Top US intelligence officials said that Russian President Vladimir Putin is unlikely to use nuclear weapons unless he feels an 'existential threat' to the Russian state amid the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.

US Intel officials: Putin unlikely to use nuclear weapons unless he feels an 'existential threat'

South Korea's new President Yoon Suk-yeol in his inauguration speech in Seoul after being sworn in, offered a door to dialogue with North Korea but on a few conditions. Listen in.

Watch: South Korea's new President Yoon Suk-yeol speaks on North Korea’s nuclear weapons program

North Korea's leader Kim Jong-Un has vowed to strengthen and also further develop the country's nuclear weapons program. The North Korean leader was speaking in Pyongyang at a high-profile military parade to mark the 90th anniversary of the founding of the country's army.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un vows to bolster nuclear weapons

North Korea celebrated the 110th anniversary of the birth of late founder Kim Il Sung on Friday with fireworks, a procession, and an evening gala in Pyongyang's main square, with thousands of people in colourful traditional dress singing and dancing.

North Korea celebrates founder's birthday with dance, music but no military parade

Russia warned Sweden and Finland that if they joined NATO, then it will deploy nuclear weapons in hypersonic missiles in the heart of Europe. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is pushing Finland and Sweden towards NATO

Russia warns of Nuke and Hypersonic deployment to Baltic

CIA chief William Burns said on Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin may use a tactical or low-yield nuclear weapon especially since Russia has faced setbacks in its invasion of Ukraine. Burns was speaking in Atlanta in front of Georgia Tech University.

"Given the potential desperation of President Putin and the Russian leadership, given the setbacks that they've faced so far, militarily, none of us can take lightly the threat posed by a potential resort to tactical nuclear weapons or low-yield nuclear weapons," said Burns.

Watch | Russia-Ukraine war: Russian Flagship 'Moskva' sinks in Black Sea while being towed to port

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-russian-flagship-moskva-sinks-in-black-sea-while-being-towed-to-port-471102/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Burns added that the US has not seen "a lot of practical evidence" of actual deployment of nuclear weapons.

"We're obviously very concerned. I know President Biden is deeply concerned about avoiding a third world war, about avoiding a threshold in which, you know, nuclear conflict becomes possible," said Burns.

Russia possesses tactical nuclear weapons. Such nuclear weapons are less powerful than the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima during Second World War.

The escalate to de-escalate military doctrine of Russia would involve launching a first strike nuclear weapon of low yield to regain the initiative if things go badly in a conventional conflict with the West.

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/moskva-russian-navys-black-sea-fleet-flagship-has-sunk-defence-ministry-471089">Moskva, Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet flagship, has sunk: Defence ministry</a>

But under this hypothesis, "NATO would intervene militarily on the ground in Ukraine in the course of this conflict, and that's not something, as President Biden has made very clear, that's in the cards."

Burns has served as US ambassador to Russia. He had strong words for Vladimir Putin.

calling him an "apostle of payback" who over the years "has stood in a combustible combination of grievance and ambition and insecurity."

"Every day, Putin demonstrates that declining powers can be at least as disruptive as rising ones," Burns said.

(With inputs from agencies)

CIA chief William Burns said on Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin may use a tactical or low-yield nuclear weapon especially since Russia has faced setbacks in its invasion of Ukraine.

CIA chief William Burns said on Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin may use a tactical or low-yield nuclear weapon especially since Russia has faced setbacks in its invasion of Ukraine. Burns was speaking in Atlanta in front of Georgia Tech University. "Given the potential desperation of President Putin and the Russian leadership, given the setbacks that they've faced so far, militarily, none of us can take lightly the threat posed by a potential resort to tactical nuclear weapons or low-yield nuclear weapons," said Burns. Watch | Russia-Ukraine war: Russian Flagship 'Moskva' sinks in Black Sea while being towed to port × Burns added that the US has not seen "a lot of practical evidence" of actual deployment of nuclear weapons. "We're obviously very concerned. I know President Biden is deeply concerned about avoiding a third world war, about avoiding a threshold in which, you know, nuclear conflict becomes possible," said Burns. Russia possesses tactical nuclear weapons. Such nuclear weapons are less powerful than the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima during Second World War. The escalate to de-escalate military doctrine of Russia would involve launching a first strike nuclear weapon of low yield to regain the initiative if things go badly in a conventional conflict with the West. Also Read | Moskva, Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet flagship, has sunk: Defence ministry But under this hypothesis, "NATO would intervene militarily on the ground in Ukraine in the course of this conflict, and that's not something, as President Biden has made very clear, that's in the cards." Burns has served as US ambassador to Russia. He had strong words for Vladimir Putin. calling him an "apostle of payback" who over the years "has stood in a combustible combination of grievance and ambition and insecurity." "Every day, Putin demonstrates that declining powers can be at least as disruptive as rising ones," Burns said. (With inputs from agencies)

Desperate Putin may use nuclear weapons, says CIA chief

US says that North Korea could be planning a big show of its growing nuclear weapons on April 15. In recent times, Pyongyang began a series of missile tests since President came to power conducting 13 missile tests. North Korea has ignored US overtures for talks

US : North Korea could hold its nuclear weapons test next week

Amid the ongoing Ukrainian Crisis, Poland Deputy Prime Minister said the nation is open to idea of U.S. deploying tactical Nuclear weapons on its soil

Amid Russia-Ukraine Crisis Poland hints at hosting nuclear warheads

The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on five entities it accused of providing support to&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea's development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs, increasing pressure on Pyongyang following a recent series of missile launches.

The Treasury Department in a statement said the action targets the Ministry of Rocket Industry, which it said is a&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korean weapons of mass destruction research and development organisation directly linked to the development of new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).

It also designated four of the organisation's subsidiaries,&nbsp;Hapjanggang Trading Corporation,&nbsp;Korea&nbsp;Rounsan Trading Corporation, Sungnisan Trading Corporation, and Unchon Trading Corporation.

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-north-korea-is-upset-with-pakistan-heres-why-461455/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

North&nbsp;Korea’s mission to the United Nations in New York did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new sanctions.

Friday's move follows a rise in tensions with&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea&nbsp;after two ballistic missile tests on Feb. 26 and March 4 that involved a new ICBM system that&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea&nbsp;is developing, and last week's first full ICBM test conducted by&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea&nbsp;since 2017.

“The DPRK’s (Democratic People's Republic of&nbsp;Korea's) provocative ballistic missile tests represent a clear threat to regional and global security and are in blatant violation of UN Security Council resolutions,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in the statement.

“The United States is committed to using our sanctions authorities to respond to the DPRK’s continued development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles," she said.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-north-korea-fake-missile-launch-466998">Also read |&nbsp;Did North Korea 'fake' missile launch?</a>

Washington's move on Friday follows measures imposed by Japan, which froze the assets of six&nbsp;North&nbsp;Koreans for involvement in&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea's weapons projects.

South&nbsp;Korean officials have reported new construction at the&nbsp;North's only known nuclear test site, which was shuttered in 2018.

