The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear appeals filed by the Muslim side against the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment declaring Bhojshala a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. While refusing to allow Friday namaz inside the disputed complex, the court directed that members of the Muslim community be provided a separate open space adjacent to the site to offer prayers under an ad hoc arrangement.&nbsp;A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notices to the Madhya Pradesh government, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Hindu parties, seeking their responses. The matter has been listed for hearing in two to three weeks.&nbsp;The Supreme Court declined to stay the High Court judgment or revive the 2003 ASI arrangement that governed worship at the disputed site. Instead, it issued an interim order permitting members of the Muslim community to offer Friday namaz at a separate open space next to the disputed premises.&nbsp;"Meanwhile, as an interim measure and without prejudice to the rights of both sides... a separate open space adjacent to the subject premises may be provided to the appellant and other members of the Muslim community for offering Namaz on Friday between 1-3 pm. The arrangement shall be ad hoc in nature. And subject to final adjudication of the appeal," the Court said.&nbsp;The bench also directed that the ASI should not undertake any structural changes at the disputed Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque Complex in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh, without prior permission from the Supreme Court.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/acts-of-violence-india-lodges-strong-protest-over-hormuz-strikes-calls-for-end-to-attacks-on-commercial-vessels-1784024780401">'Acts of violence': India lodges strong protest over Hormuz strikes, calls for end to attacks on commercial vessels</a>&nbsp;"Structural alteration to the Complex as proposed by ASI, it will not be done without the leave (permission) of this Court", it added.&nbsp;The court asked both the Hindu and Muslim sides to exercise patience, saying Bhojshala is a sensitive matter. It also said it was ready to hear the case on a day-to-day basis to resolve the dispute.&nbsp;The appeals challenge the May 15 judgment of the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which ruled that the religious character of the disputed monument is that of Bhojshala, a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati.&nbsp;The High Court had set aside the 2003 ASI arrangement to the extent that it restricted the rights of Hindus to worship inside the Bhojshala complex while allowing Friday prayers by the Muslim community. It also directed the Union government and the ASI to take decisions on the administration and management of the temple, while the ASI would continue to oversee the preservation and regulation of the protected monument.&nbsp;The High Court further observed that the Union government may consider representations seeking the return of the idol of Goddess Saraswati, which is currently housed in a London museum, and its reinstallation at the Bhojshala complex. It also said that if the Muslim community seeks suitable land in Dhar district to construct a mosque or place of prayer, the state government may consider the request in accordance with the law.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the Muslim side's appeal against the Bhojshala ruling while refusing to restore Friday namaz inside the complex and permitting prayers at a nearby open space.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear appeals filed by the Muslim side against the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment declaring Bhojshala a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. While refusing to allow Friday namaz inside the disputed complex, the court directed that members of the Muslim community be provided a separate open space adjacent to the site to offer prayers under an ad hoc arrangement. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notices to the Madhya Pradesh government, the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and the Hindu parties, seeking their responses. The matter has been listed for hearing in two to three weeks. The Supreme Court declined to stay the High Court judgment or revive the 2003 ASI arrangement that governed worship at the disputed site. Instead, it issued an interim order permitting members of the Muslim community to offer Friday namaz at a separate open space next to the disputed premises. "Meanwhile, as an interim measure and without prejudice to the rights of both sides... a separate open space adjacent to the subject premises may be provided to the appellant and other members of the Muslim community for offering Namaz on Friday between 1-3 pm. The arrangement shall be ad hoc in nature. And subject to final adjudication of the appeal," the Court said. The bench also directed that the ASI should not undertake any structural changes at the disputed Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque Complex in Dhar, Madhya Pradesh, without prior permission from the Supreme Court. Also Read: 'Acts of violence': India lodges strong protest over Hormuz strikes, calls for end to attacks on commercial vessels "Structural alteration to the Complex as proposed by ASI, it will not be done without the leave (permission) of this Court", it added. The court asked both the Hindu and Muslim sides to exercise patience, saying Bhojshala is a sensitive matter. It also said it was ready to hear the case on a day-to-day basis to resolve the dispute. The appeals challenge the May 15 judgment of the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, which ruled that the religious character of the disputed monument is that of Bhojshala, a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. The High Court had set aside the 2003 ASI arrangement to the extent that it restricted the rights of Hindus to worship inside the Bhojshala complex while allowing Friday prayers by the Muslim community. It also directed the Union government and the ASI to take decisions on the administration and management of the temple, while the ASI would continue to oversee the preservation and regulation of the protected monument. The High Court further observed that the Union government may consider representations seeking the return of the idol of Goddess Saraswati, which is currently housed in a London museum, and its reinstallation at the Bhojshala complex. It also said that if the Muslim community seeks suitable land in Dhar district to construct a mosque or place of prayer, the state government may consider the request in accordance with the law.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the Muslim side's appeal against the Bhojshala ruling while refusing to restore Friday namaz inside the complex and permitting prayers at a nearby open space.

