<p>The CBI filed a 1,000-page charge sheet in the Gurgaon school murder case on Monday.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The charge sheet says the fingerprints of the juvenile accused were found at the crime scene. And that the source of the murder weapon -- a knife -- has been identified.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The charge sheet adds that the motive for the murder remains the same -- that the juvenile had wanted to postpone a school exam and delay a parent-teacher meeting.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The CBI has also said in its charge sheet that the role of the school and the police in the murder is still under investigation. The agency meanwhile has also asked for the discharge of the bus conductor Ashok, who was first accused of the murder by Gurgaon Police.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The CBI&nbsp;charge sheet says the juvenile searched &quot;how to remove bloodstains&quot; on the internet.</p>

<p>The CBI says in its charge sheet that this indicates he planned the murder and the destruction of evidence. It also adds that the juvenile&#39;s statements do not match with the CCTV footage retrieved.</p>

<p>His email and mobile phone records are included in the charge sheet.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The CBI adds that the behaviour of the juvenile before and after the murder has been included in the charge sheet. The CBI adds that the &quot;behavioural analysis&quot; was carried out by psychiatrists.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Circumstantial evidence is reportedly included in the charge sheet, and there are a total of 127 witnesses in the Prince murder case.</p>

<p>Prince was found dead in the toilet of his Gurgaon school on September 8 last year.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The seven-year-old was studying in class II. Gurgaon Police arrested and charged the school bus conductor Ashok with the murder on September 8 itself.&nbsp;</p>

<p>But Prince&#39;s father insisted on a CBI enquiry, saying the police and school were covering something up.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The CBI took over the case on September 23. A few days later they said a class 11 boy was their prime suspect.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The CBI said the juvenile had committed the murder because he wanted to have an exam postponed.&nbsp;</p>

<p>A Gurgaon court meanwhile turned down the juvenile accused&#39;s bail application, saying the stage was not fit for the granting of bail.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p>The 16-year-old will be tried as an adult.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


The CBI filed a 1,000-page charge sheet in a Gurgaon court today

The CBI filed a 1,000-page charge sheet in the Gurgaon school murder case on Monday. The charge sheet says the fingerprints of the juvenile accused were found at the crime scene. And that the source of the murder weapon -- a knife -- has been identified. The charge sheet adds that the motive for the murder remains the same -- that the juvenile had wanted to postpone a school exam and delay a parent-teacher meeting. The CBI has also said in its charge sheet that the role of the school and the police in the murder is still under investigation. The agency meanwhile has also asked for the discharge of the bus conductor Ashok, who was first accused of the murder by Gurgaon Police. The CBI charge sheet says the juvenile searched "how to remove bloodstains" on the internet. The CBI says in its charge sheet that this indicates he planned the murder and the destruction of evidence. It also adds that the juvenile's statements do not match with the CCTV footage retrieved. His email and mobile phone records are included in the charge sheet. The CBI adds that the behaviour of the juvenile before and after the murder has been included in the charge sheet. The CBI adds that the "behavioural analysis" was carried out by psychiatrists. Circumstantial evidence is reportedly included in the charge sheet, and there are a total of 127 witnesses in the Prince murder case. Prince was found dead in the toilet of his Gurgaon school on September 8 last year. The seven-year-old was studying in class II. Gurgaon Police arrested and charged the school bus conductor Ashok with the murder on September 8 itself. But Prince's father insisted on a CBI enquiry, saying the police and school were covering something up. The CBI took over the case on September 23. A few days later they said a class 11 boy was their prime suspect. The CBI said the juvenile had committed the murder because he wanted to have an exam postponed. A Gurgaon court meanwhile turned down the juvenile accused's bail application, saying the stage was not fit for the granting of bail. The 16-year-old will be tried as an adult.

