<p>Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has restated his position that the United States would only come to the defence of NATO members in the event of a Russian attack if Washington's European allies increased their defence spending. Trump made this reassertion in an interview with Britain's GB News.</p>

<p>Asked if the US would defend NATO allies if they purportedly&nbsp;started to "pay their bills properly", Trump said, "Yes. But the United States should pay its fair share, not everybody else's fair share."</p>

<p>"So if they start to play fair, America's there?" interviewer Nigel Farage asked.</p>

<p>"Yes. 100 per cent," Trump replied.</p>

<p>Earlier, in a&nbsp;campaign rally, Trump had suggested that if a NATO member failed to meet defence spending targets, he would not discourage Russia from taking aggressive actions against them.</p>

<p>In his latest interview, Trump defended his earlier comment about the possibility of a "bloodbath" if he lost the election, referring specifically to the American auto industry.</p>

<p><strong>Also watch |&nbsp;Was Donald Trump misquoted on 'bloodbath' comment?</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/was-donald-trump-misquoted-on-bloodbath-comment-701588/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>The former US president has frequently criticised NATO members for not meeting the alliance's defence spending goal of 2 per cent of GDP, saying that the United States is shouldering a disproportionate share of the financial burden.</p>

<p>While NATO estimates indicate that only 11 members currently meet this target, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said that 18 allies will reach it this year.</p>

<p>In response to criticism of his February remarks over NATO allies' defence spending, Trump said that he did not care if his political opponents used them against him in the run-up to the November 5 election.</p>

<p>"I don't care if they use it," Trump said. "Because what I'm saying is a form of negotiation. Why should we guard these countries that have a lot of money and the United States was paying for most of NATO?" Trump said.</p>

<h2><strong>Trump repeats hardline stance on illegal border crossings</strong></h2>

<p>Asked about his immigration policy, Trump repeated his stance on illegal border crossings.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"You can come into the country, but you have to come in legally. They're here illegally, especially these criminals. I'm going to deport them. We're going to get them out right away," he said.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>


Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has restated his position that the United States would only come to the defence of NATO members in the event of a Russian attack if Washington's European allies increased their defence spending.

Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has restated his position that the United States would only come to the defence of NATO members in the event of a Russian attack if Washington's European allies increased their defence spending. Trump made this reassertion in an interview with Britain's GB News. Asked if the US would defend NATO allies if they purportedly started to "pay their bills properly", Trump said, "Yes. But the United States should pay its fair share, not everybody else's fair share." "So if they start to play fair, America's there?" interviewer Nigel Farage asked. "Yes. 100 per cent," Trump replied. Earlier, in a campaign rally, Trump had suggested that if a NATO member failed to meet defence spending targets, he would not discourage Russia from taking aggressive actions against them. In his latest interview, Trump defended his earlier comment about the possibility of a "bloodbath" if he lost the election, referring specifically to the American auto industry. Also watch | Was Donald Trump misquoted on 'bloodbath' comment? × The former US president has frequently criticised NATO members for not meeting the alliance's defence spending goal of 2 per cent of GDP, saying that the United States is shouldering a disproportionate share of the financial burden. While NATO estimates indicate that only 11 members currently meet this target, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said that 18 allies will reach it this year. In response to criticism of his February remarks over NATO allies' defence spending, Trump said that he did not care if his political opponents used them against him in the run-up to the November 5 election. "I don't care if they use it," Trump said. "Because what I'm saying is a form of negotiation. Why should we guard these countries that have a lot of money and the United States was paying for most of NATO?" Trump said. Trump repeats hardline stance on illegal border crossings Asked about his immigration policy, Trump repeated his stance on illegal border crossings. "You can come into the country, but you have to come in legally. They're here illegally, especially these criminals. I'm going to deport them. We're going to get them out right away," he said. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump repeats 'fair share' condition for US help to NATO allies

<p>Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump.</p>

<p>"NATO would be in real jeopardy," John Bolton, former US national security advisor in the Trump administration was quoted as saying by Scuitto on CNN.</p>

<p>"I think he would try to get out."</p>

<p><strong>Also watch |&nbsp;NATO Chief: Trump comments undermine all of our security</strong></p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-chief-trump-comments-undermine-all-of-our-security-689602/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>Not just NATO, Trump also does not want to keep US troops in South Korea and Japan, retired General John Kelly, a former chief of staff to Donald Trump was quoted as saying in the book, CNN reported.</p>

<p>"The point is, he saw absolutely no point in NATO," Kelly reportedly said in the book. "He was just dead set against having troops in South Korea, again, a deterrent force, or having troops in Japan, a deterrent force."</p>

