President Donald Trump warned Wednesday that US forces would strike Iran "hard" in the coming night, after earlier declaring Washington's ceasefire with Iran over at a NATO summit in Ankara. "We're gonna hit 'em hard tonight," he said before holding talks with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, adding, "They violated the agreement..." Earlier, the US president declared the ceasefire with Iran "over" on Wednesday. Trump noted he would allow his negotiators, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, to continue talks if they wished, after fighting flared amid tensions over attacks on ships in the vital Strait of Hormuz. "As far as I'm concerned, it's over," Trump said at a NATO summit in Turkey on Wednesday when asked if the truce was intact. "It's just a waste of time dealing with them," he added. "I'll let our wonderful negotiators keep talking if they want, but I don't see it. I don't like these people." Trump's announcement follows a massive strike on more than 80 targets in Iran, after the US accused the Islamic Republic of targeting three merchant ships near the Strait of Hormuz, a key global shipping route. While the US military described the operation as a response to Iranian aggression, Tehran has warned it will take all necessary measures to protect its national interests.&nbsp;Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nato-allies-call-for-freedom-of-navigation-in-hormuz-reaffirm-ironclad-commitment-to-collective-defence-1783516894763"> Hormuz navigation, collective defence, support for Ukraine: Key takeaways from NATO's Ankara declaration</a>&nbsp;These statements put the fragile 14-point memorandum of understanding, signed by US President Trump at the Palace of Versailles on June 17 and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in jeopardy. The MoU was aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February, and was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks. Meanwhile, Iranian Parliament Speaker and top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf issued a fierce rhetorical pushback against Washington. In a statement published on X, Ghalibaf accused the United States of "major violations" regarding the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), a tenuous ceasefire agreement aimed at managing regional friction. In his post, Ghalibaf outlined five specific grievances, condemning what he termed "attacks on southern Iran," "persistent threats of further strikes," the reinstatement of crippling oil sanctions, and US interference with Iranian maritime operations in the Strait. He additionally tied the breakdown of the MoU to broader geopolitical dynamics, listing "continued Zionist aggression" against Lebanon as a primary breach.

Trump announced fresh strikes after the US carried out attacks on over 80 Iranian targets, following accusations that Iran had attacked merchant ships near the Strait of Hormuz.

President Donald Trump warned Wednesday that US forces would strike Iran "hard" in the coming night, after earlier declaring Washington's ceasefire with Iran over at a NATO summit in Ankara. "We're gonna hit 'em hard tonight," he said before holding talks with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, adding, "They violated the agreement..." Earlier, the US president declared the ceasefire with Iran "over" on Wednesday. Trump noted he would allow his negotiators, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, to continue talks if they wished, after fighting flared amid tensions over attacks on ships in the vital Strait of Hormuz. "As far as I'm concerned, it's over," Trump said at a NATO summit in Turkey on Wednesday when asked if the truce was intact. "It's just a waste of time dealing with them," he added. "I'll let our wonderful negotiators keep talking if they want, but I don't see it. I don't like these people." Trump's announcement follows a massive strike on more than 80 targets in Iran, after the US accused the Islamic Republic of targeting three merchant ships near the Strait of Hormuz, a key global shipping route. While the US military described the operation as a response to Iranian aggression, Tehran has warned it will take all necessary measures to protect its national interests. Also Read: Hormuz navigation, collective defence, support for Ukraine: Key takeaways from NATO's Ankara declaration These statements put the fragile 14-point memorandum of understanding, signed by US President Trump at the Palace of Versailles on June 17 and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in jeopardy. The MoU was aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February, and was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks. Meanwhile, Iranian Parliament Speaker and top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf issued a fierce rhetorical pushback against Washington. In a statement published on X, Ghalibaf accused the United States of "major violations" regarding the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), a tenuous ceasefire agreement aimed at managing regional friction. In his post, Ghalibaf outlined five specific grievances, condemning what he termed "attacks on southern Iran," "persistent threats of further strikes," the reinstatement of crippling oil sanctions, and US interference with Iranian maritime operations in the Strait. He additionally tied the breakdown of the MoU to broader geopolitical dynamics, listing "continued Zionist aggression" against Lebanon as a primary breach.

Trump announced fresh strikes after the US carried out attacks on over 80 Iranian targets, following accusations that Iran had attacked merchant ships near the Strait of Hormuz.

'We'll hit them hard tonight': Trump vows fresh Iran strikes after declaring ceasefire 'over'

Tensions in the Middle East have escalated as US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (Jul 8) that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is "over", following renewed strikes and alleged violations by both sides. Trump's remarks at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, sparked rise in oil prices and stock market volatility across the world. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancelled a planned trip to Israel, Israeli media reported. Is the war back?<h2>Trump thinks further dealings with Iran are a waste of time</h2>Making some harsh remarks in which he described Iranian leaders as "scum", the US president said further dealings with them were a waste of time. He allowed negotiators to continue talks if they wished, but said the MoU was "over". Just hours earlier, US and Iranian forces had traded strikes, including military actions around the Strait of Hormuz.<h2>Iran accuses the US of violating the MoU, strikes sites in Kuwait, Bahrain</h2>Iran accused the US of violating the MoU, which was signed in mid-June 2026 at the Palace of Versailles and aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February. The MoU was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks.Reports said that Iran targeted military interests in Kuwait and Bahrain. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said one of its fighters was killed in an ‘enemy drone strike’, according to Iranian state media. A senior IRGC commander warned that any location supporting US attacks would be considered a legitimate target, Iranian state media reported.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strikes-on-iran-4-5-times-bigger-than-previous-wave-officials-1783469488428">US strikes on Iran '4-5 times bigger' than previous wave: Officials</a><h2>Oil markets react immediately to war talk</h2>Oil prices are rising - by up to 6 per cent in some cases- at the time of writing this, amid fears that hostilities would resume. Brent crude prices jumped towards $79 per barrel as traders reacted to the risk of disruption to roughly 20 per cent of global oil flows that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Earlier in the conflict, prices had surged dramatically to more than US$120 per barrel at their peak before easing following the truce.&nbsp;The latest volatility echoes previous price spikes linked to attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure in the region.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed</a><h2>US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancels Israel trip</h2>The Jerusalem Post reported citing sources that Hegseth cancelled a planned visit to Israel on Wednesday, during which he was due to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz. Hegseth, who is in Ankara with Trump for the NATO summit, was expected to make a brief visit in the wake of the overnight US strikes against Iran, which Washington said were in response to Iranian attacks targeting three commercial tankers in the waters off Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz, the report said.(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.) &nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump said the peace MoU is "over" after renewed tit-for-tat strikes. Oil prices are surging again. Pete Hegseth cancelled his Israel trip. Is Iran war back? 

