With elections in India just over a month away the drama surrounding electoral bonds continues to make headlines. After days of back and forth, the State Bank of India has submitted all details to the Election Commission of India. Following the submission the poll body has now released all the data on its website.

India elections 2024: EC publishes poll bond data with bond numbers

The Indian Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) dismissed applications seeking a stay on the appointment of two new Election Commissioners, just days after the poll body announced dates for the Lok Sabha election this summer.

The top court asked the government to file a response within six weeks on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023.

A few days ago, the government had filled two vacancies in the Election Commission of India (ECI), which arose following the retirement of Anup Chandra Pandey last month and the sudden resignation of Arun Goel.&nbsp;The government appointed former Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu.

“We are dismissing the applications for a stay on the appointment,” a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said.

Petitions in the top court had challenged the validity of the new law, Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Terms of Office) Act, 2023. One of their contentions is about the absence of Chief Justice of India in the selection panel for election commissioners.

“At this stage, we cannot stay the legislation or suspend its operation. It would lead to chaos and uncertainty and we cannot do it (stay) by way of an interim order. There are no allegations against the new election commissioners,” the bench told the petitioners, adding that it will examine the main petition.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-live-govt-launches-24x7-control-room-toll-free-helpline-for-polls-702503">Click here to follow LIVE updates on the Lok Sabha polls 2024</a>

The Supreme Court also questioned the central government for the speed with which the Search Committee shortlisted the candidates, and two Election Commissioners were selected.

<blockquote>
Supreme Court asks Centre to file a response within six weeks on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023. <a href="https://t.co/6jgrhQ1KeT">https://t.co/6jgrhQ1KeT</a>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1770700775376719909?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 21, 2024</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<a href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a>

The top court pointed out that it was not questioning the credentials of the Election Commissioners selected, but on the procedure in which the selection was made. 
&nbsp;

Also watch |&nbsp;SC dismisses application seeking Electoral Bonds disclosure from before 2019

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-sc-dismisses-application-seeking-electoral-bonds-disclosure-from-before-2019-701461/embed" width="560"></iframe>

<a href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a>

(With inputs from agencies)

The Indian Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) dismissed applications seeking a stay on the appointment of two new Election Commissioners, just days after the poll body announced dates for the Lok Sabha election this summer.

The Indian Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) dismissed applications seeking a stay on the appointment of two new Election Commissioners, just days after the poll body announced dates for the Lok Sabha election this summer. The top court asked the government to file a response within six weeks on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023. A few days ago, the government had filled two vacancies in the Election Commission of India (ECI), which arose following the retirement of Anup Chandra Pandey last month and the sudden resignation of Arun Goel. The government appointed former Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu. “We are dismissing the applications for a stay on the appointment,” a bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta said. Petitions in the top court had challenged the validity of the new law, Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Terms of Office) Act, 2023. One of their contentions is about the absence of Chief Justice of India in the selection panel for election commissioners. “At this stage, we cannot stay the legislation or suspend its operation. It would lead to chaos and uncertainty and we cannot do it (stay) by way of an interim order. There are no allegations against the new election commissioners,” the bench told the petitioners, adding that it will examine the main petition. Click here to follow LIVE updates on the Lok Sabha polls 2024 The Supreme Court also questioned the central government for the speed with which the Search Committee shortlisted the candidates, and two Election Commissioners were selected. Supreme Court asks Centre to file a response within six weeks on the petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners Act, 2023. https://t.co/6jgrhQ1KeT — ANI (@ANI) March 21, 2024 × The top court pointed out that it was not questioning the credentials of the Election Commissioners selected, but on the procedure in which the selection was made. Also watch | SC dismisses application seeking Electoral Bonds disclosure from before 2019 × (With inputs from agencies)

Lok Sabha polls: Supreme Court dismisses pleas seeking stay on appointment of election commissioners

India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) paused the central government’s March 20 notification to set up a Fact Check Unit (FCU) under the Information Technology (IT) rules till the Bombay High Court delivers a verdict on petitions challenging the 2023 amendment to the IT Rules.

<h2>Supreme Court stays FCU</h2>

The apex court stayed the Centre’s notification to set up an FCU under the Press Information Bureau (PIB), saying that the challenge to the validity of the unit involves a “serious constitutional question” and its impact on “free speech and expression would need to be analysed by the High Court.” &nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-polls-supreme-court-dismisses-plea-seeking-stay-on-appointment-of-election-commissioners-702603">Lok Sabha polls: Supreme Court dismisses pleas seeking stay on appointment of Election Commissioners</a>

The decision comes a day after the IT ministry notified the FCU under the PIB as a statutory body that would be tasked with flagging what it perceives as fake news related to the Indian government and its agencies on social media.&nbsp;

The bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud set aside the March 11 order of the Bombay HC which refused to grant a stay on setting up of the FCU.&nbsp;

“We are of the considered view that questions before the HC deal with core questions on Article 19(1)(a) of the constitution,” the three-judge bench also comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said in its order.&nbsp;

It added, “We are of the view that notification dated March 20, 2024, after rejection of application of interim relief, needs to be stayed.”&nbsp;

<h2>About the petition filed against FCU</h2>

The decision by the apex court comes after the Bombay HC declined to stop the Centre from notifying the unit based on the petition filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra and the Editors Guild of India.

Senior Advocate Darius Khambata representing the petitioner (Kamra) questioned why is the FCU only for the Centre and not for everyone as an independent body if the objective is to prevent fake news since it affects everybody.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-polls-criminal-action-done-by-modi-shah-congress-slams-bjp-over-freezing-of-its-bank-accounts-702569">Lok Sabha polls | Criminal action done by Modi, Shah: Congress slams BJP over freezing of its bank accounts</a>

Khambata argued that the FCU cannot be dependent on the government’s discretion on what constitutes false or not.&nbsp;

He also noted that with the elections right around the corner, the FCU could be used as a way to control and filter what information reaches out to the voters.&nbsp;

The senior advocate also pointed out that FCU was notified yesterday but was not done for an entire year.&nbsp;

Similarly, lawyers representing the Editor’s Guild stressed that a government-controlled FCU “strikes at the core” of Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution which guarantees the fundamental right of free speech and expression.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) paused the central government’s March 20 notification to set up a Fact Check Unit (FCU) under the Information Technology (IT) rules till the Bombay High Court delivers a verdict on petitions challenging the 2023 amendment to the IT Rules.

India's Supreme Court on Thursday (Mar 21) paused the central government’s March 20 notification to set up a Fact Check Unit (FCU) under the Information Technology (IT) rules till the Bombay High Court delivers a verdict on petitions challenging the 2023 amendment to the IT Rules. Supreme Court stays FCU The apex court stayed the Centre’s notification to set up an FCU under the Press Information Bureau (PIB), saying that the challenge to the validity of the unit involves a “serious constitutional question” and its impact on “free speech and expression would need to be analysed by the High Court.” Also Read | Lok Sabha polls: Supreme Court dismisses pleas seeking stay on appointment of Election Commissioners The decision comes a day after the IT ministry notified the FCU under the PIB as a statutory body that would be tasked with flagging what it perceives as fake news related to the Indian government and its agencies on social media. The bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud set aside the March 11 order of the Bombay HC which refused to grant a stay on setting up of the FCU. “We are of the considered view that questions before the HC deal with core questions on Article 19(1)(a) of the constitution,” the three-judge bench also comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said in its order. It added, “We are of the view that notification dated March 20, 2024, after rejection of application of interim relief, needs to be stayed.” About the petition filed against FCU The decision by the apex court comes after the Bombay HC declined to stop the Centre from notifying the unit based on the petition filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra and the Editors Guild of India. Senior Advocate Darius Khambata representing the petitioner (Kamra) questioned why is the FCU only for the Centre and not for everyone as an independent body if the objective is to prevent fake news since it affects everybody. Also Read | Lok Sabha polls | Criminal action done by Modi, Shah: Congress slams BJP over freezing of its bank accounts Khambata argued that the FCU cannot be dependent on the government’s discretion on what constitutes false or not. He also noted that with the elections right around the corner, the FCU could be used as a way to control and filter what information reaches out to the voters. The senior advocate also pointed out that FCU was notified yesterday but was not done for an entire year. Similarly, lawyers representing the Editor’s Guild stressed that a government-controlled FCU “strikes at the core” of Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution which guarantees the fundamental right of free speech and expression. (With inputs from agencies)

Supreme Court stays Indian government's notification of Fact Check Unit

Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna has tendered an unqualified apology in the Supreme Court over alleged misleading advertisements. 
In an affidavit, Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna said that he submits an unqualified apology before the top court for the breach of the statement recorded in the order copy of the top court dated November 21, 2023.

Acharya Balkrishna said that he will ensure that such advertisements are not issued in the future and submits that its intention is only to exhort the citizens of this country to lead a healthier life by consuming products of the Ayurvedic company, including products for lifestyle ailments, through the use of age old literature and materials supplemented and backed by Ayurvedic research.

"The deponent regrets that the advertisement in question, which was meant to contain only general statements, inadvertently included the offending sentences. The same was bona-fide and added to the routine course by the media department of the Respondent No. 5 Company. The personnel of the media department of the Respondent No. 5 Company were not cognizant of the order dated November 21, 2023," read the affidavit.

Acharya Balkrishna further submitted that Schedule J of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, read with the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1955, is in an archaic state and the last changes were introduced in 1996. The Drug &amp; Cosmetic Act, 1940, was passed when scientific evidence in Ayurveda research was lacking.

The Ayurvedic Company now possesses evidence-based scientific data with clinical research conducted in Ayurveda, which would demonstrate the advances made through scientific research in the context of diseases mentioned in the said schedule.

In light of the same, it is humbly submitted that the deponent's only quest is for a better and healthier life for each and every citizen and to reduce the burden on the country's healthcare infrastructure by providing holistic, evidence based solutions for lifestyle-related medical complications through the use of the age-old traditional approaches of Ayurveda and Yoga, the affidavit said.

In fact, the idea was to promote the Ayurvedic products, which are based on age old literature/material backed by scientific research, the affidavit said.

The affidavit came as a response to the SC's earlier order, whereby the court sought from Patanjali Ayurveda Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna a response to the show cause notice in contempt proceedings against him over alleged misleading advertisements of Patanjali Ayurved.

In the earlier hearing, the top court issued notice to Ayurvedic Company, asking it to show cause why contempt of action should not be initiated against the company and its managing director for giving misleading advertisements.

The top court had observed that the ayurvedic company has prima facie violated the top court's order dated November 20, 2023, where it cautioned against misleading advertisements about its medicines.

The court had also restrained the Ayurvedic Company (Patanjali Ayurved) from advertising or branding their products specified as treating disease under the drug norms and also cautioned it from making any statements against any system of medicine in the media.

The court's observation came when it noted that the company has given alleged misleading advertisements.

The court was dealing with an Indian Medical Association plea seeking to frame guidelines for prohibiting false and misleading advertisements in relation to allopathy and modern medicine.

IMA, a registered society, has more than 3,30,000 medical doctors as its members all over the country. The petition also raised the issue of the campaign of misguidance, misinformation and disparagement against the modern system of medicine.

