Moments after fiercely defending his memory as "fine", US President Joe Biden mixed up the names of the leaders of Mexico and Egypt.

Speaking on the Gaza war, he referred to Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as the “president of Mexico.”

“I think as you know initially, the president of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to humanitarian material to get in. I talked to him. I convinced him to open the gate,” Biden said.

Earlier, Biden reacted strongly after a Special Counsel report on his handling of classified documents allegedly&nbsp;raised questions on his memory and pointed out that&nbsp;he struggled to recall when his son died.&nbsp;

While confronting these claims that emerged out of the much-anticipated report, Biden expressed outrage at such suggestions.

"There's even a reference that I don't remember when my son died. How in the hell dare he raise that?"&nbsp;

"My memory is fine...Take a look at what I've done since I became president," he added.&nbsp;

These comments came during a surprise news briefing on Thursday (Feb 8), where he also criticised Israel over the Gaza war. 
 
After Special Counsel Robert Hur decided to not impose charges on Biden about the classified documents case, the US president expressed satisfaction.

"I knew they would be reached all along."

He also recollected his full cooperation with the investigation as he recounted sitting for extensive interviews.&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/mea-dismisses-canadas-election-interference-accusations-says-its-meddling-in-indias-internal-affairs-688439">MEA dismisses Canada's election interference accusations, says it's meddling in India's internal affairs</a>

In the report, Hur had said, “Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified information after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen." &nbsp;

“We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter,” said the report, adding that the “evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," he added.

Hur, the US Justice Department's special counsel probing&nbsp;Biden's handling of these documents, released the&nbsp;report on Thursday (Feb 8).&nbsp;

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canada-police-arrest-5-indian-origin-people-for-extortion-firearms-offences-targeting-south-asian-businesses-688438">Canada: Police arrest 5 Indian-origin people for extortion, firearms offences targeting South Asian businesses</a>

The report criticised Biden's conduct, highlighting "serious risks" to national security but stated that pursuing criminal charges was not the proper remedy.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bomb-strikes-and-cries-life-in-gaza-will-israel-hamas-agree-to-a-peace-plan-688450">Bomb, strikes and cries: Life in Gaza | Will Israel-Hamas agree to a peace plan?</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/bomb-strikes-and-cries-life-in-gaza-will-israel-hamas-agree-to-a-peace-plan-688450/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The investigation spanned Biden's final days as vice president and the years thereafter, involving classified documents related to military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and other sensitive national security matters.

(With inputs from agencies)v

Moments after fiercely defending his memory as "fine", US President Joe Biden mixed up the names of the leaders of Mexico and Egypt. Speaking on the Gaza war, he referred to Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as the “president of Mexico.

Moments after fiercely defending his memory as "fine", US President Joe Biden mixed up the names of the leaders of Mexico and Egypt. Speaking on the Gaza war, he referred to Egyptian leader Abdel Fattah El-Sisi as the “president of Mexico.” “I think as you know initially, the president of Mexico, El-Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to humanitarian material to get in. I talked to him. I convinced him to open the gate,” Biden said. Earlier, Biden reacted strongly after a Special Counsel report on his handling of classified documents allegedly raised questions on his memory and pointed out that he struggled to recall when his son died. While confronting these claims that emerged out of the much-anticipated report, Biden expressed outrage at such suggestions. "There's even a reference that I don't remember when my son died. How in the hell dare he raise that?" "My memory is fine...Take a look at what I've done since I became president," he added. These comments came during a surprise news briefing on Thursday (Feb 8), where he also criticised Israel over the Gaza war. After Special Counsel Robert Hur decided to not impose charges on Biden about the classified documents case, the US president expressed satisfaction. "I knew they would be reached all along." He also recollected his full cooperation with the investigation as he recounted sitting for extensive interviews. Also Read | MEA dismisses Canada's election interference accusations, says it's meddling in India's internal affairs In the report, Hur had said, “Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified information after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen." “We conclude that no criminal charges are warranted in this matter,” said the report, adding that the “evidence does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," he added. Hur, the US Justice Department's special counsel probing Biden's handling of these documents, released the report on Thursday (Feb 8). Also Read | Canada: Police arrest 5 Indian-origin people for extortion, firearms offences targeting South Asian businesses The report criticised Biden's conduct, highlighting "serious risks" to national security but stated that pursuing criminal charges was not the proper remedy. Watch | Bomb, strikes and cries: Life in Gaza | Will Israel-Hamas agree to a peace plan? × The investigation spanned Biden's final days as vice president and the years thereafter, involving classified documents related to military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and other sensitive national security matters. (With inputs from agencies)v

Just after saying his memory is fine, Biden mixes up names of Mexican and Egyptian leaders

In a court filing on Saturday (Dec 30), US Special Counsel Jack Smith strongly contested former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, stating that such a claim "threatens to license Presidents to commit crimes to remain in office."

Smith's response precedes oral arguments scheduled for January 9 before a US appeals court in Washington, DC, in the federal election subversion case.&nbsp;Ex-President Donald Trump is calling on a federal appeals court to dismiss the federal election subversion criminal case in Washington, DC, asserting that he is shielded by presidential immunity.

In the filing, Smith countered Trump's argument that the prosecution endangers the foundation of the Republic.

He asserted, "To the contrary: it is the defendant’s claim that he cannot be held to answer for the charges that he engaged in an unprecedented effort to retain power through criminal means, despite having lost the election, that threatens the democratic and constitutional foundation of our Republic."

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/global-terror-alert-cities-ramp-up-security-measures-for-new-years-celebrations-amid-high-risk-of-attacks-675128">Global terror alert: Cities ramp up security measures for New Year's celebrations amid 'high risk' of attacks</a>

Smith urged the court to affirm and expedite the resolution of the case to serve the public and the defendant's interest in a prompt resolution.

Trump, who is facing four counts in the case, has pleaded not guilty.&nbsp;

The federal election subversion case's pre-trial proceedings were temporarily halted pending Trump’s appeal of the district court judge’s ruling that, as a former president, he is not entitled to immunity for potential crimes committed while in office.

Originally set for March 4, the trial date has been a point of contention, with Trump's legal team advocating for a post-2024 presidential election timeline.

Also Read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/exclusive-eam-jaishankar-to-represent-india-at-uganda-nam-summit-in-january-2024-675103">EAM Jaishankar to represent India at Uganda NAM Summit in January 2024</a>

Smith, in the Saturday filing, emphasised the dangers of granting a former president broad immunity, stating, "The implications of the defendant’s broad immunity theory are sobering." He warned against a precedent that would shield a president from prosecution for various criminal activities, including bribery, tampering with evidence, ordering violence against critics, or selling national secrets to foreign adversaries, all under the guise of executing presidential duties.

Watch |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/hamas-officials-to-visit-cairo-for-hostage-talks-675121">Hamas officials to visit Cairo for hostage talks</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/hamas-officials-to-visit-cairo-for-hostage-talks-675121/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

If the appeals court swiftly addresses these arguments, it may maintain the scheduled trial date, resisting efforts to postpone until after the 2024 election.

(With inputs from agencies)

In a court filing on Saturday (Dec 30), US Special Counsel Jack Smith strongly contested former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, stating that such a claim "threatens to license Presidents to commit crimes to remain in office.

In a court filing on Saturday (Dec 30), US Special Counsel Jack Smith strongly contested former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, stating that such a claim "threatens to license Presidents to commit crimes to remain in office." Smith's response precedes oral arguments scheduled for January 9 before a US appeals court in Washington, DC, in the federal election subversion case. Ex-President Donald Trump is calling on a federal appeals court to dismiss the federal election subversion criminal case in Washington, DC, asserting that he is shielded by presidential immunity. In the filing, Smith countered Trump's argument that the prosecution endangers the foundation of the Republic. He asserted, "To the contrary: it is the defendant’s claim that he cannot be held to answer for the charges that he engaged in an unprecedented effort to retain power through criminal means, despite having lost the election, that threatens the democratic and constitutional foundation of our Republic." Also Read | Global terror alert: Cities ramp up security measures for New Year's celebrations amid 'high risk' of attacks Smith urged the court to affirm and expedite the resolution of the case to serve the public and the defendant's interest in a prompt resolution. Trump, who is facing four counts in the case, has pleaded not guilty. The federal election subversion case's pre-trial proceedings were temporarily halted pending Trump’s appeal of the district court judge’s ruling that, as a former president, he is not entitled to immunity for potential crimes committed while in office. Originally set for March 4, the trial date has been a point of contention, with Trump's legal team advocating for a post-2024 presidential election timeline. Also Read | EAM Jaishankar to represent India at Uganda NAM Summit in January 2024 Smith, in the Saturday filing, emphasised the dangers of granting a former president broad immunity, stating, "The implications of the defendant’s broad immunity theory are sobering." He warned against a precedent that would shield a president from prosecution for various criminal activities, including bribery, tampering with evidence, ordering violence against critics, or selling national secrets to foreign adversaries, all under the guise of executing presidential duties. Watch | Hamas officials to visit Cairo for hostage talks × If the appeals court swiftly addresses these arguments, it may maintain the scheduled trial date, resisting efforts to postpone until after the 2024 election. (With inputs from agencies)

US: Special Counsel rebuts Trump's immunity claim, warns of threat to democracy

The White House counsel's office announced on Monday that President Joe Biden had an interview as part of Special Counsel Robert Hur's inquiry into his handling of confidential materials.

