Tibetan Exiles in India's Himachal Pradesh say they are staring at uncertain future over the advancing age of the 14th July Dalai Lama with questions on succession looming large. Tibetans fear that Beijing will try to impose a reincarnation of its Choice. Watch in for more details!

Tibetans fear China's interference in reincarnation of leader

Watch top headlines of the hour: - China's Russia aid hurting EU ties: Germany - 3 dead in Russian strikes on Kharkiv - Sunak slams Farage for Ukraine remark - 24 dead in Israeli strikes in Gaza - IDF kills Hamas arms supplier in Lebanon - Biden approves New Mexico disaster aid

China's Russia aid hurting EU ties: Germany | 3 dead in Russian strikes on Kharkiv

The death toll from this year's Hajj has exceeded 1,000. And Saudi officials say that more than half of them were unregistered worshippers who performed the pilgrimage in extreme heat. Watch in for more details!

Hajj pilgrimage 2024: 1,126 pilgrims dead in Saudi heatwave

The Theodore Roosevelt, a nuclear-powered US aircraft carrier, arrived in the South Korean port city of Busan on Saturday to participate in joint military drills later this month with the host country and Japan, according to naval officials.

Freedom Edge exercises conducted by US, Japan & South Korea to check China's 'agressive behaviour'

US lawmakers including former US house speaker Nancy Pelosi met the Dalai Lama in Dharmasala.The visit comes a week after the US House of Representatives passed a vote for the resolve Tibet act which has now been sent to President Joe Biden in order to become a law. The latest move by Washington has irked China and Beijing has warned of severe repercussions.

US delegates-Dalai Lama meet in India, What's next for China?

Watch top headlines of the hour: - India, Bangladesh sign 10 agreements - Sino-French satellite launched into orbit - India: High-level panel formed for fair exams - US warship Rossevelt in Busan for joint drills - Israel pounds tent camps around Rafah - Yemen Houthis attack USS Eisenhower

India, Bangladesh sign 10 agreements | Sino-French satellite launched into orbit

China on Friday threatened to impose&nbsp;death penalty in extreme cases for "diehard"&nbsp;Taiwan&nbsp;independence separatists, a ratcheting up of pressure even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction on the democratically governed island.

China, which views&nbsp;Taiwan&nbsp;as its own territory, has made no secret of its dislike of President Lai Ching-te who took office last month, saying he is a "separatist", and staged war games shortly after his inauguration.

Taiwan&nbsp;has complained of a pattern of ramped up Chinese pressure since Lai won the election in January, including ongoing military actions, trade sanctions and coast guard patrols around&nbsp;Taiwan-controlled islands next to China.

The new guidelines say China's courts, prosecutors, public and state security bodies should "severely punish&nbsp;Taiwan&nbsp;independence diehards for splitting the country and inciting secession crimes in accordance with the law, and resolutely defend national sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity", according to China's state-run Xinhua news agency.

China on Friday threatened to impose death penalty in extreme cases for "diehard" Taiwan independence separatists, a ratcheting up of pressure even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction on the democratically governed island.

China on Friday threatened to impose death penalty in extreme cases for "diehard" Taiwan independence separatists, a ratcheting up of pressure even though Chinese courts have no jurisdiction on the democratically governed island. China, which views Taiwan as its own territory, has made no secret of its dislike of President Lai Ching-te who took office last month, saying he is a "separatist", and staged war games shortly after his inauguration. Taiwan has complained of a pattern of ramped up Chinese pressure since Lai won the election in January, including ongoing military actions, trade sanctions and coast guard patrols around Taiwan-controlled islands next to China. The new guidelines say China's courts, prosecutors, public and state security bodies should "severely punish Taiwan independence diehards for splitting the country and inciting secession crimes in accordance with the law, and resolutely defend national sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity", according to China's state-run Xinhua news agency.

China threatens death penalty for 'diehard' Taiwan separatists

China’s hegemonic ambitions and brazen acts of aggression in the South China Sea (SCS) pose significant threats to regional stability and the sanctity of international maritime law. These activities, including the recent interception of a Philippine resupply airdrop to the BRP Sierra Madre on May 19,&nbsp;highlight the urgent need for a robust and collective response to uphold the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and ensure regional security. While the immediate act of barbarism and what amounts to ‘pirate-like’ behaviour has gotten extensive coverage in the media, the strategic perspective is what I would like to pen down.

<h2>Personal insights and experiences</h2>

Having served in the Indian Navy for almost four decades, I have gained firsthand insight into the evolving maritime dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region. My participation in numerous exercises and diplomatic engagements at various levels has provided me with a unique perspective on the strategic importance of the SCS and the formidable challenges posed by Beijing’s maritime assertiveness, disregard for rule-based order, and hegemonic ambitions.

<h2>Historical context of China’s claims</h2>

China’s expansive claims in the SCS, encapsulated by the nine-dash line, date back to the early 1950s. This line, stretching over 2,000 kilometres from the Chinese mainland, encompasses nearly the entire SCS, overlapping with the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of several Southeast Asian countries.&nbsp;

Despite the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 2016 ruling rejecting the nine-dash line, Beijing continues to assert its claims brazenly and aggressively, in blatant disregard of international law and the sovereignty of its neighbours.

<h2>Key historical events:</h2>

●&nbsp;2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration Ruling: The tribunal rejected China’s historical claims within the nine-dash line, affirming that they have no legal basis under UNCLOS.

●&nbsp;Scarborough Shoal Standoff (2012): China effectively seized control of this strategically vital area, harassing and denying access to Philippine fishing boats.

<h2>China’s aggressive actions in the SCS</h2>

The interception of the Philippine resupply airdrop to the BRP Sierra Madre exemplifies China’s aggressiveness. Armed Chinese personnel seized and discarded essential supplies, a continuation of a broader pattern of brazen aggression, intimidation and coercion.

<h2>Case studies:</h2>

●&nbsp;Spratly Islands: China has established a significant military presence, constructing artificial islands equipped with runways, radar systems, and missile installations.

●&nbsp;Paracel Islands: Under Chinese control since 1974, these islands are crucial for their proximity to major sea routes and potential underwater resources.

<h2>Violation of UNCLOS</h2>

The 1982&nbsp;United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea&nbsp;(UNCLOS) establishes a comprehensive legal framework for maritime activities, crucial for maintaining order at sea. China’s actions, including the interception of resupply missions and the militarisation of disputed territories, blatantly violate UNCLOS principles, undermining peace, regional stability, and the rule of law.

<h2>Grey zone warfare: Beyond the visible</h2>

China employs grey zone warfare tactics, which operate in the nebulous space between peace and open conflict. These tactics include economic manipulation, influence operations, cyberattacks, and disinformation campaigns to achieve strategic objectives without triggering full-scale war.

<h2>China’s grey zone tactics in the maritime domain</h2>

China leverages its Maritime Militia, Coast Guard, and dual-use research vessels to blur the lines between civilian and military operations, pursuing territorial ambitions with minimal risk of direct military confrontation.

<h2>The Dark Triad: China's three-pronged maritime strategy</h2>

1.&nbsp;Maritime Militia: Known as the People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM), these ostensibly civilian vessels conduct aggressive operations, such as surveillance, enforcing blockades, and harassing foreign ships.

2.&nbsp;Dual-Use Research Vessels: While conducting scientific research, these ships gather extensive oceanographic data to support the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and enhance maritime surveillance.

3. Coast Guard: The Chinese Coast Guard engages in overt acts of aggression and intimidation, as seen in the harassment of Philippine fishing boats at Scarborough Shoal.

<h2>Impact on regional security</h2>

China’s actions threaten the sovereignty and security of Southeast Asian nations, disrupting regional maritime security and international trade routes. The militarisation of disputed territories, coupled with aggressive grey zone tactics, escalates tensions and undermines regional stability.

<h2>Responses from affected nations</h2>

Southeast Asian countries have responded through diplomatic, legal, and military means. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia have condemned China’s actions, sought legal recourse through international mechanisms, and increased their military readiness. Joint exercises with allies and public information campaigns have also effectively countered Chinese aggression.

<h2>International involvement and support</h2>

External powers and like-minded nations such as the United States, Japan, and Australia (also members of QUAD) play a crucial role in balancing China’s ambitions. Their naval presence and joint maritime exercises enhance regional security and support Southeast Asian nations in defending their sovereignty.