Gurgaon school murder case: CBI says fingerprints of juvenile accused found at crime scene

<p>The principal of the school in Lucknow, where a student of Class 1 was attacked, has been arrested. The six-year-old boy was found in a pool of blood outside the bathroom of the school.</p>

<p>He is currently in hospital. His condition was stated to be out of danger.</p>

<p>&quot;He was attacked by a girl student of Class 6 with a knife which is used to chop vegetables. We have sent the hair of the girl, found near the child, for DNA test. She will be presented before Juvenile Justice Board. The Principal has been arrested,&quot; said Lucknow SSP Deepak Kumar.</p>

<p>Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath met the boy the the hospital on Thursday.</p>

<p>The boy was found unconscious outside the school bathroom on Wednesday and was immediately rushed to the nearest hospital.</p>

<p>In a statement to the police, the boy said that the girl, while beating him, said she was doing so to get the school to close early.</p>

<p>&quot;I was informed by the school that my son is injured. He has been attacked with knife by a girl,&quot; said the victim&#39;s distraught father, a class four employee in the high court.</p>

<p>Dr Sandeep Tewari, who was treating the boy, said the victim had deep wounds on chest and stomach that &quot;seem to have been inflicted with a knife-like sharp object&quot;.</p>


In a statement to the police, the boy said that the girl, while beating him, said she was doing so to get the school to close early.

The principal of the school in Lucknow, where a student of Class 1 was attacked, has been arrested. The six-year-old boy was found in a pool of blood outside the bathroom of the school. He is currently in hospital. His condition was stated to be out of danger. "He was attacked by a girl student of Class 6 with a knife which is used to chop vegetables. We have sent the hair of the girl, found near the child, for DNA test. She will be presented before Juvenile Justice Board. The Principal has been arrested," said Lucknow SSP Deepak Kumar. Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath met the boy the the hospital on Thursday. The boy was found unconscious outside the school bathroom on Wednesday and was immediately rushed to the nearest hospital. In a statement to the police, the boy said that the girl, while beating him, said she was doing so to get the school to close early. "I was informed by the school that my son is injured. He has been attacked with knife by a girl," said the victim's distraught father, a class four employee in the high court. Dr Sandeep Tewari, who was treating the boy, said the victim had deep wounds on chest and stomach that "seem to have been inflicted with a knife-like sharp object".

Principal of Lucknow school, where a boy was stabbed in Ryan-like incident, arrested

<p>The father of the 16-year-old juvenile suspect in the Ryan murder case on Friday filed a plea&nbsp;against the CBI for his son&#39;s three-day custody given by the Juvenile Justice Board&nbsp;</p>

<p>The petition stated that the board &quot;erroneously and illegally&quot; granted remand&nbsp;to the CBI and every other action taken by the agency pursuant to the legal order be established null and void.&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>

<p>Reports also mentioned that the suspect&#39;s father is furious as the provisions of section 10 of Juvenile Justice Act 2015 have been breached and hence, decided to move the plea against the November 8 order to the CBI.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The petition mentions how the suspect never had any previous criminal history and how he was beaten up, manhandled and forced&nbsp;to confess a crime under the influence by the investigators.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Th section 10 of Juvenile Justice Act 2015 clearly bans and prohibits that the juvenile in conflict with the law under no circumstances can be put in jail and further the juvenile&nbsp;justice board has no authority to grant remand to the investigating officials of a juvenile, reports said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Moreover, the Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the hearing on cancellation of bail granted to Pinto family on Monday.</p>

<p>The High Court had, on November 21, granted an anticipatory bail to the Pinto family, in connection with the case.</p>


According to reports, the petition stated that the board "erroneously and illegally" granted remand?to the CBI and every other action taken by the agency pursuant to the legal order be established null and void

