Israel's first privately funded mission to moon fails. Watch video to know more

Israeli spacecraft crash lands on moon

Gaza amputees tackle trauma with football

An<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-launches-gaza-strikes-after-rockets-fired-at-tel-aviv-203444"> Israeli </a>air strike in central<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/syrian-army-says-israeli-strikes-hit-northern-aleppo-city-damages-materials-only-206124"> Syria </a>wounded three combatants early Saturday, the official SANA news agency reported.

A Britain-based war monitor said the strike killed several Iranian fighters and wounded 17 Syrian troops and their allies.

An Israeli military spokesman declined to comment on the foreign media report.

"Around 2:30 am (2330 GMT Friday)... the Israeli air force carried out a strike targeting one of our military positions in the town of Misyaf," in Hama province north of Damascus, SANA quoted a military source as saying.

"Our air defence batteries intercepted some of the Israeli missiles," the source said, adding that the strike "wounded three combatants and destroyed buildings".

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the strike targeted a Syrian military college in the town and two buildings used by Iranian forces in nearby villages -- a development centre for medium-range missiles in Zawi and a training camp in Sheikh Ghadban.&nbsp;

Israel has carried out hundreds of air strikes in Syria against what it says are Iranian and Hezbollah targets.

With the support of the US administration of President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed repeatedly to take whatever military action he deems necessary to prevent archfoe Iran and its Lebanese ally Hezbollah establishing a continuing military presence.

Late last month, Trump broke with decades of international consensus to recognise Israel's unilateral annexation of the strategic Golan Heights, seized from Syria in the Six-Day War of 1967.

The move was a diplomatic prize for Israel but met with a chorus of opposition from US foes and allies alike.

Iran and Hezbollah have both intervened in Syria's civil war, which erupted in 2011 to support forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad.

They were joined in 2015 by Russia, which supplied its S300 air defence system to Assad's forces after a Russian aircraft was downed by mistake by Syrian defence systems during an Israeli raid on September 17, killing all 15 people on board.

After several months of frosty relations, Russia and Israeli resumed coordination of their military operations in Syria and Israel's bombing campaign picked up again.

An Israeli air strike in central Syria wounded three combatants early Saturday, the official SANA news agency reported. A Britain-based war monitor said the strike killed several Iranian fighters and wounded 17 Syrian troops and their allies.

An Israeli air strike in central Syria wounded three combatants early Saturday, the official SANA news agency reported. A Britain-based war monitor said the strike killed several Iranian fighters and wounded 17 Syrian troops and their allies. An Israeli military spokesman declined to comment on the foreign media report. "Around 2:30 am (2330 GMT Friday)... the Israeli air force carried out a strike targeting one of our military positions in the town of Misyaf," in Hama province north of Damascus, SANA quoted a military source as saying. "Our air defence batteries intercepted some of the Israeli missiles," the source said, adding that the strike "wounded three combatants and destroyed buildings". The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the strike targeted a Syrian military college in the town and two buildings used by Iranian forces in nearby villages -- a development centre for medium-range missiles in Zawi and a training camp in Sheikh Ghadban. Israel has carried out hundreds of air strikes in Syria against what it says are Iranian and Hezbollah targets. With the support of the US administration of President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed repeatedly to take whatever military action he deems necessary to prevent archfoe Iran and its Lebanese ally Hezbollah establishing a continuing military presence. Late last month, Trump broke with decades of international consensus to recognise Israel's unilateral annexation of the strategic Golan Heights, seized from Syria in the Six-Day War of 1967. The move was a diplomatic prize for Israel but met with a chorus of opposition from US foes and allies alike. Iran and Hezbollah have both intervened in Syria's civil war, which erupted in 2011 to support forces loyal to President Bashar al-Assad. They were joined in 2015 by Russia, which supplied its S300 air defence system to Assad's forces after a Russian aircraft was downed by mistake by Syrian defence systems during an Israeli raid on September 17, killing all 15 people on board. After several months of frosty relations, Russia and Israeli resumed coordination of their military operations in Syria and Israel's bombing campaign picked up again.

Israel raid wounds three in central Syria: state media

The Israeli spacecraft Beresheet crashed onto the moon on Thursday (April 11) after a series of technical failures during its final descent, shattering hopes of a historic controlled landing on the lunar surface. Watch video to know more.

Israeli spacecraft crashes onto moon after technical failures

The first privately funded mission to the Moon has crashed on the lunar surface after the apparent failure of its main engine.

Israel's Beresheet spacecraft crashes on Moon due to main engine failure

The Lok Sabha elections spread over April and May have kept us distracted from other democratic battles elsewhere. Ranging from the microstate Maldives to Israel, parliamentary elections have thrown up interesting and not entirely expected results.