There are increasing signs that&nbsp;North&nbsp;Korea&nbsp;could soon test a nuclear weapon for the first time since 2017 in a bid to improve its arsenal and increase political pressure, US&nbsp;and South&nbsp;Korean officials and analysts said.

The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on five entities it accused of providing support to North Korea's development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs, increasing pressure on Pyongyang following a recent series of missile launches.

The United States on Friday imposed sanctions on five entities it accused of providing support to North Korea's development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs, increasing pressure on Pyongyang following a recent series of missile launches. The Treasury Department in a statement said the action targets the Ministry of Rocket Industry, which it said is a North Korean weapons of mass destruction research and development organisation directly linked to the development of new intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). It also designated four of the organisation's subsidiaries, Hapjanggang Trading Corporation, Korea Rounsan Trading Corporation, Sungnisan Trading Corporation, and Unchon Trading Corporation. North Korea’s mission to the United Nations in New York did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new sanctions. Friday's move follows a rise in tensions with North Korea after two ballistic missile tests on Feb. 26 and March 4 that involved a new ICBM system that North Korea is developing, and last week's first full ICBM test conducted by North Korea since 2017. “The DPRK’s (Democratic People's Republic of Korea's) provocative ballistic missile tests represent a clear threat to regional and global security and are in blatant violation of UN Security Council resolutions,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in the statement. “The United States is committed to using our sanctions authorities to respond to the DPRK’s continued development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles," she said. Also read | Did North Korea 'fake' missile launch? Washington's move on Friday follows measures imposed by Japan, which froze the assets of six North Koreans for involvement in North Korea's weapons projects. South Korean officials have reported new construction at the North's only known nuclear test site, which was shuttered in 2018. There are increasing signs that North Korea could soon test a nuclear weapon for the first time since 2017 in a bid to improve its arsenal and increase political pressure, US and South Korean officials and analysts said.

US issues fresh North Korea sanctions after recent missile launches

Here's a look at countries that possess Nuclear weapons and how many warheads are at their disposal amid the growing tensions between the West and Russia.

Nuclear war: Putin's threat or rhetoric? Who has how many nuclear warheads?

An epic blunder by Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko has revealed Putin's military strategy in eastern Europe. Lukashenko's map appeared to show a planned Russian offensive on Moldova. Could this ex-Soviet state be Putin's next target? Palki Sharma tells you.

Gravitas: Belarus leader's blunder reveals Putin's masterplan

Belarusians have voted in a constitutional referendum allowing the former soviet republic to host nuclear weapons. The constitutional reforms also extend the rule of leader Alexander Lukashenko, the amendments would reinstate presidential term limits to two five-year terms but that will only apply to the next elected president.

Belarus to give up non-nuclear status amid Russian invasion of Ukraine

Russia is stepping up its deployments around Ukraine. Moscow has now moved troops to Belarus. The US says Russian troops could now be deployed permanently and with nuclear weapons. Will the West go to war with Russia over Ukraine? Palki Sharma tells you more.

Gravitas: Ukraine on target of Russian Nukes?

Iran is five years away from developing a nuclear weapon, and international talks due to restart next week will do nothing to slow it down, Israel said on Tuesday, adding it reserved the right to act to protect itself.

Israel: Iran nuke program at the most advanced stage

India feels confident in its strategic deterrent capabilities, which would be bolstered by the continuing induction of Agni-V missiles and the commissioning of nuclear submarines, despite being behind China and Pakistan in terms of nuclear weapons.

According to a recent analysis in the US-based Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists, Pakistan continues to develop its nuclear arsenal with more warheads, delivery systems, and an expanding fissile materials production business.

China, India, and Pakistan are all working on new ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and nuclear delivery systems that can be launched from the sea.

To counter perceived Indian conventional military threats, Pakistan has lowered the barrier for nuclear weapons use by developing tactical nuclear weapons capabilities.&nbsp;

The Pakistani government has never officially stated the extent of its nuclear arsenal, and news reports concerning nuclear weapons are regularly embellished by media sources.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>Approximately 13,080 nuclear warheads are held by the world's nuclear-armed powers, with Russia and the United States accounting for nearly 90% of them.There are around 9,600 warheads in military service, with the remainder awaiting disarmament.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Approximately 13,080 nuclear warheads are held by the world's nuclear-armed powers, with Russia and the United States accounting for nearly 90% of them.There are around 9,600 warheads in military service, with the remainder awaiting disarmament. " target="_blank">&nbsp;</a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">×</a></div>
</div>
</div>

But Pakistan, as of date, has a nuclear weapons stockpile of approximately 165 warheads, according to The Arms Control Association, a neutral membership group located in the United States.

And these figures should be concerning for India.

Because Pakistan is seeking a "full spectrum deterrent posture," which includes both long-range missiles and planes for strategic missions and a number of short-range, lower-yield nuclear-capable weapon systems to counter military threats below the strategic level.

China also has a limited number of non-strategic (also known as tactical) nuclear weapons that are not subject to treaty restrictions.

<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 500px;">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Country</td>
			<td>Nuclear Weapons</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>China</td>
			<td>350</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Pakistan</td>
			<td>165</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>India</td>
			<td>156</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

(Data source: armscontrol.org)

China now has roughly 350&nbsp;nuclear warheads in its arsenal.

However, the country is rapidly building its nuclear weapons, closing the gap with the United States, according to a Pentagon report.

According to that report, China might have 700 deliverable nuclear warheads by 2027, and 1,000 by 2030 — a nuclear arsenal two-and-a-half times the amount estimated by the Pentagon only a year ago.

India, on the other hand, possesses&nbsp;156 nuclear weapons. 
 
Watch | Pakistan's nuclear weapons at risk of theft, sabotage

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistans-nuclear-weapons-at-risk-of-theft-sabotage-6058/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

India and Pakistan are all known to have nuclear weapons and have never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

In 1974, India conducted its first nuclear test. Pakistan accelerated work on its clandestine nuclear weapons development as a result of the test.

In May 1998, India and Pakistan both openly showcased their nuclear weapons capability by conducting a series of tit-for-tat nuclear tests.

India feels confident in its strategic deterrent capabilities, which would be bolstered by the continuing induction of Agni-V missiles and the commissioning of nuclear submarines, despite being behind China and Pakistan in terms of nuclear weapons.

