Winters are coming in northern India, and so is the choking season as residents stare at staggering levels of air pollution. Now, the Supreme Court of India (SC) has issued a warning to Punjab and Haryana states over the persistent issue of stubble burning, which contributes to poor air quality in neighbouring Delhi.

During proceedings on Wednesday (Oct 16), the country’s top court highlighted the rising cases of stubble burning in the two states, and blasted&nbsp;the major agrarian states for “complete defiance" of directives from the Commission of Air Quality Management.

The apex court also issued summons to the chief secretaries of Punjab and Haryana for the next hearing on Oct 23.

While taking on Haryana, Justice AS Oka said while highlighting compliance issues, “We see that the affidavit by Haryana is full of non-compliance. We direct the Commission to take penal action against State Officers under Section 14." He also directed state's chief secretary T.V.S.N. Prasad&nbsp;to be present in the court and explain the state’s failure to check stubble burning.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwjzqOOH05KJAxV94zQHHQcFEeUQxfQBKAB6BAgIEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ahead-of-smog-season-delhi-writes-to-centre-pushes-for-cloud-seeding-to-combat-air-pollution-766458" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ahead-of-smog-season-delhi-writes-to-centre-pushes-for-cloud-seeding-to-combat-air-pollution-766458&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjzqOOH05KJAxV94zQHHQcFEeUQxfQBKAB6BAgIEAE">Ahead of smog season, Delhi writes to Centre, pushes for ‘cloud seeding’ to combat air pollution</a>

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Augustine George Masih directed the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to take penal action against Haryana and Punjab government officials.

"This is not a political matter. If chief secretary is acting at somebody's behest, we will issue summons against them as well. Next Wednesday, we are going to physically call chief secretary and explain everything. Nothing has been done, same is with Punjab government. The attitude is of complete defiance," the bench said.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwjzqOOH05KJAxV94zQHHQcFEeUQxfQBKAB6BAgTEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/e-challans-for-expired-pollution-certificates-indias-e-detection-system-to-combat-pollution-766776" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/e-challans-for-expired-pollution-certificates-indias-e-detection-system-to-combat-pollution-766776&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjzqOOH05KJAxV94zQHHQcFEeUQxfQBKAB6BAgTEAE">E-challans for expired pollution certificates: India's ‘e-detection’ system to combat pollution</a>

Speaking of Punjab, the bench highlighted how not even a single prosecution has taken place in the state for the widespread offence.

The court also rapped the CAQM for becoming ‘a toothless tiger’.

(With inputs from agencies)

Winters are coming in northern India, and so is the choking season as residents stare at staggering levels of air pollution. Now, the Supreme Court of India (SC) has issued a warning to Punjab and Haryana states over the persistent issue of stubble burning, which contributes to poor air quality in neighbouring Delhi.

Winters are coming in northern India, and so is the choking season as residents stare at staggering levels of air pollution. Now, the Supreme Court of India (SC) has issued a warning to Punjab and Haryana states over the persistent issue of stubble burning, which contributes to poor air quality in neighbouring Delhi. During proceedings on Wednesday (Oct 16), the country’s top court highlighted the rising cases of stubble burning in the two states, and blasted the major agrarian states for “complete defiance" of directives from the Commission of Air Quality Management. The apex court also issued summons to the chief secretaries of Punjab and Haryana for the next hearing on Oct 23. While taking on Haryana, Justice AS Oka said while highlighting compliance issues, “We see that the affidavit by Haryana is full of non-compliance. We direct the Commission to take penal action against State Officers under Section 14." He also directed state's chief secretary T.V.S.N. Prasad to be present in the court and explain the state’s failure to check stubble burning. Also read: Ahead of smog season, Delhi writes to Centre, pushes for ‘cloud seeding’ to combat air pollution A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Augustine George Masih directed the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to take penal action against Haryana and Punjab government officials. "This is not a political matter. If chief secretary is acting at somebody's behest, we will issue summons against them as well. Next Wednesday, we are going to physically call chief secretary and explain everything. Nothing has been done, same is with Punjab government. The attitude is of complete defiance," the bench said. Also read: E-challans for expired pollution certificates: India's ‘e-detection’ system to combat pollution Speaking of Punjab, the bench highlighted how not even a single prosecution has taken place in the state for the widespread offence. The court also rapped the CAQM for becoming ‘a toothless tiger’. (With inputs from agencies)

‘Complete defiance,’ SC scolds Punjab and Haryana over rising cases of stubble burning

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday (Oct 15)&nbsp;during a hearing in the Kolkata rape and murder case of a trainee female doctor at RG Kar Hospital and College&nbsp;that the report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) indicated that it&nbsp;is&nbsp;probing the role of "others" involved in the case.

In its fifth status report, the CBI indicated that the agency is probing the role of "others" in the case.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of the CBI and submitted the latest status report to the bench, comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.

The apex court directed the West Bengal government to inform about steps being taken so that civic volunteers are not posted in hospitals, police stations, and schools after the CBI named Sanjay Roy as prime accused in the case.&nbsp;

The court asked the state government to provide details of the recruitment process of civic volunteers, as the prime accused, Sanjay Roy, is also a volunteer.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-doctor-rape-murder-case-third-medic-hospitalised-as-fast-unto-death-protest-continues-766942">Also read:&nbsp;Kolkata doctor rape-murder case: Third medic hospitalised as 'fast-unto-death' protest continues</a>

Sanjay Roy was arrested by Kolkata Police on August 10.&nbsp;

"It is a nice process of conferring political patronage on unverified persons," the Supreme Court said, while seeking an affidavit in three weeks.

The government has recruited over 1,500 civic volunteers under its 'Ratire Sathi' scheme. The bench asked the West Bengal government not to post these persons in hospitals, police stations, and schools till further notice.&nbsp;

Watch |&nbsp;RG Kar Protest: Junior Doctors Hospitalised, Rest Continue 'Fast-Unto-Death' | WION Originals

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/rg-kar-protest-junior-doctors-hospitalised-rest-continue-fast-unto-death-wion-originals-767572/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

12-hour nationwide hunger strike&nbsp;

The Indian Medical Association declared a 12-hour nationwide hunger strike on Tuesday to express their solidarity with the protesting junior doctors.

Further, the court said that the National Task Force meetings should be held periodically and directed it to formulate recommendations on the safety of Kolkata doctors within three weeks.&nbsp;

The Chief Justice recorded&nbsp;in the order that “no substantial progress” has been made by the NTF. He further instructed the Centre to ensure that proactive steps are taken so that the NTF is able to complete its work within a reasonable time.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday (Oct 15) during a hearing in the Kolkata rape and murder case of a trainee female doctor at RG Kar Hospital and College that the report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) indicated that it is probing the role of "others" involved in the case.

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday (Oct 15) during a hearing in the Kolkata rape and murder case of a trainee female doctor at RG Kar Hospital and College that the report filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) indicated that it is probing the role of "others" involved in the case. In its fifth status report, the CBI indicated that the agency is probing the role of "others" in the case. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared on behalf of the CBI and submitted the latest status report to the bench, comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The apex court directed the West Bengal government to inform about steps being taken so that civic volunteers are not posted in hospitals, police stations, and schools after the CBI named Sanjay Roy as prime accused in the case. The court asked the state government to provide details of the recruitment process of civic volunteers, as the prime accused, Sanjay Roy, is also a volunteer. Also read: Kolkata doctor rape-murder case: Third medic hospitalised as 'fast-unto-death' protest continues Sanjay Roy was arrested by Kolkata Police on August 10. "It is a nice process of conferring political patronage on unverified persons," the Supreme Court said, while seeking an affidavit in three weeks. The government has recruited over 1,500 civic volunteers under its 'Ratire Sathi' scheme. The bench asked the West Bengal government not to post these persons in hospitals, police stations, and schools till further notice. Watch | RG Kar Protest: Junior Doctors Hospitalised, Rest Continue 'Fast-Unto-Death' | WION Originals × 12-hour nationwide hunger strike The Indian Medical Association declared a 12-hour nationwide hunger strike on Tuesday to express their solidarity with the protesting junior doctors. Further, the court said that the National Task Force meetings should be held periodically and directed it to formulate recommendations on the safety of Kolkata doctors within three weeks. The Chief Justice recorded in the order that “no substantial progress” has been made by the NTF. He further instructed the Centre to ensure that proactive steps are taken so that the NTF is able to complete its work within a reasonable time. (With inputs from agencies)

CBI probing 'role of others' in Kolkata rape and murder case, SC told

In a move to support the ongoing protest against the alleged rape and murder of a junior doctor in West Bengal, the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) on Monday announced a nationwide hunger strike.

The doctors’ association held a meeting on Monday and announced that the hunger strike will begin on Wednesday, which will be two months from the day the alleged rape and murder of a trainee doctor at R G Kar Medical College in West Bengal happened on August 9.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-doctor-murder-rape-cbi-files-chargesheet-ruling-out-gangrape-says-accused-roy-acted-alone-765198">Kolkata doctor murder-rape: CBI files chargesheet ruling out gangrape, says accused Sanjay Roy acted alone</a>

“We have been in close contact with the West Bengal Junior Doctors’ Front and are united in our stance,” said Suvrankar Datta, President of FAIMA.

“After extensive deliberation, we have decided to organise a nationwide hunger strike in solidarity with our colleagues in West Bengal, Datta said.

Datta also emphasised that the hunger strike is intended to amplify the voices of the junior doctors who have been on strike for weeks, advocating for better working conditions, enhanced safety protocols, and other essential reforms.

The doctors’ association has also called on healthcare workers across the country to participate in the strike, to highlight unity among medical professionals in their fight for fair treatment and improved conditions, FAIMA said in a statement.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience. 
&nbsp;

In a move to support the ongoing protest against the alleged rape and murder of a junior doctor in West Bengal, the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) on Monday announced a nationwide hunger strike.

In a move to support the ongoing protest against the alleged rape and murder of a junior doctor in West Bengal, the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) on Monday announced a nationwide hunger strike. The doctors’ association held a meeting on Monday and announced that the hunger strike will begin on Wednesday, which will be two months from the day the alleged rape and murder of a trainee doctor at R G Kar Medical College in West Bengal happened on August 9. Also read | Kolkata doctor murder-rape: CBI files chargesheet ruling out gangrape, says accused Sanjay Roy acted alone “We have been in close contact with the West Bengal Junior Doctors’ Front and are united in our stance,” said Suvrankar Datta, President of FAIMA. “After extensive deliberation, we have decided to organise a nationwide hunger strike in solidarity with our colleagues in West Bengal, Datta said. Datta also emphasised that the hunger strike is intended to amplify the voices of the junior doctors who have been on strike for weeks, advocating for better working conditions, enhanced safety protocols, and other essential reforms. The doctors’ association has also called on healthcare workers across the country to participate in the strike, to highlight unity among medical professionals in their fight for fair treatment and improved conditions, FAIMA said in a statement. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Indian doctors call nationwide hunger strike to protest rape, murder of Kolkata trainee doctor

The Supreme Court on Monday (Oct 07) condemned the ongoing discrimination against women in public offices, emphasising the need for stronger support systems that empower women rather than hinder them.

