The US military has confirmed that five people were killed in strikes targeting two vessels suspected of drug smuggling.


US Military: Five Killed in Strikes on Two Alleged Drug Boats

United States President Donald Trump has ordered “a total and complete” blockade of all US-sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela.


US-Venezuela Tensions: Trump Orders Naval Blockade of Sanctioned Venezuelan Oil Tankers

US President Donald Trump, in a recent address, asserted that he "inherited a mess" from the Biden administration eleven months ago and is now "fixing it." Trump claimed that under his leadership, "zero illegal aliens" have entered the country in the past seven months, contrasting this with an "invasion" of 25 million people under the previous government. 


US President Donald Trump Accuses Joe Biden of Allowing 25 Million 'Illegals' into US 

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Dec 18 ) doubled down on his claim that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil. This comes even as criticism mounts over the scope and legality of the United States' expanding operations in the region. Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump brushed aside questions about seeking authorisation from Congress if the US were to target drug cartels on land in Venezuela. Here's what he said.<h2>'Not a big deal'</h2>When asked directly whether lawmakers would be consulted before authorising land hits on drug cartels, Trump said he "wouldn't mind" informing them but insisted it was "not a big deal".He also suggested that briefing Congress could compromise operations, saying politicians "leak like a sieve."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strikes-another-narco-trafficking-boat-kills-4-day-after-trump-s-venezuela-blockade-1766022468096">US strikes another ‘narco-trafficking’ boat, kills 4 day after Trump’s Venezuela blockade. Watch</a>"I wouldn't mind telling them, but you know, it's not a big deal," Trump said. "I don't have to tell them," claimed the POTUS.The comments come amid an aggressive US military campaign that has already seen multiple air and naval strikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific since September. These operations have reportedly killed at least 99 people and triggered a heated debate in Washington over the legality of the operations.Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has meanwhile accused Washington of using drug trafficking as a pretext for a broader push to destabilise or overthrow his government, a charge the Trump administration denies. US officials insist the strikes are part of a counter-narcotics effort aimed at stopping the flow of drugs into the United States.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-turns-up-heat-on-venezuela-with-total-and-complete-blockade-of-oil-tankers-1765933286118">Trump turns up heat on Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers</a><h2>What does the US Constitution say?</h2>Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war.Legal experts note that presidents can order limited military strikes without congressional approval under certain conditions, particularly if the actions are framed as defensive or limited in scope.&nbsp;

Trump said he does not need Congress to authorise US strikes on Venezuelan soil, calling it “not a big deal” and claiming lawmakers “leak like a sieve.” But, what does the US Constitution say? All you need to know.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Dec 18 ) doubled down on his claim that he does not need congressional approval to order military strikes on Venezuelan soil. This comes even as criticism mounts over the scope and legality of the United States' expanding operations in the region. Speaking in the Oval Office, Trump brushed aside questions about seeking authorisation from Congress if the US were to target drug cartels on land in Venezuela. Here's what he said. 'Not a big deal' When asked directly whether lawmakers would be consulted before authorising land hits on drug cartels, Trump said he "wouldn't mind" informing them but insisted it was "not a big deal". He also suggested that briefing Congress could compromise operations, saying politicians "leak like a sieve." Also read | US strikes another ‘narco-trafficking’ boat, kills 4 day after Trump’s Venezuela blockade. Watch "I wouldn't mind telling them, but you know, it's not a big deal," Trump said. "I don't have to tell them," claimed the POTUS. The comments come amid an aggressive US military campaign that has already seen multiple air and naval strikes against alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific since September. These operations have reportedly killed at least 99 people and triggered a heated debate in Washington over the legality of the operations. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has meanwhile accused Washington of using drug trafficking as a pretext for a broader push to destabilise or overthrow his government, a charge the Trump administration denies. US officials insist the strikes are part of a counter-narcotics effort aimed at stopping the flow of drugs into the United States. Also read | Trump turns up heat on Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers What does the US Constitution say? Under the US Constitution, the president serves as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but Congress holds the exclusive authority to formally declare war. Legal experts note that presidents can order limited military strikes without congressional approval under certain conditions, particularly if the actions are framed as defensive or limited in scope.

Trump said he does not need Congress to authorise US strikes on Venezuelan soil, calling it “not a big deal” and claiming lawmakers “leak like a sieve.” But, what does the US Constitution say? All you need to know.

‘Not a big deal’: Trump claims he can strike Venezuela without Congress permission. But, what does the US Constitution say?

The US health department on Thursday announced proposed measures that would effectively ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth, a major escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to roll back protections for trans people.The series of sweeping proposals announced by US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other officials would cut off vital federal funding from hospitals that provide pediatric gender transition services -- including puberty blockers, hormone therapies and surgical interventions -- even in states where they are legal.In announcing his proposals -- which are not final and must go through lengthy review and public comment -- Kennedy called gender-affirming care "malpractice" based on "junk science driven by ideological pursuits."His health department this year released a report largely written by critics of gender transition that emphasised risks of gender-affirming care and urged counseling before interventions -- a document that proved central to Thursday's announcement.The proposed measures would prohibit reimbursements for minors' gender-affirming care from Medicaid, the federal program that provides health care coverage to low-income children and adults.Even more limiting, it would revoke all funding from both Medicaid and Medicare -- the health care program for elderly adults and disabled people -- from any hospital that provides such care.Such a move would place extreme financial hardship on facilities if they continued to provide such health services.It puts medical providers in an "extremely precarious position," said Michael Ulrich, a Boston University professor of public health and law."I'm not sure there's a provider that exists that doesn't rely substantially on federal money," he told AFP.<h2>- 'Life-saving' care -</h2>The American Civil Liberties Union vowed a legal battle, calling the proposals "cruel" as well as "unconstitutional, saying they target "a vulnerable population for political gain."The American Academy of Pediatrics -- which just abruptly lost federal funds in the millions including for initiatives to prevent infant death, according to a Washington Post report -- called Thursday's actions and rhetoric "harmful.""These rules help no one, do nothing to address health care costs, and unfairly stigmatize a population of young people," the organization's president said in a statement.The LGBTQ advocacy organization Human Rights Campaign said the proposals would "force providers into an impossible choice: stop providing health care to trans youth in order to protect federal funding for every other patient."Zoe Taylor, a family doctor in the western US state of Washington, called gender-affirming health care "life-saving."The physician, a fellow with the advocacy organization Physicians for Reproductive Health, said in her practice she's seen "youth thrive once their gender dysphoria is treated.""Treating trans kids with gender-affirming care prevents and treats other mental health issues that come from society's reaction to trans youth, and also to their own gender dysphoria," she told AFP.The proposals are an intrusion on the relationship between patients, their families and physicians, she said.<h2>- 'Extremely dangerous' -</h2>Throughout the first year of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonized any recognition of gender diversity and placed strong focus on attacking transgender people.But the push to withhold broader federal health funding from any provider who offers transgender care scaled up Trump's crusade dramatically.And it came one day after a split House of Representatives narrowly passed a bill that would criminalize providing gender-affirming medical care to trans minors.Transgender people are a small proportion of the population, but lawyer Ulrich said the issue is both "extremely bad for transgender youth" and could "open the door" for other controversial government health care decisions."I don't think that enough people recognize the extent to which this is the federal government saying, 'We have the authority to declare to hospitals throughout the country what kind of health care they can and cannot provide,'" he said."It's an extremely, extremely dangerous proposition for the future."

Even more limiting, it would revoke all funding from both Medicaid and Medicare -- the health care program for elderly adults and disabled people -- from any hospital that provides such care.

The US health department on Thursday announced proposed measures that would effectively ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth, a major escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to roll back protections for trans people. The series of sweeping proposals announced by US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other officials would cut off vital federal funding from hospitals that provide pediatric gender transition services -- including puberty blockers, hormone therapies and surgical interventions -- even in states where they are legal. In announcing his proposals -- which are not final and must go through lengthy review and public comment -- Kennedy called gender-affirming care "malpractice" based on "junk science driven by ideological pursuits." His health department this year released a report largely written by critics of gender transition that emphasised risks of gender-affirming care and urged counseling before interventions -- a document that proved central to Thursday's announcement. The proposed measures would prohibit reimbursements for minors' gender-affirming care from Medicaid, the federal program that provides health care coverage to low-income children and adults. Even more limiting, it would revoke all funding from both Medicaid and Medicare -- the health care program for elderly adults and disabled people -- from any hospital that provides such care. Such a move would place extreme financial hardship on facilities if they continued to provide such health services. It puts medical providers in an "extremely precarious position," said Michael Ulrich, a Boston University professor of public health and law. "I'm not sure there's a provider that exists that doesn't rely substantially on federal money," he told AFP. - 'Life-saving' care - The American Civil Liberties Union vowed a legal battle, calling the proposals "cruel" as well as "unconstitutional, saying they target "a vulnerable population for political gain." The American Academy of Pediatrics -- which just abruptly lost federal funds in the millions including for initiatives to prevent infant death, according to a Washington Post report -- called Thursday's actions and rhetoric "harmful." "These rules help no one, do nothing to address health care costs, and unfairly stigmatize a population of young people," the organization's president said in a statement. The LGBTQ advocacy organization Human Rights Campaign said the proposals would "force providers into an impossible choice: stop providing health care to trans youth in order to protect federal funding for every other patient." Zoe Taylor, a family doctor in the western US state of Washington, called gender-affirming health care "life-saving." The physician, a fellow with the advocacy organization Physicians for Reproductive Health, said in her practice she's seen "youth thrive once their gender dysphoria is treated." "Treating trans kids with gender-affirming care prevents and treats other mental health issues that come from society's reaction to trans youth, and also to their own gender dysphoria," she told AFP. The proposals are an intrusion on the relationship between patients, their families and physicians, she said. - 'Extremely dangerous' - Throughout the first year of his second term, President Donald Trump has demonized any recognition of gender diversity and placed strong focus on attacking transgender people. But the push to withhold broader federal health funding from any provider who offers transgender care scaled up Trump's crusade dramatically. And it came one day after a split House of Representatives narrowly passed a bill that would criminalize providing gender-affirming medical care to trans minors. Transgender people are a small proportion of the population, but lawyer Ulrich said the issue is both "extremely bad for transgender youth" and could "open the door" for other controversial government health care decisions. "I don't think that enough people recognize the extent to which this is the federal government saying, 'We have the authority to declare to hospitals throughout the country what kind of health care they can and cannot provide,'" he said. "It's an extremely, extremely dangerous proposition for the future."

Even more limiting, it would revoke all funding from both Medicaid and Medicare -- the health care program for elderly adults and disabled people -- from any hospital that provides such care.

Trump health chief seeks to bar trans youth from gender-affirming care

US President Donald Trump said Thursday he was signing an executive order reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, in one of America's biggest shifts in drug policy for years.The move stops short of full federal legalisation for recreational use across the United States but is aimed at encouraging medical research on the use of cannabis products."Today, I'm pleased to announce that I will be signing an executive order to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance with legitimate medical uses," Trump said in the Oval Office.Marijuana is currently classified as a Schedule I substance -- in the same league as drugs like heroin and LSD. The US government considers these drugs to have high abuse potential without accepted use for medical treatment.Schedule III substances, which include ketamine and anabolic steroids, are considered to have medical value and less potential for abuse.Trump, who was surrounded by white-coated medical experts for the announcement, added that the order "is not the legalization" of marijuana "and no way sanctions its use as a recreational drug."The teetotal 79-year-old added: "I've always told my children, don't take drugs, no drinking, no smoking, and just stay away from drugs."Dozens of US states already have legal medical marijuana programs, and many also have approved its recreational use."A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can't be done unless you reclassify, so we are looking at that very strongly," Trump said earlier this week.Easing federal restrictions could have ripple effects, including lowering barriers to pursue research, as authorizing clinical studies on Schedule I substances can require many layers of approval.It could also have major tax implications for companies that legally grow and sell cannabis.US presidents cannot unilaterally reclassify a drug, but Republican Trump's order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to expedite the process.Democrat Joe Biden's administration had previously pursued reclassification, but efforts stalled and were not completed before Trump took office in early 2025.The US has a patchwork of state-level regulations regarding the commercial distribution, recreational possession, and personal cultivation of cannabis.In small amounts, it is already legal for recreational use in 24 states, as well as the capital, Washington.

