US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Sept 13) criticised those calling for a slowdown in artificial intelligence (AI) development, describing them as “negative” forces. Speaking to reporters during a visit to Ireland, Trump said some critics were raising concerns about developments that he believed would not actually happen.&nbsp;“I think you have a lot of negative” forces “that are bringing it up that shouldn't be bringing it up, and they're bringing up things that won't happen,” he said.&nbsp;Trump said the US currently has an advantage over China in AI and stressed that maintaining that lead was crucial. He was responding to questions from reporters about whether the AI sector should face tighter regulations or slow its development.&nbsp;“We're leading China in AI. We're the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI wins,” Trump told reporters, according to Reuters.&nbsp;His comments came a day after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on AI companies to slow the development of increasingly powerful systems and strengthen safeguards.&nbsp;Amodei on Saturday proposed a three-part plan aimed at controlling the pace of frontier AI development. He argued that AI systems are becoming capable of helping create more advanced models, raising concerns about how quickly the technology could progress.&nbsp;“We must pace the frontier,” Amodei wrote in an essay outlining his proposals.&nbsp;As part of his first proposal, Amodei called for independent third-party evaluators to receive permanent, employee-level access to frontier AI systems. He said these experts should be able to assess safety measures, report incidents and check whether models remain aligned with their intended goals during training.&nbsp;Amodei said AI companies should also work together on common safety standards and agree on limits to unchecked development. His third proposal called for greater international cooperation on advanced AI safety.&nbsp;He also urged democratic governments, including the US, to engage with authoritarian countries on AI safety, while recognising the difficulty of ensuring compliance with international agreements.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-takes-brics-chair-wars-trade-disruptions-and-local-currency-trade-in-focus-1789298580586">China takes BRICS chair: Wars, trade disruptions and local-currency trade in focus</a><h3>Sam Altman, Elon Musk back Amodei</h3>OpenAI CEO Sam Altman supported Amodei’s call for a more measured approach to frontier AI development.&nbsp;“I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” Altman wrote on X.&nbsp;Altman also backed the proposal for independent evaluators to have employee-like access to AI systems and said OpenAI would adopt a similar approach.&nbsp;Tesla CEO Elon Musk also endorsed Amodei’s position, writing, “Dario is right.”&nbsp;The debate comes as AI companies race to develop increasingly capable systems, while researchers and industry leaders remain divided over how quickly the technology should advance and what safeguards are needed to manage potential risks.

Trump dismissed concerns over the rapid development of AI and rejected calls from industry leaders, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, to slow its progress and strengthen safeguards.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (Sept 13) criticised those calling for a slowdown in artificial intelligence (AI) development, describing them as “negative” forces. Speaking to reporters during a visit to Ireland, Trump said some critics were raising concerns about developments that he believed would not actually happen. “I think you have a lot of negative” forces “that are bringing it up that shouldn't be bringing it up, and they're bringing up things that won't happen,” he said. Trump said the US currently has an advantage over China in AI and stressed that maintaining that lead was crucial. He was responding to questions from reporters about whether the AI sector should face tighter regulations or slow its development. “We're leading China in AI. We're the most sophisticated country in the world, and frankly I want to keep it that way because whoever wins AI wins,” Trump told reporters, according to Reuters. His comments came a day after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called on AI companies to slow the development of increasingly powerful systems and strengthen safeguards. Amodei on Saturday proposed a three-part plan aimed at controlling the pace of frontier AI development. He argued that AI systems are becoming capable of helping create more advanced models, raising concerns about how quickly the technology could progress. “We must pace the frontier,” Amodei wrote in an essay outlining his proposals. As part of his first proposal, Amodei called for independent third-party evaluators to receive permanent, employee-level access to frontier AI systems. He said these experts should be able to assess safety measures, report incidents and check whether models remain aligned with their intended goals during training. Amodei said AI companies should also work together on common safety standards and agree on limits to unchecked development. His third proposal called for greater international cooperation on advanced AI safety. He also urged democratic governments, including the US, to engage with authoritarian countries on AI safety, while recognising the difficulty of ensuring compliance with international agreements. Also Read: China takes BRICS chair: Wars, trade disruptions and local-currency trade in focus Sam Altman, Elon Musk back Amodei OpenAI CEO Sam Altman supported Amodei’s call for a more measured approach to frontier AI development. “I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” Altman wrote on X. Altman also backed the proposal for independent evaluators to have employee-like access to AI systems and said OpenAI would adopt a similar approach. Tesla CEO Elon Musk also endorsed Amodei’s position, writing, “Dario is right.” The debate comes as AI companies race to develop increasingly capable systems, while researchers and industry leaders remain divided over how quickly the technology should advance and what safeguards are needed to manage potential risks.

Trump dismissed concerns over the rapid development of AI and rejected calls from industry leaders, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, to slow its progress and strengthen safeguards.

‘Whoever wins AI wins’: Trump brushes off fears, rejects AI bosses’ calls to slow development

