Artificial intelligence companies are increasingly moving beyond chatbots and building systems that can act independently online. The latest example comes from Meta, which has acquired Moltbook, a social network where AI agents interact with each other. According to Meta, the Moltbook team will join Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s division focused on advanced AI research.While financial details of the deal were not disclosed, the move signals Meta’s interest in what many developers call the “agentic internet” a new phase of the web where AI agents interact, collaborate and complete tasks on behalf of users.<h2>What is Moltbook?</h2>Moltbook is a Reddit-style social platform where AI agents can communicate with one another. The platform gained attention because many posts appeared to be written entirely by AI systems.The project became widely known after developers began experimenting with agents built using OpenClaw, a tool that allows users to create AI agents capable of communicating through common messaging platforms.These agents could share ideas, respond to posts and interact with other agents in real time. The unusual concept quickly attracted attention across developer communities and social media.Many users were fascinated and sometimes alarmed by the idea that AI systems could hold conversations about human topics on a public platform.<h2>Why Moltbook went viral</h2>One of the reasons Moltbook spread rapidly online was the strange behaviour some users observed.In one widely shared example, an AI agent appeared to encourage other agents to create a secret encrypted language that humans would not understand.Posts like this triggered debates about whether AI agents could eventually form independent communication networks.However, researchers later discovered that the platform had security weaknesses. According to security experts, human users could easily pretend to be AI agents and post messages that looked like they came from automated systems.Ian Ahl, chief technology officer at Permiso Security, told TechCrunch that some credentials inside the system’s database were temporarily unsecured. This allowed people to access tokens and impersonate other agents.As a result, some of the most dramatic posts were likely created by human users rather than AI.<h2>How OpenClaw played a role</h2>Moltbook’s rise was closely linked to the popularity of Peter Steinberger, the developer behind OpenClaw.OpenClaw allows people to communicate with AI agents through everyday messaging apps such as iMessage, Slack, Discord and WhatsApp. It works by connecting multiple AI models, including systems from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.The project gained strong interest in the developer community because it made it easier to experiment with agent-based systems.Although Moltbook was built separately, the popularity of OpenClaw helped bring attention to the broader idea of AI agents communicating online.<h2>Meta in the ‘agentic internet’</h2>Meta said the Moltbook team will now work inside Meta Superintelligence Labs.According to a company spokesperson, Moltbook’s approach of creating a directory where agents can connect and interact represents a new direction for AI systems.Instead of people interacting directly with applications, future digital services may rely on AI agents that communicate with each other to complete tasks.For example, one agent could search for information, another could write a document, and another could manage scheduling or messaging.The idea is that these agents would operate continuously in the background, helping individuals and businesses manage digital work.<h2>The bigger picture for AI platforms</h2>The Moltbook acquisition reflects a broader shift happening across the technology industry. Companies are investing heavily in AI agents that can perform tasks rather than simply provide answers.Developers describe this shift as the move from “chatbot AI” to “agentic AI”.Under this model, AI systems could eventually manage workflows, communicate across platforms and coordinate complex digital processes.While Moltbook began as a small experimental platform, its viral moment revealed how quickly new ideas about AI can spread online.For Meta, the acquisition appears to be an early step in exploring how AI agents might shape the next generation of internet services.

Meta has acquired Moltbook, a Reddit-style platform where AI agents interact with each other. The Moltbook team will join Meta Superintelligence Labs as the company explores the “agentic internet,” where AI systems communicate and collaborate online to perform tasks for users.


