In a major development for millions of merchants, a federal judge has indicated that Visa and Mastercard could be on the hook for a far larger settlement than the $30 billion accord she just rejected. U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie in Brooklyn explained her thinking Tuesday in an opinion that was released last Friday, three days after the judge rejected an initial preliminary settlement calling for payment by both major credit and debit card companies.

It had aimed to resolve allegations of more than 12 million retailers who claimed they had been overcharged for so-called "swipe fees," more formally known as interchange fees, paid to process Visa and Mastercard transactions.

"Without evidence of Visa’s and Mastercard's profitability, the court cannot say with certainty that defendants can withstand a greater judgement; however, the evidence strongly suggests that they could withstand a substantially greater judgement," Brodie wrote.

The 2005 antitrust litigation can proceed to trial if a new settlement is not made. Visa criticised the decision and maintained that an agreement between them and the merchants directly serves the best interest. Even Mastercard responded, explaining that settling would serve the interest of competition, saving millions of businesses from substantive money.

This settlement would reduce the standard 1.5% swipe fee to 3.5 per cent by 0.04 percentage point for three years, cap fees for five years, and give merchants more leeway to charge customers surcharges. The judge said the settlement wasn't the "best possible" recovery. She said it kept fees far higher than they would be without the alleged antitrust violations and continued to burden merchants with the "Honor All Cards" rule, which requires them to accept all Visa and Mastercard cards if any are accepted.

Many merchants objected to the settlement, as did several trade groups including the National Retail Federation.

With the litigation lingering, the possibility remains for an even bigger settlement-one that could totally revolutionise the financial dynamics for both merchants and the credit card giants.

In a major development for millions of merchants, a federal judge has indicated that Visa and Mastercard could be on the hook for a far larger settlement than the $30 billion accord she just rejected.

In a major development for millions of merchants, a federal judge has indicated that Visa and Mastercard could be on the hook for a far larger settlement than the $30 billion accord she just rejected. U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie in Brooklyn explained her thinking Tuesday in an opinion that was released last Friday, three days after the judge rejected an initial preliminary settlement calling for payment by both major credit and debit card companies. It had aimed to resolve allegations of more than 12 million retailers who claimed they had been overcharged for so-called "swipe fees," more formally known as interchange fees, paid to process Visa and Mastercard transactions. "Without evidence of Visa’s and Mastercard's profitability, the court cannot say with certainty that defendants can withstand a greater judgement; however, the evidence strongly suggests that they could withstand a substantially greater judgement," Brodie wrote. The 2005 antitrust litigation can proceed to trial if a new settlement is not made. Visa criticised the decision and maintained that an agreement between them and the merchants directly serves the best interest. Even Mastercard responded, explaining that settling would serve the interest of competition, saving millions of businesses from substantive money. This settlement would reduce the standard 1.5% swipe fee to 3.5 per cent by 0.04 percentage point for three years, cap fees for five years, and give merchants more leeway to charge customers surcharges. The judge said the settlement wasn't the "best possible" recovery. She said it kept fees far higher than they would be without the alleged antitrust violations and continued to burden merchants with the "Honor All Cards" rule, which requires them to accept all Visa and Mastercard cards if any are accepted. Many merchants objected to the settlement, as did several trade groups including the National Retail Federation. With the litigation lingering, the possibility remains for an even bigger settlement-one that could totally revolutionise the financial dynamics for both merchants and the credit card giants.

Visa and Mastercard face potentially higher settlement in swipe fee dispute

Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. have agreed to pay $197 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit filed by millions of consumers. The complaint accused financial payment companies of maintaining unreasonably high cash access costs.<o:p></o:p>

The plaintiffs' lawyers announced the potential settlement in a filing in federal court in Washington DC on Wednesday. The compensation applies to customers who have withdrawn money from bank-operated ATMs since 2007. Two more related class actions involving non-bank ATM users and firms who own independent ATMs are currently proceeding in the same court.<o:p></o:p>

The settlement needs to be approved by the court. Visa will contribute $104.6 million, while Mastercard will pay $92.8 million, according to the settlement papers. Previously, the case's bank defendants agreed to a $66 million settlement. Both Visa and Mastercard have denied any wrongdoing and have yet to reply to demands for comment.<o:p></o:p>

The plaintiffs' lawyers asserted that the settlement will "deliver immediate and assured relief" to the impacted consumers.<o:p></o:p>

The plaintiffs in the three connected actions claimed that Visa and Mastercard's ATM network rules caused them to pay excessive access fees. They were demanding more than $9 billion in damages.<o:p></o:p>

The settlement comes after the US Supreme Court rejected Visa and Mastercard's appeal in April. The firms had contested a lower court's decision to enable the plaintiffs to sue as a class. Visa and Mastercard argued that the judge did not perform a "rigorous analysis" before certifying the class actions.<o:p></o:p>

The proposed settlement class is projected to have at least 175 million members. Consumers will be able to object to the conditions of the settlement, including the settlement fund amount and any legal expenses granted.<o:p></o:p>

Visa and MasterCard are also involved in a second, ongoing legal case in Brooklyn federal court. The complaint contains charges that the corporations overcharged retailers and others for debit and credit card transactions.<o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. have agreed to pay $197 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit filed by millions of consumers. The complaint accused financial payment companies of maintaining unreasonably high cash access costs.

Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. have agreed to pay $197 million to resolve a class-action lawsuit filed by millions of consumers. The complaint accused financial payment companies of maintaining unreasonably high cash access costs. The plaintiffs' lawyers announced the potential settlement in a filing in federal court in Washington DC on Wednesday. The compensation applies to customers who have withdrawn money from bank-operated ATMs since 2007. Two more related class actions involving non-bank ATM users and firms who own independent ATMs are currently proceeding in the same court. The settlement needs to be approved by the court. Visa will contribute $104.6 million, while Mastercard will pay $92.8 million, according to the settlement papers. Previously, the case's bank defendants agreed to a $66 million settlement. Both Visa and Mastercard have denied any wrongdoing and have yet to reply to demands for comment. The plaintiffs' lawyers asserted that the settlement will "deliver immediate and assured relief" to the impacted consumers. The plaintiffs in the three connected actions claimed that Visa and Mastercard's ATM network rules caused them to pay excessive access fees. They were demanding more than $9 billion in damages. The settlement comes after the US Supreme Court rejected Visa and Mastercard's appeal in April. The firms had contested a lower court's decision to enable the plaintiffs to sue as a class. Visa and Mastercard argued that the judge did not perform a "rigorous analysis" before certifying the class actions. The proposed settlement class is projected to have at least 175 million members. Consumers will be able to object to the conditions of the settlement, including the settlement fund amount and any legal expenses granted. Visa and MasterCard are also involved in a second, ongoing legal case in Brooklyn federal court. The complaint contains charges that the corporations overcharged retailers and others for debit and credit card transactions. (With inputs from Reuters)

Visa and Mastercard settle ATM fee lawsuit for $197 million

Turkish citizens are increasingly cancelling their Visa and Mastercards in a nationwide boycott against companies or nations they deem to be supporting&nbsp;Israel, country's Yeni Safak publication reported.&nbsp;

Banks are reportedly struggling with the surge in demand for Troy cards, Turkey's domestic payment system established by the Interbank Card Center in 2015. This shift is a protest against the West's support for Israel's purported 'right to defence' after it was attacked by Hamas on October 7 that killed about 1200 Israelis.

