A Virginia man baffled the internet after claiming that he almost swallowed a nose ring when he bit into something sharp while eating from Taco Bell. Jeremy, 33, told Newsweek he had ordered two steak cheesy street chalupas takeout from the food chain on July 24. When only a few bites left, he felt "something sharp" stuck at the back of his throat.

After clearing it from his throat, Jeremy tried to bite into it again, only for it to get wedged between his molars. He spat the object out when he felt a sharp pain and realised he had nearly swallowed someone's nose piercing.

"The nose ring, now slightly bent from the bite, got pushed to the front of my mouth, and I spit it out. It took a small bit of my filling with it, and [I felt] a small sharp pain from the bite," he said.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-man-who-forced-son-to-run-on-treadmill-causing-his-death-jailed-for-25-years-747176">US man who forced son to run on treadmill, causing his death, jailed for 25 years</a>

"I was in pure shock when I realized what it was. I looked at my wife, and she looked over and couldn't say anything."

Disgusted by the incident, Jeremy took to Reddit and shared the pictures of the jewellery piece he found in his food. His post gained over 45,000 votes and 4,200 comments.

"I decided to share it online because I thought it was so egregious that others would like to see it," Jeremy told Newsweek.

He reached out to the local branch of Taco Bell right after finding the nose ring in his takeout order. The manager appeared "mostly unbothered" and stated that the article couldn't have come from their store kitchen, not taking any responsibility.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/american-airlines-flight-makes-emergency-landing-after-passengers-spot-lice-in-womans-hair-747059">American Airlines flight makes emergency landing after passengers spot lice in woman’s hair</a>

"I just wish the manager had a bit more integrity and would take responsibility for this. It very clearly was an employee who made a mistake, but instead, they used the rhetoric that it wasn't their fault. But who else could it be? If not the store, then the distribution centre, maybe, but that's less believable to me," Jeremy said.

Jeremy added that he "felt sick for two days" and still has a sore throat. He believes the most Taco Bell would do is offer him coupons or gift cards.

"There's no accountability, and no reason I'd want free tacos for mental and physical pain, no matter how small," he said.

In a statement to Newsweek, Taco Bell said, "We take this very seriously. We are looking into this matter and strive to make things right with the customer."

(With inputs from agencies)

A Virginia man baffled the internet after claiming that he almost swallowed a nose ring when he bit into something sharp while eating from Taco Bell. Jeremy, 33, told Newsweek he had ordered two steak cheesy street chalupas takeout from the food chain on July 24.

A Virginia man baffled the internet after claiming that he almost swallowed a nose ring when he bit into something sharp while eating from Taco Bell. Jeremy, 33, told Newsweek he had ordered two steak cheesy street chalupas takeout from the food chain on July 24. When only a few bites left, he felt "something sharp" stuck at the back of his throat. After clearing it from his throat, Jeremy tried to bite into it again, only for it to get wedged between his molars. He spat the object out when he felt a sharp pain and realised he had nearly swallowed someone's nose piercing. "The nose ring, now slightly bent from the bite, got pushed to the front of my mouth, and I spit it out. It took a small bit of my filling with it, and [I felt] a small sharp pain from the bite," he said. Also read | US man who forced son to run on treadmill, causing his death, jailed for 25 years "I was in pure shock when I realized what it was. I looked at my wife, and she looked over and couldn't say anything." Disgusted by the incident, Jeremy took to Reddit and shared the pictures of the jewellery piece he found in his food. His post gained over 45,000 votes and 4,200 comments. "I decided to share it online because I thought it was so egregious that others would like to see it," Jeremy told Newsweek. He reached out to the local branch of Taco Bell right after finding the nose ring in his takeout order. The manager appeared "mostly unbothered" and stated that the article couldn't have come from their store kitchen, not taking any responsibility. Also read | American Airlines flight makes emergency landing after passengers spot lice in woman’s hair "I just wish the manager had a bit more integrity and would take responsibility for this. It very clearly was an employee who made a mistake, but instead, they used the rhetoric that it wasn't their fault. But who else could it be? If not the store, then the distribution centre, maybe, but that's less believable to me," Jeremy said. Jeremy added that he "felt sick for two days" and still has a sore throat. He believes the most Taco Bell would do is offer him coupons or gift cards. "There's no accountability, and no reason I'd want free tacos for mental and physical pain, no matter how small," he said. In a statement to Newsweek, Taco Bell said, "We take this very seriously. We are looking into this matter and strive to make things right with the customer." (With inputs from agencies)