India feels confident in its strategic deterrent capabilities, which would be bolstered by the continuing induction of Agni-V missiles and the commissioning of nuclear submarines, despite being behind China and Pakistan in terms of nuclear weapons. According to a recent analysis in the US-based Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists, Pakistan continues to develop its nuclear arsenal with more warheads, delivery systems, and an expanding fissile materials production business. China, India, and Pakistan are all working on new ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and nuclear delivery systems that can be launched from the sea. To counter perceived Indian conventional military threats, Pakistan has lowered the barrier for nuclear weapons use by developing tactical nuclear weapons capabilities. The Pakistani government has never officially stated the extent of its nuclear arsenal, and news reports concerning nuclear weapons are regularly embellished by media sources. Approximately 13,080 nuclear warheads are held by the world's nuclear-armed powers, with Russia and the United States accounting for nearly 90% of them.There are around 9,600 warheads in military service, with the remainder awaiting disarmament. × But Pakistan, as of date, has a nuclear weapons stockpile of approximately 165 warheads, according to The Arms Control Association, a neutral membership group located in the United States. And these figures should be concerning for India. Because Pakistan is seeking a "full spectrum deterrent posture," which includes both long-range missiles and planes for strategic missions and a number of short-range, lower-yield nuclear-capable weapon systems to counter military threats below the strategic level. China also has a limited number of non-strategic (also known as tactical) nuclear weapons that are not subject to treaty restrictions. Country Nuclear Weapons China 350 Pakistan 165 India 156 (Data source: armscontrol.org) China now has roughly 350 nuclear warheads in its arsenal. However, the country is rapidly building its nuclear weapons, closing the gap with the United States, according to a Pentagon report. According to that report, China might have 700 deliverable nuclear warheads by 2027, and 1,000 by 2030 — a nuclear arsenal two-and-a-half times the amount estimated by the Pentagon only a year ago. India, on the other hand, possesses 156 nuclear weapons. Watch | Pakistan's nuclear weapons at risk of theft, sabotage India and Pakistan are all known to have nuclear weapons and have never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). In 1974, India conducted its first nuclear test. Pakistan accelerated work on its clandestine nuclear weapons development as a result of the test. In May 1998, India and Pakistan both openly showcased their nuclear weapons capability by conducting a series of tit-for-tat nuclear tests.

India has less nukes than Pakistan, China: New analysis of capabilities

Former US NSA John Bolton believes terrorists in Pakistan could topple the government and gain access to 150 nuclear warheads. What does this mean for neighbours like India? How will the world confront 'nuclear terror'? Molly Gambhir tells you

Gravitas: Can terrorists get Pakistani nukes?

In a conversation on WABC 770 radio station, former US national security advisor John Bolton said on Sunday that Taliban may obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Bolton, who served&nbsp;under the then-President Donald Trump,&nbsp;criticised US President Joe Biden's hasty military withdrawal from the war-torn Afghanistan. &nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pentagon-leaders-to-face-congress-on-afghan-pullout-decision-416575/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Bolton added it was possible that nuclear weapons could be obtained from Pakistan should Islamist insurgents get hold of them. &nbsp;

The abrupt US troops withdrawal allowed the Taliban to rapidly take over and bring the country once again under their control. &nbsp; &nbsp;

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-air-force-darpa-raytheon-successfully-tested-hypersonic-missile-416577" hreflang="en">US Air Force, DARPA, Raytheon successfully tested hypersonic missile</a>

In recent times, Bolton has been a vocal critic of American foreign policy. He has also been critical of his former boss. &nbsp;&nbsp;

He has been giving views about US policies regarding the Middle East, especially Iran. He has also expressed support for Israel's right to act in its own security interests. &nbsp;

The former NSA has also supported pre-emptive strikes against hostile regimes, such as Iran and North Korea. &nbsp;

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cant-go-unvaccinated-president-biden-gets-vaccine-booster-shot-416490" hreflang="en">'Can't go unvaccinated': President Biden gets vaccine booster shot</a>

However, he also complimented Biden for the nuclear submarine deal with Australia. He says the deal is a way to counter China threat. &nbsp;&nbsp;

US is only giving nuclear submarines. "These are what we call hunter-killer submarines," Bolton explained. &nbsp;

“It’s a huge step forward for us in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. It’s a real signal to China that we are determined not to let them just run wild,” added Bolton. &nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

In a conversation on WABC 770 radio station, former US national security advisor John Bolton said on Sunday that Taliban may obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan.

In a conversation on WABC 770 radio station, former US national security advisor John Bolton said on Sunday that Taliban may obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan. Bolton, who served under the then-President Donald Trump, criticised US President Joe Biden's hasty military withdrawal from the war-torn Afghanistan. Watch: × Bolton added it was possible that nuclear weapons could be obtained from Pakistan should Islamist insurgents get hold of them. The abrupt US troops withdrawal allowed the Taliban to rapidly take over and bring the country once again under their control. Also Read: US Air Force, DARPA, Raytheon successfully tested hypersonic missile In recent times, Bolton has been a vocal critic of American foreign policy. He has also been critical of his former boss. He has been giving views about US policies regarding the Middle East, especially Iran. He has also expressed support for Israel's right to act in its own security interests. The former NSA has also supported pre-emptive strikes against hostile regimes, such as Iran and North Korea. Also Read: 'Can't go unvaccinated': President Biden gets vaccine booster shot However, he also complimented Biden for the nuclear submarine deal with Australia. He says the deal is a way to counter China threat. US is only giving nuclear submarines. "These are what we call hunter-killer submarines," Bolton explained. “It’s a huge step forward for us in the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. It’s a real signal to China that we are determined not to let them just run wild,” added Bolton. (With inputs from agencies)

Taliban may obtain nuclear weapons from Pakistan, says former US national security advisor John Bolton

US&nbsp;President Joe Biden, in a meeting on Monday with Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, said his commitment to Israel is "iron-clad" and he looks forward to meeting with new Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett soon. 
 
Biden, in his first meeting as president with a top Israeli official, also said Iran would not come to possess a nuclear weapon during his time in office. 
 
“My commitment to Israel is ... ironclad,” Biden told Rivlin at the start of their meeting in the Oval Office. He said the two officials would discuss a range of topics, including Iran. 
 
“What I can say to you is that Iran will never get a nuclear weapon on my watch," Biden said. 
 
The meeting took place just weeks after Bennett took over as Israel`s new prime minister, replacing Benjamin Netanyahu. US&nbsp;officials are working on setting up a meeting between Biden and Bennett in the coming weeks. 
 
“He’s going to invite the prime minister of Israel in the very next days in order to find a way to go forward and to exchange ideas," Rivlin said of Biden after their meeting. 
 
The get-together comes amid concerns in Israel and Arab capitals about US&nbsp;efforts to re-enter the Iran nuclear deal because of fears a resumption of the accord may eventually allow Tehran to acquire atomic weapons that would leave them vulnerable to Iranian intimidation or military threat. 
 
US&nbsp;attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal, after then-President Donald Trump abandoned it in 2018, have been slow to make progress with Tehran insisting the United States lift all economic sanctions. 
 
A source familiar with the Biden-Rivlin meeting said Biden was expected to tell Rivlin that the United States and Israel share the same objective, that Iran not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and that Biden would stress US&nbsp;support for Israel`s right to defend itself. 
 
The two leaders are also expected to discuss Israel`s 11-day war with Gaza. The United States has pledged to resupply Israel`s Iron Dome defense system, which got heavy usage during the Gaza conflict. 
 
Rivlin is to leave office on July 7 after a seven-year term, with Jewish Agency Chairman Isaac Herzog taking over as Israeli president. 
 
Rivlin is on his final foreign trip as president. He will meet officials at the United Nations in New York and congressional lawmakers in Washington.

US President Joe Biden, in a meeting on Monday with Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, said his commitment to Israel is "iron-clad" and he looks forward to meeting with new Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett soon.

