Prince Harry accused a tabloid publisher of "industrial scale" phone hacking as he wrapped up almost eight hours of court testimony on Wednesday, becoming the first British royal in over a century to take to the witness stand.

The younger son of King Charles III appeared emotional as he came to the end of his two days' cross-examination by a lawyer for Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), which publishes The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People. 
 
"It's a lot," the 38-year-old prince replied in a barely audible voice after his own lawyer David Sherborne asked him how having to relive upsetting episodes of his life in court had made him feel.

Harry and several other claimants allege the titles engaged in "illegal information gathering", including intercepting phone voicemails, to write dozens of stories about him.

"I believe phone hacking was at an industrial scale across at least three of its (MGN's) papers and that is beyond doubt," Harry said under renewed questioning by MGN lawyer Andrew Green.

If that was not accepted by the court, he added, "I would feel some injustice".

Pressed on why he was singling out MGN, Harry said he believes alleged hacking elsewhere was on a lesser scale and that it "started at Mirror group".

He also revealed that part of the motivation for the lawsuit was a desire to do something about the "hate that was coming towards me and my wife" in recent years.

<h2>- 'All made sense' -</h2>

The last time a royal gave evidence in court was in the 1890s when the future king Edward VII took the stand in a slander trial.

Harry -- fifth in line to the throne -- has rarely been far from the headlines since quitting royal life in 2020 and relocating to California with his American wife Meghan. 
 
The Duke of Sussex, as he is also known, has launched legal action against several tabloid media groups, alongside barrages of attacks aimed at his family and the monarchy.

In a rarity for a British royal, who normally steer clear of politics, he also hit out at the government during Tuesday's proceedings.

In a lengthy written witness statement, the prince said media intrusion had blighted his life while claiming the state of both the press and government were "at rock bottom".

In the witness box and after swearing an oath on the Bible, Harry argued he had been the victim of relentless and distressing media intrusion virtually his entire life.

Some media had blood on their hands, he argued, and said stories written about him had made him paranoid and untrusting in friendships and relationships.

When the practice of phone-hacking came to light, "it all made sense", he told the court.

Harry described a sense of being besieged by the media during a trip to Argentina when "very aggressive paparazzi" surrounded the ranch where he was staying and local police said the only way to get rid of them would be to pay them off.

He said it became clear that it would be difficult to leave without being "chased or swarmed by these individuals".

<h2>- 'Land of speculation' -</h2>

MGN has admitted to "some evidence" of unlawful information gathering, including for a story about Harry.

But it has denied voicemail interception and also argued that some claims were brought too late by Harry and the other claimants.

In court, the prince faced questions about various aspects of the 33 tabloid stories being considered, covering everything from ex-girlfriends and rumours that army officer James Hewitt was his father, to royal family relations.

Harry admitted that he had no recollection of reading the majority of the articles, which date back over the last 20 years.

He has long had a turbulent relationship with the press and holds the media responsible for the death of his mother, Princess Diana, in a 1997 Paris car crash while being pursued by paparazzi.

Allegations that tabloid journalists hacked into celebrities' mobile phones first emerged two decades ago and prompted a public inquiry.

It found British newspapers had "wreaked havoc with the lives of innocent people", and led to the closure of Britain's top-selling newspaper, the Rupert Murdoch-owned News of the World in 2011.

But MGN lawyer Green suggested Harry was "in the land of total speculation" by accusing the publisher of using hacked voicemails for its stories.

"Not at all I disagree," the prince responded.

Prince Harry accused a tabloid publisher of "industrial scale" phone hacking as he wrapped up almost eight hours of court testimony on Wednesday, becoming the first British royal in over a century to take to the witness stand.

Prince Harry accused a tabloid publisher of "industrial scale" phone hacking as he wrapped up almost eight hours of court testimony on Wednesday, becoming the first British royal in over a century to take to the witness stand. The younger son of King Charles III appeared emotional as he came to the end of his two days' cross-examination by a lawyer for Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), which publishes The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People. "It's a lot," the 38-year-old prince replied in a barely audible voice after his own lawyer David Sherborne asked him how having to relive upsetting episodes of his life in court had made him feel. Harry and several other claimants allege the titles engaged in "illegal information gathering", including intercepting phone voicemails, to write dozens of stories about him. "I believe phone hacking was at an industrial scale across at least three of its (MGN's) papers and that is beyond doubt," Harry said under renewed questioning by MGN lawyer Andrew Green. If that was not accepted by the court, he added, "I would feel some injustice". Pressed on why he was singling out MGN, Harry said he believes alleged hacking elsewhere was on a lesser scale and that it "started at Mirror group". He also revealed that part of the motivation for the lawsuit was a desire to do something about the "hate that was coming towards me and my wife" in recent years. - 'All made sense' - The last time a royal gave evidence in court was in the 1890s when the future king Edward VII took the stand in a slander trial. Harry -- fifth in line to the throne -- has rarely been far from the headlines since quitting royal life in 2020 and relocating to California with his American wife Meghan. The Duke of Sussex, as he is also known, has launched legal action against several tabloid media groups, alongside barrages of attacks aimed at his family and the monarchy. In a rarity for a British royal, who normally steer clear of politics, he also hit out at the government during Tuesday's proceedings. In a lengthy written witness statement, the prince said media intrusion had blighted his life while claiming the state of both the press and government were "at rock bottom". In the witness box and after swearing an oath on the Bible, Harry argued he had been the victim of relentless and distressing media intrusion virtually his entire life. Some media had blood on their hands, he argued, and said stories written about him had made him paranoid and untrusting in friendships and relationships. When the practice of phone-hacking came to light, "it all made sense", he told the court. Harry described a sense of being besieged by the media during a trip to Argentina when "very aggressive paparazzi" surrounded the ranch where he was staying and local police said the only way to get rid of them would be to pay them off. He said it became clear that it would be difficult to leave without being "chased or swarmed by these individuals". - 'Land of speculation' - MGN has admitted to "some evidence" of unlawful information gathering, including for a story about Harry. But it has denied voicemail interception and also argued that some claims were brought too late by Harry and the other claimants. In court, the prince faced questions about various aspects of the 33 tabloid stories being considered, covering everything from ex-girlfriends and rumours that army officer James Hewitt was his father, to royal family relations. Harry admitted that he had no recollection of reading the majority of the articles, which date back over the last 20 years. He has long had a turbulent relationship with the press and holds the media responsible for the death of his mother, Princess Diana, in a 1997 Paris car crash while being pursued by paparazzi. Allegations that tabloid journalists hacked into celebrities' mobile phones first emerged two decades ago and prompted a public inquiry. It found British newspapers had "wreaked havoc with the lives of innocent people", and led to the closure of Britain's top-selling newspaper, the Rupert Murdoch-owned News of the World in 2011. But MGN lawyer Green suggested Harry was "in the land of total speculation" by accusing the publisher of using hacked voicemails for its stories. "Not at all I disagree," the prince responded.

Emotional Harry finishes evidence in historic tabloids court battle

On Tuesday, Britain's Prince Harry took the witness box to testify against the British press accusing them of intrusion and playing a 'destructive&nbsp;role' throughout his life. The Duke Of Sussex is the first member of the British royal family to appear in court in over a century in a case that he has filed again a well-known tabloid.&nbsp;&nbsp;Harry's Tuesday appearance at the High Court in London is being termed as important and historical.&nbsp; 
 
Harry has accused the publisher of the Daily Mirror of using unlawful techniques on an 'industrial scale' to create stories about his life. 
In a written testimony filed to the High Court in London, Harry said "the prying eyes of the tabloids" strained his relationship with his former girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He stated that it was"the main factor" in why they decided to call it quits. 
 
In the testimony, Harry stated that the couple met in early 2004 &nbsp;and were in an on-and-off relationship till mid-2010 untill they finally broke up. Harry and Chesly's relationship fueled the tabloid for years. 
 
"Our relationship was long distance for the majority of the time we were together, with Chelsy and I often living in different countries, so we relied on communicating by phone a lot," Harry wrote. "We, naturally, spoke about all types of personal matters, including all aspects of our relationship and this was often through voicemail. As my girlfriend, I trusted Chelsy with the most private of information and vice versa." 
 
Much of the case against Mirror Group Newspapers focusses on details he believed were leaked concerning his relationship with Davu. In his testimony, Harry claimed much of their private conversations throughout their relationship made their way to the newspaper. Harry said that such conversations were obtained via illicit means.&nbsp; 
 
Harry pointed out one article that alleged Davy gave him "a tongue-lashing down the phone" for flirting with another woman at a party. Harry said the details of their phone conversations weren’t attributed to sources. He also mentioned another article that described "an emotional phone call" involving Davy. 
 
Harry said private details about his vacations with Davy were also obtained by the press and recalled how journalists and photographers would arrive at their hotel off the coast of Mozambique before they did. 
 
"I don’t believe that my girlfriend would ever have spoken to a passenger on a plane about our relationship," Harry noted. 
 
"We could also never understand how private elements of our life together were finding their way into the tabloids, and so our circle of friends became smaller and smaller," said Harry. "I remember finding it very hard to trust anyone, which led to bouts of depression and paranoia."

Also see: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harrys-past-drug-use-at-issue-in-us-visa-case-601481">Prince Harry's past drug use at issue in US visa case</a> 
 
In the process, Harry admitted he cut off ties with friends fearing that they were the sources of the leaks. The case dates from 1996 to 2011. 
 
"I genuinely feel that in every relationship that I’ve ever had – be that with friends, girlfriends, with family or with the army, there’s always been a third party involved, namely the tabloid press," said Harry. 
 
Harry married actress Meghan Markle in 2018. Davy is now married to Sam Cutmore Scott in 2022. They share a son together. Davy was one of the guests at Harry's wedding to Markle.&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1  width=&quot;100%&quot;"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

On Tuesday, Britain's Prince Harry took the witness box to testify against the British press accusing them of intrusion and playing a 'destructive role' throughout his life.