Tensions in the Middle East have escalated as US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday (Jul 8) that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) is "over", following renewed strikes and alleged violations by both sides. Trump's remarks at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey, sparked rise in oil prices and stock market volatility across the world. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancelled a planned trip to Israel, Israeli media reported. Is the war back? Trump thinks further dealings with Iran are a waste of time Making some harsh remarks in which he described Iranian leaders as "scum", the US president said further dealings with them were a waste of time. He allowed negotiators to continue talks if they wished, but said the MoU was "over". Just hours earlier, US and Iranian forces had traded strikes, including military actions around the Strait of Hormuz. Iran accuses the US of violating the MoU, strikes sites in Kuwait, Bahrain Iran accused the US of violating the MoU, which was signed in mid-June 2026 at the Palace of Versailles and aimed at ending the active hostilities that began in late February. The MoU was intended to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, restore freedom of navigation for commercial shipping, reduce military tensions in the Gulf, and lay the groundwork for broader diplomatic talks. Reports said that Iran targeted military interests in Kuwait and Bahrain. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said one of its fighters was killed in an ‘enemy drone strike’, according to Iranian state media. A senior IRGC commander warned that any location supporting US attacks would be considered a legitimate target, Iranian state media reported. Also read: US strikes on Iran '4-5 times bigger' than previous wave: Officials Oil markets react immediately to war talk Oil prices are rising - by up to 6 per cent in some cases- at the time of writing this, amid fears that hostilities would resume. Brent crude prices jumped towards $79 per barrel as traders reacted to the risk of disruption to roughly 20 per cent of global oil flows that pass through the Strait of Hormuz. Earlier in the conflict, prices had surged dramatically to more than US$120 per barrel at their peak before easing following the truce. The latest volatility echoes previous price spikes linked to attacks on shipping and energy infrastructure in the region. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-there-ll-either-be-deal-or-us-will-finish-job-says-trump-1783402027929/embed US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth cancels Israel trip The Jerusalem Post reported citing sources that Hegseth cancelled a planned visit to Israel on Wednesday, during which he was due to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz. Hegseth, who is in Ankara with Trump for the NATO summit, was expected to make a brief visit in the wake of the overnight US strikes against Iran, which Washington said were in response to Iranian attacks targeting three commercial tankers in the waters off Oman, near the Strait of Hormuz, the report said. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Trump said the peace MoU is "over" after renewed tit-for-tat strikes. Oil prices are surging again. Pete Hegseth cancelled his Israel trip. Is Iran war back?&nbsp;

War clouds loom over Iran once again? Hegseth cancels Israel trip, oil prices rise as Trump says peace deal is ‘over’

Trump ally and senior US Senator from South Carolina Lindsey Graham, one of the biggest proponents of the Iran war who had argued for use of "overwhelming firepower" to crush the Iranian regime's ability to project power, on Monday (March 30) shifted his stance, saying "Wind down the war and wind up efforts for a historic peace deal" as the conflict in West Asia stretches past its first month with no end in sight.&nbsp;Graham, in a post on X, claimed that "the necessity for military action is weeks, not months, and Operation Epic Fury is well ahead of pace" following a "very good discussion" with US President Donald Trump about his “recent statement regarding the consequences to Iran if they do not agree to an acceptable peace deal.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Just had a very good discussion with <a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a> about his recent statement regarding the consequences to Iran if they do not agree to an acceptable peace deal. I support diplomatic efforts to end the conflict consistent with our military objectives, but it takes two to tango. The… <a href="https://t.co/0EgFaFwKHj">https://t.co/0EgFaFwKHj</a>&mdash; Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) <a href="https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/2038609256727838836?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On Monday, Trump posted on Truth Social that Washington was engaged in active negotiations with Tehran, expressing optimism about a possible resolution. The two sides, he wrote, had held "very good and productive" talks aimed at achieving a "complete and total resolution of hostilities in the Middle East."&nbsp;At the same time, Trump issued a strong warning, saying the US would strike key Iranian infrastructure, including "electric generating plants, oil wells and Kharg Island," if the Strait of Hormuz does not "open for business."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-vows-all-necessary-steps-to-stabilise-energy-markets-as-crude-oil-surges-to-116-amid-escalating-west-asia-war-1774882203136">G7 vows ‘all necessary steps’ to stabilise energy markets as crude oil surges to $116 amid escalating West Asia war</a>&nbsp;The White House's current shift in stance towards Tehran is attributed to Graham and others' months-long lobbying efforts for war with Iran, even as Trump had argued against US intervention in foreign countries during his presidential campaign. As Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, the Senator is currently spearheading a reconciliation bill to secure $200 billion in supplemental defence funding for the war effort. Graham is also a key figure in Christians United for Israel (CUFI), the largest pro-Israel grassroots organisation in the US.&nbsp;Graham further asserted that neutralising Iran, the "largest state sponsor of terrorism," would pave a path to peace by "allowing Saudi Arabia and Israel to normalise their relationship, effectively ending the Arab-Israeli conflict."&nbsp;Accusing Tehran of being a spoiler of Arab-Israeli peace, he said: "If this historic normalisation deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel occurs, it will be due to President Trump's bold, decisive leadership in dealing with the Iranian threat so they can no longer be a spoiler for peace like they were on October 7, 2023."

