teenagers with ad campaigns: Report So what's the best way to enjoy videos while avoiding boredom? “Just as we pay for an immersive experience in a movie theatre, enjoyment often comes from immersing ourselves in videos rather than swiping through them,” Tan said. (With inputs from agencies)

Those videos you scroll for killing time might actually be causing more boredom

A man from Montreal, Canada, is filing a lawsuit against social networking platforms YouTube, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok claiming that they cause addiction and have a negative impact on mental health, as per CTV News.&nbsp;

The 24-year-old man said that he began utilising social media in 2015 and since then, started experiencing numerous problems with body image and productivity. As per the lawsuit, his utilisation time of social networking sites was up to four hours, but he has now cut that down to two hours a day. Philippe Brault from Lambert Avocats, the law firm representing the man said, "He still finds that it has an effect on his productivity and his sleep.”

Also Read|<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/bangladeshs-st-martin-island-what-a-potential-us-airbase-could-mean-for-region-749179">What a US airbase at Bangladesh's St. Martin Island could mean for region</a>|

Brault added, "In 2024, it's estimated that humanity as a whole will be using social media for a total of 500 million years." He mentioned that the firm took this case because it is an ever-growing problem for everyone. He highlighted that 52 per cent of children in Canada between the ages of seven and eleven use social media.&nbsp;

The aim of the case is to recover these punitive damages for the purportedly careless platform designs of social media companies. Brault also highlighted that platform owners should prioritise the safety and health of their users.&nbsp;

Also Read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trumps-presidential-campaign-hacked-iranian-actors-blamed-by-his-team-749057">Trump's prez campaign hacked, Iranian actors blamed by his team</a>|

The design of these social media platforms exploits the psychological weaknesses of their users, leading to extended engagements that negatively impact the user's daily lives.

"We're also looking to get this message out there by talking to the media. People have to understand the risks of the use of social media," he added.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

A man from Montreal, Canada, is filing a lawsuit against social networking platforms YouTube, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok claiming that they cause addiction and have a negative impact on mental health, as per CTV News.

A man from Montreal, Canada, is filing a lawsuit against social networking platforms YouTube, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and TikTok claiming that they cause addiction and have a negative impact on mental health, as per CTV News. The 24-year-old man said that he began utilising social media in 2015 and since then, started experiencing numerous problems with body image and productivity. As per the lawsuit, his utilisation time of social networking sites was up to four hours, but he has now cut that down to two hours a day. Philippe Brault from Lambert Avocats, the law firm representing the man said, "He still finds that it has an effect on his productivity and his sleep.” Also Read|What a US airbase at Bangladesh's St. Martin Island could mean for region| Brault added, "In 2024, it's estimated that humanity as a whole will be using social media for a total of 500 million years." He mentioned that the firm took this case because it is an ever-growing problem for everyone. He highlighted that 52 per cent of children in Canada between the ages of seven and eleven use social media. The aim of the case is to recover these punitive damages for the purportedly careless platform designs of social media companies. Brault also highlighted that platform owners should prioritise the safety and health of their users. Also Read |Trump's prez campaign hacked, Iranian actors blamed by his team| The design of these social media platforms exploits the psychological weaknesses of their users, leading to extended engagements that negatively impact the user's daily lives. "We're also looking to get this message out there by talking to the media. People have to understand the risks of the use of social media," he added. (With inputs from agencies)

Canada man sues social networking sites Meta, TikTok, and Reddit for being addictive

On August 5, a couple allegedly skipped out on a £120 (approximately ₹12,000) bill at The Lazy Fox after posting pictures of their meal on Facebook. The couple had reportedly enjoyed a lavish spread that included six espresso martinis, gourmet burgers, halloumi, sweet potato fries, and a Biscoff cheesecake.

Restaurant co-owner Mauricio Spinola expressed frustration over the financial loss, stating, "It's a big hit for a small business like ours, we just can't afford to lose over 100 pounds in the current climate. We can't ask people to give us their phone or wallet when they go out for a cigarette. The vast majority of our customers are great and would think that is weird." Spinola also mentioned that the police have been notified of the incident, as they seek to recover the unpaid bill.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/indian-cop-suspended-for-demanding-5-kg-potatoes-as-bribe-749125">Indian cop suspended for demanding '5 kg potatoes' as bribe</a>

Echoing the sentiment, co-owner Enoely Fernandez criticised the couple's audacity, calling them "silly" for flaunting their meal on social media. Fernandez also mentioned the difficulty faced by the staff, noting, "The hard thing is the guy didn’t look suspicious. He wasn’t drunk. He wasn’t shouting. He wasn’t disruptive. He asked to go out for a cigarette, and of course, we said that was fine."