On Tuesday, Britain's Prince Harry took the witness box to testify against the British press accusing them of intrusion and playing a 'destructive role' throughout his life. The Duke Of Sussex is the first member of the British royal family to appear in court in over a century in a case that he has filed again a well-known tabloid. Harry's Tuesday appearance at the High Court in London is being termed as important and historical. Harry has accused the publisher of the Daily Mirror of using unlawful techniques on an 'industrial scale' to create stories about his life. In a written testimony filed to the High Court in London, Harry said "the prying eyes of the tabloids" strained his relationship with his former girlfriend Chelsy Davy. He stated that it was"the main factor" in why they decided to call it quits. In the testimony, Harry stated that the couple met in early 2004 and were in an on-and-off relationship till mid-2010 untill they finally broke up. Harry and Chesly's relationship fueled the tabloid for years. "Our relationship was long distance for the majority of the time we were together, with Chelsy and I often living in different countries, so we relied on communicating by phone a lot," Harry wrote. "We, naturally, spoke about all types of personal matters, including all aspects of our relationship and this was often through voicemail. As my girlfriend, I trusted Chelsy with the most private of information and vice versa." Much of the case against Mirror Group Newspapers focusses on details he believed were leaked concerning his relationship with Davu. In his testimony, Harry claimed much of their private conversations throughout their relationship made their way to the newspaper. Harry said that such conversations were obtained via illicit means. Harry pointed out one article that alleged Davy gave him "a tongue-lashing down the phone" for flirting with another woman at a party. Harry said the details of their phone conversations weren’t attributed to sources. He also mentioned another article that described "an emotional phone call" involving Davy. Harry said private details about his vacations with Davy were also obtained by the press and recalled how journalists and photographers would arrive at their hotel off the coast of Mozambique before they did. "I don’t believe that my girlfriend would ever have spoken to a passenger on a plane about our relationship," Harry noted. "We could also never understand how private elements of our life together were finding their way into the tabloids, and so our circle of friends became smaller and smaller," said Harry. "I remember finding it very hard to trust anyone, which led to bouts of depression and paranoia." Also see: Prince Harry's past drug use at issue in US visa case In the process, Harry admitted he cut off ties with friends fearing that they were the sources of the leaks. The case dates from 1996 to 2011. "I genuinely feel that in every relationship that I’ve ever had – be that with friends, girlfriends, with family or with the army, there’s always been a third party involved, namely the tabloid press," said Harry. Harry married actress Meghan Markle in 2018. Davy is now married to Sam Cutmore Scott in 2022. They share a son together. Davy was one of the guests at Harry's wedding to Markle. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Prince Harry blames UK tabloids for his split with ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy

Prince Harry has made allegations against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), claiming that they hacked his voicemails during his teenage years. He expressed that this invasion of his privacy caused him to feel a lack of trust in others. On the first day of the trial, Harry revealed his experience with tabloid newspapers, stating, "I ended up feeling as though I was playing up to a lot of the headlines and stereotypes that they wanted to pin on me mainly because I thought that, if they are printing this rubbish about me and people were believing it, I may as well 'do the crime,' so to speak." He described a downward spiral where the tabloids would consistently try to manipulate him, a vulnerable young man, into doing something foolish that would generate sensational stories and boost newspaper sales.

Now Harry is back on the second day of the trial in London on Wednesday, as per the BBC. The hearing was underway at the time of writing.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/uk-prince-harry-set-for-court-appearance-expected-to-give-evidence-against-mirror-group-601049/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

<h2>What Prince Harry's lawsuit against&nbsp;Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) is all about?</h2>

Prince Harry, along with more than 100 other individuals, is involved in a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of tabloids such as the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror, and the Sunday People. The plaintiffs accuse MGN of engaging in widespread unlawful activities between 1991 and 2011. The allegations include phone-hacking on a large scale and obtaining private information through deceptive means, carried out by the media group's journalists or private investigators commissioned by them. According to the claimants' lawyers, senior editors and executives within MGN were aware of and approved such behaviour.

Prince Harry has claimed that the behaviour of journalists had a detrimental impact on his mental well-being, leading to "bouts of depression and paranoia." He suggested that their actions had severe consequences for his emotional state, causing periods of deep sadness and feelings of suspicion.

MGN is contesting the claims and refutes allegations that senior figures were aware of any wrongdoing. The media group also argues that some of the lawsuits were filed after the expiration of the legal time limit. Prince Harry, being one of the claimants, was selected as one of four test cases for the trial, which commenced on May 10.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

Prince Harry has made allegations against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), claiming that they hacked his voicemails during his teenage years. He expressed that this invasion of his privacy caused him to feel a lack of trust in others.

Prince Harry has made allegations against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), claiming that they hacked his voicemails during his teenage years. He expressed that this invasion of his privacy caused him to feel a lack of trust in others. On the first day of the trial, Harry revealed his experience with tabloid newspapers, stating, "I ended up feeling as though I was playing up to a lot of the headlines and stereotypes that they wanted to pin on me mainly because I thought that, if they are printing this rubbish about me and people were believing it, I may as well 'do the crime,' so to speak." He described a downward spiral where the tabloids would consistently try to manipulate him, a vulnerable young man, into doing something foolish that would generate sensational stories and boost newspaper sales. Now Harry is back on the second day of the trial in London on Wednesday, as per the BBC. The hearing was underway at the time of writing. What Prince Harry's lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) is all about? Prince Harry, along with more than 100 other individuals, is involved in a lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of tabloids such as the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror, and the Sunday People. The plaintiffs accuse MGN of engaging in widespread unlawful activities between 1991 and 2011. The allegations include phone-hacking on a large scale and obtaining private information through deceptive means, carried out by the media group's journalists or private investigators commissioned by them. According to the claimants' lawyers, senior editors and executives within MGN were aware of and approved such behaviour. Prince Harry has claimed that the behaviour of journalists had a detrimental impact on his mental well-being, leading to "bouts of depression and paranoia." He suggested that their actions had severe consequences for his emotional state, causing periods of deep sadness and feelings of suspicion. MGN is contesting the claims and refutes allegations that senior figures were aware of any wrongdoing. The media group also argues that some of the lawsuits were filed after the expiration of the legal time limit. Prince Harry, being one of the claimants, was selected as one of four test cases for the trial, which commenced on May 10. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Prince Harry faces second day of cross-examination in hacking case against UK tabloid publisher

Here, we bring you the news that is trending across WION's social media platforms- Britain's Prince Harry took to the witness box to testify against the British press. Prince of Sussex has accused the press for intrusion and playing a destructive role throughout his life. Harry has said that our prying eyes of the Tabloid strained his relationship with his former girlfriend Chelsy Davy as well.

Prince Harry testifies against British Press, accusing them for hampering privacy

Prince Harry was back in the witness box at the London High Court on Wednesday for a second day of grilling over his allegations that British tabloids targeted him with phone-hacking and other unlawful behaviour.

Prince Harry faces second day of grilling over UK tabloid claims

A conservative US think tank urged a federal judge on Tuesday to order the release of the immigration records of Britain's Prince Harry, who was awarded a visa despite the admission in his memoir that he had used illegal drugs.

Lawyers for the Washington-based Heritage Foundation are seeking the release of the records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

"This is obviously a case about Prince Harry," Samuel Dewey, a lawyer for the Heritage Foundation, said at the hearing. "But it's truly about DHS and its compliance to the law." 
 
The 38-year-old Harry was not in court — he was in London's High Court on Tuesday complaining about the "incredibly invasive" media coverage that he has endured from the British press.

The younger son of Britain's King Charles III accuses Mirror Group Newspapers — publisher of The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People tabloids — of illegal information gathering, including phone hacking.

Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, an American citizen, moved to the United States in January 2020 after stepping away from their royal duties.

In the complaint being heard here in US District Court, the Heritage Foundation noted that Harry "has publicly admitted to the essential elements of a number of drug offenses in both the United States and abroad." 
 
"United States law generally renders such a person inadmissible for entry to the United States," the complaint says.

In his book Spare,&nbsp;Harry admitted to experimenting with drugs including marijuana, cocaine and psychedelics.

Arguing for the release of Harry's immigration file, the Heritage Foundation said there is "widespread public and press interest" in the case.

The Heritage Foundation noted that other celebrities such as the late football star Maradona and the late singer Amy Winehouse had been denied entry into the United States because of past drug use.

In its response, the government said that while there "may be some public interest in the records sought," it is not presently convinced there is a compelling need to release the records.

Two branches of the DHS have previously declined to release the prince's immigration file without his consent.

Visa applicants to the United States are asked about their past drug use and can be barred from entry, although there are exceptions and waivers can be granted.

Judge Carl Nichols gave the DHS until June 13 to come up with a response to the records request.

&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1  width=&quot;100%&quot;"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

A conservative US think tank urged a federal judge on Tuesday to order the release of the immigration records of Britain's Prince Harry, who was awarded a visa despite the admission in his memoir that he had used illegal drugs.

A conservative US think tank urged a federal judge on Tuesday to order the release of the immigration records of Britain's Prince Harry, who was awarded a visa despite the admission in his memoir that he had used illegal drugs. Lawyers for the Washington-based Heritage Foundation are seeking the release of the records from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). "This is obviously a case about Prince Harry," Samuel Dewey, a lawyer for the Heritage Foundation, said at the hearing. "But it's truly about DHS and its compliance to the law." The 38-year-old Harry was not in court — he was in London's High Court on Tuesday complaining about the "incredibly invasive" media coverage that he has endured from the British press. The younger son of Britain's King Charles III accuses Mirror Group Newspapers — publisher of The Mirror, Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People tabloids — of illegal information gathering, including phone hacking. Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, an American citizen, moved to the United States in January 2020 after stepping away from their royal duties. In the complaint being heard here in US District Court, the Heritage Foundation noted that Harry "has publicly admitted to the essential elements of a number of drug offenses in both the United States and abroad." "United States law generally renders such a person inadmissible for entry to the United States," the complaint says. In his book Spare, Harry admitted to experimenting with drugs including marijuana, cocaine and psychedelics. Arguing for the release of Harry's immigration file, the Heritage Foundation said there is "widespread public and press interest" in the case. The Heritage Foundation noted that other celebrities such as the late football star Maradona and the late singer Amy Winehouse had been denied entry into the United States because of past drug use. In its response, the government said that while there "may be some public interest in the records sought," it is not presently convinced there is a compelling need to release the records. Two branches of the DHS have previously declined to release the prince's immigration file without his consent. Visa applicants to the United States are asked about their past drug use and can be barred from entry, although there are exceptions and waivers can be granted. Judge Carl Nichols gave the DHS until June 13 to come up with a response to the records request. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

US think tank cites Prince Harry’s drug use for release of his visa records

Britain's Prince Harry took to the witness stand on Tuesday to testify as a witness in a lawsuit that he has filed against the British tabloid Daily Mirror accusing them of phone hacking and other unlawful activities.&nbsp;Harry is King Charles and the late Princess Diana's younger son and has always been vocal about the toxic tabloid culture in Britain and how it has impacted him since childhood.&nbsp; 
 
Harry is the first senior British royal to give evidence in court in 130 years. In 2020, he and his wife Meghan Markle quit their roles as senior members of the royal family and opted for a more private life in the US. Since then Harry and Meghan have had a strained relationship with the royal family.

<h2>'Subjected to invasive articles since childhood'</h2>

On Tuesday, Harry stated in court that he has been subjected to incredibly invasive articles since his childhood. Harry was 13 when his mother passed away in a tragic car crash in Paris while being chased by the paparazzi. 
 
When the court asked Harry if he could recall any particular news article that carries a story about him during childhood, the Duke of Sussex was unable to specify and instead said, "I was a child, I was at school, these articles were incredibly invasive, every single time one of these articles was written, it would have an impact on my life, the people around me, my mother in this case." 
 