The Maldives first. No more than a pinpoint on the world map these atolls- a little over eleven hundred islets-have caused considerable concern to India in recent past. A few years back democratically elected president Nasheed was ousted by Yameen who debarred him from contesting elections and forced him into exile. Keeping the sensitivities of a smaller neighbour in mind India acted wisely by not offering political asylum or succour to Nasheed and remained strictly neutral. However, this did not deter Yameen from playing the China card against India. Lucrative contracts granted to Indian companies were rescinded and in some case allotted to Chinese companies.

The Chinese were quick to offer economic and technical aid but it wasn’t long before critics of Yameen could discern the debt trap looming large in Chinese designs. There were allegations of kickbacks and the president and his cronies were accused of mortgaging Maldivian sovereignty to Chinese. In some cases the Chinese projects to build ports, landing strips etc were tied to the concession of extra-territorial rights. The Indians were understandably alarmed.&nbsp;

Ironically, the gift of two Indian helicopters to cope with natural calamities was criticised as the deployment of foreign troops by officials close to the president.&nbsp;

It wasn’t only the Chinese that Yameen cultivated recklessly. He also tried to draw Pakistan in as a counterweight to India. True, that the overwhelming majority of Maldives population comprise Sunni Muslims and that the Maldives has enjoyed centuries-old trading ties with seafaring Arabs, however, this doesn’t mean that it can turn its back on the Indian subcontinent. It is India that has come to its aid when the Tsunami struck or to fend off the threat of a coup when Gayoom- the predecessor of Nasheed was at the helm.&nbsp;

Maldives economy is dependent on high-value tourism that is managed and serviced largely by immigrant Indians. It is difficult to imagine that it can survive-far less flourish- antagonising India. Encouraged by China and Pakistan Yameen had flirted dangerously with elements inimical to India. Many of the uninhabited islets provide an ideal sanctuary for pirates and smugglers who can be cultivated and abused by terrorists hostile to us. This is primarily the reason that the government of India has chosen repeatedly to overlook pinpricks and even pocket provocative insults like humiliations heaped on the Indian envoy. It is in this context that the victory of Nasheed’s party in presidential elections some time back and now in parliamentary elections has generated a feeling of euphoria in India.

We would be wise to tread with caution. China and Pakistan and Saudi Arm a step removed can’t be expected to yield without a contest. Also, the new government can ill afford to displease the Chinese. It will face a daunting task to disentangle itself from the tangled web the Chinese have woven to trap their tiny, but strategically sensitive, country. It will be worth watching how the Blue Water Indian Navy acquits itself in keeping this part of the Indian Ocean free from external powers meddling here.&nbsp; 
 
On the other hand, the victory of Netanyahu in Israel is also bound to pose complex challenges for India. In recent years Israel has emerged as an important source of military hardware for us. From a Pariah it has become an invaluable strategic partner that can help us combat terrorist flaunting Aggressive Islamic ideology. Much has been made of the affinities between strong leaders-true, Modi and Netanyahu. 
 
But such comparisons are simplistic. One can remain blind to the fact that the closer we are prodded to Israel by the US the farther we move from our traditional allies like Iran, Russia and the Palestinians. None can deny that in Syria, the trio of Russia, Iran and Lebanon are in a much better position that forces on ground friendly to the US. Saudi Arab is no longer predominant power in the region in the aftermath of falling oil prices and the Khashoggi Affair. Lybia is once again in turmoil and Turkey too is full of uncertainties and unrest. Israel and Iran are sharply focused on their national-strategic interests. One can’t say the same about India. 
 
Nor can India afford to overlook that Netanyahu has registered a slender victory over his comparatively youthful adversary Gentz. He may be in a much better position to form a coalition government but he can’t claim to be in an unassailable position. He is embroiled in serious allegations of corruptions that can destabilise his government. The many issues that divide Israeli society today seem to be beyond his grasp. He may have set a record by registering five straight wins but India should keep scanning the horizon before hastily joining celebrations. 
 
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.) &nbsp; 
&nbsp;

The Lok Sabha elections spread over April and May have kept us distracted from other democratic battles elsewhere. Ranging from the microstate Maldives to Israel, parliamentary elections have thrown up interesting and not entirely expected results.