On social media, the hashtag campaign #TroyKartaGeçiyoruz (#WeGoToTroyKarta) has gained momentum, in a reference to the country's own payment system Troy.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-hamas-war-massacre-in-gaza-product-of-west-turkeys-erdogan-addresses-huge-pro-palestinian-rally-652379">Israel-Hamas war: Erdogan addresses huge pro-Palestine rally, blames West for massacre in Gaza</a>

Since targeting Visa and Mastercard, approximately 19 million new Troy cards have been issued, Yeni Safak report added.&nbsp;

Troy, Turkey's sole domestic payment card, was launched officially in April 2016, providing financial services such as credit cards, debit cards, and prepaid cards.

Also watch |&nbsp;Turkey: Erdogan defends Hamas and lashes out on Israel

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/turkey-erdogan-defends-hamas-and-lashes-out-on-israel-652783/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Notably, Troy cards have been accepted in the US on the Discover Card network since 2017.&nbsp;

The development coincides with a related move when the Turkish parliament removed Coca-Cola and Nestle products from its campus restaurants, accusing them of supporting Israel.&nbsp;

<h2>What does it mean?</h2>

This multifaceted protest reflects a growing pro-Palestine sentiment among the Turkish citizens.

Besides, the Turkish President Recep&nbsp;Tayyip Erdogan said recently that Hamas was not a terrorist organisation but a liberation group fighting to protect Palestinian lands and people, in contrast to the fact that the militant-political organisation that rules blockaded Gaza Strip has been designated as a terrorist group by the US and collective West.&nbsp;

"Once all of this that is happening is finished, we want to see Gaza as a peaceful region that is a part of an independent Palestinian state, in line with 1967 borders, with territorial integrity, and with East Jerusalem as its capital," Erdogan said earlier this month.

More than 10,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed in retaliatory attack launched by Israel on Oct 7 as per the claims of Hamas-run ministry.

(With inputs from agencies)

Turkish citizens are increasingly cancelling their Visa and Mastercards in a nationwide boycott against companies or nations they deem to be supporting Israel, country's Yeni Safak publication reported.

Turkish citizens are increasingly cancelling their Visa and Mastercards in a nationwide boycott against companies or nations they deem to be supporting Israel, country's Yeni Safak publication reported. Banks are reportedly struggling with the surge in demand for Troy cards, Turkey's domestic payment system established by the Interbank Card Center in 2015. This shift is a protest against the West's support for Israel's purported 'right to defence' after it was attacked by Hamas on October 7 that killed about 1200 Israelis. On social media, the hashtag campaign #TroyKartaGeçiyoruz (#WeGoToTroyKarta) has gained momentum, in a reference to the country's own payment system Troy. Also read | Israel-Hamas war: Erdogan addresses huge pro-Palestine rally, blames West for massacre in Gaza Since targeting Visa and Mastercard, approximately 19 million new Troy cards have been issued, Yeni Safak report added. Troy, Turkey's sole domestic payment card, was launched officially in April 2016, providing financial services such as credit cards, debit cards, and prepaid cards. Also watch | Turkey: Erdogan defends Hamas and lashes out on Israel × Notably, Troy cards have been accepted in the US on the Discover Card network since 2017. The development coincides with a related move when the Turkish parliament removed Coca-Cola and Nestle products from its campus restaurants, accusing them of supporting Israel. What does it mean? This multifaceted protest reflects a growing pro-Palestine sentiment among the Turkish citizens. Besides, the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said recently that Hamas was not a terrorist organisation but a liberation group fighting to protect Palestinian lands and people, in contrast to the fact that the militant-political organisation that rules blockaded Gaza Strip has been designated as a terrorist group by the US and collective West. "Once all of this that is happening is finished, we want to see Gaza as a peaceful region that is a part of an independent Palestinian state, in line with 1967 borders, with territorial integrity, and with East Jerusalem as its capital," Erdogan said earlier this month. More than 10,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed in retaliatory attack launched by Israel on Oct 7 as per the claims of Hamas-run ministry. (With inputs from agencies)

Israel-Hamas war: Visa, Mastercard's loss becomes Troy's gain in Turkey

If you are regular user of visa & mastercard credit cards, there's some bad news for you. Soon, you may have to pay more for your purchases via credit cards.

Mastercard & Visa to hike credit card fees

Visa and Mastercard are looking to raise their credit card fees that merchants pay when they use customer’s credit cards for transactions, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

According to sources familiar with the situation and documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the fee rise will begin in October and April. Online purchases will mostly have these increased fees.

According to CMSPI, a consulting firm that works with merchants, the modifications may result in businesses paying an extra $502 million in fees every year.

More than half of those funds will come from network charge increases, according to CMSPI. Increases in interchange fees, often known as swipe fees, will provide the remaining funds. These charges are borne by retailers whenever customers use credit cards.

The interchange fee economy is mostly unknown to consumers. However, the fees are a significant point of friction between the card networks and all types of merchants, from huge internet retailers to neighborhood coffee shops.

According to the Nilson Report, a trade journal, U.S. businesses spent an estimated $93 billion on Visa and Mastercard credit-card fees last year. Comparatively, $33 billion was the amount in 2012.

At least a portion of the expense is transferred by retailers to customers in the form of higher pricing. Small companies are increasingly rewarding customers who pay with a debit card, cash, or check with discounts.

The costs that retailers must pay are determined by card networks like Visa and Mastercard. Visa and Mastercard regulate the network fees. The bank that issued the card receives exchange fees.

According to Visa, Mastercard, and the major banks, the fees assist in clearing the expenses relating to fraud detection and innovation. The banks frequently subsidise well-known credit-card rewards with the money they receive from interchange fees.

&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Visa and Mastercard are looking to raise their credit card fees that merchants pay when they use customer’s credit cards for transactions, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

Visa and Mastercard are looking to raise their credit card fees that merchants pay when they use customer’s credit cards for transactions, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal. According to sources familiar with the situation and documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the fee rise will begin in October and April. Online purchases will mostly have these increased fees. According to CMSPI, a consulting firm that works with merchants, the modifications may result in businesses paying an extra $502 million in fees every year. More than half of those funds will come from network charge increases, according to CMSPI. Increases in interchange fees, often known as swipe fees, will provide the remaining funds. These charges are borne by retailers whenever customers use credit cards. The interchange fee economy is mostly unknown to consumers. However, the fees are a significant point of friction between the card networks and all types of merchants, from huge internet retailers to neighborhood coffee shops. According to the Nilson Report, a trade journal, U.S. businesses spent an estimated $93 billion on Visa and Mastercard credit-card fees last year. Comparatively, $33 billion was the amount in 2012. At least a portion of the expense is transferred by retailers to customers in the form of higher pricing. Small companies are increasingly rewarding customers who pay with a debit card, cash, or check with discounts. The costs that retailers must pay are determined by card networks like Visa and Mastercard. Visa and Mastercard regulate the network fees. The bank that issued the card receives exchange fees. According to Visa, Mastercard, and the major banks, the fees assist in clearing the expenses relating to fraud detection and innovation. The banks frequently subsidise well-known credit-card rewards with the money they receive from interchange fees. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Visa, Mastercard gear up to increase credit-card fees: Report 

Global financial payment-major Mastercard said that companies must stop individuals in the United States from buying legal marijuana using&nbsp;their debit cards.&nbsp;

Marijuana remains legal for medical use in 38 of the 50 states in the US. It is also legal for adults over 21 years old to buy for recreational use in 23 states, including Washington DC and the entire US West Coast. But federally, the largely recreational drug remains illegal.&nbsp; 
 
Mastercard said that it implemented the move after some shops were found to be accepting debit payments while a federal ban remained in place.&nbsp;

"As we were made aware of this matter, we quickly investigated it. In accordance with our policies, we instructed the financial institutions that offer payment services to cannabis merchants and connect them to Mastercard to terminate the activity," Mastercard said in a statement on Wednesday.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/credit-card-equivalent-study-finds-how-much-plastic-humans-inhale-every-week-but-where-does-it-go-606194">‘Credit card-equivalent’: Study finds how much plastic humans inhale every week. But where does it go?</a>

"The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems," the statement continued.