Special counsel interviews Joe Biden about handling of classified documents

President Joe Biden interviewed by the special counsel in his case

Newly unsealed court filings have revealed that X, (formerly Twitter) turned over at least 32 direct messages from former president Donald Trump's account to Special Counsel Jack Smith, according to a CNN report.&nbsp;

The revelations were made last month but the new filing shows the extent of the data received and how&nbsp;prosecutors specifically argued that Trump posed a risk of tampering with evidence, while seeking to secure data from his X account.

Though it remains unclear how the messages affected the investigation, the documents reveal that Smith and his team were able to lay hands on private records associated with the account as well.&nbsp;

<h2>Prosecutors school X</h2>

Notably,&nbsp;X had initially refused to turn over the information, as the Justice Department requested to not disclose the request to Trump.&nbsp;DOJ&nbsp;argued that if Trump learnt about the warrant, it&nbsp;“would result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses or serious jeopardy to this investigation”.

However, the delay meant that Smith got access to only 32 DMs and the prosecutors let the court know about it.

“Indeed, the materials Twitter produced to the Government included only 32 direct-message items, constituting a minuscule proportion of the total production,” the prosecutors wrote in the newly unsealed brief.&nbsp;

The Elon Musk-owned company put up resistance, arguing that some of Trump’s direct messages might be covered by&nbsp;executive privilege if he was communicating about state business with other administration officials.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-is-it-time-for-biden-and-trump-to-retire-will-america-vote-for-younger-politician-wion-636003">Watch |&nbsp;US: Is it time for Biden and Trump to retire? Will America vote for younger politician? | WION</a>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-is-it-time-for-biden-and-trump-to-retire-will-america-vote-for-younger-politician-wion-636003/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

“As such, Twitter sought to delay compliance with the entirety of the Warrant based on the speculative possibility that a tiny fraction of the total production could, implausibly, contain instances when the President sought to use the direct-messaging function to carry out sensitive and confidential deliberations with trusted advisors within the Executive Branch,” the prosecutors added.

Ultimately, X produced the record but not before it was fined $350,000 for not handing over the data in time. During one of the court hearings,&nbsp;DOJ attorney Thomas Windom complained about the lax attitude by X in the handing over of the data.

“I had felt like I had been getting nickeled-and-dimed for the prior 20 minutes of conversation. We need the material. We need it now. We needed it 13 days ago,” he said.&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Newly unsealed court filings have revealed that X, (formerly Twitter) turned over at least 32 direct messages from former president Donald Trump's account to Special Counsel Jack Smith, according to a CNN report.

Newly unsealed court filings have revealed that X, (formerly Twitter) turned over at least 32 direct messages from former president Donald Trump's account to Special Counsel Jack Smith, according to a CNN report. The revelations were made last month but the new filing shows the extent of the data received and how prosecutors specifically argued that Trump posed a risk of tampering with evidence, while seeking to secure data from his X account. Though it remains unclear how the messages affected the investigation, the documents reveal that Smith and his team were able to lay hands on private records associated with the account as well. Prosecutors school X Notably, X had initially refused to turn over the information, as the Justice Department requested to not disclose the request to Trump. DOJ argued that if Trump learnt about the warrant, it “would result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses or serious jeopardy to this investigation”. However, the delay meant that Smith got access to only 32 DMs and the prosecutors let the court know about it. “Indeed, the materials Twitter produced to the Government included only 32 direct-message items, constituting a minuscule proportion of the total production,” the prosecutors wrote in the newly unsealed brief. The Elon Musk-owned company put up resistance, arguing that some of Trump’s direct messages might be covered by executive privilege if he was communicating about state business with other administration officials. Watch | US: Is it time for Biden and Trump to retire? Will America vote for younger politician? | WION × “As such, Twitter sought to delay compliance with the entirety of the Warrant based on the speculative possibility that a tiny fraction of the total production could, implausibly, contain instances when the President sought to use the direct-messaging function to carry out sensitive and confidential deliberations with trusted advisors within the Executive Branch,” the prosecutors added. Ultimately, X produced the record but not before it was fined $350,000 for not handing over the data in time. During one of the court hearings, DOJ attorney Thomas Windom complained about the lax attitude by X in the handing over of the data. “I had felt like I had been getting nickeled-and-dimed for the prior 20 minutes of conversation. We need the material. We need it now. We needed it 13 days ago,” he said. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

X gave access to 32 direct messages from Donald Trump's account to special counsel

Special Counsel Jack Smith who recently charged Donald Trump with a third indictment for conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, received access to the&nbsp;former president's direct messages, and draft tweets on X, formerly known as Twitter, according to The New York Times&nbsp;report.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Smith got access to the&nbsp;trove of so-called messages earlier this winter but it remains unclear what sort of information those texts contained.&nbsp;

The newly unsealed court papers which contained the transcripts of the proceedings, showed that a lawyer for X, confirmed Judge Howell that the company had turned over&nbsp;“all direct messages, the DMs” to the special counsel's office.&nbsp;

<h2>X and Musk siding with Trump?</h2>

During the February hearings, Judge Howell repeatedly questioned X whether the company's resistance to share the messages reflected then CEO Elon Musk's efforts to side with Trump.&nbsp;

X initially refused to turn over the information, as Justice Department requested to not disclose the request to Trump.&nbsp;DOJ&nbsp;argued that if Trump learnt about the warrant, it&nbsp;“would result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses or serious jeopardy to this investigation".

The Musk-owned company put up resistance adding some of Trump’s direct messages might be covered by&nbsp;executive privilege if he was communicating about state business with other administration officials.

Watch:&nbsp;No plea deal for Hunter Biden: Prosecutors&nbsp;

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" data-gtm-yt-inspected-20="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-25="true" data-gtm-yt-inspected-30="true" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/no-plea-deal-for-hunter-biden-prosecutors-626141/embed" width="560"></iframe>

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-why-is-donald-trumps-georgia-indictment-different-626154#" id="jqclosemark">×</a>

<h2>X slapped with the fine</h2>

The transcript also showed the frustration that prosecutors had to endure over the opposition from X, with&nbsp;DOJ attorney Thomas Windom complaining about earlier phone calls to address concerns prior to appearing in court.

“I had felt like I had been getting nickeled-and-dimed for the prior 20 minutes of conversation. We need the material. We need it now. We needed it 13 days ago,” he said.

Ultimately, X produced the record but not before it was fined $350,000 for not handing over the data in time.&nbsp;

“DOJ was most interested in communications between government officials and Twitter regarding the subject account,” the&nbsp;lawyer representing X said.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-why-is-donald-trumps-georgia-indictment-different-626154">Also read |&nbsp;Explained: Why is Donald Trump's Georgia indictment different?</a>

Both Smith and Trump have a frosty relationship with each other. After Trump was indicted for the second time in June by the Miami court, he delivered a charged speech where he called Smith a 'thug'.&nbsp;

"I've named him deranged Jack Smith.&nbsp;He does political hit jobs…He looks like a thug," said Trump, adding that Smith was a "raging and uncontrolled Trump hater".&nbsp;

(With inputs from agencies) 
 
&nbsp;

WATCH WION LIVE HERE:&nbsp;

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Special Counsel Jack Smith who recently charged Donald Trump with a third indictment for conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, received access to the former president's direct messages, and draft tweets on X, formerly known as Twitter, according to The New York Times report.