Anthropic has announced that Mythos-class artificial intelligence models will be made available to all customers in the coming weeks, marking a major step for one of the most closely watched AI systems in the cybersecurity industry. The announcement came alongside the launch of Anthropic's upgraded Claude Opus 4.8 model. While the new model attracted attention, many industry observers focused on a separate update confirming that Anthropic is preparing a broader rollout of AI systems with capabilities similar to Mythos. According to the company, safety protections are progressing quickly, allowing it to move closer to public availability.<h2>What is Anthropic's Mythos AI?</h2>Mythos is a specialised AI model designed to identify cybersecurity vulnerabilities in software systems. Unlike traditional AI chatbots that focus on answering questions or generating content, Mythos has been built to analyse software code, identify weaknesses and help organisations strengthen their digital security.The model has attracted attention because of its reported ability to find large numbers of software vulnerabilities in a short period of time. Anthropic says Mythos can identify security flaws that may otherwise take human teams weeks or months to discover. Because of these capabilities, the company initially restricted access to the model through a programme called Project Glasswing, which was created to test the technology before a wider release.<h2>Thousands of vulnerabilities already discovered</h2>According to Anthropic, Mythos Preview has already helped uncover thousands of high-severity software vulnerabilities during testing. The company said some of these vulnerabilities affected major operating systems, web browsers and critical software infrastructure used worldwide. Anthropic reported that many organisations participating in Project Glasswing discovered hundreds of significant vulnerabilities in their own systems after using the model. Some participants also reported that their software security testing became more than ten times faster compared with traditional methods. One of the most notable examples came from Cloudflare, which said the model helped identify around 2,000 software bugs across important systems. According to Anthropic, nearly 400 of those vulnerabilities were classified as high or critical severity. The company also said Cloudflare found the model produced fewer false alarms than many traditional human-led testing methods.<h2>Why cybersecurity experts are watching closely</h2>The growing capabilities of AI systems in cybersecurity have generated both excitement and concern among industry experts. Supporters believe tools such as Mythos could significantly improve software security by helping companies identify weaknesses before cybercriminals exploit them. Faster detection of vulnerabilities could reduce the risk of major data breaches, ransomware attacks and disruptions to critical infrastructure. At the same time, experts have warned that powerful cybersecurity AI systems must be released carefully. If similar technology falls into the wrong hands, it could potentially be used to identify vulnerabilities for offensive purposes rather than defence.This is one reason Anthropic created Project Glasswing, which includes participation from major technology firms such as Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike and Google.<h2>Anthropic says safeguards are improving</h2>Anthropic said the broader release is possible because the company is making progress on safety protections and monitoring systems. The company stated that it expects Mythos-class models to become available to customers in the coming weeks, although it has not yet confirmed whether the public version will be the exact Mythos model currently being tested or a closely related version with similar capabilities. The announcement reflects a broader trend across the AI industry, where companies are increasingly developing specialised models for fields such as cybersecurity, software engineering and scientific research.The wider rollout of Mythos-class AI could become one of the most significant cybersecurity developments of the year. If Anthropic's claims are validated through broader deployment, organisations may gain access to tools capable of finding software vulnerabilities at a speed that was previously difficult to achieve. For businesses, governments and cybersecurity teams, the coming weeks will provide a clearer picture of how advanced AI systems can be used to strengthen digital defences while balancing safety and responsible deployment.&nbsp;

Anthropic has announced that Mythos-class artificial intelligence models will be made available to all customers in the coming weeks, marking a major step for one of the most closely watched AI systems in the cybersecurity industry.


Anthropic has announced that Mythos-class artificial intelligence models will be made available to all customers in the coming weeks, marking a major step for one of the most closely watched AI systems in the cybersecurity industry. The announcement came alongside the launch of Anthropic's upgraded Claude Opus 4.8 model. While the new model attracted attention, many industry observers focused on a separate update confirming that Anthropic is preparing a broader rollout of AI systems with capabilities similar to Mythos. According to the company, safety protections are progressing quickly, allowing it to move closer to public availability. What is Anthropic's Mythos AI? Mythos is a specialised AI model designed to identify cybersecurity vulnerabilities in software systems. Unlike traditional AI chatbots that focus on answering questions or generating content, Mythos has been built to analyse software code, identify weaknesses and help organisations strengthen their digital security. The model has attracted attention because of its reported ability to find large numbers of software vulnerabilities in a short period of time. Anthropic says Mythos can identify security flaws that may otherwise take human teams weeks or months to discover. Because of these capabilities, the company initially restricted access to the model through a programme called Project Glasswing, which was created to test the technology before a wider release. Thousands of vulnerabilities already discovered According to Anthropic, Mythos Preview has already helped uncover thousands of high-severity software vulnerabilities during testing. The company said some of these vulnerabilities affected major operating systems, web browsers and critical software infrastructure used worldwide. Anthropic reported that many organisations participating in Project Glasswing discovered hundreds of significant vulnerabilities in their own systems after using the model. Some participants also reported that their software security testing became more than ten times faster compared with traditional methods. One of the most notable examples came from Cloudflare, which said the model helped identify around 2,000 software bugs across important systems. According to Anthropic, nearly 400 of those vulnerabilities were classified as high or critical severity. The company also said Cloudflare found the model produced fewer false alarms than many traditional human-led testing methods. Why cybersecurity experts are watching closely The growing capabilities of AI systems in cybersecurity have generated both excitement and concern among industry experts. Supporters believe tools such as Mythos could significantly improve software security by helping companies identify weaknesses before cybercriminals exploit them. Faster detection of vulnerabilities could reduce the risk of major data breaches, ransomware attacks and disruptions to critical infrastructure. At the same time, experts have warned that powerful cybersecurity AI systems must be released carefully. If similar technology falls into the wrong hands, it could potentially be used to identify vulnerabilities for offensive purposes rather than defence. This is one reason Anthropic created Project Glasswing, which includes participation from major technology firms such as Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike and Google. Anthropic says safeguards are improving Anthropic said the broader release is possible because the company is making progress on safety protections and monitoring systems. The company stated that it expects Mythos-class models to become available to customers in the coming weeks, although it has not yet confirmed whether the public version will be the exact Mythos model currently being tested or a closely related version with similar capabilities. The announcement reflects a broader trend across the AI industry, where companies are increasingly developing specialised models for fields such as cybersecurity, software engineering and scientific research. The wider rollout of Mythos-class AI could become one of the most significant cybersecurity developments of the year. If Anthropic's claims are validated through broader deployment, organisations may gain access to tools capable of finding software vulnerabilities at a speed that was previously difficult to achieve. For businesses, governments and cybersecurity teams, the coming weeks will provide a clearer picture of how advanced AI systems can be used to strengthen digital defences while balancing safety and responsible deployment.

Anthropic has announced that Mythos-class artificial intelligence models will be made available to all customers in the coming weeks, marking a major step for one of the most closely watched AI systems in the cybersecurity industry.