Marijuana is currently classified as a Schedule I substance -- in the same league as drugs like heroin and LSD. The US government considers these drugs to have high abuse potential without accepted use for medical treatment.

US President Donald Trump said Thursday he was signing an executive order reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug, in one of America's biggest shifts in drug policy for years. The move stops short of full federal legalisation for recreational use across the United States but is aimed at encouraging medical research on the use of cannabis products. "Today, I'm pleased to announce that I will be signing an executive order to reschedule marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III controlled substance with legitimate medical uses," Trump said in the Oval Office. Marijuana is currently classified as a Schedule I substance -- in the same league as drugs like heroin and LSD. The US government considers these drugs to have high abuse potential without accepted use for medical treatment. Schedule III substances, which include ketamine and anabolic steroids, are considered to have medical value and less potential for abuse. Trump, who was surrounded by white-coated medical experts for the announcement, added that the order "is not the legalization" of marijuana "and no way sanctions its use as a recreational drug." The teetotal 79-year-old added: "I've always told my children, don't take drugs, no drinking, no smoking, and just stay away from drugs." Dozens of US states already have legal medical marijuana programs, and many also have approved its recreational use. "A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can't be done unless you reclassify, so we are looking at that very strongly," Trump said earlier this week. Easing federal restrictions could have ripple effects, including lowering barriers to pursue research, as authorizing clinical studies on Schedule I substances can require many layers of approval. It could also have major tax implications for companies that legally grow and sell cannabis. US presidents cannot unilaterally reclassify a drug, but Republican Trump's order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to expedite the process. Democrat Joe Biden's administration had previously pursued reclassification, but efforts stalled and were not completed before Trump took office in early 2025. The US has a patchwork of state-level regulations regarding the commercial distribution, recreational possession, and personal cultivation of cannabis. In small amounts, it is already legal for recreational use in 24 states, as well as the capital, Washington.

Marijuana is currently classified as a Schedule I substance -- in the same league as drugs like heroin and LSD. The US government considers these drugs to have high abuse potential without accepted use for medical treatment.

Trump signs executive order to reclassify marijuana as less dangerous

Before the end of 2025, the Trump administration gave a surprise to Taiwan after announcing a massive package of arms sales to the nation valued at over $10 billion that includes medium-range missiles, howitzers and drones. He also announced a $1,776 “warrior dividend” check for active-duty servicemembers who will be paid with tariff revenue. Additionally, there were several such major steps and police moves taken by the US President Donald Trump that surprised everyone.<h3>Here's is list of the top 15 decisions and policy moves</h3><ol><li>Largest Ever US Arms Sale to Taiwan</li></ol>Trump announced an $11.15 billion weapons package to Taiwan, including missiles and rocket systems, to bolster its defence against China, provoking strong rebukes from Beijing over regional security and US–China tensions.&nbsp;2. Trump's ‘Warrior Dividend’ Funded by Tariffs&nbsp;In a televised announcement, Trump revealed a $1,776 bonus for US military personnel, attributing it to tariff revenues and linking trade policy to troop support.&nbsp;3. Federal Travel Ban Expansion &amp; Immigration Pause&nbsp;The administration paused immigration applications from 19 non-European countries and expanded travel restrictions, citing security concerns, tightening US entry rules in response to global threats.&nbsp;4. Withdrawal From the World Health Organisation&nbsp;Trump signed an order to withdraw the US from the WHO again, criticising the organisation’s pandemic response and reducing U.S. engagement with global health governance.&nbsp;5. Designation of Fentanyl as a ‘Weapon of Mass Destruction’&nbsp;In a bold executive move, Trump classified fentanyl as a WMD, enabling the use of military and intelligence tools against traffickers, reflecting a militarised approach to combat the opioid crisis.&nbsp;6. Ramp-Up of Denaturalisation Cases&nbsp;The administration directed US Citizenship and Immigration Services to dramatically increase denaturalisation proceedings against some naturalised citizens alleged to have gained status fraudulently, part of a broader immigration enforcement strategy.&nbsp;7. US Tech Force to Recruit Big Tech Professionals&nbsp;Trump launched a federal initiative to recruit around 1,000 tech experts from companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft to modernise government digital systems and boost artificial intelligence capacity.&nbsp;8. Repeal of Biden-Era Fuel Efficiency Standards&nbsp;The White House moved to dismantle federal vehicle fuel efficiency rules, reducing emissions regulations in favour of greater industry flexibility but drawing environmental concerns and criticism.&nbsp;9. Naval Blockade of Venezuelan Oil Tankers&nbsp;Trump ordered a full blockade on sanctioned Venezuelan oil tankers entering and leaving ports, intensifying pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s government by demanding the return of US assets.&nbsp;10. House Vote on Federal Union Rights Order&nbsp;Congress moved to repeal a Trump executive order that limited collective bargaining rights for federal workers, reflecting domestic pushback on labour policy changes instituted during his term.&nbsp;11. Removal of Brazilian Justice from US Sanctions List&nbsp;Following diplomatic engagement, the US removed a Brazilian Supreme Court justice and his wife from a sanctions list, signalling a slight shift toward improved bilateral relations.&nbsp;12. Executive Order on National AI Policy Framework&nbsp;Trump signed an order to create a federal framework for artificial intelligence, centralising AI regulatory authority and limiting state-level rules to promote national coherence.&nbsp;13. Price-Fixing and Food Supply Chain EO&nbsp;An executive order aimed to counter anti-competitive behaviour and price-fixing in critical food supply sectors, seeking task forces to investigate foreign influence and market manipulation.&nbsp;14. Restoring Free Speech and Ending Federal Censorship&nbsp;An executive order sought to limit perceived government “censorship,” barring federal cooperation with content moderation and directing investigations into past federal communication policies.&nbsp;15. Executive Order Enforcing the Hyde Amendment&nbsp;Trump issued an order ending federal funding for elective abortions, reaffirming the Hyde Amendment and reversing Obama-era reproductive healthcare expansions.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The key steps and policy moves by the US President Donald Trump reflect major decisions in 2025 covering national security, immigration, trade, technology, public health and culture wars.

Before the end of 2025, the Trump administration gave a surprise to Taiwan after announcing a massive package of arms sales to the nation valued at over $10 billion that includes medium-range missiles, howitzers and drones. He also announced a $1,776 “warrior dividend” check for active-duty servicemembers who will be paid with tariff revenue. Additionally, there were several such major steps and police moves taken by the US President Donald Trump that surprised everyone. Here's is list of the top 15 decisions and policy moves Largest Ever US Arms Sale to Taiwan Trump announced an $11.15 billion weapons package to Taiwan, including missiles and rocket systems, to bolster its defence against China, provoking strong rebukes from Beijing over regional security and US–China tensions. 2. Trump's ‘Warrior Dividend’ Funded by Tariffs In a televised announcement, Trump revealed a $1,776 bonus for US military personnel, attributing it to tariff revenues and linking trade policy to troop support. 3. Federal Travel Ban Expansion & Immigration Pause The administration paused immigration applications from 19 non-European countries and expanded travel restrictions, citing security concerns, tightening US entry rules in response to global threats. 4. Withdrawal From the World Health Organisation Trump signed an order to withdraw the US from the WHO again, criticising the organisation’s pandemic response and reducing U.S. engagement with global health governance. 5. Designation of Fentanyl as a ‘Weapon of Mass Destruction’ In a bold executive move, Trump classified fentanyl as a WMD, enabling the use of military and intelligence tools against traffickers, reflecting a militarised approach to combat the opioid crisis. 6. Ramp-Up of Denaturalisation Cases The administration directed US Citizenship and Immigration Services to dramatically increase denaturalisation proceedings against some naturalised citizens alleged to have gained status fraudulently, part of a broader immigration enforcement strategy. 7. US Tech Force to Recruit Big Tech Professionals Trump launched a federal initiative to recruit around 1,000 tech experts from companies like Apple, Google and Microsoft to modernise government digital systems and boost artificial intelligence capacity. 8. Repeal of Biden-Era Fuel Efficiency Standards The White House moved to dismantle federal vehicle fuel efficiency rules, reducing emissions regulations in favour of greater industry flexibility but drawing environmental concerns and criticism. 9. Naval Blockade of Venezuelan Oil Tankers Trump ordered a full blockade on sanctioned Venezuelan oil tankers entering and leaving ports, intensifying pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s government by demanding the return of US assets. 10. House Vote on Federal Union Rights Order Congress moved to repeal a Trump executive order that limited collective bargaining rights for federal workers, reflecting domestic pushback on labour policy changes instituted during his term. 11. Removal of Brazilian Justice from US Sanctions List Following diplomatic engagement, the US removed a Brazilian Supreme Court justice and his wife from a sanctions list, signalling a slight shift toward improved bilateral relations. 12. Executive Order on National AI Policy Framework Trump signed an order to create a federal framework for artificial intelligence, centralising AI regulatory authority and limiting state-level rules to promote national coherence. 13. Price-Fixing and Food Supply Chain EO An executive order aimed to counter anti-competitive behaviour and price-fixing in critical food supply sectors, seeking task forces to investigate foreign influence and market manipulation. 14. Restoring Free Speech and Ending Federal Censorship An executive order sought to limit perceived government “censorship,” barring federal cooperation with content moderation and directing investigations into past federal communication policies. 15. Executive Order Enforcing the Hyde Amendment Trump issued an order ending federal funding for elective abortions, reaffirming the Hyde Amendment and reversing Obama-era reproductive healthcare expansions.

The key steps and policy moves by the US President Donald Trump reflect major decisions in 2025 covering national security, immigration, trade, technology, public health and culture wars.

Year-Ender: What did Donald Trump announce in 2025? Full list of major decisions and policy moves by US President

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres spoke to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Wednesday over the phone amid tensions surrounding a recent US decision to impose a "total blockade" on Venezuelan oil tankers.


