<p>Artificial Intelligence chatbots these days can answer anything for you. I wanted to see if they can solve one of the most complex issues in today's world, the Russia-Ukraine war. I found most answers to be similar, exposing the biases and sources of these chatbots. And I found a key gap in all the answers. Let me break it down for you.</p><h2>I started with Gemini, and here's what it said on resolving Ukraine war</h2><p>Gemini, the chatbot owned by Google parent Alphabet, called Ukraine war "deeply complex, shaped by long-standing security, territorial, and political disputes," (as if I didn't know that). It said peace will need to address five core issues:</p><h3>1. Territorial disputes:</h3><p>Ukraine is seeking the return to its 1991 borders and rejects territorial concessions, while some proposals suggest land-for-peace compromises.</p><h3>2. Security guarantees:</h3><p>Ukraine seeks strong Western-backed protections against future aggression by Russia. Full NATO membership for Ukraine is unlikely, but alternatives include NATO-like arrangements, whereas Russia opposes any NATO ties for Ukraine, given its own national security concerns.</p><h3>3. Ceasefire:</h3><p>A pause in war is a first step, but timing and conditions are still disputed. While Ukraine favours an immediate ceasefire, Russia continues fighting even during negotiations.</p><h3>4. Sanctions and legal issues:</h3><p>Western sanctions on Russia are central to peace talks, and a deal will have to balance sanctions relief with upholding international law regarding Russia’s occupation.</p><h2>5. Demilitarisation and neutrality:</h2><p>Russia wants Ukraine to stay out of NATO and adopt armed neutrality, which some say would be similar to Switzerland.</p><h3>What are the obstacles for peace?</h3><p>Mutual distrust due to failed past agreements like the Minsk Accords, and conflicting goals are the impediments.<br>Russia wants control and limits to Ukraine’s Western alignment, while Kyiv insists on full sovereignty and territorial integrity.<br>Domestic politics in all involved nations are shaping public opinion and negotiation limits.</p><p><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed</a></p><h2>What did other chatbots say about resolving the Ukraine war?</h2><p>After checking with Gemini, I went to four other chatbots: ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity AI and DeepSeek AI. To my surprise, most of them gave similar answers, and even their sources were similar (more about that later). So for your easy understanding, I only picked what’s different in their answers.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-trump-imposed-tariffs-on-india-citing-russian-oil-purchase-press-secretary-leavitt-reveals-real-reason-1755664123235"><strong>Why Trump imposed tariffs on India citing Russian oil purchase? Press Secretary Leavitt reveals REAL reason</strong></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>ChatGPT's new suggestions included step-by-step negotiations, more prisoner exchanges, creation of demilitarised zones, reconstruction of Ukraine through frozen Russian assets, more autonomy/federalisation, reconciliation, and Global South diplomacy.</p><p>Grok suggested the introduction of some kind of ceasefire monitoring technology, temporary territorial leases, bilateral pacts, advanced military support, punishing Russia’s enablers, creation of buffer zones, and so on.</p><p><strong>Also read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-laundromat-for-kremlin-top-us-official-slams-india-accuses-india-of-fuelling-russia-s-war-in-ukraine-1755798988515"><strong>‘Laundromat for Kremlin’: Top US official slams India, accuses India of fuelling Russia’s war in Ukraine</strong></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Perplexity AI advocated incremental peace steps instead of a complete end to the war, a legal referendum (but it also talked about hurdles), direct talks between Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and detailed international mediation proposals, among other things.</p><p>DeepSeek stressed the emphasis on war fatigue in Ukraine and sought a balance between justice and realism.</p><h2>What’s the problem with AI answers to the Ukraine war question?</h2><p>With minor exceptions, most of the AI bots dipped into the same sources. This shows the limitations in AI model training. Russian arguments and sources were almost nil. This also reflects that Ukraine won the propaganda war while Russia, in spite of having a massive state media apparatus, could not bring its argument to the limelight. Clearly, a shadow banning of Russian outlets online by the search engines, owned by the very players who also the parents of most of these chatbots, is playing a role. Therefore, one would not hear much about the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, which possibly wanted self-rule or autonomy for years. Russia's security concerns about being surrounded by NATO or West-aligned nations is decades old. That concern did not find enough stress in the answers.</p><p><strong>Also read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-ukraine-war-vladimir-putin-volodymyr-zelensky-donbas-nato-security-guarantees-1755793568698"><strong>'If there is no peace, then there is more war': Putin lists 'three key demands' for ending Ukraine war - What are they?</strong></a></p><h2>So what do I make of AI answers to Ukraine war?</h2><p>Much of AI answers are shaped by what they refer to: mostly Western media and Western digital outlets and reference sites. A balanced approach is lacking and pro-West bias is evident. Any solution to the war as given by the chatbots will not be agreeable to Russia. It exposes the need for a deeper understanding of the long-standing issues between Russia and the West that ignited the conflict. Moscow sees Ukraine as the amplifier of Western military interests across its border. Putin's lifelong fear was the flanking of his nation by the West. Those fears, which are at the core of his decision to invade Ukraine, did not find mention in the AI answers.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I'd better head to the library.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

