Even as the monsoon session of parliament has been marred by disruptions, derailing any meaningful debate on key bills, Tamil Nadu CM Vijay has taken the lead.Whether it is the amendments to the country's foreign funding law or the pending delimitation bill, the actor-turned-politician has emerged as a fierce opponent of BJP.&nbsp;On Tuesday, the Tamil Nadu assembly approved a resolution tabled by the TVK government urging the centre to withdraw the FCRA Amendment Bill.&nbsp;Speaking on the bill, the state's education minister asserted that its provisions may adversely affect the autonomy of charitable organisations and educational institutions run by minority communities. This came barely a day after representatives from Christian and Muslim organisations met Vijay at the state secretariat.The delegation comprising bishops discussed matters pertaining to minorities.&nbsp;Amid growing pressure by the opposition, the Centre agreed to send this bill to a joint parliamentary committee.&nbsp;Let's take a look at how this bill would impact NGOs.&nbsp;The government has proposed the creation of a 'designated authority' who can take over control of assets of any NGO whose registration has expired or has been cancelled.Even institutions built with partial foreign funds such as schools and hospitals could be taken over.&nbsp;This is not all. Such seized assets can be sold off, proceeds of which will go to the central government.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Additionally, state governments have to seek Centre’s permission before starting any probe related to this act. Now, this is not the only time when Vijay has taken on BJP's policies. A day earlier, the Tamil Nadu assembly passed another resolution seeking the abolition of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test, or NEET, for undergraduate medical admissions. It also requested the BJP-led centre to allow states to grant medical admissions based solely on class 12 exam scores, citing financial and psychological pressure on families. Earlier in the day, the TVK chief also took a firm stance on the delimitation issue. His government tabled a resolution, requesting the centre to keep the existing Lok Sabha strength at 543. Vijay also demanded immediate implementation of 33% reservation for women in the parliament and state assemblies, based on their current strength. The TVK chief highlighted that more women had voted than men in the last assembly elections. Interestingly, this resolution also got the backing of the DMK, after which it was unanimously adopted by the house. From the Cauvery water dispute to other issues, it is increasingly clear that Vijay is trying to emerge as a key challenger to BJP, and in turn, further bolster his party's standing in Tamil Nadu.

Tamil Nadu CM Vijay also demanded immediate implementation of 33% reservation for women in the parliament and state assemblies, based on their current strength. The TVK chief highlighted that more women had voted than men in the last assembly elections.

Even as the monsoon session of parliament has been marred by disruptions, derailing any meaningful debate on key bills, Tamil Nadu CM Vijay has taken the lead. Whether it is the amendments to the country's foreign funding law or the pending delimitation bill, the actor-turned-politician has emerged as a fierce opponent of BJP. On Tuesday, the Tamil Nadu assembly approved a resolution tabled by the TVK government urging the centre to withdraw the FCRA Amendment Bill. Speaking on the bill, the state's education minister asserted that its provisions may adversely affect the autonomy of charitable organisations and educational institutions run by minority communities. This came barely a day after representatives from Christian and Muslim organisations met Vijay at the state secretariat. The delegation comprising bishops discussed matters pertaining to minorities. Amid growing pressure by the opposition, the Centre agreed to send this bill to a joint parliamentary committee. Let's take a look at how this bill would impact NGOs. The government has proposed the creation of a 'designated authority' who can take over control of assets of any NGO whose registration has expired or has been cancelled. Even institutions built with partial foreign funds such as schools and hospitals could be taken over. This is not all. Such seized assets can be sold off, proceeds of which will go to the central government.

Tamil Nadu CM Vijay also demanded immediate implementation of 33% reservation for women in the parliament and state assemblies, based on their current strength. The TVK chief highlighted that more women had voted than men in the last assembly elections.

Christian leaders meet Vijay, Tamil Nadu passes resolution against foreign donation bill | Gravitas

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay is stepping up his opposition to the Centre over the proposed FCRA amendment legislation. His party TVK has urged the government to withdraw the bill, raising concerns over changes to rules governing foreign contributions. The move marks a sharper political challenge to the BJP and could add another layer to Tamil Nadu’s increasingly competitive political landscape.