Special Counsel Jack Smith who recently charged Donald Trump with a third indictment for conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, received access to the former president's direct messages, and draft tweets on X, formerly known as Twitter, according to The New York Times report. Smith got access to the trove of so-called messages earlier this winter but it remains unclear what sort of information those texts contained. The newly unsealed court papers which contained the transcripts of the proceedings, showed that a lawyer for X, confirmed Judge Howell that the company had turned over “all direct messages, the DMs” to the special counsel's office. X and Musk siding with Trump? During the February hearings, Judge Howell repeatedly questioned X whether the company's resistance to share the messages reflected then CEO Elon Musk's efforts to side with Trump. X initially refused to turn over the information, as Justice Department requested to not disclose the request to Trump. DOJ argued that if Trump learnt about the warrant, it “would result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses or serious jeopardy to this investigation". The Musk-owned company put up resistance adding some of Trump’s direct messages might be covered by executive privilege if he was communicating about state business with other administration officials. Watch: No plea deal for Hunter Biden: Prosecutors × X slapped with the fine The transcript also showed the frustration that prosecutors had to endure over the opposition from X, with DOJ attorney Thomas Windom complaining about earlier phone calls to address concerns prior to appearing in court. “I had felt like I had been getting nickeled-and-dimed for the prior 20 minutes of conversation. We need the material. We need it now. We needed it 13 days ago,” he said. Ultimately, X produced the record but not before it was fined $350,000 for not handing over the data in time. “DOJ was most interested in communications between government officials and Twitter regarding the subject account,” the lawyer representing X said. Also read | Explained: Why is Donald Trump's Georgia indictment different? Both Smith and Trump have a frosty relationship with each other. After Trump was indicted for the second time in June by the Miami court, he delivered a charged speech where he called Smith a 'thug'. "I've named him deranged Jack Smith. He does political hit jobs…He looks like a thug," said Trump, adding that Smith was a "raging and uncontrolled Trump hater". (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

Special counsel got access to Trump's direct messages, drafts on X, court transcripts reveal

Apart from the US presidential election candidates, there are three other important individuals who will figure prominently in the newspaper headlines and newsrooms for the next few months. They are David Weiss, Jack Smith, and Robert Hur.

All of them are special counsels appointed to oversee some of the most politically important cases that perhaps can change the course of the 2024 US presidential elections.

On Friday (Aug 11), David Weiss was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to probe the financial and business dealings of Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

Apparently, according to Garland, Weiss volunteered himself to be on the case and told him that “in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work,” now as special counsel.

In January, Garland appointed Robert Hur, a former US attorney in Maryland, to oversee the Justice Department’s investigation into how several batches of documents marked as classified ended up at Joe Biden’s Delaware home and at the offices of the president’s Washington think tank.

And last year, Garland appointed former Justice Department public corruption prosecutor Jack Smith to lead investigations into the retention of classified documents at former president Donald Trump’s Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, and also lead another probe into the Jan 6, 2021, insurrection and efforts to undo the 2020 election. Trump is now facing charges in both cases.

The appointment of these special counsels has again thrown a light on their duties, responsibilities and the kind of power they hold.

<h2>What is a special counsel?</h2>

A special counsel is an attorney who is appointed to investigate, and possibly prosecute, sensitive cases usually involving political figures or allegations of serious wrongdoing by the government.

A special counsel has or at least is perceived to enjoy more independence than is usually afforded to federal investigators.

According to the Justice Department rules, the special counsel is appointed when the department would have a conflict of interest or when he or she decides that it would be in the “public interest” to have an outside lawyer handle an investigation.

The Code of Federal Regulations stipulates that a special counsel must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decision-making,” as well as “an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies.”

Though they’re not subject to the day-to-day supervision of the Justice Department, special counsels must still comply with department regulations, policies and procedures.

They also technically report to the attorney general — the one government official who can fire them.

The attorney general is entitled to seek explanations from a special counsel about any requested investigative or prosecutorial step, but under the regulations is also expected to give great weight to the special counsel’s views.

In the event the attorney general rejects a move the special counsel wants to make, the Justice Department is to notify Congress at the end of the investigation.

<h2>What powers do special counsels have?</h2>

A special counsel’s power is equivalent to a federal prosecutor. They supervise, investigate, decide whether to bring charges and, if so, take those cases to trial.

They are required to follow the Justice Department’s internal rules, including policies that spell out how to decide whether to bring charges.

Though they’re not subject to the day-to-day supervision of the Justice Department, special counsels must still comply with department regulations, policies and procedures. They also technically report to the attorney general — the one government official who can fire them.

They also operate with more public scrutiny. Unlike with other cases, the attorney general must notify Congress if he or she overrules one of the special counsel’s decisions. And the special counsel must submit a report laying out the reasons for charging people or declining to do so. Those reports can become public, something that rarely happens in other federal investigations.

<h2>How do they operate?</h2>

Special counsels are provided with a budget and can request a staff of attorneys, both inside and outside the department, if they need extra help.

In addition to the ability to bring indictments, special counsels are vested with bread-and-butter law enforcement tools such as the power to issue subpoenas and search warrants.

Robert Mueller, a former FBI director who as special counsel in the Trump administration, led the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, issued more than 2,800 subpoenas and executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants.

<h2>Who can be a special counsel?</h2>

Normally, a special counsel is a lawyer brought in from outside the Justice Department. That was the case with Smith and with Robert Mueller, the former FBI director who investigated allegations that Trump’s campaign had conspired with Russia before the 2016 election.

But in some cases, attorneys general have appointed lawyers from within the agency to be special counsels to add heft to investigations they were already supervising.

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

Apart from the US presidential election candidates, there are three other important individuals who will figure prominently in the newspaper headlines and newsrooms for the next few months.

Apart from the US presidential election candidates, there are three other important individuals who will figure prominently in the newspaper headlines and newsrooms for the next few months. They are David Weiss, Jack Smith, and Robert Hur. All of them are special counsels appointed to oversee some of the most politically important cases that perhaps can change the course of the 2024 US presidential elections. On Friday (Aug 11), David Weiss was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland to probe the financial and business dealings of Joe Biden’s son Hunter. Apparently, according to Garland, Weiss volunteered himself to be on the case and told him that “in his judgment, his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work,” now as special counsel. In January, Garland appointed Robert Hur, a former US attorney in Maryland, to oversee the Justice Department’s investigation into how several batches of documents marked as classified ended up at Joe Biden’s Delaware home and at the offices of the president’s Washington think tank. And last year, Garland appointed former Justice Department public corruption prosecutor Jack Smith to lead investigations into the retention of classified documents at former president Donald Trump’s Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, and also lead another probe into the Jan 6, 2021, insurrection and efforts to undo the 2020 election. Trump is now facing charges in both cases. The appointment of these special counsels has again thrown a light on their duties, responsibilities and the kind of power they hold. What is a special counsel? A special counsel is an attorney who is appointed to investigate, and possibly prosecute, sensitive cases usually involving political figures or allegations of serious wrongdoing by the government. A special counsel has or at least is perceived to enjoy more independence than is usually afforded to federal investigators. According to the Justice Department rules, the special counsel is appointed when the department would have a conflict of interest or when he or she decides that it would be in the “public interest” to have an outside lawyer handle an investigation. The Code of Federal Regulations stipulates that a special counsel must have “a reputation for integrity and impartial decision-making,” as well as “an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies.” Though they’re not subject to the day-to-day supervision of the Justice Department, special counsels must still comply with department regulations, policies and procedures. They also technically report to the attorney general — the one government official who can fire them. The attorney general is entitled to seek explanations from a special counsel about any requested investigative or prosecutorial step, but under the regulations is also expected to give great weight to the special counsel’s views. In the event the attorney general rejects a move the special counsel wants to make, the Justice Department is to notify Congress at the end of the investigation. What powers do special counsels have? A special counsel’s power is equivalent to a federal prosecutor. They supervise, investigate, decide whether to bring charges and, if so, take those cases to trial. They are required to follow the Justice Department’s internal rules, including policies that spell out how to decide whether to bring charges. Though they’re not subject to the day-to-day supervision of the Justice Department, special counsels must still comply with department regulations, policies and procedures. They also technically report to the attorney general — the one government official who can fire them. They also operate with more public scrutiny. Unlike with other cases, the attorney general must notify Congress if he or she overrules one of the special counsel’s decisions. And the special counsel must submit a report laying out the reasons for charging people or declining to do so. Those reports can become public, something that rarely happens in other federal investigations. How do they operate? Special counsels are provided with a budget and can request a staff of attorneys, both inside and outside the department, if they need extra help. In addition to the ability to bring indictments, special counsels are vested with bread-and-butter law enforcement tools such as the power to issue subpoenas and search warrants. Robert Mueller, a former FBI director who as special counsel in the Trump administration, led the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign, issued more than 2,800 subpoenas and executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants. Who can be a special counsel? Normally, a special counsel is a lawyer brought in from outside the Justice Department. That was the case with Smith and with Robert Mueller, the former FBI director who investigated allegations that Trump’s campaign had conspired with Russia before the 2016 election. But in some cases, attorneys general have appointed lawyers from within the agency to be special counsels to add heft to investigations they were already supervising. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE

Explained | What is special counsel in US and what role do they play?