SC declines to restore Friday namaz inside Bhojshala, permits prayers at adjacent site

Indian scientists have discovered a bamboo stem from the Ice Age that continued to thrive while the others died as they couldn't endure the harsh cold in Europe and other colder regions. Researchers from the Birbal Sahni Institution of Palaeosciences (BSIP) found an intact bamboo stem with thorn marks in the Chirang River in Manipur’s Imphal Valley. The 37,000-year-old stem is the earliest thorny bamboo fossil found in Asia, and can reveal the continent’s botanical history, and possibly alter it. It is rare to find bamboo fossils since its hollow stems and fibrous tissues decay pretty quickly. The only way to learn about the history of bamboo is to compare modern species with their habitats.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/scientist-finds-earliest-evidence-that-rig-veda-verses-influenced-civilisations-outside-india-1755591662063">Scientist finds earliest evidence that Rig Veda verses influenced civilisations outside India</a><h2>Finding the marks on the bamboo stem was completely unexpected</h2>But when researchers from the institute stumbled upon this bamboo with scars all over it during a field survey, they knew that they had found something rare. The nature of the unusual markings wasn't clear initially. A detailed analysis was carried out to understand the bamboo species and what those marks could be. Scientists from the autonomous institute of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) found that the marks were left behind by thorns the bamboo once had. The stem was also assigned to the genus Chimonobambusa. Not only was there a bamboo stem fossil, but it was one with fossilised thorn marks.&nbsp;They then compared the stem with living thorny bamboos such as Bambusa bambos and Chimonobambusa callosa to learn about how it defended itself and its place in the ecological chain. The thorns act as a way for bamboos to protect themselves against herbivores. This is the first fossil evidence that bamboos in Asia had already developed thorniness during the Ice Age. The discovery points to the fact that the warm and humid conditions of Northeast India were a haven for bamboo at a time when other regions were too cold, where bamboos perished.The research was published in the journal Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology and carried out by Harshita Bhatia, Pushpa Kumari, NH Singh and Gaurav Srivastava.

A fossilised bamboo stem from the Ice Age has been found in Manipur, which throws light on how the warm and humid conditions of Northeast India supported plant life at a time when other regions proved too cold and killed the bamboos.

Indian scientists have discovered a bamboo stem from the Ice Age that continued to thrive while the others died as they couldn't endure the harsh cold in Europe and other colder regions. Researchers from the Birbal Sahni Institution of Palaeosciences (BSIP) found an intact bamboo stem with thorn marks in the Chirang River in Manipur’s Imphal Valley. The 37,000-year-old stem is the earliest thorny bamboo fossil found in Asia, and can reveal the continent’s botanical history, and possibly alter it. It is rare to find bamboo fossils since its hollow stems and fibrous tissues decay pretty quickly. The only way to learn about the history of bamboo is to compare modern species with their habitats. Also Read: Scientist finds earliest evidence that Rig Veda verses influenced civilisations outside India Finding the marks on the bamboo stem was completely unexpected But when researchers from the institute stumbled upon this bamboo with scars all over it during a field survey, they knew that they had found something rare. The nature of the unusual markings wasn't clear initially. A detailed analysis was carried out to understand the bamboo species and what those marks could be. Scientists from the autonomous institute of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) found that the marks were left behind by thorns the bamboo once had. The stem was also assigned to the genus Chimonobambusa. Not only was there a bamboo stem fossil, but it was one with fossilised thorn marks. They then compared the stem with living thorny bamboos such as Bambusa bambos and Chimonobambusa callosa to learn about how it defended itself and its place in the ecological chain. The thorns act as a way for bamboos to protect themselves against herbivores. This is the first fossil evidence that bamboos in Asia had already developed thorniness during the Ice Age. The discovery points to the fact that the warm and humid conditions of Northeast India were a haven for bamboo at a time when other regions were too cold, where bamboos perished. The research was published in the journal Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology and carried out by Harshita Bhatia, Pushpa Kumari, NH Singh and Gaurav Srivastava.

A fossilised bamboo stem from the Ice Age has been found in Manipur, which throws light on how the warm and humid conditions of Northeast India supported plant life at a time when other regions proved too cold and killed the bamboos.

Indian scientists stumble upon 37,000-year-old bamboo stem with strange marks in Manipur. It changes things for Asia