The Lok Sabha elections spread over April and May have kept us distracted from other democratic battles elsewhere. Ranging from the microstate Maldives to Israel, parliamentary elections have thrown up interesting and not entirely expected results. The Maldives first. No more than a pinpoint on the world map these atolls- a little over eleven hundred islets-have caused considerable concern to India in recent past. A few years back democratically elected president Nasheed was ousted by Yameen who debarred him from contesting elections and forced him into exile. Keeping the sensitivities of a smaller neighbour in mind India acted wisely by not offering political asylum or succour to Nasheed and remained strictly neutral. However, this did not deter Yameen from playing the China card against India. Lucrative contracts granted to Indian companies were rescinded and in some case allotted to Chinese companies. The Chinese were quick to offer economic and technical aid but it wasn’t long before critics of Yameen could discern the debt trap looming large in Chinese designs. There were allegations of kickbacks and the president and his cronies were accused of mortgaging Maldivian sovereignty to Chinese. In some cases the Chinese projects to build ports, landing strips etc were tied to the concession of extra-territorial rights. The Indians were understandably alarmed. Ironically, the gift of two Indian helicopters to cope with natural calamities was criticised as the deployment of foreign troops by officials close to the president. It wasn’t only the Chinese that Yameen cultivated recklessly. He also tried to draw Pakistan in as a counterweight to India. True, that the overwhelming majority of Maldives population comprise Sunni Muslims and that the Maldives has enjoyed centuries-old trading ties with seafaring Arabs, however, this doesn’t mean that it can turn its back on the Indian subcontinent. It is India that has come to its aid when the Tsunami struck or to fend off the threat of a coup when Gayoom- the predecessor of Nasheed was at the helm. Maldives economy is dependent on high-value tourism that is managed and serviced largely by immigrant Indians. It is difficult to imagine that it can survive-far less flourish- antagonising India. Encouraged by China and Pakistan Yameen had flirted dangerously with elements inimical to India. Many of the uninhabited islets provide an ideal sanctuary for pirates and smugglers who can be cultivated and abused by terrorists hostile to us. This is primarily the reason that the government of India has chosen repeatedly to overlook pinpricks and even pocket provocative insults like humiliations heaped on the Indian envoy. It is in this context that the victory of Nasheed’s party in presidential elections some time back and now in parliamentary elections has generated a feeling of euphoria in India. We would be wise to tread with caution. China and Pakistan and Saudi Arm a step removed can’t be expected to yield without a contest. Also, the new government can ill afford to displease the Chinese. It will face a daunting task to disentangle itself from the tangled web the Chinese have woven to trap their tiny, but strategically sensitive, country. It will be worth watching how the Blue Water Indian Navy acquits itself in keeping this part of the Indian Ocean free from external powers meddling here. On the other hand, the victory of Netanyahu in Israel is also bound to pose complex challenges for India. In recent years Israel has emerged as an important source of military hardware for us. From a Pariah it has become an invaluable strategic partner that can help us combat terrorist flaunting Aggressive Islamic ideology. Much has been made of the affinities between strong leaders-true, Modi and Netanyahu. But such comparisons are simplistic. One can remain blind to the fact that the closer we are prodded to Israel by the US the farther we move from our traditional allies like Iran, Russia and the Palestinians. None can deny that in Syria, the trio of Russia, Iran and Lebanon are in a much better position that forces on ground friendly to the US. Saudi Arab is no longer predominant power in the region in the aftermath of falling oil prices and the Khashoggi Affair. Lybia is once again in turmoil and Turkey too is full of uncertainties and unrest. Israel and Iran are sharply focused on their national-strategic interests. One can’t say the same about India. Nor can India afford to overlook that Netanyahu has registered a slender victory over his comparatively youthful adversary Gentz. He may be in a much better position to form a coalition government but he can’t claim to be in an unassailable position. He is embroiled in serious allegations of corruptions that can destabilise his government. The many issues that divide Israeli society today seem to be beyond his grasp. He may have set a record by registering five straight wins but India should keep scanning the horizon before hastily joining celebrations. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.)

How Nasheed's comeback in Maldives and Netanyahu's fifth term as Israeli PM impact India

Ties between India & Israel reached new heights under Modi & Netanyahu's rule. Here's why the elections in Israel matters to India.

Gravitas: Why the Israel elections matter to India

It's Often Said That Coalition Governments Cannot Take Tough Decisions Like Dictatorial Regimes Like China. Israel Remains An Exception

Gravitas: Are Coalition Governments always unstable? Israel bucks the trend

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Benny Gantz, an ex-general and leader of a centrist party, both claimed victory on Tuesday night in the closely-fought election race, despite exit polls showing no clear winner.

Israel election: 96% of votes counted so far, Netanyahu on track to form government

Israel Elections: PM Narendra Modi congratulates Netanyahu

Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s conservative prime minister for the past decade, and his chief rival, Benny Gantz, a centrist former military chief, were locked in a tight race in Tuesday’s parliamentary election. Watch video to know more.

Israel election: Netanyahu slightly ahead in tight race

Watch current reports of Israel election by Daniele Pagani, West-Asia chief of WION from Israel. Watch complete video to get proper details.

Will Israeli PM Netanyahu secure 5th term?

PM Benjamin Netanyahu is likely to secure a record fifth term after almost complete results from Israel's election suggest a new right-wing coalition. Watch video to know more.

Israel election: Netanyahu edges towards 5th straight win

Discusses Israel Polls hot topics with Dr. Azriel Bermant, Int. Affair Expert from Jerusalem. Watch complete video for more details.

