A federal judge in the US has temporarily blocked the Pentagon's ‘supply chain risk’ designation against Anthropic, the AI firm, whose Claude model was reportedly used in the first days of the Iran war for purposes including target determination for US forces. In the 43-page ruling, US District Judge Rita Lin sided with Anthropic, also halting President Donald Trump’s directive to cut all federal contracts with the company.<h2>Anthropic vs Pentagon: What the court ruling said</h2>Terming the Trump administration's actions ‘classic First Amendment retaliation,’ Judge Lin wrote in the ruling: “These broad measures do not appear to be directed at the government’s stated national security interests.”“If the concern is the integrity of the operational chain of command, the Department of War could just stop using Claude… Instead, these measures appear designed to punish Anthropic,” the judge said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-us-use-anthropic-ai-in-iran-s-strikes-despite-trump-s-ban-what-we-know-1772356637161">Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know</a><h2>Anthropic versus Pentagon: How did they reach here?</h2>The dispute centres around the Pentagon’s insistence on using Anthropic’s Claude model for “all lawful uses,” including some potential military applications that Anthropic vehemently resisted.These included the use of its AI in fully autonomous lethal weapons and mass surveillance of Americans. Anthropic argued, as did its CEO Dario Amodei, that this stance is a “protected viewpoint” of the company.Judge Lin supported Anthropic's argument, stating, “Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary… for expressing disagreement with the government.”Lin also found Anthropic likely to succeed on claims that its due process rights were violated and that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth failed to follow due process.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/anthropic-vs-pentagon-anthropic-refuses-pentagon-request-for-ai-weapons-1774462511822/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/anthropic-vs-pentagon-anthropic-refuses-pentagon-request-for-ai-weapons-1774462511822/embed</a><h2>It is not over yet for Anthropic</h2>The ruling has been paused for one week so that the Trump administration can appeal to the US Court of Appeals. The court ruling blocks sweeping restrictions such as banning federal contracts and limiting partnerships for Anthropic. However, it does not prevent the Pentagon from discontinuing use of Claude or selecting alternative AI vendors.Many tech companies had supported Anthropic’s challenge to the Pentagon. A spokesperson for Anthropic said the firm is “grateful” and remains focused on ensuring “safe, reliable AI” for Americans.However, it may be difficult for the company to make a comeback to government contracts. The Department of Health and Human Services and the General Services Administration, for instance, had already removed Anthropic products following earlier directives.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-dictator-style-praise-anthropic-ceo-says-us-govt-hostility-linked-to-trump-donations-slams-openai-s-altman-in-internal-memo-report-1772698855018">'No dictator-style praise': Anthropic CEO says US govt hostility linked to Trump donations; slams OpenAI's Altman in internal memo - Report</a><h2>Why the Anthropic ruling matters: A question of First Amendment, national security, and AI policy</h2>The case is being seen as a litmus test for issues at the crossroads of the First Amendment, national security, and AI policy. The Pentagon’s “supply chain risk” designation is typically reserved for foreign adversaries, making its application to a US-based firm unusual. As AI systems like Claude become increasingly powerful, debates have intensified about their use in military operations, surveillance, and public sector deployment. The ruling is a significant development in the ongoing clash between the artificial intelligence-led tech industry and the government over AI regulation, national security, and constitutional rights.

A US judge has blocked the Pentagon’s ‘supply chain risk’ designation for Anthropic, calling it a ‘First Amendment retaliation’. This is a significant development in the legal battle over AI use in the military, ethics, and national security. Here is why

