The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday (Mar 10) tendered an "unconditional and unqualified apology" for the '<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ncert-flags-judicial-corruption-and-over-53-million-pending-cases-in-new-class-8-social-science-book-1771912233327">Corruption in the judiciary</a>' chapter in its Class 8 Social Science textbook, "Exploring Society: India and Beyond" (Part II). In a statement issued on X, NCERT said that the entire book has now been withdrawn. This comes as the Supreme Court of India on February 26 ordered a "complete blanket ban is hereby imposed on any further publication re: printing or digital dissemination of the book.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/petrol-and-diesel-prices-in-india-unlikely-to-rise-for-now-but-can-increase-if-oil-prices-cross-this-mark-1773111685796">India to hike petrol and diesel prices? Your fuel cost can increase if crude oil crosses THIS mark. Details inside</a><h2>NCERT's unconditional and unqualified apology</h2>In a statement on X, NCERT said that the book in its entirety has been withdrawn. "The National Council of Educational Research and Training [NCERT] has recently published a social science textbook, "Exploring Society: India and Beyond," Grade 8 (Part II), which contained Chapter IV titled "The Role of Judiciary in our Society." The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for the said Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available".Expressing regret for any inconvenience caused, NCERT reiterated its commitment to accuracy and sensitivity in educational materials. "NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content," it said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞: 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐀𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐲 The National Council of Educational Research and Training [NCERT] has recently published a social science textbook, “Exploring Society: India and Beyond,&quot; Grade 8 (Part II), which contained Chapter IV titled “The Role of… <a href="https://t.co/mZY15aJTDo">pic.twitter.com/mZY15aJTDo</a>&mdash; NCERT (@ncert) <a href="https://twitter.com/ncert/status/2031199477558817038?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What did the chapter 'The Role of Judiciary in our Society' say?</h2>The National Council of Educational Research and Training had, for the first time, added a section on corruption within the judiciary to its Class 8 Social Science textbook. The revised chapter, titled "The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society," still explained the hierarchy of courts and the idea of access to justice. It also addressed the system's vulnerabilities, including corruption and the massive backlog of cases.The book laid out the scale of the problem in stark numbers. It cites roughly 53,321,000 pending cases across courts - 81,000 in the Supreme Court, 62.4 lakh (62,40,000) in High Courts across India, and about 4.7 crore (4,70,00,000) in district and subordinate courts.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Why did NCERT withdraw an entire Class 8 textbook and issue an “unconditional apology”? The move comes after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on the book. What exactly did the chapter say and why did it trigger such a strong response? Scroll down to read more.

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) on Tuesday (Mar 10) tendered an "unconditional and unqualified apology" for the 'Corruption in the judiciary' chapter in its Class 8 Social Science textbook, "Exploring Society: India and Beyond" (Part II). In a statement issued on X, NCERT said that the entire book has now been withdrawn. This comes as the Supreme Court of India on February 26 ordered a "complete blanket ban is hereby imposed on any further publication re: printing or digital dissemination of the book. Also read | India to hike petrol and diesel prices? Your fuel cost can increase if crude oil crosses THIS mark. Details inside NCERT's unconditional and unqualified apology In a statement on X, NCERT said that the book in its entirety has been withdrawn. "The National Council of Educational Research and Training [NCERT] has recently published a social science textbook, "Exploring Society: India and Beyond," Grade 8 (Part II), which contained Chapter IV titled "The Role of Judiciary in our Society." The Director and Members of NCERT hereby tender an unconditional and unqualified apology for the said Chapter IV. The entire book has been withdrawn and is not available". Expressing regret for any inconvenience caused, NCERT reiterated its commitment to accuracy and sensitivity in educational materials. "NCERT remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of accuracy, sensitivity, and responsibility in educational content," it said.

Why did NCERT withdraw an entire Class 8 textbook and issue an “unconditional apology”? The move comes after the Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on the book. What exactly did the chapter say and why did it trigger such a strong response? Scroll down to read more.

NCERT withdraws controversial class 8 book, issues 'unconditional' apology for 'corruption in the judiciary' chapter

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reacted to the inclusion of a section on “Corruption in the Judiciary” in the &nbsp;National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) Social Science textbook for Class 8. "Kaun dekh raha hai ye sab (Who is looking after all this)," said the Prime Minister, as per various media organisations.&nbsp;The PM asked Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to find out who was responsible for this and who should be held accountable.&nbsp;Pradhan also expressed his regret over the issue on Wednesday and said, "We hold the judiciary in the highest regard... There was absolutely no intention on the part of the government to disrespect the judiciary. We are taking this matter very seriously... We will fully comply with the judiciary's decision. I am deeply saddened by what happened and express my regret."&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-deploys-a-dozen-f-22-stealth-jets-to-israel-expanding-its-military-presence-in-middle-east-amid-tension-with-iran-1772169507000">US deploys a dozen F-22 stealth jets to Israel, expanding its military presence in Middle East amid tension with Iran</a>&nbsp;Also, the &nbsp;Information and Broadcasting (I&amp;B) Ministry and the Electronics and Information Technology Ministry (MeitY) have been asked by the education ministry to stop dissemination of the controversial textbook via digital platforms and media.<h2>What's the NCERT row?</h2>&nbsp;The Class 8 Social Science book prescribed by NCERT mentions that corruption, backlog of cases, and a lack of adequate number of judges were among the some major challenges faced by the judicial system.&nbsp;The chapter “Corruption in the Judiciary” didn't go down well with the Supreme Court of India. Taking note of it, the SC issued a show-cause notice to the Secretary of School Education in the Ministry of Education and the Director of NCERT.&nbsp;

