The United States and Iran appear to be moving toward another possible round of negotiations, even as tensions between the two countries continue to escalate sharply. US President Donald Trump on Monday (April 13) hinted that backchannel communication may already be underway, suggesting renewed diplomatic interest from Tehran or intermediaries. “We’ve been called this morning by the right people, the appropriate people, and they want to work a deal,” Trump said at the White House, without elaborating on who participated in the conversation.&nbsp;His remarks came just hours after the US moved to restrict vessels from transiting a key waterway connected to Iranian ports and coastal areas, a move seen as potentially heightening tensions amid ongoing global energy concerns.<h2>Iran signals conditional openness to talks</h2>Iran’s ambassador to India, Mohammad Fathali, said Tehran is open to another round of talks with the US, but only if Washington avoids what it considers “unlawful demands.” At the same time, he warned that Iran remains fully prepared for escalation if required.&nbsp;“If you want progress in any diplomatic process, both sides should be ready for negotiations. And they should avoid unlawful demands,” Fathali told a media briefing at the Iranian embassy. “Our high-ranking officials said we are ready for peace, we are ready for negotiations. But you should know that Iran is also ready for war.”&nbsp;He also accused Washington of making unreasonable conditions while noting that key issues were discussed in previous regional talks, including nuclear concerns, sanctions relief, and war-related reparations. “But I think that they [the US] have some unlawful demands,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-picture-abhi-baaki-hai-iran-hits-back-at-us-over-hormuz-blockade-calls-threats-filmy-dialogues-as-crisis-escalates-1776109544503">'Picture abhi baaki hai': Iran hits back at US over Hormuz blockade, calls threats 'filmy dialogues' as crisis escalates</a><h2>Iran warns it is prepared for escalation</h2>Commenting on the US move to restrict access related to Iranian ports, Fathali said Washington is aware of Iran’s capabilities and readiness to respond. “Our high-ranking officials have said they are ready for all options. You can see how in our response and reaction.”&nbsp;While reaffirming Iran’s commitment to international law and maritime navigation, he said Tehran considers the Strait of Hormuz as being under shared jurisdiction. He added that Iran would soon announce a mechanism for passage through the strait, without clarifying whether any new rules would affect foreign shipping, including Indian vessels.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/hormus-crisis-deepens-trump-orders-naval-blockade-of-iran-to-secure-critical-waterway-1776093296196/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/hormus-crisis-deepens-trump-orders-naval-blockade-of-iran-to-secure-critical-waterway-1776093296196/embed</a><h3>Talks depend on US stance</h3>Fathali stressed that the future of any renewed negotiations depends entirely on Washington’s approach. The continuation of any ceasefire or diplomatic process, he said, “depends on the way they approach these negotiations,” adding that Iran would proceed only if its conditions were accepted. “They wanted to finish the war in three or four days, but…the duration, the scope, and the geography of the war are under our control. You can see this situation after the 42-day war,” he said.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US and Iran signal possible new round of talks amid rising tensions, maritime restrictions, and sanctions pressure, with both sides warning of escalation if conditions fail

The United States and Iran appear to be moving toward another possible round of negotiations, even as tensions between the two countries continue to escalate sharply. US President Donald Trump on Monday (April 13) hinted that backchannel communication may already be underway, suggesting renewed diplomatic interest from Tehran or intermediaries. “We’ve been called this morning by the right people, the appropriate people, and they want to work a deal,” Trump said at the White House, without elaborating on who participated in the conversation. His remarks came just hours after the US moved to restrict vessels from transiting a key waterway connected to Iranian ports and coastal areas, a move seen as potentially heightening tensions amid ongoing global energy concerns. Iran signals conditional openness to talks Iran’s ambassador to India, Mohammad Fathali, said Tehran is open to another round of talks with the US, but only if Washington avoids what it considers “unlawful demands.” At the same time, he warned that Iran remains fully prepared for escalation if required. “If you want progress in any diplomatic process, both sides should be ready for negotiations. And they should avoid unlawful demands,” Fathali told a media briefing at the Iranian embassy. “Our high-ranking officials said we are ready for peace, we are ready for negotiations. But you should know that Iran is also ready for war.” He also accused Washington of making unreasonable conditions while noting that key issues were discussed in previous regional talks, including nuclear concerns, sanctions relief, and war-related reparations. “But I think that they [the US] have some unlawful demands,” he said. Also Read: 'Picture abhi baaki hai': Iran hits back at US over Hormuz blockade, calls threats 'filmy dialogues' as crisis escalates Iran warns it is prepared for escalation Commenting on the US move to restrict access related to Iranian ports, Fathali said Washington is aware of Iran’s capabilities and readiness to respond. “Our high-ranking officials have said they are ready for all options. You can see how in our response and reaction.” While reaffirming Iran’s commitment to international law and maritime navigation, he said Tehran considers the Strait of Hormuz as being under shared jurisdiction. He added that Iran would soon announce a mechanism for passage through the strait, without clarifying whether any new rules would affect foreign shipping, including Indian vessels. https://www.wionews.com/videos/hormus-crisis-deepens-trump-orders-naval-blockade-of-iran-to-secure-critical-waterway-1776093296196/embed Talks depend on US stance Fathali stressed that the future of any renewed negotiations depends entirely on Washington’s approach. The continuation of any ceasefire or diplomatic process, he said, “depends on the way they approach these negotiations,” adding that Iran would proceed only if its conditions were accepted. “They wanted to finish the war in three or four days, but…the duration, the scope, and the geography of the war are under our control. You can see this situation after the 42-day war,” he said. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

