Pakistan to head IMF, World Bank boards after 74 years  amid persistent economic crisis

Russian woman and Bihar boy's love story goes viral after she reaches India to marry him

'We are not sitting in ivory towers, we are aware': SC issues notice to Rahul Gandhi, Akhilesh Yadav

Group's fibre-optic drones pose new challenge for Israel

CJP's Tiranga march: People hit streets of Delhi again, reiterate call for Gyanesh Kumar's resignation

US midterms 2026: Ken Paxton may have Elon Musk to thank if he wins the Texas Senate race. Here's why

Trump invokes national interest to waive new Russia sanctions, tariffs; India gets relief from 100% tariff threat

Ankita Bhandari murder case: Parents meet CBI, seek impartial investigation

US budget deficit nears $2 trn as tariff refunds rise; debt crosses $40 trn

Gravitas | Iran threatens to hit key bridges in 7 countries if US resumes strikes

‘Pee-wee Herman’: Trump mocks Jon Ossoff’s appearance at Georgia rally, repeats false claim about El-Sayed

Ukraine drone strike disrupts 22 Russian airports, over 200 flights

Not Khan but Pal: Why did Imran Khan choose his mother's surname over his father's? Family tree explained

A secret code, a midnight escape and 300 deaths: The Russian officer who turned on Putin

Oregon school shooting: 16-year-old shooter identified, used shotgun bought by mother; Trump praises bystander who shot gunman as 'great hero'

After ODIs, T20Is and Tests, cricket set to introduce a new format: All you need to know

China tells Israel to stop West Bank settlements, calls Palestine issue ‘historic injustice’

‘My president, I mean my husband’: Trump's new press secretary Katie Zacharia's first briefing goes off the rails in 14 minutes

China responds to Trump's Press Secretary Katie Zacharia after toilet remark: 'Visit China more often'

Who left the White House podium the fastest? Press secretaries with the shortest stints

Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna's Ranabaali X Review: Netizens call it history-rich but overstuffed

Israel examines Russia's Shahed-type drones sent by Ukraine to combat Iran | Gravitas

US midterms 2026: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez donates $1 million to Abdul El-Sayed’s as Michigan race heats up

Here’s who is eyeing the White House press secretary role after Katie Zacharia’s exit

BCCI names India’s ODI squad for New Zealand tour, Gill and Iyer to share captaincy

Abhishek Sharma sets all-time record for most T20I sixes in a year

US midterms 2026: Dan Sullivan’s ‘gotcha’ attempt backfires against Mary Peltola in fiery Alaska Senate debate

Inside Tesla's Roadster: 10 features of Elon Musk's 'flying car' that push the limits of electric vehicles | In Pics

India’s naval priorities: Ex-Navy Chief calls for third aircraft carrier, more warships and submarines

New Friday OTT releases (October 16, 2026): DC, Sacrifice, Aasha- 6 new movies and TV shows coming on Netflix, Zee 5, Prime Video and more

Selma Blair’s team responds to flight incident, says actress ‘did not intend to harm anyone’

India's Gen Z rebellion: Can the 'Lehra Do Tiranga' movement reshape the political order? | The Verdict

Salman Khan-Karisma Kapoor reunion at Koffee with Karan season 9 sparks nostalgia: A look at their most loved films

Delhi police places CJP's Abhijeet Dipke under preventive arrest over breach of peace, AISA Chief Neha Bora released

Did Trump just fire Katie Zacharia as his new press secretary? Here’s what he said

Iran rejects Saudi allegations of backing Houthi attacks, renews mediation offer

The U.S. housing market continued its downward spiral in December, with sales of existing homes falling for the 12th straight month compared to the year before, a CNBC report states. However, industry experts are offering signs of hope for a spring rebound as mortgage rates ease and inventory creeps up.

According to a CNBC report, sales dropped 1 per cent from November to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 3.78 million units, marking the lowest level since August 2010. Compared to December 2022, the decline was even steeper at 6.2 per cent, bringing the year-end tally to a dismal 4.09 million units – the worst since 1995.

Regionally, the picture was mixed, with sales remaining flat in the Northeast and falling in the Midwest and South. However, a surprising 7.8 per cent jump in the West offered a glimmer of hope. Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), attributed the overall decline to higher mortgage rates that peaked around 8 per cent in October before dipping into the 7 per cent range in November. Today, rates sit at a more palatable 6.89 per cent.

"The latest month's sales look to be the bottom before inevitably turning higher in the new year," Yun predicted in a press release. "Mortgage rates are meaningfully lower compared to just two months ago, and more inventory is expected to appear on the market in upcoming months."

While Yun's optimism seems justified, existing inventory remains tight, falling 11.5 per cent from November but still up 4.2 per cent year-over-year. The December count of 1 million homes for sale translates to a 3.2-month supply at the current sales pace – a far cry from the six-month buffer considered balanced between buyers and sellers.

Despite the inventory crunch, home prices continued their upward climb. The median price in December hit $382,600, a 4.4 per cent increase from December 2022 and the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year gains. The full-year median price of $389,800 also set a new record.

Homes spent an average of 29 days on the market in December, compared to 25 in November. Additionally, the share of all-cash sales rose from 27 per cent to 29 per cent. Notably, individual investors, who typically drive a significant portion of cash purchases, reduced their activity, buying 16 per cent of homes compared to 18 per cent the prior month.

This pullback from investors could spell good news for first-time buyers, who have been disproportionately priced out of the market. Their share of December sales dropped to 29 per cent, down from 31 per cent a year ago and significantly lower than the historical average of 40 per cent.

A recent Realtor.com study suggests this trend may continue, offering hope for first-time buyers in 2024. Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, tells CNBC, "With rents continuing to ease and more multi-family homes entering the market for rent, investors may continue to tread more cautiously in the housing market. This would mean one less source of competition for potential first-time home buyers who are approaching the 2024 market with optimism despite the challenge of trying to buy a home at a below-median price point, one that investors also often target."

The U.S. housing market continued its downward spiral in December, with sales of existing homes falling for the 12th straight month compared to the year before, a CNBC report states.

The U.S. housing market continued its downward spiral in December, with sales of existing homes falling for the 12th straight month compared to the year before, a CNBC report states. However, industry experts are offering signs of hope for a spring rebound as mortgage rates ease and inventory creeps up. According to a CNBC report, sales dropped 1 per cent from November to a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 3.78 million units, marking the lowest level since August 2010. Compared to December 2022, the decline was even steeper at 6.2 per cent, bringing the year-end tally to a dismal 4.09 million units – the worst since 1995. Regionally, the picture was mixed, with sales remaining flat in the Northeast and falling in the Midwest and South. However, a surprising 7.8 per cent jump in the West offered a glimmer of hope. Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors (NAR), attributed the overall decline to higher mortgage rates that peaked around 8 per cent in October before dipping into the 7 per cent range in November. Today, rates sit at a more palatable 6.89 per cent. "The latest month's sales look to be the bottom before inevitably turning higher in the new year," Yun predicted in a press release. "Mortgage rates are meaningfully lower compared to just two months ago, and more inventory is expected to appear on the market in upcoming months." While Yun's optimism seems justified, existing inventory remains tight, falling 11.5 per cent from November but still up 4.2 per cent year-over-year. The December count of 1 million homes for sale translates to a 3.2-month supply at the current sales pace – a far cry from the six-month buffer considered balanced between buyers and sellers. Despite the inventory crunch, home prices continued their upward climb. The median price in December hit $382,600, a 4.4 per cent increase from December 2022 and the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year gains. The full-year median price of $389,800 also set a new record. Homes spent an average of 29 days on the market in December, compared to 25 in November. Additionally, the share of all-cash sales rose from 27 per cent to 29 per cent. Notably, individual investors, who typically drive a significant portion of cash purchases, reduced their activity, buying 16 per cent of homes compared to 18 per cent the prior month. This pullback from investors could spell good news for first-time buyers, who have been disproportionately priced out of the market. Their share of December sales dropped to 29 per cent, down from 31 per cent a year ago and significantly lower than the historical average of 40 per cent. A recent Realtor.com study suggests this trend may continue, offering hope for first-time buyers in 2024. Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, tells CNBC, "With rents continuing to ease and more multi-family homes entering the market for rent, investors may continue to tread more cautiously in the housing market. This would mean one less source of competition for potential first-time home buyers who are approaching the 2024 market with optimism despite the challenge of trying to buy a home at a below-median price point, one that investors also often target."