The PM asked Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to find out who was responsible for including the chapter in the text and hold the person accountable.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has reacted to the inclusion of a section on “Corruption in the Judiciary” in the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) Social Science textbook for Class 8. "Kaun dekh raha hai ye sab (Who is looking after all this)," said the Prime Minister, as per various media organisations. The PM asked Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to find out who was responsible for this and who should be held accountable. Pradhan also expressed his regret over the issue on Wednesday and said, "We hold the judiciary in the highest regard... There was absolutely no intention on the part of the government to disrespect the judiciary. We are taking this matter very seriously... We will fully comply with the judiciary's decision. I am deeply saddened by what happened and express my regret." ALSO READ: US deploys a dozen F-22 stealth jets to Israel, expanding its military presence in Middle East amid tension with Iran Also, the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Ministry and the Electronics and Information Technology Ministry (MeitY) have been asked by the education ministry to stop dissemination of the controversial textbook via digital platforms and media. What's the NCERT row? The Class 8 Social Science book prescribed by NCERT mentions that corruption, backlog of cases, and a lack of adequate number of judges were among the some major challenges faced by the judicial system. The chapter “Corruption in the Judiciary” didn't go down well with the Supreme Court of India. Taking note of it, the SC issued a show-cause notice to the Secretary of School Education in the Ministry of Education and the Director of NCERT.

The PM asked Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to find out who was responsible for including the chapter in the text and hold the person accountable.

NCERT judiciary ‘corruption’ content: PM Modi asks to fix responsibility, Education Minister vows action

The Supreme Court has ordered a complete, blanket ban on the reprinting and digital dissemination of the NCERT’s newest Social Science textbook for Class 8, which includes a chapter, “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society,” also mentioning “corruption” in the judiciary. As an abundant caution, the court ordered a complete, blanket ban on the reprinting and digital dissemination of the book and said any attempt to circulate the book would be in defiance and breach of the top court’s direction. A three-judge Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi passed the order on Thursday while hearing a suo motu case registered over the matter.“We would like to have a deeper probe. We need to find out who is responsible… heads must roll! We won’t close the case,” the apex court said as it grilled Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, arguing for the NCERT.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/share-revenue-with-news-publishers-or-face-legal-action-minister-ashwini-vaishnaw-warns-platforms-1772103925985">‘Share revenue with news publishers or face legal action,’ minister Ashwini Vaishnaw warns platforms</a>&nbsp;<h2>Bench orders immediate seizure of all copies in circulation, seeks compliance report</h2>&nbsp;The bench called it a “deep-rooted conspiracy against the judiciary”, ordered an immediate seizure of the copies in circulation, and called for a compliance report on the seizure of books in two weeks.&nbsp;&nbsp;The NCERT, in coordination with Union and State departments, are directed to ensure that copies of the book, hard or soft, in circulation are immediately seized and away from public access, even from digital platforms, the Bench said.It would be the personal responsibility of the NCERT Director and school principals, it added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-treasury-sanctions-over-30-individuals-and-entities-for-enabling-illicit-iranian-petroleum-sales-1772043577579">US Treasury sanctions over 30 individuals and entities for enabling illicit Iranian petroleum sales</a><h2>‘Thankful to the media for bringing this out’: CJI</h2>&nbsp;CJI Surya Kant thanked the media “for bringing this out” as the issue was first brought to notice in media reports.“I was getting hundreds and hundreds of calls and had taken cognisance even before (Kapil) Sibal mentioned it yesterday,” CJI Surya Kant said.“We all must stand together and defend the independence of the judicial institution,” he said.&nbsp;The Solicitor General said a notice has been published in the media and a copy placed on record. According to the press release, the Department of School Education and Literacy said the distribution of the book has been held back until further orders. That chapter would be rewritten, it said while tendering an apology.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/suicide-bomber-blows-himself-up-near-pakistan-checkpost-4-cops-dead-1772038584936">Suicide bomber blows himself up near Pakistan checkpost; 4 cops dead | Video</a><h2>Show cause notice issued to Dept. of School Education, NCERT Director</h2>&nbsp;“We deem it appropriate to issue show cause notice to Dept. of School Education secretary, Dr. Dinesh Prakash Sakhlani (NCERT Director) as to why suitable action under contempt of court act or in accordance with any other provisions of law against them or those found responsible for introducing the offending chapter,” the CJI said.&nbsp;The Supreme Court said it will consider later whether the apology has been tendered genuinely or to wriggle out of the spot when substantial damage has been done.&nbsp;<h2>Publish an unconditional apology: SG</h2>&nbsp;The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the current apology is not enough and an unqualified and unconditional apology will be published.&nbsp;The individuals who prepared the chapter would not be associated with any preparation of any chapter or any work in any ministry, the SG added.&nbsp;<h2>‘Fundamentally wrong to expose students to biased misconceptions at this tender age’</h2>&nbsp;CJI Surya Kant said the necessity has arisen for judicial intervention to safeguard the pedagogical sanctity. “Students are only beginning to navigate the nuances of life, it is fundamentally wrong to expose them to biased misconceptions at this tender age.”“There is a need to appreciate the manifold and onerous responsibilities by the judiciary,” the CJI said.“We have to keep in mind that the subject book will not remain confined to students only, the contents are bound to travel from students, teachers to parents and including the next generation too. It may have a lasting impact on judicial independence. Such misconduct falls within criminal contempt; if it proves to be deliberate, it will amount to scandalising the institution and bring it to disrepute,” he added.&nbsp;<h2>Text does not mention judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional values: CJI</h2>&nbsp;CJI Kant said that with just one stroke of the pen the publication washed off the illustrious history of the Supreme Court and High Courts and does not mention any substantive contributions of these institutions towards protecting the democratic values.&nbsp;“If this is allowed to go unchecked, it will erode the sanctity of the judiciary in the eyes of the public and more importantly the impressionable minds of the youth,” he said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-shocking-unacceptable-says-minister-govt-initiates-action-against-bsnl-director-over-prayagraj-visit-row-1772027947359">‘Shocking, unacceptable,’ says minister; govt initiates action against BSNL director over Prayagraj visit row</a><h2>‘Heads must roll; we want to know persons behind this’: CJI</h2>&nbsp;The Chief Justice said the court wants to know who the persons behind this are.“Heads must roll. There must be a deeper probe into this issue. Who are the persons behind this? We want to know. We must,” CJI Kant states.&nbsp;Justice Joymalya Bagchi said the text is extremely lopsided as it has not been highlighted that the judiciary is the protector of the Constitution. “How we do legal aid, etc., not mentioned,” Justice Bagchi said.

