Iran’s weapons and defence equipment production capacity has increased by 250% compared to before the US and Israel launched war on the country more than seven months ago, the Islamic Republic’s defence ministry claimed on Tuesday. It further claimed that the production of some weapons has even risen by more than three times.&nbsp;Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brig. Ge. Reza Talaei-Nik said, “The country’s capacity to produce weapons and defence equipment compared with before the Ramadan War has increased 2.5 times, and in some weapons, the level of production has increased by more than three times.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nobel-prize-in-physics-awarded-to-francis-halzen-for-ice-cube-neutrino-discovery-1791280882679">Nobel Prize in Physics 2026 awarded to Francis Halzen for ice neutrino discovery</a>&nbsp;“In some weapons, production has increased by more than three times in secure facilities and with the participation of the private sector,” Talaei-Nik said. He said the ministry was also upgrading weapons and increasing production to reflect a shift toward a more offensive military doctrine.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Iran’s Ministry of Defense spokesperson:
Iran’s capacity to produce weapons and defense equipment has increased 2.5 times compared with before the Ramadan war. Production of some weapons has risen by more than three times.&mdash; IRIB (Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting) (@iribnews_irib) <a href="https://x.com/iribnews_irib/status/2107433200196968740?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 6, 2026</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;&nbsp;He added that the increase had taken place over more than seven months of war and involved greater use of private-sector and technology companies in the defence industry. Three months ago, the ministry had put the increase at about twofold, he said.&nbsp;The spokesman also warned that any renewed attack on Iran by the US would see Iran’s foes “face heavier defeats”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-lawmakers-move-to-honour-indian-pilot-smit-machchhar-with-a-resolution-1791299684835">US lawmakers move to honour Indian pilot Smit Machchhar with a resolution</a>&nbsp;The Trump administration has repeatedly insisted that most of Iran’s military and defence production capacities have been destroyed during the war.Iran’s defence cooperation with Russia and China has neither been halted nor diminished, but, in fact, it has been reinforced and remains ongoing in certain areas, he added.&nbsp;“Iran’s defence cooperation with Russia and China has not stopped or decreased, and in some areas, it has also been strengthened and continues,” he said.

The increase in weapons and defence equipment production had taken place over more than seven months of war and involved greater use of private-sector and technology companies in the defence industry, said Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brig. Ge. Reza Talaei-Nik.

Iran’s weapons and defence equipment production capacity has increased by 250% compared to before the US and Israel launched war on the country more than seven months ago, the Islamic Republic’s defence ministry claimed on Tuesday. It further claimed that the production of some weapons has even risen by more than three times. Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brig. Ge. Reza Talaei-Nik said, “The country’s capacity to produce weapons and defence equipment compared with before the Ramadan War has increased 2.5 times, and in some weapons, the level of production has increased by more than three times.” Also Read: Nobel Prize in Physics 2026 awarded to Francis Halzen for ice neutrino discovery “In some weapons, production has increased by more than three times in secure facilities and with the participation of the private sector,” Talaei-Nik said. He said the ministry was also upgrading weapons and increasing production to reflect a shift toward a more offensive military doctrine.

The increase in weapons and defence equipment production had taken place over more than seven months of war and involved greater use of private-sector and technology companies in the defence industry, said Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brig. Ge. Reza Talaei-Nik.

Iran claims its weapons production is up by 250%; defence cooperation with Russia and China reinforced