The trial began in May. Harry is one of more than 100 high-profile figures suing Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, for alleged wrongdoing between 1991 and 2011.

MGN, now owned by Reach, apologised at the beginning of the trial and admitted on one occasion that the Sunday People had unlawfully sought information about Harry, accepting he was entitled to compensation. 
 
However, the publication has rejected his other allegations, saying he had no evidence for his claims. 
 
It is expected that Harry will be asked about the role of Buckingham Palace during his cross-examination. MGN has reportedly claimed that many of the articles were published with the information provided by royal aides. 
 
Harry's lawyer, David Sherborne, told the court on Monday that the lawsuit was not part of a vendetta against the press but intended to focus attention on alleged unlawful activities.

Sherborne said some 2,500 articles about Harry's private life had appeared in the MGN titles during the period the allegations covered, with nothing being "sacrosanct or out of bounds" and "no protection" from these unlawful information-gathering methods. 
 
(With inputs from agencies) 
&nbsp;

 
WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Britain's Prince Harry took to the witness stand on Tuesday to testify as a witness in a lawsuit that he has filed against the British tabloid Daily Mirror accusing them of phone hacking and other unlawful activities.

Britain's Prince Harry took to the witness stand on Tuesday to testify as a witness in a lawsuit that he has filed against the British tabloid Daily Mirror accusing them of phone hacking and other unlawful activities. Harry is King Charles and the late Princess Diana's younger son and has always been vocal about the toxic tabloid culture in Britain and how it has impacted him since childhood. Harry is the first senior British royal to give evidence in court in 130 years. In 2020, he and his wife Meghan Markle quit their roles as senior members of the royal family and opted for a more private life in the US. Since then Harry and Meghan have had a strained relationship with the royal family. 'Subjected to invasive articles since childhood' On Tuesday, Harry stated in court that he has been subjected to incredibly invasive articles since his childhood. Harry was 13 when his mother passed away in a tragic car crash in Paris while being chased by the paparazzi. When the court asked Harry if he could recall any particular news article that carries a story about him during childhood, the Duke of Sussex was unable to specify and instead said, "I was a child, I was at school, these articles were incredibly invasive, every single time one of these articles was written, it would have an impact on my life, the people around me, my mother in this case." The trial began in May. Harry is one of more than 100 high-profile figures suing Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, for alleged wrongdoing between 1991 and 2011. MGN, now owned by Reach, apologised at the beginning of the trial and admitted on one occasion that the Sunday People had unlawfully sought information about Harry, accepting he was entitled to compensation. However, the publication has rejected his other allegations, saying he had no evidence for his claims. It is expected that Harry will be asked about the role of Buckingham Palace during his cross-examination. MGN has reportedly claimed that many of the articles were published with the information provided by royal aides. Harry's lawyer, David Sherborne, told the court on Monday that the lawsuit was not part of a vendetta against the press but intended to focus attention on alleged unlawful activities. Sherborne said some 2,500 articles about Harry's private life had appeared in the MGN titles during the period the allegations covered, with nothing being "sacrosanct or out of bounds" and "no protection" from these unlawful information-gathering methods. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

Prince Harry testifies in court in phone tapping case: Invasive articles impacted my childhood

Prince Harry is set to make an appearance in the UK court as his case against the publisher of the Daily Mail begins. This also makes the Duke of Sussex the first senior British Royal to give evidence in the court in 130 years.

UK: Prince Harry set for court appearance, expected to give evidence against Mirror group

Prince Harry is on Tuesday expected to take the witness stand in a London court as part of claims against a British tabloid publisher, the latest in his legal battles with the press.

King Charles III's younger son will become the first senior British royal to give evidence in court for more than a century when he testifies against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN).

He and various other high-profile claimants accuse it of unlawful activities, including phone hacking.

The case is one of several that the 38-year-old prince has brought against British newspaper groups since stepping down from frontline royal duties in early 2020 and eventually relocating to California with his American wife Meghan Markle. 
 
Harry's lawyer David Sherborne told London's High Court on Monday that the prince was targeted by illegal information-gathering even as a young schoolboy and his phone would have been hacked on "multiple occasions".

"No aspect of the young prince's life was safe" from press intrusion, he submitted.

Representing MGN, publisher of The Mirror and The Sunday People tabloids, barrister Andrew Green said there was "no evidence" that Harry's phone was tapped.

The prince had been expected to appear in the courtroom Monday but did not take part in the hearing because of flying to the UK late Sunday after celebrating his daughter Lilibet's second birthday, according to Sherborne.

The case against MGN centres on claims its tabloids conducted unlawful information-gathering to obtain stories about Harry and other claimants, including two TV soap opera actors and the ex-wife of a comedian. 
 
At the start of the trial on May 10, MGN apologised and admitted to "some evidence" of unlawful information-gathering, including for a story about Harry.

But it denied voicemail tapping and also argued that some claims had been brought too late.

Sherborne submitted that "industrial scale" illegal activities were happening at MGN and had been approved by senior executives.

Harry, who is fifth in line to the throne, has had a turbulent relationship with the press and holds the media responsible for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi.

In television interviews and his explosive memoir "Spare" -- released in January -- Harry hit out at other royals, accusing them of colluding with the press.

In court filings unveiled in April, Harry claimed the royal family as an institution had struck a "secret agreement" with one UK publisher that had prevented him from suing, to avoid a royal entering the witness box.

He also alleged the monarchy wanted to prevent the opening of a "Pandora's Box" of negative coverage that could tarnish the royal brand.

The prince has vowed to spearhead efforts to enforce change on Britain's tabloid media, and the MGN trial is one of several ongoing legal battles he has launched against the press.

They include joint legal action against Associated Newspapers (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail, over alleged breaches of privacy.

The California-based prince made a surprise appearance at the High Court in March to hear legal arguments in the case, but did not give in-person evidence.

His testimony on Tuesday will be the first time a senior royal has given evidence in court since Edward VII, who took the stand in an 1890 slander trial before becoming monarch.

Charles's sister Princess Anne became the first member of the current royal family to be convicted of a criminal offence after one of her dogs bit two children in 2002. 
 
She pleaded guilty to an offence under the Dangerous Dogs Act so was not required to give evidence in court.

Prince Harry is on Tuesday expected to take the witness stand in a London court as part of claims against a British tabloid publisher, the latest in his legal battles with the press.

Prince Harry is on Tuesday expected to take the witness stand in a London court as part of claims against a British tabloid publisher, the latest in his legal battles with the press. King Charles III's younger son will become the first senior British royal to give evidence in court for more than a century when he testifies against Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN). He and various other high-profile claimants accuse it of unlawful activities, including phone hacking. The case is one of several that the 38-year-old prince has brought against British newspaper groups since stepping down from frontline royal duties in early 2020 and eventually relocating to California with his American wife Meghan Markle. Harry's lawyer David Sherborne told London's High Court on Monday that the prince was targeted by illegal information-gathering even as a young schoolboy and his phone would have been hacked on "multiple occasions". "No aspect of the young prince's life was safe" from press intrusion, he submitted. Representing MGN, publisher of The Mirror and The Sunday People tabloids, barrister Andrew Green said there was "no evidence" that Harry's phone was tapped. The prince had been expected to appear in the courtroom Monday but did not take part in the hearing because of flying to the UK late Sunday after celebrating his daughter Lilibet's second birthday, according to Sherborne. The case against MGN centres on claims its tabloids conducted unlawful information-gathering to obtain stories about Harry and other claimants, including two TV soap opera actors and the ex-wife of a comedian. At the start of the trial on May 10, MGN apologised and admitted to "some evidence" of unlawful information-gathering, including for a story about Harry. But it denied voicemail tapping and also argued that some claims had been brought too late. Sherborne submitted that "industrial scale" illegal activities were happening at MGN and had been approved by senior executives. Harry, who is fifth in line to the throne, has had a turbulent relationship with the press and holds the media responsible for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi. In television interviews and his explosive memoir "Spare" -- released in January -- Harry hit out at other royals, accusing them of colluding with the press. In court filings unveiled in April, Harry claimed the royal family as an institution had struck a "secret agreement" with one UK publisher that had prevented him from suing, to avoid a royal entering the witness box. He also alleged the monarchy wanted to prevent the opening of a "Pandora's Box" of negative coverage that could tarnish the royal brand. The prince has vowed to spearhead efforts to enforce change on Britain's tabloid media, and the MGN trial is one of several ongoing legal battles he has launched against the press. They include joint legal action against Associated Newspapers (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail, over alleged breaches of privacy. The California-based prince made a surprise appearance at the High Court in March to hear legal arguments in the case, but did not give in-person evidence. His testimony on Tuesday will be the first time a senior royal has given evidence in court since Edward VII, who took the stand in an 1890 slander trial before becoming monarch. Charles's sister Princess Anne became the first member of the current royal family to be convicted of a criminal offence after one of her dogs bit two children in 2002. She pleaded guilty to an offence under the Dangerous Dogs Act so was not required to give evidence in court.

Prince Harry to testify against British tabloid publisher

Prince Harry has began giving evidence at London’s High Court in his lawsuit against a tabloid publisher whose titles he accuses of phone-hacking and other unlawful activities.

Prince Harry: UK tabloids hacked my voicemails

Prince Harry gives evidence in UK court in phone hacking trial

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is currently appearing in court in London for this eagerly awaited event. He is also the subject of an ongoing legal dispute in the United States about his drug use, which could result in more litigation.

UK: Prince Harry sues Mirror group newspapers for alleged phone hacking

Prince&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;will be ready to give evidence in a London court over his lawsuit against the publisher of a British tabloid on Tuesday, his lawyer said, prompting the judge to say he was "surprised" by his absence on Monday.

Harry, King Charles' younger son, had been expected to appear in court on Monday and to be questioned in the witness stand from either Monday or Tuesday, becoming the first senior British royal to give evidence in court for 130 years.

He is one of more than 100 other high-profile figures suing the Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, for alleged phone-hacking and other unlawful behaviour between 1991 and 2011.

The trial began last month, as lawyers representing&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;and three other test claimants attempted to prove that unlawful information gathering was carried out with the knowledge and approval of senior editors and executives.

Harry's lawyer David Sherborne told the judge, Timothy Fancourt, that the prince would not be attending Monday's hearing, held in a modern courtroom at the High Court's Rolls Building that was packed with media and a smattering of members of the public.

Sherborne said&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;flew from his home in Los Angeles on Sunday evening, after attending his daughter Lilibet's second birthday, but was not available to give evidence on Monday.

Fancourt said he was "surprised" after he had asked that the first witness in each of the four test cases appear in court on the first day of their individual case. MGN's lawyer Andrew Green said it was "absolutely extraordinary" that the prince would not be there.

He is seeking to question&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;for more than a day over 33 articles that&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;says were based on material which was unlawfully obtained.

PALACE AIDES

MGN, now owned by Reach, apologised at the start of the trial for one admitted occasion that the Sunday People had unlawfully sought information about&nbsp;Harry, accepting he was entitled to compensation.