US-Venezuela Tensions: Venezuela’s Maduro Calls UN Chief Amid US Blockade Tensions

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a Christmas bonus check of $1,776 to the US troops. The white house called it “Warrior Dividend”. In the announcement, Trump said that the US have made a lot of money from the tariffs and it wants to reward its military. Trump's speech comes just as the nation is heading into the festive season. “The checks are already on the way,” said Trump," Nobody understood that one"."1,450,000 military service members will receive a special we call Warrior Dividend before Christmas... in honour of our nation's founding in 1776, we are sending every soldier $1,776," said the White House in a statement.“We made a lot more money than anybody thought because of tariffs, and the bill helped us along,” &nbsp;said Trump, nodding at the tax cut legislation of the Republicans. &nbsp;“Nobody deserves it more than our military, and I say congratulations,” said Trump.The bonus will at least make certain sections of the Americans happy, as they face mounting costs of groceries, housing, utilities and their holiday gifts as inflation remains elevated. Trump has reportedly suggested sending $2000 checks to low and middle-income groups, though he did not follow up on that in the Wednesday proposal.<h2>Trump blames Biden and Democrats for economic woes</h2>In his 20-minute-long speech, Trump bashed Biden, blaming him for the poor economic situation and the inflation. “Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it,” said Trump. It was the usual rhetoric, blame the immigrants and your previous administration.&nbsp;“Illegal aliens stole American jobs and flooded emergency rooms, getting free health care and education paid for by you – the American taxpayer. They also increased the cost of law enforcement by numbers so high that they are not even to be mentioned,” said Trump.&nbsp;His December 17 speech was a rehash of his old speech and lacked connection with reality. It comes at a time when Trump faced a decline in his approval rating. According to the latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, only 36 per cent of Americans approve of his handling of the economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump announces a $1,776 “Warrior Dividend” Christmas bonus for 1.45 million troops, citing tariff revenues and tax cuts.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a Christmas bonus check of $1,776 to the US troops. The white house called it “Warrior Dividend”. In the announcement, Trump said that the US have made a lot of money from the tariffs and it wants to reward its military. Trump's speech comes just as the nation is heading into the festive season. “The checks are already on the way,” said Trump," Nobody understood that one". "1,450,000 military service members will receive a special we call Warrior Dividend before Christmas... in honour of our nation's founding in 1776, we are sending every soldier $1,776," said the White House in a statement. “We made a lot more money than anybody thought because of tariffs, and the bill helped us along,” said Trump, nodding at the tax cut legislation of the Republicans. “Nobody deserves it more than our military, and I say congratulations,” said Trump. The bonus will at least make certain sections of the Americans happy, as they face mounting costs of groceries, housing, utilities and their holiday gifts as inflation remains elevated. Trump has reportedly suggested sending $2000 checks to low and middle-income groups, though he did not follow up on that in the Wednesday proposal. Trump blames Biden and Democrats for economic woes In his 20-minute-long speech, Trump bashed Biden, blaming him for the poor economic situation and the inflation. “Eleven months ago, I inherited a mess, and I’m fixing it,” said Trump. It was the usual rhetoric, blame the immigrants and your previous administration. “Illegal aliens stole American jobs and flooded emergency rooms, getting free health care and education paid for by you – the American taxpayer. They also increased the cost of law enforcement by numbers so high that they are not even to be mentioned,” said Trump. His December 17 speech was a rehash of his old speech and lacked connection with reality. It comes at a time when Trump faced a decline in his approval rating. According to the latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, only 36 per cent of Americans approve of his handling of the economy.

US President Donald Trump announces a $1,776 “Warrior Dividend” Christmas bonus for 1.45 million troops, citing tariff revenues and tax cuts.

Trump announces 'warrior dividend' checks of $1,776 for US military before Christmas

President Donald Trump had already twice suspended the implementation of sanctions in response to pleas from Saudi Arabia and Turkey, allies of the new government headed by former jihadist Ahmed al-Sharaa.


US Congress Ends Sanctions on Syria , Paving Way for Investment 

Trump has reshaped the White House history walk with harsh plaques attacking Biden and Obama while praising himself. Biden is labelled the "worst president," Obama "divisive," and Trump credits himself with ending wars, turning the walls into a political manifesto.

Trump rewrites White House history with brutal plaques mocking Biden and Obama. See pics HERE

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his prosecution of Donald Trump on Wednesday, telling lawmakers the US president had engaged in a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election.Smith's testimony to the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee was being held behind closed doors, but several US media outlets obtained excerpts of his prepared remarks."The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions," Smith was quoted as telling the panel."Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power," Smith said."If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether the president was a Republican or Democrat," he added.Smith had requested that his deposition be delivered in public, but the Republican majority on the House Judiciary Committee declined his request.Trump was accused by Smith of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and plotting to overturn the results of the White House race he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.Neither case came to trial and Smith -- in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president -- dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election.Smith declined to speak to reporters as he arrived for the deposition before the committee, which is examining his decision to bring the two criminal cases against Trump.<h2>- 'Unprecedented retribution campaign' -</h2>Lanny Breuer, Smith's lawyer, said the former special counsel, in testifying, was "showing tremendous courage in light of the remarkable and unprecedented retribution campaign against him by this administration and this White House.""Jack Smith, a career prosecutor, conducted this investigation based on the facts and based on the law and nothing more," Breuer told reporters.Since taking office for the second time, Trump has urged the Justice Department to bring cases against Smith and a number of other perceived political opponents.Cases brought against Trump foes James Comey, a former FBI director, and New York Attorney General Letitia James collapsed last month after a judge ruled that the prosecutor who brought the charges was unlawfully appointed.Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has criticized the decision by the Republicans on the oversight panel not to allow Smith to testify publicly."What are our colleagues so afraid of, that they won't let the American people hear directly from the special counsel?" Raskin said."The American people deserve to hear the full unvarnished truth about special counsel Smith's years-long effort to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed by Donald Trump and his co-conspirators," he said.

Trump was accused by Smith of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and plotting to overturn the results of the White House race he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his prosecution of Donald Trump on Wednesday, telling lawmakers the US president had engaged in a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith's testimony to the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee was being held behind closed doors, but several US media outlets obtained excerpts of his prepared remarks. "The decision to bring charges against President Trump was mine, but the basis for those charges rests entirely with President Trump and his actions," Smith was quoted as telling the panel. "Our investigation developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power," Smith said. "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether the president was a Republican or Democrat," he added. Smith had requested that his deposition be delivered in public, but the Republican majority on the House Judiciary Committee declined his request. Trump was accused by Smith of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and plotting to overturn the results of the White House race he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. Neither case came to trial and Smith -- in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president -- dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election. Smith declined to speak to reporters as he arrived for the deposition before the committee, which is examining his decision to bring the two criminal cases against Trump. - 'Unprecedented retribution campaign' - Lanny Breuer, Smith's lawyer, said the former special counsel, in testifying, was "showing tremendous courage in light of the remarkable and unprecedented retribution campaign against him by this administration and this White House." "Jack Smith, a career prosecutor, conducted this investigation based on the facts and based on the law and nothing more," Breuer told reporters. Since taking office for the second time, Trump has urged the Justice Department to bring cases against Smith and a number of other perceived political opponents. Cases brought against Trump foes James Comey, a former FBI director, and New York Attorney General Letitia James collapsed last month after a judge ruled that the prosecutor who brought the charges was unlawfully appointed. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has criticized the decision by the Republicans on the oversight panel not to allow Smith to testify publicly. "What are our colleagues so afraid of, that they won't let the American people hear directly from the special counsel?" Raskin said. "The American people deserve to hear the full unvarnished truth about special counsel Smith's years-long effort to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed by Donald Trump and his co-conspirators," he said.

Trump was accused by Smith of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and plotting to overturn the results of the White House race he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Ex-special counsel defends Trump prosecution in House appearance

US President Donald Trump is going to outline the agenda for 2026 and beyond in a live address from the White House on Wednesday night (Dec 17). The White House has offered limited details on the content of the speech, scheduled for 9 pm EST. This came amid the growing public dissatisfaction with Trump’s handling of the economy. Several opinion polls have recently shown that many Americans are frustrated as inflation has increased following the imposition of tariffs.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-trump-has-an-alcoholic-s-personality-us-president-s-chief-of-staff-susie-wiles-makes-big-claims-in-disingenuously-framed-interview-1765912672199">‘Trump has an alcoholic's personality’: US president’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, makes big claims in ‘disingenuously framed’ interview</a>&nbsp;The American president has said multiple times that public support would improve if voters better understood his record. “It has been a great year for our Country, and THE BEST IS YET TO COME!" Trump posted on social media on Tuesday while announcing the speech.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-a-genuine-hero-premier-of-new-south-wales-state-hails-ahmed-al-ahmed-who-saved-countless-lives-in-bondi-beach-shooting-1765800069653">‘A genuine hero’: Premier of New South Wales state hails Ahmed al Ahmed who ‘saved countless lives’ in Bondi Beach shooting</a>&nbsp;White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president will highlight his achievements so far and lay out plans for the remainder of his second term. The data released on Tuesday revealed the challenges facing the administration.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zohran-mamdani-who-won-nyc-mayor-polls-on-promise-to-make-city-affordable-set-to-move-into-100mn-mansion-with-wife-for-safety-1765296231524">Zohran Mamdani, who won NYC mayor polls on promise to make City ‘affordable’, set to move into $100mn mansion with wife for ‘safety’</a> &nbsp;Although the broader US economy remains stable, &nbsp;the job market appears increasingly fragile. The data showed that employers added an average of 122,750 jobs per month in the first four months of the year; however, since the announcement of sweeping tariffs in April, monthly job gains have fallen sharply to about 17,000. The unemployment rate has also risen from 4 per cent in January to 4.6 per cent.

This came amid the growing public dissatisfaction with Trump’s handling of the economy. Several opinion polls have recently shown that many Americans are frustrated as inflation has increased following the imposition of tariffs.

US President Donald Trump is going to outline the agenda for 2026 and beyond in a live address from the White House on Wednesday night (Dec 17). The White House has offered limited details on the content of the speech, scheduled for 9 pm EST. This came amid the growing public dissatisfaction with Trump’s handling of the economy. Several opinion polls have recently shown that many Americans are frustrated as inflation has increased following the imposition of tariffs. Also read: ‘Trump has an alcoholic's personality’: US president’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, makes big claims in ‘disingenuously framed’ interview The American president has said multiple times that public support would improve if voters better understood his record. “It has been a great year for our Country, and THE BEST IS YET TO COME!" Trump posted on social media on Tuesday while announcing the speech. Also read: ‘A genuine hero’: Premier of New South Wales state hails Ahmed al Ahmed who ‘saved countless lives’ in Bondi Beach shooting White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president will highlight his achievements so far and lay out plans for the remainder of his second term. The data released on Tuesday revealed the challenges facing the administration. Also read: Zohran Mamdani, who won NYC mayor polls on promise to make City ‘affordable’, set to move into $100mn mansion with wife for ‘safety’ Although the broader US economy remains stable, the job market appears increasingly fragile. The data showed that employers added an average of 122,750 jobs per month in the first four months of the year; however, since the announcement of sweeping tariffs in April, monthly job gains have fallen sharply to about 17,000. The unemployment rate has also risen from 4 per cent in January to 4.6 per cent.

This came amid the growing public dissatisfaction with Trump’s handling of the economy. Several opinion polls have recently shown that many Americans are frustrated as inflation has increased following the imposition of tariffs.