The three-judge bench of CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi called it a deep-rooted conspiracy against the judiciary, ordered an immediate seizure of the copies in circulation, and called for a compliance report on the seizure of books in two weeks.

The Supreme Court has ordered a complete, blanket ban on the reprinting and digital dissemination of the NCERT’s newest Social Science textbook for Class 8, which includes a chapter, “The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society,” also mentioning “corruption” in the judiciary. As an abundant caution, the court ordered a complete, blanket ban on the reprinting and digital dissemination of the book and said any attempt to circulate the book would be in defiance and breach of the top court’s direction. A three-judge Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi passed the order on Thursday while hearing a suo motu case registered over the matter. “We would like to have a deeper probe. We need to find out who is responsible… heads must roll! We won’t close the case,” the apex court said as it grilled Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, arguing for the NCERT. Also Read: ‘Share revenue with news publishers or face legal action,’ minister Ashwini Vaishnaw warns platforms Bench orders immediate seizure of all copies in circulation, seeks compliance report The bench called it a “deep-rooted conspiracy against the judiciary”, ordered an immediate seizure of the copies in circulation, and called for a compliance report on the seizure of books in two weeks. The NCERT, in coordination with Union and State departments, are directed to ensure that copies of the book, hard or soft, in circulation are immediately seized and away from public access, even from digital platforms, the Bench said. It would be the personal responsibility of the NCERT Director and school principals, it added. Also Read: US Treasury sanctions over 30 individuals and entities for enabling illicit Iranian petroleum sales ‘Thankful to the media for bringing this out’: CJI CJI Surya Kant thanked the media “for bringing this out” as the issue was first brought to notice in media reports. “I was getting hundreds and hundreds of calls and had taken cognisance even before (Kapil) Sibal mentioned it yesterday,” CJI Surya Kant said. “We all must stand together and defend the independence of the judicial institution,” he said. The Solicitor General said a notice has been published in the media and a copy placed on record. According to the press release, the Department of School Education and Literacy said the distribution of the book has been held back until further orders. That chapter would be rewritten, it said while tendering an apology. Also Read: Suicide bomber blows himself up near Pakistan checkpost; 4 cops dead | Video Show cause notice issued to Dept. of School Education, NCERT Director “We deem it appropriate to issue show cause notice to Dept. of School Education secretary, Dr. Dinesh Prakash Sakhlani (NCERT Director) as to why suitable action under contempt of court act or in accordance with any other provisions of law against them or those found responsible for introducing the offending chapter,” the CJI said. The Supreme Court said it will consider later whether the apology has been tendered genuinely or to wriggle out of the spot when substantial damage has been done. Publish an unconditional apology: SG The Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the current apology is not enough and an unqualified and unconditional apology will be published. The individuals who prepared the chapter would not be associated with any preparation of any chapter or any work in any ministry, the SG added. ‘Fundamentally wrong to expose students to biased misconceptions at this tender age’ CJI Surya Kant said the necessity has arisen for judicial intervention to safeguard the pedagogical sanctity. “Students are only beginning to navigate the nuances of life, it is fundamentally wrong to expose them to biased misconceptions at this tender age.” “There is a need to appreciate the manifold and onerous responsibilities by the judiciary,” the CJI said. “We have to keep in mind that the subject book will not remain confined to students only, the contents are bound to travel from students, teachers to parents and including the next generation too. It may have a lasting impact on judicial independence. Such misconduct falls within criminal contempt; if it proves to be deliberate, it will amount to scandalising the institution and bring it to disrepute,” he added. Text does not mention judiciary’s role in upholding constitutional values: CJI CJI Kant said that with just one stroke of the pen the publication washed off the illustrious history of the Supreme Court and High Courts and does not mention any substantive contributions of these institutions towards protecting the democratic values. “If this is allowed to go unchecked, it will erode the sanctity of the judiciary in the eyes of the public and more importantly the impressionable minds of the youth,” he said. Also Read: ‘Shocking, unacceptable,’ says minister; govt initiates action against BSNL director over Prayagraj visit row ‘Heads must roll; we want to know persons behind this’: CJI The Chief Justice said the court wants to know who the persons behind this are. “Heads must roll. There must be a deeper probe into this issue. Who are the persons behind this? We want to know. We must,” CJI Kant states. Justice Joymalya Bagchi said the text is extremely lopsided as it has not been highlighted that the judiciary is the protector of the Constitution. “How we do legal aid, etc., not mentioned,” Justice Bagchi said.