President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden may be headed for a criminal trial, U.S. Special Counsel David Weiss said shortly after promotion into that role on Friday, in a sign that courtroom drama could play an outsized role in the 2024 presidential election.

A potential trial raises the possibility of an unprecedented spectacle in U.S. history: The son of a sitting president facing criminal charges while his father campaigns for re-election, likely against Republican Donald Trump, who faces at least three upcoming criminal trials of his own.&nbsp;

Republicans in the House of Representatives are also threatening an impeachment inquiry into unproven claims that President Biden benefitted from his 54-year-old son's business ventures.

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ahead-of-brics-summit-russian-envoy-babushkin-advocates-trading-in-national-currencies-624722">Ahead of BRICS summit, Russian envoy Babushkin advocates trading in national currencies</a>

Weiss, who has been investigating Hunter Biden since 2019, filed misdemeanour criminal tax and gun charges in June, but a federal judge refused to accept a proposed plea deal.

Weiss said in a court filing on Friday that talks between the two sides have since broken down. "The Government now believes that the case will not resolve short of a trial," he wrote.

The filing came moments after U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland elevated Weiss to special counsel status, giving him additional authority and independence to pursue the investigation.

Hunter Biden in July pleaded not guilty to charges of failing to pay taxes on more than $1.5 million in income in 2017 and 2018 despite owing more than $100,000. He did not enter a plea deal in a separate case where he is charged with unlawfully owning a firearm while using illegal drugs, which is a felony.

<h2>Trump appointee&nbsp;</h2>

Weiss was originally appointed to his position as U.S. Attorney for Delaware by Trump and was allowed to stay on during the Biden administration.

As a special counsel, Weiss will be free from day-to-day supervision from the Justice Department and file charges anywhere in the United States. Garland can overrule his proposed actions but must notify Congress if he does so.

Also Read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/explained-indian-govt-proposes-revamp-of-colonial-era-laws-heres-what-will-change-624710">Indian govt proposes revamp of colonial-era laws, here’s what will change</a>

Weiss said he might bring different charges against Hunter Biden in Washington or California, where the alleged criminal conduct took place.

A lawyer for Hunter Biden said he expected Weiss not to bend to political pressures.

"Whether in Delaware, Washington, D.C. or anywhere else, we expect a fair resolution not infected by politics and we’ll do what is necessary on behalf of Mr. Biden to achieve that,” lawyer Chris Clark said in a statement.

Weiss will produce a report when his work is done, Garland said, and the Justice Department will make as much of it public as is possible.

"The appointment of Mr. Weiss reinforces for the American people the department's commitment to both independence and accountability in particularly sensitive matters," Garland told a press conference.

Republicans have accused the elder Biden of profiting from his son's business ventures in Ukraine and China, though they have yet to produce any evidence of wrongdoing. House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy said in July that the chamber might launch an impeachment inquiry in the autumn.

WATCH | No-Confidence Motion: PM Modi's NDA government wins trust vote in Parliament&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/no-confidence-motion-pm-modis-nda-government-wins-trust-vote-in-parliament-the-india-story-624712/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The White House declined to comment. Biden officials have previously dismissed Republican allegations as "insane conspiracy theories" and has said that Biden did not participate in his son's business affairs.

Hunter Biden has worked as a lobbyist, lawyer, consultant and investment banker and has said he has struggled with alcoholism and crack cocaine use.

Republicans said Weiss lacked credibility to continue the investigation. "If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?" McCarthy said.

Weiss is the third special counsel appointed by Garland to investigate politically sensitive matters.

One of those, Jack Smith, has filed criminal charges against Trump in two separate cases, while another, Robert Hur, is probing whether Biden mishandled classified documents after he left office as vice president.

In previous administrations, special counsels have investigated the outing of a CIA agent and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Hunter Biden has been a focus of several Republican congressional committees.

One former associate told the House Oversight Committee that Hunter gave an impression that he emphasized his family ties while he was doing business in Ukraine nearly a decade ago, while his father was vice president. That witness, Devon Archer, said Hunter spoke with his father daily but said the conversations did not involve business dealings.

Trump also has frequently mentioned the younger Biden in an attempt to tar his father as the two gear up for a possible rematch in the 2024 presidential election. His spokesperson Stephen Cheung said Weiss should "quickly conclude" that Biden and his son "should face the required consequences."

A June Reuters/Ipsos poll found half of Americans, including 75% of Republicans and 33% of Democrats, believed the younger Biden received preferential treatment from Weiss. But most said that would not affect their vote next year.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us <a href="https://www.wionews.com/content-contribution-registration-form">here</a>.
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden may be headed for a criminal trial, U.S. Special Counsel David Weiss said shortly after promotion into that role on Friday, in a sign that courtroom drama could play an outsized role in the 2024 presidential election.

President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden may be headed for a criminal trial, U.S. Special Counsel David Weiss said shortly after promotion into that role on Friday, in a sign that courtroom drama could play an outsized role in the 2024 presidential election. A potential trial raises the possibility of an unprecedented spectacle in U.S. history: The son of a sitting president facing criminal charges while his father campaigns for re-election, likely against Republican Donald Trump, who faces at least three upcoming criminal trials of his own. Republicans in the House of Representatives are also threatening an impeachment inquiry into unproven claims that President Biden benefitted from his 54-year-old son's business ventures. Also Read | Ahead of BRICS summit, Russian envoy Babushkin advocates trading in national currencies Weiss, who has been investigating Hunter Biden since 2019, filed misdemeanour criminal tax and gun charges in June, but a federal judge refused to accept a proposed plea deal. Weiss said in a court filing on Friday that talks between the two sides have since broken down. "The Government now believes that the case will not resolve short of a trial," he wrote. The filing came moments after U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland elevated Weiss to special counsel status, giving him additional authority and independence to pursue the investigation. Hunter Biden in July pleaded not guilty to charges of failing to pay taxes on more than $1.5 million in income in 2017 and 2018 despite owing more than $100,000. He did not enter a plea deal in a separate case where he is charged with unlawfully owning a firearm while using illegal drugs, which is a felony. Trump appointee Weiss was originally appointed to his position as U.S. Attorney for Delaware by Trump and was allowed to stay on during the Biden administration. As a special counsel, Weiss will be free from day-to-day supervision from the Justice Department and file charges anywhere in the United States. Garland can overrule his proposed actions but must notify Congress if he does so. Also Read | Indian govt proposes revamp of colonial-era laws, here’s what will change Weiss said he might bring different charges against Hunter Biden in Washington or California, where the alleged criminal conduct took place. A lawyer for Hunter Biden said he expected Weiss not to bend to political pressures. "Whether in Delaware, Washington, D.C. or anywhere else, we expect a fair resolution not infected by politics and we’ll do what is necessary on behalf of Mr. Biden to achieve that,” lawyer Chris Clark said in a statement. Weiss will produce a report when his work is done, Garland said, and the Justice Department will make as much of it public as is possible. "The appointment of Mr. Weiss reinforces for the American people the department's commitment to both independence and accountability in particularly sensitive matters," Garland told a press conference. Republicans have accused the elder Biden of profiting from his son's business ventures in Ukraine and China, though they have yet to produce any evidence of wrongdoing. House of Representatives Speaker Kevin McCarthy said in July that the chamber might launch an impeachment inquiry in the autumn. WATCH | No-Confidence Motion: PM Modi's NDA government wins trust vote in Parliament × The White House declined to comment. Biden officials have previously dismissed Republican allegations as "insane conspiracy theories" and has said that Biden did not participate in his son's business affairs. Hunter Biden has worked as a lobbyist, lawyer, consultant and investment banker and has said he has struggled with alcoholism and crack cocaine use. Republicans said Weiss lacked credibility to continue the investigation. "If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?" McCarthy said. Weiss is the third special counsel appointed by Garland to investigate politically sensitive matters. One of those, Jack Smith, has filed criminal charges against Trump in two separate cases, while another, Robert Hur, is probing whether Biden mishandled classified documents after he left office as vice president. In previous administrations, special counsels have investigated the outing of a CIA agent and Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Hunter Biden has been a focus of several Republican congressional committees. One former associate told the House Oversight Committee that Hunter gave an impression that he emphasized his family ties while he was doing business in Ukraine nearly a decade ago, while his father was vice president. That witness, Devon Archer, said Hunter spoke with his father daily but said the conversations did not involve business dealings. Trump also has frequently mentioned the younger Biden in an attempt to tar his father as the two gear up for a possible rematch in the 2024 presidential election. His spokesperson Stephen Cheung said Weiss should "quickly conclude" that Biden and his son "should face the required consequences." A June Reuters/Ipsos poll found half of Americans, including 75% of Republicans and 33% of Democrats, believed the younger Biden received preferential treatment from Weiss. But most said that would not affect their vote next year. WATCH WION LIVE HERE You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here. ×

Hunter Biden could face criminal trial, newly named US special counsel says

US Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday (August 11) declared Delaware Attorney David Weiss&nbsp;as a special counsel to investigate alleged illicit overseas business deals of Hunter Biden, the son of US President Joe Biden.