The White House’s current shift in stance towards Tehran is attributed to Graham and others’ months-long lobbying for war with Iran, even as Trump had argued against US intervention in foreign countries during his presidential campaign.

Trump ally and senior US Senator from South Carolina Lindsey Graham, one of the biggest proponents of the Iran war who had argued for use of "overwhelming firepower" to crush the Iranian regime's ability to project power, on Monday (March 30) shifted his stance, saying "Wind down the war and wind up efforts for a historic peace deal" as the conflict in West Asia stretches past its first month with no end in sight. Graham, in a post on X, claimed that "the necessity for military action is weeks, not months, and Operation Epic Fury is well ahead of pace" following a "very good discussion" with US President Donald Trump about his “recent statement regarding the consequences to Iran if they do not agree to an acceptable peace deal.”

The White House’s current shift in stance towards Tehran is attributed to Graham and others’ months-long lobbying for war with Iran, even as Trump had argued against US intervention in foreign countries during his presidential campaign.

Trump ally who championed Iran offensive now calls for 'Wind down the war' as hostilities spiral past one month

The Iranian military on Saturday (March 28) claimed that it targeted a US logistics vessel near the Omani port of Salalah. The strike reportedly occurred at a "considerable distance" from the port to avoid direct violation of Omani territorial waters.&nbsp;"A logistics vessel supporting the aggressive US army was targeted by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran at a considerable distance from the port of Salalah in Oman," Ebrahim Zolfaghari, a spokesman for Iran's central military command, said in a statement carried by state TV.&nbsp;These strikes come as the United States, Israel and Iran continue to trade missiles, bombs and threats, with the war in West Asia nearing the one-month mark. Earlier in the day, US-Israeli forces hit multiple targets in Iran; however, Iranian media said these were civilian and residential sites, not military installations.&nbsp;The war, triggered by a US-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran, began on February 28, targeting multiple government, military and economic sites. It also specifically launched decapitation strikes on the Islamic Republic's leadership, aimed at sparking regime change.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/up-becomes-state-with-highest-number-of-international-airports-as-pm-modi-inaugurates-noida-international-airport-1774695258873">UP becomes state with highest number of international airports as PM Modi inaugurates Noida International Airport</a>&nbsp;In retaliation, Iran has launched a barrage of missiles and drones at Israel and also targeted US bases and allies in the region. Tehran also announced the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for nearly 20 per cent of global supply, sparking a surge in energy prices, which remain above $100, and triggering an energy crisis across the world.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the US President extended the timeline for strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure by 10 days to April 6. However, the situation regarding negotiations remains in flux as both sides continue to make contradictory claims and counterclaims.&nbsp;Since the United States' Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, CENTCOM reported that over 120 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed or incapacitated, primarily while still moored at their piers in Bandar Abbas and Chabahar.

These strikes come as the United States, Israel and Iran continue to trade missiles, bombs and threats, with the war in West Asia nearing the one-month mark.

The Iranian military on Saturday (March 28) claimed that it targeted a US logistics vessel near the Omani port of Salalah. The strike reportedly occurred at a "considerable distance" from the port to avoid direct violation of Omani territorial waters. "A logistics vessel supporting the aggressive US army was targeted by the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran at a considerable distance from the port of Salalah in Oman," Ebrahim Zolfaghari, a spokesman for Iran's central military command, said in a statement carried by state TV. These strikes come as the United States, Israel and Iran continue to trade missiles, bombs and threats, with the war in West Asia nearing the one-month mark. Earlier in the day, US-Israeli forces hit multiple targets in Iran; however, Iranian media said these were civilian and residential sites, not military installations. The war, triggered by a US-Israeli bombing campaign against Iran, began on February 28, targeting multiple government, military and economic sites. It also specifically launched decapitation strikes on the Islamic Republic's leadership, aimed at sparking regime change. Also Read: UP becomes state with highest number of international airports as PM Modi inaugurates Noida International Airport In retaliation, Iran has launched a barrage of missiles and drones at Israel and also targeted US bases and allies in the region. Tehran also announced the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for nearly 20 per cent of global supply, sparking a surge in energy prices, which remain above $100, and triggering an energy crisis across the world. Meanwhile, the US President extended the timeline for strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure by 10 days to April 6. However, the situation regarding negotiations remains in flux as both sides continue to make contradictory claims and counterclaims. Since the United States' Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, CENTCOM reported that over 120 Iranian naval vessels have been destroyed or incapacitated, primarily while still moored at their piers in Bandar Abbas and Chabahar.

These strikes come as the United States, Israel and Iran continue to trade missiles, bombs and threats, with the war in West Asia nearing the one-month mark.

