After Bangladesh withdrew from the T20 World Cup, here are five instances when teams refused to play in ICC tournaments due to security or political concerns, showing how safety issues have shaped cricket history.

The 1996 World Cup had matches in Sri Lanka during a civil war. After a bomb blast in Colombo, Australia and the West Indies felt it was unsafe to travel. They skipped their games and lost points by default.

The 2003 World Cup was played in South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Kenya. England refused to play in Zimbabwe due to political reasons. New Zealand avoided Kenya after a bombing. Both teams lost points, changing the tournament standings.

Zimbabwe withdrew from the 2009 T20 World Cup due to political problems and strained relations with the host country. The ICC accepted their decision. Scotland replaced Zimbabwe and got a chance to play at the global level.

Australia did not take part in the 2016 Under-19 World Cup in Bangladesh due to security concerns. They had already cancelled a tour earlier. The ICC respected their choice and selected Ireland as their replacement.

India chose not to travel to Pakistan for the 2025 Champions Trophy due to political and security concerns. The ICC used a hybrid model, with India playing in Dubai while Pakistan hosted its matches at home.