But it has rejected his other allegations, saying he had no evidence for his claims. Buckingham Palace is likely to feature prominently in&nbsp;Harry's cross-examination, with MGN arguing that some information had come from royal aides.

In court documents,&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;says the impact of the alleged unlawful activities was to cause him "huge distress" and paranoia, blaming it for the breakdown of his relationship with ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy.

This week's appearance will be the second time this year&nbsp;Harry&nbsp;has attended the High Court, after joining singer Elton John and others for hearings in March over their lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily and Sunday Mail tabloids.

Harry, the fifth-in-line to the throne, has barely been out of the headlines in the last six months.

He is in engaged in several legal battles with the British press, including a similar phone-hacking case against Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper arm.

The prince has also accused his family and their aides in his memoir and Netflix documentary series of colluding with tabloids. The palace has not commented on those accusations.

Prince Harry will be ready to give evidence in a London court over his lawsuit against the publisher of a British tabloid on Tuesday, his lawyer said, prompting the judge to say he was "surprised" by his absence on Monday.

Prince Harry will be ready to give evidence in a London court over his lawsuit against the publisher of a British tabloid on Tuesday, his lawyer said, prompting the judge to say he was "surprised" by his absence on Monday. Harry, King Charles' younger son, had been expected to appear in court on Monday and to be questioned in the witness stand from either Monday or Tuesday, becoming the first senior British royal to give evidence in court for 130 years. He is one of more than 100 other high-profile figures suing the Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), the publisher of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People, for alleged phone-hacking and other unlawful behaviour between 1991 and 2011. The trial began last month, as lawyers representing Harry and three other test claimants attempted to prove that unlawful information gathering was carried out with the knowledge and approval of senior editors and executives. Harry's lawyer David Sherborne told the judge, Timothy Fancourt, that the prince would not be attending Monday's hearing, held in a modern courtroom at the High Court's Rolls Building that was packed with media and a smattering of members of the public. Sherborne said Harry flew from his home in Los Angeles on Sunday evening, after attending his daughter Lilibet's second birthday, but was not available to give evidence on Monday. Fancourt said he was "surprised" after he had asked that the first witness in each of the four test cases appear in court on the first day of their individual case. MGN's lawyer Andrew Green said it was "absolutely extraordinary" that the prince would not be there. He is seeking to question Harry for more than a day over 33 articles that Harry says were based on material which was unlawfully obtained. PALACE AIDES MGN, now owned by Reach, apologised at the start of the trial for one admitted occasion that the Sunday People had unlawfully sought information about Harry, accepting he was entitled to compensation. But it has rejected his other allegations, saying he had no evidence for his claims. Buckingham Palace is likely to feature prominently in Harry's cross-examination, with MGN arguing that some information had come from royal aides. In court documents, Harry says the impact of the alleged unlawful activities was to cause him "huge distress" and paranoia, blaming it for the breakdown of his relationship with ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy. This week's appearance will be the second time this year Harry has attended the High Court, after joining singer Elton John and others for hearings in March over their lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily and Sunday Mail tabloids. Harry, the fifth-in-line to the throne, has barely been out of the headlines in the last six months. He is in engaged in several legal battles with the British press, including a similar phone-hacking case against Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper arm. The prince has also accused his family and their aides in his memoir and Netflix documentary series of colluding with tabloids. The palace has not commented on those accusations.

Prince Harry leaves judge 'surprised' as he misses the first day of court hearing against UK tabloid

UK: Prince Harry expected to give evidence against newspaper group

Prince Harry to appear before UK court as UK Royal sues Mirror group for alleged phone hacking

Prince Harry will become the first British royal to appear in the witness box since the 1890s when he testifies at the High Court in London as part of his lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers.

Here are details of the trial:

WHAT IS THE COURT CASE ABOUT?

Harry and more than 100 other people are suing Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), publisher of the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People tabloids, accusing them of widespread unlawful activities between 1991 and 2011.

Those involved include actors, sports stars, celebrities and people who simply had a connection to high-profile figures.

They say it's journalists or private investigators commissioned by them carried out phone-hacking on an "industrial scale", obtained their private details by deception and carried out other illicit acts to find out information about them.

Senior editors and executives knew and approved of the behaviour, the claimants' lawyers say. MGN is contesting the claims and denies senior figures were aware of wrongdoing. It also argues some of the lawsuits were brought too late.

Harry, the younger son of King Charles, was selected at an earlier hearing as one of four test cases for the trial which began on May 10. He is due to give evidence when his specific case is heard over three days, starting on Monday.

WHAT IS PHONE-HACKING?

Phone-hacking, the illegal interception of voicemails on mobile phones, first came to attention in 2006 when the then royal editor of Rupert Murdoch's News of the World (NoW) tabloid and a private investigator were arrested.

They pleaded guilty and were jailed in 2007. The NoW and senior figures at Murdoch's News Group Newspapers (NGN) UK operation said hacking was limited to a rogue reporter.

But further revelations in 2011, including that a murdered schoolgirl had been targeted, led to the closure of the paper and a criminal trial.

In 2014, the NoW's former editor, Andy Coulson, who later worked for ex-Prime Minister David Cameron, was found guilty of conspiracy to hack phones and jailed. Rebekah Brookes, who heads up Murdoch's UK newspaper and radio operation, was acquitted of all charges.

The Mirror group had consistently denied its journalists had been involved in hacking, including at a public inquiry, but in 2014 it admitted liability in four cases.

Since then, MGN has settled more than 600 claims at a cost of over 100 million pounds ($120 million) in damages and costs.

WHAT DOES HARRY SAY THE MIRROR GROUP NEWSPAPERS DID?

Harry says 140 stories which appeared in MGN papers were the result of phone-hacking or other unlawful behaviour, however the trial is only considering 33 of these.

His lawyers said the intrusion led to the breakdown of his relationship with long-term girlfriend Chelsy Davy.

In other documents released at the outset of the trial, MGN admitted there was evidence that private investigators had been instructed to unlawfully gather information about three of those involved in the test cases, including, on one occasion, Harry.

The publisher said it unreservedly apologised and that he was entitled to compensation.

However it has rejected his other claims. In documents, it says some of the information had been passed on by a former senior aide working for his father.

WHY IS HARRY TAKING ACTION?

The MGN case is one of four that Harry is currently pursuing at the High Court against British newspapers.

He is also suing Murdoch's NGN, which publishes the Sun tabloid and used to produce the defunct NoW, over alleged phone-hacking and other unlawful acts. NGN denies the Sun was involved in wrongdoing and is fighting to have his case thrown out.

The prince, with singer Elton John and five others, is also suing Associated Newspapers (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, over phone-hacking and illicit privacy breaches. ANL denies any unlawful activity.

Harry is also suing ANL for libel.

"This isn't just about phone hacking, this is about accountability of power," he wrote in a statement as part of the NGN case. He says the press was too important to have "criminals masquerading as journalists running the show".

Prince Harry will become the first British royal to appear in the witness box since the 1890s when he testifies at the High Court in London as part of his lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers.

Prince Harry will become the first British royal to appear in the witness box since the 1890s when he testifies at the High Court in London as part of his lawsuit against Mirror Group Newspapers. Here are details of the trial: WHAT IS THE COURT CASE ABOUT? Harry and more than 100 other people are suing Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), publisher of the Daily Mirror, the Sunday Mirror and the Sunday People tabloids, accusing them of widespread unlawful activities between 1991 and 2011. Those involved include actors, sports stars, celebrities and people who simply had a connection to high-profile figures. They say it's journalists or private investigators commissioned by them carried out phone-hacking on an "industrial scale", obtained their private details by deception and carried out other illicit acts to find out information about them. Senior editors and executives knew and approved of the behaviour, the claimants' lawyers say. MGN is contesting the claims and denies senior figures were aware of wrongdoing. It also argues some of the lawsuits were brought too late. Harry, the younger son of King Charles, was selected at an earlier hearing as one of four test cases for the trial which began on May 10. He is due to give evidence when his specific case is heard over three days, starting on Monday. WHAT IS PHONE-HACKING? Phone-hacking, the illegal interception of voicemails on mobile phones, first came to attention in 2006 when the then royal editor of Rupert Murdoch's News of the World (NoW) tabloid and a private investigator were arrested. They pleaded guilty and were jailed in 2007. The NoW and senior figures at Murdoch's News Group Newspapers (NGN) UK operation said hacking was limited to a rogue reporter. But further revelations in 2011, including that a murdered schoolgirl had been targeted, led to the closure of the paper and a criminal trial. In 2014, the NoW's former editor, Andy Coulson, who later worked for ex-Prime Minister David Cameron, was found guilty of conspiracy to hack phones and jailed. Rebekah Brookes, who heads up Murdoch's UK newspaper and radio operation, was acquitted of all charges. The Mirror group had consistently denied its journalists had been involved in hacking, including at a public inquiry, but in 2014 it admitted liability in four cases. Since then, MGN has settled more than 600 claims at a cost of over 100 million pounds ($120 million) in damages and costs. WHAT DOES HARRY SAY THE MIRROR GROUP NEWSPAPERS DID? Harry says 140 stories which appeared in MGN papers were the result of phone-hacking or other unlawful behaviour, however the trial is only considering 33 of these. His lawyers said the intrusion led to the breakdown of his relationship with long-term girlfriend Chelsy Davy. In other documents released at the outset of the trial, MGN admitted there was evidence that private investigators had been instructed to unlawfully gather information about three of those involved in the test cases, including, on one occasion, Harry. The publisher said it unreservedly apologised and that he was entitled to compensation. However it has rejected his other claims. In documents, it says some of the information had been passed on by a former senior aide working for his father. WHY IS HARRY TAKING ACTION? The MGN case is one of four that Harry is currently pursuing at the High Court against British newspapers. He is also suing Murdoch's NGN, which publishes the Sun tabloid and used to produce the defunct NoW, over alleged phone-hacking and other unlawful acts. NGN denies the Sun was involved in wrongdoing and is fighting to have his case thrown out. The prince, with singer Elton John and five others, is also suing Associated Newspapers (ANL), publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, over phone-hacking and illicit privacy breaches. ANL denies any unlawful activity. Harry is also suing ANL for libel. "This isn't just about phone hacking, this is about accountability of power," he wrote in a statement as part of the NGN case. He says the press was too important to have "criminals masquerading as journalists running the show".

Why is Prince Harry giving evidence in court?

It was a scary evening for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after they were involved in a car crash but what’s scarier for them is that none of the agencies in America will hand over them the footage of the reported “catastrophic” car chase as demanded by them. In a witty response to their demand for the footage be turned to them, a US agency said, “rejected” before answering the couple’s lawyers.&nbsp;

The US agency wrote back saying, "In America, as I'm sure you know, property belongs to the owner of it: Third parties cannot just demand it be given to them, as perhaps Kings can do." They further suggested that the lawyers sit down with Harry and Meghan to explain that "his English rules of the royal prerogative to demand that the citizenry hand over their property to the Crown were rejected by this country long ago," adding, "We stand by our founding fathers."