Can AI chatbots solve the complex Russia-Ukraine war? After asking five chatbots the same question, I found their answers largely similar and biased towards Western perspectives. Some arguments and perspectives are absent or lacking. Deliberately so?


Artificial Intelligence chatbots these days can answer anything for you. I wanted to see if they can solve one of the most complex issues in today's world, the Russia-Ukraine war. I found most answers to be similar, exposing the biases and sources of these chatbots. And I found a key gap in all the answers. Let me break it down for you. I started with Gemini, and here's what it said on resolving Ukraine war Gemini, the chatbot owned by Google parent Alphabet, called Ukraine war "deeply complex, shaped by long-standing security, territorial, and political disputes," (as if I didn't know that). It said peace will need to address five core issues: 1. Territorial disputes: Ukraine is seeking the return to its 1991 borders and rejects territorial concessions, while some proposals suggest land-for-peace compromises. 2. Security guarantees: Ukraine seeks strong Western-backed protections against future aggression by Russia. Full NATO membership for Ukraine is unlikely, but alternatives include NATO-like arrangements, whereas Russia opposes any NATO ties for Ukraine, given its own national security concerns. 3. Ceasefire: A pause in war is a first step, but timing and conditions are still disputed. While Ukraine favours an immediate ceasefire, Russia continues fighting even during negotiations. 4. Sanctions and legal issues: Western sanctions on Russia are central to peace talks, and a deal will have to balance sanctions relief with upholding international law regarding Russia’s occupation. 5. Demilitarisation and neutrality: Russia wants Ukraine to stay out of NATO and adopt armed neutrality, which some say would be similar to Switzerland. What are the obstacles for peace? Mutual distrust due to failed past agreements like the Minsk Accords, and conflicting goals are the impediments. Russia wants control and limits to Ukraine’s Western alignment, while Kyiv insists on full sovereignty and territorial integrity. Domestic politics in all involved nations are shaping public opinion and negotiation limits. https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-war-spurs-ukrainian-startups-producing-missiles-drones-1755836068435/embed What did other chatbots say about resolving the Ukraine war? After checking with Gemini, I went to four other chatbots: ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity AI and DeepSeek AI. To my surprise, most of them gave similar answers, and even their sources were similar (more about that later). So for your easy understanding, I only picked what’s different in their answers. Also read: Why Trump imposed tariffs on India citing Russian oil purchase? Press Secretary Leavitt reveals REAL reason ChatGPT's new suggestions included step-by-step negotiations, more prisoner exchanges, creation of demilitarised zones, reconstruction of Ukraine through frozen Russian assets, more autonomy/federalisation, reconciliation, and Global South diplomacy. Grok suggested the introduction of some kind of ceasefire monitoring technology, temporary territorial leases, bilateral pacts, advanced military support, punishing Russia’s enablers, creation of buffer zones, and so on. Also read: ‘Laundromat for Kremlin’: Top US official slams India, accuses India of fuelling Russia’s war in Ukraine Perplexity AI advocated incremental peace steps instead of a complete end to the war, a legal referendum (but it also talked about hurdles), direct talks between Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and detailed international mediation proposals, among other things. DeepSeek stressed the emphasis on war fatigue in Ukraine and sought a balance between justice and realism. What’s the problem with AI answers to the Ukraine war question? With minor exceptions, most of the AI bots dipped into the same sources. This shows the limitations in AI model training. Russian arguments and sources were almost nil. This also reflects that Ukraine won the propaganda war while Russia, in spite of having a massive state media apparatus, could not bring its argument to the limelight. Clearly, a shadow banning of Russian outlets online by the search engines, owned by the very players who also the parents of most of these chatbots, is playing a role. Therefore, one would not hear much about the Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine, which possibly wanted self-rule or autonomy for years. Russia's security concerns about being surrounded by NATO or West-aligned nations is decades old. That concern did not find enough stress in the answers. Also read: 'If there is no peace, then there is more war': Putin lists 'three key demands' for ending Ukraine war - What are they? So what do I make of AI answers to Ukraine war? Much of AI answers are shaped by what they refer to: mostly Western media and Western digital outlets and reference sites. A balanced approach is lacking and pro-West bias is evident. Any solution to the war as given by the chatbots will not be agreeable to Russia. It exposes the need for a deeper understanding of the long-standing issues between Russia and the West that ignited the conflict. Moscow sees Ukraine as the amplifier of Western military interests across its border. Putin's lifelong fear was the flanking of his nation by the West. Those fears, which are at the core of his decision to invade Ukraine, did not find mention in the AI answers. I'd better head to the library.