A federal judge in the US has temporarily blocked the Pentagon's ‘supply chain risk’ designation against Anthropic, the AI firm, whose Claude model was reportedly used in the first days of the Iran war for purposes including target determination for US forces. In the 43-page ruling, US District Judge Rita Lin sided with Anthropic, also halting President Donald Trump’s directive to cut all federal contracts with the company. Anthropic vs Pentagon: What the court ruling said Terming the Trump administration's actions ‘classic First Amendment retaliation,’ Judge Lin wrote in the ruling: “These broad measures do not appear to be directed at the government’s stated national security interests.” “If the concern is the integrity of the operational chain of command, the Department of War could just stop using Claude… Instead, these measures appear designed to punish Anthropic,” the judge said. Also read: Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know Anthropic versus Pentagon: How did they reach here? The dispute centres around the Pentagon’s insistence on using Anthropic’s Claude model for “all lawful uses,” including some potential military applications that Anthropic vehemently resisted. These included the use of its AI in fully autonomous lethal weapons and mass surveillance of Americans. Anthropic argued, as did its CEO Dario Amodei, that this stance is a “protected viewpoint” of the company. Judge Lin supported Anthropic's argument, stating, “Nothing in the governing statute supports the Orwellian notion that an American company may be branded a potential adversary… for expressing disagreement with the government.” Lin also found Anthropic likely to succeed on claims that its due process rights were violated and that Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth failed to follow due process. https://www.wionews.com/videos/anthropic-vs-pentagon-anthropic-refuses-pentagon-request-for-ai-weapons-1774462511822/embed It is not over yet for Anthropic The ruling has been paused for one week so that the Trump administration can appeal to the US Court of Appeals. The court ruling blocks sweeping restrictions such as banning federal contracts and limiting partnerships for Anthropic. However, it does not prevent the Pentagon from discontinuing use of Claude or selecting alternative AI vendors. Many tech companies had supported Anthropic’s challenge to the Pentagon. A spokesperson for Anthropic said the firm is “grateful” and remains focused on ensuring “safe, reliable AI” for Americans. However, it may be difficult for the company to make a comeback to government contracts. The Department of Health and Human Services and the General Services Administration, for instance, had already removed Anthropic products following earlier directives. Also read: 'No dictator-style praise': Anthropic CEO says US govt hostility linked to Trump donations; slams OpenAI's Altman in internal memo - Report Why the Anthropic ruling matters: A question of First Amendment, national security, and AI policy The case is being seen as a litmus test for issues at the crossroads of the First Amendment, national security, and AI policy. The Pentagon’s “supply chain risk” designation is typically reserved for foreign adversaries, making its application to a US-based firm unusual. As AI systems like Claude become increasingly powerful, debates have intensified about their use in military operations, surveillance, and public sector deployment. The ruling is a significant development in the ongoing clash between the artificial intelligence-led tech industry and the government over AI regulation, national security, and constitutional rights.

A US judge has blocked the Pentagon’s ‘supply chain risk’ designation for Anthropic, calling it a ‘First Amendment retaliation’. This is a significant development in the legal battle over AI use in the military, ethics, and national security. Here is why

Anthropic vs Pentagon: Judge blocks designation of AI firm as ‘supply chain risk’. It's 1–0, for now