Vijay takes on BJP over FCRA bill, demands centre withdraw amendment

The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, was formally referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on Wednesday ( August 12) after the Central Government moved a motion in the Lok Sabha.&nbsp;Union Minister Nityanand Rai moved the motion after the Lok Sabha resumed proceedings following its morning adjournment. According to the Supplementary List of Business, the Joint Committee will have 31 members, including 21 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha.&nbsp;"That the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, be referred to a Joint Committee of the Houses consisting of 21 Members of this House to be nominated by the Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha, and 10 Members of Rajya Sabha to be nominated by Hon'ble Chairman, Rajya Sabha," the motion stated.&nbsp;The committee will examine the provisions of the proposed legislation in detail and submit its report to Parliament by the last day of the first week of the Winter Session 2026.&nbsp;The motion also stated that one-third of the total members will constitute the quorum for meetings of the Joint Committee.&nbsp;"This House recommends to Rajya Sabha that Rajya Sabha do join the said Joint Committee and communicate to this House names of the Members to be appointed by Rajya Sabha to the Joint Committee," it added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indigo-flight-suffers-engine-failure-emergency-declared-at-chennai-airport-1786520967055">IndiGo flight suffers engine failure; emergency declared at Chennai airport</a><h2>Opposition raises concerns over FCRA Bill</h2>The move comes amid Opposition demands to withdraw the proposed amendment, with opposition parties alleging that some of its provisions target religious minorities.&nbsp;Congress leader KC Venugopal called for the withdrawal of the Bill, while Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav alleged that the proposed legislation targets minorities.&nbsp;Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju rejected the allegations and challenged the Opposition to identify a single provision that targets minorities. He accused the Opposition of misleading the House.<h2>Monsoon Session ends on August 13</h2>Parliament has witnessed repeated uproar during almost the entire session, with the Opposition demanding a response from Home Minister Amit Shah over alleged police atrocities during the July 20 students' protest and the Ram Mandir donation theft row. The Monsoon Session is scheduled to end on August 13.&nbsp;The FCRA regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions by individuals, associations and organisations in India. It also seeks to ensure that such contributions are used for the purposes for which they are received.

The FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026, was referred to a 31 member Joint Parliamentary Committee amid Opposition protests and demands for its withdrawal over allegations that it targets religious minorities.

The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, was formally referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on Wednesday ( August 12) after the Central Government moved a motion in the Lok Sabha. Union Minister Nityanand Rai moved the motion after the Lok Sabha resumed proceedings following its morning adjournment. According to the Supplementary List of Business, the Joint Committee will have 31 members, including 21 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha. "That the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, be referred to a Joint Committee of the Houses consisting of 21 Members of this House to be nominated by the Hon'ble Speaker, Lok Sabha, and 10 Members of Rajya Sabha to be nominated by Hon'ble Chairman, Rajya Sabha," the motion stated. The committee will examine the provisions of the proposed legislation in detail and submit its report to Parliament by the last day of the first week of the Winter Session 2026. The motion also stated that one-third of the total members will constitute the quorum for meetings of the Joint Committee. "This House recommends to Rajya Sabha that Rajya Sabha do join the said Joint Committee and communicate to this House names of the Members to be appointed by Rajya Sabha to the Joint Committee," it added. Also Read: IndiGo flight suffers engine failure; emergency declared at Chennai airport Opposition raises concerns over FCRA Bill The move comes amid Opposition demands to withdraw the proposed amendment, with opposition parties alleging that some of its provisions target religious minorities. Congress leader KC Venugopal called for the withdrawal of the Bill, while Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav alleged that the proposed legislation targets minorities. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju rejected the allegations and challenged the Opposition to identify a single provision that targets minorities. He accused the Opposition of misleading the House. Monsoon Session ends on August 13 Parliament has witnessed repeated uproar during almost the entire session, with the Opposition demanding a response from Home Minister Amit Shah over alleged police atrocities during the July 20 students' protest and the Ram Mandir donation theft row. The Monsoon Session is scheduled to end on August 13. The FCRA regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions by individuals, associations and organisations in India. It also seeks to ensure that such contributions are used for the purposes for which they are received.

The FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026, was referred to a 31-member Joint Parliamentary Committee amid Opposition protests and demands for its withdrawal over allegations that it targets religious minorities.

FCRA Amendment Bill referred to JPC amid Parliament disruptions; Opposition seeks withdrawal

