Republican leaders, officials, and aides of Donald Trump rallied behind the president after the US Supreme Court struck down his global tariffs on Friday.&nbsp;In one of the first reactions to the verdict from members of the Trump administration, US Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley downplayed the Supreme Court’s ruling in a post on X.“President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox,” Crowley said. “Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump,” she added.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox. Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump 🇺🇸&mdash; Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) <a href="https://twitter.com/MonicaCrowley/status/2024876710450081992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-victory-for-americans-and-us-economy-democrats-rejoice-over-scotus-ruling-against-trump-s-tariffs-1771608358859">‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs</a>&nbsp;House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., also praised Trump’s tariffs in a post on X. He said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the tariffs ruling.Johnson wrote, “Trump’s tariffs have brought in billions of dollars and created immense leverage for America’s trade strategy and for securing strong, reciprocal America-first trade agreements with countries that had been taking advantage of American workers for decades.”&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">No one can deny that the President’s use of tariffs has brought in billions of dollars and created immense leverage for America’s trade strategy and for securing strong, reciprocal America-first trade agreements with countries that had been taking advantage of American workers…&mdash; Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SpeakerJohnson/status/2024892242930884617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Rep. Abe Hamadeh, of Arizona, also backed Trump’s tariffs, saying his policy “has been extraordinary successful.” Hamadeh added that he would “continue to work with the Administration on ensuring President Trump’s tariff policy continues, whether through existing executive action, or through Congress.”&nbsp;However, some House Republicans offered mixed responses to the ruling. Rep. French Hill, of Arkansas, who chairs the Financial Services Committee, said that while “tariffs can be a useful tool when applied in a targeted way,” the Supreme Court decision “underscores the need for Congress to play a role in trade policy.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-diversifying-energy-options-will-buy-venezuela-oil-says-us-ambassador-sergio-gor-1771597691150">India ‘diversifying’ energy options, will buy Venezuela oil, says US ambassador Sergio Gor</a>&nbsp;Republican US Senator from Ohio, Bernie Moreno, called the verdict “outrageous”. In a post on X, Moreno said, “SCOTUS’s outrageous ruling handcuffs our fight against unfair trade that has devastated American workers for decades. These tariffs protected jobs, revived manufacturing, and forced cheaters like China to pay up. Now globalists win, factories investments may reverse, and American workers lose again.”“This betrayal must be reversed and Republicans must get to work immediately on a reconciliation bill to codify the tariffs that had made our country the hottest country on earth!,” he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>

House Speaker Mike Johnson also praised President Donald Trump’s tariffs and said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the Supreme Court’s tariffs ruling.

Republican leaders, officials, and aides of Donald Trump rallied behind the president after the US Supreme Court struck down his global tariffs on Friday. In one of the first reactions to the verdict from members of the Trump administration, US Chief of Protocol Monica Crowley downplayed the Supreme Court’s ruling in a post on X. “President Trump has plenty of tools in the tariff toolbox,” Crowley said. “Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump,” she added.

House Speaker Mike Johnson also praised President Donald Trump’s tariffs and said the Congress and administration would “determine the best path forward in the coming weeks” in response to the Supreme Court’s tariffs ruling.

‘Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump’: Republicans, aides rally behind president

