President Donald Trump is asking the US Supreme Court to allow him to proceed with construction of a proposed ballroom at the White House, arguing that the project is necessary for presidential security, national security and architectural preservation. The emergency application, filed on Friday, comes after lower courts repeatedly ruled that Trump must obtain congressional approval before moving ahead with the estimated $400 million project.&nbsp;The latest setback came August 7, when the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that Trump did not have unilateral authority to pursue the ballroom and ordered the administration to stop above-ground construction at the site of the former East Wing. The appeals court, however, paused enforcement of its ruling for 14 days to give the administration time to seek Supreme Court review.&nbsp;US Solicitor General John Sauer argued in the Supreme Court filing that the East Wing construction was ‘absolutely required’ for the president’s safety, pointing to the attempts that have been made on Trump’s life in recent years. “The President of the United States of America is not a tenant, but rather the sole, elected head of the Executive Branch, and Congress has authorized him to renovate, secure, and protect the White House and its grounds, as other Presidents have been allowed to do, without exception,” Sauer wrote. “The injunction is ‘judicial overreach beyond the proper province of the federal courts."&nbsp;The case marks the first time one of Trump's signature White House projects has reached the Supreme Court. In recent months, lower courts have considered numerous challenges to the administration's efforts to reshape Washington and have repeatedly questioned the legal basis for some of Trump's plans.<h2>Appeals Court said Congress must decide</h2>The ballroom dispute was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the country's leading historic preservation organization. In its 2-1 decision, the DC Circuit agreed with a federal judge who had ordered the administration to halt above-ground construction. The rulings allowed work on a highly sophisticated underground security bunker beneath the planned ballroom to continue.&nbsp;“Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” the DC Circuit said in its 2-1 ruling. The appeals court also rejected the administration's broader interpretation of presidential authority over the White House complex. “The National Trust has shown, compellingly, that Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s desires,” the appeals court concluded. The Trump administration is now asking the Supreme Court to intervene before the appeals court's temporary pause expires.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/gold-rush-9m-treasure-discovered-behind-belgian-cellar-walls-but-who-gets-it-1786715441714">Gold rush! €9m treasure discovered behind Belgian cellar walls — but who gets it?</a><h2>White House emphasises presidential security</h2>The administration argued Friday that allowing the underground bunker to continue while stopping the ballroom above it does not adequately address security concerns. Sauer said the lower court's order “threatens the security and safety of the President.” “The entire ballroom structure is designed to shield the military installation beneath it,” Sauer wrote, “Halting the Project will stall this vital construction, making this President, the subject of recurrent assassination attempts, much less safe, and risking future Presidents’ safety.” Construction above ground began in the spring and has progressed substantially. Images released by Trump in early August showed multiple levels of concrete support columns and metal rebar, along with extensive construction equipment, including a tower crane.&nbsp;Trump has taken a personal interest in the project's design, including floor plans and the selection of marble. Architect Shalom Baranes has said the proposed ballroom will cover approximately 89,000 square feet. That would make it substantially larger than the Executive Mansion, the primary White House structure, which is about 55,000 square feet. Trump has argued that the project does not require congressional or other significant oversight and that his administration has the authority to proceed.&nbsp;The administration said Friday that “Congress gave the President the power to make “alteration[s]” and “improvement[s]” to the White House “as the President may determine.” Trump has said he wants the ballroom completed by summer 2028, an accelerated schedule that would put the project on track for completion months before his current term ends.<h2>Administration warns of construction risks</h2>The administration also argued that stopping work at this stage could create additional security and structural problems. Sauer told the justices that freezing construction “would create a veritable obstacle course for the Secret Service, further imperiling safety.” “The partially finished, 70-foot concrete-and-steel superstructure ‘cannot be largely left alone at this point’ without tremendous setbacks that will fundamentally compromise the integrity of everything currently built there,’ not to mention the ‘major safety risk’ from leaving it with inadequate’ stability or strength to handle wind and heavy loads on [its] own,” Sauer said. The filing maintains that stopping construction could cause significant delays, increase risks at the construction site and undermine the integrity of work already completed.<h2>Ballroom design draws inspiration from Supreme Court</h2>The administration also highlighted the architectural ambitions behind the project. Friday's filing said the ballroom's design was inspired by the Supreme Court and specifically by its “magnificent Corinthian columns, considered the highest column order in architecture.” According to Sauer, the ballroom's columns are being made from the “highest-grade Indiana limestone” that was shipped to Italy for fabrication.&nbsp;The filing said the stone is “being being carved by some of the greatest artists anywhere in the world.” “Delivery and installation will begin shortly,” he said. The Supreme Court must now decide whether to intervene while the legal dispute over Trump's authority to construct the ballroom continues.