In a video released by the restaurant, the couple was seen taking an hour to enjoy their meal before stepping out "for a cigarette." However, they never returned, according to a report by the Independent.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/nasa-issues-sudden-alert-as-massive-asteroid-rushes-to-come-too-close-to-earth-at-scary-speed-749113">NASA issues sudden alert as massive asteroid rushes to come too close to Earth at scary speed</a>

The incident has resonated with other restaurant owners in the area, some of whom have reported similar encounters with the same couple. These reports suggest that the pair may have a history of deceiving restaurants, raising concerns within the local dining community.

(With inputs from agencies)

On August 5, a couple allegedly skipped out on a £120 (approximately ₹12,000) bill at The Lazy Fox after posting pictures of their meal on Facebook. The couple had reportedly enjoyed a lavish spread that included six espresso martinis, gourmet burgers, halloumi, sweet potato fries, and a Biscoff cheesecake.

On August 5, a couple allegedly skipped out on a £120 (approximately ₹12,000) bill at The Lazy Fox after posting pictures of their meal on Facebook. The couple had reportedly enjoyed a lavish spread that included six espresso martinis, gourmet burgers, halloumi, sweet potato fries, and a Biscoff cheesecake. Restaurant co-owner Mauricio Spinola expressed frustration over the financial loss, stating, "It's a big hit for a small business like ours, we just can't afford to lose over 100 pounds in the current climate. We can't ask people to give us their phone or wallet when they go out for a cigarette. The vast majority of our customers are great and would think that is weird." Spinola also mentioned that the police have been notified of the incident, as they seek to recover the unpaid bill. Also read | Indian cop suspended for demanding '5 kg potatoes' as bribe Echoing the sentiment, co-owner Enoely Fernandez criticised the couple's audacity, calling them "silly" for flaunting their meal on social media. Fernandez also mentioned the difficulty faced by the staff, noting, "The hard thing is the guy didn’t look suspicious. He wasn’t drunk. He wasn’t shouting. He wasn’t disruptive. He asked to go out for a cigarette, and of course, we said that was fine." In a video released by the restaurant, the couple was seen taking an hour to enjoy their meal before stepping out "for a cigarette." However, they never returned, according to a report by the Independent. Also read | NASA issues sudden alert as massive asteroid rushes to come too close to Earth at scary speed The incident has resonated with other restaurant owners in the area, some of whom have reported similar encounters with the same couple. These reports suggest that the pair may have a history of deceiving restaurants, raising concerns within the local dining community. (With inputs from agencies)

UK couple leaves restaurant without paying £120 bill, flaunts meal on Facebook

Turkey has blocked access to social media platform Instagram, the infotech regulator said on Friday, without stating a reason or duration for the ban, which also left the platform's mobile app inaccessible. The move follows comments on Wednesday by Turkish communications official Fahrettin Altun, criticizing the platform for what he called its decision to block condolence posts on the killing of Ismail Haniyeh, a key official of Palestinian militant group Hamas.

Turkey response to META'S Censorship: Instagram blocked without stating reason or duration | WION

Meta Platforms is close to having to pay its first antitrust fine in the European Union, according to those familiar with the matter, after regulators have decided the company's alleged anti-competitive practices.

The tech giant is under pressure over its classified ads service, Facebook Marketplace, which the EU Commission believes has been unfairly bundled with the core Facebook social network.

Furthermore, it's alleged by the Commission that Meta has imposed unfavourable terms on rival classified ad services advertising on its platforms.

It could be as high as $13.4 billion, although past EU fines indicate that the actual fine will likely be much lower.

The Commission is to adopt its final decision in the next few months before antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager leaves in November.

Meta has always denied any wrongdoing, arguing its product innovations benefit consumers and rivals alike. Indeed, it even attempted to settle an investigation by offering limits on how it uses competitor advertising data to boost Facebook Marketplace, but this was rejected by the EU.

It is the latest of a line in regulatory challenges for Meta, already facing a separate charge at the Commission over its failure to comply with new tech rules about its ad model.

With the digital world evolving, there has been increased pressure on tech giants to observe antitrust regulations.

If the court rules against Meta, this could dramatically change how it works in Europe and might set a legally binding precedent for future antitrust actions against other tech companies.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Meta Platforms is close to having to pay its first antitrust fine in the European Union, according to those familiar with the matter, after regulators have decided the company's alleged anti-competitive practices.

