President Donald Trump has called for the death penalty for certain Democratic leaders, escalating his already contentious rhetoric.

Donald Trump Demands Death Penalty for Democrats

Trump vs Democrats: President Donald Trump sharply criticized a video released by six Democratic lawmakers with military and intelligence backgrounds urging service members to refuse illegal orders. On his platform Truth Social, Trump called the video “seditious behavior” and suggested such actions are “punishable by death,” sparking outrage and condemnation from Democratic leaders.  


Trump Labels Democrats’ Military Video ‘Seditious Behavior, Punishable by Death’ 

Trump vs Democrats: President Donald Trump has escalated tensions by threatening Democratic lawmakers with sedition charges after they released a video urging members of the U.S. military and intelligence community to refuse illegal orders. Trump described the Democrats' actions as "seditious behavior" and claimed they are "punishable by death," calling for their arrest and trial. 


Trump vs Democrats: President Donald Trump recently threatened several Democratic lawmakers with sedition charges, calling their actions "punishable by death" after they released a video urging members of the U.S. military and intelligence community to refuse illegal orders. 


Trump vs Democrats: Trump Threatens Democrats with Sedition Charges Over Military Video 

<p>President Donald Trump on Thursday accused several Democratic lawmakers of “seditious behaviour” and called for them to “be arrested and put on trial” for behaviour that could be “punishable by death.” The lawmakers, many of whom are veterans, had on Tuesday posted a video telling military and intelligence officers to “refuse illegal orders”.</p><p>“It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL. Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand — We won’t have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET,” the president wrote in one Truth Social post Thursday morning. He also added a link to an article in the Washington Examiner about the video in the post on Truth Social.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“This is really bad, and Dangerous to our Country. Their words cannot be allowed to stand. SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR FROM TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP???” Trump wrote in another post.</p><p>In a third, he wrote, “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”</p><p>Trump also reposted multiple posts from other Truth Social users about the video, including one that said, “Hang them George Washington would.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also Read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nikki-haley-s-son-calls-for-limit-on-foreign-students-in-us-universities-no-public-office-for-naturalised-us-citizens-1763668313774"><strong>Nikki Haley’s son calls for limit on foreign students in US universities, no public office for naturalised US citizens</strong></a></p><h2>‘You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders’</h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In the video posted by Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin on Tuesday, the lawmakers, who were military veterans and former intelligence officials, spoke directly to members of the military and intelligence community.</p><p>“We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk,” said the Democratic lawmakers, including Slotkin, Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, and Reps. Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Jason Crow of Colorado.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this Constitution. Right now, the threats coming to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad but from right here at home. Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders,” they added. “No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.”</p><p>The lawmakers did not call for opposition to any specific policies or orders.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also Read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-posts-solid-job-gains-in-september-but-unemployment-rate-rises-to-4-4-1763665049397"><strong>US posts solid job gains in September but unemployment rate rises to 4.4%</strong></a></p><h2>‘Democratic lawmakers openly calling for insurrection’</h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The day the video was posted, Trump adviser Stephen Miller condemned the Democratic lawmakers and accused them of “openly calling for insurrection.”</p><p>At a press briefing on Thursday afternoon, the White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said “no” when asked if Trump wants to execute members of Congress.</p><p>Leavitt criticised the Democratic lawmakers in the video and said, “You have sitting members of the United States Congress who conspired together to orchestrate a video message to members of the United States military, to active duty service members, to members of national security apparatus, encouraging them to defy the president's lawful orders.”</p><p>“I’m not a lawyer. I’ll leave that to the Department of Justice and the Department of War to decide,” she added.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also Read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-highlight-affordability-concerns-in-meeting-with-president-trump-mamdani-1763662395401"><strong>‘Will highlight affordability concerns in meeting with President Trump’: Mamdani</strong></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>‘Dark day in the country for any president to say such a thing’</h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Hours after Trump’s post, the targeted Democratic lawmakers released a statement, calling on Americans to “unite and condemn the President’s calls for our murder and political violence.”</p><p>"What’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law," the lawmakers said in a statement posted to X.</p><p>“It’s a dark day in the country for any president to say such a thing,” Deluzio said.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>House Speaker Mike Johnson also criticised the lawmakers and said their message was “wildly inappropriate, dangerous and unprecedented in American history.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also Read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-zealand-halts-new-puberty-blocker-prescriptions-for-young-transgender-people-1763660267103"><strong>New Zealand halts new puberty blocker prescriptions for young transgender people</strong></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer spoke about the posts on the Senate floor, saying, “The president of the United States is calling for the execution of elected officials. This is an outright threat, and it’s deadly serious.”</p><p>“He is lighting a match in a country soaked with political gasoline,” Schumer added.</p>

Hours after Trump’s post, the targeted Democratic lawmakers called on Americans to unite and condemn the President’s calls for our murder and political violence. "What’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law," the lawmakers said.

President Donald Trump on Thursday accused several Democratic lawmakers of “seditious behaviour” and called for them to “be arrested and put on trial” for behaviour that could be “punishable by death.” The lawmakers, many of whom are veterans, had on Tuesday posted a video telling military and intelligence officers to “refuse illegal orders”. “It’s called SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL. Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL. Their words cannot be allowed to stand — We won’t have a Country anymore!!! An example MUST BE SET,” the president wrote in one Truth Social post Thursday morning. He also added a link to an article in the Washington Examiner about the video in the post on Truth Social.

<p>Hours after Trump’s post, the targeted Democratic lawmakers called on Americans to unite and condemn the President’s calls for our murder and political violence. "What’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law," the lawmakers said.</p>

‘Seditious behaviour, punishable by death’: Trump slams Democrats for urging military to ignore illegal orders

Epstein Emails: House Democrats have released thousands of pages of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails, including messages where Epstein wrote that President Trump “spent hours” with one of Epstein’s victims. These newly disclosed communications suggest that Epstein believed Trump knew more about the abuse allegations than he has publicly acknowledged. 


Epstein files: Epstein claimed Trump 'knew of the girls' in one email 

President Donald Trump delivered a fiery address to Republican senators, blaming Democrats for the ongoing government shutdown and urging the GOP to “stand strong” against what he called “reckless spending and open-border policies.” Speaking to a packed audience, Trump accused Democratic leaders of putting politics before the American people and vowed that Republicans would “restore fiscal sanity and secure the border.”

Trump Addresses Republican Senators | Blames Democrats For Shutdown

Zohran Mamdani declared New York will be “a light in political darkness.”  The democratic socialist, who is the city’s youngest and first Muslim mayor, promised to stand against Islamophobia and antisemitism, pledging support for immigrants, labor, and economic justice. He directly challenged President Donald Trump.