US home sales hit rock bottom in December, but springtime rebound expected

In a decisive move, Macy’s has rebuffed the $5.8 billion proposal from Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital Management to take the retail giant private. The bid, which aimed to acquire the shares Macy’s doesn’t already own at $21 per share, was rejected on Sunday. <o:p></o:p>

Macy’s cited apprehensions over deal financing and valuation as the primary reasons for turning down the offer, stating, “The Board has determined not to enter into a non-disclosure agreement or provide any due diligence information to Arkhouse and Brigade,” and highlighting “a lack of compelling value” in the proposal. The department store operator expressed particular reservations about Arkhouse and Brigade’s ability to finance the proposed transaction, asserting that the furnished information failed to address these concerns.<o:p></o:p>

Arkhouse Management, specialising in real estate investments, and Brigade Capital Management, a global asset manager, emphasised the potential for an augmented proposal should they be granted access to necessary due diligence. <o:p></o:p>

Despite the rejection, Macy’s acknowledged the significant stake the investor group holds in the company through Arkhouse-managed funds. Jefferies, acting as the financial adviser for the buyout group, issued a highly confident letter supporting their capability to raise the required funds for the transaction.<o:p></o:p>

The bid by Arkhouse and Brigade has brought attention to the undervaluation of Macy’s concerning its real estate. Analysts estimate the company's real estate to be worth between $7.5 billion to $11.6 billion, shedding light on the potential value yet to be unlocked. Macy’s, which owns 316 of its 722 total stores as of January, is currently navigating a challenging landscape. <o:p></o:p>

Last week, the company announced a strategic streamlining initiative, involving the elimination of 2,350 jobs and the closure of five stores. This move is indicative of the broader struggle faced by legacy department stores in competing against younger, online rivals with smaller physical footprints.<o:p></o:p>

Investment bankers and analysts had previously suggested that while a deal for Macy’s with Arkhouse and Brigade might be unlikely, the bid could prompt the company to explore options for unlocking additional value. <o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

In a decisive move, Macy’s has rebuffed the $5.8 billion proposal from Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital Management to take the retail giant private. The bid, which aimed to acquire the shares Macy’s doesn’t already own at $21 per share, was rejected on Sunday.

In a decisive move, Macy’s has rebuffed the $5.8 billion proposal from Arkhouse Management and Brigade Capital Management to take the retail giant private. The bid, which aimed to acquire the shares Macy’s doesn’t already own at $21 per share, was rejected on Sunday. Macy’s cited apprehensions over deal financing and valuation as the primary reasons for turning down the offer, stating, “The Board has determined not to enter into a non-disclosure agreement or provide any due diligence information to Arkhouse and Brigade,” and highlighting “a lack of compelling value” in the proposal. The department store operator expressed particular reservations about Arkhouse and Brigade’s ability to finance the proposed transaction, asserting that the furnished information failed to address these concerns. Arkhouse Management, specialising in real estate investments, and Brigade Capital Management, a global asset manager, emphasised the potential for an augmented proposal should they be granted access to necessary due diligence. Despite the rejection, Macy’s acknowledged the significant stake the investor group holds in the company through Arkhouse-managed funds. Jefferies, acting as the financial adviser for the buyout group, issued a highly confident letter supporting their capability to raise the required funds for the transaction. The bid by Arkhouse and Brigade has brought attention to the undervaluation of Macy’s concerning its real estate. Analysts estimate the company's real estate to be worth between $7.5 billion to $11.6 billion, shedding light on the potential value yet to be unlocked. Macy’s, which owns 316 of its 722 total stores as of January, is currently navigating a challenging landscape. Last week, the company announced a strategic streamlining initiative, involving the elimination of 2,350 jobs and the closure of five stores. This move is indicative of the broader struggle faced by legacy department stores in competing against younger, online rivals with smaller physical footprints. Investment bankers and analysts had previously suggested that while a deal for Macy’s with Arkhouse and Brigade might be unlikely, the bid could prompt the company to explore options for unlocking additional value. (With inputs from Reuters)

Macy’s rejects $5.8 bn takeover bid from Arkhouse, citing financing & valuation concerns

China has opted to keep its benchmark lending rates steady during the monthly fixing on Monday, signalling limited room for monetary easing in the face of growing pressure on the yuan. Last week, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) surprised markets by maintaining its medium-term lending facility rate, showcasing a cautious stance. <o:p></o:p>

The central bank's decision, despite recent economic data revealing uneven recovery and deflationary concerns impacting borrowing costs, underscores its reluctance to exacerbate yuan depreciation. Reuters cited Julian Evans-Pritchard from Capital Economics who noted policymakers' "lingering concerns" about the yuan, predicting a cautious approach with a focus on quantitative easing tools.<o:p></o:p>

The one-year loan prime rate (LPR) remains at 3.45 per cent, while the five-year LPR stands unchanged at 4.20 per cent. In a recent Reuters poll involving 27 market watchers, all but one participant anticipated the status quo for both LPRs. The one-year LPR significantly influences most new and existing loans in China, whereas the five-year rate impacts mortgage pricing. <o:p></o:p>

Despite signs of resilience in the US economy, the yuan faced downward pressure at the beginning of the year, weakening by approximately 1.3 per cent year-to-date. Analysts, including Evans-Pritchard, anticipate the PBOC to resume rate cuts once the yuan stabilizes, projecting a 20 basis point reduction by the end of the second quarter.<o:p></o:p>

Last year, the PBOC reduced the one-year LPR twice by a total of 20 basis points, and the five-year LPR saw a 10 basis point decrease. As the Lunar New Year holidays approach, market observers expect the central bank to increase liquidity injections to meet heightened cash demand from corporations and households. <o:p></o:p>

The week-long holiday begins on February 10 this year. Analysts, as reported by the state-owned China Securities Journal, suggest the PBOC may utilise methods such as reverse repos in open market operations, with the possibility of a reduction in banks' reserve requirement ratio (RRR).<o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

China has opted to keep its benchmark lending rates steady during the monthly fixing on Monday, signalling limited room for monetary easing in the face of growing pressure on the yuan.