US and Iran signal possible new talks amid rising tensions, sanctions, and maritime restrictions, with both warning of escalation if talks fail

New US-Iran talks on the table? Trump claims ‘they want a deal’, Iran open to negotiations but warns of escalation

The collapse of high-stakes talks between the US and Iran in Islamabad has sparked a fresh controversy, with an unverified claim suggesting that Israeli intervention may have influenced the outcome. However, there is no concrete evidence to support this assertion. Negotiations, mediated by Pakistan, stretched for nearly 21 hours but ultimately failed to produce an agreement. Speaking after the talks, US Vice President JD Vance, who also served as Washington’s chief negotiator, said the US had presented its “final and best offer” to Tehran, which Iran declined.&nbsp;Vance described the breakdown as “bad news for Iran” rather than for the US, indicating Washington believed it had put forward a reasonable proposal. US President Donald Trump also placed the blame squarely on Tehran. In a post on Truth Social, he said the marathon discussions had lasted close to 20 hours but accused Iran of being unwilling to abandon its nuclear ambitions. “There is only one thing that matters, Iran is unwilling to give up its nuclear ambitions,” Trump wrote.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/now-trump-wants-a-trump-tower-on-moon-shares-ai-image-of-golden-building-how-long-will-it-take-1776063892977">Now, Trump wants a Trump Tower on Moon, shares AI image of golden building. How long will it take?</a>&nbsp;Amid the blame game, a separate narrative emerged from Iranian officials. According to Iranian state-linked outlet Press TV, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed that a phone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Vance during the negotiations shifted the direction of the talks in favour of Israeli interests. Araghchi was quoted as saying that the alleged call changed the focus of the negotiations and that the US attempted to achieve at the negotiating table what it could not achieve through military means.&nbsp;However, the claim remains unverified. While reports referred to a post on X attributed to Araghchi, no such post could be found on his official timeline. WION cannot independently verify the claim regarding any call between Netanyahu and Vance and the X post of Araghchi.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-shares-ai-image-of-himself-as-jesus-christ-after-slamming-pope-leo-as-weak-terrible-how-the-feud-began-1776051410819">Trump shares AI-image of himself as Christ after slamming Pope Leo XIV as 'weak'</a>&nbsp;Iranian state media offered a different explanation for the failed talks, blaming what it described as “unreasonable” and “excessive” demands from the United States. Contentious issues reportedly included Iran’s nuclear programme, its rights under international frameworks, and tensions linked to the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;State broadcaster IRIB said the Iranian delegation engaged in continuous and intensive negotiations to protect national interests, but that Washington’s demands prevented progress. It stated that despite multiple initiatives from Tehran, the talks ultimately ended without agreement.

Reports claim a Netanyahu call to JD Vance derailed US-Iran nuclear talks in Islamabad; however, no concrete evidence exists. Both nations blame each other for the high-stakes negotiation collapse.