US: Virginia man feels sharp pain while eating Taco Bell, nearly swallows a nose ring

In boost to Nawaz and Tareen, Supreme Court ends lifetime disqualification SC issues ruling with 6-1 majority; disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) capped at 5 years; Justice Afridi differs with fellow judges

Pakistan Supreme Court reverses its earlier order

Swiggy has unveiled its yearly food delivery report which gives an insight into the consumer's dining preferences. One of the most surprising things revealed in this report was that a customer from India's Mumbai ordered food worth $ 50948.19. Swiggy, in their report, wittily wrote, "A user from Mumbai, who placed food orders worth ₹42.3 lakh ($ 50948.19) (no, that’s not a CTC)." This is not only it, another person from Hyderabad spent $ 7226.69 on idlis.

<h2>India's love for biryani</h2>

The report features insights into India's dining preferences, with Biryani reigning supreme as the nation's most beloved dish ordered through the platform. India ordered 2.5 biryanis per second in 2023 and&nbsp;a Hyderabad resident-led by ordering 1,633 biryanis in the entire year. That is more than 4 biryanis a day.

While chicken biryani topped the non-veg food chart, vegetarians ordered veg-biryani&nbsp;every 5.5 seconds.&nbsp;However, the biggest biryani order came from Chandigarh. According to the report, a family from the city ordered 70 plates of biryani in a single go during the adrenaline-loaded India vs Pakistan match.

Also read|&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/after-chandrayaan-3s-success-india-to-launch-chandrayaan-4-details-here-669985">After success of Chandrayaan-3, India to launch Chandrayaan-4. Details here</a>

<h2>What India ordered&nbsp;</h2>

A resident of Jhansi placed an order of 269 items on a single day and 207 pizzas were ordered at a household in Bhubaneshwar.&nbsp;

With 8.5 million orders for chocolate cake, Bengaluru emerged as the ‘Cake Capital’.

During Durga Puja, 7.7 million orders of gulab jamun were enjoyed nationwide, and during Navratri, the beloved masala dosa was the most popular dish among vegetarians. In Hyderabad, a customer spent&nbsp;$ 7222.87 on buying idlis. Biryani continued its reign as the most-ordered dish for the eighth consecutive year, with a rate of 2.5 biryanis per second.

<h2>Bangalore: The 'Cake Capital'</h2>

Bangalore claimed the title of 'Cake Capital' with a remarkable 8.5 million orders for chocolate cake. While the country ordered 271 cakes per minute on Valentine’s Day.

Vegan orders on Swiggy Guilt Free rose by&nbsp;146 per cent. The battle between Japanese and Korean cuisine tilted in favour of Anime, with Japanese dishes securing twice as many orders.

(With inputs from agencies)

Swiggy has unveiled its yearly food delivery report which gives an insight into the consumer's dining preferences. One of the most surprising things revealed in this report was that a customer from India's Mumbai ordered food worth $ 50948.

