According to reports, social media giant Facebook has exempted high profile VIPs from its rules in a new quality control move.

The programme&nbsp;is reportedly called "cross-check" or "XCheck". The Wall Street Journal report said the policy protests celebrities even though the social media company claims to apply rules equally to everyone.

Andy Stone, Facebook spokesman in a series of tweets said: "The WSJ piece repeatedly cites Facebook's own documents pointing to the need for changes that are in fact already underway at the company."

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
But since 2019, when we, ourselves, promoted that the company would take this approach to politicians’ speech, there have been literally hundreds of news stories critical of our approach.
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) <a href="https://twitter.com/andymstone/status/1437463051985473538?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 13, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"We have new teams, new resources and an overhaul of the process that is an existing work-stream at Facebook," Stone added.&nbsp; 
Stone said there have been "literally hundreds of news stories critical of our approach" while conceding&nbsp;that Facebook's own analysis had come to the conclusion improvements need&nbsp;to be made.

<div class="ui-state-default" contenteditable="false">
<div class="twitter-block" draggable="false">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
The Journal’s reporting also suggests we were not clear about the ability of politicians to speak freely on the platform -- suggesting this somehow a secret protection.
— Andy Stone (@andymstone) <a href="https://twitter.com/andymstone/status/1437462907202281472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 13, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></div>
<a class="close-mark close-div" href="#" id="jqclosemark">×</a></div>

"There aren't two systems of justice; it's an attempted safeguard against mistakes," Stone said in the tweet, adding: "We know our enforcement is not perfect and there are tradeoffs between speed and accuracy."

The WSJ report said XCheck grew to include at least 5.8 million users last year.&nbsp;Facebook had claimed earlier that it does not protect profiles, pages or content from being removed while adding that it "is simply done to make sure our decision is correct."

(With inputs from Agencies)

According to reports, social media giant Facebook has exempted high profile VIPs from its rules in a new quality control move. The programme is reportedly called "cross-check" or "XCheck".

According to reports, social media giant Facebook has exempted high profile VIPs from its rules in a new quality control move. The programme is reportedly called "cross-check" or "XCheck". The Wall Street Journal report said the policy protests celebrities even though the social media company claims to apply rules equally to everyone. Andy Stone, Facebook spokesman in a series of tweets said: "The WSJ piece repeatedly cites Facebook's own documents pointing to the need for changes that are in fact already underway at the company." But since 2019, when we, ourselves, promoted that the company would take this approach to politicians’ speech, there have been literally hundreds of news stories critical of our approach. — Andy Stone (@andymstone) September 13, 2021 × "We have new teams, new resources and an overhaul of the process that is an existing work-stream at Facebook," Stone added. Stone said there have been "literally hundreds of news stories critical of our approach" while conceding that Facebook's own analysis had come to the conclusion improvements need to be made. The Journal’s reporting also suggests we were not clear about the ability of politicians to speak freely on the platform -- suggesting this somehow a secret protection. — Andy Stone (@andymstone) September 13, 2021 × "There aren't two systems of justice; it's an attempted safeguard against mistakes," Stone said in the tweet, adding: "We know our enforcement is not perfect and there are tradeoffs between speed and accuracy." The WSJ report said XCheck grew to include at least 5.8 million users last year. Facebook had claimed earlier that it does not protect profiles, pages or content from being removed while adding that it "is simply done to make sure our decision is correct." (With inputs from Agencies)

Facebook protects elite users from its own rules: Report

A day after the Trump administration announced caps on the number of <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-announces-caps-on-chinese-staff-working-in-state-media-in-us-283847">Chinese</a> nationals who can work for state-run media in the United States, the Chinese government said it will retaliate against US "bullying".

"Out of a Cold War mindset and ideological bias, the US State Department uses groundless reasons to politically oppress Chinese media organisations based in the US," China's foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said while strongly opposing the US move.

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-expelling-journalists-china-demands-apology-from-the-wall-street-journal-282443">Also Read: After expelling journalists, China demands apology from WSJ</a>

"The hypocrisy of the United States' so-called freedom of the press as blatant double standard and hegemonic bullying," the foreign ministry spokesman added.

US secretary of state Mike Pompeo had announced on Monday that the US government would be implementing personnel cap on Chinese government-controlled media organizations in the United States.

