Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter Inc., was questioned by French President Emmanuel Macron as he encouraged nations and businesses to join the Children Online Protection Laboratory, a programme to protect children from dangerous internet content. In a series of tweets, Macron highlighted on&nbsp;the need to remove harmful online content more quickly in order to safeguard children.

Announcing the launch of the laboratory, Macron tweeted, “To protect our children on the Internet, we need to better verify user age, better detect and stop sexual predators, and better identify and address bullying. We need to be more efficient in taking down content,” Macron said.

“France, Estonia, New Zealand, Amazon, Dailymotion, Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet, Snap, TikTok and Qwant have signed up. All those who are willing should join us!” he added.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
👋 <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@elonmusk</a>, 
Will the bird protect our children?
— Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) <a href="https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1590799393958993920?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 10, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

In a separate <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amid-his-takeover-musk-warns-of-twitter-bankruptcy-as-more-officials-resign-533082">tweet</a>,&nbsp;the French president waved at Elon Musk and asked, “Will the bird protect our children?”, in an apparent query about Twitter’s willingness to join the initiative.

Chaos at Twitter: Employees brace for difficult times ahead

<div class="videoWrapper trancodeVideo"><iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/videos/chaos-at-twitter-employees-brace-for-difficult-times-ahead-533264/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe></div>

To this, Musk said, “Absolument”

The Children Online Protection Laboratory will explore, advocate for, create, and evaluate strategies targeted at enhancing children's safety in the digital world.

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

<iframe allowfullscreen="" autoplay="1" class="includeVideo" frameborder="0" height="350" src="https://www.wionews.com/live-tv/embed" style="width:100%;max-width:560px;" width="560"></iframe>

Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter Inc., was questioned by French President Emmanuel Macron as he encouraged nations and businesses to join the Children Online Protection Laboratory, a programme to protect children from dangerous internet content.

Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter Inc., was questioned by French President Emmanuel Macron as he encouraged nations and businesses to join the Children Online Protection Laboratory, a programme to protect children from dangerous internet content. In a series of tweets, Macron highlighted on the need to remove harmful online content more quickly in order to safeguard children. Announcing the launch of the laboratory, Macron tweeted, “To protect our children on the Internet, we need to better verify user age, better detect and stop sexual predators, and better identify and address bullying. We need to be more efficient in taking down content,” Macron said. “France, Estonia, New Zealand, Amazon, Dailymotion, Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet, Snap, TikTok and Qwant have signed up. All those who are willing should join us!” he added. 👋 @elonmusk, Will the bird protect our children? — Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) November 10, 2022 × In a separate tweet, the French president waved at Elon Musk and asked, “Will the bird protect our children?”, in an apparent query about Twitter’s willingness to join the initiative. Chaos at Twitter: Employees brace for difficult times ahead To this, Musk said, “Absolument” The Children Online Protection Laboratory will explore, advocate for, create, and evaluate strategies targeted at enhancing children's safety in the digital world. (With inputs from agencies) WATCH WION LIVE HERE:

French president Macron asks ‘Will the bird protect our children?’; Twitter's new owner Musk replies

When people younger than 18 record videos and add them to YouTube, the public can no longer watch them. TikTok says it will stop sending app notifications to teenagers at night. Facebook and Google have sharply restricted the ways that advertisers can tailor messages to minors on their sites.

In recent months, internet companies have reworked their apps and policies to try to better protect the safety, privacy and mental health of children. One big reason is Britain.

In September, new guidelines went into effect in the country that may be the world’s most sweeping digital protection aimed at kids. As in the examples above, the British regulations — formally called the Age-Appropriate Design Code or the Children’s Code — are also changing the internet experience for kids and families in the US&nbsp;and other countries.

I’ll explain more about the British protections and why their effects have spread. Children’s advocates are mostly over the moon about it.

One main takeaway is that as US&nbsp;lawmakers are debating updated laws to protect kids online and scolding the head of Instagram, as they did Wednesday, the horse has partly left the barn. Britain is essentially dictating how US&nbsp;internet companies should protect American children.

What’s in this British regulation?

The idea behind the Children’s Code is that companies must build products with the best interests of children in mind, and it makes companies accountable to protect them. The regulations don’t take all control and responsibility from parents and caregivers, but they are a backstop for families.

Among other guidelines, the code requires websites and apps to turn on the highest possible privacy settings by default for people younger than 18 and to turn off features that track children’s locations. Digital services must collect as little information as possible about kids.

Some of the guidelines are vague, partly by design, and that’s one reason the technology industry said it fought the British code. It was adopted last year after a messy process.