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to help decide what its Claude AI models should and should not be allowed to do.&nbsp;The unusual job, called Policy Design Manager, Conventional Weapons, sits within Anthropic’s Safeguards organisation. The successful candidate will help define the boundary between legitimate engineering research and requests that could contribute to weapons development. The position comes as Anthropic faces growing questions about how increasingly capable AI systems could be misused in military and other high-risk settings. And the company is willing to pay heavily for someone who can help answer those questions.<h2>Anthropic is offering up to $285,000</h2>The job listing gives an annual salary range of $245,000 to $285,000. At the upper end, that is roughly Rs 2.7 crore a year, depending on the exchange rate. That works out to about Rs 22.5 lakh a month before tax. Anthropic says it is looking for someone with deep, practical knowledge of weapons systems. Experience at a defence research laboratory, government research agency or weapons company is among the backgrounds it lists. A bachelor's degree or equivalent experience is required. Knowledge of machine learning is preferred, along with experience in areas such as robotics, autonomy, guidance and navigation, sensors, aerospace or embedded software.<h2>What will the weapons expert actually do?</h2>The job is not simply about blocking questions about guns or military equipment. Anthropic says conventional weapons increasingly depend on software and autonomous systems. The role therefore covers technologies with legitimate civilian uses that could also contribute to weapons systems. The person hired will develop threat models and evaluations to assess how Claude could contribute to weapons development. They will also work with engineers to turn policy decisions into model guardrails, detection systems and enforcement tools.&nbsp;Anthropic specifically says the role extends to autonomous systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without human authorisation.&nbsp;The aim is to establish a practical line between acceptable research and harmful weapons development.<h2>Why is Anthropic doing this now?</h2>The timing is significant. Anthropic has been expanding its AI safeguards as its models become more capable. Last week, the company published research showing that frontier AI models can perform tasks relevant to tactical intelligence and conventional weapons development, while also describing safeguards designed to block misuse. Anthropic has also previously restricted Claude from assisting with weapons design and development. The company has argued that advanced AI systems need stronger protections in high-risk areas.That makes the new hire part of a broader effort to build safeguards around Claude rather than evidence that Anthropic believes an AI war is about to begin. The bigger question is becoming harder to ignore: as AI becomes capable of handling more sophisticated technical work, where exactly should the line be drawn? Anthropic is now looking for a weapons expert to help draw it.

Anthropic is hiring a Policy Design Manager for conventional weapons, offering up to $285,000 a year. The role will define limits for Claude, build threat models and evaluations, and help engineers create safeguards against AI-assisted weapons development.

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to help decide what its Claude AI models should and should not be allowed to do. The unusual job, called Policy Design Manager, Conventional Weapons, sits within Anthropic’s Safeguards organisation. The successful candidate will help define the boundary between legitimate engineering research and requests that could contribute to weapons development. The position comes as Anthropic faces growing questions about how increasingly capable AI systems could be misused in military and other high-risk settings. And the company is willing to pay heavily for someone who can help answer those questions. Anthropic is offering up to $285,000 The job listing gives an annual salary range of $245,000 to $285,000. At the upper end, that is roughly Rs 2.7 crore a year, depending on the exchange rate. That works out to about Rs 22.5 lakh a month before tax. Anthropic says it is looking for someone with deep, practical knowledge of weapons systems. Experience at a defence research laboratory, government research agency or weapons company is among the backgrounds it lists. A bachelor's degree or equivalent experience is required. Knowledge of machine learning is preferred, along with experience in areas such as robotics, autonomy, guidance and navigation, sensors, aerospace or embedded software. What will the weapons expert actually do? The job is not simply about blocking questions about guns or military equipment. Anthropic says conventional weapons increasingly depend on software and autonomous systems. The role therefore covers technologies with legitimate civilian uses that could also contribute to weapons systems. The person hired will develop threat models and evaluations to assess how Claude could contribute to weapons development. They will also work with engineers to turn policy decisions into model guardrails, detection systems and enforcement tools. Anthropic specifically says the role extends to autonomous systems capable of selecting and engaging targets without human authorisation. The aim is to establish a practical line between acceptable research and harmful weapons development. Why is Anthropic doing this now? The timing is significant. Anthropic has been expanding its AI safeguards as its models become more capable. Last week, the company published research showing that frontier AI models can perform tasks relevant to tactical intelligence and conventional weapons development, while also describing safeguards designed to block misuse. Anthropic has also previously restricted Claude from assisting with weapons design and development. The company has argued that advanced AI systems need stronger protections in high-risk areas. That makes the new hire part of a broader effort to build safeguards around Claude rather than evidence that Anthropic believes an AI war is about to begin. The bigger question is becoming harder to ignore: as AI becomes capable of handling more sophisticated technical work, where exactly should the line be drawn? Anthropic is now looking for a weapons expert to help draw it.

Anthropic is hiring a Policy Design Manager for conventional weapons, offering up to $285,000 a year. The role will define limits for Claude, build threat models and evaluations, and help engineers create safeguards against AI-assisted weapons development.