Swiggy has unveiled its yearly food delivery report which gives an insight into the consumer's dining preferences. One of the most surprising things revealed in this report was that a customer from India's Mumbai ordered food worth $ 50948.19. Swiggy, in their report, wittily wrote, "A user from Mumbai, who placed food orders worth ₹42.3 lakh ($ 50948.19) (no, that’s not a CTC)." This is not only it, another person from Hyderabad spent $ 7226.69 on idlis. India's love for biryani The report features insights into India's dining preferences, with Biryani reigning supreme as the nation's most beloved dish ordered through the platform. India ordered 2.5 biryanis per second in 2023 and a Hyderabad resident-led by ordering 1,633 biryanis in the entire year. That is more than 4 biryanis a day. While chicken biryani topped the non-veg food chart, vegetarians ordered veg-biryani every 5.5 seconds. However, the biggest biryani order came from Chandigarh. According to the report, a family from the city ordered 70 plates of biryani in a single go during the adrenaline-loaded India vs Pakistan match. Also read| After success of Chandrayaan-3, India to launch Chandrayaan-4. Details here What India ordered A resident of Jhansi placed an order of 269 items on a single day and 207 pizzas were ordered at a household in Bhubaneshwar. With 8.5 million orders for chocolate cake, Bengaluru emerged as the ‘Cake Capital’. During Durga Puja, 7.7 million orders of gulab jamun were enjoyed nationwide, and during Navratri, the beloved masala dosa was the most popular dish among vegetarians. In Hyderabad, a customer spent $ 7222.87 on buying idlis. Biryani continued its reign as the most-ordered dish for the eighth consecutive year, with a rate of 2.5 biryanis per second. Bangalore: The 'Cake Capital' Bangalore claimed the title of 'Cake Capital' with a remarkable 8.5 million orders for chocolate cake. While the country ordered 271 cakes per minute on Valentine’s Day. Vegan orders on Swiggy Guilt Free rose by 146 per cent. The battle between Japanese and Korean cuisine tilted in favour of Anime, with Japanese dishes securing twice as many orders. (With inputs from agencies)

Mumbai resident ordered food worth over $50,000 on food aggregator app

In what most would call an end to hour-long waiting lines, Uber Japan has announced plan for online delivery during matches. You can now order snacks while sitting on your seats.

End to hour-long waiting lines: Uber Japan announces plan for online delivery during matches

To end contempt of court order, former US president Donald Trump must meet conditions and pay USD 110,000 in fines, said a New York judge on Wednesday.&nbsp;The former president was slow to respond to a civil subpoena, which was issued by the attorney general of the state, media reports said.&nbsp;If Trump submits paperwork by May 20 giving details about efforts taken to search for the subpoenaed records and explains his and his firm's document retention policies, the contempt finding will end,&nbsp;Judge Arthur Engoron&nbsp;said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Also Read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-us-condominium-collapse-lawsuit-nearly-1-billion-settlement-reached-478249" hreflang="en">In US condominium collapse lawsuit, nearly $1 billion settlement reached</a>

On April 25, Engoron declared Trump in contempt. He had also fined the former president USD 10,000 per day for not complying with a subpoena in probe by New York Attorney General Letitia James into business practices of Trump. &nbsp;

In a statement on Wednesday, James said, "For years, Mr Trump and the Trump Organisation have tried to thwart our lawful investigation, but today's decision makes clear that no one can evade accountability." &nbsp;

Watch:&nbsp;US inflation edges down in April as compared to March, stays elevated at 8.3%

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-inflation-edges-down-in-april-as-compared-to-march-stays-elevated-at-83-478154/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

Trump has been ordered to pay USD 110,000 by Engoron as it is the total amount of fines he had accrued through May 6 when his lawyers had submitted court documents of 66 pages, which detailed the efforts by him and his lawyers to locate the subpoenaed records. &nbsp;

If conditions are not met, Engoron said that he can reinstate the fine, retroactive to May 7. &nbsp;&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

To end contempt of court order, former US president Donald Trump must meet conditions and pay USD 110,000 in fines, said a New York judge on Wednesday. The former president was slow to respond to a civil subpoena, which was issued by the attorney general of the state, media reports said.