<h2>Strategies for countering China’s hegemony</h2>

Enhancing maritime security cooperation among Southeast Asian nations is essential to counter China’s hegemonic ambitions. Joint patrols, intelligence sharing, and increased defence investments are necessary to build regional resilience. Public information campaigns highlighting Chinese aggression can garner international support and pressure Beijing to adhere to international norms.

<h2>Rethinking the South China Sea in Indian Maritime Security Strategy</h2>

India’s strategic and economic interests in the SCS are growing, driven by significant trade routes and joint hydrocarbon exploration projects. The Indian Navy has increased its presence in the region, reflecting India’s commitment to regional peace, stability, rules-based order, and freedom of navigation.

Challenges:

●&nbsp;Intra-ASEAN Divisions: Diverse interests among ASEAN members complicate a unified stance against China.

●&nbsp;China’s Economic Influence: China’s significant economic footprint in the region hinders efforts to counter its dominance.

<h2>Policy recommendations and future projections</h2>

Given the complexities of the SCS, a multi-faceted approach is required.

Policy Recommendations:

1. Strengthen Regional Alliances: Foster stronger ties with ASEAN nations through regional naval exercises, capacity building, intelligence sharing, and defence cooperation.

2. Enhance Maritime Domain Awareness: Invest in advanced maritime surveillance technologies and collaborate with international partners.

3. Increase Economic Engagement: Deepen economic ties with Southeast Asian nations through trade agreements and joint ventures.

4. Promote Rule of Law: Advocate for adherence to international maritime law and support legal actions challenging China's claims.

Future Projections:

●&nbsp;Persistent Aggression: China’s aggressive posture in the SCS will likely continue, driven by strategic and economic interests.

●&nbsp;International Pressure: Regional and international pressure and strengthened alliances can mitigate risks and promote stability.

●&nbsp;Strategic Partnerships: Ongoing diplomatic efforts and strategic partnerships will be crucial in ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific.

<h2>Upholding the rule of law</h2>

A rules-based international order is crucial for maintaining peace and stability in the SCS. Regional and international stakeholders must unite against China’s coercive tactics and uphold the principles of UNCLOS. Vigilance, solidarity, and persistent engagement are crucial to ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific.

China’s brazen acts of aggression and grey zone tactics in the SCS involving its Navy, Coast Guard, Maritime Militia, and dual-use research vessels, pose significant threats to regional stability and international maritime law.&nbsp;

By understanding and countering China’s grey zone warfare, the international community can uphold the sovereignty of nations and maintain a rules-based order in the maritime domain. The time to act is now, for the region’s peace, stability and the integrity of international law depend on our collective resolve and action.&nbsp;

(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

China’s hegemonic ambitions and brazen acts of aggression in the South China Sea (SCS) pose significant threats to regional stability and the sanctity of international maritime law.

China’s hegemonic ambitions and brazen acts of aggression in the South China Sea (SCS) pose significant threats to regional stability and the sanctity of international maritime law. These activities, including the recent interception of a Philippine resupply airdrop to the BRP Sierra Madre on May 19, highlight the urgent need for a robust and collective response to uphold the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and ensure regional security. While the immediate act of barbarism and what amounts to ‘pirate-like’ behaviour has gotten extensive coverage in the media, the strategic perspective is what I would like to pen down. Personal insights and experiences Having served in the Indian Navy for almost four decades, I have gained firsthand insight into the evolving maritime dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region. My participation in numerous exercises and diplomatic engagements at various levels has provided me with a unique perspective on the strategic importance of the SCS and the formidable challenges posed by Beijing’s maritime assertiveness, disregard for rule-based order, and hegemonic ambitions. Historical context of China’s claims China’s expansive claims in the SCS, encapsulated by the nine-dash line, date back to the early 1950s. This line, stretching over 2,000 kilometres from the Chinese mainland, encompasses nearly the entire SCS, overlapping with the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of several Southeast Asian countries. Despite the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 2016 ruling rejecting the nine-dash line, Beijing continues to assert its claims brazenly and aggressively, in blatant disregard of international law and the sovereignty of its neighbours. Key historical events: ● 2016 Permanent Court of Arbitration Ruling: The tribunal rejected China’s historical claims within the nine-dash line, affirming that they have no legal basis under UNCLOS. ● Scarborough Shoal Standoff (2012): China effectively seized control of this strategically vital area, harassing and denying access to Philippine fishing boats. China’s aggressive actions in the SCS The interception of the Philippine resupply airdrop to the BRP Sierra Madre exemplifies China’s aggressiveness. Armed Chinese personnel seized and discarded essential supplies, a continuation of a broader pattern of brazen aggression, intimidation and coercion. Case studies: ● Spratly Islands: China has established a significant military presence, constructing artificial islands equipped with runways, radar systems, and missile installations. ● Paracel Islands: Under Chinese control since 1974, these islands are crucial for their proximity to major sea routes and potential underwater resources. Violation of UNCLOS The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) establishes a comprehensive legal framework for maritime activities, crucial for maintaining order at sea. China’s actions, including the interception of resupply missions and the militarisation of disputed territories, blatantly violate UNCLOS principles, undermining peace, regional stability, and the rule of law. Grey zone warfare: Beyond the visible China employs grey zone warfare tactics, which operate in the nebulous space between peace and open conflict. These tactics include economic manipulation, influence operations, cyberattacks, and disinformation campaigns to achieve strategic objectives without triggering full-scale war. China’s grey zone tactics in the maritime domain China leverages its Maritime Militia, Coast Guard, and dual-use research vessels to blur the lines between civilian and military operations, pursuing territorial ambitions with minimal risk of direct military confrontation. The Dark Triad: China's three-pronged maritime strategy 1. Maritime Militia: Known as the People’s Armed Forces Maritime Militia (PAFMM), these ostensibly civilian vessels conduct aggressive operations, such as surveillance, enforcing blockades, and harassing foreign ships. 2. Dual-Use Research Vessels: While conducting scientific research, these ships gather extensive oceanographic data to support the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and enhance maritime surveillance. 3. Coast Guard: The Chinese Coast Guard engages in overt acts of aggression and intimidation, as seen in the harassment of Philippine fishing boats at Scarborough Shoal. Impact on regional security China’s actions threaten the sovereignty and security of Southeast Asian nations, disrupting regional maritime security and international trade routes. The militarisation of disputed territories, coupled with aggressive grey zone tactics, escalates tensions and undermines regional stability. Responses from affected nations Southeast Asian countries have responded through diplomatic, legal, and military means. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia have condemned China’s actions, sought legal recourse through international mechanisms, and increased their military readiness. Joint exercises with allies and public information campaigns have also effectively countered Chinese aggression. International involvement and support External powers and like-minded nations such as the United States, Japan, and Australia (also members of QUAD) play a crucial role in balancing China’s ambitions. Their naval presence and joint maritime exercises enhance regional security and support Southeast Asian nations in defending their sovereignty. Strategies for countering China’s hegemony Enhancing maritime security cooperation among Southeast Asian nations is essential to counter China’s hegemonic ambitions. Joint patrols, intelligence sharing, and increased defence investments are necessary to build regional resilience. Public information campaigns highlighting Chinese aggression can garner international support and pressure Beijing to adhere to international norms. Rethinking the South China Sea in Indian Maritime Security Strategy India’s strategic and economic interests in the SCS are growing, driven by significant trade routes and joint hydrocarbon exploration projects. The Indian Navy has increased its presence in the region, reflecting India’s commitment to regional peace, stability, rules-based order, and freedom of navigation. Challenges: ● Intra-ASEAN Divisions: Diverse interests among ASEAN members complicate a unified stance against China. ● China’s Economic Influence: China’s significant economic footprint in the region hinders efforts to counter its dominance. Policy recommendations and future projections Given the complexities of the SCS, a multi-faceted approach is required. Policy Recommendations: 1. Strengthen Regional Alliances: Foster stronger ties with ASEAN nations through regional naval exercises, capacity building, intelligence sharing, and defence cooperation. 2. Enhance Maritime Domain Awareness: Invest in advanced maritime surveillance technologies and collaborate with international partners. 3. Increase Economic Engagement: Deepen economic ties with Southeast Asian nations through trade agreements and joint ventures. 4. Promote Rule of Law: Advocate for adherence to international maritime law and support legal actions challenging China's claims. Future Projections: ● Persistent Aggression: China’s aggressive posture in the SCS will likely continue, driven by strategic and economic interests. ● International Pressure: Regional and international pressure and strengthened alliances can mitigate risks and promote stability. ● Strategic Partnerships: Ongoing diplomatic efforts and strategic partnerships will be crucial in ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific. Upholding the rule of law A rules-based international order is crucial for maintaining peace and stability in the SCS. Regional and international stakeholders must unite against China’s coercive tactics and uphold the principles of UNCLOS. Vigilance, solidarity, and persistent engagement are crucial to ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific. China’s brazen acts of aggression and grey zone tactics in the SCS involving its Navy, Coast Guard, Maritime Militia, and dual-use research vessels, pose significant threats to regional stability and international maritime law. By understanding and countering China’s grey zone warfare, the international community can uphold the sovereignty of nations and maintain a rules-based order in the maritime domain. The time to act is now, for the region’s peace, stability and the integrity of international law depend on our collective resolve and action. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