China has opted to keep its benchmark lending rates steady during the monthly fixing on Monday, signalling limited room for monetary easing in the face of growing pressure on the yuan. Last week, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) surprised markets by maintaining its medium-term lending facility rate, showcasing a cautious stance. The central bank's decision, despite recent economic data revealing uneven recovery and deflationary concerns impacting borrowing costs, underscores its reluctance to exacerbate yuan depreciation. Reuters cited Julian Evans-Pritchard from Capital Economics who noted policymakers' "lingering concerns" about the yuan, predicting a cautious approach with a focus on quantitative easing tools. The one-year loan prime rate (LPR) remains at 3.45 per cent, while the five-year LPR stands unchanged at 4.20 per cent. In a recent Reuters poll involving 27 market watchers, all but one participant anticipated the status quo for both LPRs. The one-year LPR significantly influences most new and existing loans in China, whereas the five-year rate impacts mortgage pricing. Despite signs of resilience in the US economy, the yuan faced downward pressure at the beginning of the year, weakening by approximately 1.3 per cent year-to-date. Analysts, including Evans-Pritchard, anticipate the PBOC to resume rate cuts once the yuan stabilizes, projecting a 20 basis point reduction by the end of the second quarter. Last year, the PBOC reduced the one-year LPR twice by a total of 20 basis points, and the five-year LPR saw a 10 basis point decrease. As the Lunar New Year holidays approach, market observers expect the central bank to increase liquidity injections to meet heightened cash demand from corporations and households. The week-long holiday begins on February 10 this year. Analysts, as reported by the state-owned China Securities Journal, suggest the PBOC may utilise methods such as reverse repos in open market operations, with the possibility of a reduction in banks' reserve requirement ratio (RRR). (With inputs from Reuters)

China maintains stability in benchmark lending rates amid yuan pressure

Singapore-based Terraform Labs, the company behind the infamous TerraUSD stablecoin crash, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States. This move comes two years after the dramatic collapse of TerraUSD and its linked cryptocurrency, Luna, which sent shockwaves through the global crypto market.

From stablecoin dreams to bankruptcy nightmare

TerraUSD was designed to maintain a steady $1 peg, but its algorithmic mechanism failed spectacularly in May 2022, triggering a domino effect that wiped out billions of dollars in investor value. Both TerraUSD and Luna plummeted to near zero, leaving a trail of financial ruin and accusations of mismanagement against Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon.

Chapter 11: Restructuring or Retreat?

Terraform Labs claims the bankruptcy filing will allow them to "navigate ongoing legal proceedings" while continuing operations. They pledge to fulfill financial obligations to employees and vendors and even expand their Web3 offerings. However, scepticism abounds. Critics see the move as a desperate attempt to shield assets and avoid accountability for the TerraUSD debacle.

Legal shadow looms

Terraform Labs and Kwon face a barrage of legal challenges, including a lawsuit from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleging a $40 billion crypto fraud. The SEC accused them of misleading investors and manipulating the TerraUSD peg. A recent trial postponement, while aimed at extraditing Kwon, adds further uncertainty to the legal landscape.

Crypto market repercussions &amp; the future:

The TerraUSD crash dealt a blow to the cryptocurrency market's reputation and triggered increased regulatory scrutiny. While the market has somewhat recovered, the Terraform Labs bankruptcy serves as a stark reminder of the risks and volatility inherent in cryptocurrencies.

Terraform Labs' Web3 ambitions, despite the bankruptcy, raise questions. Can they rebuild trust and attract users after the TerraUSD fiasco? Can Web3 be truly decentralised and transparent if its key players face bankruptcy and fraud allegations? Only time will tell if Terraform Labs' Web3 plans survive the shadow of their stablecoin nightmare.

Singapore-based Terraform Labs, the company behind the infamous TerraUSD stablecoin crash, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States. This move comes two years after the dramatic collapse of TerraUSD and its linked cryptocurrency, Luna, which sent shockwaves through the global crypto market.

Singapore-based Terraform Labs, the company behind the infamous TerraUSD stablecoin crash, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States. This move comes two years after the dramatic collapse of TerraUSD and its linked cryptocurrency, Luna, which sent shockwaves through the global crypto market. From stablecoin dreams to bankruptcy nightmare TerraUSD was designed to maintain a steady $1 peg, but its algorithmic mechanism failed spectacularly in May 2022, triggering a domino effect that wiped out billions of dollars in investor value. Both TerraUSD and Luna plummeted to near zero, leaving a trail of financial ruin and accusations of mismanagement against Terraform Labs and its co-founder Do Kwon. Chapter 11: Restructuring or Retreat? Terraform Labs claims the bankruptcy filing will allow them to "navigate ongoing legal proceedings" while continuing operations. They pledge to fulfill financial obligations to employees and vendors and even expand their Web3 offerings. However, scepticism abounds. Critics see the move as a desperate attempt to shield assets and avoid accountability for the TerraUSD debacle. Legal shadow looms Terraform Labs and Kwon face a barrage of legal challenges, including a lawsuit from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleging a $40 billion crypto fraud. The SEC accused them of misleading investors and manipulating the TerraUSD peg. A recent trial postponement, while aimed at extraditing Kwon, adds further uncertainty to the legal landscape. Crypto market repercussions & the future: The TerraUSD crash dealt a blow to the cryptocurrency market's reputation and triggered increased regulatory scrutiny. While the market has somewhat recovered, the Terraform Labs bankruptcy serves as a stark reminder of the risks and volatility inherent in cryptocurrencies. Terraform Labs' Web3 ambitions, despite the bankruptcy, raise questions. Can they rebuild trust and attract users after the TerraUSD fiasco? Can Web3 be truly decentralised and transparent if its key players face bankruptcy and fraud allegations? Only time will tell if Terraform Labs' Web3 plans survive the shadow of their stablecoin nightmare.

Terraform Labs files for bankruptcy after stablecoin disaster, eyes Web3 future

The Indian retail landscape is on the cusp of a significant transformation driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI). A recent survey conducted by EY unravels key findings, revealing pivotal themes shaping the future of retail in India. We also spoke to Jaspreet Bindra, AI expert and founder of Tech Whisperer Ltd. UK, regarding the same.

Gen AI promises to inject agility and efficiency into every step of the retail chain.&nbsp;The survey reveals that 54% of respondents anticipate cost reduction, and 50% foresee a complete overhaul of the value chain thanks to Gen AI. This could eventually transition to an intelligent inventory system that anticipates demand surges, predictive maintenance that prevents equipment breakdowns before they disrupt sales, and dynamic pricing that reacts to real-time market trends.

"There could be Gen AI bots that could help people search/buy better," says Jaspreet Bindra. "Think hyper-targeted ads that create immersive experiences and even streamline the returns/exchanges process. It can touch every step of the retail value chain, potentially boosting value by $20 billion."

Gen AI also promises to inject hyper-personalisation into every retail touchpoint.&nbsp;The survey found that 76% of respondents see customer experience as the most impacted facet by Gen AI. A revolution is underway; We can envision AI-powered mirrors that suggest outfits based on your body type, virtual assistants curating shopping lists based on your past purchases and social media musings, and dynamic loyalty programs that evolve with your changing preferences.

3 key insights:

<ul>
	<li>71% of retailers plan to adopt Gen AI within the next year:&nbsp;This indicates widespread enthusiasm beyond established brands, extending to smaller businesses like Kirana stores.</li>
	<li>82% prefer partnerships with external tech providers:&nbsp;This highlights the collaborative approach, allowing smaller players to leverage tech expertise without hefty investments.</li>
	<li>India as a global hub for Gen AI retail solutions:&nbsp;With its IT prowess and vast consumer base, India can become a breeding ground for affordable, accessible Gen AI solutions that empower local retailers.</li>
</ul>

The adoption of Gen AI in India's retail sector comes with its own set of challenges – skills gaps, data privacy concerns, and the need for robust infrastructure. But the potential rewards are undeniable. By 2025, Gen AI could elevate India's retail sector's profitability by 20%, not just through cost savings but by unlocking a new era of personalised experiences and hyper-local relevance.