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
I promise this is worth the read. Harry &amp; Meghan had their lawyers fire off a letter to the paparazzi agency that followed them last night, demanding all of their footage. 
 
This is how the agency responded: 
(Yes, it’s real) 😂😂 <a href="https://t.co/mu5uxFf1IW">pic.twitter.com/mu5uxFf1IW</a>
— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1659345220922638337?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 18, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lawyers had fired a letter for the car footage to be handed to them. Reportedly, the two were involved in a “catastrophic car chase” with paparazzi following them for over two hours.

<h2>Conflicting Claims</h2>

The alleged car chase occurred as the couple left with Meghan’s mother after the Ms. Foundation’s Women of Vision event in New York.&nbsp;

The US agency has disputed these claims. They confirmed that they have received images of the entire scene from&nbsp;four freelance photographers. The agency stated that the photographers had no intention of causing harm and that their only tool was their cameras. According to them, the photographers felt that the couple was not in immediate danger at any point.

The New York Police Department (NYPD) has <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/new-york-police-dismiss-the-hype-around-prince-harry-meghans-paparazzi-car-chase-593636">downplayed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s paparazzi car chase</a> saying that they find it hard that there was a “two-hour high-speed chase”.&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here.</a>

 
&nbsp;

It was a scary evening for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after they were involved in a car crash but what’s scarier for them is that none of the agencies in America will hand over them the footage of the reported “catastrophic” car chase as demanded by them.

It was a scary evening for Meghan Markle and Prince Harry after they were involved in a car crash but what’s scarier for them is that none of the agencies in America will hand over them the footage of the reported “catastrophic” car chase as demanded by them. In a witty response to their demand for the footage be turned to them, a US agency said, “rejected” before answering the couple’s lawyers. The US agency wrote back saying, "In America, as I'm sure you know, property belongs to the owner of it: Third parties cannot just demand it be given to them, as perhaps Kings can do." They further suggested that the lawyers sit down with Harry and Meghan to explain that "his English rules of the royal prerogative to demand that the citizenry hand over their property to the Crown were rejected by this country long ago," adding, "We stand by our founding fathers." I promise this is worth the read. Harry & Meghan had their lawyers fire off a letter to the paparazzi agency that followed them last night, demanding all of their footage. This is how the agency responded: (Yes, it’s real) 😂😂 pic.twitter.com/mu5uxFf1IW — Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) May 18, 2023 × Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lawyers had fired a letter for the car footage to be handed to them. Reportedly, the two were involved in a “catastrophic car chase” with paparazzi following them for over two hours. Conflicting Claims The alleged car chase occurred as the couple left with Meghan’s mother after the Ms. Foundation’s Women of Vision event in New York. The US agency has disputed these claims. They confirmed that they have received images of the entire scene from four freelance photographers. The agency stated that the photographers had no intention of causing harm and that their only tool was their cameras. According to them, the photographers felt that the couple was not in immediate danger at any point. The New York Police Department (NYPD) has downplayed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s paparazzi car chase saying that they find it hard that there was a “two-hour high-speed chase”. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

'Not your property', says US agency rejecting demand to give car chase footage to Prince Harry and Meghan

Britain's Prince Harry, his wife Meghan and her mother were involved in a near-catastrophic car chase involving paparazzi photographers. In a statement, the Prince's spokesperson said the "relentless pursuit" lasted for over two hours.

Prince Harry and wife Meghan in near 'catastrophic car chase'

Did Harry and Meghan lie about the near-catastrophic car chase? A New York taxi driver who claims to have picked up the couple says things were exaggerated. Here's his interview.

Gravitas: Did Harry and Meghan lie? New York driver denies claims of a car chase

Here, we bring you the news that is trending across WION's social media platforms - Prince Harry and Meghan Markle escape the paparazzi with the help of of an Indian-origin cab driver

An Indian-origin cab driver helps Prince Harry and Meghan Markle escape paparazzi

Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle were trailed in their car by the paparazzi in New York as they left a charity event on Tuesday night where Meghan was honoured for her work. The couple and Meghan's mother took a brief refuge at a police station before being whisked away in a yellow cab, which an Indian-origin man was incidentally driving.&nbsp; 
 
The pursuit and media frenzy on Tuesday brought back horrific memories of the 1997 car chase through Paris that killed Harry’s mother, Princess Diana. On Tuesday though, no one was hurt.&nbsp; 
 
The incident was reported by their spokesperson on Wednesday, revealing that the couple were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase," through the streets of Manhattan. &nbsp; 
 
That account led New York City Mayor Eric Adams to condemn the paparazzi chasing them as “reckless and irresponsible.” 
 
However, New York police later stated that the pursuit was relatively short and led to no injuries, collisions or arrests and hence warranted no further investigations.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-wife-meghan-in-near-catastrophic-car-chase-with-paparazzi-reports-593370">Prince Harry, wife Meghan in ‘near catastrophic car chase’ with paparazzi: Reports</a> 
 
Still, it drove home real security concerns surrounding the royal couple and the trauma brought on by the death of Harry’s mother when he was just 12 years old.

Indian cab driver to rescue 
 
The cab driver who drove them from the police station said he instantly recognised his passengers and claimed that paparazzi “were following us the whole time,” but added that he wouldn’t call it a chase. “They had this look on their faces,” the driver, Sukhcharn Singh, said. “All of a sudden paparazzi came out and started taking pictures.” 
 
Singh told news agency AP that he was a witness to only some part of the drama. Not calling his drive a dangerous chase by photographers, he said, “I was on 67th Street and then the security guard hailed me. Next thing you know, Prince Harry and his wife were hopping into my cab.” 
 
“We got blocked by a garbage truck, and all of a sudden paparazzi came and started taking pictures. They looked nervous, I think they were being chased the whole day or something,” he said, adding, “They were pretty nervous, but the security guard, he was on it.”

Police issued a short statement confirming an incident Tuesday night involving photographers and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.&nbsp; 
In New York on Tuesday night, the couple left Manhattan’s Ziegfeld Ballroom — where Meghan was honoured at the Ms. Foundation’s Woman of Vision Awards with Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown. Post event the couple and Meghan's mother got into an SUV as crowds of pedestrians and photographers cheered.&nbsp; 
 
Harry and Meghan’s vehicle was then followed by photographers in a scene that their office said “resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD officers.” The couple’s office called the incident “near catastrophic.” 
 
Police eventually intervened and led them inside a police station, 18 blocks from the ballroom. The three spent several minutes at the station and once they felt it was safe, opted to leave in a taxi.&nbsp; 
 
The award presentation was Meghan and Harry's first public appearance since the coronation of King Charles III earlier this month. Harry had attended the coronation alone while Meghan stayed back in California for her son Prince Archie’s fourth birthday.&nbsp;

(With agency inputs)

Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle were trailed in their car by the paparazzi in New York as they left a charity event on Tuesday night where Meghan was honoured for her work.

Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle were trailed in their car by the paparazzi in New York as they left a charity event on Tuesday night where Meghan was honoured for her work. The couple and Meghan's mother took a brief refuge at a police station before being whisked away in a yellow cab, which an Indian-origin man was incidentally driving. The pursuit and media frenzy on Tuesday brought back horrific memories of the 1997 car chase through Paris that killed Harry’s mother, Princess Diana. On Tuesday though, no one was hurt. The incident was reported by their spokesperson on Wednesday, revealing that the couple were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase," through the streets of Manhattan. That account led New York City Mayor Eric Adams to condemn the paparazzi chasing them as “reckless and irresponsible.” However, New York police later stated that the pursuit was relatively short and led to no injuries, collisions or arrests and hence warranted no further investigations. Prince Harry, wife Meghan in ‘near catastrophic car chase’ with paparazzi: Reports Still, it drove home real security concerns surrounding the royal couple and the trauma brought on by the death of Harry’s mother when he was just 12 years old. Indian cab driver to rescue The cab driver who drove them from the police station said he instantly recognised his passengers and claimed that paparazzi “were following us the whole time,” but added that he wouldn’t call it a chase. “They had this look on their faces,” the driver, Sukhcharn Singh, said. “All of a sudden paparazzi came out and started taking pictures.” Singh told news agency AP that he was a witness to only some part of the drama. Not calling his drive a dangerous chase by photographers, he said, “I was on 67th Street and then the security guard hailed me. Next thing you know, Prince Harry and his wife were hopping into my cab.” “We got blocked by a garbage truck, and all of a sudden paparazzi came and started taking pictures. They looked nervous, I think they were being chased the whole day or something,” he said, adding, “They were pretty nervous, but the security guard, he was on it.” Police issued a short statement confirming an incident Tuesday night involving photographers and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. In New York on Tuesday night, the couple left Manhattan’s Ziegfeld Ballroom — where Meghan was honoured at the Ms. Foundation’s Woman of Vision Awards with Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown. Post event the couple and Meghan's mother got into an SUV as crowds of pedestrians and photographers cheered. Harry and Meghan’s vehicle was then followed by photographers in a scene that their office said “resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD officers.” The couple’s office called the incident “near catastrophic.” Police eventually intervened and led them inside a police station, 18 blocks from the ballroom. The three spent several minutes at the station and once they felt it was safe, opted to leave in a taxi. The award presentation was Meghan and Harry's first public appearance since the coronation of King Charles III earlier this month. Harry had attended the coronation alone while Meghan stayed back in California for her son Prince Archie’s fourth birthday. (With agency inputs)

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle escaped the paparazzi with the help of an Indian-origin cab driver

Calling it a “bogus story”, the New York Police Department (NYPD) downplayed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s paparazzi car chase that took place after the couple attended an awards event earlier in the day. The couple called it a “near catastrophic car chase” but the NYPD said they find it hard that there was a “two-hour high speed chase”

After attending an awards event where Meghan was felicitated, she along with mother Doria Ragland and husband Harry were caught in a car chase that came “at the hands of a run of highly aggressive paparazzi,” according to their spokesperson. In a statement, they also said that it “resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD [New York Police Department] officers.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-meghan-markle-glows-in-gold-dress-as-she-attends-awards-ceremony-in-new-york-593325">Meghan Markle glows in gold dress as she attends awards ceremony in New York</a>

<img alt="Meghan and Harry" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="45e26b76-d967-4a9b-9ec6-f437431b1265" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/HORIZONS%20-%202023-05-18T151320.905.jpg" />

After reports of the <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-wife-meghan-in-near-catastrophic-car-chase-with-paparazzi-reports-593370">car chase</a> came to light, the New York police issued a statement that reads: “On Tuesday evening, May 16, the NYPD assisted the private security team protecting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries or arrests in regard.”