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai issued a clarification on Thursday (September 18) regarding his recent comments about the Lord Vishnu idol in Khajuraho, which had stirred significant controversy. He said, "I respect all religions," responding to claims that his statements had been misrepresented on social media.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/modi-speaks-to-nepal-pm-sushila-karki-over-phone-says-will-help-restore-peace-and-stability-after-gen-z-protest-1758186478886">Modi speaks to Nepal PM Sushila Karki over phone, says will help ‘restore peace and stability’ after Gen Z protest</a>&nbsp;The clarification followed a judgment delivered earlier in the week, where CJI Gavai, leading a bench, dismissed a petition seeking the reconstruction and reinstallation of a seven-foot Lord Vishnu idol at the Javari Temple, part of the UNESCO World Heritage Khajuraho complex in Madhya Pradesh. In his ruling, the CJI had remarked, "This is nothing but publicity-driven litigation. If you are a devout follower of Lord Vishnu, focus on prayer and meditation."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/71-year-old-us-citizen-invited-to-india-for-marriage-burnt-to-death-by-75-year-old-nri-groom-1758182893527">71-year-old US citizen invited to India for marriage, burnt to death by 75-year-old NRI groom</a>&nbsp;He also highlighted that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) had jurisdiction over such matters and suggested the petitioner could visit the nearby Shiva Temple while the case remained unresolved. "If you are open to Shaivism, there is a significant Shiva linga at Khajuraho," he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-is-the-pm-of-india-an-important-man-abhilash-tomy-remembers-narendra-modi-s-call-after-his-rescue-from-shipwreck-1758181997038">Abhilash Tomy remembers Narendra Modi's phone call after his rescue from shipwreck, in heartfelt birthday wish to Indian PM</a>&nbsp;However, the remarks sparked outrage, with several Hindu organizations accusing the CJI of mocking religious beliefs. Some social media users called for his impeachment, and prominent figures, such as Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) president Alok Kumar, urged restraint in courtroom speech. Legal professionals also sent letters to the Chief Justice of India, asking him to retract his comments, stressing the need to preserve the dignity of all religions. One letter specifically urged the Supreme Court and the President to address the matter seriously.

Chief Justice BR Gavai clarified that he respects all religions after his remarks about a Lord Vishnu idol in Khajuraho sparked controversy. His comments, dismissing a petition for idol restoration, drew strong reactions

Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai issued a clarification on Thursday (September 18) regarding his recent comments about the Lord Vishnu idol in Khajuraho, which had stirred significant controversy. He said, "I respect all religions," responding to claims that his statements had been misrepresented on social media. Also Read: Modi speaks to Nepal PM Sushila Karki over phone, says will help ‘restore peace and stability’ after Gen Z protest The clarification followed a judgment delivered earlier in the week, where CJI Gavai, leading a bench, dismissed a petition seeking the reconstruction and reinstallation of a seven-foot Lord Vishnu idol at the Javari Temple, part of the UNESCO World Heritage Khajuraho complex in Madhya Pradesh. In his ruling, the CJI had remarked, "This is nothing but publicity-driven litigation. If you are a devout follower of Lord Vishnu, focus on prayer and meditation." Also Read: 71-year-old US citizen invited to India for marriage, burnt to death by 75-year-old NRI groom He also highlighted that the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) had jurisdiction over such matters and suggested the petitioner could visit the nearby Shiva Temple while the case remained unresolved. "If you are open to Shaivism, there is a significant Shiva linga at Khajuraho," he added. Also Read: Abhilash Tomy remembers Narendra Modi's phone call after his rescue from shipwreck, in heartfelt birthday wish to Indian PM However, the remarks sparked outrage, with several Hindu organizations accusing the CJI of mocking religious beliefs. Some social media users called for his impeachment, and prominent figures, such as Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) president Alok Kumar, urged restraint in courtroom speech. Legal professionals also sent letters to the Chief Justice of India, asking him to retract his comments, stressing the need to preserve the dignity of all religions. One letter specifically urged the Supreme Court and the President to address the matter seriously.

Chief Justice BR Gavai clarified that he respects all religions after his remarks about a Lord Vishnu idol in Khajuraho sparked controversy. His comments, dismissing a petition for idol restoration, drew strong reactions

'I respect all religions', says CJI BR Gavai amid backlash over Khajuraho remarks

The archaeological survey of India reveals it found around 55 stone sculptures of Hindu deities’ n the Gyanvapi mosque complex located in state of Uttar Pradesh. The report has concluded that a temple appears to have been destroyed in the 17th century during the reign of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb.

ASI report on Gyanvapi mosque: 55 Hindu deity sculptures found in mosque

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report on the Gyanvapi Mosque complex will be made available to both the Hindu and the Muslim sides, a district court in Uttar Pradesh's Varanasi said on Wednesday (Jan 24) in the significant development in the ongoing case.&nbsp;

Last year in December, ASI submitted its 1,000-page "scientific survey" report on the mosque complex to the district judge in a sealed cover.&nbsp;

The court said in the latest hearing that both parties shall give an affidavit to keep the report with them and won't make it public.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ayodhya-consecration-miracle-that-modi-is-alive-says-congress-leader-moily-on-pms-11-day-ritual-683138">Ayodhya consecration: 'Miracle' that Modi is alive, says Congress leader Moily on PM's 11-day ritual</a>&nbsp;

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who is representing the Hindu side, said, "The court listened to both sides today. After hearing both sides, an agreement was reached that a certified copy of ASI's report be made available to both sides."&nbsp;