<h2><strong>Donald Trump's opinion on Putin and Kim Jong Un</strong></h2>

<p>According to John Kelly, Trump believed Putin and Kim Jong Un to be "okay" guys.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"He thought (Vladimir) Putin was an okay guy and Kim (Jong Un) was an okay guy, ­that we had pushed North Korea into a corner," Kelly recalled. "To him, it was like we were goading these guys. 'If we didn't have NATO, then Putin wouldn’t be doing these things.'"</p>

<p>The book claims that Trump very nearly removed the United States from NATO at the alliance's 2018 summit in Brussels.</p>

<p><strong>Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/donald-trump-says-he-warned-nato-ally-spend-more-on-defence-or-face-consequences-689463">Donald Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defence or face consequences</a></strong></p>

<p>"He was always ranting and raving and jumping up and down, and oftentimes he would spin up in terms of, 'Well, I'm smarter than they are,' and all of this," Kelly said, describing Trump’s mindset in Brussels.&nbsp;</p>

<p>A former senior US official reportedly&nbsp;told the author that Trump issued orders to then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper for the US to withdraw from NATO.&nbsp;</p>

<p>They reportedly considered the president's direction a "lawful order” and drew up plans to execute the withdrawal.</p>

<p>Bolton recalled the 2018 summit to the author. "Honest to God, it was frightening because we didn’t know what he was going to do up until the last minute. And I mean, I think, he all but said he was going to get out of NATO and then pulled back on it," said Bolton.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)</em></p>


Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump.

Former US President Donald Trump will seek to formally withdraw the United States from NATO if he returns to power, claimed CNN journalist Jim Sciutto in his book 'The Return of Great Powers' after citing multiple former White House advisors to Donald Trump. "NATO would be in real jeopardy," John Bolton, former US national security advisor in the Trump administration was quoted as saying by Scuitto on CNN. "I think he would try to get out." Also watch | NATO Chief: Trump comments undermine all of our security × Not just NATO, Trump also does not want to keep US troops in South Korea and Japan, retired General John Kelly, a former chief of staff to Donald Trump was quoted as saying in the book, CNN reported. "The point is, he saw absolutely no point in NATO," Kelly reportedly said in the book. "He was just dead set against having troops in South Korea, again, a deterrent force, or having troops in Japan, a deterrent force." Donald Trump's opinion on Putin and Kim Jong Un According to John Kelly, Trump believed Putin and Kim Jong Un to be "okay" guys. "He thought (Vladimir) Putin was an okay guy and Kim (Jong Un) was an okay guy, that we had pushed North Korea into a corner," Kelly recalled. "To him, it was like we were goading these guys. 'If we didn't have NATO, then Putin wouldn’t be doing these things.'" The book claims that Trump very nearly removed the United States from NATO at the alliance's 2018 summit in Brussels. Also read | Donald Trump says he warned NATO ally: Spend more on defence or face consequences "He was always ranting and raving and jumping up and down, and oftentimes he would spin up in terms of, 'Well, I'm smarter than they are,' and all of this," Kelly said, describing Trump’s mindset in Brussels. A former senior US official reportedly told the author that Trump issued orders to then-chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley and then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper for the US to withdraw from NATO. They reportedly considered the president's direction a "lawful order” and drew up plans to execute the withdrawal. Bolton recalled the 2018 summit to the author. "Honest to God, it was frightening because we didn’t know what he was going to do up until the last minute. And I mean, I think, he all but said he was going to get out of NATO and then pulled back on it," said Bolton. (With inputs from agencies)

Trump once ordered the US to withdraw from NATO, if re-elected he may execute it: Report

<p>Grief, anguish and even anger have raged among a sizable section of the American society as the inconsistent, abusive, and xenophobic Donald J. Trump prevailed in the bitterly fought US presidential election following a two years of ugly campaigning. Though he received less popular vote than his main opponent Hillary Rodham Clinton, Trump primarily won because of the archaic electoral college vote system prevailing in the US. Ever since the informal declaration of the result, anti-Trump protests broke out in many US cities for several days now and its showing no sign of ceasing.&nbsp;</p>

<p>For passionate and politically conscious liberals, Trump&rsquo;s win is an unbearable reality. Hence, their frustration and rage are running high.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Entire political establishment of the US, the media, pollsters, civil society, Hollywood, intelligentsia, minorities, liberals&nbsp; - all were stunned by the demagogue&rsquo;s highly unexpected victory. Is the US, still the most powerful country and the largest economy on the surface of the earth, going to change forever domestically? The white working and middle-class, the most powerful segments of the US electorate, have voted way more for Trump than the domestically liberal Hillary. If this new support pattern persists, indeed there will be a paradigm shift in the US domestic politics.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>The white working and middle-class, the most powerful segments of the US electorate, have voted way more for Trump than the domestically liberal Hillary.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=The white working and middle-class, the most powerful segments of the US electorate, have voted way more for Trump than the domestically liberal Hillary." target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Many have predicted that a Trump win would mean the end of free trade and revoking of economic protectionism.&nbsp; Also, the nature of USA, as a country of immigrants, shall change. There are suspicions that he holds a deep-rooted racist view of America. Some fear that President Barack Obama&#39;s signature achievement of his presidency, the &lsquo;Obamacare&#39; (the health care system which he introduced in 2009 with the help of the then democrat-dominated Congress through the enacting&nbsp; &lsquo;Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act&rsquo; ), which is a comprehensive pro-poor scheme, could&nbsp; become the first casualty in Republican America under Trump&rsquo;s auspice .&nbsp;</p>