IMA, in its plea, had sought to pass an order directing the Center and others to immediately take strict and prompt action, in accordance with law, for the violation of the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, the Drugs &amp; Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the repeated acts of omission and commission of Respondent Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., including by publishing advertisements all over the country making illegal and prohibited claims. 
&nbsp;

Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna has tendered an unqualified apology in the Supreme Court over alleged misleading advertisements. In an affidavit, Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna said that he submits an unqualified apology before the top court for the breach of the statement recorded in the order copy of the top court dated November 21, 2023.

Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna has tendered an unqualified apology in the Supreme Court over alleged misleading advertisements. In an affidavit, Patanjali Ayurved Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna said that he submits an unqualified apology before the top court for the breach of the statement recorded in the order copy of the top court dated November 21, 2023. Acharya Balkrishna said that he will ensure that such advertisements are not issued in the future and submits that its intention is only to exhort the citizens of this country to lead a healthier life by consuming products of the Ayurvedic company, including products for lifestyle ailments, through the use of age old literature and materials supplemented and backed by Ayurvedic research. "The deponent regrets that the advertisement in question, which was meant to contain only general statements, inadvertently included the offending sentences. The same was bona-fide and added to the routine course by the media department of the Respondent No. 5 Company. The personnel of the media department of the Respondent No. 5 Company were not cognizant of the order dated November 21, 2023," read the affidavit. Acharya Balkrishna further submitted that Schedule J of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, read with the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1955, is in an archaic state and the last changes were introduced in 1996. The Drug & Cosmetic Act, 1940, was passed when scientific evidence in Ayurveda research was lacking. The Ayurvedic Company now possesses evidence-based scientific data with clinical research conducted in Ayurveda, which would demonstrate the advances made through scientific research in the context of diseases mentioned in the said schedule. In light of the same, it is humbly submitted that the deponent's only quest is for a better and healthier life for each and every citizen and to reduce the burden on the country's healthcare infrastructure by providing holistic, evidence based solutions for lifestyle-related medical complications through the use of the age-old traditional approaches of Ayurveda and Yoga, the affidavit said. In fact, the idea was to promote the Ayurvedic products, which are based on age old literature/material backed by scientific research, the affidavit said. The affidavit came as a response to the SC's earlier order, whereby the court sought from Patanjali Ayurveda Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna a response to the show cause notice in contempt proceedings against him over alleged misleading advertisements of Patanjali Ayurved. In the earlier hearing, the top court issued notice to Ayurvedic Company, asking it to show cause why contempt of action should not be initiated against the company and its managing director for giving misleading advertisements. The top court had observed that the ayurvedic company has prima facie violated the top court's order dated November 20, 2023, where it cautioned against misleading advertisements about its medicines. The court had also restrained the Ayurvedic Company (Patanjali Ayurved) from advertising or branding their products specified as treating disease under the drug norms and also cautioned it from making any statements against any system of medicine in the media. The court's observation came when it noted that the company has given alleged misleading advertisements. The court was dealing with an Indian Medical Association plea seeking to frame guidelines for prohibiting false and misleading advertisements in relation to allopathy and modern medicine. IMA, a registered society, has more than 3,30,000 medical doctors as its members all over the country. The petition also raised the issue of the campaign of misguidance, misinformation and disparagement against the modern system of medicine. IMA, in its plea, had sought to pass an order directing the Center and others to immediately take strict and prompt action, in accordance with law, for the violation of the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, the Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, 1945 and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 by the repeated acts of omission and commission of Respondent Patanjali Ayurved Ltd., including by publishing advertisements all over the country making illegal and prohibited claims.

Patanjali MD Acharya Balkrishna submits unqualified apology to Supreme Court over alleged misleading ads

Former US president Donald Trump appealed to the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Mar 19) to grant him absolute immunity in the federal election interference case, claiming that a ruling against him will "incapacitate every future president."&nbsp;

He said that former presidents are entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution for steps taken while in office, and argued that the "long history of not prosecuting" his predecessors shows that he cannot be criminally prosecuted.

"From 1789 to 2023, no former, or current, president faced criminal charges for his official acts — for good reason," Trump's lawyers said in court.

"The president cannot function, and the presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence, if the president faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office," they added.&nbsp;

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-repeats-fair-share-condition-for-us-help-to-nato-allies-702073">Trump repeats 'fair share' condition for US help to NATO allies</a>

“A denial of criminal immunity would incapacitate every future President with de facto blackmail and extortion while in office, and condemn him to years of post-office trauma at the hands of his political opponents,” Trump’s legal team further said.

<h2>'SC's decision will affect presidency for the rest of nation's history'</h2>

Lawyer D John Sauer submitted a 51-page filing and appealed to the Supreme Court to reverse a decision of the lower court which rejected his claim of immunity and appealed that the charges filed against him should be dismissed.

Sauer said that the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity will have consequences which will not be confined to Trump, but rather "will affect the presidency itself for the rest of our nation's history."&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;US Elections 2024: Trump warns of ‘bloodbath’ if he loses presidential election in November

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-elections-2024-trump-warns-of-bloodbath-if-he-loses-presidential-election-in-november-701218/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"This court should not adopt a rule that creates the appearance of a President Trump-only gerrymander. That would be the antithesis of the rule of law," he said.&nbsp;

Last month, the Supreme Court agreed to look into the decision of the federal appeals court in Washington which said that Trump can be prosecuted for alleged attempts made for subverting presidential power&nbsp;transfer after the 2020 election and scheduled arguments for April 25.&nbsp;

The question which is being considered by the justices is "whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office."&nbsp;

As per the phrasing, the justices are not looking into claims made by Trump that the presidents can be criminally charged only if the House has first impeached them and the Senate has convicted them.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Former US president Donald Trump appealed to the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Mar 19) to grant him absolute immunity in the federal election interference case, claiming that a ruling against him will "incapacitate every future president.

Former US president Donald Trump appealed to the Supreme Court on Tuesday (Mar 19) to grant him absolute immunity in the federal election interference case, claiming that a ruling against him will "incapacitate every future president." He said that former presidents are entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution for steps taken while in office, and argued that the "long history of not prosecuting" his predecessors shows that he cannot be criminally prosecuted. "From 1789 to 2023, no former, or current, president faced criminal charges for his official acts — for good reason," Trump's lawyers said in court. "The president cannot function, and the presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence, if the president faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office," they added. Also Read: Trump repeats 'fair share' condition for US help to NATO allies “A denial of criminal immunity would incapacitate every future President with de facto blackmail and extortion while in office, and condemn him to years of post-office trauma at the hands of his political opponents,” Trump’s legal team further said. 'SC's decision will affect presidency for the rest of nation's history' Lawyer D John Sauer submitted a 51-page filing and appealed to the Supreme Court to reverse a decision of the lower court which rejected his claim of immunity and appealed that the charges filed against him should be dismissed. Sauer said that the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity will have consequences which will not be confined to Trump, but rather "will affect the presidency itself for the rest of our nation's history." Watch: US Elections 2024: Trump warns of ‘bloodbath’ if he loses presidential election in November "This court should not adopt a rule that creates the appearance of a President Trump-only gerrymander. That would be the antithesis of the rule of law," he said. Last month, the Supreme Court agreed to look into the decision of the federal appeals court in Washington which said that Trump can be prosecuted for alleged attempts made for subverting presidential power transfer after the 2020 election and scheduled arguments for April 25. The question which is being considered by the justices is "whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office." As per the phrasing, the justices are not looking into claims made by Trump that the presidents can be criminally charged only if the House has first impeached them and the Senate has convicted them. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump urges Supreme Court for broader immunity in 2020 election case, saying past presidents not prosecuted

According to the recent affidavit filed by the director of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) in the Supreme Court, a total of 15,536 children and youth of both genders up to the age of 18 years were adopted in 11 states between 2021 and 2023 under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA).

The parents adopted 9,474 girls in comparison to 6,012 boys during this period, indicating a rise in the number of adoptions for girls.

The CARA is a statutory body of the Union ministry of women and child development and works as the nodal agency for the adoption of children in the country. It is mandated to monitor and regulate in-country and inter-country adoptions.

There is no such trend but more girls are abandoned so that is why availability is high for adoption, the experts told PTI.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/kashmir-sales-of-dates-surge-during-ramadan-becoming-most-sold-food-item-this-month-702374">Kashmir: Sales of dates surge during Ramadan, becoming most sold food item this month</a>

Availability of more girl children results in their more adoption, said Bharti Ali, co-founder and the executive director of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights.

“This (rise) may be because there are more girls available, more daughters are dumped,” she said.

Child rights activist Enakshi Ganguly concurred with Ali’s views and said, “That's because more girls are abandoned or surrendered and, hence, more (are) available for adoption.”

CARA, in its affidavit, gave details of the children falling under five categories -- orphan, abandoned, surrendered, unfit parents and non-visitation -- who are available for adoptions in the country, according to the data provided by certain states.

A total number of 20,673 children (under the age group of 7-11 years and 12-18 years) have been identified so far in the states and Union Territories (UTs) during an identification drive comprising the five categories, it said.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-woman-gives-birth-on-moving-train-this-is-what-happened-next-702367">Indian woman gives birth on moving train. This is what happened next</a>

Ten states and UTs -- Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Jammu Kashmir, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Ladakh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Manipur -- have not provided the data on total adoptions&nbsp;during the period.

In Punjab, a total of 7,496 adoptions were registered under the HAMA. Out of them, 4,966 were girls and 2,530 were boys.

In Telangana, the couples preferred male children for adoption under the HAMA.

The top court, on March 15, voiced displeasure over the failure to set up Specialised Adoption Agencies (SAAs) meant to streamline the adoption process of abandoned and surrendered children in 370 districts across the country. It warned the states and UTs of 'coercive steps' for non-compliance of its directions.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/isis-india-head-haris-farooqi-his-associates-arrested-in-dhubri-district-assam-702386">ISIS India Head Haris Farooqi &amp; his associates arrested in Dhubri district, Assam</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/isis-india-head-haris-farooqi-his-associates-arrested-in-dhubri-district-assam-702386/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

It lamented that out of 760 districts in the country, 370 do not have functional SAAs, a necessary legal requirement under the Juvenile Justice Act.

The SAAs prepare the home study report of the prospective adoptive parents and after finding them eligible, refers a child declared legally free for adoption to them along with the child study report and the medical report of the child.

The bench also asked the states and the UTs to provide the latest data by April 7 to the Union ministry of women and child development on setting up of SAAs and the number of adoptions, saying that it wanted to know whether the court orders have made any difference on the ground or not.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre, said the states should be asked to provide the data to the Union ministry for effective implementation of the court orders meant to smoothen the adoption procedure.

“All states and Union Territories are peremptorily directed to ensure that within every district falling within their jurisdiction, SAAs as required by the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, shall be set up by 31 January 2024,” the bench had directed on November 20 last year.

The top court had earlier said the child adoption process in India is 'very tedious' and that there is an urgent need for the procedure to be streamlined.