Anthropic has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the government retaliated against the company after it refused to allow its Claude AI model to be used for autonomous lethal warfare and mass surveillance of Americans. The 48-page complaint was filed Monday in federal court in San Francisco. In it, Anthropic asks the court to declare unlawful and block the government’s decision to label the company a national security supply-chain risk.According to the lawsuit, Anthropic was founded on the principle that its AI should be developed and deployed responsibly. The company states that its technology should be "used in a way that maximizes positive outcomes for humanity" and should "be the safest and the most responsible."&nbsp;"Anthropic brings this suit because the federal government has retaliated against it for expressing that principle," the lawsuit says. Anthropic says it is the first US company ever to be publicly punished with such a designation. The label is typically applied to organizations tied to foreign adversaries, such as Chinese tech giant Huawei. Because of the designation, defense vendors and contractors must certify that they are not using Anthropic’s models in any work related to the Pentagon.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-kharg-island-iran-s-key-oil-export-hub-trump-may-target-amid-middle-east-conflict-1773070616004">What is Kharg Island? Iran’s key oil export hub Trump may target amid Middle East conflict</a>&nbsp;"The consequences of this case are enormous," the lawsuit states, adding that the government is “seeking to destroy the economic value created by one of the world's fastest-growing private companies.” The dispute reportedly began after tensions with Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth. Anthropic had insisted that its technology should not be used for mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons systems. Following the disagreement, President Donald Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology. Shortly afterward, Hegseth formally designated the company as a "Supply-Chain Risk to National Security" and directed that no military contractor, supplier, or partner "may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic."&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-khybar-missile-broke-through-israel-s-iron-dome-1773074698948/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-khybar-missile-broke-through-israel-s-iron-dome-1773074698948/embed</a>&nbsp;The order included a six-month transition period for the Pentagon itself. The conflict surfaced just days before the US military attack against Iran. According to the filing, Claude is the Pentagon’s most widely deployed frontier AI model and the only such system currently operating on the Department of War’s classified networks. In the lawsuit, Anthropic argues that the government’s actions violate the First Amendment by punishing the company for protected speech related to AI safety policy. The company also claims the Pentagon exceeded its legal authority and denied Anthropic due process under the Fifth Amendment.&nbsp;"The Constitution does not allow the government to wield its enormous power to punish a company for its protected speech," the complaint states. Anthropic is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction that would block enforcement of the designation.

Anthropic sues Pentagon over AI warfare dispute; seeks to undo 'supply chain risk' designation

Anthropic has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the government retaliated against the company after it refused to allow its Claude AI model to be used for autonomous lethal warfare and mass surveillance of Americans. The 48-page complaint was filed Monday in federal court in San Francisco. In it, Anthropic asks the court to declare unlawful and block the government’s decision to label the company a national security supply-chain risk. According to the lawsuit, Anthropic was founded on the principle that its AI should be developed and deployed responsibly. The company states that its technology should be "used in a way that maximizes positive outcomes for humanity" and should "be the safest and the most responsible." "Anthropic brings this suit because the federal government has retaliated against it for expressing that principle," the lawsuit says. Anthropic says it is the first US company ever to be publicly punished with such a designation. The label is typically applied to organizations tied to foreign adversaries, such as Chinese tech giant Huawei. Because of the designation, defense vendors and contractors must certify that they are not using Anthropic’s models in any work related to the Pentagon. Also Read: What is Kharg Island? Iran’s key oil export hub Trump may target amid Middle East conflict "The consequences of this case are enormous," the lawsuit states, adding that the government is “seeking to destroy the economic value created by one of the world's fastest-growing private companies.” The dispute reportedly began after tensions with Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth. Anthropic had insisted that its technology should not be used for mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons systems. Following the disagreement, President Donald Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology. Shortly afterward, Hegseth formally designated the company as a "Supply-Chain Risk to National Security" and directed that no military contractor, supplier, or partner "may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic." https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-khybar-missile-broke-through-israel-s-iron-dome-1773074698948/embed The order included a six-month transition period for the Pentagon itself. The conflict surfaced just days before the US military attack against Iran. According to the filing, Claude is the Pentagon’s most widely deployed frontier AI model and the only such system currently operating on the Department of War’s classified networks. In the lawsuit, Anthropic argues that the government’s actions violate the First Amendment by punishing the company for protected speech related to AI safety policy. The company also claims the Pentagon exceeded its legal authority and denied Anthropic due process under the Fifth Amendment. "The Constitution does not allow the government to wield its enormous power to punish a company for its protected speech," the complaint states. Anthropic is asking the court to issue a permanent injunction that would block enforcement of the designation.