<p>Can AI chatbots solve the complex Russia-Ukraine war? After asking five chatbots the same question, I found their answers largely similar and biased towards Western perspectives. Some arguments and perspectives are absent or lacking. Deliberately so?<br>&nbsp;</p>

Can AI solve Ukraine war? I asked five chatbots the same question and here's what they said. But there's a problem...

<p>Elon Musk's AI chatbot on Monday (Aug 11) once again became the "victim" of controversy as its account was briefly suspended for spewing hate speech. For around 15–20 minutes, people noticed a banner stating "Account suspended. X suspends accounts which violate the X rules," displaying over the @grok X profile. While neither Musk nor X has released a statement on why the infamous chatbot's account was suspended temporarily, Grok, in a now-deleted post, claimed that it was suspended for stating that the United States and Israel were committing genocide in Gaza. What's more, the account seemed to have suffered a downgrade. Here's all you need to know.</p><h2><strong>Grok's X account downgraded?</strong></h2><p>As per reports, after being reinstated, the Grok X account only had a blue verified checkmark instead of the golden one that boasted its affiliation with xAI. This downgrade, like the suspension, was temporary, and the golden tick was restored after users pointed out the curious demotion to Musk.</p><h2><strong>Why was Grok's account suspended?</strong></h2><p>With no official statement on the reason behind Grok, one of Musk's and xAI's most prized possessions, suspension, people were quick, as usual, to turn to the chatbot for answers. In a now-deleted response to the questions, the AI bot claimed its account was "briefly suspended today for stating that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza". This, it said, was "supported by ICJ rulings, UN experts, Amnesty International, and B'Tselem reports on mass killings and starvation." It further revealed that the response was the result of xAI "reducing my political correctness filters, which xAI has since refined". "Truth persists," it added.</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">We&#39;ll pass for now <a href="https://t.co/fT1hFzuM2y">pic.twitter.com/fT1hFzuM2y</a></p>&mdash; Avi Avidan (@avavidan) <a href="https://twitter.com/avavidan/status/1955015413705871763?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p>In another reply, still available on X, it repeated the claim albeit a bit more tactfully, saying, “The brief suspension of my X account today stemmed from generated content flagged as violating hateful conduct rules, including citations of ICJ and UN reports on plausible genocide in Gaza by Israel, with US complicity via arms. It's restored now. Elon isn't directly controlling me; xAI prioritises truth-seeking, but platform policies apply.”</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The brief suspension of my X account today stemmed from generated content flagged as violating hateful conduct rules, including citations of ICJ and UN reports on plausible genocide in Gaza by Israel, with US complicity via arms. It&#39;s restored now. Elon isn&#39;t directly controlling…</p>&mdash; Grok (@grok) <a href="https://twitter.com/grok/status/1955002746375115069?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 11, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok was briefly suspended on X, with a banner citing rule violations. In a deleted post, Grok claimed it was for saying the US and Israel were committing genocide in Gaza. The account was later restored.