The Centre is making efforts to build political consensus on referring the contentious Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), amid continued opposition to the proposed legislation, people familiar with the matter said on Tuesday. The government has been reaching out to political parties as well as stakeholders, including Church representatives and non-government organisations, to address concerns over provisions of the bill, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha in March.&nbsp;A BJP lawmaker said the government has taken note of concerns raised by several political parties and civil society groups. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has also assured Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhoma that the amended FCRA provisions will not be applied retrospectively. “…We are in touch with parties and what we have gathered is that some are in favour of sending the bill to a JPC. The Congress and the TMC [Trinamool Congress] are against it…but discussions with other parties are ongoing,” said the BJP lawmaker and added the government is also reaching out to the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) to agree to a JPC.&nbsp;The lawmaker said Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju is leading the government's outreach to Opposition parties in an attempt to secure agreement on referring the bill to a JPC. “There are several parties that have demanded scrapping the bill entirely. While some have concerns about specific provisions…now these can be examined and discussed in detail. The government has refuted the perception that the bill will adversely impact minorities or social organisations,” the BJP lawmaker said.&nbsp;The government's move comes amid growing political pressure over the proposed changes. Opposition parties and several organisations have raised concerns about the potential impact of the legislation on NGOs, charitable institutions, religious organisations and other entities that receive foreign contributions. The bill seeks to amend the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, including provisions dealing with foreign-funded assets, registration, penalties and investigations. The proposed legislation would create a framework under which foreign contributions and assets could be placed under the control of a designated authority in certain circumstances.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-amit-shah-and-gandhis-top-leaders-attend-wedding-reception-of-supriya-sule-s-daughter-1786451662920">PM Modi, Amit Shah, and Gandhis: Top leaders attend wedding reception of Supriya Sule’s daughter</a><h2>FCRA Bill unlikely to be taken up this session</h2>With the Monsoon Session of Parliament scheduled to conclude on Friday, the chances of the FCRA Amendment Bill being taken up for detailed discussion and passage appear limited. A second BJP leader said the bill is unlikely to be taken up during the remaining days of the session. However, if the government manages to reach a consensus on the JPC proposal, it could make a statement in Parliament announcing the decision to refer the legislation for further scrutiny. The bill's absence from the final days of the Lok Sabha agenda has already fuelled speculation that the government may be considering a more cautious approach to the contentious legislation. A JPC would allow lawmakers from both Houses of Parliament to examine the provisions in greater detail and hear representations from stakeholders before submitting recommendations.<h2>BJD open to JPC scrutiny</h2>The Biju Janata Dal (BJD) has indicated that it is not opposed to the bill being examined by a JPC. A BJD lawmaker said several provisions require closer examination, particularly those relating to administrative procedures and the functioning of organisations involved in education and healthcare. “There are some issues that need to be addressed, such as administrative procedures and processes that should not create problems for organisations that work in the sectors of education or health care,” said the BJD lawmaker.&nbsp;The party also raised concerns about organisations that may have opaque foreign funding or divert funds from their stated purpose. “There should be scrutiny of international organisations that have opaque funding; those which divert funds meant for one particular purpose to another and those organisations that are involved in proselytisation… But if any organisation gets caught in administrative lapses and loses their licence, there has to be recourse for that.” The BJD's position could be significant as the government seeks support beyond its immediate allies for a JPC referral.<h2>Church representatives meet Amit Shah</h2>Concerns over the FCRA Bill have also come from Christian organisations and Church representatives. A delegation led by DMK lawmaker P Wilson met Amit Shah and submitted a memorandum outlining its objections to the proposed legislation. The delegation argued that the bill, which changes the framework governing charitable, educational, medical and religious property linked to foreign contributions, should not be passed without extensive pre-legislative scrutiny. The memorandum called for the bill to be referred to a JPC.&nbsp;The delegation also argued that a JPC would be more appropriate than a Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee because the proposed changes cut across the jurisdiction and concerns of multiple ministries.It said no single departmental committee would be adequately placed to examine the issues in their entirety.<h2>What does the FCRA Amendment Bill seek to change?</h2>The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, proposes several changes to the existing framework governing foreign contributions received by eligible organisations in India. Among its key provisions are changes relating to the receipt and utilisation of foreign contributions, treatment of assets when an organisation's registration is suspended or ceases, cancellation and non-renewal of registration, penalties and investigation procedures.&nbsp;The bill also proposes a designated authority to oversee foreign contributions and assets in specified circumstances.The government has argued that the amendments are intended to address administrative and legal gaps in the existing law, strengthen oversight and prevent misuse of foreign funds. Opponents, however, have questioned whether the proposed powers could create difficulties for NGOs, charitable institutions, healthcare and educational organisations and religious bodies that depend on foreign contributions.<h2>Why is the government considering a JPC?</h2>A JPC could provide the government with a way to move the legislation forward while allowing Opposition parties and affected stakeholders greater opportunity to examine its provisions. For the government, securing consensus on a JPC could also help break the current political deadlock without immediately withdrawing the bill.&nbsp;For the Opposition and stakeholder groups, however, the key demand remains broader scrutiny, and some parties have called for the legislation to be withdrawn altogether. Mizoram has emerged as an important voice in the debate because of concerns among Christian organisations and institutions in the northeastern state. Following his meeting with Amit Shah, Lalduhoma said he had received an assurance that the proposed changes would not have retrospective effect.

FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 faces Opposition resistance as Centre seeks JPC consensus. Know Amit Shah's assurance, Church concerns and what happens next