The decision came after plea talks between the Justice Department and Hunter fell apart after an intervention from a Delaware federal judge. David Weiss has been investigating Hunter since 2019 over charges related to tax evasion and possession of illegal firearms.

But his appointment as the special counsel gives him more powers. The appointment authorises him to "conduct the ongoing investigation described above, as well as any matters that arose from that investigation or may arise,” said Garland.

<h2>Weiss himself asked for the special counsel status</h2>

Garland also informed that Weiss himself asked for the special counsel status on Tuesday (August 8) after he determined that “his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as Special Counsel and he asked to be so appointed."

He will present a report at the end of the investigation in conformity with special counsel regulations and accordingly make the results public, reported NPR.

<h2>Plea between Justice Dept&nbsp;and Hunter Biden falls apart</h2>

The recent development arises just a few weeks after the judge overseeing the Hunter Biden case expressed her hesitance to approve the plea deal negotiated between the president's son and the Justice Department.&nbsp;

She instructed both sides to provide further explanations and scheduled a future court appearance.

Watch:&nbsp;Gravitas: Did the White House influence the Hunter Biden case?

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-did-the-white-house-influence-the-hunter-biden-case-624335/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

The judge demanded clarification from both sets of attorneys that the agreement doesn't grant Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution regarding his business activities.&nbsp;

Consequently, Hunter Biden entered a plea of not guilty to two misdemeanour charges related to his failure to file federal income taxes.&nbsp;

<h2>What was the plea deal?</h2>

Earlier this year, Hunter Biden had initially pleaded guilty to two misdemeanour charges connected to his federal income tax filings. Additionally, federal authorities accused him of a felony firearm violation. He then accepted a pretrial diversion arrangement to evade prosecution in this matter.

According to David Weiss, the Delaware U.S. attorney appointed during the Trump administration, Hunter Biden neglected to pay federal income taxes for the years 2017 and 2018, despite having owed over $100,000 in taxes annually.&nbsp;

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hunter-biden-sold-his-father-as-the-brand-to-oligarchs-house-oversight-gop-claims-624111">Also read:&nbsp;Hunter Biden sold his father as `the brand` to oligarchs, House Oversight memo claims</a>

Moreover, in October 2018, Biden unlawfully possessed a firearm despite knowing he was a controlled substance user and addicted, as per Weiss' office.

However, the plea deal faced intense opposition from the Republicans, who alleged that it was an example of unfair treatment for Joe Biden’s son.&nbsp;

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
WATCH WION LIVE HERE

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="350" loading="”lazy”" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed?autoplay=1&amp;mute=1" width="100%"></iframe>
</div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

&nbsp;

US Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday (August 11) declared Delaware Attorney David Weiss as a special counsel to investigate alleged illicit overseas business deals of Hunter Biden, the son of US President Joe Biden.

US Attorney General Merrick Garland on Friday (August 11) declared Delaware Attorney David Weiss as a special counsel to investigate alleged illicit overseas business deals of Hunter Biden, the son of US President Joe Biden. The decision came after plea talks between the Justice Department and Hunter fell apart after an intervention from a Delaware federal judge. David Weiss has been investigating Hunter since 2019 over charges related to tax evasion and possession of illegal firearms. But his appointment as the special counsel gives him more powers. The appointment authorises him to "conduct the ongoing investigation described above, as well as any matters that arose from that investigation or may arise,” said Garland. Weiss himself asked for the special counsel status Garland also informed that Weiss himself asked for the special counsel status on Tuesday (August 8) after he determined that “his investigation has reached a stage at which he should continue his work as Special Counsel and he asked to be so appointed." He will present a report at the end of the investigation in conformity with special counsel regulations and accordingly make the results public, reported NPR. Plea between Justice Dept and Hunter Biden falls apart The recent development arises just a few weeks after the judge overseeing the Hunter Biden case expressed her hesitance to approve the plea deal negotiated between the president's son and the Justice Department. She instructed both sides to provide further explanations and scheduled a future court appearance. Watch: Gravitas: Did the White House influence the Hunter Biden case? × The judge demanded clarification from both sets of attorneys that the agreement doesn't grant Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution regarding his business activities. Consequently, Hunter Biden entered a plea of not guilty to two misdemeanour charges related to his failure to file federal income taxes. What was the plea deal? Earlier this year, Hunter Biden had initially pleaded guilty to two misdemeanour charges connected to his federal income tax filings. Additionally, federal authorities accused him of a felony firearm violation. He then accepted a pretrial diversion arrangement to evade prosecution in this matter. According to David Weiss, the Delaware U.S. attorney appointed during the Trump administration, Hunter Biden neglected to pay federal income taxes for the years 2017 and 2018, despite having owed over $100,000 in taxes annually. Also read: Hunter Biden sold his father as `the brand` to oligarchs, House Oversight memo claims Moreover, in October 2018, Biden unlawfully possessed a firearm despite knowing he was a controlled substance user and addicted, as per Weiss' office. However, the plea deal faced intense opposition from the Republicans, who alleged that it was an example of unfair treatment for Joe Biden’s son. WATCH WION LIVE HERE ×

Trump appointee Delaware Attorney David Weiss declared as special counsel in Hunter Biden case

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of <a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/muellers-office-disputes-report-that-trump-told-cohen-to-lie-to-congress-191342">Russian meddling in the 2016 US&nbsp;election</a> is close to wrapping up, Acting US&nbsp;Attorney General Matthew Whitaker told reporters on Monday.

"I've been fully briefed on the investigation and I look forward to Director Mueller delivering the final report," he said at a press conference on <a href="http://www.wionews.com/americas/united-states-formally-charges-chinas-huawei-with-bank-fraud-stealing-trade-secrets-193545">US&nbsp;charges against China's Huawei Technologies</a> Co Ltd.

"Right now the investigation is I think close to being completed and I hope that we can get the report from Director Mueller as soon as possible."

Whitaker's comments mark the first time a top government official with knowledge of the investigation has publicly confirmed the probe is in its final stages.

Media outlets have reported that Mueller's office could be close to issuing a final report on his investigation.

But Mueller has been tight-lipped about when the months of closed-door grand jury sessions and criminal charges will conclude, leaving questions over how far into the White House his probe will reach and what will happen to his findings.

Mueller's investigation most recently ensnared a long-time confidant of President Donald Trump, political operative Roger Stone.

Others in Trump's orbit have also been charged in the probe, including Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, his former campaign deputy, Richard Gates, and his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn.

Trump's nominee to fill the attorney general post permanently, William Barr, recently pledged to make public as much of the report as possible, saying Mueller is required to file it confidentially.

But Barr has declined to pledge to release Mueller's report in its entirety, saying that some portions might need to remain confidential, such as decisions not to charge certain individuals.

Russia denies any wrongdoing in the 2016 election. Trump has repeatedly said he was not involved in any collusion with Russia and has often referred to the probe as a "witch hunt."

Whitaker's comments about the Mueller investigation are likely to trigger further inquiries from Democrats who have accused him of being illegally appointed and failing to heed ethics advice suggesting he should recuse himself from overseeing the Mueller investigation.

He is due to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on February 8, where he is expected to be peppered with questions over his role in the Mueller probe and whether he has taken steps to narrow it or limit what Mueller can investigate.

Whitaker was installed as acting attorney general in November, after Trump ousted Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Prior to joining the Justice Department as Sessions’ chief of staff in 2017, Whitaker served as a conservative media pundit and made multiple comments raising scepticism about Mueller’s investigation.

Those comments, coupled with Whitaker’s friendship with Trump’s 2016 election co-chair, Sam Clovis, have raised questions about whether Whitaker should recuse himself.