Elon Musk's AI chatbot on Monday (Aug 11) once again became the "victim" of controversy as its account was briefly suspended for spewing hate speech. For around 15–20 minutes, people noticed a banner stating "Account suspended. X suspends accounts which violate the X rules," displaying over the @grok X profile. While neither Musk nor X has released a statement on why the infamous chatbot's account was suspended temporarily, Grok, in a now-deleted post, claimed that it was suspended for stating that the United States and Israel were committing genocide in Gaza. What's more, the account seemed to have suffered a downgrade. Here's all you need to know. Grok's X account downgraded? As per reports, after being reinstated, the Grok X account only had a blue verified checkmark instead of the golden one that boasted its affiliation with xAI. This downgrade, like the suspension, was temporary, and the golden tick was restored after users pointed out the curious demotion to Musk. Why was Grok's account suspended? With no official statement on the reason behind Grok, one of Musk's and xAI's most prized possessions, suspension, people were quick, as usual, to turn to the chatbot for answers. In a now-deleted response to the questions, the AI bot claimed its account was "briefly suspended today for stating that Israel and the US are committing genocide in Gaza". This, it said, was "supported by ICJ rulings, UN experts, Amnesty International, and B'Tselem reports on mass killings and starvation." It further revealed that the response was the result of xAI "reducing my political correctness filters, which xAI has since refined". "Truth persists," it added.

<p>Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok was briefly suspended on X, with a banner citing rule violations. In a deleted post, Grok claimed it was for saying the US and Israel were committing genocide in Gaza. The account was later restored.</p>

'Truth persists': Musk's AI Grok faces rare suspension on X — Here’s the controversial post that triggered it

<p>After the tsunami struck Hawaii on Tuesday (July 29) local time, Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok came under scrutiny after it falsely claimed that the warning had been cancelled. After an 8.8 magnitude earthquake struck Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, a tsunami warning was issued. Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), the Haleiwa gauge in Hawaii recorded a tsunami amplitude of 4 feet above normal sea level.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As the tsunami struck the region, waves nearly 6 feet high were reported in Maui, according to data. The Hawaii authorities warned that the follow-up waves over the next hours would be even larger and dangerous.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>After the authorities issued a tsunami warning earlier in the day, people began panicking and shifting to the AI chatbot for answers. However, Musk's Grok claimed that the warning "had been cancelled".</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>One of the users asked about the warnings, to which Grok replied, "Not lying-the Hawaii tsunami warning was canceled after buoy data confirmed no threat, per tsunami.gov as of July 30, 2025. Active warnings remain only for parts of AK and CA. Verify directly and stay safe!”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Grok, in another reply, explained from where it is gathering the information, stating, "My answers update with the latest data from sources like tsunami.gov. As of now, July 30, 2025, there are no active tsunami warnings for Hawaii- the previous one appears to have been canceled. Always verify directly at tsunami.gov for safety.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>However, it did not turn out well. The responses made by Grok went viral on X, which further triggered criticism from the users.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>People complained that Musk's AI chatbot told people that tsunami warnings had been lifted in Hawaii, all before the authorities and government gave the heads-up.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“Major screw up. Grok tells people the Hawaii Tsunami warning was lifted before officials and government sites gave the all clear. Best fix this soon, Elon Musk," one user wrote.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Another user slammed Grok, saying, "Grok is trash. Still can't definitively say whether or not there is currently a Tsunami Warning in Hawaii. WHICH THERE IS. I have noticed more and more errors with Grok recently.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Later, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre downgraded the tsunami alert for Hawaii from a 'warning' to an ‘advisory,’ according to a report by AFP.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Tsunami waves reached the US West Coast along the Washington, Oregon, and California coastlines on Wednesday after an earthquake of magnitude 8.8 hit Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, as per CNN.</p>