Iran targets US vessel near Oman as West Asia war expands despite Trump’s 'pause'

As the Iran war continues, the Pentagon appears to be constantly leaking information to the American press on troop buildup, this time with reports saying that an additional 10,000 ground troops are being dispatched to the Middle East. First reported by the Wall Street Journal and picked up by multiple American outlets, this deployment, if it happens, will add to the thousands of Marines and airborne division infantry that have reportedly already been ordered to the region. With talks reaching nowhere, US President Donald Trump extended his five-day pause on striking Iran energy infrastructure. It was set to end on Friday (Mar 27), but now it has been postponed to April 6. Amid this, &nbsp;the additional troop deployments is expected to give the US president yet another military option.<h2>Pentagon sending 10,000 more US ground troops to Middle East: What reports say</h2>The deployment of additional 10,000 troops could include infantry units and armoured forces such as vehicles and heavy equipment. According to the reports, these troops would likely be positioned within operational range of Iran, but not necessarily deployed inside Iranian territory.The strategic purpose of this move is to increase pressure on Iran and to prepare for possible ground operations. This is also aimed at strengthening US leverage during diplomatic negotiations to end the war.The decision, according to unnamed officials cited in the reports, has not yet been approved. It is still under planning as part of providing Trump with expanded military options.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/black-thursday-stocks-tumble-in-worst-crash-of-2026-as-iran-toll-booth-pushes-oil-past-100-1774566312748">Black Thursday? Stocks tumble in worst crash of 2026 as Iran 'toll booth' pushes oil past $100</a><h2>7,000 US troops are already deployed, as per reports</h2>If one goes by earlier reports, there are already 7,000 American troops in the region. This includes 5,000 Marines and some 2,000 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division, including paratroopers.The recent buildup, as per reports, would be around 17,000 troops if one adds up everyting leaked to the press. On the higher end, it could be up to 20,000 troops, as much of the reporting is not officially confirmed due to the secretive nature of such plans and deployments.If one includes the wider estimated US military presence in the Gulf states around Iran, the total numbers could approach 50,000 personnel.<h2>A posturing or another mistake in the desert? Iran mobilising 1 million troops</h2>The leaked information indicates the US has a range of plans and options, including ground invasion and/or attacking and taking control of strategic areas in and around the Strait of Hormuz, including Kharg Island, from which Iranian oil flows.But the slow American buildup, if it is indeed happening, is also giving Iran enough time to deploy its own defences. Already, reports say that Iran has mobilised over a million troops to face off against any ground invasion from the US.American troops are reportedly being positioned in Gulf states, on aircraft carriers, and at forward operating bases in the region.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed</a><h2>Analysis: Is victory over Iran that easy?</h2>So the question is, will this be another desert quagmire for American troops, or will they achieve a swift victory over Iran? Whether the US will succeed or not, we will know in days.But consider the below facts:If one is to trust the Iranian ground troop mobilisation numbers of 1 million, it would outnumber US forces (estimated at 17,000) by nearly 60 times over.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/what-will-end-the-iran-war-us-demands-iran-red-lines-and-israel-s-stance-breaking-down-what-each-side-wants-1774533776640">What will end the Iran war? US demands, Iran red lines and Israel’s stance — breaking down what each side wants</a>Iran is well-versed in the terrain, battle-hardened not only within its own borders but in the broader region, directly or via proxies. Iranian missile and drone capabilities are far from depleted if one goes by its strike rates even now.Trump himself gave a timeline of victory at around six weeks, in his remarks on Thursday. He also paused energy sector targeting of Iran for 10 days till April 6, "at Iran’s request.''The current US buildup is for multiple objectives: military readiness and possible control of strategic assets such as Iran’s oil infrastructure, and securing maritime routes like the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

The Pentagon is reportedly planning to send 10,000 more troops to the Middle East amid the Iran war. This could potentially bring the total US forces to 20,000. Iran meanwhile, is mobilising 1 million ground troops, say reports. Is that a good match?

As the Iran war continues, the Pentagon appears to be constantly leaking information to the American press on troop buildup, this time with reports saying that an additional 10,000 ground troops are being dispatched to the Middle East. First reported by the Wall Street Journal and picked up by multiple American outlets, this deployment, if it happens, will add to the thousands of Marines and airborne division infantry that have reportedly already been ordered to the region. With talks reaching nowhere, US President Donald Trump extended his five-day pause on striking Iran energy infrastructure. It was set to end on Friday (Mar 27), but now it has been postponed to April 6. Amid this, the additional troop deployments is expected to give the US president yet another military option. Pentagon sending 10,000 more US ground troops to Middle East: What reports say The deployment of additional 10,000 troops could include infantry units and armoured forces such as vehicles and heavy equipment. According to the reports, these troops would likely be positioned within operational range of Iran, but not necessarily deployed inside Iranian territory. The strategic purpose of this move is to increase pressure on Iran and to prepare for possible ground operations. This is also aimed at strengthening US leverage during diplomatic negotiations to end the war. The decision, according to unnamed officials cited in the reports, has not yet been approved. It is still under planning as part of providing Trump with expanded military options. Also read: Black Thursday? Stocks tumble in worst crash of 2026 as Iran 'toll booth' pushes oil past $100 7,000 US troops are already deployed, as per reports If one goes by earlier reports, there are already 7,000 American troops in the region. This includes 5,000 Marines and some 2,000 troops from the 82nd Airborne Division, including paratroopers. The recent buildup, as per reports, would be around 17,000 troops if one adds up everyting leaked to the press. On the higher end, it could be up to 20,000 troops, as much of the reporting is not officially confirmed due to the secretive nature of such plans and deployments. If one includes the wider estimated US military presence in the Gulf states around Iran, the total numbers could approach 50,000 personnel. A posturing or another mistake in the desert? Iran mobilising 1 million troops The leaked information indicates the US has a range of plans and options, including ground invasion and/or attacking and taking control of strategic areas in and around the Strait of Hormuz, including Kharg Island, from which Iranian oil flows. But the slow American buildup, if it is indeed happening, is also giving Iran enough time to deploy its own defences. Already, reports say that Iran has mobilised over a million troops to face off against any ground invasion from the US. American troops are reportedly being positioned in Gulf states, on aircraft carriers, and at forward operating bases in the region. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed Analysis: Is victory over Iran that easy? So the question is, will this be another desert quagmire for American troops, or will they achieve a swift victory over Iran? Whether the US will succeed or not, we will know in days. But consider the below facts: If one is to trust the Iranian ground troop mobilisation numbers of 1 million, it would outnumber US forces (estimated at 17,000) by nearly 60 times over. Also read: What will end the Iran war? US demands, Iran red lines and Israel’s stance — breaking down what each side wants Iran is well-versed in the terrain, battle-hardened not only within its own borders but in the broader region, directly or via proxies. Iranian missile and drone capabilities are far from depleted if one goes by its strike rates even now. Trump himself gave a timeline of victory at around six weeks, in his remarks on Thursday. He also paused energy sector targeting of Iran for 10 days till April 6, "at Iran’s request.'' The current US buildup is for multiple objectives: military readiness and possible control of strategic assets such as Iran’s oil infrastructure, and securing maritime routes like the Strait of Hormuz. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

The Pentagon is reportedly planning to send 10,000 more troops to the Middle East amid the Iran war. This could potentially bring the total US forces to 20,000. Iran meanwhile, is mobilising 1 million ground troops, say reports. Is that a good match?

