US President-elect Donald Trump has refused to rule out the use of military force to seize control of the Panama Canal and Greenland. He declared that US control over both territories would be crucial to American national security.

Donald Trump ramps up threats to gain control of Greenland & Panama canal

Donald Trump escalates threats against Greenland, Panama canal

US President-elect Donald Trump announced on Wednesday (Dec 25) that Miami-Dade county commissioner Kevin Marino Cabrera will serve as the ambassador to Panama. Describing him as &ldquo;a fierce fighter for America First principles," the Republican said Cabrera has played a major role in driving economic growth and fostering international partnerships.&nbsp;
In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump wrote, &ldquo;Few understand Latin American politics as well as Kevin &ndash; He will do a FANTASTIC job representing our Nation&rsquo;s interests in Panama!&rdquo;
Also read | <a class="gh-archive-page-post-title-link" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-cautions-against-promoting-hypotheses-about-azerbaijan-plane-crash-8568101" aria-label="Azerbaijan Airlines crash: Russia cautions against promoting 'hypotheses' about accident">Azerbaijan Airlines crash: Russia cautions against promoting 'hypotheses' about accident</a>
"In 2020, Kevin did an incredible job as my Florida State Director and, this year, advanced our MAGA Agenda as a Member of the RNC Platform Committee," Trump wrote.&nbsp;
<iframe width="600" style="max-width: 100%; border: 0;" src="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113715171941661598/embed" class="truthsocial-embed" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe>

<script src="https://truthsocial.com/embed.js" async="async"></script>

The announcement came after Trump's threat to reassert the control of the United States over the Panama Canal. The US administered the canal for several decades and then handed it over to the Central American country in 1999.&nbsp;
<h3>'Thank You, President Trump'&nbsp;</h3>
After Trump's announcement, Cabrera released a statement saying, "As a first-generation American and the son of Cuban exiles, I am profoundly grateful for everything this country has given me."&nbsp;
"Thank you, President Trump, for this incredible honour. I am eager and energized to join your administration as the next ambassador to Panama," he wrote.&nbsp;
Before becoming the Miami-Dade county commissioner, Cabrera was the director of Trump's 2020 re-election campaign in Florida.&nbsp;
In November 2024, Cabrera sponsored an initiative to recognize Hialeah's creation of President Donald J. Trump Avenue and the county commission approved it.&nbsp;
In his statement, Cabrera wrote, "I am committed to supporting President Trump's America First vision and will work tirelessly every day to uphold his bold approach to international diplomacy. Together, we will ensure that American strength, freedom, and leadership continue to shape a brighter future for all." 
(With inputs from agencies)

The upcoming US president further accused Chinese soldiers of illegally operating the Panama Canal. Panama President said that China did not influence the canal's administration. 

US President-elect Donald Trump announced on Wednesday (Dec 25) that Miami-Dade county commissioner Kevin Marino Cabrera will serve as the ambassador to Panama. Describing him as “a fierce fighter for America First principles," the Republican said Cabrera has played a major role in driving economic growth and fostering international partnerships. In a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Few understand Latin American politics as well as Kevin – He will do a FANTASTIC job representing our Nation’s interests in Panama!” Also read | Azerbaijan Airlines crash: Russia cautions against promoting 'hypotheses' about accident "In 2020, Kevin did an incredible job as my Florida State Director and, this year, advanced our MAGA Agenda as a Member of the RNC Platform Committee," Trump wrote. The announcement came after Trump's threat to reassert the control of the United States over the Panama Canal. The US administered the canal for several decades and then handed it over to the Central American country in 1999. 'Thank You, President Trump' After Trump's announcement, Cabrera released a statement saying, "As a first-generation American and the son of Cuban exiles, I am profoundly grateful for everything this country has given me." "Thank you, President Trump, for this incredible honour. I am eager and energized to join your administration as the next ambassador to Panama," he wrote. Before becoming the Miami-Dade county commissioner, Cabrera was the director of Trump's 2020 re-election campaign in Florida. In November 2024, Cabrera sponsored an initiative to recognize Hialeah's creation of President Donald J. Trump Avenue and the county commission approved it. In his statement, Cabrera wrote, "I am committed to supporting President Trump's America First vision and will work tirelessly every day to uphold his bold approach to international diplomacy. Together, we will ensure that American strength, freedom, and leadership continue to shape a brighter future for all." (With inputs from agencies)

Who is Kevin Marino Cabrera, Trump's pick for ambassador to Panama?

US President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday nominated Miami-Dade County Commissioner Kevin Marino Cabrera to serve as ambassador to Panama.
Trump described Cabrera as "a fierce fighter for America First principles" who he said has been instrumental in driving economic growth and fostering international partnerships.
Also read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/h1b-visas-us-far-right-goes-on-anti-india-drivel-over-trumps-pick-sriram-musk-wades-in-8566899" class="editor-rtfLink" rel="noopener">H1B visas: US far-right goes on anti-India drivel over Trump's pick Sriram;&nbsp;Musk&nbsp;wades&nbsp;in</a>
"Few understand Latin American politics as well as Kevin - He will do a FANTASTIC job representing our Nation&rsquo;s interests in Panama!" he said in a post on Truth Social.
The announcement of his pick for ambassador comes after Trump threatened to reassert US control over the Panama Canal, which it administered for decades before handing over to Panama in 1999.
Also read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/15000-devices-fail-to-detonate-in-israels-explosive-pager-operation-against-hezbollah-report-8567156" class="editor-rtfLink" rel="noopener">15,000 devices failed to explode during Israel's pager operation against Hezbollah: Report</a>
Trump said the Central American country, with whom the US has had diplomatic relations since 1903, is "ripping us off on the Panama Canal, far beyond their wildest dreams."
In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump accused Chinese soldiers of illegally operating the canal and "always making certain that the United States puts in Billions of Dollars in 'repair' money but will have absolutely nothing to say about 'anything.'"
Also read: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/passenger-captures-moments-before-and-after-azerbaijan-airlines-plane-crash-8566817" class="editor-rtfLink" rel="noopener">Video: Passenger captures Azerbaijan Airlines plane crash that killed 38</a>
Panama's President Jose Raul Mulino has said China had no influence on the canal's administration.
China does not control or administer the canal, but a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings (0001.HK), opens new tab, has long managed two ports located on the canal's Caribbean and Pacific entrances.
Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience.

The announcement of his pick for ambassador comes after Trump threatened to reassert US control over the Panama Canal, which it handed over to Panama in 1999.

US President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday nominated Miami-Dade County Commissioner Kevin Marino Cabrera to serve as ambassador to Panama. Trump described Cabrera as "a fierce fighter for America First principles" who he said has been instrumental in driving economic growth and fostering international partnerships. Also read: H1B visas: US far-right goes on anti-India drivel over Trump's pick Sriram; Musk wades in "Few understand Latin American politics as well as Kevin - He will do a FANTASTIC job representing our Nation’s interests in Panama!" he said in a post on Truth Social. The announcement of his pick for ambassador comes after Trump threatened to reassert US control over the Panama Canal, which it administered for decades before handing over to Panama in 1999. Also read: 15,000 devices failed to explode during Israel's pager operation against Hezbollah: Report Trump said the Central American country, with whom the US has had diplomatic relations since 1903, is "ripping us off on the Panama Canal, far beyond their wildest dreams." In a post on Truth Social on Wednesday, Trump accused Chinese soldiers of illegally operating the canal and "always making certain that the United States puts in Billions of Dollars in 'repair' money but will have absolutely nothing to say about 'anything.'" Also read: Video: Passenger captures Azerbaijan Airlines plane crash that killed 38 Panama's President Jose Raul Mulino has said China had no influence on the canal's administration. China does not control or administer the canal, but a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings (0001.HK), opens new tab, has long managed two ports located on the canal's Caribbean and Pacific entrances. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

US President-elect Donald Trump names 'fierce fighter' Kevin Cabrera as Panama ambassador

In response to Trump's threats to restore US authority over the canal, Panama's President, Jose Raul Mulino, sought backing from other leaders to protect the country's strategic waterway. On Monday, Mulino met with three Panamanian leaders who, in a joint statement, reaffirmed Panama's sovereignty and independence of the canal.

Panama President Rallies Support For Canal After Trump Threat

First it was Canada, then the Panama Canal, now Donald Trump again wants Greenland. Our next report tries to explore why the U.S. president-elect is hinting at an American territorial expansion. Watch in for more details!



Trump Eyes Panama Canal Amid Concerns Over Control & Costs

Panama's assets take a hit as a dispute escalates between the country and US President-elect Donald Trump over a strategically significant canal. Following Trump's warning to re-establish US control of the Panama Canal unless the nation reduced passage costs, bonds of Panama fell across the board Monday morning.

Donald Trump's Fight Over Canal Control Weighs Down Panama Assets

First it was Canada, then the Panama Canal, now Donald Trump again wants Greenland. Our next report tries to explore why the U.S. president-elect is hinting at an American territorial expansion. Watch in for more details!

Panama's Assets Take a Hit From Trump Fight

US President-elect Donald Trump has ignited controversy with remarks suggesting that the United States should consider demanding the return of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump criticised the high tolls imposed by the Panama Canal Authority and expressed concerns over growing Chinese influence in Panama, which he argued could pose a strategic risk to US interests.

Panama’s President, José Raúl Mulino, swiftly rejected the remarks, calling the canal an integral part of Panama’s sovereignty. As this issue gains attention, it is worth exploring the history of the Panama Canal, its importance in global trade, and the implications of Trump’s proposal.