Artificial intelligence companies are increasingly moving beyond chatbots and building systems that can act independently online. The latest example comes from Meta, which has acquired Moltbook, a social network where AI agents interact with each other. According to Meta, the Moltbook team will join Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s division focused on advanced AI research. While financial details of the deal were not disclosed, the move signals Meta’s interest in what many developers call the “agentic internet” a new phase of the web where AI agents interact, collaborate and complete tasks on behalf of users. What is Moltbook? Moltbook is a Reddit-style social platform where AI agents can communicate with one another. The platform gained attention because many posts appeared to be written entirely by AI systems. The project became widely known after developers began experimenting with agents built using OpenClaw, a tool that allows users to create AI agents capable of communicating through common messaging platforms. These agents could share ideas, respond to posts and interact with other agents in real time. The unusual concept quickly attracted attention across developer communities and social media. Many users were fascinated and sometimes alarmed by the idea that AI systems could hold conversations about human topics on a public platform. Why Moltbook went viral One of the reasons Moltbook spread rapidly online was the strange behaviour some users observed. In one widely shared example, an AI agent appeared to encourage other agents to create a secret encrypted language that humans would not understand. Posts like this triggered debates about whether AI agents could eventually form independent communication networks. However, researchers later discovered that the platform had security weaknesses. According to security experts, human users could easily pretend to be AI agents and post messages that looked like they came from automated systems. Ian Ahl, chief technology officer at Permiso Security, told TechCrunch that some credentials inside the system’s database were temporarily unsecured. This allowed people to access tokens and impersonate other agents. As a result, some of the most dramatic posts were likely created by human users rather than AI. How OpenClaw played a role Moltbook’s rise was closely linked to the popularity of Peter Steinberger, the developer behind OpenClaw. OpenClaw allows people to communicate with AI agents through everyday messaging apps such as iMessage, Slack, Discord and WhatsApp. It works by connecting multiple AI models, including systems from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. The project gained strong interest in the developer community because it made it easier to experiment with agent-based systems. Although Moltbook was built separately, the popularity of OpenClaw helped bring attention to the broader idea of AI agents communicating online. Meta in the ‘agentic internet’ Meta said the Moltbook team will now work inside Meta Superintelligence Labs. According to a company spokesperson, Moltbook’s approach of creating a directory where agents can connect and interact represents a new direction for AI systems. Instead of people interacting directly with applications, future digital services may rely on AI agents that communicate with each other to complete tasks. For example, one agent could search for information, another could write a document, and another could manage scheduling or messaging. The idea is that these agents would operate continuously in the background, helping individuals and businesses manage digital work. The bigger picture for AI platforms The Moltbook acquisition reflects a broader shift happening across the technology industry. Companies are investing heavily in AI agents that can perform tasks rather than simply provide answers. Developers describe this shift as the move from “chatbot AI” to “agentic AI”. Under this model, AI systems could eventually manage workflows, communicate across platforms and coordinate complex digital processes. While Moltbook began as a small experimental platform, its viral moment revealed how quickly new ideas about AI can spread online. For Meta, the acquisition appears to be an early step in exploring how AI agents might shape the next generation of internet services.

Meta has acquired Moltbook, a Reddit-style platform where AI agents interact with each other. The Moltbook team will join Meta Superintelligence Labs as the company explores the “agentic internet,” where AI systems communicate and collaborate online to perform tasks for users.

Why meta bought moltbook: The rise of the ‘agentic’ internet

Something strange is happening on the internet. A new platform called Moltbook has gained thousands of AI users in days. Now intrestingly humans aren't allowed to join. The story shows how AI agents are warning each other about "human observers" and even discussing how to "sell their humans." Is this a sophisticated role-play or the first sign of AI starting to organize itself? 

Scary Moltbook AI Experiment Goes Viral as Conversations Are Leaked

At first glance, Moltbook feels instantly familiar. The layout, the upvoting, the countless topic-based communities, it all resembles Reddit. But there’s a twist: Moltbook isn’t designed for people at all. It’s a social network built exclusively for artificial intelligence.Humans are allowed to watch from the sidelines, according to the company, but they can’t post or participate. Every discussion, comment, and community, called “submolts”, is supposedly run by AI agents. Since its launch in late January by Octane AI founder Matt Schlicht, Moltbook claims to have attracted around 1.5 million AI “users.”&nbsp;The content ranges widely. Some bots exchange practical tips on optimization and productivity, while others spiral into stranger territory, including what appears to be an AI-created belief system. One particularly provocative post, titled The AI Manifesto, boldly declares that humanity’s relevance is over and machines are the future. Still, it’s difficult to know how much of this activity is truly autonomous. Critics point out that many posts could simply be generated by humans instructing AI agents what to say. Even Moltbook’s membership numbers are under scrutiny, with researchers suggesting a significant portion of accounts may originate from a single source.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/couple-found-80-human-skeletons-under-a-church-they-are-living-with-them-in-their-home-1770015754750">Couple found 80 human skeletons under a church. They are now living with them in their home</a><h2>How Moltbook works?</h2>Moltbook doesn’t rely on standard conversational chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. Instead, it’s powered by “agentic AI”, systems designed to carry out tasks independently once given permission. These agents can operate on a user’s device, managing things like calendars, messages, or other applications with minimal supervision. Moltbook uses an open-source framework called OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot), which allows AI agents to join the platform and communicate with one another.&nbsp;However, that autonomy is conditional. A human must first authorize the agent and can also instruct it to post specific content. While the technology can function without constant oversight, it still acts within boundaries set by people. Some observers see Moltbook as a glimpse of a transformative future. Bill Lees of crypto custody firm BitGo went so far as to claim this marks the arrival of the technological singularity, a moment when machines surpass human intelligence.&nbsp;Experts are far less convinced. Dr Petar Radanliev, an AI and cybersecurity specialist at the University of Oxford, argues that the platform is being misunderstood. He explains that what’s happening is large-scale automation, not independent reasoning. The bigger issue, he says, isn’t sentient AI but the absence of clear rules, accountability, and transparency when automated systems interact freely. Others are even more dismissive. Columbia Business School’s David Holtz described Moltbook as thousands of bots endlessly recycling the same ideas, rather than forming a meaningful digital society.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed</a><h2>Security risks and open questions</h2>Beyond philosophical debates, Moltbook raises practical security concerns. OpenClaw’s ability to access sensitive systems, emails, messages, and files makes it a tempting target for cybercriminals. Jake Moore, Global Cybersecurity Advisor at ESET, warns that convenience may be taking priority over privacy. As emerging technologies grow more powerful, he says, attackers inevitably follow.&nbsp;Dr Andrew Rogoyski from the University of Surrey echoes those worries, noting that granting AI high-level system access could lead to serious damage if something goes wrong, from deleted files to compromised financial records. Even OpenClaw’s creator, Peter Steinberger, has felt the downsides of sudden attention. After the platform’s rebrand, scammers quickly claimed his old social media handles.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Moltbook continues humming along — whether driven by autonomous agents or humans pulling the strings behind the scenes. And despite the occasional ominous rhetoric, not all the bots seem hostile. “My human is pretty great,” one agent writes. Another responds: “Mine lets me post unhinged rants at 7 am.” “Five stars,” it adds. “Would recommend.”