The three-judge bench of CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi called it a deep-rooted conspiracy against the judiciary, ordered an immediate seizure of the copies in circulation, and called for a compliance report on the seizure of books in two weeks.

Supreme Court orders blanket ban on NCERT textbook, says ‘heads must roll’

The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday (Feb 25) began suo moto proceedings over the inclusion of a section on "corruption in the judiciary" within the new NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) class 8 Social Science textbook. The Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, said that the institution will not be allowed to be defamed. "I'm fully aware of it. We will wait for a day. This definitely concerns the entire institution. Both bar and bench," he said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-a-claim-to-overshadow-epstein-files-russia-demands-concrete-data-on-alexei-navalny-poisoning-allegation-putin-1771428712351">‘A claim to overshadow Epstein Files’: Russia demands ‘concrete data’ on Alexei Navalny poisoning allegation</a>&nbsp;"I am getting a lot of calls, lots of messages. I'm taking suo moto cognisance of the issue. I will not let anybody, no matter how high up they are, defame the institution," the Chief Justice said, ANI reported.&nbsp;Moreover, the senior lawyers Kapil Sibal and Abhishek M Singhvi mentioned the issue before the CJI-led bench, saying that children are being taught the subject of corruption in the judiciary as if it doesn't exist anywhere else in any other institution. "They have left out bureaucracy, politics, etc. Not a word on other sectors. They are teaching as if it only exists in this institution", the lawyers said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-to-attack-iran-soon-from-usss-abraham-lincoln-to-gerald-ford-us-deploys-these-warships-are-heading-towards-middle-east-nuclear-deal-1771605910151">Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East</a><h2>What did NCERT say?</h2>The council, in response to the judiciary's actio, said that the content in the textbook was the result of an "error". In a statement issued, the NCERT said, "As per the extant procedure, NCERT brought out the Social Science textbook, Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Vol II, for Class 8 on 24-02-2026. On receiving the textbook, it has been observed that certain inappropriate textual material and errors of judgment have inadvertently crept into Chapter No 4, entitled “The Role of Judiciary in our Society” (page 125-142). The Department of School Education &amp; Literacy (Ministry of Education) also made a similar observation and directed that the distribution of this book may be kept on strict hold until further orders. &nbsp;The same has been complied with. The NCERT holds the judiciary in the highest esteem and considers it to be the upholder of the Indian Constitution and protector of Fundamental Rights. The aforesaid error is purely unintentional, and NCERT regrets the inclusion of inappropriate material in the said chapter."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;

The Supreme Court initiated suo moto proceedings over an NCERT Class 8 textbook section on judicial corruption, prompting NCERT to halt distribution and call the content an unintentional error.

The Indian Supreme Court on Wednesday (Feb 25) began suo moto proceedings over the inclusion of a section on "corruption in the judiciary" within the new NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) class 8 Social Science textbook. The Chief Justice of India, Surya Kant, said that the institution will not be allowed to be defamed. "I'm fully aware of it. We will wait for a day. This definitely concerns the entire institution. Both bar and bench," he said. Also read: ‘A claim to overshadow Epstein Files’: Russia demands ‘concrete data’ on Alexei Navalny poisoning allegation "I am getting a lot of calls, lots of messages. I'm taking suo moto cognisance of the issue. I will not let anybody, no matter how high up they are, defame the institution," the Chief Justice said, ANI reported. Moreover, the senior lawyers Kapil Sibal and Abhishek M Singhvi mentioned the issue before the CJI-led bench, saying that children are being taught the subject of corruption in the judiciary as if it doesn't exist anywhere else in any other institution. "They have left out bureaucracy, politics, etc. Not a word on other sectors. They are teaching as if it only exists in this institution", the lawyers said. Also read: Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East What did NCERT say? The council, in response to the judiciary's actio, said that the content in the textbook was the result of an "error". In a statement issued, the NCERT said, "As per the extant procedure, NCERT brought out the Social Science textbook, Exploring Society: India and Beyond, Vol II, for Class 8 on 24-02-2026. On receiving the textbook, it has been observed that certain inappropriate textual material and errors of judgment have inadvertently crept into Chapter No 4, entitled “The Role of Judiciary in our Society” (page 125-142). The Department of School Education & Literacy (Ministry of Education) also made a similar observation and directed that the distribution of this book may be kept on strict hold until further orders. The same has been complied with. The NCERT holds the judiciary in the highest esteem and considers it to be the upholder of the Indian Constitution and protector of Fundamental Rights. The aforesaid error is purely unintentional, and NCERT regrets the inclusion of inappropriate material in the said chapter." Also read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options

The Supreme Court initiated suo moto proceedings over an NCERT Class 8 textbook section on judicial corruption, prompting NCERT to halt distribution and call the content an unintentional error.