Zohran Mamdani, NY First Muslim Mayor, Pledges to Combat Hate and Inequality

Mayoral Democratic candidate front-runner Zohran Mamdani made his final pitch to voters before the November 4 election at a rally on Sunday with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and New York Governor Kathy Hochul.

NYC Mayoral Elections: Top Democrat Leaders Target Trump at Mamdani's Campaign Rally

President Donald Trump has recently boasted about having record-high approval ratings — but a closer look reveals a gap between his claims and actual polling data. Multiple independent poll trackers show numbers that don’t match Trump’s statements, raising questions about political spin, public perception, and the facts behind the figures.

Trump’s Approval Ratings: Claims vs Reality | What the Numbers Really Say

President Donald Trump announced plans to cut 'a lot of' government jobs as the shutdown settles in its second week. He said the democrats handed him this opportunity on a silver platter.

US Government Shutdown: Uncertainty Mounts As Trump Warns Of Federal Job Cuts

When will the government shutdown end? That's the question lawmakers were hearing from constituents after the failure of another Senate vote to end the shutdown Oct. 3, despite President Donald Trump warning of "vast" layoffs and weighing which agencies to eliminate.

Donald Trump Refuses to Bow to Democrat Demands on Healthcare 

The U.S. government shut down much of its operations on October 1 after Republicans and Democrats failed to reach an agreement to extend funding past the end of the federal fiscal year on September 30.
The closure has shut off the flow of key economic data at a moment of uncertainty among policymakers and investors about the health of the U.S. job market, the trajectory of inflation and the strength of consumer spending and business investment.

US Government Shutdown: Weaker Job Outlook Trumps Inflation Worries

<p>The White House has issued a stark warning to federal agencies, urging them to prepare for widespread layoffs if Congress fails to secure a funding agreement before next Wednesday (September October 1). A memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), released on Wednesday (September 24), instructed agencies whose funding runs out on October 1 — and which lack alternative funding sources or don’t align with the President’s priorities — to begin considering reduction-in-force notices for their employees.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This directive intensifies pressure on lawmakers to reach a deal and prevent a government shutdown, as it threatens the jobs of thousands of federal workers. During previous shutdowns, federal employees were typically placed on temporary furlough until a resolution was reached. The most recent full shutdown, in 2013, saw approximately 850,000 workers furloughed, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Also Read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/starbucks-is-changing-more-than-just-its-menu-here-s-what-s-coming-next-for-coffee-giant-1758803524637"><strong>Layoffs &amp; store closure: Starbucks is changing more than just its menu—Here’s what’s coming next for coffee giant</strong></a></p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Democrats are about to shutdown the government because they demand we fund healthcare for illegal aliens.</p>&mdash; JD Vance (@JDVance) <a href="https://twitter.com/JDVance/status/1971202169870438560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p>Commenting on the matter, US Vice-President JD Vance took it to X and wrote, “Democrats are about to shutdown the government because they demand we fund healthcare for illegal aliens.” Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer condemned the memo, calling it a "political intimidation tactic" that serves to scare federal workers. He argued that Trump's focus on firing government employees is less about governance and more about instilling fear. Schumer also pointed out that similar attempts at firings had been reversed in the past.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The looming threat of mass layoffs only escalates the ongoing budget conflict between the White House and congressional Democrats. While Democrats have called for an extension of enhanced federal subsidies for Affordable Care Act coverage, Republicans have refused to make any concessions, leaving the fate of government funding hanging in the balance.</p>

Trump's administration reacts to Democrats-GOP tussle as government shut down looms

The White House has issued a stark warning to federal agencies, urging them to prepare for widespread layoffs if Congress fails to secure a funding agreement before next Wednesday (September October 1). A memo from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), released on Wednesday (September 24), instructed agencies whose funding runs out on October 1 — and which lack alternative funding sources or don’t align with the President’s priorities — to begin considering reduction-in-force notices for their employees. This directive intensifies pressure on lawmakers to reach a deal and prevent a government shutdown, as it threatens the jobs of thousands of federal workers. During previous shutdowns, federal employees were typically placed on temporary furlough until a resolution was reached. The most recent full shutdown, in 2013, saw approximately 850,000 workers furloughed, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Also Read: Layoffs & store closure: Starbucks is changing more than just its menu—Here’s what’s coming next for coffee giant

<p>The Trump administration is preparing federal agencies for mass layoffs if a government shutdown happens, targeting non-essential programs in a funding dispute with the Democrats</p>

Democrats have released what they claim is a handwritten birthday note from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, igniting fresh controversy. While the authenticity of the note is still under scrutiny, the political and media fallout is already underway.

 Trump denies sending birthday note to Epstein: 'I didn't do it'

Trump's alleged birthday note to Epstein exposed by Democrats | 'I didn't do it'

Donald Trump is rolling out a multi-pronged strategy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, combining aggressive fundraising, redistricting pushes, and voter ID mandates. He’s using endorsements, PACs, and ground operations to solidify Republican control. Critics argue it's a power grab; supporters call it strategic reform. As Trump reshapes the GOP’s electoral path, the stakes for both parties are rising sharply.

Trump's multi-pronged strategy to clinch 2026 midterms elections

Democrats are criticizing President Trump’s decision to impose 50% tariffs on Indian goods, questioning why India was targeted instead of China. The move has sparked political backlash and concerns over U.S.-India trade relations.


Democrats slam Trump's 50% tariffs: 'Why India, not China?' 

Texas Republicans have approved a controversial mid-decade congressional map backed by Donald Trump, aimed at flipping five Democratic-held seats. The move comes after Democrats ended a two-week walkout, returning to the House floor in protest. The redistricting fight now fuels a wider national battle as both parties maneuver for control ahead of next year’s elections.

Texas senate approves redistricting bill | Five Republican leaning seats added

California lawmakers have fast-tracked and passed a sweeping redistricting plan aimed at gaining five additional U.S. House seats for Democrats—directly countering a Trump-backed redistricting effort in Texas. Governor Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, quickly signed the measure, framing it as an “emergency” response to GOP efforts to tilt the electoral map.