Trump asks the Supreme Court to allow White House ballroom construction to continue, citing presidential security, national security and executive authority

President Donald Trump is asking the US Supreme Court to allow him to proceed with construction of a proposed ballroom at the White House, arguing that the project is necessary for presidential security, national security and architectural preservation. The emergency application, filed on Friday, comes after lower courts repeatedly ruled that Trump must obtain congressional approval before moving ahead with the estimated $400 million project. The latest setback came August 7, when the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that Trump did not have unilateral authority to pursue the ballroom and ordered the administration to stop above-ground construction at the site of the former East Wing. The appeals court, however, paused enforcement of its ruling for 14 days to give the administration time to seek Supreme Court review. US Solicitor General John Sauer argued in the Supreme Court filing that the East Wing construction was ‘absolutely required’ for the president’s safety, pointing to the attempts that have been made on Trump’s life in recent years. “The President of the United States of America is not a tenant, but rather the sole, elected head of the Executive Branch, and Congress has authorized him to renovate, secure, and protect the White House and its grounds, as other Presidents have been allowed to do, without exception,” Sauer wrote. “The injunction is ‘judicial overreach beyond the proper province of the federal courts." The case marks the first time one of Trump's signature White House projects has reached the Supreme Court. In recent months, lower courts have considered numerous challenges to the administration's efforts to reshape Washington and have repeatedly questioned the legal basis for some of Trump's plans. Appeals Court said Congress must decide The ballroom dispute was brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the country's leading historic preservation organization. In its 2-1 decision, the DC Circuit agreed with a federal judge who had ordered the administration to halt above-ground construction. The rulings allowed work on a highly sophisticated underground security bunker beneath the planned ballroom to continue. “Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help,” the DC Circuit said in its 2-1 ruling. The appeals court also rejected the administration's broader interpretation of presidential authority over the White House complex. “The National Trust has shown, compellingly, that Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s desires,” the appeals court concluded. The Trump administration is now asking the Supreme Court to intervene before the appeals court's temporary pause expires. Also Read: Gold rush! €9m treasure discovered behind Belgian cellar walls — but who gets it? White House emphasises presidential security The administration argued Friday that allowing the underground bunker to continue while stopping the ballroom above it does not adequately address security concerns. Sauer said the lower court's order “threatens the security and safety of the President.” “The entire ballroom structure is designed to shield the military installation beneath it,” Sauer wrote, “Halting the Project will stall this vital construction, making this President, the subject of recurrent assassination attempts, much less safe, and risking future Presidents’ safety.” Construction above ground began in the spring and has progressed substantially. Images released by Trump in early August showed multiple levels of concrete support columns and metal rebar, along with extensive construction equipment, including a tower crane. Trump has taken a personal interest in the project's design, including floor plans and the selection of marble. Architect Shalom Baranes has said the proposed ballroom will cover approximately 89,000 square feet. That would make it substantially larger than the Executive Mansion, the primary White House structure, which is about 55,000 square feet. Trump has argued that the project does not require congressional or other significant oversight and that his administration has the authority to proceed. The administration said Friday that “Congress gave the President the power to make “alteration[s]” and “improvement[s]” to the White House “as the President may determine.” Trump has said he wants the ballroom completed by summer 2028, an accelerated schedule that would put the project on track for completion months before his current term ends. Administration warns of construction risks The administration also argued that stopping work at this stage could create additional security and structural problems. Sauer told the justices that freezing construction “would create a veritable obstacle course for the Secret Service, further imperiling safety.” “The partially finished, 70-foot concrete-and-steel superstructure ‘cannot be largely left alone at this point’ without tremendous setbacks that will fundamentally compromise the integrity of everything currently built there,’ not to mention the ‘major safety risk’ from leaving it with inadequate’ stability or strength to handle wind and heavy loads on [its] own,” Sauer said. The filing maintains that stopping construction could cause significant delays, increase risks at the construction site and undermine the integrity of work already completed. Ballroom design draws inspiration from Supreme Court The administration also highlighted the architectural ambitions behind the project. Friday's filing said the ballroom's design was inspired by the Supreme Court and specifically by its “magnificent Corinthian columns, considered the highest column order in architecture.” According to Sauer, the ballroom's columns are being made from the “highest-grade Indiana limestone” that was shipped to Italy for fabrication. The filing said the stone is “being being carved by some of the greatest artists anywhere in the world.” “Delivery and installation will begin shortly,” he said. The Supreme Court must now decide whether to intervene while the legal dispute over Trump's authority to construct the ballroom continues.