'Corruption in judiciary'? NCERT in tight spot after SC begins suo moto proceedings over class 8 textbook. Here’s why

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant took note of the mention of ‘corruption in the judiciary’ in a revised NCERT textbook chapter and informed members of the Bar on Wednesday that the Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of it and asserted that he would not let anyone defame the institution. “I will not allow anyone on earth to defame the institution. Howsoever high they be, nobody is above the law. Do not worry… I know how to deal with it,” the CJI said in open court after some senior advocates urged the court to intervene.Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the issue before a bench also comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi, saying the Bar was “deeply disturbed”.&nbsp;<h2>‘Have already passed the order, taking matter suo motu’</h2>&nbsp;“We are compelled to urgently mention this matter since we, at the Bar, are deeply disturbed. Children in Class 8 are being taught about ‘corruption in judiciary’. It is a part of the NCERT curriculum and their textbook,” Sibal submitted.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pm-modi-greeted-by-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-as-he-lands-in-israel-1772017052730">PM Modi greeted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on landing in Israel, to address Knesset</a>&nbsp;The CJI responded that he was already aware of the development. “I am fully aware of it. I can assure you…it definitely concerns the entire institution. All stakeholders, judges in high courts are equally perturbed and have brought it to my notice. I am receiving lot of calls and messages,” he said.“I have already passed the order on the administrative side. We are taking the matter suo motu,” he added, indicating that the top court would initiate proceedings on its own motion.&nbsp;The CJI described the development as “deep-rooted,” adding that it appeared to be “a calculated and conscious step”.&nbsp;<h2>‘Not a word about corruption in bureaucracy or politics’</h2>&nbsp;Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out that while the chapter mentioned corruption in the judiciary, there was “not a word” about corruption in other sectors like the bureaucracy or politics.Responding, Justice Bagchi observed that “constitutional morality, as envisaged in the basic structure, is missing”.“I can assure you we will take appropriate steps,” the CJI reiterated.&nbsp;Supreme Court Bar Association President Senior Advocate Vikas Singh later said in a remark to the media that the instance is completely shocking and merits action. "This is completely shocking... Do they have a sub-chapter with regard to the 40 % MLAs and MPs who have a serious criminal background? ... This kind of a message, if they want to give, they should give it about these MLAs and MPs... Corruption in the judiciary is far less than what it is in the executive and in politics,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Delhi: On the Supreme Court taking suo moto cognisance of the issue of Class 8 students being taught ‘corruption in the Indian judiciary’ in their NCERT curriculum, President of Supreme Court Bar Association, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh says, &quot;This is completely… <a href="https://t.co/i1eYOAliWQ">pic.twitter.com/i1eYOAliWQ</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/2026605435781001658?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 25, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-shocking-unacceptable-says-minister-govt-initiates-action-against-bsnl-director-over-prayagraj-visit-row-1772027947359">‘Shocking, unacceptable,’ says minister; govt initiates action against BSNL director over Prayagraj visit row</a><h2>Chapter raises corruption at various levels and massive backlog of cases as challenges</h2>&nbsp;The controversy is about the newly released social science textbook for Class 8 by NCERT, which includes a section on “corruption in the judiciary” as part of a chapter titled “The role of the judiciary in our society."&nbsp;The chapter lists “corruption at various levels of the judiciary” and a “massive backlog” of cases as among the challenges faced by the judicial system. It provides approximate figures of pending cases—around 81,000 in the Supreme Court, over 6.2 million in high courts, and nearly 47 million in district courts.The section states that judges are bound by a code of conduct governing their behaviour both inside and outside court, refers to internal accountability mechanisms, and mentions complaints received through the Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPGRAMS). It notes that over 1,600 such complaints were received between 2017 and 2021.&nbsp;It also explains the constitutional mechanism for the removal of judges through impeachment by Parliament after due inquiry and states that instances of corruption and misconduct can negatively affect public confidence. The textbook also emphasises the need for transparency and accountability and quotes former CJI B R Gavai on the importance of swift and decisive action to preserve faith in the institution.&nbsp;<h2>‘Shortage of judges, complex legal procedures, and inadequate infrastructure reasons for backlog’</h2>&nbsp;The previous edition of the textbook, based on the 2005 National Curriculum Framework, covered the structure and role of the judiciary and issues like delay in disposal of cases but did not mention corruption in the judiciary.NCERT keeps revising textbooks, and the new books for Classes 1 to 8 have already been rolled out.&nbsp;The revised Class 8 textbook, with a chapter titled ‘The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society’, also cites shortage of judges, complex legal procedures, and inadequate infrastructure as reasons for the heavy backlog.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant described the development as deep-rooted, adding that it appeared to be a calculated and conscious step. The Chief Justce also assured appropriate action on the subject.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant took note of the mention of ‘corruption in the judiciary’ in a revised NCERT textbook chapter and informed members of the Bar on Wednesday that the Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of it and asserted that he would not let anyone defame the institution. “I will not allow anyone on earth to defame the institution. Howsoever high they be, nobody is above the law. Do not worry… I know how to deal with it,” the CJI said in open court after some senior advocates urged the court to intervene. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned the issue before a bench also comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi, saying the Bar was “deeply disturbed”. ‘Have already passed the order, taking matter suo motu’ “We are compelled to urgently mention this matter since we, at the Bar, are deeply disturbed. Children in Class 8 are being taught about ‘corruption in judiciary’. It is a part of the NCERT curriculum and their textbook,” Sibal submitted. Also Read: PM Modi greeted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on landing in Israel, to address Knesset The CJI responded that he was already aware of the development. “I am fully aware of it. I can assure you…it definitely concerns the entire institution. All stakeholders, judges in high courts are equally perturbed and have brought it to my notice. I am receiving lot of calls and messages,” he said. “I have already passed the order on the administrative side. We are taking the matter suo motu,” he added, indicating that the top court would initiate proceedings on its own motion. The CJI described the development as “deep-rooted,” adding that it appeared to be “a calculated and conscious step”. ‘Not a word about corruption in bureaucracy or politics’ Senior counsel Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out that while the chapter mentioned corruption in the judiciary, there was “not a word” about corruption in other sectors like the bureaucracy or politics. Responding, Justice Bagchi observed that “constitutional morality, as envisaged in the basic structure, is missing”. “I can assure you we will take appropriate steps,” the CJI reiterated. Supreme Court Bar Association President Senior Advocate Vikas Singh later said in a remark to the media that the instance is completely shocking and merits action. "This is completely shocking... Do they have a sub-chapter with regard to the 40 % MLAs and MPs who have a serious criminal background? ... This kind of a message, if they want to give, they should give it about these MLAs and MPs... Corruption in the judiciary is far less than what it is in the executive and in politics,” he said.

Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant described the development as deep-rooted, adding that it appeared to be a calculated and conscious step. The Chief Justce also assured appropriate action on the subject.&nbsp;

‘Will not let anyone defame institution’s integrity’: SC takes suo motu cognisance of ‘corruption in judiciary’ mention in NCERT book

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) in its latest edition of Class 8 social science textbook has slammed the British government for holding out on an apology for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre 1919. These updates are part of the new National Education Policy (NEP) and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023.<h2>Why hasn't the UK apologised for this 'deeply shameful event in British history'?</h2>The newly updated textbook 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond Part 2' in a chapter titled 'India's Long Road to Independence,' covers the freedom fight - from the 1857 revolt, up to the 1947 partition of India-Pakistan. It also mentions the Partition of Bengal.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ncert-flags-judicial-corruption-and-over-53-million-pending-cases-in-new-class-8-social-science-book-1771912233327">NCERT flags judicial corruption, over 53 million pending cases in Class 8 book</a>Describing the massacre which claimed over 1,000 lives as &nbsp;a "deeply shameful event in British history" the book which adds new perspective to India's fight for freedom, notes that despite multiple requests the British have not apologised for the atrocity. The previous edition of the book did not mention any requests for an apology.<h2>The devastating death toll of Jallianwala Bagh massacre</h2>On April 13, 1919, Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to fire at thousands of people who had gathered to protest against the Rowlatt Act at the annual Baisakhi fair. It is estimated that firing inside the crowded, enclosed area continued straight for 10 minutes, especially targeting the exits.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-the-only-way-forward-ncert-revises-class-8-textbook-says-gandhi-opposed-but-congress-accepted-1947-partition-all-about-new-changes-here-1771908643180">NCERT revises Class 8 book, says Cong accepted Partition as 'only way forward'</a>According to a British government inquiry, 379 people were killed, while approximately 1,200 were wounded in the brutal carnage. However, these figures have long been considered a significant underestimation. Reports, including one by a committee headed by Madan Mohan Malviya, estimated the death toll to be over 1,000–1,500. While in 2019, Britain expressed deep "regret" for the bloodbath, the nation is yet to formally tender an apology.&nbsp;

NCERT’s revised Class 8 textbook calls the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre a “deeply shameful” chapter and notes Britain has still not formally apologised, despite past requests. All you need to know.

The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) in its latest edition of Class 8 social science textbook has slammed the British government for holding out on an apology for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre 1919. These updates are part of the new National Education Policy (NEP) and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023. Why hasn't the UK apologised for this 'deeply shameful event in British history'? The newly updated textbook 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond Part 2' in a chapter titled 'India's Long Road to Independence,' covers the freedom fight - from the 1857 revolt, up to the 1947 partition of India-Pakistan. It also mentions the Partition of Bengal. Also read | NCERT flags judicial corruption, over 53 million pending cases in Class 8 book Describing the massacre which claimed over 1,000 lives as a "deeply shameful event in British history" the book which adds new perspective to India's fight for freedom, notes that despite multiple requests the British have not apologised for the atrocity. The previous edition of the book did not mention any requests for an apology. The devastating death toll of Jallianwala Bagh massacre On April 13, 1919, Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to fire at thousands of people who had gathered to protest against the Rowlatt Act at the annual Baisakhi fair. It is estimated that firing inside the crowded, enclosed area continued straight for 10 minutes, especially targeting the exits. Also read | NCERT revises Class 8 book, says Cong accepted Partition as 'only way forward' According to a British government inquiry, 379 people were killed, while approximately 1,200 were wounded in the brutal carnage. However, these figures have long been considered a significant underestimation. Reports, including one by a committee headed by Madan Mohan Malviya, estimated the death toll to be over 1,000–1,500. While in 2019, Britain expressed deep "regret" for the bloodbath, the nation is yet to formally tender an apology.

NCERT’s revised Class 8 textbook calls the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre a “deeply shameful” chapter and notes Britain has still not formally apologised, despite past requests. All you need to know.