To end contempt of court order, former US president Donald Trump must meet conditions and pay USD 110,000 in fines, said a New York judge on Wednesday. The former president was slow to respond to a civil subpoena, which was issued by the attorney general of the state, media reports said. If Trump submits paperwork by May 20 giving details about efforts taken to search for the subpoenaed records and explains his and his firm's document retention policies, the contempt finding will end, Judge Arthur Engoron said. Also Read: In US condominium collapse lawsuit, nearly $1 billion settlement reached On April 25, Engoron declared Trump in contempt. He had also fined the former president USD 10,000 per day for not complying with a subpoena in probe by New York Attorney General Letitia James into business practices of Trump. In a statement on Wednesday, James said, "For years, Mr Trump and the Trump Organisation have tried to thwart our lawful investigation, but today's decision makes clear that no one can evade accountability." Watch: US inflation edges down in April as compared to March, stays elevated at 8.3% × Trump has been ordered to pay USD 110,000 by Engoron as it is the total amount of fines he had accrued through May 6 when his lawyers had submitted court documents of 66 pages, which detailed the efforts by him and his lawyers to locate the subpoenaed records. If conditions are not met, Engoron said that he can reinstate the fine, retroactive to May 7. WATCH WION LIVE HERE (With inputs from agencies)

To end contempt of court order, US judge tells Donald Trump to meet conditions, pay $110,000 in fines

Apple may have paid $950 million to Samsung for not meeting its goals in terms of the number of OLED screen it had ordered.

The iPhone maker depends on Samsung to procure Organic Light Emitting Diodes screens. Samsung makes over 40 per cent of all OLED screens in the world. With its AMOLED displays, it has a 98 per cent share of screens in the market. Out of the $400 million yearly revenue from screens over $100 million is generated by Samsung alone.

The report, which was published by Display Supply Chain Consultants suggests a one-time payment for falling short in terms of product acquirement.

"One-time gain"

During its Q2 2020 release, Samsung made a reference to a “one-time gain” coming from its screen display enterprise. However, no clear indication of Apple’s involvement or amount was mentioned in this report.

Last month, reports of Samsung receiving over $700 million circulated on social media. But this new revelation pins the approximate amount at $950 million.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="/technology/apple-supplier-foxconn-to-invest-1-billion-in-india-sources-312563" hreflang="en">Apple supplier Foxconn to invest $1 billion in India: Sources</a>

The report also mentioned how this affects the profit for Samsung. “The Apple payment likely turned what otherwise would have been an operating loss for display devices into an operating profit,” it said.

The revenue incurred from screens was down by 7 per cent for Samsung, while its operation profit was up by 23 per cent, much higher than expected.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="/world/samsung-smartphone-receive-mysterious-1-notification-company-says-it-was-mistake-281871" hreflang="en">Samsung smartphone receive mysterious '1' notification; company says it was mistake</a>

Not the first time

This is not the first time Apple has paid a hefty amount to Samsung. In 2019, a similar penalty was enforced by Samsung for not buying enough OLED screens. For perspective - let’s say Apple placed an order for 20 million screens, but due to market fluctuations and demands, was only able to accommodate 15 million screens. The value of the 5 million screens would then have to be paid to Samsung, or made up by procuring even more screens from the company, which is exactly what happened last year.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="/technology/ceos-of-apple-amazon-facebook-and-google-to-testify-in-congress-over-antitrust-issues-310090" hreflang="en">CEOs of Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google to testify in Congress over antitrust issues</a>

Most big companies make deals with screen makers with a guaranteed purchase of a minimum number of screens, which lowers the total cost of buying them. As part of the contract, inability to fulfil this imposes fine on the buyer.

It is likely that this year’s disruption will be attributed to COVID-19, which has caused a global slowdown of selling and buying power. Factories have also remained shut in the face of growing concerns about social distancing to conquer the virus.

Apple may have paid $950 million to Samsung for not meeting its goals in terms of the number of OLED screen it had ordered. The iPhone maker depends on Samsung to procure Organic Light Emitting Diodes screens.