Trump’s live address: US president to outline agenda for 2026. Details inside

Venezuela has strongly rejected the notion that its oil exports have been impacted by US sanctions, following US President Donald Trump's announcement of a total blockade. In a statement, state-owned oil company PDVSA insisted that its operations remain unaffected, with crude oil exports and related shipments continuing as usual. "Oil tankers associated with PDVSA are still active," the company confirmed.&nbsp;Trump had declared on Tuesday (December 16) that a comprehensive blockade would be imposed on all oil tankers linked to Venezuela, restricting the flow of oil in and out of the country. He also warned of the "largest Armada ever assembled in South America," referring to the US military's presence in the Caribbean, which includes the world’s largest aircraft carrier. Despite these threats, Venezuela's military, which backs President Nicolas Maduro, vowed not to be intimidated, asserting that the country would not bow to external pressure. PDVSA, for its part, stated that the company’s operations and workforce remain steadfast, unaffected by the ongoing sanctions or military posturing.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-praises-bhutan-s-lingzhi-dzong-project-oblivious-to-india-s-major-financial-support-behind-it-1765979491836">Pakistan praises Bhutan’s Lingzhi Dzong project, oblivious to India’s major financial support behind it</a><h2>Venezuelan military 'not intimidated' by Trump threats: Defence ministry</h2>The Venezuelan military on Wednesday (December 17) said that it was not intimidated by threats from Donald Trump, who has ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil vessels heading to and leaving the South American country. "We say to the US government and its president that we are not intimidated by their crude and arrogant threats," Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez said at an event, surrounded by senior commanders who have repeatedly vowed loyalty to President Nicolas Maduro. "The dignity of this homeland is neither negotiable nor cowed by absolutely anyone," the minister added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-lie-pure-nonsense-putin-slams-nato-chief-s-prepare-for-a-war-remarks-says-russia-is-not-threat-for-europe-1765985005838">‘Lie, pure nonsense’: Putin slams NATO chief’s ‘prepare for a war’ remark, says Russia is not threat for Europe</a>

Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA has said that crude oil exports remain unaffected despite President Donald Trump's announcement of a US blockade against Venezuelan tankers

Venezuela has strongly rejected the notion that its oil exports have been impacted by US sanctions, following US President Donald Trump's announcement of a total blockade. In a statement, state-owned oil company PDVSA insisted that its operations remain unaffected, with crude oil exports and related shipments continuing as usual. "Oil tankers associated with PDVSA are still active," the company confirmed. Trump had declared on Tuesday (December 16) that a comprehensive blockade would be imposed on all oil tankers linked to Venezuela, restricting the flow of oil in and out of the country. He also warned of the "largest Armada ever assembled in South America," referring to the US military's presence in the Caribbean, which includes the world’s largest aircraft carrier. Despite these threats, Venezuela's military, which backs President Nicolas Maduro, vowed not to be intimidated, asserting that the country would not bow to external pressure. PDVSA, for its part, stated that the company’s operations and workforce remain steadfast, unaffected by the ongoing sanctions or military posturing. Also Read: Pakistan praises Bhutan’s Lingzhi Dzong project, oblivious to India’s major financial support behind it Venezuelan military 'not intimidated' by Trump threats: Defence ministry The Venezuelan military on Wednesday (December 17) said that it was not intimidated by threats from Donald Trump, who has ordered a blockade of sanctioned oil vessels heading to and leaving the South American country. "We say to the US government and its president that we are not intimidated by their crude and arrogant threats," Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez said at an event, surrounded by senior commanders who have repeatedly vowed loyalty to President Nicolas Maduro. "The dignity of this homeland is neither negotiable nor cowed by absolutely anyone," the minister added. Also Read: ‘Lie, pure nonsense’: Putin slams NATO chief’s ‘prepare for a war’ remark, says Russia is not threat for Europe

Venezuela's state oil company PDVSA has said that crude oil exports remain unaffected despite President Donald Trump's announcement of a US blockade against Venezuelan tankers

'Export operations for crude and byproducts continue normally', says Venezuela despite Trump 'blockade'

European leaders are meeting in Brussels for this week’s European Council summit with a high-stakes agenda, one of which is a decision on the use of Russian frozen assets worth €210 billion to fund Ukraine. But reports from Politico suggest that the Trump administration is actively lobbying and even asserting pressure on the European leaders to refrain from using the fund.&nbsp;The European Commission wants to use the Russian assets held in Belgium as security for a Ukraine loan, to help in defence and reconstruction. &nbsp;But Washington is asking to delay it as these assets could be used as leverage for a future peace deal.&nbsp;"They want to weaken us,” said a senior EU official familiar with transatlantic relations and preparations for the summit. This has indeed widened the rift in the European Union. Several leaders, such as Hungary's Viktor Orbán, the Czech Republic’s Andrej Babiš and Giorgia Meloni of Italy are asking European Union to seek other alternatives.European officials have described the US pressure as “enormous and unprecedented”. They have warned that the failure of the plan would be a reputational damage for the European Union and hint at the National Strategic Policy of the US which aims to polarise EU and support the Eurosceptic forces within Europe.&nbsp;“A shattered Ukraine would be in a weaker position at the negotiating table, undercutting its ability to secure a lasting peace and rebuild after four years of all-out war,” read the report.However the Trump administration has dismissed the report of interference. “A shattered Ukraine would be in a weaker position at the negotiating table, undercutting its ability to secure a lasting peace and rebuild after four years of all-out war,” said White House Deputy Press Secretary Ana Kelly. She asserted that the White House has one goal to achieve lasting peace. “Both Ukrainians and Russians have made their positions on frozen assets clear, and our sole aim is to facilitate an exchange of views that could eventually lead to an agreement”, said Deputy Press Secretary Ana Kelly.&nbsp;

The Trump administration is pressuring the EU to abandon plans to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine. Washington warns that these could be used for a future peace deal.

European leaders are meeting in Brussels for this week’s European Council summit with a high-stakes agenda, one of which is a decision on the use of Russian frozen assets worth €210 billion to fund Ukraine. But reports from Politico suggest that the Trump administration is actively lobbying and even asserting pressure on the European leaders to refrain from using the fund. The European Commission wants to use the Russian assets held in Belgium as security for a Ukraine loan, to help in defence and reconstruction. But Washington is asking to delay it as these assets could be used as leverage for a future peace deal. "They want to weaken us,” said a senior EU official familiar with transatlantic relations and preparations for the summit. This has indeed widened the rift in the European Union. Several leaders, such as Hungary's Viktor Orbán, the Czech Republic’s Andrej Babiš and Giorgia Meloni of Italy are asking European Union to seek other alternatives. European officials have described the US pressure as “enormous and unprecedented”. They have warned that the failure of the plan would be a reputational damage for the European Union and hint at the National Strategic Policy of the US which aims to polarise EU and support the Eurosceptic forces within Europe. “A shattered Ukraine would be in a weaker position at the negotiating table, undercutting its ability to secure a lasting peace and rebuild after four years of all-out war,” read the report. However the Trump administration has dismissed the report of interference. “A shattered Ukraine would be in a weaker position at the negotiating table, undercutting its ability to secure a lasting peace and rebuild after four years of all-out war,” said White House Deputy Press Secretary Ana Kelly. She asserted that the White House has one goal to achieve lasting peace. “Both Ukrainians and Russians have made their positions on frozen assets clear, and our sole aim is to facilitate an exchange of views that could eventually lead to an agreement”, said Deputy Press Secretary Ana Kelly.

The Trump administration is pressuring the EU to abandon plans to use frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine. Washington argues that these could be used for a future peace deal

Trump pressures EU to drop Ukraine's 'reparations loan' plan using Russian asset

Trump's son-in-law and former senior adviser, Jared Kushner's investment firm, Affinity Partners, has abandoned the plan of building a Trump-branded hotel in Belgrade, Serbia. The project had led to major backlash after a cabinet member and three other officials were indicted over the project on Monday. According to news reports the Jared Kushner had been working for two years to gain permission to tear down a protected building to build a $500 million luxury hotel in Belgrade, Serbia.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Why did the project become controversial?</h2>The Serbian government was planning to strip the site of its cultural heritage protections and transfer it to &nbsp;Affinity Partners. In May, a semi-independent prosecutors office arrested an official for allegedly forging a document that permitted the demolition of the site. Soon, the Serbian government passed two Parliamentary measures to strip its protected status. An anti-government protest erupted, and it fueled nationalist sentiment. Citizens and preservationists view the decision as disrespectful and an attempt to curry favour for the US government and the Trump family. Prosecutors file charges against Culture Minister and three other officials abusing their positions and falsifying documents.<h2>Clarification by Aleksandar Vučić's government&nbsp;</h2>Aleksandar Vučić said the project was a “witch hunt”, and Serbia lost an important investment. It didn't mean to take down a heritage site, but to replace an old and damaged building with a new one. Both on the left and right united in protest of the proposed project. As for the right, it was a symbol of national identity, and on the left, it was the giveaway of a public asset without a thorough process.&nbsp;The site was the building of a former Yugoslav Ministry of Defence and was damaged during the 1999 NATO bombing during the Kosovo War to halt the ethnic cleansing led by former Serbian President Slobodan Milošević. It was seen by many Serbs as a symbol of suffering and national heritage.

Jared Kushner has dropped plans to build a Trump-branded luxury hotel in Serbia following fierce public protests, political outrage, and a corruption investigation involving senior officials.


Trump's son-in-law and former senior adviser, Jared Kushner's investment firm, Affinity Partners, has abandoned the plan of building a Trump-branded hotel in Belgrade, Serbia. The project had led to major backlash after a cabinet member and three other officials were indicted over the project on Monday. According to news reports the Jared Kushner had been working for two years to gain permission to tear down a protected building to build a $500 million luxury hotel in Belgrade, Serbia. Why did the project become controversial? The Serbian government was planning to strip the site of its cultural heritage protections and transfer it to Affinity Partners. In May, a semi-independent prosecutors office arrested an official for allegedly forging a document that permitted the demolition of the site. Soon, the Serbian government passed two Parliamentary measures to strip its protected status. An anti-government protest erupted, and it fueled nationalist sentiment. Citizens and preservationists view the decision as disrespectful and an attempt to curry favour for the US government and the Trump family. Prosecutors file charges against Culture Minister and three other officials abusing their positions and falsifying documents. Clarification by Aleksandar Vučić's government Aleksandar Vučić said the project was a “witch hunt”, and Serbia lost an important investment. It didn't mean to take down a heritage site, but to replace an old and damaged building with a new one. Both on the left and right united in protest of the proposed project. As for the right, it was a symbol of national identity, and on the left, it was the giveaway of a public asset without a thorough process. The site was the building of a former Yugoslav Ministry of Defence and was damaged during the 1999 NATO bombing during the Kosovo War to halt the ethnic cleansing led by former Serbian President Slobodan Milošević. It was seen by many Serbs as a symbol of suffering and national heritage.

Jared Kushner has dropped plans to build a Trump-branded luxury hotel in Serbia following fierce public protests, political outrage, and a corruption investigation involving senior officials.

Jared Kushner drops Trump hotel project in Serbia after massive corruption probe

Who is Susie Wiles, and why is she in the spotlight? Trump’s chief of staff, as per reports, is the quiet power behind Trump 2.0. A longtime loyalist, Wiles now faces backlash after a viral Vanity Fair profile. Here's what you need to know about her.

Who is Susie Wiles? All about the Chief of Staff who called Trump ‘alcoholic personality’ in explosive Vanity Fair interview

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has disputed portions of a Vanity Fair article in which she paints an unflattering picture of the Trump administration and many of its top officials.


Trump & Cabinet Rally Around Susie Wiles | Row Over 'Alcoholic's Personality' Remark

While President Donald Trump often touts a ‘strong’ economy, the latest jobs data tells a more complicated story. Beneath the claims of resilience, the Labour market is showing signs of fatigue. Rising joblessness and uneven hiring point to a slowdown that is becoming hard to ignore.

Higher-Income Households Drive Spending Growth

Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Staff, sparked a major controversy with her comments in a Vanity Fair interview, stating that President Trump has an “alcoholic’s personality.” The remarks have triggered internal fallout within the White House, with senior officials expressing concern. However, both Trump and his cabinet have publicly defended Wiles, downplaying the remarks and emphasizing her loyalty and effectiveness in the administration.