California Lawmakers Pass Bill That Redraws Congressional Map | WION

Race to redraw U.S. electoral maps: California governor signs redistricting bills

Texas Republicans approve Trump-backed congressional map | Democrats return to house

<p>Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state police to locate and arrest Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to prevent a vote on a controversial redistricting plan. The move comes after the state House issued civil arrest warrants for the absent members. The Democrats left Texas on Sunday to block a Republican-backed map that could give the party five additional congressional seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The plan has the backing of President Donald Trump.</p><p><strong>Also read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-block-trans-women-from-entering-on-visas-to-compete-in-women-s-sports-1754347383538"><strong>'Matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth': US to block trans women from entering on visas to compete in women’s sports</strong></a></p><h2><strong>Abbott says Democrats ‘holding legislation hostage’</strong></h2><p>“By fleeing the state, Texas House Democrats are holding hostage critical legislation to aid flood victims and advance property tax relief. There are consequences for dereliction of duty,” Abbott said in a statement on Monday. He added that he had instructed the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to “find, arrest and return any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans” and that the order would remain in force until all missing lawmakers were brought back to the Capitol.</p><h2><strong>Arrest powers stop at the Texas border</strong></h2><p>DPS officers are limited to operating within Texas, meaning they cannot detain lawmakers who have left the state. However, if any of the Democrats are found within Texas, officers can escort them back to the Capitol. The absent lawmakers face a $500 fine for each day they remain away, breaking quorum.</p><h2><strong>Democrats accuse Republicans of voter suppression</strong></h2><p>Democrats have denounced the redistricting plan as “illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans” and a “threat to American democracy.” Some appear unconcerned by Abbott’s threats. “He’s trying to get sound bites and he has no legal mechanism,” said Houston Representative Jolanda Jones at a press conference in New York.</p>

Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to block a GOP redistricting plan. The move aims to force their return and resume legislative business.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state police to locate and arrest Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to prevent a vote on a controversial redistricting plan. The move comes after the state House issued civil arrest warrants for the absent members. The Democrats left Texas on Sunday to block a Republican-backed map that could give the party five additional congressional seats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The plan has the backing of President Donald Trump. Also read: 'Matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth': US to block trans women from entering on visas to compete in women’s sports Abbott says Democrats ‘holding legislation hostage’ “By fleeing the state, Texas House Democrats are holding hostage critical legislation to aid flood victims and advance property tax relief. There are consequences for dereliction of duty,” Abbott said in a statement on Monday. He added that he had instructed the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to “find, arrest and return any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans” and that the order would remain in force until all missing lawmakers were brought back to the Capitol. Arrest powers stop at the Texas border DPS officers are limited to operating within Texas, meaning they cannot detain lawmakers who have left the state. However, if any of the Democrats are found within Texas, officers can escort them back to the Capitol. The absent lawmakers face a $500 fine for each day they remain away, breaking quorum. Democrats accuse Republicans of voter suppression Democrats have denounced the redistricting plan as “illegal voter suppression of Black and Latino Central Texans” and a “threat to American democracy.” Some appear unconcerned by Abbott’s threats. “He’s trying to get sound bites and he has no legal mechanism,” said Houston Representative Jolanda Jones at a press conference in New York.

<p>Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state to block a GOP redistricting plan. The move aims to force their return and resume legislative business.</p>

'Democrats are holding hostage': Abbott orders arrest of Democrats who fled Texas to block redistricting vote

<p>Texas House Democrats fled the state on Sunday (Aug 3) in an attempt to stop a vote on a new congressional map backed by US President Donald Trump. The redistricting, which was introduced by the majority Republicans of Texas last week, could potentially create five new Republican-leaning seats in the US House of Representatives. This comes ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, where the GOP seeks to hold a slim majority in the House.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In order to hold a vote in the 150-member Texas legislature, at least two-thirds of the members must be present. Denying Republicans the required quorum, 51 Democrats have left the state, most of them to Illinois. The politicians have said that they plan on staying away until the end of a special legislative session convened by Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><strong>Is it common for states to redistrict?</strong></h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>It is not unusual for the states to redraw congressional district boundaries. However, it typically happens once every 10 years after the updated population data is released from the United States Census.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>According to the Texas Capitol data on redistricting, the last time a redistricting of the Texas Senate happened was in October 2021. Before that, a senate redistricting happened in May 2011. Notably, a revision of the map mid-decade would be out of the ordinary. The recent move by Republicans is seen as an effort to retain control of the House.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The midterm elections, which occur every two years, mark the midpoint of a president’s four-year term of office. The next midterm elections in the United States are scheduled to be held on November 3, 2026. &nbsp;This election will determine all 435 seats in the US House of Representatives, and 35 of the 100 seats in the US Senate will be contested to elect the 120th United States Congress.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The session is being held to approve the redistricting, along with providing disaster relief for the deadly Texas floods that happened last month, and to ban THC, the primary psychoactive compound in marijuana.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2><strong>Can Democrats be penalised for fleeing state?</strong></h2><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, has threatened to arrest the Democrats for their absence. In addition, each of the lawmakers could face a $500 fine for every day they are away.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The state should “use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law,” Paxton said on X. “Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Defending their move, the Texas Democrats said in a statement, “We’re not walking out on our responsibilities.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>“We’re walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent,” said state legislator and chairman of the Democratic caucus Gene Wu.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Watch | Trump Intensifies Sanctions Warning on Russia, Acknowledges Moscow’s Evasion Tactics</strong></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-intensifies-sanctions-warning-on-russia-acknowledges-moscow-s-evasion-tactics-1754288961433/embed<br>&nbsp;</p>

The politicians have said that they plan on staying away until the end of a special legislative session convened by Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott.

Texas House Democrats fled the state on Sunday (Aug 3) in an attempt to stop a vote on a new congressional map backed by US President Donald Trump. The redistricting, which was introduced by the majority Republicans of Texas last week, could potentially create five new Republican-leaning seats in the US House of Representatives. This comes ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, where the GOP seeks to hold a slim majority in the House. In order to hold a vote in the 150-member Texas legislature, at least two-thirds of the members must be present. Denying Republicans the required quorum, 51 Democrats have left the state, most of them to Illinois. The politicians have said that they plan on staying away until the end of a special legislative session convened by Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott. Is it common for states to redistrict? It is not unusual for the states to redraw congressional district boundaries. However, it typically happens once every 10 years after the updated population data is released from the United States Census. According to the Texas Capitol data on redistricting, the last time a redistricting of the Texas Senate happened was in October 2021. Before that, a senate redistricting happened in May 2011. Notably, a revision of the map mid-decade would be out of the ordinary. The recent move by Republicans is seen as an effort to retain control of the House. The midterm elections, which occur every two years, mark the midpoint of a president’s four-year term of office. The next midterm elections in the United States are scheduled to be held on November 3, 2026. This election will determine all 435 seats in the US House of Representatives, and 35 of the 100 seats in the US Senate will be contested to elect the 120th United States Congress. The session is being held to approve the redistricting, along with providing disaster relief for the deadly Texas floods that happened last month, and to ban THC, the primary psychoactive compound in marijuana. Can Democrats be penalised for fleeing state? The Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, has threatened to arrest the Democrats for their absence. In addition, each of the lawmakers could face a $500 fine for every day they are away. The state should “use every tool at our disposal to hunt down those who think they are above the law,” Paxton said on X. “Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.” Defending their move, the Texas Democrats said in a statement, “We’re not walking out on our responsibilities.” “We’re walking out on a rigged system that refuses to listen to the people we represent,” said state legislator and chairman of the Democratic caucus Gene Wu. Watch | Trump Intensifies Sanctions Warning on Russia, Acknowledges Moscow’s Evasion Tactics https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-intensifies-sanctions-warning-on-russia-acknowledges-moscow-s-evasion-tactics-1754288961433/embed