Trump asks the Supreme Court to let him continue building a $400 million White House ballroom, citing presidential security and executive authority

'National security needs and architectural value': Trump asks Supreme Court to allow White House ballroom construction

A US federal appeals court on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing, marking a significant legal setback in a case examining the limits of presidential authority. In a 2-1 ruling, the Washington-based US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a president does not have unilateral authority to fundamentally alter the White House without congressional approval.&nbsp;“Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House” and cannot fundamentally reshape it without congressional approval, the court said. The decision upheld a preliminary injunction secured by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which filed a lawsuit last year after the administration demolished the East Wing and began constructing a 90,000-square-foot (8,360-square-meter) ballroom without first obtaining authorization from Congress.&nbsp;The court's majority emphasised that decisions about major structural changes to the White House belong to Congress. "Whether or not a ​massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help," the panel majority wrote. "Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s ​desires."&nbsp;The appeals court placed its ruling on hold for 14 days, allowing the Trump administration time to seek review from the US Supreme Court. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The National Trust for Historic Preservation also did not immediately comment. The appeal followed rulings by US District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by former President George W. Bush, who twice blocked above-ground construction while allowing underground work to continue.&nbsp;The ballroom project has been described by the administration as necessary for hosting large formal events while improving White House security. It is also one of several initiatives by Trump aimed at reshaping prominent government buildings and landmarks in Washington. In a separate legal dispute, another judge recently ruled that Trump's name had been illegally added to the exterior of the Kennedy Center and ordered it removed.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/security-can-t-be-bought-with-pakistan-turkey-deal-iran-tells-saudi-arabia-1786115733935">'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia</a><h2>National security arguments</h2>During oral arguments before the DC Circuit on June 5, Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts should not interfere with the privately funded ballroom project. Roth contended that the National Trust's ‘architectural preference’ should not outweigh national security concerns, asserting that the former East Wing left the president and others inside the White House vulnerable to attack.&nbsp;"They just don't want to go to Congress," responded Thaddeus Heuer, attorney for the preservation group. The majority opinion, written by Democratic-appointed judges Patricia Millett and Brad Garcia, clarified that the ruling does not permanently prohibit construction. Instead, it pauses above-ground work while the lawsuit proceeds and until congressional approval is obtained.&nbsp;“The bold assertion that the Executive can act with utter lawlessness, destroying treasured national landmarks and harming ​the interests of individuals, and that no court can stop it flouts our constitutional order,” the majority wrote. The judges also rejected the administration's national security argument, stating that ‘are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card’. In dissent, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, appointed by Trump during his first term, argued that the lower court had exceeded its authority.&nbsp;“The district court seized supervision of construction at the White House, and my colleagues affirm this judicial overreach,” Rao wrote. Trump has continued to defend the ballroom project despite its growing cost, which has doubled from its original estimate. In a Truth Social post in May, Trump said the increased cost reflected the expanded scope of the project, writing that ‘it is approximately twice the size, and a far higher quality, than the original proposal’ and promising ‘it will be magnificent, safe, and secure!’<h2>‘We will be immediately appealing to US Supreme Court’: Trump</h2>US President Donald Trump on Friday criticised an appeals court decision ordering a pause in construction of his White House ballroom, and promised to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. "We will be immediately appealing to the United States Supreme Court," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, describing it as "a horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful ruling" that goes against national security interests.