Anthropic’s most powerful Mythos-class AI model could soon reach all users

Anthropic’s Mythos model has drawn global attention after reports suggested it could identify thousands of software vulnerabilities. The release led to concerns among governments, banks and technology firms about the possibility of a new phase of AI-driven cyberattacks.However, cybersecurity experts say that the capabilities highlighted by Mythos are not entirely new. According to researchers, similar results can already be achieved using existing AI models, including those from Anthropic and OpenAI.&nbsp;<h2>What Mythos revealed about cybersecurity risks</h2>Mythos gained attention because of its ability to detect large numbers of vulnerabilities in software systems. Some of these issues had remained unnoticed for years, raising concerns about how widely such flaws may exist.The model was released in a limited way to selected organisations, including major companies, to reduce the risk of misuse. This controlled rollout reflects the sensitivity of tools that can identify weaknesses in critical systems.&nbsp;<h2>Experts say similar capabilities already exist</h2>Despite the attention around Mythos, researchers say that the ability to detect vulnerabilities at scale has been possible for some time.Cybersecurity firms have shown that by using a method known as orchestration, multiple AI models can work together to analyse code and find similar vulnerabilities. In tests, older models from both Anthropic and OpenAI were able to detect many of the same issues identified by Mythos.Experts note that this suggests the main difference is not just the model itself, but how effectively tools are combined and used.&nbsp;<h2>What are ‘zero-day’ vulnerabilities</h2>One of the key concerns in cybersecurity is the detection of “zero-day” vulnerabilities. These are flaws in software that are unknown to developers and have not yet been fixed.Such vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers before patches are released, making them particularly risky. Researchers say current AI tools are already capable of identifying these weaknesses, which adds to concerns about how quickly they can be used.&nbsp;Growing concern among governments and companiesThe release of Mythos has increased discussions around cybersecurity risks at the highest levels. Reports indicate that policymakers and industry leaders are considering stronger oversight of advanced AI systems.At the same time, organisations are concerned about the balance between detecting vulnerabilities and fixing them. While AI can identify issues quickly, addressing them still requires time and human effort.<h2>Offence may have an early advantage</h2>Experts suggest that the current situation may favour attackers in the short term. While AI tools can help defenders identify risks, they also make it easier for malicious actors to discover and exploit vulnerabilities.Cybersecurity professionals note that hackers already have the skills needed to use such techniques, and AI could reduce the time required to carry out attacks. This could lead to an increase in the number of attempts on systems that were previously not targeted.<h2>Challenges in fixing vulnerabilities</h2>Even before AI tools became widely available, organisations faced challenges in managing software vulnerabilities. Fixing issues often requires testing, updates and sometimes taking systems offline, which can be complex and time-consuming.Experts say that while AI has increased the number of vulnerabilities being identified, tools to fix them automatically are still limited. This creates a gap between detection and resolution.<h2>What this means for the future</h2>The discussion around Mythos highlights a broader trend in cybersecurity. AI is making it easier to identify risks, but it is also raising new challenges in how those risks are managed.Experts believe that collaboration between companies, governments and researchers will be important in addressing these issues. As AI tools continue to improve, the focus will likely shift towards building systems that can not only detect vulnerabilities but also help fix them efficiently.For now, the key takeaway is that the cybersecurity risks linked to AI are not entirely new, but they are becoming more visible and more urgent to address.&nbsp;

Anthropic’s Mythos model has drawn global attention after reports suggested it could identify thousands of software vulnerabilities. The release led to concerns among governments, banks and technology firms about the possibility of a new phase of AI-driven cyberattacks.


Anthropic’s Mythos model has drawn global attention after reports suggested it could identify thousands of software vulnerabilities. The release led to concerns among governments, banks and technology firms about the possibility of a new phase of AI-driven cyberattacks. However, cybersecurity experts say that the capabilities highlighted by Mythos are not entirely new. According to researchers, similar results can already be achieved using existing AI models, including those from Anthropic and OpenAI. What Mythos revealed about cybersecurity risks Mythos gained attention because of its ability to detect large numbers of vulnerabilities in software systems. Some of these issues had remained unnoticed for years, raising concerns about how widely such flaws may exist. The model was released in a limited way to selected organisations, including major companies, to reduce the risk of misuse. This controlled rollout reflects the sensitivity of tools that can identify weaknesses in critical systems. Experts say similar capabilities already exist Despite the attention around Mythos, researchers say that the ability to detect vulnerabilities at scale has been possible for some time. Cybersecurity firms have shown that by using a method known as orchestration, multiple AI models can work together to analyse code and find similar vulnerabilities. In tests, older models from both Anthropic and OpenAI were able to detect many of the same issues identified by Mythos. Experts note that this suggests the main difference is not just the model itself, but how effectively tools are combined and used. What are ‘zero-day’ vulnerabilities One of the key concerns in cybersecurity is the detection of “zero-day” vulnerabilities. These are flaws in software that are unknown to developers and have not yet been fixed. Such vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers before patches are released, making them particularly risky. Researchers say current AI tools are already capable of identifying these weaknesses, which adds to concerns about how quickly they can be used. Growing concern among governments and companies The release of Mythos has increased discussions around cybersecurity risks at the highest levels. Reports indicate that policymakers and industry leaders are considering stronger oversight of advanced AI systems. At the same time, organisations are concerned about the balance between detecting vulnerabilities and fixing them. While AI can identify issues quickly, addressing them still requires time and human effort. Offence may have an early advantage Experts suggest that the current situation may favour attackers in the short term. While AI tools can help defenders identify risks, they also make it easier for malicious actors to discover and exploit vulnerabilities. Cybersecurity professionals note that hackers already have the skills needed to use such techniques, and AI could reduce the time required to carry out attacks. This could lead to an increase in the number of attempts on systems that were previously not targeted. Challenges in fixing vulnerabilities Even before AI tools became widely available, organisations faced challenges in managing software vulnerabilities. Fixing issues often requires testing, updates and sometimes taking systems offline, which can be complex and time-consuming. Experts say that while AI has increased the number of vulnerabilities being identified, tools to fix them automatically are still limited. This creates a gap between detection and resolution. What this means for the future The discussion around Mythos highlights a broader trend in cybersecurity. AI is making it easier to identify risks, but it is also raising new challenges in how those risks are managed. Experts believe that collaboration between companies, governments and researchers will be important in addressing these issues. As AI tools continue to improve, the focus will likely shift towards building systems that can not only detect vulnerabilities but also help fix them efficiently. For now, the key takeaway is that the cybersecurity risks linked to AI are not entirely new, but they are becoming more visible and more urgent to address.