The Centre is making efforts to build political consensus on referring the contentious Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC), amid continued opposition to the proposed legislation, people familiar with the matter said on Tuesday. The government has been reaching out to political parties as well as stakeholders, including Church representatives and non-government organisations, to address concerns over provisions of the bill, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha in March. A BJP lawmaker said the government has taken note of concerns raised by several political parties and civil society groups. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has also assured Mizoram Chief Minister Lalduhoma that the amended FCRA provisions will not be applied retrospectively. “…We are in touch with parties and what we have gathered is that some are in favour of sending the bill to a JPC. The Congress and the TMC [Trinamool Congress] are against it…but discussions with other parties are ongoing,” said the BJP lawmaker and added the government is also reaching out to the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) to agree to a JPC. The lawmaker said Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju is leading the government's outreach to Opposition parties in an attempt to secure agreement on referring the bill to a JPC. “There are several parties that have demanded scrapping the bill entirely. While some have concerns about specific provisions…now these can be examined and discussed in detail. The government has refuted the perception that the bill will adversely impact minorities or social organisations,” the BJP lawmaker said. The government's move comes amid growing political pressure over the proposed changes. Opposition parties and several organisations have raised concerns about the potential impact of the legislation on NGOs, charitable institutions, religious organisations and other entities that receive foreign contributions. The bill seeks to amend the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, including provisions dealing with foreign-funded assets, registration, penalties and investigations. The proposed legislation would create a framework under which foreign contributions and assets could be placed under the control of a designated authority in certain circumstances. Also Read: PM Modi, Amit Shah, and Gandhis: Top leaders attend wedding reception of Supriya Sule’s daughter FCRA Bill unlikely to be taken up this session With the Monsoon Session of Parliament scheduled to conclude on Friday, the chances of the FCRA Amendment Bill being taken up for detailed discussion and passage appear limited. A second BJP leader said the bill is unlikely to be taken up during the remaining days of the session. However, if the government manages to reach a consensus on the JPC proposal, it could make a statement in Parliament announcing the decision to refer the legislation for further scrutiny. The bill's absence from the final days of the Lok Sabha agenda has already fuelled speculation that the government may be considering a more cautious approach to the contentious legislation. A JPC would allow lawmakers from both Houses of Parliament to examine the provisions in greater detail and hear representations from stakeholders before submitting recommendations. BJD open to JPC scrutiny The Biju Janata Dal (BJD) has indicated that it is not opposed to the bill being examined by a JPC. A BJD lawmaker said several provisions require closer examination, particularly those relating to administrative procedures and the functioning of organisations involved in education and healthcare. “There are some issues that need to be addressed, such as administrative procedures and processes that should not create problems for organisations that work in the sectors of education or health care,” said the BJD lawmaker. The party also raised concerns about organisations that may have opaque foreign funding or divert funds from their stated purpose. “There should be scrutiny of international organisations that have opaque funding; those which divert funds meant for one particular purpose to another and those organisations that are involved in proselytisation… But if any organisation gets caught in administrative lapses and loses their licence, there has to be recourse for that.” The BJD's position could be significant as the government seeks support beyond its immediate allies for a JPC referral. Church representatives meet Amit Shah Concerns over the FCRA Bill have also come from Christian organisations and Church representatives. A delegation led by DMK lawmaker P Wilson met Amit Shah and submitted a memorandum outlining its objections to the proposed legislation. The delegation argued that the bill, which changes the framework governing charitable, educational, medical and religious property linked to foreign contributions, should not be passed without extensive pre-legislative scrutiny. The memorandum called for the bill to be referred to a JPC. The delegation also argued that a JPC would be more appropriate than a Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee because the proposed changes cut across the jurisdiction and concerns of multiple ministries. It said no single departmental committee would be adequately placed to examine the issues in their entirety. What does the FCRA Amendment Bill seek to change? The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, proposes several changes to the existing framework governing foreign contributions received by eligible organisations in India. Among its key provisions are changes relating to the receipt and utilisation of foreign contributions, treatment of assets when an organisation's registration is suspended or ceases, cancellation and non-renewal of registration, penalties and investigation procedures. The bill also proposes a designated authority to oversee foreign contributions and assets in specified circumstances. The government has argued that the amendments are intended to address administrative and legal gaps in the existing law, strengthen oversight and prevent misuse of foreign funds. Opponents, however, have questioned whether the proposed powers could create difficulties for NGOs, charitable institutions, healthcare and educational organisations and religious bodies that depend on foreign contributions. Why is the government considering a JPC? A JPC could provide the government with a way to move the legislation forward while allowing Opposition parties and affected stakeholders greater opportunity to examine its provisions. For the government, securing consensus on a JPC could also help break the current political deadlock without immediately withdrawing the bill. For the Opposition and stakeholder groups, however, the key demand remains broader scrutiny, and some parties have called for the legislation to be withdrawn altogether. Mizoram has emerged as an important voice in the debate because of concerns among Christian organisations and institutions in the northeastern state. Following his meeting with Amit Shah, Lalduhoma said he had received an assurance that the proposed changes would not have retrospective effect.