Discusses Israel Polls' hot topics with Dr. Azriel Bermant, Int. Affair Expert from Jerusalem

Israel's Arab minority pledges to boycott election

Despite advanced technology, Israel prefers paper ballots in its elections. Here's something you did not expect from Israel. The technological powerhouse still uses ballot papers in its elections. Here's a report on Israel elections.

Gravitas: Israel casts vote on ballot papers

Israel heading for elections today

Israelis began voting on Tuesday in an election that could hand Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a record fifth term or see him dethroned by an ex-general. Watch this video to know more

Israel Election 2019: Israelis vote in high-stakes election

In this video watch Daniele Pagani in conversation with defence analyst Anna Aronheim.

Israel Elections 2019: In conversation with Anna Aronheim

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's party sent monitors equipped with body cameras to a <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-votes-with-pm-benjamin-netanyahus-future-at-stake-208922">number of polling stations</a> with Arab constituents on election day in Israel on Tuesday, and Arab politicians condemned the move as voter intimidation.

Asked about the use of cameras in polling stations, Israeli police said there had been "a number of suspected irregularities" in the north, where many Israeli Arabs - who comprise 21 per cent of the population - live.

Netanyahu, head of the right-wing Likud party who opinion polls showed was neck-and-neck with a centrist rival, defended the filming, saying that cameras should be posted openly at voting stations everywhere to ensure "a valid vote".

In 2015 Netanyahu angered Israeli Arab leaders when he said that Arabs were flocking “in droves” to cast ballots. Analysts said the remark was an attempt to galvanise his right-wing base, and that it deepened longstanding mistrust among Arabs.

On election days in Israel, representatives of most parties sit at venues to check the pre-vote identification process. Voters are then handed an envelope and go behind a screen to cast their ballot in private.

Arab lawmaker Ahmad Tibi said the cameras seen at polling stations on Tuesday were illegal, and were a "direct attempt to sabotage" the freedom to vote.

Jamil Baransi, Deputy Mayor of Reineh, an Arab town in northern Israel, said monitors from right-wing parties had brought cameras to all of 17 local polling centres.

"We noticed that each one of these representatives had a camera on them, on their bodies," he said, adding that he believed the cameras were "designed to intimidate voters."

He said police intervened and people with cameras had left.

In such a close election, a key factor could be the Arab turnout. Many Arabs were angered by Israel's nation-state law, passed in 2018, which declared that only Jews have the right of self-determination in the country. Netanyahu backed the measure.

Camera controversy

Arab officials at polling stations in several Arab towns in the north said the cameras were not filming behind the screens but were attached to the shirts of Likud representatives, with the camera lenses visible.

Complaints came from polling stations in districts with predominantly Arab or mixed constituencies. Asked if representatives with cameras were also sent to mostly Jewish areas, a Likud spokesman said he did not know.

A Likud party official confirmed that cameras were deployed, saying it was to ensure there would be no vote rigging.

"They are not hidden cameras. They are cameras in the open," Kobi Matza, a Likud election official, told Kan radio station. "We are worried about counterfeit (votes) in the Arab sector."

The head of Israel's election committee, Justice Hanan Melcer, said he was aware of complaints about "hidden cameras", but it had been "made clear that voters had not been filmed inside the voting booth".

He said it was forbidden to film inside polling stations unless there was concern over "significant harm" being caused to the voting process, such as threats, bribery or violence.

An election committee official said he was not aware of cameras being used in past elections.

Israeli police said there had been "a number of suspected irregularities" at polling stations in the north.

"The police are working in these specific places in coordination with the Elections Committee in order to maintain public order and prevent any further incidents related to the voting polls in today's elections," a police statement said.

Ahmad Jamal Mahagny, 30, voting in the northern town of Umm al-Fahm later in the day, said: "I'm not sure what they were trying to do. Perhaps they wanted to disqualify the votes here."