The collapse of high-stakes talks between the US and Iran in Islamabad has sparked a fresh controversy, with an unverified claim suggesting that Israeli intervention may have influenced the outcome. However, there is no concrete evidence to support this assertion. Negotiations, mediated by Pakistan, stretched for nearly 21 hours but ultimately failed to produce an agreement. Speaking after the talks, US Vice President JD Vance, who also served as Washington’s chief negotiator, said the US had presented its “final and best offer” to Tehran, which Iran declined. Vance described the breakdown as “bad news for Iran” rather than for the US, indicating Washington believed it had put forward a reasonable proposal. US President Donald Trump also placed the blame squarely on Tehran. In a post on Truth Social, he said the marathon discussions had lasted close to 20 hours but accused Iran of being unwilling to abandon its nuclear ambitions. “There is only one thing that matters, Iran is unwilling to give up its nuclear ambitions,” Trump wrote. Also read: Now, Trump wants a Trump Tower on Moon, shares AI image of golden building. How long will it take? Amid the blame game, a separate narrative emerged from Iranian officials. According to Iranian state-linked outlet Press TV, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed that a phone call from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Vance during the negotiations shifted the direction of the talks in favour of Israeli interests. Araghchi was quoted as saying that the alleged call changed the focus of the negotiations and that the US attempted to achieve at the negotiating table what it could not achieve through military means. However, the claim remains unverified. While reports referred to a post on X attributed to Araghchi, no such post could be found on his official timeline. WION cannot independently verify the claim regarding any call between Netanyahu and Vance and the X post of Araghchi. Also read: Trump shares AI-image of himself as Christ after slamming Pope Leo XIV as 'weak' Iranian state media offered a different explanation for the failed talks, blaming what it described as “unreasonable” and “excessive” demands from the United States. Contentious issues reportedly included Iran’s nuclear programme, its rights under international frameworks, and tensions linked to the Strait of Hormuz. State broadcaster IRIB said the Iranian delegation engaged in continuous and intensive negotiations to protect national interests, but that Washington’s demands prevented progress. It stated that despite multiple initiatives from Tehran, the talks ultimately ended without agreement.

Reports claim a Netanyahu call to JD Vance derailed US-Iran nuclear talks in Islamabad; however, no concrete evidence exists. Both nations blame each other for the high-stakes negotiation collapse.

FACT CHECK: Did Netanyahu’s call to JD Vance derail US-Iran peace talks? This is what we know

Talks between the US and Iran, held in Islamabad, have ended without a breakthrough, with both sides blaming each other for the deadlock as key sticking points remain unresolved. According to Iran’s Fars news agency, the outcome of the negotiations depends on Washington “changing unreasonable demands”, particularly on contentious issues such as the Strait of Hormuz and Tehran’s peaceful nuclear programme. The agency reported that experts from both sides are working to find common ground, while a Pakistani mediator is attempting to narrow the differences and bring the positions closer together.&nbsp;Fars also cited a source close to the Iranian delegation as saying that the United States sought “through negotiation everything they couldn’t obtain during war”. The source added that Iran had rejected what it described as “ambitious conditions” relating to the Strait of Hormuz, nuclear energy and other key issues.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-us-negotiation-pause-in-islamabad-after-15-hour-marathon-talks-to-continue-on-sunday-amid-disagreements-1775942502136">No breakthrough after 15-hour Iran-US talks in Pak; dialouge to resume on Sunday</a>&nbsp;Negotiators from both countries have stepped back to consult their respective expert teams on draft proposals, with talks expected to resume once revised texts are prepared, the agency said. However, US Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the latest round of discussions failed to produce an agreement acceptable to both sides.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the Iranian embassy in Ghana posted on social media platform X, “The US flew their Vice President halfway across the world to Islamabad. 21 hours of talks. They demanded everything they couldn't achieve through war. Iran said a BIG NO. The talks are over. The Strait is still closed. And the VP is flying home empty-handed. Just Iran's word. Again. They don't have any option left to save face.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The US flew their Vice President halfway across the world to Islamabad. 21 hours of talks. They demanded everything they couldn&#39;t achieve through war. Iran said a BIG NO. The talks are over. The Strait is still closed. And the VP is flying home empty-handed. Just Iran&#39;s word.…&mdash; Iran in Ghana (@IRAN_GHANA) <a href="https://twitter.com/IRAN_GHANA/status/2043152018550694222?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>‘Bad news’</h2>“We have not yet reached an agreement acceptable to the Iranian side,” Vance said after several hours of talks, signalling a continued impasse in the high-stakes negotiations.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-issues-warning-to-2-us-warships-transit-strait-of-hormuz-amid-ongoing-pakistan-islamabad-talks-irgc-warning-will-be-dealt-severely-1775944332187">Iran issues BIG warning after 2 US warships 'transit Strait of Hormuz'</a>&nbsp;In a pointed remark, Vance said Iran had “chosen not to accept” the terms put forward by Washington. He stressed that the United States had clearly outlined its red lines, including areas where it was willing to show flexibility and those where it would not compromise. “The bad news is that we have not reached an agreement. And I think that’s bad news for Iran much more than it’s bad news for the United States,” he said.

US-Iran talks in Islamabad ended in deadlock over nuclear programs and the Strait of Hormuz. Both sides blame each other's "unreasonable" demands, though mediators continue working on revised proposals.