Iran war: Pentagon to send 10,000 more ground troops as Iran mobilises 1 million, say reports. Pressure tactic or costly mistake of US?

Is the Iran war over? There are many conflicting reports on the status of the ongoing US–Israel–Iran conflict, hours after US President Donald Trump on Monday &nbsp;(Mar 23) announced a five-day pause on attacks on Iranian energy and power infrastructure. There is widespread scepticism about the war ending any time soon, as attacks and counterattacks continue, and little has changed regarding the Strait of Hormuz blockade. Here are eight reasons the war is far from over:<h2>1. US Marines continue to reach CENTCOM for Middle East deployment</h2>Reports indicate that thousands of additional US Marines, including from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit aboard amphibious ships such as USS Tripoli, are continuing to deploy or arrive in the US Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. The build-up was ordered before Trump announced the pause, but its objectives include securing the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring maritime security, supporting evacuations, and potentially conducting limited ground missions to protect shipping lanes or strategic islands. This sustained mobilisation signals that Washington is preparing for escalation scenarios in the near future.<h2>2. Iran, US and Israel continue air strikes and missile attacks</h2>Reports following Trump's pause announcement indicate that Israel has carried out airstrikes on Tehran and other Iranian targets, including weapons sites and power infrastructure. Strikes by the US and Israel have reportedly targeted a natural gas pipeline linked to a power plant in Khorramshahr. Power outages were recorded in Tehran after the strikes. Iran, meanwhile, continued launching missiles and drones at Israel, hitting both southern and northern regions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly vowed to “keep striking” Iran and Hezbollah positions in Lebanon.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/gulf-countries-iran-conflict-saudi-uae-us-bases-hormuz-tensions-1774328297752">Saudi Arabia, UAE to join Iran war as ceasefire claims remain disputed</a><h2>3. Strait of Hormuz situation remains unchanged</h2>There is no indication that maritime traffic has normalised in the Strait of Hormuz, through some 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passes. Shipping activity remains sharply reduced, with heightened risks for commercial vessels. At the time of writing, there is no clear pathway to reopening or stabilising this vital route, keeping global energy markets on edge.<h2>4. No confirmation from Iran on negotiations or talks, as Arab nations remain sceptical</h2>The Wall Street Journal reported that Arab mediators privately doubt that the US and Iran can reach a near-term agreement, citing deep strategic gaps between the two sides. Iranian officials, including representatives from the foreign ministry and parliament, denied any direct negotiations with Washington. They have dismissed Trump’s claims as “fake news” aimed at influencing oil markets and geopolitical narratives. Regional diplomatic channels appear active but inconclusive, with no verifiable breakthrough.<h2>5. Brent crude oil prices remain volatile and above $100 per barrel</h2>The sustained volatility in Brent crude oil prices—frequently crossing the $100 per barrel mark—reflects persistent uncertainty in global energy markets. Traders are reacting not only to physical supply risks but also to geopolitical signalling, including military deployments and unresolved tensions. The price movements suggest that markets do not yet believe the conflict is nearing resolution.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/mojtaba-khamenei-advisor-says-war-will-continue-despite-trump-netanyahu-5-day-halt-how-iran-has-reacted-so-far-1774322779656">Khamenei's advisor says ‘war will continue’ despite Trump's '5-day halt' announcement — How Iran has reacted so far</a><h2>6. Only speculative reporting on diplomatic negotiations</h2>There are multiple, often conflicting, reports about backchannel diplomacy. Some US media outlets suggest that countries such as Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt are facilitating indirect communication between Washington and Tehran. There have also been unverified claims regarding potential high-level meetings and leadership-level outreach. Regional broadcasters like Al Arabiya have cited anonymous sources suggesting possible willingness to negotiate from Iranian supreme leader. However, none of these developments have been officially confirmed, limiting their credibility.<h2>7. Gulf states reassessing their strategic posture</h2>Reports suggest that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates may be recalibrating their positions in response to rising Iranian threats. Concerns over attacks on oil infrastructure and warnings from Iran regarding desalination plants and power facilities &nbsp;heightened regional security anxieties. While no formal entry into the conflict has been announced, even a limited shift in Gulf involvement could significantly widen the scope of the war.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-iran-war-israel-s-missile-defence-system-under-scrutiny-after-iranian-attack-1774337391652/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-iran-war-israel-s-missile-defence-system-under-scrutiny-after-iranian-attack-1774337391652/embed</a><h2>8. Core geopolitical issues remain unresolved</h2>Fundamental drivers of the conflict remain unaddressed. These include the future of Iran’s nuclear programme, regional power balance in the Middle East, sanctions, Irianian demand for reparations, and the security of key waterways such as the Strait of Hormuz. Questions around regime change and stability within Iran continue to be unsolved.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-sets-these-conditions-to-end-israel-us-war-after-trump-s-5-day-halt-closure-of-us-bases-to-hormuz-control-1774326659739">Iran sets THESE conditions to end war after Trump's 5-day halt: From closure of US bases to Hormuz control - Full list</a><h2>Perspective: It is not over till...but who will have to sing to end the Iran - US - Israel war?</h2>In summary, the US–Israel–Iran conflict has not ended. Despite the announcement of a temporary pause, ongoing military operations, unresolved disputes, disruption of energy markets, and the absence of verified diplomatic progress point towards an uneasy calm at best, and a highly volatile situation that could lead to another flare-up, at worst. Trump's five-day pause appears to be a tactical move rather than a definitive step towards peace, with the risk of further escalation still firmly present. &nbsp;