Many in Israel's Arab communities say they face discrimination and are treated as second-class citizens.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's party sent monitors equipped with body cameras to a number of polling stations with Arab constituents on election day in Israel on Tuesday, and Arab politicians condemned the move as voter intimidation.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's party sent monitors equipped with body cameras to a number of polling stations with Arab constituents on election day in Israel on Tuesday, and Arab politicians condemned the move as voter intimidation. Asked about the use of cameras in polling stations, Israeli police said there had been "a number of suspected irregularities" in the north, where many Israeli Arabs - who comprise 21 per cent of the population - live. Netanyahu, head of the right-wing Likud party who opinion polls showed was neck-and-neck with a centrist rival, defended the filming, saying that cameras should be posted openly at voting stations everywhere to ensure "a valid vote". In 2015 Netanyahu angered Israeli Arab leaders when he said that Arabs were flocking “in droves” to cast ballots. Analysts said the remark was an attempt to galvanise his right-wing base, and that it deepened longstanding mistrust among Arabs. On election days in Israel, representatives of most parties sit at venues to check the pre-vote identification process. Voters are then handed an envelope and go behind a screen to cast their ballot in private. Arab lawmaker Ahmad Tibi said the cameras seen at polling stations on Tuesday were illegal, and were a "direct attempt to sabotage" the freedom to vote. Jamil Baransi, Deputy Mayor of Reineh, an Arab town in northern Israel, said monitors from right-wing parties had brought cameras to all of 17 local polling centres. "We noticed that each one of these representatives had a camera on them, on their bodies," he said, adding that he believed the cameras were "designed to intimidate voters." He said police intervened and people with cameras had left. In such a close election, a key factor could be the Arab turnout. Many Arabs were angered by Israel's nation-state law, passed in 2018, which declared that only Jews have the right of self-determination in the country. Netanyahu backed the measure. Camera controversy Arab officials at polling stations in several Arab towns in the north said the cameras were not filming behind the screens but were attached to the shirts of Likud representatives, with the camera lenses visible. Complaints came from polling stations in districts with predominantly Arab or mixed constituencies. Asked if representatives with cameras were also sent to mostly Jewish areas, a Likud spokesman said he did not know. A Likud party official confirmed that cameras were deployed, saying it was to ensure there would be no vote rigging. "They are not hidden cameras. They are cameras in the open," Kobi Matza, a Likud election official, told Kan radio station. "We are worried about counterfeit (votes) in the Arab sector." The head of Israel's election committee, Justice Hanan Melcer, said he was aware of complaints about "hidden cameras", but it had been "made clear that voters had not been filmed inside the voting booth". He said it was forbidden to film inside polling stations unless there was concern over "significant harm" being caused to the voting process, such as threats, bribery or violence. An election committee official said he was not aware of cameras being used in past elections. Israeli police said there had been "a number of suspected irregularities" at polling stations in the north. "The police are working in these specific places in coordination with the Elections Committee in order to maintain public order and prevent any further incidents related to the voting polls in today's elections," a police statement said. Ahmad Jamal Mahagny, 30, voting in the northern town of Umm al-Fahm later in the day, said: "I'm not sure what they were trying to do. Perhaps they wanted to disqualify the votes here." Many in Israel's Arab communities say they face discrimination and are treated as second-class citizens.

Minority Arabs in Israel object to cameras at polling centres

Love him or loathe him, the Israel election is all about Benjamin Netanyahu. Hailed by supporters as "King Bibi", Netanyahu has been in power since 2009, after a first stint as prime minister from 1996 to 1999.

Who is Benjamin Netanyahu?

As Israel gets set to vote, Palki brings us the profile of Benny Gantz, the former army chief who is challenging Prime Minister Netanyahu for the top job.

Gravitas: An Benny Gantz unseat Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu?

Here's all you need to know about the Prime Minister of Israel since 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu, his rise as a politician and his reign and his foreign policy.

Gravitas: All you need to know about Benjamin Netanyahu

Daniele Pagani, West-Asia Bureau Chief talked to Seth J Frantzman from The Jersulem Post on Israel's election & economy. Watch video to know in details.

Exclusive interaction with Seth J Frantzman from The Jersulem Post on Israel's election

Watch the complete story on the relations of Israel and India before and after PM Narendra Modi.

Will anything change after both India & Israel parliamentary elections?

Benny Gantz is the former Army Chief. He also has two other chiefs of staff in his party. Watch complete video to know more.

Know who is Benjamin's opponent Benny Gantz in Israel election

Watch live report from Israel by Daniele Pagani, West-Asia Bureau Chief on Israel election day. Watch this video to know more.

Who will lead the next Israeli Govt?

Gravitas: Israel votes: Breaking down the numbers

The pendulum of the Israeli Knesset (Parliament) elections seems to be swinging precariously between the incumbent Likud Party led by PM, Benjamin Netanyahu and a new centrist coalition, Blue and White. For the four-times PM Netanyahu, this is panning out to be one of the toughest electoral battles of his career. Firstly, charges of corruption and the breach of trust levied by Israel’s Attorney General Mandelbilt against the PM and his family can erode his legitimacy. Secondly, a centrist Blue and White coalition party, led by a former head of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), is challenging the fortunes of Netanyahu’s Likud party. While Netanyahu’s voter base remains strong, these charges can put pressure on his coalition partners to take a stand. So, are we witnessing the run-up to a post-Netanyahu era in Israeli politics?&nbsp;

In late February 2019, the Attorney General had announced that PM Netanyahu would be indicted on bribery and corruption charges from three separate corruption investigations that are still pending a hearing. Even though in Israeli politics, the PM is not expected to step down until a conviction is upheld through the appeals process, these developments can have a significant impact on the elections. For one, it gives ammunition to the centrist coalition Blue and White party to target the PM. The Blue and White party has been formed by the merger of three parties – Israel Resistance Party, Yesh Atid Party and the Telem party. It is being led by Benny Gantz, ex-Chief of Staff of the IDF, who led the Israeli military through two wars in Gaza in 2012 and 2014. Some voters are likely to perceive him and his party as untainted by Israeli politics, at the same time representing continuity and strength in military and security affairs. &nbsp;