Anthropic’s Mythos model has drawn global attention after reports suggested it could identify thousands of software vulnerabilities. The release led to concerns among governments, banks and technology firms about the possibility of a new phase of AI-driven cyberattacks.

‘AI cyber risk’: Why existing AI models are already powerful

Anthropic’s new Mythos model is changing how companies approach cybersecurity, with early results showing a sharp improvement in detecting software vulnerabilities. When the model was introduced in April 2026, it reportedly identified thousands of high-severity bugs, many of which needed to be fixed before the system could be made widely available. Now, researchers working on Mozilla Firefox have shared how this technology is already being used in practice.<h2>AI finds long-hidden bugs in Firefox</h2>According to Mozilla’s security team, Mythos has uncovered several serious vulnerabilities, including issues that had remained undetected for more than a decade. This marks a significant shift compared to earlier AI tools, which often produced large numbers of low-quality alerts and false positives.&nbsp;Researchers say that recent improvements in AI systems, especially those that can review and refine their own outputs, have made these tools more reliable. As a result, security teams are now able to focus on meaningful findings instead of filtering out incorrect reports.<h2>Bug fixes rise sharply with AI support</h2>The impact of AI tools is clearly visible in Firefox’s recent updates. In April 2026, the browser released 423 bug fixes, compared to just 31 fixes in the same month last year. This increase shows how AI is helping teams identify more issues in less time. Some of these bugs were highly complex, including vulnerabilities in Firefox’s sandbox system. These types of issues are difficult to detect because they require multiple steps, including creating test code and simulating attacks on secure parts of the browser.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Bug fixes rise sharply with AI support

<h2>AI helps find bugs, but humans still fix them</h2>Despite these advances, human engineers remain central to the process. While AI can suggest possible fixes, the final code is still written and reviewed by developers.Mozilla’s team has said that AI-generated patches often need refinement and cannot be directly applied. For now, the role of AI is mainly to assist in discovery rather than fully automate the repair process.&nbsp;<h2>A shift in cybersecurity approach</h2>The use of tools like Mythos reflects a broader change in cybersecurity. Instead of relying only on manual testing or traditional scanning tools, companies are now using AI to analyse code more deeply and identify hidden risks.However, experts also note that these tools could be used by both defenders and attackers. While AI can help fix vulnerabilities faster, it may also enable malicious actors to discover weaknesses more quickly. Dario Amodei has suggested that, if managed properly, these tools could improve overall security by helping organisations fix vulnerabilities before they are exploited.&nbsp;At the same time, Mozilla engineers have taken a cautious view, noting that the long-term impact is still unclear. They believe that while AI gives an advantage to defenders, the balance between attackers and defenders may continue to evolve.<h2>What this means going forward</h2>The use of AI in cybersecurity is growing rapidly, and tools like Mythos show how quickly capabilities are improving. The ability to detect complex and long-standing bugs could help make software more secure.At the same time, the technology raises new questions about how security risks will be managed in the future. As AI tools become more widely available, companies will need to adapt their strategies to keep systems safe while making the most of these new capabilities&nbsp;

Anthropic’s new Mythos model is changing how companies approach cybersecurity, with early results showing a sharp improvement in detecting software vulnerabilities. 

Anthropic’s new Mythos model is changing how companies approach cybersecurity, with early results showing a sharp improvement in detecting software vulnerabilities. When the model was introduced in April 2026, it reportedly identified thousands of high-severity bugs, many of which needed to be fixed before the system could be made widely available. Now, researchers working on Mozilla Firefox have shared how this technology is already being used in practice. AI finds long-hidden bugs in Firefox According to Mozilla’s security team, Mythos has uncovered several serious vulnerabilities, including issues that had remained undetected for more than a decade. This marks a significant shift compared to earlier AI tools, which often produced large numbers of low-quality alerts and false positives. Researchers say that recent improvements in AI systems, especially those that can review and refine their own outputs, have made these tools more reliable. As a result, security teams are now able to focus on meaningful findings instead of filtering out incorrect reports. Bug fixes rise sharply with AI support The impact of AI tools is clearly visible in Firefox’s recent updates. In April 2026, the browser released 423 bug fixes, compared to just 31 fixes in the same month last year. This increase shows how AI is helping teams identify more issues in less time. Some of these bugs were highly complex, including vulnerabilities in Firefox’s sandbox system. These types of issues are difficult to detect because they require multiple steps, including creating test code and simulating attacks on secure parts of the browser.

Anthropic’s new Mythos model is changing how companies approach cybersecurity, with early results showing a sharp improvement in detecting software vulnerabilities.&nbsp;

‘Anthropic’s Mythos AI bug detection’: What it means for the future of software security

Anthropic has revealed details about a new experimental AI model called Claude Mythos, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. According to Anthropic, the model has demonstrated a strong ability to detect serious cybersecurity flaws in widely used software systems. Because of its capabilities, the company is not releasing the model publicly yet and is instead working with technology partners to fix the vulnerabilities it discovered.The announcement reflects how AI tools are increasingly being used in cybersecurity research to identify weaknesses in complex software systems.<h2>Claude Mythos identified thousands of software vulnerabilities</h2>In a blog post, Anthropic said Claude Mythos Preview was able to identify thousands of previously unknown vulnerabilities in widely used software.These include “zero-day vulnerabilities”, which are security flaws that software developers have not yet discovered. Zero-day vulnerabilities are particularly concerning because attackers can exploit them before developers have time to fix them.<h2>Anthropic said the AI model identified vulnerabilities across:</h2>Web browsersOperating systemsCore system softwareThe company added that some of the vulnerabilities could potentially allow attackers to escalate access from a normal user account to full control of a system.Vulnerabilities discovered in OpenBSD and Linux systemsAmong the findings was a 27-year-old vulnerability in OpenBSD, an operating system widely used in security-focused infrastructure such as firewalls and servers. The model also identified several vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, which powers the majority of servers worldwide and forms the backbone of many internet services.Security researchers say the Linux kernel is one of the most widely analysed pieces of software in the world, which makes the discovery of new vulnerabilities particularly notable.According to Anthropic, these flaws could potentially allow attackers to gain elevated access to systems if exploited.<h2>Anthropic working with 40 technology companies</h2>Because of the security implications, Anthropic said it is collaborating with more than 40 technology companies to address the vulnerabilities identified by Claude Mythos.The goal is to fix the security issues before the model is released more broadly. This approach reflects a growing concern in the AI industry: extremely capable AI systems could potentially identify security weaknesses faster than humans, which creates both benefits and risks.Anthropic said controlled testing with industry partners will help ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed responsibly.<h2>Why the model is not yet publicly released</h2>Although Claude Mythos reportedly outperforms earlier models such as Claude Opus 4.6 and other competing AI systems on several benchmarks, Anthropic is taking a cautious approach.The company said the model’s cybersecurity capabilities mean it needs additional testing and safeguards before public deployment.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has previously warned that highly capable AI models may present new risks if released without careful evaluation. Earlier reports also suggested that the model’s existence first became known after references appeared in a data leak related to Anthropic’s internal systems.<h2>AI and the future of cybersecurity</h2>Cybersecurity experts increasingly see artificial intelligence as a powerful tool for analysing large codebases and identifying weaknesses that human researchers may overlook.Traditional vulnerability discovery often requires months of manual review by security teams. AI systems can scan code at scale and highlight suspicious patterns within minutes.However, experts say this capability must be handled carefully. The same technology that identifies vulnerabilities could potentially be misused if released without safeguards. Anthropic’s decision to work with industry partners before releasing Claude Mythos suggests that AI companies are becoming more cautious about how powerful models are deployed. As AI research continues to advance, tools like Claude Mythos may play an important role in strengthening digital security across software systems used worldwide.&nbsp;