The Supreme Court on Monday (Oct 07) condemned the ongoing discrimination against women in public offices, emphasising the need for stronger support systems that empower women rather than hinder them. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan called attention to the gender biases women continue to face within administrative frameworks, despite constitutional protections and legislative measures. The justices expressed concern that women, particularly in leadership roles, are often met with unfair challenges, stating, "As a country, we are attempting to realise the progressive goal of gender parity and women empowerment across all spheres, including public offices, and most importantly adequate women representatives in elected bodies." They stressed that such barriers reveal ingrained discriminatory attitudes, preventing progress towards a more inclusive political environment. Also read: CBI files chargesheet in RG Kar case, rules out gangrape, says Roy acted alone The court underlined the importance of handling the removal of elected representatives, particularly women from rural areas, with great care, recognising the challenges these women face in securing and maintaining such positions. The court said, "We would like to reiterate that the matter of removal of an elected public representative should not be treated so lightly, especially when it concerns women belonging to rural areas. It must be acknowledged that these women who succeed in occupying such public offices do so only after significant struggle." These strong observations from the court came as it reinstated Manisha Ravindra Panpatil as the sarpanch of Vichkheda in Maharashtra’s Jalgaon district. Local authorities had disqualified her on the grounds that she resided on government land, an allegation the court found unsubstantiated. Panpatil had been elected in February 2021. In its ruling, the court urged government authorities to create a more supportive environment for women in governance, particularly in rural areas. It added the need for administrative bodies to "sensitise themselves and work towards creating a more conducive atmosphere." The court also noted that the actions of those seeking Panpatil’s disqualification stemmed from resistance to a woman holding decision-making power in the village. "This seems to us a classic case where the residents of the village could not reconcile with the fact that the appellant, being a woman, was nevertheless elected to the office of the sarpanch of their village," the court said. Also read: New Delhi, Male sign MoUs, agreement including launch of RuPay in Maldives Highlighting a broader issue of gender-based exclusion, the court remarked that Panpatil’s removal, based on unverified claims, reflected a wider problem of indifference towards women’s roles in local governance. It criticised the "mechanical and summary orders" issued by government officials, including the collector and divisional commissioner, which demonstrated a "systemic pattern of prejudicial treatment." The court expressed concern not only about the biased actions of the private complainants but also the casual manner in which government authorities had removed an elected representative. "While there is no doubt in our mind that the private respondents may have operated in a discriminatory manner, what is more worrying is the casual approach adopted by government authorities in summarily removing an elected representative. This is all the more concerning when the representative in question is a woman and elected in the reservation quota..." it said. The court further warned against the routine or casual dismissal of elected representatives, particularly women from rural areas, as it overlooks the significant effort they invest in winning and maintaining their positions. (With inputs from agencies)

Supreme Court calls out gender bias in public offices, urges stronger support for women leaders

On Friday, the Supreme Court directed a special investigation team (SIT) to look into the claims made by the Andhra Pradesh government, led by N Chandrababu, that the Yuvajana Sramika Rythu (YSR) Congress Party's previous government used inferior ghee that contained animal fat to make laddus at the Sri Venkateswara temple in Tirupati.

Tirupati Laddu Row: SC Orders CBI-Monitored SIT Probe, Cautions Against Politicizing Case

In a path-breaking development, India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Oct 3) banned all caste-based discrimination in Indian jails, terming them as “unconstitutional.” The court calls for immediate reforms across all states and Union Territories (UTs) against the various jail manual provisions like scavenging and cleaning by the marginalised inmates, as this violates their right to dignity and equality.

The verdict was delivered by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, specifically addressing the entrenched discriminatory practices against marginalised communities, including scheduled castes (SC), scheduled tribes (ST) and denotified tribes (DNTs) in Indian prisons.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/couple-in-indias-up-dupes-people-of-millions-with-promise-of-age-reversal-heres-what-happened-764438">Couple in India's UP dupes people of millions with promise of 'age reversal.' Here's what happened</a>

“The right to live with dignity extends even to the incarcerated. Not providing dignity to prisoners is a relic of the colonisers and pre-colonial mechanisms, where oppressive systems were designed to dehumanise and degrade those under the control of the State,” the SC bench said.

These discriminatory provisions are part of the pre-colonial-era Prisons Act of 1894, but they continue in independent India despite manuals and Acts framed by the Centre as recently as last year, the apex court found.&nbsp;

“The rule that a prisoner of a high caste be allowed to refuse food cooked by other castes is a legal sanction by the state authorities to untouchability and the caste system,” the bench, which included Justice J B&nbsp;Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, said.

The provision that food is to be cooked by prisoners from a “suitable caste” allows jail officials to discriminate against the marginalised castes, it said.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pilgrims-can-now-see-mount-kailash-from-inside-indian-territory-heres-how-764397">Pilgrims can now see Mount Kailash from inside Indian territory. Here's how</a>

It frowned upon the imposition of work such as cleaning latrines and sweeping only on “Mether, Hari caste or Chandal” and similar castes, saying it amounted to “forced labour”. The top court condemned such practice, calling it a clear violation of human dignity.

“We therefore find that the impugned provisions are violative of Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), 17 (untouchability), 21 (life and liberty), and 23 (prohibition against forced labour),” the SC bench said.

The bench also asked the central government to make the necessary changes to the Model Prison Manual 2016 and the Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act 2023 within three months.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

In a path-breaking development, India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Oct 3) banned all caste-based discrimination in Indian jails, terming them as “unconstitutional.

In a path-breaking development, India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Oct 3) banned all caste-based discrimination in Indian jails, terming them as “unconstitutional.” The court calls for immediate reforms across all states and Union Territories (UTs) against the various jail manual provisions like scavenging and cleaning by the marginalised inmates, as this violates their right to dignity and equality. The verdict was delivered by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, specifically addressing the entrenched discriminatory practices against marginalised communities, including scheduled castes (SC), scheduled tribes (ST) and denotified tribes (DNTs) in Indian prisons. Also Read | Couple in India's UP dupes people of millions with promise of 'age reversal.' Here's what happened “The right to live with dignity extends even to the incarcerated. Not providing dignity to prisoners is a relic of the colonisers and pre-colonial mechanisms, where oppressive systems were designed to dehumanise and degrade those under the control of the State,” the SC bench said. These discriminatory provisions are part of the pre-colonial-era Prisons Act of 1894, but they continue in independent India despite manuals and Acts framed by the Centre as recently as last year, the apex court found. “The rule that a prisoner of a high caste be allowed to refuse food cooked by other castes is a legal sanction by the state authorities to untouchability and the caste system,” the bench, which included Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, said. The provision that food is to be cooked by prisoners from a “suitable caste” allows jail officials to discriminate against the marginalised castes, it said. Also Read | Pilgrims can now see Mount Kailash from inside Indian territory. Here's how It frowned upon the imposition of work such as cleaning latrines and sweeping only on “Mether, Hari caste or Chandal” and similar castes, saying it amounted to “forced labour”. The top court condemned such practice, calling it a clear violation of human dignity. “We therefore find that the impugned provisions are violative of Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), 17 (untouchability), 21 (life and liberty), and 23 (prohibition against forced labour),” the SC bench said. The bench also asked the central government to make the necessary changes to the Model Prison Manual 2016 and the Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act 2023 within three months. (With inputs from agencies)

India's Supreme Court scraps 'unconstitutional' laws that promote caste-based discrimination in jails

After Laddu row, Tirupati prepares for the 9-day Brahmotsavam festival. Tirupati has invited devotees from all around the world to offer prayers during the festival. Officials say around a million pilgrims are expected to arrive for Brahmotsavam. Tirupati’s sacred kitchen is gearing up to produce a minimum of 8 lakh laddus a day. Traditional temple cleansing ritual was performed before the festival scheduled from Oct. 4 to 12. Watch to know more!

Tirupati Prepares For Mega Brahmotsavam Festival As It Moves On From Laddu Row | WION Originals

Supreme Court comes down heavily on Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu amid Tirupati Laddu Row. Top Court says ‘show proof of contaminated laddus’. Bench of Justices BR Gavai, KV Viswanathan heard petitions regarding alleged adulteration. Bench posed several questions to AP Govt and Tirumala Tirupati temple management. SC slams Naidu government for going to the press without sufficient evidence. Top Court says constitutional offices are expected to keep religion separate from politics. Watch to know more!

Tirupati Laddu Row: Supreme Court Slams CM Naidu, ‘Show Proof Of Contamination’ | WION Originals

The Indian government on Thursday opposed the criminalisation of marital rape in the Supreme Court, and stressed that matter relating to marital rape needs "a comprehensive approach" rather than a "strict legal approach".&nbsp;

The Centre said that if sexual acts by a man with his own wife are made punishable as "rape", it may severely impact the conjugal relationship and lead to serious disturbances in the institution of marriage, according to the news agency PTI.&nbsp;

It further said that "while exercising such judicial review on such subjects (marital rape), it is to be appreciated that the present question is not only a constitutional question but essentially&nbsp;a social question on which Parliament, after being apprised and being aware of all sides of the opinion on the present issue, has taken a position."

Centre informed the court that Parliament has decided to retain Exception 2 to Section 375 of IPC in 2013 while amending the said section in the year 2013.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/marriage-a-license-to-rape-indias-top-court-to-hear-pleas-on-marital-rape-these-countries-criminalise-it-576588">Also read:&nbsp;Marriage a license to rape? India's top court to hear pleas on marital rape; these countries criminalise it</a>

"Furthermore, it is submitted that striking down Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC on the ground of its constitutional validity will have a far-reaching effect on the institution of marriage if sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife is made punishable as 'rape'," the Centre said in its affidavit, according to news agency PTI.

"It is submitted that the act colloquially referred to as 'marital rape' ought to be illegal and criminalised. The central government asserts that a woman's consent is not obliterated by marriage and its violation should result in penal consequences. However, the consequences of such violations within marriage differ from those outside it," the affidavit said.

Moreover, the Centre told the Supreme Court that Parliament has provided different remedies, including criminal law provisions, to protect consent within marriage.

Watch |&nbsp;Delhi High Court's split verdict on Marital rape; consent of women still an issue?

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/delhi-high-courts-split-verdict-on-marital-rape-consent-of-women-still-an-issue-478256/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"Given the nature of the marital institution in our socio-legal milieu, if the legislature is of the view that, for the preservation of the marital institution, the impugned exception should be retained, it is submitted that it would not be appropriate for this court to strike down the exception," the central government told the Supreme Court.

"It may severely impact the conjugal relationship and may lead to serious disturbances in the institution of marriage," the government said.

"This is more so since the issues involved have a direct bearing on the society in general and is a part of Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India," the Centre said.

According to the affidavit, a husband certainly does not have any fundamental right to violate the consent of the wife, however, attracting the crime in the nature of "rape" as recognised in India to the institution of marriage can be arguably considered to be excessively harsh and therefore, disproportionate.

"Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that if the legislature decides to exempt, from the rigour of such a charge, and such a label, husbands, vis-a-vis their wives, given the intelligible differentia that exists in a marital relationship vis-a-vis other relationships, the said decision and discretion should be respected and not interfered with, especially when a separate suitably tailored penal remedy is provided by the Legislature," it said.

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

The Indian government on Thursday opposed the criminalisation of marital rape in the Supreme Court, and stressed that matter relating to marital rape needs "a comprehensive approach" rather than a "strict legal approach".

The Indian government on Thursday opposed the criminalisation of marital rape in the Supreme Court, and stressed that matter relating to marital rape needs "a comprehensive approach" rather than a "strict legal approach". The Centre said that if sexual acts by a man with his own wife are made punishable as "rape", it may severely impact the conjugal relationship and lead to serious disturbances in the institution of marriage, according to the news agency PTI. It further said that "while exercising such judicial review on such subjects (marital rape), it is to be appreciated that the present question is not only a constitutional question but essentially a social question on which Parliament, after being apprised and being aware of all sides of the opinion on the present issue, has taken a position." Centre informed the court that Parliament has decided to retain Exception 2 to Section 375 of IPC in 2013 while amending the said section in the year 2013. Also read: Marriage a license to rape? India's top court to hear pleas on marital rape; these countries criminalise it "Furthermore, it is submitted that striking down Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC on the ground of its constitutional validity will have a far-reaching effect on the institution of marriage if sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his own wife is made punishable as 'rape'," the Centre said in its affidavit, according to news agency PTI. "It is submitted that the act colloquially referred to as 'marital rape' ought to be illegal and criminalised. The central government asserts that a woman's consent is not obliterated by marriage and its violation should result in penal consequences. However, the consequences of such violations within marriage differ from those outside it," the affidavit said. Moreover, the Centre told the Supreme Court that Parliament has provided different remedies, including criminal law provisions, to protect consent within marriage. Watch | Delhi High Court's split verdict on Marital rape; consent of women still an issue? × "Given the nature of the marital institution in our socio-legal milieu, if the legislature is of the view that, for the preservation of the marital institution, the impugned exception should be retained, it is submitted that it would not be appropriate for this court to strike down the exception," the central government told the Supreme Court. "It may severely impact the conjugal relationship and may lead to serious disturbances in the institution of marriage," the government said. "This is more so since the issues involved have a direct bearing on the society in general and is a part of Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India," the Centre said. According to the affidavit, a husband certainly does not have any fundamental right to violate the consent of the wife, however, attracting the crime in the nature of "rape" as recognised in India to the institution of marriage can be arguably considered to be excessively harsh and therefore, disproportionate. "Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that if the legislature decides to exempt, from the rigour of such a charge, and such a label, husbands, vis-a-vis their wives, given the intelligible differentia that exists in a marital relationship vis-a-vis other relationships, the said decision and discretion should be respected and not interfered with, especially when a separate suitably tailored penal remedy is provided by the Legislature," it said. (With inputs from agencies)

Indian govt opposes criminalisation of marital rape in SC, says such matters need ‘comprehensive approach’

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the Delhi Police have withdrawn the notification imposing a prohibitory order in the national capital.