However, in politics, there’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip’. Netanyahu is a crafty politician who is not going to go down without a fight. In this regard, three factors need to be closely watched – the nature of the coalition politics, the ‘nationalist’ landscape and the future of allegations against Netanyahu’s.&nbsp;

The changing landscape of coalition politics in Israel can produce an ambiguous election result. Likud and Blue White are likely to emerge as the biggest parties, but with not enough majority to form the government, without the support of smaller parties. And here, it is advantage&nbsp;Netanyahu. The smaller right-wing parties have currently pledged their support to Netanyahu, partly to avoid upsetting their joint right-wing support base. Notably, around 40 political parties are competing for seats in the 120-seat parliament. However, given the minimum threshold of qualification of 3.25 per cent of votes, only 10-14 are expected to finally reach the parliament. &nbsp;

Netanyahu still has an upper edge in the ‘nationalist’ narrative. The US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, containing Iran’s presence in Syria and the shifting of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem are perceived as Netanyahu’s policy successes. The recent US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over Golan heights is likely to add to this narrative. Domestically, Netanyahu’s right-wing and religious bloc has more potential voters. The current PM has tried to brand his rival Gantz, as a ‘weak left’ candidate, forcing the latter to prove his credentials by taking a hard stance towards foreign and security policy. &nbsp;

From now on much will depend on how the perception related to the investigation will pan out. The announcement of Mandelbilt’s intention to indict the PM after a year-long investigation had caused a sharp drop in the polls for Likud, with the party trailing behind the main opposition for the first time. However, the situation has somewhat stabilised since then. The recent decision by Madelblit to withhold evidence until after the elections is being seen as a victory for Netanyahu and may boost the perception that the investigations are politically motivated. &nbsp;&nbsp;

With the two main parties – Likud and Blue White - neck to neck in the upcoming elections, it looks difficult that either of them will be able to form a governing coalition with any likely combination of minor parties. A major antithesis to this is that the Arab parties are unlikely to join any coalition government. One of the post-election scenarios can be a ‘national unity’ government made up of Likud and Blue and White Party. The main point here will be who ends up leading this government or who is chosen by the coalition partners to be the next PM – Netanyahu or Gantz. With so many variables at play, the pendulum can sway in either direction. However, no matter who becomes the PM, fundamentals of Israeli politics are unlikely to change.&nbsp; 
 
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.) &nbsp; 
 
&nbsp;

The pendulum of the Israeli Knesset (Parliament) elections seems to be swinging precariously between the incumbent Likud Party led by PM, Benjamin Netanyahu and a new centrist coalition, Blue and White.

The pendulum of the Israeli Knesset (Parliament) elections seems to be swinging precariously between the incumbent Likud Party led by PM, Benjamin Netanyahu and a new centrist coalition, Blue and White. For the four-times PM Netanyahu, this is panning out to be one of the toughest electoral battles of his career. Firstly, charges of corruption and the breach of trust levied by Israel’s Attorney General Mandelbilt against the PM and his family can erode his legitimacy. Secondly, a centrist Blue and White coalition party, led by a former head of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), is challenging the fortunes of Netanyahu’s Likud party. While Netanyahu’s voter base remains strong, these charges can put pressure on his coalition partners to take a stand. So, are we witnessing the run-up to a post-Netanyahu era in Israeli politics? In late February 2019, the Attorney General had announced that PM Netanyahu would be indicted on bribery and corruption charges from three separate corruption investigations that are still pending a hearing. Even though in Israeli politics, the PM is not expected to step down until a conviction is upheld through the appeals process, these developments can have a significant impact on the elections. For one, it gives ammunition to the centrist coalition Blue and White party to target the PM. The Blue and White party has been formed by the merger of three parties – Israel Resistance Party, Yesh Atid Party and the Telem party. It is being led by Benny Gantz, ex-Chief of Staff of the IDF, who led the Israeli military through two wars in Gaza in 2012 and 2014. Some voters are likely to perceive him and his party as untainted by Israeli politics, at the same time representing continuity and strength in military and security affairs. However, in politics, there’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip’. Netanyahu is a crafty politician who is not going to go down without a fight. In this regard, three factors need to be closely watched – the nature of the coalition politics, the ‘nationalist’ landscape and the future of allegations against Netanyahu’s. The changing landscape of coalition politics in Israel can produce an ambiguous election result. Likud and Blue White are likely to emerge as the biggest parties, but with not enough majority to form the government, without the support of smaller parties. And here, it is advantage Netanyahu. The smaller right-wing parties have currently pledged their support to Netanyahu, partly to avoid upsetting their joint right-wing support base. Notably, around 40 political parties are competing for seats in the 120-seat parliament. However, given the minimum threshold of qualification of 3.25 per cent of votes, only 10-14 are expected to finally reach the parliament. Netanyahu still has an upper edge in the ‘nationalist’ narrative. The US withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, containing Iran’s presence in Syria and the shifting of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem are perceived as Netanyahu’s policy successes. The recent US recognition of Israeli sovereignty over Golan heights is likely to add to this narrative. Domestically, Netanyahu’s right-wing and religious bloc has more potential voters. The current PM has tried to brand his rival Gantz, as a ‘weak left’ candidate, forcing the latter to prove his credentials by taking a hard stance towards foreign and security policy. From now on much will depend on how the perception related to the investigation will pan out. The announcement of Mandelbilt’s intention to indict the PM after a year-long investigation had caused a sharp drop in the polls for Likud, with the party trailing behind the main opposition for the first time. However, the situation has somewhat stabilised since then. The recent decision by Madelblit to withhold evidence until after the elections is being seen as a victory for Netanyahu and may boost the perception that the investigations are politically motivated. With the two main parties – Likud and Blue White - neck to neck in the upcoming elections, it looks difficult that either of them will be able to form a governing coalition with any likely combination of minor parties. A major antithesis to this is that the Arab parties are unlikely to join any coalition government. One of the post-election scenarios can be a ‘national unity’ government made up of Likud and Blue and White Party. The main point here will be who ends up leading this government or who is chosen by the coalition partners to be the next PM – Netanyahu or Gantz. With so many variables at play, the pendulum can sway in either direction. However, no matter who becomes the PM, fundamentals of Israeli politics are unlikely to change. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of ZMCL.)