<img alt="Meghan and Harry" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="4ed36fb3-b0ad-4b41-837f-ce57a5401116" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/HORIZONS%20-%202023-05-18T151259.984.jpg" />

The couple left the awards in their car with a police escort, but paparazzi followed on motorbikes, cars and electric scooters, reported several publications after the couple’s spokesperson issued a statement.&nbsp;

An Indian taxi driver named Sukhcharn Singh picked them up and dropped them to their destination. He said that it did appear that they were followed by other vehicles and were photographed but he said, “I don’t think I would call it a chase. I never felt like I was in danger. It wasn’t like a car chase in a movie. They were quiet and seemed scared but it’s New York — it’s safe.”

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here.</a>

 
&nbsp;

Calling it a “bogus story”, the New York Police Department (NYPD) downplayed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s paparazzi car chase that took place after the couple attended an awards event earlier in the day.

Calling it a “bogus story”, the New York Police Department (NYPD) downplayed Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s paparazzi car chase that took place after the couple attended an awards event earlier in the day. The couple called it a “near catastrophic car chase” but the NYPD said they find it hard that there was a “two-hour high speed chase” After attending an awards event where Meghan was felicitated, she along with mother Doria Ragland and husband Harry were caught in a car chase that came “at the hands of a run of highly aggressive paparazzi,” according to their spokesperson. In a statement, they also said that it “resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD [New York Police Department] officers.” Meghan Markle glows in gold dress as she attends awards ceremony in New York After reports of the car chase came to light, the New York police issued a statement that reads: “On Tuesday evening, May 16, the NYPD assisted the private security team protecting the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries or arrests in regard.” The couple left the awards in their car with a police escort, but paparazzi followed on motorbikes, cars and electric scooters, reported several publications after the couple’s spokesperson issued a statement. An Indian taxi driver named Sukhcharn Singh picked them up and dropped them to their destination. He said that it did appear that they were followed by other vehicles and were photographed but he said, “I don’t think I would call it a chase. I never felt like I was in danger. It wasn’t like a car chase in a movie. They were quiet and seemed scared but it’s New York — it’s safe.” WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

New York police dismiss the hype around Prince Harry, Meghan's paparazzi car chase

Britain's Prince Harry, his wife Meghan and her mother were involved in a near-catastrophic car chase involving paparazzi photographers. In a statement, the prince's spokesperson said the "relentless pursuit" lasted for over two hours.

Near catastrophic chase: Prince Harry, Meghan's car chased

Britain's Prince Harry, his wife Meghan Markle and her mother were reportedly involved in a 'near catastrophic car chase', that involved the paparazzi. The news was shared by Harry's spokesperson. The incident occurred after the couple had attended an awards ceremony held in New York by the MS Foundation for Women,&nbsp;where&nbsp;Meghan was honoured for her work. 
 
Pictures that have appeared on social media have shown Harry, Meghan and her mother, Doria Ragland, in a taxi. 
 
"Last night, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Ms Ragland were involved in a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi," the spokesperson said in a statement. 
 
"This relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours, resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD (New York Police Department) officers." 
 
Harry and Meghan stepped down from their royal roles in 2020 and moved to the United States partly because of what they described as intense media harassment.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-meghan-markle-glows-in-gold-dress-as-she-attends-awards-ceremony-in-new-york-593325">Meghan Markle glows in gold dress as she attends awards ceremony in New York</a> 
 
The prince has long spoken out about his anger about press intrusion which he blames for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who was killed when her limousine crashed as it sped away from chasing paparazzi in Paris. 
 
(With inputs from agencies) 
 
&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Britain's Prince Harry, his wife Meghan Markle and her mother were reportedly involved in a 'near catastrophic car chase', that involved the paparazzi. The news was shared by Harry's spokesperson.

Britain's Prince Harry, his wife Meghan Markle and her mother were reportedly involved in a 'near catastrophic car chase', that involved the paparazzi. The news was shared by Harry's spokesperson. The incident occurred after the couple had attended an awards ceremony held in New York by the MS Foundation for Women, where Meghan was honoured for her work. Pictures that have appeared on social media have shown Harry, Meghan and her mother, Doria Ragland, in a taxi. "Last night, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Ms Ragland were involved in a near catastrophic car chase at the hands of a ring of highly aggressive paparazzi," the spokesperson said in a statement. "This relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours, resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD (New York Police Department) officers." Harry and Meghan stepped down from their royal roles in 2020 and moved to the United States partly because of what they described as intense media harassment. Meghan Markle glows in gold dress as she attends awards ceremony in New York The prince has long spoken out about his anger about press intrusion which he blames for the death of his mother Princess Diana, who was killed when her limousine crashed as it sped away from chasing paparazzi in Paris. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Prince Harry, wife Meghan in ‘near catastrophic car chase’ with paparazzi: Reports

Prince Harry reportedly suffered "huge bouts of depression and paranoia" due to press intrusion in his life. Harry is suing Mirror Newspaper Group(MGN) over alleged unlawful information gathering by journalists.&nbsp; 
 
During a court proceeding, Harry's attorney said that his ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy decided "a royal life was not for her" as a result of the alleged activities of MGN journalists. 
 
Prince Harry's lawyer- David Sherborne- said, “He became immediately suspicious of anyone named in stories about him and felt that he could not trust anybody, even at such a young age. It also caused great challenges in his relationship with his ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, and made him fear for his and her safety.” 
 
“Every time he was in a relationship, or even a rumoured relationship, that whole person’s family, and often their friends, would be 'dragged into the chaos' and find themselves the subject of unlawful activity on the part of MGN. There was nowhere that was 'off limits' for MGN’s newspapers, whose journalists would even manage to book into a hotel in Bazaruto, a small island off the coast of Mozambique, when the Duke of Sussex and Ms Davy tried to escape there and enjoy some peace and quiet,” the court was told. 
 
“They were never on their own, which ‘placed a huge amount of unnecessary stress and strain’ on their relationship," the attorney further added. Harry stated that MGN’s activities led Davy to make the decision that ‘a royal life was not for her’, which led to Harry suffering from depression. 
 
&nbsp;"They also caused their circle of friends to become smaller and smaller, meaning that friendships were lost entirely unnecessarily, and led to ‘huge bouts of depression and paranoia’,” the court heard. 
 
Prince Harry married Meghan Markle in 2018 and the couple quit their roles as senior members of the royal family in 2020 and moved to the US to live a private life with their two kids.&nbsp;

Prince Harry reportedly suffered "huge bouts of depression and paranoia" due to press intrusion in his life. Harry is suing Mirror Newspaper Group(MGN) over alleged unlawful information gathering by journalists.

Prince Harry reportedly suffered "huge bouts of depression and paranoia" due to press intrusion in his life. Harry is suing Mirror Newspaper Group(MGN) over alleged unlawful information gathering by journalists. During a court proceeding, Harry's attorney said that his ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy decided "a royal life was not for her" as a result of the alleged activities of MGN journalists. Prince Harry's lawyer- David Sherborne- said, “He became immediately suspicious of anyone named in stories about him and felt that he could not trust anybody, even at such a young age. It also caused great challenges in his relationship with his ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy, and made him fear for his and her safety.” “Every time he was in a relationship, or even a rumoured relationship, that whole person’s family, and often their friends, would be 'dragged into the chaos' and find themselves the subject of unlawful activity on the part of MGN. There was nowhere that was 'off limits' for MGN’s newspapers, whose journalists would even manage to book into a hotel in Bazaruto, a small island off the coast of Mozambique, when the Duke of Sussex and Ms Davy tried to escape there and enjoy some peace and quiet,” the court was told. “They were never on their own, which ‘placed a huge amount of unnecessary stress and strain’ on their relationship," the attorney further added. Harry stated that MGN’s activities led Davy to make the decision that ‘a royal life was not for her’, which led to Harry suffering from depression. "They also caused their circle of friends to become smaller and smaller, meaning that friendships were lost entirely unnecessarily, and led to ‘huge bouts of depression and paranoia’,” the court heard. Prince Harry married Meghan Markle in 2018 and the couple quit their roles as senior members of the royal family in 2020 and moved to the US to live a private life with their two kids.

Prince Harry tells court he suffered 'huge bouts of depression' due to press intrusion

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry marked their first public appearance together on Tuesday days after King Charles was coronated in Britain. Meghan had skipped the ceremony and stayed back with her children in the US while Harry had attended it solo in London.&nbsp; 
 
On Tuesday night, the Duchess of Sussex was honoured at the Women of Vision Awards in New York. For the special occasion, Meghan opted for a gold strapless Johanna Ortiz dress with a subtle keyhole cut-out. 
 
Meghan was joined by her husband and her mother Doria Ragland for the ceremony, which benefits the Ms&nbsp;Foundation for Women and feminist movements. Harry and Meghan will celebrate their fifth wedding anniversary on Friday. 
 
Meghan received the 2023 Women of Vision award from Gloria Steinem at the event Tuesday evening. &nbsp; 
 
Meghan glowed in a stunning gold jacquard dress which accentuated her well-toned frame. She kept her hair open and wore towering metallic heels. The mother of two carried a matching golden clutch in one hand and wore a pair of thick gold earrings to complete the look.&nbsp;

<img alt="f" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="f3ddc608-e22b-42f4-87e4-db1cdfc8fa09" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Untitled%20design%20-%202023-05-17T181102.821.jpg" /> 
 
The Duke of Sussex, meanwhile, sported a classic navy-blue suit with a light-blue tie. 
 
Markle was honoured for "her global advocacy to empower and advocate on behalf of women and girls" by Gloria Steinem, the Ms. Foundation co-founder.&nbsp; 
&nbsp;

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry marked their first public appearance together on Tuesday days after King Charles was coronated in Britain. Meghan had skipped the ceremony and stayed back with her children in the US while Harry had attended it solo in London.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry marked their first public appearance together on Tuesday days after King Charles was coronated in Britain. Meghan had skipped the ceremony and stayed back with her children in the US while Harry had attended it solo in London. On Tuesday night, the Duchess of Sussex was honoured at the Women of Vision Awards in New York. For the special occasion, Meghan opted for a gold strapless Johanna Ortiz dress with a subtle keyhole cut-out. Meghan was joined by her husband and her mother Doria Ragland for the ceremony, which benefits the Ms Foundation for Women and feminist movements. Harry and Meghan will celebrate their fifth wedding anniversary on Friday. Meghan received the 2023 Women of Vision award from Gloria Steinem at the event Tuesday evening. Meghan glowed in a stunning gold jacquard dress which accentuated her well-toned frame. She kept her hair open and wore towering metallic heels. The mother of two carried a matching golden clutch in one hand and wore a pair of thick gold earrings to complete the look. The Duke of Sussex, meanwhile, sported a classic navy-blue suit with a light-blue tie. Markle was honoured for "her global advocacy to empower and advocate on behalf of women and girls" by Gloria Steinem, the Ms. Foundation co-founder.