Solicitor General Mehta apprised a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud when a plea relating to the issue was mentioned before the top court.&nbsp;

His reply came when a petition mentioned in the Supreme Court challenging the order of Delhi Police restricting large gatherings in Delhi, saying it would affect Ram Leela, Durga Puja pandals, Dussehra, and public gatherings.

Sunil, a priest of the famous Kalkaji Temple in Delhi and the Secretary of Manas Naman Sewa Society, who organises the grand Ramlila at the Satpula Ground in Chirag&nbsp;Dilli, filed the plea through advocate Prateek Chadha. He has challenged the Delhi Police Prohibitory Order banning assembly of five or more people from September 30 to October 5, saying that it will affect footfall during Dussehra and Navratri festivals. The petitioner said that the order would hinder religious celebrations during this period.

"The Ramlila and the fair around it see significant footfall each year during Dussehra and Navratri. Such festivities are organised in every nook and cranny of the city, and these were scheduled to commence on October 3, 2024. However, now, in light of the order assailed in this present petition, the commencement of these festivities across the city and long-standing traditions observed by innumerable residents of Delhi is in jeopardy for no constitutionally valid reason," the petition said.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-activist-sonam-wangchuk-and-others-detained-in-delhi-launch-indefinite-fast-763482">Also read:&nbsp;India: Activist Sonam Wangchuk and others detained in Delhi, launch indefinite fast</a>

"Given that the highly religiously significant period of the Navratas begins on 03.10.2024, any assemblies to celebrate the festivities in the notified areas [New Delhi, North Delhi, Central Delhi, and all the border areas of the NCT of Delhi] will be adversely affected," the petition read.

In the plea, the petitioner sought quashing and setting aside of the order dated September 30, 2024, issued by the Commissioner of Police. Delhi Police exercising and enacting the powers under Section 163 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, prohibited the assembly of five or more unauthorised persons from September 30 to October 5. During this period, there is a prohibition on the assembly of five or more unauthorised persons, carrying of firearms, banners, placards, lathis, and so on and dharnas in public areas.

"The impugned order will have a significant effect on the ingress and egress of citizens wishing to enter the NCT of Delhi from other states," the petition said.

The reasons provided in the order do not relate to any emergency or unforeseen circumstance that necessitates the curfew sought to be imposed by the police, the petition said.

"The elections, amendments to the Waqf laws, as well as the upcoming festivals, are all well known to the public authorities in advance, and necessary security arrangements ought to be made for the same. The practice of invoking Section 163 of BNSS for such foreseeable scenarios, without a grave apprehension of security breaches or disruption of public order is unsustainable in light of the pronouncements of this Court," the petitioner said.

Watch |&nbsp;Farmers' 'Delhi Chalo' March: Delhi Police impose prohibitory orders across national capital

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/farmers-delhi-chalo-march-delhi-police-impose-prohibitory-orders-across-national-capital-689476/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The petitioner submitted that it appears that instead of performing its duties in respect of the maintenance of law and order and crowd management, the respondent simply seeks to evade them by trying to prohibit legitimate gatherings that would ordinarily take place in plural and thriving metropolises such as Delhi.

The petitioner said that the Delhi police decision is a serious hindrance to the general day-to-day life of individuals, and their fundamental rights, which cause grave hindrance to the rights, life, and livelihood of the citizens of Delhi.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the Delhi Police have withdrawn the notification imposing a prohibitory order in the national capital.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on Thursday informed the Supreme Court that the Delhi Police have withdrawn the notification imposing a prohibitory order in the national capital. Solicitor General Mehta apprised a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud when a plea relating to the issue was mentioned before the top court. His reply came when a petition mentioned in the Supreme Court challenging the order of Delhi Police restricting large gatherings in Delhi, saying it would affect Ram Leela, Durga Puja pandals, Dussehra, and public gatherings. Sunil, a priest of the famous Kalkaji Temple in Delhi and the Secretary of Manas Naman Sewa Society, who organises the grand Ramlila at the Satpula Ground in Chirag Dilli, filed the plea through advocate Prateek Chadha. He has challenged the Delhi Police Prohibitory Order banning assembly of five or more people from September 30 to October 5, saying that it will affect footfall during Dussehra and Navratri festivals. The petitioner said that the order would hinder religious celebrations during this period. "The Ramlila and the fair around it see significant footfall each year during Dussehra and Navratri. Such festivities are organised in every nook and cranny of the city, and these were scheduled to commence on October 3, 2024. However, now, in light of the order assailed in this present petition, the commencement of these festivities across the city and long-standing traditions observed by innumerable residents of Delhi is in jeopardy for no constitutionally valid reason," the petition said. Also read: India: Activist Sonam Wangchuk and others detained in Delhi, launch indefinite fast "Given that the highly religiously significant period of the Navratas begins on 03.10.2024, any assemblies to celebrate the festivities in the notified areas [New Delhi, North Delhi, Central Delhi, and all the border areas of the NCT of Delhi] will be adversely affected," the petition read. In the plea, the petitioner sought quashing and setting aside of the order dated September 30, 2024, issued by the Commissioner of Police. Delhi Police exercising and enacting the powers under Section 163 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, prohibited the assembly of five or more unauthorised persons from September 30 to October 5. During this period, there is a prohibition on the assembly of five or more unauthorised persons, carrying of firearms, banners, placards, lathis, and so on and dharnas in public areas. "The impugned order will have a significant effect on the ingress and egress of citizens wishing to enter the NCT of Delhi from other states," the petition said. The reasons provided in the order do not relate to any emergency or unforeseen circumstance that necessitates the curfew sought to be imposed by the police, the petition said. "The elections, amendments to the Waqf laws, as well as the upcoming festivals, are all well known to the public authorities in advance, and necessary security arrangements ought to be made for the same. The practice of invoking Section 163 of BNSS for such foreseeable scenarios, without a grave apprehension of security breaches or disruption of public order is unsustainable in light of the pronouncements of this Court," the petitioner said. Watch | Farmers' 'Delhi Chalo' March: Delhi Police impose prohibitory orders across national capital × The petitioner submitted that it appears that instead of performing its duties in respect of the maintenance of law and order and crowd management, the respondent simply seeks to evade them by trying to prohibit legitimate gatherings that would ordinarily take place in plural and thriving metropolises such as Delhi. The petitioner said that the Delhi police decision is a serious hindrance to the general day-to-day life of individuals, and their fundamental rights, which cause grave hindrance to the rights, life, and livelihood of the citizens of Delhi. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Delhi Police withdraw prohibitory orders against gatherings, Centre tells Supreme Court

Indian Supreme Court Thursday (Oct 3) chided the governments of Punjab and Haryana states for not doing anything substantial to tackle the pollution problem. The top court also criticised the states for collecting just nominal compensation from farmers engaging in stubble burning, which annually causes lethal, toxic air pollution in Delhi.

The apex court also rebuked the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), which is tasked with controlling pollution in and around Delhi.

The bench comprising Justice A Amanullah and Justice AG Masih said, "Everybody knows that except discussion nothing is happening. That is the harsh reality of this."

This comes after the Supreme Court ordered CAQM last week to file a detailed affidavit on steps being taken to tackle stubble burning in the neighbouring states of Haryana and Punjab, key farming hubs in northern India. The bench highlighted how the committee met only thrice in the past nine months and there was no discussion on stubble burning at all.

“The last meeting was on August 29. Entire September, there was no meeting. You said that this committee consists of IPS officers etc who will enforce the directions. Now not a single meeting has been held after August 29 when it comes to enforcement," Justice Oka said.

"Is this the seriousness which is being shown?" the judge asked.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwig2vC18vGIAxXnqFYBHWqfBMsQxfQBKAB6BAgIEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/is-stubbly-burning-the-sole-reason-for-delhis-poor-aqi-a-new-study-reveals-otherwise-655878" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/is-stubbly-burning-the-sole-reason-for-delhis-poor-aqi-a-new-study-reveals-otherwise-655878&amp;ved=2ahUKEwig2vC18vGIAxXnqFYBHWqfBMsQxfQBKAB6BAgIEAE">Is stubble burning the sole reason for Delhi’s poor air quality? A new study reveals otherwise</a>

The state government’s counsel in response told the court that they had filed cases under relevant sections against those engaging in disobedience of orders of a public servant. The court then shot back, saying the FIRs had been filed under the softest provisions.

"You have taken the softest provision that is there to prosecute. There is Section 14 of CAQM Act, Section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act which has drastic powers," the bench noted.

The government’s counsel then argued they didn’t take drastic measures because the pollution level had reduced.

"You must implement your own orders. This is all in the air. There are targets, action plans, sectoral meetings but the basic provisions of the Act are not be implemented at all. In 2024, there are 129 cases of stubble burning, why action has not been taken against these people? Why Section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act is not invoked and why the corresponding action is not taken against the officers of the government?" Justice Oka asked.

(With inputs from agencies)

Indian Supreme Court Thursday (Oct 3) chided the governments of Punjab and Haryana states for not doing anything substantial to tackle the pollution problem. The top court also criticised the states for collecting just nominal compensation from farmers engaging in stubble burning, which annually causes lethal, toxic air pollution in Delhi.

Indian Supreme Court Thursday (Oct 3) chided the governments of Punjab and Haryana states for not doing anything substantial to tackle the pollution problem. The top court also criticised the states for collecting just nominal compensation from farmers engaging in stubble burning, which annually causes lethal, toxic air pollution in Delhi. The apex court also rebuked the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM), which is tasked with controlling pollution in and around Delhi. The bench comprising Justice A Amanullah and Justice AG Masih said, "Everybody knows that except discussion nothing is happening. That is the harsh reality of this." This comes after the Supreme Court ordered CAQM last week to file a detailed affidavit on steps being taken to tackle stubble burning in the neighbouring states of Haryana and Punjab, key farming hubs in northern India. The bench highlighted how the committee met only thrice in the past nine months and there was no discussion on stubble burning at all. “The last meeting was on August 29. Entire September, there was no meeting. You said that this committee consists of IPS officers etc who will enforce the directions. Now not a single meeting has been held after August 29 when it comes to enforcement," Justice Oka said. "Is this the seriousness which is being shown?" the judge asked. Also read: Is stubble burning the sole reason for Delhi’s poor air quality? A new study reveals otherwise The state government’s counsel in response told the court that they had filed cases under relevant sections against those engaging in disobedience of orders of a public servant. The court then shot back, saying the FIRs had been filed under the softest provisions. "You have taken the softest provision that is there to prosecute. There is Section 14 of CAQM Act, Section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act which has drastic powers," the bench noted. The government’s counsel then argued they didn’t take drastic measures because the pollution level had reduced. "You must implement your own orders. This is all in the air. There are targets, action plans, sectoral meetings but the basic provisions of the Act are not be implemented at all. In 2024, there are 129 cases of stubble burning, why action has not been taken against these people? Why Section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act is not invoked and why the corresponding action is not taken against the officers of the government?" Justice Oka asked. (With inputs from agencies)

‘Nothing is happening,’ SC rebukes Haryana, Punjab over Delhi’s pollution problem

Andhra Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), Dwaraka Tirumala Rao, on Tuesday, announced that the SIT investigation into the Tirupati laddoo prasadam case will be suspended until October 3, due to the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court.

The SIT was formed to investigate the sensitive case, and the suspension is a precautionary measure to ensure the investigation's integrity

Rao clarified that the investigation will resume after the Supreme Court issues its directives on October 3. The decision to form the SIT was made considering the severity of the case, and the temporary suspension is necessary to avoid any potential legal complications.