Despite Trump's temporary pause announcement, the Iran war tensions remain high with ongoing strikes and military build-ups. The disruption of Strait of Hormuz oil routes is not over, signalling continued instability and no clear path to de-escalation. Why it's not over till it's over

Is the Iran war over? There are many conflicting reports on the status of the ongoing US–Israel–Iran conflict, hours after US President Donald Trump on Monday (Mar 23) announced a five-day pause on attacks on Iranian energy and power infrastructure. There is widespread scepticism about the war ending any time soon, as attacks and counterattacks continue, and little has changed regarding the Strait of Hormuz blockade. Here are eight reasons the war is far from over: 1. US Marines continue to reach CENTCOM for Middle East deployment Reports indicate that thousands of additional US Marines, including from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit aboard amphibious ships such as USS Tripoli, are continuing to deploy or arrive in the US Central Command (CENTCOM) area of responsibility. The build-up was ordered before Trump announced the pause, but its objectives include securing the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring maritime security, supporting evacuations, and potentially conducting limited ground missions to protect shipping lanes or strategic islands. This sustained mobilisation signals that Washington is preparing for escalation scenarios in the near future. 2. Iran, US and Israel continue air strikes and missile attacks Reports following Trump's pause announcement indicate that Israel has carried out airstrikes on Tehran and other Iranian targets, including weapons sites and power infrastructure. Strikes by the US and Israel have reportedly targeted a natural gas pipeline linked to a power plant in Khorramshahr. Power outages were recorded in Tehran after the strikes. Iran, meanwhile, continued launching missiles and drones at Israel, hitting both southern and northern regions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly vowed to “keep striking” Iran and Hezbollah positions in Lebanon. Also read: Saudi Arabia, UAE to join Iran war as ceasefire claims remain disputed 3. Strait of Hormuz situation remains unchanged There is no indication that maritime traffic has normalised in the Strait of Hormuz, through some 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passes. Shipping activity remains sharply reduced, with heightened risks for commercial vessels. At the time of writing, there is no clear pathway to reopening or stabilising this vital route, keeping global energy markets on edge. 4. No confirmation from Iran on negotiations or talks, as Arab nations remain sceptical The Wall Street Journal reported that Arab mediators privately doubt that the US and Iran can reach a near-term agreement, citing deep strategic gaps between the two sides. Iranian officials, including representatives from the foreign ministry and parliament, denied any direct negotiations with Washington. They have dismissed Trump’s claims as “fake news” aimed at influencing oil markets and geopolitical narratives. Regional diplomatic channels appear active but inconclusive, with no verifiable breakthrough. 5. Brent crude oil prices remain volatile and above $100 per barrel The sustained volatility in Brent crude oil prices—frequently crossing the $100 per barrel mark—reflects persistent uncertainty in global energy markets. Traders are reacting not only to physical supply risks but also to geopolitical signalling, including military deployments and unresolved tensions. The price movements suggest that markets do not yet believe the conflict is nearing resolution. Also read: Khamenei's advisor says ‘war will continue’ despite Trump's '5-day halt' announcement — How Iran has reacted so far 6. Only speculative reporting on diplomatic negotiations There are multiple, often conflicting, reports about backchannel diplomacy. Some US media outlets suggest that countries such as Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt are facilitating indirect communication between Washington and Tehran. There have also been unverified claims regarding potential high-level meetings and leadership-level outreach. Regional broadcasters like Al Arabiya have cited anonymous sources suggesting possible willingness to negotiate from Iranian supreme leader. However, none of these developments have been officially confirmed, limiting their credibility. 7. Gulf states reassessing their strategic posture Reports suggest that Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates may be recalibrating their positions in response to rising Iranian threats. Concerns over attacks on oil infrastructure and warnings from Iran regarding desalination plants and power facilities heightened regional security anxieties. While no formal entry into the conflict has been announced, even a limited shift in Gulf involvement could significantly widen the scope of the war. https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-iran-war-israel-s-missile-defence-system-under-scrutiny-after-iranian-attack-1774337391652/embed 8. Core geopolitical issues remain unresolved Fundamental drivers of the conflict remain unaddressed. These include the future of Iran’s nuclear programme, regional power balance in the Middle East, sanctions, Irianian demand for reparations, and the security of key waterways such as the Strait of Hormuz. Questions around regime change and stability within Iran continue to be unsolved. Also read: Iran sets THESE conditions to end war after Trump's 5-day halt: From closure of US bases to Hormuz control - Full list Perspective: It is not over till...but who will have to sing to end the Iran - US - Israel war? In summary, the US–Israel–Iran conflict has not ended. Despite the announcement of a temporary pause, ongoing military operations, unresolved disputes, disruption of energy markets, and the absence of verified diplomatic progress point towards an uneasy calm at best, and a highly volatile situation that could lead to another flare-up, at worst. Trump's five-day pause appears to be a tactical move rather than a definitive step towards peace, with the risk of further escalation still firmly present.

Despite Trump's temporary pause announcement, the Iran war tensions remain high with ongoing strikes and military build-ups. The disruption of Strait of Hormuz oil routes is not over, signalling continued instability and no clear path to de-escalation. Why it's not over till it's over

Fog of war: Eight signs that Iran-US-Israel conflict is not over despite Trump's five-day pause announcement

A Financial Times report states that just minutes before Trump announced a halt to Iran strikes, massive bets were placed in the oil market, amounting to billions of dollars. A sudden flurry of activity was reported in the oil market between 6:49 am and 6:50 am ET.