Vanity Fair Interview: Susie Wiles Calls Trump’s Personality “Alcoholic,” Cabinet Responds

President Donald Trump’s approval rating has slipped nearly to its lowest point of his current term, with even Republican voters showing signs of unease, particularly over his handling of the economy, according to a new Reuters Ipsos poll.<h2>Trump's report card is HERE</h2>The three-day survey, which ended Sunday (Dec 14), found that 39 per cent of US adults approve of Trump’s job performance. That is down from 41 per cent earlier in December and just one point above the 38 per cent reading recorded in mid-November, his weakest showing this year. The Reuters Ipsos poll was conducted online among 1,016 adults across the United States.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/marijuana-research-material-but-fentanyl-a-weapon-of-mass-destruction-trump-s-explosive-announcement-on-devil-s-lettuce-1765868829719">Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce</a>Trump returned to the White House in January with a far stronger standing, registering a 47 per cent approval rating at the start of his term. Since then, his popularity has steadily softened, driven largely by concerns over economic management.Only 33 per cent of respondents said they approve of how Trump is handling the US economy, marking his lowest rating on that issue so far this year.<h2>What's causing the approval rating to fall?</h2>The decline comes amid growing anxiety about hiring and growth. While a recent government shutdown disrupted the release of some official data, many economists believe businesses have slowed hiring, citing uncertainty and shock effects linked to Trump’s tariff policies.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fentanyl-more-dangerous-than-a-bomb-trump-classifies-drug-as-weapon-of-mass-destruction-1765847533698">Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'</a><h2>What about Trump's MAGA base?</h2>Support among Republicans remains solid overall, but cracks are beginning to show. About 85 per cent of Republican respondents said they approve of Trump’s overall performance, unchanged from earlier this month. However, approval among Republicans on economic management dropped to 72 per cent, down from 78 per cent earlier in December and the lowest level recorded this year within his party.Trump campaigned heavily on a promise to repair the economy after a period of high inflation under former Democratic president Joe Biden. While inflation has eased from its earlier peaks, it has remained stubbornly elevated during Trump’s term, hovering near 3 per cent. That remains above the roughly 2 per cent level policymakers generally see as healthier.Public frustration over everyday expenses is also evident. Trump’s approval rating on the cost of living fell to 27 per cent, down from 31 per cent earlier in the month, highlighting persistent voter concern about prices.&nbsp;

Trump’s approval falls to 39 per cent, near his term low, as voters sour on the economy. Only 33 per cent back his economic handling, with even his MAGA base withdrawing support. Check out his report card HERE.

President Donald Trump’s approval rating has slipped nearly to its lowest point of his current term, with even Republican voters showing signs of unease, particularly over his handling of the economy, according to a new Reuters Ipsos poll. Trump's report card is HERE The three-day survey, which ended Sunday (Dec 14), found that 39 per cent of US adults approve of Trump’s job performance. That is down from 41 per cent earlier in December and just one point above the 38 per cent reading recorded in mid-November, his weakest showing this year. The Reuters Ipsos poll was conducted online among 1,016 adults across the United States. Also read | Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce Trump returned to the White House in January with a far stronger standing, registering a 47 per cent approval rating at the start of his term. Since then, his popularity has steadily softened, driven largely by concerns over economic management. Only 33 per cent of respondents said they approve of how Trump is handling the US economy, marking his lowest rating on that issue so far this year. What's causing the approval rating to fall? The decline comes amid growing anxiety about hiring and growth. While a recent government shutdown disrupted the release of some official data, many economists believe businesses have slowed hiring, citing uncertainty and shock effects linked to Trump’s tariff policies. Also read | Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction' What about Trump's MAGA base? Support among Republicans remains solid overall, but cracks are beginning to show. About 85 per cent of Republican respondents said they approve of Trump’s overall performance, unchanged from earlier this month. However, approval among Republicans on economic management dropped to 72 per cent, down from 78 per cent earlier in December and the lowest level recorded this year within his party. Trump campaigned heavily on a promise to repair the economy after a period of high inflation under former Democratic president Joe Biden. While inflation has eased from its earlier peaks, it has remained stubbornly elevated during Trump’s term, hovering near 3 per cent. That remains above the roughly 2 per cent level policymakers generally see as healthier. Public frustration over everyday expenses is also evident. Trump’s approval rating on the cost of living fell to 27 per cent, down from 31 per cent earlier in the month, highlighting persistent voter concern about prices.

Trump’s approval falls to 39 per cent, near his term low, as voters sour on the economy. Only 33 per cent back his economic handling, with even his MAGA base withdrawing support. Check out his report card HERE.

POTUS's end-of-year performance report card: Trump's approval rating slips to 39%

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Dec 16) dramatically escalated his pressure campaign against Venezuela, announcing what he called a "total and complete blockade" of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the United States would move to intercept vessels linked to Venezuela's oil trade, arguing that the revenue was being used to prop up President Nicolás Maduro’s government. This comes as Caracas lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council over the tanker seized by the US recently. Calling it an act of "state-sponsored piracy".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fentanyl-more-dangerous-than-a-bomb-trump-classifies-drug-as-weapon-of-mass-destruction-1765847533698">Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'</a><h2>Trump slams 'illegitimate Maduro regime'</h2>In his Truth Social post, Trump said, "Today, I am ordering A TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Tuesday evening. Calling the Venezuelan government "illegitimate Maduro regime," he alleged that it was "using Oil from these stolen Oil Fields to finance themselves, Drug Terrorism, Human Trafficking, Murder, and Kidnapping".The announcement marks a sharp expansion of Washington’s pressure campaign against Caracas. For months, the US has been steadily increasing its military presence in the Caribbean, officially framing the deployment as a counter-narcotics operation. That buildup now includes the world's largest aircraft carrier and a growing number of warships and surveillance aircraft operating close to Venezuelan waters.In recent weeks, US forces have carried out strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Last week, American forces also seized a large oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast, claiming it was transporting black-market oil in violation of US sanctions. Washington later announced fresh sanctions on additional vessels tied to the trade.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/marijuana-research-material-but-fentanyl-a-weapon-of-mass-destruction-trump-s-explosive-announcement-on-devil-s-lettuce-1765868829719">Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce</a><h2>US action against Venezuela to "only get bigger"</h2>Trump also warned that the naval presence would "only get bigger" until Venezuela returned "to the United States of America all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us." While the US already enforces sweeping sanctions on Venezuela’s energy sector, a full blockade of oil exports could further cripple the country’s fragile economy.<h2>Venezuela urges UN to condemn US</h2>Maduro in a letter sent to Slovenia's UN ambassador, whose country currently holds the rotating Security Council presidency, accused Washington of illegally using military force against a private vessel and stealing a cargo involved in lawful international trade.The Maduro government also demanded the release of what it described as the tanker’s "kidnapped" crew.

Trump announces a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers to choke Maduro’s regime, vows US naval action will only grow. Scroll down for more.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Dec 16) dramatically escalated his pressure campaign against Venezuela, announcing what he called a "total and complete blockade" of sanctioned oil tankers entering or leaving the country. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said the United States would move to intercept vessels linked to Venezuela's oil trade, arguing that the revenue was being used to prop up President Nicolás Maduro’s government. This comes as Caracas lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council over the tanker seized by the US recently. Calling it an act of "state-sponsored piracy". Also read | Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction' Trump slams 'illegitimate Maduro regime' In his Truth Social post, Trump said, "Today, I am ordering A TOTAL AND COMPLETE BLOCKADE OF ALL SANCTIONED OIL TANKERS going into, and out of, Venezuela," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform Tuesday evening. Calling the Venezuelan government "illegitimate Maduro regime," he alleged that it was "using Oil from these stolen Oil Fields to finance themselves, Drug Terrorism, Human Trafficking, Murder, and Kidnapping". The announcement marks a sharp expansion of Washington’s pressure campaign against Caracas. For months, the US has been steadily increasing its military presence in the Caribbean, officially framing the deployment as a counter-narcotics operation. That buildup now includes the world's largest aircraft carrier and a growing number of warships and surveillance aircraft operating close to Venezuelan waters. In recent weeks, US forces have carried out strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the region, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Last week, American forces also seized a large oil tanker off Venezuela’s coast, claiming it was transporting black-market oil in violation of US sanctions. Washington later announced fresh sanctions on additional vessels tied to the trade. Also read | Trump's cannabis shift: POTUS makes explosive announcement on devil's lettuce US action against Venezuela to "only get bigger" Trump also warned that the naval presence would "only get bigger" until Venezuela returned "to the United States of America all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us." While the US already enforces sweeping sanctions on Venezuela’s energy sector, a full blockade of oil exports could further cripple the country’s fragile economy. Venezuela urges UN to condemn US Maduro in a letter sent to Slovenia's UN ambassador, whose country currently holds the rotating Security Council presidency, accused Washington of illegally using military force against a private vessel and stealing a cargo involved in lawful international trade. The Maduro government also demanded the release of what it described as the tanker’s "kidnapped" crew.

Trump announces a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers to choke Maduro’s regime, vows US naval action will only grow. Scroll down for more.

Trump turns up heat on Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers

Donald Trump’s top national security officials were grilled by lawmakers on Tuesday (Dec 16) over US military strikes against suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific, operations that have triggered concerns about an expanding use of force close to Venezuela. Briefings to the House and Senate, led by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, took place amid growing unease in Congress over the president’s widening operations in waters off Latin America, as lawmakers consider steps to rein in Trump’s authority to act without legislative approval.&nbsp;US officials say the operations target narcotics bound for American shores.&nbsp;Critics counter that the campaign -- which has destroyed at least 26 boats and killed at least 95 people, according to US military figures -- is legally ambiguous and strategically unclear.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/your-political-opinions-online-could-cost-you-us-visa-trump-administration-expands-screening-for-h-1b-and-h-4-visas-1765900690172">Your political opinions online could cost you US visa: Trump administration expands screening for H-1B and H-4 visas</a>&nbsp;The classified sessions preceded a possible Senate vote on resolutions aimed at restricting Trump from launching military action against Venezuela without congressional consent.&nbsp;But Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters as he left the room that the officials had offered nothing new.&nbsp;"The administration came to this briefing empty handed... and if they can't be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?" Schumer said.&nbsp;The boat strikes have drawn particular scrutiny over a September 2 operation in which US forces carried out a follow-up attack on a disabled boat, killing two survivors of the initial strike.&nbsp;Lawmakers from both parties have demanded answers on the legal basis for that attack and why Congress has been denied full access to video footage, which so far has been shown only to a handful of senior lawmakers.&nbsp;Schumer has warned that secrecy -- combined with the presence of US troops and a carrier group in the region -- risked dragging the country into another open-ended conflict.He told reporters he reiterated the demand for every senator to be given access to the complete, unedited tape of the September 2 strike but was rebuffed.&nbsp;Rubio and Hegseth defended the "highly successful mission" as they left the briefing, and said the Pentagon would allow the House and Senate Armed Services Committees to view the video alongside the commander who ordered them, Admiral Frank Bradley.&nbsp;"But, in keeping with longstanding... Department of Defense policy, we're not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public," Hegseth added.&nbsp;Beyond the boat strikes, the administration has ratcheted up pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro -- deepening sanctions, deploying warships and aircraft near his coastline and seizing an oil tanker linked to Caracas.<h2>Maduro's days are numbered: Trump</h2>Trump has declared that Maduro's "days are numbered" and pointedly refused to rule out a US ground invasion.&nbsp;Legal experts say the case highlights a central tension in Trump's approach -- that treating drug trafficking as an act of war may violate international law.&nbsp;This week, Trump signed an executive order classifying fentanyl -- which is stocked and administered by hospitals -- as a "weapon of mass destruction," an escalation supporters say reflects the gravity of the opioid crisis.&nbsp;Specialists note, however, that most of the intercepted boats were believed to be carrying cocaine, not fentanyl.&nbsp;Despite mounting scrutiny, the campaign shows no sign of slowing.&nbsp;On Monday, the Pentagon said it had carried out fresh strikes against alleged drug boats in the Pacific, killing eight people described as "narco-terrorists."&nbsp;The Senate briefing also follows last week's dramatic US seizure of an oil tanker accused of transporting sanctioned Venezuelan fuel in a network linked to Iran.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/messi-event-fiasco-cm-mamata-banerjee-assumes-charge-of-west-bengal-sports-after-minister-s-resignation-mamta-messi-india-tour-1765905241623">Messi event fiasco: CM Mamata Banerjee assumes charge of West Bengal sports after minister’s resignation</a>&nbsp;Republican senator and staunch Trump ally Lindsey Graham said as he emerged from his briefing that the video was the least of his concerns, asserting that the September 2 strike was lawful.&nbsp;"Most Americans want to know what's going to happen next. I want to know what's going to happen next. Is it the policy to take Maduro down? It should be, if it's not. And if he goes, what's going to happen next?"