Anthropic sues the Trump administration, alleging retaliation after refusing to allow its Claude AI model to be used for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance

Artificial intelligence firm Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei has criticised his former colleague and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for being beholden to the Trump administration on issues related to the use of AI in defence and personal security. Amodei suggested that the firm behind popular AI models such as Claude is receiving little support because it did not donate as much money to Donald Trump as OpenAI did. The allegations were made in an internal memo to staff, according to the website The Information.<h2>Political donations and AI policy disputes: Leaked memo reveals rift between Anthropic and US government</h2>Amodei claimed that tensions between his company and the Trump administration stem partly from the firm’s refusal to financially support Trump and its approach to AI regulation and safety issues. His roughly 1,600-word message was sent on 27 February to around 2,000 employees, explaining what he described as the “real reasons” the Department of Defence and the Trump administration were hostile towards Anthropic. The memo came as the Pentagon suspended an earlier contract for using Anthropic’s Claude and other AI models in its systems. Trump himself posted about the issue on social media, with Anthropic declared a “supply chain risk”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/anthropic-resumes-pentagon-talks-after-dispute-over-ai-use-by-the-us-military-reports-1772698977750">Anthropic resumes Pentagon talks after dispute over AI use by the US military: Reports</a><h2>‘Anthropic didn’t do dictator-style praise of Trump while OpenAI donated to him’</h2>In Amodei’s view, the reasons for the US government’s hostility towards Anthropic included its refusal to donate to Trump and the lack of what he called “dictator-style praise” for the US president. Other reasons included Anthropic’s support for AI regulation and its willingness to speak openly about the risks of AI, such as job displacement.&nbsp;Amodei said Anthropic maintained ethical “red lines”. He claimed that OpenAI, led by CEO Sam Altman, chose to cooperate with the government and accused it of appeasing employees and regulators.Amodei noted that OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife reportedly donated $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc super PAC, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund and has publicly praised the president.Amodei accused OpenAI of compromising principles, calling the rival company’s recent Pentagon agreement “mendacious” and a form of “safety theatre”. He also criticised OpenAI employees as being easily swayed by leadership narratives.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed</a><h2>Pentagon dispute with Anthropic: Mass surveillance and autonomous weapons were key issues</h2>Anthropic and the US government came to loggerheads after the Pentagon sought to modify existing contracts with AI firms to remove restrictions on the use of AI for domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.Anthropic refused these changes, saying the limits it placed on military use of AI reflected American values and the company’s ethical commitments. President Trump reportedly directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology, cancelling more than $200 million in government contracts.Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth labelled Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”, which could restrict partners like Amazon Web Services from collaborating with the AI firm.Anthropic plans to challenge the decision in court, calling it retaliatory and punitive.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-us-use-anthropic-ai-in-iran-s-strikes-despite-trump-s-ban-what-we-know-1772356637161">Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know</a><h2>OpenAI’s Pentagon deal vs Anthropic's call for AI oversight</h2>Shortly after the government vs Athropic dispute escalated, OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon to provide AI tools in classified environments, accepting terms similar to those rejected by Anthropic.&nbsp;Anthropic has advocated stronger oversight of artificial intelligence. It donated $20 million to Public First Action, a political action committee supporting AI guardrails and opposing deregulation efforts favoured by the Trump administration.OpenAI, meanwhile, has taken a more flexible approach to regulation. OpenAI avoided a public conflict with the government.Amodei has repeatedly warned about the societal risks of AI, including large-scale job displacement, and has criticised hands-off policy approaches.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei hinted that the Trump administration targeted the company after it refused political donations and opposed changes to Pentagon AI contracts involving mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Here are his allegations, according to reports