Centre seeks consensus to send FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 to JPC as Opposition, Church groups and NGOs raise concerns over its provisions

FCRA Amendment Bill: Centre seeks consensus on JPC as opposition, Church groups raise concerns

As the Centre plans to introduce the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, the Tamil Nadu Assembly on Tuesday (August 11) unanimously passed a resolution opposing the proposed legislation and urged the Union government to withdraw the amendments.&nbsp;The resolution called for comprehensive consultations with state governments and stakeholders, including charitable, religious, educational, medical and social organisations.&nbsp;According to the government, the proposed legislation seeks to amend the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, to strengthen administrative oversight, curb financial misuse and prevent foreign funds from being used against national security interests or for forced religious conversions.&nbsp;The Bill proposes to create a central Designated Authority that would take over the management of an organisation when its FCRA registration gets cancelled, surrendered or ceases to remain valid due to non-renewal.&nbsp;An FCRA certificate automatically becomes invalid if an organisation fails to apply for renewal before its five-year validity expires. The proposed framework would then allow the government to take control of the organisation's assets.&nbsp;Critics, however, argue that the creation of a Central government-appointed Designated Authority could give the executive broad and unchecked powers to take custody of foreign funds and immovable assets, including schools, hospitals and community facilities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/syrian-ousted-president-bashar-al-assad-gets-death-penalty-in-landmark-verdict-1786437414005">Ousted Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad gets death sentence in landmark verdict</a><h2>Why Tamil Nadu is opposing the Bill</h2>Tamil Nadu Minister Rajmohan told the Assembly that the proposed provisions could adversely affect educational institutions run by minority organisations and other charitable institutions.&nbsp;"The Union Government has introduced the Foreign Contribution Regulation Bill in Parliament to regulate international aid legally. Because of this, educational institutions run by minority organisations and others are being affected. Cancellation of registration and cancellation of renewal are also impacting them," Rajmohan said.&nbsp;He said the proposed changes could have implications for institutions working in education, healthcare and social welfare.&nbsp;"Hospitals, elderly care homes, and educational institutions will be affected through FCRA. The Tamil Nadu government objects to this," the Minister said.&nbsp;Rajmohan stressed that regulatory procedures governing such institutions must comply with constitutional principles.&nbsp;"Regulatory procedures must be in accordance with the Constitution," he said.&nbsp;The Minister also objected to provisions that would allow the government to take over, manage, dispose of, or sell the assets of charitable organisations after the cancellation, non-renewal, refusal, or surrender of their FCRA registration.&nbsp;He said institutions facing such action should receive an opportunity to present their case before authorities take any decision.&nbsp;"The institutions that are being handed over to the government must be given an opportunity. If there are no charges against that institution, it should not be taken over through FCRA," Rajmohan said.

The Tamil Nadu Assembly unanimously opposed the proposed FCRA Amendment Bill, citing concerns over government control of charitable assets and its potential impact on minority-run educational, medical and social welfare institutions.

As the Centre plans to introduce the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, the Tamil Nadu Assembly on Tuesday (August 11) unanimously passed a resolution opposing the proposed legislation and urged the Union government to withdraw the amendments. The resolution called for comprehensive consultations with state governments and stakeholders, including charitable, religious, educational, medical and social organisations. According to the government, the proposed legislation seeks to amend the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, to strengthen administrative oversight, curb financial misuse and prevent foreign funds from being used against national security interests or for forced religious conversions. The Bill proposes to create a central Designated Authority that would take over the management of an organisation when its FCRA registration gets cancelled, surrendered or ceases to remain valid due to non-renewal. An FCRA certificate automatically becomes invalid if an organisation fails to apply for renewal before its five-year validity expires. The proposed framework would then allow the government to take control of the organisation's assets. Critics, however, argue that the creation of a Central government-appointed Designated Authority could give the executive broad and unchecked powers to take custody of foreign funds and immovable assets, including schools, hospitals and community facilities. Also Read: Ousted Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad gets death sentence in landmark verdict Why Tamil Nadu is opposing the Bill Tamil Nadu Minister Rajmohan told the Assembly that the proposed provisions could adversely affect educational institutions run by minority organisations and other charitable institutions. "The Union Government has introduced the Foreign Contribution Regulation Bill in Parliament to regulate international aid legally. Because of this, educational institutions run by minority organisations and others are being affected. Cancellation of registration and cancellation of renewal are also impacting them," Rajmohan said. He said the proposed changes could have implications for institutions working in education, healthcare and social welfare. "Hospitals, elderly care homes, and educational institutions will be affected through FCRA. The Tamil Nadu government objects to this," the Minister said. Rajmohan stressed that regulatory procedures governing such institutions must comply with constitutional principles. "Regulatory procedures must be in accordance with the Constitution," he said. The Minister also objected to provisions that would allow the government to take over, manage, dispose of, or sell the assets of charitable organisations after the cancellation, non-renewal, refusal, or surrender of their FCRA registration. He said institutions facing such action should receive an opportunity to present their case before authorities take any decision. "The institutions that are being handed over to the government must be given an opportunity. If there are no charges against that institution, it should not be taken over through FCRA," Rajmohan said.

The Tamil Nadu Assembly unanimously opposed the proposed FCRA Amendment Bill, citing concerns over government control of charitable assets and its potential impact on minority-run educational, medical and social welfare institutions.

Tamil Nadu Assembly passes resolution against FCRA Bill: Why is the state opposing it?

