<p>Indian cricketer Shikhar Dhawan hasn’t had the best of times on and off the field lately. While he got dropped from India’s white-ball squads owing to some mediocre performances, his relationship with his estranged wife, Aesha Mukerji also took an ugly turn. As per latest reports, Aesha tried defaming Dhawan by even circulating defamatory messages to Dhawan’s IPL franchise&nbsp;Delhi Capitals’ CEO, Dheeraj Malhotra, in an attempt to tarnish his reputation. The reports further claim that Dhawan has now filed a plea in Delhi’s Patiala House Court against her, who is also believed to have threatened Dhawan of ruining his career.</p>

<p>Looking into this case, Judge Harish Kumar has said, if Aesha actually has some ‘real grievances’ against Shikhar Dhawan, she cannot be restrained from lodging with the concerned authorities.</p>

<p><strong>ALSO READ:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/wpl-mumbai-team-ropes-in-legend-charlotte-edwards-as-head-coach-jhulan-goswami-as-mentor-559101">WPL: Mumbai team ropes in legend Charlotte Edwards as head coach, Jhulan Goswami as mentor</a></p>

<p>However, he further added saying, “She can certainly be restrained from sharing her grievance against him (Dhawan) with her friends, relatives, peers of parties as well as from making it public even before approaching the appropriate authority."</p>

<p>"In these circumstances, she is hereby restrained till further order from circulating any of her grievances against Dhawan or her version of the dispute involved herein or the alleged defamatory and false material against him in social media, print media or to any other forum or to friends, relatives or colleagues of the parties," Kumar said as quoted by the Quint.</p>

<p>Dhawan married Aesha in 2012 and they even have&nbsp;a son who stays with&nbsp;Aesha in Australia.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmoKRBUI19K/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);">
<div style="padding:16px;">
<div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;">
<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>

<div style="padding: 19% 0;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmoKRBUI19K/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"><svg height="50px" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 60 60" width="50px" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd" stroke="none" stroke-width="1"><g fill="#000000" transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></a></div>

<div style="padding-top: 8px;">
<div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmoKRBUI19K/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank">View this post on Instagram</a></div>
</div>

<div style="padding: 12.5% 0;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;">
<div>
<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<div style="margin-left: 8px;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<div style="margin-left: auto;">
<div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);">&nbsp;</div>
</div>
</div>

<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;">
<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;">&nbsp;</div>

<div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;">&nbsp;</div>
</div>

<p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmoKRBUI19K/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A post shared by Shikhar Dhawan (@shikhardofficial)</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p><strong>What future lies for Dhawan?</strong></p>

<p>Out of favour opener Shikhar Dhawan last featured for India during the third ODI against Bangladesh in December last year. Now with the young players like Shubman Gill and Ishan Kishan delivering at the top in the white-ball cricket, Dhawan’s comeback doesn’t look likely to happen, at least in the 50-over format. Even in the shortest format, the left-handed batter could still feature for his IPL franchise in Delhi Capitals this season, his chances of playing T20Is for India any further look bleak too.</p>


Indian cricketer Shikhar Dhawan hasn’t had the best of times on and off the field lately. While he got dropped from India’s white-ball squads owing to some mediocre performances, his relationship with his estranged wife, Aesha Mukerji also took an ugly turn.

Indian cricketer Shikhar Dhawan hasn’t had the best of times on and off the field lately. While he got dropped from India’s white-ball squads owing to some mediocre performances, his relationship with his estranged wife, Aesha Mukerji also took an ugly turn. As per latest reports, Aesha tried defaming Dhawan by even circulating defamatory messages to Dhawan’s IPL franchise Delhi Capitals’ CEO, Dheeraj Malhotra, in an attempt to tarnish his reputation. The reports further claim that Dhawan has now filed a plea in Delhi’s Patiala House Court against her, who is also believed to have threatened Dhawan of ruining his career. Looking into this case, Judge Harish Kumar has said, if Aesha actually has some ‘real grievances’ against Shikhar Dhawan, she cannot be restrained from lodging with the concerned authorities. ALSO READ: WPL: Mumbai team ropes in legend Charlotte Edwards as head coach, Jhulan Goswami as mentor However, he further added saying, “She can certainly be restrained from sharing her grievance against him (Dhawan) with her friends, relatives, peers of parties as well as from making it public even before approaching the appropriate authority." "In these circumstances, she is hereby restrained till further order from circulating any of her grievances against Dhawan or her version of the dispute involved herein or the alleged defamatory and false material against him in social media, print media or to any other forum or to friends, relatives or colleagues of the parties," Kumar said as quoted by the Quint. Dhawan married Aesha in 2012 and they even have a son who stays with Aesha in Australia. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Shikhar Dhawan (@shikhardofficial) × What future lies for Dhawan? Out of favour opener Shikhar Dhawan last featured for India during the third ODI against Bangladesh in December last year. Now with the young players like Shubman Gill and Ishan Kishan delivering at the top in the white-ball cricket, Dhawan’s comeback doesn’t look likely to happen, at least in the 50-over format. Even in the shortest format, the left-handed batter could still feature for his IPL franchise in Delhi Capitals this season, his chances of playing T20Is for India any further look bleak too.