US President Joe Biden, in a meeting on Monday with Israeli President Reuven Rivlin, said his commitment to Israel is "iron-clad" and he looks forward to meeting with new Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett soon. Biden, in his first meeting as president with a top Israeli official, also said Iran would not come to possess a nuclear weapon during his time in office. “My commitment to Israel is ... ironclad,” Biden told Rivlin at the start of their meeting in the Oval Office. He said the two officials would discuss a range of topics, including Iran. “What I can say to you is that Iran will never get a nuclear weapon on my watch," Biden said. The meeting took place just weeks after Bennett took over as Israel`s new prime minister, replacing Benjamin Netanyahu. US officials are working on setting up a meeting between Biden and Bennett in the coming weeks. “He’s going to invite the prime minister of Israel in the very next days in order to find a way to go forward and to exchange ideas," Rivlin said of Biden after their meeting. The get-together comes amid concerns in Israel and Arab capitals about US efforts to re-enter the Iran nuclear deal because of fears a resumption of the accord may eventually allow Tehran to acquire atomic weapons that would leave them vulnerable to Iranian intimidation or military threat. US attempts to revive the Iran nuclear deal, after then-President Donald Trump abandoned it in 2018, have been slow to make progress with Tehran insisting the United States lift all economic sanctions. A source familiar with the Biden-Rivlin meeting said Biden was expected to tell Rivlin that the United States and Israel share the same objective, that Iran not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and that Biden would stress US support for Israel`s right to defend itself. The two leaders are also expected to discuss Israel`s 11-day war with Gaza. The United States has pledged to resupply Israel`s Iron Dome defense system, which got heavy usage during the Gaza conflict. Rivlin is to leave office on July 7 after a seven-year term, with Jewish Agency Chairman Isaac Herzog taking over as Israeli president. Rivlin is on his final foreign trip as president. He will meet officials at the United Nations in New York and congressional lawmakers in Washington.

Biden vows to Israel: No nuclear weapon for Iran on my watch

Russia and UK's relations hit an all-time low as Russia strongly condemns UK's plan to radically increase nuclear warheads to 260 by the year 2030. The United Nations also expresses concern over UK's effort to scale up nuclear weapons.

Russia condemns UK's vision to scale up nuclear warheads

Reversing a trend of disarmament, Britain on Tuesday announced plans to increase its stockpile of nuclear weapons.

"The UK will move to an overall nuclear weapon stockpile of no more than 260 warheads," said a government review of defence, security and foreign policy. The review said that emerging threats no longer made it possible to stick to commitment to reduce warheads.&nbsp;

It is being viewed that UK is taking the step with Russia and China in mind.

In recent years, the UK has had its share of disagreements with both Russia and China on an array of issues ranging from cyber-attacks to human rights to espionage. Many people within the UK have called for the country’s “Trident nuclear programme” to be scrapped, as the global calls for denuclearisation increase.

International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), Beatrice Fihn accused the UK of being “irresponsible and dangerous”, while adding how this move violates international law.

Meanwhile, the review of&nbsp;country's post-Brexit 'Global Britain' vision concluded that the UK must shift its foreign policy focus to Indo-Pacific region. The review suggests that countries such as India, Australia and Japan should be at the heart of the move.

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who will formally release the review in the House of Commons later on Tuesday, is to activate the so-called Indo-Pacific tilt with a visit to India at the end of next month, an application for partner status of the Association of South East Asian nations (ASEAN) economic union and the Royal Navy warship Queen Elizabeth Carrier deployment to the region.

(With agency inputs)

Reversing a trend of disarmament, Britain on Tuesday announced plans to increase its stockpile of nuclear weapons. "The UK will move to an overall nuclear weapon stockpile of no more than 260 warheads," said a government review of defence, security and foreign policy.

Reversing a trend of disarmament, Britain on Tuesday announced plans to increase its stockpile of nuclear weapons. "The UK will move to an overall nuclear weapon stockpile of no more than 260 warheads," said a government review of defence, security and foreign policy. The review said that emerging threats no longer made it possible to stick to commitment to reduce warheads. It is being viewed that UK is taking the step with Russia and China in mind. In recent years, the UK has had its share of disagreements with both Russia and China on an array of issues ranging from cyber-attacks to human rights to espionage. Many people within the UK have called for the country’s “Trident nuclear programme” to be scrapped, as the global calls for denuclearisation increase. International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), Beatrice Fihn accused the UK of being “irresponsible and dangerous”, while adding how this move violates international law. Meanwhile, the review of country's post-Brexit 'Global Britain' vision concluded that the UK must shift its foreign policy focus to Indo-Pacific region. The review suggests that countries such as India, Australia and Japan should be at the heart of the move. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who will formally release the review in the House of Commons later on Tuesday, is to activate the so-called Indo-Pacific tilt with a visit to India at the end of next month, an application for partner status of the Association of South East Asian nations (ASEAN) economic union and the Royal Navy warship Queen Elizabeth Carrier deployment to the region. (With agency inputs)

UK planning to increase nuclear weapons stockpile: govt review

A top US intelligence officer for North Korea has claimed that the country is using diplomacy only for selfish motives which will ultimately be harmful for the world.

Joe Biden’s nominee for secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has reported that the new administration has planned a full review of the way US is planning to approach North Korea to bring negotiations back on the table.

Also read|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-korea-unveil-submarine-launched-ballistic-missile-356997">North Korea unveil submarine-launched ballistic missile</a>

White House spokesperson Jen Psakin, on Friday, had also acknowledged North Korea's nuclear weapons as a serious threat against peace. She also reported that the Washington is gearing up to come up with plans of deterring Pyongyang.

Sydney Seiler, the US national intelligence officer for North Korea, has claimed that North Korea's weapons development has been one of the main consistent policy for the past 30 years.

Also read|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kim-jong-uns-sister-lashes-out-at-idiot-south-korean-authorities-kcna-356431">Kim Jong Un's sister lashes out at 'idiot' South Korean authorities: KCNA</a>

"Every engagement in diplomacy has been designed to further the nuclear programme, not to find a way out … I just urge people not to let the tactical ambiguity obstruct the strategic clarity about North Korea that we have," he told the Center for Strategic and International Studies thinktank.

"So we should not be overly encouraged if suddenly (North Korea leader Kim Jong-un) proposes dialogue tomorrow, nor should we be overly surprised, or discouraged, if there’s an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) launch by Sunday," he added.

While thse statements hint towards an active plan towards North Korea's deadly nuclear weapons development, some experts have urged the new Biden administration to learn from Obama administration's mistakes and not delay te plans.

A top US intelligence officer for North Korea has claimed that the country is using diplomacy only for selfish motives which will ultimately be harmful for the world.