Amid the controversy surrounding the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill (FCRA), 2026, India's ambassador to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, has taken to social media to debunk some 'myths' about the bill. In a thread on X, the ambassador to the US has stated that the bill aims to improve transparency, make way for better governance and clearer rules. He debunked five myths surrounding the bill, most of which allege that the FCRA will target religions or NGOs' assets, or cut off foreign aid to civil society.&nbsp;This comes after the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Aug 7 dismissed criticism by US Congressman Riley Moore over the proposed FFCRA bill, asserting that legislative matters are India's internal affairs. The ministry also pointed out that many countries, including the United States, have their own legal frameworks regulating foreign funding. Riley Moore, a Republican Congressman from West Virginia, claimed that the proposed amendments represented a ‘clear attack against Christians’ and warned that the legislation could negatively impact India-US relations.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-s-internal-matter-mea-hits-back-at-us-congressman-over-fcra-amendment-bill-1786099590095">'India's internal matter': MEA hits back at US Congressman over FCRA Amendment Bill</a>&nbsp;MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): India is framing a new law to cut off foreign aid to civil society.&nbsp;TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): Regulation of foreign financial flows in public and political spaces is a sovereign step driven by national security concerns. It is an accepted feature of modern governance in many democracies around the world.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-proposes-major-fcra-changes-tougher-rules-for-ngos-receiving-foreign-funds-1786023050363">India Proposes Major FCRA Changes | Tougher Rules for NGOs Receiving Foreign Funds</a>&nbsp;MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): &nbsp;FCRA has adversely impacted the working of NGOs and charitable organization and the new amendment would further restrict their ability to operate in India.&nbsp;&nbsp;TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): In reality, foreign money inflows into India have been rising, not falling. Foreign contributions to registered organisations grew from roughly $1.2 billion in 2010–11 to $2.67 billion in 2024–25. India has over 3 million NGOs. A bare fraction of these, only 14,450, hold FCRA registration. Thus, the overwhelming majority of the civil society organizations are entirely outside the Act. FCRA does not stop anyone from accepting foreign charity, research grants or humanitarian aid. It asks three things — register, receive the money through laid down process, report what you did with it.&nbsp;MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): The law will lead to seizure of assets of NGOs, including religious charities, places of worship, hospitals, schools, and charitable organizations that rely on foreign donations.&nbsp;&nbsp;TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): India welcomes genuine international partnerships and has always provided a legal framework within which such contributions can be received and utilised. When a registration is cancelled or surrendered, foreign contributions and the assets created from them already vest in a State Government authority. This has been in force since 2010. It is not new. What the 2026 Bill adds is a designated authority to safeguard those assets — and a way back. If the organisation restores its registration, all assets and unused funds are returned in full. Places of worship carry their own protection. Where a cancelled association has created property connected to a place of worship, that property goes to another FCRA-registered association of the same faith to ensure continuity of worship. &nbsp;MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): FCRA specifically targets a particular religion or community&nbsp;&nbsp;TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): Nothing could be farther from it. The Act applies uniformly to all organisations regardless of religion, community or ideology. Faith-based welfare activities, including religious education, maintenance of places of worship, and charitable work by organisations of every faith, continue to be eligible for foreign funding.

India's US envoy Vinay Mohan Kwatra debunked five “myths” around the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026, saying it seeks greater transparency and governance. His comments came after US Congressman Riley Moore criticised the proposed law, alleging it could target Christians and affect India-US ties.

Amid the controversy surrounding the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill (FCRA), 2026, India's ambassador to the United States, Vinay Mohan Kwatra, has taken to social media to debunk some 'myths' about the bill. In a thread on X, the ambassador to the US has stated that the bill aims to improve transparency, make way for better governance and clearer rules. He debunked five myths surrounding the bill, most of which allege that the FCRA will target religions or NGOs' assets, or cut off foreign aid to civil society. This comes after the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Aug 7 dismissed criticism by US Congressman Riley Moore over the proposed FFCRA bill, asserting that legislative matters are India's internal affairs. The ministry also pointed out that many countries, including the United States, have their own legal frameworks regulating foreign funding. Riley Moore, a Republican Congressman from West Virginia, claimed that the proposed amendments represented a ‘clear attack against Christians’ and warned that the legislation could negatively impact India-US relations. Also Read: 'India's internal matter': MEA hits back at US Congressman over FCRA Amendment Bill MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): India is framing a new law to cut off foreign aid to civil society. TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): Regulation of foreign financial flows in public and political spaces is a sovereign step driven by national security concerns. It is an accepted feature of modern governance in many democracies around the world. Also Read: India Proposes Major FCRA Changes | Tougher Rules for NGOs Receiving Foreign Funds MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): FCRA has adversely impacted the working of NGOs and charitable organization and the new amendment would further restrict their ability to operate in India. TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): In reality, foreign money inflows into India have been rising, not falling. Foreign contributions to registered organisations grew from roughly $1.2 billion in 2010–11 to $2.67 billion in 2024–25. India has over 3 million NGOs. A bare fraction of these, only 14,450, hold FCRA registration. Thus, the overwhelming majority of the civil society organizations are entirely outside the Act. FCRA does not stop anyone from accepting foreign charity, research grants or humanitarian aid. It asks three things — register, receive the money through laid down process, report what you did with it. MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): The law will lead to seizure of assets of NGOs, including religious charities, places of worship, hospitals, schools, and charitable organizations that rely on foreign donations. TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): India welcomes genuine international partnerships and has always provided a legal framework within which such contributions can be received and utilised. When a registration is cancelled or surrendered, foreign contributions and the assets created from them already vest in a State Government authority. This has been in force since 2010. It is not new. What the 2026 Bill adds is a designated authority to safeguard those assets — and a way back. If the organisation restores its registration, all assets and unused funds are returned in full. Places of worship carry their own protection. Where a cancelled association has created property connected to a place of worship, that property goes to another FCRA-registered association of the same faith to ensure continuity of worship. MYTH 1 (as mentioned by Kwatra): FCRA specifically targets a particular religion or community TRUTH (as mentioned by Kwatra): Nothing could be farther from it. The Act applies uniformly to all organisations regardless of religion, community or ideology. Faith-based welfare activities, including religious education, maintenance of places of worship, and charitable work by organisations of every faith, continue to be eligible for foreign funding.