The apex court was hearing a PIL by 'The Temple of Healing' which sought simplification of the legal process for child adoption in India, saying only 4,000 adoptions take place annually in the country.

 
&nbsp;

According to the recent affidavit filed by the director of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) in the Supreme Court, a total of 15,536 children and youth of both genders up to the age of 18 years were adopted in 11 states between 2021 and 2023 under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA).

According to the recent affidavit filed by the director of the Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) in the Supreme Court, a total of 15,536 children and youth of both genders up to the age of 18 years were adopted in 11 states between 2021 and 2023 under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act (HAMA). The parents adopted 9,474 girls in comparison to 6,012 boys during this period, indicating a rise in the number of adoptions for girls. The CARA is a statutory body of the Union ministry of women and child development and works as the nodal agency for the adoption of children in the country. It is mandated to monitor and regulate in-country and inter-country adoptions. There is no such trend but more girls are abandoned so that is why availability is high for adoption, the experts told PTI. Also Read | Kashmir: Sales of dates surge during Ramadan, becoming most sold food item this month Availability of more girl children results in their more adoption, said Bharti Ali, co-founder and the executive director of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights. “This (rise) may be because there are more girls available, more daughters are dumped,” she said. Child rights activist Enakshi Ganguly concurred with Ali’s views and said, “That's because more girls are abandoned or surrendered and, hence, more (are) available for adoption.” CARA, in its affidavit, gave details of the children falling under five categories -- orphan, abandoned, surrendered, unfit parents and non-visitation -- who are available for adoptions in the country, according to the data provided by certain states. A total number of 20,673 children (under the age group of 7-11 years and 12-18 years) have been identified so far in the states and Union Territories (UTs) during an identification drive comprising the five categories, it said. Also Read | Indian woman gives birth on moving train. This is what happened next Ten states and UTs -- Arunachal Pradesh, Bihar, Jammu Kashmir, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Ladakh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Manipur -- have not provided the data on total adoptions during the period. In Punjab, a total of 7,496 adoptions were registered under the HAMA. Out of them, 4,966 were girls and 2,530 were boys. In Telangana, the couples preferred male children for adoption under the HAMA. The top court, on March 15, voiced displeasure over the failure to set up Specialised Adoption Agencies (SAAs) meant to streamline the adoption process of abandoned and surrendered children in 370 districts across the country. It warned the states and UTs of 'coercive steps' for non-compliance of its directions. Watch | ISIS India Head Haris Farooqi & his associates arrested in Dhubri district, Assam × It lamented that out of 760 districts in the country, 370 do not have functional SAAs, a necessary legal requirement under the Juvenile Justice Act. The SAAs prepare the home study report of the prospective adoptive parents and after finding them eligible, refers a child declared legally free for adoption to them along with the child study report and the medical report of the child. The bench also asked the states and the UTs to provide the latest data by April 7 to the Union ministry of women and child development on setting up of SAAs and the number of adoptions, saying that it wanted to know whether the court orders have made any difference on the ground or not. Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre, said the states should be asked to provide the data to the Union ministry for effective implementation of the court orders meant to smoothen the adoption procedure. “All states and Union Territories are peremptorily directed to ensure that within every district falling within their jurisdiction, SAAs as required by the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, shall be set up by 31 January 2024,” the bench had directed on November 20 last year. The top court had earlier said the child adoption process in India is 'very tedious' and that there is an urgent need for the procedure to be streamlined. The apex court was hearing a PIL by 'The Temple of Healing' which sought simplification of the legal process for child adoption in India, saying only 4,000 adoptions take place annually in the country.

India: More girls abandoned than boys, leading to rise in their adoptions, child rights activists tell SC

The US Supreme Court is addressing a dispute between Republican States and the Biden Administration. The case is regarding government intervention in social media content related to covid-19 and election security. Watch to know more!

US Supreme court hears argument on free speech & social media

The Supreme Court has taken action on Tuesday regarding petitions requesting a stay on the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, setting April 9 as the next hearing date. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, requested time to address the 20 applications seeking a stay on the CAA Rules until the apex court resolves petitions challenging the Act's constitutional validity.

<h2>No stay on citizenship grant amidst petitioners' appeals</h2>

Despite some petitioners urging for stay, there is currently no halt on the grant of citizenship. Mehta clarified to the bench, headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, that the CAA does not revoke anyone's citizenship.

The Centre notified the CAA rules on March 11, four years post its passage in Parliament. The Act aims to provide Indian citizenship to persecuted non-Muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014.

Various opposition parties have criticised the CAA, labelling it 'discriminatory,' 'communal,' and 'anti-constitutional.' However, the Modi government asserts that the Act does not infringe upon anyone's citizenship rights. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has reiterated multiple times that the Act is not designed to revoke the rights of any citizen and provides relief to persecuted non-Muslim minorities from neighboring countries.

Also watch |&nbsp;CAA implemented: SC denies stay on CAA implementation, seeks Centre's response

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/caa-implemented-sc-denies-stay-on-caa-implementation-seeks-centres-response-701871/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Government's justification for CAA</h2>

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo">Shah, in an interview with ANI, emphasised that the CAA aims to alleviate the suffering of persecuted non-Muslim migrants by offering them Indian citizenship. He clarified that the law is intended to assist Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis, and Christians who fled religious persecution in their home countries.</div>

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-is-caa-how-it-fastracks-citizenship-of-religious-minorities-from-parts-of-south-asia-699036">Also read |&nbsp;What is CAA? How it fast-tracks Indian citizenship of religious minorities from South Asian nations</a>

As the Supreme Court awaits the government's response, the debate surrounding the CAA continues. While the government argues for the Act's humanitarian intent, critics raise concerns about its implications on India's secular fabric.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court has taken action on Tuesday regarding petitions requesting a stay on the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, setting April 9 as the next hearing date.

The Supreme Court has taken action on Tuesday regarding petitions requesting a stay on the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, setting April 9 as the next hearing date. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, requested time to address the 20 applications seeking a stay on the CAA Rules until the apex court resolves petitions challenging the Act's constitutional validity. No stay on citizenship grant amidst petitioners' appeals Despite some petitioners urging for stay, there is currently no halt on the grant of citizenship. Mehta clarified to the bench, headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, that the CAA does not revoke anyone's citizenship. The Centre notified the CAA rules on March 11, four years post its passage in Parliament. The Act aims to provide Indian citizenship to persecuted non-Muslim migrants from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014. Various opposition parties have criticised the CAA, labelling it 'discriminatory,' 'communal,' and 'anti-constitutional.' However, the Modi government asserts that the Act does not infringe upon anyone's citizenship rights. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has reiterated multiple times that the Act is not designed to revoke the rights of any citizen and provides relief to persecuted non-Muslim minorities from neighboring countries. Also watch | CAA implemented: SC denies stay on CAA implementation, seeks Centre's response Government's justification for CAA Shah, in an interview with ANI, emphasised that the CAA aims to alleviate the suffering of persecuted non-Muslim migrants by offering them Indian citizenship. He clarified that the law is intended to assist Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis, and Christians who fled religious persecution in their home countries. Also read | What is CAA? How it fast-tracks Indian citizenship of religious minorities from South Asian nations As the Supreme Court awaits the government's response, the debate surrounding the CAA continues. While the government argues for the Act's humanitarian intent, critics raise concerns about its implications on India's secular fabric. (With inputs from agencies)

India’s Supreme Court seeks central govt’s response to pleas calling for stay on CAA rules

The Supreme Court has directed the State Bank of India (SBI) to disclose all details related to electoral bonds that allowed individuals and companies to make donations to political parties. Watch in for more details!

India: Supreme Court orders full disclosure of information held by SBI

India's Top Court while hearing the Electoral bonds case today said that it wanted all information related to electoral bonds which are in SBI's possession to be disclosed. Watch to know more!

Electoral Bonds Data: India's Supreme Court orders full disclosure of information held by SBI

India's Home Minister Amit Shah, speaking about the Supreme Court's order on electoral bonds, said that he fully respects the order but added that the purpose of introducing the scheme was to put an end to the flow of black money in politics and added that it should have been improved and not scrapped.

India's Home Minister Amit Shah, speaking about the Supreme Court's order on electoral bonds, said that he fully respects the order but added that the purpose of introducing the scheme was to put an end to the flow of black money in politics and added that it should have been improved and not scrapped. "Electoral bonds were introduced to end the influence of black money in Indian politics. Everyone has to accept the decision given by the Supreme Court. I fully respect the Supreme Court decision. But I feel that instead of completely scrapping the electoral bonds, it should have been improved," Shah said while speaking at the India Today Conclave. Shah also touched upon the issue of ''One Nation, One Election" saying that it is a concept which has been brought by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led BJP and when implemented will ensure the country's faster development and put an end to recurring expenditure. Amit Shah accuses Congress of mismanaging political donations Speaking about the Congress, Shah said that the opposition party leaders have been accepting cash donations in the name of the party but pocket almost the entire amount. "The Congress party has run this system for years," the home minister alleged. Also Read: Lok Sabha Election 2024: PM pens letter to country, says 'Our partnership a decade, confident will continue' Shah stated that there have been claims of the electoral bonds benefiting the BJP whereas the truth is that the system has also been beneficial for other parties too. "I want to make my stance clear about it. Out of the total Rs 200,000 million electoral bonds, the BJP has got approximately Rs 60,000 million. Where did the rest of the bonds go? TMC has got Rs 16,000 million, Congress got Rs 14,000 million, BRS got Rs 12,000 million, BJD got Rs 7500 million and DMK got Rs 6390 million," Shah said. "We have got Rs 60,000 million despite having 303 MPs and the rest got Rs 140,000 million against 242 MPs. What is the hue and cry about? I can say that once the accounts are settled they will not be able to face questions from you all," the home minister added. 'One Nation, One Election' proposed to stop repeated expenditure: Shah Speaking about the 'One Nation, One Election' proposal, Shah said that a large amount of money is spent on conducting elections since the polls take place many times across the nation. He said that because of the imposition of the Model Code of Conduct, the government's decision-making gets adversely affected because of which development work is stalled. Watch: CAA becomes a reality: How will it impact the elections? "The idea of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP behind one nation, one election is that elections are held again and again in this country and the people are busy in elections and this leads to repeated expenditure," said the home minister. "Due to the model code of conduct, many development works come to a halt. One nation, one election is a solution for this," he added. (With inputs from agencies)

India's Home Minister Amit Shah reacts to SC's order on electoral bonds, says 'fully respect but...'

The Election Commission of India has revealed fresh data on the financial transactions of political parties through the now-quashed electoral bonds scheme. Reports suggest that the disclosed data encompassed crucial details such as the issuance dates, number of bonds, denominations, and the respective State Bank of India (SBI) branches involved in the transactions.&nbsp;

Additionally, it also includes the dates of receipt and crediting into the respective parties' bank accounts. However, even the new data does not contain any information on the electoral bond numbers. The election commission had provided this latest disclosed information to the SC in sealed envelopes with the poll body not retaining any.