"The Indian government and IT minister rightly highlight the need for AI-related skills," Bindra acknowledges. "We need to make India not just literate, but 'AI-literate'. Basic education must include AI skills alongside math and science. This requires a collective effort from the government, corporations, and the entire education system."

The Indian retail landscape is on the cusp of a significant transformation driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI). A recent survey conducted by EY unravels key findings, revealing pivotal themes shaping the future of retail in India.

The Indian retail landscape is on the cusp of a significant transformation driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen AI). A recent survey conducted by EY unravels key findings, revealing pivotal themes shaping the future of retail in India. We also spoke to Jaspreet Bindra, AI expert and founder of Tech Whisperer Ltd. UK, regarding the same. Gen AI promises to inject agility and efficiency into every step of the retail chain. The survey reveals that 54% of respondents anticipate cost reduction, and 50% foresee a complete overhaul of the value chain thanks to Gen AI. This could eventually transition to an intelligent inventory system that anticipates demand surges, predictive maintenance that prevents equipment breakdowns before they disrupt sales, and dynamic pricing that reacts to real-time market trends. "There could be Gen AI bots that could help people search/buy better," says Jaspreet Bindra. "Think hyper-targeted ads that create immersive experiences and even streamline the returns/exchanges process. It can touch every step of the retail value chain, potentially boosting value by $20 billion." Gen AI also promises to inject hyper-personalisation into every retail touchpoint. The survey found that 76% of respondents see customer experience as the most impacted facet by Gen AI. A revolution is underway; We can envision AI-powered mirrors that suggest outfits based on your body type, virtual assistants curating shopping lists based on your past purchases and social media musings, and dynamic loyalty programs that evolve with your changing preferences. 3 key insights: 71% of retailers plan to adopt Gen AI within the next year: This indicates widespread enthusiasm beyond established brands, extending to smaller businesses like Kirana stores. 82% prefer partnerships with external tech providers: This highlights the collaborative approach, allowing smaller players to leverage tech expertise without hefty investments. India as a global hub for Gen AI retail solutions: With its IT prowess and vast consumer base, India can become a breeding ground for affordable, accessible Gen AI solutions that empower local retailers. The adoption of Gen AI in India's retail sector comes with its own set of challenges – skills gaps, data privacy concerns, and the need for robust infrastructure. But the potential rewards are undeniable. By 2025, Gen AI could elevate India's retail sector's profitability by 20%, not just through cost savings but by unlocking a new era of personalised experiences and hyper-local relevance. "The Indian government and IT minister rightly highlight the need for AI-related skills," Bindra acknowledges. "We need to make India not just literate, but 'AI-literate'. Basic education must include AI skills alongside math and science. This requires a collective effort from the government, corporations, and the entire education system."

EY survey unveils Gen AI trends: Indian retail's leap into the future

In a significant development, Elon Musk's Starlink is on the brink of securing approval to launch space-based broadband services in India, with reports suggesting that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may issue a Letter of Intent (LoI) by the end of this month. According to sources, Starlink's recent clarification to the Department for Promotion of Industry &amp; Internal Trade (DPIIT) has paved the way for this imminent approval.<o:p></o:p>

The ET Telecom report quotes an insider stating, "Starlink replied to the Department for Promotion of Industry &amp; Internal Trade, and in the next few days or by the end of this month, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may issue a Letter of Intent (LoI) to Starlink." Meanwhile, Moneycontrol, citing its sources, suggests that the DoT could extend this crucial approval to Starlink as early as Wednesday.<o:p></o:p>

Both reports highlight the preparation of an approval letter by telecom secretary Neeraj Mittal and communications secretary Ashwini Vaishnaw, expected to be finalized by next week. However, it is noted that both officials are currently abroad, with Mittal attending the PanIIT 2024 event in Washington DC and Vaishnaw participating in the World Economic Forum in Davos.<o:p></o:p>

Starlink initiated its journey in India by applying for a global mobile personal communication by satellite services (GMPCS) license in November 2022. If granted, this license will position Starlink as the third company in India, following Reliance Jio and OneWeb, to secure such authorisation. The GMPCS license would empower Starlink to provide messaging services, voice services, and broadband to individuals and organisations across India.<o:p></o:p>

However, in addition to government approval, Satcom players, including Starlink, must obtain clearance from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe), the designated single-window agency for space activity approvals in India since 2023. The subsequent step involves spectrum allotment by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT).<o:p></o:p>

It's worth noting that Starlink faced criticism from the Telecom Ministry in late 2021 for accepting advance payments from subscribers without holding the necessary license. The Ministry directed Starlink to refund the money to approximately 5,000 pre-ordered customers in India.<o:p></o:p>

In a significant development, Elon Musk's Starlink is on the brink of securing approval to launch space-based broadband services in India, with reports suggesting that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may issue a Letter of Intent (LoI) by the end of this month.

In a significant development, Elon Musk's Starlink is on the brink of securing approval to launch space-based broadband services in India, with reports suggesting that the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may issue a Letter of Intent (LoI) by the end of this month. According to sources, Starlink's recent clarification to the Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (DPIIT) has paved the way for this imminent approval. The ET Telecom report quotes an insider stating, "Starlink replied to the Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade, and in the next few days or by the end of this month, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may issue a Letter of Intent (LoI) to Starlink." Meanwhile, Moneycontrol, citing its sources, suggests that the DoT could extend this crucial approval to Starlink as early as Wednesday. Both reports highlight the preparation of an approval letter by telecom secretary Neeraj Mittal and communications secretary Ashwini Vaishnaw, expected to be finalized by next week. However, it is noted that both officials are currently abroad, with Mittal attending the PanIIT 2024 event in Washington DC and Vaishnaw participating in the World Economic Forum in Davos. Starlink initiated its journey in India by applying for a global mobile personal communication by satellite services (GMPCS) license in November 2022. If granted, this license will position Starlink as the third company in India, following Reliance Jio and OneWeb, to secure such authorisation. The GMPCS license would empower Starlink to provide messaging services, voice services, and broadband to individuals and organisations across India. However, in addition to government approval, Satcom players, including Starlink, must obtain clearance from the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe), the designated single-window agency for space activity approvals in India since 2023. The subsequent step involves spectrum allotment by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT). It's worth noting that Starlink faced criticism from the Telecom Ministry in late 2021 for accepting advance payments from subscribers without holding the necessary license. The Ministry directed Starlink to refund the money to approximately 5,000 pre-ordered customers in India.