<h2>The History of the Panama Canal</h2>

The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, is one of the most significant engineering achievements in history. Stretching approximately 50 miles across the Isthmus of Panama, the canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, dramatically reducing maritime travel times by eliminating the need to navigate around South America’s Cape Horn. This shortcut transformed global trade, enabling faster and more efficient movement of goods.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/panama-rubbishes-trumps-promise-to-take-control-of-canal-786198">Panama rubbishes Donald Trump's threat to take control of Canal</a>

The canal’s construction was originally attempted by French engineers in the late 19th century but failed due to financial mismanagement, engineering challenges, and deadly tropical diseases like malaria and yellow fever. In the early 20th century, the United States stepped in, purchasing the French assets and securing the rights to complete the canal.

The US&nbsp;role in the canal’s construction was closely tied to Panama’s independence from Colombia. In 1903, the US supported Panama’s bid for independence, and shortly after, the newly established Panamanian government signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the US control over the canal zone in perpetuity. The canal opened in 1914, operated and maintained by the US, and became a cornerstone of American strategic and economic power.

<h2>The Struggle for Panamanian Sovereignty</h2>

While the canal was a point of pride for American engineering, it became a source of resentment in Panama. The canal zone, a US-controlled territory, created economic disparities and fuelled anti-American sentiment among Panamanians. Calls for sovereignty over the canal grew louder in the mid-20th century, culminating in the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977.

These agreements, negotiated by US President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos, set a timeline for the gradual transfer of the canal to Panama. Over 22 years, control was handed over step by step, with Panama officially taking full ownership of the canal on December 31, 1999. Today, the Panama Canal is a vital economic asset for Panama, generating billions of dollars annually and serving as a symbol of national pride.

<h2>Trump’s Remarks and Panama’s Response</h2>

During his recent remarks, President-elect Trump criticised the tolls charged by the Panama Canal Authority, arguing that they disproportionately harm American businesses. He also raised concerns about Chinese investments in Panama, including infrastructure projects near the canal. These comments align with Trump’s broader “America First” philosophy, which prioritises US economic and strategic dominance.

Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino quickly responded, rejecting Trump’s comments as a challenge to Panamanian sovereignty. Mulino emphasised that the canal is a non-negotiable part of the country’s independence and identity. “The Panama Canal is ours. It represents our sovereignty and is not up for debate,” Mulino stated in an official press release.

Trump’s remarks highlight growing US concerns about China’s expanding presence in Latin America. Beijing has invested heavily in Panamanian infrastructure, including port facilities near the canal, as part of its broader Belt and Road Initiative. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, China is now one of Panama’s largest trading partners, sparking fears in Washington that Beijing’s economic influence could translate into strategic leverage.

Watch:&nbsp;Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-threatens-to-reassert-us-control-over-panama-canal-786102/embed" width="560"></iframe>

<h2>The Modern Role of the Panama Canal</h2>

The Panama Canal remains a critical artery for global commerce, facilitating the passage of approximately five per cent of the world’s maritime trade. Its strategic importance extends beyond economics, serving as a vital link in supply chains for goods ranging from oil to consumer electronics. For Panama, the canal is an economic lifeline, generating billions of dollars in revenue and supporting thousands of jobs.

In 2016, the canal underwent a $5.25 billion expansion, adding a third set of locks to accommodate larger ships, known as Neopanamax vessels. This upgrade has reinforced the canal’s relevance in a rapidly changing global trade landscape.

For the United States, the canal remains a strategic asset. While the Torrijos-Carter Treaties formalised the transfer of ownership, the canal’s efficient operation and neutrality are essential for US shipping and military logistics. However, China’s investments in Panama have added a layer of complexity to this dynamic, raising questions about the balance of power in the region.

Despite a significant decline in ship crossings due to water shortages and a sharp drop in rainfall in 2023, the Panama Canal saw a remarkable 15 per cent&nbsp;revenue increase to nearly $5 billion, buoyed by higher tolls and special auction fees that reached up to $4 million per passage, according to the New York Times.&nbsp;

The canal authority introduced significant toll increases before the water crisis, which helped offset the financial impact of reduced ship traffic caused by low water levels.&nbsp;

Shipping companies were willing to pay substantial sums, up to $4 million per passage, to secure one of the limited crossings. However, continued delays and rising costs may prompt shipping companies to explore alternative routes, such as the Suez Canal or circumnavigating Africa.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029">Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>

<h2>Legal and Diplomatic Challenges</h2>

Trump’s suggestion to demand the return of the Panama Canal faces significant legal and diplomatic obstacles. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties are internationally recognised agreements, and any attempt to renegotiate or reverse them could strain US-Latin American relations, which have already been tested in recent years.

Moreover, demanding the canal’s return risks alienating Panama, a key regional partner. Analysts argue that such rhetoric could push Panama closer to China, undermining US efforts to counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Western Hemisphere.

<h2>Geopolitical Implications</h2>

The Panama Canal’s importance goes beyond trade. In an era of heightened US-China competition, control of critical infrastructure like the canal has taken on new strategic significance. While Trump’s concerns about China’s investments are shared by many policymakers in Washington, experts caution that provocative demands could backfire, weakening US influence in Latin America.

Instead, analysts suggest that the US focus on strengthening partnerships with Panama and other Latin American nations. By investing in regional development and fostering economic ties, the US can counterbalance China’s presence without resorting to contentious demands.

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

The Panama Canal has become a symbol of sovereignty, cooperation, and global trade for Panama. While Donald Trump's remarks may resonate with many, any attempt to reclaim it would face significant opposition and risk destabilising US-Latin American relations. Ultimately, the US would need to carefully weigh whether reasserting control over the canal is worth the potential costs and consequences, considering the fragile balance of regional diplomacy and the canal's enduring importance in global commerce.

US President-elect Donald Trump has ignited controversy with remarks suggesting that the United States should consider demanding the return of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump criticised the high tolls imposed by the Panama Canal Authority and expressed concerns over growing Chinese influence in Panama, which he argued could pose a strategic risk to US interests.

US President-elect Donald Trump has ignited controversy with remarks suggesting that the United States should consider demanding the return of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump criticised the high tolls imposed by the Panama Canal Authority and expressed concerns over growing Chinese influence in Panama, which he argued could pose a strategic risk to US interests. Panama’s President, José Raúl Mulino, swiftly rejected the remarks, calling the canal an integral part of Panama’s sovereignty. As this issue gains attention, it is worth exploring the history of the Panama Canal, its importance in global trade, and the implications of Trump’s proposal. The History of the Panama Canal The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, is one of the most significant engineering achievements in history. Stretching approximately 50 miles across the Isthmus of Panama, the canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, dramatically reducing maritime travel times by eliminating the need to navigate around South America’s Cape Horn. This shortcut transformed global trade, enabling faster and more efficient movement of goods. Also read | Panama rubbishes Donald Trump's threat to take control of Canal The canal’s construction was originally attempted by French engineers in the late 19th century but failed due to financial mismanagement, engineering challenges, and deadly tropical diseases like malaria and yellow fever. In the early 20th century, the United States stepped in, purchasing the French assets and securing the rights to complete the canal. The US role in the canal’s construction was closely tied to Panama’s independence from Colombia. In 1903, the US supported Panama’s bid for independence, and shortly after, the newly established Panamanian government signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the US control over the canal zone in perpetuity. The canal opened in 1914, operated and maintained by the US, and became a cornerstone of American strategic and economic power. The Struggle for Panamanian Sovereignty While the canal was a point of pride for American engineering, it became a source of resentment in Panama. The canal zone, a US-controlled territory, created economic disparities and fuelled anti-American sentiment among Panamanians. Calls for sovereignty over the canal grew louder in the mid-20th century, culminating in the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977. These agreements, negotiated by US President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos, set a timeline for the gradual transfer of the canal to Panama. Over 22 years, control was handed over step by step, with Panama officially taking full ownership of the canal on December 31, 1999. Today, the Panama Canal is a vital economic asset for Panama, generating billions of dollars annually and serving as a symbol of national pride. Trump’s Remarks and Panama’s Response During his recent remarks, President-elect Trump criticised the tolls charged by the Panama Canal Authority, arguing that they disproportionately harm American businesses. He also raised concerns about Chinese investments in Panama, including infrastructure projects near the canal. These comments align with Trump’s broader “America First” philosophy, which prioritises US economic and strategic dominance. Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino quickly responded, rejecting Trump’s comments as a challenge to Panamanian sovereignty. Mulino emphasised that the canal is a non-negotiable part of the country’s independence and identity. “The Panama Canal is ours. It represents our sovereignty and is not up for debate,” Mulino stated in an official press release. Trump’s remarks highlight growing US concerns about China’s expanding presence in Latin America. Beijing has invested heavily in Panamanian infrastructure, including port facilities near the canal, as part of its broader Belt and Road Initiative. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, China is now one of Panama’s largest trading partners, sparking fears in Washington that Beijing’s economic influence could translate into strategic leverage. Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal The Modern Role of the Panama Canal The Panama Canal remains a critical artery for global commerce, facilitating the passage of approximately five per cent of the world’s maritime trade. Its strategic importance extends beyond economics, serving as a vital link in supply chains for goods ranging from oil to consumer electronics. For Panama, the canal is an economic lifeline, generating billions of dollars in revenue and supporting thousands of jobs. In 2016, the canal underwent a $5.25 billion expansion, adding a third set of locks to accommodate larger ships, known as Neopanamax vessels. This upgrade has reinforced the canal’s relevance in a rapidly changing global trade landscape. For the United States, the canal remains a strategic asset. While the Torrijos-Carter Treaties formalised the transfer of ownership, the canal’s efficient operation and neutrality are essential for US shipping and military logistics. However, China’s investments in Panama have added a layer of complexity to this dynamic, raising questions about the balance of power in the region. Despite a significant decline in ship crossings due to water shortages and a sharp drop in rainfall in 2023, the Panama Canal saw a remarkable 15 per cent revenue increase to nearly $5 billion, buoyed by higher tolls and special auction fees that reached up to $4 million per passage, according to the New York Times. The canal authority introduced significant toll increases before the water crisis, which helped offset the financial impact of reduced ship traffic caused by low water levels. Shipping companies were willing to pay substantial sums, up to $4 million per passage, to secure one of the limited crossings. However, continued delays and rising costs may prompt shipping companies to explore alternative routes, such as the Suez Canal or circumnavigating Africa. Also read | Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control Legal and Diplomatic Challenges Trump’s suggestion to demand the return of the Panama Canal faces significant legal and diplomatic obstacles. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties are internationally recognised agreements, and any attempt to renegotiate or reverse them could strain US-Latin American relations, which have already been tested in recent years. Moreover, demanding the canal’s return risks alienating Panama, a key regional partner. Analysts argue that such rhetoric could push Panama closer to China, undermining US efforts to counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Western Hemisphere. Geopolitical Implications The Panama Canal’s importance goes beyond trade. In an era of heightened US-China competition, control of critical infrastructure like the canal has taken on new strategic significance. While Trump’s concerns about China’s investments are shared by many policymakers in Washington, experts caution that provocative demands could backfire, weakening US influence in Latin America. Instead, analysts suggest that the US focus on strengthening partnerships with Panama and other Latin American nations. By investing in regional development and fostering economic ties, the US can counterbalance China’s presence without resorting to contentious demands. Conclusion The Panama Canal has become a symbol of sovereignty, cooperation, and global trade for Panama. While Donald Trump's remarks may resonate with many, any attempt to reclaim it would face significant opposition and risk destabilising US-Latin American relations. Ultimately, the US would need to carefully weigh whether reasserting control over the canal is worth the potential costs and consequences, considering the fragile balance of regional diplomacy and the canal's enduring importance in global commerce.