He added, "As soon as the court passes the order, our legal team will apply for the certified copy."&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Gyanvapi case | Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, says, "The court listened to both sides today. After hearing both sides, an agreement was reached that a certified copy of ASI's report be made available to both sides. As soon as the court passes… <a href="https://t.co/q5E1hWL2oS">pic.twitter.com/q5E1hWL2oS</a>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1750094728438391266?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 24, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<h2>Gyanvapi Mosque Case&nbsp;</h2>

The Gyanvapi Mosque is located in Varanasi, a holy city and one of the most popular tourist destinations in the north Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.&nbsp;

It was constructed by Aurangzeb in 1669 after demolishing an ancient temple of Lord Shiva , claims the Hindu side.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-mamata-banerjee-west-bengal-chief-minister-injured-in-car-accident-683194">Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal Chief Minister, injured in car accident</a>&nbsp;

ASI survey of the site was launched after the Allahabad High Court upheld the Varanasi court order, stating that the survey was "necessary in the interest of justice". It added that the survey would benefit both sides in the dispute.&nbsp;

After the court's order, the ASI carried out a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi complex premises, located next to the famous Kashi Vishwanath temple.&nbsp;

The main aim of the survey was to determine or not whether the mosque was constructed over a Hindu temple.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report on the Gyanvapi Mosque complex will be made available to both the Hindu and the Muslim sides, a district court in Uttar Pradesh's Varanasi said on Wednesday (Jan 24) in the significant development in the ongoing case.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report on the Gyanvapi Mosque complex will be made available to both the Hindu and the Muslim sides, a district court in Uttar Pradesh's Varanasi said on Wednesday (Jan 24) in the significant development in the ongoing case. Last year in December, ASI submitted its 1,000-page "scientific survey" report on the mosque complex to the district judge in a sealed cover. The court said in the latest hearing that both parties shall give an affidavit to keep the report with them and won't make it public. Also read: Ayodhya consecration: 'Miracle' that Modi is alive, says Congress leader Moily on PM's 11-day ritual Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who is representing the Hindu side, said, "The court listened to both sides today. After hearing both sides, an agreement was reached that a certified copy of ASI's report be made available to both sides." He added, "As soon as the court passes the order, our legal team will apply for the certified copy." #WATCH | Gyanvapi case | Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, says, "The court listened to both sides today. After hearing both sides, an agreement was reached that a certified copy of ASI's report be made available to both sides. As soon as the court passes… pic.twitter.com/q5E1hWL2oS — ANI (@ANI) January 24, 2024 × Gyanvapi Mosque Case The Gyanvapi Mosque is located in Varanasi, a holy city and one of the most popular tourist destinations in the north Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. It was constructed by Aurangzeb in 1669 after demolishing an ancient temple of Lord Shiva , claims the Hindu side. Also read: Mamata Banerjee, West Bengal Chief Minister, injured in car accident ASI survey of the site was launched after the Allahabad High Court upheld the Varanasi court order, stating that the survey was "necessary in the interest of justice". It added that the survey would benefit both sides in the dispute. After the court's order, the ASI carried out a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi complex premises, located next to the famous Kashi Vishwanath temple. The main aim of the survey was to determine or not whether the mosque was constructed over a Hindu temple. (With inputs from agencies)

Gyanvapi Mosque Case: Archaeological Survey of India's survey report made available to both sides

ASI shares images of prominent heritage monuments of India awash in tricolour

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) resumed the Gyanvapi mosque complex’s scientific survey in the north Indian city of Varanasi to determine if the mosque was actually constructed over a temple.

On Friday (August 4) morning, a team of ASI officials reached inside the premises of the 17th-century mosque and started the scientific survey to find whether any structure of a Hindu temple existed in the same place.

The survey started amid tight security arrangements on the Godaulia-Maidagin route, one day after Allahabad High Court gave its nod to the ASI to conduct the survey.

"All people (including ASI officials) have reached there. The survey has started. We are also going inside," said Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi, the advocate representing the Hindu side on the Gyanvapi case.

 
At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a 'shivling', a holy structure of the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/explained-the-gyanvapi-case-history-and-battle-over-places-of-worship-act-622020">Explained | The Gyanvapi case, history and battle over Places of Worship Act</a>

<h2>HC says survey in ‘interest of justice’</h2>

On Thursday (August 3), Allahabad High Court gave ASI permission to conduct a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi.

"In the opinion of the Court, the scientific survey/investigation proposed is necessary in the interest of justice and shall benefit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and come in aid of the trial court to arrive at a just decision. The (trial) court was justified in passing the impugned order," said the bench, in its 16-page verdict.

<img alt="temple" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9d25f998-a493-4227-90ce-ce70a5413e1a" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Untitled%20design%20-%202023-08-04T092835.096.png" />

&nbsp;

Caption: These are the artefacts present in the Gyanvapi premises which were&nbsp;linked to the Hindu temple during the commissioner survey.

The ruling of the high court has been challenged by the mosque committee in the Supreme Court, a request which will be heard later today.