Talks between the US and Iran, held in Islamabad, have ended without a breakthrough, with both sides blaming each other for the deadlock as key sticking points remain unresolved. According to Iran’s Fars news agency, the outcome of the negotiations depends on Washington “changing unreasonable demands”, particularly on contentious issues such as the Strait of Hormuz and Tehran’s peaceful nuclear programme. The agency reported that experts from both sides are working to find common ground, while a Pakistani mediator is attempting to narrow the differences and bring the positions closer together. Fars also cited a source close to the Iranian delegation as saying that the United States sought “through negotiation everything they couldn’t obtain during war”. The source added that Iran had rejected what it described as “ambitious conditions” relating to the Strait of Hormuz, nuclear energy and other key issues. Also read: No breakthrough after 15-hour Iran-US talks in Pak; dialouge to resume on Sunday Negotiators from both countries have stepped back to consult their respective expert teams on draft proposals, with talks expected to resume once revised texts are prepared, the agency said. However, US Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the latest round of discussions failed to produce an agreement acceptable to both sides. Meanwhile, the Iranian embassy in Ghana posted on social media platform X, “The US flew their Vice President halfway across the world to Islamabad. 21 hours of talks. They demanded everything they couldn't achieve through war. Iran said a BIG NO. The talks are over. The Strait is still closed. And the VP is flying home empty-handed. Just Iran's word. Again. They don't have any option left to save face.”

US-Iran talks in Islamabad ended in deadlock over nuclear programs and the Strait of Hormuz. Both sides blame each other's "unreasonable" demands, though mediators continue working on revised proposals.

‘Outcome depends on US changing unreasonable demands’: Iran after Vance announces ‘bad news’ of failed talks in Islamabad

Tensions in the region continue to escalate as the Lebanese presidency signals openness to a ceasefire, while Israel has reportedly refused to engage in direct talks with Hezbollah. According to Lebanon’s health ministry, 357 people have been killed in recent Israeli airstrikes, highlighting the growing humanitarian toll. The diplomatic gap between both sides remains wide, raising concerns over further escalation and the failure of ceasefire efforts.


US-Iran Talks: Israel Refuses To Discuss About Hezbollah in Upcoming Talks: Reports

US Vice President JD Vance is leading the US delegation in Islamabad for the high-stakes diplomatic talks with Iran. After remaining absent from the scene for much of the key developments in the US-Iran war, Vance has emerged as the central figure in a crucial “make or break” situation to lead the fragile and tenous ceasefire to an enduring peace in what could be the most devastating war the region has seen in decades. He is accompanied by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/pete-hegseth-tattoos-crusader-symbolism-debate-1775827164536">What is the real meaning behind Pete Hegseth's tattoos?</a><h2>Why JD Vance?</h2>JD Vance had maintained a studied distance since the beginning of Operation Epic Fury, when the Trump administration was failing to put together a coherent strategy. Vance had remained widely sceptical of foreign intervention, and Iran sees him as a “fresh face” compared to the more hawkish US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.&nbsp;Vance had been part of the diplomatic talks for some time now. On March 26, US President Donald Trump asked Vance to brief the cabinet on Iran, hinting that he is leading the diplomatic efforts. Pakistani media also reported that Vance had previously scheduled visits to Islamabad twice, along with Witkoff and Kushner, for negotiations with their Iranian counterpart, but the plan was later discarded. US President Donald Trump, during the Easter dinner on April 1, discussed the Iran peace talks, “So, if it doesn’t happen, I’m blaming JD Vance,” Trump said, “If it does happen, I’m taking full credit.”The stakes are also equally high for Vice President JD Vance; a successful negotiation would cement his credentials for the Presidential race in 2028, while a failure can damage his prospects. However, analysts remain sceptical of the possibility of any permanent peace, as the US continue its military build-up in the region and some of its observers also note that this is “Good Cop”, “Bad Cop” tactic as Trump maintains “maximum pressure” narrative.Vance's public and private scepticism of the war and now his involvement in peace talks is likely an attempt to reconcile with the anti-war camp, including the likes of Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Matt Walsh and Joe Kent, etc. So that if this fails, the US has a prolonged war, then there are reduced chances of “MAGA mutiny” ahead of the mid-term.&nbsp;

US Vice President JD Vance steps into the spotlight as he leads high-stakes Iran peace talks in Islamabad. Is this a diplomatic gamble by Donald Trump or a calculated political move ahead of 2028. 