Democratic lawmakers rejoiced after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by imposing steep tariffs on global imports, toppling one of the president’s most aggressive assertions of executive power. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) hailed the Supreme Court’s ruling as a victory for Americans and the US economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;“This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer,” Schumer said in a statement. “Trump’s chaotic and illegal tariff tax made life more expensive and our economy more unstable. Families paid more. Small businesses and farmers got squeezed. Markets swung wildly.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-stocks-rise-after-supreme-court-rules-against-trump-s-sweeping-tariffs-1771603853424">US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs</a><h2>‘End this reckless trade war for good’</h2>&nbsp;“We’ve said from day one: a president cannot ignore Congress and unilaterally slap tariffs on Americans. That overreach failed,” he continued. “Now Trump should end this reckless trade war for good and finally give families and small businesses the relief they deserve.”&nbsp;The House Democratic whip, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, said the verdict was a win for the American people.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;“Trump’s tariffs are an illegal tax on working families—hiking costs on everything from groceries to utility bills,” she wrote on social media. “Democrats will keep fighting to make your life more affordable.”&nbsp;<h2>‘Ruling a step in righting the wrongs’&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. “Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs,” he said, adding that the ruling was “a step in righting these wrongs, but we have so much more to go”.&nbsp;Colorado representative Joe Neguse, whose congressional litigation task force had pursued the challenge from district courts all the way to the Supreme Court and which focuses on curbing Trump’s executive actions, called it a “vindication”.&nbsp;“Our Litigation Task Force fought against President Trump’s unlawful and reckless tariffs every step of the way,” he said. “Today’s ruling is a victory for the American people.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-victory-for-americans-and-us-economy-democrats-rejoice-over-scotus-ruling-against-trump-s-tariffs-1771608358859">‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs</a>&nbsp;Pete Aguilar, the California representative and a senior member of Democratic leadership, said the ruling affirmed what his party had argued for months. “This is a major victory for the American people who have been suffering from sky-high prices,” he said. “Democrats will keep fighting to lower costs and hold Trump accountable.”&nbsp;<h2>Trump critics among Republicans also hail verdict</h2>

The ruling was also hailed by Trump critics among the Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said the verdict would prevent any future president from using emergency powers to enact sweeping economic policy unilaterally.&nbsp;Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas, whose southern district is dependent on cross-border trade, said the ruling reaffirmed that “Congress has the authority over tariffs and taxation”, and said that strong trade policy did not require “raising costs on everyday goods and materials.”The Nevada representative Susie Lee said the tariffs had taken “a wrecking ball to southern Nevada’s tourism economy”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-diversifying-energy-options-will-buy-venezuela-oil-says-us-ambassador-sergio-gor-1771597691150">India ‘diversifying’ energy options, will buy Venezuela oil, says US ambassador Sergio Gor</a>&nbsp;Representative Tom Suozzi of New York said the ruling carried a message beyond the immediate economic impact.&nbsp;“It is a clear message that the president cannot act unilaterally and must negotiate and try and find common ground with the co-equal branch of government: the Congress.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canadian-govt-asks-court-to-block-sensitive-info-in-nijjar-case-as-it-may-harm-international-relations-1771588403457">Canadian govt asks court to block sensitive info in Nijjar case as it may harm international relations</a><h2>Trump calls ruling a ‘disgrace’</h2>&nbsp;Trump, meanwhile, was unrepentant. Speaking during a White House breakfast with governors on Friday morning, the president reportedly called the ruling a “disgrace” and told those gathered that he had a backup plan, though he offered no details.

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey, who is a progressive Democrat, expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs, he said, adding that the ruling was a step in righting the wrongs,

Democratic lawmakers rejoiced after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump overstepped his authority by imposing steep tariffs on global imports, toppling one of the president’s most aggressive assertions of executive power. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) hailed the Supreme Court’s ruling as a victory for Americans and the US economy. “This is a win for the wallets of every American consumer,” Schumer said in a statement. “Trump’s chaotic and illegal tariff tax made life more expensive and our economy more unstable. Families paid more. Small businesses and farmers got squeezed. Markets swung wildly.” Also Read: US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs ‘End this reckless trade war for good’ “We’ve said from day one: a president cannot ignore Congress and unilaterally slap tariffs on Americans. That overreach failed,” he continued. “Now Trump should end this reckless trade war for good and finally give families and small businesses the relief they deserve.” The House Democratic whip, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, said the verdict was a win for the American people. Also Read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options “Trump’s tariffs are an illegal tax on working families—hiking costs on everything from groceries to utility bills,” she wrote on social media. “Democrats will keep fighting to make your life more affordable.” ‘Ruling a step in righting the wrongs’ Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. “Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs,” he said, adding that the ruling was “a step in righting these wrongs, but we have so much more to go”. Colorado representative Joe Neguse, whose congressional litigation task force had pursued the challenge from district courts all the way to the Supreme Court and which focuses on curbing Trump’s executive actions, called it a “vindication”. “Our Litigation Task Force fought against President Trump’s unlawful and reckless tariffs every step of the way,” he said. “Today’s ruling is a victory for the American people.” Also Read: ‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs Pete Aguilar, the California representative and a senior member of Democratic leadership, said the ruling affirmed what his party had argued for months. “This is a major victory for the American people who have been suffering from sky-high prices,” he said. “Democrats will keep fighting to lower costs and hold Trump accountable.” Trump critics among Republicans also hail verdict