The boat strikes have drawn particular scrutiny over a September 2 operation in which US forces carried out a follow-up attack on a disabled boat, killing two survivors of the initial strike.

Donald Trump’s top national security officials were grilled by lawmakers on Tuesday (Dec 16) over US military strikes against suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific, operations that have triggered concerns about an expanding use of force close to Venezuela. Briefings to the House and Senate, led by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, took place amid growing unease in Congress over the president’s widening operations in waters off Latin America, as lawmakers consider steps to rein in Trump’s authority to act without legislative approval. US officials say the operations target narcotics bound for American shores. Critics counter that the campaign -- which has destroyed at least 26 boats and killed at least 95 people, according to US military figures -- is legally ambiguous and strategically unclear. Also Read: Your political opinions online could cost you US visa: Trump administration expands screening for H-1B and H-4 visas The classified sessions preceded a possible Senate vote on resolutions aimed at restricting Trump from launching military action against Venezuela without congressional consent. But Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters as he left the room that the officials had offered nothing new. "The administration came to this briefing empty handed... and if they can't be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?" Schumer said. The boat strikes have drawn particular scrutiny over a September 2 operation in which US forces carried out a follow-up attack on a disabled boat, killing two survivors of the initial strike. Lawmakers from both parties have demanded answers on the legal basis for that attack and why Congress has been denied full access to video footage, which so far has been shown only to a handful of senior lawmakers. Schumer has warned that secrecy -- combined with the presence of US troops and a carrier group in the region -- risked dragging the country into another open-ended conflict. He told reporters he reiterated the demand for every senator to be given access to the complete, unedited tape of the September 2 strike but was rebuffed. Rubio and Hegseth defended the "highly successful mission" as they left the briefing, and said the Pentagon would allow the House and Senate Armed Services Committees to view the video alongside the commander who ordered them, Admiral Frank Bradley. "But, in keeping with longstanding... Department of Defense policy, we're not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public," Hegseth added. Beyond the boat strikes, the administration has ratcheted up pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro -- deepening sanctions, deploying warships and aircraft near his coastline and seizing an oil tanker linked to Caracas. Maduro's days are numbered: Trump Trump has declared that Maduro's "days are numbered" and pointedly refused to rule out a US ground invasion. Legal experts say the case highlights a central tension in Trump's approach -- that treating drug trafficking as an act of war may violate international law. This week, Trump signed an executive order classifying fentanyl -- which is stocked and administered by hospitals -- as a "weapon of mass destruction," an escalation supporters say reflects the gravity of the opioid crisis. Specialists note, however, that most of the intercepted boats were believed to be carrying cocaine, not fentanyl. Despite mounting scrutiny, the campaign shows no sign of slowing. On Monday, the Pentagon said it had carried out fresh strikes against alleged drug boats in the Pacific, killing eight people described as "narco-terrorists." The Senate briefing also follows last week's dramatic US seizure of an oil tanker accused of transporting sanctioned Venezuelan fuel in a network linked to Iran. Also Read: Messi event fiasco: CM Mamata Banerjee assumes charge of West Bengal sports after minister’s resignation Republican senator and staunch Trump ally Lindsey Graham said as he emerged from his briefing that the video was the least of his concerns, asserting that the September 2 strike was lawful. "Most Americans want to know what's going to happen next. I want to know what's going to happen next. Is it the policy to take Maduro down? It should be, if it's not. And if he goes, what's going to happen next?"

The boat strikes have drawn particular scrutiny over a September 2 operation in which US forces carried out a follow-up attack on a disabled boat, killing two survivors of the initial strike.

US lawmakers grill Trump officials over alleged drug boat strikes

The Trump administration has told a federal court that construction of a new White House ballroom must proceed because it is tied to national security needs. The argument was made in a court filing on Monday (December 15), responding to a lawsuit submitted last week by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The group is seeking an immediate pause on the project until it undergoes independent design scrutiny, environmental review, public consultation and congressional approval.&nbsp;As part of its response, the administration submitted a declaration from a senior US Secret Service official saying that additional construction activity at the former East Wing site is required to satisfy the agency’s security standards. The government also indicated it is willing to brief the judge on classified security concerns privately, without the plaintiffs present. The filing provides the clearest picture so far of the ballroom project, shedding light on how it received rapid internal approval and how its scope has continued to evolve. Officials acknowledged that the final architectural plans are still incomplete, even as demolition and preparatory work at the site continues.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-labels-colombia-s-clan-del-golfo-as-terrorist-organisation-amid-peace-talks-1765901719483">US labels Colombia's Clan del Golfo as terrorist organisation amid peace talks</a>&nbsp;John Stanwich, the National Park Service’s White House liaison, wrote that underground construction remains ongoing, with foundation work expected to begin in January. He added that visible, above-ground construction is unlikely to start before April 2026. The National Trust for Historic Preservation did not immediately respond to requests for comment.In its lawsuit, the preservation group asked the US District Court in Washington to halt the project, arguing that the ballroom addition should not move forward without formal reviews and explicit congressional authorisation.&nbsp;Trump ordered the demolition of the East Wing in October to make way for the proposed 90,000-square-foot ballroom, a privately funded project estimated to cost $300 million and scheduled for completion before the end of his term in 2029. The administration’s filing argues that challenges related to the East Wing demolition are no longer relevant, since the structure has already been removed. It also claims objections to future construction are premature because final designs have not yet been approved.&nbsp;Additionally, the government contends that the preservation group cannot demonstrate immediate harm, as above-ground construction is still months away. It said consultations with federal planning and design bodies will occur in due course, without the need for court intervention. “Even if the plaintiff were able to clear the legal hurdles of standing, ripeness and mootness, it would still fail to justify the extraordinary relief it seeks,” the administration said.&nbsp;While the ballroom proposal has drawn backlash from architects, preservationists and political opponents, the lawsuit represents the strongest effort yet to slow or derail a project that would be nearly double the size of the White House as it stood before the East Wing’s removal. A court hearing on the matter was scheduled for Tuesday in Washington.

Ballroom construction is critical for security concerns: White House tells court

The Trump administration has told a federal court that construction of a new White House ballroom must proceed because it is tied to national security needs. The argument was made in a court filing on Monday (December 15), responding to a lawsuit submitted last week by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The group is seeking an immediate pause on the project until it undergoes independent design scrutiny, environmental review, public consultation and congressional approval. As part of its response, the administration submitted a declaration from a senior US Secret Service official saying that additional construction activity at the former East Wing site is required to satisfy the agency’s security standards. The government also indicated it is willing to brief the judge on classified security concerns privately, without the plaintiffs present. The filing provides the clearest picture so far of the ballroom project, shedding light on how it received rapid internal approval and how its scope has continued to evolve. Officials acknowledged that the final architectural plans are still incomplete, even as demolition and preparatory work at the site continues. Also Read: US labels Colombia's Clan del Golfo as terrorist organisation amid peace talks John Stanwich, the National Park Service’s White House liaison, wrote that underground construction remains ongoing, with foundation work expected to begin in January. He added that visible, above-ground construction is unlikely to start before April 2026. The National Trust for Historic Preservation did not immediately respond to requests for comment. In its lawsuit, the preservation group asked the US District Court in Washington to halt the project, arguing that the ballroom addition should not move forward without formal reviews and explicit congressional authorisation. Trump ordered the demolition of the East Wing in October to make way for the proposed 90,000-square-foot ballroom, a privately funded project estimated to cost $300 million and scheduled for completion before the end of his term in 2029. The administration’s filing argues that challenges related to the East Wing demolition are no longer relevant, since the structure has already been removed. It also claims objections to future construction are premature because final designs have not yet been approved. Additionally, the government contends that the preservation group cannot demonstrate immediate harm, as above-ground construction is still months away. It said consultations with federal planning and design bodies will occur in due course, without the need for court intervention. “Even if the plaintiff were able to clear the legal hurdles of standing, ripeness and mootness, it would still fail to justify the extraordinary relief it seeks,” the administration said. While the ballroom proposal has drawn backlash from architects, preservationists and political opponents, the lawsuit represents the strongest effort yet to slow or derail a project that would be nearly double the size of the White House as it stood before the East Wing’s removal. A court hearing on the matter was scheduled for Tuesday in Washington.

Trump administration tells court that the White House ballroom must proceed for security reasons, opposing a preservation group’s bid to halt the $300mn project

Expanding the scope of the crackdown on immigrants and individuals looking to migrate to the United States seeking better employment and education opportunities, the Trump administration made the US visa-vetting system stricter. The US State Department announced that all H1B workers and their H-4 dependents must undergo social media screening. The decision was implemented on December 15.&nbsp;&nbsp;“As of December 15, the Department will expand the requirement that an online presence review be conducted for all H-1B applicants and their dependents, in addition to the students and exchange visitors already subject to this review. To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for H-1B and their dependents (H-4), F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas are instructed to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to “public,” according to a US State Department press release.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/should-us-end-h-1b-programme-know-what-elon-musk-thinks-about-indian-immigrants-donald-trump-elon-musk-tesla-immigration-indian-immigration-us-1764519420595">Should US end H-1B programme? Know what Elon Musk thinks about Indian immigrants</a>&nbsp;The State Department stressed that it will use all the available information about an applicant in the visa screening and vetting process “We conduct thorough vetting of all visa applicants, including online presence review of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” Explaining the rationale behind the move, the State Department said the system is designed to bolster national security while keeping the integrity of the visa system intact.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US Embassy in India in June warned visa applicants against cleaning their social media profiles “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the embassy said on X.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/jordan-crown-prince-personally-chauffeurs-pm-modi-to-national-museum-diplomacy-pm-modi-africa-pm-modi-on-foreign-visits-1765891284302">Jordan Crown Prince personally chauffeurs PM Modi to national museum</a>&nbsp;The decision came amid the ongoing crackdown on immigration by the Trump administration, the US President imposed stricter conditions on the H1B visa programme, making it difficult for job seekers to enter the United States. Beginning September 1, US employers seeking to hire foreign professionals in specialised occupations have to pay $1 lakh supplemental fee for new workers. &nbsp;

The US Department of State has mandated an online presence review for H-1B and H-4 visa applicants, a requirement took effect from December 15, as part of expanded screening measures.