Also&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-bjp-under-pm-modi-deploys-artificial-intelligence-to-break-language-barrier-701053">Lok Sabha Elections 2024: BJP under PM Modi deploys Artificial Intelligence to break language barrier</a>

Each electoral bond issued by the State Bank of India reportedly bears a distinctive alphanumeric code, visible only under certain lighting conditions. This code serves as a means to associate each donation with the corresponding political party that receives it, forming a link between the donors and recipients.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/telangana-cm-launches-scathing-attack-against-brs-and-bjp-over-kavithas-arrest-calls-it-serial-drama-700937">Telangana CM launches scathing attack against BRS and BJP over Kavitha's arrest, calls it 'serial drama</a>

Earlier, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, leading a five-judge bench, questioned the SBI's reluctance to disclose the individual bond numbers. The court reiterated its earlier directive for full transparency and urged for disclosing all pertinent details, including bond numbers.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/lok-sabha-elections-election-commission-announces-poll-dates-leaders-react-to-date-announcement-701065">Lok Sabha Elections: Election Commission announces poll dates, leaders react to date announcement</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/lok-sabha-elections-election-commission-announces-poll-dates-leaders-react-to-date-announcement-701065/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Earlier, the State Bank Of India had requested an extension to submit electoral bond data until June 30, however, the Supreme Court had dismissed it. The unveiling of the electoral bond details coincided with the announcement of the dates for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, scheduled to take place in seven phases from April 19 to June 1, with results expected on June 4.

According to the State Bank of India, a total of 22,217 electoral bonds were purchased and 22,030 were redeemed by political parties between April 1, 2019, and February 15, 2024.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Election Commission of India has revealed fresh data on the financial transactions of political parties through the now-quashed electoral bonds scheme. Reports suggest that the disclosed data encompassed crucial details such as the issuance dates, number of bonds, denominations, and the respective State Bank of India (SBI) branches involved in the transactions.

The Election Commission of India has revealed fresh data on the financial transactions of political parties through the now-quashed electoral bonds scheme. Reports suggest that the disclosed data encompassed crucial details such as the issuance dates, number of bonds, denominations, and the respective State Bank of India (SBI) branches involved in the transactions. Additionally, it also includes the dates of receipt and crediting into the respective parties' bank accounts. However, even the new data does not contain any information on the electoral bond numbers. The election commission had provided this latest disclosed information to the SC in sealed envelopes with the poll body not retaining any. Also Lok Sabha Elections 2024: BJP under PM Modi deploys Artificial Intelligence to break language barrier Each electoral bond issued by the State Bank of India reportedly bears a distinctive alphanumeric code, visible only under certain lighting conditions. This code serves as a means to associate each donation with the corresponding political party that receives it, forming a link between the donors and recipients. Also Read | Telangana CM launches scathing attack against BRS and BJP over Kavitha's arrest, calls it 'serial drama Earlier, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, leading a five-judge bench, questioned the SBI's reluctance to disclose the individual bond numbers. The court reiterated its earlier directive for full transparency and urged for disclosing all pertinent details, including bond numbers. Watch | Lok Sabha Elections: Election Commission announces poll dates, leaders react to date announcement × Earlier, the State Bank Of India had requested an extension to submit electoral bond data until June 30, however, the Supreme Court had dismissed it. The unveiling of the electoral bond details coincided with the announcement of the dates for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, scheduled to take place in seven phases from April 19 to June 1, with results expected on June 4. According to the State Bank of India, a total of 22,217 electoral bonds were purchased and 22,030 were redeemed by political parties between April 1, 2019, and February 15, 2024. (With inputs from agencies)

Election Commission of India reveals fresh data on electoral bonds

Following directives from the Indian Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has uploaded the electoral bonds data on its website. In adherence to the court's orders dated February 15 and March 11, 2024, the State Bank of India (SBI) provided the data to the ECI on March 12, 2024.

The ECI confirmed that the data was uploaded "as is where is basis" on its website. This comes as the Chairman of SBI filed a compliance affidavit on Wednesday (Mar 13), informing the Supreme Court about furnishing the electoral bonds details to the election commission.

“In compliance of Hon’ble Supreme Court's directions, contained in its order dated Feb 15 &amp; March 11, 2024 (in the matter of WPC NO.880 of 2017), the State Bank of India (SBI) had provided the data pertaining to the electoral bonds to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on March 12, 2024," the commission said in a statement on Thursday (Mar 14)

"The Election Commission of India has today uploaded the data on electoral bonds on its website as received from SBI on “as is where is basis". The data as received from SBI can be accessed at this url: https://www.eci.gov.in/candidate-politicalparty It may be recalled that in the said matter, ECI has consistently and categorically weighed in favour of disclosure and transparency, a position reflected in the proceedings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and noted in the order also," it added.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-tmc-releases-mamata-banerjees-hospital-pictures-after-major-head-injury-700148">Lok Sabha Elections 2024: TMC releases Mamata Banerjee's hospital pictures after major head injury</a>

The affidavit submitted by the SBI chairman stated that the bank has provided details of “the date of purchase, denomination and name of buyer were recorded, and [in relation to the political parties] the date of encashment and the denominations of the bonds encashed were recorded”.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/supreme-court-calls-out-ajit-pawar-faction-for-using-sharad-pawars-images-stick-to-your-identity-700127">Supreme Court calls out Ajit Pawar faction for using Sharad Pawar's images; 'stick to your identity'</a>

The data covers bonds purchased and redeemed between April 12, 2019, and February 15, 2024. The electoral bonds data was transferred to the ECI on a pen drive with two password-protected PDF documents, along with a separate envelope containing the passwords and a letter addressed to Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar.

<h2>What are electoral bonds?&nbsp;</h2>

Electoral bonds were introduced in 2017 by the Indian government as a means for individuals and organisations to donate money to political parties anonymously.&nbsp;These bonds are similar to promissory notes, allowing donors to purchase them from authorised banks.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-elections-2024-indian-politicians-and-their-superstitions-700122">India Elections 2024: Indian politicians and their superstitions</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-elections-2024-indian-politicians-and-their-superstitions-700122/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The donor can then donate these bonds to the political party of their choice, which can encash them through designated bank accounts.&nbsp;The failure to cash the amount within 15 days resulted in the donation being deposited into the Prime Minister's Relief Fund.

(With inputs from agencies)

Following directives from the Indian Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has uploaded the electoral bonds data on its website. In adherence to the court's orders dated February 15 and March 11, 2024, the State Bank of India (SBI) provided the data to the ECI on March 12, 2024.

Following directives from the Indian Supreme Court, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has uploaded the electoral bonds data on its website. In adherence to the court's orders dated February 15 and March 11, 2024, the State Bank of India (SBI) provided the data to the ECI on March 12, 2024. The ECI confirmed that the data was uploaded "as is where is basis" on its website. This comes as the Chairman of SBI filed a compliance affidavit on Wednesday (Mar 13), informing the Supreme Court about furnishing the electoral bonds details to the election commission. “In compliance of Hon’ble Supreme Court's directions, contained in its order dated Feb 15 & March 11, 2024 (in the matter of WPC NO.880 of 2017), the State Bank of India (SBI) had provided the data pertaining to the electoral bonds to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on March 12, 2024," the commission said in a statement on Thursday (Mar 14) "The Election Commission of India has today uploaded the data on electoral bonds on its website as received from SBI on “as is where is basis". The data as received from SBI can be accessed at this url: https://www.eci.gov.in/candidate-politicalparty It may be recalled that in the said matter, ECI has consistently and categorically weighed in favour of disclosure and transparency, a position reflected in the proceedings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court and noted in the order also," it added. Also Read | Lok Sabha Elections 2024: TMC releases Mamata Banerjee's hospital pictures after major head injury The affidavit submitted by the SBI chairman stated that the bank has provided details of “the date of purchase, denomination and name of buyer were recorded, and [in relation to the political parties] the date of encashment and the denominations of the bonds encashed were recorded”. Also Read | Supreme Court calls out Ajit Pawar faction for using Sharad Pawar's images; 'stick to your identity' The data covers bonds purchased and redeemed between April 12, 2019, and February 15, 2024. The electoral bonds data was transferred to the ECI on a pen drive with two password-protected PDF documents, along with a separate envelope containing the passwords and a letter addressed to Chief Election Commissioner Rajiv Kumar. What are electoral bonds? Electoral bonds were introduced in 2017 by the Indian government as a means for individuals and organisations to donate money to political parties anonymously. These bonds are similar to promissory notes, allowing donors to purchase them from authorised banks. Watch | India Elections 2024: Indian politicians and their superstitions × The donor can then donate these bonds to the political party of their choice, which can encash them through designated bank accounts. The failure to cash the amount within 15 days resulted in the donation being deposited into the Prime Minister's Relief Fund. (With inputs from agencies)

India: Election Commission publishes electoral bonds data on its website following Supreme Court order

The Indian Supreme Court set aside the conviction of two Tamil Nadu teachers in a sexual harassment case, according to media reports on Monday (Mar 11). A report by ETV Bharat said that one of the two teachers was the main accused in the case and was convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO).

The Indian Supreme Court set aside the conviction of two Tamil Nadu teachers in a sexual harassment case, according to media reports on Monday (Mar 11). A report by ETV Bharat said that one of the two teachers was the main accused in the case and was convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO). The second teacher was charged with criminal intimidation. A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court comprising justices Dipankar Datta, K V Viswanathan, and Sandeep Mehta said that it agreed with the submissions of the senior counsel of Tamil Nadu that an act of sexual harassment of a girl student who is also a minor by "any teacher would figure quite high on the list of offences of grave nature since it has far-reaching consequences, which impact more than just the parties to the proceeding." The bench said that the two teachers were behind bars and should be immediately released from custody. What is the case about? In 2018, on the occasion of Valentine's Day (February 14), the main accused teacher entered a classroom, approached a minor female student and forcefully presented her with flowers and chocolates in the presence of other students. The report said that despite the student's refusal to accept the offerings, the teacher resorted to twisting her arm, forcing her to accept the items. Later on the same day, the victim was called by another teacher in the school. This teacher asked her why she was refusing to talk to the teacher who presented her with flowers and chocolates. He said that if the victim continued to not talk to the first teacher, he (the teacher who gave gifts) would die and she would be held responsible. The convictions Both the teachers were convicted in 2021. They moved the Supreme Court challenging the Madras High Court judgment passed in November 2022, which dismissed their plea seeking relief in the case. The ETV report said that in November 2021, a special court convicted the main accused teacher under section 12 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him to three years of rigorous imprisonment. The second teacher, meanwhile, was convicted under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment. The Supreme Court bench said on Monday that the right to live a life of dignity and personal liberty was not supposed to be jeopardised based on half-baked evidence. Justice Datta said that it was axiomatic that a teacher earns a reputation upon rendering service over the years and an accusation like this becomes an indelible mark marring his entire future life. The bench said it was inclined to deem that this case was unsuitable for securing a conviction under section 11 read with section 12 of the POCSO Act, as there were enough missing links to extend the benefit of the doubt to the main accused. As for the second teacher, the bench said, "As regards A-2, we do not consider that the prosecution was successful in proving that the conduct of A-2 was a case of criminal intimidation punishable under section 506 of IPC; his conviction, too, is also liable to be set aside." (With inputs from agencies)

How a bunch of flowers and chocolates landed a teacher in sexual harassment case in India's Tamil Nadu

The Ajit Pawar faction was on Thursday (March 14) questioned by the Supreme Court over&nbsp;using veteran leader Sharad Pawar's images for campaigning.

