Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLAs on Tuesday staged a walkout from the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly after objecting to the resolution on statehood passed by the House a day earlier, calling it “unconstitutional.” The BJP legislators created an uproar in the House and raised slogans against the government. They also alleged that Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather was acting in a partisan manner. During the proceedings, Leader of Opposition (LoP) Sunil Sharma again raised the issue of the removal of the Speaker.&nbsp;Responding to Sharma, Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather asserted his authority and said he was aware of the powers vested in his office. “I know my powers. I have already told you yesterday about the procedure. Don’t teach me,” Rather told the LoP. “Hooliganism will not work here,” the Speaker added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/j-k-assembly-passes-statehood-resolution-omar-abdullah-if-statehood-depends-on-end-of-militancy-decision-will-depend-on-pakistan-1790590604033">J&amp;K assembly passes statehood resolution</a>&nbsp;The exchange came a day after BJP MLAs served a notice seeking the removal of the Speaker and raised slogans inside the House, including “Kursi Chhodo, Kursi Chhodo, Speaker Sahab.” The BJP has maintained that the statehood resolution was unconstitutional, while the government has defended the legislative proceedings and the resolution. The BJP members subsequently walked out of the House amid the continued protests.&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier on Monday, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah questioned the Centre’s repeated assertion that statehood will be restored to Jammu and Kashmir at the “right time”, asking what parameters determine when that time will arrive. Speaking in the backdrop of the controversy over the statehood resolution moved by him in the J&amp;K Legislative Assembly, Abdullah said amendments brought to the resolution, including by legislators from his own party, had given the BJP an opportunity to protest inside the House.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/omar-questions-centre-s-right-time-for-j-k-statehood-raises-advocate-general-appointment-1790585643926">Omar questions Centre’s ‘right time’ for J&amp;K statehood</a>&nbsp;According to Abdullah, the communication conveyed the government’s position that the resolution should not be discussed on the ground that the matter was sub judice. The Chief Minister also questioned the prolonged absence of an Advocate General for Jammu and Kashmir. “We had given a name for the post of Advocate General of J&amp;K. It’s been two years and we still have no one,” Abdullah said. He asked the BJP to clarify which state or Union Territory in the country was functioning without an Advocate General.

BJP MLAs walked out of the J&K Assembly after opposing the statehood resolution passed a day earlier and calling it unconstitutional. The row also saw a clash between LoP Sunil Sharma and Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather, with BJP demanding the Speaker's removal.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLAs on Tuesday staged a walkout from the Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly after objecting to the resolution on statehood passed by the House a day earlier, calling it “unconstitutional.” The BJP legislators created an uproar in the House and raised slogans against the government. They also alleged that Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather was acting in a partisan manner. During the proceedings, Leader of Opposition (LoP) Sunil Sharma again raised the issue of the removal of the Speaker. Responding to Sharma, Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather asserted his authority and said he was aware of the powers vested in his office. “I know my powers. I have already told you yesterday about the procedure. Don’t teach me,” Rather told the LoP. “Hooliganism will not work here,” the Speaker added. Also Read: J&K assembly passes statehood resolution The exchange came a day after BJP MLAs served a notice seeking the removal of the Speaker and raised slogans inside the House, including “Kursi Chhodo, Kursi Chhodo, Speaker Sahab.” The BJP has maintained that the statehood resolution was unconstitutional, while the government has defended the legislative proceedings and the resolution. The BJP members subsequently walked out of the House amid the continued protests. Earlier on Monday, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah questioned the Centre’s repeated assertion that statehood will be restored to Jammu and Kashmir at the “right time”, asking what parameters determine when that time will arrive. Speaking in the backdrop of the controversy over the statehood resolution moved by him in the J&K Legislative Assembly, Abdullah said amendments brought to the resolution, including by legislators from his own party, had given the BJP an opportunity to protest inside the House. Also Read: Omar questions Centre’s ‘right time’ for J&K statehood According to Abdullah, the communication conveyed the government’s position that the resolution should not be discussed on the ground that the matter was sub judice. The Chief Minister also questioned the prolonged absence of an Advocate General for Jammu and Kashmir. “We had given a name for the post of Advocate General of J&K. It’s been two years and we still have no one,” Abdullah said. He asked the BJP to clarify which state or Union Territory in the country was functioning without an Advocate General.

BJP MLAs walked out of the J&amp;K Assembly after opposing the statehood resolution passed a day earlier and calling it unconstitutional. The row also saw a clash between LoP Sunil Sharma and Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather, with BJP demanding the Speaker's removal.