<p>The politicians have said that they plan on staying away until the end of a special legislative session convened by Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott.</p>

Trump trying to manipulate 2026 midterm election? Democrats flee Texas to block vote on redistricting map

<p>It has been hours hours since Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat and minority leader, has been giving his speech in the US House on Thursday, with an aim to delay voting on President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on tax and spending. Jeffries has been continuing his marathon speech, opposing Republican's signature legislation carrying Trump's domestic agenda.</p><p>He even began his speech by saying that he was "planning to take my sweet time” with his speech. Allotted 60 seconds, Jeffries was making use of his prerogative as a leader to stretch his allotted time, and took far longer than that, in a house tradition "magic minute".</p><p>Trump has earlier said that he wants to sign the bill by July 4. However, Jeffries has no chance of stopping the bill even if he delays the voting.</p><p>Jeffries in his speech, said, "Republicans are trying to jam this one, big, ugly bill down the throats of the American people,” urging lawmakers to vote against it.</p><p>Further, the speech mainly focuses on the ramifications of spending cuts to social safety programs, laying out stories of vulnerable Americans who might be affected by its Medicaid cuts.</p><p>“Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos, and corruption,” he said, adding that the bill was “an extraordinary assault on the health care of the American people.”</p><p>US House Speaker Mike Johnson was likely to address the chamber once Jeffries' speech ends. However, Johnson also has unlimited time, but earlier, he told reporters that he expected his speech would be shorter than Jeffries.</p><p>'Magic Minute Speech'</p><p>If democratic leader wants to set a record of a magic minute, he still has to continue for one more hour. Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, then the Republican leader, spoke for more than eight hours to delay a vote on a $2 trillion Democratic bill in 2021.</p><p>They did this with a motive to strengthen the social safety net and fight climate change.</p>

He even began his speech by saying that he was "planning to take my sweet time” with his speech. Allotted 60 seconds, Jeffries was making use of his prerogative as a leader to stretch his allotted time, and took far longer than that, in a house tradition "magic minute".

It has been hours hours since Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the New York Democrat and minority leader, has been giving his speech in the US House on Thursday, with an aim to delay voting on President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on tax and spending. Jeffries has been continuing his marathon speech, opposing Republican's signature legislation carrying Trump's domestic agenda. He even began his speech by saying that he was "planning to take my sweet time” with his speech. Allotted 60 seconds, Jeffries was making use of his prerogative as a leader to stretch his allotted time, and took far longer than that, in a house tradition "magic minute". Trump has earlier said that he wants to sign the bill by July 4. However, Jeffries has no chance of stopping the bill even if he delays the voting. Jeffries in his speech, said, "Republicans are trying to jam this one, big, ugly bill down the throats of the American people,” urging lawmakers to vote against it. Further, the speech mainly focuses on the ramifications of spending cuts to social safety programs, laying out stories of vulnerable Americans who might be affected by its Medicaid cuts. “Leadership requires courage, conviction, compassion — and yet what we have seen from this administration and co-conspirators on the Republican side of the aisle is cruelty, chaos, and corruption,” he said, adding that the bill was “an extraordinary assault on the health care of the American people.” US House Speaker Mike Johnson was likely to address the chamber once Jeffries' speech ends. However, Johnson also has unlimited time, but earlier, he told reporters that he expected his speech would be shorter than Jeffries. 'Magic Minute Speech' If democratic leader wants to set a record of a magic minute, he still has to continue for one more hour. Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, then the Republican leader, spoke for more than eight hours to delay a vote on a $2 trillion Democratic bill in 2021. They did this with a motive to strengthen the social safety net and fight climate change.

<p>He even began his speech by saying that he was "planning to take my sweet time” with his speech. Allotted 60 seconds, Jeffries was making use of his prerogative as a leader to stretch his allotted time, and took far longer than that, in a house tradition "magic minute".</p>

Another 'magic minute' speech? Democratic Leader Jeffries's speech crosses '8 hours', delays vote on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'

<p>President Donald Trump’s latest budget proposal, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), runs to a staggering 940 pages, just shy of the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. The bill passed the House of Representatives by a razor-thin margin of one vote.</p><p>The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.</p><p><strong>Also read: </strong><a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-big-beautiful-bill-full-list-of-republicans-opposing-us-president-s-tax-and-spending-measure-1751159077308"><strong>Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: FULL LIST of Republicans opposing US president's tax and spending measure</strong></a></p><h2><strong>Democrats stall with full reading to expose ‘monstrosity’</strong></h2><p>In a rare procedural move, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has decided to force the entire bill to be read aloud in the Senate chamber. The move, designed to slow down the process and shine a light on the bill’s contents, could take at least 15 hours.</p><p>“Schumer believes Americans deserve to hear exactly what’s in this monstrosity,” said a Democratic source, citing permanent tax breaks for billionaires, cuts to health care and food assistance, fossil fuel giveaways, and public land sales as just a few of the bill’s more contentious provisions.</p><h2><strong>GOP senators face pressure amid razor-thin vote margin</strong></h2><p>With only three Republican votes allowed to be lost in the Senate, Trump’s sweeping bill is on fragile ground. At least three GOP senators have already indicated they may vote against it. One of the loudest critics, Senator Rand Paul, was even spotted golfing with Trump over the weekend, leaving some to wonder if behind-the-scenes negotiations are underway.</p><h2><strong>‘Green tax credits’ and confusion among Republicans</strong></h2><p>The bill has not only caused opposition from Democrats but also confusion within Republican ranks. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she voted for the bill without knowing what was in it, saying, “Full transparency, I did not know.” Even Trump appeared surprised by some of the details, taking to social media to vent his frustration. “I HATE the green tax credits,” he posted in all caps, referring to a policy tucked deep within the text.</p>

The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.

President Donald Trump’s latest budget proposal, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), runs to a staggering 940 pages, just shy of the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. The bill passed the House of Representatives by a razor-thin margin of one vote. The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Also read: Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: FULL LIST of Republicans opposing US president's tax and spending measure Democrats stall with full reading to expose ‘monstrosity’ In a rare procedural move, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has decided to force the entire bill to be read aloud in the Senate chamber. The move, designed to slow down the process and shine a light on the bill’s contents, could take at least 15 hours. “Schumer believes Americans deserve to hear exactly what’s in this monstrosity,” said a Democratic source, citing permanent tax breaks for billionaires, cuts to health care and food assistance, fossil fuel giveaways, and public land sales as just a few of the bill’s more contentious provisions. GOP senators face pressure amid razor-thin vote margin With only three Republican votes allowed to be lost in the Senate, Trump’s sweeping bill is on fragile ground. At least three GOP senators have already indicated they may vote against it. One of the loudest critics, Senator Rand Paul, was even spotted golfing with Trump over the weekend, leaving some to wonder if behind-the-scenes negotiations are underway. ‘Green tax credits’ and confusion among Republicans The bill has not only caused opposition from Democrats but also confusion within Republican ranks. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she voted for the bill without knowing what was in it, saying, “Full transparency, I did not know.” Even Trump appeared surprised by some of the details, taking to social media to vent his frustration. “I HATE the green tax credits,” he posted in all caps, referring to a policy tucked deep within the text.