Relationship between Shikhar Dhawan and Aesha gets dirty, estranged wife threatens to ruin his career

<p>Delhi's Patiala House Court on March 19 ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru under section 83 of the code of criminal procedure in connection with a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case, news agency ANI reported on Saturday.&nbsp;</p>

<p>As per reports, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Deepak Sherawat issued fresh directions after the Bengaluru Police, through Enforcement Directorate's special public prosecutor NK Matta and advocate Samvedna Verma, sought more time to execute its earlier order in this regard, news agency PTI reported.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The court has directed the state police to attach the properties by July 10, which is the next date of hearing.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">Delhi's Patiala House Court on 19th March ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru under section 83 in The code of criminal procedure in connection with a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case. <a href="https://t.co/i912hpl0zd">pic.twitter.com/i912hpl0zd</a></p>
— ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1109324545809371136?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

<p>The court was informed that Bengaluru Police had earlier identified 159 properties belonging to Mallya but had not been able to attach any of them.</p>

<p>Fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya was declared a proclaimed offender by the court for evading its summons in the case.</p>

<p>The court had previously directed the attachment of Mallya's properties in the case through the Bengaluru Police commissioner and sought a report on it. An open-ended non-bailable warrant (NBW) was also issued against Mallya.</p>

<p><em>(With inputs from agencies)&nbsp;</em><br />
&nbsp;</p>


Delhi's Patiala House Court on March 19 ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru under section 83 of the code of criminal procedure in connection with a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case, news agency ANI reported on Saturday.

Delhi's Patiala House Court on March 19 ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru under section 83 of the code of criminal procedure in connection with a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case, news agency ANI reported on Saturday. As per reports, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Deepak Sherawat issued fresh directions after the Bengaluru Police, through Enforcement Directorate's special public prosecutor NK Matta and advocate Samvedna Verma, sought more time to execute its earlier order in this regard, news agency PTI reported. The court has directed the state police to attach the properties by July 10, which is the next date of hearing. Delhi's Patiala House Court on 19th March ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru under section 83 in The code of criminal procedure in connection with a FERA (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act) violation case. pic.twitter.com/i912hpl0zd — ANI (@ANI) March 23, 2019 × The court was informed that Bengaluru Police had earlier identified 159 properties belonging to Mallya but had not been able to attach any of them. Fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya was declared a proclaimed offender by the court for evading its summons in the case. The court had previously directed the attachment of Mallya's properties in the case through the Bengaluru Police commissioner and sought a report on it. An open-ended non-bailable warrant (NBW) was also issued against Mallya. (With inputs from agencies)

Delhi court ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru 

<p>A criminal defamation complaint has been filed in Delhi's Patiala House Court against Congress leader Shashi Tharoor for his alleged remark 'Modi is like a scorpion on Shivling'.</p>

<p>The court has adjourned the hearing in the matter for November 16, reported ANI.</p>

<p>Tharoor, who made the remark during an event in Bengaluru, attributed it to an unnamed Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) source.&nbsp;</p>

<p>"There's an extraordinarily striking metaphor expressed by an unnamed RSS source to a journalist, that, "Modi is like a scorpion sitting on a Shivling, you can't remove him with your hand &amp; you cannot hit it with a chappal either," Tharoor reportedly said at the event.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Tharoor reportedly made the controversial comment while addressing the audience at the Bangalore Literature Festival (BLF). He also read a few pages from his new book, The Paradoxical Prime Minister, on the occasion.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The book is highly critical of Modi calling him a ''paradoxical man who says one thing and does another''. &nbsp;</p>


A criminal defamation complaint has been filed in Delhi's Patiala House Court against Congress leader Shashi Tharoor for his alleged remark 'Modi is like a scorpion on Shivling'.

A criminal defamation complaint has been filed in Delhi's Patiala House Court against Congress leader Shashi Tharoor for his alleged remark 'Modi is like a scorpion on Shivling'. The court has adjourned the hearing in the matter for November 16, reported ANI. Tharoor, who made the remark during an event in Bengaluru, attributed it to an unnamed Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) source. "There's an extraordinarily striking metaphor expressed by an unnamed RSS source to a journalist, that, "Modi is like a scorpion sitting on a Shivling, you can't remove him with your hand & you cannot hit it with a chappal either," Tharoor reportedly said at the event. Tharoor reportedly made the controversial comment while addressing the audience at the Bangalore Literature Festival (BLF). He also read a few pages from his new book, The Paradoxical Prime Minister, on the occasion. The book is highly critical of Modi calling him a ''paradoxical man who says one thing and does another''.

