In a significant development, the US Supreme Court on Friday (June 21) maintained a federal law that bars domestic abusers from owning a firearm. Watch in for more details!

US: Supreme Court upholds law that bans domestic abusers from owning guns

The Supreme Court on Friday again declined to stay the process of counselling in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate) 2024 and has issued a notice to the National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducts the examination. Watch in for more details!

NEET-UG 2024: India Supreme Court again declines to stay process of counselling

The US Supreme Court has lifted a ban on bump stocks, the rapid-fire gun accessory used in America's deadliest mass shooting. In a decision on Friday, the court said the government did not have the right to ban the accessories.

US top court says Trump administration broke law

The Supreme Court on Friday (June 14) issued notices to private parties on a plea of the National Testing Agency seeking transfer of cases pending in various high courts on the NEET-UG row to the top court to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

A vacation bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta took note of the submission of the National Testing Agency's (NTA) counsel that several pleas, seeking cancellation of the National Eligibility cum Entrance TestUnder Graduate, 2024 on the allegations of question paper leak and other malpractices, are pending in several high courts.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/congress-president-kharge-hits-out-at-pm-modi-over-neet-ug-exam-says-future-of-students-at-stake-731506" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/congress-president-kharge-hits-out-at-pm-modi-over-neet-ug-exam-says-future-of-students-at-stake-731506&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiMkK_R1NqGAxWxd2wGHZDQCfwQFnoECAkQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw0jQCt2zyPRnzTNPrOXW9YO&amp;arm=e&amp;fexp=72519171,72519168" dir="ltr" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/congress-president-kharge-hits-out-at-pm-modi-over-neet-ug-exam-says-future-of-students-at-stake-731506" target="_blank">Congress President Kharge hits out at PM Modi over&nbsp;NEET&nbsp;</a>

"Issue notice," the bench said, adding they will be taken up for hearing on July 8.

The NTA, meanwhile, said it wanted to withdraw three other petitions, which were seeking transfer of cases from high courts to the top court, as they pertained to grant of grace marks to 1,563 candidates on account of loss of time during the examination on May 5.

The counsel for the NTA said the issue has been settled and that he will be intimating the high court about the decision to cancel the compensatory marks given to 1,536 candidates and the consequential June 13 order of the top court.

Amid a raging row over the NEET-UG examination, the Centre and the NTA on Thursday told the Supreme Court they have cancelled the grace marks given to 1,563 candidates who took the examination for admission to MBBS and other such courses.

They will have the option to either take a re-test or forgo the compensatory marks awarded to them for loss of time, the centre had said.

The examination was held on May 5 across 4,750 centres and around 24 lakh candidates took it.

The results were expected to be declared on June 14 but were announced on June 4, apparently because the evaluation of the answer sheets got completed earlier.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiMkK_R1NqGAxWxd2wGHZDQCfwQFnoECAUQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw06Q-9RWyMQ8-qh8IZqE90k&amp;arm=e&amp;fexp=72519171,72519168" dir="ltr" href="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwiMkK_R1NqGAxWxd2wGHZDQCfwQFnoECAUQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw06Q-9RWyMQ8-qh8IZqE90k&amp;arm=e&amp;fexp=72519171,72519168" target="_blank">NEET&nbsp;aspirants allege inflation of marks, NTA denies discrepancies</a>

The allegations have led to protests in several cities and filing of cases in seven high courts as also the Supreme Court.

Scores of students protested in Delhi on June 10 seeking a probe into alleged irregularities.

As many as 67 students scored a perfect 720, unprecedented in the NTA's history, with six from a centre in Haryana's Faridabad figuring in the list, raising suspicions about irregularities.

It has been alleged that grace marks contributed to 67 students sharing the top rank.

The NEET-UG examination is conducted by the NTA for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH and other related courses in government and private institutions across the country.

The Supreme Court on Friday (June 14) issued notices to private parties on a plea of the National Testing Agency seeking transfer of cases pending in various high courts on the NEET-UG row to the top court to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

The Supreme Court on Friday (June 14) issued notices to private parties on a plea of the National Testing Agency seeking transfer of cases pending in various high courts on the NEET-UG row to the top court to avoid multiplicity of litigation. A vacation bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta took note of the submission of the National Testing Agency's (NTA) counsel that several pleas, seeking cancellation of the National Eligibility cum Entrance TestUnder Graduate, 2024 on the allegations of question paper leak and other malpractices, are pending in several high courts. Also read: Congress President Kharge hits out at PM Modi over NEET "Issue notice," the bench said, adding they will be taken up for hearing on July 8. The NTA, meanwhile, said it wanted to withdraw three other petitions, which were seeking transfer of cases from high courts to the top court, as they pertained to grant of grace marks to 1,563 candidates on account of loss of time during the examination on May 5. The counsel for the NTA said the issue has been settled and that he will be intimating the high court about the decision to cancel the compensatory marks given to 1,536 candidates and the consequential June 13 order of the top court. Amid a raging row over the NEET-UG examination, the Centre and the NTA on Thursday told the Supreme Court they have cancelled the grace marks given to 1,563 candidates who took the examination for admission to MBBS and other such courses. They will have the option to either take a re-test or forgo the compensatory marks awarded to them for loss of time, the centre had said. The examination was held on May 5 across 4,750 centres and around 24 lakh candidates took it. The results were expected to be declared on June 14 but were announced on June 4, apparently because the evaluation of the answer sheets got completed earlier. Also read: NEET aspirants allege inflation of marks, NTA denies discrepancies The allegations have led to protests in several cities and filing of cases in seven high courts as also the Supreme Court. Scores of students protested in Delhi on June 10 seeking a probe into alleged irregularities. As many as 67 students scored a perfect 720, unprecedented in the NTA's history, with six from a centre in Haryana's Faridabad figuring in the list, raising suspicions about irregularities. It has been alleged that grace marks contributed to 67 students sharing the top rank. The NEET-UG examination is conducted by the NTA for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH and other related courses in government and private institutions across the country.

SC issues notices on NTA's plea seeking transfer of cases on NEET-UG row from HCs to it

India's National Enligibility and Enterance Test is under the scanner. The examination is conducted across India for addmission in Undergraduate medical programmes but its result this year has trigerred concerns and even protests. Watch the video to know why.

NEET UG 2024: Supreme Court orders cancellation of grace marks in NEET Exam

The Supreme Court was informed by the Centre that they will be cancelling the scorecards of 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates who were earlier given grace marks.&nbsp;

The Centre took this decision after allegations of use of unfair means during the examination were raised by people.

The Centre announced that the 1,563 students will be given the option to take a re-test, which will ensure fairness and integrity in the examination process. The Centre further detailed the steps taken to address the issue.&nbsp;

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-ug-2024-supreme-court-issues-notice-to-nta-over-leak-claims-730739">NEET result row: Supreme Court issues notice to testing agency NTA over paper leak claims</a>

"A committee meeting was held on June 10, 11, and 12 to investigate the allegations. Based on the committee's recommendations, the scorecards of the affected candidates will be cancelled, and a re-examination will be held for these students," said the Centre, in a statement.

<h2>SC clarifies counselling process won't be halted</h2>

The Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision not to stop the counselling process for other students who took the NEET-UG 2024 examination.&nbsp;

"Counselling will proceed as scheduled and there will be no interruption. If the exam continues, everything else will proceed as well, so there is no cause for concern," stated the top court.

National Testing Agency (NTA) will conduct the retest on June 23 and the result will be announced on June 30.

"A committee was set up to review the results of more than 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates who received 'grace marks' due to time loss during the exam. The committee has decided to invalidate the scorecards of these candidates, who will now have the option to participate in a re-test,"&nbsp;the Government/NTA informed the Supreme Court.

"The results of the re-test will be declared on June 30; counselling for admission in MBBS, BDS&nbsp;and other courses will start on July 6," the Centre said to the Supreme Court.

Watch:&nbsp;India medical enterance exam NEET under scanner, candidates allege paper leak

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-medical-enterance-exam-neet-under-scanner-candidates-allege-paper-leak-731268/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"All petitions, including those seeking cancellation of NEET-UG 2024 on account of allegations of malpractices, will be taken up on July 8," the top court stated.

A fresh petition was being heard by the court over the NEET-UG 2024 results which had claimed discrepancies in scores and also alleged that some students were given preferential treatment.

The petition has further appealed that the scores from the May 5 exam be cancelled and a fresh exam is held.

Meanwhile, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said, "I want to assure the students and their parents that the Govt of India and NTA are committed to providing justice to them. 24 lakh students have successfully taken the NEET examination. There is no paper leak, no proof has been found yet."&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court was informed by the Centre that they will be cancelling the scorecards of 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates who were earlier given grace marks. The Centre took this decision after allegations of use of unfair means during the examination were raised by people.