China’s hegemonic ambitions, brazen aggression in SCS: Threat to regional peace, stability, int'l order

The United States and China resumed semi-official nuclear arms talks in March for the first time in five years, with Beijing's representatives telling U.S. counterparts that they would not resort to atomic threats over Taiwan, according to two American delegates who attended.

The Chinese representatives offered reassurances after their U.S. interlocutors raised concerns that China might use, or threaten to use, nuclear weapons if it faced defeat in a conflict over Taiwan. Beijing views the democratically governed island as its territory, a claim rejected by the government in Taipei.

"They told the U.S. side that they were absolutely convinced that they are able to prevail in a conventional fight over Taiwan without using nuclear weapons," said scholar David Santoro, the U.S. organiser of the Track Two talks, the details of which are being reported by Reuters for the first time.

Participants in Track Two talks are generally former officials and academics who can speak with authority on their government's position, even if they are not directly involved with setting it. Government-to-government negotiations are known as Track One.&nbsp;

Washington was represented by about half a dozen delegates, including former officials and scholars at the two-day discussions, which took place in a Shanghai hotel conference room.&nbsp;

Beijing sent a delegation of scholars and analysts, which included several former People's Liberation Army officers.

A State Department spokesperson said in response to Reuters' questions that Track Two talks could be "beneficial". The department did not participate in the March meeting though it was aware of it, the spokesperson said.&nbsp;

Such discussions cannot replace formal negotiations "that require participants to speak authoritatively on issues that are often highly compartmentalized within (Chinese) government circles," the spokesperson said.

Members of the Chinese delegation and Beijing's defence ministry did not respond to requests for comment.&nbsp;

The informal discussions between the nuclear-armed powers took place with the U.S. and China at odds over major economic and geopolitical issues, with leaders in Washington and Beijing accusing each other of dealing in bad faith.&nbsp;

The two countries briefly resumed Track One talks over nuclear arms in November but those negotiations have since stalled, with a top U.S. official publicly expressing frustration at China's responsiveness.&nbsp;

The Pentagon, which estimates that Beijing's nuclear arsenal increased by more than 20% between 2021 and 2023, said in October that China "would also consider nuclear use to restore deterrence if a conventional military defeat in Taiwan" threatened CCP rule.

China has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control and has over the past four years stepped up military activity around the island.

The Track Two talks are part of a two-decade nuclear weapons and posture dialogue that stalled after the Trump administration pulled funding in 2019.&nbsp;

After the COVID-19 pandemic, semi-official discussions resumed on broader security and energy issues, but only the Shanghai meeting dealt in detail with nuclear weapons and posture.

Santoro, who runs the Hawaii-based Pacific Forum think-tank, described "frustrations" on both sides during the latest discussions but said the two delegations saw reason to continue talking. More discussions were being planned in 2025, he said.&nbsp;

Nuclear policy analyst William Alberque of the Henry Stimson Centre think-tank, who was not involved in the March discussions, said the Track Two negotiations were useful at a time of glacial U.S.-Chinese relations.

"It's important to continue talking with China with absolutely no expectations," he said, when nuclear arms are at issue.

NO FIRST-USE?

The U.S. Department of Defense estimated last year that Beijing has 500 operational nuclear warheads and will probably field more than 1,000 by 2030.&nbsp;

That compares to 1,770 and 1,710 operational warheads deployed by the U.S. and Russia respectively. The Pentagon said that by 2030, much of Beijing's weapons will likely be held at higher readiness levels.

Since 2020, China has also modernised its arsenal, starting production of its next-generation ballistic missile submarine, testing hypersonic glide vehicle warheads and conducting regular nuclear-armed sea patrols.

Weapons on land, in the air and at sea give China the "nuclear triad" - a hallmark of a major nuclear power.

A key point the U.S. side wanted to discuss, according to Santoro, was whether China still stood by its no-first-use and minimal deterrence policies, which date from the creation of its first nuclear bomb in the early 1960s.

Minimal deterrence refers to having just enough atomic weapons to dissuade adversaries.

China is also one of two nuclear powers - the other being India - to have pledged not to initiate a nuclear exchange. Chinese military analysts have speculated that the no-first-use policy is conditional - and that nuclear arms could be used against Taiwan's allies - but it remains Beijing's stated stance.&nbsp;

Santoro said the Chinese delegates told U.S. representatives that Beijing maintained these policies and that "'we are not interested in reaching nuclear parity with you, let alone superiority.'"&nbsp;

"'Nothing has changed, business as usual, you guys are exaggerating'," Santoro said in summarising Beijing's position.

His description of the discussions was corroborated by fellow U.S. delegate Lyle Morris, a security scholar at the Asia Society Policy Institute.&nbsp;

A report on the discussions is being prepared for U.S. government but would not be made public, Santoro said.

'RISK AND OPACITY'

Top U.S. arms control official Bonnie Jenkins told Congress in May that China had not responded to nuclear-weapons risk reduction proposals that Washington raised during last year's formal talks.&nbsp;

China has yet to agree to further government-to-government meetings.

Bejing's "refusal to substantively engage" in discussions over its nuclear build-up raises questions around its "already ambiguous stated "no-first-use" policy and its nuclear doctrine more broadly," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters.&nbsp;

China's Track Two delegation did not discuss specifics about Beijing's modernisation effort, Santoro and Morris said.

Alberque of the Henry Stimson Centre said that China relied heavily on "risk and opacity" to mitigate U.S. nuclear superiority and there was "no imperative" for Beijing to have constructive discussions.

China's expanded arsenal - which includes anti-ship cruise missiles, bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarines - exceeded the needs of a state with a minimal deterrence and no-first-use policy, Alberque said.&nbsp;

Chinese talking points revolved around the "survivability" of Beijing's nuclear weapons if it suffered a first strike, said Morris.

The U.S. delegates said the Chinese described their efforts as a deterrence-based modernisation programme to cope with developments such as improved U.S. missile defences, better surveillance capabilities, and strengthened alliances.

The U.S., Britain and Australia last year signed a deal to share nuclear submarine technology and develop a new class of boats, while Washington is now working with Seoul to coordinate responses to a potential atomic attack.

Washington's policy on nuclear weapons includes the possibility of using them if deterrence fails, though the Pentagon says it would only consider that in extreme circumstances. It did not provide specifics.&nbsp;

One Chinese delegate "pointed to studies that said Chinese nuclear weapons were still vulnerable to U.S. strikes - their second-strike capability was not enough", said Morris.

The United States and China resumed semi-official nuclear arms talks in March for the first time in five years, with Beijing's representatives telling U.S. counterparts that they would not resort to atomic threats over Taiwan, according to two American delegates who attended.