Anthropic is hiring a weapons expert to decide what Claude should be allowed to do

Anthropic says scientists used its Claude AI models for sensitive biological research that could potentially aid the development of biological weapons.&nbsp;The company said it disrupted several such attempts this year, including research involving viruses and other biological work with possible weapons applications. The disclosure has renewed concerns about how increasingly capable AI models could lower barriers to dangerous scientific work. Much of the research involved so-called dual-use science, where the same work can have legitimate medical benefits but could also create security risks.<h2>What did the researchers use Claude for?</h2>One case involved a request to help prepare a grant application for research involving the chikungunya virus. According to Anthropic, the proposed work involved genetic changes intended to study properties such as transmissibility and immune evasion. Such research can have legitimate purposes, including understanding viruses and developing treatments or vaccines, but the same capabilities can raise serious biosecurity concerns.&nbsp;Anthropic said it blocked the accounts involved after detecting activity that violated its policies. The company has not publicly identified the researchers or organisations involved in the biological cases.<h2>Why is AI raising bioweapon concerns?</h2>The concern is not simply that Claude can answer biology questions. Anthropic says newer models are becoming increasingly capable at connecting information across areas of biology and helping researchers with complex scientific tasks. Its own testing has found that some models can provide significant assistance on biological tasks relevant to security risks. That creates a difficult problem for AI companies. The same model that can speed up drug discovery can potentially help with dangerous biological research. Anthropic has therefore introduced stronger safeguards around high-risk biological queries and says its models should not provide serious assistance to people seeking to create biological weapons.<h2>A warning about where AI is heading</h2>The disclosure comes as AI companies face growing pressure over the misuse of increasingly powerful models. Anthropic's latest threat report also describes attempts to use Claude for cyberattacks, surveillance, influence operations and conventional weapons-related work. The biological cases are particularly sensitive because mistakes in this area could have consequences far beyond the person using the AI. For Anthropic, the message is clear: AI safety is no longer only about what models might do in theory. Companies are now having to detect and stop potentially dangerous uses in the real world.

Anthropic says it disrupted several attempts by scientists to use Claude AI for sensitive biological research that could potentially aid biological weapons development. 

Anthropic says scientists used its Claude AI models for sensitive biological research that could potentially aid the development of biological weapons. The company said it disrupted several such attempts this year, including research involving viruses and other biological work with possible weapons applications. The disclosure has renewed concerns about how increasingly capable AI models could lower barriers to dangerous scientific work. Much of the research involved so-called dual-use science, where the same work can have legitimate medical benefits but could also create security risks. What did the researchers use Claude for? One case involved a request to help prepare a grant application for research involving the chikungunya virus. According to Anthropic, the proposed work involved genetic changes intended to study properties such as transmissibility and immune evasion. Such research can have legitimate purposes, including understanding viruses and developing treatments or vaccines, but the same capabilities can raise serious biosecurity concerns. Anthropic said it blocked the accounts involved after detecting activity that violated its policies. The company has not publicly identified the researchers or organisations involved in the biological cases. Why is AI raising bioweapon concerns? The concern is not simply that Claude can answer biology questions. Anthropic says newer models are becoming increasingly capable at connecting information across areas of biology and helping researchers with complex scientific tasks. Its own testing has found that some models can provide significant assistance on biological tasks relevant to security risks. That creates a difficult problem for AI companies. The same model that can speed up drug discovery can potentially help with dangerous biological research. Anthropic has therefore introduced stronger safeguards around high-risk biological queries and says its models should not provide serious assistance to people seeking to create biological weapons. A warning about where AI is heading The disclosure comes as AI companies face growing pressure over the misuse of increasingly powerful models. Anthropic's latest threat report also describes attempts to use Claude for cyberattacks, surveillance, influence operations and conventional weapons-related work. The biological cases are particularly sensitive because mistakes in this area could have consequences far beyond the person using the AI. For Anthropic, the message is clear: AI safety is no longer only about what models might do in theory. Companies are now having to detect and stop potentially dangerous uses in the real world.

Anthropic says it disrupted several attempts by scientists to use Claude AI for sensitive biological research that could potentially aid biological weapons development.&nbsp;

Anthropic says scientists used Claude AI for research that could aid biological weapons development

weapons-development

Weapons Development, News on Weapons Development, stories on Weapons Development, articles on Weapons Development, Weapons Development stories at Wion, Weapons Development news, Weapons Development latest news

weapons development

Iran claims its weapons production is up by 250%; defence cooperation with Russia and China reinforced

Who decides what AI can do in a war? Anthropic is hiring for that job

Anthropic stopped attempts to use Claude in research that could aid bioweapons