Rs 5,373 crore in mystery oil bets placed 15 minutes before Trump's Iran talks post: Report

As Donald Trump announced the pause in “military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five days” Iranian media reported that US-Israeli strikes continued to target the energy facilities in Isfahan province. This is one of the regions where America’s B-2 bombers struck in June 2025. Even back then, he had first launched an attack from a US base, al-Udeid in Qatar. After noting that the&nbsp;“objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, a stop to the nuclear threat posed", Trump announces a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-talks-who-is-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-iran-speaker-in-spotlight-amid-trump-claim-1774333790343/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-talks-who-is-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-iran-speaker-in-spotlight-amid-trump-claim-1774333790343/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Fars News Agency reported that Isfahan's natural gas administration building and a gas pressure reduction station were hit, causing damage to parts of the facilities and nearby homes. Hours ago, the US president posted on his social media account wrote, “I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/west-asia-war-why-iran-is-targeting-uae-bases-but-letting-abu-dhabi-oil-pass-on-friendly-ships-1773726079438">West Asia War: Why Iran is targeting UAE but letting Abu Dhabi oil pass on 'friendly' ships</a>&nbsp;He also pointed at “detailed, and constructive conversations”, while Tehran denies any such dialogue.The Foreign Ministry's spokesman, Esmaeil Baqaei, said no direct or indirect talks have taken place in the last 24 hours, and the parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, reiterated.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/day-after-attacking-iran-nuclear-sites-trump-talks-peace-announces-ceasefire-here-s-a-timeline-1750734084159/1750734084160">Day after US attacks Iran nuclear sites, Trump talks peace, announces ceasefire: Here's a timeline</a>&nbsp;The latter even pointed out the fact that this could be Trump's strategy to manipulate the energy market; he said, “No negotiations have been held with the US, and fake news is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped.”

Despite President Trump’s 5-day pause on energy strikes, Iran’s state media reports new attacks on gas facilities in Isfahan and Khorramshahr. Tehran denies talks.

As Donald Trump announced the pause in “military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five days” Iranian media reported that US-Israeli strikes continued to target the energy facilities in Isfahan province. This is one of the regions where America’s B-2 bombers struck in June 2025. Even back then, he had first launched an attack from a US base, al-Udeid in Qatar. After noting that the “objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, a stop to the nuclear threat posed", Trump announces a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-talks-who-is-mohammad-bagher-ghalibaf-iran-speaker-in-spotlight-amid-trump-claim-1774333790343/embed Fars News Agency reported that Isfahan's natural gas administration building and a gas pressure reduction station were hit, causing damage to parts of the facilities and nearby homes. Hours ago, the US president posted on his social media account wrote, “I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.” Also read: West Asia War: Why Iran is targeting UAE but letting Abu Dhabi oil pass on 'friendly' ships He also pointed at “detailed, and constructive conversations”, while Tehran denies any such dialogue.The Foreign Ministry's spokesman, Esmaeil Baqaei, said no direct or indirect talks have taken place in the last 24 hours, and the parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, reiterated. Also read: Day after US attacks Iran nuclear sites, Trump talks peace, announces ceasefire: Here's a timeline The latter even pointed out the fact that this could be Trump's strategy to manipulate the energy market; he said, “No negotiations have been held with the US, and fake news is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped.”

Despite President Trump’s 5-day pause on energy strikes, Iran’s state media reports new attacks on gas facilities in Isfahan and Khorramshahr. Tehran denies talks.

Trump claims war pause; Iran reports new strikes on Isfahan and Khorramshahr energy sites

US President Donald Trump appeared to shift responsibility for escalating the Iran conflict, suggesting that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had been among the earliest voices pushing for military action against Iran’s nuclear programme. The war traces back to the 28 February joint Israel–US airstrikes on Iranian targets, a move that significantly escalated tensions in the region and triggered sustained retaliation from Iran.<h2>How Trump appeared to put the spotlight on Hegseth</h2>Speaking at a roundtable on public safety with the Tennessee Safe Task Force in Memphis on Monday (Mar 23), Donald Trump singled out Hegseth as an early advocate of military intervention.“Pete, I think you were the first one to speak up and you said let’s do it because you can’t let them have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said, in comments that have drawn attention across US political and defence circles.Trump added that he had consulted Hegseth and other officials while discussing Iran as a “purveyor of terror”, framing the decision-making process as collaborative, though critics noted the emphasis placed on Hegseth’s role.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fact-check-did-families-of-killed-us-soldiers-tell-hegesth-to-finish-the-job-1773988660027">Fact Check: Did families of killed US soldiers tell Hegseth to ‘finish the job’?</a><h2>Political timing: Midterm elections and public opinion</h2>The remarks come at a sensitive political moment. Donald Trump is campaigning ahead of the US midterm elections, where control of Congress remains critical for the Republican Party.The prolonged conflict with Iran has gradually lost public support in the United States, amid concerns over unclear strategic objectives, rising costs, and American casualties. Analysts suggest Trump’s comments may reflect an effort to recalibrate political accountability as scrutiny intensifies.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-will-finish-this-pete-hegseth-vows-us-will-stay-until-mission-complete-1773921940223">'We will finish this': Pete Hegseth vows US will stay until mission complete</a>&nbsp;<h2>Hegseth: The face of Operation Epic Fury</h2>Since US involvement deepened, Pete Hegseth has been the public face of military operations, often defending the campaign, “Operation Epic Fury”.“We didn’t start this war, but under President Trump we’re finishing it,” Hegseth said in earlier statements, emphasising a decisive military approach.However, his messaging has evolved. Initial rhetoric hinted at regime change in Iran, but he later clarified that the conflict was not intended to be a “regime-change war”, instead stressing that it would not become an endless war.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-it-takes-money-to-kill-bad-guys-pentagon-defends-200-billion-for-iran-war-as-hegseth-says-number-could-move-1773926561828">'It takes money to kill bad guys': Pentagon defends $200 billion for Iran war as Hegseth says number 'could move'</a><h2>Shifting narratives amid a complex conflict</h2>Observers noted that Donald Trump’s latest remarks could signal a shift in narrative as the war grows more complicated. Iranian retaliation and resilience have reduced expectations of a quick victory for the US, increasing both military and political pressure on the Trump administration.Notably, during the roundtable discussion, Pete Hegseth did not publicly respond or challenge Trump’s characterisation. He has consistently maintained that ultimate authority rests with the president, stating that Trump “controls the throttle” on all major decisions.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-pete-hegseth-says-us-not-concerned-by-russia-iran-intelligence-reports-wion-1772933387905/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-pete-hegseth-says-us-not-concerned-by-russia-iran-intelligence-reports-wion-1772933387905/embed</a><h2>Pause in strikes and diplomatic signals</h2>Trump’s comments came shortly after he announced a five-day pause in planned strikes on Iranian infrastructure. The move is widely interpreted as an attempt to manage growing domestic frustration and open space for potential negotiations.Known for his deal-making approach, Donald Trump may be seeking to bring Iran back to the negotiating table, even as the conflict continues to unfold.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Donald Trump appeared to suggests that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed for Iran strikes, as US pauses attacks amid political pressure, and growing scrutiny over the prolonged Iran conflict.