The Supreme Court was informed by the Centre that they will be cancelling the scorecards of 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates who were earlier given grace marks. The Centre took this decision after allegations of use of unfair means during the examination were raised by people. The Centre announced that the 1,563 students will be given the option to take a re-test, which will ensure fairness and integrity in the examination process. The Centre further detailed the steps taken to address the issue. Also Read: NEET result row: Supreme Court issues notice to testing agency NTA over paper leak claims "A committee meeting was held on June 10, 11, and 12 to investigate the allegations. Based on the committee's recommendations, the scorecards of the affected candidates will be cancelled, and a re-examination will be held for these students," said the Centre, in a statement. SC clarifies counselling process won't be halted The Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision not to stop the counselling process for other students who took the NEET-UG 2024 examination. "Counselling will proceed as scheduled and there will be no interruption. If the exam continues, everything else will proceed as well, so there is no cause for concern," stated the top court. National Testing Agency (NTA) will conduct the retest on June 23 and the result will be announced on June 30. "A committee was set up to review the results of more than 1,563 NEET-UG 2024 candidates who received 'grace marks' due to time loss during the exam. The committee has decided to invalidate the scorecards of these candidates, who will now have the option to participate in a re-test," the Government/NTA informed the Supreme Court. "The results of the re-test will be declared on June 30; counselling for admission in MBBS, BDS and other courses will start on July 6," the Centre said to the Supreme Court. Watch: India medical enterance exam NEET under scanner, candidates allege paper leak "All petitions, including those seeking cancellation of NEET-UG 2024 on account of allegations of malpractices, will be taken up on July 8," the top court stated. A fresh petition was being heard by the court over the NEET-UG 2024 results which had claimed discrepancies in scores and also alleged that some students were given preferential treatment. The petition has further appealed that the scores from the May 5 exam be cancelled and a fresh exam is held. Meanwhile, Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said, "I want to assure the students and their parents that the Govt of India and NTA are committed to providing justice to them. 24 lakh students have successfully taken the NEET examination. There is no paper leak, no proof has been found yet." (With inputs from agencies)

NEET UG result 2024: Centre tells SC grace marks to 1,563 candidates cancelled, re-exam on June 23

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 11) issued notice to the Centre and National Testing Agency (NTA)&nbsp;on a plea to&nbsp;cancel the results of the NEET-UG 2024 - a&nbsp;competitive entrance test for undergraduate medical courses - amid allegations the paper was leaked.&nbsp;

"It is not that simple... just because you held the exam doesn't make it revered," the court told the NTA. "The sanctity of the examination has been compromised... so we need answers."

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjv1eylkNOGAxVaTGwGHZiQCycQFnoECAkQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw2nAOcVx-boa_O3pPz053gm&amp;arm=e&amp;fexp=72519171,72519168" dir="ltr" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/neet-aspirants-allege-inflation-of-marks-nta-denies-discrepancies-729765" target="_blank">NEET&nbsp;aspirants allege inflation of marks, NTA denies discrepancies</a>

The court, however, said the counselling for the admissions will continue for now.&nbsp;

Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah said, "We are not discontinuing counselling".

The matter will be heard with a plea filed before Chief Justice DY Chandrachud on July 8.

It is worth mentioning that&nbsp;the court was hearing a fresh petition in the ongoing row over the NEET-UG 2024 results that claims inconsistency in scores and alleged special treatment to some students.

The petition asked for the scores from the May 5 exam to be cancelled and&nbsp;also asked for a fresh exam to be held.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ctorig="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-hits-out-at-modi-government-for-destroying-future-of-students-amid-neet-ug-exam-row-730171" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?client=internal-element-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;q=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-hits-out-at-modi-government-for-destroying-future-of-students-amid-neet-ug-exam-row-730171&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=2ahUKEwjv1eylkNOGAxVaTGwGHZiQCycQFnoECAgQAg&amp;usg=AOvVaw1oyXIhZ8EFSaQsEdnZoIiQ&amp;arm=e&amp;fexp=72519171,72519168" dir="ltr" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-hits-out-at-modi-government-for-destroying-future-of-students-amid-neet-ug-exam-row-730171" target="_blank">NEET-UG exam row: Rahul Gandhi hits out at Modi government</a>

It may be mentioned here, the petitioners - from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh - have claimed discrepancy in the grant of grace marks. According to the petitioners, there is no defined logic and drew&nbsp;the court's attention to "statistically impossible" marks, including students scoring the maximum - 720 of 720.

The petitioners highlighted that 67 students from a single coaching centre&nbsp;scored&nbsp;perfect 720 marks.

Additionally, over 13,000 students contested a provisional answer key released by the NTA, arguing that it indicated a different answer.

Amid the ongoing court hearing, the NTA has made a high-powered committee that will analyse the grievances of 1,600 students who have already appeared for the NEET 2024 exam.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 11) issued notice to the Centre and National Testing Agency (NTA) on a plea to cancel the results of the NEET-UG 2024 - a competitive entrance test for undergraduate medical courses - amid allegations the paper was leaked.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (June 11) issued notice to the Centre and National Testing Agency (NTA) on a plea to cancel the results of the NEET-UG 2024 - a competitive entrance test for undergraduate medical courses - amid allegations the paper was leaked. "It is not that simple... just because you held the exam doesn't make it revered," the court told the NTA. "The sanctity of the examination has been compromised... so we need answers." Also read: NEET aspirants allege inflation of marks, NTA denies discrepancies The court, however, said the counselling for the admissions will continue for now. Justices Vikram Nath and Ahsanuddin Amanullah said, "We are not discontinuing counselling". The matter will be heard with a plea filed before Chief Justice DY Chandrachud on July 8. It is worth mentioning that the court was hearing a fresh petition in the ongoing row over the NEET-UG 2024 results that claims inconsistency in scores and alleged special treatment to some students. The petition asked for the scores from the May 5 exam to be cancelled and also asked for a fresh exam to be held. Also read: NEET-UG exam row: Rahul Gandhi hits out at Modi government It may be mentioned here, the petitioners - from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh - have claimed discrepancy in the grant of grace marks. According to the petitioners, there is no defined logic and drew the court's attention to "statistically impossible" marks, including students scoring the maximum - 720 of 720. The petitioners highlighted that 67 students from a single coaching centre scored perfect 720 marks. Additionally, over 13,000 students contested a provisional answer key released by the NTA, arguing that it indicated a different answer. Amid the ongoing court hearing, the NTA has made a high-powered committee that will analyse the grievances of 1,600 students who have already appeared for the NEET 2024 exam. (With inputs from agencies)

NEET result row: Supreme Court issues notice to testing agency NTA over paper leak claims

The government of Delhi reached out to the Central government and moved the Supreme Court appealing for additional water supply from Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Himachal Pradesh for a month amid a severe shortage in the national capital.

In its petition submitted to the Supreme Court, the Delhi government said that there has been an increase in the demand for water in the national capital amid sweltering heat.

"Delhi's need for water has increased in the scorching heat. It is everyone's responsibility to fulfil the needs of the country's capital," stated the petition.

Delhi minister complains to Centre about Haryana failing to release adequate amount of water

Delhi Minister Atishi wrote to the Central government regarding the water crisis and said that an adequate amount of water is not being released by Haryana.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/car-washing-banned-delhi-govt-takes-heavy-handed-approach-amidst-water-crisis-726688">‘Car washing banned,’ Delhi govt introduces fine for wasting water amidst acute shortage</a>

"Delhi is heavily dependent on water from the Yamuna River for its day-to-day demand for water. However, since the last few days, there has been a drastic dip in the water levels at the Wazirabad Barrage as Haryana is not releasing the required amount of water in the Yamuna river," said Atishi, in a letter to Union Water Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat.

"Moreover, the temperature in Delhi has touched almost 50 degrees. This has further intensified the demand for water," she said.

<h2>National capital's water woes</h2>

Various areas in the national capital including Chanakyapuri's Sanjay Camp area and Geeta colony in east Delhi have been battling acute water shortages.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Delhi water crisis <a href="https://t.co/Ly9JhBJycY">pic.twitter.com/Ly9JhBJycY</a>
— MrsMohini (@MohiniWealth) <a href="https://twitter.com/MohiniWealth/status/1796169448467923241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

In the scorching heat and rising temperature, people have been forced to stand in long queues to fill just one bucket of water as tankers come and go without providing them with&nbsp;adequate amount of water.

The national capital is facing water crisis amid day&nbsp;temperature recording&nbsp;close to the 50 degrees Celsius.&nbsp;

Delhi Chief Minister&nbsp;Arvind Kejriwal had earlier blamed states sharing borders with New Delhi for reduced water supply.

Watch:&nbsp;Delhi heatwave: IMD says reading a sensor 'error'

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/delhi-heatwave-imd-says-reading-a-sensor-error-727033/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"If the BJP talks to its governments in Haryana and UP and gets some water for Delhi for a month, then the people of Delhi will greatly appreciate this step of the BJP. Such scorching heat is not in anyone's control. But if we all work together, we can provide relief to the people from this?",&nbsp;Kejriwal wrote on social media platform X.

Meanwhile,&nbsp;Delhi LG VK Saxena said, "From the last few days, we can see the irresponsible attitude of the Delhi government towards the water crisis in Delhi. Today in Delhi, people are seen risking their lives and running behind tankers to get water. But the government is blaming other states for its failures. The Chief Minister's promise of 24-hour water supply in Delhi has so far proved to be a trick. Haryana and Uttar Pradesh are continuously supplying their fixed quota of water to Delhi."

(With inputs from agencies)

The government of Delhi reached out to the Central government and moved the Supreme Court appealing for additional water supply from Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Himachal Pradesh for a month amid a severe shortage in the national capital.

The government of Delhi reached out to the Central government and moved the Supreme Court appealing for additional water supply from Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Himachal Pradesh for a month amid a severe shortage in the national capital. In its petition submitted to the Supreme Court, the Delhi government said that there has been an increase in the demand for water in the national capital amid sweltering heat. "Delhi's need for water has increased in the scorching heat. It is everyone's responsibility to fulfil the needs of the country's capital," stated the petition. Delhi minister complains to Centre about Haryana failing to release adequate amount of water Delhi Minister Atishi wrote to the Central government regarding the water crisis and said that an adequate amount of water is not being released by Haryana. Also Read: ‘Car washing banned,’ Delhi govt introduces fine for wasting water amidst acute shortage "Delhi is heavily dependent on water from the Yamuna River for its day-to-day demand for water. However, since the last few days, there has been a drastic dip in the water levels at the Wazirabad Barrage as Haryana is not releasing the required amount of water in the Yamuna river," said Atishi, in a letter to Union Water Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat. "Moreover, the temperature in Delhi has touched almost 50 degrees. This has further intensified the demand for water," she said. National capital's water woes Various areas in the national capital including Chanakyapuri's Sanjay Camp area and Geeta colony in east Delhi have been battling acute water shortages. Delhi water crisis pic.twitter.com/Ly9JhBJycY — MrsMohini (@MohiniWealth) May 30, 2024 × In the scorching heat and rising temperature, people have been forced to stand in long queues to fill just one bucket of water as tankers come and go without providing them with adequate amount of water. The national capital is facing water crisis amid day temperature recording close to the 50 degrees Celsius. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal had earlier blamed states sharing borders with New Delhi for reduced water supply. Watch: Delhi heatwave: IMD says reading a sensor 'error' "If the BJP talks to its governments in Haryana and UP and gets some water for Delhi for a month, then the people of Delhi will greatly appreciate this step of the BJP. Such scorching heat is not in anyone's control. But if we all work together, we can provide relief to the people from this?", Kejriwal wrote on social media platform X. Meanwhile, Delhi LG VK Saxena said, "From the last few days, we can see the irresponsible attitude of the Delhi government towards the water crisis in Delhi. Today in Delhi, people are seen risking their lives and running behind tankers to get water. But the government is blaming other states for its failures. The Chief Minister's promise of 24-hour water supply in Delhi has so far proved to be a trick. Haryana and Uttar Pradesh are continuously supplying their fixed quota of water to Delhi." (With inputs from agencies)

Delhi battles acute water crisis, state govt moves SC seeking additional water supply

The United States&nbsp;Supreme Court gave a boost on Thursday to the National Rifle Association in its free speech dispute with a New York state official it accused of coercing banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the influential gun rights advocacy group.