Anthropic has revealed an experimental AI system called Claude Mythos, which reportedly discovered thousands of previously unknown cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including zero-day flaws in systems such as OpenBSD and the Linux kernel. 

Anthropic has revealed details about a new experimental AI model called Claude Mythos, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. According to Anthropic, the model has demonstrated a strong ability to detect serious cybersecurity flaws in widely used software systems. Because of its capabilities, the company is not releasing the model publicly yet and is instead working with technology partners to fix the vulnerabilities it discovered. The announcement reflects how AI tools are increasingly being used in cybersecurity research to identify weaknesses in complex software systems. Claude Mythos identified thousands of software vulnerabilities In a blog post, Anthropic said Claude Mythos Preview was able to identify thousands of previously unknown vulnerabilities in widely used software. These include “zero-day vulnerabilities”, which are security flaws that software developers have not yet discovered. Zero-day vulnerabilities are particularly concerning because attackers can exploit them before developers have time to fix them. Anthropic said the AI model identified vulnerabilities across: Web browsers Operating systems Core system software The company added that some of the vulnerabilities could potentially allow attackers to escalate access from a normal user account to full control of a system. Vulnerabilities discovered in OpenBSD and Linux systems Among the findings was a 27-year-old vulnerability in OpenBSD, an operating system widely used in security-focused infrastructure such as firewalls and servers. The model also identified several vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, which powers the majority of servers worldwide and forms the backbone of many internet services. Security researchers say the Linux kernel is one of the most widely analysed pieces of software in the world, which makes the discovery of new vulnerabilities particularly notable. According to Anthropic, these flaws could potentially allow attackers to gain elevated access to systems if exploited. Anthropic working with 40 technology companies Because of the security implications, Anthropic said it is collaborating with more than 40 technology companies to address the vulnerabilities identified by Claude Mythos. The goal is to fix the security issues before the model is released more broadly. This approach reflects a growing concern in the AI industry: extremely capable AI systems could potentially identify security weaknesses faster than humans, which creates both benefits and risks. Anthropic said controlled testing with industry partners will help ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed responsibly. Why the model is not yet publicly released Although Claude Mythos reportedly outperforms earlier models such as Claude Opus 4.6 and other competing AI systems on several benchmarks, Anthropic is taking a cautious approach. The company said the model’s cybersecurity capabilities mean it needs additional testing and safeguards before public deployment. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has previously warned that highly capable AI models may present new risks if released without careful evaluation. Earlier reports also suggested that the model’s existence first became known after references appeared in a data leak related to Anthropic’s internal systems. AI and the future of cybersecurity Cybersecurity experts increasingly see artificial intelligence as a powerful tool for analysing large codebases and identifying weaknesses that human researchers may overlook. Traditional vulnerability discovery often requires months of manual review by security teams. AI systems can scan code at scale and highlight suspicious patterns within minutes. However, experts say this capability must be handled carefully. The same technology that identifies vulnerabilities could potentially be misused if released without safeguards. Anthropic’s decision to work with industry partners before releasing Claude Mythos suggests that AI companies are becoming more cautious about how powerful models are deployed. As AI research continues to advance, tools like Claude Mythos may play an important role in strengthening digital security across software systems used worldwide.

Anthropic has revealed an experimental AI system called Claude Mythos, which reportedly discovered thousands of previously unknown cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including zero-day flaws in systems such as OpenBSD and the Linux kernel.&nbsp;

‘Claude Mythos in cybersecurity’: How Anthropic’s new AI model can find hidden software vulnerabilities