Apple may have paid $950 million to Samsung for not meeting its goals in terms of the number of OLED screen it had ordered. The iPhone maker depends on Samsung to procure Organic Light Emitting Diodes screens. Samsung makes over 40 per cent of all OLED screens in the world. With its AMOLED displays, it has a 98 per cent share of screens in the market. Out of the $400 million yearly revenue from screens over $100 million is generated by Samsung alone. The report, which was published by Display Supply Chain Consultants suggests a one-time payment for falling short in terms of product acquirement. "One-time gain" During its Q2 2020 release, Samsung made a reference to a “one-time gain” coming from its screen display enterprise. However, no clear indication of Apple’s involvement or amount was mentioned in this report. Last month, reports of Samsung receiving over $700 million circulated on social media. But this new revelation pins the approximate amount at $950 million. Also read: Apple supplier Foxconn to invest $1 billion in India: Sources The report also mentioned how this affects the profit for Samsung. “The Apple payment likely turned what otherwise would have been an operating loss for display devices into an operating profit,” it said. The revenue incurred from screens was down by 7 per cent for Samsung, while its operation profit was up by 23 per cent, much higher than expected. Also read: Samsung smartphone receive mysterious '1' notification; company says it was mistake Not the first time This is not the first time Apple has paid a hefty amount to Samsung. In 2019, a similar penalty was enforced by Samsung for not buying enough OLED screens. For perspective - let’s say Apple placed an order for 20 million screens, but due to market fluctuations and demands, was only able to accommodate 15 million screens. The value of the 5 million screens would then have to be paid to Samsung, or made up by procuring even more screens from the company, which is exactly what happened last year. Also read: CEOs of Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google to testify in Congress over antitrust issues Most big companies make deals with screen makers with a guaranteed purchase of a minimum number of screens, which lowers the total cost of buying them. As part of the contract, inability to fulfil this imposes fine on the buyer. It is likely that this year’s disruption will be attributed to COVID-19, which has caused a global slowdown of selling and buying power. Factories have also remained shut in the face of growing concerns about social distancing to conquer the virus.

Apple reportedly paid almost $1 billion to Samsung for faltering on order for screens

Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked Border Security Force to withdraw an order against a BSF jawan who was given a penalty of seven days&rsquo; pay for showing disrespect towards Mr Modi.

BSF constable Sanjeev Kumar who forgot to affix &#39;honourable&#39; or &#39;Shri&#39; while referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi was penalised by the force, which called the mistake &quot;disrespect&quot; to the Prime Minister.

The incident took place on February 21 inside the BSF&#39;s 15th Battalion headquarters in Mahatpur, Nadia (West Bengal), during the zero parade, a routine exercise to account for jawans&#39; daily activities.&nbsp;

&ldquo;The Prime Minister has expressed his displeasure and directed the force to immediately withdraw the punishment. The order has been rescinded and the concerned Commandant has been cautioned for not dealing with the matter judiciously,&rdquo; said a BSF spokesperson.

A seven-day pay cut of a BSF jawan, who was punished for “disrespecting” PM Modi, was restored after the PM himself intervened and directed the border force to withdraw the order

Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked Border Security Force to withdraw an order against a BSF jawan who was given a penalty of seven days’ pay for showing disrespect towards Mr Modi. BSF constable Sanjeev Kumar who forgot to affix 'honourable' or 'Shri' while referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi was penalised by the force, which called the mistake "disrespect" to the Prime Minister. The incident took place on February 21 inside the BSF's 15th Battalion headquarters in Mahatpur, Nadia (West Bengal), during the zero parade, a routine exercise to account for jawans' daily activities. “The Prime Minister has expressed his displeasure and directed the force to immediately withdraw the punishment. The order has been rescinded and the concerned Commandant has been cautioned for not dealing with the matter judiciously,” said a BSF spokesperson.

BSF revokes pay cut of jawan who did not call PM 'Shri'

&nbsp;A federal court judge in California on Monday blocked an executive order from President Donald Trump to deny some federal grants to so-called sanctuary cities, undermining the administration&#39;s crackdown on illegal immigration.

The judge, who blocked the order provisionally in April, issued a permanent injunction in the suit brought by the city and county of San Francisco and Santa Clara County, which said the order was unconstitutional.

&quot;The Counties have demonstrated that the Executive Order has caused and will cause them constitutional injuries by violating the separation of powers doctrine and depriving them of their Tenth and Fifth Amendment rights,&quot; U.S. District Judge William Orrick for the Northern District of California wrote in his order.