The justices, in a 9-0 decision authored by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, threw out a lower court's ruling that dismissed the NRA's 2018 lawsuit against Maria Vullo, a former superintendent of New York's Department of Financial Services. The NRA has claimed that Vullo unlawfully retaliated against it following a mass shooting in which 17 people were killed at a high school in Parkland, Florida.

At issue in the dispute is whether Vullo had wielded her regulatory power to coerce New York financial institutions into cutting ties with the NRA in violation of protections under the US&nbsp;Constitution's First Amendment against government restrictions on free speech.

"Ultimately, the critical takeaway is that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech, directly or, as alleged here, through private intermediaries," Sotomayor wrote.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/biden-claims-xenophobia-stalling-economic-growth-in-india-china-japan-717243">Biden claims 'xenophobia' stalling economic growth in India, China, Japan</a>

The case will now return to the lower courts for further analysis of the NRA's allegations under the standard articulated in the Supreme Court's ruling.

Vullo called upon banks and insurers to consider the "reputational risks" of doing business with gun rights groups following the February 2018 Parkland shootings. In the aftermath of the Parkland rampage by a 19-year-old former student armed with an AR-15 rifle, NRA officials lashed out at gun control advocates, arguing that Democratic elites were politicizing the shootings to erode gun rights.

Vullo later fined Lloyd's of London and two other insurers more than $13 million for offering an NRA-endorsed product called "Carry Guard" that Vullo's office found was in violation of New York insurance law. The product provided liability coverage for policyholders who caused injuries from gunfire, even in cases involving the wrongful use of a firearm.

The insurers agreed to stop selling NRA-endorsed products that New York considered illegal.

<h2>'Implicit&nbsp;censorship regime'</h2>

The NRA's lawsuit, seeking unspecified monetary damages, accused Vullo of unlawfully retaliating against the group for its constitutionally protected gun rights advocacy by targeting it with an "implicit censorship regime." Its suit alleged that New York's "blacklisting" campaign sought to deprive the NRA of basic financial services and threatened its advocacy work.

The case did not involve the Constitution's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in March.

The NRA is the largest and most powerful gun rights organization in the United States and has been instrumental in thwarting Democratic-backed gun restrictions in the U.S. Congress. The nonprofit group is organized under the laws of New York state, with its main offices in Virginia.

Watch:&nbsp;US set to lift 2021 ban on offensive weapons sales to Saudi Arabia

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-set-to-lift-2021-ban-on-offensive-weapons-sales-to-saudi-arabia-725833/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

A federal judge in 2021 dismissed all of the NRA's claims apart from two free speech counts against Vullo. The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 said those also should have been dismissed, prompting the NRA's Supreme Court appeal.

The NRA found an unlikely ally in the case in President Joe Biden's administration. Even though Biden has called gun violence a national embarrassment, his administration had urged the justices to let the NRA pursue its lawsuit.

The administration argued that a lower court should determine whether Vullo's actions crossed the line between permissible criticism of the NRA and coercion aimed at suppressing a disfavored viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment protections.

The case was the latest to come before the Supreme Court involving the NRA, a group closely aligned with Republicans that has opposed gun control measures and backed pivotal lawsuits that have widened U.S. gun rights.

Americans remain deeply divided over how to address firearms violence including frequent mass shootings even as the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of gun rights.

Vullo was sued in both her official and personal capacities. But the 2nd Circuit found that Vullo would be protected from suit under the legal defense of qualified immunity that shields officials from civil litigation in certain circumstances.

The Supreme Court by the end of June is expected to issue rulings in two gun rights cases. One involves a challenge to the legality of a federal ban on "bump stock" devices that enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns. The other involves a challenge to the legality of a federal law that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to have guns.

The United States Supreme Court gave a boost on Thursday to the National Rifle Association in its free speech dispute with a New York state official it accused of coercing banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the influential gun rights advocacy group.

The United States Supreme Court gave a boost on Thursday to the National Rifle Association in its free speech dispute with a New York state official it accused of coercing banks and insurers to avoid doing business with the influential gun rights advocacy group. The justices, in a 9-0 decision authored by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, threw out a lower court's ruling that dismissed the NRA's 2018 lawsuit against Maria Vullo, a former superintendent of New York's Department of Financial Services. The NRA has claimed that Vullo unlawfully retaliated against it following a mass shooting in which 17 people were killed at a high school in Parkland, Florida. At issue in the dispute is whether Vullo had wielded her regulatory power to coerce New York financial institutions into cutting ties with the NRA in violation of protections under the US Constitution's First Amendment against government restrictions on free speech. "Ultimately, the critical takeaway is that the First Amendment prohibits government officials from wielding their power selectively to punish or suppress speech, directly or, as alleged here, through private intermediaries," Sotomayor wrote. Also Read: Biden claims 'xenophobia' stalling economic growth in India, China, Japan The case will now return to the lower courts for further analysis of the NRA's allegations under the standard articulated in the Supreme Court's ruling. Vullo called upon banks and insurers to consider the "reputational risks" of doing business with gun rights groups following the February 2018 Parkland shootings. In the aftermath of the Parkland rampage by a 19-year-old former student armed with an AR-15 rifle, NRA officials lashed out at gun control advocates, arguing that Democratic elites were politicizing the shootings to erode gun rights. Vullo later fined Lloyd's of London and two other insurers more than $13 million for offering an NRA-endorsed product called "Carry Guard" that Vullo's office found was in violation of New York insurance law. The product provided liability coverage for policyholders who caused injuries from gunfire, even in cases involving the wrongful use of a firearm. The insurers agreed to stop selling NRA-endorsed products that New York considered illegal. 'Implicit censorship regime' The NRA's lawsuit, seeking unspecified monetary damages, accused Vullo of unlawfully retaliating against the group for its constitutionally protected gun rights advocacy by targeting it with an "implicit censorship regime." Its suit alleged that New York's "blacklisting" campaign sought to deprive the NRA of basic financial services and threatened its advocacy work. The case did not involve the Constitution's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in March. The NRA is the largest and most powerful gun rights organization in the United States and has been instrumental in thwarting Democratic-backed gun restrictions in the U.S. Congress. The nonprofit group is organized under the laws of New York state, with its main offices in Virginia. Watch: US set to lift 2021 ban on offensive weapons sales to Saudi Arabia A federal judge in 2021 dismissed all of the NRA's claims apart from two free speech counts against Vullo. The Manhattan-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022 said those also should have been dismissed, prompting the NRA's Supreme Court appeal. The NRA found an unlikely ally in the case in President Joe Biden's administration. Even though Biden has called gun violence a national embarrassment, his administration had urged the justices to let the NRA pursue its lawsuit. The administration argued that a lower court should determine whether Vullo's actions crossed the line between permissible criticism of the NRA and coercion aimed at suppressing a disfavored viewpoint in violation of the First Amendment protections. The case was the latest to come before the Supreme Court involving the NRA, a group closely aligned with Republicans that has opposed gun control measures and backed pivotal lawsuits that have widened U.S. gun rights. Americans remain deeply divided over how to address firearms violence including frequent mass shootings even as the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of gun rights. Vullo was sued in both her official and personal capacities. But the 2nd Circuit found that Vullo would be protected from suit under the legal defense of qualified immunity that shields officials from civil litigation in certain circumstances. The Supreme Court by the end of June is expected to issue rulings in two gun rights cases. One involves a challenge to the legality of a federal ban on "bump stock" devices that enable semiautomatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns. The other involves a challenge to the legality of a federal law that makes it a crime for people under domestic violence restraining orders to have guns.

US Supreme Court boosts NRA in free speech fight with New York official

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has sought an extension of his interim bail by seven days, the news agency ANI reported on Monday (May 27). Chief Minister Kejriwal was arrested in the Delhi excise policy case on March 21.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has sought an extension of his interim bail by seven days, the news agency ANI reported on Monday (May 27). Chief Minister Kejriwal was arrested in the Delhi excise policy case on March 21. On May 10, the Supreme Court granted Kejriwal interim bail till June 1. The Supreme Court asked Kejriwal to surrender on June 2. Citing the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), ANI reported that Kejriwal has filed a petition in the apex court, seeking an extension of his interim bail by a week. Also read | Lok Sabha elections 2024: I voted against dictatorship, says Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal "Kejriwal has to undergo PET-CT scan and other tests. Kejriwal asked for 7 days to get the investigation done," the AAP said. Kejriwal lost seven kilogrammes after arrest The AAP also said that Kejriwal lost seven kilogrammes following his arrest, adding his ketone level is high which could signal some disease. Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal files a petition in the Supreme Court, seeking an extension of his interim bail by 7 days. Delhi CM Kejriwal has to undergo PET-CT scan and other tests. Kejriwal asked for 7 days to get the investigation done: Aam Aadmi Party — ANI (@ANI) May 27, 2024 × Following his release from jail, the chief minister has been involved in campaigning for the INDIA bloc in the ongoing Lok Sabha elections in India. Polling was held in the capital Delhi on Saturday (May 25). Interim bail conditions for Delhi CM The Supreme Court imposed certain conditions while granting interim bail to Kejriwal. The court said he would not interact with any of the witnesses or have access to any official files connected to the excise policy case. Kejriwal would not make any comment concerning his role in the case. The apex court also said that the CM "shall be bound by the statement made on his behalf that he shall not sign official files unless it is required and necessary for obtaining clearance/ approval of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi." (With inputs from agencies)

Delhi excise policy case: Kejriwal files petition in SC seeking extension of interim bail by seven days

The Supreme Court has refused a petition related to elections in the country the petition wanted the poll body to publish booth-wise numbers of voter turnout as well as upload copies of form 17c on its website within 48 Hours of polling.