The United States and China resumed semi-official nuclear arms talks in March for the first time in five years, with Beijing's representatives telling U.S. counterparts that they would not resort to atomic threats over Taiwan, according to two American delegates who attended. The Chinese representatives offered reassurances after their U.S. interlocutors raised concerns that China might use, or threaten to use, nuclear weapons if it faced defeat in a conflict over Taiwan. Beijing views the democratically governed island as its territory, a claim rejected by the government in Taipei. "They told the U.S. side that they were absolutely convinced that they are able to prevail in a conventional fight over Taiwan without using nuclear weapons," said scholar David Santoro, the U.S. organiser of the Track Two talks, the details of which are being reported by Reuters for the first time. Participants in Track Two talks are generally former officials and academics who can speak with authority on their government's position, even if they are not directly involved with setting it. Government-to-government negotiations are known as Track One. Washington was represented by about half a dozen delegates, including former officials and scholars at the two-day discussions, which took place in a Shanghai hotel conference room. Beijing sent a delegation of scholars and analysts, which included several former People's Liberation Army officers. A State Department spokesperson said in response to Reuters' questions that Track Two talks could be "beneficial". The department did not participate in the March meeting though it was aware of it, the spokesperson said. Such discussions cannot replace formal negotiations "that require participants to speak authoritatively on issues that are often highly compartmentalized within (Chinese) government circles," the spokesperson said. Members of the Chinese delegation and Beijing's defence ministry did not respond to requests for comment. The informal discussions between the nuclear-armed powers took place with the U.S. and China at odds over major economic and geopolitical issues, with leaders in Washington and Beijing accusing each other of dealing in bad faith. The two countries briefly resumed Track One talks over nuclear arms in November but those negotiations have since stalled, with a top U.S. official publicly expressing frustration at China's responsiveness. The Pentagon, which estimates that Beijing's nuclear arsenal increased by more than 20% between 2021 and 2023, said in October that China "would also consider nuclear use to restore deterrence if a conventional military defeat in Taiwan" threatened CCP rule. China has never renounced the use of force to bring Taiwan under its control and has over the past four years stepped up military activity around the island. The Track Two talks are part of a two-decade nuclear weapons and posture dialogue that stalled after the Trump administration pulled funding in 2019. After the COVID-19 pandemic, semi-official discussions resumed on broader security and energy issues, but only the Shanghai meeting dealt in detail with nuclear weapons and posture. Santoro, who runs the Hawaii-based Pacific Forum think-tank, described "frustrations" on both sides during the latest discussions but said the two delegations saw reason to continue talking. More discussions were being planned in 2025, he said. Nuclear policy analyst William Alberque of the Henry Stimson Centre think-tank, who was not involved in the March discussions, said the Track Two negotiations were useful at a time of glacial U.S.-Chinese relations. "It's important to continue talking with China with absolutely no expectations," he said, when nuclear arms are at issue. NO FIRST-USE? The U.S. Department of Defense estimated last year that Beijing has 500 operational nuclear warheads and will probably field more than 1,000 by 2030. That compares to 1,770 and 1,710 operational warheads deployed by the U.S. and Russia respectively. The Pentagon said that by 2030, much of Beijing's weapons will likely be held at higher readiness levels. Since 2020, China has also modernised its arsenal, starting production of its next-generation ballistic missile submarine, testing hypersonic glide vehicle warheads and conducting regular nuclear-armed sea patrols. Weapons on land, in the air and at sea give China the "nuclear triad" - a hallmark of a major nuclear power. A key point the U.S. side wanted to discuss, according to Santoro, was whether China still stood by its no-first-use and minimal deterrence policies, which date from the creation of its first nuclear bomb in the early 1960s. Minimal deterrence refers to having just enough atomic weapons to dissuade adversaries. China is also one of two nuclear powers - the other being India - to have pledged not to initiate a nuclear exchange. Chinese military analysts have speculated that the no-first-use policy is conditional - and that nuclear arms could be used against Taiwan's allies - but it remains Beijing's stated stance. Santoro said the Chinese delegates told U.S. representatives that Beijing maintained these policies and that "'we are not interested in reaching nuclear parity with you, let alone superiority.'" "'Nothing has changed, business as usual, you guys are exaggerating'," Santoro said in summarising Beijing's position. His description of the discussions was corroborated by fellow U.S. delegate Lyle Morris, a security scholar at the Asia Society Policy Institute. A report on the discussions is being prepared for U.S. government but would not be made public, Santoro said. 'RISK AND OPACITY' Top U.S. arms control official Bonnie Jenkins told Congress in May that China had not responded to nuclear-weapons risk reduction proposals that Washington raised during last year's formal talks. China has yet to agree to further government-to-government meetings. Bejing's "refusal to substantively engage" in discussions over its nuclear build-up raises questions around its "already ambiguous stated "no-first-use" policy and its nuclear doctrine more broadly," the State Department spokesperson told Reuters. China's Track Two delegation did not discuss specifics about Beijing's modernisation effort, Santoro and Morris said. Alberque of the Henry Stimson Centre said that China relied heavily on "risk and opacity" to mitigate U.S. nuclear superiority and there was "no imperative" for Beijing to have constructive discussions. China's expanded arsenal - which includes anti-ship cruise missiles, bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarines - exceeded the needs of a state with a minimal deterrence and no-first-use policy, Alberque said. Chinese talking points revolved around the "survivability" of Beijing's nuclear weapons if it suffered a first strike, said Morris. The U.S. delegates said the Chinese described their efforts as a deterrence-based modernisation programme to cope with developments such as improved U.S. missile defences, better surveillance capabilities, and strengthened alliances. The U.S., Britain and Australia last year signed a deal to share nuclear submarine technology and develop a new class of boats, while Washington is now working with Seoul to coordinate responses to a potential atomic attack. Washington's policy on nuclear weapons includes the possibility of using them if deterrence fails, though the Pentagon says it would only consider that in extreme circumstances. It did not provide specifics. One Chinese delegate "pointed to studies that said Chinese nuclear weapons were still vulnerable to U.S. strikes - their second-strike capability was not enough", said Morris.

US and China hold first informal nuclear talks in 5 years, eyeing Taiwan

China has downgraded its diplomatic stance towards Pakistan, reclassifying its relationship from a “top priority” to a “priority” within its foreign policy framework. Watch in for more details!

China downgrades diplomatic stance towards Pakistan, takes away 'high priority' status

A violent clash took place between the Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) and the Filipino sailors in the South China Sea. The clash took place on Monday (June 17). Watch in for more details!

'Violent confrontation between Filipino and Chinese navy ships

Pakistan is no longer China's 'high priority' status partner

Global trade tensions are rising as the US Pushes allies to join its fight against china's economic practices. But why are Japanese firms hesitant on china tariffs? Take a look at this report to find out.

Japanese companies oppose tariffs on Chinese imports

During an event in Islamabad, China's Minister of the International Department, Liu Jianchao, said "Business environment cannot improve without security.' Recently, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also returned nearly empty-handed from a trip to China where he had hoped to secure major investments for Pakistan, especially through a revival of CPEC. But with the flagship project of the BRI suffering in Pakistan due to internal turmoil, is China growing tired of Pakistan? What else does this message from the Chinese Minister want to convey to Pakistan?

Gravitas: CPEC in danger? China sets conditions on Pakistan for new BRI investments

For centuries, gold has captivated humanity. A symbol of wealth, power, and beauty, it has fueled empires and ignited exploration. But this landscape is shifting. China has emerged as the leading producer and consumer of gold.

Gravitas: China emerges as top gold producer & consumer

India issued just 2,000 visas to Chinese nationals in 2024 compared to 200,000 visas issued in 2019-20. According to a report in the Hindustan Times, about 200,000 visas were issued to Chinese nationals in 2019 before Covid pandemic and the June 15, 2020 Galwan clash.

This number was brought down to just 2,000 in 2024 following a structural screening of Chinese nationals seeking to visit India.&nbsp;

On June 15, 2020, twenty Indian soldiers died on the line of duty while thwarting a PLA incursion into Indian territory in eastern Ladakh. An undisclosed number of Chinese soldiers also lost their lives in the clash. The ties between India and China subsequently went down the slope amid Chinese expansionist ambitions that face persistent strategic challenge from India&nbsp;and beyond the unresolved Himalayan frontiers between the two Asian powerhouses.&nbsp;

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/taiwan-slams-china-for-protesting-against-india-over-election-congratulatory-message-729743">Taiwan slams China for protesting against India over election congratulatory message</a>

The Hindustan Times report added that the government has granted around 1,500 visas to Chinese nationals in recent months.&nbsp;

Of these, around 1,000 visas were issued to meet the requirements of the Indian electronics industry, it added.&nbsp;

Another 1,000 visas of Chinese nationals are reportedly being processed, primarily for the electronics sector, following rigorous screening procedures.

The last full-fledged bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese leader Xi Jinping took place in November 2019 in Brazil during BRICS summit. Seven months later, in June 2020, the India-China ties ebbed to the lowest in decades after Galwan clash.&nbsp;

Also watch |&nbsp;Gravitas: Is China increasing its nuclear stockpile with an eye on India?