Artificial intelligence firm Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei has criticised his former colleague and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for being beholden to the Trump administration on issues related to the use of AI in defence and personal security. Amodei suggested that the firm behind popular AI models such as Claude is receiving little support because it did not donate as much money to Donald Trump as OpenAI did. The allegations were made in an internal memo to staff, according to the website The Information.<h2>Political donations and AI policy disputes: Leaked memo reveals rift between Anthropic and US government</h2>Amodei claimed that tensions between his company and the Trump administration stem partly from the firm’s refusal to financially support Trump and its approach to AI regulation and safety issues. His roughly 1,600-word message was sent on 27 February to around 2,000 employees, explaining what he described as the “real reasons” the Department of Defence and the Trump administration were hostile towards Anthropic. The memo came as the Pentagon suspended an earlier contract for using Anthropic’s Claude and other AI models in its systems. Trump himself posted about the issue on social media, with Anthropic declared a “supply chain risk”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/anthropic-resumes-pentagon-talks-after-dispute-over-ai-use-by-the-us-military-reports-1772698977750">Anthropic resumes Pentagon talks after dispute over AI use by the US military: Reports</a><h2>‘Anthropic didn’t do dictator-style praise of Trump while OpenAI donated to him’</h2>In Amodei’s view, the reasons for the US government’s hostility towards Anthropic included its refusal to donate to Trump and the lack of what he called “dictator-style praise” for the US president. Other reasons included Anthropic’s support for AI regulation and its willingness to speak openly about the risks of AI, such as job displacement.&nbsp;Amodei said Anthropic maintained ethical “red lines”. He claimed that OpenAI, led by CEO Sam Altman, chose to cooperate with the government and accused it of appeasing employees and regulators.Amodei noted that OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife reportedly donated $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc super PAC, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund and has publicly praised the president.Amodei accused OpenAI of compromising principles, calling the rival company’s recent Pentagon agreement “mendacious” and a form of “safety theatre”. He also criticised OpenAI employees as being easily swayed by leadership narratives.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed</a><h2>Pentagon dispute with Anthropic: Mass surveillance and autonomous weapons were key issues</h2>Anthropic and the US government came to loggerheads after the Pentagon sought to modify existing contracts with AI firms to remove restrictions on the use of AI for domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.Anthropic refused these changes, saying the limits it placed on military use of AI reflected American values and the company’s ethical commitments. President Trump reportedly directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology, cancelling more than $200 million in government contracts.Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth labelled Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”, which could restrict partners like Amazon Web Services from collaborating with the AI firm.Anthropic plans to challenge the decision in court, calling it retaliatory and punitive.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-us-use-anthropic-ai-in-iran-s-strikes-despite-trump-s-ban-what-we-know-1772356637161">Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know</a><h2>OpenAI’s Pentagon deal vs Anthropic's call for AI oversight</h2>Shortly after the government vs Athropic dispute escalated, OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon to provide AI tools in classified environments, accepting terms similar to those rejected by Anthropic.&nbsp;Anthropic has advocated stronger oversight of artificial intelligence. It donated $20 million to Public First Action, a political action committee supporting AI guardrails and opposing deregulation efforts favoured by the Trump administration.OpenAI, meanwhile, has taken a more flexible approach to regulation. OpenAI avoided a public conflict with the government.Amodei has repeatedly warned about the societal risks of AI, including large-scale job displacement, and has criticised hands-off policy approaches.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei hinted that the Trump administration targeted the company after it refused political donations and opposed changes to Pentagon AI contracts involving mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Here are his allegations, according to reports

Artificial intelligence firm Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei has criticised his former colleague and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for being beholden to the Trump administration on issues related to the use of AI in defence and personal security. Amodei suggested that the firm behind popular AI models such as Claude is receiving little support because it did not donate as much money to Donald Trump as OpenAI did. The allegations were made in an internal memo to staff, according to the website The Information. Political donations and AI policy disputes: Leaked memo reveals rift between Anthropic and US government Amodei claimed that tensions between his company and the Trump administration stem partly from the firm’s refusal to financially support Trump and its approach to AI regulation and safety issues. His roughly 1,600-word message was sent on 27 February to around 2,000 employees, explaining what he described as the “real reasons” the Department of Defence and the Trump administration were hostile towards Anthropic. The memo came as the Pentagon suspended an earlier contract for using Anthropic’s Claude and other AI models in its systems. Trump himself posted about the issue on social media, with Anthropic declared a “supply chain risk”. Also read: Anthropic resumes Pentagon talks after dispute over AI use by the US military: Reports ‘Anthropic didn’t do dictator-style praise of Trump while OpenAI donated to him’ In Amodei’s view, the reasons for the US government’s hostility towards Anthropic included its refusal to donate to Trump and the lack of what he called “dictator-style praise” for the US president. Other reasons included Anthropic’s support for AI regulation and its willingness to speak openly about the risks of AI, such as job displacement. Amodei said Anthropic maintained ethical “red lines”. He claimed that OpenAI, led by CEO Sam Altman, chose to cooperate with the government and accused it of appeasing employees and regulators. Amodei noted that OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife reportedly donated $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc super PAC, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund and has publicly praised the president. Amodei accused OpenAI of compromising principles, calling the rival company’s recent Pentagon agreement “mendacious” and a form of “safety theatre”. He also criticised OpenAI employees as being easily swayed by leadership narratives. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed Pentagon dispute with Anthropic: Mass surveillance and autonomous weapons were key issues Anthropic and the US government came to loggerheads after the Pentagon sought to modify existing contracts with AI firms to remove restrictions on the use of AI for domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic refused these changes, saying the limits it placed on military use of AI reflected American values and the company’s ethical commitments. President Trump reportedly directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology, cancelling more than $200 million in government contracts. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth labelled Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”, which could restrict partners like Amazon Web Services from collaborating with the AI firm. Anthropic plans to challenge the decision in court, calling it retaliatory and punitive. Also read: Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know OpenAI’s Pentagon deal vs Anthropic's call for AI oversight Shortly after the government vs Athropic dispute escalated, OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon to provide AI tools in classified environments, accepting terms similar to those rejected by Anthropic. Anthropic has advocated stronger oversight of artificial intelligence. It donated $20 million to Public First Action, a political action committee supporting AI guardrails and opposing deregulation efforts favoured by the Trump administration. OpenAI, meanwhile, has taken a more flexible approach to regulation. OpenAI avoided a public conflict with the government. Amodei has repeatedly warned about the societal risks of AI, including large-scale job displacement, and has criticised hands-off policy approaches.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei hinted that the Trump administration targeted the company after it refused political donations and opposed changes to Pentagon AI contracts involving mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Here are his allegations, according to reports

'No dictator-style praise': Anthropic CEO says US govt hostility linked to Trump donations; slams OpenAI's Altman in internal memo - Report

Artificial intelligence is moving faster than many people expected. According to Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, society may not be fully prepared for the scale of change ahead.&nbsp;Speaking on Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath’s podcast WTF Is, Amodei compared the current AI moment to “standing on the shore while a massive wave gathers in the distance”.&nbsp;For young Indians choosing careers today, his message was clear: do not compete against AI build around it.&nbsp;

<h2>‘What should a 25-year-old learn today?’</h2>During the podcast, Kamath asked a question many students face: which skills will stay relevant in the next decade?&nbsp;Amodei suggested focusing on three broad areas:&nbsp;Build skills that work with AI&nbsp;Focus on human-centred tasks&nbsp;Develop strong analytical thinking&nbsp;He said roles that involve understanding people, emotions, real-world behaviour and decision-making may remain valuable for longer than routine technical tasks.&nbsp;“I would think about tasks that are human-centred, tasks that involve relating to people,” Amodei said.