<p>The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.</p>

'Hear what’s in this monstrosity': Democrats stall Trump’s 940-page ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ by forcing it to be read aloud in Senate

<p>The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability.</p><h2>Did Trump overstep his authority?</h2><p>At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched.</p><h2>Presidential authority &amp; historical precedents</h2><p>Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace.</p><h2>Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke</h2><p>Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking.</p><h2>Global and domestic consequences</h2><p>The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic.</p><h2>Diplomatic fallout</h2><p>The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war.</p><h2>A defining moment</h2><p>Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.</p>

Trump ordered the shot on Iran but can he really declare war What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another stupid war

The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS? The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.” As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents? Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability. Did Trump overstep his authority? At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war? The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink. As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021). Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.” Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched. Presidential authority & historical precedents Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority. Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war. But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities. The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace. Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran. However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.” Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.” Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking. Global and domestic consequences The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high. Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic. Diplomatic fallout The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future. Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution. Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war. A defining moment Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin? This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.

<p>US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan</p>

Trump ordered the shot on Iran, but can he really declare war? What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another 'stupid war'

<p><span data-olk-copy-source="MailCompose">As Republicans push to finalise President Donald Trump&rsquo;s ambitious $4.5 trillion tax cut plan, the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap has emerged as a central flashpoint dividing the party. At the heart of the uproar is a policy first enacted by Republicans in 2017 &mdash; and now fiercely opposed by moderates, the Grand Old Party's lawmakers and Democrats alike.</span><span></span></p>
<h2><span><b>What is the SALT deduction?</b></span></h2>
<p><span>The SALT deduction allows taxpayers to subtract certain state and local taxes,&nbsp;such as property, income, and sales taxes,&nbsp;from their federal tax liability. Prior to 2017, there was no cap on this deduction. But under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed solely with Republican support during the Trump administration, a cap of $10,000 was introduced. This move significantly affected taxpayers in high-tax states like New York, California, and New Jersey.</span></p>
<p><span>According to the Tax Policy Center, nearly 11 million households lost the full benefit of the SALT deduction after the cap was introduced in 2018. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the cap generated about $668 billion in federal revenue over 10 years.</span><span></span></p>
<h2><span><b>Jeffries calls GOP SALT strategy &ldquo;Phony&rdquo;</b></span></h2>
<p><span>Democrats argue that the SALT cap disproportionately penalises&nbsp;blue-state taxpayers and should simply be allowed to expire at the end of 2025. Jeffries has ridiculed the Republican effort to repackage their tax reform as a relief measure.</span></p>
<p><span>As stated in the Associated Press, the US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Republicans are &ldquo;crashing the economy, raising costs, and driving us toward a recession.&rdquo; He added, &ldquo;This majority, this presidency, has been a complete and total disaster for working-class Americans.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span>He further slammed Republicans for pretending to rescue taxpayers from a crisis they created. As stated in Associated Press, Jeffries said, &ldquo;Donald Trump, House Republicans, and Senate Republicans &mdash; let&rsquo;s be clear, not a single Democrat supported capping the state and local tax deduction. That was done by Republicans when they enacted the GOP tax scam. They crashed the car and want to pretend now that they&rsquo;re on a rescue operation.&rdquo;</span></p>
<h2><span><b>Trump&rsquo;s big bill: Tax cuts vs spending cuts</b></span></h2>
<p><span>At the core of the current dispute is Trump&rsquo;s proposed fiscal package, which includes $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and $1.5 trillion in federal spending cuts, according to a legislative outline obtained by Bloomberg. The proposal reportedly aims to make many of the 2017 tax cuts permanent and roll back several Biden-era incentives, including green energy tax credits and expanded Medicaid funding.</span></p>
<p><span>But the plan has hit a wall as fiscally conservative Republicans demand deeper spending cuts, while moderate Republicans push to protect key tax breaks and social programs. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warned in a recent analysis that Trump&rsquo;s plan could add $3 trillion to the national deficit over a decade if not offset.</span><span></span></p>
<h2><span><b>Political Showdown Inside the GOP</b></span></h2>
<p><span>The party is deeply divided. On one side, members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus are demanding as much as $2 trillion in additional cuts,&nbsp;particularly to entitlement programs like Medicaid and food assistance, as reported by Politico. On the other side, GOP moderates reportedly argue that removing the SALT cap is essential to winning re-election in competitive districts.</span></p>
<p><span>Some of these lawmakers have reportedly met privately with Trump at the White House and at Mar-a-Lago, signalling how high-stakes the issue has become. Speaker Mike Johnson is racing against a self-imposed Memorial Day deadline to pass the bill, but insiders say the split could torpedo the entire legislative effort, as reported by Reuters.</span><span></span></p>
<h2><span><b>Democrats&rsquo; Strategy: Let the Cap Expire</b></span></h2>
<p><span>Democrats see an opportunity. If Republicans do nothing, the SALT cap,&nbsp;which was designed to expire at the end of 2025,&nbsp;will vanish on its own, restoring full deductions. Jeffries emphasised&nbsp;that fact repeatedly in his remarks.</span></p>
<p><span>As stated in Associated Press, Jeffries said, &ldquo;If there is nothing done with respect to the state and local tax deduction cap by the end of the year, you know what happens? It goes away. So, anything that Republicans are doing that relates to a cap actually will increase taxes on the American people, not lower taxes. Let&rsquo;s be clear about that.&rdquo;</span></p>
<h2><span><b>What&rsquo;s Next?</b></span></h2>
<p><span>As Republicans struggle to unify their fiscal vision, the SALT cap has become a symbolic and strategic litmus test, not only about tax fairness, but about who truly controls the GOP&rsquo;s agenda. With Democrats standing firm and moderate Republicans threatening to walk away, Trump&rsquo;s massive economic plan may hinge on how this single issue is resolved.</span></p>

Business & Economy:  The State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction allows taxpayers to subtract certain state and local taxes, such as property, income, and sales taxes, from their federal tax liability.