The SIT's investigation will proceed according to the Supreme Court's guidance, ensuring a fair and impartial inquiry.

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu for making public allegations about the use of adulterated ghee in the preparation of laddoos, which were served as prasadam at the Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Tirumala.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan criticised the chief minister, saying there is no conclusive proof yet to substantiate that contaminated ghee was used in preparation of prasadam laddoos.

It questioned the need to make a public statement on the issue when a probe had already been ordered by the state into the allegations.

The bench also asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, to seek instructions from the Central government on whether an independent investigation is required and posted the matter to October 3 at 3.30 pm.

"We are prima facie of the view that when the investigation was under process, it was not appropriate for the high constitutional authority to make a statement that can affect the sentiments of crores of people. In that view of the matter, we find that it would be appropriate if the Solicitor General assists us on whether the SIT by the state should continue or the investigation should be by an independent agency," said the bench in it's order.

The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions seeking court-monitored investigation into the allegations of use of animal fat to make laddoos to serve as prasadam at the Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Tirumala, Andhra Pradesh, where Lord Venkateswara is worshipped.

During the hearing, the top court asked the Andhra Pradesh government whether the alleged adulterated laddoos had been sent for testing.

Senior advocate Siddhartha Luthra, appearing for Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), said that there were complaints regarding the quality of laddoos and possible contamination. He also said that the lab report of the NDDB showed contamination and the nature of contamination was under inquiry.

The top court was hearing petitions filed by former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy, and ex TTD Chairman YV Subba Reddy, Surjit Singh Yadav, President of non government organisation Hindu Sena Samiti, historian Dr. Vikram Sampath, chairman managing director (CMD) and the editor-in-chief of Sudarshan, Suresh Chavhanke and others.

The petitions sought court-monitored investigation into the allegations levelled by TDP-led Andhra Pradesh government regarding use of adulterated ghee in preparation of laddoos at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple during the previous YSRCP regime.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for&nbsp;WION&nbsp;audience. 
&nbsp;

Andhra Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), Dwaraka Tirumala Rao, on Tuesday, announced that the SIT investigation into the Tirupati laddoo prasadam case will be suspended until October 3, due to the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court.

Andhra Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), Dwaraka Tirumala Rao, on Tuesday, announced that the SIT investigation into the Tirupati laddoo prasadam case will be suspended until October 3, due to the ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court. The SIT was formed to investigate the sensitive case, and the suspension is a precautionary measure to ensure the investigation's integrity Rao clarified that the investigation will resume after the Supreme Court issues its directives on October 3. The decision to form the SIT was made considering the severity of the case, and the temporary suspension is necessary to avoid any potential legal complications. The SIT's investigation will proceed according to the Supreme Court's guidance, ensuring a fair and impartial inquiry. The Supreme Court on Monday questioned Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu for making public allegations about the use of adulterated ghee in the preparation of laddoos, which were served as prasadam at the Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Tirumala. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan criticised the chief minister, saying there is no conclusive proof yet to substantiate that contaminated ghee was used in preparation of prasadam laddoos. It questioned the need to make a public statement on the issue when a probe had already been ordered by the state into the allegations. The bench also asked Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, to seek instructions from the Central government on whether an independent investigation is required and posted the matter to October 3 at 3.30 pm. "We are prima facie of the view that when the investigation was under process, it was not appropriate for the high constitutional authority to make a statement that can affect the sentiments of crores of people. In that view of the matter, we find that it would be appropriate if the Solicitor General assists us on whether the SIT by the state should continue or the investigation should be by an independent agency," said the bench in it's order. The apex court was hearing a batch of petitions seeking court-monitored investigation into the allegations of use of animal fat to make laddoos to serve as prasadam at the Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple in Tirumala, Andhra Pradesh, where Lord Venkateswara is worshipped. During the hearing, the top court asked the Andhra Pradesh government whether the alleged adulterated laddoos had been sent for testing. Senior advocate Siddhartha Luthra, appearing for Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), said that there were complaints regarding the quality of laddoos and possible contamination. He also said that the lab report of the NDDB showed contamination and the nature of contamination was under inquiry. The top court was hearing petitions filed by former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy, and ex TTD Chairman YV Subba Reddy, Surjit Singh Yadav, President of non government organisation Hindu Sena Samiti, historian Dr. Vikram Sampath, chairman managing director (CMD) and the editor-in-chief of Sudarshan, Suresh Chavhanke and others. The petitions sought court-monitored investigation into the allegations levelled by TDP-led Andhra Pradesh government regarding use of adulterated ghee in preparation of laddoos at the Tirumala Tirupati Temple during the previous YSRCP regime. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Amid Supreme Court hearing, SIT investigation into Tirupati laddoo prasadam case suspended till Oct 3

The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday (Oct 1) said any religious structure, be it a temple or dargah (mosque), must go if it encroaches on roads or railway tracks, adding that public safety was paramount.&nbsp;

The apex court was hearing a batch of pleas alleging that&nbsp;properties, including of those accused of crime, were being demolished in several states.

"We are a secular country and our direction will be for all, irrespective of religion or community. If there is any religious structure in the middle of the road, be it gurudwara or dargah or temple, it cannot obstruct the public," the two-judge bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan said.

Justice Gavai declared that the court would not intervene in the case of encroachments into public lands, streets and roads. He clarified&nbsp;that the SC has no intention to protect encroachments on public roads, streets, or footpaths.&nbsp;

The court has long maintained that&nbsp;no property should be demolished without its approval, except in cases where the structures are illegal and located on public roads or footpaths.

It also extended its previous stay on demolitions and reserved the judgment. Last month, the court, issuing a stern warning to state government said that&nbsp;even a single case of unlawful demolition goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution.

Also watch |&nbsp;Pakistan refugee crisis: Bulldozer razes homes of Afghan refugees in Pakistan

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-refugee-crisis-bulldozer-razes-homes-of-afghan-refugees-in-pakistan-654665/embed" width="560"></iframe>

<h2>Bulldozer justice&nbsp;</h2>

The case came to light after state governments across the country indulged in 'bulldozer justice' where properties belonging to people accused of crimes were destroyed even before they had gone through the legal system.&nbsp;

Justice Gavai made it clear that somebody being an accused or convict is no ground to demolish their home.

“We make it clear that there should be proper notice, chance of hearing in case somebody is found to be in violation of building laws,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cant-be-demolished-even-if-hes-a-convict-supreme-court-on-bulldozer-justice-755204">Also read |&nbsp;'House can't be demolished even if person is a convict': Supreme Court on 'bulldozer justice'</a>

Justice Viswanathan added that even in unauthorised structures, 10 to 15 days should be given for the occupants to find an alternative home.

The judge suggested&nbsp;videographing the demolition so that the jurisdictional court would later on know whether the measure was proportionate.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday (Oct 1) said any religious structure, be it a temple or dargah (mosque), must go if it encroaches on roads or railway tracks, adding that public safety was paramount.

The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday (Oct 1) said any religious structure, be it a temple or dargah (mosque), must go if it encroaches on roads or railway tracks, adding that public safety was paramount. The apex court was hearing a batch of pleas alleging that properties, including of those accused of crime, were being demolished in several states. "We are a secular country and our direction will be for all, irrespective of religion or community. If there is any religious structure in the middle of the road, be it gurudwara or dargah or temple, it cannot obstruct the public," the two-judge bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan said. Justice Gavai declared that the court would not intervene in the case of encroachments into public lands, streets and roads. He clarified that the SC has no intention to protect encroachments on public roads, streets, or footpaths. The court has long maintained that no property should be demolished without its approval, except in cases where the structures are illegal and located on public roads or footpaths. It also extended its previous stay on demolitions and reserved the judgment. Last month, the court, issuing a stern warning to state government said that even a single case of unlawful demolition goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution. Also watch | Pakistan refugee crisis: Bulldozer razes homes of Afghan refugees in Pakistan Bulldozer justice The case came to light after state governments across the country indulged in 'bulldozer justice' where properties belonging to people accused of crimes were destroyed even before they had gone through the legal system. Justice Gavai made it clear that somebody being an accused or convict is no ground to demolish their home. “We make it clear that there should be proper notice, chance of hearing in case somebody is found to be in violation of building laws,” he said. Also read | 'House can't be demolished even if person is a convict': Supreme Court on 'bulldozer justice' Justice Viswanathan added that even in unauthorised structures, 10 to 15 days should be given for the occupants to find an alternative home. The judge suggested videographing the demolition so that the jurisdictional court would later on know whether the measure was proportionate. (With inputs from agencies)

'Temple or mosques, they have to go': Indian SC on encroachment and bulldozer justice

The Supreme Court resumed hearing in the suo motu case related to the rape and murder of a postgraduate medic at the R G Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata on Monday (Sep 30) and noted that substantial leads have come up in the CBI investigation.

The Supreme Court resumed hearing in the suo motu case related to the rape and murder of a postgraduate medic at the R G Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata on Monday (Sep 30) and noted that substantial leads have come up in the CBI investigation. The bench said that the investigative agency has given statements on both aspects — alleged rape and murder and financial irregularities. Substantial leads in CBI investigation During the hearing, Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, said, "Very substantial leads have come up in the CBI Investigation. Obviously, let the CBI continue the investigation." Court criticises West Bengal government’s slow progress on security measures The court also criticised the Mamata Banerjee government in West Bengal for the slow pace in setting up CCTV cameras and other essential facilities like toilets and separate rest areas for women. “Why is the progress so tardy? We have been hearing this matter since some time now,” said the bench. Also read: 'Terrorism has no place...,' PM Narendra Modi speaks to Netanyahu The bench further noted that while West Bengal's status report mentioned that work is ongoing, it added that “though the state has indicated that remaining work will be completed by 31st October, the state has assured that it will make all endeavours to complete the work by October 15, 2024”. Individuals facing misconduct allegations still in position Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also pointed out that several individuals at the college, who face serious allegations, remain in their positions. He said that while the doctor requested their suspension or placement on leave, the final decision lies with the state government. No disclosure of victim’s identity, Supreme Court reiterates The court also reiterated its earlier ruling that no intermediary is allowed to reveal the victim's name or photo. Advocate Vrinda Grover, representing the victim's family, raised concerns about the continued sharing of her identity on social media platforms. Also read: Electoral bond extortion case: Karnataka HC stays probe against FM Sitharaman “Our earlier order is clarified to apply in relation to all intermediaries and to reiterate, no intermediary shall be allowed to carry the name or pictures of her identity. MEITY shall notify a nodal officer in relation to any uploading of unauthorized publication which is taken down”, said the bench. (With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata doctor rape case: SC says ‘substantial leads’ found in CBI probe; slams Bengal govt’s ‘tardiness’

The Supreme Court of India criticised the Andhra Pradesh government regarding the controversy over Tirupati temple prasadam, and questioned why the issue was brought to the media before confirming whether adulterated ghee had been used in making prasadam laddoos.