<p>However, all may not be doomed and gloom. Some analysts are opining that raw and demagoguery communication style was a tool that Trump employed to win the election, but not necessarily that he would follow up on after the election. Some commentators say that he is bound to come to terms with reality because it&rsquo;s impossible for him to deliver exactly what he promised. He is already trying to unify a highly polarised American society which is, partly, an outcome of the divisive election campaign he ran for the last couple of years.&nbsp;</p>

<p>In many occasions, Trump will have to be flexible, balanced and innovative. It&rsquo;s not going to be easy though. Interestingly right after the election, he has started showing flexibility by stating that he will retain the popular key features of Obamacare as he goes about replacing it.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>There is also no easy way to implement one of his key election promises to bring back manufacturing in the Midwestern US.</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=There is also no easy way to implement one of his key election promises to bring back manufacturing in the Midwestern US. " target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>There is also no easy way to implement one of his key election promises to bring back manufacturing in the Midwestern US. For that to happen, he has to reverse many of the progress made by long and exhaustive free trade negotiations and agreements among influential international actors. He may not get the critical support from the Congress for that. Even if he manages political support of the Congress, his protectionist drive to bring back manufacturing may encourage reactionary measures by the affected countries, which in turn may harm other economic sectors of the US.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Free trade, over past decades, has spread across the globe. Brought about&nbsp; by the demise of communism, it has, in fact, kept resisting the rebirth of communism or high-socialism in the world. This is a core global politico-economic ideology that both Republicans and the Democrats of the US embrace whole-heartedly. Trump may not be able to disengage them from free trade to any considerable degree.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The only sane thing Trump has been talking was to make US allies pay for the defense and security service that it renders to them. Or else, he is likely to withdraw these services to cut the country&#39;s expenditure cost. That would be another major policy shift. It would mean a highly significant change to the post-World War II and post-communist global order. The vacuum which might be created by a potential US withdrawal of military funding will frighten Europe due to their perceived threat from Russia. A Similar effect will take place in Asia, particularly in Japan and India with regards to China.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="row">
<div class="article-blockquote">
<div class="col-sm-10 col-sm-offset-1 blockquote-content quoteshare">
<blockquote>
<h5>The vacuum which might be created by a potential US withdrawal of military funding will frighten Europe due to their perceived threat from Russia</h5>
</blockquote>
</div>

<div class="col-sm-1 blockquote-content">
<div class="share-blockquote"><a class="twitter popup" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=The vacuum which might be created by a potential US withdrawal of military funding will frighten Europe due to their perceived threat from Russia" target="_blank"><i class="fa fa-share">&nbsp;</i></a></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqquoteclosemark">&times;</a></div>
</div>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>Trump has indicated to the US allies that they should either pay the US enough or take care of their own defense by building their military, even nukes and missiles. This means that these countries can do full-fledged rearming, bringing a tectonic shift in the global balance of power and dilution of American military hegemony across the world. Again, both Democrats and Republicans might find it difficult to swallow this bitter pill. But this is the only pragmatic talk that Trump actually did. To share the costly burden of the war against global terrorist phenomena, such as ISIS and Al Qaida, he seems to be ready to accede geo-strategic space to competitors like Russia. All in all, Trump appears to have a vision of more inward-looking America. If that causes insecurity to some distant foreign land, he won&rsquo;t bother. But all these are against the established dominant philosophy of both Republican and Democratic parties of the US.</p>

<p>The reality is, the power of US presidency is substantially checked by US Congress. Give his distance with the Republicans and acrimony with the Democrats, it&rsquo;s difficult to foresee that he will be able to exercise enough leverage to materialise his vision. It&rsquo;s hard to say right now whether that would be good or bad for the US and the rest of the world.&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p>


Trump is bound to come to terms with reality because it?s impossible for him to deliver exactly what he promised