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-is-china-increasing-its-nuclear-stockpile-with-an-eye-on-india-732617/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

New Delhi has called for the restoration of status quo along the Line of Actual Control. Over 50,000 troops and heavy equipment continue to be deployed on both sides of the Line of Actual Control.

Meanwhile, Beijing on June 5, 2024,&nbsp;congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi on winning a third term in power and said it stands ready to work with India bearing in mind the overall interests of bilateral ties.

(With inputs from agencies)

India issued just 2,000 visas to Chinese nationals in 2024 compared to 200,000 visas issued in 2019-20. According to a report in the Hindustan Times, about 200,000 visas were issued to Chinese nationals in 2019 before Covid pandemic and the June 15, 2020 Galwan clash.

India issued just 2,000 visas to Chinese nationals in 2024 compared to 200,000 visas issued in 2019-20. According to a report in the Hindustan Times, about 200,000 visas were issued to Chinese nationals in 2019 before Covid pandemic and the June 15, 2020 Galwan clash. This number was brought down to just 2,000 in 2024 following a structural screening of Chinese nationals seeking to visit India. On June 15, 2020, twenty Indian soldiers died on the line of duty while thwarting a PLA incursion into Indian territory in eastern Ladakh. An undisclosed number of Chinese soldiers also lost their lives in the clash. The ties between India and China subsequently went down the slope amid Chinese expansionist ambitions that face persistent strategic challenge from India and beyond the unresolved Himalayan frontiers between the two Asian powerhouses. Also read | Taiwan slams China for protesting against India over election congratulatory message The Hindustan Times report added that the government has granted around 1,500 visas to Chinese nationals in recent months. Of these, around 1,000 visas were issued to meet the requirements of the Indian electronics industry, it added. Another 1,000 visas of Chinese nationals are reportedly being processed, primarily for the electronics sector, following rigorous screening procedures. The last full-fledged bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese leader Xi Jinping took place in November 2019 in Brazil during BRICS summit. Seven months later, in June 2020, the India-China ties ebbed to the lowest in decades after Galwan clash. Also watch | Gravitas: Is China increasing its nuclear stockpile with an eye on India? × New Delhi has called for the restoration of status quo along the Line of Actual Control. Over 50,000 troops and heavy equipment continue to be deployed on both sides of the Line of Actual Control. Meanwhile, Beijing on June 5, 2024, congratulated Prime Minister Narendra Modi on winning a third term in power and said it stands ready to work with India bearing in mind the overall interests of bilateral ties. (With inputs from agencies)

From 200,000 to barely 2,000: India clamps down on visas issued to Chinese nationals

Days of torrential rain, flash floods and landslides across southern china is forcing authorities to step up emergency plans, as surging waters from swollen rivers threatened to disrupt the lives of millions...

Heavy rains lash Southern China: Authorities step up emergency plans

Hajj pilgrimage 2024: New deaths reported include 58 from Egypt

Japan imposed trade restrictions on several companies in China, India, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan for allegedly aiding Russia's war in Ukraine, according to a statement released by the Japanese foreign ministry on Friday, as reported by Reuters.

This is the first time Japan has imposed sanctions on Chinese companies concerning the ongoing conflict.

The sanctioned entities include Asia Pacific Links Ltd., based in Hong Kong and accused of supplying microchips for Russian drones, and Yilufa Electronics Limited based in China.

These sanctions mirror measures previously taken by the United States and prohibit Japanese companies from exporting goods to the targeted firms.

The US has accused China of aiding Russia's military efforts in Ukraine by providing drone and missile technology.

Last week, the US expanded its sanctions on Russia, including Chinese companies that sell semiconductors to Moscow.

Additionally, China and Russia reportedly are implementing detailed measures to ensure uninterrupted bilateral financial transactions, potentially exposing some Chinese financial institutions to future sanctions.

(With inputs from Reuters)

Japan imposed trade restrictions on several companies in China, India, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan for allegedly aiding Russia's war in Ukraine, according to a statement released by the Japanese foreign ministry on Friday, as reported by Reuters.

Japan imposed trade restrictions on several companies in China, India, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan for allegedly aiding Russia's war in Ukraine, according to a statement released by the Japanese foreign ministry on Friday, as reported by Reuters. This is the first time Japan has imposed sanctions on Chinese companies concerning the ongoing conflict. The sanctioned entities include Asia Pacific Links Ltd., based in Hong Kong and accused of supplying microchips for Russian drones, and Yilufa Electronics Limited based in China. These sanctions mirror measures previously taken by the United States and prohibit Japanese companies from exporting goods to the targeted firms. The US has accused China of aiding Russia's military efforts in Ukraine by providing drone and missile technology. Last week, the US expanded its sanctions on Russia, including Chinese companies that sell semiconductors to Moscow. Additionally, China and Russia reportedly are implementing detailed measures to ensure uninterrupted bilateral financial transactions, potentially exposing some Chinese financial institutions to future sanctions. (With inputs from Reuters)

Japan joins US in sanctioning China over support for Russia's war

The Philippines urged China on Wednesday to avoid actions that endanger sailors and vessels in the South China Sea, saying peace could not be achieved if China’s words did not match its behaviour in the disputed waters. Watch in for more details!

Philippines urges China to avoid actions that endanger sailors

The Philippine military said on Wednesday that the Chinese coast guard rammed and boarded Filipino navy boats and seized their guns in the South China Sea this week in a confrontation that saw a Filipino sailor lose a thumb.

Chinese coast guard board Philippines' Navy boat, after ramming into the Filipino vessel

South China Sea tensions: Chinese coast guard board Philippines' Navy boat

Manila released new footage of Chinese coast guard sailors brandishing knives, an axe and other weapons in a clash with Philippine naval vessels. The scuffle happened near a strategic reef in the South China Sea.

In a post on X, the Armed Forces of the Philippines said that in a "brazen act of aggression", Chinese forces obstructed critical humanitarian rotation and resupply operations at BRP Sierra Madre (LS57) in Ayungin Shoal on June 17.&nbsp;

The Philippines also claimed that the Chinese coast guard is employing physical attacks, bladed weapons, blaring sirens and blinding strobe lights.&nbsp;

The clash took place Monday as Philippine forces attempted to resupply marines stationed on a derelict warship that was deliberately grounded atop the disputed Second Thomas Shoal in 1999 to assert Manila's territorial claims.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/putins-pyongyang-yawn-social-media-buzzes-over-videos-of-bored-putin-at-north-korean-concert-733542">Putin's Pyongyang yawn: Social media buzzes over videos of 'bored' Putin at North Korean concert</a>

The clash became the latest in a series of escalating confrontations between Chinese and Philippine ships in recent months.&nbsp;

According to Philippine military chief General Romeo Brawner, the "outnumbered" Filipino crew had been unarmed and had fought with their "bare hands".&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/putin-lands-in-vietnam-after-signing-defence-pact-with-north-korea-irks-us-733328">Putin arrives in Vietnam after signing defence pact with North Korea, irks US</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Philippine military said that a Filipino sailor lost a thumb in the clash, in which the Chinese coast guard confiscated or destroyed Philippine equipment including guns.&nbsp;

The dramatic footage released by the Philippine military late Wednesday showed small boats crewed by Chinese sailors shouting, waving knives and using sticks to hit an inflatable boat as a siren blares.&nbsp;

A voice speaking Tagalog can be heard in one clip saying someone had "lost a finger". Manila's footage of the clash is slightly different from the photos released by Beijing's state media on Wednesday. Beijing's video did not show Chinese forces wielding weapons.&nbsp;

Watch the video here:&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">
CCG personnel violently attached ropes to tow the AFP's RHIB while threatening to injure an AFP soldier w/ a pickaxe. They also employed blaring sirens to create chaos, disrupt communication, and divert the attention of AFP troops, exacerbating the hostile &amp; dangerous situation. <a href="https://t.co/a8cPaGGH8j">pic.twitter.com/a8cPaGGH8j</a>
— Armed Forces of the Philippines (@TeamAFP) <a href="https://twitter.com/TeamAFP/status/1803457303112458431?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 19, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The head of the Philippine armed forces said that Chinese troops are similar to the "pirates". He asked China to return the rifles and equipment they took.&nbsp;

"We are demanding that the Chinese return our rifles and our equipment and we are also demanding that they pay for the damage they caused," Brawner Jr said at a press conference in the Philippines' western Palawan province.&nbsp;

"They boarded our boats illegally and seized our equipment. They’re now like pirates with these kinds of actions," he said.&nbsp;

<h2>China calls it 'totally bogus'&nbsp;</h2>

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian was asked about the videos on Thursday to which&nbsp;he said that Manila's comments on the clash were "totally bogus accusations that confuse black with white".&nbsp;

The spokesperson blamed the Philippines for the confrontation, saying they had "escalated tensions" and accused them of ramming Chinese boats. Lin said the Philippine boats had been trying "to sneak in building materials, but also tried to smuggle in military equipment".&nbsp;

Beijing has insisted that its coast guard behaved in a "professional and restrained" way and claimed "no direct measures" were taken against Filipino personnel.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;

Manila released new footage of Chinese coast guard sailors brandishing knives, an axe and other weapons in a clash with Philippine naval vessels. The scuffle happened near a strategic reef in the South China Sea.