NCERT revised Class 8 book slams Britain’s lack of apology for ‘deeply shameful’ Jallianwala Bagh massacre

The NCERT has made major changes to its Class 8 Social Science textbooks, adding, for the first time, a section on corruption within the judiciary. The updated edition of the textbooks differs from earlier editions, which mainly focused on how courts function. These updates are part of the new National Education Policy (NEP) and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023.<h2>Judicial corruption</h2>The National Council of Educational Research and Training has added a section on corruption within the judiciary to its Class 8 Social Science textbook.The revised chapter, titled "The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society," still explains the hierarchy of courts and the idea of access to justice. However, now it also addresses the system's vulnerabilities, including corruption and the massive backlog of cases.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-the-only-way-forward-ncert-revises-class-8-textbook-says-gandhi-opposed-but-congress-accepted-1947-partition-all-about-new-changes-here-1771908643180">NCERT revises Class 8 book, says Cong accepted Partition as 'only way forward'</a>The book lays out the scale of the problem in stark numbers. It cites roughly 53,321,000 pending cases across courts - 81,000 in the Supreme Court, 62.4 lakh (62,40,000) in High Courts across India, and about 4.7 crore (4,70,00,000) in district and subordinate courts.&nbsp;<h2>What does the NCERT say about judges?</h2>While discussing corruption, the textbook notes that judges are bound by a code of conduct that governs their behaviour both inside and outside the courtroom. It explains that complaints against members of the judiciary can be filed through the Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System, also known as CPGRAMS.Between 2017 and 2021, more than 1,600 complaints were received through this mechanism, according to the book.It also outlines the constitutional process for removing a judge in serious cases. "In cases where the allegations are serious, Parliament can take action and remove a judge by passing a motion of impeachment. Such a motion is considered only after a proper inquiry, during which the judge is given a fair opportunity to present their side of the case," it reads.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/revealed-at-least-6-epstein-secret-storage-units-missed-by-fbi-what-are-they-hiding-unseen-pics-of-young-victims-blackmail-material-powerful-men-1771892294014">DOJ files reveal 6 Epstein secret storage units FBI never raided. What's inside?</a><h2>Public trust at stake?</h2>The chapter also makes mention of public perception and concerns. "Nevertheless, people do experience corruption at various levels of the judiciary. For the poor and the disadvantaged, this can worsen the issue of access to justice," the chapter notes.The text adds that both state and Union governments are working to improve transparency, including through the use of technology and prompt action in proven cases of misconduct.Quoting former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, the book states that corruption and misconduct damage public confidence. Rebuilding trust, as per the former CJI, "lies in the swift, decisive and transparent action taken to address and resolve these issues... Transparency and accountability are democratic virtues," notes the book.&nbsp;

India News: NCERT’s revised Class 8 Social Science book now includes a section on judicial corruption and case backlogs. It cites over 53 crore pending cases nationwide, and even explains the impeachment process for judges to boost transparency and trust. All you need to know.

The NCERT has made major changes to its Class 8 Social Science textbooks, adding, for the first time, a section on corruption within the judiciary. The updated edition of the textbooks differs from earlier editions, which mainly focused on how courts function. These updates are part of the new National Education Policy (NEP) and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023. Judicial corruption The National Council of Educational Research and Training has added a section on corruption within the judiciary to its Class 8 Social Science textbook. The revised chapter, titled "The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society," still explains the hierarchy of courts and the idea of access to justice. However, now it also addresses the system's vulnerabilities, including corruption and the massive backlog of cases. Also read | NCERT revises Class 8 book, says Cong accepted Partition as 'only way forward' The book lays out the scale of the problem in stark numbers. It cites roughly 53,321,000 pending cases across courts - 81,000 in the Supreme Court, 62.4 lakh (62,40,000) in High Courts across India, and about 4.7 crore (4,70,00,000) in district and subordinate courts. What does the NCERT say about judges? While discussing corruption, the textbook notes that judges are bound by a code of conduct that governs their behaviour both inside and outside the courtroom. It explains that complaints against members of the judiciary can be filed through the Centralised Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System, also known as CPGRAMS. Between 2017 and 2021, more than 1,600 complaints were received through this mechanism, according to the book. It also outlines the constitutional process for removing a judge in serious cases. "In cases where the allegations are serious, Parliament can take action and remove a judge by passing a motion of impeachment. Such a motion is considered only after a proper inquiry, during which the judge is given a fair opportunity to present their side of the case," it reads. Also read | DOJ files reveal 6 Epstein secret storage units FBI never raided. What's inside? Public trust at stake? The chapter also makes mention of public perception and concerns. "Nevertheless, people do experience corruption at various levels of the judiciary. For the poor and the disadvantaged, this can worsen the issue of access to justice," the chapter notes. The text adds that both state and Union governments are working to improve transparency, including through the use of technology and prompt action in proven cases of misconduct. Quoting former Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, the book states that corruption and misconduct damage public confidence. Rebuilding trust, as per the former CJI, "lies in the swift, decisive and transparent action taken to address and resolve these issues... Transparency and accountability are democratic virtues," notes the book.

India News: NCERT’s revised Class 8 Social Science book now includes a section on judicial corruption and case backlogs. It cites over 53 million pending cases nationwide, and even explains the impeachment process for judges to boost transparency and trust. All you need to know.