The father of the 16-year-old juvenile suspect in the Ryan murder case on Friday filed a plea against the CBI for his son's three-day custody given by the Juvenile Justice Board The petition stated that the board "erroneously and illegally" granted remand to the CBI and every other action taken by the agency pursuant to the legal order be established null and void. Reports also mentioned that the suspect's father is furious as the provisions of section 10 of Juvenile Justice Act 2015 have been breached and hence, decided to move the plea against the November 8 order to the CBI. The petition mentions how the suspect never had any previous criminal history and how he was beaten up, manhandled and forced to confess a crime under the influence by the investigators. Th section 10 of Juvenile Justice Act 2015 clearly bans and prohibits that the juvenile in conflict with the law under no circumstances can be put in jail and further the juvenile justice board has no authority to grant remand to the investigating officials of a juvenile, reports said. Moreover, the Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the hearing on cancellation of bail granted to Pinto family on Monday. The High Court had, on November 21, granted an anticipatory bail to the Pinto family, in connection with the case.

Pradyuman murder: Suspect's father files plea against CBI custody of son

<p>The Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the hearing on cancellation of bail granted to Pinto family on Monday.</p>

<p>The High Court had, on November 21, granted an anticipatory bail to the Pinto family, in connection with the case.</p>

<p>Justice Surender Gupta, however, barred them from leaving the country without permission and directed the family to extend their help in the investigation.</p>

<p>Also Read: <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/ryan-school-murder-supreme-court-to-hear-plea-challenging-pinto-familys-anticipatory-bail-25553">Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Pinto family&#39;s anticipatory bail</a></p>

<p>Pradyuman was found in a pool of blood with his throat slit inside the school, sparking a public outcry following which the Gurugram Police arrested bus conductor Ashok, accusing him of killing the seven-year-old student.</p>

<p>But the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which is now probing the matter, gave him a clean chit and held a class 11 student responsible for the murder.</p>


The High Court had, on November 21, granted an anticipatory bail to the Pinto family, in connection with the case

The Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the hearing on cancellation of bail granted to Pinto family on Monday. The High Court had, on November 21, granted an anticipatory bail to the Pinto family, in connection with the case. Justice Surender Gupta, however, barred them from leaving the country without permission and directed the family to extend their help in the investigation. Also Read: Supreme Court to hear plea challenging Pinto family's anticipatory bail Pradyuman was found in a pool of blood with his throat slit inside the school, sparking a public outcry following which the Gurugram Police arrested bus conductor Ashok, accusing him of killing the seven-year-old student. But the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which is now probing the matter, gave him a clean chit and held a class 11 student responsible for the murder.

Pradyuman Thakur murder: Plea seeking Pinto family's bail cancellation adjourned

<p>The juvenile who was suspected of murdering class 2 student, Pradhyumn Thakur in Gurugram&rsquo;s Ryan International School has reportedly retracted his earlier confession that he made to the CBI on Monday, media reports said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The investigators, on Monday, had forced him to confess the murder said the accused while speaking to a legal officer and a team of CBI officials, reports said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The boy earlier claimed that the investigators beat him up, which was also reported by his father on Saturday. However, the CBI officials have denied any such charges.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The case has taken&nbsp;a turn after the boy allegedly said that he had visited a temple on the morning of Pradhyumm&#39;s murder - after which he reached school and then waited for a friend near the school&#39;s water cooler.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The boy then reportedly decided to go to the music room since his friend did not come and found the room locked so he went back and stood near the water cooler. After which, he decided to go to the washroom where he heard the boy screaming and throwing up blood, media reports said.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Upon hearing the child scream, the accused then ran an informed the gardener of the school - Harpal, and a teacher about the incident.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The investigation was held by the Gurugram Police was allegedly proven wrong, an English news channel reported.&nbsp;</p>

<p>According to reports, the CBI had now stated that Ashok Kumar - the bus conductor suspected earlier, was also in the washroom at that moment, however, the CCTV footage showed that he was unaware of the crime.&nbsp;</p>

<p>These developments have now made the case more ambiguous, leaving the accused under more scrutiny.</p>


CBI produce the juvenile accused in a Gurgaon court at the conclusion of a three-day remand, in Gurgaon.