Manila released new footage of Chinese coast guard sailors brandishing knives, an axe and other weapons in a clash with Philippine naval vessels. The scuffle happened near a strategic reef in the South China Sea. In a post on X, the Armed Forces of the Philippines said that in a "brazen act of aggression", Chinese forces obstructed critical humanitarian rotation and resupply operations at BRP Sierra Madre (LS57) in Ayungin Shoal on June 17. The Philippines also claimed that the Chinese coast guard is employing physical attacks, bladed weapons, blaring sirens and blinding strobe lights. The clash took place Monday as Philippine forces attempted to resupply marines stationed on a derelict warship that was deliberately grounded atop the disputed Second Thomas Shoal in 1999 to assert Manila's territorial claims. Also read: Putin's Pyongyang yawn: Social media buzzes over videos of 'bored' Putin at North Korean concert The clash became the latest in a series of escalating confrontations between Chinese and Philippine ships in recent months. According to Philippine military chief General Romeo Brawner, the "outnumbered" Filipino crew had been unarmed and had fought with their "bare hands". Also read: Putin arrives in Vietnam after signing defence pact with North Korea, irks US The Philippine military said that a Filipino sailor lost a thumb in the clash, in which the Chinese coast guard confiscated or destroyed Philippine equipment including guns. The dramatic footage released by the Philippine military late Wednesday showed small boats crewed by Chinese sailors shouting, waving knives and using sticks to hit an inflatable boat as a siren blares. A voice speaking Tagalog can be heard in one clip saying someone had "lost a finger". Manila's footage of the clash is slightly different from the photos released by Beijing's state media on Wednesday. Beijing's video did not show Chinese forces wielding weapons. Watch the video here: CCG personnel violently attached ropes to tow the AFP's RHIB while threatening to injure an AFP soldier w/ a pickaxe. They also employed blaring sirens to create chaos, disrupt communication, and divert the attention of AFP troops, exacerbating the hostile & dangerous situation. pic.twitter.com/a8cPaGGH8j — Armed Forces of the Philippines (@TeamAFP) June 19, 2024 × The head of the Philippine armed forces said that Chinese troops are similar to the "pirates". He asked China to return the rifles and equipment they took. "We are demanding that the Chinese return our rifles and our equipment and we are also demanding that they pay for the damage they caused," Brawner Jr said at a press conference in the Philippines' western Palawan province. "They boarded our boats illegally and seized our equipment. They’re now like pirates with these kinds of actions," he said. China calls it 'totally bogus' Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian was asked about the videos on Thursday to which he said that Manila's comments on the clash were "totally bogus accusations that confuse black with white". The spokesperson blamed the Philippines for the confrontation, saying they had "escalated tensions" and accused them of ramming Chinese boats. Lin said the Philippine boats had been trying "to sneak in building materials, but also tried to smuggle in military equipment". Beijing has insisted that its coast guard behaved in a "professional and restrained" way and claimed "no direct measures" were taken against Filipino personnel. (With inputs from agencies)

Dramatic video shows Chinese coast guards attacking Philippine naval vessels with knives, axes

The Philippines urged China on Wednesday to avoid actions that endanger sailors and vessels in the South China Sea, saying peace could not be achieved if China's words did not match its behaviour in the disputed waters.

South China Sea tensions: China and Philippines spar at sea again

Over a millennium ago, in July 1054, when Chinese astronomers documented a remarkable "guest star" that shone as brightly as Jupiter for nearly a month, it sparked curiosity and speculations in equal proportions. But the two quickly went into oblivion as the guest star faded from sight. This celestial phenomenon was later identified as a cloud of debris from a dying star, located approximately 6,500 light-years away in the constellation Taurus.&nbsp;

Named the Crab Nebula in the 19th century by Irish astronomer Lord Rosse, it was so called due to its appearance of "streams running out like claws in every direction."

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/supernova-hunter-james-webb-spots-most-distant-star-explosion-731106">Supernova hunter James Webb spots most distant star explosion</a>

Now in the twenty first century, the James Webb Space Telescope has provided an unprecedented mosaic of the Crab Nebula. For the first time, astronomers can observe the cage-like formations created by countless dust grains, prominently displayed as fluffy magenta material in the upper right and lower left regions of the image.&nbsp;

Unlike other supernova remnants, where dust is concentrated in the central regions, the Crab Nebula’s dust is largely contained within the filaments of its outer shell.

Also watch |&nbsp;NASA James Webb Telescope captures stunning pictures of the universe | Science News | WION

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-james-webb-telescope-captures-stunning-pictures-of-the-universe-science-news-wion-677764/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"The Crab Nebula lives up to a tradition in astronomy: The nearest, brightest, and best-studied objects tend to be bizarre," Nathan Smith, co-author of the study from the Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona, said in a statement.&nbsp;

These observations have been detailed in a paper accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

<h2>What makes this 'guest star' mysterious?</h2>

Since its explosion as a supernova, the star's shell has been expanding at a staggering rate of approximately 900 miles (1,500 kilometres) per second and now spans about 11 light-years across. Despite its well-documented history and proximity, many details of the explosion have remained a mystery.

The star at the centre&nbsp;of the Crab Nebula likely initiated its demise by producing iron, a process that consumes more energy than it releases, causing the star to collapse under its own gravity.&nbsp;

At the heart of the nebula now lies a rapidly spinning pulsar, visible in Webb's image as a bright white dot at the centre.

(With inputs from agencies)

Over a millennium ago, in July 1054, when Chinese astronomers documented a remarkable "guest star" that shone as brightly as Jupiter for nearly a month, it sparked curiosity and speculations in equal proportions.

Over a millennium ago, in July 1054, when Chinese astronomers documented a remarkable "guest star" that shone as brightly as Jupiter for nearly a month, it sparked curiosity and speculations in equal proportions. But the two quickly went into oblivion as the guest star faded from sight. This celestial phenomenon was later identified as a cloud of debris from a dying star, located approximately 6,500 light-years away in the constellation Taurus. Named the Crab Nebula in the 19th century by Irish astronomer Lord Rosse, it was so called due to its appearance of "streams running out like claws in every direction." Also read | Supernova hunter James Webb spots most distant star explosion Now in the twenty first century, the James Webb Space Telescope has provided an unprecedented mosaic of the Crab Nebula. For the first time, astronomers can observe the cage-like formations created by countless dust grains, prominently displayed as fluffy magenta material in the upper right and lower left regions of the image. Unlike other supernova remnants, where dust is concentrated in the central regions, the Crab Nebula’s dust is largely contained within the filaments of its outer shell. Also watch | NASA James Webb Telescope captures stunning pictures of the universe | Science News | WION × "The Crab Nebula lives up to a tradition in astronomy: The nearest, brightest, and best-studied objects tend to be bizarre," Nathan Smith, co-author of the study from the Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona, said in a statement. These observations have been detailed in a paper accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. What makes this 'guest star' mysterious? Since its explosion as a supernova, the star's shell has been expanding at a staggering rate of approximately 900 miles (1,500 kilometres) per second and now spans about 11 light-years across. Despite its well-documented history and proximity, many details of the explosion have remained a mystery. The star at the centre of the Crab Nebula likely initiated its demise by producing iron, a process that consumes more energy than it releases, causing the star to collapse under its own gravity. At the heart of the nebula now lies a rapidly spinning pulsar, visible in Webb's image as a bright white dot at the centre. (With inputs from agencies)

China's 11th century 'guest star' revealed as spectacular Crab Nebula

On Tuesday, China conveyed "strong concern" over the visit of a high-level US Congress delegation to Dharamshala to meet with the Dalai Lama and urged US President Joe Biden not to sign the Tibet policy bill, threatening "resolute measures".