<h2>Coding vs software engineering: What may change first?</h2>One of the strongest points he made was about coding.“I think coding is going away first,” he said, referring to basic programming tasks that AI models are increasingly able to perform.However, he made a distinction between coding and full software engineering.While AI may handle code generation, system architecture, product design, user understanding and managing AI systems may take longer to automate.&nbsp;He added that areas like:Design thinkingUnderstanding customer demandCoordinating AI toolsMaking judgement-based decisions&nbsp;are likely to remain human-driven for a longer period.&nbsp;<h2>The ‘5 percent’ advantage in an AI world</h2>Amodei also explained what he called a “comparative advantage” in the AI age.&nbsp;Even if humans only do 5 percent of a task while AI does 95 percent, that small portion can become highly valuable.&nbsp;“If you’re only doing five percent of the task, that five percent gets super-amplified,” he said.&nbsp;In simple terms, AI could increase productivity sharply. A single individual could produce 10 or even 20 times more output using AI tools.&nbsp;However, he also admitted uncertainty about the long-term effect on jobs.&nbsp;“I can’t guarantee that more jobs will be created than destroyed,” he has said in other discussions on AI impact.&nbsp;The safe bet: Human + Physical + Analytical&nbsp;For young Indians planning their future, Amodei suggested combining:&nbsp;Human-centred skills&nbsp;Work connected to the physical world&nbsp;Strong analytical foundations&nbsp;He said mixing these elements may offer more stability than focusing only on routine technical tasks.&nbsp;India has one of the world’s youngest workforces. According to government data, over 65 percent of India’s population is below 35 years of age. This makes career planning in the AI era especially important.Amodei’s broader warning was that AI progress is accelerating rapidly, while education systems and regulatory structures are struggling to keep pace.&nbsp;<h2>What this means for India’s youth</h2>The message was not to avoid technology. Instead, it was to rethink how careers are built.&nbsp;Rather than asking, “Will AI replace me?”, the better question may be, “How can I use AI to become more effective?”As AI systems become more capable, roles based purely on repetitive digital work may face pressure. But jobs that combine empathy, judgement, real-world understanding and critical thinking may prove more resilient.For India’s young workforce, the takeaway is simple: the AI wave is building. Preparing for it means learning how to work with machines while strengthening the skills that make us human.&nbsp;

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that AI is advancing rapidly and society may not be fully prepared. Speaking on Nikhil Kamath’s podcast, he advised young Indians to build careers around AI rather than compete with it. 

Artificial intelligence is moving faster than many people expected. According to Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, society may not be fully prepared for the scale of change ahead. Speaking on Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath’s podcast WTF Is, Amodei compared the current AI moment to “standing on the shore while a massive wave gathers in the distance”. For young Indians choosing careers today, his message was clear: do not compete against AI build around it.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that AI is advancing rapidly and society may not be fully prepared. Speaking on Nikhil Kamath’s podcast, he advised young Indians to build careers around AI rather than compete with it.&nbsp;

Don’t compete with AI, build around it: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s advice to young professionals

A brief onstage moment between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei drew attention during the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi.&nbsp;During a group photograph with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other global technology leaders, several attendees were seen holding hands and raising them for the cameras. However, social media users quickly noticed that Altman and Amodei did not hold hands. Instead, both raised their fists separately, maintaining distance between them.&nbsp;The moment soon went viral, with many online speculating about tensions between the two AI leaders.&nbsp;Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood at the centre of the photograph. Google CEO Sundar Pichai stood on his right, while Altman stood on his left. Amodei was positioned next to Altman.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman Responds: ‘I Was Confused’</h2>Hours after the image spread online, Sam Altman said about the incident during a closed-door interaction with few reporters.&nbsp;“I was sort of confused and didn’t know what I was supposed to do,” Altman said. He explained that Prime Minister Modi had taken his hand and raised it, but he was unsure about the intended gesture for the photograph.&nbsp;Altman added, “Modi grabbed my hand and put it up, and I wasn’t sure what we were supposed to be doing.”&nbsp;As of now there was no comment from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on the incident.&nbsp;<h2>OpenAI and Anthropic Rivalry</h2>Sam Altman, 40, and Dario Amodei, 43, previously worked together at OpenAI until 2019. According to earlier reports, Amodei left OpenAI in 2020 along with several senior researchers following disagreements over the company’s direction. He later co-founded Anthropic with his sister Daniela Amodei.&nbsp;In 2023, when OpenAI’s board temporarily removed Altman as CEO, reports suggested that Amodei was approached as a possible replacement. He declined the offer. Altman was reinstated as CEO within days.&nbsp;Today, OpenAI and Anthropic are among the leading artificial intelligence firms globally. According to Bloomberg estimates cited in reports, OpenAI is valued at around $500 billion, while Anthropic is valued at approximately $380 billion.&nbsp;The rivalry has also played out publicly. Anthropic recently aired a high-profile Super Bowl advertisement that criticised the idea of intrusive AI advertising. The ad suggested that some AI companies might insert advertisements directly into chatbot responses.&nbsp;In response, Altman posted on X that he “laughed” at the ad but described it as “clearly dishonest.” He said OpenAI’s principle was not to insert ads directly into chatbot responses. He also claimed that “more Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US.”&nbsp;<h2>India AI Impact Summit them brought together</h2>The India AI Impact Summit 2026 brought together global AI leaders, policymakers and industry executives to discuss artificial intelligence governance, infrastructure and innovation. With OpenAI and Anthropic both expanding globally, including in India, public appearances of their CEOs attract close attention.&nbsp;While the viral moment sparked speculation online, Altman’s clarification suggests there was no deliberate snub, but rather uncertainty during a coordinated stage gesture.&nbsp;&nbsp;

A viral moment at the India AI Impact Summit showed Sam Altman and Dario Amodei not holding hands during a group photo with PM Modi. Altman later said he was “confused” about the gesture. The clip sparked speculation amid OpenAI-Anthropic rivalry.