India General Election 2024: Supreme Court quashes voter turnout petition

Supreme Court of India&nbsp;has dismissed&nbsp;petitions seeking a review of a December 2023 decision that upheld a decision by the Indian Parliament to&nbsp;abrogate&nbsp;the special status of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

A five-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna concluded that the earlier judgment was impeccable.

"Having perused the review petitions, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed," the bench noted in its May 1 order made public on Tuesday (May 21).

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwitpbHpmp-GAxU5yjgGHRL2AekQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-supreme-court-orders-release-of-newsclick-founder-calls-his-arrest-invalid-721588" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-supreme-court-orders-release-of-newsclick-founder-calls-his-arrest-invalid-721588&amp;ved=2ahUKEwitpbHpmp-GAxU5yjgGHRL2AekQxfQBKAB6BAgHEAE">India`s Supreme Court orders release of NewsClick founder, calls his arrest `invalid`</a>

In its December 11 decision, the court had upheld the presidential order&nbsp;which&nbsp;took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. It refused to intervene after the Solicitor General, the government's advocate, assured the court that&nbsp;the statehood of the Jammu and Kashmir territory would be restored&nbsp;at the earliest.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwitpbHpmp-GAxU5yjgGHRL2AekQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-top-court-slams-lackadaisical-approach-of-uttarakhand-govt-to-tackle-forest-fires-721886" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-top-court-slams-lackadaisical-approach-of-uttarakhand-govt-to-tackle-forest-fires-721886&amp;ved=2ahUKEwitpbHpmp-GAxU5yjgGHRL2AekQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE">India’s top court slams ‘lackadaisical’ approach of Uttarakhand govt in tackling forest fires</a>

In the landmark judgment, the Supreme Court had upheld the abrogation of Article 370 granting semi-autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. The court ruled that the Parliament had the legislative competence to enact the laws and that&nbsp;the abrogation did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution.

The court also approved the formation of Ladakh as a separate Union Territory (UT), citing parliament's powers to do so without taking the state assembly's nod. 
 
Petitioners Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association, Awami National Conference, Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and Jammu and Kashmir People’s Movement had contended that the Constitution Bench reached ‘erroneous conclusions’, said reports.

&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

Supreme Court of India has dismissed petitions seeking a review of a December 2023 decision that upheld a decision by the Indian Parliament to abrogate the special status of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Supreme Court of India has dismissed petitions seeking a review of a December 2023 decision that upheld a decision by the Indian Parliament to abrogate the special status of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. A five-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, Surya Kant and AS Bopanna concluded that the earlier judgment was impeccable. "Having perused the review petitions, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed," the bench noted in its May 1 order made public on Tuesday (May 21). Also read: India`s Supreme Court orders release of NewsClick founder, calls his arrest `invalid` In its December 11 decision, the court had upheld the presidential order which took away the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. It refused to intervene after the Solicitor General, the government's advocate, assured the court that the statehood of the Jammu and Kashmir territory would be restored at the earliest. Also read: India’s top court slams ‘lackadaisical’ approach of Uttarakhand govt in tackling forest fires In the landmark judgment, the Supreme Court had upheld the abrogation of Article 370 granting semi-autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. The court ruled that the Parliament had the legislative competence to enact the laws and that the abrogation did not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. The court also approved the formation of Ladakh as a separate Union Territory (UT), citing parliament's powers to do so without taking the state assembly's nod. Petitioners Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association, Awami National Conference, Muzaffar Iqbal Khan and Jammu and Kashmir People’s Movement had contended that the Constitution Bench reached ‘erroneous conclusions’, said reports. (With inputs from agencies)

Supreme Court of India rejects petitions seeking review of Article 370 ruling

India's Supreme Court on Wednesday (May 15) slammed the Uttarakhand government over its "lackadaisical" approach while tacking raging forest fires in the state.&nbsp;

The top court was hearing a plea on the forest fires in the northern state. A Forest Department bulletin revealed that the fires have affected more than 1,437 hectares of green cover since November.&nbsp;

A bench of Justices BR Gavai, SVN Bhatti and Sandeep Mehta said that the State's approach to controlling forest fires was not up to the mark.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-citizenship-amendment-act-in-action-14-migrants-granted-citizenship-by-mha-721828">India’s&nbsp;Citizenship (Amendment) Act in action: 14 migrants granted citizenship by MHA</a>&nbsp;

The Court asked the counsel, who appeared for Uttarakhand, "Why have you employed the forest fire staff on election duty amidst fire?"&nbsp;

According to a state official, the election duty was over and the Chief Secretary had directed them not to put any official on poll duty.&nbsp;

"It's a sorry state of affairs. You are only making excuses," the bench responded.&nbsp;

The top court also raised the matter of a huge vacancy in the state's forest department, stating that it must be handled.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-top-court-refuses-to-allow-abortion-for-pregnancy-beyond-27-weeks-says-foetus-has-right-to-live-721716">India’s top court refuses to allow abortion for pregnancy beyond 27 weeks, says foetus has right to live</a>&nbsp;

"There is a huge fire and 40 per cent of the forest is under fire. This is undoused," advocate Parmeshwar told the court.&nbsp;

The counsel for Uttarakhand responded to the claim, stating that there were no new fires. Notably, the recent rains in several sections of the state gave much-needed relief from forest fires. Local reports said that there were no new incidents reported in the last few days.

The top court also demanded an explanation from the state administration as to why funds provided by the central last year were not fully utilised.&nbsp;

The government counsel claimed that the state government had not received funds from the Centre to fight the forest fire.&nbsp;

He said, "Funding is a huge issue now. Had there been proper funding, the situation would have been better. The Centre has to chip in to help the state."&nbsp; 
 
The apex court in 2021 agreed to examine pleas asking the Uttarakhand government to take measures to prevent the occurrence of forest fires causing large-scale destruction of flora and fauna in the hill state.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

India's Supreme Court on Wednesday (May 15) slammed the Uttarakhand government over its "lackadaisical" approach while tacking raging forest fires in the state. The top court was hearing a plea on the forest fires in the northern state.

India's Supreme Court on Wednesday (May 15) slammed the Uttarakhand government over its "lackadaisical" approach while tacking raging forest fires in the state. The top court was hearing a plea on the forest fires in the northern state. A Forest Department bulletin revealed that the fires have affected more than 1,437 hectares of green cover since November. A bench of Justices BR Gavai, SVN Bhatti and Sandeep Mehta said that the State's approach to controlling forest fires was not up to the mark. Also read: India’s Citizenship (Amendment) Act in action: 14 migrants granted citizenship by MHA The Court asked the counsel, who appeared for Uttarakhand, "Why have you employed the forest fire staff on election duty amidst fire?" According to a state official, the election duty was over and the Chief Secretary had directed them not to put any official on poll duty. "It's a sorry state of affairs. You are only making excuses," the bench responded. The top court also raised the matter of a huge vacancy in the state's forest department, stating that it must be handled. Also read: India’s top court refuses to allow abortion for pregnancy beyond 27 weeks, says foetus has right to live "There is a huge fire and 40 per cent of the forest is under fire. This is undoused," advocate Parmeshwar told the court. The counsel for Uttarakhand responded to the claim, stating that there were no new fires. Notably, the recent rains in several sections of the state gave much-needed relief from forest fires. Local reports said that there were no new incidents reported in the last few days. The top court also demanded an explanation from the state administration as to why funds provided by the central last year were not fully utilised. The government counsel claimed that the state government had not received funds from the Centre to fight the forest fire. He said, "Funding is a huge issue now. Had there been proper funding, the situation would have been better. The Centre has to chip in to help the state." The apex court in 2021 agreed to examine pleas asking the Uttarakhand government to take measures to prevent the occurrence of forest fires causing large-scale destruction of flora and fauna in the hill state. (With inputs from agencies)

India’s top court slams ‘lackadaisical’ approach of Uttarakhand govt in tackling forest fires

The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), an Indian government body, has recommended an increase in the reservation quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in public sector employment in Indian states of Punjab and West Bengal, the news agency PTI reported on Thursday (May 16).

The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), an Indian government body, has recommended an increase in the reservation quota for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in public sector employment in Indian states of Punjab and West Bengal, the news agency PTI reported on Thursday (May 16). At present, Punjab allocates 25 per cent of public employment positions to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and 12 per cent to OBCs. In an advisory, the NCBC proposed enhancing the OBC quota by an additional 13%, bringing the total OBC reservation in public employment to 25%. This adjustment would adhere to the Supreme Court's ceiling of up to 50 per cent reservation for socially and educationally backward classes. Also read | 'BJP will scrap Muslim reservation and give it to SC, ST, OBC,' asserts Amit Shah In West Bengal, the reservation quota for SCs is 22 per cent, for Scheduled Tribes (STs) is six per cent, and for OBCs is 17 per cent, concerning services and posts under the control of the state in establishments run or aided by the government. The NCBC said that in Bengal 17% reservation for the Other Backward Classes in respect of services and posts has been ensured. "Thus the total reservation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes for public employment comes to 45%," the commission added. Also watch | PM Modi & NCBC question Karnataka govt for giving all Muslims OBC reservation × The NCBC also observed that the remaining five per cent quota in public employment under the control of the state government may be enhanced concerning OBCs as per the ceiling up to 50 per cent in compliance with Supreme Court directions. The advisory said that the above decisions by the NCBC came following a review of the current reservation policies, oral statements and documentary evidence, aiming to align with the directives laid out by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case. (With inputs from agencies)

Centre recommends increase in reservation quota for OBCs in public employment in Punjab, West Bengal

India's Supreme Court ordered NewsClick editor Prabir Purkayastha's release after it observed that his arrest by the Delhi Police in the anti-terror case was 'invalid'.