China warns of resolute measures if Biden signs Tibet Bill

India's image in Canada has taken a hit as positive views related to the country dropped&nbsp;by 11 points since March 2023,&nbsp;according to new data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute.&nbsp;

The Angus Reid Institute was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist Dr Angus Reid and provides public opinion polling among other services. Some reports suggest that the non-profit is biased in its reporting.&nbsp;

In the latest report on India-Canada, the institute suggested that only 33 per cent of Canadians have a favourable opinion of India while a majority of 54 per cent view it unfavourably.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-house-delegation-including-nancy-pelosi-michael-mccaul-arrives-in-dharamshala-for-talks-with-dalai-lama-732890">US House delegation, including Nancy Pelosi, Michael McCaul arrives in Dharamshala for talks with Dalai Lama</a>

This decline follows a report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) which highlighted concerns about interference in Canadian elections by both China and India.&nbsp;

In its 2019 review, the Committee noted that the "most significant perpetrators of foreign interference in Canada were the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Russian Federation" and that other states, "including India, Pakistan and Iran engaged in foreign interference activities."&nbsp;

Notably, India has strongly refuted the claims terming them "baseless". Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal had said, "We have seen media reports about the Canadian commission inquiring into. We strongly reject all such baseless allegations of Indian interference in Canadian elections."

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/biden-to-offer-citizenship-pathway-for-undocumented-spouses-of-us-citizens-732903">Biden to offer citizenship pathway for undocumented spouses of US citizens</a>

"It is not the government of India's policy to interfere in the democratic processes of other countries. In fact, quite on the reverse, it is Canada which has been interfering in our internal affairs," he added.&nbsp;

The relationship between Canada and India has particularly soured recently. 
 
Prime Minister Justin&nbsp;Trudeau’s accusation that the Indian government was involved in the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian Sikh activist who India considered a terrorist, has intensified tensions.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-elections-will-a-guilty-verdict-cost-donald-trump-an-election-732925">US Elections: Will a guilty verdict cost Donald Trump an election?</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-elections-will-a-guilty-verdict-cost-donald-trump-an-election-732925/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"Last year in March, more than two-in-five (44 per cent) said they had favourable views of India. Now only one-third say the same," as per the report.&nbsp;

There is a downturn in views towards China as well. Canadians remain favourable towards other countries like United Kingdom and France, ahead of key trade partners Mexico and the United States.

"China, Russia, and Iran all generate negative favourability among four-in-five or more," the report said.&nbsp;

(With input from agencies)

India's image in Canada has taken a hit as positive views related to the country dropped by 11 points since March 2023, according to new data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute.

India's image in Canada has taken a hit as positive views related to the country dropped by 11 points since March 2023, according to new data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute. The Angus Reid Institute was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist Dr Angus Reid and provides public opinion polling among other services. Some reports suggest that the non-profit is biased in its reporting. In the latest report on India-Canada, the institute suggested that only 33 per cent of Canadians have a favourable opinion of India while a majority of 54 per cent view it unfavourably. Also Read | US House delegation, including Nancy Pelosi, Michael McCaul arrives in Dharamshala for talks with Dalai Lama This decline follows a report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) which highlighted concerns about interference in Canadian elections by both China and India. In its 2019 review, the Committee noted that the "most significant perpetrators of foreign interference in Canada were the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Russian Federation" and that other states, "including India, Pakistan and Iran engaged in foreign interference activities." Notably, India has strongly refuted the claims terming them "baseless". Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal had said, "We have seen media reports about the Canadian commission inquiring into. We strongly reject all such baseless allegations of Indian interference in Canadian elections." Also Read | Biden to offer citizenship pathway for undocumented spouses of US citizens "It is not the government of India's policy to interfere in the democratic processes of other countries. In fact, quite on the reverse, it is Canada which has been interfering in our internal affairs," he added. The relationship between Canada and India has particularly soured recently. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s accusation that the Indian government was involved in the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian Sikh activist who India considered a terrorist, has intensified tensions. Watch | US Elections: Will a guilty verdict cost Donald Trump an election? × "Last year in March, more than two-in-five (44 per cent) said they had favourable views of India. Now only one-third say the same," as per the report. There is a downturn in views towards China as well. Canadians remain favourable towards other countries like United Kingdom and France, ahead of key trade partners Mexico and the United States. "China, Russia, and Iran all generate negative favourability among four-in-five or more," the report said. (With input from agencies)

Canadian sentiment towards India drops sharply amid diplomatic strains: Report

The US Congress passed this month a legislation, the Resolve Tibet Act, calling for a peaceful resolution of the dispute over the status and governance of Tibet. It also calls on Beijing to resume dialogue with the Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama. Watch in for more details!

US lawmakers pass Tibet policy bill promoting talks between China & Dalai Lama

A bipartisan delegation of US lawmakers, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, met the Dalai Lama, in India. Reaffirming American support for Tibetan autonomy, the lawmakers warned China that the U.S. will not allow Beijing to influence the choice of his successor. The lawmakers comments are expected to anger China as it views the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader as a "separatist."

Gravitas: China seethes as US lawmakers meet Dalai Lama, vow support for Tibetan autonomy

13,800 High-net-worth individuals left China in 2023, 15,200 are expected to leave China this year. Why are Chinese millionaires leaving their country? Gravitas explores.

Gravitas: Why China's millionaires are leaving the country?

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine last year, the world already witnessed how fault lines that existed for a long time between different power blocs bore prominence and continued to shape and reshape. Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, wary of the ever-spreading NATO, announced the ‘liberation’ of Donetsk and Luhansk, two regions in Ukraine bordering Russia.&nbsp;

Further, NATO’s hug to Finland as well as the recent adventurism by the Wagner Group amidst an all-out war, manifested in the coup attempt have only exacerbated Putin’s invincibility in Russia. However, the Wagner crisis seems to be averted for now but whether it will last long or not is yet to be answered.&nbsp;

Albeit the cold shoulder to Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, at the recent 2-day NATO summit, the regular and covert support to Ukraine coming straight from the US and its allies has kept Russians dwindling for a final solution in Ukraine.&nbsp; 
 
In the meantime, the biggest likely gainers are China and, to some extent, India. The pertinent query is whether India decides to yield the space open for China to manoeuvre things or compete with China to consolidate its own position in evolving international affairs.&nbsp;

China arrives with a bang but will the world even whimper?

Beijing has already upped the ante as it has embarked upon several diplomatic actions aimed at toppling the United States from the role of the global peacemaker or the diktat issuer. The signs are worrisome not only for the USA or its allies but also for India which has, though lately, decided to get over its meagre regional credentials and assume a global role.&nbsp;

Saudi-Iran deal: How did China snatch the pivotal position of US?

China recently brought two conventional belligerents - Saudi Arabia and Iran to a negotiation table and catalysed a deal sending worrying signs to the US, a key player in the Middle East. Previously, under Donald Trump’s presidency, the US unilaterally decided to pull out of the JCPOA- Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action- a deal between P5 (five permanent members of UNSC) plus Germany and Iran. It left Tehran with no option but to side with Beijing in the long run. 
 