"We urge Beijing to respect freedom of expression and will continue to seek reciprocity across the bilateral relationship," Pompeo had said.

The move by the US comes as China ordered three reporters from The Wall Street Journal to leave the country after the US-based newspaper in a headline said &nbsp;"China is the Real Sick Man of Asia" although the journalists hadn't written the opinion piece.

However, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said: "It was the US who broke the rules of the game first, China can only follow suit." 
&nbsp;

A day after the Trump administration announced caps on the number of Chinese nationals who can work for state-run media in the United States, the Chinese government said it will retaliate against US "bullying".

A day after the Trump administration announced caps on the number of Chinese nationals who can work for state-run media in the United States, the Chinese government said it will retaliate against US "bullying". "Out of a Cold War mindset and ideological bias, the US State Department uses groundless reasons to politically oppress Chinese media organisations based in the US," China's foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said while strongly opposing the US move. Also Read: After expelling journalists, China demands apology from WSJ "The hypocrisy of the United States' so-called freedom of the press as blatant double standard and hegemonic bullying," the foreign ministry spokesman added. US secretary of state Mike Pompeo had announced on Monday that the US government would be implementing personnel cap on Chinese government-controlled media organizations in the United States. "We urge Beijing to respect freedom of expression and will continue to seek reciprocity across the bilateral relationship," Pompeo had said. The move by the US comes as China ordered three reporters from The Wall Street Journal to leave the country after the US-based newspaper in a headline said "China is the Real Sick Man of Asia" although the journalists hadn't written the opinion piece. However, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman said: "It was the US who broke the rules of the game first, China can only follow suit."

It is hegemonic bullying, says China after US caps Chinese nationals in state media in US

The Foreign Correspondents' Club of China (FCCC) in a report said that government was planning to send back more foreign journalists after row over three Wall Street Journal reporters in Beijing were sent back over a headline calling China the "real sick man of Asia".

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-expelling-journalists-china-demands-apology-from-the-wall-street-journal-282443">Also Read: China demands apology from The Wall Street Journal</a> 
&nbsp;

"Since 2013, when Xi Jinping's ascension to power was completed, China has forced out nine foreign journalists, either through outright expulsion or by non-renewal of visas. The FCCC fears that China is preparing to expel more journalists," the group said.

The press body said that journalists were being threatened with the government intimidating the press fraternity by using it as a weapon&nbsp;"like never before".

"Chinese authorities are using visas as weapons against the foreign press like never before, expanding their deployment of a long-time intimidation tactic as working conditions for foreign journalists in China markedly deteriorated in 2019," it said.

However, China's foreign ministry said: "What happened to the Wall Street Journal journalists was just an independent case."

"There are over 600 foreign journalists stationed in China and they don't need to worry about their reporting in China as long as they observe Chinese laws and regulations," China's foreign ministry spokesman said.

The FCCC said at least 82 per cent journalists had experienced interference, harassment or violence while reporting.

"As China reaches new heights of economic influence, it has shown a growing willingness to use its considerable state power to suppress factual reporting that does not fit with the global image it seeks to present," the report said.

"As scrutiny is intensifying toward China, it is more important than ever for foreign media to have freedom to report and cover the country," the report added.

The press body said the ability of foreign journalists based in China is crucial for the news coverage about the country while waring that &nbsp;"hostility toward foreign press is now so pervasive that the most basic elements of journalism are often frustrated in China".&nbsp;

The Foreign Correspondents' Club of China (FCCC) in a report said that government was planning to send back more foreign journalists after row over three Wall Street Journal reporters in Beijing were sent back over a headline calling China the "real sick man of Asia".