The Supreme Court of India criticised the Andhra Pradesh government regarding the controversy over Tirupati temple prasadam, and questioned why the issue was brought to the media before confirming whether adulterated ghee had been used in making prasadam laddoos. During the hearing, on Monday (September 30), the court questioned Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu's decision to make public statements while the matter was still under investigation. The bench told the state government's lawyer that lab tests revealed the ghee tested was already rejected. The case was heard by Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, who were hearing several petitions seeking a court-observed investigation into the controversy surrounding the Tirupati laddoos. 'We expect the Gods to be kept away from politics': SC to Andhra Pradesh government "Till outcome of SIT probe, what was the need to go to the press?" the Court asked, according to LiveLaw. "When you have ordered an investigation through the SIT, what was the necessity to go to the press?" Justice Gavai asked the State. He also remarked, "When you hold a constitutional office...we expect the Gods to be kept away from the politics." SC to consider handing Tirupati Laddoo probe to independent agency The Court also indicated it might move the investigation into allegations of ghee adulteration with animal fat at the Tirupati Tirumala Temple from the state to an independent body. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta was instructed to come back with instructions on October 3. Also read: War of words between BJP and Cong over Kharge's remark on Indian PM Modi “The petition pertains to sentiments affecting crores of people living in the entire world. The Hon'ble Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh had gone in public making a statement that the animal fat was being used to make Tirupati laddus under the previous regime,” the Court pointed out. “However, some press reports also show that the Chief Executive Officer of the Tirupati Tirumala Devasthanam had also made a statement that such an adulterated ghee was never used. The petitions have been filed seeking various prayers including an independent enquiry and directions for regulating the affairs of the religious trusts and specifically the manufacture of prasadam,” it added. Naidu vs Reddy on Tirupati laddoo controversy Earlier this month, Andhra Pradesh CM, N. Chandrababu Naidu, alleged that animal fat was used in preparing the sacred prasadam. He said that during Jagan Mohan Reddy's rule, adulterated ghee had been used for making the laddoos at Tirupati temple. The Andhra Pradesh government set up a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the matter. Former CM Jagan Mohan Reddy denied Naidu's claims, accusing him of 'lying' about the Tirupati laddoo prasadam. Also read: Chief Justice of India irked by use of 'yeah, yeah' in court, scolds petitioner, 'This is not a coffee shop' On Friday, Jagan Mohan Reddy cancelled his scheduled visit to Tirumala, accusing the government of issuing notices to his party leaders to prevent them from visiting the temple. “The demon rule is continuing in the state. The government is trying to obstruct my upcoming visit to the Tirumala temple. Police have issued notices to YSRCP leaders across the state regarding the temple visit. The notice states that the visit to the Tirumala temple is not permitted, and the programme organised by YSRCP does not have the necessary approval. Consequently, leaders are not allowed to participate in that programme,” the former chief minister said. (With inputs from agencies)

Tirupati laddoo row: Supreme Court slams Andhra Pradesh govt, says, ‘Keep God out of politics’

On Thursday, the Supreme Court granted bail to former Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate last year in connection with a money laundering case.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court granted bail to former Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji, who was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate last year in connection with a money laundering case. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih put onerous conditions while granting relief. The top court had reserved its verdict on August 12 after hearing submissions of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and senior advocates Mukul Rohatagi and Sidharth Luthra, appearing for Balaji. Also read: India: Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut sentenced to 15 days in jail in defamation case The high court, while dismissing Balaji’s bail petition, had said if he is let out on bail in a case of this nature, it would send out a wrong signal and be against the larger public interest. It had said since the petitioner was in custody for more than eight months, it would be appropriate to direct the special court to dispose of the case within a time frame. "Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the Principal Special Court, Chennai, to dispose of the case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order,” it had ordered. The high court ordered that the trial shall be conducted on a day-to-day basis by the guidelines issued by the top court. Also read: Bengaluru fridge horror: Accused reveals shocking details in suicide note Balaji was arrested on June 14 last year by the ED in connection with a money laundering case linked to an alleged cash-for-jobs scam when he was the transport minister in an earlier AIADMK government. The ED had on August 12 last year filed a 3,000-page charge sheet against Balaji. On October 19, the high court had dismissed Balaji’s earlier bail plea. A local court has also dismissed his bail petitions thrice. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for the WION audience.

SC grants bail to Tamil Nadu ex-minister V Senthil Balaji in money laundering case

The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday (Sep 25) closed the proceedings against&nbsp;a lower court judge after he made remarks, referring to a Muslim-dominated area as ‘mini-Pakistan'. A five-judge bench, Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, led by&nbsp;Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said the decision was taken after the judge apologised and&nbsp;in the wider interest of justice and dignity of the judiciary.&nbsp;

The apex court had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue last week and called out&nbsp;Karnataka High Court judge&nbsp;Vedavyasachar Srishananda for his insensitive comment.&nbsp;

"No one can call any part of territory of India as Pakistan," CJI Chandrachud declared.&nbsp;

"It is fundamentally against the territorial integrity of the nation. The answer to sunlight is more sunlight and not to suppress what happens in court. The answer is not to close it down."

The CJI said such observations may indicate personal biases which may be directed at a certain gender or community. Thus, judges should be wary of making&nbsp;patriarchal or misogynistic comments.&nbsp;

"We express our serious concern about observations on a certain gender or a community and such observations are liable to be construed in a negative light. We hope and trust that the responsibilities entrusted to all stakeholders are discharged without bias and caution," CJI added.&nbsp;

<h2>What did&nbsp;Srishananda comment?</h2>

During a recent hearing, Justice V Srishananda expressed his views on traffic conditions near the Mysore Road flyover in Bengaluru, where he made te contentious remark.&nbsp;

“Go towards the Mysore Road Flyover, every autorickshaw has got 10 people. The Mysore Road Flyover from the market to Goripalya is in Pakistan, not in India. This is the reality.&nbsp;However strict an officer you send, he will be beaten. This is not on any channel.”

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-supreme-court-halts-orders-requiring-eateries-to-display-owner-names-along-kanwar-yatra-route-743038">Also read |&nbsp;India: Supreme Court halts orders requiring eateries to display owner names along Kanwar Yatra route</a>

A video clip of the judge making the remarks went viral on social media which instantly brought him flak and the legal trouble.&nbsp;

Another video showed Justice&nbsp;Srishananda telling a female lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday (Sep 25) closed the proceedings against a lower court judge after he made remarks, referring to a Muslim-dominated area as ‘mini-Pakistan'.

The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday (Sep 25) closed the proceedings against a lower court judge after he made remarks, referring to a Muslim-dominated area as ‘mini-Pakistan'. A five-judge bench, Justices S Khanna, B R Gavai, S Kant, and H Roy, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud said the decision was taken after the judge apologised and in the wider interest of justice and dignity of the judiciary. The apex court had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue last week and called out Karnataka High Court judge Vedavyasachar Srishananda for his insensitive comment. "No one can call any part of territory of India as Pakistan," CJI Chandrachud declared. "It is fundamentally against the territorial integrity of the nation. The answer to sunlight is more sunlight and not to suppress what happens in court. The answer is not to close it down." The CJI said such observations may indicate personal biases which may be directed at a certain gender or community. Thus, judges should be wary of making patriarchal or misogynistic comments. "We express our serious concern about observations on a certain gender or a community and such observations are liable to be construed in a negative light. We hope and trust that the responsibilities entrusted to all stakeholders are discharged without bias and caution," CJI added. What did Srishananda comment? During a recent hearing, Justice V Srishananda expressed his views on traffic conditions near the Mysore Road flyover in Bengaluru, where he made te contentious remark. “Go towards the Mysore Road Flyover, every autorickshaw has got 10 people. The Mysore Road Flyover from the market to Goripalya is in Pakistan, not in India. This is the reality. However strict an officer you send, he will be beaten. This is not on any channel.” Also read | India: Supreme Court halts orders requiring eateries to display owner names along Kanwar Yatra route A video clip of the judge making the remarks went viral on social media which instantly brought him flak and the legal trouble. Another video showed Justice Srishananda telling a female lawyer that she seemed to know a lot about the "opposition party", so much so that she might be able to reveal the colour of their undergarments. (With inputs from agencies)

India: SC closes case against judge who called Muslim-majority area 'mini-Pakistan'

Vodafone Idea's, Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues of Rs 70,300 crore will require urgent government intervention, according to Vodafone Idea Limited (VIL), the telecom operator that incurred these high AGR dues. After the Supreme Court rejected its plea for re-evaluation of its AGR dues recently, it has started afresh dialogue with government officials about its possible remedies as detailed in a report by the Press Trust of India. 

The challenge posed by AGR dues<o:p></o:p>

The apex court has rejected the plea of Vodafone Idea on 19 September 2024 to re-calculate its AGR liabilities, which account for as much as 33 per cent of the debt. The company is of the view that only telecom revenue should be taken into account in such calculations and not the non-telecom revenue. Yet, with this latest jolt, the CEO, Akshaya Moondra, appears optimistic about the long-term turnaround strategy of the company and calls upon government support during such financial turmoil.

According to Moondra, "Our merits on AGR dues are pretty strong," which means that the company is quite confident about the strength of its case for relief. That in itself speaks to how important these discussions with the government are. Further, an executive mentioned that, if there were any re-examinations, that would have to come from the government.

Financial outlook and Strategic moves<o:p></o:p>

Vodafone Idea has an integrated plan for managing cash flow and reducing debt during a tussle with its financial liability. The telecom firm is looking to clear the government dues and outstanding dues against banks and vendors through operational cash flows. 

Vodafone Idea Limited’s payment obligation to the government stood at Rs 2,09,520 crore as of June 30, 2024, including deferred spectrum payment obligations of Rs 1,39,200 crore and AGR liability of Rs 70,320 crore.

Further, Vodafone Idea recently kick-started a series of significant capital expenditure plans worth Rs 55,000 crore for the next three years as a strategic move to improve its financial position. The money would be spent majorly on enhancing its 4G network in preparation for nationwide 5G rollouts in all priority circles across India.

Market reactions and future prospects<o:p></o:p>

Despite the hurdle, Vodafone Idea witnessed a minuscule rise in its stock after reports that the company is holding negotiations with the government and expansion plans for the network. Analysts are divided in the future potential of the company. Some are of the opinion that it cannot survive without more support while others have huge hopes for strategic initiatives. Brokerages have pointed out that in the absence of relief on AGR dues, Vodafone Idea may face significant financial pressure as early as FY26 when relatively large payments would come due. It is hence to be seen how the government handles the situation and supports the debt-ridden Vodafone Idea to fulfil its obligations.

<o:p>&nbsp;</o:p>

Vodafone Idea's, Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues of Rs 70,300 crore will require urgent government intervention, according to Vodafone Idea Limited (VIL), the telecom operator that incurred these high AGR dues.

Vodafone Idea's, Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues of Rs 70,300 crore will require urgent government intervention, according to Vodafone Idea Limited (VIL), the telecom operator that incurred these high AGR dues. After the Supreme Court rejected its plea for re-evaluation of its AGR dues recently, it has started afresh dialogue with government officials about its possible remedies as detailed in a report by the Press Trust of India. The challenge posed by AGR dues The apex court has rejected the plea of Vodafone Idea on 19 September 2024 to re-calculate its AGR liabilities, which account for as much as 33 per cent of the debt. The company is of the view that only telecom revenue should be taken into account in such calculations and not the non-telecom revenue. Yet, with this latest jolt, the CEO, Akshaya Moondra, appears optimistic about the long-term turnaround strategy of the company and calls upon government support during such financial turmoil. According to Moondra, "Our merits on AGR dues are pretty strong," which means that the company is quite confident about the strength of its case for relief. That in itself speaks to how important these discussions with the government are. Further, an executive mentioned that, if there were any re-examinations, that would have to come from the government. Financial outlook and Strategic moves Vodafone Idea has an integrated plan for managing cash flow and reducing debt during a tussle with its financial liability. The telecom firm is looking to clear the government dues and outstanding dues against banks and vendors through operational cash flows. Vodafone Idea Limited’s payment obligation to the government stood at Rs 2,09,520 crore as of June 30, 2024, including deferred spectrum payment obligations of Rs 1,39,200 crore and AGR liability of Rs 70,320 crore. Further, Vodafone Idea recently kick-started a series of significant capital expenditure plans worth Rs 55,000 crore for the next three years as a strategic move to improve its financial position. The money would be spent majorly on enhancing its 4G network in preparation for nationwide 5G rollouts in all priority circles across India. Market reactions and future prospects Despite the hurdle, Vodafone Idea witnessed a minuscule rise in its stock after reports that the company is holding negotiations with the government and expansion plans for the network. Analysts are divided in the future potential of the company. Some are of the opinion that it cannot survive without more support while others have huge hopes for strategic initiatives. Brokerages have pointed out that in the absence of relief on AGR dues, Vodafone Idea may face significant financial pressure as early as FY26 when relatively large payments would come due. It is hence to be seen how the government handles the situation and supports the debt-ridden Vodafone Idea to fulfil its obligations.

Vodafone Idea seeks Government relief in AGR duress crisis

India Supreme Court has ruled that downloading storing and viewing child sexual abuse material is a criminal offense. The Supreme Court has clarified that such acts will be considered criminal when used with intent to gain or benefit from them. Watch in for more details!