<h2>What does it mean?</h2>

Industry insiders have decried the move as a blow to the industry.

Sunburn Cannabis CEO Brady Cobb said in a statement that "this move is another blow to the state-legal cannabis industry and patients/consumers who want to access this budding category."

Pot firm Verano's President, Darren Weiss, said, "We will continue to advocate for cannabis reform in Washington through further dialogue with elected officials and stakeholders to advance conversations supporting the growth of safe, legal cannabis across the US."

<h2>How do customers pay for marijuana?</h2>

Customers are forced to pay for marijuana in cash in 38 states where marijuana remains legal.

Earlier this month, Republican Senator John Cornyn said Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's plan to pass a marijuana banking bill was "wishful thinking".

Also watch |&nbsp;RBI is transforming India's credit card industry by promoting customer choice and flexibility

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/rbi-is-transforming-indias-credit-card-industry-by-promoting-customer-choice-and-flexibility-614401/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The SAFE Banking Act is a significant legislation that would make it easier for the cannabis industry to access banking services.

Many US states now make significant revenues through marijuana sales.&nbsp;

California now regularly rakes in more than $1 billion per year in marijuana tax revenue.&nbsp;

Many other states make hundreds of millions per year.&nbsp;

The states in the US reported a cumulative&nbsp;$15.16 billion in tax revenue from recreational cannabis sales in 2022, excluding the revenue from medical marijuana, according to the Marijuana Policy Project.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

Global financial payment-major Mastercard said that companies must stop individuals in the United States from buying legal marijuana using their debit cards. Marijuana remains legal for medical use in 38 of the 50 states in the US.

Global financial payment-major Mastercard said that companies must stop individuals in the United States from buying legal marijuana using their debit cards. Marijuana remains legal for medical use in 38 of the 50 states in the US. It is also legal for adults over 21 years old to buy for recreational use in 23 states, including Washington DC and the entire US West Coast. But federally, the largely recreational drug remains illegal. Mastercard said that it implemented the move after some shops were found to be accepting debit payments while a federal ban remained in place. "As we were made aware of this matter, we quickly investigated it. In accordance with our policies, we instructed the financial institutions that offer payment services to cannabis merchants and connect them to Mastercard to terminate the activity," Mastercard said in a statement on Wednesday. Also read | ‘Credit card-equivalent’: Study finds how much plastic humans inhale every week. But where does it go? "The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems," the statement continued. What does it mean? Industry insiders have decried the move as a blow to the industry. Sunburn Cannabis CEO Brady Cobb said in a statement that "this move is another blow to the state-legal cannabis industry and patients/consumers who want to access this budding category." Pot firm Verano's President, Darren Weiss, said, "We will continue to advocate for cannabis reform in Washington through further dialogue with elected officials and stakeholders to advance conversations supporting the growth of safe, legal cannabis across the US." How do customers pay for marijuana? Customers are forced to pay for marijuana in cash in 38 states where marijuana remains legal. Earlier this month, Republican Senator John Cornyn said Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's plan to pass a marijuana banking bill was "wishful thinking". Also watch | RBI is transforming India's credit card industry by promoting customer choice and flexibility × The SAFE Banking Act is a significant legislation that would make it easier for the cannabis industry to access banking services. Many US states now make significant revenues through marijuana sales. California now regularly rakes in more than $1 billion per year in marijuana tax revenue. Many other states make hundreds of millions per year. The states in the US reported a cumulative $15.16 billion in tax revenue from recreational cannabis sales in 2022, excluding the revenue from medical marijuana, according to the Marijuana Policy Project. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

SAFE Act row: Mastercard asks US cannabis shops to stop swiping its cards

Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc are currently under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC is probing whether their security tokens limit debit-card routing for online payments.&nbsp;

Known as one of the two biggest card networks in the US, Visa and Mastercard allow people to route their payments.&nbsp;

The FTC has been keeping an eye on Visa and Mastercard for a few years, inquiring whether both prevent business owners from making payments through different debit card networks. The FTC has increased its focus on the matter.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/global-economy-live-updates-japanese-yen-hits-a-fresh-32-year-low-against-dollar-526286">Also read | Global Economy LIVE updates | Nationwide strikes in Paris Tuesday amidst soaring inflation</a>

Earlier, a Justice Department investigation was conducted to know whether Visa Inc has illegally maintained a monopoly on the debit card market share. This was done because as per federal laws, the customers must be provided with a choice of at least&nbsp;two debit card networks for making payments, The Wall Street Journal reported.&nbsp;

This month, the Federal issued an updated rule to the banks, referring that each customer must be&nbsp;given&nbsp;at least two networks on all debit cards including online shopping or payments.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/credit-suisse-to-pay-495-millio-to-settle-case-concerning-2008-financial-crisis-526149">Also read |&nbsp;Credit Suisse to pay $495 million to settle case concerning 2008 financial crisis</a>

Whenever a customer links a debit card with a digital wallet, a random 16-digit number is generated, referred to as a "security token" as it makes the payment easy. The token is only understood by the network. For example, if using Visa, then only Visa will be able to make the payments easy. However, the card network can also scramble the token if the debit is handled by another network.&nbsp;

Using this practice, Visa and Mastercard continue to remain on top.

However, customers complain regarding the process believing that the payments can be cancelled if it's handled by a different network.&nbsp;

This is the reason, the FTC is inquiring whether the top card networks are restricting payments after the shopper enters&nbsp;their debit card information.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc are currently under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC is probing whether their security tokens limit debit-card routing for online payments.

Visa Inc and Mastercard Inc are currently under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC is probing whether their security tokens limit debit-card routing for online payments. Known as one of the two biggest card networks in the US, Visa and Mastercard allow people to route their payments. The FTC has been keeping an eye on Visa and Mastercard for a few years, inquiring whether both prevent business owners from making payments through different debit card networks. The FTC has increased its focus on the matter. Also read | Global Economy LIVE updates | Nationwide strikes in Paris Tuesday amidst soaring inflation Earlier, a Justice Department investigation was conducted to know whether Visa Inc has illegally maintained a monopoly on the debit card market share. This was done because as per federal laws, the customers must be provided with a choice of at least two debit card networks for making payments, The Wall Street Journal reported. This month, the Federal issued an updated rule to the banks, referring that each customer must be given at least two networks on all debit cards including online shopping or payments. Also read | Credit Suisse to pay $495 million to settle case concerning 2008 financial crisis Whenever a customer links a debit card with a digital wallet, a random 16-digit number is generated, referred to as a "security token" as it makes the payment easy. The token is only understood by the network. For example, if using Visa, then only Visa will be able to make the payments easy. However, the card network can also scramble the token if the debit is handled by another network. Using this practice, Visa and Mastercard continue to remain on top. However, customers complain regarding the process believing that the payments can be cancelled if it's handled by a different network. This is the reason, the FTC is inquiring whether the top card networks are restricting payments after the shopper enters their debit card information. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Visa, Mastercard under FTC investigation over debit-card routing competition

Mastercard has replaced Paytm as the new title sponsor of the Indian cricket team for their home matches. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Monday (September 05) confirmed their association with Mastercard welcoming their new sponsor on board.