Elon Musk's Starlink nears approval for space broadband services in India

In a recent disclosure by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), it has been unveiled that Afghanistan has been the recipient of substantial financial aid, with an average of $80 million arriving every 10 to 14 days over the past three months. This revelation comes amid a shrinking Afghan economy, as reported by TOLOnews. <o:p></o:p>

SIGAR's report emphasises that these funds are transported in various shipments and stored in private banks under the United Nations' accounts, aiming to benefit the Afghan people.<o:p></o:p>

According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), a staggering 69 percent of Afghans currently lack access to sufficient resources for their basic necessities. The economic downturn in Afghanistan is further highlighted by a 27 percent contraction since 2020. <o:p></o:p>

This has left seven out of ten Afghans struggling to meet essential needs such as food, healthcare, and employment. The humanitarian situation has significantly deteriorated since the Taliban's resurgence in August 2021, exacerbated by the Ukraine crisis, leading to a surge in food prices and rendering crucial items unaffordable for the average citizen.<o:p></o:p>

In response to the aid influx, the Taliban asserts that the funds delivered through the UN are allocated to crucial sectors like education, health, and development projects. TOLOnews reports that Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban's spokesperson, clarified, "The aid given by the countries is implemented through international institutions in Kabul; this money is available to them, and the Islamic Emirate does not benefit from this money." <o:p></o:p>

However, some economic analysts argue that the international community's financial support could play a pivotal role in stabilising Afghanistan's fiscal situation and fostering economic growth.<o:p></o:p>

Despite the claims of constructive utilisation, Afghanistan continues to grapple with persistent human rights violations, particularly against women and minorities. The post-government collapse landscape has witnessed a decline in sectarian conflicts, yet serious concerns persist, reflecting a complex socio-political scenario. <o:p></o:p>

In a recent disclosure by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), it has been unveiled that Afghanistan has been the recipient of substantial financial aid, with an average of $80 million arriving every 10 to 14 days over the past three months.

In a recent disclosure by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), it has been unveiled that Afghanistan has been the recipient of substantial financial aid, with an average of $80 million arriving every 10 to 14 days over the past three months. This revelation comes amid a shrinking Afghan economy, as reported by TOLOnews. SIGAR's report emphasises that these funds are transported in various shipments and stored in private banks under the United Nations' accounts, aiming to benefit the Afghan people. According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), a staggering 69 percent of Afghans currently lack access to sufficient resources for their basic necessities. The economic downturn in Afghanistan is further highlighted by a 27 percent contraction since 2020. This has left seven out of ten Afghans struggling to meet essential needs such as food, healthcare, and employment. The humanitarian situation has significantly deteriorated since the Taliban's resurgence in August 2021, exacerbated by the Ukraine crisis, leading to a surge in food prices and rendering crucial items unaffordable for the average citizen. In response to the aid influx, the Taliban asserts that the funds delivered through the UN are allocated to crucial sectors like education, health, and development projects. TOLOnews reports that Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban's spokesperson, clarified, "The aid given by the countries is implemented through international institutions in Kabul; this money is available to them, and the Islamic Emirate does not benefit from this money." However, some economic analysts argue that the international community's financial support could play a pivotal role in stabilising Afghanistan's fiscal situation and fostering economic growth. Despite the claims of constructive utilisation, Afghanistan continues to grapple with persistent human rights violations, particularly against women and minorities. The post-government collapse landscape has witnessed a decline in sectarian conflicts, yet serious concerns persist, reflecting a complex socio-political scenario.

Afghanistan receives $80 million bi-weekly amid economic decline: UN Report

Amazon's ambitious $1.4 billion deal to acquire iRobot, the robot vacuum manufacturer, is facing a potential veto from European Union (EU) antitrust regulators. Sources reveal that the European Commission, concerned about potential market competition restrictions in the robot vacuum sector, warned against the deal. 

Amazon, however, chose not to provide remedies to address these concerns, leading to increased scepticism from regulators. The decision on the deal is expected by February 14, with indications pointing toward a blockage of the acquisition.<o:p></o:p>

The European Commission's primary apprehension lies in the possibility of Amazon using its dominance on the online marketplace to suppress iRobot's competitors, particularly in key European markets such as France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. The concerns revolve around potential anti-competitive practices that could emerge, impacting the broader landscape of robot vacuum cleaners. Both the European Commission and Amazon have refrained from commenting on the ongoing developments.<o:p></o:p>

Notably, Amazon's defiance of the European Commission's warnings and its reluctance to provide remedies have fuelled speculations about the deal's viability. The regulator is scheduled to make a decision in mid-February, with mounting indications that it will block the acquisition. 

One source suggests that the recently enacted EU tech rules, known as the Digital Markets Act, could potentially address concerns arising from the deal. However, given the untested nature of this legislation and the prolonged enforcement process, regulators are leaning towards an outright rejection of the Amazon-iRobot merger.<o:p></o:p>

In response to the uncertain fate of the deal, iRobot shares experienced a significant downturn, plummeting by 30 per cent in late trade. <o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

Amazon's ambitious $1.4 billion deal to acquire iRobot, the robot vacuum manufacturer, is facing a potential veto from European Union (EU) antitrust regulators. Sources reveal that the European Commission, concerned about potential market competition restrictions in the robot vacuum sector, warned against the deal.

Amazon's ambitious $1.4 billion deal to acquire iRobot, the robot vacuum manufacturer, is facing a potential veto from European Union (EU) antitrust regulators. Sources reveal that the European Commission, concerned about potential market competition restrictions in the robot vacuum sector, warned against the deal. Amazon, however, chose not to provide remedies to address these concerns, leading to increased scepticism from regulators. The decision on the deal is expected by February 14, with indications pointing toward a blockage of the acquisition. The European Commission's primary apprehension lies in the possibility of Amazon using its dominance on the online marketplace to suppress iRobot's competitors, particularly in key European markets such as France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. The concerns revolve around potential anti-competitive practices that could emerge, impacting the broader landscape of robot vacuum cleaners. Both the European Commission and Amazon have refrained from commenting on the ongoing developments. Notably, Amazon's defiance of the European Commission's warnings and its reluctance to provide remedies have fuelled speculations about the deal's viability. The regulator is scheduled to make a decision in mid-February, with mounting indications that it will block the acquisition. One source suggests that the recently enacted EU tech rules, known as the Digital Markets Act, could potentially address concerns arising from the deal. However, given the untested nature of this legislation and the prolonged enforcement process, regulators are leaning towards an outright rejection of the Amazon-iRobot merger. In response to the uncertain fate of the deal, iRobot shares experienced a significant downturn, plummeting by 30 per cent in late trade. (With inputs from Reuters)

EU Antitrust regulators set to block Amazon's $1.4 bn iRobot deal

The European Central Bank (ECB) is likely to cut rates this year. A Bloomberg survey shows that majority of analysts believe the ECB will begin rate cuts from June.

Survey: Analysts believe ECB will begin rate cuts from June

Traders are betting that the Federal Reserve won't ease policy until may, as stronger-than-expected economic data and comments from central bankers diminish confidence in earlier interest-rate cuts.

US: Inflation concerns resurface

In a boost to the United Kingdom's quest to attract foreign investment, US tech giant Google has announced that it will invest $1 billion to build a data centre, just outside of London.

Google to invest $1 billion for building data centre in UK

The covid pandemic, geopolitical tensions and disruptive technologies have changed the global economy. These changes seem to be irreversable, heralding the new economic normal. In the 'new normal', geopolitical fragmentation, elevated debt levels, & disruptive technologies like a-I will dictate the economy.

Davos 2024: Leaders bat for global structural reforms at Davos summit

Russia has surpassed Saudi Arabia to become China's top crude oil supplier in 2023. The world's biggest crude importer has defied western sanctions to purchase discounted oil for its processing plants.

Russia pips Saudi Arabia to become China's top crude supplier in 2023

James Gorman took home $37 million as compensation in 2023 - his last year as Morgan Stanley's CEO. His total pay package rose 17% from $31.5 million in 2022. Gorman's pay package was the highest for any major banker last year.