As Republicans push to finalise President Donald Trump’s ambitious $4.5 trillion tax cut plan, the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap has emerged as a central flashpoint dividing the party. At the heart of the uproar is a policy first enacted by Republicans in 2017 — and now fiercely opposed by moderates, the Grand Old Party's lawmakers and Democrats alike. What is the SALT deduction? The SALT deduction allows taxpayers to subtract certain state and local taxes, such as property, income, and sales taxes, from their federal tax liability. Prior to 2017, there was no cap on this deduction. But under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed solely with Republican support during the Trump administration, a cap of $10,000 was introduced. This move significantly affected taxpayers in high-tax states like New York, California, and New Jersey. According to the Tax Policy Center, nearly 11 million households lost the full benefit of the SALT deduction after the cap was introduced in 2018. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the cap generated about $668 billion in federal revenue over 10 years. Jeffries calls GOP SALT strategy “Phony” Democrats argue that the SALT cap disproportionately penalises blue-state taxpayers and should simply be allowed to expire at the end of 2025. Jeffries has ridiculed the Republican effort to repackage their tax reform as a relief measure. As stated in the Associated Press, the US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said Republicans are “crashing the economy, raising costs, and driving us toward a recession.” He added, “This majority, this presidency, has been a complete and total disaster for working-class Americans.” He further slammed Republicans for pretending to rescue taxpayers from a crisis they created. As stated in Associated Press, Jeffries said, “Donald Trump, House Republicans, and Senate Republicans — let’s be clear, not a single Democrat supported capping the state and local tax deduction. That was done by Republicans when they enacted the GOP tax scam. They crashed the car and want to pretend now that they’re on a rescue operation.” Trump’s big bill: Tax cuts vs spending cuts At the core of the current dispute is Trump’s proposed fiscal package, which includes $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and $1.5 trillion in federal spending cuts, according to a legislative outline obtained by Bloomberg. The proposal reportedly aims to make many of the 2017 tax cuts permanent and roll back several Biden-era incentives, including green energy tax credits and expanded Medicaid funding. But the plan has hit a wall as fiscally conservative Republicans demand deeper spending cuts, while moderate Republicans push to protect key tax breaks and social programs. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warned in a recent analysis that Trump’s plan could add $3 trillion to the national deficit over a decade if not offset. Political Showdown Inside the GOP The party is deeply divided. On one side, members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus are demanding as much as $2 trillion in additional cuts, particularly to entitlement programs like Medicaid and food assistance, as reported by Politico. On the other side, GOP moderates reportedly argue that removing the SALT cap is essential to winning re-election in competitive districts. Some of these lawmakers have reportedly met privately with Trump at the White House and at Mar-a-Lago, signalling how high-stakes the issue has become. Speaker Mike Johnson is racing against a self-imposed Memorial Day deadline to pass the bill, but insiders say the split could torpedo the entire legislative effort, as reported by Reuters. Democrats’ Strategy: Let the Cap Expire Democrats see an opportunity. If Republicans do nothing, the SALT cap, which was designed to expire at the end of 2025, will vanish on its own, restoring full deductions. Jeffries emphasised that fact repeatedly in his remarks. As stated in Associated Press, Jeffries said, “If there is nothing done with respect to the state and local tax deduction cap by the end of the year, you know what happens? It goes away. So, anything that Republicans are doing that relates to a cap actually will increase taxes on the American people, not lower taxes. Let’s be clear about that.” What’s Next? As Republicans struggle to unify their fiscal vision, the SALT cap has become a symbolic and strategic litmus test, not only about tax fairness, but about who truly controls the GOP’s agenda. With Democrats standing firm and moderate Republicans threatening to walk away, Trump’s massive economic plan may hinge on how this single issue is resolved.

US tax turmoil: SALT deduction cap sparks deep Republican Rift as Jeffries slams “Phony” reform

<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">President Donald Trump has unveiled a bold new budget proposal that aims to slash federal government spending by over $160 billion, targeting a wide range of non-defence programmes while keeping military funding largely unchanged. The move has already stirred unrest among Republicans in Congress, who are growing uneasy about the scale of the cuts.</span></p>
<h2><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">What all is facing cuts in Trump's budget proposal?</span></strong></h2>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">The proposed 2026 budget, often referred to as a "skinny budget", outlines sweeping reductions to domestic spending. Key areas facing cuts include:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Public health: Millions would be stripped from agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the CDC.</span></li>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Education: Grants supporting low-income students, teacher training, and preschool development could be axed.</span></li>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Environment: Environmental Protection Agency programmes&mdash;particularly those linked to environmental justice&mdash;are in the crosshairs.</span></li>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Housing and labour: The Departments of Housing and Urban Development, the Interior, and Labour could each lose over 30% of their current funding.</span></li>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Foreign aid: USAID and the U.S. Institute of Peace may be eliminated </span><span data-preserver-spaces="true">entirely</span><span data-preserver-spaces="true">.</span></li>
<li><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Scientific research: NASA&rsquo;s space science initiatives and funding for the International Space Station would see major reductions.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">At the same time, the Trump administration wants increased investment in border security, rail and air safety, and law enforcement.</span></p>
<p><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-ukraine-peace-talks-us-ukraine-minerals-deal-russia-zelensky-putin-9027333" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;Dealmaker in chief&rsquo; or dealbreaker? Is Trump walking away from Ukraine peace talks after sealing key minerals deal?</a></span></strong></p>
<h2><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">How are </span><span data-preserver-spaces="true">GOP</span><span data-preserver-spaces="true"> and Democrats reacting?</span></strong></h2>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">The reaction on Capitol Hill has been swift&mdash;and mixed.</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) criticised the proposal for lacking detail and for holding defence spending flat at $893 billion. &ldquo;I have serious objections to the proposed freeze in our defence funding,&rdquo; she said, adding that cuts to biomedical research and support for low-income households were also deeply concerning.</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Former GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell, now leading the Senate&rsquo;s defence funding panel, echoed those concerns. He accused the White House of using &ldquo;OMB accounting gimmicks&rdquo; and warned that the proposed defence budget was &ldquo;not a substitute for full-year appropriations.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trumps-id-like-to-be-pope-breaks-internet-as-world-awaits-new-vatican-head-video-9016996" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">Donald Trump's 'I'd like to be pope' breaks internet as world awaits new Vatican head - Video</a></span></strong></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) added that the proposal would &ldquo;shred to the bone our military capabilities.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">House Republicans have been more cautious. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said lawmakers had &ldquo;a better understanding of what can pass and what can&rsquo;t&rdquo; than the administration.</span></p>
<h2><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Could Congress push back?</span></strong></h2>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Although Congress often sets its </span><span data-preserver-spaces="true">own</span><span data-preserver-spaces="true"> funding priorities, Trump&rsquo;s administration is signalling that it may withhold funding lawmakers approve. A senior White House official did not rule out using &ldquo;impoundment&rdquo; powers to block spending decisions by Congress.</span></p>
<p><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mike-waltz-un-ambassador-national-security-advisor-donald-trump-signal-john-bolton-9027090" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">&lsquo;Doesn&rsquo;t compare&rsquo;: Mike Waltz&rsquo;s UN posting is a demotion, not a promotion, says the guy who&rsquo;s held both jobs</a></span></strong></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">This sets the stage for a clash between the White House and Capitol Hill, especially with Republicans needing some Democratic votes to pass any budget. Without bipartisan support, the risk of a government shutdown increases, with a deadline looming on 30 September.</span></p>
<h2><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">What are Democrats saying?</span></strong></h2>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Democrats have come out strongly against the proposed cuts. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called Trump&rsquo;s budget &ldquo;a betrayal of working people&rdquo; and &ldquo;morally bankrupt.&rdquo; He pledged to oppose the plan with full force.</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">With memories of the March spending battle still fresh, Democrats are under pressure to resist further compromises.</span></p>
<h2><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">What does the budget </span><span data-preserver-spaces="true">really</span><span data-preserver-spaces="true"> mean?</span></strong></h2>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">While presidential budgets are typically symbolic, this year&rsquo;s proposal has more weight. Trump has already frozen billions in spending without Congress&rsquo; approval, drawing multiple lawsuits and watchdog investigations. This budget signals how aggressively he intends to reshape government spending.</span></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">It also reflects Trump&rsquo;s broader political goals. White House budget director Russ Vought framed the proposal as a push to return power to states and families. &ldquo;The Federal Government has intruded on matters best left to American families,&rdquo; he wrote.</span></p>
<p><strong><span data-preserver-spaces="true">Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/national-security-adviser-mike-waltz-using-signal-day-before-he-was-ousted-by-donald-trump-9025760" rel="dofollow noopener" target="_blank">Caught on camera! Mike Waltz photographed using Signal the day before he was ousted by Trump - Who was he texting?</a></span></strong></p>
<p><span data-preserver-spaces="true">The administration&rsquo;s full budget, with more detailed agency-by-agency plans, is expected later this month.</span></p>