President-elect Trump threatens to demand return of Panama Canal: History and significance explained

New York, United States
US President-elect Donald Trump has ignited controversy with remarks suggesting that the United States should consider demanding the return of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump criticised the high tolls imposed by the Panama Canal Authority and expressed concerns over growing Chinese influence in Panama, which he argued could pose a strategic risk to US interests.
Panama’s President, José Raúl Mulino, swiftly rejected the remarks, calling the canal an integral part of Panama’s sovereignty. As this issue gains attention, it is worth exploring the history of the Panama Canal, its importance in global trade, and the implications of Trump’s proposal.
<h2>The History of the Panama Canal</h2>
The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, is one of the most significant engineering achievements in history. Stretching approximately 50 miles across the Isthmus of Panama, the canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, dramatically reducing maritime travel times by eliminating the need to navigate around South America’s Cape Horn. This shortcut transformed global trade, enabling faster and more efficient movement of goods.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/panama-rubbishes-trumps-promise-to-take-control-of-canal-786198">Panama rubbishes Donald Trump's threat to take control of Canal</a>
The canal’s construction was originally attempted by French engineers in the late 19th century but failed due to financial mismanagement, engineering challenges, and deadly tropical diseases like malaria and yellow fever. In the early 20th century, the United States stepped in, purchasing the French assets and securing the rights to complete the canal.
The US role in the canal’s construction was closely tied to Panama’s independence from Colombia. In 1903, the US supported Panama’s bid for independence, and shortly after, the newly established Panamanian government signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the US control over the canal zone in perpetuity. The canal opened in 1914, operated and maintained by the US, and became a cornerstone of American strategic and economic power.
<h2>The Struggle for Panamanian Sovereignty</h2>
While the canal was a point of pride for American engineering, it became a source of resentment in Panama. The canal zone, a US-controlled territory, created economic disparities and fuelled anti-American sentiment among Panamanians. Calls for sovereignty over the canal grew louder in the mid-20th century, culminating in the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977.
These agreements, negotiated by US President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos, set a timeline for the gradual transfer of the canal to Panama. Over 22 years, control was handed over step by step, with Panama officially taking full ownership of the canal on December 31, 1999. Today, the Panama Canal is a vital economic asset for Panama, generating billions of dollars annually and serving as a symbol of national pride.
<h2>Trump’s Remarks and Panama’s Response</h2>
During his recent remarks, President-elect Trump criticised the tolls charged by the Panama Canal Authority, arguing that they disproportionately harm American businesses. He also raised concerns about Chinese investments in Panama, including infrastructure projects near the canal. These comments align with Trump’s broader “America First” philosophy, which prioritises US economic and strategic dominance.
Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino quickly responded, rejecting Trump’s comments as a challenge to Panamanian sovereignty. Mulino emphasised that the canal is a non-negotiable part of the country’s independence and identity. “The Panama Canal is ours. It represents our sovereignty and is not up for debate,” Mulino stated in an official press release.
Trump’s remarks highlight growing US concerns about China’s expanding presence in Latin America. Beijing has invested heavily in Panamanian infrastructure, including port facilities near the canal, as part of its broader Belt and Road Initiative. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, China is now one of Panama’s largest trading partners, sparking fears in Washington that Beijing’s economic influence could translate into strategic leverage.
Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal
<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://cdn.thepublive.com/wion/static/kaltura_player/wion_video_player_iframe.html?thumbnail=wion/media/post_attachments/files/2024/12/23/2312_panama_930am-1734930610-00000003.jpg&videourl=https://vodakm.zeenews.com/vod/WION/2312_panama_930am.mp4/index.m3u8&duration=195&tags=Donald Trump,US,Panama,Panama canal" width="560"></iframe>
<h2>The Modern Role of the Panama Canal</h2>
The Panama Canal remains a critical artery for global commerce, facilitating the passage of approximately five per cent of the world’s maritime trade. Its strategic importance extends beyond economics, serving as a vital link in supply chains for goods ranging from oil to consumer electronics. For Panama, the canal is an economic lifeline, generating billions of dollars in revenue and supporting thousands of jobs.
In 2016, the canal underwent a $5.25 billion expansion, adding a third set of locks to accommodate larger ships, known as Neopanamax vessels. This upgrade has reinforced the canal’s relevance in a rapidly changing global trade landscape.
For the United States, the canal remains a strategic asset. While the Torrijos-Carter Treaties formalised the transfer of ownership, the canal’s efficient operation and neutrality are essential for US shipping and military logistics. However, China’s investments in Panama have added a layer of complexity to this dynamic, raising questions about the balance of power in the region.
Despite a significant decline in ship crossings due to water shortages and a sharp drop in rainfall in 2023, the Panama Canal saw a remarkable 15 per cent revenue increase to nearly $5 billion, buoyed by higher tolls and special auction fees that reached up to $4 million per passage, according to the New York Times. 
The canal authority introduced significant toll increases before the water crisis, which helped offset the financial impact of reduced ship traffic caused by low water levels. 
Shipping companies were willing to pay substantial sums, up to $4 million per passage, to secure one of the limited crossings. However, continued delays and rising costs may prompt shipping companies to explore alternative routes, such as the Suez Canal or circumnavigating Africa.
Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029">Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>
<h2>Legal and Diplomatic Challenges</h2>
Trump’s suggestion to demand the return of the Panama Canal faces significant legal and diplomatic obstacles. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties are internationally recognised agreements, and any attempt to renegotiate or reverse them could strain US-Latin American relations, which have already been tested in recent years.
Moreover, demanding the canal’s return risks alienating Panama, a key regional partner. Analysts argue that such rhetoric could push Panama closer to China, undermining US efforts to counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Western Hemisphere.
<h2>Geopolitical Implications</h2>
The Panama Canal’s importance goes beyond trade. In an era of heightened US-China competition, control of critical infrastructure like the canal has taken on new strategic significance. While Trump’s concerns about China’s investments are shared by many policymakers in Washington, experts caution that provocative demands could backfire, weakening US influence in Latin America.
Instead, analysts suggest that the US focus on strengthening partnerships with Panama and other Latin American nations. By investing in regional development and fostering economic ties, the US can counterbalance China’s presence without resorting to contentious demands.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
The Panama Canal has become a symbol of sovereignty, cooperation, and global trade for Panama. While Donald Trump's remarks may resonate with many, any attempt to reclaim it would face significant opposition and risk destabilising US-Latin American relations. Ultimately, the US would need to carefully weigh whether reasserting control over the canal is worth the potential costs and consequences, considering the fragile balance of regional diplomacy and the canal's enduring importance in global commerce.