Meta Platforms is close to having to pay its first antitrust fine in the European Union, according to those familiar with the matter, after regulators have decided the company's alleged anti-competitive practices. The tech giant is under pressure over its classified ads service, Facebook Marketplace, which the EU Commission believes has been unfairly bundled with the core Facebook social network. Furthermore, it's alleged by the Commission that Meta has imposed unfavourable terms on rival classified ad services advertising on its platforms. It could be as high as $13.4 billion, although past EU fines indicate that the actual fine will likely be much lower. The Commission is to adopt its final decision in the next few months before antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager leaves in November. Meta has always denied any wrongdoing, arguing its product innovations benefit consumers and rivals alike. Indeed, it even attempted to settle an investigation by offering limits on how it uses competitor advertising data to boost Facebook Marketplace, but this was rejected by the EU. It is the latest of a line in regulatory challenges for Meta, already facing a separate charge at the Commission over its failure to comply with new tech rules about its ad model. With the digital world evolving, there has been increased pressure on tech giants to observe antitrust regulations. If the court rules against Meta, this could dramatically change how it works in Europe and might set a legally binding precedent for future antitrust actions against other tech companies. (With inputs from Reuters)

Meta braces for first EU antitrust fine

Meta on Friday said it was rolling back some restrictions to former President Donald J. Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts so people on its services could hear from those running for the presidency “on the same basis.” Watch to know more.

Melania Trump to attend Republican event | Musk donates 'unknown' amount to Trump campaign

Meta has reported that Facebook is attracting its most young adult users in 3 years. More than 40 million us and Canadian adults to aged 18 to 29 now check Facebook daily.

Meta's Facebook sees highest number of young adult users in three years

The European Union (EU) on Thursday (May 16) started a formal investigation into Facebook and Instagram on allegations that the Meta-owned platforms are leading to addictive behaviour in children.

The European Union (EU) on Thursday (May 16) started a formal investigation into Facebook and Instagram on allegations that the Meta-owned platforms are leading to addictive behaviour in children. The investigation is being carried out under a mammoth law called the Digital Services Act (DSA) which forces the largest tech firms in the world to take more steps to protect European users online and remove any illegal content. This is the second investigation which has been launched into Meta. Last month, another probe was launched by the European Union over concerns that Facebook and Instagram are not countering disinformation. Also Read: EU flexes arms as it launches probe against Meta over disinformation concerns "We are not convinced that it has done enough to comply with the DSA obligations to mitigate the risks of negative effects to the physical and mental health of young Europeans," said EU's internal market commissioner, Thierry Breton. "We are sparing no effort to protect our children," he stated. Meanwhile, Meta's spokesperson tried to defend the company and claimed that it had taken steps to protect young users. "We want young people to have safe, age-appropriate experiences online and have spent a decade developing more than 50 tools and policies designed to protect them," said the spokesperson. "This is a challenge the whole industry is facing, and we look forward to sharing details of our work with the European Commission," the spokesperson added. EU suspects Meta's systems 'may stimulate behavioural addictions in children' The European Commission, which is the tech regulator of the European Union, in Thursday's (May 16) announcement said that it suspected the systems of the platform "may stimulate behavioural addictions in children". The commission also raised another issue which was the so-called "rabbit hole" effect. This happens when users get related content based on an algorithm, which in a few cases leads to more extreme content. The commission also expressed concern that the age-verification tools of Meta may not be that effective. According to DSA, there are strict rules for protecting children and ensuring that their privacy and security are not hampered online. The EU fears that Meta may not be taking enough steps to meet these obligations. Watch: Meta's oversight board probes handling of AI-generated explicit images In a statement, the European Union said that the "opening of formal proceedings does not prejudge its outcome". No deadline has been set for the completion of the probe. The DSA is present within the powerful legal armoury of the European Union to keep a check on big tech companies. Facebook and Instagram fall among 23 "very large" online platforms which need to comply with the DSA or face the risk of fines which can be as high as six per cent of the total global turnover of the platform. It can also impose a ban on social media platforms for serious and repeated violations. Other social media platforms which have been under the scrutiny of DSA are Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube. (With inputs from agencies)

EU starts formal investigation into Facebook, Instagram over child protection policies

According to report in March Meta got over 27,000 complaints on Facebook and Instagram from India about synthetic content. Watch in for more details!

Meta India: 27,000 complaints in March, fake FB & Instagram profiles key concern

Meta’s stock price took a nosedive after the company released its first-quarter earnings report. Investors reacted negatively to forecasts of higher expenses and lower-than-expected revenue. The stock price drop wiped nearly $200 billion off Meta's market capitalisation. This decrease brings Meta's market value down to roughly $1 trillion.

Meta stock plunges after AI spending forecast disappoints investors

Meta's Oversight Board has announced two separate investigations after explicit AI-powered images appeared on its platforms. Watch to know more.

Meta's oversight board probes handling of AI-generated explicit images

Meta Platforms on Monday said that it would temporarily shut down its social media platform Threads in Turkey from April 29 with an interim order. Watch to know more.

Meta platforms to temporarily shutdown shut down threads in Turkey

facebook

Facebook, News on Facebook, stories on Facebook, articles on Facebook, Facebook stories at Wion, Facebook news, Facebook latest news