India's US envoy Vinay Mohan Kwatra debunked five “myths” around the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026, saying it seeks greater transparency and governance. His comments came after US Congressman Riley Moore criticised the proposed law, alleging it could target Christians and affect India-US ties.

India's US envoy Vinay Mohan Kwatra debunks 5 myths on FCRA Amendment Bill

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday (August 7) dismissed criticism by US Congressman Riley Moore over the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, asserting that legislative matters are India's internal affairs. The ministry also pointed out that many countries, including the United States, have their own legal frameworks regulating foreign funding. The response comes after Riley Moore, a Republican Congressman from West Virginia, claimed that the proposed amendments represented a ‘clear attack against Christians’ and warned that the legislation could negatively impact India-US relations.&nbsp;Responding to media queries, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India's democratic institutions have an established legislative process and stressed that domestic laws should be viewed in their proper context. He further noted that countries around the world, including the United States, regulate foreign contributions to organisations through their own legal systems.Moore, in a statement released on August 4, alleged that the proposed amendments could allow the Indian government to assume control of churches and religious charities if their Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) registration is cancelled or not renewed. He argued that such provisions would disproportionately impact Christian organisations and urged the Indian government to reconsider the proposed legislation.<h2>What the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 proposes</h2>The proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 seeks to amend the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, which regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions by individuals, associations and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in India. The FCRA aims to ensure that foreign funding does not adversely affect India's sovereignty, integrity, national security, public interest or democratic institutions.&nbsp;Under the proposed amendments, if an organisation's FCRA registration is cancelled, surrendered or not renewed, a government-designated authority would temporarily manage its foreign contributions and related assets. The Bill also specifies that in the case of places of worship and religious institutions, the designated authority must preserve their religious character while administering such assets. According to the Centre, the proposed amendments are intended to improve transparency, accountability and the administration of foreign-funded organisations, particularly when they are no longer eligible to receive overseas donations.&nbsp;The government has also maintained that the changes are designed to protect public assets created through foreign contributions while ensuring that ongoing charitable activities continue in accordance with the law. However, the proposed legislation has triggered political as well as international debate, with critics raising concerns about the extent of government oversight. The MEA's response marks India's first official reaction to Moore's remarks, reiterating that legislative decisions are matters of domestic policy and should be assessed within India's constitutional and legal framework.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cbi-reveals-digital-trail-behind-neet-ug-2026-paper-leak-through-whatsapp-groups-telegram-chats-and-photos-1786097020958">CBI reveals digital trail behind NEET UG 2026 paper leak through WhatsApp groups, Telegram chats and photos</a><h2>‘Govt had no role to play in Hasina's media event'</h2>The Ministry of External Affairs also clarified that the Government of India had no role in the media interaction featuring former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on August 5 and does not endorse the remarks made during the event. Addressing the issue, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, “The government had no role to play in what was an event by a private media entity, and it does not endorse anything said at the forum, especially with regard to the duly constituted government of Bangladesh.” Jaiswal's remarks came in response to questions regarding Sheikh Hasina's interaction with the media held on August 5.<h2>Watch the video here</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Bi-Weekly Media Briefing by the Official Spokesperson (August 07, 2026) <a href="https://t.co/rT0CbgPosI">https://t.co/rT0CbgPosI</a>&mdash; Randhir Jaiswal (@MEAIndia) <a href="https://x.com/MEAIndia/status/2085675930379325724?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri’s Sri Lanka visit, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal , “As part of the visit, he had interactions at the highest level. He called on the President of Sri Lanka and the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. He also had meetings with the Foreign Minister and his counterpart, the Foreign Secretary of Sri Lanka, where they discussed a wide range of issues. They also discussed development cooperation, all the programmes that are currently being run there, and some of the new programmes that were started in the wake of Cyclone Ditwah.”&nbsp;&nbsp;"The fishermen issue also came up for discussion. Once again, we urge that this particular matter be given a humanitarian approach because the livelihood of fishermen is involved. We have pressed that the issues we have raised for the welfare of our fishermen should be given due consideration, keeping in mind their livelihood concerns and humanitarian considerations..." On Somalia and Pakistan signing a defence cooperation pact, Randhir Jaiswal said, “We continue to closely follow the developments between Somalia and the other country that you mentioned. That is what I have to say.” On Africa Day, he said, “Yes, this was a big celebration. Each year, we celebrate our solidarity, support, and partnership with Africa with great enthusiasm. This time, the External Affairs Minister attended the Africa Day celebrations.” On Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Pakistan signing a joint trilateral defence agreement, he said, "This is also a development that we are closely following, and we shall keep you updated."