"Allahabad High Court has said that the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex will start. Sessions court order is upheld by the High Court," said Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi survey case, while speaking to reporters. &nbsp;

WATCH |&nbsp;Gyanvapi survey to continue, rules court; needed in interest of justice

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gyanvapi-survey-to-continue-rules-court-needed-in-interest-of-justice-621994/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>Mosque committee boycotts survey</h2>

Muslim body Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee will not be taking part in the survey, just the way it did on July 24 when the survey was put on hold by the Supreme Court.

Committee's joint secretary SM Yasin said that the ASI has been ordered by the High Court to conduct Gyanvapi Masjid’s survey without damaging the mosque.

“The Anjuman Intazamiya Masjid appealed against the order in the Supreme Court on Thursday. Its hearing is fixed for today,” he stated while appealing to the officials to postpone the survey.

You can&nbsp;now write for&nbsp;wionews.com&nbsp;and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" data-gtm-yt-inspected-17="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-22="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-23="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-32="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-33="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) resumed the Gyanvapi mosque complex’s scientific survey in the north Indian city of Varanasi to determine if the mosque was actually constructed over a temple.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) resumed the Gyanvapi mosque complex’s scientific survey in the north Indian city of Varanasi to determine if the mosque was actually constructed over a temple. On Friday (August 4) morning, a team of ASI officials reached inside the premises of the 17th-century mosque and started the scientific survey to find whether any structure of a Hindu temple existed in the same place. The survey started amid tight security arrangements on the Godaulia-Maidagin route, one day after Allahabad High Court gave its nod to the ASI to conduct the survey. "All people (including ASI officials) have reached there. The survey has started. We are also going inside," said Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi, the advocate representing the Hindu side on the Gyanvapi case. At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a 'shivling', a holy structure of the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain. ALSO READ | Explained | The Gyanvapi case, history and battle over Places of Worship Act HC says survey in ‘interest of justice’ On Thursday (August 3), Allahabad High Court gave ASI permission to conduct a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi. "In the opinion of the Court, the scientific survey/investigation proposed is necessary in the interest of justice and shall benefit the plaintiffs and defendants alike and come in aid of the trial court to arrive at a just decision. The (trial) court was justified in passing the impugned order," said the bench, in its 16-page verdict. Caption: These are the artefacts present in the Gyanvapi premises which were linked to the Hindu temple during the commissioner survey. The ruling of the high court has been challenged by the mosque committee in the Supreme Court, a request which will be heard later today. "Allahabad High Court has said that the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex will start. Sessions court order is upheld by the High Court," said Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi survey case, while speaking to reporters. WATCH | Gyanvapi survey to continue, rules court; needed in interest of justice Mosque committee boycotts survey Muslim body Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee will not be taking part in the survey, just the way it did on July 24 when the survey was put on hold by the Supreme Court. Committee's joint secretary SM Yasin said that the ASI has been ordered by the High Court to conduct Gyanvapi Masjid’s survey without damaging the mosque. “The Anjuman Intazamiya Masjid appealed against the order in the Supreme Court on Thursday. Its hearing is fixed for today,” he stated while appealing to the officials to postpone the survey. You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

India: ASI resumes scientific survey of Gyanvapi mosque complex

The Archaeological Survey of India has resumed its survey of the Gyanvapi mosque in the city of Varanasi. The survey aims to determine whether the 17th-century Mosque was constructed over a pre-existing structure of a Hindu temple the Mosque Committee has challenged the survey and the petition is in India's Supreme Court.

India: Survey of Gyanvapi Mosque resumes

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday (August 3) upheld the district court's order to allow the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to carry out a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi. Dismissing the plea of the Muslim side, the bench of&nbsp;Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker said that the Varanasi district court was justified in ordering the ASI survey and that the scientific survey is necessary in the interest of justice.&nbsp;

The Allahabad High Court had previously asked the ASI not to start Gyanvapi mosque’s survey in Varanasi, after the ASI’s detailed scientific survey was postponed by the Supreme Court till 5 pm on July 26. The survey’s purpose was to find out if the mosque, which is situated adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple, was constructed on top of a temple.

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/gyanvapi-survey-allahabad-hc-stays-asi-survey-of-mosque-premises-till-august-3-619969">Gyanvapi case: Allahabad HC reserves order for August 3, stays ASI survey till then</a>

The apex court was responding to a plea submitted against the order given by the district court which directed the ASI to carry out the controversial survey. “Allahabad HC has said that the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex is to start. Sessions court order upheld by HC,” said Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi survey case, while speaking to news agency ANI.

<h2>Gyanvapi mosque complex and the question of 'shivling'</h2>

At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a 'shivling', a holy structure of the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain.&nbsp;

In the Gyanvapi mosque case, the Supreme Court had earlier inadvertently disposed of the committee's appeal challenging the maintainability of the lawsuit which was filed by Hindus in the trial court, demanding rights to worship inside the mosque. &nbsp;

WATCH |&nbsp;Gyanvapi mosque 'scientific survey' stayed

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gyanvapi-mosque-scientific-survey-stayed-620073/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

However, interim relief was granted by the top court as it placed a stay on the ASI survey and the main case was disposed of on July 24. An interim plea was filed by the mosque committee with the top court in the pending petition appealing for a halt to the ASI's work.