India's Supreme Court ordered NewsClick editor Prabir Purkayastha's release after it observed that his arrest by the Delhi Police in the anti-terror case was 'invalid'. A bench of Justices Sandeep Mehta and BR Gavai on Wednesday (May 15) said that the court was not provided with the remand copy which made his arrest void. "There is no hesitation in the mind of the court that the grounds of arrest were not provided...which vitiates arrest. The appellant is entitled to release from custody after the Pankaj Bansal case. The remand order is invalid," Justice Mehta said. According to the top court, the grounds for arrest should be provided in writing to the accused person in custody. Also Read: Jackie Shroff moves Delhi High Court against unauthorised use of his name, personality traits Speaking about the Supreme Court's order, Advocate Arshdeep Khurana said, "Supreme Court has held the arrest and the remand proceedings to be illegal and has directed the release of Purkayastha. We have been directed to furnish the bail bond before the trial court. "This is a major and big relief because we have been maintaining from the beginning that the entire proceedings against him were illegal and the manner of arrest was illegal which has now been upheld by the Supreme Court," he added. Why did the Delhi Police arrest Prabir Purkayastha? Delhi Police had arrested Purkayastha on October 3 under the anti-terror law, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, days after a New York Times investigation accused NewsClick of receiving funds from a network which promoted Chinese propaganda. In the chargesheet, which was filed in March and ran through 8,000 pages with different annexures, NewsClick and Purkayastha were accused by the Delhi Police of promoting Chinese propaganda and terror funding. A case was filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against NewsClick on October 11 for breaching the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. In its investigation, the Delhi Police claimed that Neville Roy Singham, who is an active member of the Communist Party of China's propaganda department, had fraudulently injected funds into the portal. Watch: Bollywood actor Jackie Shroff files complain in Delhi High Court, wants personality rights protected The police also arrested NewsClick's HR head Amit Chakravarty on October 3. However, in January, a court permitted him to become an approver in the case. (With inputs from agencies)

India's Supreme Court orders release of NewsClick founder, calls his arrest 'invalid'

Following a night of interrogation, a 64-year-old businessman challenged his arrest by the central agency during odd hours. The Supreme Court demanded the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) answer to his plea.

Following a night of interrogation, a 64-year-old businessman challenged his arrest by the central agency during odd hours. The Supreme Court demanded the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) answer to his plea. The petitioner was also granted permission to move the vacation benches for bail by a bench consisting of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Prashant Kumar Mishra. "Give notice, with a three-week return period. Dasti notice on the Standing Counsel through the Central Agency Section, in addition," the order said. A 64-year-old businessman named Ram Issrani filed a plea with the court accusing the ED of unlawfully detaining him in connection with an alleged bank fraud case. He stated that he was forced to wait in the ED's office on August 7 and 8, 2018, following that from 10:30 pm to 3:00 am, his statement was recorded. He said that he was kept awake for 20 hours in all and that he was detained on August 8 at 5:30 am. The Bombay High Court declined to invalidate the arrest and remand, leading to the instant appeal. Also read: What is the Enforcement Directorate? What are its recent high profile cases? Though the High Court refused to overturn the arrest, it did object to the central agency recording testimonies of witnesses and accused at unusual hours, which resulted in sleep deprivation. The Court had instructed the ED to publish a circular or instructions about when to record statements after a summons for interrogation is sent out. It reaffirmed that, because it was considered a judicial procedure, an investigation conducted by ED personnel was conducted on a different basis than an inquiry conducted in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure. It was brought up before the Supreme Court that the petitioner was not brought before a magistrate right away after being taken into custody. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, together with Advocates Vijay Agarwal, Mahesh Agarwal, Ankur Saigal, Kajal Dalal, and EC Agrawala, represented the businessman before the Supreme Court. (With inputs from agencies)

64-year-old’s plea against odd-hour arrest: Supreme Court seeks ED’s response

In a big win for the INDIA alliance ahead of the Delhi Lok Sabha election voting, India's Supreme Court on Friday (May 10) granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till June 1.

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader was arrested and jailed in connection with the liquor excise policy case.

"We are passing an interim order...giving him interim bail till June 1," the apex court reportedly said giving relief to the Delhi CM who has been running the capital from behind bars since March 21.&nbsp;

In its order, SC further asked Kejriwal to surrender and go back to jail on June 2.

This key development comes as a huge respite for the AAP as Delhi High Court last month refused to give bail to the Delhi chief minister.&nbsp;

The court also approved Kejriwal's campaign for the elections after his release from jail.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pak-will-think-of-using-atom-bomb-congress-mani-shankar-aiyars-comments-spark-controversy-720032">Mani Shankar Aiyar sparks controversy with 'Pak can drop atom bomb on India' statement</a>

"Let us not draw any parallel. He was arrested in March and the arrest could have been before or after. Now, after 21 days, there won't be any difference. On June 2, Arvind Kejriwal will surrender," the court ruled.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/narendra-dabholkar-murder-case-two-accused-get-life-imprisonment-720000">Narendra Dabholkar murder case: Two accused get life imprisonment</a>

After the Supreme Court's interim bail ruling, Kejriwal's attorney will proceed to the trial court to prepare and dispatch the release order to the Tihar Jail administration, media reports said citing sources.

Kejriwal will be released by the jail administration only upon receipt of the trial court's release order, they added.&nbsp;

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-elections-2024-accelerating-rural-indias-economy-decoding-govts-plan-for-rural-india-719995">India Elections 2024: Accelerating rural India's economy | Decoding govt's plan for rural India</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-elections-2024-accelerating-rural-indias-economy-decoding-govts-plan-for-rural-india-719995/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the ED, told the court that Kejriwal should refrain from disclosing any information pertaining to the case and must surrender on the given date.

To rejoice and celebrate the release of the leader, who had been lodged in Delhi's Tihar Jail since March 21, AAP party workers raised slogans outside the party office.&nbsp;

<h2>Reactions pour in on Kejriwal's bail&nbsp;</h2>

On the Supreme Court granting interim bail to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP leader Gopal Rai said, "...Today the Supreme Court has given a ray of hope to all those who believe in the Constitution. Our party, people of Delhi thank the Supreme Court..."

Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led&nbsp;Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Nipuram said, "Instead of jail or bail, first he should be removed from the CM post. How can an accused run the government from jail?"

(With inputs from agencies)

&nbsp;

In a big win for the INDIA alliance ahead of the Delhi Lok Sabha election voting, India's Supreme Court on Friday (May 10) granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till June 1.

In a big win for the INDIA alliance ahead of the Delhi Lok Sabha election voting, India's Supreme Court on Friday (May 10) granted interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal till June 1. The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader was arrested and jailed in connection with the liquor excise policy case. "We are passing an interim order...giving him interim bail till June 1," the apex court reportedly said giving relief to the Delhi CM who has been running the capital from behind bars since March 21. In its order, SC further asked Kejriwal to surrender and go back to jail on June 2. This key development comes as a huge respite for the AAP as Delhi High Court last month refused to give bail to the Delhi chief minister. The court also approved Kejriwal's campaign for the elections after his release from jail. Also Read | Mani Shankar Aiyar sparks controversy with 'Pak can drop atom bomb on India' statement "Let us not draw any parallel. He was arrested in March and the arrest could have been before or after. Now, after 21 days, there won't be any difference. On June 2, Arvind Kejriwal will surrender," the court ruled. Also Read | Narendra Dabholkar murder case: Two accused get life imprisonment After the Supreme Court's interim bail ruling, Kejriwal's attorney will proceed to the trial court to prepare and dispatch the release order to the Tihar Jail administration, media reports said citing sources. Kejriwal will be released by the jail administration only upon receipt of the trial court's release order, they added. Watch | India Elections 2024: Accelerating rural India's economy | Decoding govt's plan for rural India × Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the ED, told the court that Kejriwal should refrain from disclosing any information pertaining to the case and must surrender on the given date. To rejoice and celebrate the release of the leader, who had been lodged in Delhi's Tihar Jail since March 21, AAP party workers raised slogans outside the party office. Reactions pour in on Kejriwal's bail On the Supreme Court granting interim bail to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, AAP leader Gopal Rai said, "...Today the Supreme Court has given a ray of hope to all those who believe in the Constitution. Our party, people of Delhi thank the Supreme Court..." Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Nipuram said, "Instead of jail or bail, first he should be removed from the CM post. How can an accused run the government from jail?" (With inputs from agencies)

India Supreme Court grants interim bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal

Wealth redistribution has been a highly debated issue between the government and the opposition in the Lok Sabha elections. The Supreme Court has also appointed a nine-judge bench to interpret the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in terms of material resource ownership and management.