US Vice President JD Vance is leading the US delegation in Islamabad for the high-stakes diplomatic talks with Iran. After remaining absent from the scene for much of the key developments in the US-Iran war, Vance has emerged as the central figure in a crucial “make or break” situation to lead the fragile and tenous ceasefire to an enduring peace in what could be the most devastating war the region has seen in decades. He is accompanied by special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. Also Read: What is the real meaning behind Pete Hegseth's tattoos? Why JD Vance? JD Vance had maintained a studied distance since the beginning of Operation Epic Fury, when the Trump administration was failing to put together a coherent strategy. Vance had remained widely sceptical of foreign intervention, and Iran sees him as a “fresh face” compared to the more hawkish US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth. Vance had been part of the diplomatic talks for some time now. On March 26, US President Donald Trump asked Vance to brief the cabinet on Iran, hinting that he is leading the diplomatic efforts. Pakistani media also reported that Vance had previously scheduled visits to Islamabad twice, along with Witkoff and Kushner, for negotiations with their Iranian counterpart, but the plan was later discarded. US President Donald Trump, during the Easter dinner on April 1, discussed the Iran peace talks, “So, if it doesn’t happen, I’m blaming JD Vance,” Trump said, “If it does happen, I’m taking full credit.” The stakes are also equally high for Vice President JD Vance; a successful negotiation would cement his credentials for the Presidential race in 2028, while a failure can damage his prospects. However, analysts remain sceptical of the possibility of any permanent peace, as the US continue its military build-up in the region and some of its observers also note that this is “Good Cop”, “Bad Cop” tactic as Trump maintains “maximum pressure” narrative. Vance's public and private scepticism of the war and now his involvement in peace talks is likely an attempt to reconcile with the anti-war camp, including the likes of Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Matt Walsh and Joe Kent, etc. So that if this fails, the US has a prolonged war, then there are reduced chances of “MAGA mutiny” ahead of the mid-term.

US Vice President JD Vance steps into the spotlight as he leads high-stakes Iran peace talks in Islamabad. Is this a diplomatic gamble by Donald Trump or a calculated political move ahead of 2028

Trump’s ‘Good Cop, Bad Cop’ strategy: Can JD Vance deliver peace in high-stakes Iran talks?

Less than 48 hours before high-stakes negotiations between the United States and Iran were set to begin in Islamabad, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif posted a series of messages on X describing Israel as "evil and a curse for humanity" and expressing hope that those who created "this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European Jews burn in hell." Now, the posts have been deleted.&nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/netanyahu-s-corruption-trial-to-resume-as-israel-lifts-war-emergency-iran-weighs-in-on-dumb-us-letting-him-kill-diplomacy-1775782561246">Netanyahu's corruption trial to resume as Israel lifts war emergency — Iran weighs in on 'dumb' US 'letting him kill diplomacy'</a><h2>What did Khwaja Asif say?</h2>In a post on X, the Pakistan Defence Minister claimed that, as "peace talks are underway in Islamabad, genocide is being committed in Lebanon. Innocent citizens are being killed by Israel, first Gaza, then Iran, and now Lebanon, and bloodletting continues unabated."Calling Israel "cancerous," he added, “I hope and pray people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European jews [sic] burn in hell.”<figure class="image"><img src="https://english.cdn.zeenews.com/sites/default/files/HFe-76pXQAAYkDw.jpg"></figure><h2>Israel slams Asif's post</h2>Israel responded immediately and with considerable heat. The Prime Minister's Office called the remarks "outrageous," adding that they could not "be tolerated from any government, especially not from one that claims to be a neutral arbiter for peace." Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar went further, describing Khawaja Muhammad Asif's comments as "blatant antisemitic blood libels" and stating plainly that "calling the Jewish state 'cancerous' is effectively calling for its annihilation.""Israel will defend itself against terrorists who vow its destruction," he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-ghost-murmur-how-the-cia-used-secret-futuristic-tech-to-rescue-downed-us-f-15e-pilot-dude-44-bravo-amid-iran-war-1775647718461">'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war</a>The backlash extended beyond Israel. US Congressman Josh Gottheimer called the rhetoric "vile" and "beyond unacceptable," adding that it was "unproductive at this fragile moment, " adding, "This is not diplomacy and must be condemned".Analyst Emily Schrader argued Pakistan "should not be permitted to mediate anything."Former US official Ellie Cohanim noted that "Many of us were concerned by the idea of the country which harboured and sheltered 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden to serve as any kind of mediator". She added that "Pakistan has blown any notion of objectivity".Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Did Pakistan’s defence minister just derail peace talks before they began? Just days before US-Iran negotiations, Khwaja Asif posted explosive remarks about Israel, triggering sharp backlash before deleting them.

Diplomatic misstep or deeper stance?