SC Rules Watching or Downloading Child Sexual Abuse Material Is An Offence Under POCSO Act

In a landmark judgment today, Supreme Court has ruled that storing child pornographic material is an offense under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Criminalizes Storing, Watching Child Pornography Under POCSO Act

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Sep 23) ruled that watching and storage of child pornography amounted to an offence under the&nbsp;Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). In the process, the court overturned a Madras High Court ruling which stated that downloading and watching pornography involving children on digital devices was not an offence.&nbsp;&nbsp;

A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justice Pardiwala said the High Court committed an "egregious error" in quashing the criminal proceedings. The bench set aside the decision and restored the criminal prosecution.&nbsp;

"The HC committed an error in its order and thus we set aside the HC order and we remit the matter back to the sessions court," the court observed.&nbsp;

The bench also explained the degree of&nbsp;mens rea (intention) required for such an act to constitute an offence under Section 15 of the POCSO Act. Notably, sub-section (1) of Section 15 penalises the failure to delete, destroy or report any child pornographic material that has been found to be stored or in possession by any person with an intention to share or transmit the same.

"Facilitation of such transmission, preparation, set up to enable transmit etc has to be there. Mens rea&nbsp;has to be found from the storage of such pornographic material. To establish offence under Section 15(3), apart from storage of child pornographic material, it has to be shown that such storage was done to make some gain or advantage."

The court also suggested that the Indian Parliament bring a law amending the POSCO Act to replace&nbsp;the term "child pornography" with "Child Sexual Exploitative and Abusive Material".

NGO, Just Right for Children Alliance, which worked for the welfare of children had filed the petition in the apex court demanding that the HC order be set aside and appropriate directors be issued in the matter.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/remove-child-sex-abuse-from-the-internet-india-warns-3-social-media-companies-643558">Watch |&nbsp;Remove child sex abuse from the internet: India warns 3 social media companies</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/remove-child-sex-abuse-from-the-internet-india-warns-3-social-media-companies-643558/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

<h2>What did Madras High Court rule?</h2>

In January this year, the Madras High Court quashed the case against S Harish (28), charged&nbsp;for downloading and watching on his mobile phone some pornographic content involving children.

The court ruled that in order to consider what Harish did as an offence under Section 67-B of the Information&nbsp;Technology Act, 2000, he must have published, transmitted, and created material depicting children in a sexually explicit act or conduct.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/ai-researchers-delete-over-2000-web-links-to-suspected-child-sexual-abuse-imagery-754839">Also read |&nbsp;AI researchers delete over 2,000 web links to suspected child sexual abuse imagery</a>

A careful reading of this provision does not make watching child pornography, an offence under the said Section, it had said.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Sep 23) ruled that watching and storage of child pornography amounted to an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act).

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Sep 23) ruled that watching and storage of child pornography amounted to an offence under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act). In the process, the court overturned a Madras High Court ruling which stated that downloading and watching pornography involving children on digital devices was not an offence. A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justice Pardiwala said the High Court committed an "egregious error" in quashing the criminal proceedings. The bench set aside the decision and restored the criminal prosecution. "The HC committed an error in its order and thus we set aside the HC order and we remit the matter back to the sessions court," the court observed. The bench also explained the degree of mens rea (intention) required for such an act to constitute an offence under Section 15 of the POCSO Act. Notably, sub-section (1) of Section 15 penalises the failure to delete, destroy or report any child pornographic material that has been found to be stored or in possession by any person with an intention to share or transmit the same. "Facilitation of such transmission, preparation, set up to enable transmit etc has to be there. Mens rea has to be found from the storage of such pornographic material. To establish offence under Section 15(3), apart from storage of child pornographic material, it has to be shown that such storage was done to make some gain or advantage." The court also suggested that the Indian Parliament bring a law amending the POSCO Act to replace the term "child pornography" with "Child Sexual Exploitative and Abusive Material". NGO, Just Right for Children Alliance, which worked for the welfare of children had filed the petition in the apex court demanding that the HC order be set aside and appropriate directors be issued in the matter. Watch | Remove child sex abuse from the internet: India warns 3 social media companies × What did Madras High Court rule? In January this year, the Madras High Court quashed the case against S Harish (28), charged for downloading and watching on his mobile phone some pornographic content involving children. The court ruled that in order to consider what Harish did as an offence under Section 67-B of the Information Technology Act, 2000, he must have published, transmitted, and created material depicting children in a sexually explicit act or conduct. Also read | AI researchers delete over 2,000 web links to suspected child sexual abuse imagery A careful reading of this provision does not make watching child pornography, an offence under the said Section, it had said. (With inputs from agencies)

'Watching, storage of child pornography crime': Indian SC rules, quashing Madras HC's judgment

India's Supreme Court, on Tuesday (Sep 17), issued a strong warning to state authorities regarding the use of "bulldozer justice," emphasising that even a single case of unlawful demolition goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution.

The court has ordered a halt to all such demolitions nationwide until October 1, when the matter will be reviewed again. It clarified that no property should be demolished without its approval, except in cases where the structures are illegal and located on public roads or footpaths.

A bench of Justices B R&nbsp;Gavai and K V&nbsp;Viswanathan was addressing petitions that claimed properties belonging to individuals accused of crimes were being torn down in several states.

Condemning the practice of "bulldozer justice," which some states have been accused of, the apex&nbsp;court remarked, "Heavens won't fall if we ask you to hold your hands till the next hearing."

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that a "narrative" was being built around the demolitions, to which the&nbsp;court responded, "Rest assured that outside noise is not influencing us."

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-sc-scolds-west-bengal-govt-for-denying-night-shifts-to-women-doctors-759439">Kolkata horror: SC slams Bengal govt for denying night shifts to women doctors</a>

Previously, the top court had pointed out, "In a country where actions of the state are governed by the rule of law, the transgression by a family member cannot invite action against other members of the family or their legally-constructed residence. Alleged involvement in crime is no ground for the demolition of a property."

It further stated, "Moreover, the alleged crime has to be proved through due legal process in a court of law. The court cannot be oblivious to such demolition threats inconceivable in a nation where law is supreme. Otherwise, such actions may be seen as running a bulldozer over the laws of the land."

On September 2, the Supreme Court had indicated that it would issue nationwide guidelines to regulate demolitions across the country.

"We are on broad guidelines so that there is no bulldozer tomorrow and that it is documented and checked so that neither side points any lacunae...Why cannot some guidelines be passed so that it is followed? There can be notice, time to file a reply, time to pursue other legal remedies and then the demolition...we want to resolve this on a pan-India basis," said Justices Gavai and Viswanathan.

(With inputs from agencies)

India's Supreme Court, on Tuesday (Sep 17), issued a strong warning to state authorities regarding the use of "bulldozer justice," emphasising that even a single case of unlawful demolition goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution.

India's Supreme Court, on Tuesday (Sep 17), issued a strong warning to state authorities regarding the use of "bulldozer justice," emphasising that even a single case of unlawful demolition goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution. The court has ordered a halt to all such demolitions nationwide until October 1, when the matter will be reviewed again. It clarified that no property should be demolished without its approval, except in cases where the structures are illegal and located on public roads or footpaths. A bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan was addressing petitions that claimed properties belonging to individuals accused of crimes were being torn down in several states. Condemning the practice of "bulldozer justice," which some states have been accused of, the apex court remarked, "Heavens won't fall if we ask you to hold your hands till the next hearing." Solicitor General Tushar Mehta argued that a "narrative" was being built around the demolitions, to which the court responded, "Rest assured that outside noise is not influencing us." Also read: Kolkata horror: SC slams Bengal govt for denying night shifts to women doctors Previously, the top court had pointed out, "In a country where actions of the state are governed by the rule of law, the transgression by a family member cannot invite action against other members of the family or their legally-constructed residence. Alleged involvement in crime is no ground for the demolition of a property." It further stated, "Moreover, the alleged crime has to be proved through due legal process in a court of law. The court cannot be oblivious to such demolition threats inconceivable in a nation where law is supreme. Otherwise, such actions may be seen as running a bulldozer over the laws of the land." On September 2, the Supreme Court had indicated that it would issue nationwide guidelines to regulate demolitions across the country. "We are on broad guidelines so that there is no bulldozer tomorrow and that it is documented and checked so that neither side points any lacunae...Why cannot some guidelines be passed so that it is followed? There can be notice, time to file a reply, time to pursue other legal remedies and then the demolition...we want to resolve this on a pan-India basis," said Justices Gavai and Viswanathan. (With inputs from agencies)

India: SC freezes 'bulldozer justice'; no demolitions without approval until October 1

Institutions, including Election Commission and investigative agencies, perform their duty under tight situations and an observation can “despirit” them, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has said.

He also said that one has to be “extremely conscious” about the country’s institutions, which are robust and are working independently under the rule of law with suitable checks and balances.

His remarks at an event in Mumbai on Sunday came against the backdrop of a Supreme Court judge observing on Friday that probe agency must be above board and the Central Bureau of investigation (CBI) should dispel notion of it being a caged parrot.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/shiv-sena-mla-offers-rs-11-lakh-to-cut-off-congress-leader-rahul-gandhis-tongue-after-us-visit-comments-759175">Shiv Sena MLA offers Rs 11 lakh to 'cut off' Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s tongue after US visit comments</a>

Observing that Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest by the CBI in the excise policy case was unjustified, Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan had slammed the agency, and said it must dispel the notion of being a caged parrot.

Addressing the event, Dhankhar said all organs of the State have one common objective: that the common man should get all the rights and India should flourish and prosper.

“They need to work in tandem and togetherness to nurture and blossom democratic values and further Constitutional ideals… Let these sacred platforms — the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary — not be trigger points of political inflammatory debate that is detrimental to established institutions that serve the nation well in challenging and daunting environment,” the vice president said.

While referring to institutions, he mentioned the Election Commission and investigative agencies.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-former-rg-kar-principal-sandip-ghoshs-polygraph-results-deceptive-says-cbi-759098">Former RG Kar principal Sandip Ghosh’s polygraph results deceptive, says CBI</a>

He was of the view that institutions perform their duty under tight situations and observations can “despirit” them.

“It can set a political debate afloat and trigger a narrative. We have to be extremely conscious about our Institutions. They are robust, they are working independently under rule of law and there are suitable checks and balances,” Dhankhar said.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience.

Institutions, including Election Commission and investigative agencies, perform their duty under tight situations and an observation can “despirit” them, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has said.

Institutions, including Election Commission and investigative agencies, perform their duty under tight situations and an observation can “despirit” them, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has said. He also said that one has to be “extremely conscious” about the country’s institutions, which are robust and are working independently under the rule of law with suitable checks and balances. His remarks at an event in Mumbai on Sunday came against the backdrop of a Supreme Court judge observing on Friday that probe agency must be above board and the Central Bureau of investigation (CBI) should dispel notion of it being a caged parrot. Also read: Shiv Sena MLA offers Rs 11 lakh to 'cut off' Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s tongue after US visit comments Observing that Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest by the CBI in the excise policy case was unjustified, Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan had slammed the agency, and said it must dispel the notion of being a caged parrot. Addressing the event, Dhankhar said all organs of the State have one common objective: that the common man should get all the rights and India should flourish and prosper. “They need to work in tandem and togetherness to nurture and blossom democratic values and further Constitutional ideals… Let these sacred platforms — the Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary — not be trigger points of political inflammatory debate that is detrimental to established institutions that serve the nation well in challenging and daunting environment,” the vice president said. While referring to institutions, he mentioned the Election Commission and investigative agencies. Also read: Former RG Kar principal Sandip Ghosh’s polygraph results deceptive, says CBI He was of the view that institutions perform their duty under tight situations and observations can “despirit” them. “It can set a political debate afloat and trigger a narrative. We have to be extremely conscious about our Institutions. They are robust, they are working independently under rule of law and there are suitable checks and balances,” Dhankhar said. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

VP Dhankhar warns against undermining institutions after SC’s ‘caged parrot’ comment on CBI

Former principal of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Sandip Ghosh, and Tala police station in-charge, Abhijit Mondal, were remanded in CBI custody till September 17 by a court in Sealdah on Sunday (Sep 15).&nbsp;

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleged in court that there "could be a bigger conspiracy" and that both Ghosh and Mondal played "vital roles" in the rape and murder case of a junior doctor at RG Kar.&nbsp;

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:118,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1955}">A nexus to hide the crime</h2>

The CBI seeking three-day custody of the two men alleged that Ghosh and Mondal tried to "downplay" the horrific incident as well as "shield" the heinous crime and that the agency wanted to interrogate them "face-to-face".