The Foreign Correspondents' Club of China (FCCC) in a report said that government was planning to send back more foreign journalists after row over three Wall Street Journal reporters in Beijing were sent back over a headline calling China the "real sick man of Asia". Also Read: China demands apology from The Wall Street Journal "Since 2013, when Xi Jinping's ascension to power was completed, China has forced out nine foreign journalists, either through outright expulsion or by non-renewal of visas. The FCCC fears that China is preparing to expel more journalists," the group said. The press body said that journalists were being threatened with the government intimidating the press fraternity by using it as a weapon "like never before". "Chinese authorities are using visas as weapons against the foreign press like never before, expanding their deployment of a long-time intimidation tactic as working conditions for foreign journalists in China markedly deteriorated in 2019," it said. However, China's foreign ministry said: "What happened to the Wall Street Journal journalists was just an independent case." "There are over 600 foreign journalists stationed in China and they don't need to worry about their reporting in China as long as they observe Chinese laws and regulations," China's foreign ministry spokesman said. The FCCC said at least 82 per cent journalists had experienced interference, harassment or violence while reporting. "As China reaches new heights of economic influence, it has shown a growing willingness to use its considerable state power to suppress factual reporting that does not fit with the global image it seeks to present," the report said. "As scrutiny is intensifying toward China, it is more important than ever for foreign media to have freedom to report and cover the country," the report added. The press body said the ability of foreign journalists based in China is crucial for the news coverage about the country while waring that "hostility toward foreign press is now so pervasive that the most basic elements of journalism are often frustrated in China".

Chinese authorities using visas as weapons against foreign press: Report

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday after the first intra-Korean talks in over two years that the United States was willing to speak to North Korea &quot;under the right circumstances,&quot; although it was far from clear whether this would pay dividends.

South Korea said Trump had also said in a phone call with its President Moon Jae-in that there would be no military action while North-South talks were going on and that a Wall Street Journal article saying he was contemplating a military strike against North Korea was &quot;completely wrong.&quot;

&quot;Who knows where it leads?&quot; Trump told reporters at the White House after his call with Moon to discuss Tuesday&#39;s North-South talks, the first since 2015.

He said Moon told him the talks went well, and added: &quot;Hopefully it will lead to success for the world, not just for our country, but for the world. And we&#39;ll be seeing over the next number of weeks and months what happens.&quot;

At a later news conference with the visiting Norwegian prime minister, Trump said the United States had problems with North Korea, but &quot;a lot of good talks are going on right now.&quot;

&quot;I see a lot of good energy. I like it very much ... So, hopefully, a lot of good things are going to work out.&quot;

&quot;I think that we will have peace through strength,&quot; he said, a reference to his policy of maintaining a powerful U.S. military.

South Korea&#39;s Presidential Blue House said both men had said the dialogue &quot;could naturally lead to talks between the United States and North Korea for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula after the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics.&quot;

At Tuesday&#39;s intra-Korea talks, North Korea said it would attend the Olympics, which South Korea will host next month, while both sides agreed to resolve problems between them through dialogue and to revive military consultations to avoid accidental conflict.

However, Pyongyang said it would not discuss its nuclear weapons because they were aimed only at the United States and not its &quot;brethren&quot; in South Korea, or Russia or China, showing that a diplomatic breakthrough to the crisis remained far off.

While Washington has welcomed the talks as a first step towards solving the crisis over North Korea&#39;s programme to develop nuclear missiles capable of reaching the United States, it has reiterated that any talks involving the United States must be aimed at North Korea&#39;s denuclearisation.

The White House said Trump told Moon the United States was willing to talk to North Korea &quot;at the appropriate time and under the right circumstances.&quot;

Trump, who has swung between hurling insults and threats at North Korea to expressing a willingness to talk, said on Saturday he would be willing to speak to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, though not without pre-conditions.

An unsourced article in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday said U.S. officials were debating whether it was possible to mount a limited military strike against North Korea without igniting an all-out war.

The Trump administration has said it prefers a diplomatic solution, but that all options are on the table, including military ones.

U.S. officials say Trump has been considering a number of military options, including a preemptive strike on a missile or nuclear facility, but officials and analysts have warned of the risks of triggering a catastrophic wider conflict.

Moon credits Trump for talks&nbsp;

Earlier on Tuesday, Moon made a point of crediting Trump for the Korean talks and also said he himself was open to meeting with Kim at any time if conditions were right and &quot;certain achievements are guaranteed&quot;.

&quot;The purpose of it shouldn&rsquo;t be talks for the sake of talks,&quot; he told a news conference, while warning that Pyongyang would face stronger sanctions if &quot;provocations&quot; continued.