Expanding the scope of the crackdown on immigrants and individuals looking to migrate to the United States seeking better employment and education opportunities, the Trump administration made the US visa-vetting system stricter. The US State Department announced that all H1B workers and their H-4 dependents must undergo social media screening. The decision was implemented on December 15. “As of December 15, the Department will expand the requirement that an online presence review be conducted for all H-1B applicants and their dependents, in addition to the students and exchange visitors already subject to this review. To facilitate this vetting, all applicants for H-1B and their dependents (H-4), F, M, and J nonimmigrant visas are instructed to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media profiles to “public,” according to a US State Department press release. Also Read: Should US end H-1B programme? Know what Elon Musk thinks about Indian immigrants The State Department stressed that it will use all the available information about an applicant in the visa screening and vetting process “We conduct thorough vetting of all visa applicants, including online presence review of all student and exchange visitor applicants in the F, M, and J nonimmigrant classifications.” Explaining the rationale behind the move, the State Department said the system is designed to bolster national security while keeping the integrity of the visa system intact. The US Embassy in India in June warned visa applicants against cleaning their social media profiles “Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas,” the embassy said on X. Also Read: Jordan Crown Prince personally chauffeurs PM Modi to national museum The decision came amid the ongoing crackdown on immigration by the Trump administration, the US President imposed stricter conditions on the H1B visa programme, making it difficult for job seekers to enter the United States. Beginning September 1, US employers seeking to hire foreign professionals in specialised occupations have to pay $1 lakh supplemental fee for new workers.

The US Department of State has mandated an online presence review for H-1B and H-4 visa applicants, a requirement took effect from December 15, as part of expanded screening measures.

Your political opinions online could cost you US visa: Trump administration expands screening for H-1B and H-4 visas

A Trump supporter was shocked to see that someone had cancelled his plane ticket after he posted a photo of his boarding pass online. Apparently, this man was bragging about how he was flying first class, and it was all possible because of the US president who had "Made America Great Again." He was flying to Greenville–Spartanburg airport in South Carolina. However, his foolishness cost him the trip as his boarding pass had all the details someone needs to cancel a trip. When he reached the airport, his ticket had already been cancelled. According to View From The Wing, several airlines let passengers access "Manage my Bookings" with just the confirmation number and last name.&nbsp;Netizens are in disbelief to see that someone can actually do this. Many people commented that this is likely just a lie, while others were shocked to learn that this is possible. Others simply had a laugh about it.<h2>Instances when someone changed other people's tickets</h2>Similar incidents have happened in the past, where someone shared too much information about their trip, and ended up either with a cancelled reservation or being relegated to Coach from Business. In 2011, blogger Ben Schlappig faced the latter when someone called American Airlines and changed the booking. He was supposed to fly from Tampa to Paris, but found himself with a coach ticket from Raleigh to Los Angeles. However, he managed to get it changed to the original ticket.Such incidents reveal the importance of keeping things private, especially your itinerary and ticket details. Social media has led people to flaunt their international trips with tickets and boarding passes that they post online. Such acts also raise security risks, as telling strangers about your plans or that you'll be out of your home can prove dangerous. While some might be compelled to brag on social media, it is best to keep your plans to yourself.&nbsp;

An American passenger showed off his boarding off on social media, saying how Donald Trump made it possible for him to fly First Class. This cost him dearly as someone used the details to cancel his booking. 

A Trump supporter was shocked to see that someone had cancelled his plane ticket after he posted a photo of his boarding pass online. Apparently, this man was bragging about how he was flying first class, and it was all possible because of the US president who had "Made America Great Again." He was flying to Greenville–Spartanburg airport in South Carolina. However, his foolishness cost him the trip as his boarding pass had all the details someone needs to cancel a trip. When he reached the airport, his ticket had already been cancelled. According to View From The Wing, several airlines let passengers access "Manage my Bookings" with just the confirmation number and last name. Netizens are in disbelief to see that someone can actually do this. Many people commented that this is likely just a lie, while others were shocked to learn that this is possible. Others simply had a laugh about it. Instances when someone changed other people's tickets Similar incidents have happened in the past, where someone shared too much information about their trip, and ended up either with a cancelled reservation or being relegated to Coach from Business. In 2011, blogger Ben Schlappig faced the latter when someone called American Airlines and changed the booking. He was supposed to fly from Tampa to Paris, but found himself with a coach ticket from Raleigh to Los Angeles. However, he managed to get it changed to the original ticket. Such incidents reveal the importance of keeping things private, especially your itinerary and ticket details. Social media has led people to flaunt their international trips with tickets and boarding passes that they post online. Such acts also raise security risks, as telling strangers about your plans or that you'll be out of your home can prove dangerous. While some might be compelled to brag on social media, it is best to keep your plans to yourself.

An American passenger showed off his boarding off on social media, saying how Donald Trump made it possible for him to fly First Class. This cost him dearly as someone used the details to cancel his booking.&nbsp;

Man posts First Class boarding pass on social media, says 'Trump made it possible'. Someone cancelled his ticket

US President Donald Trump is trying to divert attention from his own connection with Epstein, as focus shifts towards the Democratic leaders Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, who are supposedly trying to avoid deposition in the House investigation for the Epstein case. Republican Chairman of the House Oversight Committee for the Epstein case, James Comer, has threatened to pursue a contempt case against the Clintons if they fail to appear physically in the Capitol Hill on December 17 or 18 or schedule a date for early January. These charges could result in one year in prison as well as a fine of $100,000.“President Trump has consistently sought to divert attention from his own relationship with Mr Epstein, and unfortunately, the committee appears to be complicit.” The US President Donald Trump has signed a bill to release the full list of Epstein files in a downloadable and printable format by December 19.<h2>Are the Clintons avoiding testifying in the House Epstein enquiry?</h2>Bill and Hillary Clinton have on several occasions offered to provide sworn-in statements but refused to appear on Capitol Hill. David Kendaill, Clinton's attorney, has sent three letters to the House Oversight Committee, explaining why they should be required to submit a sworn statement not physically appearing. But Comer refused to pay heed to the clues, instead threatening them with contempt. Kendall pointed out that apart from the Clintons, Comer has subpoenaed eight others, out of whom only one, Attorney General William Barr, appeared before the committee. Five of the former Attorney Generals, FBI directors James B. Comey and Robert S. Mueller III were allowed to give a written statement. He accused Comer of "weaponising legislative investigations and targeted criminal prosecutions" against the Clintons. He has accused James Comer of holding Clinton to a different standard and targeting Clinton to create a public spectacle.&nbsp;

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton avoiding testimony in the House Epstein inquiry? James Comer threatens contempt as Trump orders Epstein files release.

US President Donald Trump is trying to divert attention from his own connection with Epstein, as focus shifts towards the Democratic leaders Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, who are supposedly trying to avoid deposition in the House investigation for the Epstein case. Republican Chairman of the House Oversight Committee for the Epstein case, James Comer, has threatened to pursue a contempt case against the Clintons if they fail to appear physically in the Capitol Hill on December 17 or 18 or schedule a date for early January. These charges could result in one year in prison as well as a fine of $100,000. “President Trump has consistently sought to divert attention from his own relationship with Mr Epstein, and unfortunately, the committee appears to be complicit.” The US President Donald Trump has signed a bill to release the full list of Epstein files in a downloadable and printable format by December 19. Are the Clintons avoiding testifying in the House Epstein enquiry? Bill and Hillary Clinton have on several occasions offered to provide sworn-in statements but refused to appear on Capitol Hill. David Kendaill, Clinton's attorney, has sent three letters to the House Oversight Committee, explaining why they should be required to submit a sworn statement not physically appearing. But Comer refused to pay heed to the clues, instead threatening them with contempt. Kendall pointed out that apart from the Clintons, Comer has subpoenaed eight others, out of whom only one, Attorney General William Barr, appeared before the committee. Five of the former Attorney Generals, FBI directors James B. Comey and Robert S. Mueller III were allowed to give a written statement. He accused Comer of "weaponising legislative investigations and targeted criminal prosecutions" against the Clintons. He has accused James Comer of holding Clinton to a different standard and targeting Clinton to create a public spectacle.

Are Bill and Hillary Clinton avoiding testimony in the House Epstein inquiry? James Comer threatens contempt as Trump orders Epstein files release.

Trump 'diverting attention' from himself as Bill and Hillary Clinton are avoiding testifying in Epstein case

In a shocking statement, the White House has branded the BBC a “leftist propaganda machine,” following confirmation that Donald Trump’s legal counsel has officially filed a lawsuit against the broadcaster. The case alleges media bias and defamation. Stay tuned for updates, reactions, and expert analysis on this escalating political and legal battle.


Trump Sues BBC: Trump Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against BBC 

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) signalled that his administration is seriously considering easing federal restrictions on marijuana, reopening a debate that has long divided Washington and the states. This comes as Trump signed an executive order classifying fentanyl a "weapon of mass destruction".<h2>What did Trump say about weed?</h2>Asked by reporters whether an executive order on cannabis reform was in the works, Trump said the idea was under active review. "We are considering that," he said. He claimed that a lot of people were asking for reclassification for "research" purposes. "A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can't be done unless you reclassify, so we are looking at that very strongly."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fentanyl-more-dangerous-than-a-bomb-trump-classifies-drug-as-weapon-of-mass-destruction-1765847533698">Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'</a><h2>Is marijuana legal in the US?</h2>Under federal law, marijuana, aka grass, is currently listed as a Schedule I substance, a category reserved for drugs like heroin and LSD, which the government says have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. That status has increasingly clashed with reality on the ground, where dozens of US states now allow marijuana, also referred to as Devil's lettuce, for medical purposes, and many permit recreational use as well.According to a recent Washington Post report, Trump is weighing a shift to Schedule III, a category that includes drugs considered to have legitimate medical value and a lower risk of abuse. Ketamine and anabolic steroids are classified at that level.<h2>Does that mean marijuana would be legal throughout the US?</h2>No, rescheduling would not amount to full legalisation or decriminalisation. But it could bring significant changes. Moving marijuana out of Schedule I would ease restrictions on scientific research, which currently requires multiple layers of federal approval. Researchers have long argued that the existing rules make it unnecessarily difficult to study cannabis for medical benefits and risks.The move could also have tax implications for the growing legal cannabis industry.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sza-slams-trump-admin-for-rage-baiting-artists-for-free-promo-after-white-house-uses-her-song-big-boy-in-ice-video-watch-1765422624181">SZA slams Trump admin for ‘rage baiting artists for free promo’ after White House uses her song 'Big Boy' in ICE video. Watch</a><h2>But can Trump reclassify cannabis?</h2>Trump cannot change marijuana's classification on his own. Any shift would require action by federal agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The Post reported that Trump is expected to sign an executive order instructing those agencies to begin the process.Former president Joe Biden had also pushed for reclassification, but his administration did not complete the effort before Trump returned to office in early 2025. &nbsp;

Trump hints at big weed shift | Trump says the White House is actively considering easing federal marijuana rules, including reclassifying cannabis for research. Here's what he said.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) signalled that his administration is seriously considering easing federal restrictions on marijuana, reopening a debate that has long divided Washington and the states. This comes as Trump signed an executive order classifying fentanyl a "weapon of mass destruction". What did Trump say about weed? Asked by reporters whether an executive order on cannabis reform was in the works, Trump said the idea was under active review. "We are considering that," he said. He claimed that a lot of people were asking for reclassification for "research" purposes. "A lot of people want to see it, the reclassification, because it leads to tremendous amounts of research that can't be done unless you reclassify, so we are looking at that very strongly." Also read | Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction' Is marijuana legal in the US? Under federal law, marijuana, aka grass, is currently listed as a Schedule I substance, a category reserved for drugs like heroin and LSD, which the government says have a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use. That status has increasingly clashed with reality on the ground, where dozens of US states now allow marijuana, also referred to as Devil's lettuce, for medical purposes, and many permit recreational use as well. According to a recent Washington Post report, Trump is weighing a shift to Schedule III, a category that includes drugs considered to have legitimate medical value and a lower risk of abuse. Ketamine and anabolic steroids are classified at that level. Does that mean marijuana would be legal throughout the US? No, rescheduling would not amount to full legalisation or decriminalisation. But it could bring significant changes. Moving marijuana out of Schedule I would ease restrictions on scientific research, which currently requires multiple layers of federal approval. Researchers have long argued that the existing rules make it unnecessarily difficult to study cannabis for medical benefits and risks. The move could also have tax implications for the growing legal cannabis industry. Also read | SZA slams Trump admin for ‘rage baiting artists for free promo’ after White House uses her song 'Big Boy' in ICE video. Watch But can Trump reclassify cannabis? Trump cannot change marijuana's classification on his own. Any shift would require action by federal agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The Post reported that Trump is expected to sign an executive order instructing those agencies to begin the process. Former president Joe Biden had also pushed for reclassification, but his administration did not complete the effort before Trump returned to office in early 2025.