Federal appeals court halts Trump's $400 million White House ballroom project, ruling Congress must approve major White House changes. Read the latest court decision, legal arguments, and what comes next

A US federal appeals court on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing, marking a significant legal setback in a case examining the limits of presidential authority. In a 2-1 ruling, the Washington-based US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a president does not have unilateral authority to fundamentally alter the White House without congressional approval. “Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House” and cannot fundamentally reshape it without congressional approval, the court said. The decision upheld a preliminary injunction secured by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which filed a lawsuit last year after the administration demolished the East Wing and began constructing a 90,000-square-foot (8,360-square-meter) ballroom without first obtaining authorization from Congress. The court's majority emphasised that decisions about major structural changes to the White House belong to Congress. "Whether or not a massive ballroom should be constructed is for Congress to decide and is not a matter for Executive self-help," the panel majority wrote. "Congress has not ceded unfettered authority to the Executive Branch to dramatically redesign, reshape, and reconstruct the White House, the People’s House, to fit a particular President’s desires." The appeals court placed its ruling on hold for 14 days, allowing the Trump administration time to seek review from the US Supreme Court. The White House and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The National Trust for Historic Preservation also did not immediately comment. The appeal followed rulings by US District Judge Richard Leon, appointed by former President George W. Bush, who twice blocked above-ground construction while allowing underground work to continue. The ballroom project has been described by the administration as necessary for hosting large formal events while improving White House security. It is also one of several initiatives by Trump aimed at reshaping prominent government buildings and landmarks in Washington. In a separate legal dispute, another judge recently ruled that Trump's name had been illegally added to the exterior of the Kennedy Center and ordered it removed. Also Read: 'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia National security arguments During oral arguments before the DC Circuit on June 5, Justice Department attorney Yaakov Roth argued that courts should not interfere with the privately funded ballroom project. Roth contended that the National Trust's ‘architectural preference’ should not outweigh national security concerns, asserting that the former East Wing left the president and others inside the White House vulnerable to attack. "They just don't want to go to Congress," responded Thaddeus Heuer, attorney for the preservation group. The majority opinion, written by Democratic-appointed judges Patricia Millett and Brad Garcia, clarified that the ruling does not permanently prohibit construction. Instead, it pauses above-ground work while the lawsuit proceeds and until congressional approval is obtained. “The bold assertion that the Executive can act with utter lawlessness, destroying treasured national landmarks and harming the interests of individuals, and that no court can stop it flouts our constitutional order,” the majority wrote. The judges also rejected the administration's national security argument, stating that ‘are not an automatic get-out-of-law-free card’. In dissent, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, appointed by Trump during his first term, argued that the lower court had exceeded its authority. “The district court seized supervision of construction at the White House, and my colleagues affirm this judicial overreach,” Rao wrote. Trump has continued to defend the ballroom project despite its growing cost, which has doubled from its original estimate. In a Truth Social post in May, Trump said the increased cost reflected the expanded scope of the project, writing that ‘it is approximately twice the size, and a far higher quality, than the original proposal’ and promising ‘it will be magnificent, safe, and secure!’ ‘We will be immediately appealing to US Supreme Court’: Trump US President Donald Trump on Friday criticised an appeals court decision ordering a pause in construction of his White House ballroom, and promised to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. "We will be immediately appealing to the United States Supreme Court," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, describing it as "a horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful ruling" that goes against national security interests.

President Trump's $400 million White House ballroom project has been halted by a federal appeals court, which ruled Congress must approve major White House redesigns before construction proceeds

US appeals court halts Trump's $400 million White House Ballroom project construction; Trump says, 'Will be appealing to US Supreme Court'

white-house-ballroom-project

White House Ballroom Project, News on White House Ballroom Project, stories on White House Ballroom Project, articles on White House Ballroom Project, White House Ballroom Project stories at Wion, White House Ballroom Project news, White House Ballroom Project latest news

white house-ballroom-project

'National security needs and architectural value': Trump asks Supreme Court to allow White House ballroom construction

US appeals court halts Trump's $400mn White House Ballroom project construction