Criminal defamation complaint filed against Tharoor for 'Modi is like a scorpion' taunt

<p>The Delhi's Patiala House Court has convicted gangster Abu Salem in the 2002 extortion case against him.</p>

<p>The gangster has been charged for demanding an amount of Rs 5 crore as protection money from Delhi businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002.&nbsp</p>

<p>On January 15, he had claimed that there was not much evidence available against him in the case.&nbsp</p>

<p>He also said that he was being tried in the case in violation of the order by which he was brought from Portugal to India in 2005.&nbsp</p>

<p>Salem has already been convicted in the 1993&nbspMumbai blasts case and was sentenced to life imprisonment in September 2017.</p>

<p>Infamous for terrorising the Bollywood film industry, the gangster worked in the D-Company as a driver transporting weapons and contraband.&nbsp<br />
&nbsp</p>

<p>&nbsp</p>

<p><br />
<br />
&nbsp</p>


The gangster has been charged for demanding an amount of Rs 5 crore as protection money from Delhi businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002

The Delhi's Patiala House Court has convicted gangster Abu Salem in the 2002 extortion case against him. The gangster has been charged for demanding an amount of Rs 5 crore as protection money from Delhi businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002. On January 15, he had claimed that there was not much evidence available against him in the case. He also said that he was being tried in the case in violation of the order by which he was brought from Portugal to India in 2005. Salem has already been convicted in the 1993&nbspMumbai blasts case and was sentenced to life imprisonment in September 2017. Infamous for terrorising the Bollywood film industry, the gangster worked in the D-Company as a driver transporting weapons and contraband.

Delhi Patiala House court convicts Abu Salem in 2002 extortion case

<p>The Delhi Patiala House Court has again issued a production warrant against Abu Salem in the 2002 businessman extortion case.</p>

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en">2002 extortion case: Delhi&#39;s Patiala House Court once again issued a production warrant against Abu Salem and directed the jail authorities to produce him before it on 27 March.</p>
&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/977483547824087040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">&times;</a></div>

<p>The court&nbsp;directed jail authorities to produce him before the court on March 27.</p>

<p>The court had issued the same warrant in February as well.</p>

<p>Also read: <a href="http://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-court-issues-production-warrant-against-abu-salem-32734">Delhi court issues Production warrant against Abu Salem</a></p>

<p>Gangster Abu Salem is undergoing&nbsp;trial for allegedly demanding an amount of Rs 5 crore as protection money from Delhi businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002.&nbsp;</p>

<p>On January 15, he had claimed that there was not much evidence available against him in the case.&nbsp;</p>

<p>He also said that he was being tried in the case in violation of the order by which he was brought from Portugal to India in 2005.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Salem has already been given a bail in the case. However, he remains in the jail after being convicted in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case.&nbsp;</p>

<p>A TADA court had sentenced Abu Salem to life imprisonment in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case in September 2017.</p>

<p><br />
&nbsp;</p>


The court further directed jail authorities to produce him before the court on March 27

The Delhi Patiala House Court has again issued a production warrant against Abu Salem in the 2002 businessman extortion case. 2002 extortion case: Delhi's Patiala House Court once again issued a production warrant against Abu Salem and directed the jail authorities to produce him before it on 27 March. — ANI (@ANI) March 24, 2018 × The court directed jail authorities to produce him before the court on March 27. The court had issued the same warrant in February as well. Also read: Delhi court issues Production warrant against Abu Salem Gangster Abu Salem is undergoing trial for allegedly demanding an amount of Rs 5 crore as protection money from Delhi businessman Ashok Gupta in 2002. On January 15, he had claimed that there was not much evidence available against him in the case. He also said that he was being tried in the case in violation of the order by which he was brought from Portugal to India in 2005. Salem has already been given a bail in the case. However, he remains in the jail after being convicted in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case. A TADA court had sentenced Abu Salem to life imprisonment in the 1993 Mumbai blasts case in September 2017.

Delhi court again issues production warrant against Abu Salem

delhi-patiala-house-court

Delhi Patiala House Court, News on Delhi Patiala House Court, stories on Delhi Patiala House Court, articles on Delhi Patiala House Court, Delhi Patiala House Court stories at Wion, Delhi Patiala House Court news, Delhi Patiala House Court latest news

delhi patiala-house-court

Relationship between Shikhar Dhawan and Aesha gets dirty, estranged wife threatens to ruin his career

Delhi court ordered attachment of Vijay Mallya's properties in Bengaluru

Criminal defamation complaint filed against Tharoor for 'Modi is like a scorpion' taunt

Delhi Patiala House court convicts Abu Salem in 2002 extortion case

Delhi court again issues production warrant against Abu Salem