Officially recognised as the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Ajit Pawar group was asked to file an undertaking by a bench of Justices Surya Kant and KV Viswanathan that they would neither directly nor indirectly use the name of Sharad Pawar.

It also suggested the Ajit Pawar group to use a symbol other than the 'clock' for elections so that there is no confusion.

The bench told counsel appearing for Ajit Pawar faction, "You are a different political party now. You have chosen not to be with him. Now stick to this. Why to use his (Sharad Pawar) picture... Go with your own identity now..."

The top court further issued a notice to the Ajit Pawar faction seeking reply by March 16 on an application filed by the Sharad Pawar group over 'misuse' of name, and pictures in order to appeal to voters.

The Supreme Court fixed the date&nbsp;for further hearing on the application for&nbsp;March 19.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/one-nation-one-election-here-are-the-recommendations-ram-nath-kovind-panel-made-in-its-report-699965">'One nation, one election': Ram Nath Kovind panel puts forward recommendations in its report</a>

During the hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who was appearing for the Sharad Pawar faction told the bench about the posters that were on display by the Ajit Pawar faction with the 'clock' symbol and an image of Sharad Pawar.

"This is blatant patent deception, riding piggyback on my goodwill," Singhvi said.&nbsp;

He then claimed, "Democracy, fair and free elections, are part of the basic structure. If they are so confident to win the elections, then let them do that on their own."

To this, Justice Kant questioned senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for the Ajit Pawar group as to why the faction was using Sharad Pawar's photographs. "If you are so confident, then use your photographs," the court said.

Singh responded claiming that this wasn't done by the party but by some stray members.

The bench told Singh, "Then who is responsible? You give an undertaking that you will stop all your members from using his (Sharad Pawar) photo... It is for you to control your workers."

"We need a categorical and unconditional undertaking that the name and pictures of Sharad Pawar will not be used," the bench further said.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Ajit Pawar faction was on Thursday (March 14) questioned by the Supreme Court over using veteran leader Sharad Pawar's images for campaigning. Officially recognised as the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Ajit Pawar group was asked to file an undertaking by a bench of Justices Surya Kant and KV Viswanathan that they would neither directly nor indirectly use the name of Sharad Pawar.

The Ajit Pawar faction was on Thursday (March 14) questioned by the Supreme Court over using veteran leader Sharad Pawar's images for campaigning. Officially recognised as the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Ajit Pawar group was asked to file an undertaking by a bench of Justices Surya Kant and KV Viswanathan that they would neither directly nor indirectly use the name of Sharad Pawar. It also suggested the Ajit Pawar group to use a symbol other than the 'clock' for elections so that there is no confusion. The bench told counsel appearing for Ajit Pawar faction, "You are a different political party now. You have chosen not to be with him. Now stick to this. Why to use his (Sharad Pawar) picture... Go with your own identity now..." The top court further issued a notice to the Ajit Pawar faction seeking reply by March 16 on an application filed by the Sharad Pawar group over 'misuse' of name, and pictures in order to appeal to voters. The Supreme Court fixed the date for further hearing on the application for March 19. Also read: 'One nation, one election': Ram Nath Kovind panel puts forward recommendations in its report During the hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who was appearing for the Sharad Pawar faction told the bench about the posters that were on display by the Ajit Pawar faction with the 'clock' symbol and an image of Sharad Pawar. "This is blatant patent deception, riding piggyback on my goodwill," Singhvi said. He then claimed, "Democracy, fair and free elections, are part of the basic structure. If they are so confident to win the elections, then let them do that on their own." To this, Justice Kant questioned senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for the Ajit Pawar group as to why the faction was using Sharad Pawar's photographs. "If you are so confident, then use your photographs," the court said. Singh responded claiming that this wasn't done by the party but by some stray members. The bench told Singh, "Then who is responsible? You give an undertaking that you will stop all your members from using his (Sharad Pawar) photo... It is for you to control your workers." "We need a categorical and unconditional undertaking that the name and pictures of Sharad Pawar will not be used," the bench further said. (With inputs from agencies)

'Stick to your identity': Supreme Court pulls up Ajit Pawar faction for using Sharad Pawar's images

The State Bank of India (SBI) diligently submitted electoral bond data to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday (March 12), as mandated by a stern directive from the Supreme Court.

The Chairman and Managing Director of the bank also provided an affidavit, affirming their adherence to the court's order.

This crucial information, pertaining to electoral bonds, will be compiled and disclosed by the poll panel before 5 pm on Friday (March 15), in accordance with the court's specific timeline.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-sc-rejects-sbis-electoral-bond-disclosure-extension-plea-asks-eci-to-publish-details-by-march-15-698888" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-sc-rejects-sbis-electoral-bond-disclosure-extension-plea-asks-eci-to-publish-details-by-march-15-698888&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiQn9Og7u6EAxX7wzgGHTe2AnsQFnoECAkQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw18jMHiZA_6l1HQFhrzre92&amp;arm=e" dir="ltr" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-sc-rejects-sbis-electoral-bond-disclosure-extension-plea-asks-eci-to-publish-details-by-march-15-698888" target="_blank">India: SC rejects&nbsp;SBI's&nbsp;electoral bond disclosure extension plea</a>

The SBI has issued Electoral Bonds worth Rs 16,518 crore in 30 tranches since the inception of the scheme in 2018.

The Supreme Court on Monday (March 11), dismissed SBI's plea seeking an extension of the March 6 deadline for releasing the data.

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, leading the bench, expressed strong disapproval of the bank's willful disobedience of orders and issued a warning of contempt proceedings if the stipulated deadline was not met.

While refraining from immediate contempt jurisdiction, the court emphasised that the SBI must comply with the specified directions and timelines, cautioning that contempt proceedings might ensue otherwise.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/indias-sbi-urges-supreme-court-for-electoral-bond-data-extension-until-june-30-696669" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/indias-sbi-urges-supreme-court-for-electoral-bond-data-extension-until-june-30-696669&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiQn9Og7u6EAxX7wzgGHTe2AnsQFnoECAAQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw0tD5Me0Uj1EkHCHZh2D6KO&amp;arm=e" dir="ltr" href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/indias-sbi-urges-supreme-court-for-electoral-bond-data-extension-until-june-30-696669" target="_blank">India's&nbsp;SBI&nbsp;urges Supreme Court for electoral bond data extension</a>

The bank had argued that the process of collecting, cross-checking, and releasing the data, stored in two confidential silos, required more time. It pleaded for an extension until June 30, well beyond the general election.

In response, the Supreme Court pointed out that donor details were accessible at the SBI's Mumbai branch and asserted that the bank merely needed to "open covers, collate details, and provide information."

In a landmark verdict last month, the Supreme Court declared the electoral bond scheme unconstitutional, citing a violation of citizens' right to information. The SBI had been specifically directed to disclose the data by March 6, with the Election Commission slated to make this information public by March 13.

Watch:&nbsp;Electoral Bonds Case: Indian Supreme Court rejects SBI's plea

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/electoral-bonds-case-indian-supreme-court-rejects-sbis-plea-699032/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The recent developments underscore the judiciary's commitment to ensuring transparency and compliance with legal directives in the electoral process.

Introduced as an alternative to cash contributions to political parties, electoral bonds were intended to improve transparency in political funding.

These bonds were designed to be exclusively redeemed by eligible political parties through a designated bank account, with the State Bank of India (SBI) being the sole authorised bank for issuing such bonds.

(With inputs from agencies)

The State Bank of India (SBI) diligently submitted electoral bond data to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday (March 12), as mandated by a stern directive from the Supreme Court.

The State Bank of India (SBI) diligently submitted electoral bond data to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on Tuesday (March 12), as mandated by a stern directive from the Supreme Court. The Chairman and Managing Director of the bank also provided an affidavit, affirming their adherence to the court's order. This crucial information, pertaining to electoral bonds, will be compiled and disclosed by the poll panel before 5 pm on Friday (March 15), in accordance with the court's specific timeline. Also read: India: SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea The SBI has issued Electoral Bonds worth Rs 16,518 crore in 30 tranches since the inception of the scheme in 2018. The Supreme Court on Monday (March 11), dismissed SBI's plea seeking an extension of the March 6 deadline for releasing the data. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, leading the bench, expressed strong disapproval of the bank's willful disobedience of orders and issued a warning of contempt proceedings if the stipulated deadline was not met. While refraining from immediate contempt jurisdiction, the court emphasised that the SBI must comply with the specified directions and timelines, cautioning that contempt proceedings might ensue otherwise. Also read: India's SBI urges Supreme Court for electoral bond data extension The bank had argued that the process of collecting, cross-checking, and releasing the data, stored in two confidential silos, required more time. It pleaded for an extension until June 30, well beyond the general election. In response, the Supreme Court pointed out that donor details were accessible at the SBI's Mumbai branch and asserted that the bank merely needed to "open covers, collate details, and provide information." In a landmark verdict last month, the Supreme Court declared the electoral bond scheme unconstitutional, citing a violation of citizens' right to information. The SBI had been specifically directed to disclose the data by March 6, with the Election Commission slated to make this information public by March 13. Watch: Electoral Bonds Case: Indian Supreme Court rejects SBI's plea × The recent developments underscore the judiciary's commitment to ensuring transparency and compliance with legal directives in the electoral process. Introduced as an alternative to cash contributions to political parties, electoral bonds were intended to improve transparency in political funding. These bonds were designed to be exclusively redeemed by eligible political parties through a designated bank account, with the State Bank of India (SBI) being the sole authorised bank for issuing such bonds. (With inputs from agencies)

SBI submits electoral bonds data to Election Commission following Indian SC's censure

The daughter of a cook in the Indian Supreme Court was felicitated by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud for securing a scholarship to study master's in law at two different universities in the United States. Supreme Court cook Ajay Kumar Samal's meritorious daughter Pragya was handed the Indian Constitution book signed by all the Supreme Court judges.

The Chief Justice also honoured Pragya's mother and father.&nbsp;

A top court official said it is a matter of pride for all Supreme Court officials.&nbsp;

<h2>Supreme Court judges give standing ovation to Pragya</h2>

Supreme Court judges gathered at the judges' lounge to commend Pragya, a law researcher associated with the Supreme Court's Centre for Research and Planning (CPR), along with her parents.&nbsp;

Also watch |&nbsp;Article 370: CJI says there are three judgements by the 5-judge bench on the issue

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/article-370-cji-says-there-are-three-judgements-by-the-5-judge-bench-on-the-issue-668390/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The judges, before commencing the day's proceedings, stood in ovation to acknowledge Pragya's dedication and achievements.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) then presented Pragya with three books on the Indian Constitution signed by every judge of the highest court, and gave shawls to her parents.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and other Supreme Court judges today felicitated the daughter of a cook in the Supreme Court, for scoring a scholarship to study masters in law in two different universities in the United States. 
 