World: US President Donald Trump has unveiled a bold new budget proposal that aims to slash federal government spending by over $160 billion.

President Donald Trump has unveiled a bold new budget proposal that aims to slash federal government spending by over $160 billion, targeting a wide range of non-defence programmes while keeping military funding largely unchanged. The move has already stirred unrest among Republicans in Congress, who are growing uneasy about the scale of the cuts. What all is facing cuts in Trump's budget proposal? The proposed 2026 budget, often referred to as a "skinny budget", outlines sweeping reductions to domestic spending. Key areas facing cuts include: Public health: Millions would be stripped from agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the CDC. Education: Grants supporting low-income students, teacher training, and preschool development could be axed. Environment: Environmental Protection Agency programmes—particularly those linked to environmental justice—are in the crosshairs. Housing and labour: The Departments of Housing and Urban Development, the Interior, and Labour could each lose over 30% of their current funding. Foreign aid: USAID and the U.S. Institute of Peace may be eliminated entirely. Scientific research: NASA’s space science initiatives and funding for the International Space Station would see major reductions. At the same time, the Trump administration wants increased investment in border security, rail and air safety, and law enforcement. Also read: ‘Dealmaker in chief’ or dealbreaker? Is Trump walking away from Ukraine peace talks after sealing key minerals deal? How are GOP and Democrats reacting? The reaction on Capitol Hill has been swift—and mixed. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) criticised the proposal for lacking detail and for holding defence spending flat at $893 billion. “I have serious objections to the proposed freeze in our defence funding,” she said, adding that cuts to biomedical research and support for low-income households were also deeply concerning. Former GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell, now leading the Senate’s defence funding panel, echoed those concerns. He accused the White House of using “OMB accounting gimmicks” and warned that the proposed defence budget was “not a substitute for full-year appropriations.” Also read: Donald Trump's 'I'd like to be pope' breaks internet as world awaits new Vatican head - Video Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) added that the proposal would “shred to the bone our military capabilities.” House Republicans have been more cautious. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) said lawmakers had “a better understanding of what can pass and what can’t” than the administration. Could Congress push back? Although Congress often sets its own funding priorities, Trump’s administration is signalling that it may withhold funding lawmakers approve. A senior White House official did not rule out using “impoundment” powers to block spending decisions by Congress. Also read: ‘Doesn’t compare’: Mike Waltz’s UN posting is a demotion, not a promotion, says the guy who’s held both jobs This sets the stage for a clash between the White House and Capitol Hill, especially with Republicans needing some Democratic votes to pass any budget. Without bipartisan support, the risk of a government shutdown increases, with a deadline looming on 30 September. What are Democrats saying? Democrats have come out strongly against the proposed cuts. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called Trump’s budget “a betrayal of working people” and “morally bankrupt.” He pledged to oppose the plan with full force. With memories of the March spending battle still fresh, Democrats are under pressure to resist further compromises. What does the budget really mean? While presidential budgets are typically symbolic, this year’s proposal has more weight. Trump has already frozen billions in spending without Congress’ approval, drawing multiple lawsuits and watchdog investigations. This budget signals how aggressively he intends to reshape government spending. It also reflects Trump’s broader political goals. White House budget director Russ Vought framed the proposal as a push to return power to states and families. “The Federal Government has intruded on matters best left to American families,” he wrote. Also read: Caught on camera! Mike Waltz photographed using Signal the day before he was ousted by Trump - Who was he texting? The administration’s full budget, with more detailed agency-by-agency plans, is expected later this month.

Trump’s 'skinny budget' slashes $163 billion from federal programs, even his own party is alarmed - Here's what it means