A top US intelligence officer for North Korea has claimed that the country is using diplomacy only for selfish motives which will ultimately be harmful for the world. Joe Biden’s nominee for secretary of state, Antony Blinken, has reported that the new administration has planned a full review of the way US is planning to approach North Korea to bring negotiations back on the table. Also read| North Korea unveil submarine-launched ballistic missile White House spokesperson Jen Psakin, on Friday, had also acknowledged North Korea's nuclear weapons as a serious threat against peace. She also reported that the Washington is gearing up to come up with plans of deterring Pyongyang. Sydney Seiler, the US national intelligence officer for North Korea, has claimed that North Korea's weapons development has been one of the main consistent policy for the past 30 years. Also read| Kim Jong Un's sister lashes out at 'idiot' South Korean authorities: KCNA "Every engagement in diplomacy has been designed to further the nuclear programme, not to find a way out … I just urge people not to let the tactical ambiguity obstruct the strategic clarity about North Korea that we have," he told the Center for Strategic and International Studies thinktank. "So we should not be overly encouraged if suddenly (North Korea leader Kim Jong-un) proposes dialogue tomorrow, nor should we be overly surprised, or discouraged, if there’s an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) launch by Sunday," he added. While thse statements hint towards an active plan towards North Korea's deadly nuclear weapons development, some experts have urged the new Biden administration to learn from Obama administration's mistakes and not delay te plans.

North Korea using diplomacy to further nuclear weapons programme: US official

Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set down in a 2015 deal with world powers, the UN's nuclear agency reported on Wednesday.

An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report seen by AFP said that as of 2 November "Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile... was 2442.9 kg."

The limit in the 2015 deal was set at 300 kilograms (661 pounds) of enriched uranium in a particular compound form, which is the equivalent of 202.8 kg of uranium in non-compound form.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/we-hope-lesson-has-been-learnt-says-iran-on-nuclear-deal-with-usa-341410" hreflang="en">We hope 'lesson' has been learnt, says Iran on nuclear deal with USA</a> 
 
The UN's nuclear watchdog said Wednesday that Iran's explanations over the presence of nuclear material at an undeclared site in the country were "not credible". 
 
Despite Iranian authorities providing some information about the site, "the agency informed Iran that it continues to consider Iran's response to be not technically credible," the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a report seen by AFP. 
&nbsp;

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/satellite-photos-show-activity-at-irans-natanz-nuclear-facility-338798/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

"A full and prompt explanation from Iran regarding the presence of uranium particles of anthropogenic origin... at a location in Iran not declared to the Agency, is needed," the report said. 
 
While the IAEA has not identified the site in question, diplomatic sources have indicated to AFP that it is in the Turquzabad district of Tehran, previously identified by Israel as an alleged site of secret atomic activity. 
 
The new report did not provide any new information about two other locations where the IAEA took samples in September and where undeclared nuclear activity may have taken place in the early 2000s. 
 
The analysis of those samples is ongoing.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/us-to-impose-sanctions-on-iranians-for-violence-against-protesters-342040" hreflang="en">US to impose sanctions on Iranians for violence against protesters</a> 
 
The report did confirm that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set down in a 2015 deal with world powers. 
 
It said that as of November 2, "Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile... was 2,442.9 kg." 
 
The limit in the 2015 deal was set at 300 kilogrammes (661 pounds) of enriched uranium in a particular compound form, which is the equivalent of 202.8 kilogrammes of non-compound enriched uranium.

Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set down in a 2015 deal with world powers, the UN's nuclear agency reported on Wednesday.

Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set down in a 2015 deal with world powers, the UN's nuclear agency reported on Wednesday. An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report seen by AFP said that as of 2 November "Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile... was 2442.9 kg." The limit in the 2015 deal was set at 300 kilograms (661 pounds) of enriched uranium in a particular compound form, which is the equivalent of 202.8 kg of uranium in non-compound form. Also read: We hope 'lesson' has been learnt, says Iran on nuclear deal with USA The UN's nuclear watchdog said Wednesday that Iran's explanations over the presence of nuclear material at an undeclared site in the country were "not credible". Despite Iranian authorities providing some information about the site, "the agency informed Iran that it continues to consider Iran's response to be not technically credible," the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in a report seen by AFP. "A full and prompt explanation from Iran regarding the presence of uranium particles of anthropogenic origin... at a location in Iran not declared to the Agency, is needed," the report said. While the IAEA has not identified the site in question, diplomatic sources have indicated to AFP that it is in the Turquzabad district of Tehran, previously identified by Israel as an alleged site of secret atomic activity. The new report did not provide any new information about two other locations where the IAEA took samples in September and where undeclared nuclear activity may have taken place in the early 2000s. The analysis of those samples is ongoing. Also read: US to impose sanctions on Iranians for violence against protesters The report did confirm that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium is now more than 12 times the limit set down in a 2015 deal with world powers. It said that as of November 2, "Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile... was 2,442.9 kg." The limit in the 2015 deal was set at 300 kilogrammes (661 pounds) of enriched uranium in a particular compound form, which is the equivalent of 202.8 kilogrammes of non-compound enriched uranium.

Iran's enriched uranium stockpile 12 times over limit set in 2015 deal: UN nuclear agency

The "historic"&nbsp;international treaty banning nuclear weapons has passed an important threshold and is all set to enter into force after 90 days.

Earlier, the United Nations informed that Honduras became the 50th nation to ratify the treaty on Sunday.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/honduras-becomes-50th-nation-to-ratify-un-nuclear-ban-treaty-337823" hreflang="en">Honduras becomes 50th nation to ratify UN nuclear ban treaty</a>

While nuclear powers have not signed up to the treaty, activists who have pushed for its enactment hold out hope that it will nonetheless prove to be more than symbolic and have a gradual deterrent effect.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called it "the culmination of a worldwide movement to draw attention to the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of&nbsp;nuclear weapons," according to a statement from his spokesman on Saturday.

"It represents a meaningful commitment towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons, which remains the highest disarmament priority of the United Nations."

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/un-says-libya-sides-reach-permanent-ceasefire-deal-337584/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

NGOs also welcomed the news, including the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), a coalition that won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its key role in bringing the treaty to fruition.

"Honduras just ratified the Treaty as the 50th state, triggering entry into force and making history," ICAN said in a tweet.

Peter Maurer, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), said in a statement: "Today is a victory for humanity and a promise of a safer future."

The 75th anniversary of the nuclear attacks on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, marked in August, saw a wave of countries ratify the treaty, which will now to enter into force on January 22, 2021, the UN said.

'A new chapter'

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons,&nbsp;&nbsp;which bans the use, development, production, testing, stationing, stockpiling, and the threat of use of such weapons, was adopted by the UN General Assembly in July 2017 with the approval of 122 countries.

Eighty-four states have since signed it, though not all have ratified the text.

The clutch of nuclear-armed states, including the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia, have not signed the treaty.

Japan, the only country to have been attacked with atomic weapons, ruled out any immediate plans to sign.

"We can't help but question the effectiveness of the treaty, which nuclear powers can't join," Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi told reporters on Sunday.

But atom bomb survivor Sunao Tsuboi told public broadcaster NHK: "We have no doubt that it is a great step toward materialising the ban and abolition of nuclear weapons.

"We really want the Japanese government to join the treaty in consideration of the wish of atomic bomb survivors."