MEA rejects US Congressman Riley Moore's criticism of the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026, saying India's laws are internal matters. It also clarifies it did not endorse Sheikh Hasina's media event remarks

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday (August 7) dismissed criticism by US Congressman Riley Moore over the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, asserting that legislative matters are India's internal affairs. The ministry also pointed out that many countries, including the United States, have their own legal frameworks regulating foreign funding. The response comes after Riley Moore, a Republican Congressman from West Virginia, claimed that the proposed amendments represented a ‘clear attack against Christians’ and warned that the legislation could negatively impact India-US relations. Responding to media queries, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India's democratic institutions have an established legislative process and stressed that domestic laws should be viewed in their proper context. He further noted that countries around the world, including the United States, regulate foreign contributions to organisations through their own legal systems. Moore, in a statement released on August 4, alleged that the proposed amendments could allow the Indian government to assume control of churches and religious charities if their Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) registration is cancelled or not renewed. He argued that such provisions would disproportionately impact Christian organisations and urged the Indian government to reconsider the proposed legislation. What the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026 proposes The proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026 seeks to amend the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, which regulates the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contributions by individuals, associations and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in India. The FCRA aims to ensure that foreign funding does not adversely affect India's sovereignty, integrity, national security, public interest or democratic institutions. Under the proposed amendments, if an organisation's FCRA registration is cancelled, surrendered or not renewed, a government-designated authority would temporarily manage its foreign contributions and related assets. The Bill also specifies that in the case of places of worship and religious institutions, the designated authority must preserve their religious character while administering such assets. According to the Centre, the proposed amendments are intended to improve transparency, accountability and the administration of foreign-funded organisations, particularly when they are no longer eligible to receive overseas donations. The government has also maintained that the changes are designed to protect public assets created through foreign contributions while ensuring that ongoing charitable activities continue in accordance with the law. However, the proposed legislation has triggered political as well as international debate, with critics raising concerns about the extent of government oversight. The MEA's response marks India's first official reaction to Moore's remarks, reiterating that legislative decisions are matters of domestic policy and should be assessed within India's constitutional and legal framework. Also Read: CBI reveals digital trail behind NEET UG 2026 paper leak through WhatsApp groups, Telegram chats and photos ‘Govt had no role to play in Hasina's media event' The Ministry of External Affairs also clarified that the Government of India had no role in the media interaction featuring former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on August 5 and does not endorse the remarks made during the event. Addressing the issue, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, “The government had no role to play in what was an event by a private media entity, and it does not endorse anything said at the forum, especially with regard to the duly constituted government of Bangladesh.” Jaiswal's remarks came in response to questions regarding Sheikh Hasina's interaction with the media held on August 5. Watch the video here

MEA rejected US Congressman Riley Moore's criticism of the FCRA Amendment Bill 2026, calling it India's internal matter. It also clarified the government had no role in Sheikh Hasina's media event

'India's internal matter': MEA hits back at US Congressman over FCRA Amendment Bill

fcra-bill

Fcra Bill, News on Fcra Bill, stories on Fcra Bill, articles on Fcra Bill, Fcra Bill stories at Wion, Fcra Bill news, Fcra Bill latest news

fcra bill

Christian leaders meet Vijay, Tamil Nadu passes resolution against foreign donation bill | Gravitas

Vijay takes on BJP over FCRA bill, demands centre withdraw amendment

FCRA Bill referred to JPC amid disruptions, Opposition presses for withdrawal

FCRA Amendment Bill: Centre seeks consensus on JPC as opposition raise concerns

Tamil Nadu Assembly opposes FCRA Bill: Why is the state opposing it?

India's US envoy Vinay Mohan Kwatra debunks 5 myths on FCRA Amendment Bill

MEA rejects US Congressman's FCRA criticism, calls it 'India's internal matter'