Morgan Stanley's James Gorman earns $37 million in 2023

India's ICICI bank reported better-than-expected third-quarter profit in the December quarter, helped by robust loan growth, although its net interest margin shrank for the fourth straight quarter.

ICICI bank's profit surges to $1.24 bn

Hopes for lower interest rates and resilient growth in 2024 took the S&P 500 to a record high on Friday, after two roller-coaster years featuring soaring inflation, tumult in the banking industry and economic unease.

Bulls take charge on Wall Street; S&P 500 enters bull market

Every January, the Swiss resort town of Davos becomes the meeting place of global leaders, industry titans, and thought leaders.

Since 1971, the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit has turned the town's name into a by-word for the 'global elite'.

However, the connotation is often negative.

The World Economic Forum has long been the torchbearer of globalisation, arguing that it brought "millions out of poverty".

It has continued to bat for globalisation, despite the idea coming under attack over the last decade.

In fact, even as the world's economic growth slowed in 2023, the WEF pitched for revamping globalisation.

The driving force behind the Forum's globalisation push is its founder, 85-year-old Klaus Schwab.

The German-born economist and professor of business policy has deemed globalisation “a very easy scapegoat”.

When Schwab began the non-profit organisation in 1971, 'globalisation' was a little-known concept.

While the WEF has now become the poster boy of globalisation, its origins were more European. &nbsp;

The European Management Forum, its earlier avatar, brought together European corporates, who wanted to compete with U.S. firms.

Having studied management in the US, Schwab was fascinated by American&nbsp;corporate practices and wanted it replicated in Europe.

Long eclipsed by the US, Europe sought&nbsp;a return to economic glory. Schwab's idea made a mark instantly.

Several hundred top European executives gathered at Davos in January 1971 for a two-week-long symposium.

The idea of a multinational forum was pathbreaking for the 1970s, an era defined by the Cold War.

During the Cold War, the United Nations provided the only common platform for global leaders.

But the geopolitical split between the Capitalist &amp; the Socialist world meant countries rarely agreed on anything.

This is why Davos, a remote location that provides privacy, offered the best platform for divergent views.

At least, that is what the World Economic Forum continues to claim to date.

Schwab's idea of the forum emerged out of the concept of "multi-stakeholder participation".

This approach considers the interests of everybody involved in the production flow and distribution process.

Thus, the owner, shareholders, customers, suppliers, employees as well as the government and interest groups play a role.

Primarily a management concept, Schwab creatively applied it to build the forum, where he brought companies and policymakers together.

But its transformation from a European organisation that put out feelers to the US to a globalisation poster boy was complete&nbsp;by the mid-1980s.

By then, the non-profit organisation got its present name, more trans-Atlantic voices spoke at Davos, and a rising China made its debut.

In fact, Henry Kissinger remarked at the 1980 Davos meeting: "For the first time in history, foreign policy is truly global."

When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, it was seen as a win for the democratic, free-market world.

The world became unipolar, with the West-led world order facing no major challenge.

This also meant that WEF was in pole position to expand its idea of globalisation to newer markets.

Globalisation became the buzzword of the 1990s and early 2000s, as the economies of India and China rose rapidly.

Many even attributed the establishment of the WTO to several discussions that took place at Davos summits.

It seemed WEF's motto "Entrepreneurship in the global public interest" was reshaping the new economic order.

The 2008 Global Financial Crisis, however, disrupted the WEF's fairytale-like rise.

As economies collapsed, people began questioning the neo-liberal globalisation that WEF was closely linked to.&nbsp;

Populism rose sharply as those apparently left behind by globalisation emerged as a political force.

As globalisation came under attack, so did its poster boy - the World Economic Forum.

Once a melting pot of ideas, Davos began to be identified as a 'talking shop' of the global elite with minimal real impact.&nbsp;

In fact, many have raised questions about the true intentions of the forum.

Critics have argued it promotes multinational firms and its version of global capitalism under the pretext of "doing good".

Even Schwab has agreed that globalisation in its current form may no longer work, advocating for 'Globalisation 4.0'.

Schwab has left a mark in the annals of global political economy. But only posterity will tell us whether his legacy transcends the WEF.&nbsp;

Every January, the Swiss resort town of Davos becomes the meeting place of global leaders, industry titans, and thought leaders. Since 1971, the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit has turned the town's name into a by-word for the 'global elite'.

Every January, the Swiss resort town of Davos becomes the meeting place of global leaders, industry titans, and thought leaders. Since 1971, the World Economic Forum (WEF) summit has turned the town's name into a by-word for the 'global elite'. However, the connotation is often negative. The World Economic Forum has long been the torchbearer of globalisation, arguing that it brought "millions out of poverty". It has continued to bat for globalisation, despite the idea coming under attack over the last decade. In fact, even as the world's economic growth slowed in 2023, the WEF pitched for revamping globalisation. The driving force behind the Forum's globalisation push is its founder, 85-year-old Klaus Schwab. The German-born economist and professor of business policy has deemed globalisation “a very easy scapegoat”. When Schwab began the non-profit organisation in 1971, 'globalisation' was a little-known concept. While the WEF has now become the poster boy of globalisation, its origins were more European. The European Management Forum, its earlier avatar, brought together European corporates, who wanted to compete with U.S. firms. Having studied management in the US, Schwab was fascinated by American corporate practices and wanted it replicated in Europe. Long eclipsed by the US, Europe sought a return to economic glory. Schwab's idea made a mark instantly. Several hundred top European executives gathered at Davos in January 1971 for a two-week-long symposium. The idea of a multinational forum was pathbreaking for the 1970s, an era defined by the Cold War. During the Cold War, the United Nations provided the only common platform for global leaders. But the geopolitical split between the Capitalist & the Socialist world meant countries rarely agreed on anything. This is why Davos, a remote location that provides privacy, offered the best platform for divergent views. At least, that is what the World Economic Forum continues to claim to date. Schwab's idea of the forum emerged out of the concept of "multi-stakeholder participation". This approach considers the interests of everybody involved in the production flow and distribution process. Thus, the owner, shareholders, customers, suppliers, employees as well as the government and interest groups play a role. Primarily a management concept, Schwab creatively applied it to build the forum, where he brought companies and policymakers together. But its transformation from a European organisation that put out feelers to the US to a globalisation poster boy was complete by the mid-1980s. By then, the non-profit organisation got its present name, more trans-Atlantic voices spoke at Davos, and a rising China made its debut. In fact, Henry Kissinger remarked at the 1980 Davos meeting: "For the first time in history, foreign policy is truly global." When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, it was seen as a win for the democratic, free-market world. The world became unipolar, with the West-led world order facing no major challenge. This also meant that WEF was in pole position to expand its idea of globalisation to newer markets. Globalisation became the buzzword of the 1990s and early 2000s, as the economies of India and China rose rapidly. Many even attributed the establishment of the WTO to several discussions that took place at Davos summits. It seemed WEF's motto "Entrepreneurship in the global public interest" was reshaping the new economic order. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis, however, disrupted the WEF's fairytale-like rise. As economies collapsed, people began questioning the neo-liberal globalisation that WEF was closely linked to. Populism rose sharply as those apparently left behind by globalisation emerged as a political force. As globalisation came under attack, so did its poster boy - the World Economic Forum. Once a melting pot of ideas, Davos began to be identified as a 'talking shop' of the global elite with minimal real impact. In fact, many have raised questions about the true intentions of the forum. Critics have argued it promotes multinational firms and its version of global capitalism under the pretext of "doing good". Even Schwab has agreed that globalisation in its current form may no longer work, advocating for 'Globalisation 4.0'. Schwab has left a mark in the annals of global political economy. But only posterity will tell us whether his legacy transcends the WEF.