The Saudi Arabian story also has got the US at its genesis. Before coming to the helm of affairs, Joe Biden vowed to act against the killers of Jamal Khashoggi, a fierce critic of Mohammad bin Salman, the Saudi Arabian prince, and the prospective ruler. Reports allege the involvement of MBS in Khashoggi’s assassination and thus Biden’s election plank seems to have taken Saudi-US relations to a new low. Preying on the evolving equations, Beijing stitched the two Islamic nations with the common thread of anti-Americanism.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-and-france-forge-new-indo-pacific-roadmap-to-promote-stability-sustainable-development-615777">ALSO READ| India, France draw up roadmap for balanced and stable order in Asia-Pacific region</a>

Russia- Ukraine conflict: China’s peacemaker moment

Major world powers expect Beijing to rein in Vladimir Putin so that the devastation in Europe gets arrested. In the backdrop of the West galvanising against Russian interests, Chinese influence, buoyed by the humongous economy, appears decisive in breaking the logjam and is likely to play as a saviour of Russian causes. Sanctioned by almost all the advanced economies, Moscow’s markets seek refuge in China’s deep pockets and Beijing in return gets Russia to play the unconventional second fiddle in the Sino-Russia relations.&nbsp;

France snubs US, China ends up with the last laugh

A disappointing end to the France-Australia submarine deal coupled with the formation of AUKUS has contributed negatively to the US-France relations. As the ties between Paris and Washington undergo restructuring, Paris has openly called off &nbsp;‘USA’s leadership’ in geopolitics. French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to China in April this year and his ‘America’s followers’ statement, not resonating well in the US, is a clear-cut sign that France under his watch might not toe the Pentagon’s line and may pursue a foreign policy with an unprecedented sense of autonomy.&nbsp;

India, the only silver lining for the developed and developing world

Well, perhaps the only country in the global south, which has remained committed to its longstanding abhorrence of taking sides is India. With few abstentions in the UN appearing pro-Russian, New Delhi smartly tried to turn the optics in its favour and smoothen its position by providing relief materials to Ukraine. Indian Prime Minister Modi’s ‘not the era of war’ remark to Putin resonated well in the Western media giving credibility and contributing to the legitimacy of India’s role as a peacemaker. Nonetheless, Russia too has identified India along with China as its ‘main’ allies in foreign policy strategy.&nbsp;

In China vs Europe, India takes the cake

As China flexes its might in the South China Sea violating the UNCLOS and preying upon regions like Hong Kong and Taiwan; sitting upon the crucial information pertaining to the origin of Covid; unleashing its debt-trap juggernaut to subjugate nations, Beijing falls behind New Delhi in getting perceived with the same degree of trust as India in Western Capitals.&nbsp; 
Also, the recent visit to the US by PM Modi and the grand treatment India got prefaces the big game the world is seeking to play with India taking the lead position.&nbsp;

Is India ready to play the leading role?

In order to play the protagonist in the big game of geopolitics, India will have to start from its backyard itself. New Delhi must ameliorate its efforts to become a more reliable partner for its neighbours by sending friendly signals to neighbouring capitals and undoing the strained ties.&nbsp; 
 
The world takes note of India due to its cultural robustness and vibrant cosmopolitanism. Taking India’s acceptance upwards, virtues as such are nowhere to be found in the Chinese discourse. However, along with keeping the heterogeneity of the society and tolerance intact, India needs to consolidate its democratic credentials further.&nbsp;

Despite China’s economic prowess, New Delhi stands out as the ultimate pacifier in the global south. It has a role to bridge the ever-expanding gap between the global South and the global North in the transitioning geopolitics. The strategic balance is well-poised between India and China in the choppy waters of international politics and the world must meticulously choose its navigator.

 
(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.) &nbsp; 
&nbsp; 
WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine last year, the world already witnessed how fault lines that existed for a long time between different power blocs bore prominence and continued to shape and reshape.

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine last year, the world already witnessed how fault lines that existed for a long time between different power blocs bore prominence and continued to shape and reshape. Vladimir Putin, the Russian President, wary of the ever-spreading NATO, announced the ‘liberation’ of Donetsk and Luhansk, two regions in Ukraine bordering Russia. Further, NATO’s hug to Finland as well as the recent adventurism by the Wagner Group amidst an all-out war, manifested in the coup attempt have only exacerbated Putin’s invincibility in Russia. However, the Wagner crisis seems to be averted for now but whether it will last long or not is yet to be answered. Albeit the cold shoulder to Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Lithuanian capital, Vilnius, at the recent 2-day NATO summit, the regular and covert support to Ukraine coming straight from the US and its allies has kept Russians dwindling for a final solution in Ukraine. In the meantime, the biggest likely gainers are China and, to some extent, India. The pertinent query is whether India decides to yield the space open for China to manoeuvre things or compete with China to consolidate its own position in evolving international affairs. China arrives with a bang but will the world even whimper? Beijing has already upped the ante as it has embarked upon several diplomatic actions aimed at toppling the United States from the role of the global peacemaker or the diktat issuer. The signs are worrisome not only for the USA or its allies but also for India which has, though lately, decided to get over its meagre regional credentials and assume a global role. Saudi-Iran deal: How did China snatch the pivotal position of US? China recently brought two conventional belligerents - Saudi Arabia and Iran to a negotiation table and catalysed a deal sending worrying signs to the US, a key player in the Middle East. Previously, under Donald Trump’s presidency, the US unilaterally decided to pull out of the JCPOA- Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action- a deal between P5 (five permanent members of UNSC) plus Germany and Iran. It left Tehran with no option but to side with Beijing in the long run. The Saudi Arabian story also has got the US at its genesis. Before coming to the helm of affairs, Joe Biden vowed to act against the killers of Jamal Khashoggi, a fierce critic of Mohammad bin Salman, the Saudi Arabian prince, and the prospective ruler. Reports allege the involvement of MBS in Khashoggi’s assassination and thus Biden’s election plank seems to have taken Saudi-US relations to a new low. Preying on the evolving equations, Beijing stitched the two Islamic nations with the common thread of anti-Americanism. ALSO READ| India, France draw up roadmap for balanced and stable order in Asia-Pacific region Russia- Ukraine conflict: China’s peacemaker moment Major world powers expect Beijing to rein in Vladimir Putin so that the devastation in Europe gets arrested. In the backdrop of the West galvanising against Russian interests, Chinese influence, buoyed by the humongous economy, appears decisive in breaking the logjam and is likely to play as a saviour of Russian causes. Sanctioned by almost all the advanced economies, Moscow’s markets seek refuge in China’s deep pockets and Beijing in return gets Russia to play the unconventional second fiddle in the Sino-Russia relations. France snubs US, China ends up with the last laugh A disappointing end to the France-Australia submarine deal coupled with the formation of AUKUS has contributed negatively to the US-France relations. As the ties between Paris and Washington undergo restructuring, Paris has openly called off ‘USA’s leadership’ in geopolitics. French President Emmanuel Macron’s visit to China in April this year and his ‘America’s followers’ statement, not resonating well in the US, is a clear-cut sign that France under his watch might not toe the Pentagon’s line and may pursue a foreign policy with an unprecedented sense of autonomy. India, the only silver lining for the developed and developing world Well, perhaps the only country in the global south, which has remained committed to its longstanding abhorrence of taking sides is India. With few abstentions in the UN appearing pro-Russian, New Delhi smartly tried to turn the optics in its favour and smoothen its position by providing relief materials to Ukraine. Indian Prime Minister Modi’s ‘not the era of war’ remark to Putin resonated well in the Western media giving credibility and contributing to the legitimacy of India’s role as a peacemaker. Nonetheless, Russia too has identified India along with China as its ‘main’ allies in foreign policy strategy. In China vs Europe, India takes the cake As China flexes its might in the South China Sea violating the UNCLOS and preying upon regions like Hong Kong and Taiwan; sitting upon the crucial information pertaining to the origin of Covid; unleashing its debt-trap juggernaut to subjugate nations, Beijing falls behind New Delhi in getting perceived with the same degree of trust as India in Western Capitals. Also, the recent visit to the US by PM Modi and the grand treatment India got prefaces the big game the world is seeking to play with India taking the lead position. Is India ready to play the leading role? In order to play the protagonist in the big game of geopolitics, India will have to start from its backyard itself. New Delhi must ameliorate its efforts to become a more reliable partner for its neighbours by sending friendly signals to neighbouring capitals and undoing the strained ties. The world takes note of India due to its cultural robustness and vibrant cosmopolitanism. Taking India’s acceptance upwards, virtues as such are nowhere to be found in the Chinese discourse. However, along with keeping the heterogeneity of the society and tolerance intact, India needs to consolidate its democratic credentials further. Despite China’s economic prowess, New Delhi stands out as the ultimate pacifier in the global south. It has a role to bridge the ever-expanding gap between the global South and the global North in the transitioning geopolitics. The strategic balance is well-poised between India and China in the choppy waters of international politics and the world must meticulously choose its navigator. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.) WATCH WION LIVE HERE

In a transitioning world order, what are India's chances?

china

China, News on China, stories on China, articles on China, China stories at Wion, China news, China latest news