Campaigners hope that it comes into force will have the same impact as previous international treaties on landmines and cluster munitions, bringing a stigma to their stockpiling and use, and thereby a change in behavior even in countries that did not sign up.

ICAN said it expects "companies to stop producing nuclear weapons and financial institutions to stop investing in nuclear weapon producing companies."

The coalition's executive director Beatrice Fihn called it "a new chapter for nuclear disarmament."

"Decades of activism have achieved what many said was impossible: nuclear weapons are banned."

Nuclear-armed states argue their arsenals serve as a deterrent and say they remain committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which seeks to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.

Separately, Russia and the United States have been seeking to break an impasse in long-running talks aimed at extending a nuclear arms deal between them.

The two sides have struggled to find common ground over the fate of the New START treaty, which limits both sides to 1,550 deployed warheads but is due to expire next February.

While the US wants to rework the deal to include China and cover new kinds of weapons, Russia is willing to extend the agreement for five years without any new conditions -- and each side has repeatedly shot down the other's proposals.

The agreement was signed in 2010 at the peak of hopes for a "reset" in relations between the two countries.

Together with the Cold War-era Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, it was considered a centerpiece of international arms control.

However, the United States withdrew from the INF last year after accusing Moscow of violations.

&nbsp;

The "historic" international treaty banning nuclear weapons has passed an important threshold and is all set to enter into force after 90 days. Earlier, the United Nations informed that Honduras became the 50th nation to ratify the treaty on Sunday.

The "historic" international treaty banning nuclear weapons has passed an important threshold and is all set to enter into force after 90 days. Earlier, the United Nations informed that Honduras became the 50th nation to ratify the treaty on Sunday. Also read: Honduras becomes 50th nation to ratify UN nuclear ban treaty While nuclear powers have not signed up to the treaty, activists who have pushed for its enactment hold out hope that it will nonetheless prove to be more than symbolic and have a gradual deterrent effect. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called it "the culmination of a worldwide movement to draw attention to the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons," according to a statement from his spokesman on Saturday. "It represents a meaningful commitment towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons, which remains the highest disarmament priority of the United Nations." NGOs also welcomed the news, including the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), a coalition that won the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its key role in bringing the treaty to fruition. "Honduras just ratified the Treaty as the 50th state, triggering entry into force and making history," ICAN said in a tweet. Peter Maurer, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), said in a statement: "Today is a victory for humanity and a promise of a safer future." The 75th anniversary of the nuclear attacks on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, marked in August, saw a wave of countries ratify the treaty, which will now to enter into force on January 22, 2021, the UN said. 'A new chapter' The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which bans the use, development, production, testing, stationing, stockpiling, and the threat of use of such weapons, was adopted by the UN General Assembly in July 2017 with the approval of 122 countries. Eighty-four states have since signed it, though not all have ratified the text. The clutch of nuclear-armed states, including the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia, have not signed the treaty. Japan, the only country to have been attacked with atomic weapons, ruled out any immediate plans to sign. "We can't help but question the effectiveness of the treaty, which nuclear powers can't join," Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi told reporters on Sunday. But atom bomb survivor Sunao Tsuboi told public broadcaster NHK: "We have no doubt that it is a great step toward materialising the ban and abolition of nuclear weapons. "We really want the Japanese government to join the treaty in consideration of the wish of atomic bomb survivors." Campaigners hope that it comes into force will have the same impact as previous international treaties on landmines and cluster munitions, bringing a stigma to their stockpiling and use, and thereby a change in behavior even in countries that did not sign up. ICAN said it expects "companies to stop producing nuclear weapons and financial institutions to stop investing in nuclear weapon producing companies." The coalition's executive director Beatrice Fihn called it "a new chapter for nuclear disarmament." "Decades of activism have achieved what many said was impossible: nuclear weapons are banned." Nuclear-armed states argue their arsenals serve as a deterrent and say they remain committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which seeks to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Separately, Russia and the United States have been seeking to break an impasse in long-running talks aimed at extending a nuclear arms deal between them. The two sides have struggled to find common ground over the fate of the New START treaty, which limits both sides to 1,550 deployed warheads but is due to expire next February. While the US wants to rework the deal to include China and cover new kinds of weapons, Russia is willing to extend the agreement for five years without any new conditions -- and each side has repeatedly shot down the other's proposals. The agreement was signed in 2010 at the peak of hopes for a "reset" in relations between the two countries. Together with the Cold War-era Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, it was considered a centerpiece of international arms control. However, the United States withdrew from the INF last year after accusing Moscow of violations.

'Historic' treaty to prohibit nuclear weapons to enter into force

After North Korea displayed its latest&nbsp;intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at a military parade in Pyongyang on Saturday, the United States has expressed its disappointment over this chest-beating parade.

"It is disappointing to see the DPRK (North Korea) continuing to prioritize its prohibited nuclear and ballistic missile program," a US official said.

The official urged the North Korean leader to follow the agreement that the two countries had back in 2018. "The United States remains guided by the vision President Trump and Chairman Kim set forth in Singapore (in 2018) and calls on the DPRK to engage in sustained and substantive negotiations to achieve complete denuclearization."

The statement has come at a time when the two countries, led by Donald Trumo and Kim Jong Un, are unable to reach a conclusion on the&nbsp;denuclearization negotiations since the&nbsp;collapse of their Hanoi summit early last year over sanctions relief and what the North would be willing to give up in return.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/not-a-single-person-with-virus-north-korea-conducts-pre-dawn-military-parade-334287">Have a look|&nbsp;'Not a single person with virus': North Korea conducts pre-dawn military parade</a>

The missile -- which may have been a mock-up -- was carried on an enormous and previously unseen 11-axle transporter-erector-launcher, far larger than the eight-axle Chinese-made vehicles the North has employed so far.

The display was proudly observed by the North Korean leader a few weeks before the US elections that are scheduled for November 03.

Display of ICBM has received criticism from all over the world and is being seen as a violation of several requests and orders passed by the rest of the world to put an end to the development of&nbsp;its arsenal throughout the diplomatic process.

Analysts also said that it was the largest road-mobile, liquid-fuelled missile anywhere in the world, and was likely to be designed to carry multiple warheads in independent re-entry vehicles (MIRVs).

(With inputs from AFP)

After North Korea displayed its latest intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at a military parade in Pyongyang on Saturday, the United States has expressed its disappointment over this chest-beating parade.