North Korea ramped up missile launches last year and conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test, prompting a U.S.-led campaign to impose some of the strongest international sanctions yet, which Pyongyang dubbed an &quot;act of war&quot;.

Trump and Kim have exchanged threats and insults over the past year, raising fears of war. South Korea and the United States are technically still at war with the North after the 1950-53 Korean conflict ended with a truce, not a peace treaty.

Washington and Seoul opened the way for the talks last week when they announced the postponement of joint military exercises that Pyongyang has denounced as a rehearsal for invasion.

Washington had raised concerns that a New Year overture from Kim that led to the talks could be aimed at driving a wedge between the allies, but Moon said he and Washington did not differ over how to respond to North Korean threats.

&quot;This initial round of talks is for the improvement of relations between North and South Korea. Our task ... is to draw North Korea to talks aimed at the denuclearisation of the North,&quot; Moon said. &quot;(It&#39;s) our basic stance that will never be given up.&quot;

The United Nations Security Council said following a briefing on the talks that it hopes &quot;that such interactions will lead towards the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula.&quot;

Olof Skoog, Swedish ambassador to the U.N., said his nation had called for the briefing because it was important for the Security Council to remain active and united in its efforts to resolve the Korean conflict.

On an agreement on continued military-to-military talks and the reopened inter-Korean military hotline, Skoog said: &quot;We have consistently underlined the importance of these channels of communication to avoid misunderstanding and to reduce tensions.&quot;

North Korea&#39;s official Rodong Sinmun newspaper said all problems would be resolved through the efforts of the Korean people alone.

&quot;If the North and South abandon external forces and cooperate together, we will be able to fully solve all problems to match our people&#39;s needs and our joint prosperity,&quot; it said.

In spite of the hopeful words about the potential for future talks, the U.S. intelligence assessment of North Korea&rsquo;s weapons programs has not altered, officials say.

U.S. officials familiar with the classified analysis say the consensus is that Kim remains convinced that the United States is determined to overthrow him and that only a nuclear arsenal that threatens America can deter that.

One official said the North-South talks were likely to follow the pattern of past diplomatic efforts, in which North Korea has benefited from aid without making concessions.

Lee Woo-young, a professor at Seoul&#39;s University of North Korean Studies, said it was wise of Moon to praise Trump.

&quot;By doing that, he can help the U.S. build logic for moving toward negotiations,&quot; he said.

The United States and Canada are due to host a conference of about 20 foreign ministers next week in Vancouver to discuss North Korea, without the participation of China, Pyongyang&#39;s sole major ally and biggest trade partner.

The State Department said the talks, which will involve countries that supported South Korea in the Korean War, would look at ways both to increase the U.S.-led pressure campaign on North Korea and take diplomatic efforts forward.

&quot;The pressure campaign is intended to lead to credible negotiations on denuclearisation,&quot; a spokesman said.

China said it was opposed to the meeting as it would not help reduce tensions

South Korea's Presidential Blue House said both men had said the dialogue "could naturally lead to talks between the United States and North Korea for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula after the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics."