Trump hints at big weed shift | Trump says the White House is actively considering easing federal marijuana rules, including reclassifying cannabis for research. Here's what he said.

Marijuana 'research' material but fentanyl a 'weapon of mass destruction'? Trump's explosive announcement on devil's lettuce

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) filed a lawsuit seeking at least $10 billion in damages from the BBC, accusing the British broadcaster of defamation. The lawsuit alleges that the British broadcaster manipulated Trump's January 6, 2021 speech to supporters ahead of the US Capitol riot. The lawsuit has been filed in federal court in Miami and names two counts against the BBC. Trump is seeking "damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000" for each count, alleging defamation and violations of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fentanyl-more-dangerous-than-a-bomb-trump-classifies-drug-as-weapon-of-mass-destruction-1765847533698">Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'</a><h2>BBC 'put words in my mouth': Trump</h2>Earlier in the day, Trump had signalled that legal action was coming, claiming the BBC had deliberately altered his words. He said the broadcaster had "put words in my mouth," and even suggested that the clip may have been manipulated using "AI or something."Trump's legal team, in a statement to AFP, said the BBC had intentionally "defamed" Trump. "The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election," they alleged.The statement also alleged the BBC "has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda". Trump’s lawsuit claims the altered video was broadcast just a week before the election in an effort to damage his campaign. The video was "fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election's outcome to President Trump's detriment."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-extrememly-frustrated-trump-warns-ukraine-war-could-explode-into-a-third-world-war-1765520498886">'Extremely frustrated' Trump warns Ukraine war could explode into a 'third world war'</a><h2>What did the BBC do?</h2>The case centres on a documentary aired last year on Panorama, the BBC's flagship current affairs programme, in the run-up to the 2024 US presidential election. The film edited together two separate portions of Trump's speech from January 6 in a way that, according to the lawsuit, made it appear he directly encouraged supporters to storm the Capitol as Congress met to certify Joe Biden's election victory.The controversy has already had major consequences for the broadcaster. The BBC was thrown into turmoil last month after media reports revived scrutiny of the edited clip. The fallout led to the resignations of the BBC's director-general and its top news executive.The BBC has denied the defamation allegations, though its chairman, Samir Shah, had sent Trump a letter of apology.

Trump sues BBC for $10bn | Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC, accusing it of doctoring his January 6 speech to make it look like he incited the Capitol riot. 

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) filed a lawsuit seeking at least $10 billion in damages from the BBC, accusing the British broadcaster of defamation. The lawsuit alleges that the British broadcaster manipulated Trump's January 6, 2021 speech to supporters ahead of the US Capitol riot. The lawsuit has been filed in federal court in Miami and names two counts against the BBC. Trump is seeking "damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000" for each count, alleging defamation and violations of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. Also read | Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction' BBC 'put words in my mouth': Trump Earlier in the day, Trump had signalled that legal action was coming, claiming the BBC had deliberately altered his words. He said the broadcaster had "put words in my mouth," and even suggested that the clip may have been manipulated using "AI or something." Trump's legal team, in a statement to AFP, said the BBC had intentionally "defamed" Trump. "The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election," they alleged. The statement also alleged the BBC "has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda". Trump’s lawsuit claims the altered video was broadcast just a week before the election in an effort to damage his campaign. The video was "fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election's outcome to President Trump's detriment." Also read | 'Extremely frustrated' Trump warns Ukraine war could explode into a 'third world war' What did the BBC do? The case centres on a documentary aired last year on Panorama, the BBC's flagship current affairs programme, in the run-up to the 2024 US presidential election. The film edited together two separate portions of Trump's speech from January 6 in a way that, according to the lawsuit, made it appear he directly encouraged supporters to storm the Capitol as Congress met to certify Joe Biden's election victory. The controversy has already had major consequences for the broadcaster. The BBC was thrown into turmoil last month after media reports revived scrutiny of the edited clip. The fallout led to the resignations of the BBC's director-general and its top news executive. The BBC has denied the defamation allegations, though its chairman, Samir Shah, had sent Trump a letter of apology.

Trump sues BBC for $10bn | Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC, accusing it of doctoring his January 6 speech to make it look like he incited the Capitol riot.&nbsp;

'They put words in my mouth': Trump claims BBC used AI to alter Jan 6 speech, files $10 billion lawsuit

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) announced he was classifying fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, escalating his administration’s crackdown on drug cartels across Latin America and framing the opioid crisis as a national security threat on par with nuclear and chemical weapons.<h2>Deadlier than a bomb?</h2>Speaking at the White House while signing an executive order, Trump said fentanyl was deadlier than any bomb. "No bomb does what this is doing -- 200-300,000 people die every year, that we know of".The executive order places illicit fentanyl in the same category as weapons of mass destruction, arguing that its production and distribution threaten US national security and fuel instability across the region and at the country’s borders. The document states that fentanyl is "closer to a chemical weapon than a narcotic," and that the manufacture and distribution of the drug "threatens our national security and fuels lawlessness in our hemisphere and at our borders."<h2>Is fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb?</h2>No, official data does not support the Trumps fatality figures. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the country recorded an estimated 80,000 overdose deaths in 2024, with roughly 48,000 linked to synthetic opioids such as fentanyl.However, the narrative aligns with Trump's broader campaign against what his administration calls "narco-terrorists." Since early September, the US military has carried out strikes on more than 20 suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Trump has claimed each vessel destroyed saves 25,000 American lives.Experts note, however, that most of the boats targeted are believed to be carrying cocaine, not fentanyl. The synthetic opioid largely enters the United States through land routes from Mexico, rather than maritime smuggling from countries like Colombia or Venezuela.The strikes have been accompanied by a significant US naval buildup in the Caribbean, including the deployment of the world's largest aircraft carrier and multiple warships. US military aircraft have also conducted repeated flights along Venezuela’s coastline in recent weeks.Washington insists the buildup is focused on counter-narcotics operations. Meanwhile, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has accused the US of using drug trafficking as a pretext for pursuing regime change. The Trump administration has linked Maduro directly to the issue, accusing him of leading the so-called "Cartel of the Suns," which it designated a narco-terrorist organisation last month, and offering a $50 million reward for information leading to his capture. &nbsp;

Fentanyl = WMD? Trump’s explosive claim | Trump labels fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction, says it kills more than bombs. US data disputes the numbers. Scroll to read what Trump said vs the truth.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Dec 15) announced he was classifying fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, escalating his administration’s crackdown on drug cartels across Latin America and framing the opioid crisis as a national security threat on par with nuclear and chemical weapons. Deadlier than a bomb? Speaking at the White House while signing an executive order, Trump said fentanyl was deadlier than any bomb. "No bomb does what this is doing -- 200-300,000 people die every year, that we know of". The executive order places illicit fentanyl in the same category as weapons of mass destruction, arguing that its production and distribution threaten US national security and fuel instability across the region and at the country’s borders. The document states that fentanyl is "closer to a chemical weapon than a narcotic," and that the manufacture and distribution of the drug "threatens our national security and fuels lawlessness in our hemisphere and at our borders." Is fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? No, official data does not support the Trumps fatality figures. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the country recorded an estimated 80,000 overdose deaths in 2024, with roughly 48,000 linked to synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. However, the narrative aligns with Trump's broader campaign against what his administration calls "narco-terrorists." Since early September, the US military has carried out strikes on more than 20 suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean, operations that have killed nearly 90 people. Trump has claimed each vessel destroyed saves 25,000 American lives. Experts note, however, that most of the boats targeted are believed to be carrying cocaine, not fentanyl. The synthetic opioid largely enters the United States through land routes from Mexico, rather than maritime smuggling from countries like Colombia or Venezuela. The strikes have been accompanied by a significant US naval buildup in the Caribbean, including the deployment of the world's largest aircraft carrier and multiple warships. US military aircraft have also conducted repeated flights along Venezuela’s coastline in recent weeks. Washington insists the buildup is focused on counter-narcotics operations. Meanwhile, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has accused the US of using drug trafficking as a pretext for pursuing regime change. The Trump administration has linked Maduro directly to the issue, accusing him of leading the so-called "Cartel of the Suns," which it designated a narco-terrorist organisation last month, and offering a $50 million reward for information leading to his capture.

Fentanyl = WMD? Trump’s explosive claim | Trump labels fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction, says it kills more than bombs. US data disputes the numbers. Scroll to read what Trump said vs the truth.

Fentanyl more dangerous than a bomb? Trump classifies drug as 'weapon of mass destruction'

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

US Military: Five Killed in Strikes on Two Alleged Drug Boats

US-Venezuela Tensions: Trump Orders Naval Blockade of Sanctioned Venezuelan Oil Tankers

US President Donald Trump Accuses Joe Biden of Allowing 25 Million 'Illegals' into US

‘Not a big deal’: Trump claims he can strike Venezuela without Congress nod

Trump health chief seeks to bar trans youth from gender-affirming care

Trump signs executive order to reclassify marijuana as less dangerous

Year-Ender: What did Donald Trump announce in 2025? Full list of major decisions

US-Venezuela Tensions: Venezuela’s Maduro Calls UN Chief Amid US Blockade Tensions

Trump announces 'warrior dividend' checks of $1,776 for US military

US Congress Ends Sanctions on Syria , Paving Way for Investment

Trump rewrites White House history with brutal plaques mocking Biden and Obama

Ex-special counsel defends Trump prosecution in House appearance

Trump’s live address: US president to outline agenda for 2026. Details inside

'Export operations for crude and byproducts continue normally', says Venezuela despite Trump 'blockade'

Trump pressures EU to drop Ukraine's 'reparations loan' plan using Russian asset

Jared Kushner drops Trump hotel project in Serbia after massive corruption probe

Who is Susie Wiles? Chief of Staff who called Trump an ‘alcoholic personality’

Trump & Cabinet Rally Around Susie Wiles | Row Over 'Alcoholic's Personality' Remark

Higher-Income Households Drive Spending Growth

Vanity Fair Interview: Susie Wiles Calls Trump’s Personality “Alcoholic,” Cabinet Responds

POTUS' end-of-year report card: Trump's approval rating nears lowest point

Trump targets Venezuela with ‘total and complete blockade’ of oil tankers

US lawmakers grill Trump officials over alleged drug boat strikes

Ballroom construction is critical for security concerns: White House tells court

Political views online may affect US visas under expanded Trump-era screening

Man posts First Class boarding pass, praises MAGA. Someone cancelled his ticket