A brief onstage moment between OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei drew attention during the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi. During a group photograph with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and other global technology leaders, several attendees were seen holding hands and raising them for the cameras. However, social media users quickly noticed that Altman and Amodei did not hold hands. Instead, both raised their fists separately, maintaining distance between them. The moment soon went viral, with many online speculating about tensions between the two AI leaders. Prime Minister Narendra Modi stood at the centre of the photograph. Google CEO Sundar Pichai stood on his right, while Altman stood on his left. Amodei was positioned next to Altman. Sam Altman Responds: ‘I Was Confused’ Hours after the image spread online, Sam Altman said about the incident during a closed-door interaction with few reporters. “I was sort of confused and didn’t know what I was supposed to do,” Altman said. He explained that Prime Minister Modi had taken his hand and raised it, but he was unsure about the intended gesture for the photograph. Altman added, “Modi grabbed my hand and put it up, and I wasn’t sure what we were supposed to be doing.” As of now there was no comment from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei on the incident. OpenAI and Anthropic Rivalry Sam Altman, 40, and Dario Amodei, 43, previously worked together at OpenAI until 2019. According to earlier reports, Amodei left OpenAI in 2020 along with several senior researchers following disagreements over the company’s direction. He later co-founded Anthropic with his sister Daniela Amodei. In 2023, when OpenAI’s board temporarily removed Altman as CEO, reports suggested that Amodei was approached as a possible replacement. He declined the offer. Altman was reinstated as CEO within days. Today, OpenAI and Anthropic are among the leading artificial intelligence firms globally. According to Bloomberg estimates cited in reports, OpenAI is valued at around $500 billion, while Anthropic is valued at approximately $380 billion. The rivalry has also played out publicly. Anthropic recently aired a high-profile Super Bowl advertisement that criticised the idea of intrusive AI advertising. The ad suggested that some AI companies might insert advertisements directly into chatbot responses. In response, Altman posted on X that he “laughed” at the ad but described it as “clearly dishonest.” He said OpenAI’s principle was not to insert ads directly into chatbot responses. He also claimed that “more Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US.” India AI Impact Summit them brought together The India AI Impact Summit 2026 brought together global AI leaders, policymakers and industry executives to discuss artificial intelligence governance, infrastructure and innovation. With OpenAI and Anthropic both expanding globally, including in India, public appearances of their CEOs attract close attention. While the viral moment sparked speculation online, Altman’s clarification suggests there was no deliberate snub, but rather uncertainty during a coordinated stage gesture.

A viral moment at the India AI Impact Summit showed Sam Altman and Dario Amodei not holding hands during a group photo with PM Modi. Altman later said he was “confused” about the gesture. The clip sparked speculation amid OpenAI-Anthropic rivalry.

'Didn't know what was happening': Here’s what Sam Altman said on his awkward exchange with Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei

In a surprising turn of events, AI’s long-running rivalry between OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei hesitated to hold each other's hands at the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in Delhi's Bharat Mandapam with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on stage. &nbsp;Instead of displaying solidarity in the end, the two lifted their fists while making the chain.&nbsp;The video uploaded by the news agency ANI on social media shows that when PM Modi raised fists, making a chain with other global tech leaders to show unity, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei hesitated to hold each other's hands while making the chain. Instead, both of them just raised their fists to show respect.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Delhi | Prime Minister Narendra Modi, along with global tech leaders including the CEO of Google and Alphabet, Sundar Pichai, CEO of OpenAI, Sam Altman, Alexandr Wang, Chief AI Officer of Meta, CEO of Anthropic, Dario Amodei pose for a group photograph at the India AI… <a href="https://t.co/GccXlG9rRx">pic.twitter.com/GccXlG9rRx</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/2024349307835732347?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 19, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h3>Rift between OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei</h3>The rift between the tech leaders started after the founding of Anthropic, when Dario and Daniela Amodei, both former OpenAI vice presidents, with their then leader, Sam Altman, cited concerns that OpenAI was prioritising commercial interests over safety. That split set the stage for a deeper philosophical divide.&nbsp;Since then, Dario has built Anthropic around a safety-first ethos, placing his company on a trajectory starkly different from OpenAI’s. Altman’s firm, meanwhile, has closely tracked its former executive—now a major rival, and has frequently criticised Anthropic.&nbsp;Tensions resurfaced in early February, when the two exchanged fresh barbs after Anthropic ran a Super Bowl advertisement that appeared to poke fun at OpenAI’s decision to introduce ads in ChatGPT, a move Altman, who champions broad access over paywalls, openly pushed back against.&nbsp;"Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people," Altman said in a post on the social media platform X. "We are glad they do that, and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions," he added. &nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/this-us-tech-ceo-misses-ai-summit-gala-hosted-by-pm-modi-after-four-hours-in-delhi-traffic-who-is-she-1771497626452">THIS US tech CEO missed AI Summit gala hosted by PM Modi after four hours in Delhi traffic. Who is she?</a>

The rift between the tech leaders started after the founding of Anthropic, when Dario and Daniela Amodei, both former OpenAI vice presidents, with their then leader, Sam Altman, cited concerns that OpenAI was prioritising commercial interests over safety.

In a surprising turn of events, AI’s long-running rivalry between OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei hesitated to hold each other's hands at the India AI Impact Summit 2026 in Delhi's Bharat Mandapam with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on stage. Instead of displaying solidarity in the end, the two lifted their fists while making the chain. The video uploaded by the news agency ANI on social media shows that when PM Modi raised fists, making a chain with other global tech leaders to show unity, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei hesitated to hold each other's hands while making the chain. Instead, both of them just raised their fists to show respect.

The rift between the tech leaders started after the founding of Anthropic, when Dario and Daniela Amodei, both former OpenAI vice presidents, with their then leader, Sam Altman, cited concerns that OpenAI was prioritising commercial interests over safety.

Cold war on stage? OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs avoid holding hands in PM Modi's group photo at India AI Summit | WATCH