CJI also honoured her mother and father, Ajay… <a href="https://t.co/VgWqbQ0ZOQ">pic.twitter.com/VgWqbQ0ZOQ</a>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1767898977700123038?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 13, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"It is not just the responsibility of the government but also the citizens to ensure that every child, who wants to do higher studies or excel in sports, can achieve their dreams," the CJI remarked, according to the Press Trust of India, which captured the heartwarming moment in the judges' lounge.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/to-marry-or-not-to-marry-an-analysis-of-the-same-sex-marriage-judgment-648831">To marry or not to marry: An analysis of Indian Supreme Court's same-sex marriage judgment</a>

Pragya received well-wishes from other judges for her future endeavours, who congratulated her on receiving admission offers from law schools such as Columbia Law School, Chicago Law School, and Michigan Law School.

Pragya singled out Justice Chandrachud for inspiring her. "He encourages young lawyers, and his words are like gems. He is my inspiration," she remarked, moved by the support and encouragement from the judiciary.

(With inputs from agencies)

The daughter of a cook in the Indian Supreme Court was felicitated by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud for securing a scholarship to study master's in law at two different universities in the United States.

The daughter of a cook in the Indian Supreme Court was felicitated by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud for securing a scholarship to study master's in law at two different universities in the United States. Supreme Court cook Ajay Kumar Samal's meritorious daughter Pragya was handed the Indian Constitution book signed by all the Supreme Court judges. The Chief Justice also honoured Pragya's mother and father. A top court official said it is a matter of pride for all Supreme Court officials. Supreme Court judges give standing ovation to Pragya Supreme Court judges gathered at the judges' lounge to commend Pragya, a law researcher associated with the Supreme Court's Centre for Research and Planning (CPR), along with her parents. Also watch | Article 370: CJI says there are three judgements by the 5-judge bench on the issue × The judges, before commencing the day's proceedings, stood in ovation to acknowledge Pragya's dedication and achievements. Chief Justice of India (CJI) then presented Pragya with three books on the Indian Constitution signed by every judge of the highest court, and gave shawls to her parents. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and other Supreme Court judges today felicitated the daughter of a cook in the Supreme Court, for scoring a scholarship to study masters in law in two different universities in the United States. CJI also honoured her mother and father, Ajay… pic.twitter.com/VgWqbQ0ZOQ — ANI (@ANI) March 13, 2024 × "It is not just the responsibility of the government but also the citizens to ensure that every child, who wants to do higher studies or excel in sports, can achieve their dreams," the CJI remarked, according to the Press Trust of India, which captured the heartwarming moment in the judges' lounge. Also read | To marry or not to marry: An analysis of Indian Supreme Court's same-sex marriage judgment Pragya received well-wishes from other judges for her future endeavours, who congratulated her on receiving admission offers from law schools such as Columbia Law School, Chicago Law School, and Michigan Law School. Pragya singled out Justice Chandrachud for inspiring her. "He encourages young lawyers, and his words are like gems. He is my inspiration," she remarked, moved by the support and encouragement from the judiciary. (With inputs from agencies)

Chief Justice of India honours meritorious daughter of Supreme Court cook

The Indian Supreme Court, on Monday (Mar 11) will hear an application filed by the State Bank of India (SBI), seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month.

<h2>Constitutional bench</h2>

A five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, B. R. Gavai, J. B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, is set to convene today (Monday, Mar 11) at 10:30 am to deliberate on two petitions.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-sc-rejects-sbis-electoral-bond-disclosure-extension-plea-asks-eci-to-publish-details-by-march-15-698888">India: SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea; asks ECI to publish details by March 15</a>

Along with SBI's plea seeking extension, the bench will also consider a separate plea, requesting the initiation of contempt action against the SBI. This plea alleges that SBI "wilfully and deliberately" disobeyed the apex court's direction to submit details of contributions made to political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission by March 6.

<h2>The scrapping of electoral bonds</h2>

In a significant ruling on February 15, a five-judge Constitution Bench invalidated the central government's electoral bonds scheme, which permitted anonymous political funding, deeming it "unconstitutional." The court also mandated disclosure by the Election Commission of the donors, their donation amounts, and the recipients by March 13.

Subsequently, the top court directed the SBI, the designated financial institution under the scheme, to furnish details of electoral bonds purchased from April 12, 2019, to date to the Election Commission by March 6. The Commission was instructed to publish this information on its official website by March 13.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-president-accepts-resignation-tendered-by-election-commissioner-arun-goel-ahead-of-lok-sabha-polls-698380">India: Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigns ahead of Lok Sabha polls, president accepts resignation</a>

However, as per news agency PTI, on March 4, the SBI petitioned the apex court for an extension until June 30 to disclose the details of electoral bonds encashed by political parties. The bank argued that retrieving information from "each silo" and "decoding" electoral bonds and matching donors to donations due to stringent anonymity measures would be a time-consuming exercise.

The data pertaining to bond issuance and redemption were maintained separately to safeguard donor anonymity.

<h2>SBI's 'mala fide' application</h2>

A subsequent petition was lodged seeking contempt proceedings against the SBI for allegedly flouting the apex court's directives. The petitioners, NGOs Association for Democratic Reforms and Common Cause, accused the SBI of filing the extension application at the eleventh hour to prevent public disclosure of donor details before the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.

"It is submitted that the said application is mala fide and demonstrates a wilful and deliberate disobedience &amp; defiance of the judgement passed by the constitution bench of this court. It is further a clear attempt to undermine the authority of this court," it alleged.

"The petitioner herein is filing the instant petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against State Bank of India for wilfully and deliberately disobeying the order dated February 15 passed by this court … wherein this court directed SBI to submit details of contribution made to the political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission of India by March 6," said the contempt plea.

The plea asserted that electoral bonds are "completely traceable", as evidenced by the SBI's maintenance of donor records. It contended that any form of anonymity in political party finances contradicts the principles of participatory democracy and the public's right to information, as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Access to information about electoral bonds, the petition argued, would empower voters to scrutinise, express, and make informed decisions regarding their choices.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Indian Supreme Court, on Monday (Mar 11) will hear an application filed by the State Bank of India (SBI), seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month.

The Indian Supreme Court, on Monday (Mar 11) will hear an application filed by the State Bank of India (SBI), seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month. Constitutional bench A five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, B. R. Gavai, J. B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, is set to convene today (Monday, Mar 11) at 10:30 am to deliberate on two petitions. Also read | India: SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea; asks ECI to publish details by March 15 Along with SBI's plea seeking extension, the bench will also consider a separate plea, requesting the initiation of contempt action against the SBI. This plea alleges that SBI "wilfully and deliberately" disobeyed the apex court's direction to submit details of contributions made to political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission by March 6. The scrapping of electoral bonds In a significant ruling on February 15, a five-judge Constitution Bench invalidated the central government's electoral bonds scheme, which permitted anonymous political funding, deeming it "unconstitutional." The court also mandated disclosure by the Election Commission of the donors, their donation amounts, and the recipients by March 13. Subsequently, the top court directed the SBI, the designated financial institution under the scheme, to furnish details of electoral bonds purchased from April 12, 2019, to date to the Election Commission by March 6. The Commission was instructed to publish this information on its official website by March 13. Also read | India: Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigns ahead of Lok Sabha polls, president accepts resignation However, as per news agency PTI, on March 4, the SBI petitioned the apex court for an extension until June 30 to disclose the details of electoral bonds encashed by political parties. The bank argued that retrieving information from "each silo" and "decoding" electoral bonds and matching donors to donations due to stringent anonymity measures would be a time-consuming exercise. The data pertaining to bond issuance and redemption were maintained separately to safeguard donor anonymity. SBI's 'mala fide' application A subsequent petition was lodged seeking contempt proceedings against the SBI for allegedly flouting the apex court's directives. The petitioners, NGOs Association for Democratic Reforms and Common Cause, accused the SBI of filing the extension application at the eleventh hour to prevent public disclosure of donor details before the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. "It is submitted that the said application is mala fide and demonstrates a wilful and deliberate disobedience & defiance of the judgement passed by the constitution bench of this court. It is further a clear attempt to undermine the authority of this court," it alleged. "The petitioner herein is filing the instant petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against State Bank of India for wilfully and deliberately disobeying the order dated February 15 passed by this court … wherein this court directed SBI to submit details of contribution made to the political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission of India by March 6," said the contempt plea. The plea asserted that electoral bonds are "completely traceable", as evidenced by the SBI's maintenance of donor records. It contended that any form of anonymity in political party finances contradicts the principles of participatory democracy and the public's right to information, as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Access to information about electoral bonds, the petition argued, would empower voters to scrutinise, express, and make informed decisions regarding their choices. (With inputs from agencies)

India: Supreme Court to hear SBI's electoral bond disclosure delay plea, and contempt allegations against bank

The Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking more time to furnish the details of electoral bonds to the Election Commission. Watch in for more election updates!

India Elections 2024: Supreme Court rejects SBI's plea for extension on electoral bonds

The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a crucial plea as the State Bank of India also known as the SBI filed a petition seeking an extension till June 30th to disclose details of each electoral Bond.

Supreme Court to hear SBI's plea in Electoral Bonds Case

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) dismissed the West Bengal government's plea challenging a Calcutta High Court order in a matter relating to the attack on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) team in the Sandeshkhali region in the east Indian state of West Bengal.&nbsp;

The plea for an order to transfer the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for an investigation into the January 5 attack on ED officials in Sandeshkhali village which is in the North 24 Parganas district.&nbsp;

The Calcutta HC had also asked for the custody of the accused Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Shahjahan Sheikh to be granted to the central agency. He was arrested by the West Bengal police on February 29 in connection with the attack.&nbsp;

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, however, ordered expunging certain remarks and observations made against the state government and the police in the March 5 order of the high court.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/tmc-full-of-rapists-real-and-reel-bjp-slams-tmc-for-nominating-veteran-actor-shatrughan-sinha-698849">'TMC full of rapists, real and reel': BJP slams TMC for nominating veteran actor Shatrughan Sinha</a>&nbsp;

The bench noted the submission of Additional Solicitor General SV Raju that he has no objection to the expunction of the remarks if the final order transferring the probe to CBI remains as it is.&nbsp;

The bench posed several questions during the hearing to senior advocate Jaideep Gupta, who is representing the West Bengal police, as to why the suspended Sheikh was not promptly arrested and why was there a delay in the investigation of the case.&nbsp;

The West Bengal government on March 6 had approached the top court seeking urgent listing of its petition challenging the high court order, but failed to elicit prompt relief.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-sc-rejects-sbis-electoral-bond-disclosure-extension-plea-asks-eci-to-publish-details-by-march-15-698888">SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea, directs it to share info by March 12</a>&nbsp;

The state government, in its plea before the apex court, had dubbed the Calcutta high court order as perverse, illegal, and arbitrary which deserves to be set aside.&nbsp;

"It is most respectfully submitted that the Impugned Order was pronounced by the Division Bench at 3 pm and uploaded on the High Court website by 3.30 pm (approx.), but the directions contained therein required the Petitioner/State Govt. To comply with such directions by 4.30 pm on the self same day i.e. March 5, 2024 which effectively frustrated the Petitioner's right to avail its remedy under Article 136 of the Constitution."&nbsp;

"In fact, the Advocate General appearing for the Petitioner State orally prayed seeking stay on the operation of the Impugned Order for three days to avail such legal remedy but the Division Bench not only rejected such prayer but refused to record the same in the Impugned Order," the state government said.&nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;Electoral bonds scheme case timeline, all you need to know&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/electoral-bonds-electoral-bonds-scheme-case-timeline-all-you-need-to-know-698977/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>CBI summons close aides of Shahjahan Sheikh</h2>

The CBI has summoned nine close aides and associates of suspended TMC leader to appear before the agency on Monday, officials said. The investigating agency suspects that these nine individuals were allegedly part of the attack on ED officials.&nbsp;

They also allegedly instigated the crowd to target the team when they went to raid the premises of Sheikh.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) dismissed the West Bengal government's plea challenging a Calcutta High Court order in a matter relating to the attack on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) team in the Sandeshkhali region in the east Indian state of West Bengal.