A lawyer for CBI said that the agency had obtained call detail records (CDR) of the two on the night of the incident and probe suggested a possible nexus between the two.

"We want to confront both of them," said the CBI lawyer.

Also read |&nbsp;<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:311,&quot;w&quot;:719,&quot;h&quot;:34,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2148}" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-west-bengal-lop-alleges-kolkata-police-involved-in-tampering-evidence-758772">Kolkata rape-murder case: West Bengal LoP alleges Kolkata police involved in 'tampering evidence'</a>

The CBI alleged that Mondal took an "unusually long time to arrive at the scene of the crime," even though it was "only a five-minute drive." According to the investigative agency, the Tala police station in-charge was "informed about the incident at 10.03 am but he reached the spot at 11 am."

Furthermore, the lawyer pointed out a "14-hour delay in registering an FIR," and also raised questions regarding the filing of a "general diary by the police, stating that the victim was lying unconscious".

"He was obligated to register the FIR. They tried to pass it off as a suicide. There was a clear dereliction of duty. Custodial interrogation of both individuals is necessary."

Also read |&nbsp;<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:527,&quot;w&quot;:711,&quot;h&quot;:34,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2364}" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-cbi-detains-rg-kar-ex-principal-sandip-ghosh-police-officer-for-delay-in-registering-fir-758722">Kolkata horror: CBI detains RG Kar ex-principal Sandip Ghosh, police officer for delay in registering FIR</a>

"It was a case of sexual assault, and they should have approached it cautiously. Mondal conspired with others... There is no conflict between the CBI and the police. We just want to uncover the truth. For us, he is not a police officer; he is a suspect," added the CBI's lawyer.

Both Ghosh and Mondal have been taken to the CBI Special Crime Branch Office at the CGO Complex in Salt Lake.

(With inputs from agencies)

Former principal of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Sandip Ghosh, and Tala police station in-charge, Abhijit Mondal, were remanded in CBI custody till September 17 by a court in Sealdah on Sunday (Sep 15).

Former principal of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Sandip Ghosh, and Tala police station in-charge, Abhijit Mondal, were remanded in CBI custody till September 17 by a court in Sealdah on Sunday (Sep 15). The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleged in court that there "could be a bigger conspiracy" and that both Ghosh and Mondal played "vital roles" in the rape and murder case of a junior doctor at RG Kar. A nexus to hide the crime The CBI seeking three-day custody of the two men alleged that Ghosh and Mondal tried to "downplay" the horrific incident as well as "shield" the heinous crime and that the agency wanted to interrogate them "face-to-face". A lawyer for CBI said that the agency had obtained call detail records (CDR) of the two on the night of the incident and probe suggested a possible nexus between the two. "We want to confront both of them," said the CBI lawyer. Also read | Kolkata rape-murder case: West Bengal LoP alleges Kolkata police involved in 'tampering evidence' The CBI alleged that Mondal took an "unusually long time to arrive at the scene of the crime," even though it was "only a five-minute drive." According to the investigative agency, the Tala police station in-charge was "informed about the incident at 10.03 am but he reached the spot at 11 am." Furthermore, the lawyer pointed out a "14-hour delay in registering an FIR," and also raised questions regarding the filing of a "general diary by the police, stating that the victim was lying unconscious". "He was obligated to register the FIR. They tried to pass it off as a suicide. There was a clear dereliction of duty. Custodial interrogation of both individuals is necessary." Also read | Kolkata horror: CBI detains RG Kar ex-principal Sandip Ghosh, police officer for delay in registering FIR "It was a case of sexual assault, and they should have approached it cautiously. Mondal conspired with others... There is no conflict between the CBI and the police. We just want to uncover the truth. For us, he is not a police officer; he is a suspect," added the CBI's lawyer. Both Ghosh and Mondal have been taken to the CBI Special Crime Branch Office at the CGO Complex in Salt Lake. (With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata horror: CBI alleges ‘nexus’ between Sanjay Ghosh, Abhijit Mondal in bid to ‘shield’ heinous crime

Leader of the Opposition (LOP) in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari has accused the local police of 'tampering evidence' in the horrific murder-rape case of a trainee doctor in August. &nbsp;

Adhikari's allegations come after the arrest of Tala police station officer-in-charge, Abhijit Mondal, by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Mondal is&nbsp;due to be produced in court on Sunday (Sep 15).

Also read |&nbsp;<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:131,&quot;w&quot;:711,&quot;h&quot;:34,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1968}" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-cbi-detains-rg-kar-ex-principal-sandip-ghosh-police-officer-for-delay-in-registering-fir-758722">Kolkata horror: CBI detains RG Kar ex-principal Sandip Ghosh, police officer for delay in registering FIR</a>

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:185,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2022}">Police directly involved in 'tampering evidence': West Bengal LoP</h2>

Suvendu Adhikari, the LoP of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), said,&nbsp;"The arrest of Abhijit Mondal; Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Tala Police Station (PS), has established that the Police were directly involved in tampering evidence."

He further stated that the Kolkata police "acted as a stimulant to create lacuna in order to derail the investigation into the Rape and Murder of the RG Kar PGT Lady Doctor."

"The procedural lapses were well orchestrated and closely monitored by the top officials of @KolkataPolice," he alleged.&nbsp;

<div bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:396,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:190,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2233}" class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:116,&quot;y&quot;:406,&quot;w&quot;:505,&quot;h&quot;:169,&quot;abs_x&quot;:149,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2243}" class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:121,&quot;y&quot;:406,&quot;w&quot;:495,&quot;h&quot;:169,&quot;abs_x&quot;:154,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2243}" class="twitter-tweet">
The arrest of Abhijit Mondal; Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Tala Police Station (PS), has established that the Police were directly involved in tampering evidence and acted as a stimulant to create lacuna in order to derail the investigation into the Rape and Murder of the RG Kar PGT…
— Suvendu Adhikari (@SuvenduWB) <a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:444,&quot;y&quot;:535,&quot;w&quot;:117,&quot;h&quot;:14,&quot;abs_x&quot;:477,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2372}" href="https://twitter.com/SuvenduWB/status/1834998354281107479?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 14, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:710,&quot;y&quot;:396,&quot;w&quot;:20,&quot;h&quot;:20,&quot;abs_x&quot;:743,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2233}" class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Also read |&nbsp;<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:601,&quot;w&quot;:690,&quot;h&quot;:34,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2438}" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-police-foil-attack-bid-on-agitating-doctors-victims-mother-sees-hope-amid-impasse-758701">Kolkata horror: Police ‘foil’ attack bid on agitating doctors, victim’s mother sees hope amid impasse</a>

Adhikari also demanded the resignation of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, saying that she doesn’t have any moral authority left to continue in the position.

"@CPKolkata Vineet Goyal should be suspended immediately and Home Minister Mamata Banerjee must resign as she doesn’t have any moral authority left to continue as the head of the Home Dept," he added.

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:754,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2591}">RG Kar ex-principal arrested</h2>

This comes after the CBI on Saturday (Sep 14) detained the ex-principal of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Sandip Ghosh, along with&nbsp;Abhijit Mondal for the delay in registering the FIR in connection with the rape and murder case.&nbsp;The CBI has accused Ghosh of misleading the investigators and hiding the evidence.

(With inputs from agencies)

Leader of the Opposition (LOP) in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari has accused the local police of 'tampering evidence' in the horrific murder-rape case of a trainee doctor in August.

Leader of the Opposition (LOP) in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly and BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari has accused the local police of 'tampering evidence' in the horrific murder-rape case of a trainee doctor in August. Adhikari's allegations come after the arrest of Tala police station officer-in-charge, Abhijit Mondal, by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Mondal is due to be produced in court on Sunday (Sep 15). Also read | Kolkata horror: CBI detains RG Kar ex-principal Sandip Ghosh, police officer for delay in registering FIR Police directly involved in 'tampering evidence': West Bengal LoP Suvendu Adhikari, the LoP of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly, in a post on X (formerly Twitter), said, "The arrest of Abhijit Mondal; Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Tala Police Station (PS), has established that the Police were directly involved in tampering evidence." He further stated that the Kolkata police "acted as a stimulant to create lacuna in order to derail the investigation into the Rape and Murder of the RG Kar PGT Lady Doctor." "The procedural lapses were well orchestrated and closely monitored by the top officials of @KolkataPolice," he alleged. The arrest of Abhijit Mondal; Officer-in-Charge (OC) of Tala Police Station (PS), has established that the Police were directly involved in tampering evidence and acted as a stimulant to create lacuna in order to derail the investigation into the Rape and Murder of the RG Kar PGT… — Suvendu Adhikari (@SuvenduWB) September 14, 2024 × Also read | Kolkata horror: Police ‘foil’ attack bid on agitating doctors, victim’s mother sees hope amid impasse Adhikari also demanded the resignation of West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, saying that she doesn’t have any moral authority left to continue in the position. "@CPKolkata Vineet Goyal should be suspended immediately and Home Minister Mamata Banerjee must resign as she doesn’t have any moral authority left to continue as the head of the Home Dept," he added. RG Kar ex-principal arrested This comes after the CBI on Saturday (Sep 14) detained the ex-principal of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Sandip Ghosh, along with Abhijit Mondal for the delay in registering the FIR in connection with the rape and murder case. The CBI has accused Ghosh of misleading the investigators and hiding the evidence. (With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata rape-murder case: West Bengal LoP alleges Kolkata police involved in 'tampering evidence'

The Supreme Court has granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has been in jail for the past six months in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam. This follows an earlier temporary bail granted two months ago, just ahead of the Lok Sabha elections.

Arvind Kejriwal bail: SC grants bail to Delhi CM in Delhi Excise Policy Case

The Supreme Court will deliver its verdict on the petitions filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Friday (September 13). The AAP leader's petitions include one appealing against the denial of bail and another contesting his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the excise policy case.

The Supreme Court will deliver its verdict on the petitions filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Friday (September 13). The AAP leader's petitions include one appealing against the denial of bail and another contesting his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the excise policy case. If the court rules in his favour, Kejriwal could be released almost six months after his initial arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and two months after receiving bail for the arrest. The Supreme Court had granted him bail on July 12 in the case investigated by the ED. However, he remained in custody because the CBI had arrested him on June 26, just as the ED withdrew its challenge in the same case. Also read | Kolkata horror: CM Mamata ‘willing to resign’ amid standoff with doctors During the last hearing on September 5, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment on Kejriwal's petitions. According to the Supreme Court’s schedule for September 13, a bench led by Justice Surya Kant will announce the verdict at 10:30 AM. If Kejriwal is granted bail, he will become the fifth opposition figure to be released in connection with this case. Others who have been released so far include his former deputy Manish Sisodia, AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh, K Kavitha of the BRS, and AAP leader Durgesh Pathak. Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest timeline Kejriwal was first arrested by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21, shortly after his plea for interim protection was rejected by the Delhi High Court. Although the Supreme Court granted him interim bail in the ED case on July 12, he remained in jail due to his arrest by the CBI on June 26. Also read | Putin ‘waiting for Modi’ for BRICS summit, says 30 nations want to join bloc The Delhi High Court ruled on August 5 that Kejriwal's arrest was lawful, adding that the CBI’s actions were appropriate and that there was no malice involved. The court also said that Kejriwal’s arrest made witnesses feel safe enough to come forward and testify. The CBI filed its fourth chargesheet in the case on July 30, naming multiple people, including Kejriwal, Satyendar Jain, Amit Arora, Vinod Chauhan, Ashish Mathur, and P Sarath Reddy. According to the CBI, Kejriwal is described as “one of the main conspirators,” allegedly linked to the South Group led by K Kavitha. (With inputs from agencies)

Will Kejriwal walk free? Supreme Court to deliver verdict on AAP leader's petitions

The Supreme Court has granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has been in jail for the past six months in connection with the alleged Delhi Excise policy case. This follows an earlier temporary bail granted two months ago, just ahead of the Lok Sabha elections.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal granted bail by Supreme Court in excise policy case

Kolkata rape-murder case: India's central investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has collected the teeth impression of Sanjay Roy, the primary suspect in the rape and murder of a trainee doctor in India's West Bengal, suggest Indian media reports.