Flashback Friday: How the World Economic Forum became the poster boy of globalisation 

The recent revelations from a recent EY survey offers a closer look at how Gen AI, the next frontier in artificial intelligence, is reshaping the retail experience right here in India.

Challenges & opportunities in the retail renaissance with Gen AI

India's Tata Steel said on Friday it will close its two blast furnaces in Britain by the end of this year. This, the company said, will lead to at least 2,800 workers losing their jobs at its port talbot steelworks in Wales.

Tata Steel to close two blast furnaces by end of 2024

The US real estate market witnessed a significant downturn in existing home sales in 2023, reaching the lowest levels since 1995. The National Association of Realtors reported a stark contrast from the previous year, with sales dropping to nearly 4 million from 2022's 5 million.

US home sales nosedive to 1995 levels

India's $433 billion banking sector faces a gloomy outlook following an unusual sell-off in HDFC Bank Ltd., the country's largest private sector lender. The top 12 largest banks in India are on track for their worst week since September, witnessing a collective market value loss of nearly $21 billion.

India's banking benchmark index starts 2024 in red

The World Tourism Organization reports a promising rebound for the global tourism industry, projecting international tourism levels to surpass pre-pandemic figures by 2024. In 2023, 1.3 million tourists ventured to foreign destinations, marking 88% of pre-pandemic levels and a 44% increase from 2022.

2024 the year of the globetrotter?

The 54th edition of the World Economic Forum Summit at Davos came to an end on Friday. Over the last five days, global leaders, industry titans & thought leaders deliberated on 'rebuilding trust' amid rising uncertainties around the world.

Davos 2024: Key takeaways from World Economic Forum 2024

In a rapidly evolving world, the Indian healthcare sector is at a crucial juncture, poised for transformative changes. As we approach budget for India, the healthcare industry has outlined key areas for attention, presenting an opportunity to address critical gaps.

Healthcare wishlist for India Budget 2024

The US House of Representatives approved a crucial stopgap funding bill on Thursday, securing the federal government's financial support through early March and preventing a looming partial government shutdown.<o:p></o:p>

This is based on a Reuters report.<o:p></o:p>

The bill, passed with a vote of 314-108, now awaits President Joe Biden's final approval. This comes after the Senate's earlier approval with a decisive 77-18 vote, just ahead of the impending weekend deadline. <o:p></o:p>

"There will not be a shutdown on Friday," Reuters quoted Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.<o:p></o:p>

The swift approval of the stopgap bill was prompted by concerns over an impending snowstorm on Friday that could have complicated lawmakers' travel plans for the weekend. <o:p></o:p>

The bipartisan effort, however, faced opposition from 106 Republicans and two Democrats in the House. Despite divisions, the urgency to avert a government shutdown due to a lack of approved funding for the fiscal year that started on Oct. 1 took precedence. <o:p></o:p>

The stopgap bill, often referred to as a "continuing resolution" (CR), will maintain spending at the previous fiscal year's levels until March 1 and March 8, providing lawmakers additional time to finalize a comprehensive budget for various government agencies.<o:p></o:p>

The contentious budget negotiations in Congress, marked by partisan disagreements, have further complicated the funding process. Although Schumer and House Republican counterpart Mike Johnson initially agreed to a $1.59 trillion discretionary spending level for the fiscal year, their latest dispute reveals a stark division. <o:p></o:p>

Democrats now assert that the agreed-upon amount is $1.66 trillion, reflecting the deep-seated discord within the Congress. The national debt, currently standing at $34.4 trillion, adds urgency to the need for a coherent and comprehensive fiscal plan. The interest payments on this debt are a growing concern for the Treasury Department.<o:p></o:p>

This marks the third stopgap funding bill, with its primary aim to provide short-term financial stability while the Congress grapples with the daunting task of passing 12 bills that constitute the full-year budget. <o:p></o:p>

The temporary funding measure, with its March deadlines, allows lawmakers to extend negotiations without facing an immediate shutdown crisis. However, it highlights the underlying challenges in achieving a consensus on long-term spending priorities. <o:p></o:p>

House Republicans, especially those advocating for spending cuts, may pose challenges for Mike Johnson, reminiscent of the opposition faced by his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy.<o:p></o:p>

Despite internal party tensions, Johnson seems to have maintained some support from hardline members who, while expressing displeasure, acknowledge the complex nature of the situation. <o:p></o:p>

Representative Tim Burchett, who had voted against McCarthy's leadership in September due to a bipartisan stopgap vote, acknowledged, "It's just reality. Johnson didn't create this problem."<o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

The US House of Representatives approved a crucial stopgap funding bill on Thursday, securing the federal government's financial support through early March and preventing a looming partial government shutdown.

The US House of Representatives approved a crucial stopgap funding bill on Thursday, securing the federal government's financial support through early March and preventing a looming partial government shutdown. This is based on a Reuters report. The bill, passed with a vote of 314-108, now awaits President Joe Biden's final approval. This comes after the Senate's earlier approval with a decisive 77-18 vote, just ahead of the impending weekend deadline. "There will not be a shutdown on Friday," Reuters quoted Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. The swift approval of the stopgap bill was prompted by concerns over an impending snowstorm on Friday that could have complicated lawmakers' travel plans for the weekend. The bipartisan effort, however, faced opposition from 106 Republicans and two Democrats in the House. Despite divisions, the urgency to avert a government shutdown due to a lack of approved funding for the fiscal year that started on Oct. 1 took precedence. The stopgap bill, often referred to as a "continuing resolution" (CR), will maintain spending at the previous fiscal year's levels until March 1 and March 8, providing lawmakers additional time to finalize a comprehensive budget for various government agencies. The contentious budget negotiations in Congress, marked by partisan disagreements, have further complicated the funding process. Although Schumer and House Republican counterpart Mike Johnson initially agreed to a $1.59 trillion discretionary spending level for the fiscal year, their latest dispute reveals a stark division. Democrats now assert that the agreed-upon amount is $1.66 trillion, reflecting the deep-seated discord within the Congress. The national debt, currently standing at $34.4 trillion, adds urgency to the need for a coherent and comprehensive fiscal plan. The interest payments on this debt are a growing concern for the Treasury Department. This marks the third stopgap funding bill, with its primary aim to provide short-term financial stability while the Congress grapples with the daunting task of passing 12 bills that constitute the full-year budget. The temporary funding measure, with its March deadlines, allows lawmakers to extend negotiations without facing an immediate shutdown crisis. However, it highlights the underlying challenges in achieving a consensus on long-term spending priorities. House Republicans, especially those advocating for spending cuts, may pose challenges for Mike Johnson, reminiscent of the opposition faced by his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy. Despite internal party tensions, Johnson seems to have maintained some support from hardline members who, while expressing displeasure, acknowledge the complex nature of the situation. Representative Tim Burchett, who had voted against McCarthy's leadership in September due to a bipartisan stopgap vote, acknowledged, "It's just reality. Johnson didn't create this problem." (With inputs from Reuters)

US Congress passes stopgap funding bill to avert shutdown

The escalating disruptions to shipping in the Red Sea are casting a dark shadow over Chinese exporters, inflicting financial strain and logistical challenges.<o:p></o:p>