Israel elections 2019: Which way will the pendulum swing?

Israeli Prime Minister <a href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-polls-the-rise-and-rise-of-israeli-prime-minister-benjamin-netanyahu-208436&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjp7YeRvcDhAhXBV3wKHb8sDKoQFggIMAE&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;usg=AOvVaw0LKar4w0_nmjS2nPb6_SGT">Benjamin Netanyahu</a> sought to energise supporters on the eve of Tuesday's elections with warnings and controversial promises, while his centrist challenger urged voters to tell the premier the country has had enough.

The general election in which Netanyahu is seeking to extend his already 13 years in office despite corruption allegations against him is expected to be close, with ex-military chief Benny Gantz posing a serious threat.

They spent the campaign's final hours exhorting voters with two different strategies: Netanyahu repeatedly warned that his Likud was at risk of losing, while Gantz made the case that Israel was on the verge of historic change.

The truth was more complicated, with opinion polls giving Netanyahu's Likud and Gantz's Blue and White a similar number of seats in the 120-seat parliament.

Under those polls, both would fall far short of an outright majority and would need to pull together a coalition.

If polling trends hold, Netanyahu would be best placed to do so thanks to smaller right-wing parties allied to him.

There have however been repeated warnings of the unreliability of polls in the past and the fact that many voters say they remain undecided.

Netanyahu's claims that Likud may lose were widely seen as a way to ensure his base of supporters turns out to vote.

'Who can do this?'&nbsp;

Netanyahu has made last-minute appeals to the right, issuing a deeply controversial pledge to annex settlements in the occupied <a href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.wionews.com/world/benjamin-netanyahu-pledges-to-annex-west-bank-settlements-after-vote-208465&amp;sa=U&amp;ved=0ahUKEwjp7YeRvcDhAhXBV3wKHb8sDKoQFggLMAI&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;cx=006054055338965708568:09spwrlibei&amp;usg=AOvVaw3j7hMBpYqfPSILaqVnnD6i">West Bank</a>.

If done on a large-scale, applying Israeli sovereignty there could end any remaining hopes for a two-state solution with the Palestinians.

In an interview on Sunday, Netanyahu said US President Donald Trump, who is expected to release his long-awaited deal for Israeli-Palestinian peace sometime after the election, was aware of his plans to do so.

He said he planned to apply sovereignty gradually, and that he did not differentiate between Israel's large West Bank settlement blocs and the isolated ones located deep in the territory on land the Palestinians see as part of a future state.

"Who else can do this? Who can do this? Come on. Honestly," Netanyahu said, making the case as he has throughout the campaign that he is Israel's essential statesman.

"Who can stand in front of the world? Who can stand in front of the American Congress? Who can move public opinion in that direction?"

Gantz has called Netanyahu's pledge an "irresponsible" bid for right-wing votes.

He says he favours a "globally backed peace agreement" that sees Israel hold on to the large settlement blocs in the West Bank and maintain security control over the territory.

Gantz has also highlighted his security credentials while saying he will heal divisions he accuses Netanyahu of exacerbating.

"There’s a need for change and an opportunity for change," Gantz told Israel's army radio on Monday.

"Israel needs to choose a direction of unification, connection and hope -- or of extremity."