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) dismissed the West Bengal government's plea challenging a Calcutta High Court order in a matter relating to the attack on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) team in the Sandeshkhali region in the east Indian state of West Bengal. The plea for an order to transfer the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for an investigation into the January 5 attack on ED officials in Sandeshkhali village which is in the North 24 Parganas district. The Calcutta HC had also asked for the custody of the accused Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Shahjahan Sheikh to be granted to the central agency. He was arrested by the West Bengal police on February 29 in connection with the attack. A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta, however, ordered expunging certain remarks and observations made against the state government and the police in the March 5 order of the high court. Also read: 'TMC full of rapists, real and reel': BJP slams TMC for nominating veteran actor Shatrughan Sinha The bench noted the submission of Additional Solicitor General SV Raju that he has no objection to the expunction of the remarks if the final order transferring the probe to CBI remains as it is. The bench posed several questions during the hearing to senior advocate Jaideep Gupta, who is representing the West Bengal police, as to why the suspended Sheikh was not promptly arrested and why was there a delay in the investigation of the case. The West Bengal government on March 6 had approached the top court seeking urgent listing of its petition challenging the high court order, but failed to elicit prompt relief. Also read: SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea, directs it to share info by March 12 The state government, in its plea before the apex court, had dubbed the Calcutta high court order as perverse, illegal, and arbitrary which deserves to be set aside. "It is most respectfully submitted that the Impugned Order was pronounced by the Division Bench at 3 pm and uploaded on the High Court website by 3.30 pm (approx.), but the directions contained therein required the Petitioner/State Govt. To comply with such directions by 4.30 pm on the self same day i.e. March 5, 2024 which effectively frustrated the Petitioner's right to avail its remedy under Article 136 of the Constitution." "In fact, the Advocate General appearing for the Petitioner State orally prayed seeking stay on the operation of the Impugned Order for three days to avail such legal remedy but the Division Bench not only rejected such prayer but refused to record the same in the Impugned Order," the state government said. Watch: Electoral bonds scheme case timeline, all you need to know × CBI summons close aides of Shahjahan Sheikh The CBI has summoned nine close aides and associates of suspended TMC leader to appear before the agency on Monday, officials said. The investigating agency suspects that these nine individuals were allegedly part of the attack on ED officials. They also allegedly instigated the crowd to target the team when they went to raid the premises of Sheikh. (With inputs from agencies)

Sandeshkhali violence: Supreme Court rejects West Bengal govt’s plea against HC order for CBI probe

The Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking more time to furnish the details of electoral bonds to the Election Commission. Watch in for more details!

India Elections 2024: India's Supreme Court rejects SBI's June 30 electoral bonds data plea

The Supreme Court of India on Monday rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking more time to furnish the details of electoral bonds to the Election Commission.

Electoral Bonds Case: Indian Supreme Court rejects SBI's plea

Today, the Supreme Court will consider the State Bank of India's application, which asks for an extension till June 30th to provide information about the Election Bonds. In accordance with the verdict rendered on February 15, the Bank was required to provide the data to the Indian Election Commission by March 6.

Electoral bonds: Electoral bonds scheme case timeline, all you need to know

Electoral bonds: India's SC rejects SBI's electoral bonds plea

Electoral bonds: The Supreme Court of India hears SBI's extension plea

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month. Instead, it directed the bank&nbsp;"to disclose the details by the close of business hours of 12 March 2024 (Tuesday)".

Furthermore, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has been directed to "compile the information and publish the details on its official website no later than by 15 March 2024 by 5 PM."

<h2>Contempt charges</h2>

A five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, B. R. Gavai, J. B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra also heard a plea&nbsp;requesting the initiation of contempt action against the SBI. The plea alleged that SBI "wilfully and deliberately" disobeyed the apex court's direction to submit details of contributions made to political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission by March 6.

The court has asked SBI to "file an affidavit of its Chairman and Managing Director on compliance with the directions issued above." It warned the bank that it may move ahead with contempt charges if its instructions are flouted.

"While we are not inclined to exercise the contempt jurisdiction at this time, we place SBI on notice that this Court may be inclined to proceed against it for wilful disobedience if SBI does not comply with the directions by the timelines indicated in this order," the court observed.

<h2>The scrapping of electoral bonds</h2>

In a significant ruling on February 15, a five-judge Constitution Bench invalidated the central government's electoral bonds scheme, which permitted anonymous political funding, deeming it "unconstitutional." The court also mandated disclosure by the Election Commission of the donors, their donation amounts, and the recipients by March 13.

Subsequently, the top court directed the SBI, the designated financial institution under the scheme, to furnish details of electoral bonds purchased from April 12, 2019, to date to the Election Commission by March 6. The Commission was instructed to publish this information on its official website by March 13.

However, as per news agency PTI, on March 4, the SBI petitioned the apex court for an extension until June 30 to disclose the details of electoral bonds encashed by political parties. The bank argued that retrieving information from "each silo" and "decoding" electoral bonds and matching donors to donations due to stringent anonymity measures would be a time-consuming exercise.

The data on bond issuance and redemption were maintained separately to safeguard donor anonymity, it said.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month.

The Supreme Court of India on Monday (Mar 11) rejected the State Bank of India's (SBI) plea seeking an extension until June 30 to disclose details of each electoral bond encashed by political parties before the scheme was scrapped last month. Instead, it directed the bank "to disclose the details by the close of business hours of 12 March 2024 (Tuesday)". Furthermore, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has been directed to "compile the information and publish the details on its official website no later than by 15 March 2024 by 5 PM." Contempt charges A five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, B. R. Gavai, J. B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra also heard a plea requesting the initiation of contempt action against the SBI. The plea alleged that SBI "wilfully and deliberately" disobeyed the apex court's direction to submit details of contributions made to political parties through electoral bonds to the Election Commission by March 6. The court has asked SBI to "file an affidavit of its Chairman and Managing Director on compliance with the directions issued above." It warned the bank that it may move ahead with contempt charges if its instructions are flouted. "While we are not inclined to exercise the contempt jurisdiction at this time, we place SBI on notice that this Court may be inclined to proceed against it for wilful disobedience if SBI does not comply with the directions by the timelines indicated in this order," the court observed. The scrapping of electoral bonds In a significant ruling on February 15, a five-judge Constitution Bench invalidated the central government's electoral bonds scheme, which permitted anonymous political funding, deeming it "unconstitutional." The court also mandated disclosure by the Election Commission of the donors, their donation amounts, and the recipients by March 13. Subsequently, the top court directed the SBI, the designated financial institution under the scheme, to furnish details of electoral bonds purchased from April 12, 2019, to date to the Election Commission by March 6. The Commission was instructed to publish this information on its official website by March 13. However, as per news agency PTI, on March 4, the SBI petitioned the apex court for an extension until June 30 to disclose the details of electoral bonds encashed by political parties. The bank argued that retrieving information from "each silo" and "decoding" electoral bonds and matching donors to donations due to stringent anonymity measures would be a time-consuming exercise. The data on bond issuance and redemption were maintained separately to safeguard donor anonymity, it said. (With inputs from agencies)

India: SC rejects SBI's electoral bond disclosure extension plea, directs it to share info by March 12

The stage is set for another Supreme Court showdown in the Electoral Bond scheme case on Monday, March 11th. The State Bank of India faces opposition for withholding data on electoral bonds after failing to furnish the bonds with the information. Our next report will tell you more.

Indian elections 2024: Scrapped electoral bonds scheme, What Supreme Court held

Two convicts in the Bilkis Bano gangrape case have approached the Supreme Court urging it to refer the matter of their pre-mature release from jail to a larger bench, as two different benches passed different orders.

Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah and Rajubhai Babulal Soni filed petition saying that the apex court's January 8 verdict which led to the cancellation of their remission (early release from prison) and their re-imprisonment was judicially improper.

On January 8, the Supreme Court had struck down the&nbsp;Gujarat&nbsp;government's order granting remission to 11 convicts who had gangraped Bilkis Bano and murdered her family members during the 2002 Godhra riots.

In their plea, they have mentioned that two different co-ordinate benches of an equal number of judges have taken a different view of the case.

"Issue direction clarifying and directing which judgment of its co-ordinate bench would be applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case i.e. one which has been delivered in the case," it said.

As per the plea, the January 8 judgment delivered by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan has "not only judicial impropriety but creates uncertainty and chaos as to which precedence of law has to be applied in future."

It was incorrect in law for the two-judge bench led by Justice Nagarathna to overrule a judgment rendered by another two judge-bench of the Supreme Court, namely Justices Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, said the plea.

It is to be noted that the May 13, 2022 judgment rendered by the Justice Rastogi-led bench had held that the State of&nbsp;Gujarat&nbsp;(and not the Maharashtra government) was the appropriate government to decide on remission applications filed by the rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case.

Thereafter, the&nbsp;Gujarat&nbsp;government decided to allow the remission applications of convicts. The decision was challenged by Bilkis Bano and others in the top court.

The bench led by Justice Nagarathna had found that the May 2022 judgment was secured by Radheshyam after misleading the court and suppressing key facts.

It had held that the judgment of May 13, 2022, by which another bench of the apex court had directed the&nbsp;Gujarat&nbsp;government to consider remission of a convict as per the 1992 policy, was obtained by "playing fraud" on the court and by suppressing material facts.

Justice Nagarathna led-bench in January this year had held that&nbsp;Gujarat&nbsp;government was not competent to pass the remission orders but Maharashtra government. It had said the appropriate government to decide the remission was the State (in this case Maharashtra) within whose territorial limits the accused are sentenced and not where the crime is committed or the accused are imprisoned.

"In view of conflicting judgment on the same issue by bench of equal numbers of judges, the matter must be referred to a larger bench for final adjudication and proper determination on law and merits of the case," the plea filed through advocate Rishi Malhotra stated.

Two convicts in the Bilkis Bano gangrape case have approached the Supreme Court urging it to refer the matter of their pre-mature release from jail to a larger bench, as two different benches passed different orders.