Roy, a civic volunteer, was arrested last month for the heinous crime reported from Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in August.

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:135,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1822}">Why were Roy's teeth impressions collected?</h2>

As per central agency officials, the teeth impression of the accused is often considered vital evidence in rape and/or murder cases.

Also read |&nbsp;<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:229,&quot;w&quot;:696,&quot;h&quot;:34,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1916}" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-mother-of-victim-slams-cm-mamata-banerjee-for-lying-says-family-was-offered-money-757236">Kolkata horror: Mother of victim slams CM Mamata Banerjee for lying, says family was offered 'money'</a>

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:283,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1970}">CBI questions TMC MLA</h2>

The CBI, on Thursday (Sep 12) started questioning Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Dr Sudipto Roy at his residence in Sithi in north Kolkata.

As per the PTI, the TMC MLA was present at the hospital when the news of the doctor's death spread.

"He was present at the hospital soon after the news of the doctor's death spread. We are questioning him about what he knows about the case," the CBI told the news agency.

Dr Sudipto Roy, a four-time&nbsp;party legislator, is also the chairperson of the 'Rogi Kalyan Samity' (patient&nbsp;welfare committee).

The CBI also conducted raid and search operations at his office.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-doctor-rape-murder-case-junior-doctors-say-they-will-continue-their-protest-757297">Kolkata doctor rape-murder case: Junior doctors disappointed by SC hearing, to continue protest</a>

Parallelly, three Enforcement Directorate (ED) officers were conducting raid and search operations at three locations in the city and its outskirts.&nbsp;

This included the ancestral residence of Sandip Ghosh, the controversial former principal&nbsp;of R G Kar Medical College. Additionally, the residence of Chandan Louha, a&nbsp;non-teaching staff of R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital at Tala in North Kolkata, was also being searched. Reportedly, Louha is an extremely close confidant of Ghosh and was even running an illegal cafeteria within the RG Kar hospital premises due to the ex-principal's patronage.

Finally, a chemist &amp; druggist shop at Kalindi, north Kolkata, were raided after ED officials tracked several documents relating to business transactions with RG Kar authorities while Ghosh was at the helm of the hospital's affairs.

(With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata rape-murder case: India's central investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has collected the teeth impression of Sanjay Roy, the primary suspect in the rape and murder of a trainee doctor in India's West Bengal, suggest Indian media reports.

Kolkata rape-murder case: India's central investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), has collected the teeth impression of Sanjay Roy, the primary suspect in the rape and murder of a trainee doctor in India's West Bengal, suggest Indian media reports. Roy, a civic volunteer, was arrested last month for the heinous crime reported from Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital in August. Why were Roy's teeth impressions collected? As per central agency officials, the teeth impression of the accused is often considered vital evidence in rape and/or murder cases. Also read | Kolkata horror: Mother of victim slams CM Mamata Banerjee for lying, says family was offered 'money' CBI questions TMC MLA The CBI, on Thursday (Sep 12) started questioning Trinamool Congress (TMC) MLA Dr Sudipto Roy at his residence in Sithi in north Kolkata. As per the PTI, the TMC MLA was present at the hospital when the news of the doctor's death spread. "He was present at the hospital soon after the news of the doctor's death spread. We are questioning him about what he knows about the case," the CBI told the news agency. Dr Sudipto Roy, a four-time party legislator, is also the chairperson of the 'Rogi Kalyan Samity' (patient welfare committee). The CBI also conducted raid and search operations at his office. Also read | Kolkata doctor rape-murder case: Junior doctors disappointed by SC hearing, to continue protest Parallelly, three Enforcement Directorate (ED) officers were conducting raid and search operations at three locations in the city and its outskirts. This included the ancestral residence of Sandip Ghosh, the controversial former principal of R G Kar Medical College. Additionally, the residence of Chandan Louha, a non-teaching staff of R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital at Tala in North Kolkata, was also being searched. Reportedly, Louha is an extremely close confidant of Ghosh and was even running an illegal cafeteria within the RG Kar hospital premises due to the ex-principal's patronage. Finally, a chemist & druggist shop at Kalindi, north Kolkata, were raided after ED officials tracked several documents relating to business transactions with RG Kar authorities while Ghosh was at the helm of the hospital's affairs. (With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata horror: CBI takes teeth impression of main accused Sanjay Roy, questions TMC MLA

The Supreme Court on Thursday (September 05) is set to hear Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail pleas. These pleas challenge his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case.

The Supreme Court on Thursday (September 05) is set to hear Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's bail pleas. These pleas challenge his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case. Kejriwal has filed two separate pleas, one challenging his arrest by CBI and another challenging the rejection of his bail application. On August 05, Delhi High Court's ruling upheld his arrest. In the last hearing, held on August 23, the Supreme Court gave the CBI a week to respond to one of Kejriwal's pleas. Delhi High Court summons Kejriwal, others after CBI's fourth supplementary chargesheet On Tuesday (September 03), the Delhi High Court issued summons to Kejriwal and other individuals linked to the case after reviewing the CBI's fourth supplementary chargesheet in the excise policy case. The court also extended Kejriwal's judicial custody until September 11, and Special Judge Kaveri Baweja directed all accused to appear in court on the date. Also read | Kolkata horror: Victoria Memorial, Raj Bhawan go dark as 'Reclaim the Night' protests rage in Bengal The CBI’s fourth chargesheet, filed on July 30, names multiple people, including Kejriwal, Satyendar Jain, Amit Arora, Vinod Chauhan, Ashish Mathur, and P Sarath Reddy. According to the CBI, Kejriwal is “one of the main conspirators” allegedly having connections with the South group, which includes K Kavitha, Raghav Magunta, Arun Pillai, Butchibabu Gorantla, P Sarath Reddy, Abhishek Boinpally, and Benoy Babu. When was AAP supremo arrested? Kejriwal was initially arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on March 21, shortly after the Delhi High Court refused his request for interim protection. Although the Supreme Court granted him interim bail on July 12 in the ED case, he remained in jail due to his arrest by the CBI on June 26. The Delhi High Court, on August 5, ruled that his arrest was legitimate, adding that there was no ill intent in the CBI's actions. The court also said that the CBI had proved how Kejriwal could potentially influence witnesses, who had only felt safe to testify following his arrest. (With inputs from agencies)

Delhi CM Kejriwal’s freedom on the line as Supreme Court set to hear bail plea in excise policy case

Kolkata rape-murder case: Parents of the doctor trainee, who was brutally&nbsp;raped and murdered at RG Kar hospital in August, alleged&nbsp;on Wednesday (Sep 4) that the Kolkata Police attempted to bribe them and suppress the case by hurriedly cremating her body.

<h2 bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:85,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:26,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:1771}">Attempts to hush the case</h2>

The parents, while participating in a protest at the state-run RG Kar Medical College and Hospital where the horrific tragedy took place, said "The police, from the very beginning, tried to hush up the case."

"We were not allowed to see the body and had to wait at the police station while the body was taken for post-mortem examinations. Later, when the body was handed over to us, a senior police official offered us money, which we immediately declined," they alleged.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-rape-murder-case-ex-rg-kar-principal-sandip-ghosh-slapped-by-bystander-after-cbi-arrest-755717">Kolkata rape-murder case: Ex-RG Kar principal Sandip Ghosh slapped by bystander after CBI arrest. Watch video</a>

They said that they joined the protest to support the junior doctors fighting for their daughter since August 10.&nbsp;

An aunt of the deceased, as per ANI, said,&nbsp;"When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house the police were offering money, is this the humanity of police?"

<div bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:8,&quot;y&quot;:346,&quot;w&quot;:723,&quot;h&quot;:206,&quot;abs_x&quot;:41,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2032}" class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:116,&quot;y&quot;:357,&quot;w&quot;:505,&quot;h&quot;:184,&quot;abs_x&quot;:149,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2043}" class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:121,&quot;y&quot;:357,&quot;w&quot;:495,&quot;h&quot;:184,&quot;abs_x&quot;:154,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2043}" class="twitter-tweet">
<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:192,&quot;y&quot;:395,&quot;w&quot;:53,&quot;h&quot;:14,&quot;abs_x&quot;:225,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2081}" href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder case: Aunt of the deceased doctor says "When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house the police were offering money, is this the humanity of police?" 
 
"...Till the last rites were… <a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:391,&quot;y&quot;:472,&quot;w&quot;:156,&quot;h&quot;:14,&quot;abs_x&quot;:424,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2158}" href="https://t.co/16QJgFvTut">pic.twitter.com/16QJgFvTut</a>
— ANI (@ANI) <a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:376,&quot;y&quot;:500,&quot;w&quot;:110,&quot;h&quot;:14,&quot;abs_x&quot;:409,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2186}" href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1831550588024451100?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 5, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a bis_size="{&quot;x&quot;:710,&quot;y&quot;:347,&quot;w&quot;:20,&quot;h&quot;:20,&quot;abs_x&quot;:743,&quot;abs_y&quot;:2033}" class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

She claimed that "...Till the last rites were not performed, 300-400 policemen surrounded us but after it was performed, not a single policeman was seen there. What would the family do? How would they go home? Police took no responsibility."

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kolkata-horror-victoria-memorial-raj-bhawan-go-dark-as-reclaim-the-night-protests-rage-in-bengal-755966">Kolkata horror: Victoria Memorial, Raj Bhawan go dark as 'Reclaim the Night' protests rage in Bengal</a>

"Police were active till the last rites were performed and after that, they became completely inactive. When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house and we were shedding tears, the police were offering money. Is this the humanity of the police? The Police were saying that they have fulfilled all their responsibilities. Is this what is called fulfilling the responsibility?" she said further.

(With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata rape-murder case: Parents of the doctor trainee, who was brutally raped and murdered at RG Kar hospital in August, alleged on Wednesday (Sep 4) that the Kolkata Police attempted to bribe them and suppress the case by hurriedly cremating her body.

Kolkata rape-murder case: Parents of the doctor trainee, who was brutally raped and murdered at RG Kar hospital in August, alleged on Wednesday (Sep 4) that the Kolkata Police attempted to bribe them and suppress the case by hurriedly cremating her body. Attempts to hush the case The parents, while participating in a protest at the state-run RG Kar Medical College and Hospital where the horrific tragedy took place, said "The police, from the very beginning, tried to hush up the case." "We were not allowed to see the body and had to wait at the police station while the body was taken for post-mortem examinations. Later, when the body was handed over to us, a senior police official offered us money, which we immediately declined," they alleged. Also read | Kolkata rape-murder case: Ex-RG Kar principal Sandip Ghosh slapped by bystander after CBI arrest. Watch video They said that they joined the protest to support the junior doctors fighting for their daughter since August 10. An aunt of the deceased, as per ANI, said, "When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house the police were offering money, is this the humanity of police?" #WATCH | Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital rape-murder case: Aunt of the deceased doctor says "When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house the police were offering money, is this the humanity of police?" "...Till the last rites were… pic.twitter.com/16QJgFvTut — ANI (@ANI) September 5, 2024 × She claimed that "...Till the last rites were not performed, 300-400 policemen surrounded us but after it was performed, not a single policeman was seen there. What would the family do? How would they go home? Police took no responsibility." Also read | Kolkata horror: Victoria Memorial, Raj Bhawan go dark as 'Reclaim the Night' protests rage in Bengal "Police were active till the last rites were performed and after that, they became completely inactive. When the body of the daughter was lying in front of the parents in the house and we were shedding tears, the police were offering money. Is this the humanity of the police? The Police were saying that they have fulfilled all their responsibilities. Is this what is called fulfilling the responsibility?" she said further. (With inputs from agencies)

Kolkata rape-murder case: Police tried to bribe us, allege parents of the deceased

supreme-court

Supreme Court, News on Supreme Court, stories on Supreme Court, articles on Supreme Court, Supreme Court stories at Wion, Supreme Court news, Supreme Court latest news

supreme court