At Monday's press conference, Whitaker publicly addressed questions about his past statements on the Mueller probe, saying he made those comments as a private citizen who had access only to publicly available information.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 US election is close to wrapping up, Acting US Attorney General Matthew Whitaker told reporters on Monday.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 US election is close to wrapping up, Acting US Attorney General Matthew Whitaker told reporters on Monday. "I've been fully briefed on the investigation and I look forward to Director Mueller delivering the final report," he said at a press conference on US charges against China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd. "Right now the investigation is I think close to being completed and I hope that we can get the report from Director Mueller as soon as possible." Whitaker's comments mark the first time a top government official with knowledge of the investigation has publicly confirmed the probe is in its final stages. Media outlets have reported that Mueller's office could be close to issuing a final report on his investigation. But Mueller has been tight-lipped about when the months of closed-door grand jury sessions and criminal charges will conclude, leaving questions over how far into the White House his probe will reach and what will happen to his findings. Mueller's investigation most recently ensnared a long-time confidant of President Donald Trump, political operative Roger Stone. Others in Trump's orbit have also been charged in the probe, including Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, his former campaign deputy, Richard Gates, and his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn. Trump's nominee to fill the attorney general post permanently, William Barr, recently pledged to make public as much of the report as possible, saying Mueller is required to file it confidentially. But Barr has declined to pledge to release Mueller's report in its entirety, saying that some portions might need to remain confidential, such as decisions not to charge certain individuals. Russia denies any wrongdoing in the 2016 election. Trump has repeatedly said he was not involved in any collusion with Russia and has often referred to the probe as a "witch hunt." Whitaker's comments about the Mueller investigation are likely to trigger further inquiries from Democrats who have accused him of being illegally appointed and failing to heed ethics advice suggesting he should recuse himself from overseeing the Mueller investigation. He is due to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on February 8, where he is expected to be peppered with questions over his role in the Mueller probe and whether he has taken steps to narrow it or limit what Mueller can investigate. Whitaker was installed as acting attorney general in November, after Trump ousted Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Prior to joining the Justice Department as Sessions’ chief of staff in 2017, Whitaker served as a conservative media pundit and made multiple comments raising scepticism about Mueller’s investigation. Those comments, coupled with Whitaker’s friendship with Trump’s 2016 election co-chair, Sam Clovis, have raised questions about whether Whitaker should recuse himself. At Monday's press conference, Whitaker publicly addressed questions about his past statements on the Mueller probe, saying he made those comments as a private citizen who had access only to publicly available information.

Mueller probe 'close to being completed': Acting US attorney general

US&nbspPresident Donald Trump on Monday said he had committed no wrongdoing but has the "absolute" power to pardon himself, echoing a sweeping argument put forth by his lawyers amid the US&nbspspecial counsel's investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.

In the memo to US&nbspSpecial Counsel Robert Mueller, which was sent in January and reported on by the New York Times on Saturday, Trump's lawyers argued the president could not have obstructed the investigation, given the powers granted to him by the US&nbspConstitution.

One of Trump's lawyers on Sunday also spoke of Trump's broad claim to power, saying the president probably could pardon himself but was unlikely to do so.

"As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?" Trump said in a Twitter post on Monday, reiterating his claim that the Russia investigation was a "witch hunt."

"The appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL," Trump said in another post.

Several pardons already issued by Trump also have raised questions about his use of the presidential pardon power. Last week he pardoned Dinesh D'Souza, a conservative pundit convicted of campaign finance crimes, and last year he pardoned former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, who campaigned for Trump before being convicted in a case regarding racial profiling.

Critics say Trump has undermined the rule of law with pardons based on political considerations.

The rebukes came again on Monday as several Democratic lawmakers pushed back against Trump's claim and noted that Mueller's investigation has already led to multiple indictments, including against several Trump aides who have pleaded guilty.

'YOU'RE NOT A KING'

"You can’t pardon yourself," Democratic US&nbspRepresentative Ted Deutch said in response to Trump on Twitter. "Let me remind you of something, we don’t live in a monarchy and you are not a king."

Harvard Law School constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe called Trump's position "ludicrous" and "legal fantasy."

Trump first opened the door to what he said was his "complete power to pardon" last July in a series of tweets that appeared to be in response to a report that Trump and his legal team had examined presidential powers to pardon Trump aides, family members and possibly even himself.

On a Sunday, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani told on ABC's "This Week" program it was an "open question" as to whether the president could pardon himself but that Trump "has no intention" of doing so. Giuliani said the U.S. Constitution, which gives a president the authority to issue pardons, "doesn't say he can't."

The 20-page letter from Trump's lawyers to Mueller in January came in response to repeated requests by the special counsel's office asking to interview Trump, according to the Times.[L2N1T40CM]

Russia has denied U.S. intelligence agencies' assessment that Moscow sought to interfere with the 2016 U.S. election to boost Donald Trump's prospects of becoming president. Trump has also said there was no collusion by his campaign.

Some of Mueller's actions remain under seal but so far five people have pleaded guilty, including former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and longtime Manafort business partner Rick Gates.

Mueller's team has also charged 13 Russians and three Russian companies as well as Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, who has not pleaded guilty.

As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?' Trump said in a Twitter post on Monday

US&nbspPresident Donald Trump on Monday said he had committed no wrongdoing but has the "absolute" power to pardon himself, echoing a sweeping argument put forth by his lawyers amid the US&nbspspecial counsel's investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election. In the memo to US&nbspSpecial Counsel Robert Mueller, which was sent in January and reported on by the New York Times on Saturday, Trump's lawyers argued the president could not have obstructed the investigation, given the powers granted to him by the US&nbspConstitution. One of Trump's lawyers on Sunday also spoke of Trump's broad claim to power, saying the president probably could pardon himself but was unlikely to do so. "As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?" Trump said in a Twitter post on Monday, reiterating his claim that the Russia investigation was a "witch hunt." "The appointment of the Special Counsel is totally UNCONSTITUTIONAL," Trump said in another post. Several pardons already issued by Trump also have raised questions about his use of the presidential pardon power. Last week he pardoned Dinesh D'Souza, a conservative pundit convicted of campaign finance crimes, and last year he pardoned former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, who campaigned for Trump before being convicted in a case regarding racial profiling. Critics say Trump has undermined the rule of law with pardons based on political considerations. The rebukes came again on Monday as several Democratic lawmakers pushed back against Trump's claim and noted that Mueller's investigation has already led to multiple indictments, including against several Trump aides who have pleaded guilty. 'YOU'RE NOT A KING' "You can’t pardon yourself," Democratic US&nbspRepresentative Ted Deutch said in response to Trump on Twitter. "Let me remind you of something, we don’t live in a monarchy and you are not a king." Harvard Law School constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe called Trump's position "ludicrous" and "legal fantasy." Trump first opened the door to what he said was his "complete power to pardon" last July in a series of tweets that appeared to be in response to a report that Trump and his legal team had examined presidential powers to pardon Trump aides, family members and possibly even himself. On a Sunday, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani told on ABC's "This Week" program it was an "open question" as to whether the president could pardon himself but that Trump "has no intention" of doing so. Giuliani said the U.S. Constitution, which gives a president the authority to issue pardons, "doesn't say he can't." The 20-page letter from Trump's lawyers to Mueller in January came in response to repeated requests by the special counsel's office asking to interview Trump, according to the Times.[L2N1T40CM] Russia has denied U.S. intelligence agencies' assessment that Moscow sought to interfere with the 2016 U.S. election to boost Donald Trump's prospects of becoming president. Trump has also said there was no collusion by his campaign. Some of Mueller's actions remain under seal but so far five people have pleaded guilty, including former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn and longtime Manafort business partner Rick Gates. Mueller's team has also charged 13 Russians and three Russian companies as well as Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort, who has not pleaded guilty.

As Special Counsel's investigation progresses, Trump says he has 'absolute' power to pardon himself

A former senior official in Donald Trump&#39;s 2016 presidential campaign, Rick Gates, pleaded guilty on Friday to conspiracy against the United States and lying to investigators, and he is cooperating with a federal probe into Russia&#39;s role in the election.

Gates, who was a deputy campaign manager for Trump, is being investigated by the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which is probing alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. election.

Gates had been potentially facing decades in prison on much more serious charges, including bank fraud and conspiracy to launder money. Under the charges he pleaded guilty to, he faces a maximum sentence of nearly six years.

Prosecutors said they could ask the judge for a reduction in Gates&#39; sentence based on the extent of his cooperation with Mueller&#39;s probe.

The plea increases pressure on Paul Manafort, who was Trump&#39;s campaign manager for five months in 2016, to also seek a plea deal. However, Manafort said in a statement issued after Gates&#39; plea deal that he maintained his innocence.

Cooperation by Gates, and potentially by Manafort at a later stage, could provide a rich vein of information for Mueller, whose Russia probe includes looking into whether Trump&#39;s campaign colluded with Moscow to interfere in the election.

Gates&#39; plea deal appeared to be partially motivated by his concern over legal costs and the strain on his family.

Prosecutors allege that Manafort, with Gates&#39; assistance, laundered more than $30 million and duped banks into lending money. It says the pair used funds from secret offshore accounts to enjoy a life of luxury.