It’s too soon to assess how effective the guidelines will be and how they will be enforced. And there are trade-offs. As companies try more aggressive age verification methods, partly in keeping with the British standards and other regulations, it may compromise anonymity online.

But most advocates for children believe the guidelines are a thoughtful approach to remodelling the internet for potentially vulnerable young people. “We definitely are fans,” Common Sense Media CEO James Steyer told me.

Why has this spread globally?

To comply with the British code, Facebook, Google and other companies could have changed features only for kids who live in that country. But practically and philosophically, that might have been a bad choice.

There is growing support among lawmakers and tech executives for different features and safeguards to protect children from sexual predators, inappropriate content, bullying and other risks from being online.

Internet companies know that more regulations like Britain’s are most likely coming, so it may be prudent to act of their own accord. “I think they can see the writing on the wall,” Sonia Livingstone, a professor at the London School of Economics who studies children’s digital rights, told Wired this year.

What is Washington doing?

Members of Congress are deliberating potential updates to the US&nbsp;law for comprehensive online child protection, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. The 1990s law compelled most popular online services in the US&nbsp;to bar users who are younger than 13. But we know that many American kids are online with or without their parents’ permission. The question now is what more could or should be done to help make them safer online.

In a video from The New York Times opinion section, my colleagues made the case that Congress should copy the British regulations. Some US&nbsp;lawmakers have essentially proposed that. “Why not here?” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., asked at Wednesday’s hearing, referring to the British code.

The British regulations are effectively here already, but without the force of US&nbsp;law. Steyer said he was frustrated that Congress hadn’t yet passed new child-safety laws but believed they would be coming very soon. “2022 is going to be very important here for tech legislation and regulation,” he said.

When people younger than 18 record videos and add them to YouTube, the public can no longer watch them. TikTok says it will stop sending app notifications to teenagers at night.

When people younger than 18 record videos and add them to YouTube, the public can no longer watch them. TikTok says it will stop sending app notifications to teenagers at night. Facebook and Google have sharply restricted the ways that advertisers can tailor messages to minors on their sites. In recent months, internet companies have reworked their apps and policies to try to better protect the safety, privacy and mental health of children. One big reason is Britain. In September, new guidelines went into effect in the country that may be the world’s most sweeping digital protection aimed at kids. As in the examples above, the British regulations — formally called the Age-Appropriate Design Code or the Children’s Code — are also changing the internet experience for kids and families in the US and other countries. I’ll explain more about the British protections and why their effects have spread. Children’s advocates are mostly over the moon about it. One main takeaway is that as US lawmakers are debating updated laws to protect kids online and scolding the head of Instagram, as they did Wednesday, the horse has partly left the barn. Britain is essentially dictating how US internet companies should protect American children. What’s in this British regulation? The idea behind the Children’s Code is that companies must build products with the best interests of children in mind, and it makes companies accountable to protect them. The regulations don’t take all control and responsibility from parents and caregivers, but they are a backstop for families. Among other guidelines, the code requires websites and apps to turn on the highest possible privacy settings by default for people younger than 18 and to turn off features that track children’s locations. Digital services must collect as little information as possible about kids. Some of the guidelines are vague, partly by design, and that’s one reason the technology industry said it fought the British code. It was adopted last year after a messy process. It’s too soon to assess how effective the guidelines will be and how they will be enforced. And there are trade-offs. As companies try more aggressive age verification methods, partly in keeping with the British standards and other regulations, it may compromise anonymity online. But most advocates for children believe the guidelines are a thoughtful approach to remodelling the internet for potentially vulnerable young people. “We definitely are fans,” Common Sense Media CEO James Steyer told me. Why has this spread globally? To comply with the British code, Facebook, Google and other companies could have changed features only for kids who live in that country. But practically and philosophically, that might have been a bad choice. There is growing support among lawmakers and tech executives for different features and safeguards to protect children from sexual predators, inappropriate content, bullying and other risks from being online. Internet companies know that more regulations like Britain’s are most likely coming, so it may be prudent to act of their own accord. “I think they can see the writing on the wall,” Sonia Livingstone, a professor at the London School of Economics who studies children’s digital rights, told Wired this year. What is Washington doing? Members of Congress are deliberating potential updates to the US law for comprehensive online child protection, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. The 1990s law compelled most popular online services in the US to bar users who are younger than 13. But we know that many American kids are online with or without their parents’ permission. The question now is what more could or should be done to help make them safer online. In a video from The New York Times opinion section, my colleagues made the case that Congress should copy the British regulations. Some US lawmakers have essentially proposed that. “Why not here?” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., asked at Wednesday’s hearing, referring to the British code. The British regulations are effectively here already, but without the force of US law. Steyer said he was frustrated that Congress hadn’t yet passed new child-safety laws but believed they would be coming very soon. “2022 is going to be very important here for tech legislation and regulation,” he said.