Varanasi district judge AK Vishvesha had given the order to ASI to carry out a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex on July 21 after receiving an application from four Hindu women on May 16, 2023. However, the complex’s ablution pond area was excluded by the court, which was already sealed on the order of the top court.&nbsp;

You can&nbsp;now write for&nbsp;wionews.com&nbsp;and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" data-gtm-yt-inspected-17="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-22="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-32="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday (August 3) upheld the district court's order to allow the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to carry out a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi.

The Allahabad High Court on Thursday (August 3) upheld the district court's order to allow the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to carry out a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in Varanasi. Dismissing the plea of the Muslim side, the bench of Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker said that the Varanasi district court was justified in ordering the ASI survey and that the scientific survey is necessary in the interest of justice. The Allahabad High Court had previously asked the ASI not to start Gyanvapi mosque’s survey in Varanasi, after the ASI’s detailed scientific survey was postponed by the Supreme Court till 5 pm on July 26. The survey’s purpose was to find out if the mosque, which is situated adjacent to the Kashi Vishwanath temple, was constructed on top of a temple. ALSO READ | Gyanvapi case: Allahabad HC reserves order for August 3, stays ASI survey till then The apex court was responding to a plea submitted against the order given by the district court which directed the ASI to carry out the controversial survey. “Allahabad HC has said that the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex is to start. Sessions court order upheld by HC,” said Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi survey case, while speaking to news agency ANI. Gyanvapi mosque complex and the question of 'shivling' At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a 'shivling', a holy structure of the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain. In the Gyanvapi mosque case, the Supreme Court had earlier inadvertently disposed of the committee's appeal challenging the maintainability of the lawsuit which was filed by Hindus in the trial court, demanding rights to worship inside the mosque. WATCH | Gyanvapi mosque 'scientific survey' stayed However, interim relief was granted by the top court as it placed a stay on the ASI survey and the main case was disposed of on July 24. An interim plea was filed by the mosque committee with the top court in the pending petition appealing for a halt to the ASI's work. Varanasi district judge AK Vishvesha had given the order to ASI to carry out a survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex on July 21 after receiving an application from four Hindu women on May 16, 2023. However, the complex’s ablution pond area was excluded by the court, which was already sealed on the order of the top court. You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Allahabad High Court allows ASI to survey Gyanvapi mosque complex

The team of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) started a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in the northern city of Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh state on Monday (July 24) as per court orders.&nbsp;

At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a shivling, a holy structure for the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain.

The ASI is carrying out the survey of the premises, excluding the sealed 'Wazukhana' area, even though a petition has been filed by the mosque management committee, against the order of the Varanasi district court allowing the inspection, in the Supreme Court. &nbsp;

<h2>40 officials visit the mosque complex</h2>

The team of ASI reached Varanasi on Sunday (July 23) along with all the required equipment. As per reports, currently 40 members including ASI officials, councils for the Gyanvapi mosque management committee, four Hindu women plaintiff and their counsels are present in the mosque complex. The Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee had said it will not participate in the survey.&nbsp;

ALSO READ |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-varanasi-court-allows-archaeological-survey-of-entire-gyanvapi-complex-excluding-wuzukhana-618162">India: Varanasi court allows archaeological survey of entire Gyanvapi complex, excluding 'wuzukhana'</a>

The committee's joint secretary SM Yasin said, “We have boycotted the ASI survey. Neither we, nor our advocate are present there (in the Gyanvapi mosque) during the ASI survey. We are not participating in it."

The order was pronounced by the Varanasi after a petition was filed by the Hindu side demanding that ASI carries out a “scientific survey” of the entire Gyanvapi mosque premises.&nbsp;

Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi, who is representing the Hindu side, stated that the survey's result will be in favour of Hindus. Addressing the media reporters, Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi said, "We are sure that the whole premise is of temple only. The result of the survey will be favourable to us."

<h2>Survey to complete in 3 to 6 months</h2>

"Today the Gyanvapi survey will be conducted, it is a good thing for us...the survey will begin at 7 am, can't say how long it will go on...", stated advocate Sudhir Tripathi, who will be representing the Hindu side.&nbsp;

WATCH |&nbsp;India: Nine arrested from across the country over investment fraud

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-nine-arrested-from-across-the-country-over-investment-fraud-618613/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"I have been informed that my application has been approved and the court has given directions to conduct an ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, excluding the Wazukhana which has been sealed. I think the survey can be completed within 3 to 6 months," stated advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain.&nbsp;

Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi said the decision of the court is a turning point in the case. "Our application for the ASI survey has been accepted. It is a turning point in the case," he stated.&nbsp;

Meanwhile,&nbsp;the Gyanvapi Masjid Committee moved the Supreme Court, seeking the case's urgent listing after the survey was ordered by a Varanasi court. The case of the&nbsp;committee will be presented before the Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Monday (July 24).