Meghan Markle glows in gold dress as she attends awards ceremony in New York

The publisher of the British tabloid, the Daily Mirror, has made a significant admission at the onset of Prince Harry's phone-hacking trial. Mirror Group Newspapers has acknowledged its unlawful gathering of information about Prince Harry and has formally apologised for its actions. This admission comes as part of the court filings that outline the publisher's defence strategy. While the publisher denies hacking phones to intercept voicemail messages, it has accepted that there is evidence of engaging third parties in other forms of unlawful information gathering (UIG). As a result, Mirror Group Newspapers stated that compensation is warranted for Prince Harry and the other claimants involved in the trial. However, the specific form or amount of compensation has not been detailed.

In the court papers, Mirror Group Newspapers expressed an unreserved apology for all instances of unlawful information gathering and reassured the claimants that such conduct would never occur again. The publisher asserted that the apology was not a tactical move aimed at reducing potential damages but was made sincerely because such behaviour should never have taken place.

"MGN unreservedly apologizes for all such instances of UIG, and assures the claimants that such conduct will never be repeated," said court papers.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/prince-harry-is-attending-the-coronation-but-meghan-and-their-children-arent-589615/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

Prince Harry's phone-hacking trial represents his initial legal battle against the British press. Alongside other celebrities, he is suing the former publisher of the Daily Mirror for invasion of privacy. This trial marks the first of the three phone-hacking lawsuits Prince Harry has initiated and has the potential to force a member of the royal family onto the witness stand, leading to potentially embarrassing revelations.

The phone-hacking activities in question date back over two decades when journalists and private investigators intercepted voicemails to intrude upon the privacy of various individuals, including members of the royal family, politicians, athletes, celebrities, and even crime victims. The revelation of these hacking practices sparked a scandal within the media industry.

Prince Harry is expected to testify in person in June, as stated by his lawyer. This trial follows his surprise appearance in the High Court last month, where he observed most of a four-day hearing related to one of his other lawsuits. Although he was absent during the opening statements of this trial, Prince Harry briefly attended his father's coronation ceremony before returning to California to celebrate his son's birthday with his family.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-memoir-ghostwriter-reveals-collaborative-challenges-and-tensions-590636">Prince Harry memoir ghostwriter reveals collaborative challenges and clashes over controversial content</a>

The prince has been engaged in a war of words against British newspapers, both through legal claims and in his best-selling memoir, Spare. He has vowed to make it his life's mission to reform the media, which he holds responsible for the untimely death of his mother, Princess Diana, in a car accident in Paris in 1997, as she attempted to evade paparazzi.

In addition to the lawsuit against the Daily Mirror, Prince Harry has also filed lawsuits against the publishers of the Daily Mail and the Sun, concerning the wider phone-hacking scandal that emerged following a year-long inquiry into press ethics in 2011. The investigation revealed that employees of the now-defunct News of the World tabloid had unlawfully eavesdropped on mobile phone voicemails.

Prince Harry has detailed his grievances against the media in court documents, describing how he has been hounded by the press since his early years, leading to the creation of a negative narrative that portrayed him as a "thicko," a "cheat," and an "underage drinker." He has also highlighted how his relationships with girlfriends were negatively impacted by the tabloid press, whom he perceives as a third party in ruining those relationships.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

The publisher of the British tabloid, the Daily Mirror, has made a significant admission at the onset of Prince Harry's phone-hacking trial. Mirror Group Newspapers has acknowledged its unlawful gathering of information about Prince Harry and has formally apologised for its actions.

The publisher of the British tabloid, the Daily Mirror, has made a significant admission at the onset of Prince Harry's phone-hacking trial. Mirror Group Newspapers has acknowledged its unlawful gathering of information about Prince Harry and has formally apologised for its actions. This admission comes as part of the court filings that outline the publisher's defence strategy. While the publisher denies hacking phones to intercept voicemail messages, it has accepted that there is evidence of engaging third parties in other forms of unlawful information gathering (UIG). As a result, Mirror Group Newspapers stated that compensation is warranted for Prince Harry and the other claimants involved in the trial. However, the specific form or amount of compensation has not been detailed. In the court papers, Mirror Group Newspapers expressed an unreserved apology for all instances of unlawful information gathering and reassured the claimants that such conduct would never occur again. The publisher asserted that the apology was not a tactical move aimed at reducing potential damages but was made sincerely because such behaviour should never have taken place. "MGN unreservedly apologizes for all such instances of UIG, and assures the claimants that such conduct will never be repeated," said court papers. Prince Harry's phone-hacking trial represents his initial legal battle against the British press. Alongside other celebrities, he is suing the former publisher of the Daily Mirror for invasion of privacy. This trial marks the first of the three phone-hacking lawsuits Prince Harry has initiated and has the potential to force a member of the royal family onto the witness stand, leading to potentially embarrassing revelations. The phone-hacking activities in question date back over two decades when journalists and private investigators intercepted voicemails to intrude upon the privacy of various individuals, including members of the royal family, politicians, athletes, celebrities, and even crime victims. The revelation of these hacking practices sparked a scandal within the media industry. Prince Harry is expected to testify in person in June, as stated by his lawyer. This trial follows his surprise appearance in the High Court last month, where he observed most of a four-day hearing related to one of his other lawsuits. Although he was absent during the opening statements of this trial, Prince Harry briefly attended his father's coronation ceremony before returning to California to celebrate his son's birthday with his family. Also Read: Prince Harry memoir ghostwriter reveals collaborative challenges and clashes over controversial content The prince has been engaged in a war of words against British newspapers, both through legal claims and in his best-selling memoir, Spare. He has vowed to make it his life's mission to reform the media, which he holds responsible for the untimely death of his mother, Princess Diana, in a car accident in Paris in 1997, as she attempted to evade paparazzi. In addition to the lawsuit against the Daily Mirror, Prince Harry has also filed lawsuits against the publishers of the Daily Mail and the Sun, concerning the wider phone-hacking scandal that emerged following a year-long inquiry into press ethics in 2011. The investigation revealed that employees of the now-defunct News of the World tabloid had unlawfully eavesdropped on mobile phone voicemails. Prince Harry has detailed his grievances against the media in court documents, describing how he has been hounded by the press since his early years, leading to the creation of a negative narrative that portrayed him as a "thicko," a "cheat," and an "underage drinker." He has also highlighted how his relationships with girlfriends were negatively impacted by the tabloid press, whom he perceives as a third party in ruining those relationships. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Prince Harry phone-hacking trial: British tabloid group admits unlawful information gathering

Meghan Markle spent the coronation weekend hiking with friends and her two children in California. Meghan's husband, Prince Harry attended his father, King Charles' coronation in London on Saturday, while the former actress stayed back in California with the couple's two children Archie and Lilibet. May 6 was also Archie's fourth birthday.&nbsp; 
 
At the coronation ceremony, Prince Harry was spotted standing in the third row, alongside his cousins and his controversial uncle Prince Andrew. Earlier, the palace&nbsp;released a statement confirming Meghan's absence from the event. “The Duke of Sussex will attend the Coronation service at Westminster Abbey on May 6th. The Duchess of Sussex will remain in California with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet," read the statement.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MeghanMarkle?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MeghanMarkle</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MinorOwnBusiness?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MinorOwnBusiness</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/GettingOnWithYourLife?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#GettingOnWithYourLife</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FabulousAsAlways?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FabulousAsAlways</a> 🌺💐🌹💖💝❤️💖💖💝 looking gorgeous as ever <a href="https://t.co/6Mkcz0MsRO">pic.twitter.com/6Mkcz0MsRO</a>
— romano🇯🇲🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺 support🇺🇦 (@romano114) <a href="https://twitter.com/romano114/status/1655340764207931394?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

On Sunday, Meghan was spotted without her two children – Archie, 4, and Lilibet, 1, for a hike near her California home. Her longtime friends Markus Anderson and Heather Dorak accompanied her for the hike. The Duchess of Sussex was dressed in a deep blue loose-fitted top paired with fitted bottoms and hiking shoes. She completed the casual look with large-frame sunglasses, a scarf and a hat. Meghan seemed to be in a casual mood as she was pictured smiling and talking to her friends.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
Princess Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex out and about in Montecito♥️🥰🔥👑<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MeghanMarkle?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MeghanMarkle</a> <a href="https://t.co/6VrHwBy9cV">pic.twitter.com/6VrHwBy9cV</a>
— The Powers (@NyakioR) <a href="https://twitter.com/NyakioR/status/1655464796974731264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Harry, reportedly, only stayed for a few hours post the coronation, even&nbsp;though he was not seen on Sunday's hiking trip.

Britain's King Charles III was officially crowned as the monarch of the United Kingdom on Saturday in a grand ceremony following the centuries-old tradition. On Sunday the coronation concert saw performances by Katy Perry and Lionel Richie among others. Bollywood star Sonam Kapoor delivered a spoken word performance as she introduced various choir performers of the Commonwealth at the event.&nbsp;

Meghan Markle spent the coronation weekend hiking with friends and her two children in California. Meghan's husband, Prince Harry attended his father, King Charles' coronation in London on Saturday, while the former actress stayed back in California with the couple's two children Archie and Lilibet.

Meghan Markle spent the coronation weekend hiking with friends and her two children in California. Meghan's husband, Prince Harry attended his father, King Charles' coronation in London on Saturday, while the former actress stayed back in California with the couple's two children Archie and Lilibet. May 6 was also Archie's fourth birthday. At the coronation ceremony, Prince Harry was spotted standing in the third row, alongside his cousins and his controversial uncle Prince Andrew. Earlier, the palace released a statement confirming Meghan's absence from the event. “The Duke of Sussex will attend the Coronation service at Westminster Abbey on May 6th. The Duchess of Sussex will remain in California with Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet," read the statement. #MeghanMarkle #MinorOwnBusiness #GettingOnWithYourLife #FabulousAsAlways 🌺💐🌹💖💝❤️💖💖💝 looking gorgeous as ever pic.twitter.com/6Mkcz0MsRO — romano🇯🇲🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇬🇧🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺 support🇺🇦 (@romano114) May 7, 2023 × On Sunday, Meghan was spotted without her two children – Archie, 4, and Lilibet, 1, for a hike near her California home. Her longtime friends Markus Anderson and Heather Dorak accompanied her for the hike. The Duchess of Sussex was dressed in a deep blue loose-fitted top paired with fitted bottoms and hiking shoes. She completed the casual look with large-frame sunglasses, a scarf and a hat. Meghan seemed to be in a casual mood as she was pictured smiling and talking to her friends. Princess Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex out and about in Montecito♥️🥰🔥👑#MeghanMarkle pic.twitter.com/6VrHwBy9cV — The Powers (@NyakioR) May 8, 2023 × Harry, reportedly, only stayed for a few hours post the coronation, even though he was not seen on Sunday's hiking trip. Britain's King Charles III was officially crowned as the monarch of the United Kingdom on Saturday in a grand ceremony following the centuries-old tradition. On Sunday the coronation concert saw performances by Katy Perry and Lionel Richie among others. Bollywood star Sonam Kapoor delivered a spoken word performance as she introduced various choir performers of the Commonwealth at the event.