The juvenile who was suspected of murdering class 2 student, Pradhyumn Thakur in Gurugram’s Ryan International School has reportedly retracted his earlier confession that he made to the CBI on Monday, media reports said. The investigators, on Monday, had forced him to confess the murder said the accused while speaking to a legal officer and a team of CBI officials, reports said. The boy earlier claimed that the investigators beat him up, which was also reported by his father on Saturday. However, the CBI officials have denied any such charges. The case has taken a turn after the boy allegedly said that he had visited a temple on the morning of Pradhyumm's murder - after which he reached school and then waited for a friend near the school's water cooler. The boy then reportedly decided to go to the music room since his friend did not come and found the room locked so he went back and stood near the water cooler. After which, he decided to go to the washroom where he heard the boy screaming and throwing up blood, media reports said. Upon hearing the child scream, the accused then ran an informed the gardener of the school - Harpal, and a teacher about the incident. The investigation was held by the Gurugram Police was allegedly proven wrong, an English news channel reported. According to reports, the CBI had now stated that Ashok Kumar - the bus conductor suspected earlier, was also in the washroom at that moment, however, the CCTV footage showed that he was unaware of the crime. These developments have now made the case more ambiguous, leaving the accused under more scrutiny.

Pradyuman murder: Juvenile 'retracts confession'

<p>What is more chilling: To know that a 7-years old has been murdered or to be told that a 16-years old could have been the killer.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As a parent, I don&#39;t want to be put in a situation where I would not know if I would shed tears for the dead or the accused.</p>

<p>My deepest regret is that we have failed both these kids collectively.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>Not only have the school administration failed to protect one of its pupils, in shielding the perpetrator, they are exposing other kids of the school to a very dangerous environment.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Not only have the school administration failed to protect one of its pupils, in shielding the perpetrator, they are exposing other kids of the school to a very dangerous environment." target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>We failed to provide a safe environment for Pradyuman - a kid who was too young, too weak, too vulnerable to protect himself. I still don&#39;t know for certain whether, as the CBI has been pointing out since this morning, Dr Augustine Francis Pinto, Chairman of Ryan International Group of Institutions and other members of the Board of Trustees, was indeed involved in a cover-up.</p>

<p>If that allegation proves to be true, it is treachery of the highest order. Not only have the school administration failed to protect one of its pupils, in shielding the perpetrator, they are exposing other kids of the school to a very dangerous environment.</p>

<p>Teachers may have their favourite pupil but they are not supposed to discriminate between students. As a teacher, I had my favourites, however, I did not let that dictate my professional life. I can still recall, the quiet, bright boy sitting at the corner of the classroom or the argumentative, energetic girl sitting at the front desk. I liked few of them more than the others. But I was not allowed to privilege one over the other.&nbsp;If this more benign form of favouritism is a taboo in academia, can you imagine how heinous it is to cover up the death of a murdered student because the school administration is close to the parents of the accused?</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>Speculation, based on circumstantial evidence, is already rife that the Pintos had been trying to hide facts because the parents of the accused were members of the Board of Trustees.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Speculation, based on circumstantial evidence, is already rife that the Pintos had been trying to hide facts because the parents of the accused were members of the Board of Trustees." target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>What could be the reason behind Ryan management&#39;s attempt for a cover-up? Speculation, based on circumstantial evidence, is already rife that the Pintos had been trying to hide facts because the parents of the accused were members of the Board of Trustees. The CBI did point out that the Gurgaon police did plant the knife on the co-accused who happens to be the school bus conductor.</p>

<p>Framing a less-privileged member of the working class for a crime they have not committed is not happening for the first time in India. It most possibly happened with the security guard Dhananjay Chatterjee who was hanged on charges of raping and murdering a 13-year old Hetal Parekh.</p>

<p>Our punishment doesn&#39;t end with knowing, reading and writing about these horrifying crimes. As if the brutality of these acts were not enough. We are pushed to the nadir of our civilised existence on knowing that people very much like us were complicit in these acts. Not monsters but very common people like us. The banality of evil did not die with holocaust perpetrators, such as Eichmann. This kind of people very much lives amidst us.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
There is no doubt that we have failed to protect Pradyuman, Hetal, Arushi and many others. But have we done our duty towards the accused either?</p>