Artificial intelligence firm Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei has criticised his former colleague and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for being beholden to the Trump administration on issues related to the use of AI in defence and personal security. Amodei suggested that the firm behind popular AI models such as Claude is receiving little support because it did not donate as much money to Donald Trump as OpenAI did. The allegations were made in an internal memo to staff, according to the website The Information. Political donations and AI policy disputes: Leaked memo reveals rift between Anthropic and US government Amodei claimed that tensions between his company and the Trump administration stem partly from the firm’s refusal to financially support Trump and its approach to AI regulation and safety issues. His roughly 1,600-word message was sent on 27 February to around 2,000 employees, explaining what he described as the “real reasons” the Department of Defence and the Trump administration were hostile towards Anthropic. The memo came as the Pentagon suspended an earlier contract for using Anthropic’s Claude and other AI models in its systems. Trump himself posted about the issue on social media, with Anthropic declared a “supply chain risk”. Also read: Anthropic resumes Pentagon talks after dispute over AI use by the US military: Reports ‘Anthropic didn’t do dictator-style praise of Trump while OpenAI donated to him’ In Amodei’s view, the reasons for the US government’s hostility towards Anthropic included its refusal to donate to Trump and the lack of what he called “dictator-style praise” for the US president. Other reasons included Anthropic’s support for AI regulation and its willingness to speak openly about the risks of AI, such as job displacement. Amodei said Anthropic maintained ethical “red lines”. He claimed that OpenAI, led by CEO Sam Altman, chose to cooperate with the government and accused it of appeasing employees and regulators. Amodei noted that OpenAI President Greg Brockman and his wife reportedly donated $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA Inc super PAC, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund and has publicly praised the president. Amodei accused OpenAI of compromising principles, calling the rival company’s recent Pentagon agreement “mendacious” and a form of “safety theatre”. He also criticised OpenAI employees as being easily swayed by leadership narratives. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-agencies-drop-anthropic-amid-ai-surveillance-and-defense-access-dispute-1772526570603/embed Pentagon dispute with Anthropic: Mass surveillance and autonomous weapons were key issues Anthropic and the US government came to loggerheads after the Pentagon sought to modify existing contracts with AI firms to remove restrictions on the use of AI for domestic mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. Anthropic refused these changes, saying the limits it placed on military use of AI reflected American values and the company’s ethical commitments. President Trump reportedly directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology, cancelling more than $200 million in government contracts. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth labelled Anthropic a “supply chain risk to national security”, which could restrict partners like Amazon Web Services from collaborating with the AI firm. Anthropic plans to challenge the decision in court, calling it retaliatory and punitive. Also read: Did US use Anthropic AI in Iran’s strikes despite Trump’s ban? What we know OpenAI’s Pentagon deal vs Anthropic's call for AI oversight Shortly after the government vs Athropic dispute escalated, OpenAI announced a deal with the Pentagon to provide AI tools in classified environments, accepting terms similar to those rejected by Anthropic. Anthropic has advocated stronger oversight of artificial intelligence. It donated $20 million to Public First Action, a political action committee supporting AI guardrails and opposing deregulation efforts favoured by the Trump administration. OpenAI, meanwhile, has taken a more flexible approach to regulation. OpenAI avoided a public conflict with the government. Amodei has repeatedly warned about the societal risks of AI, including large-scale job displacement, and has criticised hands-off policy approaches.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei hinted that the Trump administration targeted the company after it refused political donations and opposed changes to Pentagon AI contracts involving mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Here are his allegations, according to reports

'No dictator-style praise': Anthropic CEO says US govt hostility linked to Trump donations; slams OpenAI's Altman in internal memo - Report

Can Donald Trump force Anthropic to hand over its AI under the Defense Production Act? 

As pressure mounts, the Cold War era law is back in focus. What powers does DPA actually give the US president and where are the limits? Scroll down to find out.

Can Donald Trump force Anthropic to hand over its AI under the Defense Production Act?&nbsp;As pressure mounts, the Cold War-era law is back in focus. What powers does DPA actually give the US president and where are the limits? Scroll down to find out.

What is Defense Production Act? Can Trump force Anthropic to give Pentagon 'unconditional' access to its AI