Trump issued the order in January, shortly after he was inaugurated, slashing funding to jurisdictions that refuse to comply with a statute that requires local governments to share information with U.S. immigration authorities.

As part of that policy, the Justice Department has sought to punish cities and other local jurisdictions that have joined a growing &quot;sanctuary&quot; movement aimed at shielding illegal immigrants from stepped-up deportation efforts.

&quot;The district court exceeded its authority today when it barred the president from instructing his cabinet members to enforce existing law,&quot; Department of Justice spokesman Devin O&rsquo;Malley said in a statement. &quot;The Justice Department will vindicate the president&rsquo;s lawful authority to direct the executive branch.&quot;

The department has already appealed the judge&#39;s prior ruling from April.

The Trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes.

Dozens of local governments and cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the growing &quot;sanctuary&quot; movement.

Supporters of the sanctuary policy argue enlisting police cooperation in rounding up immigrants for removal undermines communities&#39; trust in local police, particularly among Latinos.

The Justice Department is concerned about localities&#39; compliance with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement requests to detain people up to 48 hours beyond their scheduled release time so that immigration officials can pick them up.

Some cities say they will only honor such requests when accompanied by criminal warrants, and that compliance is voluntary and not required under the statute.

Chicago also sued the federal government in August over the threats of funding cuts by the Justice Department. A federal judge sided with the city in September and issued a preliminary injunction barring the U.S. government from denying the public-safety grants.

The judge issued a permanent injunction in the suit brought by the city and county of San Francisco and Santa Clara County

A federal court judge in California on Monday blocked an executive order from President Donald Trump to deny some federal grants to so-called sanctuary cities, undermining the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The judge, who blocked the order provisionally in April, issued a permanent injunction in the suit brought by the city and county of San Francisco and Santa Clara County, which said the order was unconstitutional. "The Counties have demonstrated that the Executive Order has caused and will cause them constitutional injuries by violating the separation of powers doctrine and depriving them of their Tenth and Fifth Amendment rights," U.S. District Judge William Orrick for the Northern District of California wrote in his order. Trump issued the order in January, shortly after he was inaugurated, slashing funding to jurisdictions that refuse to comply with a statute that requires local governments to share information with U.S. immigration authorities. As part of that policy, the Justice Department has sought to punish cities and other local jurisdictions that have joined a growing "sanctuary" movement aimed at shielding illegal immigrants from stepped-up deportation efforts. "The district court exceeded its authority today when it barred the president from instructing his cabinet members to enforce existing law," Department of Justice spokesman Devin O’Malley said in a statement. "The Justice Department will vindicate the president’s lawful authority to direct the executive branch." The department has already appealed the judge's prior ruling from April. The Trump administration contends local authorities endanger public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal immigrants arrested for crimes. Dozens of local governments and cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined the growing "sanctuary" movement. Supporters of the sanctuary policy argue enlisting police cooperation in rounding up immigrants for removal undermines communities' trust in local police, particularly among Latinos. The Justice Department is concerned about localities' compliance with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement requests to detain people up to 48 hours beyond their scheduled release time so that immigration officials can pick them up. Some cities say they will only honor such requests when accompanied by criminal warrants, and that compliance is voluntary and not required under the statute. Chicago also sued the federal government in August over the threats of funding cuts by the Justice Department. A federal judge sided with the city in September and issued a preliminary injunction barring the U.S. government from denying the public-safety grants.

US judge in California blocks Trump's order on sanctuary cities

Actress Amber Heard has given a statement to Los Angeles police accusing estranged husband Johnny Depp of domestic violence, her lawyers said on Tuesday, a week after she filed for divorce and obtained a restraining order against Depp. 
 
Heard`s attorneys said in a statement that in an attempt to &quot;protect her privacy and Johnny`s career&quot; the actress initially declined to report to police a May 21 incident between her and Depp that she claimed left her with a bruised eye. 
 