Scroll down to read more.

Less than 48 hours before high-stakes negotiations between the United States and Iran were set to begin in Islamabad, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif posted a series of messages on X describing Israel as "evil and a curse for humanity" and expressing hope that those who created "this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European Jews burn in hell." Now, the posts have been deleted. Also read | Netanyahu's corruption trial to resume as Israel lifts war emergency — Iran weighs in on 'dumb' US 'letting him kill diplomacy' What did Khwaja Asif say? In a post on X, the Pakistan Defence Minister claimed that, as "peace talks are underway in Islamabad, genocide is being committed in Lebanon. Innocent citizens are being killed by Israel, first Gaza, then Iran, and now Lebanon, and bloodletting continues unabated." Calling Israel "cancerous," he added, “I hope and pray people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land to get rid of European jews [sic] burn in hell.” Israel slams Asif's post Israel responded immediately and with considerable heat. The Prime Minister's Office called the remarks "outrageous," adding that they could not "be tolerated from any government, especially not from one that claims to be a neutral arbiter for peace." Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar went further, describing Khawaja Muhammad Asif's comments as "blatant antisemitic blood libels" and stating plainly that "calling the Jewish state 'cancerous' is effectively calling for its annihilation." "Israel will defend itself against terrorists who vow its destruction," he added. Also read | 'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war The backlash extended beyond Israel. US Congressman Josh Gottheimer called the rhetoric "vile" and "beyond unacceptable," adding that it was "unproductive at this fragile moment, " adding, "This is not diplomacy and must be condemned". Analyst Emily Schrader argued Pakistan "should not be permitted to mediate anything." Former US official Ellie Cohanim noted that "Many of us were concerned by the idea of the country which harboured and sheltered 9/11 mastermind Osama Bin Laden to serve as any kind of mediator". She added that "Pakistan has blown any notion of objectivity". Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Did Pakistan’s defence minister just derail peace talks before they began? Just days before US-Iran negotiations, Khwaja Asif posted explosive remarks about Israel, triggering sharp backlash before deleting them.Diplomatic misstep or deeper stance?Scroll down to read more.

'Cancerous' Israel: Pakistan defence minister deletes anti-Israel post ahead of Islamabad peace talks

U.S. President Donald Trump has warned that military strikes against Iran could resume if ceasefire conditions are not fully met, despite ongoing peace talks. The statement comes amid fragile U.S.-Iran negotiations aimed at sustaining a temporary truce brokered after weeks of escalation.


US-Iran Peace Talks: US President Says Attacks to Resume if Truce Conditions Not Met

Pakistan-led efforts to broker peace between Iran and the United States and end the ongoing conflict in the Middle East have dashed, as Tehran has formally informed mediators that it will not attend proposed talks with American officials in Islamabad, said a Wall Street Journal report on Friday.The Iranian officials have rejected Washington’s conditions outright, calling them unacceptable. Tehran’s refusal is a major setback for Pakistan, which was positioning itself as a neutral facilitator and trying to bring the warring sides to the table.&nbsp;The collapse of the talks proposal reflects a widening gap in expectations. President Donald Trump has escalated rhetoric in recent days, warning that Iran could be bombed “back to the Stone Ages” if it refuses to agree to US terms.&nbsp;Tehran has hardened its stance after such statements, making direct engagement even more difficult.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/downgrade-from-regime-change-to-find-our-pilots-iran-s-speaker-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-mocks-us-over-downed-jet-1775237385567">Downgrade from ‘regime change’ to ‘find our pilots’: Iran’s speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocks US over downed jet</a>&nbsp;Even Pakistani officials acknowledged the impasse. Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi admitted that “obstacles” were hindering progress, though he stopped short of detailing them. However, Islamabad insists that it will continue efforts to create conditions for “meaningful negotiations.” The country has maintained regular contact with Tehran. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif recently called Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and both emphasised trust-building.&nbsp;&nbsp;The war that started when US-Israeli strikes killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has spiralled into a multi-country crisis. Iranian missile and drone attacks have targeted several Gulf states.&nbsp;So far, countries like Saudi Arabia have shown restraint, but Tehran’s continuing attacks can ignite a broader conflict.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/capture-us-pilot-alive-get-reward-says-iranian-media-after-tehran-claims-it-downed-f-15e-1775229711486">‘Capture US pilot alive, get reward,’ says Iranian media after Tehran claims it downed F-15E</a>&nbsp;Besides, economic pressures are also compounding tensions as Iran’s restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz shipping have disrupted global energy supplies, driving up oil prices and straining economies worldwide.&nbsp;The stakes are particularly high for Pakistan, which is now bound by a defence agreement with Saudi Arabia and is grappling with instability along the Afghan border.Islamabad’s mediation push was more about preventing regional spillover and getting entangled in the conflict than it was about securing peace.&nbsp;Tehran’s refusal comes despite ongoing efforts by regional intermediaries to bring both sides to the negotiating table, with Pakistan playing a key role in facilitating dialogue.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ship-carrying-iranian-crude-to-indian-port-in-gujarat-reroutes-to-china-1775226409514">Ship carrying Iranian crude to Indian port in Gujarat reroutes to China</a> Islamabad had said it was prepared to facilitate discussions, with Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar noting the country would be “honoured to host and facilitate meaningful talks.”&nbsp;Iran had earlier rejected claims that it was participating in Pakistan-facilitated talks to end the ongoing conflict.In a statement shared on X, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said there were no direct talks with the US and that Tehran had only received “excessive and unreasonable demands” through intermediaries.“Pakistan’s forums are their own; we didn’t participate,” the statement said.Baghaei also said Iran had received a 15-point proposal from Trump’s administration but described the plan as “excessive, unrealistic, and irrational.”

