Tyler Robinson was not the killer of Charlie Kirk? Candace Owens alleges hidden forces in play like JFK assassination

Owens claims surveillance footage from a door camera at Utah Valley University shows a woman accompanying the shooter, suggesting Robinson may not have acted alone. She questions why the FBI has withheld this footage, arguing it could reveal critical facts obscured from the public.

Owens alleges the investigation was influenced by national actors. She claims that instead of local Utah agents, the FBI sent personnel from its Connecticut office, which she links to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), implying potential bias or interference in the handling of evidence and case direction.

Owens casts doubt on texts attributed to Robinson, including those with his partner. She suggests some messages may have been fabricated or misrepresented to support the narrative that Robinson acted alone, framing him as the sole perpetrator and controlling the public story.

Owens highlights actions she considers inconsistent with the official narrative, such as Robinson allegedly visiting a Dairy Queen after the shooting. She argues such behavior is unexpected for someone who had just committed murder, suggesting a possible misinterpretation or deliberate framing of his actions.

Central to Owens’ claims is the idea that Robinson could be a scapegoat, with investigators curating evidence to simplify the case. She argues that the narrative portraying him as the lone shooter may obscure a more complex reality, raising questions about the integrity of the investigative process.

Owens connects Kirk’s alleged concerns for his safety before his death to a broader conspiracy, hinting that undisclosed parties may have had motives to shape events. She cites selective evidence releases and alleged investigative decisions as signs that hidden forces may be influencing the case narrative.

Her claims could influence public opinion, media coverage, and legal strategy. If verified, they might pressure investigators, affect trial proceedings, or alter defence approaches. The accuracy and disclosure of surveillance, forensic evidence, and witness statements will be critical in validating or refuting her assertions.