&quot;Johnny`s team has forced Amber to give a statement to the LAPD to set the record straight as to the true facts ...,&quot; Heard`s lawyers Samantha Spector and Joseph P. Koenig said. 
 
&quot;Amber has suffered through years of physical and psychological abuse at the hands of Johnny,&quot; they said. 
 
Representatives for Depp did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Los Angeles Police Department spokeswoman Officer Liliana Preciado declined to comment, citing privacy. 
 
Depp`s 17-year-old daughter Lily-Rose supported her father on Instagram, posting a photo captioning her father as &quot;the sweetest most loving person I know.&quot; 
 
Heard, 30, said in court papers filed in Los Angeles last week that Depp, 52, had been abusive to her throughout their relationship, culminating in an argument during which he hurled a cell phone at her face and shattered objects in her apartment. 
 
Depp`s lawyer argued in a court document that Heard &quot;is attempting to secure a premature financial resolution by alleging abuse.&quot; 
 
Judge Carl H. Moor granted a temporary restraining order requiring Depp to stay at least 100 yards away from Heard and move out of the couple`s shared downtown Los Angeles condominium. A hearing was scheduled for June 17. 
 
Heard, who will star in upcoming superhero ensemble &quot;The Justice League Part One,&quot; said she was seeking $50,000 a month for spousal support. 
 
Depp, one of Hollywood`s leading actors and box office draws, and Heard married in February 2015 after meeting on the set of 2011`s &quot;The Rum Diary.&quot; 
 
Heard`s lawyers said they held off serving Depp with the divorce petition at the Hollywood premiere of his latest film &quot;Alice Through the Looking Glass&quot; last week because the actress wanted to keep it private. 
 
The Disney film failed to perform strongly at U.S. and Canadian box offices this past weekend, grossing $28.1 million, with some critics blaming the poor performance on negative headlines.&nbsp;

Actress Amber Heard has given a statement to Los Angeles police to this effect, a week after she filed for divorce

Actress Amber Heard has given a statement to Los Angeles police accusing estranged husband Johnny Depp of domestic violence, her lawyers said on Tuesday, a week after she filed for divorce and obtained a restraining order against Depp. Heard`s attorneys said in a statement that in an attempt to "protect her privacy and Johnny`s career" the actress initially declined to report to police a May 21 incident between her and Depp that she claimed left her with a bruised eye. "Johnny`s team has forced Amber to give a statement to the LAPD to set the record straight as to the true facts ...," Heard`s lawyers Samantha Spector and Joseph P. Koenig said. "Amber has suffered through years of physical and psychological abuse at the hands of Johnny," they said. Representatives for Depp did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Los Angeles Police Department spokeswoman Officer Liliana Preciado declined to comment, citing privacy. Depp`s 17-year-old daughter Lily-Rose supported her father on Instagram, posting a photo captioning her father as "the sweetest most loving person I know." Heard, 30, said in court papers filed in Los Angeles last week that Depp, 52, had been abusive to her throughout their relationship, culminating in an argument during which he hurled a cell phone at her face and shattered objects in her apartment. Depp`s lawyer argued in a court document that Heard "is attempting to secure a premature financial resolution by alleging abuse." Judge Carl H. Moor granted a temporary restraining order requiring Depp to stay at least 100 yards away from Heard and move out of the couple`s shared downtown Los Angeles condominium. A hearing was scheduled for June 17. Heard, who will star in upcoming superhero ensemble "The Justice League Part One," said she was seeking $50,000 a month for spousal support. Depp, one of Hollywood`s leading actors and box office draws, and Heard married in February 2015 after meeting on the set of 2011`s "The Rum Diary." Heard`s lawyers said they held off serving Depp with the divorce petition at the Hollywood premiere of his latest film "Alice Through the Looking Glass" last week because the actress wanted to keep it private. The Disney film failed to perform strongly at U.S. and Canadian box offices this past weekend, grossing $28.1 million, with some critics blaming the poor performance on negative headlines.

Amber Heard accuses Johnny Depp of domestic violence

order

Order, News on Order, stories on Order, articles on Order, Order stories at Wion, Order news, Order latest news