The development comes after Paytm had reportedly recently asked BCCI to reassign their sponsorship rights. The Indian cricket board got into the act and wasted no time in roping in Mastercard as the new title right holders of Indian cricket as far as the home matches are concerned. Their arrival ended Paytm's 7-year association with Indian cricket.

Mastercard will be the title sponsor of Indian men's and women's cricket teams' matches at home along with all the domestic tournaments ranging from the Ranji Trophy to the Irani Trophy.

"During this association, Mastercard will be the title sponsor for all international matches (both women and men) held on home ground, domestic cricket matches like Irani Trophy, Duleep Trophy, and Ranji Trophy organized by the BCCI as also all junior cricket (Under 19 and Under 23) matches held in India," the BCCI said in a statement.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/explained-how-can-india-still-make-it-to-the-final-of-asia-cup-2022-after-loss-against-pakistan-513113">Explained: How can India still make it to the final of Asia Cup 2022 after loss against Pakistan?</a>

Mastercard is already associated with some of the major global sporting properties across the globe in the form of the UEFA Champions League, French Open and the Australian Open. Being associated with the Indian cricket team will give the&nbsp;global payments &amp; technology company massive exposure among the subcontinent audience.

India are one of the best teams in world cricket at present and have been a force to reckon with in all three formats of the game. Despite not having won a major ICC trophy since 2013, the Men in Blue remain one of the giants of the game and the country's growing influence in the sport cannot be overlooked.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/indian-govt-summons-wikipedia-officials-after-arshdeep-singhs-page-edited-to-show-fake-khalistan-link-513083">Indian govt summons Wikipedia officials after Arshdeep Singh's page edited to show fake Khalistan link</a>

The Indian men's team is currently in action in the ongoing Asia Cup 2022 in the UAE. After bagging back-to-back wins in their first two games in the group stage, India's unbeaten streak in the tournament was snapped by arch-rivals Pakistan in their first Super Four clash on Sunday.

Mastercard has replaced Paytm as the new title sponsor of the Indian cricket team for their home matches. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Monday (September 05) confirmed their association with Mastercard welcoming their new sponsor on board.

Mastercard has replaced Paytm as the new title sponsor of the Indian cricket team for their home matches. The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) on Monday (September 05) confirmed their association with Mastercard welcoming their new sponsor on board. The development comes after Paytm had reportedly recently asked BCCI to reassign their sponsorship rights. The Indian cricket board got into the act and wasted no time in roping in Mastercard as the new title right holders of Indian cricket as far as the home matches are concerned. Their arrival ended Paytm's 7-year association with Indian cricket. Mastercard will be the title sponsor of Indian men's and women's cricket teams' matches at home along with all the domestic tournaments ranging from the Ranji Trophy to the Irani Trophy. "During this association, Mastercard will be the title sponsor for all international matches (both women and men) held on home ground, domestic cricket matches like Irani Trophy, Duleep Trophy, and Ranji Trophy organized by the BCCI as also all junior cricket (Under 19 and Under 23) matches held in India," the BCCI said in a statement. Also Read: Explained: How can India still make it to the final of Asia Cup 2022 after loss against Pakistan? Mastercard is already associated with some of the major global sporting properties across the globe in the form of the UEFA Champions League, French Open and the Australian Open. Being associated with the Indian cricket team will give the global payments & technology company massive exposure among the subcontinent audience. India are one of the best teams in world cricket at present and have been a force to reckon with in all three formats of the game. Despite not having won a major ICC trophy since 2013, the Men in Blue remain one of the giants of the game and the country's growing influence in the sport cannot be overlooked. Also Read: Indian govt summons Wikipedia officials after Arshdeep Singh's page edited to show fake Khalistan link The Indian men's team is currently in action in the ongoing Asia Cup 2022 in the UAE. After bagging back-to-back wins in their first two games in the group stage, India's unbeaten streak in the tournament was snapped by arch-rivals Pakistan in their first Super Four clash on Sunday.

Mastercard replaces Patym as BCCI's title sponsor for India's home matches, domestic tournaments

Card payment giants Visa and Mastercard announced Saturday they will suspend operations in Russia, the latest major US firms to join the business freeze-out&nbsp;of Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.

"Noting the unprecedented nature of the current conflict and the uncertain economic environment," Mastercard said it had "decided to suspend our network services in Russia."

Visa, for its part, said that "effective immediately" it would "work with its clients and partners within Russia to cease all Visa transactions over the coming days."

US President Joe Biden "welcomed the decision" during a phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in which the two discussed US, ally and private industry actions to deter Russia from aggression, according to a White House readout.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/zelensky-holds-phone-call-with-joe-biden-pushes-for-more-us-support-to-ukraine-459443">Zelensky holds phone call with Joe Biden, pushes for more US support to Ukraine</a>

Major corporations across a range of industries have halted business in Russia since its invasion began on February 24, including everything from US-based tech firms such as Intel and Airbnb to French luxury giants LVMH, Hermes and Chanel.

Visa and Mastercard had already announced that they were complying with US and international sanctions imposed on Russia in the wake of its attack.

"Our colleagues, our customers and our partners have been affected in ways that most of us could not imagine," Mastercard said, stating that its cards issued by Russian banks would no longer be supported by the company's network.

Visa similarly said that cards issued in Russia would no longer work outside the country.

Both companies said cards issued abroad would no longer work in Russia.

&nbsp;Russian banks downplay effects&nbsp;

"We are compelled to act following Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, and the unacceptable events that we have witnessed," Visa CEO Al Kelly said.

Russia's major banks, including its largest lender Sberbank and the Russia Central Bank, downplayed the effects that the cards' suspensions would have on their clients.

"All Visa and Mastercard bank cards issued by Russian banks will continue to operate normally on Russian territory until their expiration date," the Russia Central Bank said.

Sberbank said in a statement on its official Telegram account that the cards "can be used for operations in the Russian territory -- to withdraw cash, make transfers using the card number, and for payment at offline as well as at online Russian stores."

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelensky-needs-fighter-jets-russian-oil-embargo-says-report-459441">Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky needs fighter jets, Russian oil embargo, says report</a>

The cards would continue to work on Russian territory, it said, because all payments in Russia are made through a national system and do not depend on foreign systems.

However, the central bank warned that Russians traveling abroad should carry alternate means of payment.

Mastercard added that it would continue to provide pay and benefits to its nearly 200 employees in Russia.

Visa's and Mastercard's announcements came hours after PayPal also halted its services in Russia.

Ukrainian deputy prime minister Mykhailo Fedorov tweeted a letter early Saturday from PayPal CEO Dan Schulman officially announcing the stop.

Watch |&nbsp;Gravitas Plus | Ukraine War: Are we heading towards World War III

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-plus-ukraine-war-are-we-heading-towards-world-war-iii-459352/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"Under the current circumstances, we are suspending PayPal services in Russia," Schulman said in the letter.

He added that PayPal would continue to support its staff in the region and would focus on "enabling our customers and our global employee community to support" humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

&nbsp;

Card payment giants Visa and Mastercard announced Saturday they will suspend operations in Russia, the latest major US firms to join the business freeze-out of Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine.