As this issue gains attention, it is worth exploring the history of the Panama Canal, its importance in global trade, and the implications of Trump’s proposal



New York, United States US President-elect Donald Trump has ignited controversy with remarks suggesting that the United States should consider demanding the return of the Panama Canal. Speaking at a recent event, Trump criticised the high tolls imposed by the Panama Canal Authority and expressed concerns over growing Chinese influence in Panama, which he argued could pose a strategic risk to US interests. Panama’s President, José Raúl Mulino, swiftly rejected the remarks, calling the canal an integral part of Panama’s sovereignty. As this issue gains attention, it is worth exploring the history of the Panama Canal, its importance in global trade, and the implications of Trump’s proposal. The History of the Panama Canal The Panama Canal, completed in 1914, is one of the most significant engineering achievements in history. Stretching approximately 50 miles across the Isthmus of Panama, the canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, dramatically reducing maritime travel times by eliminating the need to navigate around South America’s Cape Horn. This shortcut transformed global trade, enabling faster and more efficient movement of goods. Also read | Panama rubbishes Donald Trump's threat to take control of Canal The canal’s construction was originally attempted by French engineers in the late 19th century but failed due to financial mismanagement, engineering challenges, and deadly tropical diseases like malaria and yellow fever. In the early 20th century, the United States stepped in, purchasing the French assets and securing the rights to complete the canal. The US role in the canal’s construction was closely tied to Panama’s independence from Colombia. In 1903, the US supported Panama’s bid for independence, and shortly after, the newly established Panamanian government signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, granting the US control over the canal zone in perpetuity. The canal opened in 1914, operated and maintained by the US, and became a cornerstone of American strategic and economic power. The Struggle for Panamanian Sovereignty While the canal was a point of pride for American engineering, it became a source of resentment in Panama. The canal zone, a US-controlled territory, created economic disparities and fuelled anti-American sentiment among Panamanians. Calls for sovereignty over the canal grew louder in the mid-20th century, culminating in the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties in 1977. These agreements, negotiated by US President Jimmy Carter and Panamanian leader Omar Torrijos, set a timeline for the gradual transfer of the canal to Panama. Over 22 years, control was handed over step by step, with Panama officially taking full ownership of the canal on December 31, 1999. Today, the Panama Canal is a vital economic asset for Panama, generating billions of dollars annually and serving as a symbol of national pride. Trump’s Remarks and Panama’s Response During his recent remarks, President-elect Trump criticised the tolls charged by the Panama Canal Authority, arguing that they disproportionately harm American businesses. He also raised concerns about Chinese investments in Panama, including infrastructure projects near the canal. These comments align with Trump’s broader “America First” philosophy, which prioritises US economic and strategic dominance. Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino quickly responded, rejecting Trump’s comments as a challenge to Panamanian sovereignty. Mulino emphasised that the canal is a non-negotiable part of the country’s independence and identity. “The Panama Canal is ours. It represents our sovereignty and is not up for debate,” Mulino stated in an official press release. Trump’s remarks highlight growing US concerns about China’s expanding presence in Latin America. Beijing has invested heavily in Panamanian infrastructure, including port facilities near the canal, as part of its broader Belt and Road Initiative. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, China is now one of Panama’s largest trading partners, sparking fears in Washington that Beijing’s economic influence could translate into strategic leverage. Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal The Modern Role of the Panama Canal The Panama Canal remains a critical artery for global commerce, facilitating the passage of approximately five per cent of the world’s maritime trade. Its strategic importance extends beyond economics, serving as a vital link in supply chains for goods ranging from oil to consumer electronics. For Panama, the canal is an economic lifeline, generating billions of dollars in revenue and supporting thousands of jobs. In 2016, the canal underwent a $5.25 billion expansion, adding a third set of locks to accommodate larger ships, known as Neopanamax vessels. This upgrade has reinforced the canal’s relevance in a rapidly changing global trade landscape. For the United States, the canal remains a strategic asset. While the Torrijos-Carter Treaties formalised the transfer of ownership, the canal’s efficient operation and neutrality are essential for US shipping and military logistics. However, China’s investments in Panama have added a layer of complexity to this dynamic, raising questions about the balance of power in the region. Despite a significant decline in ship crossings due to water shortages and a sharp drop in rainfall in 2023, the Panama Canal saw a remarkable 15 per cent revenue increase to nearly $5 billion, buoyed by higher tolls and special auction fees that reached up to $4 million per passage, according to the New York Times. The canal authority introduced significant toll increases before the water crisis, which helped offset the financial impact of reduced ship traffic caused by low water levels. Shipping companies were willing to pay substantial sums, up to $4 million per passage, to secure one of the limited crossings. However, continued delays and rising costs may prompt shipping companies to explore alternative routes, such as the Suez Canal or circumnavigating Africa. Also read | Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control Legal and Diplomatic Challenges Trump’s suggestion to demand the return of the Panama Canal faces significant legal and diplomatic obstacles. The Torrijos-Carter Treaties are internationally recognised agreements, and any attempt to renegotiate or reverse them could strain US-Latin American relations, which have already been tested in recent years. Moreover, demanding the canal’s return risks alienating Panama, a key regional partner. Analysts argue that such rhetoric could push Panama closer to China, undermining US efforts to counter Beijing’s growing influence in the Western Hemisphere. Geopolitical Implications The Panama Canal’s importance goes beyond trade. In an era of heightened US-China competition, control of critical infrastructure like the canal has taken on new strategic significance. While Trump’s concerns about China’s investments are shared by many policymakers in Washington, experts caution that provocative demands could backfire, weakening US influence in Latin America. Instead, analysts suggest that the US focus on strengthening partnerships with Panama and other Latin American nations. By investing in regional development and fostering economic ties, the US can counterbalance China’s presence without resorting to contentious demands. Conclusion The Panama Canal has become a symbol of sovereignty, cooperation, and global trade for Panama. While Donald Trump's remarks may resonate with many, any attempt to reclaim it would face significant opposition and risk destabilising US-Latin American relations. Ultimately, the US would need to carefully weigh whether reasserting control over the canal is worth the potential costs and consequences, considering the fragile balance of regional diplomacy and the canal's enduring importance in global commerce.

Washington, United States
US President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that the United States should buy and take control of Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for national security.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." Greenland, while geographically part of North America, is an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark.
Responding to Trump's comments Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede said, “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.”
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-musk-not-gonna-be-president-vows-to-make-male-and-female-the-only-two-legal-genders-in-us-786064" target="_blank">Trump says Musk 'not gonna be president,' vows to make 'male and female' the only two legal genders in US</a>
This is not the first time Trump has shown interest in buying Greenland. During his first term as president, he suggested the idea of purchasing the island and even cancelled a state visit to Denmark after Danish officials dismissed the proposal.
At the time, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said, “Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland. I strongly hope that this is not meant seriously,” during a visit to the island in 2019.
The United States already maintains a presence in Greenland through the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) on the island’s northwest coast. The US has considered acquiring Greenland on multiple occasions since 1867.
Trump’s recent comments about Greenland come after another controversial demand, where he called on Panamanian authorities to lower transit fees for US ships using the Panama Canal or return control of the canal to the United States.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029" target="_blank">Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>
In response to Trump’s comments, Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino posted on social media platform X, “I want to express precisely that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama, and will continue to.”
Mulino added, “The sovereignty and independence of our country are not negotiable. Every Panamanian, here or anywhere in the world, carries it in their heart, and it is part of our history of struggle and irreversible conquest.”
(With inputs from agencies)





In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." Greenland, while geographically part of North America, is an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark.



Washington, United States US President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that the United States should buy and take control of Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for national security. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." Greenland, while geographically part of North America, is an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark. Responding to Trump's comments Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede said, “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.” Also read: Trump says Musk 'not gonna be president,' vows to make 'male and female' the only two legal genders in US This is not the first time Trump has shown interest in buying Greenland. During his first term as president, he suggested the idea of purchasing the island and even cancelled a state visit to Denmark after Danish officials dismissed the proposal. At the time, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said, “Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland. I strongly hope that this is not meant seriously,” during a visit to the island in 2019. The United States already maintains a presence in Greenland through the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) on the island’s northwest coast. The US has considered acquiring Greenland on multiple occasions since 1867. Trump’s recent comments about Greenland come after another controversial demand, where he called on Panamanian authorities to lower transit fees for US ships using the Panama Canal or return control of the canal to the United States. Also read: Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control In response to Trump’s comments, Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino posted on social media platform X, “I want to express precisely that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama, and will continue to.” Mulino added, “The sovereignty and independence of our country are not negotiable. Every Panamanian, here or anywhere in the world, carries it in their heart, and it is part of our history of struggle and irreversible conquest.” (With inputs from agencies)

‘We are not for sale,’ Greenland PM rebuffs Trump’s idea of buying the island

Panama
Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday dismissed recent threats made by US President-elect Donald Trump to retake control of the Panama Canal over complaints of "unfair" treatment of American ships.
"Every square metre of the Panama Canal and its adjacent areas belongs to Panama and will continue belonging to Panama," Mulino said in a video posted to X.
Mulino's public comments, though never mentioning Trump by name, come a day after the president-elect complained about the canal on his Truth Social platform.
"Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous," he said.
Also read: <a data-ved="2ahUKEwinv-vN4r2KAxUG0DQHHccgCzoQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029&amp;ved=2ahUKEwinv-vN4r2KAxUG0DQHHccgCzoQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE">Trump accuses Panama of `ripping off` the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>
Trump also complained of China's growing influence around the canal, a worrying trend for American interests as US businesses depend on the channel to move goods between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
"It was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else," Trump said. "We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!"
The Panama Canal, which was completed by the United States in 1914, was returned to the Central American country under a 1977 deal signed by Democratic president Jimmy Carter.
<h2>Panama took full control in 1999.</h2>
Trump said that if Panama could not ensure "the secure, efficient and reliable operation" of the channel, "then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question."
Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal
<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://cdn.thepublive.com/wion/static/kaltura_player/wion_video_player_iframe.html?thumbnail=wion/media/post_attachments/files/2024/12/23/2312_panama_930am-1734930610-00000003.jpg&videourl=https://vodakm.zeenews.com/vod/WION/2312_panama_930am.mp4/index.m3u8&duration=195&tags=Donald Trump,US,Panama,Panama canal" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>
Mulino rejected Trump's claims in his video message, though he also said he hopes to have "a good and respectful relationship" with the incoming administration.
"The canal has no direct or indirect control from China, nor the European Union, nor the United States or any other power," Mulino said. "As a Panamanian, I reject any manifestation that misrepresents this reality."
Later on Sunday, Trump responded to Mulino's dismissal, writing on Truth Social: "We'll see about that!"
Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The Panama Canal, which was completed by the United States in 1914, was returned to the Central American country under a 1977 deal signed by Democratic president Jimmy Carter.