You can&nbsp;now write for&nbsp;wionews.com&nbsp;and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" data-gtm-yt-inspected-19="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-24="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-32="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

The team of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) started a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in the northern city of Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh state on Monday (July 24) as per court orders.

The team of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) started a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex in the northern city of Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh state on Monday (July 24) as per court orders. At the heart of the case is the contention by a group of Hindu petitioners that there is a shivling, a holy structure for the religion, in the mosque complex which they want to worship. The Muslim representatives argue that it is a fountain. The ASI is carrying out the survey of the premises, excluding the sealed 'Wazukhana' area, even though a petition has been filed by the mosque management committee, against the order of the Varanasi district court allowing the inspection, in the Supreme Court. 40 officials visit the mosque complex The team of ASI reached Varanasi on Sunday (July 23) along with all the required equipment. As per reports, currently 40 members including ASI officials, councils for the Gyanvapi mosque management committee, four Hindu women plaintiff and their counsels are present in the mosque complex. The Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee had said it will not participate in the survey. ALSO READ | India: Varanasi court allows archaeological survey of entire Gyanvapi complex, excluding 'wuzukhana' The committee's joint secretary SM Yasin said, “We have boycotted the ASI survey. Neither we, nor our advocate are present there (in the Gyanvapi mosque) during the ASI survey. We are not participating in it." The order was pronounced by the Varanasi after a petition was filed by the Hindu side demanding that ASI carries out a “scientific survey” of the entire Gyanvapi mosque premises. Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi, who is representing the Hindu side, stated that the survey's result will be in favour of Hindus. Addressing the media reporters, Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi said, "We are sure that the whole premise is of temple only. The result of the survey will be favourable to us." Survey to complete in 3 to 6 months "Today the Gyanvapi survey will be conducted, it is a good thing for us...the survey will begin at 7 am, can't say how long it will go on...", stated advocate Sudhir Tripathi, who will be representing the Hindu side. WATCH | India: Nine arrested from across the country over investment fraud "I have been informed that my application has been approved and the court has given directions to conduct an ASI survey of the Gyanvapi mosque complex, excluding the Wazukhana which has been sealed. I think the survey can be completed within 3 to 6 months," stated advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain. Advocate Subhash Nandan Chaturvedi said the decision of the court is a turning point in the case. "Our application for the ASI survey has been accepted. It is a turning point in the case," he stated. Meanwhile, the Gyanvapi Masjid Committee moved the Supreme Court, seeking the case's urgent listing after the survey was ordered by a Varanasi court. The case of the committee will be presented before the Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud on Monday (July 24). You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. WATCH WION LIVE HERE

India: ASI reaches Gyanvapi mosque to conduct scientific survey of complex

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern over the change of colour of the iconic Taj Mahal at Agra and said the monument had become yellowish earlier and was now turning brownish and greenish.

The apex court suggested that the Centre take the assistance of experts from India and abroad to first assess the damage and then take steps to restore the historic monument.

"We don't know whether you have or perhaps don't have the expertise. Even if you have the expertise, you are not utilising it. Or perhaps you don't care," a bench comprising Justices M B Lokur and Deepak Gupta said.

"Perhaps we need some expert organisation from outside India unless there is a decision that the Taj has to go," the bench said sarcastically, adding, "you can get experts from India as well as from outside."

The apex court perused the photographs placed before it by petitioner MC Mehta and asked Additional Solicitor General A N S Nadkarni, who was representing the government, as to why the colour of Taj Mahal has changed.

"First it was yellow and now it is becoming brown and green," the bench observed.

Nadkarni told the bench that the management of Taj Mahal has to be done by the Archaeological Survey of India.

The apex court fixed the matter for further hearing on May 9.

Environmentalist Mehta has filed the plea seeking protection of the Taj from the ill-effects of polluting gases and deforestation in and around the area.

The top court has been monitoring developments in the area to protect the historic monument, built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal in 1631. The mausoleum is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.&nbsp;

The apex court suggested that the Centre take the assistance of experts from India and abroad to first assess the damage and then take steps to restore the historic monument

The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern over the change of colour of the iconic Taj Mahal at Agra and said the monument had become yellowish earlier and was now turning brownish and greenish. The apex court suggested that the Centre take the assistance of experts from India and abroad to first assess the damage and then take steps to restore the historic monument. "We don't know whether you have or perhaps don't have the expertise. Even if you have the expertise, you are not utilising it. Or perhaps you don't care," a bench comprising Justices M B Lokur and Deepak Gupta said. "Perhaps we need some expert organisation from outside India unless there is a decision that the Taj has to go," the bench said sarcastically, adding, "you can get experts from India as well as from outside." The apex court perused the photographs placed before it by petitioner MC Mehta and asked Additional Solicitor General A N S Nadkarni, who was representing the government, as to why the colour of Taj Mahal has changed. "First it was yellow and now it is becoming brown and green," the bench observed. Nadkarni told the bench that the management of Taj Mahal has to be done by the Archaeological Survey of India. The apex court fixed the matter for further hearing on May 9. Environmentalist Mehta has filed the plea seeking protection of the Taj from the ill-effects of polluting gases and deforestation in and around the area. The top court has been monitoring developments in the area to protect the historic monument, built by Mughal emperor Shah Jahan in the memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal in 1631. The mausoleum is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

First yellow... now brown and green: Supreme Court expresses concern over change in Taj Mahal's colour

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) will permit visitors to spend only three hours at the Taj Mahal, to ease rush and control pollution.