Card payment giants Visa and Mastercard announced Saturday they will suspend operations in Russia, the latest major US firms to join the business freeze-out of Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine. "Noting the unprecedented nature of the current conflict and the uncertain economic environment," Mastercard said it had "decided to suspend our network services in Russia." Visa, for its part, said that "effective immediately" it would "work with its clients and partners within Russia to cease all Visa transactions over the coming days." US President Joe Biden "welcomed the decision" during a phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in which the two discussed US, ally and private industry actions to deter Russia from aggression, according to a White House readout. Also read | Zelensky holds phone call with Joe Biden, pushes for more US support to Ukraine Major corporations across a range of industries have halted business in Russia since its invasion began on February 24, including everything from US-based tech firms such as Intel and Airbnb to French luxury giants LVMH, Hermes and Chanel. Visa and Mastercard had already announced that they were complying with US and international sanctions imposed on Russia in the wake of its attack. "Our colleagues, our customers and our partners have been affected in ways that most of us could not imagine," Mastercard said, stating that its cards issued by Russian banks would no longer be supported by the company's network. Visa similarly said that cards issued in Russia would no longer work outside the country. Both companies said cards issued abroad would no longer work in Russia. Russian banks downplay effects "We are compelled to act following Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, and the unacceptable events that we have witnessed," Visa CEO Al Kelly said. Russia's major banks, including its largest lender Sberbank and the Russia Central Bank, downplayed the effects that the cards' suspensions would have on their clients. "All Visa and Mastercard bank cards issued by Russian banks will continue to operate normally on Russian territory until their expiration date," the Russia Central Bank said. Sberbank said in a statement on its official Telegram account that the cards "can be used for operations in the Russian territory -- to withdraw cash, make transfers using the card number, and for payment at offline as well as at online Russian stores." Also read | Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky needs fighter jets, Russian oil embargo, says report The cards would continue to work on Russian territory, it said, because all payments in Russia are made through a national system and do not depend on foreign systems. However, the central bank warned that Russians traveling abroad should carry alternate means of payment. Mastercard added that it would continue to provide pay and benefits to its nearly 200 employees in Russia. Visa's and Mastercard's announcements came hours after PayPal also halted its services in Russia. Ukrainian deputy prime minister Mykhailo Fedorov tweeted a letter early Saturday from PayPal CEO Dan Schulman officially announcing the stop. Watch | Gravitas Plus | Ukraine War: Are we heading towards World War III "Under the current circumstances, we are suspending PayPal services in Russia," Schulman said in the letter. He added that PayPal would continue to support its staff in the region and would focus on "enabling our customers and our global employee community to support" humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Russia Ukraine Crisis: Visa, Mastercard suspend operations in Russia

US President Joe Biden, during a conversation with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, welcomed the decisions of Visa and Mastercard to suspend services in Russia, the White House said.

Earlier, Zelenskyy said on Twitter that he held phone talks with Biden on Saturday, discussing Western support for Kyiv and anti-Russia sanctions.

"President Biden highlighted the ongoing actions undertaken by the United States, its allies and partners, and private industry to raise the costs on Russia for its aggression in Ukraine. In particular, he welcomed the decision this evening by Visa and Mastercard to suspend service in Russia," the White House said in a Saturday statement following the Biden-Zelenskyy conversation.

According to the release, Biden and Zelenskyy discussed the recent talks between Russia and Ukraine.

The White House said that the Biden administration is boosting assistance to Kyiev and is "working closely with Congress to secure additional funding."

US President Joe Biden, during a conversation with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, welcomed the decisions of Visa and Mastercard to suspend services in Russia, the White House said.

US President Joe Biden, during a conversation with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, welcomed the decisions of Visa and Mastercard to suspend services in Russia, the White House said. Earlier, Zelenskyy said on Twitter that he held phone talks with Biden on Saturday, discussing Western support for Kyiv and anti-Russia sanctions. "President Biden highlighted the ongoing actions undertaken by the United States, its allies and partners, and private industry to raise the costs on Russia for its aggression in Ukraine. In particular, he welcomed the decision this evening by Visa and Mastercard to suspend service in Russia," the White House said in a Saturday statement following the Biden-Zelenskyy conversation. According to the release, Biden and Zelenskyy discussed the recent talks between Russia and Ukraine. The White House said that the Biden administration is boosting assistance to Kyiev and is "working closely with Congress to secure additional funding."

Biden welcomes decision by Visa, Mastercard to suspend services in Russia: White House

Visa and Mastercard are suspending their operations in Russia in the latest blow to the country’s financial system after its invasion of Ukraine.

Visa, Mastercard halt operations in Russia over Ukraine invasion

Visa and Mastercard are unhappy and have complaints about India backing for local rival RuPay, as Visa remains concerned that PM Modi has been promoting homegrown RuPay for years, posing a challenge to Visa and Mastercard in the fast-growing payments market.

Visa, MasterCard raises concern about promotion of Rupay

A planned pan-European payments network backed by 22 banks is to compete with U.S. Mastercard and Visa appealed for public money, saying its private backers were not prepared to stump up all the cash needed.

Planned pan-European payments network  to compete with U.S. Mastercard and Visa

Mastercard faces UK’s biggest class action trial over its payment fees.

Mastercard faces UK’s biggest class action trial over its payment fees

It is the biggest class-action lawsuit in UK's history. Mastercard has been sued on the behalf of 46 million customers. Palki Sharma tells you why the $26 billion lawsuit matters.

Gravitas: Mastercard sued on behalf of 46 million customers

RBI has banned Mastercard for violating data-storage laws. When does the ban kick in? Which banks does it impact? Will it impact existing customers too? Will domestic card companies benefit from this decision? Palki Sharma answers all your questions.

Gravitas: Explained: India's Mastercard Ban

India's central bank has banned global payments giant&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;from adding new customers starting next week, in an escalation of a long-standing dispute on local data storage rules.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) found&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;to be in violation of its April 2018 circular that directed all payments data be stored exclusively in India, allowing the regulator "unfettered supervisory access" to transaction details.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Gravitas?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Gravitas</a> | <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RBI?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#RBI</a> has banned <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Mastercard?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Mastercard</a> for violating data-storage laws. When does the ban kick in? Which banks does it impact? Will it impact existing customers too? Will domestic card companies benefit from this decision? <a href="https://twitter.com/palkisu?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@palkisu</a> answers all your questions <a href="https://t.co/Ttrm187wC4">pic.twitter.com/Ttrm187wC4</a>
— WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1415733046192472068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Global payments service providers like&nbsp;Mastercard, Visa and American Express have lobbied against data localisation, citing increased costs.

"Notwithstanding (the) lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions of Storage Payment System Data," the RBI said in a notification.

Mastercard&nbsp;will be indefinitely blocked from issuing debit, credit or prepaid cards to customers in India from July 22.

The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American Express and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services, from issuing new cards due to similar violations.

But unlike American Express, which is a relatively small player in India, companies such as&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;and Visa have partnered with many Indian banks that offer cards using the US&nbsp;firms' payments network.

In 2019,&nbsp;Mastercard&nbsp;said it was "bullish on India", announcing $1 billion in investment over the next five years, in addition to its earlier investment of $1 billion from 2014-2019.

The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of&nbsp;Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added.

The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from US&nbsp;companies, which said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent.

Global payments card companies have faced increasing competition from India's United Payments Interface (UPI) transactions that offer card-less and cashless payment options using phone numbers and QR codes.

A record 2.8 billion UPI transactions worth some 5.5 trillion rupees ($73.8 billion) took place in June.