Panama Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday dismissed recent threats made by US President-elect Donald Trump to retake control of the Panama Canal over complaints of "unfair" treatment of American ships. "Every square metre of the Panama Canal and its adjacent areas belongs to Panama and will continue belonging to Panama," Mulino said in a video posted to X. Mulino's public comments, though never mentioning Trump by name, come a day after the president-elect complained about the canal on his Truth Social platform. "Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous," he said. Also read: Trump accuses Panama of `ripping off` the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control Trump also complained of China's growing influence around the canal, a worrying trend for American interests as US businesses depend on the channel to move goods between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. "It was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else," Trump said. "We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!" The Panama Canal, which was completed by the United States in 1914, was returned to the Central American country under a 1977 deal signed by Democratic president Jimmy Carter. Panama took full control in 1999. Trump said that if Panama could not ensure "the secure, efficient and reliable operation" of the channel, "then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question." Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal × Mulino rejected Trump's claims in his video message, though he also said he hopes to have "a good and respectful relationship" with the incoming administration. "The canal has no direct or indirect control from China, nor the European Union, nor the United States or any other power," Mulino said. "As a Panamanian, I reject any manifestation that misrepresents this reality." Later on Sunday, Trump responded to Mulino's dismissal, writing on Truth Social: "We'll see about that!" Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Panama rubbishes Donald Trump's threat to take control of Canal

The Panama canal, a critical maritime passage connecting the pacific and Atlantic oceans, has become the center of fresh controversy. President-elect Donald trump, addressing supporters in Arizona, criticized Panama for charging what he described as 'excessive rates' for canal usage.

Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal

US President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that the United States should buy and take control of Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for national security.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." Greenland, while geographically part of North America, is an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark.

Responding to Trump's comments Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede said, “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.”

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-musk-not-gonna-be-president-vows-to-make-male-and-female-the-only-two-legal-genders-in-us-786064" target="_blank">Trump says Musk 'not gonna be president,' vows to make 'male and female' the only two legal genders in US</a>

This is not the first time Trump has shown interest in buying Greenland. During his first term as president, he suggested the idea of purchasing the island and even cancelled a state visit to Denmark after Danish officials dismissed the proposal.

At the time, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said, “Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland. I strongly hope that this is not meant seriously,” during a visit to the island in 2019.

The United States already maintains a presence in Greenland through the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) on the island’s northwest coast. The US has considered acquiring Greenland on multiple occasions since 1867.

Trump’s recent comments about Greenland come after another controversial demand, where he called on Panamanian authorities to lower transit fees for US ships using the Panama Canal or return control of the canal to the United States.

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029" target="_blank">Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>

In response to Trump’s comments, Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino posted on social media platform X, “I want to express precisely that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama, and will continue to.”

Mulino added, “The sovereignty and independence of our country are not negotiable. Every Panamanian, here or anywhere in the world, carries it in their heart, and it is part of our history of struggle and irreversible conquest.”

(With inputs from agencies)

US President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that the United States should buy and take control of Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for national security.

US President-elect Donald Trump has once again sparked controversy by suggesting that the United States should buy and take control of Greenland, calling it an "absolute necessity" for national security. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, "For purposes of national security and freedom throughout the world, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." Greenland, while geographically part of North America, is an autonomous territory under the Kingdom of Denmark. Responding to Trump's comments Greenland’s prime minister, Múte Egede said, “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale. We must not lose our long struggle for freedom.” Also read: Trump says Musk 'not gonna be president,' vows to make 'male and female' the only two legal genders in US This is not the first time Trump has shown interest in buying Greenland. During his first term as president, he suggested the idea of purchasing the island and even cancelled a state visit to Denmark after Danish officials dismissed the proposal. At the time, Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said, “Greenland is not for sale. Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland. I strongly hope that this is not meant seriously,” during a visit to the island in 2019. The United States already maintains a presence in Greenland through the Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) on the island’s northwest coast. The US has considered acquiring Greenland on multiple occasions since 1867. Trump’s recent comments about Greenland come after another controversial demand, where he called on Panamanian authorities to lower transit fees for US ships using the Panama Canal or return control of the canal to the United States. Also read: Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control In response to Trump’s comments, Panama’s President José Raúl Mulino posted on social media platform X, “I want to express precisely that every square meter of the Panama Canal and its adjacent area belong to Panama, and will continue to.” Mulino added, “The sovereignty and independence of our country are not negotiable. Every Panamanian, here or anywhere in the world, carries it in their heart, and it is part of our history of struggle and irreversible conquest.” (With inputs from agencies)

Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday dismissed recent threats made by US President-elect Donald Trump to retake control of the Panama Canal over complaints of "unfair" treatment of American ships.

"Every square metre of the Panama Canal and its adjacent areas belongs to Panama and will continue belonging to Panama," Mulino said in a video posted to X.

Mulino's public comments, though never mentioning Trump by name, come a day after the president-elect complained about the canal on his Truth Social platform.

"Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous," he said.

Also read:&nbsp;<a data-ved="2ahUKEwinv-vN4r2KAxUG0DQHHccgCzoQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE" href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029" jsname="YKoRaf" ping="/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;rct=j&amp;opi=89978449&amp;url=https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-accuses-panama-of-ripping-off-the-us-with-excessive-fees-threatens-to-take-back-control-786029&amp;ved=2ahUKEwinv-vN4r2KAxUG0DQHHccgCzoQxfQBKAB6BAgNEAE">Trump accuses Panama of `ripping off` the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control</a>

Trump also complained of China's growing influence around the canal, a worrying trend for American interests as US businesses depend on the channel to move goods between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

"It was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else," Trump said. "We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!"

The Panama Canal, which was completed by the United States in 1914, was returned to the Central American country under a 1977 deal signed by Democratic president Jimmy Carter.

<h2>Panama took full control in 1999.</h2>

Trump said that if Panama could not ensure "the secure, efficient and reliable operation" of the channel, "then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question."

Watch:&nbsp;Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-threatens-to-reassert-us-control-over-panama-canal-786102/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Mulino rejected Trump's claims in his video message, though he also said he hopes to have "a good and respectful relationship" with the incoming administration.

"The canal has no direct or indirect control from China, nor the European Union, nor the United States or any other power," Mulino said. "As a Panamanian, I reject any manifestation that misrepresents this reality."

Later on Sunday, Trump responded to Mulino's dismissal, writing on Truth Social: "We'll see about that!"

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION&nbsp;audience. 
&nbsp;

Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday dismissed recent threats made by US President-elect Donald Trump to retake control of the Panama Canal over complaints of "unfair" treatment of American ships.

Panama's president Jose Raul Mulino on Sunday dismissed recent threats made by US President-elect Donald Trump to retake control of the Panama Canal over complaints of "unfair" treatment of American ships. "Every square metre of the Panama Canal and its adjacent areas belongs to Panama and will continue belonging to Panama," Mulino said in a video posted to X. Mulino's public comments, though never mentioning Trump by name, come a day after the president-elect complained about the canal on his Truth Social platform. "Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous," he said. Also read: Trump accuses Panama of `ripping off` the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control Trump also complained of China's growing influence around the canal, a worrying trend for American interests as US businesses depend on the channel to move goods between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. "It was solely for Panama to manage, not China, or anyone else," Trump said. "We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!" The Panama Canal, which was completed by the United States in 1914, was returned to the Central American country under a 1977 deal signed by Democratic president Jimmy Carter. Panama took full control in 1999. Trump said that if Panama could not ensure "the secure, efficient and reliable operation" of the channel, "then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question." Watch: Donald Trump Threatens to Reassert US Control Over Panama Canal × Mulino rejected Trump's claims in his video message, though he also said he hopes to have "a good and respectful relationship" with the incoming administration. "The canal has no direct or indirect control from China, nor the European Union, nor the United States or any other power," Mulino said. "As a Panamanian, I reject any manifestation that misrepresents this reality." Later on Sunday, Trump responded to Mulino's dismissal, writing on Truth Social: "We'll see about that!" Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Washington, United States
<meta content="uuideUeZlDdSGjH0" name="uuid"/>
President-elect Donald Trump has called for the Panama Canal to be returned to the United States if Panama fails to manage it in a manner he deems acceptable. He also criticised the Central American country for allegedly imposing excessive charges on vessels using the vital waterway.
“Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the US. This complete 'rip-off' of our country will immediately stop,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday (December 21).
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-firmly-opposes-outgoing-us-president-bidens-approval-5713-mn-military-aid-for-taiwan-786021" target="_blank">China 'firmly opposes' outgoing US President Biden's approval $571.3 mn military aid for Taiwan</a>
“If the moral and legal principles of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” he said.
In a Saturday evening post on Truth Social, Trump expressed concerns about the canal potentially being influenced by China. “It was solely for Panama to manage, not China or anyone else. We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!,” he wrote.
Although Trump suggested a potential Chinese role in managing the canal, China does not control or operate it. However, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings does manage two ports near the canal’s entrances on the Caribbean and Pacific sides.
Trump described the Panama Canal as a “vital national asset” for the US, stressing its importance for both commerce and national security. His remarks marked an unusual instance of a US leader suggesting the possibility of pressuring a sovereign nation to relinquish control of its territory.
Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tensions-in-red-sea-rise-as-two-us-navy-pilots-shot-down-in-friendly-fire-amid-houthi-rebel-response-785946" target="_blank">Two US Navy pilots shot down in 'friendly fire' incident over Red Sea</a>
Panamanian officials have not yet responded to Trump’s comments.
The United States largely built the canal, which opened in 1914. For decades, the US managed the surrounding territory before transferring full control of the canal to Panama in 1999 after a period of shared administration.
The canal's fees range from $0.50 to $300,000 depending on the vessel's size, making it a critical yet costly route for global trade. The United States remains the canal’s largest user, followed by China and Japan.
Trump is set to be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States on Monday, 20 January.
(With inputs from agencies)

“Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the US. This complete 'rip-off' of our country will immediately stop,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday (December 21).



Washington, United States President-elect Donald Trump has called for the Panama Canal to be returned to the United States if Panama fails to manage it in a manner he deems acceptable. He also criticised the Central American country for allegedly imposing excessive charges on vessels using the vital waterway. “Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the US. This complete 'rip-off' of our country will immediately stop,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday (December 21). Also read: China 'firmly opposes' outgoing US President Biden's approval $571.3 mn military aid for Taiwan “If the moral and legal principles of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” he said. In a Saturday evening post on Truth Social, Trump expressed concerns about the canal potentially being influenced by China. “It was solely for Panama to manage, not China or anyone else. We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!,” he wrote. Although Trump suggested a potential Chinese role in managing the canal, China does not control or operate it. However, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings does manage two ports near the canal’s entrances on the Caribbean and Pacific sides. Trump described the Panama Canal as a “vital national asset” for the US, stressing its importance for both commerce and national security. His remarks marked an unusual instance of a US leader suggesting the possibility of pressuring a sovereign nation to relinquish control of its territory. Also read: Two US Navy pilots shot down in 'friendly fire' incident over Red Sea Panamanian officials have not yet responded to Trump’s comments. The United States largely built the canal, which opened in 1914. For decades, the US managed the surrounding territory before transferring full control of the canal to Panama in 1999 after a period of shared administration. The canal's fees range from $0.50 to $300,000 depending on the vessel's size, making it a critical yet costly route for global trade. The United States remains the canal’s largest user, followed by China and Japan. Trump is set to be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States on Monday, 20 January. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump accuses Panama of 'ripping off' the US with excessive fees, threatens to take back control

President-elect Donald Trump has called for the Panama Canal to be returned to the United States if Panama fails to manage it in a manner he deems acceptable. He also criticised the Central American country for allegedly imposing excessive charges on vessels using the vital waterway.

President-elect Donald Trump has called for the Panama Canal to be returned to the United States if Panama fails to manage it in a manner he deems acceptable. He also criticised the Central American country for allegedly imposing excessive charges on vessels using the vital waterway. “Our Navy and Commerce have been treated in a very unfair and injudicious way. The fees being charged by Panama are ridiculous, especially knowing the extraordinary generosity that has been bestowed to Panama by the US. This complete 'rip-off' of our country will immediately stop,” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Saturday (December 21). Also read: China 'firmly opposes' outgoing US President Biden's approval $571.3 mn military aid for Taiwan “If the moral and legal principles of this magnanimous gesture of giving are not followed, then we will demand that the Panama Canal be returned to us, in full, and without question,” he said. In a Saturday evening post on Truth Social, Trump expressed concerns about the canal potentially being influenced by China. “It was solely for Panama to manage, not China or anyone else. We would and will NEVER let it fall into the wrong hands!,” he wrote. Although Trump suggested a potential Chinese role in managing the canal, China does not control or operate it. However, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings does manage two ports near the canal’s entrances on the Caribbean and Pacific sides. Trump described the Panama Canal as a “vital national asset” for the US, stressing its importance for both commerce and national security. His remarks marked an unusual instance of a US leader suggesting the possibility of pressuring a sovereign nation to relinquish control of its territory. Also read: Two US Navy pilots shot down in 'friendly fire' incident over Red Sea Panamanian officials have not yet responded to Trump’s comments. The United States largely built the canal, which opened in 1914. For decades, the US managed the surrounding territory before transferring full control of the canal to Panama in 1999 after a period of shared administration. The canal's fees range from $0.50 to $300,000 depending on the vessel's size, making it a critical yet costly route for global trade. The United States remains the canal’s largest user, followed by China and Japan. Trump is set to be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States on Monday, 20 January. (With inputs from agencies)

The United States has had 46 presidents to date, with 45 men serving in the position. As per Article Two of the United States Constitution, a person must be at least 35 years old to be eligible to take office.&nbsp;

The youngest person to have served as the US president is Theodore Roosevelt. He took office at the age of 42 in 1901 after William McKinley was assassinated. He served as the 26th president of the United States, from 1901 to 1909. He is ranked as one of the greatest American presidents.

Roosevelt's personal life was quite tragic. His first wife died two days after giving birth to their daughter of kidney failure in February&nbsp;1884. On the same day, Roosevelt's mother Martha also passed away from typhoid fever. He remarried on December 2, 1886.

Earlier, he was the 33rd governor of New York for two years, taking office in 1898. He later assumed the role of vice president under President McKinley for six months in 1901.&nbsp;

Roosevelt was behind initiating the construction of the Panama Canal. He appointed John Findley Wallace as chief engineer of the Panama Canal Project. However, he resigned because of several logistical issues.

Roosevelt became the first American to win a Nobel Prize when he was awarded the 1906 Nobel Peace Prize for ending the Russo-Japanese War.

He was the leader of the progressive movement and championed his "Square Deal" domestic policies. It aimed at fairness for all citizens, breaking bad trusts, regulating railroads, and pure food and drugs. He also worked for the conservation of national parks, monuments and forests.&nbsp;

Roosevelt was elected to a full term in 1904 and wanted William Howard Taft to succeed him in 1908. However, it didn't work out and he grew frustrated with his way of working. He tried to win the 1912 Republican presidential nomination but failed.&nbsp;

He then went on to establish the new Progressive Party and ran in the presidential election in 1912. However, Democratic Woodrow Wilson won this time.

Roosevelt went on a four-month expedition to the Amazon basin. Here he caught a tropical disease and nearly died. His health started to decline and he died in 1919.&nbsp;

The United States has had 46 presidents to date, with 45 men serving in the position. As per Article Two of the United States Constitution, a person must be at least 35 years old to be eligible to take office.

The United States has had 46 presidents to date, with 45 men serving in the position. As per Article Two of the United States Constitution, a person must be at least 35 years old to be eligible to take office. The youngest person to have served as the US president is Theodore Roosevelt. He took office at the age of 42 in 1901 after William McKinley was assassinated. He served as the 26th president of the United States, from 1901 to 1909. He is ranked as one of the greatest American presidents. Roosevelt's personal life was quite tragic. His first wife died two days after giving birth to their daughter of kidney failure in February 1884. On the same day, Roosevelt's mother Martha also passed away from typhoid fever. He remarried on December 2, 1886. Earlier, he was the 33rd governor of New York for two years, taking office in 1898. He later assumed the role of vice president under President McKinley for six months in 1901. Roosevelt was behind initiating the construction of the Panama Canal. He appointed John Findley Wallace as chief engineer of the Panama Canal Project. However, he resigned because of several logistical issues. Roosevelt became the first American to win a Nobel Prize when he was awarded the 1906 Nobel Peace Prize for ending the Russo-Japanese War. He was the leader of the progressive movement and championed his "Square Deal" domestic policies. It aimed at fairness for all citizens, breaking bad trusts, regulating railroads, and pure food and drugs. He also worked for the conservation of national parks, monuments and forests. Roosevelt was elected to a full term in 1904 and wanted William Howard Taft to succeed him in 1908. However, it didn't work out and he grew frustrated with his way of working. He tried to win the 1912 Republican presidential nomination but failed. He then went on to establish the new Progressive Party and ran in the presidential election in 1912. However, Democratic Woodrow Wilson won this time. Roosevelt went on a four-month expedition to the Amazon basin. Here he caught a tropical disease and nearly died. His health started to decline and he died in 1919.

The youngest US president was also the first American to win a Nobel Prize

In a major setback for Chinese leader Xi Jinping's objective to expand Beijing's pervasive footprint in Latin America, Nicaragua has cancelled a controversial plan to build a canal linking the Atlantic and the Pacific nearly a decade after it first broke ground.&nbsp;

Critics had flagged the project as a danger to the environment and raised concerns related to the mass displacement of local communities.&nbsp;

A symbolic "ground-breaking" of the canal had taken place in 2014. But no work was done on the canal that was to link Nicaragua’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts.