<p>We may give a vent to our anger and frustration with Pradyuman&#39;s death by making the accused look like a monster. Yes, he has committed a monstrous act if we believe in what CBI is telling us. But we have to stop and ask ourselves what caused the boy to act that day. At 16, he is of an age when he will play football and not plan a murder. What was he so scared of that murdering someone looked less scary to him?</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>We all want spectacular success for our kids which is not an illegal thought but if that pressure of expectation is pushing our kids into life-threatening in activities, there must be something terribly wrong with our dreams.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=We all want spectacular success for our kids which is not an illegal thought but if that pressure of expectation is pushing our kids into life-threatening in activities, there must be something terribly wrong with our dreams." target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>As per the CBI, the 16 years old wanted to postpone an exam. Having sat for all kinds of exams -- nursery admission test to PhD defense-I know for sure that no exam is worth giving or taking a life. But this knowledge was drilled into me by my father, my school principal, and my teachers. Sister Cyril, the famous principal of Loreto Day School who later won Padma Shri for her educational efforts, did not believe in exams nor in the ranking system. She never allowed her students to compete with others. Her words, I still remember, emphasised&nbsp;on the need of improving one&#39;s own self.</p>

<p>I strongly feel that we are not adhering to this life motto anymore. We all want spectacular success for our kids, which by itself is not an illegal thought but if that pressure of expectation is pushing our kids into life-threatening activities, there must be something terribly wrong with our dreams.</p>

<p>Let all of our kids prosper. Let them live a life of milk and honey. But as parents, as teachers, as members of the civil society, we have to make sure that we act as their lifeguards. Rather than seek escape routes&nbsp;in the dark alleys of crime, they have to reach out to us if they feel insecure.&nbsp;</p>

<p>We shouldn&#39;t fail our children. If we do, then the blood they spill is in our hands too.</p>