(With inputs from agencies)

India's central bank has banned global payments giant Mastercard from adding new customers starting next week, in an escalation of a long-standing dispute on local data storage rules.

India's central bank has banned global payments giant Mastercard from adding new customers starting next week, in an escalation of a long-standing dispute on local data storage rules. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) found Mastercard to be in violation of its April 2018 circular that directed all payments data be stored exclusively in India, allowing the regulator "unfettered supervisory access" to transaction details. #Gravitas | #RBI has banned #Mastercard for violating data-storage laws. When does the ban kick in? Which banks does it impact? Will it impact existing customers too? Will domestic card companies benefit from this decision? @palkisu answers all your questions pic.twitter.com/Ttrm187wC4 — WION (@WIONews) July 15, 2021 × Global payments service providers like Mastercard, Visa and American Express have lobbied against data localisation, citing increased costs. "Notwithstanding (the) lapse of considerable time and adequate opportunities being given, the entity (Mastercard) has been found to be non-compliant with the directions of Storage Payment System Data," the RBI said in a notification. Mastercard will be indefinitely blocked from issuing debit, credit or prepaid cards to customers in India from July 22. The move comes less than three months after India's central bank barred American Express and Diners Club International, owned by Discover Financial Services, from issuing new cards due to similar violations. But unlike American Express, which is a relatively small player in India, companies such as Mastercard and Visa have partnered with many Indian banks that offer cards using the US firms' payments network. In 2019, Mastercard said it was "bullish on India", announcing $1 billion in investment over the next five years, in addition to its earlier investment of $1 billion from 2014-2019. The RBI's decision will not impact existing customers of Mastercard, and the company should advise all card issuing banks in India to comply with the order, the RBI added. The RBI directive in 2018 sparked an aggressive lobbying effort from US companies, which said the rules would increase their infrastructure costs and hit their global fraud detection platforms, but the central bank did not relent. Global payments card companies have faced increasing competition from India's United Payments Interface (UPI) transactions that offer card-less and cashless payment options using phone numbers and QR codes. A record 2.8 billion UPI transactions worth some 5.5 trillion rupees ($73.8 billion) took place in June. (With inputs from agencies)

Why did India ban Mastercard from issuing new cards?

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) barred Mastercard from acquiring new customers starting July 22. The payments operator has been barred from adding domestic customers across three categories of cards – debit, credit as well as prepaid.

World Business Watch: RBI bars Mastercard from adding new clients in India from July 22

The UK Supreme Court on Friday allowed a 14 billion pound ($18.5 billion) class action to proceed against Mastercard for allegedly overcharging more than 46 million people in Britain over a 15-year period in a landmark judgment.

The complex case, brought after Mastercard lost an appeal against a 2007 European Commission ruling that its fees were anti-competitive, could entitle adults in Britain to 300 pounds each if it is successful.

The court dismissed a Mastercard appeal, setting the scene for Britain’s first mass consumer claim brought under a new legal regime and establishing a standard for a string of other, stalled class actions.

“Mastercard has been ... imposing excessive card transaction charges over a prolonged period in a way it must have known would impose an invisible tax on UK consumers,” said Walter Merricks, a lawyer who is leading the action.

Mastercard said the claim was driven by “hit and hope” U.S. lawyers.

The case will now be sent back to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), nominated in 2015 to oversees Britain’s fledgling, U.S.-style “opt-out” collective class actions for breaches of UK or European Union competition law.

The CAT will reconsider granting the necessary collective proceedings order (CPO) for the case to proceed to trial, having refused to certify the case in 2017 because of its complexity. A hearing is expected next year.

Mastercard said it would ask the CAT to avert a serious risk of the new collective action regime going down the wrong path with a “fundamentally flawed” case.

The case centres on so-called interchange fees which credit and debit card companies say they levy on merchants’ banks to cover the costs of card services, security and innovation.

Merricks, who is being advised by law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &amp; Sullivan, alleges these fees were excessive between 1992 and 2008, that they had to be paid by businesses that accepted Mastercard payments from British consumers and were passed on through increased shop prices.

Under the opt-out regime, UK-based members of a defined group are automatically bound into legal action unless they opt out.

Critics say such regimes encourage claims without merit. Others argue they can offer an effective route to compensation for those whose claims are individually too small to warrant the legal costs of taking on large companies alone - and that grouping such claims together helps attract necessary funding.

One such litigation funder, Therium, said it now expected to increase its investment allocation to competition class actions.

Anthony Maton, the global vice-chair of law firm Hausfeld, which is advising on other class actions, said: “This is a revolution in English law.

The UK Supreme Court on Friday allowed a 14 billion pound ($18.5 billion) class action to proceed against Mastercard for allegedly overcharging more than 46 million people in Britain over a 15-year period in a landmark judgment.

The UK Supreme Court on Friday allowed a 14 billion pound ($18.5 billion) class action to proceed against Mastercard for allegedly overcharging more than 46 million people in Britain over a 15-year period in a landmark judgment. The complex case, brought after Mastercard lost an appeal against a 2007 European Commission ruling that its fees were anti-competitive, could entitle adults in Britain to 300 pounds each if it is successful. The court dismissed a Mastercard appeal, setting the scene for Britain’s first mass consumer claim brought under a new legal regime and establishing a standard for a string of other, stalled class actions. “Mastercard has been ... imposing excessive card transaction charges over a prolonged period in a way it must have known would impose an invisible tax on UK consumers,” said Walter Merricks, a lawyer who is leading the action. Mastercard said the claim was driven by “hit and hope” U.S. lawyers. The case will now be sent back to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), nominated in 2015 to oversees Britain’s fledgling, U.S.-style “opt-out” collective class actions for breaches of UK or European Union competition law. The CAT will reconsider granting the necessary collective proceedings order (CPO) for the case to proceed to trial, having refused to certify the case in 2017 because of its complexity. A hearing is expected next year. Mastercard said it would ask the CAT to avert a serious risk of the new collective action regime going down the wrong path with a “fundamentally flawed” case. The case centres on so-called interchange fees which credit and debit card companies say they levy on merchants’ banks to cover the costs of card services, security and innovation. Merricks, who is being advised by law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, alleges these fees were excessive between 1992 and 2008, that they had to be paid by businesses that accepted Mastercard payments from British consumers and were passed on through increased shop prices. Under the opt-out regime, UK-based members of a defined group are automatically bound into legal action unless they opt out. Critics say such regimes encourage claims without merit. Others argue they can offer an effective route to compensation for those whose claims are individually too small to warrant the legal costs of taking on large companies alone - and that grouping such claims together helps attract necessary funding. One such litigation funder, Therium, said it now expected to increase its investment allocation to competition class actions. Anthony Maton, the global vice-chair of law firm Hausfeld, which is advising on other class actions, said: “This is a revolution in English law.

UK Supreme Court enables $18.5 billion class action against Mastercard

Credit card giants Visa and Mastercard&nbsp;are investigating their business relationship with Pornhub after a New York Times columnist alleged that the pornographic website shows videos of rape and underage sex.

Mastercard said&nbsp;it does not tolerate illegal activity on its payment network, and that it works with law enforcement and organizations like the National Center for Missing and&nbsp;Exploited Children to detect illegal transactions. Pornhub has denied it allows child videos on its site.