According to a notice issued by the ASI, the new system will become operational from Sunday (April 1).

At present, visitors can spend any amount of time till the monument is closed every evening.

Alarmed by the recent reports of "human pollution", several experts had suggested that the time restriction on tickets should be imposed at the Mughal-era monument, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

On weekends and holidays, the mausoleum is visited by more than 50,000 people. The number of children visiting the site is not recorded, as entry is free for those under 15 years.

ASI officials said the new system will take a few days to streamline and more staffer will be deployed for checking tickets for time restriction. Those spending extra time at the site will have to pay extra amount, they said.

Alarmed by the recent reports of "human pollution", several experts had suggested that the time restriction on tickets should be imposed

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) will permit visitors to spend only three hours at the Taj Mahal, to ease rush and control pollution. According to a notice issued by the ASI, the new system will become operational from Sunday (April 1). At present, visitors can spend any amount of time till the monument is closed every evening. Alarmed by the recent reports of "human pollution", several experts had suggested that the time restriction on tickets should be imposed at the Mughal-era monument, a UNESCO World Heritage Site. On weekends and holidays, the mausoleum is visited by more than 50,000 people. The number of children visiting the site is not recorded, as entry is free for those under 15 years. ASI officials said the new system will take a few days to streamline and more staffer will be deployed for checking tickets for time restriction. Those spending extra time at the site will have to pay extra amount, they said.

From April 1, you can spend only 3 hours at Taj Mahal

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) is likely to restrict the number of tourists visiting the Taj Mahal to 40,000 daily, and put a three-hour cap on each ticket holder to tour the 17th-century Mughal monument in a bid to preserve the heritage site, a source in the culture ministry said.

Culture Secretary Ravindra Singh held a high-level meeting on Tuesday with ASI officials and representatives of Agra district administration and officers of the Central Industrial Security Force, where the decision was taken.

Ministry officials said that the sale of tickets - both online and offline - will be stopped at the 40,000 mark.

As of now, there is no restriction on the number of people entering the iconic monument complex at any point of time. The average footfall at the monument has increased at a rate of 10-15 per cent per annum.

Many times, during peak tourist season and other occasions, the number of tourists inside the complex crosses 60,000 to 70,000 per day.

The ASI is also likely to introduce a system to issue &quot;zero-value&quot; tickets to children below the age of 15 years, enabling them to keep a count of the number of such visitors, whose entry will remain free.

The ASI had in 2012 commissioned the National Environmental Engineering and Research Institute (NEERI) to prepare a report on the monument&#39;s load-bearing capacity.

The decision to limit the number of visitors has been based on the final recommendation in the report submitted by NEERI, the officials said.

The Taj Mahal is considered one of the finest specimen of the Mughal architecture. In 1983, it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site and was cited as &quot;the jewel of Muslim art in India and one of the universally admired masterpieces of the world&#39;s heritage.&quot;

During peak tourist season, the number of tourists inside the complex crosses 60,000 to 70,000 per day.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) is likely to restrict the number of tourists visiting the Taj Mahal to 40,000 daily, and put a three-hour cap on each ticket holder to tour the 17th-century Mughal monument in a bid to preserve the heritage site, a source in the culture ministry said. Culture Secretary Ravindra Singh held a high-level meeting on Tuesday with ASI officials and representatives of Agra district administration and officers of the Central Industrial Security Force, where the decision was taken. Ministry officials said that the sale of tickets - both online and offline - will be stopped at the 40,000 mark. As of now, there is no restriction on the number of people entering the iconic monument complex at any point of time. The average footfall at the monument has increased at a rate of 10-15 per cent per annum. Many times, during peak tourist season and other occasions, the number of tourists inside the complex crosses 60,000 to 70,000 per day. The ASI is also likely to introduce a system to issue "zero-value" tickets to children below the age of 15 years, enabling them to keep a count of the number of such visitors, whose entry will remain free. The ASI had in 2012 commissioned the National Environmental Engineering and Research Institute (NEERI) to prepare a report on the monument's load-bearing capacity. The decision to limit the number of visitors has been based on the final recommendation in the report submitted by NEERI, the officials said. The Taj Mahal is considered one of the finest specimen of the Mughal architecture. In 1983, it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site and was cited as "the jewel of Muslim art in India and one of the universally admired masterpieces of the world's heritage."

Tourist entry at Taj Mahal likely to be capped at 40,000 daily