After North Korea displayed its latest intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at a military parade in Pyongyang on Saturday, the United States has expressed its disappointment over this chest-beating parade. "It is disappointing to see the DPRK (North Korea) continuing to prioritize its prohibited nuclear and ballistic missile program," a US official said. The official urged the North Korean leader to follow the agreement that the two countries had back in 2018. "The United States remains guided by the vision President Trump and Chairman Kim set forth in Singapore (in 2018) and calls on the DPRK to engage in sustained and substantive negotiations to achieve complete denuclearization." The statement has come at a time when the two countries, led by Donald Trumo and Kim Jong Un, are unable to reach a conclusion on the denuclearization negotiations since the collapse of their Hanoi summit early last year over sanctions relief and what the North would be willing to give up in return. Have a look| 'Not a single person with virus': North Korea conducts pre-dawn military parade The missile -- which may have been a mock-up -- was carried on an enormous and previously unseen 11-axle transporter-erector-launcher, far larger than the eight-axle Chinese-made vehicles the North has employed so far. The display was proudly observed by the North Korean leader a few weeks before the US elections that are scheduled for November 03. Display of ICBM has received criticism from all over the world and is being seen as a violation of several requests and orders passed by the rest of the world to put an end to the development of its arsenal throughout the diplomatic process. Analysts also said that it was the largest road-mobile, liquid-fuelled missile anywhere in the world, and was likely to be designed to carry multiple warheads in independent re-entry vehicles (MIRVs). (With inputs from AFP)

'Disappointing': US slams North Korea over ICBM display in military parade

Russia is developing a nuclear-powered missile that can fly around the atmosphere for years on end ready to strike at any moment.

This does mark the first time this missile has made the headlines. Last year, this so-called missile was involved with a mysterious explosion in Russia, which reportedly left at least 5 scientists dead.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/this-battery-powered-by-nuclear-waste-could-run-anything-for-28000-years-326008" hreflang="en">This battery powered by nuclear waste could run anything for 28,000 years!</a>

This explosion had also led to a major spike in the radiation levels in the area.

Now British intelligence claims that Russia is “pushing the boundaries of science, and international treaties” in developing novel weapons.

So what do we know about this cruise missile?

Russia calls the missile “Burevestnik” or “Storm Petrel”, while the NATO calls it “Skyfall”

Putin first unveiled the Burevestnik on March 1, 2018, claiming that it was invincible. Essentially, it is a cruise missile that features a small nuclear-powered engine.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://13.235.153.162/world/china-wants-to-double-its-nuclear-warheads-heres-why-the-world-should-worry-324810" hreflang="en">China wants to double its nuclear warheads, here's why the world should worry</a>

This is the first of its kind, for it can fly long distances for hours or even days.

The missile can also exploit loopholes in enemy defence networks. Russian president Vladimir Putin had earlier said that the testing of Burevestnik was going on successfully.

The British chief of defence said the missile had global reach and could “attack from unexpected directions”.

The mention of this missile came up during the Five Eyes intelligence hub including experts from the UK, US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.

Russia is developing a nuclear-powered missile that can fly around the atmosphere for years on end ready to strike at any moment. This does mark the first time this missile has made the headlines.

Russia is developing a nuclear-powered missile that can fly around the atmosphere for years on end ready to strike at any moment. This does mark the first time this missile has made the headlines. Last year, this so-called missile was involved with a mysterious explosion in Russia, which reportedly left at least 5 scientists dead. Also read: This battery powered by nuclear waste could run anything for 28,000 years! This explosion had also led to a major spike in the radiation levels in the area. Now British intelligence claims that Russia is “pushing the boundaries of science, and international treaties” in developing novel weapons. So what do we know about this cruise missile? Russia calls the missile “Burevestnik” or “Storm Petrel”, while the NATO calls it “Skyfall” Putin first unveiled the Burevestnik on March 1, 2018, claiming that it was invincible. Essentially, it is a cruise missile that features a small nuclear-powered engine. Also read: China wants to double its nuclear warheads, here's why the world should worry This is the first of its kind, for it can fly long distances for hours or even days. The missile can also exploit loopholes in enemy defence networks. Russian president Vladimir Putin had earlier said that the testing of Burevestnik was going on successfully. The British chief of defence said the missile had global reach and could “attack from unexpected directions”. The mention of this missile came up during the Five Eyes intelligence hub including experts from the UK, US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.

Russia's nuclear missile with global reach is capable of attacking from 'unexpected directions'

It's been 75 years since America dropped the world's first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. For survivors, the war isn't over yet. Discarded N-treaties, faster missiles, cyber-attacks, and artificial intelligence - the new nuclear threats are greater than before. WION's Palki Sharma tells you why the world isn't any wiser.

Gravitas: 75 Years After Hiroshima | Will new tech raise the threat of nuke war?

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, in his speech at the ceremony, said Japan is committed to nuclear weapons ban but said a nuclear-free world could not be achieved overnight and that it has to start from dialogue between opposite sides.

Japan: 75 years since first atomic bombing | Hiroshima Bombing Anniversary | Shinzo Abe

Japan marks 75th anniversary of Hiroshima atomic bombing | World War 2 | WION | World News

To counter Russia's growing arsenal of tactical nukes, the US military recently deployed a submarine equipped with a low-yield nuclear weapon.

Alarmists might see it as an escalation of already sky-high nuclear tensions in the world.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-navy-planning-to-build-six-nuclear-attack-submarines-navy-to-parliamentary-panel-270876">Indian Navy planning to build six nuclear attack submarines: Navy to Parliamentary panel</a>

"The US Navy has fielded the W76-2 low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead," John Rood, the Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, said in a statement.

A modification to the pre-existing W-76 warhead, the new weapon would be used to arm the submarine.

Launch mechanism and codes in the ''football'' for the President have been updated and now reflects this weapon, the CNN reported. 
 
The warheads are the latest addition to the US arsenal in weapons and were first produced in February of last year.

<h6><img alt="uuuuu" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="17236d1c-7a92-42f0-834c-5daca17074fb" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Untitled%20design%20%283%29_47.jpg" /> 
HMS Astute, one of British Royal Navy's new nuclear powered submarines, lays at dock in Gibraltar on its maiden call on March 20, 2014 | AFP 
&nbsp;</h6>

The weapon was earlier part of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review. According to this, many believe that the US enemies could use a smaller nuclear weapon against the US, for the American weapons are way more destructive. 
 
"Expanding flexible US nuclear options now, to include low-yield options, is important for the preservation of credible deterrence against regional aggression. It will raise the nuclear threshold and help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely," the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review said.

According to the Review, the US is expected to modify existing warheads as part of a $50 million five-year-long programme.

"The United States regularly consults with allies on its nuclear weapons systems, and has provided updates on its development of low-yield tridents since the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review," a NATO official told CNN.

<h6><img alt="pppp" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8431db57-5d39-4aea-99cf-608008fa2a3e" src="//cdn.wionews.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Untitled%20design%20%284%29_29.jpg" /> 
This undated picture shows a nuclear-powered submarine of the People's Liberation Army Navy's North Sea Fleet preparing to dive into the sea | AFP 
&nbsp;</h6>

US authorities claimed that no adversary should think that the US is unable to respond to any kind of threats.&nbsp; 
He added that the new weapon "demonstrates to potential adversaries that there is no advantage to limited nuclear employment because the United States can credibly and decisively respond to any threat scenario."

Democratic House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith of Washington called the decision "misguided and dangerous".

"The deployment of this warhead does nothing to make Americans safer. Instead, this destabilizing deployment further increases the potential for miscalculation during a crisis," he told CNN.