"We are examining the charges brought up in the New York Times and are working with MindGeek's bank to comprehend this circumstance, notwithstanding different advances they have just taken," Mastercard said in an articulation. "In the event that the cases are validated, we will make a prompt move."&nbsp;

Nicholas Kristof, opinion columnist at The New York Times,&nbsp;wrote Friday&nbsp;that Pornhub carries rape scenes, revenge pornography and other examples of explicit video taken without consent of the participants.

Pornhub said it is “irresponsible and flagrantly untrue” to suggest that it allows images of the sexual abuse of children on its site. Pornhub added that it employs moderators to screen every upload and that it removes illegal material.

The online payment service PayPal last year stopped processing payments to Pornhub, which is owned by the pornography conglomerate MindGeek. The columnist called out other card issuers for working with the site.

In response to Kristof’s story, Visa and Mastercard said they’re investigating the matter.

“We are aware of the allegations, and we are actively engaging with the relevant financial institutions to investigate, in addition to engaging directly with the site’s parent company, MindGeek,” Visa said Sunday.

Visa added that if Pornhub is violating the law or bank policies, then the website will be prohibited from accepting Visa payments.

Meanwhile, Mastercard promised “immediate action″ if the allegations are substantiated.

“We are investigating the allegations raised in the New York Times and are working with MindGeek’s bank to understand this situation,” Mastercard said in a statement.

Processing payments for pornography websites has long divided the payments and banking industry, and sex workers have claimed they’ve had their bank accounts shut down after lenders learned of their profession.

PayPal Holdings Inc. doesn’t process payments for Pornhub.com. American Express Co.’s cards aren’t accepted on Pornhub, and a spokeswoman on Saturday said the firm has a longstanding policy that prohibits card acceptance on digital adult content websites.

Credit card giants Visa and Mastercard are investigating their business relationship with Pornhub after a New York Times columnist alleged that the pornographic website shows videos of rape and underage sex.

Credit card giants Visa and Mastercard are investigating their business relationship with Pornhub after a New York Times columnist alleged that the pornographic website shows videos of rape and underage sex. Mastercard said it does not tolerate illegal activity on its payment network, and that it works with law enforcement and organizations like the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children to detect illegal transactions. Pornhub has denied it allows child videos on its site. "We are examining the charges brought up in the New York Times and are working with MindGeek's bank to comprehend this circumstance, notwithstanding different advances they have just taken," Mastercard said in an articulation. "In the event that the cases are validated, we will make a prompt move." Nicholas Kristof, opinion columnist at The New York Times, wrote Friday that Pornhub carries rape scenes, revenge pornography and other examples of explicit video taken without consent of the participants. Pornhub said it is “irresponsible and flagrantly untrue” to suggest that it allows images of the sexual abuse of children on its site. Pornhub added that it employs moderators to screen every upload and that it removes illegal material. The online payment service PayPal last year stopped processing payments to Pornhub, which is owned by the pornography conglomerate MindGeek. The columnist called out other card issuers for working with the site. In response to Kristof’s story, Visa and Mastercard said they’re investigating the matter. “We are aware of the allegations, and we are actively engaging with the relevant financial institutions to investigate, in addition to engaging directly with the site’s parent company, MindGeek,” Visa said Sunday. Visa added that if Pornhub is violating the law or bank policies, then the website will be prohibited from accepting Visa payments. Meanwhile, Mastercard promised “immediate action″ if the allegations are substantiated. “We are investigating the allegations raised in the New York Times and are working with MindGeek’s bank to understand this situation,” Mastercard said in a statement. Processing payments for pornography websites has long divided the payments and banking industry, and sex workers have claimed they’ve had their bank accounts shut down after lenders learned of their profession. PayPal Holdings Inc. doesn’t process payments for Pornhub.com. American Express Co.’s cards aren’t accepted on Pornhub, and a spokeswoman on Saturday said the firm has a longstanding policy that prohibits card acceptance on digital adult content websites.

Mastercard, Visa investigate financial ties with Pornhub

Almost every adult in the United Kingdom (UK) could receive a payout of up to £300 from Mastercard after a court ruling paved the way for a £14bn class action lawsuit.

The claim alleges 46 million people paid higher prices in shops than they should have due to high card fees.

Former financial ombudsman Walter Merricks - who is behind the claim - is trying to bring the class action on behalf of all individuals over 16 who were resident in the UK for at least three months between 1992 and 2008 and who bought an item or service from a UK business which accepted Mastercard, reported BBC.

He alleges that fees which Mastercard charged businesses for accepting payments from consumers, known as interchange fees, led to UK consumers paying higher prices on purchases from businesses that accepted Mastercard, the report added.

If the £14bn was awarded and divided between the 46 million eligible people the payout would amount to £300 each.

Mastercard said it continued to "disagree fundamentally with the basis of the claim".

"This decision is not a final ruling and the proposed claim is not approved to move forward; rather, the court has simply said a rehearing on certain issues should happen," it added.

The financial services firm said it was seeking permission to appeal against the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Almost every adult in the United Kingdom (UK) could receive a payout of up to £300 from Mastercard after a court ruling paved the way for a £14bn class action lawsuit.

Almost every adult in the United Kingdom (UK) could receive a payout of up to £300 from Mastercard after a court ruling paved the way for a £14bn class action lawsuit. The claim alleges 46 million people paid higher prices in shops than they should have due to high card fees. Former financial ombudsman Walter Merricks - who is behind the claim - is trying to bring the class action on behalf of all individuals over 16 who were resident in the UK for at least three months between 1992 and 2008 and who bought an item or service from a UK business which accepted Mastercard, reported BBC. He alleges that fees which Mastercard charged businesses for accepting payments from consumers, known as interchange fees, led to UK consumers paying higher prices on purchases from businesses that accepted Mastercard, the report added. If the £14bn was awarded and divided between the 46 million eligible people the payout would amount to £300 each. Mastercard said it continued to "disagree fundamentally with the basis of the claim". "This decision is not a final ruling and the proposed claim is not approved to move forward; rather, the court has simply said a rehearing on certain issues should happen," it added. The financial services firm said it was seeking permission to appeal against the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Court ruling may pave way for every adult in UK a payout of up to £300 from Mastercard 

Mastercard told the United States government in June that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was using nationalism to promote the use of a domestic payments network RuPay, and New Delhi's protectionist policies were hurting foreign payment companies, a document seen by Reuters showed.

In recent years, Modi has backed India's homegrown payments network RuPay, whose rise has broken the dominance of US payment giants such as Mastercard and Visa. More than half of India's 1 billion debit and credit cards now go through the RuPay payment system, and that means companies such as Mastercard face an uphill task to expand rapidly in one of the world's biggest payments growth markets.

Modi has publicly endorsed the indigenous card payment network, saying using RuPay was like serving the country as its transaction fee stays within India and could help build roads, schools and hospitals.

In a written reference to Modi's stance, Mastercard told the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on June 21 that the prime minister "associated the use of RuPay cards with nationalism, claiming it serves as 'kind of national service'."

The note, which was sent by a Mastercard Vice President for Global Public Policy, Sahra English, said that, while Modi's digital payments push was "commendable", the Indian government had adopted "a series of protectionist measures" to the detriment of global companies.

US companies in India have been increasingly battling Modi's policies they perceive to be protectionist. This year, US technology companies have protested against an Indian law that would require them to store more data locally, raising their costs.

The previously unreported note, which was seen by Reuters, shows the extent to which Modi's support for RuPay frustrated the Purchase, New York-based company, which is the world's second-largest payments processor.

"Increasing rhetoric from the prime minister and government mandates on promotion and preference for RuPay ... continues to create market access issues for US payments technology companies," Mastercard said in the note.