None of the charges to date against Gates or Manafort have made reference to any connection with Russian meddling in the 2016 election or possible collusion. Russia has denied the accusations of interference. Trump has said there was no collusion, and has also denied any attempt to obstruct Mueller&#39;s probe.

Mueller, appointed by the Department of Justice last year, has a broad brief that allows him to look into any wrongdoing uncovered in the course of his investigation.

Campaign role

While it was not clear what Gates might be able to reveal to investigators, he was on Trump&#39;s campaign team when his then-boss Manafort attended a meeting in June 2016 at Trump Tower in New York between senior campaign aides and a Russian lawyer.

Mueller, according to sources familiar with the investigation, has taken a keen interest in whether Democrats&#39; emails allegedly hacked by Russian intelligence and made public six days after that meeting were discussed then.

Gates helped run the campaign&#39;s day-to-day operations, played a key role at the Republican National Convention where Trump was chosen as the party&#39;s nominee and accompanied Trump on campaign flights.

He stayed on in the campaign even after Manafort resigned in August 2016 amid a controversy over cash payments from Ukraine. After Trump&#39;s election win, Gates was on Trump&#39;s presidential transition team and his inaugural committee.

U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Moscow sought to meddle in the campaign to tilt the vote in favor of Trump, including by hacking the emails of leading Democrats and distributing disinformation and propaganda online.

Gates and Manafort were first charged in October. On Thursday, Mueller piled up more pressure on the pair - filing a 32-count indictment against them that includes charges of bank fraud and lying on tax returns.

As part of the conspiracy charge, prosecutors say that Gates and Manafort lied to the Justice Department in September 2016, when they were asked whether they had acted as foreign agents in 2013 on behalf of Ukraine&#39;s pro-Russian government.

In the plea deal, Gates agreed that he lied to the investigators on Mueller&#39;s team on Feb. 1, about a 2013 meeting between Manafort, a senior lobbyist and an unnamed member of Congress who sits on a congressional subcommittee with jurisdiction over Ukraine.

Gates&#39; plea may push Manafort to trying to reach his own plea deal and cooperate with the probe, despite his protestations to the contrary, said Michael Padula, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice.

&quot;His ability to negotiate a deal that is favorable to him at this point given that his codefendant has already made a deal with the government will depend on what he can potentially offer the special counsel regarding their investigation into Russia collusion,&quot; Padula said.

The White House said on Friday that the latest charges against Manafort and Gates were unrelated to Trump.

&quot;This indictment has nothing to do with the White House or the president. As you know, we have been cooperative with the special counsel and as we continue to see, there&#39;s no evidence of collusion, no evidence of wrongdoing,&quot; Mercedes Schlapp, the White House strategic communications director, told Fox News Channel.

A court filing on Friday charged that between 2008 and 2017, Gates and Manafort devised a scheme to defraud the United States to obtain money and property by making false representations to banks and other financial institutions. Toward the end of that period they worked for Trump&#39;s campaign.

In March 2016, Manafort fraudulently obtained a loan for over $3 million on a Manhattan condominium, prosecutors say.

In a letter to relatives and close friends that was obtained by ABC News, Gates expressed concern that a long trial would take a heavy toll.

&quot;The reality of how long this legal process will likely take, the cost, and the circus-like atmosphere of an anticipated trial are too much. I will better serve my family moving forward by exiting this process,&quot; he wrote.

Gates, who has a young family and who has been under house arrest, has been peppering the court since last year with requests to travel, coach his children&#39;s sports teams and attend school functions.

Rick Gates, who was a deputy campaign manager for Donald Trump, is being investigated by the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which is probing alleged Russian meddling in the US election

A former senior official in Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, Rick Gates, pleaded guilty on Friday to conspiracy against the United States and lying to investigators, and he is cooperating with a federal probe into Russia's role in the election. Gates, who was a deputy campaign manager for Trump, is being investigated by the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which is probing alleged Russian meddling in the U.S. election. Gates had been potentially facing decades in prison on much more serious charges, including bank fraud and conspiracy to launder money. Under the charges he pleaded guilty to, he faces a maximum sentence of nearly six years. Prosecutors said they could ask the judge for a reduction in Gates' sentence based on the extent of his cooperation with Mueller's probe. The plea increases pressure on Paul Manafort, who was Trump's campaign manager for five months in 2016, to also seek a plea deal. However, Manafort said in a statement issued after Gates' plea deal that he maintained his innocence. Cooperation by Gates, and potentially by Manafort at a later stage, could provide a rich vein of information for Mueller, whose Russia probe includes looking into whether Trump's campaign colluded with Moscow to interfere in the election. Gates' plea deal appeared to be partially motivated by his concern over legal costs and the strain on his family. Prosecutors allege that Manafort, with Gates' assistance, laundered more than $30 million and duped banks into lending money. It says the pair used funds from secret offshore accounts to enjoy a life of luxury. None of the charges to date against Gates or Manafort have made reference to any connection with Russian meddling in the 2016 election or possible collusion. Russia has denied the accusations of interference. Trump has said there was no collusion, and has also denied any attempt to obstruct Mueller's probe. Mueller, appointed by the Department of Justice last year, has a broad brief that allows him to look into any wrongdoing uncovered in the course of his investigation. Campaign role While it was not clear what Gates might be able to reveal to investigators, he was on Trump's campaign team when his then-boss Manafort attended a meeting in June 2016 at Trump Tower in New York between senior campaign aides and a Russian lawyer. Mueller, according to sources familiar with the investigation, has taken a keen interest in whether Democrats' emails allegedly hacked by Russian intelligence and made public six days after that meeting were discussed then. Gates helped run the campaign's day-to-day operations, played a key role at the Republican National Convention where Trump was chosen as the party's nominee and accompanied Trump on campaign flights. He stayed on in the campaign even after Manafort resigned in August 2016 amid a controversy over cash payments from Ukraine. After Trump's election win, Gates was on Trump's presidential transition team and his inaugural committee. U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Moscow sought to meddle in the campaign to tilt the vote in favor of Trump, including by hacking the emails of leading Democrats and distributing disinformation and propaganda online. Gates and Manafort were first charged in October. On Thursday, Mueller piled up more pressure on the pair - filing a 32-count indictment against them that includes charges of bank fraud and lying on tax returns. As part of the conspiracy charge, prosecutors say that Gates and Manafort lied to the Justice Department in September 2016, when they were asked whether they had acted as foreign agents in 2013 on behalf of Ukraine's pro-Russian government. In the plea deal, Gates agreed that he lied to the investigators on Mueller's team on Feb. 1, about a 2013 meeting between Manafort, a senior lobbyist and an unnamed member of Congress who sits on a congressional subcommittee with jurisdiction over Ukraine. Gates' plea may push Manafort to trying to reach his own plea deal and cooperate with the probe, despite his protestations to the contrary, said Michael Padula, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice. "His ability to negotiate a deal that is favorable to him at this point given that his codefendant has already made a deal with the government will depend on what he can potentially offer the special counsel regarding their investigation into Russia collusion," Padula said. The White House said on Friday that the latest charges against Manafort and Gates were unrelated to Trump. "This indictment has nothing to do with the White House or the president. As you know, we have been cooperative with the special counsel and as we continue to see, there's no evidence of collusion, no evidence of wrongdoing," Mercedes Schlapp, the White House strategic communications director, told Fox News Channel. A court filing on Friday charged that between 2008 and 2017, Gates and Manafort devised a scheme to defraud the United States to obtain money and property by making false representations to banks and other financial institutions. Toward the end of that period they worked for Trump's campaign. In March 2016, Manafort fraudulently obtained a loan for over $3 million on a Manhattan condominium, prosecutors say. In a letter to relatives and close friends that was obtained by ABC News, Gates expressed concern that a long trial would take a heavy toll. "The reality of how long this legal process will likely take, the cost, and the circus-like atmosphere of an anticipated trial are too much. I will better serve my family moving forward by exiting this process," he wrote. Gates, who has a young family and who has been under house arrest, has been peppering the court since last year with requests to travel, coach his children's sports teams and attend school functions.

Former Trump aid pleads guilty in Russia probe

Facebook Inc said Russian agents created 129 events on the social media network during the 2016 U.S. election campaign, according to testimony to Congress, shedding more light on Russia&#39;s purported disinformation drive aimed at voters.

Facebook, in a written statement to U.S. lawmakers released on Thursday and dated Jan. 8, said that 338,300 different Facebook accounts viewed the events and that 62,500 marked that they would attend. The company said it did not have data about which of the events took place.

Facebook, the world&#39;s largest social media network, said in September only that Russians had created &quot;several promoted events.&quot;

Copies of the event pages that have surfaced since then show that at least some of them were political rallies centered on divisive subjects, such as immigration. Russia denies the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies that it tried to meddle in American democracy.