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey, who is a progressive Democrat, expressed anger that the tariffs existed in the first place. Trump just cost you a lot of money on unpopular and illegal tariffs, he said, adding that the ruling was a step in righting the wrongs,

‘Victory for Americans and US economy’: Democrats rejoice over SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs

US stocks mostly rose on Friday, as Wall Street’s main stock indexes jumped after the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The top court has voided Trump’s ⁠global ⁠tariffs since they were enacted under a federal law meant for national emergencies. The Supreme Court said Trump exceeded his powers by imposing duties without a clear Congressional authorisation.&nbsp;The six-three decision by the court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies like Nike and Abercrombie &amp; Fitch. The dollar slipped, and Treasury yields edged higher, said a WSJ report.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-donald-trump-s-global-tariffs-1771601310479">US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs</a>&nbsp;Soon after the news trickled in, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 207.03 points, or 0.42%, to 49,602.19, the S&amp;P 500 gained 33.44 points, or 0.52%, to 6,895.33 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 153.93 points, or 0.68%, to 22,836.66.&nbsp;European auto shares and US-listed shares of stock markets from South Korea to India rallied.&nbsp;The yields on US Treasury bonds also jumped across maturities. Yields on the 10-year bond, which mortgage rates often track closely, rose to 4.096%, while the 30-year Treasury yield rose to 4.74%.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-apex-court-strikes-down-swath-of-trump-s-tariffs-but-president-says-he-has-backup-plan-here-are-his-options-1771602994991">US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options</a>&nbsp;The U.S. dollar jumped against other currencies, such as the British pound, Euro, and Japan's yen, a signal that investors are taking the court decision favourably.&nbsp;Trump imposed the levies in February 2005 under the 1977 economic sanctions law meant to be used only during national emergencies. His April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs included a ⁠baseline duty of 10% on all imports to the US and specific additional tariffs ⁠of 15% to 50% on most countries, many of which were later renegotiated and lowered.&nbsp;Thousands of companies around the world have filed lawsuits challenging the sweeping tariffs and sought refunds on duties they have paid.

The six-three decision by the US Supreme Court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies. The dollar slipped, while Treasury yields edged higher.

US stocks mostly rose on Friday, as Wall Street’s main stock indexes jumped after the Supreme Court struck down US President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The top court has voided Trump’s ⁠global ⁠tariffs since they were enacted under a federal law meant for national emergencies. The Supreme Court said Trump exceeded his powers by imposing duties without a clear Congressional authorisation. The six-three decision by the court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies like Nike and Abercrombie & Fitch. The dollar slipped, and Treasury yields edged higher, said a WSJ report. Also Read: US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump's global tariffs Soon after the news trickled in, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 207.03 points, or 0.42%, to 49,602.19, the S&P 500 gained 33.44 points, or 0.52%, to 6,895.33 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 153.93 points, or 0.68%, to 22,836.66. European auto shares and US-listed shares of stock markets from South Korea to India rallied. The yields on US Treasury bonds also jumped across maturities. Yields on the 10-year bond, which mortgage rates often track closely, rose to 4.096%, while the 30-year Treasury yield rose to 4.74%. Also Read: US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options The U.S. dollar jumped against other currencies, such as the British pound, Euro, and Japan's yen, a signal that investors are taking the court decision favourably. Trump imposed the levies in February 2005 under the 1977 economic sanctions law meant to be used only during national emergencies. His April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs included a ⁠baseline duty of 10% on all imports to the US and specific additional tariffs ⁠of 15% to 50% on most countries, many of which were later renegotiated and lowered. Thousands of companies around the world have filed lawsuits challenging the sweeping tariffs and sought refunds on duties they have paid.