Wealth redistribution has been a highly debated issue between the government and the opposition in the Lok Sabha elections. The Supreme Court has also appointed a nine-judge bench to interpret the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in terms of material resource ownership and management. What is the current debate? Congress leader Rahul Gandhi during the Lok Sabha campaign said that there will be a financial survey to determine the distribution of wealth in the country for addressing the issue of inequality. The ruling BJP targeted Gandhi and alleged that Congress, if elected, would bring back the "socialistic model" of economics and hinder India's growth as an economy. India's economic policy shifts: Now vs. then In the first four decades following independence, the governments in India used "socialistic model" of economics. The economic policies resulted in the nationalisation of banks and insurance, exceptionally high direct tax rates (up to 97%), estate duty on inheritance, wealth tax, and so on. The objective behind these policies at the time was to reduce inequality and redistribute wealth among the poor who made up the bulk of the population. However, such policies impeded growth and led to the concealing of income/wealth. Since then, the country has transitioned from a closed economy to one of liberalisation, globalisation and privatisation. The market-driven economy has resulted in more resources for the government, which has aided in lifting people out of poverty. What did the Supreme Court-appointed 9-judge bench say? On Tuesday, a Constitution bench of the Supreme Court, which is examining the question of whether private property would constitute material resources of the community as mentioned in Article 39(b), stated that the provision should not be interpreted so broadly that no private rights are protected at all. The bench comprised CJI D Y Chandrachud and Justices Hrishikesh Roy, B V Nagarathna, Sudhanshu Dhulia, J B Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Rajesh Bindal, Satish Chandra Sharma and Augustine George Masih. “We will be sending a message across because what we write will send a message of what India is and what India aspires to be…We do not want to dilute the constitutional social significance of 39 (b) and (c). It’s there for us, given to us. At the same time, we should not be sending a message by interpreting 39(b) in such a wide sense that there is no protection of private rights in the society at all,” Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud, presiding over the bench, said. “It would be rather extreme to interpret Article 39(b) to include privately-owned property as material resources of the community," the bench said. “The dynamics of economic development have changed from socialist pattern to a free market economy since the 1990s and now private investments hold the key. If we want to have a productive economy, then private investment must be encouraged. In the 1950s, no one had envisaged that electricity would be distributed by private parties. In the present scenario, it would be extremely unfair to argue that community resources include all private properties,” it added. Also read: India’s former judges write to CJI, urge him to counter political pressure, efforts to undermine judiciary He also questioned, “How will we attract private investment if we say that there is no protection of private rights.” What did Solicitor General Tushar Mehta say? Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who agreed with the CJI said, "It would be a rustic and juvenile method to propose computing the nation’s wealth by totalling the wealth of every citizen and then distributing it equally among a particular section. Such ideas reflect a lack of understanding of economic development, governance, social welfare, and the nation.” The allusion to the nine judges stems from the 1978 ruling in 'The State of Karnataka And Anr Etc against Shri Ranganatha Reddy & Anr', which presented two opposing viewpoints. The lawsuit concerned the nationalisation of road transport services. Justice V R Krishna Iyer believed that the community's material resources would comprise both natural and man-made resources, as well as publicly and privately owned assets. “The formulation by Justice Krishna Iyer is a little too extreme. What that says (is) since the community consists of individuals and therefore every individual is a part of the community, the material resources of the community would therefore also mean resources of the individual,” the CJI said. (With inputs from agencies)

Wealth redistribution: Why did the Solicitor General call the idea ‘rustic and juvenile’ in Supreme Court?

The arguments in India's Supreme Court will conclude today on whether the government can actually acquire and redistribute private properties if they are considered as material resources of the community.

SC hearing on Article 39 (B): 9-judge bench to decide can govt acquire & redistribute assets

US Supreme Court in Washington is hearing a matter on whether former US President and 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump can assert immunity in a federal election subversion case related to his alleged role in inciting the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

During the proceedings, Justice Sonya Sotomayor posed a question about whether a scenario where the president labels his opponent as corrupt and instructs the military to assassinate them would qualify as an official act protected by immunity.

In a shocking response, Trump's Attorney D John Sauer responded that it could potentially be considered an "official act" depending on the specifics of the hypothetical situation.

Earlier this year, the court delivered a win for Trump by overturning a decision that sought to exclude him from Colorado's ballot. This comes as Trump is also facing trial in New York's Manhattan court regarding a hush money payment to adult star Stormy Daniels in 2016.&nbsp;

Because of his presence in Manhattan court, the Republican candidate will not be present at the Supreme Court as it hears the arguments by Trump's lawyers and Special Counsel Jack Smith.&nbsp;

Trump's legal team earlier contended that his attempts to overturn the 2020 election constitute "official acts" carried out while in office. With a conservative majority of 6-3 on the court, including three justices appointed by Trump, the decision will hold immense importance and will set a precedent in such future cases.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/polish-director-to-release-ai-assisted-putin-biopic-in-bid-to-challenge-him-through-art-714919">Polish director to release AI-assisted Putin biopic in bid to ‘challenge him through art’</a>

Supreme Court's conservative majority comprises three justices appointed by Trump - Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. The outcome of the Supreme Court case would not impact the ongoing hush-money trial in New York, which focuses on actions before Trump's presidency.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/four-more-years-pause-biden-reads-instructions-from-teleprompter-in-latest-speech-gaffe-714885">'Four more years, pause,' Biden reads instructions from teleprompter in latest speech gaffe</a>

In a filing to the justices earlier, Trump's lawyers argued for his&nbsp;immunity from criminal prosecution&nbsp;and warned that without such protection, the threat of future prosecution could be exploited as a political tool to influence presidential decisions.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/blinkens-visit-to-china-us-secy-of-state-antony-blinken-holds-meeting-with-top-shanghai-official-714903">Blinken’s Visit to China: US Secy of State Antony Blinken holds meeting with top Shanghai official</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/blinkens-visit-to-china-us-secy-of-state-antony-blinken-holds-meeting-with-top-shanghai-official-714903/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Meanwhile, ex-tabloid executive David Pecker has testified in the hush money trial, where a key evidence is a $130,000 payment made by Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels. In the hush money trial, prosecutors must present evidence of intent as Trump faces 34 counts in this trial alone.

Trump is the first former US president to face criminal prosecution in the hush money case. Notably, Trump maintains his innocence in this case and three other criminal proceedings.&nbsp;

<h2>E Jean Carroll case</h2>

In New York, a judge has rejected former President Trump's appeal for a fresh trial in a defamation lawsuit brought by writer E Jean Carroll. Carroll had accused Trump of tarnishing her reputation and hindering her professional life.

This ruling upholds the jury's decision to award $83.3 million in damages, a significant legal setback for the former president who faces numerous legal challenges.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

US Supreme Court in Washington is hearing a matter on whether former US President and 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump can assert immunity in a federal election subversion case related to his alleged role in inciting the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

US Supreme Court in Washington is hearing a matter on whether former US President and 2024 presidential candidate Donald Trump can assert immunity in a federal election subversion case related to his alleged role in inciting the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. During the proceedings, Justice Sonya Sotomayor posed a question about whether a scenario where the president labels his opponent as corrupt and instructs the military to assassinate them would qualify as an official act protected by immunity. In a shocking response, Trump's Attorney D John Sauer responded that it could potentially be considered an "official act" depending on the specifics of the hypothetical situation. Earlier this year, the court delivered a win for Trump by overturning a decision that sought to exclude him from Colorado's ballot. This comes as Trump is also facing trial in New York's Manhattan court regarding a hush money payment to adult star Stormy Daniels in 2016. Because of his presence in Manhattan court, the Republican candidate will not be present at the Supreme Court as it hears the arguments by Trump's lawyers and Special Counsel Jack Smith. Trump's legal team earlier contended that his attempts to overturn the 2020 election constitute "official acts" carried out while in office. With a conservative majority of 6-3 on the court, including three justices appointed by Trump, the decision will hold immense importance and will set a precedent in such future cases. Also Read | Polish director to release AI-assisted Putin biopic in bid to ‘challenge him through art’ Supreme Court's conservative majority comprises three justices appointed by Trump - Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. The outcome of the Supreme Court case would not impact the ongoing hush-money trial in New York, which focuses on actions before Trump's presidency. Also Read | 'Four more years, pause,' Biden reads instructions from teleprompter in latest speech gaffe In a filing to the justices earlier, Trump's lawyers argued for his immunity from criminal prosecution and warned that without such protection, the threat of future prosecution could be exploited as a political tool to influence presidential decisions. Watch | Blinken’s Visit to China: US Secy of State Antony Blinken holds meeting with top Shanghai official × Meanwhile, ex-tabloid executive David Pecker has testified in the hush money trial, where a key evidence is a $130,000 payment made by Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels. In the hush money trial, prosecutors must present evidence of intent as Trump faces 34 counts in this trial alone. Trump is the first former US president to face criminal prosecution in the hush money case. Notably, Trump maintains his innocence in this case and three other criminal proceedings. E Jean Carroll case In New York, a judge has rejected former President Trump's appeal for a fresh trial in a defamation lawsuit brought by writer E Jean Carroll. Carroll had accused Trump of tarnishing her reputation and hindering her professional life. This ruling upholds the jury's decision to award $83.3 million in damages, a significant legal setback for the former president who faces numerous legal challenges. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump attorney says presidents are immune from assassinating political rivals

In a major development the top Court of India rejected the Pleas seeking 100% cross-verification of the electronic voting machines or the EVM data with voter verifiable paper audit trail records. Watch to know more.

India General Elections: SC rejects VVPAT petitions, denies pleas for 100% verification of votes

Lok Sabha elections 2024: Supreme Court rejects plea for 100% EVM-VVPAT verification

The Supreme Court of India has issued a notice to the Election Commission of India. It was regarding a plea seeking fresh elections in constituencies where the NOTA category receives the majority of the votes.

India's SC issues notice to ECI on NOTA frame rule |

Indian Supreme Court on Friday (Apr 26) rejected all petitions seeking 100 per cent verification of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) votes with their Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips.

Supreme Court directed that, after the completion of symbol loading process, the Symbol Loading Unit (SLU) should be sealed and they should be stored at least for 45 days.

"The burnt memory in the microcontroller EVM shall be checked by a team of engineers after the declaration of results on a request by candidates in serial number 2 and 3, such a request to be made within 7 days after the declaration of results," Justice Sanjiv Khanna said, according to the LiveLaw.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/evm-vvpat-row-supreme-court-says-it-is-not-election-commissions-controlling-authority-714589">EVM-VVPAT row: Supreme Court says it is not Election Commission’s controlling authority</a>

"The expenses for the verification (of the programme) to be borne by the candidates making the request, in case the EVM is found to be tampered, the expenses will be refunded," Justice Khanna said, adding that blindly distrusting a system can lead to unwarranted suspicions.