US President Donald Trump appeared to shift responsibility for escalating the Iran conflict, suggesting that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had been among the earliest voices pushing for military action against Iran’s nuclear programme. The war traces back to the 28 February joint Israel–US airstrikes on Iranian targets, a move that significantly escalated tensions in the region and triggered sustained retaliation from Iran. How Trump appeared to put the spotlight on Hegseth Speaking at a roundtable on public safety with the Tennessee Safe Task Force in Memphis on Monday (Mar 23), Donald Trump singled out Hegseth as an early advocate of military intervention. “Pete, I think you were the first one to speak up and you said let’s do it because you can’t let them have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said, in comments that have drawn attention across US political and defence circles. Trump added that he had consulted Hegseth and other officials while discussing Iran as a “purveyor of terror”, framing the decision-making process as collaborative, though critics noted the emphasis placed on Hegseth’s role. Also read: Fact Check: Did families of killed US soldiers tell Hegseth to ‘finish the job’? Political timing: Midterm elections and public opinion The remarks come at a sensitive political moment. Donald Trump is campaigning ahead of the US midterm elections, where control of Congress remains critical for the Republican Party. The prolonged conflict with Iran has gradually lost public support in the United States, amid concerns over unclear strategic objectives, rising costs, and American casualties. Analysts suggest Trump’s comments may reflect an effort to recalibrate political accountability as scrutiny intensifies. Also read: 'We will finish this': Pete Hegseth vows US will stay until mission complete Hegseth: The face of Operation Epic Fury Since US involvement deepened, Pete Hegseth has been the public face of military operations, often defending the campaign, “Operation Epic Fury”. “We didn’t start this war, but under President Trump we’re finishing it,” Hegseth said in earlier statements, emphasising a decisive military approach. However, his messaging has evolved. Initial rhetoric hinted at regime change in Iran, but he later clarified that the conflict was not intended to be a “regime-change war”, instead stressing that it would not become an endless war. Also read: 'It takes money to kill bad guys': Pentagon defends $200 billion for Iran war as Hegseth says number 'could move' Shifting narratives amid a complex conflict Observers noted that Donald Trump’s latest remarks could signal a shift in narrative as the war grows more complicated. Iranian retaliation and resilience have reduced expectations of a quick victory for the US, increasing both military and political pressure on the Trump administration. Notably, during the roundtable discussion, Pete Hegseth did not publicly respond or challenge Trump’s characterisation. He has consistently maintained that ultimate authority rests with the president, stating that Trump “controls the throttle” on all major decisions. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-pete-hegseth-says-us-not-concerned-by-russia-iran-intelligence-reports-wion-1772933387905/embed Pause in strikes and diplomatic signals Trump’s comments came shortly after he announced a five-day pause in planned strikes on Iranian infrastructure. The move is widely interpreted as an attempt to manage growing domestic frustration and open space for potential negotiations. Known for his deal-making approach, Donald Trump may be seeking to bring Iran back to the negotiating table, even as the conflict continues to unfold. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Donald Trump appeared to suggests that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed for Iran strikes, as US pauses attacks amid political pressure, and growing scrutiny over the prolonged Iran conflict.

Did Donald Trump just blame Pete Hegseth for Iran war? With defence secretary seated nearby, US president says...

trump-on-iran-war

Trump On Iran War, News on Trump On Iran War, stories on Trump On Iran War, articles on Trump On Iran War, Trump On Iran War stories at Wion, Trump On Iran War news, Trump On Iran War latest news

trump on-iran-war

'We'll hit them hard tonight': Trump vows fresh Iran strikes after declaring ceasefire 'over'

War clouds loom over Iran once again as Trump says MoU 'over', oil prices rise

Trump ally who pushed for Iran war now calls for ‘Wind down’ as conflict spirals

Iran hits US support ship near Oman as West Asia war defies Trump’s 'pause'

US to send 10,000 troops, Iran mobilises 1 mn, say reports. Pressure or mistake?

Fog of war: Eight signs that Iran-US-Israel conflict is not over yet

Rs 5,373 crore oil bets placed 15 minutes before Trump's Iran talks post: Report

Trump claims war pause; Iran reports new strikes on energy sites

Did Trump just blame Hegseth for Iran war? With defence secy nearby, he says...