BJP MLAs walk out of J&K Assembly, call statehood resolution ‘unconstitutional’

The Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly on Monday passed Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s resolution calling for the immediate restoration of full statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, amid strong protests and a walkout by BJP legislators. Reacting to the Centre’s repeated assertion that statehood would be restored at the “right time”, Abdullah questioned what parameters would determine when that time would arrive. Abdullah said that if the Centre’s position were that statehood could be restored only after militancy ends completely, the decision would effectively depend on Pakistan. “If it is being said that statehood will be restored after militancy ends completely, then the decision will depend on Pakistan,” Abdullah said, alleging that Pakistan was responsible for militancy in Kashmir. He also questioned whether security or militancy were being treated as the parameters for determining the “right time” for restoring statehood. The resolution has triggered a confrontation between the ruling benches and the BJP, particularly over references to earlier Assembly resolutions, including the June 26, 2000 resolution on autonomy, which called for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s pre-1953 constitutional position. The resolution also referred to an Assembly resolution dated November 6, 2024. As the autumn session resumed, BJP legislators led by Leader of Opposition Sunil Sharma entered the Well of the House and raised slogans against the Omar Abdullah-led government. BJP members also protested against Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather and moved a formal motion seeking his removal.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sc-refuses-to-stay-fee-on-upi-transactions-seeks-explanation-from-centre-1790584257232">SC refuses to stay fee on UPI transactions, seeks explanation from Centre</a> BJP MLA R.S. Pathania informed the Speaker that the party had submitted the notice, alleging bias in the conduct of House proceedings and claiming that the opposition was not being given adequate opportunity to place its objections on record. Speaker Rather repeatedly urged the protesting members to return to their seats and warned that hooliganism would not be allowed, indicating that disciplinary action could follow if the disruption continued. The BJP legislators continued their protest inside the Well of the House while proceedings were underway and later walked out of the Assembly. Abdullah also alleged that the Chief Secretary had written to the Speaker regarding the statehood resolution, conveying the government’s position that the resolution should not be discussed on the ground that the matter was sub judice. The Chief Minister further raised the issue of the prolonged vacancy in the post of Advocate General of Jammu and Kashmir. He said a name had been proposed for the position nearly two years ago, but the Union Territory still had no Advocate General. “We had given a name for the post of Advocate General of J&amp;K. It’s been two years and we still have no one,” Abdullah said, asking the BJP to clarify which other state or Union Territory was functioning without an Advocate General. The latest confrontation has added to tensions during the ongoing autumn session, which has already witnessed protests over power tariffs, demands raised by NHM employees and the duration of the session.

Abdullah questioned the Centre's "right time" line on restoring J&K statehood, asking what parameters determine it. If restoration awaits an end to militancy, he said, the decision would effectively rest with Pakistan.

The Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly on Monday passed Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s resolution calling for the immediate restoration of full statehood to Jammu and Kashmir, amid strong protests and a walkout by BJP legislators. Reacting to the Centre’s repeated assertion that statehood would be restored at the “right time”, Abdullah questioned what parameters would determine when that time would arrive. Abdullah said that if the Centre’s position were that statehood could be restored only after militancy ends completely, the decision would effectively depend on Pakistan. “If it is being said that statehood will be restored after militancy ends completely, then the decision will depend on Pakistan,” Abdullah said, alleging that Pakistan was responsible for militancy in Kashmir. He also questioned whether security or militancy were being treated as the parameters for determining the “right time” for restoring statehood. The resolution has triggered a confrontation between the ruling benches and the BJP, particularly over references to earlier Assembly resolutions, including the June 26, 2000 resolution on autonomy, which called for restoration of Jammu and Kashmir’s pre-1953 constitutional position. The resolution also referred to an Assembly resolution dated November 6, 2024. As the autumn session resumed, BJP legislators led by Leader of Opposition Sunil Sharma entered the Well of the House and raised slogans against the Omar Abdullah-led government. BJP members also protested against Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather and moved a formal motion seeking his removal. Also read: SC refuses to stay fee on UPI transactions, seeks explanation from Centre BJP MLA R.S. Pathania informed the Speaker that the party had submitted the notice, alleging bias in the conduct of House proceedings and claiming that the opposition was not being given adequate opportunity to place its objections on record. Speaker Rather repeatedly urged the protesting members to return to their seats and warned that hooliganism would not be allowed, indicating that disciplinary action could follow if the disruption continued. The BJP legislators continued their protest inside the Well of the House while proceedings were underway and later walked out of the Assembly. Abdullah also alleged that the Chief Secretary had written to the Speaker regarding the statehood resolution, conveying the government’s position that the resolution should not be discussed on the ground that the matter was sub judice. The Chief Minister further raised the issue of the prolonged vacancy in the post of Advocate General of Jammu and Kashmir. He said a name had been proposed for the position nearly two years ago, but the Union Territory still had no Advocate General. “We had given a name for the post of Advocate General of J&K. It’s been two years and we still have no one,” Abdullah said, asking the BJP to clarify which other state or Union Territory was functioning without an Advocate General. The latest confrontation has added to tensions during the ongoing autumn session, which has already witnessed protests over power tariffs, demands raised by NHM employees and the duration of the session.

Abdullah questioned the Centre's "right time" line on restoring J&amp;K statehood, asking what parameters determine it. If restoration awaits an end to militancy, he said, the decision would effectively rest with Pakistan.

J&K assembly passes statehood resolution. Omar Abdullah: If statehood depends on end of militancy, decision will depend on Pakistan

jk-statehood-restoration

J&k Statehood Restoration, News on J&k Statehood Restoration, stories on J&k Statehood Restoration, articles on J&k Statehood Restoration, J&k Statehood Restoration stories at Wion, J&k Statehood Restoration news, J&k Statehood Restoration latest news

jk statehood-restoration

BJP MLAs walk out of J&K Assembly, call statehood resolution ‘unconstitutional’

If statehood restoration depends on end of militancy, it is up to Pak: J&K CM