Islamabad insists that it will continue efforts to create conditions for meaningful negotiations. The country has maintained regular contact with Tehran. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif recently called Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and both emphasised trust-building.

Pakistan-led efforts to broker peace between Iran and the United States and end the ongoing conflict in the Middle East have dashed, as Tehran has formally informed mediators that it will not attend proposed talks with American officials in Islamabad, said a Wall Street Journal report on Friday. The Iranian officials have rejected Washington’s conditions outright, calling them unacceptable. Tehran’s refusal is a major setback for Pakistan, which was positioning itself as a neutral facilitator and trying to bring the warring sides to the table. The collapse of the talks proposal reflects a widening gap in expectations. President Donald Trump has escalated rhetoric in recent days, warning that Iran could be bombed “back to the Stone Ages” if it refuses to agree to US terms. Tehran has hardened its stance after such statements, making direct engagement even more difficult. Also Read: Downgrade from ‘regime change’ to ‘find our pilots’: Iran’s speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocks US over downed jet Even Pakistani officials acknowledged the impasse. Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi admitted that “obstacles” were hindering progress, though he stopped short of detailing them. However, Islamabad insists that it will continue efforts to create conditions for “meaningful negotiations.” The country has maintained regular contact with Tehran. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif recently called Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and both emphasised trust-building. The war that started when US-Israeli strikes killed Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, has spiralled into a multi-country crisis. Iranian missile and drone attacks have targeted several Gulf states. So far, countries like Saudi Arabia have shown restraint, but Tehran’s continuing attacks can ignite a broader conflict. Also Read: ‘Capture US pilot alive, get reward,’ says Iranian media after Tehran claims it downed F-15E Besides, economic pressures are also compounding tensions as Iran’s restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz shipping have disrupted global energy supplies, driving up oil prices and straining economies worldwide. The stakes are particularly high for Pakistan, which is now bound by a defence agreement with Saudi Arabia and is grappling with instability along the Afghan border. Islamabad’s mediation push was more about preventing regional spillover and getting entangled in the conflict than it was about securing peace. Tehran’s refusal comes despite ongoing efforts by regional intermediaries to bring both sides to the negotiating table, with Pakistan playing a key role in facilitating dialogue. Also Read: Ship carrying Iranian crude to Indian port in Gujarat reroutes to China Islamabad had said it was prepared to facilitate discussions, with Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar noting the country would be “honoured to host and facilitate meaningful talks.” Iran had earlier rejected claims that it was participating in Pakistan-facilitated talks to end the ongoing conflict. In a statement shared on X, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said there were no direct talks with the US and that Tehran had only received “excessive and unreasonable demands” through intermediaries. “Pakistan’s forums are their own; we didn’t participate,” the statement said. Baghaei also said Iran had received a 15-point proposal from Trump’s administration but described the plan as “excessive, unrealistic, and irrational.”

Islamabad insists that it will continue efforts to create conditions for meaningful negotiations. The country has maintained regular contact with Tehran. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif recently called Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, and both emphasised trust-building.