The pressure of expectation is pushing kids into life-threatening activities

What is more chilling: To know that a 7-years old has been murdered or to be told that a 16-years old could have been the killer. As a parent, I don't want to be put in a situation where I would not know if I would shed tears for the dead or the accused. My deepest regret is that we have failed both these kids collectively. Not only have the school administration failed to protect one of its pupils, in shielding the perpetrator, they are exposing other kids of the school to a very dangerous environment. × We failed to provide a safe environment for Pradyuman - a kid who was too young, too weak, too vulnerable to protect himself. I still don't know for certain whether, as the CBI has been pointing out since this morning, Dr Augustine Francis Pinto, Chairman of Ryan International Group of Institutions and other members of the Board of Trustees, was indeed involved in a cover-up. If that allegation proves to be true, it is treachery of the highest order. Not only have the school administration failed to protect one of its pupils, in shielding the perpetrator, they are exposing other kids of the school to a very dangerous environment. Teachers may have their favourite pupil but they are not supposed to discriminate between students. As a teacher, I had my favourites, however, I did not let that dictate my professional life. I can still recall, the quiet, bright boy sitting at the corner of the classroom or the argumentative, energetic girl sitting at the front desk. I liked few of them more than the others. But I was not allowed to privilege one over the other. If this more benign form of favouritism is a taboo in academia, can you imagine how heinous it is to cover up the death of a murdered student because the school administration is close to the parents of the accused? Speculation, based on circumstantial evidence, is already rife that the Pintos had been trying to hide facts because the parents of the accused were members of the Board of Trustees. × What could be the reason behind Ryan management's attempt for a cover-up? Speculation, based on circumstantial evidence, is already rife that the Pintos had been trying to hide facts because the parents of the accused were members of the Board of Trustees. The CBI did point out that the Gurgaon police did plant the knife on the co-accused who happens to be the school bus conductor. Framing a less-privileged member of the working class for a crime they have not committed is not happening for the first time in India. It most possibly happened with the security guard Dhananjay Chatterjee who was hanged on charges of raping and murdering a 13-year old Hetal Parekh. Our punishment doesn't end with knowing, reading and writing about these horrifying crimes. As if the brutality of these acts were not enough. We are pushed to the nadir of our civilised existence on knowing that people very much like us were complicit in these acts. Not monsters but very common people like us. The banality of evil did not die with holocaust perpetrators, such as Eichmann. This kind of people very much lives amidst us. There is no doubt that we have failed to protect Pradyuman, Hetal, Arushi and many others. But have we done our duty towards the accused either? We may give a vent to our anger and frustration with Pradyuman's death by making the accused look like a monster. Yes, he has committed a monstrous act if we believe in what CBI is telling us. But we have to stop and ask ourselves what caused the boy to act that day. At 16, he is of an age when he will play football and not plan a murder. What was he so scared of that murdering someone looked less scary to him? We all want spectacular success for our kids which is not an illegal thought but if that pressure of expectation is pushing our kids into life-threatening in activities, there must be something terribly wrong with our dreams. × As per the CBI, the 16 years old wanted to postpone an exam. Having sat for all kinds of exams -- nursery admission test to PhD defense-I know for sure that no exam is worth giving or taking a life. But this knowledge was drilled into me by my father, my school principal, and my teachers. Sister Cyril, the famous principal of Loreto Day School who later won Padma Shri for her educational efforts, did not believe in exams nor in the ranking system. She never allowed her students to compete with others. Her words, I still remember, emphasised on the need of improving one's own self. I strongly feel that we are not adhering to this life motto anymore. We all want spectacular success for our kids, which by itself is not an illegal thought but if that pressure of expectation is pushing our kids into life-threatening activities, there must be something terribly wrong with our dreams. Let all of our kids prosper. Let them live a life of milk and honey. But as parents, as teachers, as members of the civil society, we have to make sure that we act as their lifeguards. Rather than seek escape routes in the dark alleys of crime, they have to reach out to us if they feel insecure. We shouldn't fail our children. If we do, then the blood they spill is in our hands too.

Ryan murder case: We all have blood on our hands

<p>The security guard of the Ryan International School in Bhondsi where a class II boy was found&nbsp;murdered last week has said the blood on the floor was wiped off.&nbsp;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">There was blood on the floor which was wiped off. I have been fired from my job : Security guard formerly at <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/RyanInternationalSchool?src=hash">#RyanInternationalSchool</a> <a href="https://t.co/N2QFKkqaEz">pic.twitter.com/N2QFKkqaEz</a></p>
&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/907873204970045440">September 13, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">&times;</a></div>

<p>ANI reported the guard as adding that he had been fired.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Seven-year-old Pradhuman Thakur was found murdered in the school toilet last week.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Police have since accused a school bus conductor of the murder.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Pradhuman&#39;s father Varun Thakur has asked for a parallel CBI investigation into the murder of his son, saying he is not happy with the police investigation.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


The guard added that he had been fired from his job

The security guard of the Ryan International School in Bhondsi where a class II boy was found murdered last week has said the blood on the floor was wiped off. There was blood on the floor which was wiped off. I have been fired from my job : Security guard formerly at #RyanInternationalSchool pic.twitter.com/N2QFKkqaEz — ANI (@ANI) September 13, 2017 × ANI reported the guard as adding that he had been fired. Seven-year-old Pradhuman Thakur was found murdered in the school toilet last week. Police have since accused a school bus conductor of the murder. Pradhuman's father Varun Thakur has asked for a parallel CBI investigation into the murder of his son, saying he is not happy with the police investigation.

Ryan school murder: Security guard says blood on floor was wiped off

ryan-school

Ryan School, News on Ryan School, stories on Ryan School, articles on Ryan School, Ryan School stories at Wion, Ryan School news, Ryan School latest news

ryan school