Meghan Markle spotted hiking with friends after skipping coronation

Amidst his visit to Britain for the Coronation, Prince Harry allegedly made a swift entrance and exit at Buckingham Palace without engaging with senior members of the Royal Family, as claimed in a recent report mentioned in the Daily Mail. According to the report, the Duke of Sussex spent less than thirty minutes at the Palace after the Westminster Abbey service before rushing to Heathrow Airport to return to the United States on Saturday. Photographs captured the Prince leaving Westminster Abbey at 1:15 pm and entering a black BMW, with subsequent sightings showing him near Heathrow's entrance by 2&nbsp;pm.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/prince-harry-is-attending-the-coronation-but-meghan-and-their-children-arent-589615/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

The tight timing of Prince Harry's journey to the airport suggests that stopping at Buckingham Palace, reportedly for "logistical reasons," was unlikely. Former Royal Protection Officer Ken Wharfe expressed doubt about the feasibility of the Duke's visit, citing the 35-minute journey from the West End to Heathrow under police escort as the fastest possible route. Wharfe opined that given the presence of Harry's family at the Abbey for the Coronation, there would be no one at the Palace to receive him, making a stop there highly improbable.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/lifestyle/news-prince-harry-memoir-ghostwriter-reveals-collaborative-challenges-and-tensions-590636">Prince Harry memoir ghostwriter reveals collaborative challenges and clashes over controversial content</a>

Wharfe further emphasised the challenge of entering and leaving the Palace unnoticed due to the significant number of people in central London on the day. He deemed it practically impossible for Harry to have accomplished such a feat.

This development follows the King's expression of regret over Prince Harry's absence during the Royal Family's celebratory lunch, where he toasted "those that weren't there."&nbsp;

However, as Prince Harry returned to California on Sunday morning, he did not participate in official Coronation portraits or attend the Coronation Concert.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

Amidst his visit to Britain for the Coronation, Prince Harry allegedly made a swift entrance and exit at Buckingham Palace without engaging with senior members of the Royal Family, as claimed in a recent report mentioned in the Daily Mail.

Amidst his visit to Britain for the Coronation, Prince Harry allegedly made a swift entrance and exit at Buckingham Palace without engaging with senior members of the Royal Family, as claimed in a recent report mentioned in the Daily Mail. According to the report, the Duke of Sussex spent less than thirty minutes at the Palace after the Westminster Abbey service before rushing to Heathrow Airport to return to the United States on Saturday. Photographs captured the Prince leaving Westminster Abbey at 1:15 pm and entering a black BMW, with subsequent sightings showing him near Heathrow's entrance by 2 pm. The tight timing of Prince Harry's journey to the airport suggests that stopping at Buckingham Palace, reportedly for "logistical reasons," was unlikely. Former Royal Protection Officer Ken Wharfe expressed doubt about the feasibility of the Duke's visit, citing the 35-minute journey from the West End to Heathrow under police escort as the fastest possible route. Wharfe opined that given the presence of Harry's family at the Abbey for the Coronation, there would be no one at the Palace to receive him, making a stop there highly improbable. Also Read: Prince Harry memoir ghostwriter reveals collaborative challenges and clashes over controversial content Wharfe further emphasised the challenge of entering and leaving the Palace unnoticed due to the significant number of people in central London on the day. He deemed it practically impossible for Harry to have accomplished such a feat. This development follows the King's expression of regret over Prince Harry's absence during the Royal Family's celebratory lunch, where he toasted "those that weren't there." However, as Prince Harry returned to California on Sunday morning, he did not participate in official Coronation portraits or attend the Coronation Concert. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Prince Harry's 'magical disappearing act' at Buckingham Palace raises eyebrows

JR Moehringer, novelist and ghostwriter for Prince Harry's memoir, Spare,&nbsp;has provided insights into their collaborative process, shedding light on both the positive and challenging aspects of their partnership. In a piece published by The New Yorker on May 8, Moehringer recounted a significant disagreement he had with Harry during the book's editing phase. The dispute arose over a passage concerning the Duke of Sussex's demanding military exercises in England and escalated into a late-night argument over Zoom. According to Moehringer, Harry wanted to include a "vile dig" made by a fictional terrorist about his late mother, Princess Diana. However, the author strongly advised against including the comment in the memoir.

Moehringer described the tense moment, stating that Harry remained silent and stared into the camera. Eventually, he explained that throughout his life, people had undermined his intellectual capabilities. "He was just glaring into the camera. Finally, he exhaled and calmly explained that all his life, people had belittled his intellectual capabilities, and this flash of cleverness proved that, even after being kicked and punched and deprived of sleep and food, he had his wits about him," he said.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/prince-harry-is-attending-the-coronation-but-meghan-and-their-children-arent-589615/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

The profile also revealed that Moehringer formed a connection with Harry over the shared experience of losing their mothers. Reflecting on their initial conversation, the author remarked on the relatability and frustration he felt regarding Harry's mistreatment by both strangers and close acquaintances.

Additionally, Moehringer spoke highly of his time spent with Meghan Markle, Harry's wife, during his visits to their California home. Meghan graciously hosted him in their guesthouse, and she often brought trays of food and sweets, knowing he missed his own family.

"Harry put me up in his guesthouse, where Meghan and Archie would visit me on their afternoon walks. Meghan, knowing I was missing my family, was forever bringing trays of food and sweets," he said.

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/prince-harry-faces-growing-criticism-over-memoir-revelations-550191">Prince Harry faces growing criticism over memoir revelations</a>

Harry's memoir, released earlier this year, delves into his complicated relationship&nbsp;with various members of the royal family, including his brother Prince William and his father, King Charles III. The book explores the dynamics of being perceived as the "spare" in contrast to William, the heir.

In the memoir, Harry recounts a physical altercation with William, triggered by his brother's alleged derogatory comments about Meghan in 2019. Sources have indicated that Charles is uncertain if reconciliation is possible and currently has no plans to communicate with Harry after his controversial statements.

During Harry's recent visit to the UK for his father's coronation, public interactions between the brothers were absent. Moreover, Harry did not join his family on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, further highlighting the strained relationships within the royal household. 
&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.

JR Moehringer, novelist and ghostwriter for Prince Harry's memoir, Spare, has provided insights into their collaborative process, shedding light on both the positive and challenging aspects of their partnership.

JR Moehringer, novelist and ghostwriter for Prince Harry's memoir, Spare, has provided insights into their collaborative process, shedding light on both the positive and challenging aspects of their partnership. In a piece published by The New Yorker on May 8, Moehringer recounted a significant disagreement he had with Harry during the book's editing phase. The dispute arose over a passage concerning the Duke of Sussex's demanding military exercises in England and escalated into a late-night argument over Zoom. According to Moehringer, Harry wanted to include a "vile dig" made by a fictional terrorist about his late mother, Princess Diana. However, the author strongly advised against including the comment in the memoir. Moehringer described the tense moment, stating that Harry remained silent and stared into the camera. Eventually, he explained that throughout his life, people had undermined his intellectual capabilities. "He was just glaring into the camera. Finally, he exhaled and calmly explained that all his life, people had belittled his intellectual capabilities, and this flash of cleverness proved that, even after being kicked and punched and deprived of sleep and food, he had his wits about him," he said. The profile also revealed that Moehringer formed a connection with Harry over the shared experience of losing their mothers. Reflecting on their initial conversation, the author remarked on the relatability and frustration he felt regarding Harry's mistreatment by both strangers and close acquaintances. Additionally, Moehringer spoke highly of his time spent with Meghan Markle, Harry's wife, during his visits to their California home. Meghan graciously hosted him in their guesthouse, and she often brought trays of food and sweets, knowing he missed his own family. "Harry put me up in his guesthouse, where Meghan and Archie would visit me on their afternoon walks. Meghan, knowing I was missing my family, was forever bringing trays of food and sweets," he said. Also Read: Prince Harry faces growing criticism over memoir revelations Harry's memoir, released earlier this year, delves into his complicated relationship with various members of the royal family, including his brother Prince William and his father, King Charles III. The book explores the dynamics of being perceived as the "spare" in contrast to William, the heir. In the memoir, Harry recounts a physical altercation with William, triggered by his brother's alleged derogatory comments about Meghan in 2019. Sources have indicated that Charles is uncertain if reconciliation is possible and currently has no plans to communicate with Harry after his controversial statements. During Harry's recent visit to the UK for his father's coronation, public interactions between the brothers were absent. Moreover, Harry did not join his family on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, further highlighting the strained relationships within the royal household. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

Prince Harry memoir ghostwriter reveals collaborative challenges and clashes over controversial content

King Charles III and Queen Camilla were crowned king and queen of England, respectively, at Westminster Abbey on Saturday, marking the start of a new royal era and fulfilling Charles’ seven-decade-long wait for the throne.

UK's King Charles III and Queen Camilla crowned in first Coronation Ceremony in 70 years

prince-harry

Prince Harry, News on Prince Harry, stories on Prince Harry, articles on Prince Harry, Prince Harry stories at Wion, Prince Harry news, Prince Harry latest news

prince harry

Emotional Harry finishes evidence in historic tabloids court battle

Prince Harry blames UK tabloids for his split with ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy

Prince Harry faces second day of cross-examination in hacking case against UK tabloid publisher

Prince Harry testifies against British Press, accusing them for hampering privacy

Prince Harry faces second day of grilling over UK tabloid claims

US think tank cites Prince Harry’s drug use for release of his visa records

Prince Harry testifies in court in phone tapping case: Invasive articles impacted my childhood

UK: Prince Harry set for court appearance, expected to give evidence against Mirror group

Prince Harry to testify against British tabloid publisher

Prince Harry: UK tabloids hacked my voicemails

Prince Harry gives evidence in UK court in phone hacking trial

UK: Prince Harry sues Mirror group newspapers for alleged phone hacking

Prince Harry leaves judge 'surprised' as he misses the first day of court hearing against UK tabloid

Prince Harry leaves judge 'surprised' as he misses the first day of court hearing against UK tabloid

UK: Prince Harry expected to give evidence against newspaper group

Prince Harry to appear before UK court as UK Royal sues Mirror group for alleged phone hacking

Why is Prince Harry giving evidence in court?

'Not your property', says US agency rejecting demand to give car chase footage to Prince Harry and Meghan

Prince Harry and wife Meghan in near 'catastrophic car chase'

Gravitas: Did Harry and Meghan lie? New York driver denies claims of a car chase

An Indian-origin cab driver helps Prince Harry and Meghan Markle escape paparazzi

How Prince Harry and Meghan Markle escaped the paparazzi with the help of an Indian-origin cab driver

New York police dismiss the hype around Prince Harry, Meghan's paparazzi car chase

Near catastrophic chase: Prince Harry, Meghan's car chased