AI firm Anthropic on Thursday (Feb 26) said it will not allow the Pentagon unrestricted military use of its technology. The Pentagon had reportedly given Anthropic until Friday to comply, warning that failure to do so could trigger action under the Defense Production Act. This Cold War-era law allows the government to compel private companies to prioritise defence needs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/death-is-only-the-beginning-meta-patents-technology-that-ll-let-ai-run-your-social-media-from-beyond-the-grave-wion-explains-1771304178081">Death is only the beginning? Meta patents tech that'll let AI run your social media from beyond the grave | WION Explains</a><h2>Cannot agree "in good conscience"</h2>In a statement, Anthropic's chief executive Dario Amodei said the company could not agree to Washington’s demand that its systems be made available without limits, even under national security pressure."These threats do not change our position," he said, adding that they "cannot in good conscience accede to their request".Anthropic acknowledged that its models are already being used by the Pentagon and intelligence agencies in defensive roles. But Amodei said there were clear limits. Mass surveillance of US citizens, he argued, was incompatible with democratic values. "Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/claim-vs-fact-breaking-down-trump-s-state-of-the-union-2026-speech-full-fact-check-1772001873739">Claim vs fact: Breaking down Trump’s State of the Union 2026 speech - Full fact-check</a>He also cautioned against relying on AI to run fully autonomous weapons systems, saying current technology is not reliable enough to make life-and-death decisions without human oversight. "We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America's warfighters and civilians at risk."<h2>Pentagon tries to intimidate Anthropic</h2>Earlier this week, US officials warned Anthropic that either the company agrees to unrestricted military use of its technology by 5:01 pm (22:01 GMT) Friday or face being forced to comply under the Defense Production Act. Pentagon also threatened that a refusal could lead to Anthropic being labelled a supply chain risk, a designation that can damage a company’s ability to work with government agencies. &nbsp;

Anthropic has pushed back on US Pentagon pressure, saying it cannot “in good conscience” allow unrestricted military use of its technology. The move could trigger action under a Cold War-era law. 

What lines is the company refusing to cross? Scroll down to read more.

AI firm Anthropic on Thursday (Feb 26) said it will not allow the Pentagon unrestricted military use of its technology. The Pentagon had reportedly given Anthropic until Friday to comply, warning that failure to do so could trigger action under the Defense Production Act. This Cold War-era law allows the government to compel private companies to prioritise defence needs. Also read | Death is only the beginning? Meta patents tech that'll let AI run your social media from beyond the grave | WION Explains Cannot agree "in good conscience" In a statement, Anthropic's chief executive Dario Amodei said the company could not agree to Washington’s demand that its systems be made available without limits, even under national security pressure. "These threats do not change our position," he said, adding that they "cannot in good conscience accede to their request". Anthropic acknowledged that its models are already being used by the Pentagon and intelligence agencies in defensive roles. But Amodei said there were clear limits. Mass surveillance of US citizens, he argued, was incompatible with democratic values. "Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values." Also read | Claim vs fact: Breaking down Trump’s State of the Union 2026 speech - Full fact-check He also cautioned against relying on AI to run fully autonomous weapons systems, saying current technology is not reliable enough to make life-and-death decisions without human oversight. "We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America's warfighters and civilians at risk." Pentagon tries to intimidate Anthropic Earlier this week, US officials warned Anthropic that either the company agrees to unrestricted military use of its technology by 5:01 pm (22:01 GMT) Friday or face being forced to comply under the Defense Production Act. Pentagon also threatened that a refusal could lead to Anthropic being labelled a supply chain risk, a designation that can damage a company’s ability to work with government agencies.

Anthropic has pushed back on US Pentagon pressure, saying it cannot “in good conscience” allow unrestricted military use of its technology. The move could trigger action under a Cold War-era law.&nbsp;What lines is the company refusing to cross? Scroll down to read more.

Anthropic resists Pentagon pressure, says won't give Trump admin unconditional AI use for 'mass domestic surveillance'

anthropic-ai-vs-pentagon

Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon, News on Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon, stories on Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon, articles on Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon, Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon stories at Wion, Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon news, Anthropic Ai Vs Pentagon latest news

anthropic ai-vs-pentagon

Anthropic vs Pentagon: Judge blocks designation of AI firm as ‘supply chain risk’. It's 1–0, for now

Anthropic sues Pentagon over AI warfare dispute

Anthropic's Dario links US govt hostility to donations; slams OpenAI's Altman

What is DPA? Can Trump force Anthropic to give 'unrestricted' access to its AI

Anthropic won't give Trump unconditional AI use for 'mass domestic surveillance'