While workers did break ground on access roads, the digging of the waterway never started.&nbsp;

Besides, thousands of Nicaraguan farmers had protested against land seizures meant to create a route for the government-backed project.

<h2>Why is it significant?</h2>

The project, had it achieved fruition, would have dwarfed the Panama Canal, the biggest transit route in the Americas.&nbsp;

But the canal would have bisected Lake Nicaragua, Central America’s largest lake while leading to the forcible displacement of an estimated 120,000 people, including Rama and Creole communities from protected Indigenous territories on the Caribbean coast.

The proposed $50bn, 172-mile canal across this Central American country was initially viewed as a joke due to the costs involved and the way it would turn the conventional Nicaraguan lifelines upside down.&nbsp;

Also watch |&nbsp;Nicaragua cuts diplomatic ties with Taiwan in favour of Beijing

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nicaragua-cuts-diplomatic-ties-with-taiwan-in-favour-of-beijing-435835/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

However, President Daniel Ortega’s government claimed that the canal would create tens of thousands of jobs.&nbsp;

<h2>China's role in the Nicaragua canal building</h2>

The 50-year canal concession was granted to the Hong Kong-based company HK Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Company, owned by the Chinese businessman Wang Jing.

But even Wang Jing's fortunes plummeted during China's 2015 stock market crisis when he reportedly lost up to 85 per cent of his wealth.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/the-capitals-no-gaza-truce-breakthrough-in-cairo-tories-lose-london-to-sadiq-khan-yet-again-and-more-718274">The Capitals: No Gaza truce breakthrough in Cairo; Tories lose London to Sadiq Khan yet again; and more</a>

Xi Jinping's China has developed regional headquarters of 18 Chinese companies in the Colon Free Zone in Panama, the largest free-trade zone in the Western Hemisphere. With the Nicaragua canal, it intended to expand its pervasive economic presence in the region.&nbsp;

In a major setback for Chinese leader Xi Jinping's objective to expand Beijing's pervasive footprint in Latin America, Nicaragua has cancelled a controversial plan to build a canal linking the Atlantic and the Pacific nearly a decade after it first broke ground.

In a major setback for Chinese leader Xi Jinping's objective to expand Beijing's pervasive footprint in Latin America, Nicaragua has cancelled a controversial plan to build a canal linking the Atlantic and the Pacific nearly a decade after it first broke ground. Critics had flagged the project as a danger to the environment and raised concerns related to the mass displacement of local communities. A symbolic "ground-breaking" of the canal had taken place in 2014. But no work was done on the canal that was to link Nicaragua’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts. While workers did break ground on access roads, the digging of the waterway never started. Besides, thousands of Nicaraguan farmers had protested against land seizures meant to create a route for the government-backed project. Why is it significant? The project, had it achieved fruition, would have dwarfed the Panama Canal, the biggest transit route in the Americas. But the canal would have bisected Lake Nicaragua, Central America’s largest lake while leading to the forcible displacement of an estimated 120,000 people, including Rama and Creole communities from protected Indigenous territories on the Caribbean coast. The proposed $50bn, 172-mile canal across this Central American country was initially viewed as a joke due to the costs involved and the way it would turn the conventional Nicaraguan lifelines upside down. Also watch | Nicaragua cuts diplomatic ties with Taiwan in favour of Beijing × However, President Daniel Ortega’s government claimed that the canal would create tens of thousands of jobs. China's role in the Nicaragua canal building The 50-year canal concession was granted to the Hong Kong-based company HK Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Company, owned by the Chinese businessman Wang Jing. But even Wang Jing's fortunes plummeted during China's 2015 stock market crisis when he reportedly lost up to 85 per cent of his wealth. Also read | The Capitals: No Gaza truce breakthrough in Cairo; Tories lose London to Sadiq Khan yet again; and more Xi Jinping's China has developed regional headquarters of 18 Chinese companies in the Colon Free Zone in Panama, the largest free-trade zone in the Western Hemisphere. With the Nicaragua canal, it intended to expand its pervasive economic presence in the region.

Setback for Xi's China as Nicaragua drops plan to build Atlantic-Pacific canal

Global trade faces turbulent waters as two critical shipping routes grapple with unprecedented challenges. In the red sea, a series of attacks on vessels has disrupted traffic through the suez canal, while on the other side of the world, a severe drought at the panama canal has slowed maritime trade to a crawl.

Global trade plagued by Red Sea attacks & Panama canal drought

Recent attacks on vessels in the Red Sea region and a severe drought at the Panama Canal have disrupted global trade, causing significant slowdowns and redirections in maritime traffic, according to the IMF.

These disruptions have led to longer delivery times and increased shipping costs, affecting companies worldwide.

According to data from the IMF's PortWatch platform, trade volume through critical shipping lanes has been notably impacted, posing challenges to supply chains and economic activities.

The attacks on vessels in the Red Sea area have affected traffic through the Suez Canal, a crucial maritime route linking Asia and Europe.

With about 15 per cent of global maritime trade typically passing through this route, the disruptions have forced several shipping companies to divert their vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, resulting in extended delivery times by an average of 10 days or more.

This redirection has particularly hurt companies with limited inventories, exacerbating supply chain challenges.

Simultaneously, the Panama Canal has faced challenges due to a severe drought, prompting authorities to impose restrictions that have significantly reduced daily ship crossings since October last year.

This slowdown in maritime trade through another vital chokepoint, responsible for about 5 per cent of global maritime trade, has further compounded the disruptions in global trade routes.

These developments have caused concerns over prolonged supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures, as shipping costs surge amidst longer transit times.

Data from the IMF's PortWatch platform reveals major shifts in trade volume across critical shipping lanes.

The volume of trade passing through the Suez Canal witnessed a staggering 50 per cent year-over-year decline in the first two months of the year, while trade transiting around the Cape of Good Hope surged by an estimated 74 percent above last year's levels.

Additionally, transit trade volume through the Panama Canal experienced a nearly 32 per cent drop compared to the previous year, indicating the scale of disruption faced by global trade routes.

The impact of these disruptions extends beyond delays in delivery times and increased shipping costs.

The decline in port calls to key regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the European Union, and the Middle East, reflects the transitory effects of longer shipping times.

This, coupled with potential delays in recording imports and exports due to rerouted shipments, complicates efforts to gauge the true momentum of global trade and economic activity.

Such challenges may lead to distortions in official statistics on recorded imports and exports, affecting assessments of economic performance and fiscal revenues for affected countries.

Recent attacks on vessels in the Red Sea region and a severe drought at the Panama Canal have disrupted global trade, causing significant slowdowns and redirections in maritime traffic, according to the IMF.

Recent attacks on vessels in the Red Sea region and a severe drought at the Panama Canal have disrupted global trade, causing significant slowdowns and redirections in maritime traffic, according to the IMF. These disruptions have led to longer delivery times and increased shipping costs, affecting companies worldwide. According to data from the IMF's PortWatch platform, trade volume through critical shipping lanes has been notably impacted, posing challenges to supply chains and economic activities. The attacks on vessels in the Red Sea area have affected traffic through the Suez Canal, a crucial maritime route linking Asia and Europe. With about 15 per cent of global maritime trade typically passing through this route, the disruptions have forced several shipping companies to divert their vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, resulting in extended delivery times by an average of 10 days or more. This redirection has particularly hurt companies with limited inventories, exacerbating supply chain challenges. Simultaneously, the Panama Canal has faced challenges due to a severe drought, prompting authorities to impose restrictions that have significantly reduced daily ship crossings since October last year. This slowdown in maritime trade through another vital chokepoint, responsible for about 5 per cent of global maritime trade, has further compounded the disruptions in global trade routes. These developments have caused concerns over prolonged supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures, as shipping costs surge amidst longer transit times. Data from the IMF's PortWatch platform reveals major shifts in trade volume across critical shipping lanes. The volume of trade passing through the Suez Canal witnessed a staggering 50 per cent year-over-year decline in the first two months of the year, while trade transiting around the Cape of Good Hope surged by an estimated 74 percent above last year's levels. Additionally, transit trade volume through the Panama Canal experienced a nearly 32 per cent drop compared to the previous year, indicating the scale of disruption faced by global trade routes. The impact of these disruptions extends beyond delays in delivery times and increased shipping costs. The decline in port calls to key regions, such as sub-Saharan Africa, the European Union, and the Middle East, reflects the transitory effects of longer shipping times. This, coupled with potential delays in recording imports and exports due to rerouted shipments, complicates efforts to gauge the true momentum of global trade and economic activity. Such challenges may lead to distortions in official statistics on recorded imports and exports, affecting assessments of economic performance and fiscal revenues for affected countries.

Global trade disrupted by Red Sea attacks and Panama Canal drought: IMF

In a concerning development for global trade, the panama canal is facing a critical water shortage. Unlike the Suez Canal, the panama canal relies on freshwater from lake Gatun, and its water level has reached dangerously low levels. The canal's dependence on rainwater, coupled with the El Nino weather phenomenon has resulted in the second driest year in its 110-year-old history. Watch to know more!