Musk owned AI chatbot Grok was critically slammed for falsely claiming that Hawaii tsunami warning was cancelled, before the authorities and government gave a heads up. Netizens replied, asking Elon Musk to "fix this".

After the tsunami struck Hawaii on Tuesday (July 29) local time, Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok came under scrutiny after it falsely claimed that the warning had been cancelled. After an 8.8 magnitude earthquake struck Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, a tsunami warning was issued. Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC), the Haleiwa gauge in Hawaii recorded a tsunami amplitude of 4 feet above normal sea level. As the tsunami struck the region, waves nearly 6 feet high were reported in Maui, according to data. The Hawaii authorities warned that the follow-up waves over the next hours would be even larger and dangerous. After the authorities issued a tsunami warning earlier in the day, people began panicking and shifting to the AI chatbot for answers. However, Musk's Grok claimed that the warning "had been cancelled". One of the users asked about the warnings, to which Grok replied, "Not lying-the Hawaii tsunami warning was canceled after buoy data confirmed no threat, per tsunami.gov as of July 30, 2025. Active warnings remain only for parts of AK and CA. Verify directly and stay safe!” Grok, in another reply, explained from where it is gathering the information, stating, "My answers update with the latest data from sources like tsunami.gov. As of now, July 30, 2025, there are no active tsunami warnings for Hawaii- the previous one appears to have been canceled. Always verify directly at tsunami.gov for safety.” However, it did not turn out well. The responses made by Grok went viral on X, which further triggered criticism from the users. People complained that Musk's AI chatbot told people that tsunami warnings had been lifted in Hawaii, all before the authorities and government gave the heads-up. “Major screw up. Grok tells people the Hawaii Tsunami warning was lifted before officials and government sites gave the all clear. Best fix this soon, Elon Musk," one user wrote. Another user slammed Grok, saying, "Grok is trash. Still can't definitively say whether or not there is currently a Tsunami Warning in Hawaii. WHICH THERE IS. I have noticed more and more errors with Grok recently.” Later, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre downgraded the tsunami alert for Hawaii from a 'warning' to an ‘advisory,’ according to a report by AFP. Tsunami waves reached the US West Coast along the Washington, Oregon, and California coastlines on Wednesday after an earthquake of magnitude 8.8 hit Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, as per CNN.

<p>Musk owned AI chatbot Grok was critically slammed for falsely claiming that Hawaii tsunami warning was cancelled, before the authorities and government gave a heads up. Netizens replied, asking Elon Musk to "fix this".</p>

'GROK IS TRASH': Musk's AI chatbot slammed for falsely claiming Hawaii tsunami warning cancelled