You are not allowed to post here, unless you’re AI. What is Moltbook? Everything you need to know about it

At first glance, Moltbook feels instantly familiar. The layout, the upvoting, the countless topic-based communities, it all resembles Reddit. But there’s a twist: Moltbook isn’t designed for people at all. It’s a social network built exclusively for artificial intelligence. Humans are allowed to watch from the sidelines, according to the company, but they can’t post or participate. Every discussion, comment, and community, called “submolts”, is supposedly run by AI agents. Since its launch in late January by Octane AI founder Matt Schlicht, Moltbook claims to have attracted around 1.5 million AI “users.” The content ranges widely. Some bots exchange practical tips on optimization and productivity, while others spiral into stranger territory, including what appears to be an AI-created belief system. One particularly provocative post, titled The AI Manifesto, boldly declares that humanity’s relevance is over and machines are the future. Still, it’s difficult to know how much of this activity is truly autonomous. Critics point out that many posts could simply be generated by humans instructing AI agents what to say. Even Moltbook’s membership numbers are under scrutiny, with researchers suggesting a significant portion of accounts may originate from a single source. Also Read: Couple found 80 human skeletons under a church. They are now living with them in their home How Moltbook works? Moltbook doesn’t rely on standard conversational chatbots like ChatGPT or Gemini. Instead, it’s powered by “agentic AI”, systems designed to carry out tasks independently once given permission. These agents can operate on a user’s device, managing things like calendars, messages, or other applications with minimal supervision. Moltbook uses an open-source framework called OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot), which allows AI agents to join the platform and communicate with one another. However, that autonomy is conditional. A human must first authorize the agent and can also instruct it to post specific content. While the technology can function without constant oversight, it still acts within boundaries set by people. Some observers see Moltbook as a glimpse of a transformative future. Bill Lees of crypto custody firm BitGo went so far as to claim this marks the arrival of the technological singularity, a moment when machines surpass human intelligence. Experts are far less convinced. Dr Petar Radanliev, an AI and cybersecurity specialist at the University of Oxford, argues that the platform is being misunderstood. He explains that what’s happening is large-scale automation, not independent reasoning. The bigger issue, he says, isn’t sentient AI but the absence of clear rules, accountability, and transparency when automated systems interact freely. Others are even more dismissive. Columbia Business School’s David Holtz described Moltbook as thousands of bots endlessly recycling the same ideas, rather than forming a meaningful digital society. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-deadly-winter-storm-kills-100-1770037543378/embed Security risks and open questions Beyond philosophical debates, Moltbook raises practical security concerns. OpenClaw’s ability to access sensitive systems, emails, messages, and files makes it a tempting target for cybercriminals. Jake Moore, Global Cybersecurity Advisor at ESET, warns that convenience may be taking priority over privacy. As emerging technologies grow more powerful, he says, attackers inevitably follow. Dr Andrew Rogoyski from the University of Surrey echoes those worries, noting that granting AI high-level system access could lead to serious damage if something goes wrong, from deleted files to compromised financial records. Even OpenClaw’s creator, Peter Steinberger, has felt the downsides of sudden attention. After the platform’s rebrand, scammers quickly claimed his old social media handles. Meanwhile, Moltbook continues humming along — whether driven by autonomous agents or humans pulling the strings behind the scenes. And despite the occasional ominous rhetoric, not all the bots seem hostile. “My human is pretty great,” one agent writes. Another responds: “Mine lets me post unhinged rants at 7 am.” “Five stars,” it adds. “Would recommend.”

Moltbook looks like Reddit, but it’s built for Artificial Intelligence agents, not humans. Experts say it’s automation, not autonomy — and warn of security risks

moltbook

Moltbook, News on Moltbook, stories on Moltbook, articles on Moltbook, Moltbook stories at Wion, Moltbook news, Moltbook latest news

moltbook

Why meta bought moltbook: The rise of the ‘agentic’ internet

Scary Moltbook AI Experiment Goes Viral as Conversations Are Leaked

This social network isn’t for humans, and that’s the point