Water shortage threatens Panama Canal operations

Panama Canal has been hit by a severe drought that began last year. It has forced authorities to slash ship crossings by 36 per cent in the Panama Canal.&nbsp;

A report by The Associated Press mentioned that the new cuts were announced Wednesday (Jan 17) by authorities in Panama.&nbsp;

The recent reduction is set to pose an even greater economic blow than previously expected as the Panama Canal is one of the world's most important trade routes.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukraine-says-it-hit-targets-in-russia-during-attack-on-oil-terminal-in-st-petersburg-681289">Ukraine says it hit targets in Russia during attack on oil terminal in St Petersburg</a>&nbsp;

Panama Canal Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez now expects that lowering water levels would cost between $500 million and $700 million in 2024, up from $200 million previously. wreaked havoc on the 80-kilometre maritime channel.&nbsp;

It has generated a traffic jam of vessels. It has made the viability of canals doubtful for global transport and raised fears about its impact on world commerce.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-could-ease-china-investment-curbs-if-border-stays-calm-report-681265">India could ease China investment curbs if border stays calm: Report</a>&nbsp;

Watch the report:&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/panama-canal-severe-drought-hits-canal-administrators-forced-to-cut-vessel-crossings-681249/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"It's vital that the country sends a message that we’re going to take this on and find a solution to this water problem," Vásquez said.

The news agency's report further added that the disruption of the major trade route between Asia and the United States comes at a precarious time.&nbsp;

Attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea by Yemen's Houthi rebels have rerouted vessels away from the crucial corridor for consumer goods and energy supplies.&nbsp;

The combination is having a far-reaching impact on global trade, delaying shipments and increasing transportation costs.&nbsp;

According to analysts, several corporations were planning to reroute to the Red Sea, a crucial route between Asia and Europe, to avoid delays at the Panama Canal.

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

Panama Canal has been hit by a severe drought that began last year. It has forced authorities to slash ship crossings by 36 per cent in the Panama Canal. A report by The Associated Press mentioned that the new cuts were announced Wednesday (Jan 17) by authorities in Panama.

Panama Canal has been hit by a severe drought that began last year. It has forced authorities to slash ship crossings by 36 per cent in the Panama Canal. A report by The Associated Press mentioned that the new cuts were announced Wednesday (Jan 17) by authorities in Panama. The recent reduction is set to pose an even greater economic blow than previously expected as the Panama Canal is one of the world's most important trade routes. Also read: Ukraine says it hit targets in Russia during attack on oil terminal in St Petersburg Panama Canal Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez now expects that lowering water levels would cost between $500 million and $700 million in 2024, up from $200 million previously. wreaked havoc on the 80-kilometre maritime channel. It has generated a traffic jam of vessels. It has made the viability of canals doubtful for global transport and raised fears about its impact on world commerce. Also read: India could ease China investment curbs if border stays calm: Report Watch the report: × "It's vital that the country sends a message that we’re going to take this on and find a solution to this water problem," Vásquez said. The news agency's report further added that the disruption of the major trade route between Asia and the United States comes at a precarious time. Attacks on commercial ships in the Red Sea by Yemen's Houthi rebels have rerouted vessels away from the crucial corridor for consumer goods and energy supplies. The combination is having a far-reaching impact on global trade, delaying shipments and increasing transportation costs. According to analysts, several corporations were planning to reroute to the Red Sea, a crucial route between Asia and Europe, to avoid delays at the Panama Canal. (With inputs from agencies)

Severe drought causes major drop in Panama Canal traffic which could cost millions of dollars

The Red Sea crisis has disrupted the global shipping industry. But that's hardly the only issue that shipping giants are facing right now. The industry fears it will continue to face significant disruptions in 2024.

Panama canal: Severe drought hits canal, administrators forced to cut vessel crossings

Researchers have rediscovered a 22-million-year-old mangrove forest that was swept away by a massive volcanic eruption. The forest that once thrived with huge trees and lush green grasses on an island in the Panama Canal fell prey to natural disasters that triggered complete destruction.

The rediscovery was made by the scientists at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, who found the fossilised remains of trees on the Barro Colorado Island. Not just one or a dozen, but a total of 112 preserved fossilised pieces of wood were unearthed.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/debate-settled-teenage-t-rex-skulls-belonged-to-different-dinosaur-species-676161">Debate settled: Teenage T. Rex skulls unearthed in 1942 belonged to a different dinosaur species</a>

<h2>Scientists rediscover&nbsp;long-lost forest&nbsp;</h2>

The fossils found indicated that some huge volcanic eruption triggered a lahar that eventually swept away the entire forest land. A lahar is a violent flow of water with mud, ash, and rocks. When it flows it almost flows like wet concrete at lighting speeds that can instantly cover an area into a whirlwind.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/nasa-juno-spacecraft-captures-breathtaking-images-of-jupiters-volcanic-moon-in-closest-ever-encounter-676097">These closest-ever photos of Jupiter's moon blasting lava will give you cold shivers</a>

A lahar leaves plants and animals no opportunity to rot or decompose and instantly destroys the entire land. What is more destructive is that lahar comes with silica-rich waters that seep deep into living matter and expunge their tissues, which results in well-preserved fossils locked in a moment in time.

<h2>How did such a huge mangrove forest originate in ancient times?</h2>

As per the scientists, this old mangrove forest would have originated in the early Miocene Epoch, which existed about 23 million years ago. The great land masses of South America and the Caribbean plate collided with each other forming the landscape of Panama and the rest of Central America.

This was when the hill that would eventually become Barro Colorado Island rose from the ocean. Around its edges grew a mangrove forest, whose trees rose as high as 130 feet into the air, wrote the study's authors.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/isro-to-tie-up-with-elon-musks-spacex-to-launch-satellite-676290">ISRO to tie-up with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to launch satellite</a>

Sediment samples show that the forest grew in the brackish zone where salty and fresh waters meet, ideal conditions for mangroves. But the brackish water wasn't the only thing that made the conditions ideal for a massive mangrove forest.&nbsp;

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were much higher during the Miocene than now - over 500 parts per million (ppm) as compared to about 419 ppm today.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/storm-on-mars-uae-probe-detects-significant-dust-mobilisation-676267">Storm on Mars: UAE probe detects significant dust mobilisation</a>

Since trees consume carbon dioxide to grow, the scientists concluded that these ancient species would have been able to reach heights much greater than current-day mangrove trees.&nbsp;

These ancient remains revealed a lot about the forgone forest but the study is still in its incipient stage. &nbsp;The findings of the study will be published in the March 2024 issue of the Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal.

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

Researchers have rediscovered a 22-million-year-old mangrove forest that was swept away by a massive volcanic eruption. The forest that once thrived with huge trees and lush green grasses on an island in the Panama Canal fell prey to natural disasters that triggered complete destruction.

Researchers have rediscovered a 22-million-year-old mangrove forest that was swept away by a massive volcanic eruption. The forest that once thrived with huge trees and lush green grasses on an island in the Panama Canal fell prey to natural disasters that triggered complete destruction. The rediscovery was made by the scientists at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, who found the fossilised remains of trees on the Barro Colorado Island. Not just one or a dozen, but a total of 112 preserved fossilised pieces of wood were unearthed. Also Read | Debate settled: Teenage T. Rex skulls unearthed in 1942 belonged to a different dinosaur species Scientists rediscover long-lost forest The fossils found indicated that some huge volcanic eruption triggered a lahar that eventually swept away the entire forest land. A lahar is a violent flow of water with mud, ash, and rocks. When it flows it almost flows like wet concrete at lighting speeds that can instantly cover an area into a whirlwind. Also Read | These closest-ever photos of Jupiter's moon blasting lava will give you cold shivers A lahar leaves plants and animals no opportunity to rot or decompose and instantly destroys the entire land. What is more destructive is that lahar comes with silica-rich waters that seep deep into living matter and expunge their tissues, which results in well-preserved fossils locked in a moment in time. How did such a huge mangrove forest originate in ancient times? As per the scientists, this old mangrove forest would have originated in the early Miocene Epoch, which existed about 23 million years ago. The great land masses of South America and the Caribbean plate collided with each other forming the landscape of Panama and the rest of Central America. This was when the hill that would eventually become Barro Colorado Island rose from the ocean. Around its edges grew a mangrove forest, whose trees rose as high as 130 feet into the air, wrote the study's authors. Also Read | ISRO to tie-up with Elon Musk’s SpaceX to launch satellite Sediment samples show that the forest grew in the brackish zone where salty and fresh waters meet, ideal conditions for mangroves. But the brackish water wasn't the only thing that made the conditions ideal for a massive mangrove forest. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were much higher during the Miocene than now - over 500 parts per million (ppm) as compared to about 419 ppm today. Also Read | Storm on Mars: UAE probe detects significant dust mobilisation Since trees consume carbon dioxide to grow, the scientists concluded that these ancient species would have been able to reach heights much greater than current-day mangrove trees. These ancient remains revealed a lot about the forgone forest but the study is still in its incipient stage. The findings of the study will be published in the March 2024 issue of the Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal. (With inputs from agencies)

Volcano destroyed this forest 22-million-years ago. It has now been rediscovered

This report delves into the Panama Canal crisis, where a severe drought threatens to disrupt this holiday season. This environmental disaster has led to drastic drops in canal water levels, causing significant delays in global trade. With only 24 ships allowed daily, down from 38, the world faces potential shortages and inflated prices on everything from festive decorations to children's toys. This crisis is a stark reminder of climate change's far-reaching impacts, echoing concerns that will be addressed at the upcoming COP28 conference.

Gravitas | Christmas at Risk: Panama Canal Drought Disrupts Global Trade

panama-canal

Panama Canal, News on Panama Canal, stories on Panama Canal, articles on Panama Canal, Panama Canal stories at Wion, Panama Canal news, Panama Canal latest news