The Supreme Court asked Election Commission of India to examine the suggestion for an electronic machine for counting the paper slips, and whether along with the symbol there can be a bar code for each party.

Also watch |&nbsp;India General Elections 2024: 88 seats up for grabs in phase 2

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-general-elections-2024-88-seats-up-for-grabs-in-phase-2-715283/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"That on completion of the symbol loading process in the EVM undertaken on or after 01.05.2024, the symbol loading unit should be sealed and secured in containers. The candidates and their representatives shall sign the seal. The sealed containers containing the SLUs shall be kept in the store rooms along with the EVMs at least for 45 days post the declaration of results," Justice Khanna said.

<h2>What does it mean?</h2>

The VVPAT (Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail) is an independent system attached to the EVM (Electronic Voting Machine) that allows voters to check if their votes were cast as intended.

When a vote is cast, a slip is printed containing the serial number, name and symbol of the candidate, and this is shown to the voter from a transparent screen for a few&nbsp;seconds. The machine stores it in a sealed box.

In the event of alleged discrepancies, the paper slips can be cross-checked against the votes recorded electronically to see if the declared result is valid.

During the hearings, the poll panel explained that there is a 4MB flash memory in each VVPAT machine which stores the party symbols.

This unit, or the SLU, will be kept in locked storerooms with the EVMs, the court said.

<h2>What was the case?</h2>

The bunch of petitions before the court had sought a direction to cross-verify every vote cast on EVMs with paper slips generated by the VVPAT system. The court earlier said it was not the controlling authority for elections and could not dictate the functioning of the poll body which is a constitutional authority in itself.

(With inputs from agencies)

Indian Supreme Court on Friday (Apr 26) rejected all petitions seeking 100 per cent verification of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) votes with their Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips.

Indian Supreme Court on Friday (Apr 26) rejected all petitions seeking 100 per cent verification of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) votes with their Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips. Supreme Court directed that, after the completion of symbol loading process, the Symbol Loading Unit (SLU) should be sealed and they should be stored at least for 45 days. "The burnt memory in the microcontroller EVM shall be checked by a team of engineers after the declaration of results on a request by candidates in serial number 2 and 3, such a request to be made within 7 days after the declaration of results," Justice Sanjiv Khanna said, according to the LiveLaw. Also read | EVM-VVPAT row: Supreme Court says it is not Election Commission’s controlling authority "The expenses for the verification (of the programme) to be borne by the candidates making the request, in case the EVM is found to be tampered, the expenses will be refunded," Justice Khanna said, adding that blindly distrusting a system can lead to unwarranted suspicions. The Supreme Court asked Election Commission of India to examine the suggestion for an electronic machine for counting the paper slips, and whether along with the symbol there can be a bar code for each party. Also watch | India General Elections 2024: 88 seats up for grabs in phase 2 × "That on completion of the symbol loading process in the EVM undertaken on or after 01.05.2024, the symbol loading unit should be sealed and secured in containers. The candidates and their representatives shall sign the seal. The sealed containers containing the SLUs shall be kept in the store rooms along with the EVMs at least for 45 days post the declaration of results," Justice Khanna said. What does it mean? The VVPAT (Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail) is an independent system attached to the EVM (Electronic Voting Machine) that allows voters to check if their votes were cast as intended. When a vote is cast, a slip is printed containing the serial number, name and symbol of the candidate, and this is shown to the voter from a transparent screen for a few seconds. The machine stores it in a sealed box. In the event of alleged discrepancies, the paper slips can be cross-checked against the votes recorded electronically to see if the declared result is valid. During the hearings, the poll panel explained that there is a 4MB flash memory in each VVPAT machine which stores the party symbols. This unit, or the SLU, will be kept in locked storerooms with the EVMs, the court said. What was the case? The bunch of petitions before the court had sought a direction to cross-verify every vote cast on EVMs with paper slips generated by the VVPAT system. The court earlier said it was not the controlling authority for elections and could not dictate the functioning of the poll body which is a constitutional authority in itself. (With inputs from agencies)

India elections 2024: Supreme Court rejects all petitions seeking 100 per cent EVM-VVPAT verification

India's Supreme Court declined on Friday (April 26) to order any change to the vote-counting process, rejecting petitions seeking a return to the ballot system or to tally all paper slips generated as proof of voting for votes recorded by electronic machines.

Indian Supreme Court's verdict on pleas seeking 100% EVM-VVPAT verification

The Indian Supreme Court said on Wednesday (Apr 24) that it would be dangerous to say that the private property of an individual cannot be regarded as material resources of the community and taken over by state authorities to subserve the "common good".

The Indian Supreme Court said on Wednesday (Apr 24) that it would be dangerous to say that the private property of an individual cannot be regarded as material resources of the community and taken over by state authorities to subserve the "common good". This observation was made by a Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud examining whether privately owned resources can be considered "material resources of the community". The counsel for parties, including the Property Owners Association (POA) of Mumbai, then made vehement submissions that state authorities cannot take over private properties under the garb of constitutional schemes of Articles 39 (b) and 31 C of the Constitution. A report by the news agency PTI said that the bench was considering the vexed legal question arising from the petitions on whether private properties can be considered "material resources of the community" under Article 39 (b). What is Article 39 (b)? Article 39 (b) of the Constitution makes it obligatory for the State to create policy towards securing "that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good." Also read | Indian Supreme Court allows 14-year-old rape survivor to abort 28-week pregnancy A total of 16 petitions including the lead petition filed by the Mumbai-based POA were heard by the bench. What did the bench say? On Wednesday, the Supreme Court bench said that it might be a little extreme to suggest that material resources of the community only meant "public resources and we do not have their origin in the private property of an individual." "Take simple things like mines and even private forests. For instance, for us to say that the governmental policy will not apply to the private forests under Article 39 (b)... therefore keep the hands off. It will be extremely dangerous as a proposition," the bench added. The bench highlighted that the Constitution was intended to bring about social transformation and we cannot say that Article 39 (b) has no application once the property is privately held. Also watch | Indian Supreme Court links right against climate change to Article 21 & 14 × It further said that whether the Maharashtra law, empowering authorities to take over dilapidated buildings, was valid or not was a completely different issue and would be decided independently. Meanwhile, CJI Chandrachud said, "You must understand that Article 39 (b) has been crafted in a certain way in the Constitution because the Constitution was intended to bring about a social transformation. We shouldn't therefore go that far to say that the moment private property is private property, Article 39 (b) will have no application." (With inputs from agencies)

Is seizure and redistribution of private property possible? Indian SC weighs in

The political slugfest over the redistribution of wealth is escalating. Engaged in interpreting Article 39(b) of the constitution. A nine-judge bench examined whether privately-owned resources can be considered as 'material resources of the community'.

Supreme Court on ‘Marxist interpretation’ of wealth redistribution

The Supreme Court of India&nbsp;on Wednesday (April 24) said it is not the controlling authority of the apex election body. The top court added that it cannot dictate the functioning of Election Commission, which is a constitutional authority.&nbsp;

Supreme Court made these remarks during the hearing on a bunch of petitions seeking thorough cross-verification of votes cast on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with paper slips generated through the VVPAT [Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail] system.&nbsp;

The court has reserved the judgment after a bench comprised on Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta questioned if it can act on mere suspicion.

Responding to concerns raised by advocate Prashant Bhushan for petitioner Association for Democratic Reforms, the court said, "If you are predisposed about a thought-process, then we cannot help you... we are not here to change your thought process."

The petition sought top court's direction to cross-verify every vote cast on EVMs with the paper slips generated by the VVPAT system. At present, this cross-verification is done for five randomly selected EVMs in every assembly segment of a Lok Sabha constituency.

Previously, the petitioners drew comparisons with European countries that have gone back to the ballot voting system.&nbsp;

The Election Commission asserted that the current system of voting comprised of the EVMs and the VVPAT is foolproof.

An EVM has a control unit and a balloting unit connected by a cable. These are also connected with a VVPAT -- Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail -- machine.&nbsp;

This machine shows a voter if the vote was cast properly and went to the candidate he/she supports.

The court asked election commission if the microcontrollers in the system can be re-programmed.

The Election Commission responded that all three units have their own microcontrollers and these can be programmed only once, an assertion the ADR denounced.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-election-commission-rejects-claims-over-evm-error-that-favoured-bjp-712625">Indian Election Commission rejects claims over EVM error that 'favoured' BJP</a>

The court said it has to trust the poll body's technical report. "They are saying quantum of flash memory is very low. They can store 1024 symbols, not software. They say that as far as microcontrollers in the CU (control unit) is concerned, it is agnostic. It does not recognise the party or symbol, it knows the buttons," Justice Khanna said.

Also watch |&nbsp;Fineprint: Congress leader Kapil Sibal attends EVM 'Hackathon' in London

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/fineprint-congress-leader-kapil-sibal-attends-evm-hackathon-in-london-191860/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

When Bhushan asked if it is possible to load a malicious programme in the flash memory, the court made the following remark: "Can we issue a mandamus on the basis of a suspicion? We are not the controlling authority of another constitutional authority, we cannot control the elections."

(With inputs from agencies)

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday (April 24) said it is not the controlling authority of the apex election body. The top court added that it cannot dictate the functioning of Election Commission, which is a constitutional authority.