"The Indian government's preferential treatment of RuPay coupled with fallacies on pricing must be discontinued," the company asked the US government to propose.

In response to Reuters queries, Mastercard said in a statement it "fully supports" the Indian government's initiatives and is "deeply invested" in the country. The company did not comment on its USTR note and its executive Sahra English did not respond to questions.

The USTR did not respond to a request for comment and it was not clear whether the US agency raised Mastercard's concerns with New Delhi. Visa did not respond to Reuters queries.

There was no response to requests for comment from Modi's office.

Mastercard, whose president and chief executive is India-born Ajay Banga, has a planned investment outlay of $1 billion in its key Indian market for 2014-2019. With 2,000 people, India accounts for 14 per cent of the global Mastercard workforce, the largest outside the United States.

The company recruited a Bollywood actor this year for a campaign aimed at encouraging consumers in smaller cities to use debit cards more regularly as it seeks to grow in India.

DIGITAL BOOST

In November 2016, Modi started promoting the use of digital payments after replacing high-value currency notes in an attempt to crack down on the black economy.

That increased card usage: Indians in August clocked transactions worth $51 billion on debit and credit cards, nearly double the amount recorded in November 2016, according to data from the central bank, which does not provide separate usage statistics comparing Indian and foreign payment networks.

Foreign card companies have also had to contend with a growing use of mobile wallets and state-backed digital money transfer services, some of which Modi promoted.

RuPay received a major boost due to Modi's so-called financial inclusion programme launched in 2014, which meant that all Indians opening a bank account for the first time were offered a RuPay card, not a Mastercard or Visa.

The Indian card network was developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), a group largely owned by state banks but which also counts private and foreign banks among its shareholders. It also oversees the payments services in India.

In its note to the USTR, Mastercard said the government had mandated banks to support the NPCI directly and indirectly, making it the "sole beneficiary" of Modi's financial inclusion programme.

The NPCI acted both as "a quasi-regulator and a competing payment network", Mastercard said, adding that this was "compounded by the government's open preference for RuPay with misleading statements and inaccurate information on pricing, despite Mastercard being priced lower than RuPay".

Pricing refers to the fee paid by banks to payment processors such as Mastercard for card transactions. The company did not detail which specific statements it was referring to.

The chief executive of the NPCI, Dilip Asbe, did not respond to a request for comment.

At one point, RuPay levied a transaction fee which was half of that charged by Mastercard and Visa, one industry source said, but the US card companies reduced charges in recent months. The pricing and charges are not publicly available.

Modi in June said foreign card companies take their transaction fees abroad and as "everyone cannot go to the border to protect the country, we can use RuPay card to serve the nation".

A month later, Mastercard issued a press statement which said the company gets only 15-20 per cent of debit card transaction fees, while the rest stays "within the Indian economy". It did not name RuPay.

Mastercard told the United States government in June that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was using nationalism to promote the use of a domestic payments network RuPay, and New Delhi's protectionist policies were hurting foreign payment companies, a document seen by Reuters showed.

Mastercard told the United States government in June that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was using nationalism to promote the use of a domestic payments network RuPay, and New Delhi's protectionist policies were hurting foreign payment companies, a document seen by Reuters showed. In recent years, Modi has backed India's homegrown payments network RuPay, whose rise has broken the dominance of US payment giants such as Mastercard and Visa. More than half of India's 1 billion debit and credit cards now go through the RuPay payment system, and that means companies such as Mastercard face an uphill task to expand rapidly in one of the world's biggest payments growth markets. Modi has publicly endorsed the indigenous card payment network, saying using RuPay was like serving the country as its transaction fee stays within India and could help build roads, schools and hospitals. In a written reference to Modi's stance, Mastercard told the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) on June 21 that the prime minister "associated the use of RuPay cards with nationalism, claiming it serves as 'kind of national service'." The note, which was sent by a Mastercard Vice President for Global Public Policy, Sahra English, said that, while Modi's digital payments push was "commendable", the Indian government had adopted "a series of protectionist measures" to the detriment of global companies. US companies in India have been increasingly battling Modi's policies they perceive to be protectionist. This year, US technology companies have protested against an Indian law that would require them to store more data locally, raising their costs. The previously unreported note, which was seen by Reuters, shows the extent to which Modi's support for RuPay frustrated the Purchase, New York-based company, which is the world's second-largest payments processor. "Increasing rhetoric from the prime minister and government mandates on promotion and preference for RuPay ... continues to create market access issues for US payments technology companies," Mastercard said in the note. "The Indian government's preferential treatment of RuPay coupled with fallacies on pricing must be discontinued," the company asked the US government to propose. In response to Reuters queries, Mastercard said in a statement it "fully supports" the Indian government's initiatives and is "deeply invested" in the country. The company did not comment on its USTR note and its executive Sahra English did not respond to questions. The USTR did not respond to a request for comment and it was not clear whether the US agency raised Mastercard's concerns with New Delhi. Visa did not respond to Reuters queries. There was no response to requests for comment from Modi's office. Mastercard, whose president and chief executive is India-born Ajay Banga, has a planned investment outlay of $1 billion in its key Indian market for 2014-2019. With 2,000 people, India accounts for 14 per cent of the global Mastercard workforce, the largest outside the United States. The company recruited a Bollywood actor this year for a campaign aimed at encouraging consumers in smaller cities to use debit cards more regularly as it seeks to grow in India. DIGITAL BOOST In November 2016, Modi started promoting the use of digital payments after replacing high-value currency notes in an attempt to crack down on the black economy. That increased card usage: Indians in August clocked transactions worth $51 billion on debit and credit cards, nearly double the amount recorded in November 2016, according to data from the central bank, which does not provide separate usage statistics comparing Indian and foreign payment networks. Foreign card companies have also had to contend with a growing use of mobile wallets and state-backed digital money transfer services, some of which Modi promoted. RuPay received a major boost due to Modi's so-called financial inclusion programme launched in 2014, which meant that all Indians opening a bank account for the first time were offered a RuPay card, not a Mastercard or Visa. The Indian card network was developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), a group largely owned by state banks but which also counts private and foreign banks among its shareholders. It also oversees the payments services in India. In its note to the USTR, Mastercard said the government had mandated banks to support the NPCI directly and indirectly, making it the "sole beneficiary" of Modi's financial inclusion programme. The NPCI acted both as "a quasi-regulator and a competing payment network", Mastercard said, adding that this was "compounded by the government's open preference for RuPay with misleading statements and inaccurate information on pricing, despite Mastercard being priced lower than RuPay". Pricing refers to the fee paid by banks to payment processors such as Mastercard for card transactions. The company did not detail which specific statements it was referring to. The chief executive of the NPCI, Dilip Asbe, did not respond to a request for comment. At one point, RuPay levied a transaction fee which was half of that charged by Mastercard and Visa, one industry source said, but the US card companies reduced charges in recent months. The pricing and charges are not publicly available. Modi in June said foreign card companies take their transaction fees abroad and as "everyone cannot go to the border to protect the country, we can use RuPay card to serve the nation". A month later, Mastercard issued a press statement which said the company gets only 15-20 per cent of debit card transaction fees, while the rest stays "within the Indian economy". It did not name RuPay.

Mastercard lodged protest with US govt over Modi's promotion of Indian RuPay card

mastercard

Mastercard, News on Mastercard, stories on Mastercard, articles on Mastercard, Mastercard stories at Wion, Mastercard news, Mastercard latest news