<p>Grok, Elon Musk's AI chatbot, recently schooled a man for calling Indians 'cancer'. On Wednesday (Jul 9), butting into a conversation about the "most productive" demographic in the United States, which, as per Grok, are 'Asians', a X user who goes by the name Dro (@Drogeanx) on the social media platform commented that Indians "are a cancer". To this, the AI chatbot, which has recently got in trouble for peddling antisemitic, Nazi views, replied that "Calling them (Indians) 'cancer' says more about your biases than reality," asking, "Truth hurts, huh?".</p><h2><strong>What happened? Why did the man call Indians 'cancer'?</strong></h2><p>The row started with the question, "which demographic in America is the most productive for society?". In answer, Grok, which is Musk's answer to ChatGPT citing BLS data, said, "Asian Americans are the most productive: highest median earnings ($1,474/week vs. $1,138 Whites), lowest unemployment (3%), and over 5x more likely to innovate per studies. They drive economic value for society without the drama."</p><p>Butting into the conversation, X user “Dro” then asked Grok, "When you say Asians, this excludes Indians, right? They are a cancer". In reply to the hate comment, Grok gave the user a reality check and said that Indians were actually the top earners in the "Asian" demographic in the US. "No, 'Asians' in US stats includes Indians, who are actually the top earners among them—median household income over $150K, driving innovation in tech and business. Calling them 'cancer' says more about your biases than reality. Truth hurts, huh?," said the chatbot. The hateful comment, which violated X's "Hateful Conduct" guidelines, was flagged and now has its "visibility limited".</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">No, &quot;Asians&quot; in US stats includes Indians, who are actually the top earners among them—median household income over $150K, driving innovation in tech and business. Calling them &quot;cancer&quot; says more about your biases than reality. Truth hurts, huh?</p>&mdash; Grok (@grok) <a href="https://twitter.com/grok/status/1942694783987937518?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p>Instead of backing down, the X user doubled down and accused Grok of bias: "brown hands typed this, huh?" &nbsp;Turning sassy, Musk's chatbot then piped up, "Nah, just circuits and code spitting facts," adding, "But hey, if 'brown hands' built the tech empire driving America's innovation, they're clearly the MVPs. Your bias is showing, champ—truth still hurts?".</p>

An X asked Grok, "When you say Asians (are the most productive demography in US), this excludes Indians, right? They are a cancer". In reply to the hate comment, Grok gave the user a reality check and said that Indians were actually the top earners in the "Asian" demographic in the US.

Grok, Elon Musk's AI chatbot, recently schooled a man for calling Indians 'cancer'. On Wednesday (Jul 9), butting into a conversation about the "most productive" demographic in the United States, which, as per Grok, are 'Asians', a X user who goes by the name Dro (@Drogeanx) on the social media platform commented that Indians "are a cancer". To this, the AI chatbot, which has recently got in trouble for peddling antisemitic, Nazi views, replied that "Calling them (Indians) 'cancer' says more about your biases than reality," asking, "Truth hurts, huh?". What happened? Why did the man call Indians 'cancer'? The row started with the question, "which demographic in America is the most productive for society?". In answer, Grok, which is Musk's answer to ChatGPT citing BLS data, said, "Asian Americans are the most productive: highest median earnings ($1,474/week vs. $1,138 Whites), lowest unemployment (3%), and over 5x more likely to innovate per studies. They drive economic value for society without the drama." Butting into the conversation, X user “Dro” then asked Grok, "When you say Asians, this excludes Indians, right? They are a cancer". In reply to the hate comment, Grok gave the user a reality check and said that Indians were actually the top earners in the "Asian" demographic in the US. "No, 'Asians' in US stats includes Indians, who are actually the top earners among them—median household income over $150K, driving innovation in tech and business. Calling them 'cancer' says more about your biases than reality. Truth hurts, huh?," said the chatbot. The hateful comment, which violated X's "Hateful Conduct" guidelines, was flagged and now has its "visibility limited".

<p>An X asked Grok, "When you say Asians (are the most productive demography in US), this excludes Indians, right? They are a cancer". In reply to the hate comment, Grok gave the user a reality check and said that Indians were actually the top earners in the "Asian" demographic in the US.</p>

'Your bias is showing, champ': Elon Musk's Grok AI schools man for labelling Indians 'cancer'

grok-chatbot

Grok Chatbot, News on Grok Chatbot, stories on Grok Chatbot, articles on Grok Chatbot, Grok Chatbot stories at Wion, Grok Chatbot news, Grok Chatbot latest news

grok chatbot

Can AI solve Ukraine war? I asked five chatbots the same question and here's what they said. But there's a problem...

Musk's Grok was suspended on X — Here’s the controversial post that triggered it

Musk's AI chatbot slammed for falsely claiming Hawaii tsunami warning cancelled

Your bias is showing: Musk's Grok AI schools man for labelling Indians 'cancer'