The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday (April 24) said it is not the controlling authority of the apex election body. The top court added that it cannot dictate the functioning of Election Commission, which is a constitutional authority. Supreme Court made these remarks during the hearing on a bunch of petitions seeking thorough cross-verification of votes cast on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) with paper slips generated through the VVPAT [Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail] system. The court has reserved the judgment after a bench comprised on Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta questioned if it can act on mere suspicion. Responding to concerns raised by advocate Prashant Bhushan for petitioner Association for Democratic Reforms, the court said, "If you are predisposed about a thought-process, then we cannot help you... we are not here to change your thought process." The petition sought top court's direction to cross-verify every vote cast on EVMs with the paper slips generated by the VVPAT system. At present, this cross-verification is done for five randomly selected EVMs in every assembly segment of a Lok Sabha constituency. Previously, the petitioners drew comparisons with European countries that have gone back to the ballot voting system. The Election Commission asserted that the current system of voting comprised of the EVMs and the VVPAT is foolproof. An EVM has a control unit and a balloting unit connected by a cable. These are also connected with a VVPAT -- Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail -- machine. This machine shows a voter if the vote was cast properly and went to the candidate he/she supports. The court asked election commission if the microcontrollers in the system can be re-programmed. The Election Commission responded that all three units have their own microcontrollers and these can be programmed only once, an assertion the ADR denounced. Also read | Indian Election Commission rejects claims over EVM error that 'favoured' BJP The court said it has to trust the poll body's technical report. "They are saying quantum of flash memory is very low. They can store 1024 symbols, not software. They say that as far as microcontrollers in the CU (control unit) is concerned, it is agnostic. It does not recognise the party or symbol, it knows the buttons," Justice Khanna said. Also watch | Fineprint: Congress leader Kapil Sibal attends EVM 'Hackathon' in London × When Bhushan asked if it is possible to load a malicious programme in the flash memory, the court made the following remark: "Can we issue a mandamus on the basis of a suspicion? We are not the controlling authority of another constitutional authority, we cannot control the elections." (With inputs from agencies)

EVM-VVPAT row: Supreme Court says it is not Election Commission’s controlling authority

India's Supreme Court on Monday (April 22) said that equal participation of women in the workforce remains a matter of constitutional duty, while observing the significance of child-care leaves for mothers of children with disabilities.&nbsp;

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala held that denying child-care leaves (CCL) to mothers of children with disabilities means violation of this constitutional duty to ensure equal women participation in the workforce, Bar and Bench reported.&nbsp;

The bench said, "Participation of women in the workforce is not a matter of privilege but a Constitutional requirement and the State as a model employer cannot be oblivious of this."

The Supreme Court has sought the assistance of additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati in adjudicating it, Press Trust of India reported.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pregnant-women-working-in-extreme-heat-are-more-prone-to-miscarriage-and-stillbirth-new-study-suggests-702667">Pregnant women working in extreme heat are more prone to miscarriage and stillbirth, says new study</a>

The petitioner is an assistant professor in the department of geography in a Himachal Pradesh institute.

The court passed the ruling when the petitioner was denied leave to take care of her son, who suffers&nbsp;from certain genetic disorders since birth, because she had exhausted all her sanctioned leaves.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/over-43-of-indian-women-working-in-manufacturing-sector-hail-from-this-state-656467">Over 43% of Indian women working in manufacturing sector hail from this state</a>

"We are of the view that the petition raises a serious matter of concern. The petitioner has raised the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The commissioner has indicated on affidavit that no policy of CCL has been formulated. Participation of women in the workforce is not a matter of privilege but a constitutional requirement and the State as a model employer cannot be oblivious of this," the Supreme Court bench ruled.

Also watch |&nbsp;How Covid-19 boosted women workforce | Details

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/how-covid-19-boosted-women-workforce-details-639312/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Supreme Court directed Himachal Pradesh's Sukhu government&nbsp;to revise its policy on CCL to make it consistent with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

(With inputs from agencies)

India's Supreme Court on Monday (April 22) said that equal participation of women in the workforce remains a matter of constitutional duty, while observing the significance of child-care leaves for mothers of children with disabilities.

India's Supreme Court on Monday (April 22) said that equal participation of women in the workforce remains a matter of constitutional duty, while observing the significance of child-care leaves for mothers of children with disabilities. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice JB Pardiwala held that denying child-care leaves (CCL) to mothers of children with disabilities means violation of this constitutional duty to ensure equal women participation in the workforce, Bar and Bench reported. The bench said, "Participation of women in the workforce is not a matter of privilege but a Constitutional requirement and the State as a model employer cannot be oblivious of this." The Supreme Court has sought the assistance of additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati in adjudicating it, Press Trust of India reported. Also read | Pregnant women working in extreme heat are more prone to miscarriage and stillbirth, says new study The petitioner is an assistant professor in the department of geography in a Himachal Pradesh institute. The court passed the ruling when the petitioner was denied leave to take care of her son, who suffers from certain genetic disorders since birth, because she had exhausted all her sanctioned leaves. Also read | Over 43% of Indian women working in manufacturing sector hail from this state "We are of the view that the petition raises a serious matter of concern. The petitioner has raised the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The commissioner has indicated on affidavit that no policy of CCL has been formulated. Participation of women in the workforce is not a matter of privilege but a constitutional requirement and the State as a model employer cannot be oblivious of this," the Supreme Court bench ruled. Also watch | How Covid-19 boosted women workforce | Details × Supreme Court directed Himachal Pradesh's Sukhu government to revise its policy on CCL to make it consistent with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. (With inputs from agencies)

Supreme Court says participation of women in workforce a 'constitutional requirement'

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Apr 22) allowed a 14-year-old rape survivor to abort her 28-week pregnancy, deeming the case as "exceptional".

As per Indian law, a court's permission is needed to undergo an abortion beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Earlier, the survivor's mother had sought the medical termination of the pregnancy. However, the Bombay High Court declined her plea.

On Monday, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud said this case was exceptional and allowed the minor's abortion based on a hospital report.

"The High Court of Bombay by order 4..4.24 declined to allow the plea for medical termination of pregnancy on behalf of a minor daughter. The minor, who is pregnant, is alleged to have been subjected to sexual assault...The high court while declining the plea relied on the report submitted by the JJ Group of Hospitals (Mumbai)," CJI Chandrachud said, LiveLaw reported.&nbsp;

"The petition was mentioned on urgent orders...the bench reassembled immediately thereafter and took note of the fact that the report relied upon by the HC did not take into fact the emotional and physical well-being of the minor ...," Chandrachud added.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/patanjali-misleading-ads-case-supreme-court-adjourns-ramdev-contempt-case-to-april-23-711799">You are not so innocent, Indian Supreme Court tells Patanjali in misleading ads case</a>

He said that a fresh medical board was directed to be constituted under the expertise of the Sion Hospital. The minor was examined by a team of doctors.&nbsp;

"...after examining minor, they have opined as follows (extracted from the report)....while forwarding the report of the medical board, the dean of the hospital has noted the opinion, in view of the urgency of the situation were are inclined while reserving the judgement, issuing the directions under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and Under Article 142 ...." he further said.&nbsp;

"...in a similar case, this court had converted to its constitutional jurisdictional u/a 142.....the following are borne in mind : (1) the minor is 14 years old (2) pregnancy alleged to be an emanation from sexual assault; (3) she was unaware that she was pregnancy until a very late stage," he added.

Also watch |&nbsp;16-year-old allegedly gang-raped virtually

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-16-year-old-allegedly-gang-raped-virtually-676325/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The medical board at the Sion Hospital opined that the continuation of the pregnancy may impact the physical and mental wellbeing of the minor.&nbsp;

CJI Chandrachud said that while a certain degree of risk was involved (in the abortion), the board opined that the threat in carrying out the termination is not higher than the risk in full delivery.

(With inputs from agencies)

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Apr 22) allowed a 14-year-old rape survivor to abort her 28-week pregnancy, deeming the case as "exceptional". As per Indian law, a court's permission is needed to undergo an abortion beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.

The Indian Supreme Court on Monday (Apr 22) allowed a 14-year-old rape survivor to abort her 28-week pregnancy, deeming the case as "exceptional". As per Indian law, a court's permission is needed to undergo an abortion beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy. Earlier, the survivor's mother had sought the medical termination of the pregnancy. However, the Bombay High Court declined her plea. On Monday, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud said this case was exceptional and allowed the minor's abortion based on a hospital report. "The High Court of Bombay by order 4..4.24 declined to allow the plea for medical termination of pregnancy on behalf of a minor daughter. The minor, who is pregnant, is alleged to have been subjected to sexual assault...The high court while declining the plea relied on the report submitted by the JJ Group of Hospitals (Mumbai)," CJI Chandrachud said, LiveLaw reported. "The petition was mentioned on urgent orders...the bench reassembled immediately thereafter and took note of the fact that the report relied upon by the HC did not take into fact the emotional and physical well-being of the minor ...," Chandrachud added. Also read | You are not so innocent, Indian Supreme Court tells Patanjali in misleading ads case He said that a fresh medical board was directed to be constituted under the expertise of the Sion Hospital. The minor was examined by a team of doctors. "...after examining minor, they have opined as follows (extracted from the report)....while forwarding the report of the medical board, the dean of the hospital has noted the opinion, in view of the urgency of the situation were are inclined while reserving the judgement, issuing the directions under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and Under Article 142 ...." he further said. "...in a similar case, this court had converted to its constitutional jurisdictional u/a 142.....the following are borne in mind : (1) the minor is 14 years old (2) pregnancy alleged to be an emanation from sexual assault; (3) she was unaware that she was pregnancy until a very late stage," he added. Also watch | 16-year-old allegedly gang-raped virtually × The medical board at the Sion Hospital opined that the continuation of the pregnancy may impact the physical and mental wellbeing of the minor. CJI Chandrachud said that while a certain degree of risk was involved (in the abortion), the board opined that the threat in carrying out the termination is not higher than the risk in full delivery. (With inputs from agencies)

Indian Supreme Court allows 14-year-old rape survivor to abort 28-week pregnancy

The most significant case in decades on homelessness has reached the Supreme Court as record numbers of people in America are without a permanent place to live. Watch in for more details!

US: Supreme Court to hear case on criminalising homelessness, court's decision to impact many cities

supreme-court

Supreme Court, News on Supreme Court, stories on Supreme Court, articles on Supreme Court, Supreme Court stories at Wion, Supreme Court news, Supreme Court latest news

supreme court