Grief, anguish and even anger have raged among a sizable section of the American society as the inconsistent, abusive, and xenophobic Donald J. Trump prevailed in the bitterly fought US presidential election following a two years of ugly campaigning. Though he received less popular vote than his main opponent Hillary Rodham Clinton, Trump primarily won because of the archaic electoral college vote system prevailing in the US. Ever since the informal declaration of the result, anti-Trump protests broke out in many US cities for several days now and its showing no sign of ceasing. For passionate and politically conscious liberals, Trump’s win is an unbearable reality. Hence, their frustration and rage are running high. Entire political establishment of the US, the media, pollsters, civil society, Hollywood, intelligentsia, minorities, liberals - all were stunned by the demagogue’s highly unexpected victory. Is the US, still the most powerful country and the largest economy on the surface of the earth, going to change forever domestically? The white working and middle-class, the most powerful segments of the US electorate, have voted way more for Trump than the domestically liberal Hillary. If this new support pattern persists, indeed there will be a paradigm shift in the US domestic politics. The white working and middle-class, the most powerful segments of the US electorate, have voted way more for Trump than the domestically liberal Hillary. × Many have predicted that a Trump win would mean the end of free trade and revoking of economic protectionism. Also, the nature of USA, as a country of immigrants, shall change. There are suspicions that he holds a deep-rooted racist view of America. Some fear that President Barack Obama's signature achievement of his presidency, the ‘Obamacare' (the health care system which he introduced in 2009 with the help of the then democrat-dominated Congress through the enacting ‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’ ), which is a comprehensive pro-poor scheme, could become the first casualty in Republican America under Trump’s auspice . However, all may not be doomed and gloom. Some analysts are opining that raw and demagoguery communication style was a tool that Trump employed to win the election, but not necessarily that he would follow up on after the election. Some commentators say that he is bound to come to terms with reality because it’s impossible for him to deliver exactly what he promised. He is already trying to unify a highly polarised American society which is, partly, an outcome of the divisive election campaign he ran for the last couple of years. In many occasions, Trump will have to be flexible, balanced and innovative. It’s not going to be easy though. Interestingly right after the election, he has started showing flexibility by stating that he will retain the popular key features of Obamacare as he goes about replacing it. There is also no easy way to implement one of his key election promises to bring back manufacturing in the Midwestern US. × There is also no easy way to implement one of his key election promises to bring back manufacturing in the Midwestern US. For that to happen, he has to reverse many of the progress made by long and exhaustive free trade negotiations and agreements among influential international actors. He may not get the critical support from the Congress for that. Even if he manages political support of the Congress, his protectionist drive to bring back manufacturing may encourage reactionary measures by the affected countries, which in turn may harm other economic sectors of the US. Free trade, over past decades, has spread across the globe. Brought about by the demise of communism, it has, in fact, kept resisting the rebirth of communism or high-socialism in the world. This is a core global politico-economic ideology that both Republicans and the Democrats of the US embrace whole-heartedly. Trump may not be able to disengage them from free trade to any considerable degree. The only sane thing Trump has been talking was to make US allies pay for the defense and security service that it renders to them. Or else, he is likely to withdraw these services to cut the country's expenditure cost. That would be another major policy shift. It would mean a highly significant change to the post-World War II and post-communist global order. The vacuum which might be created by a potential US withdrawal of military funding will frighten Europe due to their perceived threat from Russia. A Similar effect will take place in Asia, particularly in Japan and India with regards to China. The vacuum which might be created by a potential US withdrawal of military funding will frighten Europe due to their perceived threat from Russia × Trump has indicated to the US allies that they should either pay the US enough or take care of their own defense by building their military, even nukes and missiles. This means that these countries can do full-fledged rearming, bringing a tectonic shift in the global balance of power and dilution of American military hegemony across the world. Again, both Democrats and Republicans might find it difficult to swallow this bitter pill. But this is the only pragmatic talk that Trump actually did. To share the costly burden of the war against global terrorist phenomena, such as ISIS and Al Qaida, he seems to be ready to accede geo-strategic space to competitors like Russia. All in all, Trump appears to have a vision of more inward-looking America. If that causes insecurity to some distant foreign land, he won’t bother. But all these are against the established dominant philosophy of both Republican and Democratic parties of the US. The reality is, the power of US presidency is substantially checked by US Congress. Give his distance with the Republicans and acrimony with the Democrats, it’s difficult to foresee that he will be able to exercise enough leverage to materialise his vision. It’s hard to say right now whether that would be good or bad for the US and the rest of the world.

What to make of the Trump win?

trump-and-nato

Trump And Nato, News on Trump And Nato, stories on Trump And Nato, articles on Trump And Nato, Trump And Nato stories at Wion, Trump And Nato news, Trump And Nato latest news

trump and-nato

Trump repeats 'fair share' condition for US help to NATO allies

Trump once ordered the US to withdraw from NATO, if re-elected he may execute it: Report

What to make of the Trump win?