'Witch hunt'

The two were also engaging in typical pre-election campaigning, including Gantz riding a motorcycle to his rally on Sunday and Netanyahu visiting Jerusalem's main market on Monday.

Netanyahu will be on track to surpass founding father David Ben-Gurion as Israel's longest-serving prime minister should he win on Tuesday.

But even if he does, he faces the prospect of becoming the first sitting prime minister to be indicted.

The attorney general has announced he intends to indict Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust pending an upcoming hearing.

The premier's opponents have seized on the allegations to argue that the 69-year-old Netanyahu has lost his way and must go.

But Netanyahu has been defiant, calling the investigations a "witch hunt" and denouncing journalists reporting on them -- similar to the tactics used by his ally Trump.

While the threat of indictment hangs over Netanyahu, he has also built a reputation as the guarantor of Israel's security and economic growth.

He has repeatedly spoken of Trump's recognition of the disputed city of Jerusalem as Israel's capital and Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights as two of his major accomplishments.

Gantz has sought to overcome that in part by allying with two other former military chiefs of staff and ex-finance minister Yair Lapid.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to energise supporters on the eve of Tuesday's elections with warnings and controversial promises, while his centrist challenger urged voters to tell the premier the country has had enough.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sought to energise supporters on the eve of Tuesday's elections with warnings and controversial promises, while his centrist challenger urged voters to tell the premier the country has had enough. The general election in which Netanyahu is seeking to extend his already 13 years in office despite corruption allegations against him is expected to be close, with ex-military chief Benny Gantz posing a serious threat. They spent the campaign's final hours exhorting voters with two different strategies: Netanyahu repeatedly warned that his Likud was at risk of losing, while Gantz made the case that Israel was on the verge of historic change. The truth was more complicated, with opinion polls giving Netanyahu's Likud and Gantz's Blue and White a similar number of seats in the 120-seat parliament. Under those polls, both would fall far short of an outright majority and would need to pull together a coalition. If polling trends hold, Netanyahu would be best placed to do so thanks to smaller right-wing parties allied to him. There have however been repeated warnings of the unreliability of polls in the past and the fact that many voters say they remain undecided. Netanyahu's claims that Likud may lose were widely seen as a way to ensure his base of supporters turns out to vote. 'Who can do this?' Netanyahu has made last-minute appeals to the right, issuing a deeply controversial pledge to annex settlements in the occupied West Bank. If done on a large-scale, applying Israeli sovereignty there could end any remaining hopes for a two-state solution with the Palestinians. In an interview on Sunday, Netanyahu said US President Donald Trump, who is expected to release his long-awaited deal for Israeli-Palestinian peace sometime after the election, was aware of his plans to do so. He said he planned to apply sovereignty gradually, and that he did not differentiate between Israel's large West Bank settlement blocs and the isolated ones located deep in the territory on land the Palestinians see as part of a future state. "Who else can do this? Who can do this? Come on. Honestly," Netanyahu said, making the case as he has throughout the campaign that he is Israel's essential statesman. "Who can stand in front of the world? Who can stand in front of the American Congress? Who can move public opinion in that direction?" Gantz has called Netanyahu's pledge an "irresponsible" bid for right-wing votes. He says he favours a "globally backed peace agreement" that sees Israel hold on to the large settlement blocs in the West Bank and maintain security control over the territory. Gantz has also highlighted his security credentials while saying he will heal divisions he accuses Netanyahu of exacerbating. "There’s a need for change and an opportunity for change," Gantz told Israel's army radio on Monday. "Israel needs to choose a direction of unification, connection and hope -- or of extremity." 'Witch hunt' The two were also engaging in typical pre-election campaigning, including Gantz riding a motorcycle to his rally on Sunday and Netanyahu visiting Jerusalem's main market on Monday. Netanyahu will be on track to surpass founding father David Ben-Gurion as Israel's longest-serving prime minister should he win on Tuesday. But even if he does, he faces the prospect of becoming the first sitting prime minister to be indicted. The attorney general has announced he intends to indict Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust pending an upcoming hearing. The premier's opponents have seized on the allegations to argue that the 69-year-old Netanyahu has lost his way and must go. But Netanyahu has been defiant, calling the investigations a "witch hunt" and denouncing journalists reporting on them -- similar to the tactics used by his ally Trump. While the threat of indictment hangs over Netanyahu, he has also built a reputation as the guarantor of Israel's security and economic growth. He has repeatedly spoken of Trump's recognition of the disputed city of Jerusalem as Israel's capital and Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights as two of his major accomplishments. Gantz has sought to overcome that in part by allying with two other former military chiefs of staff and ex-finance minister Yair Lapid.

Israel PM Netanyahu, Gantz make final pitches before voters

israel

Israel, News on Israel, stories on Israel, articles on Israel, Israel stories at Wion, Israel news, Israel latest news