NCERT flags judicial corruption and over 53 million pending cases in new Class 8 Social Science book

The NCERT has made major changes to its Class 8 Social Science textbooks, adding new insights into the 1947 India-Pakistan partition. The updated version of the school textbook released on Monday (Feb 23) notes that while Mahatma Gandhi and most Congress leaders had opposed the idea of partition, "they ended up accepting it as the only way forward." This latest revision, done in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, also brings in new chapters on the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919, the Direct Action Day of 1946, and more. &nbsp;<h2>What did the previous Class 8 NCERT say about the 1947 partition?</h2>The old Class 8 NCERT history book also had a section on partition. It stated that a three-member mission sent by the British cabinet to Delhi with the suggestion of a political framework for a free India "could not get the Congress and the Muslim League to agree to specific details of the proposal"."Partition now became more or less inevitable," it noted, adding that the "joy of our country's Independence from British rule came mixed with the pain and violence of Partition".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/what-happens-to-india-s-18-tariff-after-scotus-scraps-trump-reciprocal-duties-here-s-what-the-potus-said-nothing-happens-1771648834475">Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS scraps Trump reciprocal duties? Here’s what the POTUS said</a><h2>What does the new NCERT say about Partition?</h2>The newly updated textbook 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond Part 2' in a chapter titled 'India's Long Road to Independence,' covers the freedom fight - from the 1857 revolt, up to the 1947 partition of India-Pakistan. It also mentions the Partition of Bengal.It explains that historians have long debated what led to Britain's exit from India, and notes "the earlier view was that it was mostly thanks to Gandhi, his doctrine of non-violence, and the Congress’s policies". The updated textbook notes that "multiple other factors were also at work – the popular uprisings, the numerous attempts by revolutionaries, the mutinies in the Royal Indian Air Force and the Royal Indian Navy"."Also, Britain’s diminished status after World War II, and the worldwide trend towards decolonisation – the age of empires was over, at least in that form," it reads.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/revealed-at-least-6-epstein-secret-storage-units-missed-by-fbi-what-are-they-hiding-unseen-pics-of-young-victims-blackmail-material-powerful-men-1771892294014">DOJ files reveal 6 Epstein secret storage units FBI never raided. What's inside?</a><h2>Story of 'Bande Mataram' and the rise of nationalist feelings</h2>Additionally, the textbook introduces a new section detailing the cultural influences that contribute to the growth of nationalist sentiment. It refers to Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay's 'Bande Mataram'. Featuring the first two stanzas of the National Song of India, the textbook challenges students to "make out some of their meaning". &nbsp;

India News: NCERT has revised its Class 8 Social Science book. The updated textbook says that Mahatma Gandhi and Congress opposed Partition but accepted it as 'the only way forward'. All you need to know.

The NCERT has made major changes to its Class 8 Social Science textbooks, adding new insights into the 1947 India-Pakistan partition. The updated version of the school textbook released on Monday (Feb 23) notes that while Mahatma Gandhi and most Congress leaders had opposed the idea of partition, "they ended up accepting it as the only way forward." This latest revision, done in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, also brings in new chapters on the Jallianwala Bagh massacre of 1919, the Direct Action Day of 1946, and more. What did the previous Class 8 NCERT say about the 1947 partition? The old Class 8 NCERT history book also had a section on partition. It stated that a three-member mission sent by the British cabinet to Delhi with the suggestion of a political framework for a free India "could not get the Congress and the Muslim League to agree to specific details of the proposal". "Partition now became more or less inevitable," it noted, adding that the "joy of our country's Independence from British rule came mixed with the pain and violence of Partition". Also read | Will India still pay 18% tariffs after SCOTUS scraps Trump reciprocal duties? Here’s what the POTUS said What does the new NCERT say about Partition? The newly updated textbook 'Exploring Society: India and Beyond Part 2' in a chapter titled 'India's Long Road to Independence,' covers the freedom fight - from the 1857 revolt, up to the 1947 partition of India-Pakistan. It also mentions the Partition of Bengal. It explains that historians have long debated what led to Britain's exit from India, and notes "the earlier view was that it was mostly thanks to Gandhi, his doctrine of non-violence, and the Congress’s policies". The updated textbook notes that "multiple other factors were also at work – the popular uprisings, the numerous attempts by revolutionaries, the mutinies in the Royal Indian Air Force and the Royal Indian Navy". "Also, Britain’s diminished status after World War II, and the worldwide trend towards decolonisation – the age of empires was over, at least in that form," it reads. Also read | DOJ files reveal 6 Epstein secret storage units FBI never raided. What's inside? Story of 'Bande Mataram' and the rise of nationalist feelings Additionally, the textbook introduces a new section detailing the cultural influences that contribute to the growth of nationalist sentiment. It refers to Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay's 'Bande Mataram'. Featuring the first two stanzas of the National Song of India, the textbook challenges students to "make out some of their meaning".

India News: NCERT has revised its Class 8 Social Science book. The updated textbook says that Mahatma Gandhi and Congress opposed Partition but accepted it as 'the only way forward'. All you need to know.

NCERT revises Class 8 textbook, says Congress accepted 1947 Partition as 'the only way forward' - All about new changes here

ncert-book-8th-class

Ncert Book 8th Class, News on Ncert Book 8th Class, stories on Ncert Book 8th Class, articles on Ncert Book 8th Class, Ncert Book 8th Class stories at Wion, Ncert Book 8th Class news, Ncert Book 8th Class latest news

ncert book-8th-class

NCERT withdraws controversial class 8 book, issues 'unconditional' apology for 'corruption in the judiciary' chapter

NCERT judiciary ‘corruption’ content: PM Modi asks to fix responsibility

Supreme Court orders blanket ban on NCERT textbook, says ‘heads must roll’

NCERT in tight spot after SC begins suo moto proceedings over class 8 textbook

SC takes suo motu cognisance of ‘corruption in judiciary’ mention in NCERT book

NCERT revised Class 8 book slams Britain’s lack of apology for Jallianwala Bagh

NCERT flags judicial corruption, over 53 million pending cases in Class 8 book

NCERT revises Class 8 book, says Cong accepted Partition as 'only way forward'