This is based on a Reuters report.<o:p></o:p>

Han Changming, a Chinese businessman whose trading company Fuzhou Han Changming International Trade Co Ltd faces severe setbacks, revealed that the cost of shipping a container to Europe surged from $3,000 to $7,000 due to heightened attacks on shipping by Yemen's Houthi movement. <o:p></o:p>

"The disruptions have wiped out our already thin profits," Reuters quoted Han as saying.<o:p></o:p>

The impact extends beyond increased shipping costs, with delays and higher insurance premiums taking a toll on businesses.<o:p></o:p>

The Red Sea disruptions are unravelling the intricacies of China's export-dependent economy, highlighting vulnerabilities to supply chain interruptions and external shocks.<o:p></o:p>

Premier Li Qiang, speaking at the World Economic Forum, stressed the importance of maintaining "stable and smooth" global supply chains. While not explicitly mentioning the Red Sea, the remarks highlighted the broader challenges faced by China.<o:p></o:p>

The disruptions are compelling some companies, including US-based BDI Furniture, to diversify production locations, reducing reliance on China amid geopolitical tensions.<o:p></o:p>

The fear now is that a prolonged crisis might encourage a "near-shoring" strategy, prompting businesses to shift production closer to home.<o:p></o:p>

The vulnerability of China's export economy is highlighted by the potential shift of companies opting for alternative manufacturing locations. <o:p></o:p>

Reuters cited Marco Castelli, the founder of IC Trade, who warned, "If it's permanent, then the whole mechanism will be readjusted. Some (companies) may also consider moving more production to India." <o:p></o:p>

The disruptions add to the challenges faced by China's struggling economy, grappling with a property crisis, weak consumer demand, a shrinking population, and sluggish global growth. <o:p></o:p>

As companies like Fuzhou Han Changming International Trade Co Ltd navigate delays and cost increases, there is a growing concern about the broader economic impact.<o:p></o:p>

Han Changming, whose business heavily relies on Europe and Africa trade, is pleading with suppliers and customers to share additional costs to sustain his company.<o:p></o:p>

The disruptions come at a critical time, with many companies already managing logistics challenges ahead of the Lunar New Year in February. The festive season leads to a mass exodus of nearly 300 million migrant workers and temporary factory closures, creating a rush to ship goods in the weeks preceding the holiday. <o:p></o:p>

Mike Sagan, Vice President for supply chains and operations at KidKraft, highlighted the impact, stating, "A lot of suppliers, they're screaming about money today." The disruptions, coupled with concerns about payment delays, are reverberating across the supply chain.<o:p></o:p>

Rerouting vessels from the Red Sea, primarily via the Suez Canal, to circumvent disruptions can add significant delays, impacting global container capacity and disrupting supply chains. <o:p></o:p>

The prolonged shipping schedules could result in delays for goods expected to reach Western shelves in April or May. Some logistics companies are already reporting container shortages at Ningbo-Zhoushan port, one of the world's busiest. <o:p></o:p>

The Suez Canal is a vital route for China's westward shipments, handling around 60 per cent of its exports to Europe. The broader impact on China's export landscape and the interconnected global supply chain remains a significant concern.<o:p></o:p>

The far-reaching consequences of the Red Sea shipping woes extend beyond financial strains to manufacturers reconsidering their future strategies. <o:p></o:p>

Yang Bingben, whose company manufactures industrial-use valves, revealed a substantial reduction in orders amid soaring freight costs. "The impact is huge," said Yang, emphasizing the potential loss. <o:p></o:p>

The uncertainty in trade conditions poses a particularly acute challenge for companies relying on just-in-time deliveries or frequent stock changes. <o:p></o:p>

Gerhard Flatz, Managing Director of premium sportswear manufacturer KTC, voiced concern that companies with shrinking margins might face closure, compounding the economic impact.<o:p></o:p>

(With inputs from Reuters)<o:p></o:p>

The escalating disruptions to shipping in the Red Sea are casting a dark shadow over Chinese exporters, inflicting financial strain and logistical challenges. This is based on a Reuters report.

The escalating disruptions to shipping in the Red Sea are casting a dark shadow over Chinese exporters, inflicting financial strain and logistical challenges. This is based on a Reuters report. Han Changming, a Chinese businessman whose trading company Fuzhou Han Changming International Trade Co Ltd faces severe setbacks, revealed that the cost of shipping a container to Europe surged from $3,000 to $7,000 due to heightened attacks on shipping by Yemen's Houthi movement. "The disruptions have wiped out our already thin profits," Reuters quoted Han as saying. The impact extends beyond increased shipping costs, with delays and higher insurance premiums taking a toll on businesses. The Red Sea disruptions are unravelling the intricacies of China's export-dependent economy, highlighting vulnerabilities to supply chain interruptions and external shocks. Premier Li Qiang, speaking at the World Economic Forum, stressed the importance of maintaining "stable and smooth" global supply chains. While not explicitly mentioning the Red Sea, the remarks highlighted the broader challenges faced by China. The disruptions are compelling some companies, including US-based BDI Furniture, to diversify production locations, reducing reliance on China amid geopolitical tensions. The fear now is that a prolonged crisis might encourage a "near-shoring" strategy, prompting businesses to shift production closer to home. The vulnerability of China's export economy is highlighted by the potential shift of companies opting for alternative manufacturing locations. Reuters cited Marco Castelli, the founder of IC Trade, who warned, "If it's permanent, then the whole mechanism will be readjusted. Some (companies) may also consider moving more production to India." The disruptions add to the challenges faced by China's struggling economy, grappling with a property crisis, weak consumer demand, a shrinking population, and sluggish global growth. As companies like Fuzhou Han Changming International Trade Co Ltd navigate delays and cost increases, there is a growing concern about the broader economic impact. Han Changming, whose business heavily relies on Europe and Africa trade, is pleading with suppliers and customers to share additional costs to sustain his company. The disruptions come at a critical time, with many companies already managing logistics challenges ahead of the Lunar New Year in February. The festive season leads to a mass exodus of nearly 300 million migrant workers and temporary factory closures, creating a rush to ship goods in the weeks preceding the holiday. Mike Sagan, Vice President for supply chains and operations at KidKraft, highlighted the impact, stating, "A lot of suppliers, they're screaming about money today." The disruptions, coupled with concerns about payment delays, are reverberating across the supply chain. Rerouting vessels from the Red Sea, primarily via the Suez Canal, to circumvent disruptions can add significant delays, impacting global container capacity and disrupting supply chains. The prolonged shipping schedules could result in delays for goods expected to reach Western shelves in April or May. Some logistics companies are already reporting container shortages at Ningbo-Zhoushan port, one of the world's busiest. The Suez Canal is a vital route for China's westward shipments, handling around 60 per cent of its exports to Europe. The broader impact on China's export landscape and the interconnected global supply chain remains a significant concern. The far-reaching consequences of the Red Sea shipping woes extend beyond financial strains to manufacturers reconsidering their future strategies. Yang Bingben, whose company manufactures industrial-use valves, revealed a substantial reduction in orders amid soaring freight costs. "The impact is huge," said Yang, emphasizing the potential loss. The uncertainty in trade conditions poses a particularly acute challenge for companies relying on just-in-time deliveries or frequent stock changes. Gerhard Flatz, Managing Director of premium sportswear manufacturer KTC, voiced concern that companies with shrinking margins might face closure, compounding the economic impact. (With inputs from Reuters)

Red Sea shipping woes wreak havoc on Chinese exporters: Report