<p>Former US Vice President Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance at a summit for Black women leaders in California. She has reportedly hinted at staying active in political life in what is being termed as her first public appearance after the 2024 poll debacle.&nbsp;</p>
<p>"<span>We can&rsquo;t go out there and do battle if we don&rsquo;t take care of ourselves and each other...I&rsquo;ll see you out there. I&rsquo;m not going anywhere</span>," she told the audience at the Leading Women Defined gathering, reported The Hill.</p>
<p><strong>Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-national-stabbed-to-death-in-canada-suspect-held-indian-embassy-8927732" rel="dofollow">Indian national stabbed to death in Canada, suspect held: Indian embassy</a></strong></p>
<p>In a nearly eight-minute address, Harris did not name US President Donald Trump, but spoke about the "fear" that the people of United States are witnessing "in these last few months."</p>
<p>"Fear has a way to be contagious. When one person has fear, it has a way of spreading to those around...we are witnessing that. But I say, courage is also contagious," she added.</p>
<p>Watch the video here:</p>
<blockquote class="instagram-media publive-iframes-block publive-Instagram-block" contenteditable="false" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIBHCk9RPIU/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style="background: #FFF; border: 0; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: 0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width: 658px; min-width: 326px; padding: 0; width: calc(100% - 2px);" width="600" height="400" id="PL_blockquote_block-m942nfr3-xow52ss9-pnarfaoi">
<div style="padding: 16px;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIBHCk9RPIU/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style="background: #FFFFFF; line-height: 0; padding: 0 0; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; width: 100%;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: block; height: 50px; margin: 0 auto 12px; width: 50px;"><svg height="50px" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 60 60" width="50px" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd" stroke="none" stroke-width="1"><g fill="#000000" transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div>
<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style="color: #3897f0; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: 550; line-height: 18px;">View this post on Instagram</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg);"></div>
</div>
<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style="width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div>
<div style="width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div>
<div style="background-color: #f4f4f4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div>
</div>
</a>
<p style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 17px; margin-bottom: 0; margin-top: 8px; overflow: hidden; padding: 8px 0 7px; text-align: center; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DIBHCk9RPIU/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style="color: #c9c8cd; font-family: Arial,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: 17px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Pop Base (@popbase)</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-pm-netanyahu-travels-to-hungary-in-open-defiance-of-icc-arrest-warrant-8919304" rel="dofollow">Israeli PM Netanyahu travels to Hungary in open defiance of ICC arrest warrant</a></strong></p>
<p>The Hill report also revealed that Harris will make her decision about representing California in the Senate this summer. Reports have earlier projected Harris as a possible candidate to replace Gavin Newsom as he is barred from running again due to limits.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukraine-war-18-including-9-children-killed-in-zelenskys-hometown-moscow-says-was-targeting-military-8927675" rel="dofollow">Ukraine war: 18, including 9 children, killed in Zelensky's hometown, Moscow says was targeting 'military'</a></strong></p>
<h2>Kamala Harris in politics</h2>
<p>Kamala<em> </em>Harris lost the 2024 US Presidential election to Donald Trump, who secured more than 270 electoral college votes to reclaim the presidency for the second time. In 2020, Kamala Harris had been Joe Biden's running mate. Biden had stepped aside in July last year from the race to the presidency and the Democrats picked Harris as the face to run against Republican Trump. In 2020, Harris became the first Black vice president of the United States and the first woman to hold the post.</p>
<p><strong>Read More |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-kills-hamas-commander-in-lebanon-strike-expands-ground-offensive-in-gaza-8925247" rel="dofollow"> Israel kills Hamas 'commander' in Lebanon strike, expands ground offensive in Gaza</a></strong></p>
<p>(With inputs from agencies)</p>

World | Former US Vice President Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance at a summit in California and has reportedly hinted at staying active in political life

Former US Vice President Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance at a summit for Black women leaders in California. She has reportedly hinted at staying active in political life in what is being termed as her first public appearance after the 2024 poll debacle. "We can’t go out there and do battle if we don’t take care of ourselves and each other...I’ll see you out there. I’m not going anywhere," she told the audience at the Leading Women Defined gathering, reported The Hill. Read More | Indian national stabbed to death in Canada, suspect held: Indian embassy In a nearly eight-minute address, Harris did not name US President Donald Trump, but spoke about the "fear" that the people of United States are witnessing "in these last few months." "Fear has a way to be contagious. When one person has fear, it has a way of spreading to those around...we are witnessing that. But I say, courage is also contagious," she added. Watch the video here: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Pop Base (@popbase) Read More | Israeli PM Netanyahu travels to Hungary in open defiance of ICC arrest warrant The Hill report also revealed that Harris will make her decision about representing California in the Senate this summer. Reports have earlier projected Harris as a possible candidate to replace Gavin Newsom as he is barred from running again due to limits. Read More | Ukraine war: 18, including 9 children, killed in Zelensky's hometown, Moscow says was targeting 'military' Kamala Harris in politics Kamala Harris lost the 2024 US Presidential election to Donald Trump, who secured more than 270 electoral college votes to reclaim the presidency for the second time. In 2020, Kamala Harris had been Joe Biden's running mate. Biden had stepped aside in July last year from the race to the presidency and the Democrats picked Harris as the face to run against Republican Trump. In 2020, Harris became the first Black vice president of the United States and the first woman to hold the post. Read More | Israel kills Hamas 'commander' in Lebanon strike, expands ground offensive in Gaza (With inputs from agencies)

Kamala Harris returns to public stage after 2024 US election, hints at staying in politics

Wisconsin voters have elected Democrat-backed Judge Susan Crawford in a crucial judicial race, defeating Trump and Elon Musk-backed candidate Brad Schimel. With this result, abortion laws and election rules in the state could now come under scrutiny.

Democrat-backed candidate wins Wisconsin judicial election in key race

democrats

Democrats, News on Democrats, stories on Democrats, articles on Democrats, Democrats stories at Wion, Democrats news, Democrats latest news

democrats

Donald Trump Demands Death Penalty for Democrats

Trump Labels Democrats’ Military Video ‘Seditious Behavior, Punishable by Death’

Trump Labels Democrats’ Military Video ‘Seditious Behavior, Punishable by Death’

Trump vs Democrats: Trump Threatens Democrats with Sedition Charges Over Military Video

‘Seditious behaviour, punishable by death’: Trump slams Democrat lawmakers

Epstein files: Epstein claimed Trump 'knew of the girls' in one email

Trump Addresses Republican Senators | Blames Democrats For Shutdown

Zohran Mamdani, NY First Muslim Mayor, Pledges to Combat Hate and Inequality

NYC Mayoral Elections: Top Democrat Leaders Target Trump at Mamdani's Campaign Rally

Trump’s Approval Ratings: Claims vs Reality | What the Numbers Really Say

US Government Shutdown: Uncertainty Mounts As Trump Warns Of Federal Job Cuts

Donald Trump Refuses to Bow to Democrat Demands on Healthcare

US Government Shutdown: Weaker Job Outlook Trumps Inflation Worries

Trump's administration reacts to Democrats-GOP tussle as government shut down looms

Trump denies sending birthday note to Epstein: 'I didn't do it'

Trump's alleged birthday note to Epstein exposed by Democrats | 'I didn't do it'

Trump's multi-pronged strategy to clinch 2026 midterms elections

Democrats slam Trump's 50% tariffs: 'Why India, not China?'

Texas senate approves redistricting bill | Five Republican leaning seats added

California Lawmakers Pass Bill That Redraws Congressional Map | WION

Race to redraw U.S. electoral maps: California governor signs redistricting bills

Texas Republicans approve Trump-backed congressional map | Democrats return to house

Abbott orders arrest of Democrats who fled Texas to block redistricting vote

Democrats flee Texas to block redistricting vote ahead of 2026 midterm election

Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Democratic leader's speech crosses 8 hours

Democrats stall Trump’s 940-page bill by forcing it to be read aloud in Senate