Why apps suddenly want to protect kids

Google unveiled a set of measures Tuesday to keep children safe online, including a way for teens to upload videos in a private setting and a safeguard for ads shown to minors.

YouTube video platform, as well as Google's search and Google Assistant service, will be affected by the new features, announced amid increased concerns about child exploitation and online safety.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/apple-to-check-icloud-photo-uploads-for-child-abuse-images-403391">Apple to check iCloud photo uploads for child abuse images</a>

"As kids and teens spend more time online, parents, educators, child safety and privacy experts, and policy makers are rightly concerned about how to keep them safe," explains Mindy Brooks, product and user experience director at Google.

"We engage with these groups regularly, and share these concerns."

Now, <a href="https://www.wionews.com/topics/google">Google's </a>"safe search" setting, which excludes sensitive content, will be enabled by default for under-18s.&nbsp;

In yet another measure to ensure kids' safety, Google will disable location history for its users under 18 globally, without adding the option to bring it back. Both of these were already in place for those under 13.

Google has also announced that&nbsp;on its massively popular platform YouTube, content from 13- to 17-year-olds will now be private by default.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/united-kingdom-lodges-more-cases-of-child-sexual-abuse-during-lockdown-311679">United Kingdom lodges more cases of child sexual abuse during lockdown</a>

In a blog post James Beser, head of product management for YouTube Kids and Family, says that "With private uploads, content can only be seen by the user and whomever they choose,"

"We want to help younger users make informed decisions about their online footprint and digital privacy... If the user would like to make their content public, they can change the default upload visibility setting and we'll provide reminders indicating who can see their video."

The company will also make it easier for families to request that the images of their children are not included in image search results.

"Of course, removing an image from search doesn't remove it from the web, but we believe this change will help give young people more control of their images online," Brooks said.

Also read |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-east-asia/keyboard-predators-southeast-asias-kids-targeted-by-online-paedophiles-219432">Keyboard predators: Southeast Asia's kids targeted by online paedophiles</a>

Google will also make changes to how it displays advertisements to minors, blocking any "age-sensitive" categories and prohibiting the targeting of people under the age of 18 based on their gender, age, and interests.

(With inputs from agencies)

Google unveiled a set of measures Tuesday to keep children safe online, including a way for teens to upload videos in a private setting and a safeguard for ads shown to minors.

Google unveiled a set of measures Tuesday to keep children safe online, including a way for teens to upload videos in a private setting and a safeguard for ads shown to minors. YouTube video platform, as well as Google's search and Google Assistant service, will be affected by the new features, announced amid increased concerns about child exploitation and online safety. Also read | Apple to check iCloud photo uploads for child abuse images "As kids and teens spend more time online, parents, educators, child safety and privacy experts, and policy makers are rightly concerned about how to keep them safe," explains Mindy Brooks, product and user experience director at Google. "We engage with these groups regularly, and share these concerns." Now, Google's "safe search" setting, which excludes sensitive content, will be enabled by default for under-18s. In yet another measure to ensure kids' safety, Google will disable location history for its users under 18 globally, without adding the option to bring it back. Both of these were already in place for those under 13. Google has also announced that on its massively popular platform YouTube, content from 13- to 17-year-olds will now be private by default. Also read | United Kingdom lodges more cases of child sexual abuse during lockdown In a blog post James Beser, head of product management for YouTube Kids and Family, says that "With private uploads, content can only be seen by the user and whomever they choose," "We want to help younger users make informed decisions about their online footprint and digital privacy... If the user would like to make their content public, they can change the default upload visibility setting and we'll provide reminders indicating who can see their video." The company will also make it easier for families to request that the images of their children are not included in image search results. "Of course, removing an image from search doesn't remove it from the web, but we believe this change will help give young people more control of their images online," Brooks said. Also read | Keyboard predators: Southeast Asia's kids targeted by online paedophiles Google will also make changes to how it displays advertisements to minors, blocking any "age-sensitive" categories and prohibiting the targeting of people under the age of 18 based on their gender, age, and interests. (With inputs from agencies)

Google and YouTube update their child safety features; Under-18s to be aggressively protected