U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday after the first intra-Korean talks in over two years that the United States was willing to speak to North Korea "under the right circumstances," although it was far from clear whether this would pay dividends. South Korea said Trump had also said in a phone call with its President Moon Jae-in that there would be no military action while North-South talks were going on and that a Wall Street Journal article saying he was contemplating a military strike against North Korea was "completely wrong." "Who knows where it leads?" Trump told reporters at the White House after his call with Moon to discuss Tuesday's North-South talks, the first since 2015. He said Moon told him the talks went well, and added: "Hopefully it will lead to success for the world, not just for our country, but for the world. And we'll be seeing over the next number of weeks and months what happens." At a later news conference with the visiting Norwegian prime minister, Trump said the United States had problems with North Korea, but "a lot of good talks are going on right now." "I see a lot of good energy. I like it very much ... So, hopefully, a lot of good things are going to work out." "I think that we will have peace through strength," he said, a reference to his policy of maintaining a powerful U.S. military. South Korea's Presidential Blue House said both men had said the dialogue "could naturally lead to talks between the United States and North Korea for the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula after the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics." At Tuesday's intra-Korea talks, North Korea said it would attend the Olympics, which South Korea will host next month, while both sides agreed to resolve problems between them through dialogue and to revive military consultations to avoid accidental conflict. However, Pyongyang said it would not discuss its nuclear weapons because they were aimed only at the United States and not its "brethren" in South Korea, or Russia or China, showing that a diplomatic breakthrough to the crisis remained far off. While Washington has welcomed the talks as a first step towards solving the crisis over North Korea's programme to develop nuclear missiles capable of reaching the United States, it has reiterated that any talks involving the United States must be aimed at North Korea's denuclearisation. The White House said Trump told Moon the United States was willing to talk to North Korea "at the appropriate time and under the right circumstances." Trump, who has swung between hurling insults and threats at North Korea to expressing a willingness to talk, said on Saturday he would be willing to speak to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, though not without pre-conditions. An unsourced article in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday said U.S. officials were debating whether it was possible to mount a limited military strike against North Korea without igniting an all-out war. The Trump administration has said it prefers a diplomatic solution, but that all options are on the table, including military ones. U.S. officials say Trump has been considering a number of military options, including a preemptive strike on a missile or nuclear facility, but officials and analysts have warned of the risks of triggering a catastrophic wider conflict. Moon credits Trump for talks Earlier on Tuesday, Moon made a point of crediting Trump for the Korean talks and also said he himself was open to meeting with Kim at any time if conditions were right and "certain achievements are guaranteed". "The purpose of it shouldn’t be talks for the sake of talks," he told a news conference, while warning that Pyongyang would face stronger sanctions if "provocations" continued. North Korea ramped up missile launches last year and conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test, prompting a U.S.-led campaign to impose some of the strongest international sanctions yet, which Pyongyang dubbed an "act of war". Trump and Kim have exchanged threats and insults over the past year, raising fears of war. South Korea and the United States are technically still at war with the North after the 1950-53 Korean conflict ended with a truce, not a peace treaty. Washington and Seoul opened the way for the talks last week when they announced the postponement of joint military exercises that Pyongyang has denounced as a rehearsal for invasion. Washington had raised concerns that a New Year overture from Kim that led to the talks could be aimed at driving a wedge between the allies, but Moon said he and Washington did not differ over how to respond to North Korean threats. "This initial round of talks is for the improvement of relations between North and South Korea. Our task ... is to draw North Korea to talks aimed at the denuclearisation of the North," Moon said. "(It's) our basic stance that will never be given up." The United Nations Security Council said following a briefing on the talks that it hopes "that such interactions will lead towards the denuclearisation of the Korean peninsula." Olof Skoog, Swedish ambassador to the U.N., said his nation had called for the briefing because it was important for the Security Council to remain active and united in its efforts to resolve the Korean conflict. On an agreement on continued military-to-military talks and the reopened inter-Korean military hotline, Skoog said: "We have consistently underlined the importance of these channels of communication to avoid misunderstanding and to reduce tensions." North Korea's official Rodong Sinmun newspaper said all problems would be resolved through the efforts of the Korean people alone. "If the North and South abandon external forces and cooperate together, we will be able to fully solve all problems to match our people's needs and our joint prosperity," it said. In spite of the hopeful words about the potential for future talks, the U.S. intelligence assessment of North Korea’s weapons programs has not altered, officials say. U.S. officials familiar with the classified analysis say the consensus is that Kim remains convinced that the United States is determined to overthrow him and that only a nuclear arsenal that threatens America can deter that. One official said the North-South talks were likely to follow the pattern of past diplomatic efforts, in which North Korea has benefited from aid without making concessions. Lee Woo-young, a professor at Seoul's University of North Korean Studies, said it was wise of Moon to praise Trump. "By doing that, he can help the U.S. build logic for moving toward negotiations," he said. The United States and Canada are due to host a conference of about 20 foreign ministers next week in Vancouver to discuss North Korea, without the participation of China, Pyongyang's sole major ally and biggest trade partner. The State Department said the talks, which will involve countries that supported South Korea in the Korean War, would look at ways both to increase the U.S.-led pressure campaign on North Korea and take diplomatic efforts forward. "The pressure campaign is intended to lead to credible negotiations on denuclearisation," a spokesman said. China said it was opposed to the meeting as it would not help reduce tensions

Trump, on possibility of North Korea talks, says: 'Who knows where it leads?'