Two convicts in the Bilkis Bano gangrape case have approached the Supreme Court urging it to refer the matter of their pre-mature release from jail to a larger bench, as two different benches passed different orders. Radheshyam Bhagwandas Shah and Rajubhai Babulal Soni filed petition saying that the apex court's January 8 verdict which led to the cancellation of their remission (early release from prison) and their re-imprisonment was judicially improper. On January 8, the Supreme Court had struck down the Gujarat government's order granting remission to 11 convicts who had gangraped Bilkis Bano and murdered her family members during the 2002 Godhra riots. In their plea, they have mentioned that two different co-ordinate benches of an equal number of judges have taken a different view of the case. "Issue direction clarifying and directing which judgment of its co-ordinate bench would be applicable in the facts and circumstances of the case i.e. one which has been delivered in the case," it said. As per the plea, the January 8 judgment delivered by Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan has "not only judicial impropriety but creates uncertainty and chaos as to which precedence of law has to be applied in future." It was incorrect in law for the two-judge bench led by Justice Nagarathna to overrule a judgment rendered by another two judge-bench of the Supreme Court, namely Justices Ajay Rastogi and Vikram Nath, said the plea. It is to be noted that the May 13, 2022 judgment rendered by the Justice Rastogi-led bench had held that the State of Gujarat (and not the Maharashtra government) was the appropriate government to decide on remission applications filed by the rape convicts in the Bilkis Bano case. Thereafter, the Gujarat government decided to allow the remission applications of convicts. The decision was challenged by Bilkis Bano and others in the top court. The bench led by Justice Nagarathna had found that the May 2022 judgment was secured by Radheshyam after misleading the court and suppressing key facts. It had held that the judgment of May 13, 2022, by which another bench of the apex court had directed the Gujarat government to consider remission of a convict as per the 1992 policy, was obtained by "playing fraud" on the court and by suppressing material facts. Justice Nagarathna led-bench in January this year had held that Gujarat government was not competent to pass the remission orders but Maharashtra government. It had said the appropriate government to decide the remission was the State (in this case Maharashtra) within whose territorial limits the accused are sentenced and not where the crime is committed or the accused are imprisoned. "In view of conflicting judgment on the same issue by bench of equal numbers of judges, the matter must be referred to a larger bench for final adjudication and proper determination on law and merits of the case," the plea filed through advocate Rishi Malhotra stated.

Bilkis Bano case: 2 convicts urge Indian SC to refer their premature release case to larger bench

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday (Mar 4) hailed the Supreme Court’s verdict on ‘immunity in bribery case’ and stressed that ‘it will clean politics’. Taking to social media platform X, Modi said, “A great judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which will ensure clean politics and deepen people’s faith in the system.”

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
SWAGATAM! 
 
A great judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which will ensure clean politics and deepen people’s faith in the system.<a href="https://t.co/GqfP3PMxqz">https://t.co/GqfP3PMxqz</a>
— Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) <a href="https://twitter.com/narendramodi/status/1764541405140009405?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Supreme Court's verdict</h2>

The Supreme Court of India earlier ruled that lawmakers both in the country’s parliament and state assemblies are liable to be prosecuted for taking bribes to make speeches and cast votes in the respective houses.

The top court also struck down a 1998 verdict that upheld immunity in such cases.

During the hearing on Monday, the apex court bench said “corruption and bribery by members of the legislatures erode probity in public life” and cannot be shielded under the principles of parliamentary privilege.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwje3fntjdqEAxWhbmwGHRl9BWUQxfQBKAB6BAgKEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-bjp-bets-big-on-bhojpuri-stars-but-pawan-kumar-steps-back-696102" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/lok-sabha-elections-2024-bjp-bets-big-on-bhojpuri-stars-but-pawan-kumar-steps-back-696102&amp;ved=2ahUKEwje3fntjdqEAxWhbmwGHRl9BWUQxfQBKAB6BAgKEAE">Lok Sabha Elections 2024: BJP bets big on Bhojpuri stars but Pawan Singh steps back</a>

The 1998 PV Narasimha ruling&nbsp;held that MPs and MLAs who take bribes for voting and asking questions in the House enjoy immunity as per the Constitution.

The landmark judgment was delivered by a seven-member Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud.

<h2>Top quotes by the Supreme Court</h2>

"Corruption and bribery by members of the legislature erode probity in public life," the SC noted in the judgment.

"The judgment of the majority in the PV Narasimha Rao case, which grants immunity to lawmakers, has a grave danger and thus, overruled," it added.

Watch:&nbsp;India: Gautam Gambhir not to contest Lok Sabha elections from BJP | Lok Sabha Polls 2024

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-gautam-gambhir-not-to-contest-lok-sabha-elections-from-bjp-lok-sabha-polls-2024-695921/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"The offence of a bribe is crystallised on the taking of illegal gratification and does not depend on if the vote or speech is given later, and the offence is complete when the legislator accepts a bribe," the judgment read.

"A member is induced to vote in a certain way because of a bribe and it erodes the foundation of Indian democracy," it further stated.

"Bribery is not protected by parliamentary privilege and the word anything when read with their respective operative words means that a member may claim immunity to say as they feel and vote in a direction in any matter before the house," the SC ruled.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday (Mar 4) hailed the Supreme Court’s verdict on ‘immunity in bribery case’ and stressed that ‘it will clean politics’.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday (Mar 4) hailed the Supreme Court’s verdict on ‘immunity in bribery case’ and stressed that ‘it will clean politics’. Taking to social media platform X, Modi said, “A great judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which will ensure clean politics and deepen people’s faith in the system.” SWAGATAM! A great judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court which will ensure clean politics and deepen people’s faith in the system.https://t.co/GqfP3PMxqz — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) March 4, 2024 × Supreme Court's verdict The Supreme Court of India earlier ruled that lawmakers both in the country’s parliament and state assemblies are liable to be prosecuted for taking bribes to make speeches and cast votes in the respective houses. The top court also struck down a 1998 verdict that upheld immunity in such cases. During the hearing on Monday, the apex court bench said “corruption and bribery by members of the legislatures erode probity in public life” and cannot be shielded under the principles of parliamentary privilege. Also read: Lok Sabha Elections 2024: BJP bets big on Bhojpuri stars but Pawan Singh steps back The 1998 PV Narasimha ruling held that MPs and MLAs who take bribes for voting and asking questions in the House enjoy immunity as per the Constitution. The landmark judgment was delivered by a seven-member Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud. Top quotes by the Supreme Court "Corruption and bribery by members of the legislature erode probity in public life," the SC noted in the judgment. "The judgment of the majority in the PV Narasimha Rao case, which grants immunity to lawmakers, has a grave danger and thus, overruled," it added. Watch: India: Gautam Gambhir not to contest Lok Sabha elections from BJP | Lok Sabha Polls 2024 × "The offence of a bribe is crystallised on the taking of illegal gratification and does not depend on if the vote or speech is given later, and the offence is complete when the legislator accepts a bribe," the judgment read. "A member is induced to vote in a certain way because of a bribe and it erodes the foundation of Indian democracy," it further stated. "Bribery is not protected by parliamentary privilege and the word anything when read with their respective operative words means that a member may claim immunity to say as they feel and vote in a direction in any matter before the house," the SC ruled.

‘Will ensure clean politics,’ PM Modi hails SC judgment on ‘immunity in bribery' case

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Aam Aadmi Party has been given a deadline by the Supreme Court to vacate its headquarters which stands on the plot of land allotted to the High Court.

The apex court has directed the party to vacate the place by June 15.

Taking into consideration the upcoming general election, a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud also allowed AAP to apply to the Land and Development Office of the Government of India for allotment of alternate land in accordance with the law in the meantime.

"In view of the impending general elections, we grant time until June 15, 2024, to vacate the premises," the court said.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-cm-kejriwal-agrees-to-cooperate-with-ed-after-skipping-eight-summons-in-a-row-696339">Delhi CM Kejriwal agrees to cooperate with ED after skipping eight summons in a row</a>

<h2>Respect&nbsp;SC's order to vacate the Delhi office, says AAP</h2>

The party released a statement saying that it respected the court's order to vacate its offices in Delhi's Rouse Avenue further expressing hope that it would be allotted land in the same location soon.

Priyanka Kakkar, the AAP's chief national spokesperson, said, "We respect the Supreme Court. The apex court has also directed that the Centre's L&amp;DO (Land and Development Office) allot an alternative land for the AAP's office as soon as possible."&nbsp;

"We hope that the BJP will not do any regressive, discriminatory or dirty politics and, without further delay, allot land for the AAP's office premises at the same location where all the other national parties have been allotted land for office use in Delhi," Kakkar said.

At the time of the hearing in the court, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that the Aam Aadmi Party had encroached on the land since 2017.

The court also underscored that the AAP was not a lawful occupant of the land after 2017.

However, senior Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the national capital's ruling party, submitted that the AAP was one of the six national parties and is entitled to land in the New Delhi municipal area, under its status.

"They are telling us as a national party we get nothing. I'm given (land in) Badarpur while everyone else is in better places. A particular government does not want me to be flourishing and working," Singhvi said.

(With inputs from agencies)

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Aam Aadmi Party has been given a deadline by the Supreme Court to vacate its headquarters which stands on the plot of land allotted to the High Court.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's Aam Aadmi Party has been given a deadline by the Supreme Court to vacate its headquarters which stands on the plot of land allotted to the High Court. The apex court has directed the party to vacate the place by June 15. Taking into consideration the upcoming general election, a bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud also allowed AAP to apply to the Land and Development Office of the Government of India for allotment of alternate land in accordance with the law in the meantime. "In view of the impending general elections, we grant time until June 15, 2024, to vacate the premises," the court said. Also read: Delhi CM Kejriwal agrees to cooperate with ED after skipping eight summons in a row Respect SC's order to vacate the Delhi office, says AAP The party released a statement saying that it respected the court's order to vacate its offices in Delhi's Rouse Avenue further expressing hope that it would be allotted land in the same location soon. Priyanka Kakkar, the AAP's chief national spokesperson, said, "We respect the Supreme Court. The apex court has also directed that the Centre's L&DO (Land and Development Office) allot an alternative land for the AAP's office as soon as possible." "We hope that the BJP will not do any regressive, discriminatory or dirty politics and, without further delay, allot land for the AAP's office premises at the same location where all the other national parties have been allotted land for office use in Delhi," Kakkar said. At the time of the hearing in the court, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that the Aam Aadmi Party had encroached on the land since 2017. The court also underscored that the AAP was not a lawful occupant of the land after 2017. However, senior Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for the national capital's ruling party, submitted that the AAP was one of the six national parties and is entitled to land in the New Delhi municipal area, under its status. "They are telling us as a national party we get nothing. I'm given (land in) Badarpur while everyone else is in better places. A particular government does not want me to be flourishing and working," Singhvi said. (With inputs from agencies)

India: Supreme Court orders Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party to vacate headquarters

supreme-court

Supreme Court, News on Supreme Court, stories on Supreme Court, articles on Supreme Court, Supreme Court stories at Wion, Supreme Court news, Supreme Court latest news

supreme court