According to reports, Russia has a large stockpile of nuclear weapons which are less powerful and destructive than the ones with the US but are capable of large-scale damage still.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indias-first-submarine-optical-cable-for-andaman-and-nicobar-islands-to-be-operational-by-june-273267">India’s first submarine optical cable for Andaman and Nicobar islands to be operational by June&nbsp;</a>

To counter Russia's growing arsenal of tactical nukes, the US military recently deployed a submarine equipped with a low-yield nuclear weapon. Alarmists might see it as an escalation of already sky-high nuclear tensions in the world.

To counter Russia's growing arsenal of tactical nukes, the US military recently deployed a submarine equipped with a low-yield nuclear weapon. Alarmists might see it as an escalation of already sky-high nuclear tensions in the world. Also read: Indian Navy planning to build six nuclear attack submarines: Navy to Parliamentary panel "The US Navy has fielded the W76-2 low-yield submarine-launched ballistic missile warhead," John Rood, the Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, said in a statement. A modification to the pre-existing W-76 warhead, the new weapon would be used to arm the submarine. Launch mechanism and codes in the ''football'' for the President have been updated and now reflects this weapon, the CNN reported. The warheads are the latest addition to the US arsenal in weapons and were first produced in February of last year. HMS Astute, one of British Royal Navy's new nuclear powered submarines, lays at dock in Gibraltar on its maiden call on March 20, 2014 | AFP The weapon was earlier part of the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review. According to this, many believe that the US enemies could use a smaller nuclear weapon against the US, for the American weapons are way more destructive. "Expanding flexible US nuclear options now, to include low-yield options, is important for the preservation of credible deterrence against regional aggression. It will raise the nuclear threshold and help ensure that potential adversaries perceive no possible advantage in limited nuclear escalation, making nuclear employment less likely," the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review said. According to the Review, the US is expected to modify existing warheads as part of a $50 million five-year-long programme. "The United States regularly consults with allies on its nuclear weapons systems, and has provided updates on its development of low-yield tridents since the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review," a NATO official told CNN. This undated picture shows a nuclear-powered submarine of the People's Liberation Army Navy's North Sea Fleet preparing to dive into the sea | AFP US authorities claimed that no adversary should think that the US is unable to respond to any kind of threats. He added that the new weapon "demonstrates to potential adversaries that there is no advantage to limited nuclear employment because the United States can credibly and decisively respond to any threat scenario." Democratic House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith of Washington called the decision "misguided and dangerous". "The deployment of this warhead does nothing to make Americans safer. Instead, this destabilizing deployment further increases the potential for miscalculation during a crisis," he told CNN. According to reports, Russia has a large stockpile of nuclear weapons which are less powerful and destructive than the ones with the US but are capable of large-scale damage still. Also read: India’s first submarine optical cable for Andaman and Nicobar islands to be operational by June

US deploys new type of nuclear weapon to counter Russian arsenal

The tensions between Iran and the United States reached a tipping point on January 3 when the US missile strike killed the second-most powerful man in Iran - Gen Qassem Soleimani. In retaliation, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Iraqi bases housing US troops. In an address to the nation from the White House, President Trump said no Americans were killed or wounded when Iranian forces launched more than a dozen ballistic missiles against two military bases in Iraq marking the most significant Iranian attack in a growing conflict with the United States. Trump further added that Iran will never be allowed to have nuclear weapons, promising harsher sanctions against Iran "unless it changes its behaviour". #QassemSoleimani #DonaldTrump #US #Iran #SoleimaniKilling

Donald Trump: Iranian strike caused no American deaths

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pope-francis-leaves-japan-after-trip-centred-on-anti-nuclear-message-264572">Pope&nbsp;Francis</a> announced on Tuesday he would declare the use and possession of&nbsp;nuclear&nbsp;weapons&nbsp;"immoral" in the&nbsp;Catholic&nbsp;Church's official&nbsp;manual, after visiting the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki where atomic bombs were dropped during World War II.

The cities are the only areas to have been targeted by&nbsp;nuclear&nbsp;weapons, the 1945 attacks by the United States killing 224,000 people.&nbsp;

The catechism is the church's official instruction book, which summarises the principles of the faith. &nbsp;&nbsp;

"I have said that the use of&nbsp;nuclear&nbsp;weapons&nbsp;is&nbsp;immoral," the pontiff told reporters during his flight back to Rome.&nbsp;

"This must go into the catechism of the&nbsp;Catholic&nbsp;Church, not just use but also possession," he said, adding that "a government's madness can destroy humanity".

In 2018,&nbsp;Pope&nbsp;Francis added a <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pope-francis-arrives-in-japan-to-preach-anti-nuclear-message-264057">categorical opposition</a> to the death penalty to the document.&nbsp;

Francis criticised international organisations such as the United Nations Security Council for not taking decisive action to reduce arms or avoid wars.

He also blamed "the hypocrisy of those who produce&nbsp;weapons", referring to Christian countries in Europe.&nbsp;

"They talk peace and they live for&nbsp;weapons, it's called hypocrisy," he said.

"A nation must have the courage to say, I cannot speak of peace because my economy is gaining a lot with&nbsp;weapons&nbsp;manufacturing."

On the subject of&nbsp;nuclear&nbsp;energy, he stopped short of calling for a complete phase-out but said he believed its use came with risks.

Francis has long hankered after a trip to Japan ever since he was a young missionary.

The&nbsp;pope&nbsp;also reiterated his dream of travelling to China, saying he loves the country and would like to go to Beijing. &nbsp;&nbsp;

Pope Francis announced on Tuesday he would declare the use and possession of nuclear weapons "immoral" in the Catholic Church's official manual, after visiting the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki where atomic bombs were dropped during World War II.

Pope Francis announced on Tuesday he would declare the use and possession of nuclear weapons "immoral" in the Catholic Church's official manual, after visiting the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki where atomic bombs were dropped during World War II. The cities are the only areas to have been targeted by nuclear weapons, the 1945 attacks by the United States killing 224,000 people. The catechism is the church's official instruction book, which summarises the principles of the faith. "I have said that the use of nuclear weapons is immoral," the pontiff told reporters during his flight back to Rome. "This must go into the catechism of the Catholic Church, not just use but also possession," he said, adding that "a government's madness can destroy humanity". In 2018, Pope Francis added a categorical opposition to the death penalty to the document. Francis criticised international organisations such as the United Nations Security Council for not taking decisive action to reduce arms or avoid wars. He also blamed "the hypocrisy of those who produce weapons", referring to Christian countries in Europe. "They talk peace and they live for weapons, it's called hypocrisy," he said. "A nation must have the courage to say, I cannot speak of peace because my economy is gaining a lot with weapons manufacturing." On the subject of nuclear energy, he stopped short of calling for a complete phase-out but said he believed its use came with risks. Francis has long hankered after a trip to Japan ever since he was a young missionary. The pope also reiterated his dream of travelling to China, saying he loves the country and would like to go to Beijing.

Pope Francis to list nuclear weapons as immoral in Catholic manual

nuclear-weapons

Nuclear Weapons, News on Nuclear Weapons, stories on Nuclear Weapons, articles on Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear Weapons stories at Wion, Nuclear Weapons news, Nuclear Weapons latest news