Facebook delivered the details to Congress this month in response to written questions from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/facebook-banned-in-china-but-it-uses-it-elsewhere-to-spread-state-produced-propaganda-nyt-23817" target="_blank">Facebook banned in China but it uses it elsewhere to spread &#39;state-produced propaganda&#39;</a>

Facebook said that it had found &quot;overlap&quot; between the online marketing done in 2016 by Russian agents and by President Donald Trump&#39;s campaign and called it &quot;insignificant.&quot; The company said it was not in a position to either substantiate or disprove allegations of collusion between the two camps.

Trump denies any collusion and has described investigations by congressional panels and a special counsel as a witch hunt.

Facebook has previously said some 126 million Americans may have seen Russian-backed political content on Facebook over a two-year period, and that 16 million may have been exposed to Russian information on Instagram.

Facebook, Twitter Inc and Alphabet Inc&#39;s Google testified about misuse of their services before three congressional committees in October and November.

Also in its written response to follow up questions, Facebook said that last year it removed Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab from its list of free anti-virus offerings to users who go to the social media site from a computer that may be infected with malicious code.

Facebook said it no longer provided Kaspersky Lab as a recommended anti-virus option but that it was &quot;unable to easily reconstruct how many Facebook users downloaded Kaspersky software.&quot;

Kaspersky Lab has repeatedly denied allegations by U.S. security officials that its software could enable Russian espionage, a fear that led to the U.S. government last year to ban the use of its products in federal computer networks.

A Kaspersky spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the testimony.

Facebook said it was also in the process of &quot;phasing out internal use of a different Kaspersky antivirus product&quot; that does not transmit data back to Kaspersky Lab. It did not name the product.

In separate written responses, Google said Kaspersky Lab had not been approved for use in its corporate systems and that a review had not found any installation of its products. Twitter also said it did not use Kaspersky Lab.

Facebook also said it would take &quot;significant steps&quot; in the coming weeks to notify users of an online tool it released last month that allows them to check whether they have followed or liked Facebook pages or Instagram accounts associated with the Internet Research Agency, a suspected Russian troll farm.

Facebook said 338,300 different Facebook accounts viewed the events and that 62,500 said they would attend

Facebook Inc said Russian agents created 129 events on the social media network during the 2016 U.S. election campaign, according to testimony to Congress, shedding more light on Russia's purported disinformation drive aimed at voters. Facebook, in a written statement to U.S. lawmakers released on Thursday and dated Jan. 8, said that 338,300 different Facebook accounts viewed the events and that 62,500 marked that they would attend. The company said it did not have data about which of the events took place. Facebook, the world's largest social media network, said in September only that Russians had created "several promoted events." Copies of the event pages that have surfaced since then show that at least some of them were political rallies centered on divisive subjects, such as immigration. Russia denies the conclusions of U.S. intelligence agencies that it tried to meddle in American democracy. Facebook delivered the details to Congress this month in response to written questions from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. Also read: Facebook banned in China but it uses it elsewhere to spread 'state-produced propaganda' Facebook said that it had found "overlap" between the online marketing done in 2016 by Russian agents and by President Donald Trump's campaign and called it "insignificant." The company said it was not in a position to either substantiate or disprove allegations of collusion between the two camps. Trump denies any collusion and has described investigations by congressional panels and a special counsel as a witch hunt. Facebook has previously said some 126 million Americans may have seen Russian-backed political content on Facebook over a two-year period, and that 16 million may have been exposed to Russian information on Instagram. Facebook, Twitter Inc and Alphabet Inc's Google testified about misuse of their services before three congressional committees in October and November. Also in its written response to follow up questions, Facebook said that last year it removed Moscow-based Kaspersky Lab from its list of free anti-virus offerings to users who go to the social media site from a computer that may be infected with malicious code. Facebook said it no longer provided Kaspersky Lab as a recommended anti-virus option but that it was "unable to easily reconstruct how many Facebook users downloaded Kaspersky software." Kaspersky Lab has repeatedly denied allegations by U.S. security officials that its software could enable Russian espionage, a fear that led to the U.S. government last year to ban the use of its products in federal computer networks. A Kaspersky spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the testimony. Facebook said it was also in the process of "phasing out internal use of a different Kaspersky antivirus product" that does not transmit data back to Kaspersky Lab. It did not name the product. In separate written responses, Google said Kaspersky Lab had not been approved for use in its corporate systems and that a review had not found any installation of its products. Twitter also said it did not use Kaspersky Lab. Facebook also said it would take "significant steps" in the coming weeks to notify users of an online tool it released last month that allows them to check whether they have followed or liked Facebook pages or Instagram accounts associated with the Internet Research Agency, a suspected Russian troll farm.

Facebook: Russian agents created 129 US election events

US President Donald Trump ordered the firing of Russia investigation special counsel Robert Mueller last year but later reversed course, The New York Times reported Thursday.

Mueller is leading the probe into allegations of collusion between the US president&#39;s campaign team and Russia in the 2016 election, which Trump has repeatedly criticized and views as an attack on the legitimacy of his presidency.

The Republican leader gave the order in June 2017, according to the Times, but White House counsel Don McGahn refused, saying it would have a &quot;catastrophic effect&quot; on Trump&#39;s presidency.&nbsp;

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/make-peace-or-lose-aid-trump-to-palestinians-30798" target="_blank">&#39;Make peace&#39; with Israel or lose aid,&nbsp;Trump tells Palestinians</a>

After McGahn threatened to quit, Trump backed down, The Times reported, citing four anonymous sources.

White House counsel Ty Cobb declined to comment on the matter, the newspaper said.

Trump had accused Mueller of three conflicts of interest that he argued disqualified him from running the probe, The Times said.

The alleged conflicts were as follows: Mueller had terminated his membership at a Trump golf course over a dispute about fees, had previously represented the president&#39;s son-in-law Jared Kushner, and had been interviewed for a possible return as director of the FBI before he was appointed as special counsel.

On Wednesday, Trump for the first time directly said that he would cooperate with Mueller, whose investigation he had previously dismissed as a &quot;witch hunt.&quot;

&quot;I would love to do it,&quot; Trump told reporters in the White House when asked about testifying.

Also read:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wionews.com/world/trump-rolls-out-plan-for-path-to-citizenship-for-18-million-dreamers-30797" target="_blank">Trump unveils plan offering citizenship, in 10-12 years, to 1.8 million &#39;Dreamers&#39;</a>

&quot;I would do it under oath, absolutely,&quot; he added.

Any interview of a US president in an investigation is fraught with issues of executive privilege -- how much and in what context the US leader can be forced to disclose information.

In Trump&#39;s case, it also raises deep concerns that his shoot-from-the-hip outspokenness could jeopardize his own legal position.

Mueller is leading the probe into allegations of collusion between the US president's campaign team and Russia in the 2016 election

US President Donald Trump ordered the firing of Russia investigation special counsel Robert Mueller last year but later reversed course, The New York Times reported Thursday. Mueller is leading the probe into allegations of collusion between the US president's campaign team and Russia in the 2016 election, which Trump has repeatedly criticized and views as an attack on the legitimacy of his presidency. The Republican leader gave the order in June 2017, according to the Times, but White House counsel Don McGahn refused, saying it would have a "catastrophic effect" on Trump's presidency. Also read: 'Make peace' with Israel or lose aid, Trump tells Palestinians After McGahn threatened to quit, Trump backed down, The Times reported, citing four anonymous sources. White House counsel Ty Cobb declined to comment on the matter, the newspaper said. Trump had accused Mueller of three conflicts of interest that he argued disqualified him from running the probe, The Times said. The alleged conflicts were as follows: Mueller had terminated his membership at a Trump golf course over a dispute about fees, had previously represented the president's son-in-law Jared Kushner, and had been interviewed for a possible return as director of the FBI before he was appointed as special counsel. On Wednesday, Trump for the first time directly said that he would cooperate with Mueller, whose investigation he had previously dismissed as a "witch hunt." "I would love to do it," Trump told reporters in the White House when asked about testifying. Also read: Trump unveils plan offering citizenship, in 10-12 years, to 1.8 million 'Dreamers' "I would do it under oath, absolutely," he added. Any interview of a US president in an investigation is fraught with issues of executive privilege -- how much and in what context the US leader can be forced to disclose information. In Trump's case, it also raises deep concerns that his shoot-from-the-hip outspokenness could jeopardize his own legal position.

Trump ordered Mueller's firing but reversed course: NYT

special-counsel

Special Counsel, News on Special Counsel, stories on Special Counsel, articles on Special Counsel, Special Counsel stories at Wion, Special Counsel news, Special Counsel latest news