The six-three decision by the US Supreme Court buoyed the markets and sparked a rally in transportation stocks and in tariff-exposed companies. The dollar slipped, while Treasury yields edged higher.

US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs

In a landmark judgment on Friday (Feb 20), the US Supreme Court ruled that the President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing a swath of tariffs that upended global trade. The court said in the verdict that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.”&nbsp;“The United States, after all, is not at war with every nation in the world,” the US Chief Justice said while addressing the scope of executive powers in the case. After this, Trump said he has a “backup plan” for tariffs. Let's explore the possible options the American president may consider now.&nbsp;Section 232: National Security Tariffs&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-to-attack-iran-soon-from-usss-abraham-lincoln-to-gerald-ford-us-deploys-these-warships-are-heading-towards-middle-east-nuclear-deal-1771605910151">Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East</a>&nbsp;Section 232 of the US Constitution allows tariffs if imports threaten national security. This was previously used for steel and aluminium duties. However, it requires industry-specific investigations. Hence, this section cannot justify sweeping global tariffs.&nbsp;Section 301: Unfair Trade Practices&nbsp;Under Section 301, the US can impose tariffs in response to discriminatory or unfair trade behaviour by other countries. This tool was heavily used during earlier trade disputes, especially involving China.&nbsp;Section 201: Safeguard Measures&nbsp;This section allows temporary protection for domestic industries harmed by sudden import surges. These tariffs are time-limited and must meet strict injury standards.&nbsp;Section 122: Balance-of-Payments Authority&nbsp;Section 122 of the Constitution permits temporary surcharges (usually capped at 15 per cent) to address serious balance-of-payments problems. It is narrower and more constrained than the emergency powers Trump attempted to use.<h2>What did the court say?</h2>Chief Justice John Roberts said, "The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it.”&nbsp;

The US Supreme Court ruled Trump exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers, forcing reliance on narrower trade laws like Sections 232, 301, 201, or 122.

In a landmark judgment on Friday (Feb 20), the US Supreme Court ruled that the President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing a swath of tariffs that upended global trade. The court said in the verdict that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act “does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.” “The United States, after all, is not at war with every nation in the world,” the US Chief Justice said while addressing the scope of executive powers in the case. After this, Trump said he has a “backup plan” for tariffs. Let's explore the possible options the American president may consider now. Section 232: National Security Tariffs Also read: Trump to attack Iran soon? From USS Abraham Lincoln to Gerald Ford US deploys - these warships are heading towards Middle East Section 232 of the US Constitution allows tariffs if imports threaten national security. This was previously used for steel and aluminium duties. However, it requires industry-specific investigations. Hence, this section cannot justify sweeping global tariffs. Section 301: Unfair Trade Practices Under Section 301, the US can impose tariffs in response to discriminatory or unfair trade behaviour by other countries. This tool was heavily used during earlier trade disputes, especially involving China. Section 201: Safeguard Measures This section allows temporary protection for domestic industries harmed by sudden import surges. These tariffs are time-limited and must meet strict injury standards. Section 122: Balance-of-Payments Authority Section 122 of the Constitution permits temporary surcharges (usually capped at 15 per cent) to address serious balance-of-payments problems. It is narrower and more constrained than the emergency powers Trump attempted to use. What did the court say? Chief Justice John Roberts said, "The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it.”

The US Supreme Court ruled Trump exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers, forcing reliance on narrower trade laws like Sections 232, 301, 201, or 122.