Iran jolts Pak’s ambition to broker peace, says American demands unacceptable; unwilling to meet: Report

Iran's top minister has rejected claims that Tehran has been in recent contact with Washington over ending the war. In a post on X on Tuesday (Mar 17), Seyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, said his last communication with US envoy Steve Witkoff took place before what he described as US President Donald Trump's "decision to kill diplomacy with another illegal military attack on Iran." Araghchi's denial comes after Trump, in an interview, claimed that <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/watch-trump-shares-video-of-massive-strike-on-iran-s-crown-jewel-kharg-island-amid-iran-war-1773455549662">Iran </a>wants to make a deal, but that he was not interested in doing so "because the terms aren’t good enough yet".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-trump-snub-putin-s-plan-to-tranfer-iran-s-uranium-as-us-and-israel-weigh-special-ops-raids-to-seize-450kg-of-nuclear-material-report-1773439671375">Did Trump snub Putin’s plan to transfer Iran's 450kg nuclear material to Russia? Here's what reports suggest</a><h2>What did Araghchi say?</h2>In a public denial on X, the Iranian foreign minister indirectly slammed Trump and said that his last contact with Steve Witkoff happened before the US envoy's employer, i.e., Trump, decided to "kill diplomacy with another illegal military attack on Iran".He added that any reports suggesting otherwise were misleading and aimed at influencing oil markets and public opinion. "Any claim to the contrary appears geared solely to mislead oil traders and the public," he wrote.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amid-iran-war-trump-wants-to-delay-trip-to-china-summit-with-xi-for-a-month-or-so-here-s-why-1773697685355">Trump wants to delay trip to China, summit with Xi for ‘a month or so’. Here's why</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">My last contact with Mr. Witkoff was prior to his employer&#39;s decision to kill diplomacy with another illegal military attack on Iran. Any claim to the contrary appears geared solely to mislead oil traders and the public.&mdash; Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) <a href="https://twitter.com/araghchi/status/2033651325397868982?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 16, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What did Trump say about US-Iran deal to end the war in West Asia?</h2>Talking to NBC News, the US President said he was not prepared to reach a deal with Iran despite Tehran signalling interest in negotiations. He claimed that this was because the conditions offered so far were not acceptable.“Iran wants to make a deal, and I don’t want to make it because the terms aren’t good enough yet,” he said. The president declined to explain what specific conditions Washington would require but said that any agreement would have to be “very solid.”&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp;

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has issued a stinging denial of President Donald Trump’s claims that Tehran is seeking an immediate peace deal to end the Iran war that has now entered its 18th day. Here's what he said.

Iran's top minister has rejected claims that Tehran has been in recent contact with Washington over ending the war. In a post on X on Tuesday (Mar 17), Seyed Abbas Araghchi, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran, said his last communication with US envoy Steve Witkoff took place before what he described as US President Donald Trump's "decision to kill diplomacy with another illegal military attack on Iran." Araghchi's denial comes after Trump, in an interview, claimed that Iran wants to make a deal, but that he was not interested in doing so "because the terms aren’t good enough yet". Also read | Did Trump snub Putin’s plan to transfer Iran's 450kg nuclear material to Russia? Here's what reports suggest What did Araghchi say? In a public denial on X, the Iranian foreign minister indirectly slammed Trump and said that his last contact with Steve Witkoff happened before the US envoy's employer, i.e., Trump, decided to "kill diplomacy with another illegal military attack on Iran". He added that any reports suggesting otherwise were misleading and aimed at influencing oil markets and public opinion. "Any claim to the contrary appears geared solely to mislead oil traders and the public," he wrote. Also read | Trump wants to delay trip to China, summit with Xi for ‘a month or so’. Here's why

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has issued a stinging denial of President Donald Trump’s claims that Tehran is seeking an immediate peace deal to end the Iran war, which has now entered its 18th day. Here's what he said.

Iran FM Araghchi says Trump ‘killed diplomacy’ with illegal attack, denies US claim of peace talks

us-iran-peace-talks

Us Iran Peace Talks, News on Us Iran Peace Talks, stories on Us Iran Peace Talks, articles on Us Iran Peace Talks, Us Iran Peace Talks stories at Wion, Us Iran Peace Talks news, Us Iran Peace Talks latest news

us iran-peace-talks

New US-Iran talks on the table? Trump claims ‘they want a deal’, Iran open to negotiations but warns of escalation

FACT CHECK: Did Netanyahu’s call to JD Vance derail US-Iran peace talks?

‘Outcome depends on US changing unreasonable demands’: Iran

US-Iran Talks: Israel Refuses To Discuss About Hezbollah in Upcoming Talks: Reports

Can JD Vance deliver peace in high-stakes Iran talks?

Pakistan's Defence Minister deletes 'cancerous' Israel post amid uproar

US-Iran Peace Talks: US President Says Attacks to Resume if Truce Conditions Not Met

Iran jolts Pak’s ambition to broker peace, says American demands unacceptable

Iran rejects Trump claim of peace talks, says US ‘killed diplomacy’ with attack