US apex court strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president says he has a ‘backup plan’. Here are his options

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jan 12) said that the United States would be “screwed” if the Supreme Court ruled that some of his tariffs are illegal. He added that the move would be a “complete mess” as hundreds of billions of dollars would have to be paid back to US companies, an amount that would be “almost impossible” for the United States to pay. He further claimed that “America shines brightly, the World shines brightly.”“The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and that doesn’t include the amount of ‘payback’ that Countries and Companies would require for the Investments they are making on building Plants, Factories, and Equipment, for the purpose of being able to avoid the payment of Tariffs,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.He further added, “When these Investments are added, we are talking about Trillions of Dollars! It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay. Anybody who says that it can be quickly and easily done would be making a false, inaccurate, or totally misunderstood answer to this very large and complex question. It may not be possible but, if it were, it would be Dollars that would be so large that it would take many years to figure out what number we are talking about and even, who, when, and where, to pay.”“Remember, when America shines brightly, the World shines brightly. In other words, if the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!” Trump said.The Supreme Court is expected to release opinions on Wednesday, with the tariffs case having a possibility of being among the rulings. The case was argued last year in November in the Court. During the arguments, several justices appeared sceptical of Trump invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on trade partners of the US, including Mexico, Canada and China, over their alleged roles in illicit drug flows.Trump’s policies have brought the US tariff rate to its highest since the 1930s. He has also repeatedly warned of calamity if the duties are overturned. Notably, the court’s decision will not impact sector-specific tariffs imposed, including on steel, aluminium, and automobiles.

Trump warned the US would be “screwed” if the Supreme Court strikes down his tariffs, saying hundreds of billions or even trillions could be owed back. The court is set to rule soon on a challenge to his use of emergency powers.

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jan 12) said that the United States would be “screwed” if the Supreme Court ruled that some of his tariffs are illegal. He added that the move would be a “complete mess” as hundreds of billions of dollars would have to be paid back to US companies, an amount that would be “almost impossible” for the United States to pay. He further claimed that “America shines brightly, the World shines brightly.” “The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be many Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and that doesn’t include the amount of ‘payback’ that Countries and Companies would require for the Investments they are making on building Plants, Factories, and Equipment, for the purpose of being able to avoid the payment of Tariffs,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. He further added, “When these Investments are added, we are talking about Trillions of Dollars! It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay. Anybody who says that it can be quickly and easily done would be making a false, inaccurate, or totally misunderstood answer to this very large and complex question. It may not be possible but, if it were, it would be Dollars that would be so large that it would take many years to figure out what number we are talking about and even, who, when, and where, to pay.” “Remember, when America shines brightly, the World shines brightly. In other words, if the Supreme Court rules against the United States of America on this National Security bonanza, WE’RE SCREWED!” Trump said. The Supreme Court is expected to release opinions on Wednesday, with the tariffs case having a possibility of being among the rulings. The case was argued last year in November in the Court. During the arguments, several justices appeared sceptical of Trump invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on trade partners of the US, including Mexico, Canada and China, over their alleged roles in illicit drug flows. Trump’s policies have brought the US tariff rate to its highest since the 1930s. He has also repeatedly warned of calamity if the duties are overturned. Notably, the court’s decision will not impact sector-specific tariffs imposed, including on steel, aluminium, and automobiles.

Trump warned the US would be “screwed” if the Supreme Court strikes down his tariffs, saying hundreds of billions or even trillions could be owed back. The court is set to rule soon on a challenge to his use of emergency powers.

‘WE’RE SCREWED’: Trump warns Supreme Court ruling against tariffs would be ‘complete mess’

us-supreme-court-tariffs-ruling

Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling, News on Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling, stories on Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling, articles on Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling, Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling stories at Wion, Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling news, Us Supreme Court Tariffs Ruling latest news

us supreme-court-tariffs-ruling

‘Don’t be a Panican! Trust Trump’: Republicans, aides rally behind president

‘Victory for Americans’: Democrats hail SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs

US stocks rise after Supreme Court rules against Trump’s sweeping tariffs

US SC strikes down swath of Trump’s tariffs, but president has a ‘backup plan'

‘WE’RE SCREWED’: Trump warns SC ruling against tariffs will be ‘complete mess’